DOCSLIB.ORG

Us Pension Fund Voting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Us Pension Fund Voting Volume 2, Issue 4 May 2015 VIEW FROM CALIFORNIA— CalSTRS’ ANNE SHEEHAN TENUOUS TENURE— US PENSION FUND VOTING VOTING NEWS PROXY MONTHLY www.proxyinsight.com Proxy statement Nick Dawson, Co-Founder & Managing Director, Proxy Insight Limited hareholder Activists continue at 71% and 70% of proxy contests Executive to dominate the headlines, in respectively, Vanguard and Northern Compensation Sparticular Nelson Peltz’s attempt Trust Investments only supported the has already to gain four seats on the DuPont board dissident at 13% and 24% of proxy lead to via his Trian Fund Management vehicle. contests respectively. high profile investor This follows above average opposition opposition with more at their 2014 AGM notably for A.M. BlackRock CEO, Larry Fink made a very “set to follow” Cutler who received against votes public anti-activist statement last month from key investors such as Franklin urging chief executives of the S&P 500 to be back to business as normal Resources and BNY Mellon. to stop being so nice to shareholders after the introduction last year of the and in particular resist pressure for Remuneration Policy vote every 3 years. For the 2015 vote Glass Lewis is backing short term “so-called shareholder- Centrica, ARM Holdings, HSBC and Peltz’s election, ISS is supporting both friendly steps like paying dividends and BP have all faced significant opposition Peltz and John Myers, another Trian buying back stock”. to their Remuneration Report votes. nominee and Egan Jones is backing all It seems likely that there will be many four Trian nominees. Sticking with Activism, there are others who suffer the same fate. further signs that the UK issuers are Most institutions will form their own increasingly under the microscope I am pleased to announce that we are opinion when voting at proxy contests following what is now commonplace launching our new Vote Results service and hence the support of the proxy in North America. A pretty hostile within Proxy Insight. The module voting advisers is perhaps not as campaign between Elliott and Alliance captures total shares voted – For, critical as it would normally be. Each Trust ended in an agreement however Against, Abstain etc. as disclosed by investor makes up their own mind Alliance is rumoured to have spent £3m each company after their shareholder regarding the activists as reflected in in fees to advisors to help defend them. meetings. Assuming they disclose, Proxy Insight’s data which shows a Private equity firm, Electra is next in all US issuers should be covered significant divergence of opinion. While the firing line with Edward Bramson’s together with the majority of Canadian T. Rowe Price and Deutsche Asset Sherborne Investors having another go, and UK companies. Companies in Management voted the dissident card after his failed attempt to capture the the top indices for France, Germany, firm in October last year. Switzerland, Netherlands and Australia should also be covered. While the UK issuers are Executive compensation, often a results are only available at a company increasingly controversial topic, has already lead to level at present, the next step is to under the some damaging headlines. Three top include them within our advanced Activists’ Canadian firms, CIBC, Barrick Gold search so you can see all companies microscope, and Yamana Gold have all lost their who received less than x% support for following what is now say on pay votes leading to the CEO any type of resolution. “commonplace in North of Yamana returning his special share America” units. Meanwhile in the UK, it seems Nick Dawson 2 WINNING IS EVERYTHING As long as there are teachers An interview with Anne Sheehan, Director of Corporate Governance at the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS). oes this year mark a watershed has not changed but in our updated Where does CalSTRS stand on for proxy access? How quickly guidelines, we have provided more implementing a universal ballot for Ddo you expect change from specific detail on the types of access proxy voting in the US? In your opinion companies on this topic? proposals we prefer. We have put the would it lead to increased shareholder three-and-three construct into our activism, and if so, is that good or bad? Yes, we at CalSTRS do believe that proxy voting guidelines and have said this marks a watershed. We have been we will back shareholder proposals We are supportive of the SEC taking long-term supporters of proxy access; based on specific criteria. I think that’s up the issue of the universal ballot. we supported the SEC rule and were more effective, because companies It wouldn’t necessarily lead to more disappointed when the rule was will no longer be left wondering what activism, as most activists already vacated. We are expecting over 100 thresholds we prefer. wage proxy fights from time to time proposals this year, so we think we are under the current regime. However, the at a tipping point. universal ballot would be efficient, and There’s some could be used to both companies’ and And it’s not just the shareholder reluctance to shareholders’ advantage. That would proposals. With the SEC suspending adopt proxy come with the evolution of the use of a no-action letters after the Whole Foods access, but universal ballot. We’re not talking about situation, there is a greater opportunity often times on these wholesale change every year. to push for change. Sentiment is issues, companies beginning to coalesce on this issue. “have to digest what CalSTRS has a number of governance Although there are some outliers, shareholders want” managers and we do partner with our the “three-and-three” formulation* managers on some of their proposals. structured on the original SEC proposal In past years, we’ve voted against The message to companies is that appears to be widely accepted among lower thresholds, such as a “one- they have to be on their toes. We’re institutional investors. and-one” or three-and-three without not worried about the level of activism; any protections. They didn’t quite fit activists play a beneficial role in the I’ve heard from some corporate issuers the model, and in those situations capital markets. that the shareholders have “won”. It’s we explained to the proponents why fair to say there’s some reluctance we voted the way we did. CalSTRS Did the Shareholder Director Exchange on the part of issuers to adopt proxy believes that this is a fundamental make a difference over the last year? access, but often times on these right that should be available to all Will Jim Woolery’s new fund provide an issues, companies have to take some shareholders but should have enough important example for newer activists? time to digest what shareholders want. structural protections to make sure this right is not abused. For instance, The Shareholder Director Exchange How has CalSTRS’ policy on proxy we don’t believe that hedge funds will and similar initiatives have been very access changed and how is it expected be prepared to wait three years for a positive from our perspective. These to be more effective? proxy fight, in order to avail themselves types of initiatives have resulted in of access. more discussion with issuers, on Our policy toward supporting access issues such as compensation with the 4 “THE MESSAGE TO COMPANIES IS THAT THEY HAVE TO BE ON THEIR TOES. WE’RE NOT WORRED ABOUT THE LEVEL OF ACTIVISM; ACTIVISTS PLAY A BENEFICIAL ROLE IN THE CAPITAL MARKETS” advent of say on pay. There are certain Is there any sign that the tech industry’s out that you see these firms lack the issues where we need to escalate famously high barriers (e.g. different mechanisms for shareholders to exert things to the level of the board, or where share classes, staggered boards) are influence. management are not in a position spreading beyond Silicon Valley, or to discuss a board matter, such as is the general trend positive for US What three things would you seek to executive compensation. It is awkward corporate governance? change, either about the proxy voting to hold a conversation about a CEO’s or engagement process? remuneration with the HR team, who We have some concerns, as evidenced work for that very CEO. I wish Woolery by some of the practises Silicon Valley I think our three things would be the the best. He’s clearly learned a lot from technology firms. While they are not universal ballot, a universal proxy his time as a lawyer and has partnered completely isolated their governance access rule – companies are starting with an experienced professional from practises don’t seem to have gone to adopt bylaws governing this but we JP Morgan. I think that doing activism mainstream either. There is a certain think it would be useful if the SEC could and having the corporate perspective is culture among these firms and our standardise this, although they are still an innovative approach. view is that at some point they need very busy with Dodd Frank – and a to “grow up” and mature by adopting majority voting standard. You’re supportive of Trian’s campaigns best governance practises expected in at PepsiCo and DuPont. Both stocks the wider market. If they are good, well- We’ve been sending 100 letters a year are doing well. Why is an activist run firms, they don’t need to defend to companies in the Russell 2000 needed? themselves. Actually, one of the best calling for majority voting, starting with performers in recent years, Apple, has the largest and working our way down The issue for larger firms is not the a very good governance profile.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pal “Party Rocks”
    S PAL EVENTS KDX PAL Day at the Mets Mets vs Miami September 21, 2012 Buy your tickets on-line & supportrt PAL’s after school programs. ® PALetterTHE 34 ½ East 12th Street, New York, NY 10003 212-477-9450 www.palnyc.org July 2012 PAL “PARTY ROCKS” & WINS A GRANT FROM TREASURE & BOND little rain didn’t stop 100 energetic children DQGVWDIIIURPIRUPLQJWKH¿UVWHYHU3$/)ODVK0RE A The mob marched up West Broadway from Grand T Street chanting and dancing in sync to “Party Rock Anthem.” When it was over, ballots were handed to spectators who were implored to immediately visit the Treasure & Bond store and vote for PAL. Treasure & Bond is a one-of-a-kind Nordstrom’s store at 350 West Broadway-gift boutique, art gallery and neighborhood gathering place. The store donates RIDIWHUFRVWSUR¿WVWRQRQSUR¿WRUJDQL]DWLRQV chosen by customers during store voting. Thanks to the hard work and irresistible pizzazz of PAL’s Party Rockers, PAL won enough votes to HDUQDVKDUHRI7UHDVXUH %RQG¶VPRQWKSUR¿WV Thanks are in order to those who made this happen: Armory, Brownsville, Duncan, Harlem and IS 218 Youth Centers for dancing; Stephen Chukumba of Marksmen Productions and Seye Charles and Tricia Grinell of Focused Movement/Teen Step Up for choreographing and directing; NYPD Community Affairs for keeping everyone safe; HBOIRU¿OPLQJ the event and Treasure & Bond for awarding this generous grant. 7RVHHSKRWRVDQGDYLGHRRI3$/¶V¿UVWHYHU)ODVK 0REFKHFNRXWZZZSDOQ\FRUJRUORRN XVXSRQ)DFHERRN 3XEOLVKHGE\WKH3$/'HYHORSPHQW'HSDUWPHQW 0DU\-DQH5DPER0DQDJLQJ(GLWRU (ULN&XPEHUEDWFK/D\RXW 'HVLJQ 3KRWRJUDSK\$QGHUV+XQJ 3ROLFH$WKOHWLF/HDJXH,QF$OO5LJKWV5HVHUYHG SUMMERTIME THE 3UHSDUDWLRQVDUHXQGHUZD\IRU 6XPPHU'D\&DPSVRQH WINNER IS….
    [Show full text]
  • Activist TT INVESTCO NOV14
    ARGUS ® Emerging Trends in Activist Investing ctivist investing continues to gain adherents (and capital) as high-profile managers like Daniel Loeb of Third Point LLC; Jeffrey Smith of Starboard Value, LP; Nelson A Peltz of Trian Fund Management; and Carl Icahn train their sights on underperforming targets such as Gannett & Co., Allergan Inc., Juniper Networks and even Apple Inc. According to Hedge Fund Research, assets under management for activist funds have nearly tripled in five years (to $89 billion in 2013 from $32 billion in 2008). At Argus Research, we monitor the activity of activists from several angles. Our sister com- pany, Vickers Stock Research, collects information on portfolio holdings and activist filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. These filings are reviewed by corpora- tions and investors alike. As well, analysts at Argus follow dozens of companies that activists have targeted or may target in the future. These companies are often Blue Chips with valuable franchises, but have somehow taken a misstep in the past few years — and their performance has lagged. The typical activist target is a diversified, asset-rich company with little debt and low margins. The activists can come in and push for either a restructuring or a capital reallocation program that often results in a share buyback plan or dividend increase. Sometimes a new management team is brought in. Interestingly, though, some of the recent research on activist investing has concluded that these funds often take a long-term or even collaborative approach with the managements they target. A paper published by professors from Duke University and Columbia University titled “The Long- Term Effects of Hedge Fund Activism” concluded that activist investing not only increases value around the time of investment, but for as many as five years following the investment.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Annual Report BOARDOFDIRECTORS LEADERSHIPTEAM CORPORATEOFFICE Nelson Peltz 4,6 Emil J
    2014 Annual Report BOARDOFDIRECTORS LEADERSHIPTEAM CORPORATEOFFICE Nelson Peltz 4,6 Emil J. Brolick RESTAURANTSUPPORTCENTER Chairman, The Wendy’s Company President and Chief Executive Officer The Wendy’s Company Chief Executive Officer and Founding One Dave Thomas Blvd. Partner, Trian Fund Management, L.P. Todd A. Penegor Dublin, Ohio 43017 Executive Vice President, (614) 764-3100 Peter W. May 2,4,6 Chief Financial Officer www.aboutwendys.com Vice Chairman, The Wendy’s Company and International President and Founding Partner, STOCKHOLDERINFORMATION Trian Fund Management, L.P. Robert D. Wright Executive Vice President and TRANSFERAGENTANDREGISTRAR Chief Operations Officer If you are a stockholder of record and Emil J. Brolick 2,6 require assistance with your account, such President and Chief Executive Officer, Liliana M. Esposito as a change of address or change in The Wendy’s Company Chief Communications Officer registration, please contact: 2 Edward P. Garden Sco A. Kriss American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC Chief Investment Officer and Founding Senior Vice President - 6201 15th Avenue Partner, Trian Fund Management, L.P. Chief Accounting and Tax Officer Brooklyn, NY 11219 Toll free: (877) 681-8121 or (718) 921-8200 Janet Hill 3,8 Abigail E. Pringle Fax: (718) 236-2641 Principal, Hill Family Advisors Senior Vice President - E-mail: [email protected] Chief Development Officer www.amstock.com Joseph A. Levato 1,3,4,5 Former Executive Vice President and Brandon L. Solano COMMONSTOCKLISTING Chief Financial Officer, Triarc Companies, Inc. Chief Marketing Officer (predecessor to The Wendy’s Company) R. Sco Toop J. Randolph Lewis 1,5,7 Senior Vice President, Former Senior Vice President, Supply Chain General Counsel and Secretary and Logistics, Walgreen Co.
    [Show full text]
  • The Procter & Gamble Company
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a party other than the Registrant ☐ Check the appropriate box: ☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement ☐ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) ☐ Definitive Proxy Statement ☒ Definitive Additional Materials ☐ Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12 The Procter & Gamble Company (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): ☒ No fee required. ☐ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: (5) Total fee paid: ☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. ☐ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. (1) Amount Previously Paid: (2) Form, Schedule or Registration
    [Show full text]
  • The Procter & Gamble Company
    SCHEDULE 14A Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Filed by the Registrant ¨ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant þ Check the appropriate box: ¨ Preliminary Proxy Statement ¨ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) ¨ Definitive Proxy Statement þ Definitive Additional Materials ¨ Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12 The Procter & Gamble Company (Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Trian Fund Management, L.P. Trian Fund Management GP, LLC Trian Partners, L.P. Trian Partners Co-Investment Opportunities Fund, Ltd. Trian Partners Master Fund, L.P. Trian Partners Parallel Fund I, L.P. Trian Partners Master Fund (ERISA), L.P. Trian Partners Strategic Investment Fund-A, L.P. Trian Partners Strategic Co-Investment Fund-A, L.P. Trian Partners Strategic Investment Fund-D, L.P. Trian SPV (Sub) XII L.P. Trian Partners Fund (Sub)-G, L.P. Trian Partners Strategic Fund-G II, L.P. Trian Partners Strategic Fund-G III, L.P. Trian Partners Strategic Investment Fund-N, L.P. Trian Partners Strategic Fund-K, L.P. Trian Partners Strategic Fund-C, Ltd. Nelson Peltz Peter W. May Edward P. Garden Clayton C. Daley, Jr. (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (check the appropriate box): þ No fee required. ¨ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rule 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. 1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: 2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set 3) forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): 4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: 5) Total fee paid: ¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Hedge Fund Activism Coming to Europe: Lessons from the American Experience Alexandros Seretakis
    Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law Volume 8 | Issue 2 Article 5 2014 Hedge Fund Activism Coming to Europe: Lessons from the American Experience Alexandros Seretakis Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjcfcl Recommended Citation Alexandros Seretakis, Hedge Fund Activism Coming to Europe: Lessons from the American Experience, 8 Brook. J. Corp. Fin. & Com. L. (2014). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjcfcl/vol8/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. HEDGE FUND ACTIVISM COMING TO EUROPE: LESSONS FROM THE AMERICAN EXPERIENCE Alexandros Seretakis* ABSTRACT Hedge fund activists are the bright new hope of the shareholder empowerment movement. Free from conflicts of interest and with high- powered compensation incentives, activist hedge funds are shaking up corporate boardrooms. The recent surge in activism has provoked criticism against activist investors portrayed as short-term agitators seeking to obtain short-term profits at the expense of long-term value. Although the view of hedge fund activists as short-term speculators has been discredited by empirical evidence, innovative tactics employed by hedge funds allow them to secretly accumulate large stakes in target companies within a short time period. In response to the adverse effects of activist tactics on market transparency and fairness, European regulators have tightened disclosure obligations for major blockholders, with U.S. regulators following suit. While calls for tightening disclosure obligations in the United States have been accompanied by a lively debate between proponents and opponents of tighter disclosure rules, the amendment of disclosure rules in Europe was not preceded by any meaningful empirical analysis of the benefits and costs of tighter disclosure rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Governance Event, CHAPTER 5 Are Your Directors Clueless? How About Your CEO? Created and Produced by Jim Cramer, Founder PAGE 31 of Thestreet
    Sold to [email protected] TABLECORPORATE OF CONTENTS GOVERNANCE In The Era Of Activism HANDBOOK FOR A CODE OF CONDUCT 2016 EDITION PRODUCED BY JAMES J. CRAMER Published by 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD James J. Cramer CORPORATE PAGE 3 GOVERNANCE INTRODUCTION Ronald D. Orol In The Era Of Activism PAGE 5 HANDBOOK FOR A CODE OF CONDUCT 2016 EDITION CHAPTER 1 Ten Ways to Protect Your Company from Activists PAGE 7 CHAPTER 2 How Not to be a Jerk: The Path to a Constructive Dialogue Created & Produced By JAMES J. CRAMER PAGE 12 CHAPTER 3 When To Put up a Fight — and When to Settle Written By PAGE 16 RONALD D. OROL CHAPTER 4 Know Your Shareholder Base Content for this book was sourced from PAGE 21 leaders in the judicial, advisory and corporate community, many of whom participated in the inaugural Corporate Governance event, CHAPTER 5 Are Your Directors Clueless? How About Your CEO? created and produced by Jim Cramer, founder PAGE 31 of TheStreet. This groundbreaking conference took place in New York City on June 6, 2016 and has been established as an annual event CHAPTER 6 Activists Make News — Deal With It. Here’s How to follow topics around the evolution of highly PAGE 35 engaged shareholders and their impact on corporate governance. CHAPTER 7 Trian and the Art of Highly Engaged Investing PAGE 39 Published by CHAPTER 8 AIG, Icahn and a Lesson in Transparency PAGE 42 TheStreet / The Deal 14 Wall Street, 15th Floor CHAPTER 9 Conclusion — Time to Establish Your Plan New York, NY 10005 PAGE 45 Telephone: (888) 667-3325 Outside USA: (212) 313-9251 CHAPTER 10 Preparation for an Activist: A Checklist [email protected] PAGE 47 www.TheStreet.com / www.TheDeal.com All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Activism's Long Road from Corporate Raiding to Banner Year
    Activism’s Long Road From Corporate Raiding to Banner Year The Wall Street Journal By David Benoit December 26, 2015 When activist investor Nelson Peltz demanded board seats at H.J. Heinz Co. in 2006, both the company and its headquarters city were indignant. The Pittsburgh newspaper ran editorials urging support for the “hometown team.” Heinz gave employees bottles of its signature ketchup with custom labels urging them to vote against Mr. Peltz’s nominees. “We thought, ‘Gosh, we don’t need outside help,’ ” recalls Art Winkleblack, then the company’s chief financial officer. This June, nearly a decade later, Mr. Peltz’s Trian Fund Management LP got an entirely different reception after buying a 7% stake in Pentair PLC, a Minnesota maker of pumps and valves. Pentair Chief Executive Randall Hogan spoke several times with Trian co- founder Ed Garden about corporate strategies and promptly moved to add Mr. Garden to its board. “You never know what you don’t know,” Mr. Hogan says of his willingness to listen to the activists. After decades of being treated as boorish gate-crashers, activist investors are infiltrating the boardrooms of large companies like never before. This year activists launched more campaigns in the U.S.—360 through Dec. 17—than any other year on record, according to FactSet. They secured corporate board seats in 127 of those campaigns, blowing past last year’s record of 107. Activists now manage more than $120 billion in investor capital, double what they had just three years ago, according to researcher HFR. The industry has come a long way since the 1980s, when Carl Icahn, Saul Steinberg, T.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence from My Hometown
    University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law 12-9-2016 Corporate Power is Corporate Purpose I: Evidence from My Hometown Leo E. Strine Jr. University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons, Business Organizations Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Other Business Commons Repository Citation Strine, Leo E. Jr., "Corporate Power is Corporate Purpose I: Evidence from My Hometown" (2016). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 1722. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1722 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law by an authorized administrator of Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Corporate Power is Corporate Purpose I: Evidence From My Hometown By Leo E. Strine, Jr.* † The Oxford Review of Economic Policy Seminar on Responsible Business Draft of December 9, 2016 Please do not cite * Chief Justice, Delaware Supreme Court; Adjunct Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania Law School; Austin Wakeman Scott Lecturer in Law, Harvard Law School; Senior Fellow, Harvard Program on Corporate Governance; and Henry Crown Fellow, Aspen Institute. † The author is grateful to Christine Balaguer, Jacob Fedechko, Peter Fritz, Alexandra Joyce, Fay Krewer, and Peggy Pfeiffer for their help. The author also thanks Stephen Bainbridge, Lawrence Hamermesh, David Katz, Marty Lipton, Andy Lubin, Sarah Lubin, and the two anonymous referees for excellent feedback and incisive comments on the draft.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Outsmart Activist Investors Harvard Business Review by Bill George and Jay W
    How to Outsmart Activist Investors Harvard Business Review By Bill George and Jay W. Lorsch May 2014 In July 2013 the activist investor Nelson Peltz called PepsiCo’s chair and CEO, Indra Nooyi, to tell her that his Trian Fund Management had accumulated a more than $1.3 billion stake in her company. He demanded that PepsiCo acquire Mondelēz International, the former Kraft snacks business (in which Peltz owned a $1 billion stake), and then split PepsiCo into two entities, one focused on beverages and the other on food. Peltz had staged a similar intervention at Kraft, where he pushed CEO Irene Rosenfeld to acquire Cadbury Schweppes and then split the combined company into a global snacks business (Mondelēz) and a U.S. grocery one (Kraft). Mondelēz had struggled, however, to compete with global giants such as Nestlé and Unilever. Hence Peltz’s PepsiCo plan. It was an audacious, even shocking, proposal, but it’s the kind of thing that happens often these days. Since the start of the 21st century, a new breed of shareholder—the activist hedge fund— has frequently played a decisive role in interactions between corporations and markets. These activists build on past efforts: Their interest in governance changes such as eliminating staggered boards and poison pills follows similar efforts by public-employee and union pension funds since the 1990s. Their focus on getting companies to take on more debt and pay out more to shareholders recalls the corporate raiders of the 1980s. In fact, a few of the most prominent activists, including Peltz and Carl Icahn, are former corporate raiders.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Securities and Exchange Commission
    1 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K/A (MARK ONE) X ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE --- SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 or TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ___________to ___________ Commission File Number 000-26489 MCM CAPITAL GROUP, INC. (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER) Delaware 48-1090909 -------- ---------- (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.) INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) 4302 E. Broadway Road, Phoenix, AZ 85040 ---------------------------------- ----- (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) (ZIP CODE) (800) 265-8825 -------------- (REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $.01 Par Value Per Share (TITLE OF CLASS) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No __ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 ANNUAL REPORT Directors, Officers, Corporate Information
    2011 ANNUAL REPORT Directors, Officers, Corporate Information Board of Directors Executive Officers Corporate Office (Dublin Restaurant Support Center) Nelson Peltz 2,4,6 Emil J. Brolick Chairman, The Wendy’s Company President and Chief Executive Officer The Wendy’s Company Chief Executive Officer and Founding Partner, One Dave Thomas Blvd. Trian Fund Management, L.P. Stephen E. Hare Dublin, Ohio 43017 Senior Vice President and 2,4,6 (614) 764-3100 Peter W. May Chief Financial Officer www.aboutwendys.com Vice Chairman, The Wendy’s Company President and Founding Partner, Darrell G. van Ligten Trian Fund Management, L.P. President, International Stockholder Information Emil J. Brolick 2,6 John D. Barker Transfer Agent and Registrar President and Chief Executive Officer, Senior Vice President and If you are a stockholder of record and require The Wendy’s Company Chief Communications Officer assistance with your account, such as a change of address or change in registration, please contact: Clive Chajet 3,6,8 Steven B. Graham Chairman, Chajet Consultancy, L.L.C. Senior Vice President and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company Chief Accounting Officer 59 Maiden Lane Edward P. Garden R. Scott Toop Plaza Level Chief Investment Officer and Founding Partner, New York, NY 10038 Trian Fund Management, L.P. Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary Toll free: (877) 681-8121 or Janet Hill 3,8 (718) 921-8200 Principal, Hill Family Advisors Fax: (718) 236-2641 SEC Certifications E-mail: [email protected] 1,3,4,5 Joseph A. Levato The certifications of the Company’s Chief www.amstock.com Former Executive Vice President and Executive Officer and Chief Financial Chief Financial Officer, Triarc Companies, Inc.
    [Show full text]