Seasonal Molecular Timekeeping Within the Rat Circadian Clock
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Physiol. Res. 53 (Suppl. 1): S167-S176, 2004 Seasonal Molecular Timekeeping Within the Rat Circadian Clock A. SUMOVÁ, Z. BENDOVÁ, M. SLÁDEK, Z. KOVÁČIKOVÁ, H. ILLNEROVÁ Department of Neurohumoral Regulations, Institute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic Received December 15, 2003 Accepted March 1, 2004 Summary In temperate zones duration of daylight, i.e. photoperiod, changes with the seasons. The changing photoperiod affects animal as well as human physiology. All mammals exhibit circadian rhythms and a circadian clock controlling the rhythms is located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus. The SCN consists of two parts differing morphologically and functionally, namely of the ventrolateral (VL) and the dorsomedial (DM). Many aspects of SCN- driven rhythmicity are affected by the photoperiod. The aim of the present overview is to summarize data about the effect of the photoperiod on the molecular timekeeping mechanism in the rat SCN, especially the effect on core clock genes, clock-controlled genes and clock-related genes expression. The summarized data indicate that the photoperiod affects i) clock-driven rhythm in photoinduction of c-fos gene and its protein product within the VL SCN, ii) clock- driven spontaneous rhythms in clock-controlled, i.e. arginine-vasopressin, and in clock-related, i.e. c-fos, gene expression within the DM SCN, and iii) the core clockwork mechanism within the rat SCN. Hence, the whole central timekeeping mechanism within the rat circadian clock measures not only the daytime but also the time of the year, i.e. the actual season. Key words Suprachiasmatic nucleus • Rat • Photoperiod Introduction The rhythmic production of the pineal hormone melatonin which is a part of the timekeeping system is In temperate zones, daylength, i.e. the also highly photoperiod-dependent, both in nocturnal as photoperiod, changes during the course of the year. The well as in diurnal animals; the high nocturnal melatonin changes in the photoperiod affect mammalian and production is shorter on long summer than on short marginally even human behavior and physiology. winter days (Illnerová and Vaněček 1980, Illnerová 1988, Animals prepare for a forthcoming season by modulating 1991). In humans, a shortening of daylight in the fall their fur, feeding, reproductive, metabolic and locomotor together with a decrease in outdoor light intensity is often activity, etc. In nocturnal rodents, the duration of accompanied by fatigue and seasonal affective disorder locomotor activity reflects the photoperiod as being (Terman et al. 1989). Human physiology may apparently shorter on long summer than on short winter days also adapt to changes in daylength if human subjects (Puchalski and Lynch 1991, Elliot and Tamarkin 1994). experience natural photoperiods; under the long summer PHYSIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ISSN 0862-8408 © 2004 Institute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic Fax +420 241 062 164 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.biomed.cas.cz/physiolres S168 Sumová et al. Vol. 53 days the melatonin signal may be shorter similarly as is responsible for generation of rhythmicity within the SCN the case with other mammals (Vondrašová et al. 1997, and peripheral rhythmic cells became to be partly Vondrašová-Jelínková et al. 1999). Thus, the photoperiod elucidated by the cloning of mammalian clock genes (Tei may affect significantly the mammalian timekeeping et al. 1997, Shearman et al. 1997, Sun et al. 1997, system. Gekakis et al. 1998, Kume et al. 1999). Eight genes, In mammals, light is perceived solely by the namely three Per (Per1,2,3), two Cry (Cry1, Cry2), retina (Moore 1996). Besides cones and rods mediating Clock, Bmal1 and casein kinase 1 epsilon (CK1ε), are vision, cells in the deep retinal ganglion layer containing thought to be involved in interactive transcriptional- photopigment melanopsin appear to be involved in light translational feedback loops that form the basic molecular perception as well (Provencio et al. 1998, Berson et al. clockwork (for review see King and Takahashi 2000, 2002, Menaker 2003). The ganglion cells may mediate Reppert and Weaver 2001). Briefly, the protein products the “circadian vision”, i.e. inform the circadian system CLOCK and BMAL1 heterodimers positively activate about outdoor lighting conditions in order to keep the rhythmic expression of Per and Cry genes and their endogenous system in proper phase with the outside protein products PER and CRY are produced thereafter. world. The information about light is transduced to the In cytoplasm, the PER and CRY proteins form complexes principal generator of circadian rhythmicity in the important for nuclear translocation of both proteins; the mammalian body located within the suprachiasmatic phosphorylation of PER protein monomers by CK1ε may nuclei (SCN) of the hypothalamus. The connection also regulate their cellular location and stability. After between the retina and the SCN is performed shuttling into the nucleus, the PER:CRY complexes predominantly through a monosynaptic retinohypo- directly interact with the CLOCK:BMAL1 heterodimer thalamic tract or, less extensively, through a polysynaptic and via chromatin remodeling inhibit the geniculohypothalamic tract (Harrington and Rusak 1986). CLOCK:BMAL1 mediated transcription (Etchegaray et In a non-periodic environment, e.g. under al. 2003). Moreover, BMAL1 is negatively autoregulated, constant darkness, the SCN is able to generate and CRY1, CRY2 and PER2 proteins positively activate synchronous oscillations with a period close, but not the Bmal1 transcription (Bae et al. 2001, Zheng et al. equal to 24 h. The actual length of the endogenous period 2001, Yu et al. 2002). The regulation of Bmal1 is genetically given and is species specific. When transcription is likely mediated by REV-ERBα, a protein dissociated in an in vitro culture, most of the SCN cells product of gene Rev-erbα that is controlled by are able to generate independent rhythmic output with CLOCK:BMAL1 (Preitner et al. 2002). Apparently, the different period lengths (Welsh et al. 1995). Moreover, rhythm generating mechanism is very complex and many individual SCN cells differ in their morphological processes which fine-tune the “orchestra” are expected to parameters, peptidergic phenotypes and in function. be revealed in the near future. To convey the rhythmic Whereas cells located predominantly in the ventrolateral signal to periphery, the components of the core clock (VL) part receive photic information from the retina and mechanism serve as transcription factors switching on the express light-dependent rhythmicity, cells located rhythmic transcription of a great array of clock controlled prevalently in the dorsomedial (DM) part do not receive genes within the SCN and peripheral tissues (Jin et al. any direct retinal input and are spontaneously rhythmic 1999, Oishi et al. 2000). (Van den Pol 1991, Sumová et al. 1998, Guido et al. Even less is known about the mechanism 1999a,b, Schwartz et al. 2000). Thus, communication not involved in how light resets the self-oscillating molecular only between individual SCN cells but also between both clockwork. Under light-dark conditions, the circadian parts of the SCN is important for the integration of all clock is entrained by the light period of the day rhythmicity into the resulting output. The output rhythmic (Pittendrigh 1981). Using the clock controlled signal is transduced via humoral and neuronal pathways rhythmicity as a marker, it was shown that a light and controls rhythms in peripheral tissues. Cells of stimulus administered in the evening and early night peripheral tissues are able, to some extent, to produce delays, and a light stimulus administered in the late night local oscillations independent of the SCN (Balsalobre et and early morning advances the rhythmicity (Daan and al. 2000, Yamazaki et al. 2000, Stokkan et al. 2001, Pittendrigh 1976, Illnerová and Vaněček 1982, 1987, McNamara et al. 2001, Terazono et al. 2003). Sumová and Illnerová 1998). Entrainment keeps the The basic molecular core clock mechanism endogenous clock in proper phase with the light-dark 2003 Photoperiod and the Rat Suprachiasmatic Nucleus S169 cycle of the outside world. Information about light is VL part of the rat SCN but not in the DM SCN (Jáč et al. conveyed to retinorecipient SCN cells and mostly 2000b). Importantly, this photic stimulation is phase- glutamate via glutamatergic NMDA and non-NMDA dependent and hence the circadian clock controls the receptors induces different cascades of second light-induced expression of c-fos. The pathway by which messengers in dependence on the time of day (Ebling et the molecular clockwork mediates gating of the photic al. 1991, Ding et al. 1994). Consequently, third response is, however, unclear. During the subjective messengers, namely phosphorylated CREB, are activated. night, the clock-controlled gate is open and light stimuli However, the link connecting the third messenger evoke high c-fos expression in the VL SCN as well as activation and molecular core clock mechanism is still phase shifts of overt rhythms. During the subjective day, not completely understood. Probably, induction of light- the gate is closed and light stimuli evoke neither c-fos sensitive clock genes Per1 and Per2 may proceed through expression nor shifts of the overt rhythms. The time CRE elements of their promotors (Trávníčková-Bendová interval of high photoinduction of c-fos mRNA and cFos- et al. 2002, Tischkau et al. 2003). Even less is known ir may thus serve as a SCN marker of duration of the about the mechanism of how the induced Per1 and Per2 subjective night (Sumová et al. 1995b, Trávníčková et al. mRNAs are involved in resetting the aforementioned 1996, Illnerová et al. 2000). Though it appears that molecular clockwork. Moreover, in mice phase shifts of circadian oscillations in the rat SCN start prenatally output rhythms occur only when light-induced Per1 and (Reppert and Schwartz 1984, Reppert and Uhl 1987, Per2 expression spreads from the VL to the DM parts of Shibata and Moore 1987), the rhythm in cFos the SCN (Yan and Silver 2002).