DOCSLIB.ORG

SPARCL1 Promotes Excitatory but Not Inhibitory Synapse Formation and Function Independent of Neurexins and Neuroligins

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SPARCL1 Promotes Excitatory but Not Inhibitory Synapse Formation and Function Independent of Neurexins and Neuroligins Research Articles: Cellular/Molecular SPARCL1 promotes excitatory but not inhibitory synapse formation and function independent of neurexins and neuroligins https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0454-20.2020 Cite as: J. Neurosci 2020; 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0454-20.2020 Received: 25 February 2020 Revised: 17 June 2020 Accepted: 12 July 2020 This Early Release article has been peer-reviewed and accepted, but has not been through the composition and copyediting processes. The final version may differ slightly in style or formatting and will contain links to any extended data. Alerts: Sign up at www.jneurosci.org/alerts to receive customized email alerts when the fully formatted version of this article is published. Copyright © 2020 the authors 1 2 3 4 SPARCL1 promotes excitatory but not inhibitory synapse formation and 5 function independent of neurexins and neuroligins 6 7 8 Kathlyn J. Gan1,# and Thomas C. Südhof1,2,# 9 10 1Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, 2Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 11 Stanford University School of Medicine, 265 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 12 13 Short title: Mechanism of SPARCL1-induced synaptogenesis 14 15 Keywords: SPARC-like protein 1 (SPARCL1); synapse; synapse formation; NMDA 16 receptor; neurexin; neuroligin 17 18 Number of figures: 8 19 Number of tables: 1 20 Extended data: 8 Excel files 21 Number of words: Abstract = 228; Introduction = 681; Discussion = 1287 22 23 #Corresponding authors: [email protected] and [email protected] 24 25 The authors declare no competing financial interests. 26 ABSTRACT 27 Emerging evidence supports roles for secreted extracellular matrix proteins in boosting 28 synaptogenesis, synaptic transmission, and synaptic plasticity. SPARCL1 (a.k.a. Hevin), 29 a secreted non-neuronal protein, was reported to increase synaptogenesis by 30 simultaneously binding to presynaptic neurexin-1α and to postsynaptic neuroligin-1B, 31 thereby catalyzing formation of trans-synaptic neurexin/neuroligin complexes. However, 32 neurexins and neuroligins do not themselves mediate synaptogenesis, raising the 33 question of how SPARCL1 enhances synapse formation by binding to these molecules. 34 Moreover, it remained unclear whether SPARCL1 acts on all synapses containing 35 neurexins and neuroligins or only on a subset of synapses, and whether it enhances 36 synaptic transmission in addition to boosting synaptogenesis or induces silent synapses. 37 To explore these questions, we examined the synaptic effects of SPARCL1 and their 38 dependence on neurexins and neuroligins. Using mixed neuronal and glial cultures from 39 neonatal mouse cortex of both sexes, we show that SPARCL1 selectively increases 40 excitatory but not inhibitory synapse numbers, enhances excitatory but not inhibitory 41 synaptic transmission, and augments NMDA-receptor-mediated synaptic responses 42 more than AMPAR-mediated synaptic responses. None of these effects were mediated 43 by SPARCL1-binding to neurexins or neuroligins. Neurons from triple neurexin-1/2/3 or 44 from quadruple neuroligin-1/2/3/4 conditional knockout mice that lacked all neurexins or 45 all neuroligins were fully responsive to SPARCL1. Taken together, our results reveal that 46 SPARCL1 selectively boosts excitatory but not inhibitory synaptogenesis and synaptic 47 transmission by a novel mechanism that is independent of neurexins and neuroligins. 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 2 57 SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT 58 Emerging evidence supports roles for extracellular matrix proteins in boosting synapse 59 formation and function. Previous studies demonstrated that SPARCL1, a secreted non- 60 neuronal protein, promotes synapse formation in rodent and human neurons. However, 61 it remained unclear whether SPARCL1 acts on all or on only a subset of synapses, 62 induces functional or largely inactive synapses, and generates synapses by bridging 63 presynaptic neurexins and postsynaptic neuroligins. Here, we report that SPARCL1 64 selectively induces excitatory synapses, increases their efficacy, and enhances their 65 NMDA receptor content. Moreover, using rigorous genetic manipulations, we show that 66 SPARCL1 does not require neurexins and neuroligins for its activity. Thus, SPARCL1 67 selectively boosts excitatory synaptogenesis and synaptic transmission by a novel 68 mechanism that is independent of neurexins and neuroligins. 69 3 70 INTRODUCTION 71 During development and throughout life, synapses are formed by a multi-component 72 process that is controlled by synaptic organizer molecules. Synapse formation requires 73 the initial establishment of contacts between an axon and a target cell, assembly of the 74 presynaptic release machinery and the postsynaptic receptor apparatus, and activity- 75 dependent specification of synapse properties (Südhof, 2018). Synapse formation is 76 guided by two types of organizer molecules: trans-synaptic adhesion molecules and 77 secreted factors (Ferrer-Ferrer and Dityatev, 2018; Yuzaki, 2018). Among adhesion 78 molecules, neurexins and their ligands, including neuroligins, orchestrate synapse 79 specification by mediating bidirectional, trans-cellular signaling (Südhof, 2017; Cao and 80 Tabuchi, 2017; Katzman and Alberini, 2018; Wang et al., 2019). Secreted factors act by 81 several mechanisms, for example by enhancing the recruitment of presynaptic active 82 zone proteins and postsynaptic scaffolding proteins (Wnts; Sahores et al., 2010; Cerpa 83 et al., 2011) or by connecting pre- and postsynaptic adhesion molecules (cerebellins; 84 Yuzaki, 2018). Extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, reportedly secreted by glia (such as 85 thrombospondins and glypicans), may bridge pre- and postsynaptic structures and cluster 86 ionotropic glutamate receptors at postsynaptic sites (Christopherson et al., 2005; Allen et 87 al, 2012). Although an important role in synaptogenesis is emerging for several proteins 88 traditionally associated with the ECM, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain 89 unknown. 90 The present study examines SPARCL1 (‘secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine-like 91 1’, a.k.a. Hevin), an ECM protein that induces synapse formation in rodent and human 92 neurons (Kucukdereli et al., 2011; Singh et al., 2016; Gan and Südhof, 2019). SPARCL1 93 belongs to the SPARC family of extracellular glycoproteins (Brekken and Sage, 2001). 94 SPARCL1 contains an N-terminal acidic domain, a central cysteine-rich follistatin domain, 95 and a C-terminal calcium-binding domain (Brekken and Sage, 2000). Little is known about 96 how SPARCL1 is secreted and processed. Like other ECM proteins, SPARCL1 is more 97 abundant during embryonic development than during adulthood, but its expression is 98 upregulated in response to trauma or disease (Lively and Brown, 2008 a,b). 4 99 In brain, SPARCL1 is localized to postsynaptic membranes and perisynaptic glial 100 processes in the cerebral cortex and the cerebellum (Lively et al., 2007), raising the 101 possibility that SPARCL1 regulates synapse formation. Indeed, Kucukdereli et al. (2011) 102 showed that SPARCL1 induced synapses in mouse retinal ganglion cells. Surprisingly, 103 however, these synapses were morphologically normal but did not appear to be 104 functional. In contrast, we found that SPARCL1 promotes formation of active synapses in 105 human excitatory neurons derived from embryonic stem cells (Gan and Südhof, 2019). 106 Moreover, SPARCL1 reportedly enhanced synapse formation by simultaneously binding 107 to presynaptic neurexin-1α (Nrxn1α) and postsynaptic neuroligin-1B (Nlgn1B) to form a 108 trans-synaptic complex (Singh et al., 2016). This finding was puzzling because Nrxn1α 109 forms tight complexes with all neuroligins in the absence of other factors (Boucard et al., 110 2005; Chih et al., 2006), and because biophysical studies failed to detect binding of 111 SPARCL1 to Nlgn1 (Elegheert et al., 2017). Moreover, deletion of all neuroligins 112 (Varoqueaux et al., 2006; Jiang et al., 2017; Chandra et al., 2017) or all neurexins (Missler 113 et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2017) did not decrease excitatory synapses numbers but 114 impaired synaptic transmission. Given that neurexins and neuroligins are apparently not 115 required for establishing initial synaptic contacts, in remained unclear how SPARCL1 116 could form non-functional excitatory synapses by binding to these adhesion molecules. 117 In the present study, we examined how SPARCL1 potently boosts synaptogenesis, 118 whether it acts selectively on subsets of synapses, and what role neurexins and/or 119 neuroligins play in its activity. Because key prior studies of SPARCL1-induced 120 synaptogenesis were conducted in mouse neurons (Kucukdereli et al., 2011; Singh et al., 121 2016), we performed our experiments in mixed cultures of mouse cortical neurons and 122 glia. We confirm that SPARCL1 induces excitatory synapse formation; however, in 123 contrast with previous studies, we show that SPARCL1 also enhances neurotransmission 124 by differentially elevating AMPA-receptor- (AMPAR-) and NMDA-receptor- (NMDAR-) 125 mediated synaptic responses. SPARCL1 exerts a much larger effect on NMDARs, 126 increasing the NMDAR/AMPAR ratio. Importantly, using cultures from conditional 127 knockout mice, we determined that neurexins and neuroligins do not mediate any of these 128 effects. Thus, SPARCL1 selectively activates excitatory synapse formation and signaling 129 to boost synaptic connectivity by a neurexin- and neuroligin-independent mechanism. 5 130 MATERIALS AND METHODS 131 Experimental design and statistical analyses.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Guide to Glutamate Receptors
    A guide to glutamate receptors 1 Contents Glutamate receptors . 4 Ionotropic glutamate receptors . 4 - Structure ........................................................................................................... 4 - Function ............................................................................................................ 5 - AMPA receptors ................................................................................................. 6 - NMDA receptors ................................................................................................. 6 - Kainate receptors ............................................................................................... 6 Metabotropic glutamate receptors . 8 - Structure ........................................................................................................... 8 - Function ............................................................................................................ 9 - Group I: mGlu1 and mGlu5. .9 - Group II: mGlu2 and mGlu3 ................................................................................. 10 - Group III: mGlu4, mGlu6, mGlu7 and mGlu8 ............................................................ 10 Protocols and webinars . 11 - Protocols ......................................................................................................... 11 - Webinars ......................................................................................................... 12 References and further reading . 13 Excitatory synapse pathway
    [Show full text]
  • The Interplay Between Neurons and Glia in Synapse Development And
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect The interplay between neurons and glia in synapse development and plasticity Jeff A Stogsdill and Cagla Eroglu In the brain, the formation of complex neuronal networks and regulate distinct aspects of synaptic development and amenable to experience-dependent remodeling is complicated circuit connectivity. by the diversity of neurons and synapse types. The establishment of a functional brain depends not only on The intricate communication between neurons and glia neurons, but also non-neuronal glial cells. Glia are in and their cooperative roles in synapse formation are now continuous bi-directional communication with neurons to direct coming to light due in large part to advances in genetic the formation and refinement of synaptic connectivity. This and imaging tools. This article will examine the progress article reviews important findings, which uncovered cellular made in our understanding of the role of mammalian and molecular aspects of the neuron–glia cross-talk that perisynaptic glia (astrocytes and microglia) in synapse govern the formation and remodeling of synapses and circuits. development, maturation, and plasticity since the previ- In vivo evidence demonstrating the critical interplay between ous Current Opinion article [1]. An integration of past and neurons and glia will be the major focus. Additional attention new findings of glial control of synapse development and will be given to how aberrant communication between neurons plasticity is tabulated in Box 1. and glia may contribute to neural pathologies. Address Glia control the formation of synaptic circuits Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, In the CNS, glial cells are in tight association with NC 27710, USA synapses in all brain regions [2].
    [Show full text]
  • PRESYNAPTIC Α2δ SUBUNITS ARE KEY ORGANIZERS of GLUTAMATERGIC SYNAPSES Clemens L
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/826016; this version posted October 31, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. PRESYNAPTIC α2δ SUBUNITS ARE KEY ORGANIZERS OF GLUTAMATERGIC SYNAPSES Clemens L. Schöpf1, Stefanie Geisler1, Ruslan I. Stanika1, Marta Campiglio1, Walter A. Kaufmann3, Benedikt Nimmervoll1, Bettina Schlick1, Ryuichi Shigemoto3, and Gerald J. Obermair1,2* From Division of Physiology, Medical University Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck1, Division Physiology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, A-3500 Krems2, and Institute of Science and Technology Austria, A-3400 Klosterneuburg3, Austria. Running head: Presynaptic α2δ subunits organize synapses Address correspondence to: *Gerald J. Obermair, Univ.-Prof. Dr., Phone: +43-2732-72090490, E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] In nerve cells the genes encoding for α2δ the auxiliary β and α2δ subunits. α2δ subunits, the subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels targets of the widely prescribed anti-epileptic and (VGCCs) have been linked to synaptic functions anti-allodynic drugs gabapentin and pregabalin, are and neurological disease. Here we show that α2δ membrane-anchored extracellular glycoproteins, subunits are essential for the formation and which modulate VGCC trafficking and calcium organization of glutamatergic synapses. Using a currents (Arikkath and Campbell, 2003; Dolphin, cellular α2δ subunit triple loss-of-function model, 2013; Geisler et al., 2015; Obermair et al., 2008; we demonstrate a failure in presynaptic Zamponi et al., 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Neural Control and Neuromodulationof Lower Urinary
    Neural Control and Neuromodulation of Lower Urinary Tract Function William C. de Groat University of Pittsburgh Topics • Anatomy and functions of the lower urinary tract • Peripheral innervation (efferent and afferent nerves) • Central neural control of the lower urinary tract • Lower urinary tract dysfunction • Treatment of dysfunction (neuromodulation) • Research opportunities Anatomy and Functions of the Lower Urinary Tract Functions Two Types of Voiding 1. Urine storage - Reservoir: Bladder INVOLUNTARY (Reflex) (infant & fetus) Defect in 2. Urine release Maturation Maturation - Outlet: Urethra INVOLUNTARY THERAPY VOLUNTARY (Reflex) (adult) (adult) Bladder Parkinson’s, MS, stroke, brain tumors, spinal cord injury, Urethra aging, cystitis Lower Urinary Tract Innervation Two Types of Visceral Afferent Neurons: Bladder & Bowel Aδ-fibers responsible for normal bladder sensations C-fibers contribute to urgency, frequency and incontinence Afferent Sensitivity may be Influenced by Substances Released from the Urothelium Aδ fiber C fiber X CNS Urothelium The Bladder U rothelium Glycosaminoglycan Layer Uroplakin Plaques and Discoidal Vesicles r=_zo_"_"l_a_o_cc-lu---.dens } Umbrella Cell Stratum Intermediate Cell Stratum } Basal Cell Stratum Afferent Nerve fiber Urothelial-Afferent Interactions ( I ( I ( I ( ' ( I ( I ( I Urothelium ( I ( 0 I I I AChR ATP, NO, NKA, ACh, NGF ~erves ' Efferent ' nerves nerves Interaction of Sensory Pathways of Multiple Pelvic Organs Convergent Dichotomizing Branch Bladder point Colon Somatic and Visceral Afferent
    [Show full text]
  • Electrical Synapses and Their Functional Interactions with Chemical Synapses
    REVIEWS Electrical synapses and their functional interactions with chemical synapses Alberto E. Pereda Abstract | Brain function relies on the ability of neurons to communicate with each other. Interneuronal communication primarily takes place at synapses, where information from one neuron is rapidly conveyed to a second neuron. There are two main modalities of synaptic transmission: chemical and electrical. Far from functioning independently and serving unrelated functions, mounting evidence indicates that these two modalities of synaptic transmission closely interact, both during development and in the adult brain. Rather than conceiving synaptic transmission as either chemical or electrical, this article emphasizes the notion that synaptic transmission is both chemical and electrical, and that interactions between these two forms of interneuronal communication might be required for normal brain development and function. Communication between neurons is required for Electrical and chemical synapses are now known to brain function, and the quality of such communica- coexist in most organisms and brain structures, but details tion enables hardwired neural networks to act in a of the properties and distribution of these two modalities of dynamic fashion. Functional interactions between transmission are still emerging. Most research efforts neurons occur at anatomically identifiable cellular have focused on exploring the mechanisms of chemi- regions called synapses. Although the nature of synaptic cal transmission, and considerably less is known transmission has been an area of enormous controversy about those underlying electrical transmission. It was (BOX 1), two main modalities of synaptic transmission — thought that electrical synapses were more abundant namely, chemical and electrical — are now recognized. At in invertebrates and cold-blooded vertebrates than chemical synapses, information is transferred through in mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Developmental Changes in Calcium Channel Types Mediating Central Synaptic Transmission
    The Journal of Neuroscience, January 1, 2000, 20(1):59–65 Developmental Changes in Calcium Channel Types Mediating Central Synaptic Transmission Shinichi Iwasaki,1 Akiko Momiyama,2 Osvaldo D. Uchitel,3 and Tomoyuki Takahashi1 1Department of Neurophysiology, University of Tokyo Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan, 2Laboratory of Cerebral Structure, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Myodaiji, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan, and 3Departamento de Ciencias Biologicas, Laboratorio de Fisiologia y Biologia, Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires 1428, Argentina Multiple types of high-voltage-activated Ca 21 channels trigger fact, Ca 21 currents directly recorded from the auditory calyceal neurotransmitter release at the mammalian central synapse. presynaptic terminal were identified as N-, P/Q-, and R-types at Among them, the v-conotoxin GVIA-sensitive N-type channels postnatal day 7 (P7) to P10 but became predominantly P/Q- and the v-Aga-IVA-sensitive P/Q-type channels mediate fast type at P13. In contrast to thalamic and cerebellar IPSCs and synaptic transmission. However, at most central synapses, it is brainstem auditory EPSCs, N-type Ca 21 channels persistently not known whether the contributions of different Ca 21 channel contribute to cerebral cortical EPSCs and spinal IPSCs types to synaptic transmission remain stable throughout post- throughout postnatal months. Thus, in adult animals, synaptic natal development. We have addressed this question by testing transmission is predominantly mediated by P/Q-type channels type-specific Ca 21 channel blockers at developing central syn- at a subset of synapses and mediated synergistically by multi- apses.
    [Show full text]
  • GABA Enhances Transmission at an Excitatory Glutamatergic Synapse
    The Journal of Neuroscience, August 15, 2001, 21(16):5935–5943 GABA Enhances Transmission at an Excitatory Glutamatergic Synapse Scott Gutovitz, John T. Birmingham, Jason A. Luther, David J. Simon, and Eve Marder Volen Center and Biology Department, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110 GABA mediates both presynaptic and postsynaptic inhibition at ␤-(Aminomethyl)-4-chlorobenzenepropanoic acid (baclofen) many synapses. In contrast, we show that GABA enhances was an effective agonist for the GABA-evoked enhancement transmission at excitatory synapses between the lateral gastric but did not increase the postjunctional conductance. Muscimol and medial gastric motor neurons and the gastric mill 6a and 9 activated a rapid postsynaptic conductance but did not en- (gm6a, gm9) muscles and between the lateral pyloric motor hance the amplitude of the nerve-evoked EJPs. GABA had no neuron and pyloric 1 (p1) muscles in the stomach of the lobster effect on iontophoretic responses to glutamate and decreased Homarus americanus. Two-electrode current-clamp or voltage- the coefficient of variation of nerve-evoked EJPs. In the pres- clamp techniques were used to record from muscle fibers. The ence or absence of tetrodotoxin, GABA increased the fre- innervating nerves were stimulated to evoke excitatory junc- quency but not the amplitude of miniature endplate potentials. tional potentials (EJPs) or excitatory junctional currents. Bath These data suggest that GABA acts presynaptically via a application of GABA first decreased the amplitude of evoked GABAB-like receptor to increase the release of EJPs in gm6a and gm9 muscles, but not the p1 muscle, by neurotransmitter. activating a postjunctional conductance increase that was blocked by picrotoxin.
    [Show full text]
  • Presynaptic Establishment of the Synaptic Cleft Extracellular Matrix Is Required for Post-Synaptic Differentiation
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 27, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Presynaptic establishment of the synaptic cleft extracellular matrix is required for post-synaptic differentiation Jeffrey Rohrbough, Emma Rushton, Elvin Woodruff III, Tim Fergestad, Krishanthan Vigneswaran, and Kendal Broadie1 Department of Biological Sciences, Kennedy Center for Research on Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, USA Formation and regulation of excitatory glutamatergic synapses is essential for shaping neural circuits throughout development. In a Drosophila genetic screen for synaptogenesis mutants, we identified mind the gap (mtg), which encodes a secreted, extracellular N-glycosaminoglycan-binding protein. MTG is expressed neuronally and detected in the synaptic cleft, and is required to form the specialized transsynaptic matrix that links the presynaptic active zone with the post-synaptic glutamate receptor (GluR) domain. Null mtg embryonic mutant synapses exhibit greatly reduced GluR function, and a corresponding loss of localized GluR domains. All known post-synaptic signaling/scaffold proteins functioning upstream of GluR localization are also grossly reduced or mislocalized in mtg mutants, including the dPix–dPak–Dock cascade and the Dlg/PSD-95 scaffold. Ubiquitous or neuronally targeted mtg RNA interference (RNAi) similarly reduce post-synaptic assembly, whereas post-synaptically targeted RNAi has no effect, indicating that presynaptic MTG induces and maintains the post-synaptic pathways driving GluR domain formation. These findings suggest that MTG is secreted from the presynaptic terminal to shape the extracellular synaptic cleft domain, and that the cleft domain functions to mediate transsynaptic signals required for post-synaptic development. [Keywords: Glutamatergic synaptogenesis; post-synaptic density; glutamate receptor; secretion; Drosophila; neuromuscular junction] Supplemental material is available at http://www.genesdev.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Slitrk2 Controls Excitatory Synapse Development Via PDZ-Mediated
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Slitrk2 controls excitatory synapse development via PDZ-mediated protein interactions Kyung Ah Han 1,2, Jinhu Kim1,2, Hyeonho Kim1,2, Dongwook Kim1, Dongseok Lim1, Jaewon Ko 1 & Ji Won Um 1* Members of the Slitrk (Slit- and Trk-like protein) family of synaptic cell-adhesion molecules control excitatory and inhibitory synapse development through isoform-dependent extracellular interactions with leukocyte common antigen-related receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases (LAR-RPTPs). However, how Slitrks participate in activation of intracellular signaling pathways in postsynaptic neurons remains largely unknown. Here we report that, among the six members of the Slitrk family, only Slitrk2 directly interacts with the PDZ domain-containing excitatory scafolds, PSD-95 and Shank3. The interaction of Slitrk2 with PDZ proteins is mediated by the cytoplasmic COOH-terminal PDZ domain-binding motif (Ile-Ser-Glu-Leu), which is not found in other Slitrks. Mapping analyses further revealed that a single PDZ domain of Shank3 is responsible for binding to Slitrk2. Slitrk2 forms in vivo complexes with membrane-associated guanylate kinase (MAGUK) family proteins in addition to PSD-95 and Shank3. Intriguingly, in addition to its role in synaptic targeting in cultured hippocampal neurons, the PDZ domain-binding motif of Slitrk2 is required for Slitrk2 promotion of excitatory synapse formation, transmission, and spine development in the CA1 hippocampal region. Collectively, our data suggest a new molecular mechanism for conferring isoform-specifc regulatory actions of the Slitrk family in orchestrating intracellular signal transduction pathways in postsynaptic neurons. Synapses are asymmetric intercellular junctions that permit transmission of signals from presynaptic to postsyn- aptic neurons.
    [Show full text]
  • Glial Contribution to Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapse Loss in Neurodegeneration Henstridge, Christopher; Tzioras, Makis; Paolicelli, Rosa Chiara
    University of Dundee Glial contribution to excitatory and inhibitory synapse loss in neurodegeneration Henstridge, Christopher; Tzioras, Makis; Paolicelli, Rosa Chiara Published in: Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00063 Publication date: 2019 Licence: CC BY Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in Discovery Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Henstridge, C., Tzioras, M., & Paolicelli, R. C. (2019). Glial contribution to excitatory and inhibitory synapse loss in neurodegeneration. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 13, [63]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2019.00063 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in Discovery Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from Discovery Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 30. Sep. 2021 REVIEW published: 26 February 2019 doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00063
    [Show full text]
  • Final Copy 2019 01 23 Gurun
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Gurung, Sonam Title: Kainate Receptors in various forms of plasticity General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. Kainate Receptors in various forms of plasticity Sonam Gurung August 2018 A dissertation submitted to the University of Bristol in accordance with the requirements for award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by advanced study in the School of Biochemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Redistribution and Stabilization of Cell Surface Glutamate Receptors During Synapse Formation
    The Journal of Neuroscience, October 1, 1997, 17(19):7351–7358 Redistribution and Stabilization of Cell Surface Glutamate Receptors during Synapse Formation Andrew L. Mammen,1,2 Richard L. Huganir,1,2 and Richard J. O’Brien1,2,3 1Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and Departments of 2Neuroscience and 3Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205 Although the regulation of neurotransmitter receptors during addition of N-GluR1 to live neurons. As cultures mature and synaptogenesis has been studied extensively at the neuromus- synapses form, there is a redistribution of surface GluR1 into cular junction, little is known about the control of excitatory clusters at excitatory synapses where it appears to be immo- neurotransmitter receptors during synapse formation in central bilized. The change in the distribution of GluR1 is accompanied neurons. Using antibodies against extracellular N-terminal (N- by an increase in both the half-life of the receptor and the GluR1) and intracellular C-terminal (C-GluR1) domains of the percentage of the total pool of GluR1 that is present on the cell AMPA receptor subunit GluR1, combined with surface biotiny- surface. Blockade of postsynaptic AMPA and NMDA receptors lation and metabolic labeling studies, we have characterized had no effect on the redistribution of GluR1. These results begin the redistribution and metabolic stabilization of the AMPA re- to characterize the events regulating the distribution of AMPA ceptor subunit GluR1 during synapse formation in culture. Be- receptors and demonstrate similarities between synapse for- fore synapse formation, GluR1 is distributed widely, both on the mation at the neuromuscular junction and at excitatory syn- surface and within the dendritic cytoplasm of these neurons.
    [Show full text]