DOCSLIB.ORG

Honeybee Gut Microbiota Promotes Host Weight Gain Via Bacterial Metabolism and Hormonal Signaling

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Honeybee Gut Microbiota Promotes Host Weight Gain Via Bacterial Metabolism and Hormonal Signaling Honeybee gut microbiota promotes host weight gain via bacterial metabolism and hormonal signaling Hao Zheng (郑浩)a,1, J. Elijah Powella, Margaret I. Steelea, Carsten Dietrichb, and Nancy A. Morana,1 aDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712; and bStrategy and Innovation Technology Center, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, 91052 Erlangen, Germany Edited by Joan E. Strassmann, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, and approved March 24, 2017 (received for review February 1, 2017) Social bees harbor a simple and specialized microbiota that is spa- fermentation products of dietary fiber accumulate in the human tially organized into different gut compartments. Recent results on colon in concentrations up to 80–130 mM (12) and serve as a the potential involvement of bee gut communities in pathogen major energy source for intestinal epithelial cells (13) or as the protection and nutritional function have drawn attention to the im- main respiratory substrate of the host (14). Moreover, microbial pact of the microbiota on bee health. However, the contributions of metabolites can have a profound effect on gut physiology; for gut microbiota to host physiology have yet to be investigated. Here example, their effects on oxygen concentration, pH, and redox we show that the gut microbiota promotes weight gain of both potential can be essential for host health (15). As neuroactive whole body and the gut in individual honey bees. This effect is likely compounds, SCFAs produced by the gut microbiota can affect mediated by changes in host vitellogenin, insulin signaling, and neural and immune pathways of the host and thereby influence gustatory response. We found that microbial metabolism markedly brain function and behavior (16). reduces gut pH and redox potential through the production of short- In the case of honey bees, genome-based investigations showed chain fatty acids and that the bacteria adjacent to the gut wall form that G. apicola strains potentially digest complex carbohydrates an oxygen gradient within the intestine. The short-chain fatty acid (i.e., pectin from pollen cell wall) that are otherwise indigestible profile contributed by dominant gut species was confirmed in vitro. by the host (17). A recent study documents that G. apicola strains Furthermore, metabolomic analyses revealed that the gut commu- can also use several sugars that are harmful to bees (18). How- nity has striking impacts on the metabolic profiles of the gut com- ever, how the bee gut microbiota affects host physiology and the MICROBIOLOGY partments and the hemolymph, suggesting that gut bacteria gut microenvironment has not yet been described. Hence, we degrade plant polymers from pollen and that the resulting me- compared germ-free (GF) honey bees to those with a conven- tabolites contribute to host nutrition. Our results demonstrate tional gut community (CV) to identify how the gut microbiota how microbial metabolism affects bee growth, hormonal signaling, affects weight gain, expression of genes underlying hormonal behavior, and gut physicochemical conditions. These findings in- dicate that the bee gut microbiota has basic roles similar to those pathways, gut physicochemical conditions, and metabolite pools found in some other animals and thus provides a model in studies of in the gut and hemolymph. – host microbe interactions. Results and Discussion Gut Microbiota Promotes Host Body and Gut Weight Gain. honeybee | gut microbiota | short-chain fatty acids | insulin | metabolomics To observe effects of the microbiota on growth of individual hosts, we per- formed serial measurements of whole-body wet weight in the oney bees (Apis mellifera) provide a critical link in global presence and absence of the gut microbiota. GF and CV bees Hfood production as pollinators of agricultural crops (1), and were obtained from pupae that were removed from hives, allowed their economic value is over $15 billion annually in the United to emerge in sterile laboratory conditions, and then fed either States alone (2). Honey bee populations have undergone elevated colony mortality during the last decade in the United States, Significance Canada, and Europe (3). A potential role of gut microbial com- munities in the health of honey bees has recently become more widely appreciated (4). Perturbation of the gut microbiota leads Honey bees are globally important plant pollinators. Guts of to higher mortality within hives and greater susceptibility to a adult workers contain specialized bacteria not found outside bacterial pathogen, suggesting a crucial role of normal microbiota bees. Experimental results show that gut bacteria increase in bee health (5). Honey bees are associated with specific in- weight gain in young adult bees, affect expression of genes testinal microbiota that is simpler than the microbiota found in governing insulin and vitellogenin levels, and increase sucrose mammals but shares some features, including host specificity and sensitivity. Gut bacteria also shape the physicochemical condi- social transmission (6) and a shared evolutionary history of bac- tions within the gut, lowering pH and oxygen levels. Peripheral terial and host lineages (7, 8). The bee gut is dominated by eight resident bacteria consume oxygen, thus maintaining anoxia, as core bacterial species that are spatially organized within specific required for microbial activity. Additionally, gut bacteria pro- duce short-chain fatty acids, with acetate and propionate as the gut regions. Few bacteria colonize the crop and midgut; the major metabolites, as in guts of human and other animals. This hindgut (ileum and rectum) harbors the greatest abundance of study demonstrates how bacteria in the honey bee gut affect bacteria. The ileum, a narrow tube with six longitudinal folds, is host weight gain and improves our understanding of how gut dominated by two Gram-negative bacterial species: Snodgrassella symbionts influence host health. alvi, a nonsugar fermenter forms a layer directly on the gut wall, together with Gilliamella apicola, a sugar fermenter that resides Author contributions: H.Z. and N.A.M. designed research; H.Z. and J.E.P. performed re- more toward the center of the lumen (9). The distal rectum is search; H.Z., M.I.S., and C.D. analyzed data; and H.Z. and N.A.M. wrote the paper. dominated by the Gram-positive Lactobacillus spp (10). The authors declare no conflict of interest. In both insects and mammals, the gut microbiota can possess a This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. large repertoire of metabolic capabilities and can contribute sub- 1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: [email protected] or nancy. stantively to dietary carbohydrate digestion within the intestinal [email protected]. ecosystem (11). Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), namely acetate, This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. propionate, and butyrate, produced by the gut microbiota as main 1073/pnas.1701819114/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1701819114 PNAS Early Edition | 1of6 Downloaded by guest on September 28, 2021 GF NSNS 6 GF GF A CV *** ***y BC)%( *** CV CV 140 5 30 *** NS *** HV Fig. 1. Gut microbiota increases honey bee whole- a d r d 4 body weight, gut weight, hormonal signaling, and 120 e 20 p na p sucrose sensitivity. (A) Whole-body wet weight 3 Inoculation growth curves of GF (n = 45) and CV bees (n = 49) i g thg g 2 100 10 originated from four different hives (the colony i *** NS eW 1 of origin was not statistically significant). (B) Daily initial body weight (%) weight body initial Body weight relative to relative weight Body weight gains of GF and CV bees after feeding 80 0 Gut compartment weight (mg) 0 0 4 8 12 16 GF CV Midgut Ileum Rectum with sterilized food or food supplemented with Days after emergence from pupae hindgut samples of hive nurse bees (day 1 to day 15). (C) Weights of different gut compartments of GF, D 8 *** E CV, and hive nurse bees (n = 25). Bars indicate mean 100 *** – 6 values of 10 15 pooled guts of bees from different = = GF hives (GF, n 4; CV, n 4) and hive bees from dif- 4 CV = Head ** 10 ferent hives (n 3). (D) Differential expression of ilp, 2 inR, and Vg genes in the head or abdomen of GF and CV bees originating from different hives. n = 3. Relative expression 0 ilp1 ilp2 1 (E) Distribution of sucrose-response thresholds of GF 8 *** (n = 27) and CV (n = 41) bees shown as a violin plot. 6 Sucrose concentration (%) The colony of origin was not statistically signif- Abdomen 0.1 0 icance. Each circle indicates a bee response to the 4 GF CV provided concentration of sucrose. In A–D,**P < ** NS 2 0.01, ***P < 0.001 (Mann–Whitney u test for the Relative expression 0 indicated comparisons); error bars indicate SD. In E, inR1 inR2 Vg ***P < 0.001 (χ2 test). NS, not significant. sterilized food or sterilized food inoculated with the gut content of of GF bees (Fig. 1B). After 15 d, the wet weights of both midgut conventional adult nurse bees. This procedure yields GF bees and ileum were also larger in CV bees than in GF bees and were with <105 bacteria per gut consisting of an erratic mix of bacterial similar to those of nurse bees collected from hives (Fig. 1C). In species versus CV bees with >108 bacteria per gut and consisting contrast, rectum weights were not significantly different and were primarily of core bee gut species, as in naturally inoculated hive more variable, probably because of variable levels of pollen and bees (19, 20). Although GF and CV bees showed similar survi- waste accumulation in this gut compartment (Fig. 1C). These re- vorship in laboratory experiments, CV bees attained greater body sults indicate that the presence of conventional gut microbiota is weight (Fig.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JMBFS / Surname of Author Et Al. 20Xx X (X) X-Xx
    DIVERSITY OF BACTERIA IN SLOVAK AND FOREIGN HONEY, WITH ASSESSMENT OF ITS PHYSICO- CHEMICAL QUALITY AND COUNTS OF CULTIVABLE MICROORGANISMS Vladimíra Kňazovická1, Michal Gábor2, Martina Miluchová2, Marek Bobko3, Juraj Medo*4 Address(es): Ing. Juraj Medo, PhD. 1National Agricultural and Food Centre, Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Institute of Apiculture Liptovsky Hradok, Gasperikova 599, 033 80 Liptovsky Hradok, Slovakia. 2Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Department of Genetics and Animal Breeding Biology, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia. 3Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Technology and Quality of Animal Products, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia. 4Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Microbiology, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia, phone number: +421 37 641 5810. *Corresponding author: [email protected] doi: 10.15414/jmbfs.2019.9.special.414-421 ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Received 23. 8. 2019 The aim of the study was to assess microbial microbiome of 30 honey samples and compare potential differences between the samples Revised 7. 10. 2019 from apiaries and commercial trade in Slovakia and foreign countries (Latvia, Switzerland, India, Japan and Tanzania) as well as to Accepted 10. 10. 2019 indicate their physico-chemical and basic microbiological quality. Study of each sample consisted of physico-chemical analysis (water Published 8. 11. 2019 content, pH, free acidity and electrical conductivity), basic microbiological analysis performed by dilution plating method (total plate count, sporulating aerobic microorganisms, bacteria from Enterobacteriaceae family, preliminary lactic acid bacteria and microscopic fungi) and metagenomic analysis for bacterial diversity evaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • Lists of Names of Prokaryotic Candidatus Taxa
    NOTIFICATION LIST: CANDIDATUS LIST NO. 1 Oren et al., Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. DOI 10.1099/ijsem.0.003789 Lists of names of prokaryotic Candidatus taxa Aharon Oren1,*, George M. Garrity2,3, Charles T. Parker3, Maria Chuvochina4 and Martha E. Trujillo5 Abstract We here present annotated lists of names of Candidatus taxa of prokaryotes with ranks between subspecies and class, pro- posed between the mid- 1990s, when the provisional status of Candidatus taxa was first established, and the end of 2018. Where necessary, corrected names are proposed that comply with the current provisions of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes and its Orthography appendix. These lists, as well as updated lists of newly published names of Candidatus taxa with additions and corrections to the current lists to be published periodically in the International Journal of Systematic and Evo- lutionary Microbiology, may serve as the basis for the valid publication of the Candidatus names if and when the current propos- als to expand the type material for naming of prokaryotes to also include gene sequences of yet-uncultivated taxa is accepted by the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. Introduction of the category called Candidatus was first pro- morphology, basis of assignment as Candidatus, habitat, posed by Murray and Schleifer in 1994 [1]. The provisional metabolism and more. However, no such lists have yet been status Candidatus was intended for putative taxa of any rank published in the journal. that could not be described in sufficient details to warrant Currently, the nomenclature of Candidatus taxa is not covered establishment of a novel taxon, usually because of the absence by the rules of the Prokaryotic Code.
    [Show full text]
  • A Higher Level Classification of All Living Organisms
    RESEARCH ARTICLE A Higher Level Classification of All Living Organisms Michael A. Ruggiero1*, Dennis P. Gordon2, Thomas M. Orrell1, Nicolas Bailly3, Thierry Bourgoin4, Richard C. Brusca5, Thomas Cavalier-Smith6, Michael D. Guiry7, Paul M. Kirk8 1 Integrated Taxonomic Information System, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America, 2 National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand, 3 WorldFish—FIN, Los Baños, Philippines, 4 Institut Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), UMR 7205 MNHN-CNRS-UPMC-EPHE, Sorbonne Universités, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 57, rue Cuvier, CP 50, F-75005, Paris, France, 5 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America, 6 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 7 The AlgaeBase Foundation & Irish Seaweed Research Group, Ryan Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland, 8 Mycology Section, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, United Kingdom * [email protected] Abstract We present a consensus classification of life to embrace the more than 1.6 million species already provided by more than 3,000 taxonomists’ expert opinions in a unified and coherent, OPEN ACCESS hierarchically ranked system known as the Catalogue of Life (CoL). The intent of this collab- orative effort is to provide a hierarchical classification serving not only the needs of the Citation: Ruggiero MA, Gordon DP, Orrell TM, Bailly CoL’s database providers but also the diverse public-domain user community, most of N, Bourgoin T, Brusca RC, et al. (2015) A Higher Level Classification of All Living Organisms. PLoS whom are familiar with the Linnaean conceptual system of ordering taxon relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Hierarchy of the Phylum Proteobacteria and Korean Indigenous Novel Proteobacteria Species
    Journal of Species Research 8(2):197-214, 2019 Taxonomic hierarchy of the phylum Proteobacteria and Korean indigenous novel Proteobacteria species Chi Nam Seong1,*, Mi Sun Kim1, Joo Won Kang1 and Hee-Moon Park2 1Department of Biology, College of Life Science and Natural Resources, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Republic of Korea 2Department of Microbiology & Molecular Biology, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea *Correspondent: [email protected] The taxonomic hierarchy of the phylum Proteobacteria was assessed, after which the isolation and classification state of Proteobacteria species with valid names for Korean indigenous isolates were studied. The hierarchical taxonomic system of the phylum Proteobacteria began in 1809 when the genus Polyangium was first reported and has been generally adopted from 2001 based on the road map of Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Until February 2018, the phylum Proteobacteria consisted of eight classes, 44 orders, 120 families, and more than 1,000 genera. Proteobacteria species isolated from various environments in Korea have been reported since 1999, and 644 species have been approved as of February 2018. In this study, all novel Proteobacteria species from Korean environments were affiliated with four classes, 25 orders, 65 families, and 261 genera. A total of 304 species belonged to the class Alphaproteobacteria, 257 species to the class Gammaproteobacteria, 82 species to the class Betaproteobacteria, and one species to the class Epsilonproteobacteria. The predominant orders were Rhodobacterales, Sphingomonadales, Burkholderiales, Lysobacterales and Alteromonadales. The most diverse and greatest number of novel Proteobacteria species were isolated from marine environments. Proteobacteria species were isolated from the whole territory of Korea, with especially large numbers from the regions of Chungnam/Daejeon, Gyeonggi/Seoul/Incheon, and Jeonnam/Gwangju.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery and Description of the Bacterial Associates of a Gregarious Riparian Beetle with Explosive Defensive Chemistry
    Discovery and Description of the Bacterial Associates of a Gregarious Riparian Beetle with Explosive Defensive Chemistry Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors McManus, Reilly Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 27/09/2021 16:02:09 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/625915 DISCOVERY AND DESCRIPTION OF THE BACTERIAL ASSOCIATES OF A GREGARIOUS RIPARIAN BEETLE WITH EXPLOSIVE DEFENSIVE CHEMISTRY by Reilly McManus _____________________________________________ Copyright © Reilly McManus 2017 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the THE GRADUATE INTERDISCIPLINARY PROGRAM IN ENTOMOLOGY & INSECT SCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2017 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR The thesis titled Discovery and Description of the Bacterial Associates of a Gregarious Riparian Beetle with Explosive Defensive Chemistry prepared by Reilly McManus has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for a master’s degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borroWers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are alloWable Without special permission, provided that an accurate acknoWledgement of the source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in Whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College When in his or her judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Tracing Hydrocarbon
    ABSTRACT TRACING HYDROCARBON CONTAMINATION THROUGH HYPERALKALINE ENVIRONMENTS IN THE CALUMET REGION OF SOUTHEASTERN CHICAGO Kathryn Quesnell, MS Department of Geology and Environmental Geosciences Northern Illinois University, 2016 Melissa Lenczewski, Director The Calumet region of Southeastern Chicago was once known for industrialization, which left pollution as its legacy. Disposal of slag and other industrial wastes occurred in nearby wetlands in attempt to create areas suitable for future development. The waste creates an unpredictable, heterogeneous geology and a unique hyperalkaline environment. Upgradient to the field site is a former coking facility, where coke, creosote, and coal weather openly on the ground. Hydrocarbons weather into characteristic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which can be used to create a fingerprint and correlate them to their original parent compound. This investigation identified PAHs present in the nearby surface and groundwaters through use of gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), as well as investigated the relationship between the alkaline environment and the organic contamination. PAH ratio analysis suggests that the organic contamination is not mobile in the groundwater, and instead originated from the air. 16S rDNA profiling suggests that some microbial communities are influenced more by pH, and some are influenced more by the hydrocarbon pollution. BIOLOG Ecoplates revealed that most communities have the ability to metabolize ring structures similar to the shape of PAHs. Analysis with bioinformatics using PICRUSt demonstrates that each community has microbes thought to be capable of hydrocarbon utilization. The field site, as well as nearby areas, are targets for habitat remediation and recreational development. In order for these remediation efforts to be successful, it is vital to understand the geochemistry, weathering, microbiology, and distribution of known contaminants.
    [Show full text]
  • View / Download 6.5 Mb
    Ecological and Evolutionary Factors Shaping Animal-Bacterial Symbioses: Insights from Insects & Gut Symbionts by Bryan Paul Brown Environment Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Jennifer Wernegreen, Supervisor ___________________________ Dana Hunt ___________________________ John Rawls ___________________________ Lawrence David Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of the Environment in the Graduate School of Duke University 2017 i v ABSTRACT Ecological and Evolutionary Factors Shaping Animal-Bacterial Symbioses: Insights from Insects & Gut Symbionts by Bryan Paul Brown Environment Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Jennifer Wernegreen, Supervisor ___________________________ Dana Hunt ___________________________ John Rawls ___________________________ Lawrence David An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of the Environment in the Graduate School of Duke University 2017 i v Copyright by Bryan Paul Brown 2017 Abstract Animal bacterial symbioses are pervasive and underlie the success of many groups. Here, I study ecological and evolutionary factors that shape interactions between a host and gut associates. In this dissertation, I interrogate interactions between the carpenter ant (Camponotus) and its associated gut microbiota to ask the following questions: What
    [Show full text]
  • Metabolic Roles of Uncultivated Bacterioplankton Lineages in the Northern Gulf of Mexico 2 “Dead Zone” 3 4 J
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/095471; this version posted June 12, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 Metabolic roles of uncultivated bacterioplankton lineages in the northern Gulf of Mexico 2 “Dead Zone” 3 4 J. Cameron Thrash1*, Kiley W. Seitz2, Brett J. Baker2*, Ben Temperton3, Lauren E. Gillies4, 5 Nancy N. Rabalais5,6, Bernard Henrissat7,8,9, and Olivia U. Mason4 6 7 8 1. Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA 9 2. Department of Marine Science, Marine Science Institute, University of Texas at Austin, Port 10 Aransas, TX, USA 11 3. School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK 12 4. Department of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, 13 FL, USA 14 5. Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, 15 LA, USA 16 6. Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium, Chauvin, LA USA 17 7. Architecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques, CNRS, Aix-Marseille Université, 18 13288 Marseille, France 19 8. INRA, USC 1408 AFMB, F-13288 Marseille, France 20 9. Department of Biological Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia 21 22 *Correspondence: 23 JCT [email protected] 24 BJB [email protected] 25 26 27 28 Running title: Decoding microbes of the Dead Zone 29 30 31 Abstract word count: 250 32 Text word count: XXXX 33 34 Page 1 of 31 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/095471; this version posted June 12, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological and Microbiological Diversity of Chigger Mites, Including
    Ecological and microbiological diversity of chigger mites, including vectors of scrub typhus, on small mammals across stratified habitats in Thailand Kittipong Chaisiri, A. Christina Gill, Alexandr Stekolnikov, Soawapak Hinjoy, John Mcgarry, Alistair Darby, Serge Morand, Benjamin Makepeace To cite this version: Kittipong Chaisiri, A. Christina Gill, Alexandr Stekolnikov, Soawapak Hinjoy, John Mcgarry, et al.. Ecological and microbiological diversity of chigger mites, including vectors of scrub typhus, on small mammals across stratified habitats in Thailand. Animal Microbiome, 2019, 1 (1), 10.1186/s42523- 019-0019-x. hal-02396400 HAL Id: hal-02396400 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02396400 Submitted on 6 Dec 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Chaisiri et al. Animal Microbiome (2019) 1:18 Animal Microbiome https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-019-0019-x RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Ecological and microbiological diversity of chigger mites, including vectors of scrub typhus, on small mammals across stratified habitats in Thailand Kittipong Chaisiri1,2, A. Christina Gill1,3, Alexandr A. Stekolnikov4, Soawapak Hinjoy5, John W. McGarry6, Alistair C. Darby7, Serge Morand8 and Benjamin L. Makepeace1* Abstract Background: Scrub typhus, caused by a bacterial pathogen (Orientia spp.), is a potentially life-threatening febrile illness widely distributed in the Asia-Pacific region and is emerging elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Basis for the Recognition of Sulfur in Phosphorothioated DNA
    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07093-1 OPEN Structural basis for the recognition of sulfur in phosphorothioated DNA Guang Liu 1,2, Wencheng Fu1, Zhenyi Zhang1, Yao He3, Hao Yu1, Yuli Wang1, Xiaolei Wang1, Yi-Lei Zhao 1, Zixin Deng1, Geng Wu1 & Xinyi He 1 There have been very few reports on protein domains that specifically recognize sulfur. Here we present the crystal structure of the sulfur-binding domain (SBD) from the DNA phos- 1234567890():,; phorothioation (PT)-dependent restriction endonuclease ScoMcrA. SBD contains a hydro- phobic surface cavity that is formed by the aromatic ring of Y164, the pyrolidine ring of P165, and the non-polar side chains of four other residues that serve as lid, base, and wall of the cavity. The SBD and PT-DNA undergo conformational changes upon binding. The S187RGRR191 loop inserts into the DNA major groove to make contacts with the bases of the GPSGCC core sequence. Mutating key residues of SBD impairs PT-DNA association. More than 1000 sequenced microbial species from fourteen phyla contain SBD homologs. We show that three of these homologs bind PT-DNA in vitro and restrict PT-DNA gene transfer in vivo. These results show that SBD-like PT-DNA readers exist widely in prokaryotes. 1 State Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, School of Life Sciences & Biotechnology, The Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic & Developmental Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, China. 2 State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, 200237 Shanghai, China. 3 Imaging and Characterization Core Lab, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materials
    Supplementary materials Scheme 1. Taxonomy analysis of 16S and ITS amplicon sequencing. Table S1. A. Taxonomy of 16S amplicon sequencing. Six sub-groups of three bees each were analysed. Table presents relative abundance of each of the listed bacterium (numbers as percentages) in relation to the entire amplicon. Sample PL1 PL1 PL1 PL2 PL2 PL2 PL3 PL3 PL3 PL4 PL4 PL4 PL5 PL5 PL5 PL6 PL6 PL6 Bacteria (%) (1) (2) (3) (1) (2) (3) (1) (2) (3) (1) (2) (3) (1) (2) (3) (1) (2) (3) Firmicutes 21,20 21,43 21,39 44,22 41,81 9,48 10,61 19,91 18,45 19,60 42,83 44,36 45,74 66,04 64,59 65,48 Lactobacillus γ-proteobacteria 6,99 6,95 7,33 26,97 27,15 55,68 52,38 34,91 35,42 35,63 28,51 28,31 28,55 6,21 5,54 5,02 Orbales Gilliamella α-proteobacteria Acetobacterales 4,36 4,31 4,24 15,18 15,40 0,44 0,48 1,23 1,09 1,15 7,81 6,80 7,09 6,05 6,48 6,64 Commensalibacter α-proteobacteria Rhizobiales 59,70 59,62 59,40 5,19 6,16 2,40 2,87 27,36 27,40 26,41 12,04 12,03 11,14 12,43 12,82 12,49 Bartonella γ-proteobacteria Neisseriaceae 7,36 7,29 7,24 4,53 4,97 23,69 24,48 15,44 16,37 15,90 2,37 2,33 2,02 1,10 1,18 1,27 Snodgrassella ND ND Actinobacteria Bifidobacterium 0,38 0,34 0,36 1,89 2,25 0,23 0,23 0,98 1,13 1,17 0,85 0,92 0,95 8,00 9,21 8,84 γ-proteobacteria Orbales 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,94 0,89 2,48 2,30 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,13 0,14 0,10 Frischella Bacteroidetes Dysgonomonas 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,59 0,81 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Bacteroidetes Apibacter 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,45 0,55 5,36 6,51 0,00 0,01 0,01 5,05 4,87 4,08 0,00 0,00 0,00 γ-proteobacteria Enterobacteriales 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,09 0,04 0,03 0,38 0,25 0,28 0,00 0,00 0,00 Serratia Other 0,01 0,06 0,04 0,04 0,01 0,24 0,14 0,08 0,09 0,1 0,16 0,13 0,15 0,04 0,04 0,16 ND – no data.
    [Show full text]
  • Caste-Speci C Gut Symbionts Contribute to the Different Adult Longevity in the Honeybee
    Caste-specic gut symbionts contribute to the different adult longevity in the honeybee Hongfang Wang ( [email protected] ) Shandong Agricultural University Baohua Xu Shandong Agricultural University Research article Keywords: Bombella, tness, gut microbes, Honeybee, longevity, queen bees, worker bees Posted Date: December 3rd, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-119097/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/40 Abstract Background Honeybees are important pollinators, and their health is important to agricultural production and ecosystem. Queen-bees contain same genome as worker- bees, but live longer and healthier than worker-bees; thus, queen and worker pairs are natural biological models for studying longevity. Concerns are increasing regarding the relationship between gut microbes and honeybee health. We compared the hindgut microora of queen and worker (Apis mellifera carpatica) by sequencing the bacterial 16S DNA, then salvaging the caste-specic microbes using LEfSe analysis and predicting the microbial functions using Tax4Fun, hoping to nd potential gut symbionts associated with longevity. Results The hindgut microora of queens differed from those of worker. Queens had higher abundances of Commensalibacter, Lactobacillus and Bidobacterium than workers. The dominant microora in the worker hindguts were Gilliamella (29.37%), Lactobacillus (15.28%), Commensalibacter (13.65%), Snodgrassella (11.56%), Bidobacterium (6.07%) and Frischella (3.51%). The dominant microora in the queen hindguts were Commensalibacter (44.89%), Lactobacillus (38.42%), Bidobacterium (6.74%), Gilliamella (2.44%) and Bombella (2.41%). Queen-specic microbes was Bombella genus, and worker-specic microbes included Snodgrassella alvi, Frischella perrara and Gilliamella apicola.
    [Show full text]