Bijdragen Tot De Dierkunde, 52 (2): 103-120 19Ô2
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
— Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde, 52 (2): 103-120 19Ô2 The chaetotaxy of Cypridacea (Crustacea, Ostrocoda) limbs: proposals for a descriptive model by Nico W. Broodbakker Institute of Taxonomie Zoology, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 20125, 1000 HC Amsterdam, The Netherlands & Dan L. Danielopol Limnological Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Gaisberg 116, A-5310 Mondsee, Austria Abstract On souligne l’importance des recherches sur le développe- ment dans le but d’établir des homologies au niveau de la The need for better and more of systematic descriptions chétotaxie. the data the struc- chaetotaxy (especially concerning shape, Des exemples de morphologie fonctionnelle des setae sont and of distribution of ture pattern the setae) is emphasized. analysés, et on arrive à la conclusion que la morphologie The historical of studies in developments chaetotaxy are de celles-ci être fonctionnelle de la majeure partie peut mieux reviewed. étude de dont les comprise par l’organe entier setae sont Two of cuticular be basic types processes can recognized: Une seulement une partie constitutive. signification adaptive setae and The former have sensorial and pseudochaetae. n’est le de les setae. pas propre toutes mechanical functions, the latter mechanical only a function. On modèle de la chétotaxie des propose un descriptif A of is special type seta the aesthetasc or the chemosenso- des Ostracodes Cypridacés. Les diverses particularités setae, rial Using the and structure of the setae, receptor. shape ainsi que leur position sur les extrémités, sont codés par most of them can be classified in the following categories: lettres et chiffres, avec utilisation de formules simples. simple, plumed, serrate and chelate. The importance of developmental studies for the estab- lishment of homologies in chaetotaxy is stressed. INTRODUCTION of functional Examples morphology of setae are discussed. It is emphasized that the functional morphology of most The of the be better understood when the whole superfamily is one of the setae can organ Cypridacea groups is studied of in the which the setae are only a component. Not all most rich species of Ostracoda which suc- the setae have an adaptive significance. cessfully inhabits the limnic environment. The A descriptive model of the chaetotaxy of cypridacean ostracod and the soft covered ostracods is presented. The different characteristics of the carapace body are setae as well as their position on the limbs are coded by with diverse setae like hairs, claws and specialized letters and numerals using simple formulae. chemosensorial organs. of the the The pattern distribution of setae on Résumé organism is generally called chaetotaxy (Ken- In this this in neth, 1976). paper we use term On souligne la nécessité d’une description meilleure et plus connection with studies basic systématique de la chétotaxie, ceci s’appliquant surtout à the of two types of à la des l’aspect et structure setae, ainsi qu’au modèle de cuticular ostracod processes that cover the soft leur distribution. On de manière chronolo- passe en revue body: the setae and the pseudochaetae (see section gique les développements des recherches sur la chétotaxie. and Il est de reconnaître deux "Basic nomenclature" for the possible types fondamentaux morphology d’appendices cuticulaires: les setae et les pseudochaetae. Les The definition of these structures). present study premières remplissent des fonctions sensorielles et mécaniques, deals with the the classification and tandis morphology, que les autres ont seulement une fonction mécanique. of ou the distribution of the of L’aesthétasque, récepteur chémo-sensoriel, représente un pattern specific types type spécial de seta. Tenant compte de l’aspect et de la struc- cuticular processes mentioned above. la de celles-ci ture des setae, plupart peuvent être rangées ostracod The investigation of chaetotaxy is use- dans les catégories suivantes: simples, plumeuses, denticulées ful other in order et à aspect de chela. among things to accurately Downloaded from Brill.com10/05/2021 01:32:27PM via free access 104 N. W. BROODBAKKER & D. L. DANIELOPOL - CHAETOTAXY MODEL define the taxonomie position of the organism, to TOWARDS BETTER DESCRIPTIONS OF CHAETOTAXY obtain information on the way of life of the animal in affinities and to get insight the phylogenetic Besides the positive achievements mentioned of with other ostracod taxa. Due to this large area still of ostracod seta- above, very poor descriptions interest it is understandable that zoologists con- tion of W. Klie are being published. Many papers centrated on the description of the chaetotaxy ever suffer from this deficiency (e.g. Klie, 1941). since the early stages of ostracod investigations. Some authors figure indiscriminately bristles that the of After a review of historical developments for are irrelevant, instance Paulo (1969: 28, fig. chaetotaxy research in cypridacean ostracods, the 10) in his description of the chaetotaxy of the need for better and more systematic descriptions maxilla. This negative situation occurs mainly A basic is emphasized in the present paper. nomen- because there is not enough information about the clature and a descriptive model is proposed and functional and developmental characteristics of the arguments are exemplified with an analysis the of ostracods. Neither there setae many are of developmental and functional morphology of enough data to recognize homologies and anal- some of the setae and pseudochaetae of Cypridacea. the ogies between setae, nor are differences be- tween setae and pseudochaetae well understood. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENTS The ostracodologists working on carapace morphology found it useful to standardize the The study of cypridacean chaetotaxy started at the terminology in order to improve the descriptive beginning of the nineteenth century, incorporated data different reviews (for see: Hartmann, 1966; in the general study of freshwater ostracods. The & Benson, 1971; the Sylvester-Bradley Keyser, 1980). description of setae during this period was the of the limbs, Da- and Considering chaetotaxy not very well defined mostly inaccurate, see nielopol & Cvetkov (1979) proposed a system e.g. the descriptions of Liljeborg (1853) or those of description of the setae using letters and of Vejdovsky (1882). In order to document this numerals. A less has been used the developed system statement, a plate of "Dictionnaire des scien- by Shornikov (1980). The advantage of such a ces naturelles" edited by Frédéric Cuvier in the consists in of between 1804 and is here system a more complete description years 1830, reproduced the limbs in form. the setation of an abridged It in 1. On this one can fig. plate recognize repre- also allows the retrieval of data for computer sentatives of the subfamilies Candoninae, Cypri- storage and treatment because of the symbolized dinae and Notodromatinae of which the setae are language used. only approximately figured. In the a basic nomenclature for the It the end following was during of the last century and setae of cypridacean limbs and a descriptive model the beginning of the present one that zoologists for the will be It will be started in chaetotaxy proposed. to represent ostracod limbs an accurate demonstrated that the The understanding development way. most significant contributions are those and their of the setae functional purpose (if any) of Müller (19OO) and Sars (1925). During the is a to the of the last wide prerequisite improve knowledge fifty years a range of aspects has been chaetotaxy of ostracods. investigated in relation to the chaetotaxy of the Cypridacea: contributions on general morphology of setae using light and electronmicroscope tech- BASIC MORPHOLOGY AND niques (Rome, 1947; Triebel, 1961; Danielopol, NOMENCLATURE 1972, 1973; Andersson, 1975; etc.), on functional morphology (Cannon, 1926; Storch, 1926), on The term seta comes from the latin seta which chaetotaxy classification for taxonomy (De Deck- means bristle or hair; the greek equivalent is and for chaeta A is ker, 1979; Maddocks, 1976, 1979) (Kenneth, 1976). seta, as an organ, reconstruction cuticular conical phylogenetic (Danielopol, 1976, a process, normally or tubular, in the 1978). most of cases articulated at a socket on the Downloaded from Brill.com10/05/2021 01:32:27PM via free access - 105 BIJDRAGEN TOT DE DIERKUNDE, 52 (2) 1982 illustrated in “Dictionnaire sciences naturelles” edited Frédéric Desmarest was Fig. 1. Ostracods des by Cuvier; respon- a of article “Malacostracés ”) and for the on sible for the text on ostracods (published in 1823, being part his plates work is The valve and of ostracod crustaceans in this (published 1816-1830; plate 55 reproduced here). carapace shape well with those of 3 with and no. 7 with Notodromatinae. The no. 1 conform Candoninae, no. Cypridinae Cypridinae the second instead of the Candoninae The of the (no. 2) should have swimming setae on antenna, (no. 1). chaetotaxy 2 recalls which first endopodal segment of the second antenna of ostracod no. some “giant” pseudochaetae, are imaginary all minute because European freshwater Cypridinae have pseudochaetae. Downloaded from Brill.com10/05/2021 01:32:27PM via free access 106 N. W. BROODBAKKER ft D. L. DANIELOPOL - CHAETOTAXY MODEL in limb, having an inner lumen which nervous markedly developed (fig. 2E). The surface of cells The and the is in increased terminate. seta plays a sensory seta most cases largely (Danielo- mechanical role and the is (Rome, 1947). pol, 1972) innervation very complex A