DOCSLIB.ORG

Existing Facilities the Educational Standards of Another Era

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

• Most of the district’s schools were designed in accordance with Existing Facilities the educational standards of another era. As such, many of the classrooms do not meet current size standards. Also, most The Long Range Facilities Plan is based on an Existing Facilities schools do not adequately provide the specialized spaces Evaluation of each of the district’s school buildings, as required by the advocated in the Newark Facilities Model. New Jersey Department of Education. The evaluation supports a determination of building condition, capacity, and educational adequacy, • The Newark Public Schools provides “neighborhood” schools to as submitted as part of the 1999 FMP and confirmed by the 2002 update. general education students in grades PreK-8 without busing The current state of the district’s infrastructure is summarized below, except in special circumstances. followed by a statistical analysis. • Many schools currently offer little or no on-site parking or play CRITICAL ISSUES: Physical Plant areas. The playgrounds that do exist are severely compromised • The average age of a Newark public school building is for staff parking needs. approximately 83 years. The average age of an Abbott district school is 58 years. The average age of a Newark public school addition is 73 years. The average age of an Abbott district school addition is 35 years. • Except for the Belmont-Runyon Elementary School (completed in 2004 with non-Abbott funding) and a few schools that were constructed or renovated in the 1990s, most Newark public schools requires significant upgrades to repair or replace items that are no longer functional, replace components that have exceeded their life cycle expectancy, and/or to meet current code requirements. The projected cost to correct critical health and safety deficiencies and maintain the existing buildings in operation for the next 5 years before they are replaced or fully renovated is estimated at approximately $200,000,000. CRITICAL ISSUES: Capacity/Program Spaces • The majority of Newark’s schools were located to serve student population needs of 50 to 100 years ago. Therefore, many schools today are either overcrowded or underutilized, depending upon demographic changes that have occurred during the last century. Most schools that have excess capacity are not located in areas that can help alleviate overcrowding in nearby schools. • Two of the five School Leadership Teams do not have adequate capacity to accommodate the projected enrollments. Three SLTs have surplus capacity due to the demolition of public housing units and population decline, which makes some consolidations possible. NEWARK PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2005 LONG RANGE FACILITIES PLAN DISTRIC OVERVIEW PAGE B:3 TABLE B.2 District Statistical Summary CAPACITY & ENROLLMENT INFRASTRUCTURE Capacity per 2004-05 2009 School Number of Bldgs. Total Gross Sq. Ft. GSF/Student Average School Age NJDOE Enroll. Proj. Enroll. Sites (based on capacity) (orig. sect) (acres) SLT I Central 4,963 3,499 3,422 24.56 11 938,715 189.14 East 3.144 4,347 5,228 7.18 9 463,505 147.42 SLT I TOTALS 8,107 7,846 8,650 31.74 20 1,402,220 172.96 108 yrs. SLT II TOTALS 11,230 11,358 12,277 35.90 12 2,231,935 198.75 79 yrs. SLT III North 5,642 4,113 4,707 16.19 9 872,250 154.60 South 3,830 3,327 3,355 16.79 7 702,380 183.39 SLT III TOTALS 9,472 7,440 8,062 32.98 16 1,574,630 166.24 68 yrs. SLT IV East 5,220 5,644 5,977 11.95 11 926,211 177.43 West 2,664 3,475 3,713 10.36 5 357,820 134.32 SLT IV TOTALS 7,884 9,119 9,690 22.31 16 1,284,031 162.86 84 yrs. SLT V East 5,399 3,488 3,811 14.46 8 871,090 161.34 West 3,063 2,775 3,111 10.94 7 432,195 141.10 SLT V TOTALS 8,462 6,263 6,263 25.40 14 1,303,285 154.02 77 yrs. SCHOOL TOTALS 44,611 41,954 44,942 148.33 78 7,779,431 174.38 83 yrs. NOTES: 2004-05 Enrollments do not include Charter School student or out-of-district placements. Capacity calculations are based on prescribed NJDOE methodologies, including class size. 2005 LONG RANGE FACILITIES PLAN NEWARK PUBLIC SCHOOLS EXISTING FACILITIES PAGE B:4 SLT I Facilities School Leadership Team I serves roughly two Wards of the city—the East and Central. The East Ward contains nine school buildings, including four annexes. Ten schools are located in the SLT I portion of the Central Ward. The largest part of the East Ward, referred to as the Ironbound, is one of the most densely populated and oldest neighborhoods in Newark. Defined by clear boundaries, the Ironbound is served by rail, air and water connections, which make the area extremely accessible. Close to five hundred above-market-rates housing units have been built and sold in the last five years, and more are being built daily. The Ironbound neighborhood has a vibrant identity and a strong sense of community values. Through the years, the Ironbound has attracted waves of immigrants and new businesses. Residents and businesses have fought many battles to defend the livability of the Ironbound and are currently seeking new ways to improve the quality of life in the community. Currently, however, the livability of the Ironbound is at risk. Infrastructure and services such as roads, parking, schools, recreation areas, fire stations and other facilities are heavily overloaded. In the case of schools, classes sometimes have as many as forty children and Figure B.1 playgrounds have been turned into parking lots. Due in part to the condition of the outdated facilities, a large percentage of the Ironbound student population attends private institutions, adding to the financial Of the twenty-six schools in Newark that are over one hundred years old, burden of the working-class parents of these children. fourteen are located in SLT I. This includes Lafayette Street School, which, with an original wing built in 1848, is the oldest operating school The Central Ward schools serve an area that was the center of the 1967 building in the State of New Jersey. Following closely behind Lafayette summer riots. During this era, there were 1,409 tenement apartment Street School are two Central Ward schools, Morton Street and Newton houses in the area, of which 1,247 were judged substandard. While the Street, whose original dates of construction are 1851 and 1866, enrollment in the Central Ward has diminished over the years due to respectively. Due to the age of the buildings and the programs that are families leaving or the closing of public and private housing, there is a needed to meet the students’ needs, there is a real need for new schools resurgence of new public and private housing all over this ward. Most of and other major renovations in SLT I. the students attending school in the Central Ward receive free lunch, which is an indication of the economic status of the area. Many students Critical facilities issues are summarized below. A detailed statistical presently live in public housing and come to school in need of assistance summary with infrastructure, existing capacity, projected enrollment, and with health and social needs. Because of the identified needs, most unhoused student data for each SLT I school is provided in Table C.2. schools in the Central Ward provide after-school programs in an attempt to provide safe havens for the children. One school has a new health clinic that opened several years ago. NEWARK PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2005 LONG RANGE FACILITIES PLAN DISTRIC OVERVIEW PAGE B:5 TABLE B.3 SLT I Statistical Summary CAPACITY AND ENROLLMENT INFRASTRUCTURE Grades Existing 2004-05 Site Size Gross Dates of Construction (9/04) Capacity Enrollment (acres) Sq. Ft. Orig. Add. Add. Add. SLT I CENTRAL Burnet Street PK-8 370 296 1.34 84,460 1868 1906 1914 Cleveland PK-6 452 330 1.31 78,235 1932 Dr. M L King, Jr. K-8 650 597 1.92 113,930 1872 1900 1907 1963 18th Avenue PK-6 465 308 2.56 96,300 1871 1900 1915 1923 Harold Wilson/SLT Office Vacant [368] 0 7.60 75,300 1984 Morton Street 1-8 557 338 1.43 102,945 1885 1909 Newton Street K-8 626 477 1.34 98,930 1866 1873 1900 1904 Quitman Street PK-4 900 405 6.50 156,450 1963 Berliner (at Quitman) SE 84 47 38,950 1974 Sussex Avenue 2-8 551 471 1.42 64,429 1892 1954 1996 Sussex Avenue Annex K-1 Incl. Above Incl. Above 0.44 27,525 1970 Warren Street K-8 308 230 0.56 65,690 1891 1908 Subtotal 4,963 3,499 24.56 938,715 SLT I EAST Ann Street K-8 805 1,110 2.62 92,120 1885 1897 1916 1923 Ann Street ECC PK/K Incl. Above Incl. Above Leased 4,000 Hawkins Street K-8 494 615 1.07 64,660 1887 1904 1922 Lafayette Street 1-8 643 765 1.10 75,170 1848 1863 1881 1904 Lafayette Street Annex PK-1 Incl. Above Incl. Above Leased 8,485 1874 Oliver Street PK-8 612 812 0.86 93,115 1869 1903 1915 1922 South Street K-5 296 236 0.69 35,090 1883 1900 Wilson Avenue PK-8 294 809 0.70 82,865 1881 1900 1906 1925 Wilson Avenue ECC PK Incl.
Recommended publications
  • Community Engagement at Rutgers-Newark 2010–2012

    Community Engagement at Rutgers-Newark 2010–2012

    BUILDING COMMUNITY TOGETHER! ututgersgersinin Newark Newark is oneone ofof three three campuses campuses of Rutgers,of Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. Offering countless degrees The State University of New Jersey. Offering countless degrees through its undergraduate and graduate programs, it is home to the through its undergraduate and graduate programs, it is home to the Newark College of Arts and Sciences, University College, RNewark College of Arts and Sciences, UniversityCOMMUNITYCOMMUNITY College, ENGAGEMENTENGAGEMENT Rthe Graduate School-Newark, Rutgers Business School-Newark and New the Graduate School-Newark, Rutgers Business School-Newark and New Brunswick, the School of Law-Newark, the College of Nursing, the ATSchoolAT RUTGERS-NEWARKRUTGERS-NEWARK of Brunswick,Criminal the Justice, School the ofSchool Law-Newark, of Public Affairs the College and Administration, of Nursing, and the extensive School of Criminalresearch Justice, and outreach the School centers. of PublicMore than Affairs 11,000 and students Administration, are currently and enrolled extensive 2010–2012 researchin a wide and rangeoutreach of undergraduate centers. More and thangraduate 11,000 degree students programs are offered currently at the enrolled in a 35-acrewide range downtown of undergraduate Newark campus. and Rutgers-Newark graduate degree is rankedprograms among offered the leading at the urban research universities in the northeast, and number one for student diversity, 35-acre downtown Newark campus. Rutgers-Newark is ranked among the leading by U.S. News & World Report. urban research universities in the northeast, and number one for student diversity, by U.S.Rutgers News University & World celebrated Report. 100 years of higher education in the city of Newark in 2008.
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration

    National Register of Historic Places Registration

    NFS Form 10-900 OMB NO. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) RECEIVED 2280 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service AU6-820GO National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NA1 REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES ' NATIONAL PARK SERVICE This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property____ Four Corners Historic District historic name N/A other names/site number 2. Location__________________________________________ street & number Roughly bounded by Raymond Blvd., Mulberry St., Hf St. & Washington Stn not for publication city or town Newark_____________________________________________ D vicinity state. New Jersey______ __ __ codeii NJ county Essex code °13 zip code 07102 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended. I hereby certify that this B nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property B meets D does not meet the National Register criteria.
  • Computer Modeling and Simulation of Nj Transit Penn Station Newark

    Computer Modeling and Simulation of Nj Transit Penn Station Newark

    FHWA-NJ-2004-016 COMPUTER MODELING AND SIMULATION OF NJ TRANSIT PENN STATION NEWARK FINAL REPORT August 2004 Submitted by Dr. Lazar N. Spasovic, Keir Opie, Professor Principal Transportation Engineer School of Management NCTIP/IITC New Jersey Institute of Technology University Heights, Newark, NJ 07102-1982 NJDOT Research Project Manager Nicholas Vitillo In cooperation with New Jersey Department of Transportation Division of Research and Technology and U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration DISCLAIMER STATEMENT The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the New Jersey Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-NJ-2004-016 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Computer Modeling And Simulation Of NJ Transit August 2004 Penn Station Newark 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Dr. Lazar N. Spasovic and Keir Opie 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. National Center for Transportation and Industrial Productivity New Jersey Institute of Technology 11. Contract or Grant No. 323 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. University Heights Newark, NJ 07102-1982 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered U.S. Department of Transportation N.J. Department of Transportation Research and Special Programs 1035 Parkway Avenue Administration P.O.
  • Newark Community Impacts of Mobile Source Emissions a Community-Based Participatory Research Analysis

    Newark Community Impacts of Mobile Source Emissions a Community-Based Participatory Research Analysis

    Newark Community Impacts of Mobile Source Emissions A Community-Based Participatory Research Analysis November 2020 Contents Introduction and Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 1 Study Design and Local Community Leadership and Engagement .............................................................. 3 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Phase One: Emissions Inventory .............................................................................................................. 4 Phase Two: Emissions Evaluation ............................................................................................................ 6 Key Findings ................................................................................................................................................. 8 Discussion ................................................................................................................................................... 17 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................................. 19 Table of Figures Figure 1. Key Demographics of Study Area..................................................................................................3 Figure 2. Geographic Scope and Study Area.................................................................................................4
  • The Newark Public Schools Historical Preservation Committee MISSION

    The Newark Public Schools Historical Preservation Committee MISSION

    The Newark Public Schools Historical Preservation Committee MISSION The Newark Public Schools Historical Preservation Committee is a 501 (c)(3) organization formed in 2009 to chronicle the district’s rich heritage by preserving its documents, artifacts and school buildings. It is our intention to share the history of the Newark Public Schools with students and the greater com- munity at a permanent historic site. This Distinguished Alumni Directory is the first in a series of publications that we hope will help to inform and instill a sense of pride in our Newark history. 1 NEWARK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTINGUISHED ALUMNI The Newark Public School District Historical Preservation Committee GOALS ≈ To establish a policy and guidelines for the preservation and archiving of historically valuable artifacts of the Newark Public Schools. ≈ To establish repositories within the schools for the col- lection and preservation of valuable documents and materials relating to the history of the school district which otherwise would be lost. ≈ To develop and keep current a chronology of significant events in the Newark Public Schools. ≈ To identify and nominate public schools for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. ≈ To establish a permanent Newark Public Schools museum. ≈ To have students become involved with the archiving and chronicling process. To develop collaborative work- ing relationships with alumni associations and other preservation organizations. 2 NEWARK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTINGUISHED ALUMNI JANET LIPPMAN ABU-LUGHOD (Weequahic/1945) (1928–2013) Urban sociologist; expert on the history and dynamics of the World System and Middle Eastern cities; taught for twenty years at Northeastern; retired in 1988 as professor of sociology and historical research on the Gradu- ate Faculty of the New School for Social Research; her thirteen books include the classic work: Cairo: 100 Years of the City Victorious.
  • SLT I Action Plan

    SLT I Action Plan

    SLT I Action Plan SLT I is divided into SLT I Central (covering parts of the Central Ward and the East Ward west of McCarter Highway) and SLT I East (covering the Ironbound section). These are the parts of the city that were settled first and as such have many of the oldest schools, most in educationally obsolete facilities that are in poor condition. The cost to remedy program space deficiencies, which in many cases include restructuring classrooms sized less then 500 square feet, would exceed replacement costs and result in more gross square feet per student than new construction. Figure C.1 Most existing sites are too small to accept additions to provide the needed space, much less provide for recreation and parking. In many cases there EXISTING PROPOSED is no practical way to expand existing sites without major disruption to residential neighborhoods, and no space to relocate students while ENTIRE SLT buildings are under construction/renovation. (20) Buildings (12) Buildings Incl. (4) Annexes No Annexes Based on this analysis, most SLT I school buildings will be replaced as PK-8 schools based on a “house plan” configuration. The plan for SLT I includes eight new replacement schools, the existing East Side High building ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS renovated as a new PK-8 school, and the renovation and/or expansion of two (6) Buildings (0) Buildings existing schools. This plan is still consistent with the approved 2002 update. A Incl. (3) Early Childhood Centers summary of the existing and proposed use of each building is provided in Table C.2.
  • ENCLAVES of MEMORY Michael Immerso

    ENCLAVES of MEMORY Michael Immerso

    ENCLAVES OF MEMORY Michael Immerso Sons of Italy Parade On September 20, 1916, fifteen thousand Italian Americans paraded along Broad Street in an outpouring of pride and patriotism that concurrently celebrated the 46th anniversary of Italy’s unification, and the 250th anniversary of the founding of the City of Newark. At the head of one of the fraternal lodges was a young girl dressed as Italia, and a little boy depicting Uncle Sam. The Sons of Italy, organizers of the event, chose to present the Italian community in a deliberate manner. Italian flags and floats draped with red, white, and green bunting were twined with American flags and expressions of loyalty to the adopted country and city. The message was clear: we are proud natives of Italy; we are loyal citizens of the United States. And in some ways, the parade can be understood as a high-water mark for Newark’s Italian community. Migration: 1880-1920 The peak period of Italian migration to the United States ran from approximately 1880 to 1920. During those years approximately four million Italians immigrated to the United States. The vast majority came from Italy’s southern provinces. Newark’s several Italian enclaves took shape during these peak years. In 1880 there were 407 Italians residing in the City. By 1910 the number had risen to 20,000 and Newark had the fifth largest Italian population among American cities. By 1920 there were 27,465 Italians living in Newark. The new arrivals called it NEVARCA. They settled in all parts of the city. Newark’s Italian Enclaves Prior to the great migration of Southern Italians to the United States, a small Northern Italian enclave was located on BANK STREET and Market Street near the Essex County Courthouse.
  • School District Reform in Newark: Within- and Between-School Changes in Achievement Growth

    School District Reform in Newark: Within- and Between-School Changes in Achievement Growth

    SCHOOL DISTRICT REFORM IN NEWARK: WITHIN- AND BETWEEN-SCHOOL CHANGES IN ACHIEVEMENT GROWTH MARK CHIN, THOMAS J. KANE, WHITNEY KOZAKOWSKI, BETH E. SCHUELER, AND DOUGLAS O. STAIGER* In the 2011–12 school year, the Newark Public School district (NPS) launched a set of educational reforms supported by a gift from Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan. Using data from 2008–09 through 2015–16, the authors evaluate the change in Newark students’ achievement growth relative to similar students and schools elsewhere in New Jersey. They measure achievement growth using a ‘‘value-added’’ model, controlling for prior achieve- ment, demographics, and peer characteristics. By the fifth year of reform, Newark saw statistically significant gains in English language arts (ELA) achievement growth and no significant change in math achievement growth. Perhaps because of the disruptive nature of the reforms, growth declined initially before rebounding in later years. Much of the improvement was attributed to shifting enrollment from lower- to higher-growth district and charter schools. n the fall of 2010, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, New Jersey I Governor Chris Christie, and Newark Mayor Corey Booker announced a school improvement effort in the Newark Public School district (NPS), to be aided by a $100 million gift from Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan. This *MARK CHIN is a PhD Candidate at Harvard University. THOMAS J. KANE is the Walter H. Gale Professor of Education at Harvard University. WHITNEY KOZAKOWSKI is a PhD Candidate at Harvard University. BETH E. SCHUELER is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Harvard University. DOUGLAS O. STAIGER is a Professor at Dartmouth College.
  • Opportunity Newark

    Opportunity Newark

    OpportunityNewark: Jobs and Community Development for the 21st Century ICIC Initiative for a Competitive Inner City Table of Contents Executive Summary . 3 Introduction . 23 Cluster Action Plans Transportation, Logistics, & Distribution . 26 Health Services . 35 Education & Knowledge Creation . 45 Entertainment, Arts & Retail . 51 Business Environment Action Plans Economic Development Infrastructure . 55 City Perception: Image and Identity . 62 Urban Business Investment . 67 Workforce Development Infrastructure . 71 Implementation . 78 Conclusion . 79 Acknowledgements . 80 Executive Summary Newark is an important economic center for the state of New Jersey. It is home to Port Newark, which, combined with the Elizabeth Marine Terminal, is the largest port on the East Development Projects Coast and 3rd largest port in the country; has the largest education center in the state with over 50,000 students Entertainment, Arts & Leisure and faculty at its five colleges and universities; houses the Newark Arena premiere arts and cultural center in the state, the New Jer- Newark Arena Hotel sey Performing Arts Center; and has flourishing cultural Sports/Entertainment Themed Retail hubs and neighborhoods, such as the Ironbound District. Smithsonian Sponsored Museum of For more than ten years, Newark has been building upon its African/American Music competitive assets leading to its current revitalization. Ice Skating Facility & Sports Fitness Center Community Theater Years of planning and investments have led to an unprece- dented influx of development efforts, market-rate housing, Residential Housing infrastructure projects and private investments. Major University Residences redevelopment projects such as the new Newark Arena Mulberry Commons and associated hotel and retail initiatives, the Joseph G. Trophy Building Minish Passaic River Waterfront Park redevelopment, the 1180 Raymond Boulevard minor league baseball stadium, the new Newark Light Rail Hahnes/Griffith Link and over 10,000 units of planned downtown housing Westinghouse are tangible signs of Newark’s renewal.
  • In Loving Memory 1

    In Loving Memory 1

    Coach Les Fein A Weequahic Legend Passes Within a span of five years in the 1960's, Les Fein's basketball teams won three state Group IV basketball championships and the 1967 squad was the best in the nation By Phil Yourish, 1964 I thought he was invincible. To a Weequahic guy who grew and his wife had with Weight And why not? After all, he was up in the bleachers of our tiny Watchers. the COACH. When I heard in gym watching the magical February that he had a heart moments of basketball unfold It needs to be noted that Les attack and a stroke, I believed, on the court before me, his was more than just sports and even at age 88, this would be stories about his teams and his basketball. He was a very just another challenge that he players were riveting - and he well-rounded individual with a would overcome. provided the emotion with the wide variety of interests who details. was an avid reader, enjoyed As the Executive Director of the music, art and theater, and was Weequahic High School As an ardent fan, the highlight very knowledgeable about local Alumni Association, I got to of my high school years was the and world affairs. know Les Fein over the recent Weequahic basketball team. years in a way that I never knew Could there be a finer moment Recently, he sent me an article him when he was my physical than when Weequahic beat that he wrote and wanted me to and health education teacher at Westfield to capture its first critique.
  • ANNUAL REPORT of the Ironbound Business Improvement District

    ANNUAL REPORT of the Ironbound Business Improvement District

    ANNUAL REPORT OF THE March 16 IRONBOUND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT 2015 DISTRICT IRONBOUND BUSINESS Seth A. Grossman, IMPROVEMENT Executive Director DISTRICT, NEWARK, NJ 1 IRONBOUND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Newark, NJ 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS IBID BOARD OF DIRECTORS & STAFF ............................................... 3 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 4 Promise of the IBID ............................................................. 6 IBID Strategy ...................................................................... 6 FIRST BLOCK TASK FORCE ............................................................... 7 PETER FRANCISCO PARK PROPOSAL ............................................... 10 IRONBOUND ARTS & CULTURAL CENTER ........................................ 18 MARKETING/ COMMUNICATIONS SYNOPSIS .................................. 25 Marketing & Communications ............................................ 26 Online Marketing ............................................................... 30 NewarkBound Magazine .................................................... 31 OUTDOOR MAINTENANCE & QUALITY OF LIFE ............................... 40 Statistics ............................................................................ 40 Snow Removal ................................................................... 40 E-Waste ............................................................................. 41 Report of First Block Task Force .......................................... 42
  • Ironbound Community Master Plan 2001

    Ironbound Community Master Plan 2001

    IRONBOUND COMMUNITY MASTER PLAN 2001 PLANNING PRINCIPLES Preserve the physical character and vitality of the Ironbound neighborhood by establishing and enforcing strong design and planning standards. Control transition areas between Downtown Newark and the Ironbound to prevent encroachment on the neighborhood. Create opportunities for growth and redevelopment within commercial areas while respecting the character of the neighborhood. Preserve strong industrial areas for industrial and related uses. Permit residential development in appropriate locations at appropriate densities. Preserve residential quality of life by protecting residential areas from incompatible uses and activities, such as excessive noise and pollution. Convert the waterfront into a major open space resource for the community, city and region. Link the waterfront to the neighborhood, and link schools and open spaces within the neighborhood, through green corridors. Provide adequate sites for new schools, playgrounds, and community facilities. Link scattered residential areas to the heart of the neighborhood. Create an environmentally sound community by adding green areas, planting trees, responsibly cleaning contaminated sites, and reducing air and water pollution. Create a safe and welcoming environment for pedestrians and users of public transportation Relieve congestion through a variety of means, including off-street parking garages, resident permit parking, and public transportation improvements. PLANNING AREAS 1. CBD TRANSITION DISTRICTS Expansion of the Central Business District (CBD) east of the Amtrak main line into the Ironbound will have an adverse impact on the character and livability of the area, and should be prevented. Key areas between the Amtrak line and the heart of the neighborhood should be desig-nated as transition areas, with appropriate land use and development standards to enable them to be redeveloped while maintaining the character of the community.