DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2101.11761V1 [Physics.Soc-Ph] 28 Jan 2021 Rpitsbitdt Hsc Reports Physics to Submitted Preprint Oa Ewrs N Ewr Fntok.Teitnino Th of Intention the Networks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2101.11761V1 [Physics.Soc-Ph] 28 Jan 2021 Rpitsbitdt Hsc Reports Physics to Submitted Preprint Oa Ewrs N Ewr Fntok.Teitnino Th of Intention the Networks Percolation on complex networks: Theory and application a b c,b,d, a c e Ming Li , Run-Ran Liu , Linyuan L¨u ∗, Mao-Bin Hu , Shuqi Xu , Yi-Cheng Zhang aDepartment of Thermal Science and Energy Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, P. R. China bAlibaba Research Center for Complexity Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, 310036, P. R. China cInstitute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, P. R. China dBeijing Computational Science Research Center, Beijing, 100193, P. R. China eDepartment of Physics, University of Fribourg, Fribourg CH-1700, Switzerland Abstract In the last two decades, network science has blossomed and influenced various fields, such as statistical physics, com- puter science, biology and sociology, from the perspective of the heterogeneous interaction patterns of components composing the complex systems. As a paradigm for random and semi-random connectivity, percolation model plays a key role in the development of network science and its applications. On the one hand, the concepts and analytical methods, such as the emergence of the giant cluster, the finite-size scaling, and the mean-field method, which are intimately related to the percolation theory, are employed to quantify and solve some core problems of networks. On the other hand, the insights into the percolation theory also facilitate the understanding of networked systems, such as robustness, epidemic spreading, vital node identification, and community detection. Meanwhile, network science also brings some new issues to the percolation theory itself, such as percolation of strong heterogeneous systems, topolog- ical transition of networks beyond pairwise interactions, and emergence of a giant cluster with mutual connections. So far, the percolation theory has already percolated into the researches of structure analysis and dynamic modeling in network science. Understanding the percolation theory should help the study of many fields in network science, including the still opening questions in the frontiers of networks, such as networks beyond pairwise interactions, tem- poral networks, and network of networks. The intention of this paper is to offer an overview of these applications, as well as the basic theory of percolation transition on network systems. Keywords: Percolation, Complex Network, Network Structure, Network Dynamics, Phase Transition and Critical Phenomena arXiv:2101.11761v1 [physics.soc-ph] 28 Jan 2021 ∗Corresponding author Email address: [email protected] (Linyuan L¨u) Preprint submitted to Physics Reports January 29, 2021 Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Classicalpercolation . ............... 2 1.1.1 Percolationprocessinrandommedia . ............... 2 1.1.2 Percolationmodelonlattices. ............... 3 1.1.3 Percolationtransition. .............. 5 1.2 Networks ........................................ ......... 6 1.2.1 Networkrepresentation. ............. 6 1.2.2 Statisticalproperties . .............. 6 1.2.3 Networkmodels ................................. ........ 7 1.3 Outlineofthereport.............................. .............. 9 2 Classical percolation on networks 9 2.1 Problemdescription.... .... ... .... .... .... ... .... .............. 9 2.2 Analyticmethodbasedonbranchingprocess . ................... 10 2.2.1 Behaviorsofthegiantcluster . .............. 10 2.2.2 Behaviorsoffiniteclusters . .............. 12 2.3 Pottsmodelformulation . .............. 13 2.3.1 Fortuin-Kasteleynclusterrepresentation . ..................... 14 2.3.2 Relationwiththemean-fieldequations. ................. 15 2.4 Messagepassingmethod . ............. 17 2.5 Phasetransitionandcriticalphenomena . .................... 18 2.5.1 Percolationthreshold. ............. 18 2.5.2 Scalingbehaviors. .... ... .... .... .... ... .... ... ........... 20 2.6 Onclusteredandcorrelatednetworks. ................... 21 2.6.1 Networkswithlowclustering . ............. 22 2.6.2 Networkswithhighclustering . .............. 22 2.6.3 Correlatednetworks . ........... 24 2.7 Ondirectednetworks .............................. ............. 24 2.8 Algorithmfornetworkpercolation . .................. 26 3 Network-specific percolation models 27 3.1 k-corepercolation............................... .............. 27 3.1.1 Modelandphasetransitioncharacteristics . .................... 27 3.1.2 Variantsandrelatedmodels . ............. 29 3.2 Percolation on interdependent/multiplexnetworks. 36 3.2.1 Modelandphasetransitioncharacteristics . .................... 36 3.2.2 Algorithmsforreducingtimecomplexity . ................. 39 3.2.3 Variantsandrelatedmodels . ............. 39 3.3 Explosivepercolation. ............... 39 3.3.1 Achlioptasprocess .... ... .... .... .... ... .... ... ........... 39 3.3.2 Phasetransitioncharacteristics . .................. 40 3.4 Percolation transition during the growth of networks . ........................ 41 3.4.1 Growingrandomnetwork . .......... 41 3.4.2 Variantsandrelatedmodels . ............. 43 4 Applications to network structural analysis 43 4.1 Hierarchicalstructureofnetworks . ................... 43 4.1.1 Tree-likenetworks .... ... .... .... .... ... .... ... ........... 43 4.1.2 k-shellstructure.. .... ... .... .... .... ... .... .. ............ 46 4.2 Networkrobustness............................... ............. 47 2 4.2.1 Singlenetworks................................ .......... 47 4.2.2 Multiplexnetworks. ........... 48 4.3 Communitydetection... .... ... .... .... .... ... .... ............. 50 4.4 Vitalnodesidentification . ................ 51 4.5 Networkobservability. ............... 52 5 Applications to network dynamics 52 5.1 Epidemicspreadingonnetworks . ................ 52 5.1.1 SImodel ....................................... ...... 53 5.1.2 SIRmodel ...................................... ...... 54 5.1.3 SISmodel...................................... ....... 56 5.1.4 Immunization.................................. ......... 56 5.2 Cascadingprocessonnetworks. ................ 57 5.3 Trafficandtransportation ................................. ........ 59 5.3.1 Percolation in urban trafficnetworks............................... 59 5.3.2 Percolationinconnectedvehiclenetworks . ................... 60 5.3.3 Percolation in urban trafficplanning............................... 61 5.3.4 Percolation in post-disaster trafficnetworks ........................... 61 5.4 Evolutionarygame ................................ ............ 62 6 Discussion and outlook 62 1 1. Introduction In contrast to many other modern research fields, the network problem is often easy to define by abstracting from everyday life [1, 2]. For examples, how many people an epidemic can infect in a social contact network, whether a communication network can maintain its function after an intentional attack, which node has the largest impact in a social network, and so on [3–6]. The key point of these problems with network involved can be summarized as a cluster forming process within a chosen fraction of nodes, those might be infected people, preserved nodes after an intentional attack, or individuals with the same opinion. In principle, these processes are easy to define, however, not so easy to solve. Fortunately, in statistical physics, a profound theoretical system, called percolation theory, just touches this prob- lem, i.e., the behaviors of a networked system when some of nodes or links are not available [7]. Indeed, when the network science was just a new rising topic, the percolation theory has already been widely used for explaining empirical results, and solving models [2]. Now, after more than twenty years’ development of network science, the percolation theory, including conceptions, analytical methods, and algorithms, can be found almost in all the research fields of network science. It is known that the classical percolation in statistical physics only considers regular lattices, therefore, with these applications to complex networks, the percolation theory itself also has been enriched and developed. In recent hot areas of network science, such as higher-order networks [8, 9] and networks beyond pairwise interactions [10], models and methods of percolation have still been widely touched. This is obviously because the connection property must always be a key point to understand network structure and dynamics. Due to importance of the percolation theory in the study of complex networks, almost all the review articles about networks have the relevant sections to introduce distinguishable developments and applications of percolation theory on complex networks, however, a systematic comparison and summary specifically from the perspective of percolation is still absent. This review article aims to fill this gap, and comb the scattered discussions on the network percolation and its applications, which can facilitate a wide area of sciences, ranging from physics and computer science to biology and sociology, as well as various branches of probability theory in mathematics. 1.1. Classical percolation Percolation now usually refers to a class of models that describe geometric features of random media. In statistical physics, percolation theory is often accompanied by scaling law, fractal, self-organization criticality, and renormaliza- tion, which are all of immense importance theoretically in many diverse fields of physics [7]. Therefore, percolation has long served as a basic ideal model for demonstrating phase transition and critical phenomena. However, quite apart from the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Optimal Subgraph Structures in Scale-Free Configuration
    Submitted to the Annals of Applied Probability OPTIMAL SUBGRAPH STRUCTURES IN SCALE-FREE CONFIGURATION MODELS , By Remco van der Hofstad∗ §, Johan S. H. van , , Leeuwaarden∗ ¶ and Clara Stegehuis∗ k Eindhoven University of Technology§, Tilburg University¶ and Twente Universityk Subgraphs reveal information about the geometry and function- alities of complex networks. For scale-free networks with unbounded degree fluctuations, we obtain the asymptotics of the number of times a small connected graph occurs as a subgraph or as an induced sub- graph. We obtain these results by analyzing the configuration model with degree exponent τ (2, 3) and introducing a novel class of op- ∈ timization problems. For any given subgraph, the unique optimizer describes the degrees of the vertices that together span the subgraph. We find that subgraphs typically occur between vertices with specific degree ranges. In this way, we can count and characterize all sub- graphs. We refrain from double counting in the case of multi-edges, essentially counting the subgraphs in the erased configuration model. 1. Introduction Scale-free networks often have degree distributions that follow power laws with exponent τ (2, 3) [1, 11, 22, 34]. Many net- ∈ works have been reported to satisfy these conditions, including metabolic networks, the internet and social networks. Scale-free networks come with the presence of hubs, i.e., vertices of extremely high degrees. Another property of real-world scale-free networks is that the clustering coefficient (the probability that two uniformly chosen neighbors of a vertex are neighbors themselves) decreases with the vertex degree [4, 10, 24, 32, 34], again following a power law.
    [Show full text]
  • Poisson Representations of Branching Markov and Measure-Valued
    The Annals of Probability 2011, Vol. 39, No. 3, 939–984 DOI: 10.1214/10-AOP574 c Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2011 POISSON REPRESENTATIONS OF BRANCHING MARKOV AND MEASURE-VALUED BRANCHING PROCESSES By Thomas G. Kurtz1 and Eliane R. Rodrigues2 University of Wisconsin, Madison and UNAM Representations of branching Markov processes and their measure- valued limits in terms of countable systems of particles are con- structed for models with spatially varying birth and death rates. Each particle has a location and a “level,” but unlike earlier con- structions, the levels change with time. In fact, death of a particle occurs only when the level of the particle crosses a specified level r, or for the limiting models, hits infinity. For branching Markov pro- cesses, at each time t, conditioned on the state of the process, the levels are independent and uniformly distributed on [0,r]. For the limiting measure-valued process, at each time t, the joint distribu- tion of locations and levels is conditionally Poisson distributed with mean measure K(t) × Λ, where Λ denotes Lebesgue measure, and K is the desired measure-valued process. The representation simplifies or gives alternative proofs for a vari- ety of calculations and results including conditioning on extinction or nonextinction, Harris’s convergence theorem for supercritical branch- ing processes, and diffusion approximations for processes in random environments. 1. Introduction. Measure-valued processes arise naturally as infinite sys- tem limits of empirical measures of finite particle systems. A number of ap- proaches have been developed which preserve distinct particles in the limit and which give a representation of the measure-valued process as a transfor- mation of the limiting infinite particle system.
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting Statistically Significant Communities
    1 Detecting Statistically Significant Communities Zengyou He, Hao Liang, Zheng Chen, Can Zhao, Yan Liu Abstract—Community detection is a key data analysis problem across different fields. During the past decades, numerous algorithms have been proposed to address this issue. However, most work on community detection does not address the issue of statistical significance. Although some research efforts have been made towards mining statistically significant communities, deriving an analytical solution of p-value for one community under the configuration model is still a challenging mission that remains unsolved. The configuration model is a widely used random graph model in community detection, in which the degree of each node is preserved in the generated random networks. To partially fulfill this void, we present a tight upper bound on the p-value of a single community under the configuration model, which can be used for quantifying the statistical significance of each community analytically. Meanwhile, we present a local search method to detect statistically significant communities in an iterative manner. Experimental results demonstrate that our method is comparable with the competing methods on detecting statistically significant communities. Index Terms—Community Detection, Random Graphs, Configuration Model, Statistical Significance. F 1 INTRODUCTION ETWORKS are widely used for modeling the structure function that is able to always achieve the best performance N of complex systems in many fields, such as biology, in all possible scenarios. engineering, and social science. Within the networks, some However, most of these objective functions (metrics) do vertices with similar properties will form communities that not address the issue of statistical significance of commu- have more internal connections and less external links.
    [Show full text]
  • Image Segmentation Combining Markov Random Fields and Dirichlet Processes
    ANR meeting Image segmentation combining Markov Random Fields and Dirichlet Processes Jessica SODJO IMS, Groupe Signal Image, Talence Encadrants : A. Giremus, J.-F. Giovannelli, F. Caron, N. Dobigeon Jessica SODJO ANR meeting 1 / 28 ANR meeting Plan 1 Introduction 2 Segmentation using DP models Mixed MRF / DP model Inference : Swendsen-Wang algorithm 3 Hierarchical segmentation with shared classes Principle HDP theory 4 Conclusion and perspective Jessica SODJO ANR meeting 2 / 28 ANR meeting Introduction Segmentation – partition of an image in K homogeneous regions called classes – label the pixels : pixel i $ zi 2 f1;:::; K g Bayesian approach – prior on the distribution of the pixels – all the pixels in a class have the same distribution characterized by a parameter vector Uk – Markov Random Fields (MRF) : exploit the similarity of pixels in the same neighbourhood Constraint : K must be fixed a priori Idea : use the BNP models to directly estimate K Jessica SODJO ANR meeting 3 / 28 ANR meeting Segmentation using DP models Plan 1 Introduction 2 Segmentation using DP models Mixed MRF / DP model Inference : Swendsen-Wang algorithm 3 Hierarchical segmentation with shared classes Principle HDP theory 4 Conclusion and perspective Jessica SODJO ANR meeting 4 / 28 ANR meeting Segmentation using DP models Notations – N is the number of pixels – Y is the observed image – Z = fz1;:::; zN g – Π = fA1;:::; AK g is a partition and m = fm1;:::; mK g with mk = jAk j A1 A2 m1 = 1 m2 = 5 A3 m3 = 6 mK = 4 AK FIGURE: Example of partition Jessica SODJO ANR
    [Show full text]
  • Lecturenotes 4 MCMC I – Contents
    Lecturenotes 4 MCMC I – Contents 1. Statistical Physics and Potts Models 2. Sampling and Re-weighting 3. Importance Sampling and Markov Chain Monte Carlo 4. The Metropolis Algorithm 5. The Heatbath Algorithm (Gibbs Sampler) 6. Start and Equilibration 7. Energy Checks 8. Specific Heat 1 Statistical Physics and Potts Model MC simulations of systems described by the Gibbs canonical ensemble aim at calculating estimators of physical observables at a temperature T . In the following we choose units so that β = 1/T and consider the calculation of the expectation value of an observable O. Mathematically all systems on a computer are discrete, because a finite word length has to be used. Hence, K X (k) Ob = Ob(β) = hOi = Z−1 O(k) e−β E (1) k=1 K X (k) where Z = Z(β) = e−β E (2) k=1 is the partition function. The index k = 1,...,K labels all configurations (or microstates) of the system, and E(k) is the (internal) energy of configuration k. To distinguish the configuration index from other indices, it is put in parenthesis. 2 We introduce generalized Potts models in an external magnetic field on d- dimensional hypercubic lattices with periodic boundary conditions. Without being overly complicated, these models are general enough to illustrate the essential features we are interested in. In addition, various subcases of these models are by themselves of physical interest. Generalizations of the algorithmic concepts to other models are straightforward, although technical complications may arise. We define the energy function of the system by (k) (k) (k) −β E = −β E0 + HM (3) where (k) X (k) (k) (k) (k) 2 d N E = −2 J (q , q ) δ(q , q ) + (4) 0 ij i j i j q hiji N 1 for qi = qj (k) X (k) with δ(qi, qj) = and M = 2 δ(1, qi ) .
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach Scaling Limits in Models of Statistical Mechanics
    Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach Report No. 41/2018 DOI: 10.4171/OWR/2018/41 Scaling Limits in Models of Statistical Mechanics Organised by Dmitry Ioffe, Haifa Gady Kozma, Rehovot Fabio Toninelli, Lyon 9 September – 15 September 2018 Abstract. This conference (part of a long running series) aims to cover the interplay between probability and mathematical statistical mechanics. Specific topics addressed during the 22 talks include: Universality and critical phenomena, disordered models, Gaussian free field (GFF), random planar graphs and unimodular planar maps, reinforced random walks and non-linear σ-models, non-equilibrium dynamics. Less stress is given to topics which have running series of Oberwolfach conferences devoted to them specifically, such as random matrices or integrable models and KPZ universality class. There were 50 participants, including 9 postdocs and graduate students, working in diverse intertwining areas of probability, statistical mechanics and mathematical physics. Subject classification: MSC: 60,82; IMU: 10,13. Introduction by the Organisers This workshop was a sequel to a MFO conference, by the same organizers, which took place in 2015. More broadly, it is a sequel to MFO conferences in 2006, 2009 and 2012, organised by Ken Alexander, Marek Biskup, Remco van der Hofstad and Vladas Sidoravicius. The main focus of the conference remained on probabilistic and analytic methods of non-integrable statistical mechanics. With respect to the previous editions, greater emphasis was put on statistical mechanics models on groups and general graphs, as a lot has happened in this arena recently. The list of 50 participants reflects our attempts to maintain an optimal balance between diverse fields, leading experts and promising young researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • Probabilistic and Geometric Methods in Last Passage Percolation
    Probabilistic and geometric methods in last passage percolation by Milind Hegde A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mathematics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Alan Hammond, Co‐chair Professor Shirshendu Ganguly, Co‐chair Professor Fraydoun Rezakhanlou Professor Alistair Sinclair Spring 2021 Probabilistic and geometric methods in last passage percolation Copyright 2021 by Milind Hegde 1 Abstract Probabilistic and geometric methods in last passage percolation by Milind Hegde Doctor of Philosophy in Mathematics University of California, Berkeley Professor Alan Hammond, Co‐chair Professor Shirshendu Ganguly, Co‐chair Last passage percolation (LPP) refers to a broad class of models thought to lie within the Kardar‐ Parisi‐Zhang universality class of one‐dimensional stochastic growth models. In LPP models, there is a planar random noise environment through which directed paths travel; paths are as‐ signed a weight based on their journey through the environment, usually by, in some sense, integrating the noise over the path. For given points y and x, the weight from y to x is defined by maximizing the weight over all paths from y to x. A path which achieves the maximum weight is called a geodesic. A few last passage percolation models are exactly solvable, i.e., possess what is called integrable structure. This gives rise to valuable information, such as explicit probabilistic resampling prop‐ erties, distributional convergence information, or one point tail bounds of the weight profile as the starting point y is fixed and the ending point x varies.
    [Show full text]
  • Coalescence in Bellman-Harris and Multi-Type Branching Processes Jyy-I Joy Hong Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2011 Coalescence in Bellman-Harris and multi-type branching processes Jyy-i Joy Hong Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Hong, Jyy-i Joy, "Coalescence in Bellman-Harris and multi-type branching processes" (2011). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 10103. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/10103 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Coalescence in Bellman-Harris and multi-type branching processes by Jyy-I Hong A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Mathematics Program of Study Committee: Krishna B. Athreya, Major Professor Clifford Bergman Dan Nordman Ananda Weerasinghe Paul E. Sacks Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2011 Copyright c Jyy-I Hong, 2011. All rights reserved. ii DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this thesis to my parents Wan-Fu Hong and Wen-Hsiang Tseng for their un- conditional love and support. Without them, the completion of this work would not have been possible. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . vii ABSTRACT . viii CHAPTER 1. PRELIMINARIES . 1 1.1 Introduction . 1 1.2 Discrete-time Single-type Galton-Watson Branching Processes .
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 13: Financial Disasters and Econophysics
    Lecture 13: Financial Disasters and Econophysics Big problem: Power laws in economy and finance vs Great Moderation: (Source: http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/power-curves-what- natural-and-economic-disasters-have-in-common Analysis of big data, discontinuous change especially of financial sector, where efficient market theory missed the boat has drawn attention of specialists from physics and mathematics. Wall Street“quant”models may have helped the market implode; and collapse spawned econophysics work on finance instability. NATURE PHYSICS March 2013 Volume 9, No 3 pp119-197 : “The 2008 financial crisis has highlighted major limitations in the modelling of financial and economic systems. However, an emerging field of research at the frontiers of both physics and economics aims to provide a more fundamental understanding of economic networks, as well as practical insights for policymakers. In this Nature Physics Focus, physicists and economists consider the state-of-the-art in the application of network science to finance.” The financial crisis has made us aware that financial markets are very complex networks that, in many cases, we do not really understand and that can easily go out of control. This idea, which would have been shocking only 5 years ago, results from a number of precise reasons. What does physics bring to social science problems? 1- Heterogeneous agents – strange since physics draws strength from electron is electron is electron but STATISTICAL MECHANICS --- minority game, finance artificial agents, 2- Facility with huge data sets – data-mining for regularities in time series with open eyes. 3- Network analysis 4- Percolation/other models of “phase transition”, which directs attention at boundary conditions AN INTRODUCTION TO ECONOPHYSICS Correlations and Complexity in Finance ROSARIO N.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 16: March 12 Instructor: Alistair Sinclair
    CS271 Randomness & Computation Spring 2020 Lecture 16: March 12 Instructor: Alistair Sinclair Disclaimer: These notes have not been subjected to the usual scrutiny accorded to formal publications. They may be distributed outside this class only with the permission of the Instructor. 16.1 The Giant Component in Gn,p In an earlier lecture we briefly mentioned the threshold for the existence of a “giant” component in a random graph, i.e., a connected component containing a constant fraction of the vertices. We now derive this threshold rigorously, using both Chernoff bounds and the useful machinery of branching processes. We work c with our usual model of random graphs, Gn,p, and look specifically at the range p = n , for some constant c. Our goal will be to prove: c Theorem 16.1 For G ∈ Gn,p with p = n for constant c, we have: 1. For c < 1, then a.a.s. the largest connected component of G is of size O(log n). 2. For c > 1, then a.a.s. there exists a single largest component of G of size βn(1 + o(1)), where β is the unique solution in (0, 1) to β + e−βc = 1. Moreover, the next largest component in G has size O(log n). Here, and throughout this lecture, we use the phrase “a.a.s.” (asymptotically almost surely) to denote an event that holds with probability tending to 1 as n → ∞. This behavior is shown pictorially in Figure 16.1. For c < 1, G consists of a collection of small components of size at most O(log n) (which are all “tree-like”), while for c > 1 a single “giant” component emerges that contains a constant fraction of the vertices, with the remaining vertices all belonging to tree-like components of size O(log n).
    [Show full text]
  • Processes on Complex Networks. Percolation
    Chapter 5 Processes on complex networks. Percolation 77 Up till now we discussed the structure of the complex networks. The actual reason to study this structure is to understand how this structure influences the behavior of random processes on networks. I will talk about two such processes. The first one is the percolation process. The second one is the spread of epidemics. There are a lot of open problems in this area, the main of which can be innocently formulated as: How the network topology influences the dynamics of random processes on this network. We are still quite far from a definite answer to this question. 5.1 Percolation 5.1.1 Introduction to percolation Percolation is one of the simplest processes that exhibit the critical phenomena or phase transition. This means that there is a parameter in the system, whose small change yields a large change in the system behavior. To define the percolation process, consider a graph, that has a large connected component. In the classical settings, percolation was actually studied on infinite graphs, whose vertices constitute the set Zd, and edges connect each vertex with nearest neighbors, but we consider general random graphs. We have parameter ϕ, which is the probability that any edge present in the underlying graph is open or closed (an event with probability 1 − ϕ) independently of the other edges. Actually, if we talk about edges being open or closed, this means that we discuss bond percolation. It is also possible to talk about the vertices being open or closed, and this is called site percolation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 21 Epidemics
    From the book Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World. By David Easley and Jon Kleinberg. Cambridge University Press, 2010. Complete preprint on-line at http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/kleinber/networks-book/ Chapter 21 Epidemics The study of epidemic disease has always been a topic where biological issues mix with social ones. When we talk about epidemic disease, we will be thinking of contagious diseases caused by biological pathogens — things like influenza, measles, and sexually transmitted diseases, which spread from person to person. Epidemics can pass explosively through a population, or they can persist over long time periods at low levels; they can experience sudden flare-ups or even wave-like cyclic patterns of increasing and decreasing prevalence. In extreme cases, a single disease outbreak can have a significant effect on a whole civilization, as with the epidemics started by the arrival of Europeans in the Americas [130], or the outbreak of bubonic plague that killed 20% of the population of Europe over a seven-year period in the 1300s [293]. 21.1 Diseases and the Networks that Transmit Them The patterns by which epidemics spread through groups of people is determined not just by the properties of the pathogen carrying it — including its contagiousness, the length of its infectious period, and its severity — but also by network structures within the population it is affecting. The social network within a population — recording who knows whom — determines a lot about how the disease is likely to spread from one person to another. But more generally, the opportunities for a disease to spread are given by a contact network: there is a node for each person, and an edge if two people come into contact with each other in a way that makes it possible for the disease to spread from one to the other.
    [Show full text]