DOCSLIB.ORG

2013-2017 Triennial Program Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Triennial Program Report California Boating and Waterways Commission Reporting Period: January 1, 2013 – June 30, 2017 Status report to the Governor and Legislative Committees on the programs of the California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways. Report Released July 2018 This page intentionally left blank 2 | P a g e Program Report California Boating and Waterways Commission Reporting Period: January 2013 - June 2017 Report Released July 2018 California Boating and Waterways Commission as of July 2018 Randy Short, Chair I Katherine Pettibone, Vice Chair Brian Cooley David O. Livingston Virginia Madueño Douglas W. Metz Frank Peralta California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways Lisa Ann L. Mangat I Director California State Parks Ramona Fernandez I Acting Deputy Director Division of Boating and Waterways 3 | P a g e Division of Boating and Waterways To provide safe and convenient public access to California's waterways and leadership in promoting safe, enjoyable and environmentally-sound recreational boating. 4 | P a g e Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 6 About the Commission ................................................................................................................................................................. 7 About the Division of Boating and Waterways ............................................................................................................... 7 Legislation 2012 – 2017 ............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Status of Regulations .................................................................................................................... 10 California Boater Card Program ......................................................................................................................................... 10 Programs and Grants Identified for Regulations ....................................................................................................... 10 Status of Loans and Grants ........................................................................................................... 11 Boating Safety and Boating Law Enforcement Financial Aid Grants ................................................................ 11 Boating Safety and Boating Law Enforcement Equipment Grants..................................................................... 13 Boating Safety and Boating Law Enforcement Training Grants ......................................................................... 18 Abandoned Watercraft Abatement Fund Grants ........................................................................................................ 20 Public Small Craft Harbor and Private Recreational Marina Loans .................................................................. 25 Boat Launching Facility Grants ........................................................................................................................................... 27 Non-Motorized Boat Launching Facility Grants .......................................................................................................... 32 Ramp Repair and Modification Grants ............................................................................................................................. 35 Federal Clean Vessel Act Grants .......................................................................................................................................... 37 Federal Boating Infrastructure Grants ............................................................................................................................ 41 Public Beach Erosion Control & Public Beach Restoration Grants ..................................................................... 43 Quagga and Zebra Mussel Infestation Prevention Grants ...................................................................................... 48 Aquatic Center Grants .............................................................................................................................................................. 53 5 | P a g e Introduction The California Boating and Waterways Commission (Commission) is required to prepare and submit a triennial program report to the Governor, the Assembly Committee on Water, Parks and Wildlife, the Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Water, the Senate Committee on Appropriations, and the Assembly Committee on Appropriations. This report must be developed with support and assistance from the California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways (DBW). As detailed in Harbors and Navigation Code (HNC) Section 82.3(g)(1), this report addresses the status of any regulations adopted or being considered by the DBW, and any loan or grant that has been or is being considered for a determination of eligibility. The reporting period of this document is January 1, 2013 through June 30, 2017. Some programs are on a state fiscal cycle, some are on a federal fiscal cycle and some are on a calendar year cycle. The data for each are collected accordingly. Information in each subsequent report will begin where the previous report ended to prevent either gaps or duplication. The California Boating and Waterways Commission Triennial Program Report combines and details specific DBW programs as required by Harbors and Navigation Code (HNC) §82.3(g)(1). The Commission would like to thank the DBW for its assistance in creating this report. Dana Point Marina 6 | P a g e About the Commission The Commission is authorized by th e HNC to advise the DBW and comment on all matters within its jurisdiction, and comment on all boating facility loans and grants proposed by the Division. Seven commissioners appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the State Senate comprise the Commission. Each commissioner's term runs for four years. The HNC specifies that in making appointments to the Commission, the Governor shall give primary consideration to the geographical location of the residences of members as related to boating activities and harbors. One member is required to be a private small craft harbor owner and operator, one member must belong to a recognized statewide organization representing recreational boaters, and one member must be an officer or employee of a local law enforcement agency responsible for enforcing boating laws. About the Division of Boating and Waterways The DBW was established in 1957 upon enactment of legislation supported by the recreational boating community. That legislation established a state boating agency dedicated to all aspects of recreational boating and a special account, Harbors and Watercraft Revolving Fund, to fund the department’s activities. In July 2013, the DBW merged with the California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR). The merger was part of Governor Brown’s 2012 Reorganization Plan to consolidate and simplify the state’s organizational structure. The plan added efficiencies by combining and streamlining duplicative functions, thereby reducing costs and saving taxpayer dollars. The merger left intact the major organizational structure of Boating and Waterways within the DPR, including it s principal mission, functions and funding for boating constituencies across the state. 7 | P a g e Legislation 2012 – 2017 In 2013, the DBW merged with the DPR and became a division. At the same time, the Commission’s roles and responsibilities evolved to better align with the division’s new placement. As a result, several legislative changes were necessary to create and update statute that reflected the merge of these two departments and the changes for the Commission. The following legislation addressed these changes: Assembly Bill 737 (Chapter 136, Statutes of 2012) This enabling legislation reorganized the Department of Boating and Waterways into a division within DPR. Additionally, this bill changed the responsibility and authority of the Commission to an advisory role. Senate Bill 820 (Chapter 353, Statutes of 2013) The Governor’s Reorganization Plan No. 2, provided conforming name changes to properly reflect DBW’s new position within DPR, and further modified duties between the Division and the Commission, including removing requirements for Commission approval prior to the Division making certain transfers, loans, or grants under various programs and other proposals, as specified. Below is further legislation that passed during the reporting period of this report: Assembly Bill 383 (Chapter 76, Statutes of 2013) This bill provided technical cleanup language to the HNC. Assembly Bill 8 (Chapter 401, Statutes of 2013) This bill extended the increased vessel registration fee, enacted by AB 118 (Chapter 750, Statutes of 2007) from 2016 to 2024. Senate Bill 1162 (Chapter 67, Statutes of 2014) This bill reclassifies several boating-related violations as infractions instead of misdemeanors. Senate Bill 1424 (Chapter 628, Statutes of 2014) This bill modified the land grant to the city of Martinez for the Martinez Marina and surrounding properties. Senate Bill 941 (Chapter 433, Statutes of 2014) This bill required the DBW to develop a vessel operator education program by January 1, 2018. This program, phased in over eight years, requires vessel operators to pass an exam and be issued a vessel operator card in order to operate a motorized
Recommended publications
  • Summer 2019 Vol. 15 No. 2 90Th Anniversary 2

    Summer 2019 Vol. 15 No. 2 90Th Anniversary 2

    SUMMER 2019 VOL. 15 NO. 2 THE MAGAZINE OF CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY MARITIME ACADEMY ` 90TH ANNIVERSARY 2 | OCEANOGRAPHY MAJOR 4 | COMMENCEMENT 12 From the President Ninety years ago, an act of the California State Legislature signed by Governor C.C. Young established the California Nautical School. The landscape…or seascape…of the maritime profession began to seismically shift almost immediately as—even before the first cadets arrived at the former U.S. Navy coaling sheds in Tiburon—the nation’s economy was sinking into the Great Depression. Yet, within a decade the United States, and Cal Maritime, would find itself in a swift build up to World War II. Our entire Academy history has been routinely, and sometimes unevenly, influenced and impacted by changes and events that range from geopolitical to national to local. In every case during the last 90 years, Cal Maritime continually adapted to meet the chal- lenges and ferret out the opportunities presented by events not of our making. THE CAL MARITIME CAMPUS IN THE 1980s. It is probably fitting then that this issue of Cal Maritime magazine, which unabashedly celebrates our Academy’s 90th Anniversary, includes stories highlighting the current PRESIDENT THOMAS A. CROPPER evolution of our Academy; from emerging academic offerings and curricula to continuing improvement of hands-on learning facilities to campus-wide efforts to increase sustain- able practices. Properly anticipating and responding to change—often the kinds of change brought on by technology, markets and society—has sustained our wonderful Academy and the maritime profession it serves for nine decades. Leading that evolution—whether it be on the grounds of your alma mater or in the maritime profession through the stature of our alumni—allows the Cal Maritime family to shape solutions to the ever-changing needs of the maritime and related industries.
  • State of California the Natural Resources Agency Department of Fish and Wildlife North Central Region

    State of California the Natural Resources Agency Department of Fish and Wildlife North Central Region

    State of California The Natural Resources Agency Department of Fish and Wildlife North Central Region Sugar Pine Reservoir, Placer County General Fish Survey October 4th, 2017 Mitch Lockhart Environmental Scientist December 28, 2017 Introduction Sugar Pine Reservoir is located in Placer County, approximately seven miles north of Foresthill, California (Figure 1) and sits amongst dense mixed-conifer forest at an elevation of 3,600 feet above mean sea level. The dam was built in 1979 to impound North Shirttail Creek and Forbes Creek, tributaries to the North Fork American River. When full, the reservoir stores approximately 6,900 acre-feet and has a surface area of 165 acres that services the community of Foresthill. The Tahoe National Forest manages the land and facilities around the reservoir, including a trail system, boat ramp, and two campgrounds to accommodate visitors. Figure 1: Google Earth overview image of Sugar Pine Reservoir, Placer County, California (retrieved Dec. 2017). The dam face is visible in the lower left corner of the photo. Shirttail Creek is visible in the upper right corner of the image and flows into the northern arm of the reservoir. Forbes Creek flows into the east arm of the reservoir and is visible in the right side of the image. Fish species known to occur in Sugar Pine Reservoir include: rainbow trout (RT; Oncorhynchus mykiss); brown trout (BN; Salmo trutta); spotted bass (SPB; Micropterus punctulatus); largemouth bass (LMB; Micropterus salmoides); smallmouth bass (SMB; Micropterus dolomieu); green sunfish (GSF; Lepomis cyanellus); bluegill (BG; Lepomis macrochirus); and bullhead catfish (BB; Ameiurus nebulosus). CDFW plants approximately 5,000 lbs.
  • Transforming Tomorrow

    Transforming Tomorrow

    TRANSFORMING TOMORROW calstate.edu/impact-of-the-csu/research CSU research, scholarship and creative activity positively impact student success and faculty excellence with opportunities to explore, investigate and solve the issues facing California’s diverse communities, the nation and the world. The hallmark of a CSU education includes experiential learning to engage, retain and propel students to successful careers. Within the following pages are delightful exemplars from our 23 campuses and 10 affinity groups that showcase innovative applications of discoveries and the creation of new knowledge. TABLE OF CONTENTS AFFINITY CSU GROUPS CAMPUSES 7 Agriculture 41 Bakersfield Research 45 Channel Islands Institute 49 Chico 11 California Desert Studies 53 Dominguez Hills Consortium 57 East Bay 15 Council on Ocean 61 Fresno Affairs, Science and Technology 65 Fullerton 19 CSU Program 69 Humboldt for Education 73 Long Beach and Research in 77 Los Angeles Biotechnology 81 Maritime Academy 23 Moss Landing Marine 85 Monterey Bay Laboratories 89 Northridge 27 Ocean Studies 93 Pomona Institute 97 Sacramento 29 CSU Shiley Institute for 101 San Bernardino Palliative Care 105 San Diego 33 Social Science 109 San Francisco Research and 113 San José Instructional Council 117 San Luis Obispo 35 STEM-NET 121 San Marcos 39 Water Resources 125 Sonoma and Policy 129 Stanislaus Initiatives 3 On behalf of the entire California State University, I congratulate the students and faculty who distinguish themselves through exemplary research, scholarship and creative activity. Working together, they advance knowledge, understanding and creative expression at the forefront of their disciplines to benefit California’s diverse communities, the nation and the world.
  • Spare the Air Employer Program Members List Last Updated: October

    Spare the Air Employer Program Members List Last Updated: October

    Spare the Air Employer Program Members 1000 Journals Project Aerofund Financial Svcs.,Inc. 3Com Corporation Affordable Housing Associates 511 Contra Costa - Pleasant Hill Affymax Research Institute 511 Contra Costa - San Pablo Affymetrix Inc. 511 Regional Rideshare Program Agilent 7-Flags Car Wash Agilent Technologies - Sonoma County A Nobel Smile Public Affairs A&D Christopher Ranch Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. A. Maciel Printing Air Systems Inc. A9.com Airtreks AB & I Akeena Solar ABA Staffing, Inc. Akira ABB Systems Control Akraya Inc. Abbott Alameda Co. Health Care for the Homeless Abgenix, Inc. Program Able Services Alameda County Waste Management Auth. ABM Industries, Inc Alameda Free Library Above Telecommunications, Inc. Alameda Hospital Absolute Center Alameda Publishing Group AC Transit Alexa Internet Academy of Art University All Covered Academy of Chinese Culture & Health Allergy Medical Group Of S F A Acclaim Print & Copy Centers Alliance Credit Union Accolo Alliance Occupational Medicine Accretive Solutions Allied Waste Services ACF Components Allied Waste Services -- SCCO Division Acologix Inc. 4915 ACRT, Inc Allied Waste Services/Republic Services ACS State & Local Solutions Allison & Partners Act Now Alta Bates/Summit Medical Center Acterra Alter Eco Actify, Inc. Alter Eco Americas Adaptive Planning ALTRANS TMA, Inc Addis Creson Alum Rock Library Adina for Life, Inc. Alza Corporation Adler & Colvin AMC Entertainment, Inc Adobe Lumber Amelias Antics ADP - Automatic Data Processing American Century Investment Adura Technologies American International (Group) Companies Advance Design Consultants, Inc. American Lithographers Advance Health Center American Lung Association Advance Orthopaedics American President Lines Ltd Advanced Fibre Communications Amgen, Inc Advanced Hyperbaric Recovery of Marin Amtrak Advantage Sales & Marketing Amy’s Kitchen Advent Software, Inc List last updated: October 2011 Spare the Air Employer Program Members Anderson Zeigler Disharoon Gallagher & Avnet, Inc.
  • The California State University System the California State University System Provides a Larger Context for the Efforts of an Individual Institution’S Planning

    The California State University System the California State University System Provides a Larger Context for the Efforts of an Individual Institution’S Planning

    Humboldt State University University Senate Meeting Minutes 19/20:9 2/25/2020 Tuesday, February 25, 2020, 3:00pm, Goodwin Forum (NHE 102) Vice Chair Mark Wilson called the meeting to order at 3:06pm on Tuesday, February 25, 2020, Goodwin Forum, Nelson Hall East, Room 102; a quorum was present. Members Present Alderson, Bacio, Bond-Maupin, Cano Sanchez, Creadon, Dunk, Gonzalez, Gradine, Karadjova, Keever, Malloy, Miller, Mola, Moyer, Pachmayer, Parker, Rueda, Schnurer, Thobaben, Weinberg, Wilson, Woglom, Zerbe Members Absent Burkhalter, Byrd, Dawes, Kerhoulas, Jackson, Maguire, Pawlowski Guests Steven St. Onge, George Wrenn, Mary Oling-Sisay, Kim Comet, Peggy Metzger, Steve Ladwig, Cyril Oberlander, Pedro Martinez, Sherie Gordon, Josh Smith Announcement of Proxies Blakeslee for Dawes, Dunk for Kerhoulas, Pachmayer for Pawlowski, Hagen for Byrd Approval of and Adoption of Agenda M/S (Dunk/Malloy) to approve the agenda Motion carried unanimously Approval of Minutes from the February 11 2020 Meeting M/S (Meriwether/Rueda) to approve the Minutes of February 11, 2020 Motion carried unanimously Reports, Announcements, and Communications of the Chair Vice Chair Wilson pointed out the Senate has not received nominations for the upcoming Non- Instructional Tenure Line faculty delegate vacancy, and noted the current membership of the Senate is written to allow for “tenure line coaches and counselors,” even though the Senate Office has confirmed there are no tenure-line coaches or counselors at this University. This makes the pool of general faculty members who fit the criteria for the seats limited to tenure line Librarians, of which there are about 8. Senator Mola queried the reasoning behind holding the Senate Officer Elections during the next meeting (March 10, 2020), noting that teaching schedules are set for next Fall, and if he were willing to run for a seat that is afforded WTU release time, he wouldn’t be able to accept them.
  • THE FOLSOM POWERHOUSE NO. 1 1895 National Historic Mechanical

    THE FOLSOM POWERHOUSE NO. 1 1895 National Historic Mechanical

    THE FOLSOM POWERHOUSE NO. 1 1895 National Historic Mechanical Engineering Landmark The American Society of Mechanical Engineers September 12, 1976 FACTUAL DATA ON AMERICAN RIVER DIVISION The American River Division, a part of the Central Valley Project, provides water for irrigation, municipal and industrial use, hydroelectric power, recreation, and flood control through a system of dams, canals, and powerplants. The Division includes Folsom and Sly Park Units, both in operation, and Auburn-Folsom South Unit in construction stage. FOLSOM UNIT consists of Folsom Dam, Lake, AUBURN-FOLSOM SOUTH UNIT, authorized in and Powerplant, Nimbus Dam, Lake Natoma, and 1986, will provide agricultural and municipal and Nimbus Powerplant on the American River. The industrial water supplies for Placer, El Dorado, Folsom Unit was added to the Central Valley Project Sacramento, and San Joaquin Counties, together with by Congressional authorization in 1949. hydroelectric power, flood control, fish protection, and new recreational facilities. Principal features of the Unit will be Auburn Dam, Powerplant and Reservoir, FOLSOM DAM AND FOLSOM LAKE. Folsom Dam, the Folsom South Canal, and Sugar Pine and County below a drainage area of 1,875 square miles, was Line Dams and Reservoirs. constructed by the Corps of Engineers and upon completion was transferred to the Bureau of AUBURN DAM presently under construction will Reclamation for coordinated operation as an integral be a 700-foot-high, concrete thin arch structure, with part of the Central Valley Project. The dam has a a crest length of 4,000 feet. The dam will create the concrete main river section with a height of 340 feet 2.4 million acre-foot Auburn Reservoir.
  • U N S U U S E U R a C S

    U N S U U S E U R a C S

    (Live Oak Blvd) Incline Village- Colusa Ran StHwy 99 Washoe S Crystal Bay ( Tahoe R t H Lake i Kings v w Vista e y r Beach 8 StH R w 9 y d 2 Lake Wildwood 0 Grass Valley ) WASHOE Colusa S t H LYON w Dayton y S 20 0 7 tR te y 2 0 Dollar w S to tH ac en S r a m Point StRte 174 R ( C ive r Penn Valley olfax Marlette 0 Hwy) 2 Lake y w YUBA 108th Congress of the United States tH S NEVADA Tierra Marys- Williams Sutter Buena Yuba ville StHwy 20 Rollins Reservoir CARSON CITY City Beale Sunnyside- Carson Col AFB Alta Tahoe City Sierra Sugar Pine Reservoir Carson City S t Hwy Linda Stewart Com 9 4 French Meadows 4 y Stewart Com 5 South Reservoir w H Yuba City Beale t Lake Indian StHwy 99 Olivehurst S AFB Colfax Tahoe Hills Hell Hole Reservoir COLUSA Stewart Com Johnson S t Hwy 6 Lane 5 5 Lake of Camp Far the Pines Arbuckle West Reservoir S t H Wheatland w y 395 70 Foresthill SUTTER Zephyr Cove- S t Round Hill Village H Meadow w Stateline Loon y S Vista 8 tH Lake 9 w y 6 Minden 5 ( S t DOUGLAS R Kingsbury d DISTRICT 65 Gardnerville ) 2 South Lake Tahoe StHwy 45 PLACER North Auburn Georgetown Feather River Stumpy S Dresslerville Col (L t wy 193 Meadows Lake Fallen a H H 80 tH u w St wy S etown r y 1 rg R d ) Leaf Lake e 9 l 9 o A 3 e Gardnerville 9 e G l ( v l e i ) USAF Global v Auburn Ranchos e Communication s Receiver o Byp Union Valley h R StHwy 113 g Reservoir u o l S o t K n Lincoln ni e ght s L m Mud Lake an a Lower Roseville 50 din r g c Echo Lake R a id Byp StHw S y 4 ge Blvd) Centro (El 70 StHwy 9 Ice House C Co ut Loomis ( loma Rd) Reservoir
  • Chapter 5 Recreation and Economics

    Chapter 5 Recreation and Economics

    Chapter 5 Recreation and Economics This chapter discusses the potential for the Program to affect recreation activity and economics in California. It describes recreational and commercial activities centered on fishing for trout, salmon, and steelhead in inland waters and the ocean. It also provides information on the jobs and costs associated with operating the DFG hatchery facilities. The direct and indirect economic values of the California fishing segment of the economy are presented. Sources of Information Key information sources for this assessment included: z DFG fisheries managers and biologists and hatchery supervisors, z DFG salmon surveys, z DFG agency databases, z DFG’s report to the Legislature on the Steelhead Fishing Report and Restoration Card program (Jackson 2007), z the USFWS’s biennial National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife­Associated Recreation and the related economic impact assessment Sportfishing in America—An Economic Engine and Conservation Powerhouse (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2002, 2007; Southwick Associates 2008), z Pacific Fishery Management Council’s annual reviews of ocean salmon fisheries (Pacific Fisheries Management Council 2007, 2009), and z California Department of Parks and Recreation’s (DPR’s) periodic surveys on public opinions and attitudes (California Department of Parks and Recreation 2003, 2009). Existing Conditions The following sections describe the current status of regulations that affect recreational and commercial fishing for salmon, steelhead, and trout; the recreational activity that is generated by salmon, steelhead, and trout fishing in California; the economic activity that is generated by operating the DFG hatcheries; and the economic activity that is generated by recreational and commercial fishing in the state.
  • Final Analysis of the 2009 California Survey of Registered Pleasure Craft Owners: Usage and Storage

    Final Analysis of the 2009 California Survey of Registered Pleasure Craft Owners: Usage and Storage

    Final Analysis of the 2009 California Survey of Registered Pleasure Craft Owners: Usage and Storage Prepared for the California Air Resources Board by the Institute for Social Research at California State University, Sacramento June 2009 Ernest L. Cowles, Ph.D., Director Val Logsdon, MA Research Analyst Jessica Hayes, Research Analyst with Rachael Ekins, Graduate Research Assistant Kelly Nelson, Graduate Research Assistant Andrea Nemeyer, Graduate Research Assistant Table of Contents Table of Tables…………………………………………………………………………………………………..3 Section 1: Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 4 Section 2: Summary of Survey Responses ........................................................................................... 8 General Information on Pleasure Crafts ............................................................................................. 8 Usage Information on Pleasure Crafts: Average Usage by Days, Hours, and Number of Times Pleasure Craft is Successfully Started .......................................................... 14 Usage Information on PCs: Percentage Estimates of Usage during the Week and in Different Seasons .................................................................................................................. 18 Usage Information on PC’s: Percentage Estimates by County and Waterways .............................. 22 Storage Information on PC’s ...........................................................................................................
  • Uma Hinman Consulting Team

    Uma Hinman Consulting Team

    Upper Feather River Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Statement of Qualifications Photo: exploreplumascounty.bigfishcreations.com April 2014 Uma Hinman Consulting Team Leah Wills Independent Consultant Uma Hinman Consulting PO Box 1251, Cedar Ridge, CA 95924 4/10/2014 Mr. Randy Wilson, Planning Director/Co-Manager Plumas County Flood Control and Water Conservation District 555 Main Street Quincy, CA 95971 RE: Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Update Services Dear Mr. Wilson, Uma Hinman Consulting is enthusiastic about this opportunity to provide the enclosed Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) to assist the Plumas County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) and Regional Water Management Group (RWMG) in their efforts to update the 2005 Upper Feather River (UFR) Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Plan. The enclosed SOQ is submitted on behalf of a highly- qualified team of consultants including Uma Hinman Consulting, Leah Wills, Deer Creek Resources, ECORP, PMC, Plumas Geo-Hydrology, California Indian Environmental Alliance, Sierra Institute for Community and Environment, and SWALE Inc. Our Team interprets this Project as an integrative and collaborative planning effort, supported by science and local knowledge. In response, we present a Team led by land use and water resource planners, and backed by a highly skilled group of expert geographers and cartographers, scientists, socio-economists, Tribal outreach and water resource experts with extensive knowledge of the Feather River watershed and the people who call the Upper Feather River Basin home. Additionally, we have taken great care to bring together firms and individuals both local to the Plumas area and those who have extensive experience in the watershed.
  • Central Valley Project, Folsom and Sly Park Unit, California

    Central Valley Project, Folsom and Sly Park Unit, California

    The Central Valley Project The American River Division The Folsom and Sly Park Units The Auburn-Folsom South Unit Wm. Joe Simonds Bureau of Reclamation History Program Denver, Colorado 1994 Reformatted, Edited, and Reprinted: January 2010 by Brit Storey Table of Contents Table of Contents..............................................................1 The American River Division ....................................................2 The Folsom and Sly Park Units.............................................2 The Auburn-Folsom South Unit ............................................3 Project Location.........................................................3 Historic Setting .........................................................4 Project Authorization.....................................................7 Construction History .....................................................8 Folsom and Sly Park Units ..........................................8 Auburn Folsom South Unit .........................................16 Post Construction History ................................................20 Settlement of Project Lands ...............................................22 Uses of Project Water ...................................................23 Conclusion............................................................25 About the Author .............................................................26 Bibliography ................................................................27 Manuscript and Archival Collections .......................................27
  • Foresthill Divide Community Plan

    Foresthill Divide Community Plan

    00087 PPllaacceerr CCoountuntyy,, CCaalliiffoorrniniaa August, 2003 Quad Knopf,Inc. Prepared by: Plan Team Community Foresthill Divide Planning Dept. Placer County Prepared for: Community Plan Foresthill Divide PPllaacceerr CCoountuntyy,, CCaalliiffoorrniniaa August, 2003 Roberta MacGlashan,Project Manager Contact: 784-7823 (916) Roseville, CA95678 One Sierragate Plaza, Suite270C Quad Knopf, Inc. Prepared by: Michael Wells,Senior Planner Contact: (530) 886-3000 Auburn, CA95603 11414 BAvenue Plan Team Foresthill DivideCommunity Placer CountyPlanningDept. Prepared for: Community Plan Foresthill Divide TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1-1 A. PURPOSE OF COMMUNITY PLAN 1-1 B. THE PLAN AREA 1-2 C. REGIONAL SETTING/CONTEXT 1-3 D. PLANNING PROCESS 1-3 E. PLAN ASSUMPTIONS 1-3 F. RELATIONSHIP TO COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT POLICIES 1-5 G. VISION STATEMENT 1-5 II. GENERAL COMMUNITY GOALS 2-1 III. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT 3-1 A. POPULATION AND HOUSING 3-1 1. Purpose 3-1 2. Goals and Policies 3-2 3. Population 3-3 4. Housing 3-4 5. Implementation 3-7 B. LAND USE 3-16 1. Purpose 3-16 2. General Concepts/Description 3-17 3. Goals and Policies 3-24 4. Description of Land Use Districts 3-30 5. Implementation 3-41 C. COMMUNITY DESIGN 3-43 1. Purpose 3-43 2. Elements of Community Design 3-43 3. Goals and Policies 3-52 4. Implementation 3-57 D. PUBLIC FACILITIES 3-58 1. Purpose 3-58 2. Goals and Policies 3-58 i 3. Sewage Disposal 3-60 4. Water Supply 3-62 5. Education/Schools 3-64 6. Fire Protection 3-68 7.