DOCSLIB.ORG

Rayleigh Scattering

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rayleigh Scattering Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering Beyond primary CMB with the next generation of surveys Benjamin Beringue with Daan Meerburg, Nick Battaglia, Joel Meyers Based on arXiv:2008.xxxxx, to be submitted by the release of this recording. 16/08/2020 1 Cosmology from Home 2020 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering Outline : • Motivations • Distortions induced by Rayleigh scattering • Detectability with the next generation of CMB surveys • Impact on cosmological parameters estimation 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 2 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering With the next generation of CMB surveys promising to be Cosmic Variance limited up to ℓ~5000, there is a strong need to look beyond the primary CMB signal to further constrain Λ��� and its extensions. • Spectral distortions • Secondary anisotropies : CMB lensing, tSZ, kSZ, patchy reionisation • Rayleigh Scattering ! 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 3 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering Outline : • Motivations • Distortions induced by Rayleigh scattering • Detectability with the next generation of CMB surveys • Impact on cosmological parameters estimation 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 4 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering What is Rayleigh scattering ? The recombination history is usually told as follows : - The primordial plasma consists in protons and free electrons (mainly), - Photons are kept in equilibrium by Thomson scattering, - As the universe expands, less and less and free electrons, - Finally, one last scattering event. 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 5 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering What is Rayleigh scattering ? However, photons may also scatter off neutral species formed during recombination : - Rayleigh scattering by Hydrogen and Helium atoms, # - Strong frequency dependence : �! � ∝ �"� (to lowest order) - As the universe expands, neutral species are diluted ∝ �$% and photons redshifted ∝ �$&, 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 6 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering Redshift z 1693 1269 1088 804 666 Thomson scattering 1.2 Rayleigh Scattering 750Ghz Rayleigh Scattering 500Ghz 1.0 0.8 0.6 Visibility 0.4 Fraction of free electrons 0.2 Fraction of neutral hydrogen Last scattering surface 0.0 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Redshift 200.0 250.0 280.7 350.0 400.0 Conformal time ¥ [Mpc] 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 7 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering Rayleigh scattering increases the comoving opacity of the plasma and makes it frequency dependent : �̇ = ��!�" → �̇ � = ��!�" + � �# + 0.1 - �#! �$(�) This leads to : - A damping of small scales anisotropies both in temperature and E-mode polarization. - On large angular scales, the shift of the last scattering surface towards lower redshifts, where the local quadrupole is larger, boosts the large scales E-mode signal. - A shift in the location of the acoustic peaks, both in temperature and E-mode polarization spectra. 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 8 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering Rayleigh scattering effects at frequencies below ∼ 700 GHz can be modelled as a linear distortion to the primary CMB : # / ) ),+,- . ),# . �ℓ � = �ℓ + Δ�ℓ + +� , with � = �, �, � .! .! [Lewis 2013 :1307.8148] The power spectrum reads : # # )0 )0,+,- 1 # )30,# # 3),#0 �&�1 3),#30,# �ℓ �&, �1 = �ℓ + �& �ℓ + �1 �ℓ + 1 �ℓ + … �2 �2 Primary CMB �� cross spectra �� auto spectra 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 9 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 10 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering What is Rayleigh scattering ? - Scattering of CMB photons by neutral species right after recombination, - Increases the comoving opacity in a frequency dependent way, - Distortions can be modelled linearly at the multipole level, - Produces a signal that is small (~3% at 500GHz) and highly correlated to the primary CMB. 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 11 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering Outline : • Motivations • Distortions induced by Rayleigh scattering • Detectability with the next generation of CMB surveys • Impact on cosmological parameters estimation 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 12 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering PLANCK only Most of the constraining power comes from temperature large scales ℓ < 1000. Almost no contribution from the polarized Rayleigh scattering signal. 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 13 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering CMB-S4 white noise only Most of the constraining power still comes from temperature large scales ℓ < 2000. Which will be impacted by atmospheric noise. 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 14 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering CMB-S4 Since temperature channels are the most impacted by atmospheric noise, most of the constraining power comes from polarized channels. Improvements in detector noise in the polarized channels will directly result in improvements in constraints on Rayleigh scattering. 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 15 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering Outline : • Motivations • Distortions induced by Rayleigh scattering • Detectability with the next generation of CMB surveys • Impact on cosmological parameters estimation 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 16 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering - Rayleigh scattering amplitude directly probes Helium fraction : ��� �" - Rayleigh scattering produces different last �!(�) scattering surface and fluctuation spectrum at each frequency. - Fixed length scales appear at different angular scales for primary and Rayleigh scattered components of the CMB. - Ratio of these angular scales helps constraining parameters. � - ��, ��� , ���� are improved. Courtesy of Joel Meyers. 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 17 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering PICO-like experiment [arXiv:1902.10541] ℓ"#$ = 5000, �%& fixed More details in arXiv:2008.xxxxx 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 18 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering PICO-like experiment [arXiv:1902.10541] ℓ"#$ = 5000, �%& fixed More details in arXiv:2008.xxxxx 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 19 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering 0.120 2 h c ≠ 0.119 PICO (unlensed) 67.860 PICO+BAO (unlensed) 0 H 66.860 PICO+Rayleigh (unlensed) CVL (unlensed) s 2.109 A 9 10 2.089 0.967 s n 0.963 0.056 ø 0.052 ∫ 0.092 m P 0.027 0.02235 0.02240 0.11950 0.12050 66.86000 67.86000 2.08900 2.10900 0.96290 0.96690 0.05240 0.05640 0.02750 0.09250 2 2 9 ≠bh ≠ch H0 10 As ns ø m∫ 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 P 20 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering PICO-like experiment [arXiv:1902.10541] ℓ"#$ = 5000, �%& fixed More details in arXiv:2008.xxxxx 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 21 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering 4.0e-02 3.5e-02 13% A modest 13% improvements on �#$$, would require 50 times more effort without Rayleigh scattering. 2 3 10° 3.0e-02£ ) Æ e N ( 2.6e-02 æ This holds for a 5’ beam experiment (space-based), 51.22 using lensed spectra up to ℓ%&' = 5000 and not 2.3e-02 £ )) including �ℓ . 2.0e-02 PICO + rayleigh PICO 404.1 101.0 51.2 2.0 1.0 0.4 0.3 EÆort relative to PICO (# detectors or integration time) 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 22 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering In all this work we have neglected foregrounds contamination. Several aspects of Rayleigh scattering signal will play in our favour when looking for it : - It has a strong and unique scaling with frequency which make it suitable for blind methods such as Internal Linear Combination (ILC). - Its correlation with the primary CMB means would require to be dealt with by using a constrained-ILC. - Rayleigh scattering signal is well understood and modelled which make it usable in parametric component separation codes. 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 23 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering Conclusion • Rayleigh Scattering is a weak yet robustly predicted signal in the sky . • Its first detection could be achieved with the next generation of CMB surveys. • Future space missions will use this signal to further constrain Λ��� and its extension • Component separation will play a crucial role in a first detection. 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 24 Cosmology with Rayleigh scattering Thank you very much for your attention ! (Have a look on the arxiv for our paper on Rayleigh scattering !) 16/08/2020 Cosmology from Home 2020 25.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 12 Light Scattering AQ1
    12 Light Scattering AQ1 Lev T. Perelman CONTENTS 12.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 321 12.2 Basic Principles of Light Scattering ....................................................................................323 12.3 Light Scattering Spectroscopy ............................................................................................325 12.4 Early Cancer Detection with Light Scattering Spectroscopy .............................................326 12.5 Confocal Light Absorption and Scattering Spectroscopic Microscopy ............................. 329 12.6 Light Scattering Spectroscopy of Single Nanoparticles ..................................................... 333 12.7 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 335 Acknowledgment ........................................................................................................................... 335 References ...................................................................................................................................... 335 12.1 INTRODUCTION Light scattering in biological tissues originates from the tissue inhomogeneities such as cellular organelles, extracellular matrix, blood vessels, etc. This often translates into unique angular, polari- zation, and spectroscopic features of scattered light emerging from tissue and therefore information about tissue
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2008.11688V1 [Astro-Ph.CO] 26 Aug 2020
    APS/123-QED Cosmology with Rayleigh Scattering of the Cosmic Microwave Background Benjamin Beringue,1 P. Daniel Meerburg,2 Joel Meyers,3 and Nicholas Battaglia4 1DAMTP, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge, UK, CB3 0WA 2Van Swinderen Institute for Particle Physics and Gravity, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands 3Department of Physics, Southern Methodist University, 3215 Daniel Ave, Dallas, Texas 75275, USA 4Department of Astronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA (Dated: August 27, 2020) The cosmic microwave background (CMB) has been a treasure trove for cosmology. Over the next decade, current and planned CMB experiments are expected to exhaust nearly all primary CMB information. To further constrain cosmological models, there is a great benefit to measuring signals beyond the primary modes. Rayleigh scattering of the CMB is one source of additional cosmological information. It is caused by the additional scattering of CMB photons by neutral species formed during recombination and exhibits a strong and unique frequency scaling ( ν4). We will show that with sufficient sensitivity across frequency channels, the Rayleigh scattering/ signal should not only be detectable but can significantly improve constraining power for cosmological parameters, with limited or no additional modifications to planned experiments. We will provide heuristic explanations for why certain cosmological parameters benefit from measurement of the Rayleigh scattering signal, and confirm these intuitions using the Fisher formalism. In particular, observation of Rayleigh scattering P allows significant improvements on measurements of Neff and mν . PACS numbers: Valid PACS appear here I. INTRODUCTION direction of propagation of the (primary) CMB photons. There are various distinguishable ways that cosmic In the current era of precision cosmology, the Cosmic structures can alter the properties of CMB photons [10].
    [Show full text]
  • Rayleigh Scattering by Gas Molecules: Why Is the Sky Blue?
    Please do not remove this manual from from the lab. It is available via Canvas DEMO NOTES: This manual contains demonstrator notes in blue italics Optics Rayleigh Scattering: 12 hrs Rayleigh scattering by gas molecules: why is the sky blue? Objectives After completing this experiment: • You will be familiar with using a photomultiplier tube) as a means of measuring low intensities of light; • You will have had experience of working safely with a medium power laser producing visible wavelength radiation; • You will have had an opportunity to use the concept of solid angle in connection with scattering experiments; • You will have had the opportunity to experimentally examine the phenomenon of polarization; • You should understand how the scattering of light from molecules varies accord- ing to the direction of polarization of the light and the scattering angle relative to it; • You should have a good understanding of what is meant by cross-section and differential cross section. • You should be able to describe why the daytime sky appears to be blue and why light from the sky is polarized. Note the total time for data-taking in this experiment is about one hour. There are a lot of useful physics concepts to absorb in the background material. You should read the manual bearing in mind that you need to thoroughly understand how you will calculate your results from you measurements BEFORE your final lab session. This is an exercise in time management. Safety A medium power Argon ion laser is used in this experiment. The light from it is potentially dangerous to you and other people in the room.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on Numerical Integration Methods for Rendering Atmospheric
    Open Phys. 2019; 17:241–249 Research Article Tomasz Gałaj and Adam Wojciechowski A study on numerical integration methods for rendering atmospheric scattering phenomenon https://doi.org/10.1515/phys-2019-0025 In this paper, a qualitative comparison of three, pop- Received Jan 29, 2019; accepted Mar 07, 2019 ular numerical integration methods to compute the sin- gle scattering integral is presented. In provided research, Abstract: A qualitative comparison of three, popular and three methods have been chosen, namely Midpoint, Trape- most widely known numerical integration methods in zoidal and Simpson’s Rules. These three methods are fairly terms of atmospheric single scattering calculations is pre- popular in Computer Graphics field. Atmospheric scatter- sented. A comparison of Midpoint, Trapezoidal and Simp- ing is calculated using backward ray tracing algorithm tak- son’s Rules taking into account quality of a clear sky gener- ing into account variable light conditions [5]. Then, these ated images is performed. Methods that compute the atmo- methods are compared with each other taking into account spheric scattering integrals use Trapezoidal Rule. Authors quality of the generated images of the sky. As a subproduct try to determine which numerical integration method is of this research, the fidelity of the framework presented the best for determining the colors of the sky and check by Bruneton in [3] is being checked. Authors try to deter- if Trapezoidal Rule is in fact the best choice. The research mine which numerical integration method is the best for does not only conduct experiments with Bruneton’s frame- calculating the colors of the sky and check if Trapezoidal work but also checks which of the selected numerical inte- Rule is in fact the best choice.
    [Show full text]
  • An Attempt to Detect Rayleigh Scattering in the Atmospheres of Extrasolar Planets Using a Ground-Based Telescope
    Wesleyan University Blue Skies Through a Blue Sky: An Attempt To Detect Rayleigh Scattering in the Atmospheres of Extrasolar Planets Using a Ground-Based Telescope by Kristen Luchsinger A thesis submitted to the faculty of Wesleyan University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Astronomy with a Planetary Science Concentration Middletown, Connecticut April, 2017 Acknowledgements I would like to thank the Astronomy department at Wesleyan University, which has been incredibly supportive during my time here. Both the faculty and the stu- dent community have been both welcoming and encouraging, and always pushed me to learn more than I thought possible. I would especially like to thank Avi Stein and Hannah Fritze, who first made me feel welcome in the department, and Girish Duvurri and Rachel Aranow, who made the department a joyful place to be. They, along with Wilson Cauley, were always willing to talk through any issues I encountered with me, and I am sure I would not have produced nearly as polished a product without their help. I would also like to thank the telescope operators, staff, and fellow observers from the time I spent at Kitt Peak National Observatory. Through their support and friendliness, they turned what could have been an overwhelming and fright- ening experience into a successful and enjoyable first ever solo observing run. I would like to thank my advisor, Seth Redfield, for his constant support and encouragement. Despite leading three undergraduate and one graduate student through four theses on three different topics, Seth kept us all moving forward, usually even with a smile and constant, genuine enthusiasm for the science.
    [Show full text]
  • Scattering and Polarization
    Scattering and Polarization C HAP T E R 13 13.1 these two molecules interferes de­ 1 3.2 INTRODUCTION structively. as in Figure 12.4 (along RAYLEIGH SCATTERING the x-axis). and this Is so for any - sideways direction from which you - So far we have considered what look at the beam. Air. on the other When white light scatters from hap pens when light encounters ma­ hand, is a gas. so there is no guar­ some molecules. it scatters selec­ terial obstacles of a size much antee that there will be another tively because part of the light is ab ­ greater than the wavelength (geo­ molecule half a wavelength beyond sorbed at the resonant frequ encies metrical optics) or of a size so small the first-sometimes there may be a of the molecules-the scattered as to be comparable with the wave­ few extra molecules around one light Is then colored. For man y length of light (wave optics). But point, sometimes a few less. You see other molecules. however, the im­ you can also observe effects due the scattering from these pOints be­ portant resonant frequenCies are to even smaller obstacles, much cause of these fluctuations. (The significantly higher than visible fre­ smaller than the wavelength of visi­ TRY IT suggests ways to enhance quencies. White light nevertheless ble light. When light interacts with the scattering in air.) becomes colored when it scatters an isolated object that small, it Scattering is selective in several from these molecules-the higher shakes all the charges in the object, ways: light of certain wavelengths the frequency of the incident light.
    [Show full text]
  • EMR's Interaction with the Earth & Atmosphere ∝ ∝ ∝
    EMR’s interaction with the earth & atmosphere HANDOUT’s OBJECTIVES: • familiarize student with EMR scattering basics in environment • develop basic principles of radiative transfer in environment • develop Lambert’s law & Schwarzschild equation, plus introduce remote-sensing applications of same Lord Rayleigh & sky blueness “Why is the sky blue?” is a good (and hardly trivial) starting point for studying EMR’s interactions with the earth’s atmosphere and oceans. Water (whether vapor or liquid) is often invoked to explain sky blueness. After all, if ocean water is blue, shouldn’t that explain the sky’s color? Unfortunately, several meters of liquid water are required for water’s blue-green absorption minimum to be visible. If we condensed all atmospheric water vapor into a uniform shell around the earth, the shell would only be a few centimeters thick. Visible scattering by water molecules differs little from that of other atmospheric gases. (At the molecular level, we distinguish between the scattering, or redirecting, of EMR and its absorption, or conversion to other wavelengths (or kinds) of energy.) We retrace the ideas of 19th-century British scientist Lord Rayleigh, who showed that atmospheric molecules themselves are responsible for clear-sky color. Rayleigh Rp reasoned that if a spherical particle’s radius Rp << than that of λlight ( < 0.1, the λlight Rayleigh scattering criterion) its total scattering is ∝ its volume V. So when an EMR wave “illuminates” a molecule, scattering by its atoms is in phase because they are within λlight of each other. Thus the amplitude of the scattered electric field Es ∝ V. Clearly Es also depends on the strength of the incident electric field Ei.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 7: Propagation, Dispersion and Scattering
    Satellite Remote Sensing SIO 135/SIO 236 Lecture 7: Propagation, Dispersion and Scattering Helen Amanda Fricker Energy-matter interactions • atmosphere • study region • detector Interactions under consideration • Interaction of EMR with the atmosphere scattering absorption • Interaction of EMR with matter Interaction of EMR with the atmosphere • EMR is attenuated by its passage through the atmosphere via scattering and absorption • Scattering -- differs from reflection in that the direction associated with scattering is unpredictable, whereas the direction of reflection is predictable. • Wavelength dependent • Decreases with increase in radiation wavelength • Three types: Rayleigh, Mie & non selective scattering Atmospheric Layers and Constituents JeJnesnesne n2 020505 Major subdivisions of the atmosphere and the types of molecules and aerosols found in each layer. Atmospheric Scattering Type of scattering is function of: 1) the wavelength of the incident radiant energy, and 2) the size of the gas molecule, dust particle, and/or water vapor droplet encountered. JJeennsseenn 22000055 Rayleigh scattering • Rayleigh scattering is molecular scattering and occurs when the diameter of the molecules and particles are many times smaller than the wavelength of the incident EMR • Primarily caused by air particles i.e. O2 and N2 molecules • All scattering is accomplished through absorption and re-emission of radiation by atoms or molecules in the manner described in the discussion on radiation from atomic structures. It is impossible to predict the direction in which a specific atom or molecule will emit a photon, hence scattering. • The energy required to excite an atom is associated with short- wavelength, high frequency radiation. The amount of scattering is inversely related to the fourth power of the radiation's wavelength (!-4).
    [Show full text]
  • 11. Light Scattering
    11. Light Scattering Coherent vs. incoherent scattering Radiation from an accelerated charge Larmor formula Why the sky is blue Rayleigh scattering Reflected and refracted beams from water droplets Rainbows Coherent vs. Incoherent light scattering Coherent light scattering: scattered wavelets have nonrandom relative phases in the direction of interest. Incoherent light scattering: scattered wavelets have random relative phases in the direction of interest. Example: Randomly spaced scatterers in a plane Incident Incident wave wave Forward scattering is coherent— Off-axis scattering is incoherent even if the scatterers are randomly when the scatterers are randomly arranged in the plane. arranged in the plane. Path lengths are equal. Path lengths are random. Coherent vs. Incoherent Scattering N Incoherent scattering: Total complex amplitude, Aincoh exp(j m ) (paying attention only to the phase m1 of the scattered wavelets) The irradiance: NNN2 2 IAincoh incohexp( j m ) exp( j m ) exp( j n ) mmn111 NN NN exp[jjN (mn )] exp[ ( mn )] mn11mn mn 11 mn m = n mn Coherent scattering: N 2 2 Total complex amplitude, A coh 1 N . Irradiance, I A . So: Icoh N m1 So incoherent scattering is weaker than coherent scattering, but not zero. Incoherent scattering: Reflection from a rough surface A rough surface scatters light into all directions with lots of different phases. As a result, what we see is light reflected from many different directions. We’ll see no glare, and also no reflections. Most of what you see around you is light that has been incoherently scattered. Coherent scattering: Reflection from a smooth surface A smooth surface scatters light all into the same direction, thereby preserving the phase of the incident wave.
    [Show full text]
  • CMB Polarization from Rayleigh Scattering
    Polarization from Rayleigh scattering Blue sky thinking for future CMB observations Previous work: Takahara et al. 91, Yu, et al. astro-ph/0103149 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_scattering Antony Lewis http://cosmologist.info/ Classical dipole scattering 4 2 2 Oscillating dipole 풑 = 푝0 sin(휔푡) 풛 ⇒ radiated power ∝ 휔 푝0 sin 휃 dΩ Thomson Scattering Rayleigh Scattering 푚푒푧 = −푒퐸푧 sin 휔푡 푚푒푧 = −푒퐸푧 sin 휔푡 − 푚푒휔0z −푒2퐸 2 ⇒ 풑 = 푧 sin 휔푡 풛 −푒 퐸푧 2 푚푒휔 ⇒ 풑 = 2 2 sin 휔푡 풛 푚푒(휔 −휔0) (푚nucleus ≫ 푚푒) 푝+ 푒− 푒− Frequency independent Frequency dependent Given by fundamental constants: Depends on natural frequency 휔0 of target 2 8휋 푒2 휔4 휎 ≈ 휎 (휔 ≪ 휔0) 휎푇 = 2 푅 4 푇 3 4휋휖0푚푒푐 휔0 Both dipole scattering: same angular and polarization dependence (Boltzmann equations nearly the same) http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node95.html Rayleigh scattering details Early universe ⇒ Neutral hydrogen (+small amount of Helium) After recombination, mainly neutral hydrogen in ground state: (Lee 2005: Non-relativistic quantum calculation, for energies well below Lyman-alpha) 8 휈 ≡ c R ≈ 3.1 × 106GHz eff 9 A 1+푧 휈 4 Only negligible compared to Thomson for 푛 obs ≪ 푛 퐻 3×106GHz 푒 Scattering rate Total cross section ≈ (푅퐻푒 ≈ 0.1) Visibility In principle Rayleigh scattering could do tomography of last scattering and beyond Expected signal as function of frequency Zero order: uniform blackbody not affected by Rayleigh scattering (elastic scattering, photons conserved) 1st order: anisotropies modified, no longer frequency independent May be detectable signal
    [Show full text]
  • Electromagnetic Scattering
    5 Electromagnetic Scattering Scattering is the process by which a particle in the path of an electromagnetic wave continuously removes energy from the incident wave and re-radiates the energy into the total solid angle centred at the particle. We only consider the far field solution for a single homogeneous sphere. The full formal solution called Mie theory is required for a particle that has a similar radius relative to the wavelength of the incident light. This is generally the case for cloud and aerosol particles at visible and near infrared wavelengths. This theory is the basis for describing the rainbow, glory and other atmospheric optical phenomena. When the wavelength of light is large compared to the particle size, Mie theory is well approximated by Rayleigh scattering. In the atmosphere molecules act as Rayleigh scatters — this phenomenon explains why the sky is blue. Scattering properties vary rapidly with wavelength so that broadband approxima- tions are inapplicable. Scattering is always considered as a monochromatic process, and calculations over a bandwidth involve wavelength integration. Variation in scat- tering properties for particle distributions is often slow enough that a single calcula- tion can suffice for a range of wavelengths. 5.1 Rayleigh Scattering 5.1.1 The Hertzian Dipole A Hertzian dipole consists of two small spherical conductors carrying equal and opposite charge q separated by a distance l. A thin wire connects the two spheres as shown in Figure 5.1. An alternating current is set up in the wire such that the charge oscillates at an angular frequency ω i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • 15A.2 1 Dual-Frequency Simulations of Radar Observations of Tornadoes
    15A.2 1 DUAL-FREQUENCY SIMULATIONS OF RADAR OBSERVATIONS OF TORNADOES David J. Bodine1 ;2 ;3 ;,∗ Robert D. Palmer2 ;3 , Takashi Maruyama4 , Caleb J. Fulton3 ;5 , and Boon Leng Cheong3 ;5 1 Advanced Study Program, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA 2 School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA 3 Advanced Radar Research Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA 4 Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan 5 School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA 1. INTRODUCTION based on radar reflectivity factor. A limitation to this technique is that the dominant scatterers must be rain Radars measure reflectivity-weighted particle velocities drops or small objects with similar electromagnetic and rather than air velocities, resulting in measurement errors aerodynamic characteristics, otherwise the correction is when Doppler velocities are used to estimate tornado wind underestimated. Polarimetric radar observations frequently speeds. Snow (1984) and Dowell et al. (2005) show that reveal areas of low co-polar cross-correlation coefficient debris is centrifuged outward relative to the air, and the radial (ρHV ) at S (Ryzhkov et al. 2005; Kumjian and Ryzhkov 2008; Bodine et al. 2013), C (Palmer et al. 2011; Schultz et al. difference between air and particle velocities (ur) depends on vortex dynamics and particle characteristics. Moreover, 2012a,b), and X bands (Bluestein et al. 2007; Snyder and Dowell et al. (2005) also showed that the tangential and Bluestein 2014), even in rural areas where perhaps larger vertical velocities of debris are reduced relative to the air scatterers are less common.
    [Show full text]