DOCSLIB.ORG

THIRD MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE of the WTO and IMPORTANCE of AGRICULTURE in TRADE TALKS Oker Gürler 1. INTRODUCTION the Second

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THIRD MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE of the WTO and IMPORTANCE of AGRICULTURE in TRADE TALKS Oker Gürler 1. INTRODUCTION the Second Journal of Economic Cooperation 21 , 2 (2000) 45-66 THIRD MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE OF THE WTO AND IMPORTANCE OF AGRICULTURE IN TRADE TALKS ∗ Oker Gürler The report starts with a brief review of the developments within the framework of the World Trade Organisation (WTO). Then, it takes up the preparations for the Third Ministerial Conference of the WTO. In this context, it concentrates on the content and related disputes regarding the draft declaration which would be issued at the end of the Ministerial Conference at Seattle. Then, it evaluates the rules governing international trade in agriculture since new trade talks on agriculture should start this year. After assessing briefly the problems of the developing countries relating to the implementation of the WTO Agreement, it concludes that the OIC Member States should increase co- operation amongst themselves in all areas in relation to the implementation of the WTO Agreement and the new multilateral trade talks. 1. INTRODUCTION The Second Session of the WTO Ministerial Conference was convened in Geneva from 18 to 20 May 1998. On that occasion, the World Trade Organisation (WTO) also celebrated the 50 th anniversary of the multilateral trading system. However, 1998 was also a year dominated by the global financial crisis, of which the damaging and destabilising effects are still being felt. The global financial crisis, originating from the South East Asian Countries, influenced the Russian Federation in Europe and Brazil in Latin America, and spread around the globe. The crisis has significantly affected the world output. The world output growth slowed down from 4.2 per cent in 1997 to 2.5 per cent in 1998. Growth in the newly industrialised Asian economies was negative, -2.9 per cent in 1998, while GDP growth in the developing world fell sharply from 5.7 per cent in 1997 to 3.3 per cent in 1998. ∗ Senior Economist, Director of Research Department at the SESRTCIC. 46 Journal of Economic Cooperation The decline in world output also resulted in a decline in the global trade volume, particularly the export side, from 10.5 per cent in 1997 to 3.5 per cent in 1998. Against this negative environment in the global economy, the WTO Members agreed that the countries must keep their markets open in order to avoid a further deterioration in the global economic situation, when the General Council met in July 1998. In 1998, a number of countries, the Asian Countries, in particular, continued to implement their trade liberalisation programmes. Countries like Indonesia and the Philippines are implementing medium-term tariff reduction programmes that go well beyond their commitments within the framework of the WTO agreement. South Korea has made significant moves towards financial service liberalisation. Last year, several other countries including Bolivia, Canada, Chile, Egypt, Mexico, and Turkey also carried out unilateral MFN tariff cuts. However, recently there has been some increase in the use of anti- dumping measures as compared to 1995 and 1996, in particular by certain major trading countries on certain products such as textiles and clothing, footwear and leather goods, and iron and steel. Industrial countries impose countervailing tariffs on such exports of developing countries. The talks on financial services, which had been interrupted in July 1995, were resumed with the Meeting of the Committee on Trade in Financial Services on 10 April 1997. The financial services agreement entered into force on 1 March 1999, as agreed by the representatives of 52 countries 1, accounting for more than 90 per cent of the global 1 Bahrain; Canada; Chile; Colombia; Cyprus; Czech Rep.; Ecuador; Egypt; EC and their Member States (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, The Kingdom of the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom); Hong Kong, China; Hungary; Iceland; India; Indonesia; Israel; Japan; Korea, Rep. of; Kuwait; Macau; Malaysia; Malta; Mauritius; Mexico; New Zealand; Norway; Pakistan; Peru; Romania; Senegal; Singapore; Slovak Republic; South Africa; Sri Lanka; Switzerland; Thailand; Tunisia; Turkey; United States and Venezuela. Third Ministerial Conference of the WTO 47 financial services in banking, insurance, securities and financial information. Furthermore, the WTO’s Council for Trade in Services decided to extend the deadline for accepting the protocol until 15 June 1999 in order to allow another 18 governments 2 more time to complete their domestic ratification procedures. The combined commitments of the 70 governments cover more than the estimated 95 per cent of the world’s financial service activity and eliminate or relax current restrictions on foreign financial services suppliers. The commitments cover major financial services like banking, securities and insurance. This agreement provides a base for improving financial practices and for enlarging the foreign capital available to businesses and consumers 3. Recently, the number of WTO member countries reached 134, including the Kyrgyz Republic, Latvia and Estonia as new members. 35 WTO members are OIC members. (A list of OIC members in the WTO is attached as Annex I). 32 other candidates, all developing and transition economies, are negotiating to become members of the WTO. Former Director General of the WTO, Renato Ruggiero of Italy, completed his term as scheduled on 30 April 1999 after four years in office. However, the efforts to appoint a new Director General ended in a deadlock in April 1999. The WTO council could not reach an agreement on this issue: The United States and the developed countries were insisting on the former New Zealand Premier Mike Moore and the developing countries were supporting Thai Deputy Prime Minister Supachai Panitchpakdi. The deadlock could only be solved towards the end of the summer, and the new WTO Director General Mike Moore was able to assume his post on September 1 st , 1999. 2 Australia, Bolivia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Luxembourg, El Salvador, Ghana, Honduras, Jamaica, Kenya, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Philippines, Poland, Slovenia, and Uruguay. 3 Gurler, Oker, “Recent Developments within the Framework of the WTO: From Singapore to Geneva 1998”, Journal of Economic Co-operation among Islamic Countries, Vol. 19, No.4, October 1998, pp.59-82. 48 Journal of Economic Cooperation The new WTO Director General, Mike Moore, puts forward his priorities as follows: - To help achieve a balanced outcome for all countries, from which the more vulnerable economies will benefit; - To advocate the advantages of a more open trading system which will pave the way for better living standards and a more prosperous and safer world; - To strengthen the WTO and its system and rules within the framework of integrity and fairness and to reshape the organisation to reflect the new reality of its membership and their needs. The WTO General Council nominated chairpersons for the various WTO bodies on 16 February 1999. The General Council will be chaired by H.E. Ambassador Ali Said Mchumo (Tanzania), the Dispute Settlement Body by H.E. Ambassador Nobutoshi Akao (Japan), and the Trade Policy Review Body by H.E. Ambassador Jean-Marie Noirfalisse (Belgium). (The names of the chairpersons of the other WTO bodies are attached as Annex II). 2. THIRD MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE OF THE WTO The Third Ministerial Conference of the WTO was held in Seattle, Washington , from 30 November to 3 December 1999. The US, together with Pakistan, Burkina Faso, and Colombia as the other Office Members chaired this session. Ministers and senior officials from more than 150 countries attended this important meeting at the Washington State Convention and Trade Centre in Seattle. However, the outcome was quite a disappointment against the basic expectation that this Conference would launch another round of multilateral trade negotiations in order to further liberalise markets in goods, particularly in agricultural commodities, services, and investment activities. The Conference ended without an agreement. The talks have already commenced to break this deadlock. However, the future of the trade negotiations seems to be dim at the moment with only two exceptions. New trade talks on agriculture and services will resume at the beginning of 2000, as the WTO Members have already agreed and written into the Agreement on Agriculture and Third Ministerial Conference of the WTO 49 the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). These two topics will constitute the major agenda items of the new trade talks in Geneva. Then, whether the WTO members will want to add other topics or complete the agenda that was under discussion in Seattle remains to be seen. The US Government is very well aware of the global trade benefits that are reaped by the US economy. The American economy has experienced the longest and the strongest economic expansion in the US history and the lowest unemployment rate since 1957. Trade and participation in the world economy have played a fundamental role in this development. Such a long recovery and economic strength reinforced the leadership of the US in the global economy and in world politics. In this process, the impact of the Uruguay Round cannot be neglected to open markets and expand business opportunities for American citizens and companies around the world. Being aware of the benefits of the liberalisation of trade and investment activities around the globe, the US had volunteered to host the Third Ministerial Conference of the WTO. Comment [SS1]: The US government attaches great importance to the Third Ministerial Meeting. According to the The ambitious and demanding US initiatives at the Second Session United States Trade Representative Charlene Barshefsky, “This will be the of the WTO Ministerial Conference in Geneva in May 1998 and the US largest trade event ever held in the proposal to hold the third session in the US were signals of the utmost United States and it will inaugurate global negotiations which will shape importance attached by the US government to the Third Session.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Three Approaches to Fixing the World Trade Organization's Appellate
    Institute of International Economic Law Georgetown University Law Center 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 [email protected]; http://iielaw.org/ THREE APPROACHES TO FIXING THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION’S APPELLATE BODY: THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY? By Jennifer Hillman, Professor, Georgetown University Law Center* The basic rule book for international trade consists of the legal texts agreed to by the countries that set up the World Trade Organization (WTO) along with specific provisions of its predecessor, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). At the heart of that rules-based system has been a dispute settlement process by which countries resolve any disputes they have about whether another country has violated those rules or otherwise negated the benefit of the bargain between countries. Now the very existence of that dispute settlement system is threatened by a decision of the Trump Administration to block the appointment of any new members to the dispute settlement system’s highest court, its Appellate Body. Under the WTO rules, the Appellate Body is supposed to be comprised of seven people who serve a four-year term and who may be reappointed once to a second four-year term.1 However, the Appellate Body is now * Jennifer Hillman is a Professor from Practice at Georgetown University in Washington, DC and a Distinguished Senior Fellow of its Institute of International Economic Law. She is a former member of the WTO Appellate Body and a former Ambassador and General Counsel in the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). She would like to thank her research assistant, Archana Subramanian, along with Yuxuan Chen and Ricardo Melendez- Ortiz from the International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) for their invaluable assistance with this article.
    [Show full text]
  • La Règle Du Jeu: France and the Paradox of Managed Globalization
    La Règle du Jeu: France and the Paradox of Managed Globalization Rawi Abdelal Sophie Meunier Harvard Business School Princeton University [email protected] [email protected] To be presented at the Tenth Biennial Conference of the European Union Studies Association, Montreal, Canada, May 17‐19, 2007. We would like to thank Matthew Baldwin, Pascal Lamy, and Hubert Védrine for sharing their views with us. Thanks also to Suzanne Berger, Jean‐Francois Brakeland, Peter Katzenstein, and Nicolas Véron for their comments on an earlier version of this paper. All errors, of course, remain ours. A previous version of this paper was presented at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30th‐September 3, 2006. La Règle du Jeu: France and the Paradox of Managed Globalization Abstract Globalization is often portrayed as a tidal wave that originated in the US and its policy of laissez‐faire liberalization. This paper argues, however, that globalization is not made only by striking down regulations, but also by making them. During the 1980s, French policy makers began to develop the doctrine of “managed globalization,” or what World Trade Organization (WTO) head Pascal Lamy calls today “globalization by the rules.” Central to the doctrine has been the French – and European – effort to make rules and build the capacity of international organizations such as the European Union (EU), Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), International Monetary Fund (IMF), and WTO. These organizations then would have the authority to govern commercial and financial globalization. These organizations, however, have also used this capacity to promote liberalization.
    [Show full text]
  • Article IX of the WTO Agreement
    WTO ANALYTICAL INDEX WTO Agreement – Article IX (Jurisprudence) 1 ARTICLE IX ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Text of Article IX ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Article IX:2: Interpretations by the Ministerial Conference and the General Council.............. 2 1.3 Article IX:3: Waivers .................................................................................................... 5 1.3.1 Interpretation of waivers ........................................................................................... 5 1.3.1.1 Exceptional nature of waivers .................................................................................. 5 1.3.1.2 Waivers cannot modify or add to obligations.............................................................. 6 1.3.1.3 Limited duration of waivers ..................................................................................... 7 1 ARTICLE IX 1.1 Text of Article IX Article IX Decision-Making 1. The WTO shall continue the practice of decision-making by consensus followed under GATT 1947.1 Except as otherwise provided, where a decision cannot be arrived at by consensus, the matter at issue shall be decided by voting. At meetings of the Ministerial Conference and the General Council, each Member of the WTO shall have one vote. Where the European Communities exercise their right to vote, they shall have a number of votes equal to the number
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong Ministerial Conference: Bottom Lines for Ldcs in the Gats Negotiations
    T.R.A.D.E Analysis October 2005 SC/TADP/TA/SV/2 Original: English Trade-Related Agenda, Development and Equity (T.R.A.D.E.) Analysis Series HONG KONG MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE: BOTTOM LINES FOR LDCS IN THE GATS NEGOTIATIONS SYNOPSIS This analytical note aims to assist least developed countries (LDCs) participate more actively in the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) negotiations leading up to the Sixth Hong Kong Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organisation in December 2005 by providing guidance on the final negotiating positions for LDCs in the GATS negotiations on market access and GATS rules in line with their development objectives. October 2005 Geneva, Switzerland This TRADE Analysis is produced by the South Centre to contribute to the better participation of developing countries in trade and development negotiations. Readers are encouraged to quote or reproduce the contents of this TRADE Analysis for their own use, but are requested to grant due acknowledgement to the South Centre and to send a copy of the publication in which such quote or reproduction appears to the South Centre. Electronic copies of this and other South Centre publications may be downloaded without charge from http://www.southcentre.org. T.R.A.D.E Analysis October 2005 SC/TADP/TA/SV/2 HONG KONG MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE: BOTTOM LINES for LDCs in the GATS NEGOTIATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................3 II. NEGOTIATIONS ON SPECIFIC COMMITMENTS.......................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 17 the Seattle Ministerial Conference
    CHAPTER 17 THE SEATTLE MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE The third WTO Ministerial Conference was held last year from November 30 to December 3 in Seattle, United States. The focus of the Conference was to be a decision on launching of the so-called “New Rounds,” which would be the next round of negotiations to follow the Uruguay Round, and corresponding decision on the scope and modalities of the new round. Article IV:1 of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (hereinafter, “WTO Agreement”) stipulates that “there shall be a Ministerial Conference composed of representatives of all the Members, which shall meet at least once every two years.” The first Ministerial Conference was held in Singapore in December 1996; the second, in Geneva, Switzerland in May 1998. The 1999 Conference was the third one. The four-day meeting did not reach a conclusion. At the same time, the launching of the new round was frozen and the Ministerial Declaration was not issued. It was decided that the discussion was suspended and will resume. This chapter contains an outline of the major developments regarding the new round of negotiations since the conclusion of the Uruguay Round, and brief comments on the preparation process for the Ministerial Conference and the discussions in Seattle. 1. Developments since the Conclusion on the Uruguay Round (1) First Ministerial Conference in Singapore (December 9-13, 1996) This was the first Ministerial Conference following the conclusion of the Uruguay Round in Marrakesh on April 15, 1994 and the transition from the GATT to the WTO in January 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Outcome of the 11Th WTO Ministerial Conference (MC11) Held in Buenos Aires, Argentina from 10 to 13 December 2017
    Outcome of the 11th WTO Ministerial Conference (MC11) held in Buenos Aires, Argentina from 10 to 13 December 2017 Presentation to the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Trade and Industry Dr Rob Davies, MP Minister of Trade and Industry 6 March 2018 Contents 1. Doha Development Agenda (DDA) mandate 2. Impasse in DDA negotiations 3. Outcome of 10th Ministerial Conference (MC10) in Nairobi in December 2015 4. Process to MC 11 – future of DDA 5. Africa’s approach 6. 11th Ministerial Conference (MC11) held in Buenos Aires, Argentina in December 2017 7. Decisions taken at MC10 8. Ministerial Declaration 9. Clashing of paradigms - Development 10.Conclusion 2 The Doha Development Agenda: Original Objectives • “To place interests of developing countries at heart of the work programme…”. • Reform in agriculture: improved market access, reductions in subsidies and elimination of export competition. • Enhanced exports of products of interest to developing countries. • Policy space for developing countries, notably through effective Special and Differential Treatment (S&D) provisions in favour of developing countries. 3 Impasse in DDA Negotiations • Over the course of negotiations, developmental content of DDA has steadily been eroded. • Developing countries played a key role in working towards a credible outcome in agriculture, but the anticipated ambition for agricultural reform was moderate. • By contrast, demands were made that would require developing countries to take steep cuts in their industrial tariffs with negative impact on their industrial development and employment objectives. • Impact on SA/SACU particularly harsh. 4 Impasse in DDA Negotiations cont. • Developed countries demanding that emerging economies offer greater concessions; raised concerns about consensus decision-making in the organization and the single undertaking.
    [Show full text]
  • WT/GC/W/791 28 November 2019 (19-8185) Page
    WT/GC/W/791 28 November 2019 (19-8185) Page: 1/3 General Council 9-11 December 2019 DRAFT DECISION FUNCTIONING OF THE APPELLATE BODY Decision of … The General Council, Conducting the function of the Ministerial Conference in the interval between meetings pursuant to paragraph 2 of Article IV of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (the "WTO Agreement"); Having regard to paragraph 1 of Article IX of the WTO Agreement; Mindful of the work undertaken in the Informal Process of Solution-Focused Discussion on Matters Related to the Functioning of the Appellate Body, under the auspices of the General Council; Acknowledging that the Appellate Body has, in some respects, not been functioning as intended under the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (the "DSU"); Recognizing the central importance of a properly functioning dispute settlement system in the rules-based multilateral trading system, which serves to preserve the rights and obligations of Members under the WTO Agreement and ensures that rules are enforceable; Desiring to enhance the functioning of that system consistent with the DSU; Decides as follows: Transitional rules for outgoing Appellate Body members 1. Only WTO Members may appoint members of the Appellate Body. 2. The Dispute Settlement Body (the "DSB") has the explicit authority, and responsibility, to determine membership of the Appellate Body and is obligated to fill vacancies as they arise. 3. To assist Members in discharging this responsibility, the selection process to replace outgoing Appellate Body members shall be automatically launched 180 days before the expiry of their term in office.
    [Show full text]
  • China in the WTO: Past, Present and Future
    China in the WTO: Past, Present and Future Permanent Mission of China to the WTO What the Leaders say ∗ China’s accession to the WTO is a milestone in China’s reform and opening- up, bringing us into a new era to further open up. To join the WTO was a major strategic decision based on our comprehensive analysis of the situation at home and abroad in order to push forward China’s reform and opening-up and socialist modernization drive. ---Chinese President HU Jintao What the Leaders Say ∗ China’s 10th anniversary of its accession to the WTO is a momentous event in China's opening-up to the outside world. If we describe the Canton Fair as a window China opened to the world, then the accession to the WTO can be seen as a door China opened to the world. If we describe the Canton Fair as China extending a hand to the world, then its WTO membership is its full embrace of this world. ∗ ---Chinese Premier WEN Jiabao China’s Arduous Journey to the WTO ∗ From China’s request to resume its status as a contracting party to the GATT to its final accession to the WTO, it took China 15 years to go through the arduous and prolonged negotiations. ∗ On July 10, 1986, China formally submitted to the GATT Secretariat its request of resumption of China’s status as a contracting party to the GATT. ∗ In November 1995, China formally requested to accede to the WTO. ∗ On December 11, 2001, China officially became WTO’s 143rd member.
    [Show full text]
  • RESTRICTED WT/TPR/G/401 4 November 2020 (20-7798) Page
    RESTRICTED WT/TPR/G/401 4 November 2020 (20-7798) Page: 1/23 Trade Policy Review Body Original: English TRADE POLICY REVIEW REPORT BY INDONESIA Pursuant to the Agreement Establishing the Trade Policy Review Mechanism (Annex 3 of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization), the policy statement by Indonesia is attached. Note: This report is subject to restricted circulation and press embargo until the end of the first session of the meeting of the Trade Policy Review Body on Indonesia. WT/TPR/G/401 • Indonesia - 2 - Contents 1 OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................. 3 2 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ......................................................................................... 4 2.1 Macroeconomic Performance ........................................................................................ 4 2.1.1 Inflation ................................................................................................................. 6 2.1.2 Exchange Rate ........................................................................................................ 7 2.1.3 Recent Development on Fiscal Policy .......................................................................... 7 2.2 Improvement on Investment Climate ............................................................................ 8 2.3 Financial Sectors ........................................................................................................ 9 2.4 Economic Challenges
    [Show full text]
  • World Trade Organization
    WORLD TRADE WT/MIN(01)/ST/6 10 November 2001 ORGANIZATION (01-5596) MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE Original: English Fourth Session Doha, 9 - 13 November 2001 PAKISTAN Statement by H.E. Mr Abdul Razak Dawood Minister for Commerce, Industries and Production I am honoured to represent Pakistan at this Fourth Ministerial meeting of the World Trade Organization. Let me congratulate you on your well deserved election as the President of this historic meeting. The Pakistan delegation is very happy to be in Doha, this beautiful capital of fraternal Qatar. The convening of this meeting in your noble country transmits to the world an essential message: the fundamental convergence of interests and values in our rapidly integrating world. We thank the people and Government of Qatar for their generous and traditional hospitality, especially His Highness the Emir, who is also the current Chairman of the Islamic Summit. The Doha Ministerial is destined to be historic. It will witness the long awaited accession of the People's Republic of China to the WTO. This momentous event will not only strengthen the multilateral trading system, it will greatly enhance the ability of the developing countries to promote greater equity in the system. After the atrocities of 11 September, the world nations have joined, in a coalition of cooperation security, to oppose terrorism. This campaign must also bring peace and stability to Afghanistan and bring the relief and reconstruction which the long suffering people of Afghanistan have been denied so far by global indifference and within the new paradigm of cooperative security, underlying the causes of popular anger, conflicts and disputes, poverty and deprivation, inequality within and among nations must be effectively addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues Concerning the WTO Appellate Body (PDF:168KB)
    COLUMN: ISSUES CONCERNING THE WTO APPELLATE BODY 1. BACKGROUND The WTO’s Appellate Body is a standing body established by the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) “that hears appeals from panel cases” and is “composed of seven persons, three of whom serve on any one case” (Article 17.1 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU)). However, members of the Appellate Body have finished their terms of office consecutively since June 2017, and there was only one Appellate Body member remaining as of December 2019, meaning the Appellate Body has become unable to hear appeals. Normally, the selection of a successor Appellate Body member is conducted before the end of the terms of the leaving Appellate Body member. However, to date the consensus required for the commencement of the selection process has yet to be reached at the DSB. 2. PROBLEMS POINTED OUT BY THE UNITED STATES ABOUT THE APPELLATE BODY In “The President’s Trade Policy Agenda” announced in March 2018, the United States stated that “[t]he most significant area of concern has been panels and the Appellate Body adding to or diminishing rights and obligations [of the WTO Members] under the WTO Agreement” and that “[i]t has been the longstanding position of the United States that panels and the Appellate Body are required to apply the rules of the WTO agreements in a manner that adheres strictly to the text of those agreements, as negotiated and agreed by its Members.” The United States raised the following five points as specific examples of concerns: (1) disregard for the 90-day deadline for appeals; (2) continued service by persons who are no longer Appellate Body members; (3) issuing of advisory opinions on issues not necessary to resolve a dispute; (4) Appellate Body review of facts and review of a member’s domestic (municipal) law de novo; and (5) claims by the Appellate Body that its reports are entitled to be treated as precedent.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Trade Organization: the Hong Kong Ministerial
    Order Code RL33176 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web The World Trade Organization: The Hong Kong Ministerial Updated December 9, 2005 Ian F. Fergusson, Coordinator William H. Cooper, Vivian C. Jones, and Danielle J. Langton Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Charles E. Hanrahan and Susan R. Fletcher Resources, Science, and Industry Division Jeanne J. Grimmett American Law Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress The World Trade Organization: The Hong Kong Ministerial Summary The 148 members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) are preparing for the 6th Ministerial summit to be held in Hong Kong on December 13-18, 2005. WTO Ministerials are held every two years to bring together trade ministers from member states, often to make political decisions for the body. The Hong Kong Ministerial will be used to “take stock” of the ongoing Doha Development Agenda (DDA) round of trade negotiations. The members will not be asked to agree to a package of modalities (methods by which the round is negotiated) because substantial disagreements are still evident among the members. The outcome of these negotiations could provide a substantial boost to the world economy, but if the round itself is not completed, there may be repercussions for the WTO as an institution and for the architecture of the world trading system. Agriculture is perhaps the most significant challenge the members with which the members will grapple at the Ministerial. Members are attempting to seek modalities in the areas of tariffs and domestic support and are seeking to agree on a time-line for the elimination of export subsidies.
    [Show full text]