Volunteering in the Twin Cities
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Managing Metropolitan Growth: Reflections on the Twin Cities Experience
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ MANAGING METROPOLITAN GROWTH: REFLECTIONS ON THE TWIN CITIES EXPERIENCE Ted Mondale and William Fulton A Case Study Prepared for: The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy © September 2003 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ MANAGING METROPOLITAN GROWTH: REFLECTIONS ON THE TWIN CITIES EXPERIENCE BY TED MONDALE AND WILLIAM FULTON1 I. INTRODUCTION: MANAGING METROPOLITAN GROWTH PRAGMATICALLY Many debates about whether and how to manage urban growth on a metropolitan or regional level focus on the extremes of laissez-faire capitalism and command-and-control government regulation. This paper proposes an alternative, or "third way," of managing metropolitan growth, one that seeks to steer in between the two extremes, focusing on a pragmatic approach that acknowledges both the market and government policy. Laissez-faire advocates argue that we should leave growth to the markets. If the core cities fail, it is because people don’t want to live, shop, or work there anymore. If the first ring suburbs decline, it is because their day has passed. If exurban areas begin to choke on large-lot, septic- driven subdivisions, it is because that is the lifestyle that people individually prefer. Government policy should be used to accommodate these preferences rather than seek to shape any particular regional growth pattern. Advocates on the other side call for a strong regulatory approach. Their view is that regional and state governments should use their power to engineer precisely where and how local communities should grow for the common good. Among other things, this approach calls for the creation of a strong—even heavy-handed—regional boundary that restricts urban growth to particular geographical areas. -
Urban Heat Islands in the Arctic Cities: an Updated Compilation of in Situ and Remote-Sensing Estimations
Applied Meteorology and Climatology Proceedings 2020: contributions in the pandemic year Adv. Sci. Res., 18, 51–57, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-18-51-2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Urban heat islands in the Arctic cities: an updated compilation of in situ and remote-sensing estimations Igor Esau1, Victoria Miles1, Andrey Soromotin2, Oleg Sizov3, Mikhail Varentsov4, and Pavel Konstantinov4 1Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Centre/Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Thormohlensgt. 47, Bergen, 5006, Norway 2Institute of Ecology and Natural Resources Management, Tyumen State University, 625000, Tyumen, Russia 3Oil and Gas Research Institute RAS, Moscow, Russia 4Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography/Research Computing Center, Leninskie Gory 1, Moscow, 119991, Russia Correspondence: Igor Esau ([email protected]) Received: 17 July 2020 – Revised: 10 April 2021 – Accepted: 19 April 2021 – Published: 3 May 2021 Abstract. Persistent warm urban temperature anomalies – urban heat islands (UHIs) – significantly enhance already amplified climate warming in the Arctic. Vulnerability of urban infrastructure in the Arctic cities urges a region-wide study of the UHI intensity and its attribution to UHI drivers. This study presents an overview of the surface and atmospheric UHIs in all circum-Arctic settlements (118 in total) with the population larger than 3000 inhabitants. The surface UHI (SUHI) is obtained from the land surface temperature (LST) data products of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) archive over 2000–2016. The at- mospheric UHI is obtained from screen-level temperature provided by the Urban Heat Island Arctic Research Campaign (UHIARC) observational network over 2015–2018. -
Satellite Towns
24 Satellite Towns Introduction 'Satellite town' was a term used in the year immediately after the World War I as an alternative to Garden City. It subsequently developed a much wider meaning to include any town that is closely related to or dependent on a larger city. The first specific usage of the word ‘satellite town’ was in 1915 by G.R. Taylor in ‘ Satellite Cities’ referring to towns around Chicago, St. Louis and other American cities where industries had escaped congestion and crafted manufacturer’s town in the surrounding area. The new town is planned and built to serve a particular local industry, or as a dormitory or overspill town for people who work in and nearby metropolis. Satellite Town, can also be defined as a town which is self contained and limited in size, built in the vicinity of a large town or city and houses and employs those who otherwise create a demand for expansion of the existing settlement, but dependent on the parent city to some extent for population and major services. A distinction is made between a consumer satellite (essentially a dormitory suburb with few facilities) and a production satellite (with a capacity for commercial, industrial and other production distinct from that of the parent town, so a new town) town or satellite city is a concept of urban planning and referring to a small or medium-sized city that is near a large metropolis, but predates that metropolis suburban expansion and is atleast partially independent from that metropolis economically. CITIES, URBANISATION AND URBAN SYSTEMS 414 Satellite and Dormitory Towns The suburb of an urban centre where due to locational advantage the residential, industrial and educational centres are developed are known as "satellite or dormitory towns." It has a benefit of providing clean environment and spacious ground for residential and industrial expansion. -
The Anti-Poverty Soldier Page 1 Not Participate in Or Contribute to Our That Things Still Seem to Be Getting Worse in St
THE ANTI-POVERTY SOLDIER By Clarence Hightower, Ph.D. Although Twin Cities poverty dips Now, a new report from the Met Council published in many places, it continues to rise in February, finds that while poverty has started to trend downward across much of the metropolitan in St. Paul area, there are still neighborhoods where it is April 13, 2017 | Vol. 4 No. 15 growing. Among the areas where poverty is on the rise are some northern suburbs and the City of St. In 2011, following the release of the U.S. Census Paul. In contrast to Minneapolis, where the Bureau’s American Community Survey, Minnesota poverty rate has remained “relatively flat” the last Compass published a statistical profile titled few years, the number of St. Paul residents at or “Poverty in Saint Paul.” The data, which was below 185 percent of the federal poverty alarming, showed that nearly one-quarter of all St. threshold (which is the baseline of how the Met Paul residents lived below the federal poverty Council defines poverty in its study) continues to guidelines. And, of the more than 67,000 people rise. Today in St. Paul, the number of individuals living in poverty, approximately 25,000 were living below that threshold is estimated to be children. around 125,000. Another disturbing trend highlighted by Moreover, pockets of concentrated poverty are Minnesota Compass was the rate at which poverty swelling in all corners of St. Paul. According to the was increasing in the capital city. From 1999 to latest data areas such as St. Paul’s East Side, North 2010, poverty rose significantly at the national, End, Thomas-Dale, Summit-University, and state, and the Twin Cities metro level. -
Report: Municipal Water Supplier Data Reporting in the Twin Cities
MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLIER DATA REPORTING IN THE TWIN CITIES METROPOLITAN AREA Phase I – Background and Discovery April 2020 The Council’s mission is to foster efficient and economic growth for a prosperous metropolitan region Metropolitan Council Members Charlie Zelle Chair Raymond Zeran District 9 Judy Johnson District 1 Peter Lindstrom District 10 Reva Chamblis District 2 Susan Vento District 11 Christopher Ferguson District 3 Francisco J. Gonzalez District 12 Deb Barber District 4 Chai Lee District 13 Molly Cummings District 5 Kris Fredson District 14 Lynnea Atlas-Ingebretson District 6 Phillip Sterner District 15 Robert Lilligren District 7 Wendy Wulff District 16 Abdirahman Muse District 8 The Metropolitan Council is the regional planning organization for the seven-county Twin Cities area. The Council operates the regional bus and rail system, collects and treats wastewater, coordinates regional water resources, plans and helps fund regional parks, and administers federal funds that provide housing opportunities for low- and moderate-income individuals and families. The 17-member Council board is appointed by and serves at the pleasure of the governor. On request, this publication will be made available in alternative formats to people with disabilities. Call Metropolitan Council information at 651-602-1140 or TTY 651-291-0904. Background Project Overview The Metropolitan Council (Council) is tasked with planning activities that address the water supply needs of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area (TCMA) (https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/473.1565). The Council’s Water Supply Planning unit works with communities to carry-out these activities and consults with appointed committees who advise the Council on proposed water policy and to communicate common concerns. -
The Future of Employment Services Department of Jobs and Small Business August 2018
The Future of Employment Services Department of Jobs and Small Business August 2018 Volunteering Australia Contacts Ms Adrienne Picone, Chief Executive Officer [email protected] (02) 6251 4060 Ms Lavanya Kala, Policy Manager [email protected] (02) 6251 4060 The Future of Employment Services About Volunteering Australia Volunteering Australia is the national peak body for volunteering. We work to advance volunteering in the Australian community. Volunteering Australia’s vision is to promote strong, connected communities through volunteering. Our mission is to lead, strengthen, promote and celebrate volunteering in Australia. We work collectively with the seven State and Territory volunteering peak bodies to deliver national, state/territory and local volunteering programs and initiatives in accordance with the Government’s priorities. As the primary link between the volunteering sector and federal government, Volunteering Australia provides feedback into key decision making. All feedback is informed by research, evidence and consultation with the volunteering sector. Introduction Volunteering Australia welcomes the opportunity to provide a submission to the Department of Jobs and Small Business on The Future of Employment Services. Volunteering is at the centre of Australia’s national identity, with 5.8 million Australians or 31 per cent of the population engaging in formal volunteering activities and programs.i There is strong evidence that reinforces the economic impact of the contribution of volunteering. Volunteering delivers a $4.50 return for every dollar invested.ii Research demonstrates that volunteering yields a 450 per cent return for every dollar invested.iii Nationally this is an estimated annual economic and social contribution of $290 billion.iv In this submission Volunteering Australia outlines that as we explore the future of employment services, it is important to consider the role of volunteering in providing a critical pathway to employment. -
Volunteering & Social Welfare
Volunteering & Social Welfare People who are in receipt of Social Welfare can volunteer for as long and as frequently as they wish without affecting any of their social welfare payments. However, if you are in receipt of payments from the Department of Social, Community and Family Affairs due to being unemployed or disabled, there are certain criteria, which apply to you. We have compiled this information here for you. Please take care to read this fully. If you need further assistance contact us by e-mail, phone, fax or just call in, we will be happy to help you. People who are unemployed, we believe should have the right to volunteer. The range of voluntary work available is endless and by volunteering you can: 1. Gain Job Experience Volunteer experience looks great on a resume. Also, some of the work you do could lead to a job doing similar work. 2. Improve Your Health and Self-Esteem Volunteering to help others has been shown to reduce stress, give you hope, and boost your self-esteem. 3. Meet Real Community Needs Helping people learn to read, or get basic food, clothing, shelter or furniture makes a huge difference! Whether the project is planting a tree or tutoring children, the community will look and feel better. 4. Gain New Skills and Develop Talents Whether you enjoy working with computers, children, or seniors, any interest you have can be developed through volunteering. 5. Potential employers By volunteering, unemployed people are showing potential employers that they can commit to work, are used to the work routine and have recently used, and possibly improved, their skills. -
Trends in Volunteer Mentoring in the United States: Analysis of a Decade of Census Survey Data
W&M ScholarWorks Arts & Sciences Articles Arts and Sciences 3-2018 Trends in Volunteer Mentoring in the United States: Analysis of a Decade of Census Survey Data Elizabeth B. Raposa College of William and Mary, [email protected] Nathan Dietz Jean E. Rhodes [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/aspubs Recommended Citation Raposa, Elizabeth B.; Dietz, Nathan; and Rhodes, Jean E., Trends in Volunteer Mentoring in the United States: Analysis of a Decade of Census Survey Data (2018). AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 59. 10.1002/ajcp.12117 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Arts and Sciences at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arts & Sciences Articles by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Am J Community Psychol (2017) 59:3–14 DOI 10.1002/ajcp.12117 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Trends in Volunteer Mentoring in the United States: Analysis of a Decade of Census Survey Data Elizabeth B. Raposa,1 Nathan Dietz,2 and Jean E. Rhodes3 © Society for Community Research and Action 2017 Abstract Over the past decade, considerable resources Introduction have been devoted to recruiting volunteer mentors and expanding mentoring programs. It is unclear whether The national volunteer rate among American adults these efforts have helped to counter the broader national declined significantly between the years 2006 and 2015, trends of declining volunteer rates. The current study uses with significant drops in each of the past 2 years (Bureau data from the Volunteering Supplement of the Current of Labor Statistics, 2016). -
The Broken Promises of an All-Volunteer Military
THE BROKEN PROMISES OF AN ALL-VOLUNTEER MILITARY * Matthew Ivey “God and the soldier all men adore[.] In time of trouble—and no more, For when war is over, and all things righted, God is neglected—and the old soldier slighted.”1 “Only when the privileged classes perform military service does the country define the cause as worth young people’s blood. Only when elite youth are on the firing line do war losses become more acceptable.”2 “Non sibi sed patriae”3 INTRODUCTION In the predawn hours of March 11, 2012, Staff Sergeant Robert Bales snuck out of his American military post in Kandahar, Afghanistan, and allegedly murdered seventeen civilians and injured six others in two nearby villages in Panjwai district.4 After Bales purportedly shot or stabbed his victims, he piled their bodies and burned them.5 Bales pleaded guilty to these crimes in June 2013, which spared him the death penalty, and he was sentenced to life in prison without parole.6 How did this former high school football star, model soldier, and once-admired husband and father come to commit some of the most atrocious war crimes in United States history?7 Although there are many likely explanations for Bales’s alleged behavior, one cannot help but to * The author is a Lieutenant Commander in the United States Navy. This Article does not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Defense, the United States Navy, or any of its components. The author would like to thank Michael Adams, Jane Bestor, Thomas Brown, John Gordon, Benjamin Hernandez- Stern, Brent Johnson, Michael Klarman, Heidi Matthews, Valentina Montoya Robledo, Haley Park, and Gregory Saybolt for their helpful comments and insight on previous drafts. -
Section 9: Policy Responses from Across the Region
SECTION NINE: POLICY RESPONSES FROM ACROSS THE REGION Metropolitan Council Choice, Place and Opportunity: An Equity Assessment of the Twin Cities Region Section 9 Sections One through Six of this document described the history, current situation and implications of the Twin Cities’ region’s place-based disparities by race and income. Section Seven outlined an array of the policy approaches that influence the distribution of access to opportunity. Section Eight discussed how the Metropolitan Council will respond to these issues while Section Nine outlines how other organizations and partnerships are taking action. Partnership for Regional Opportunity The new direction of the Partnership for Regional Opportunity, the successor organization to the successful Corridors of Opportunity partnership, represents one of the region’s many approaches to advancing equity. The Partnership for Regional Opportunity has adopted a vision of “Growing a prosperous, equitable, and sustainable region.” The goals of the Partnership are to: • Improve the economic prospects of low-income people and low-wealth communities • Promote high quality development near existing assets (e.g. employment centers, transitways, and commercial and industrial corridors) • Advance a 21st century transportation system Taking the findings and learning from the Corridors of Opportunity projects, the Partnership has charged itself with creating systems change and embedding the equity-focused work into existing organizations. Aligning resources, policies, and programs will be a key strategy for implementation, and each participating organization has committed to finding opportunities to embed the work internally. One of the four Partnership for Regional Opportunity workgroups is focused on Regional Equity & Community Engagement; this group is co-chaired by Ramsey County and Nexus Community Partners (representing the Community Engagement Team). -
How to Build a Successful Mentoring Program Elements of Effective
How to Build A Successful Mentoring Program Using the Elements of Effective Practice TM A STEP-BY-STEP TOOL KIT FOR PROGRAM MANAGERS MENTOR/National Mentoring Partnership 1600 Duke Street, Suite 300 Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone: 703-224-2200 Web site: www.mentoring.org AOL Keyword: mentor Online version of the tool kit: www.mentoring.org/eeptoolkit Copyright 2005. MENTOR/National Mentoring Partnership All rights reserved. Published 2005. Printed in the United States of America. Reproduction rights: Permission to reproduce or photocopy portions of this tool kit with attribution is granted by MENTOR/National Mentoring Partnership. DISCLAIMER Tools and resources submitted for inclusion in this tool kit have been edited or condensed from their original version in order to accommodate the design and intent of this publication. CONTENTS Foreword vii Acknowledgements ix Section I. About MENTOR/National Mentoring Partnership 1 Our State and Local Mentoring Partnerships 1 Resources • State and Local Mentoring Partnerships 3 • National Mentoring Institute 5 Section II. About the Tool Kit 7 Why Create a Tool Kit? 7 Guidelines for New—and Existing—Programs 7 What You’ll Find in the Tool Kit 8 Glossary of Terms 9 Let’s Get Started! 10 Section III. Introduction to Mentoring and Program-Building 11 What Is Mentoring Today? 11 What Makes a Successful Mentoring Relationship? 11 The Five Types of Mentoring 12 What Elements Constitute a Safe and Effective Mentoring Program? 13 What’s the Next Step? 14 Section IV. How to Design and Plan a Mentoring Program -
Submission Number: 85 Date Received: 4/7/2012
Submission to Inquiry into Workplace Bullying July 2012 Australian Nursing Federation Level 1, 365 Queen Street, Melbourne VIC 3000 P: 03‐9602 8500 F: 03‐9602 8567 E: [email protected] Website: www.anf.org.au The Australian Nursing Federation (ANF) is pleased to make a submission to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Education and Employment’s Inquiry into Workplace Bullying. Background on the ANF The ANF is the national union for nurses, midwives and assistants in nursing with Branches in each state and territory of Australia. The ANF is also the largest professional nursing organisation in Australia. The ANF’s core business is the industrial and professional representation of its members. The ANF has over 215,000 members and they are employed in a wide range of enterprises in urban, rural and remote locations, in the public, private and aged care sectors including nursing homes, hospitals, health services, schools, universities, the armed forces, statutory authorities, local government, and off‐shore territories and industries. The ANF participates in the development of policy in nursing and midwifery, nursing and midwifery regulation, health, community services, veterans affairs, education, training, occupational health and safety, industrial relations, immigration and law reform. Nurses, midwives and assistants in nursing are the backbone of service provision in health and aged care. Overview Workplace bullying is a serious health and safety hazard affecting nurses and midwives. The ANF considers that workplace bullying is an occupational health and safety issue and, as such, should be prevented using a risk management approach. This means that where the risk of bullying occurring is identified, the hierarchy of control must be followed in the control of the hazard, ie.