DOCSLIB.ORG

In Much Twentieth-Century Art, It Could Be Argued That the Desire for Transcendence Finds Its Voice in Abstraction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In Much Twentieth-Century Art, It Could Be Argued That the Desire for Transcendence Finds Its Voice in Abstraction Nature and abstraction in twentieth-century photography In much twentieth-century art, it could be argued that the desire for transcendence finds its voice in abstraction. Vassily Kandinsky, Kasirnir Malevich, Jackson Pollock, Mark Rothko, Barnett Newman, and Agnes Martin are only a few of the major twentieth-century abstract painters whose art can be related to an expression of the sublime. Novak's characterizations of baroque versus classical modes of expression can also be extended to the twentieth century. Painters like Kandinsky and Pollock, with their active, organic forms may be seen on the side of the baroque, across from the reductive, often architectonic, classicizing tendencies of Malevich, Rothko, Newman, and Martin. Tendencies towards abstraction are also present in much twentieth­ century photography, including work touching on the spiritual in nature. In an absolute sense, little photography deviates from the representational, being based as it is on an image of the real derived through the optics of the camera. Certainly it is possible to produce a photograph whose subject is unrecognizable. The earliest examples are probably the "Vortographs" of Alvin Langton Coburn from 1916,followed by considerable experimentation with abstraction by numerous "New Vision" photographers of the 1920s and 1930s such as Laszlo Moholy­ Nagy. However, for many photographers a more interesting problem has been a tension or reconciliation between the medium's descriptive and abstract possibilities. We can find subjective and objective approaches to the relationship of representation and abstraction. Although these categories are not mutually exclusive, the subjective (sometimes termed romantic) approach emphasizes the inner state of the artist, while the objective (or realist) approach appears to confine itself to a description of external reality. To some extent the subjective approach seems to align itself with more active baroque forms, while the objective approach is often more classical and reductive. Within twentieth-century photography Alfred Stieglitz, Minor White, Aaron Siskind, Harry Callahan, and Thomas Joshua Cooper all seem to fall within the subjective mode, while Wilson Bentley, Karl Blossfeldt, Walker Evans, Bernd and Hilla Becher, Hiroshi Sugimoto, and Richard Misrach appear more objective. The expression of the descriptive yet abstracted photograph as a subjective metaphor probably has its origins in the work of Alfred Stieglitz (1864-1946), perhaps "the central figure in the development of early twentieth-century photography.w Stieglitz had many important roles, not only as a photographer but as a theorizer, writer, publisher, and gallery director. Through his periodical publications, Camera Notes (1897­ 1902) and Camera Work (1903-1917), he played a major role in the fight for recognition of photography as an art form. Central to his thinking was the modernist conviction that photography needed to be appreciated for its 26 Sarah Greenough and Juan Hamilton, AlfredStieglitz: Plwtographs and Writings (Washington: National Gallery of Art, 1983), p. 12. 21 own particular qualities as a medium, and that these qualities could best be illuminated by comparison with the most avant-garde art of the time. Through his gallery, 291, he was the first to introduce modernist art to America, exhibiting from 1908-1916 the work of Europeans such as Matisse, Cezanne, Picasso, Picabia, Brancusi, and Braque, and American abstractionists including John Marin, Marsden Hartley, Arthur Dove, and Georgia O'Keeffe. Stieglitz was first introduced to photography through his studies as an engineering student in Berlin in the 1880s under the scientist Hermann Wilhelm Vogel. His photographs in Europe from this time, and in the early years after his return to America in 1890, were decidedly in the vein of the picturesque: quaint genre studies in the mode of earlier English artistic photographers such as Henry Peach Robinson and Peter Henry Emerson. Influenced by the Symbolist movement to explore the subjective possibilities of photography as an expressive medium, by 1902, he had gathered together a group of similarly minded Pictorialist photographers, including Edward Steichen, Frank Eugene, Gertrude Kasebier, and Clarence White, to form the so-called Photo-Secession. Softening of detail is probably the one technique that unites almost all Pictorialist photography, in a legacy passed down from earlier artistic photographers such as Julia Margaret Cameron. Characteristics associated with objective description, such as sharp focus, seemed in their minds to mitigate against the possibility for the medium to express an inner reality - for them a necessary attribute of legitimate artistic expression. Turning away from the factual character of most nineteenth­ century photography, Pictorialists including the photographers of the Photo-Secession investigated the hand manipulative possibilities of photographic processes including gum bichromate, carbon, and platinum printing, to produce self-consciously subjective images which emulated the paintings which they admired. Richly evocative photographs like those of Edward Steichen used a reductive, tonally moody, soft-focus technique to produce images that look more like drawings or etchings than conventional photographs. Edward Steichen, Trees, Long Island, 1905, gum bichromate print. 22 Although Stieglitz actively promoted the work of the Photo-Secessionists in Camera Notes and Camera Work, perhaps due to his exposure to modernist art, his own photographs largely turned away from the Pictorialist approach. While the abstract art of the early twentieth century which Stieglitz exhibited at 291 deviated from the representational in what was termed the "anti-photographic", Stieglitz, in both his writings and his own photography, increasingly came to reject the painterly approach of the Pictorialists. Instead he embraced the formal values of abs tract art within a search for the purely photographic, while still retaining the subjective aspirations of Symbolist art. Recounting the making of his celebrated 1907 image The Steerage, years later,Stieglitz stressed both the formal geometry of the picture and its metaphysical yearnings: 1:7 "A round straw hat, the funnel leaning left, the stairway leaning right, the white draw-bridge with its railings made of circular chains below, round shapes of iron machinery, a mast cutting into the sky, making a triangular shape. I stood spellbound for awhile, looking and looking. Could I photograph what I felt, looking and looking and still looking? I saw shapes related to each other. I saw a picture of shapes and underlying that the feeling I had about life." Alfred Stieglitz, The Steerage, photogravure, 32.0 x 26.7 em. By the twenties Stieglitz also began to see possibilities for photography in the series rather than the individual picture, most notably in his extended composite portrait of Georgia O'Keeffe taken over several decades. While many nineteenth-century photographers published their images as series, each photograph was seen as individual. The Pictorialists also emphasized the individual image. The O'Keeffe portraits stem from Stieglitz's conviction that the human personality was far too complex to be described in a single photograph taken in one instant, and a more fruitful approach to representing this complexity was to build an extended portrait through a series of photographs capturing many moments and aspects of the person over a long period of time. 27 Alfred Stieglitz, "Four Happenings" (1942), reprinted in Nathon Lyons, ed., Photographers on Pltotography (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1966), p. 129. 23 This serial approach is also evident in the various groups of cloud photographs Stieglitz made in the twenties. Stieglitz titled the first series of 1922 "Music: A Sequence of Ten Cloud Photographs", and the 1924 series "Songs of the Sky". Rather than being factual meteorological records, the cloud photographs, like much early abstract painting, take music as their model of an ideal abstract art. "1 wanted a series of cloud photographs which when seen by Ernest Bloch (the great composer) he would exclaim: Music! music! Man, why that is music!"28 Most of these earlier sky pictures still retain a link to traditional landscape photography though, with the horizon often retained within the view and sometimes as much as one third of the picture area showing the earth. With the 1927-29 "Equivalents", however, the horizon has generally been completely eliminated from the images, leaving the viewer floating in a space which has no sense of time, place, direction, gravity, or means of orientation. Detached from any obvious point of reference, the clouds function as abstracted forms. The "musical" mood of the images is set by their generally dark tones and compositional reliance on rhythmic formal patterns. Alfred Stieglitz, Equivalent, 1931, gelatin silver photograph, 11.8 x 9.2 em. While the "Equivalents" were always grouped as series when he exhibited them, they in no way reflect the passage of real time, but rather the changing nuances of Stieglitz's subjective inner state. The "Equivalents" are perhaps Stieglitz's most eloquent expression of the possibility of photography being simultaneously abstract and descriptive, and reflecting both the inner and outer manifestations of reality. 28 Alfred Stieglitz, "How I Came to Photograph Clouds" (1923),reprinted in Photographers on Photography , p. 112. 24 While in no way altering the objective reality
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Street—Design for a Poster
    National Gallery of Art NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART ONLINE EDITIONS Alfred Stieglitz Key Set Alfred Stieglitz (editor/publisher) after Various Artists Alfred Stieglitz American, 1864 - 1946 The Street—Design for a Poster 1900/1901, printed 1903 photogravure image: 17.6 × 13.2 cm (6 15/16 × 5 3/16 in.) Alfred Stieglitz Collection 1949.3.1270.34 Key Set Number 266 Image courtesy of the Philadelphia Museum of Art KEY SET ENTRY Related Key Set Photographs The Street—Design for a Poster 1 © National Gallery of Art, Washington National Gallery of Art NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART ONLINE EDITIONS Alfred Stieglitz Key Set Alfred Stieglitz Alfred Stieglitz The Street, Fifth Avenue Fifth Avenue—30th Street 1900/1901, printed 1903/1904 1900/1901, printed 1929/1937 photogravure gelatin silver print Key Set Number 267 Key Set Number 268 same negative same negative Remarks The date is based on stylistic similarities to Spring Showers—The Street Cleaner (Key Set number 269) and Spring Showers—The Coach (Camera Notes 5:3 [January 1902], pl. A). This photograph was made at Fifth Avenue and 30th Street with a Bausch & Lomb Extra Rapid Universal lens, and won a grand prize of $300 in the 1903 “Bausch & Lomb Quarter-Century Competition”(see Camera Work 5 [January 1904], 53; and The American Amateur Photographer 16 [February 1904], 92). Lifetime Exhibitions A print from the same negative—perhaps a photograph from the Gallery’s collection—appeared in the following exhibition(s) during Alfred Stieglitz’s lifetime: 1903, Hamburg (no. 424, as The Street, photogravure) 1903, San Francisco (no. 34a, as The Street—Winter) 1904, Washington (no.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernd & Hilla Becher Biography
    P A U L A C O O P E R G A L L E R Y Bernd & Hilla Becher Biography Bernd Becher Born: Siegen, Germany 1931 Died: 2007 Hilla Becher Born: Potsdam, Germany 1934 Died: 2015 EDUCATION Bernd Becher 1976 Professor of photography at Staatlich Kunstakademie Düsseldorf 1972 Guest lecturer Hochschule für Bildende Künste, Hamburg 1957-1961 Studies in typography at Staatliche Kunstakademie Düsseldorf 1953-1956 Studies in lithography and painting at Staaliche Kunstakademie Stuttgart under Karl Rösing Hilla Becher 1972-1973 Guest Lecturer Hochschule für bildende Künste, Hamburg 1958-1961 Studies in photography at Kunstakademie Düsseldorf GRANTS & AWARDS 2014 Rheinischer Kulturpreis der Sparkassen-Kulturstiftung Rheinland 2002 The Erasmus Prize 1991 The Leon D’Oro award for sculpture at the Venice Biennale ONE-PERSON EXHIBITIONS 2019 “Bernd & Hilla Becher: Industrial Visions,” National Museum Cardiff, Wale, UK (10/26/19 – 3/1/20) “Bernd & Hilla Becher: 1962-2000,” PKM Gallery, Seoul, Korea “Bernd & Hilla Becher: Kohlebunker,” Kunstarchiv Kaiserwerth, Düsseldorf, Germany 2018 “Bernd & Hilla Becher,”Konrad Fischer Galerie, Berlin, Germany 2014 “Bernd & Hilla Becher,” Fotografien aus fünf Jahrzehnten, Konrad Fischer Galerie, Düsseldorf “Bernd & Hilla Becher,” Sprüth Magers, London 2013 “Photographische Sammlung der SK Stiftung Kultur, Cologne Dia Art Foundation, New York Siegerländer Fachwerkhäuser, Orts- und Dorfansichten des Siegerlandes, Siegerländer Gruben und Hütten, Holzfördertürme in Pennsylvania, Museum für Gegenwartskunst, Siegen 2012 galerija TR3, Ljubljana, Slowenia Coal Mines. Steel Mills., Galerie Rudolfinum, Prague Bernd and Hilla Becher, Sonnabend Gallery, New York Bernd & Hilla Becher. Imprimés 1964-2010, Grand Palais, Paris 2011 Bergwerke und Hütten, Industrielandschaften, Fotomuseum Winterthur 534 WEST 21ST STREET, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10011 TELEPHONE 212.255.1105 FACSIMILE 212.255.5156 P A U L A C O O P E R G A L L E R Y Blick in die Sammlung: Bernd und Hilla Becher.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernd & Hilla Becher Coal Mines. Steel Mills
    Bernd & Hilla Becher: Coal Mines. Steel Mills. 22.3.2012 – 3.6.2012 This unique representative collection of 95 black-and-white photographs by Bernd and Hilla Becher focuses on so-called “Industrial Landscapes” – a term the artists themselves use to describe a particular type of image, which does not seek to portray individual works of architecture as such, but rather the situation of heavy industry plants within their urban and landscape context. The project Coal Mines. Steel Mills. is based on works created in the Ruhr Valley (Ruhrgebiet). From as far back as the early 1960s, the mining facilities and surrounding steel mills of the area have provided both artists with a major theme for their work, one they have followed to the most minute details in their records of entire industrial zones, such as the mines Hannover in Bochum, Zollern II in Dortmund, or Concordia in Oberhausen. Photographs from the Ruhr Valley are accompanied by images from the area around Siegen in North Rhine-Westphalia as well as from the UK, France and the United States in such a way – in keeping with the artists’ intent – as to draw comparison between the language of industrial architecture as it has evolved over the course of the previous century, regardless of regional or national borders. Bernd and Hilla Becher rank among the most prominent representatives of post-war German photography, not only due to their monumental oeuvre, but also the exceptional degree of international success of the various adherents of the Düsseldorf School of Photography, which they founded. As pioneers of conceptual photography, they directly influenced several generations of German photographers.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MEDIA of PHOTOGRAPHY Special Issue of the Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism
    CALL FOR PAPERS THE MEDIA OF PHOTOGRAPHY Special Issue of the Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism GUEST EDITORS Diarmuid Costello (University of Warwick) Dominic McIver Lopes (University of British Columbia) Three overlapping events occasion this proposal for a special issue of JAAC on the philosophy of photography. First, photography has matured as a visual art medium. No longer confined to specialist galleries, distribution networks, discourses, or educational programs, it has won mainstream institutional recognition – fine art museums increasingly mount major retrospectives of contemporary photographers’ work, and many of those museums now appoint curators of photography. Second, the boundary between photographic and non-photographic visual art has blurred, as lens-based technologies have found a home in a wide range of art practices from painting and theater through sculptural installation to conceptual art. Photography has become one more means at artists’ disposal; it is no longer just for photographers. Third, the rapid, ongoing development of digital imaging technologies is profoundly reshaping how photographs are made and displayed, and hence appreciated, while at the same time creating new venues for displaying photographs outside traditional art institutions. Taken together this conjunction of events raises fundamental philosophical questions about photography as an art and an aesthetic phenomenon. The proposed special issue is intended to address these questions by bringing them under a unifying theme, “the media of photography.”
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to A' Level Photography
    Welcome to A’ level Photography • Now that you have decided to study A Level Photography, you will need to do a bit of preparation. This document contains information regarding the course structure, the summer project and some Photographers you should know to prepare you to start your A level in September. The purpose of studying Photography at A Level is to develop knowledge and understanding of: • Specialist vocabulary and terminology when analysing or explaining your own and others’ work • Theoretical research of a particular genre style and/or tradition • In‐depth understanding of a variety of media, techniques, and processes • Development of an idea, concept, or issue • Recording ideas and observations related to chosen lines of enquiry • Communicating a particular meaning, message, idea or feeling • There will be a pack to buy from school which will contain a selection of the and materials you will need. The cost of the pack will be approximately £50 What do I have to do in A Level Art? Photography? There are two components of the course‐ the personal investigation and the externally set assignment. The table below summarises the evidence you will produce for each component: A Level Components What will I need to do? How will I evidence this? Personal Investigation ‐Write a personal study (essay) ‐A 1000‐3000 word essay (coursework) based on your chosen theme ‐Research on a range of artists ‐Create a body of work related to and/or designers 60% a chosen theme/s ‐Exploration of a variety of ‐Create a final piece/s media, techniques and processes ‐Development of ideas in response to chosen artist/s/theme ‐Recording of ideas and observations Externally Set Assignment ‐Create preparatory studies ‐By creating a body of work (Exam) based on the theme based on the theme given.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Times July 15, 2003 'Critic's Notebook: for London, a Summer
    New York Times July 15, 2003 ‘Critic's Notebook: For London, a Summer of Photographic Memory; Around the City, Images From Around the World’ Michael Kimmelman This city is immersed in photography exhibitions, a coincidence of scheduling, perhaps, that the museums here decided made a catchy marketing scheme. Posters and flyers advertise the “Summer of Photography.” Why not? I stopped here on the way home from the Venice Biennale, after which any exhibition that did not involve watching hours of videos in plywood sweatboxes seemed like a joy. The London shows leave you with no specific definition of what photography is now, except that it is, fruitfully, many things at once, which is a functionally vague description of the medium. You can nevertheless get a fairly clear idea of the differences between a good photograph and a bad one. In the first category are two unlike Americans: Philip-Lorca diCorcia, with a show at Whitechapel, and Cindy Sherman, at Serpentine. Into the second category falls Wolfgang Tillmans, the chic German-born, London-based photographer, who has an exhibition at Tate Britain that cheerfully disregards the idea that there might even be a difference between Categories 1 and 2. There is also the posthumous retrospective, long overdue, of Guy Bourdin, the high- concept soft-core-pornography fashion photographer for French Vogue and Charles Jourdan shoes in the 1970's and 80's, at the Victoria and Albert. And as the unofficial anchor for it all Tate Modern, which until now had apparently never organized a major photography show, has tried in one fell swoop to make up for lost time with “Cruel and Tender: The Real in the 20th Century Photograph.” The title is from Lincoln Kirstein's apt description of Walker Evans's work as “tender cruelty.” Like Tate Modern in general, “Cruel and Tender” is vast, not particularly logical and blithely skewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct PDF Link for Archiving
    Kurt E. Rahmlow “The admiration one feels for something strange and uncanny”: Impressionism, Symbolism, and Edward Steichen’s Submissions to the 1905 London Photographic Salon Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide 15, no. 1 (Spring 2016) Citation: Kurt E. Rahmlow, “‘The admiration one feels for something strange and uncanny’: Impressionism, Symbolism, and Edward Steichen’s Submissions to the 1905 London Photographic Salon,” Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide 15, no. 1 (Spring 2016), http://www. 19thc-artworldwide.org/spring16/rahmlow-on-impressionism-symbolism-steichen-1905- london-photographic-salon. Published by: Association of Historians of Nineteenth-Century Art. Notes: This PDF is provided for reference purposes only and may not contain all the functionality or features of the original, online publication. Rahmlow: Impressionism, Symbolism, and Edward Steichen’s Submissions to the 1905 London Photographic Salon Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide 15, no. 1 (Spring 2016) “The admiration one feels for something strange and uncanny”: Impressionism, Symbolism, and Edward Steichen’s Submissions to the 1905 London Photographic Salon by Kurt E. Rahmlow In August 1904, Alfred Horsley Hinton (1863–1908), editor of the British periodical Amateur Photographer and a founding member of the London-based art photography club the Brotherhood of the Linked Ring (hereafter Linked Ring), wrote to Alfred Stieglitz (1864–1946) to critique recent photographs by Edward Steichen (1879–1973). In the note, Hinton remarks, I admire Steichen’s work for myself but it is the admiration one feels for something strange and uncanny—I can’t think that such work is healthy or would in this country have a beneficial influence. Many, nay most, of his things were very well exhibited to his fellow artists in his studio.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    Alfred Stieglitz and the opponents of Photo-Secessionism Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Zimlich, Leon Edwin, Jr., 1955- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 10/10/2021 21:07:09 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/291519 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Progression of Photographic Image Manipulation in Communication: an Argument Against the "Revolution" of Technological Change
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-1992 The progression of photographic image manipulation in communication: An argument against the "revolution" of technological change Cynthia Lynn Wood University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Wood, Cynthia Lynn, "The progression of photographic image manipulation in communication: An argument against the "revolution" of technological change" (1992). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 250. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/bqu5-khy0 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Photographs Gathered by William T. Hillman
    PRESS RELEASE | NEW YORK | 9 MARCH 2015 | FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CHRISTIE’S PRESENTS LEAVES OF LIGHT AND SHADOW: PHOTOGRAPHS GATHERED BY WILLIAM T. HILLMAN FREDERICK SOMMER, Livia, 1948. gelatin silver print, $80,000 - 120,000 RINEKE DIJKSTRA, Nicky, The Krazyhouse, Liverpool, England, January 19, 2009, $15,000 - 25,000 New York – On March 31, Christie’s will present the sale of Leaves Of Light And Shadow: Photographs Gathered By William T. Hillman, comprising 117 works judiciously acquired by William Hillman over the past three decades. With a sophisticated eye and tremendous dedication to photography, Mr. Hillman has built a comprehensive collection by pursuing consummate examples from top photographers spanning the history of the medium. In Hillman’s dedication to both photography and his hometown of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, his primary mission over the past three decades has been to build a world-class collection that will ultimately be gifted to the Carnegie Museum of Art. “There are gaps in the vintage acquisitions and the need to support and strengthen the contemporary component of this endeavor,” Mr. Hillman has stated. Hillman personally designated each work being presented for sale, and will reinvest the funds raised by the auction back into his mission. The top lot of the auction is Waitress in a Nudist Camp, N.J., 1963 by Diane Arbus (estimate: $200,000-300,000). Additional Highlights include: HENRI CARTIER-BRESSON, Piazza della Signoria, Florence, Italy, 1933, gelatin silver print | Estimate: $100,000-150,000 Piazza della Signoria, Florence was one of Henri Cartier Bresson's favorite images. He included it in his first solo exhibition in 1933 and his last retrospective in 2003, as well as in his first monograph The Decisive Moment in 1952, and his last monograph in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Century British Photography and the Case of Walter Benington by Robert William Crow
    Reputations made and lost: the writing of histories of early twentieth- century British photography and the case of Walter Benington by Robert William Crow A thesis submitted to the University of Gloucestershire in accordance with the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts and Technology January 2015 Abstract Walter Benington (1872-1936) was a major British photographer, a member of the Linked Ring and a colleague of international figures such as F H Evans, Alfred Stieglitz, Edward Steichen and Alvin Langdon Coburn. He was also a noted portrait photographer whose sitters included Albert Einstein, Dame Ellen Terry, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and many others. He is, however, rarely noted in current histories of photography. Beaumont Newhall’s 1937 exhibition Photography 1839-1937 at the Museum of Modern Art in New York is regarded by many respected critics as one of the foundation-stones of the writing of the history of photography. To establish photography as modern art, Newhall believed it was necessary to create a direct link between the master-works of the earliest photographers and the photographic work of his modernist contemporaries in the USA. He argued that any work which demonstrated intervention by the photographer such as the use of soft-focus lenses was a deviation from the direct path of photographic progress and must therefore be eliminated from the history of photography. A consequence of this was that he rejected much British photography as being “unphotographic” and dangerously irrelevant. Newhall’s writings inspired many other historians and have helped to perpetuate the neglect of an important period of British photography.
    [Show full text]
  • Stieglitz, Alfred American, 1864 - 1946
    National Gallery of Art NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART ONLINE EDITIONS Alfred Stieglitz Key Set Stieglitz, Alfred American, 1864 - 1946 BIOGRAPHY Few individuals have exerted as strong an influence on 20th-century American art and culture as the photographer and art dealer Alfred Stieglitz. Born in Hoboken, New Jersey, in 1864 during the Civil War, Stieglitz lived until 1946. He began to photograph while a student in Berlin in the 1880s and studied with the renowned photochemist Hermann Wilhelm Vogel. On his return to the United States in 1890, he began to advocate that photography should be treated as an art. He wrote many articles arguing his cause, edited the periodicals Camera Notes (1897–1902) and Camera Work (1903–1917), and in 1902 formed the Photo-Secession, an organization of photographers committed to establishing the artistic merit of photography. Stieglitz photographed New York for more than 25 years, portraying its streets, parks, and newly emerging skyscrapers; its horse-drawn carriages, trolleys, trains, and ferry boats; as well as some of its people. In the late 1910s and early 1920s, he also focused his camera on the landscape around his summer home in Lake George, New York. In 1918 Stieglitz became consumed with photographing his future wife, the artist Georgia O’Keeffe. For many years he had wanted to make an extended photographic portrait—he called it a composite portrait—in which he would study one person over a long period. Over the next 19 years he made more than 330 finished portraits of her. Beginning in 1922 and continuing throughout the 1920s, he also became preoccupied with another subject, clouds, making more than 300 finished studies of them.
    [Show full text]