DOCSLIB.ORG

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Former Morse Brothers Quarry 2903 Green River Road Sweet Home, Oregon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Former Morse Brothers Quarry 2903 Green River Road Sweet Home, Oregon Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Former Morse Brothers Quarry 2903 Green River Road Sweet Home, Oregon November 20052011 Project Number 2011230034 Cascade Earth Sciences 3511 Pacific Boulevard SW Albany, OR 97321 (541) 926-7737 www.cascade-earth.com CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ V 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF SERVICES .................................................................1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................1 2.1 Location and Legal Description ........................................................................................... 1 2.2 Site Characteristics ................................................................................................................ 1 2.2.1 Description of Site .................................................................................................... 2 2.2.2 Improvements and Utilities ...................................................................................... 2 2.2.3 Roads and Easements ............................................................................................... 2 2.2.4 Zoning ....................................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Surrounding Property Characteristics .................................................................................. 3 2.3.1 Northern Boundary ................................................................................................... 3 2.3.2 Southern Boundary ................................................................................................... 3 2.3.3 Eastern Boundary ..................................................................................................... 3 2.3.4 Western Boundary .................................................................................................... 3 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ............................................................................................3 3.1 Climate and Meteorology ..................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Physiography ......................................................................................................................... 4 3.2.1 Topography ............................................................................................................... 4 3.2.2 Soils ........................................................................................................................... 4 3.2.3 Geology ..................................................................................................................... 4 3.3 Hydrology .............................................................................................................................. 4 3.3.1 Surface Water ........................................................................................................... 4 3.3.2 Groundwater ............................................................................................................. 5 3.4 Unique Land Classification .................................................................................................. 5 3.4.1 Floodplain ................................................................................................................. 5 3.4.2 Wetlands ................................................................................................................... 5 4.0 HISTORICAL USE INVESTIGATION ................................................................................5 4.1 Historical Interviews ............................................................................................................. 5 4.2 Ownership Records ............................................................................................................... 6 4.3 Activity Use Limitations and Environmental Liens ............................................................ 6 4.4 City Directory Review .......................................................................................................... 7 4.5 Aerial Photograph Review .................................................................................................... 7 4.6 Historical Map Review ......................................................................................................... 8 4.6.1 Sanborn Maps ........................................................................................................... 8 4.6.2 Historic Topographical Maps .................................................................................. 8 4.7 Additional Environmental Records ...................................................................................... 9 4.7.1 Oregon State Fire Marshal’s Records ...................................................................... 9 4.7.2 Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Records ....................................... 9 4.7.3 Linn County Records ............................................................................................... 9 5.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW ...............................................................................10 5.1 Federal Database Information ............................................................................................. 10 5.2 State and Tribal Database Information ............................................................................... 11 Cascade Earth Sciences – Albany, OR Former Morse Brothers Quarry Phase I ESA PN: 2011230034 2903 Green River Road, Sweet Home, OR Doc: 2011230034 Linn County - Former Morse Brothers Quarry Phase I ESA (final).docm November 17, 2011 / Page v 5.3 Database Summary ............................................................................................................. 13 5.4 Unmappable Facilities ......................................................................................................... 13 5.5 Previous Site Investigations ................................................................................................ 13 5.6 Records Review ................................................................................................................... 14 5.6.1 Site (ECSI #2270) ................................................................................................... 14 5.6.2 Willamette Industries – Sweet Home (ECSI #347) .............................................. 14 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE .................................................................................................14 6.1 Site Observations ................................................................................................................. 15 6.2 Adjoining Property Observations ....................................................................................... 15 7.0 FINDINGS AND OPINIONS...............................................................................................15 7.1 Recognized Environmental Conditions.............................................................................. 15 7.1.1 Regulated Substances ............................................................................................. 16 7.1.2 Aboveground Storage Tanks ................................................................................. 17 7.1.3 Underground Storage Tanks .................................................................................. 17 7.1.4 Physical Indicators .................................................................................................. 17 7.1.5 Storage Drums ........................................................................................................ 17 7.1.6 Polychlorinated Biphenyls ..................................................................................... 18 7.1.7 Drains, Dry Wells, Sumps, Catch Basins .............................................................. 18 7.1.8 Pits, Ponds, and Lagoons ....................................................................................... 18 7.1.9 Solid Waste/Debris ................................................................................................. 18 7.1.10 Wastewater/Stormwater Discharge ....................................................................... 19 7.1.11 Private or Municipal Water Wells ......................................................................... 19 7.2 Non Scope Considerations .................................................................................................. 19 8.0 DATA GAPS ........................................................................................................................19 9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...............................................................20 10.0 LIMITATIONS .....................................................................................................................21 11.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS ...................................22 12.0 REFERENCES .....................................................................................................................23 FIGURES 1. Site Location Map 2. General Site Plan 3. Site Detail APPENDICES A. Photographs B. Well Logs C. Historical Information D. Regulatory Information E. DOGAMI/ODEQ Records F. Linn County Assessment Map of the Site G. Environmental Professional Qualifications Cascade
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South Santiam Hatchery
    SOUTH SANTIAM HATCHERY PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020 South Santiam Hatchery/Foster Adult Collection Facility INTRODUCTION South Santiam Hatchery is located on the South Santiam River just downstream from Foster Dam, 5 miles east of downtown Sweet Home. The facility is at an elevation of 500 feet above sea level, at latitude 44.4158 and longitude -122.6725. The site area is 12.6 acres, owned by the US Army Corps of Engineers and is used for egg incubation and juvenile rearing. The hatchery currently receives water from Foster Reservoir. A total of 8,400 gpm is available for the rearing units. An additional 5,500 gpm is used in the large rearing pond. All rearing ponds receive single-pass water. ODFW has no water right for water from Foster Reservoir, although it does state in the Cooperative agreement between the USACE and ODFW that the USACE will provide adequate water to operate the facility. The Foster Dam Adult Collection Facility was completed in July of 2014 which eliminated the need to transport adults to and hold brood stock at South Santiam Hatchery. ODFW took over operations of the facility in April of 2014. The new facility consists of an office/maintenance building, pre-sort pool, fish sorting area, 5 long term post-sort pools, 4 short term post-sort pools, and a water-to-water fish-to-truck loading system. Adult fish collection, adult handling, out planting, recycling, spawning, carcass processing, and brood stock holding will take place at Foster The Foster Dam Adult Collection Facility is located about 2 miles east of Sweet Home, Oregon at the base of Foster Dam along the south shore of the South Santiam River at RM 37.
    [Show full text]
  • South Santiam Subbasin Tmdl
    Willamette Basin TMDL: South Santiam Subbasin September 2006 CHAPTER 9: SOUTH SANTIAM SUBBASIN TMDL Table of Contents WATER QUALITY SUMMARY....................................................................................... 2 Reason for action .........................................................................................................................................................2 Water Quality 303(d) Listed Waterbodies ................................................................................................................3 Water Quality Parameters Addressed.......................................................................................................................3 Who helped us..............................................................................................................................................................4 SUBBASIN OVERVIEW ................................................................................................. 5 Watershed Descriptions ..............................................................................................................................................6 Crabtree Creek Watershed.........................................................................................................................................6 Hamilton Creek / South Santiam River Watershed...................................................................................................6 Middle Santiam River Watershed .............................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Leaburg Hatchery
    LEABURG HATCHERY PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020 Leaburg Hatchery Plan Page 1 Leaburg Hatchery INTRODUCTION Leaburg Hatchery is located along the McKenzie River (Willamette Basin) 4 miles east of Leaburg, Oregon, on Highway 126 at River Mile 38.8 on the McKenzie River. The site is at an elevation of 740 feet above sea level, at latitude 44.1203 and longitude -122.6092. The area of the site is 21.6 acres. Water rights total 44,900 gpm from the McKenzie River. Water use varies with need throughout the year and is delivered by gravity. All rearing facilities use single-pass water. The facility is staffed with 3 FTE’s. Rearing Facilities at Leaburg Hatchery Unit Unit Unit Unit Unit Number Total Construction Type Length Width Depth Volume Units Volume Material Age Condition Comment (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft3) (ft3) Canadian Troughs 16 2.66 1.5 64 13 832 fiberglass 1987 good Canadian Troughs 16 3.0 3.0 144 2 288 Fiberglass 2002 good Circular Ponds 20 2.2 690 6 4,140 concrete 1953 good Raceways 50 20 3.66 3,660 1 10,980 concrete 1953 good Raceways 100 20 3.66 7,320 40 285,480 concrete 1953 good Troughs 18 1.17 0.5 11 5 53 aluminum 1970 good Vertical Incubators 48 plastic 1990 good 6 stacks of 8 trays PURPOSE Leaburg Hatchery was constructed in 1953 by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to mitigate for lost trout habitat caused by construction of Blue River and Cougar dams and other Willamette Valley projects.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Lebanon Historic Context Statement
    UITY OF LEBANON . HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT 1994 CITY OF LEBANON HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Prepared for the City of Lebanon September 1994 by Mary Kathryn Gallagher Linn County Planning Department Research Assistance provided by: Pat Dunn Shirlee Harrington May D. Dasch Malia Allen Project Supervisor: Doug Parker Lebanon City Planner ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Without the hours donated by the following individuals, it would not be possible to produce a document of this type with the time and monies allotted. Pat Dunn, Shirlee Harrington, May D. Dasch and Malia Allen spent hours pouring over microfilm reels of Lebanon newspapers and an ., equal number of hours in the County Recorder and Assessor Offices researching individual properties. They also donated many hours toward the end of the project assisting with the last minute details of assembling a product of this type. There were a number of other individuals that accomplished important tasks. Steve and Elyse Kassis spent many hours taking photographs of Lebanon buildings. Pat Dunn located historical views of Lebanon. John Miles assisted in historical research on donation land claim holders and Mel Harrington assisted with deed research. Joella Larsen and Lee and Betty Scott provided information on Lebanon history. Jim Nelson offered his services to create a very comprehensive index. The City of Lebanon was very supportive in this endeavor with Doug Parker, City Planner, very responsive to the needs of the project. The Lebanon Historic Resource Commission supplied the • enthusiasm so important to make the project successful. City staff Anna Rae Goetz and Donna Martell were a great help in the last minute rush to compile this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Foster Dam Adult Fish Facility and in Foster Dam Reservoir on the South Santiam River, 2017
    Technical Report 2018-3-FINAL _______________________________________________________________ EVALUATION OF ADULT CHINOOK SALMON BEHAVIOR AT THE FOSTER DAM ADULT FISH FACILITY AND IN FOSTER DAM RESERVOIR ON THE SOUTH SANTIAM RIVER, 2017 M.L. Keefer, T.S. Clabough, M.A. Jepson, T. Blubaugh, G. Brink, G.P. Naughton, C.T. Boggs, and C.C. Caudill Department of Fish and Wildlife Sciences University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844-1136 For U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Portland District 2018 1 i Technical Report 2018-3-FINAL _______________________________________________________________ EVALUATION OF ADULT CHINOOK SALMON BEHAVIOR AT THE FOSTER DAM ADULT FISH FACILITY AND IN FOSTER DAM RESERVOIR ON THE SOUTH SANTIAM RIVER, 2017 M.L. Keefer, T.S. Clabough, M.A. Jepson, T. Blubaugh, G. Brink, G.P. Naughton, C.T. Boggs, and C.C. Caudill Department of Fish and Wildlife Sciences University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844-1136 For U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Portland District 2018 ii Acknowledgements This research project was funded by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and we thank Fenton Khan, Rich Piakowski, Glenn Rhett, Deberay Charmichael, Sherry Whittaker, and Steve Schlenker for their support. We also thank Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife staff Bob Mapes, Brett Boyd, and Cameron Sharpe for project coordination and support. We are grateful to the University of Idaho’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee for reviewing and approving the protocols used in this study. We thank Stephanie Burchfield and Diana Dishman (NOAA Fisheries) and Michele Weaver and Holly Huchko (ODFW) for their assistance securing study permits and Bonnie Johnson (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Owl Ridge Trails Project
    The Owl Ridge Trails Project: Location and Documentation of Primary Travel, Trade, and Resource Use Trails of the Santiam Molalla in the South Santiam River and Blue River, Oregon Headwaters, from 1750 to 1850 Final Report by Dr. Bob Zybach Program Manager, Oregon Websites and Watersheds Project, Inc. Prepared for David Lewis, Cultural Resources Director, and the Tribal Council of the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde June 30, 2008 Mission Statements of Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde The mission of the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde staff is to improve the quality of life for Tribal people by providing opportunities and services that will build and embrace a community rich in healthy families and capable people with strong cultural values. Through collective decision making, meaningful partnerships and responsible stewardship of natural and economic resources, we will plan and provide for a sustainable economic foundation for future generations. The mission of Site Protection is to manage our cultural resources in accordance with our traditions, applicable laws, regulations, and professional standards, wherever they occur on our tribal lands, our ceded lands, and within our traditional usual and accustomed gathering places. The Cultural Collection program's mission is to preserve and perpetuate the cultural heritage of the original tribes of the Grand Ronde community by acquiring, managing, and protecting tribally affiliated collections through exhibition, loan, and repatriation. The Cultural Education program's mission is to preserve and perpetuate the cultural and linguistic heritage of the original tribes of the Grand Ronde community. Mission of Oregon Websites and Watersheds Project, Inc. Oregon Websites and Watersheds Project, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • ADDENDUM Work Completed for Compliance with the Biological
    ADDENDUM Work Completed for Compliance With the Biological Opinion for Hatchery Programs in the Willamette Basin, USACE funding: 2002-03 J. Firman, M. Buckman Task Order: NWP-OP-FH-02-01 October 2003 Introduction The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has listed Spring Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and Winter Steelhead (O. mykiss) in the Upper Willamette River Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA; 64 FRN 14308; 64 FRN 14517). Concomitant with this listing, any actions taken or funded by a federal agency must be evaluated to assess whether these actions are likely to jeopardize the continued existence of threatened and endangered species, or result in the destruction or impairment of critical habitat. Several fish hatcheries operate within the ESU and may impact wild populations of listed species. Although all of the artificial propagation programs that potentially affect listed salmonids in the Upper Willamette River ESUs are operated by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), 90% of the funding for these operations comes from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). Possible risks of artificial propagation programs have been well documented. Hazards include disease transfer, competition for food and spawning sites, increased predation, increased incidental mortality from harvest, loss of genetic variability, genetic drift, and domestication (Steward and Bjornn 1990; Hard et al. 1992; Cuenco et al. 1993; Busack and Currens 1995; NRC 1996; and Waples 1999). Hatcheries can also play a positive role for wild salmonids by bolstering populations, especially those on the verge of extirpation, providing a genetic reserve in the case of extirpation, and providing opportunities for nutrient enrichment of streams (Steward and Bjornn 1990; Cuenco et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Water Temperature Response to Dam Operations and Water Management in Green Peter and Foster Lakes and the South Santiam River, Oregon
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Modeling Water Temperature Response to Dam Operations and Water Management in Green Peter and Foster Lakes and the South Santiam River, Oregon Scientific Investigations Report 2020-5145 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Green Peter Dam (left) on the Middle Santiam River upstream of Foster Dam (right) on the South Santiam River, Oregon. Photographs taken from the U.S Army Corps of Engineers image gallery (https://www. nwd.usace.army.mil/Media/Images/). Modeling Water Temperature Response to Dam Operations and Water Management in Green Peter and Foster Lakes and the South Santiam River, Oregon By Annett B. Sullivan and Stewart A. Rounds Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Scientific Investigations Report 2020–5145 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2021 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Flows Workshop for the Santiam River Basin, Oregon
    SUMMARY REPORT: Environmental Flows Workshop for the Santiam River Basin, Oregon January 2013 North Santiam River downstream from Detroit Lake near Niagara at about river mile 57. Photograph by Casey Lovato, U.S. Geological Survey, June 2011. Leslie Bach Jason Nuckols Emilie Blevins THE NATURE CONSERVANCY IN OREGON 821 SE 14TH AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97214 nature.org/oregon 1 This page is intentionally left blank. 2 Summary Report: Environmental Flows Workshop for the Santiam River Basin, Oregon Contents Introduction 4 Background 4 Santiam River 5 Environmental Flow Workshop 6 Workshop Results 10 Fall Flows 10 Winter Flows 11 Spring Flows 12 Summer Flows 14 Flow Recommendations by Reach 16 Recommendations for Future Studies 20 References Cited 22 Appendix A. Workshop Agenda 23 Appendix B. List of workshop attendees 24 3 Introduction Background The Willamette River and its tributaries support a rich diversity of aquatic flora and fauna, including important runs of salmon and steelhead. The river is also home to the majority of Oregon’s population and provides vital goods and services to the region and beyond. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) operates 13 dams in the Willamette Basin - 11 multiple purpose storage reservoirs and 2 regulating reservoirs. All 13 of the dams are located on major tributaries; there are no USACE dams on the mainstem Willamette River. The dams provide important benefits to society, including flood risk reduction, hydropower and recreation. At the same time, the dams have changed the flow conditions in the river with associated effects on ecosystem processes and native fish and wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Prehistoric Salmon Subsistence in the Willamette Valley Using Zooarchaeological Records and Optimal Foraging Theory
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1-1-2010 Exploring Prehistoric Salmon Subsistence in the Willamette Valley using Zooarchaeological Records and Optimal Foraging Theory J. Tait Elder Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Elder, J. Tait, "Exploring Prehistoric Salmon Subsistence in the Willamette Valley using Zooarchaeological Records and Optimal Foraging Theory" (2010). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 22. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.22 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Exploring Prehistoric Salmon Subsistence in the Willamette Valley using Zooarchaeological Records and Optimal Foraging Theory by J. Tait Elder A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology Thesis Committee: Virginia L. Butler, Chair Kenneth M. Ames Douglas Wilson Portland State University ©2010 Abstract My research examines the prehistoric subsistence of native peoples of the Willamette Valley, Oregon through an analysis of the regional zooarchaeological records, and then modeling regional diet breadth. Through this analysis, I challenge commonly held stereotypes that the indigenous people of the Willamette Valley were strictly root eaters, and the basis for this claim, that salmon were not part of Native subsistence. The results of my research indicate that given the incomplete nature of the ethnohistoric record, very little can be said about expected cultural behaviors, such as salmon consumption, that appear to be absent in the Willamette Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Santiam Molalla History, Culture, and Geography the Name “Molalla
    1 1. Santiam Molalla History, Culture, and Geography The name “Molalla” has at least 27 historical spellings. It is said to be derived from the words “moolek” for elk and “olilla” for berries (Winkler 1984). This would seemingly be a good name for their land, which produced abundant elk and berries, as well as for the people, who were known to extensively trade specialty products from these plants and animals. Preserved huckleberries and blackberries, elk hides, jerked meat, and elkhorn spoons were all trade goods associated with Molallans. Beargrass and willow weaving materials were also important trade items, due to their universal value and general abundance in Molalla lands. The Santiam Molalla were known as good elk hunters, good berry pickers, accomplished traders, bitter and fierce enemies of the Cayuse to the east, and good friends, family, and business associates with the Klamath to the south. They were also said to be poor guides when more than 35 miles from their homes, indicating a relatively concentrated and productive Tribal territory of seasonal use and trade route patterns (Minto 1903). Molallan Geography. Very little is known about the Molallan history or culture (Winkler 1984; Ruby and Brown 1986; Zenk and Rigsby 1998), but there is good agreement on early historical Molallan geography. During the 1750- 1850 late precontact/early historical time period of this study, Molallans occupied nearly the entire western slope of the Oregon Cascades Range, from the Columbia River south, almost to California. The Molalla are believed to have been organized into three, or possibly four, major “bands,” or tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • View the Linn County Master Plan
    LINN COUNTY park AND recreation MASTER PLAN JANUARY 2009 L INN C OUNTY P ARKS AND R ECREATION M ASTER P LAN Prepared by: MIG, Inc. 199 East 5th Avenue #33 Eugene, OR 97402 541.683.3193 www.migcom.com Sally McIntyre, Project Manager/Principal-in-Charge Nell Donaldson, Assistant Project Manager Ryan Mottau, Project Associate Katy Wolf, Project Assistant December 2008 L INN C OUNTY B OARD OF C OUNTY C OMMISSIONERS Roger Nyquist, Chairman John K. Lindsey Cliff Wooten L INN C OUNTY P ARKS & RECREATION C OMMISSION B. Osburn Shaw, Chairman Richard Bayus Jean Blaylock Mel Harrington Gary Hull John Lindsey Milt Moran Will Tucker Ken Wetgen F. Darrell Winn L INN C OUNTY P ARKS & R ECREATION D EPARTMENT Brian J. Carroll. Director Richard Frick, Operations Supervisor Cheryl Johnston, Office Manager T ECHNICAL A DVISORY C OMMITTEE James Beal Janine Belleque Dustin Bengtson Terry Bergerson Ed Hodney Wayne Hunt Zack Jarrett Nancy Kirks Steve Lambert Craig Martin Brian McGinley Steve Michaels John Pascone Rod Sell Jeff Smith Bryan Von Bargen Don Wenzel S PECIAL T HANKS To the citizens of Linn County who participated in surveys, focus groups and public meetings providing the information necessary to create this master plan. To the Linn County Parks and Recreation staff for their dedication to improving the quality of life in Linn County. ________________________________________TABLE OF CONTENTS T ABLE OF C ONTENTS E XECUTIVE S UMMARY ............................ I I NTRODUCTION ...................................... 1 B ENEFITS OF P ARKS AND R ECREATION
    [Show full text]