Honoring First Nations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Honoring First Nations 2019 Central Committee Annual Meeting – Honoring First Nations Honoring First Nations It has been my practice to include some aspect of honoring our Native Americans in our Central Committee meetings, ranging from a simple “Land Acknowledgement” to more detailed explorations of Indian history with the presentation by the Baltimore YM Indian Affairs Committee or last year’s video in which modern First Nations people spoke of their experience. I have become increasingly uncomfortable with a simple Land Acknowledgement, however, asking myself is this just a “tip o’ the hat” gesture driven by the guilt feelings of this descendant of colonists? I don’t know, but I have come under the weight of a Query: How can I seek a better understanding and acknowledgement of the history, present and current presence of First Peoples as a step towards right relationship? In response, I want to share these excerpts from several sources with you. Though many resources I read seem well researched and reliable, it is not possible for me to identify if any Native Americans contributed to the research or writing, and accounts sometimes differ significantly. There are no Federally recognized tribes in Maryland but there are two state recognized tribes: The Tribes of the Piscataway and the Accohannock Tribe. Reisterstown is located in Baltimore County, Md. The Historical Society of Baltimore County identifies the Susquehannock Tribe as a major inhabitant of this area, though many other tribes are identified by other historians as dwellers at various times. Indeed, a Maryland State website lists 51 different historical tribal names within the state! Two of the main Indian tribes of Southeastern and Central Pennsylvania and Maryland were the Susquehannock and Lenape. The Leni Lenape, commonly associated with the Philadelphia area, are named by some authors in association with this area, though more so in northern Maryland in Cecil County. General descriptions say that the Susquehannock lived along the Susquehanna River and the Lenape lived along the Delaware River. Perhaps at one time they were part of the same tribe; however, by the 1300's there was a clear separation. Lenni Lenape Lenape is Algonquian for The People. Lenni Lenape means something like the original people. Other Indians referred to the Lenape as grandfather. The precise origin of the Lenape is not known, but there is strong evidence that the Lenape are one of the oldest tribes. Likely, this is why other Indian tribes considered them the original people and the grandfather of all Indians. Lord de la Warr, the governor of the Jamestown colony, mistaken re-named them the Delaware Indians. In the early 1600's, the Lenape were one of the first Indian tribes to come into contact with European settlers. Although the Lenape were severely respected by other Indians for their fierceness and tenacity as warriors, they preferred the path of peace. Unfortunately, this led them to be taken advantage of by the Europeans and other Indian tribes. The Susquehannock The Susquehannock Indians resided along the Susquehanna River in Central Pennsylvania. They are thought to have split off from the Iroquois Mohawks around the year 1300. Author: Frank Barch FGC Presiding Clerk Creation Date: 10/24/2019 Page 1 of 3 2019 Central Committee Annual Meeting – Honoring First Nations Around 1500 they migrated from the area between Scranton, Pennsylvania, and Binghamton, New York to what is the modern-day Lancaster, Pennsylvania area. It is believed their territory included what is present day Dauphin County, Schuylkill County, Berks County and Northumberland County. In the early 1600's, they waged war against Iroquois tribes. In 1675, the Susquehannock were defeated by other Indian tribes and were relocated to Maryland. They were renamed the Conestoga Indians. Eventually, they returned to the Lancaster area. The remnants of the Susquehannock tribe were massacred by the Paxton Boys. The Paxton Boys were a group of backcountry Presbyterian Scots-Irish frontiersmen from the area around the central Pennsylvania, in the area now defined as Dauphin County, who formed a vigilante group in response to the American Indian uprising known as Pontiac's Rebellion. The Paxton Boys felt that the government of colonial Pennsylvania was negligent in providing them with protection, and so decided to take matters into their own hands. As the nearest belligerent Indians were some 200 miles west of Paxton, the men turned their anger towards the local Conestoga (or Susquehannock) Indians—many of them Christians—who lived peacefully in small enclaves in the midst of white Pennsylvania settlements. (The Paxton Boys believed or claimed to believe that these Indians secretly provided aid and intelligence to the hostile Indians.) In 1763 a group of more than fifty Paxton Boys marched on an Indian village near Millersville, PA, murdered the six Indians they found there, and burned the bloody cabin in which the killings were done. This was their first attack, but it did not stop there. The men later attempted to kill more Indian tribes. One of the more famous of the failed attempts being the march on Philadelphia. Later, colonists looking through the ashes of the cabin, found a bag containing the Conestoga's 1701 treaty signed by William Penn, which pledged that the colonists and the Indians "shall forever hereafter be as one Head & One Heart, & live in true Friendship & Amity as one People." The remaining fourteen Susquehannocks were placed in protective custody by Governor John Penn in Lancaster. But the Paxton Boys broke into the workhouse at Lancaster and brutally killed and mutilated all fourteen. These two actions, which resulted in the deaths of all but two of the last of the Susquehannocks, are sometimes known as the "Conestoga Massacre". The Governor issued bounties for the arrest of the murderers, but no one came forward to identify them. Outraged that the eastern establishment leaders would, as they saw it, defend Indians but not settlers, in early 1764 the Paxton Boys set their sights on other Indians living peacefully within eastern Pennsylvania, 140 of whom fled to Philadelphia for protection. About two-hundred and fifty Paxton men then marched on Philadelphia in January of 1764, where only the presence of British troops and Philadelphia militia prevented them from doing more violence. Benjamin Franklin, who had raised the local militia, negotiated with the Paxton leaders and brought an end to the immediate crisis. A third of the Indians subsequently died of smallpox contracted in the crowded barracks where they had been provided refuge. A detailed article on the history of the Susquehannocks published on-line concludes: The history of the Susquehannocks’ early European contact is full of exaggerations, contradictions, and misrepresentations. Archaeology has made evident that prior to the sixteenth century the Susquehannocks’ culture was very similar to their Iroquois ancestors. Conflict drove them away from the Iroquois while trade and more secure settlements drew them south. They indirectly Author: Frank Barch FGC Presiding Clerk Creation Date: 10/24/2019 Page 2 of 3 2019 Central Committee Annual Meeting – Honoring First Nations discovered European wares and trade in the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. It was trade that caught the attention of the Susquehannocks. Growing trade meant increasing interaction with Europeans. Though the present paper does not thoroughly engage the Susquehannocks history beyond the 1650s, common knowledge allows us to understand that Indian wars and European interaction was much the cause of the Natives’ destruction. Prior to their demise as a powerful people and discernable cultural entity, it was the European trade that brought the Susquehannocks to the pinnacle of prosperity. Trade was what enabled the Susquehannock Native Americans to come into their own as one of the most affluent and prosperous Native American cultures of the mid-Atlantic region. It was initially trade with the Dutch that brought ballistic arms to the Susquehannocks. Trade, as well as their ability using piracy to cause economic hardship for the Seneca and surrounding tribes enabled their expansion. Eventually the Swedes desired the services and friendship of the Susquehannocks. The Swedish trade brought the Susquehannocks onto another level in terms of military might and influence. The English were able to briefly threaten the power and land holdings of the Susquehannocks. However, the threat of the English was shortly thereafter defused with the treaties and alliance of 1652. This alliance further bolstered the Susquehannocks’ power and achieved them their greatest military arsenal and prosperity. As I reach the end of this exploration, I’d like to return to the Leni Lenape. One author states: By the 1700's, the Lenape Indians were driven out of the Delaware River Valley into the Susquehannock region. Their numbers greatly reduced from conflict and disease, most of the remaining Delaware were relocated to Oklahoma by the mid-1800s. This implies to me that the Leni Lenape are not modern residents of the Eastern US. In addition to recognizing the previous reference to the preference of the Leni Lenape for peace over combat, I’d like to refute this, and close with this modern video demonstrating an aspect of Leni Lenape history and spirituality. https://www.lenape-nation.org/2nd-project Author: Frank Barch FGC Presiding Clerk Creation Date: 10/24/2019 Page 3 of 3 .
Recommended publications
  • Nanjemoy and Mattawoman Creek Watersheds
    Defining the Indigenous Cultural Landscape for The Nanjemoy and Mattawoman Creek Watersheds Prepared By: Scott M. Strickland Virginia R. Busby Julia A. King With Contributions From: Francis Gray • Diana Harley • Mervin Savoy • Piscataway Conoy Tribe of Maryland Mark Tayac • Piscataway Indian Nation Joan Watson • Piscataway Conoy Confederacy and Subtribes Rico Newman • Barry Wilson • Choptico Band of Piscataway Indians Hope Butler • Cedarville Band of Piscataway Indians Prepared For: The National Park Service Chesapeake Bay Annapolis, Maryland St. Mary’s College of Maryland St. Mary’s City, Maryland November 2015 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this project was to identify and represent the Indigenous Cultural Landscape for the Nanjemoy and Mattawoman creek watersheds on the north shore of the Potomac River in Charles and Prince George’s counties, Maryland. The project was undertaken as an initiative of the National Park Service Chesapeake Bay office, which supports and manages the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail. One of the goals of the Captain John Smith Trail is to interpret Native life in the Middle Atlantic in the early years of colonization by Europeans. The Indigenous Cultural Landscape (ICL) concept, developed as an important tool for identifying Native landscapes, has been incorporated into the Smith Trail’s Comprehensive Management Plan in an effort to identify Native communities along the trail as they existed in the early17th century and as they exist today. Identifying ICLs along the Smith Trail serves land and cultural conservation, education, historic preservation, and economic development goals. Identifying ICLs empowers descendant indigenous communities to participate fully in achieving these goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Bladensburg Prehistoric Background
    Environmental Background and Native American Context for Bladensburg and the Anacostia River Carol A. Ebright (April 2011) Environmental Setting Bladensburg lies along the east bank of the Anacostia River at the confluence of the Northeast Branch and Northwest Branch of this stream. Formerly known as the East Branch of the Potomac River, the Anacostia River is the northernmost tidal tributary of the Potomac River. The Anacostia River has incised a pronounced valley into the Glen Burnie Rolling Uplands, within the embayed section of the Western Shore Coastal Plain physiographic province (Reger and Cleaves 2008). Quaternary and Tertiary stream terraces, and adjoining uplands provided well drained living surfaces for humans during prehistoric and historic times. The uplands rise as much as 300 feet above the water. The Anacostia River drainage system flows southwestward, roughly parallel to the Fall Line, entering the Potomac River on the east side of Washington, within the District of Columbia boundaries (Figure 1). Thin Coastal Plain strata meet the Piedmont bedrock at the Fall Line, approximately at Rock Creek in the District of Columbia, but thicken to more than 1,000 feet on the east side of the Anacostia River (Froelich and Hack 1975). Terraces of Quaternary age are well-developed in the Bladensburg vicinity (Glaser 2003), occurring under Kenilworth Avenue and Baltimore Avenue. The main stem of the Anacostia River lies in the Coastal Plain, but its Northwest Branch headwaters penetrate the inter-fingered boundary of the Piedmont province, and provided ready access to the lithic resources of the heavily metamorphosed interior foothills to the west.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1941, Volume 36, Issue No. 1
    ma SC 5Z2I~]~J41 MARYLAND HISTORICAL MAGAZINE PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY VOLUME XXXVI BALTIMORE 1941 CONTENTS OF VOLUME XXXVI PAGE THE SUSQUEHANNOCK FORT ON PISCATAWAY CREEK. By Alice L. L. Ferguson, 1 ELIZA GODBFROY: DESTINY'S FOOTBALL. By William D. Hoyt, Jr., ... 10 BLUE AND GRAY: I. A BALTIMORE VOLUNTEER OF 1864. By William H. fames, 22 II. THE CONFEDERATE RAID ON CUMBERLAND, 1865. By Basil William Spalding, 33 THE " NARRATIVE " OF COLONEL JAMES RIGBIE. By Henry Chandlee Vorman, . 39 A WEDDING OF 1841, 50 THE LIFE OF RICHARD MALCOLM JOHNSTON IN MARYLAND, 1867-1898. By Prawds Taylor Long, concluded, 54 LETTERS OF CHARLES CARROLL, BARRISTER, continued, 70, 336 BOOK REVIEWS, 74, 223, 345, 440 NOTES AND QUERIES, 88, 231, 354, 451 PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY, 90, 237, 455 LIST OF MEMBERS, 101 THE REVOLUTIONARY IMPULSE IN MARYLAND. By Charles A. Barker, . 125 WILLIAM GODDARD'S VICTORY FOR THE FREEDOM OF THE PRESS. By W. Bird Terwilliger, 139 CONTROL OF THE BALTIMORE PRESS DURING THE CIVIL WAR. By Sidney T. Matthews, 150 SHIP-BUILDING ON THE CHESAPEAKE: RECOLLECTIONS OF ROBERT DAWSON LAMBDIN, 171 READING INTERESTS OF THE PROFESSIONAL CLASSES IN COLONIAL MARYLAND, 1700-1776. By Joseph Towne Wheeler, 184, 281 THE HAYNIE LETTERS 202 BALTIMORE COUNTY LAND RECORDS OF 1687. By Louis Dow Scisco, . 215 A LETTER FROM THE SPRINGS, 220 POLITICS IN MARYLAND DURING THE CIVIL WAR. By Charles Branch Clark, . 239 THE ORIGIN OF THE RING TOURNAMENT IN THE UNITED STATES. By G. Harrison Orians, 263 RECOLLECTIONS OF BROOKLANDWOOD TOURNAMENTS. By D. Sterett Gittings, 278 THE WARDEN PAPERS.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMER 2018 Officers President’S Message PRESIDENT Summer on Kent Island Brings Its Own Adventures and Jack E
    To Discover, Identify, Restore and Preserve the Heritage of Kent Island Newsletter of the Kent Island Heritage Society, Inc. SUMMER 2018 Officers President’s Message PRESIDENT Summer on Kent Island brings its own adventures and Jack E. Broderick Summer on Kent Island brings its own set of adventures and challenges – all in a wonderful setting. Of course there are challenges – all in a wonderful setting. Of course there are those nemeses: for me - mosquitoes, ticks, sea nettles, snakes, VICE PRESIDENT those nemeses. For me they’re mosquitoes, ticks, sea nettles, an occasional skunk, bay bridge traffic, and the sometimes Robert Lowe snakes, an occasional skunk, Bay Bridge traffic, and the some- cantankerous weather. But the magic of this place, its heritage times cantankerous weather. But the magic of this place, its and its people make it all worthwhile. Consider our steamed RECORDING SECRETARY heritage and its people make it all worth it. I mean … con- crabs, crab cakes, fried soft crabs, rock fish, ospreys, evening Nancy M. Cook sider our steamed crabs, crab cakes, fried soft crabs, rock fish, breezes, ”diamonds on the water” when the sun is just right, ospreys, evening breezes, “diamonds on the water” when the the boat ride down the creek, the visit out on the deck with CORRESPONDING sun is just right, that boat ride down the creek, the visit out on friends, neighbors, and sometimes visitors from far away. Each SECRETARY the deck with friends, neighbors, and sometimes visitors of us has our own favorites. I often think old Capt. John Smith was right when he first Carole P.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuscarora Trails: Indian Migrations, War, and Constructions of Colonial Frontiers
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2007 Tuscarora trails: Indian migrations, war, and constructions of colonial frontiers Stephen D. Feeley College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Feeley, Stephen D., "Tuscarora trails: Indian migrations, war, and constructions of colonial frontiers" (2007). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539623324. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-4nn0-c987 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Tuscarora Trails: Indian Migrations, War, and Constructions of Colonial Frontiers Volume I Stephen Delbert Feeley Norcross, Georgia B.A., Davidson College, 1996 M.A., The College of William and Mary, 2000 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the College of William and Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Lyon Gardiner Tyler Department of History The College of William and Mary May, 2007 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. APPROVAL SHEET This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Stephen Delbert F eele^ -^ Approved by the Committee, January 2007 MIL James Axtell, Chair Daniel K. Richter McNeil Center for Early American Studies 11 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study on a Potential Susquehanna Connector Trail for the John Smith Historic Trail
    Feasibility Study on a Potential Susquehanna Connector Trail for the John Smith Historic Trail Prepared for The Friends of the John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail November 16, 2009 Coordinated by The Bucknell University Environmental Center’sNature and Human Communities Initiative The Susquehanna Colloquium for Nature and Human Communities The Susquehanna River Heartland Coalition for Environmental Studies In partnership with Bucknell University The Eastern Delaware Nations The Haudenosaunee Confederacy The Susquehanna Greenway Partnership Pennsylvania Environmental Council Funded by the Conservation Fund/R.K. Mellon Foundation 2 Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 3 Recommended Susquehanna River Connecting Trail................................................................. 5 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 6 Staff ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Criteria used for Study................................................................................................................. 6 2. Description of Study Area, Team Areas, and Smith Map Analysis ...................................... 8 a. Master Map of Sites and Trails from Smith Era in Study Area........................................... 8 b. Study
    [Show full text]
  • This Land Is Whose Land?
    This Land Is Whose Land? Author: Mary Davis, Anne Arundel County Public Schools Grade Level: Upper Elementary Duration: One 90 minute class (or two 1 hour classes) Overview: In the latter half of the 17 th century, the expanding colony of Maryland came into conflict with the Eastern Woodland Indian tribes who had been hunting and farming the region for almost 6,000 years. The conflict developed from competing views of land use. The Indians saw the land as the bearer of seasonal resources to be used when available and the English colonists saw it as a commodity to be bought and sold. When the Nanticoke tribe could no longer repel the incursions of colonists, they petitioned the Maryland Assembly to have lands granted to them for their exclusive use. The terms of the agreement and size of the lands granted were insufficient for the traditional lifeways of the Nanticoke, which led to further conflicts with their neighbors. In this lesson, the students will use a series of legal documents from the Maryland Assembly to trace the development of the conflict over land ownership. Content Standards: Era 1: Three Worlds Meet (Beginnings to 1620) Standard 2: How early European exploration and colonization resulted in cultural and ecological interactions among previously unconnected peoples Historical Thinking Standards: Standard 3: Historical Analysis and Interpretation C. Analyze cause­and­effect relationships and multiple causation, including the importance of the individual, the influence of ideas, and the role of chance. Lesson Objectives: ­Students will read primary source documents about relationships between colonial Maryland and nearby Native American tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Piscataway Indian Nation
    Piscataway Indian Nation From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search The Piscataway Indian Nation is a non-state, non-federally recognized Native American tribal nation, which, at one time, was one of the most populous and powerful Native polities of the Chesapeake region. By the early seventeenth century, the Piscataway had come to exercise hegemony over other Native American groups on the north bank of the Potomac River. While Piscataway fortunes declined as Maryland colony grew and prospered, the Piscataway continue to be leaders among the tribal nations of Maryland, as well as throughout Indian Country in their commitment to Indigenous and Human Rights. Contents [hide] 1 Geography 2 Government 3 History o 3.1 The Indigenous Chesapeake o 3.2 English Colonization o 3.3 The Long Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries o 3.4 Piscataway Revival 4 Sources 5 External links [edit] Geography The Piscataway Indian Nation is a long-established tribal nation of Native Americans inhabiting traditional homelands on the western shore of Maryland's Chesapeake Bay in the areas of Charles County, Prince George's County, and St. Mary's County, located near two metropolitan areas, Baltimore and Washington, D.C. [edit] Government The current chief of the Piscataway Indian Nation is Billy Redwing Tayac, an outspoken leader in the movement for Indigenous and Human Rights, and the son of the late Chief Turkey Tayac, a prominent figure in the Native American revitalization and reclamation movements of the last half of the twentieth century. [edit] History No scientific scholarship supports the theory that those claiming today to be Piscataway Indians are actually descended from the historical tribe of that name.
    [Show full text]
  • Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail Connecting
    CAPTAIN JOHN SMITH CHESAPEAKE NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL CONNECTING TRAILS EVALUATION STUDY 410 Severn Avenue, Suite 405 Annapolis, MD 21403 CONTENTS Acknowledgments 2 Executive Summary 3 Statement of Study Findings 5 Introduction 9 Research Team Reports 10 Anacostia River 11 Chester River 15 Choptank River 19 Susquehanna River 23 Upper James River 27 Upper Nanticoke River 30 Appendix: Research Teams’ Executive Summaries and Bibliographies 34 Anacostia River 34 Chester River 37 Choptank River 40 Susquehanna River 44 Upper James River 54 Upper Nanticoke River 56 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are truly thankful to the research and project team, led by John S. Salmon, for the months of dedicated research, mapping, and analysis that led to the production of this important study. In all, more than 35 pro- fessionals, including professors and students representing six universities, American Indian representatives, consultants, public agency representatives, and community leaders contributed to this report. Each person brought an extraordinary depth of knowledge, keen insight and a personal devotion to the project. We are especially grateful for the generous financial support that we received from the following private foundations, organizations and corporate partners: The Morris & Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation, The Clay- ton Fund, Inc., Colcom Foundation, The Conservation Fund, Lockheed Martin, the Richard King Mellon Foundation, The Merrill Foundation, the Pennsylvania Environmental Council, the Rauch Foundation, The Peter Jay Sharp Foundation, Verizon, Virginia Environmental Endowment and the Wallace Genetic Foundation. Without their support this project would simply not have been possible. Finally, we would like to extend a special thank you to the board of directors of the Chesapeake Conser- vancy, and to John Maounis, Superintendent of the National Park Service Chesapeake Bay Office, for their leadership and unwavering commitment to the Captain John Smith Chesapeake Trail.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Trade Silver Among the Lenape: Pewter Objects From
    West Chester University Digital Commons @ West Chester University Anthropology & Sociology College of Arts & Sciences 1990 The Origins of Trade Silver Among the Lenape: Pewter Objects from Southeastern Pennsylvania as Possible Precursors Marshall Joseph Becker West Chester University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcupa.edu/anthrosoc_facpub Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Becker, M. J. (1990). The Origins of Trade Silver Among the Lenape: Pewter Objects from Southeastern Pennsylvania as Possible Precursors. Northeast Historical Archaeology, 19(1), 78-98. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.wcupa.edu/anthrosoc_facpub/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Sciences at Digital Commons @ West Chester University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology & Sociology by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ West Chester University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 78 Origins of Trade Silver/Becker THE ORIGINS OF TRADE SILVER AMONG THE LEN APE: PEWTER OBJECTS FROM SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA AS POSSIBLE PRECURSORS . Marshall Joseph Becker A reawakening of interest in material culture has stimulated the examination of some small pewter castings in use among northeastern Native American peoples during the 17th and early 18th centuries. Reports by 17th­ century explorers and colonists, ·who found Eastern Woodland natives to be disinterested in gold and silver artifacts, are now better understood. The period from 1720 to 1750 was critical to the Lenape and other peoples .who had just become major players in the fur trade to the Allegheny and Ohio River areas. During this period various silver-colored white metal castings may have been the precursors of sterling-quality silver trade items.
    [Show full text]
  • SYNTHESIS 6.1 Prehistoric Occupation of the Bodkin Creek
    Bodkin Creek: A Maritime Archaeological and Historical Study 6.0 RESEARCH AND SURVEY RESULTS: SYNTHESIS 6.1 Prehistoric Occupation of the Bodkin Creek Study Area The Development of the Estuary Bodkin Creek was once a considerably colder and wetter place than it is at present. The region was characterized by open tundra and boreal forests. Water was trapped in ice sheets that still blanketed much of the continent, and sea levels were hundreds of feet below current levels. Major estuary systems such as the Chesapeake Bay had not yet formed. As temperatures rose, the ice sheets retreated and melt waters drove a persistent and enduring rise in sea levels. While large rivers throughout the region probably carried more water than they presently do, a stream such as Bodkin Creek would have been a small upland tributary draining toward the ancestral Susquehanna River, taking run-off to the larger stream located two-to-three miles to the east of the present mouth of the creek. As sea level rose, the mouths of rivers flowing into the ocean were inundated forming bays and extensive estuary systems including the Chesapeake Bay, which formed from the lower reaches of the Susquehanna River. Inland estuaries began to stabilize perhaps as early as 5,000 years ago as temperatures moderated and the rate of sea level rise diminished. Within the next 2,000 years, an essentially modern climate and environment became established. The undisputed record of human occupation of the region began as early as 12,000 years ago, as nomadic Paleo-Indian hunters visited the area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potomac Above the Falls — Archeological Identification And
    COHONGOROOTO: THE POTOMAC ABOVE THE FALLS ARCHEOLOGICAL IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION STUDY OF C&O CANAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK ROCK CREEK TO SANDY HOOK (MILE MARKERS 0 TO 59) Volume I PREPARED FOR: NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION NATIONAL PARK SERVICE 1100 OHIO DRIVE, S.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20242 PREPARED BY: THE LOUIS BERGER GROUP, INC. 2300 N Street NW Washington, D.C. 20037 December 2005 Final Report COHONGOROOTO: THE POTOMAC ABOVE THE FALLS ARCHEOLOGICAL IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION STUDY OF CHESAPEAKE & OHIO CANAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK ROCK CREEK TO SANDY HOOK (MILE MARKERS 0 TO 59) VOLUME I Final Report PREPARED FOR: National Capital Region National Park Service 1100 Ohio Drive, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20242 PREPARED BY: Stuart Fiedel, John Bedell, Charles LeeDecker THE LOUIS BERGER GROUP, INC. 2300 N Street NW Washington, D.C. 20037 December 2005 FOREWORD This is the first of three volumes reporting the results of a three-year archeological survey of the easternmost 59 miles of the Chesapeake & Ohio Canal National Historical Park (C&O Canal Park) for the National Park Service (NPS), National Capital Region, from 2003 through 2005. In recognition of the paucity of basic archeological data for the C&O Canal Park, and for other NPS properties in the National Capital Region, funds were devoted to implement the Systemwide Archeological Inventory Program (SAIP) in this area. The SAIP was developed to address the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act (specifically Sections 106 and 110), Executive Order 11593, and the Archeological Resources Protection Act. The rationale for the archeological survey was based primarily on the NPS’s resource management needs under Section 110 rather than being driven by development or capital improvement projects within the park.
    [Show full text]