DOCSLIB.ORG

Organ Donation Opportunites for Action

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Organ Donation Opportunites for Action http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11643.html We ship printed books within 1 business day; personal PDFs are available immediately. Organ Donation: Opportunities for Action Committee on Increasing Rates of Organ Donation, James F. Childress and Catharyn T. Liverman, Editors ISBN: 0-309-65733-4, 358 pages, 6 x 9, (2006) This PDF is available from the National Academies Press at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11643.html Visit the National Academies Press online, the authoritative source for all books from the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Research Council: • Download hundreds of free books in PDF • Read thousands of books online for free • Explore our innovative research tools – try the “Research Dashboard” now! • Sign up to be notified when new books are published • Purchase printed books and selected PDF files Thank you for downloading this PDF. If you have comments, questions or just want more information about the books published by the National Academies Press, you may contact our customer service department toll- free at 888-624-8373, visit us online, or send an email to feedback@nap.edu. This book plus thousands more are available at http://www.nap.edu. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF File are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Distribution, posting, or copying is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. Request reprint permission for this book. Organ Donation: Opportunities for Action http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11643.html ORGAN DONATION OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACTION Committee on Increasing Rates of Organ Donation Board on Health Sciences Policy James F. Childress and Catharyn T. Liverman, Editors Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Organ Donation: Opportunities for Action http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11643.html THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Govern- ing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineer- ing, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropri- ate balance. This study was supported by Award No. HHSH23457010 between the National Academy of Sciences and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and by a grant from The Greenwall Foundation. Any opinions, findings, or conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the organizations or agencies that provided support for this project. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Increasing Rates of Organ Donation. Organ donation : opportunities for action / Committee on Increasing Rates of Organ Donation, Board on Health Sciences Policy ; James F. Childress and Catharyn T. Liverman, editors. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references. This study was supported by Award no. HHSH23457010 between the National Academy of Sciences and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ISBN 0-309-10114-X (pbk.) 1. Donation of organs, tissues, etc. 2. Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc. I. Childress, James F. II. Liverman, Catharyn T. III. Title. [DNLM: 1. Tissue and Organ Procurement—organization & administration— United States. 2. Health Policy—United States. 3. Tissue Donors—supply & distri- bution—United States. 4. Transplants—supply & distribution—United States. WO 660 I568o 2006] RD129.5.O74 2006 362.19’795—dc22 2006017677 Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, N.W., Lockbox 285, Washington, DC 20055; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area); Internet, http:// www.nap.edu. For more information about the Institute of Medicine, visit the IOM home page at: www.iom.edu. Copyright 2006 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. The serpent has been a symbol of long life, healing, and knowledge among almost all cultures and religions since the beginning of recorded history. The serpent adopted as a logotype by the Institute of Medicine is a relief carving from ancient Greece, now held by the Staatliche Museen in Berlin. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Organ Donation: Opportunities for Action http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11643.html “Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do.” —Goethe Advising the Nation. Improving Health. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Organ Donation: Opportunities for Action http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11643.html The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Acad- emy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engi- neers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineer- ing programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Wm. A. Wulf is presi- dent of the National Academy of Engineering. The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Coun- cil is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. Wm. A. Wulf are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council. www.national-academies.org Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Organ Donation: Opportunities for Action http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11643.html COMMITTEE ON INCREASING RATES OF ORGAN DONATION JAMES F. CHILDRESS (Chair), University of Virginia, Charlottesville MARY ANN BAILY, The Hastings Center, Garrison, New York RICHARD J. BONNIE, University of Virginia, Charlottesville CLIVE O. CALLENDER, Howard University, Washington, D.C. RAUL DE VELASCO, University of Miami, Florida JAMES M. DUBOIS, St. Louis University, Missouri LEWIS R. GOLDFRANK, New York University, New York SANDRA D. HICKEY, Georgetown Community Hospital, Georgetown, Kentucky DAVID H. HOWARD, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia DANNY O. JACOBS, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina CYNDA HYLTON RUSHTON, Johns Hopkins University and Children’s Center, Baltimore, Maryland DAVID SCHKADE, University of California, San Diego DEBRA A. SCHWINN, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina KEITH WAILOO, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey Liaison, Board on Health Sciences Policy NANCY N. DUBLER, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York IOM Staff CATHARYN T. LIVERMAN, Project Director EMILY ANN MEYER, Project Officer NORA HENNESSY, Research Associate (from September 2005) JUDY ESTEP, Senior Project Assistant KAREN BOYD, Research Associate (May–August 2005) ANDREA SCHULTZ, Senior Project Assistant (April–July 2005) v Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Organ Donation: Opportunities for Action http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11643.html BOARD ON HEALTH SCIENCES POLICY* FRED H. GAGE (Chair), The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California GAIL H. CASSELL, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana JAMES F. CHILDRESS, University of Virginia, Charlottesville ELLEN WRIGHT CLAYTON, Vanderbilt University Medical School, Nashville, Tennessee DAVID R. COX, Perlegen Sciences, Mountain View, California LYNN R. GOLDMAN, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland BERNARD D. GOLDSTEIN, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania MARTHA N. HILL, Johns Hopkins University School
Load more
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

354 pages remaining, click to load more.

Recommended publications
  • Transplant Immunology.Pdf
    POLICY BRIEFING Transplant Immunology September 2017 The British Society of Immunology is the largest Introduction immunology society in Europe. Our mission is to promote excellence in immunological research, scholarship and Transplantation is the process of moving cells, tissues, or clinical practice in order to improve human and animal organs, from one site to another, either within the same health. We represent the interests of more than 3,000 person or between a donor and a recipient. If an organ immunologists working in academia, clinical medicine, system fails, or becomes damaged as a consequence of and industry. We have strong international links and disease or injury, it can be replaced with a healthy organ collaborate with our European, American and Asian or tissue from a donor. partner societies in order to achieve our aims. Organ transplantation is a major operation and is only Key points: offered when all other treatment options have failed. Consequently, it is often a life-saving intervention. In • Transplantation is the process of moving cells, 2015/16, 4,601 patient lives were saved or improved in i tissues or organs from one site to another for the the UK by an organ transplant. Kidney transplants are purpose of replacing or repairing damaged or the most common organ transplanted on the NHS in diseased organs and tissues. It saves thousands the UK (3,265 in 2015/16), followed by the liver (925), and i of lives each year. However, the immune system pancreas (230). In addition, a total of 383 combined heart poses a significant barrier to successful organ and lung transplants were performed, while in 2015/16.
    [Show full text]
  • Organ Transplant Discrimination Against People with Disabilities Part of the Bioethics and Disability Series
    Organ Transplant Discrimination Against People with Disabilities Part of the Bioethics and Disability Series National Council on Disability September 25, 2019 National Council on Disability (NCD) 1331 F Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20004 Organ Transplant Discrimination Against People with Disabilities: Part of the Bioethics and Disability Series National Council on Disability, September 25, 2019 This report is also available in alternative formats. Please visit the National Council on Disability (NCD) website (www.ncd.gov) or contact NCD to request an alternative format using the following information: ncd@ncd.gov Email 202-272-2004 Voice 202-272-2022 Fax The views contained in this report do not necessarily represent those of the Administration, as this and all NCD documents are not subject to the A-19 Executive Branch review process. National Council on Disability An independent federal agency making recommendations to the President and Congress to enhance the quality of life for all Americans with disabilities and their families. Letter of Transmittal September 25, 2019 The President The White House Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President, On behalf of the National Council on Disability (NCD), I am pleased to submit Organ Transplants and Discrimination Against People with Disabilities, part of a five-report series on the intersection of disability and bioethics. This report, and the others in the series, focuses on how the historical and continued devaluation of the lives of people with disabilities by the medical community, legislators, researchers, and even health economists, perpetuates unequal access to medical care, including life- saving care. Organ transplants save lives. But for far too long, people with disabilities have been denied organ transplants as a result of unfounded assumptions about their quality of life and misconceptions about their ability to comply with post-operative care.
    [Show full text]
  • Organ and Tissue Donation
    ORGAN AND TISSUE DONATION www.kidney.org If I needed a kidney or some other vital organ to live… would I be able to get one? Maybe. Some people who need organ transplants cannot get them because of a shortage of donations. The national waiting list for organ transplants grows longer every day. Thousands die each year while waiting for a transplant of a vital organ, such as a kidney, heart, or liver. How are organs and tissues for transplantation obtained? Organs can be donated by people at the time of death (deceased donors) or by living donors. A living donor may be a relative, friend, or possibly someone who does not know the recipient but wishes to be a donor for someone in need. This brochure provides information about organ and tissue donation at the time of death. For more information about living donation, visit www.kidney.org/livingdonors How are donated organs and tissues distributed? The federal government contracts with an independent organization, called 2 NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), to manage the distribution of organs donated by individuals at the time of death (deceased donors). Because of the shortage of donations, transplant candidates’ names are placed on a waiting list. Guidelines have been established to ensure that all patients on the waiting list have a fair chance at receiving the organ they need regardless of age, sex, race, lifestyle, or social status. Organs are also distributed based on needs and medical criteria. Donated tissues are distributed through a separate process, which is coordinated by various tissue banks.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 SAMPLE PERSUASIVE SPEECH Title: Organ Donation Specific
    SAMPLE PERSUASIVE SPEECH Title: Organ Donation Specific Purpose: To persuade my audience to donate their organs and tissues when they die and to act upon their decision to donate. Thesis Statement: The need is constantly growing for organ donors and it is very simple to become an organ donor. INTRODUCTION I) How do you feel when you have to wait for something you really, really want? What if it was something you literally couldn’t live without? II) The need is constantly growing for organ donors and it is very simple to become an organ donor. III) Today I’d like to talk to you about the need for organ donors in our area, how organ donor recipients benefit from your donation, and how you can become an organ donor today. IV) I am credible to speak about this topic because I did a lot of research on organ donation and because I am an organ donor myself. (I’ll begin by telling you about the need for organ donors.) BODY I) People around the world and also right here in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Illinois, need organ transplants and they need our help. A) The problem is that there is a lack of organs and organ donors who make organ transplantation possible (Smith 35). B) According to Jane Green and Jim Lee, authors of “Organ Donations in Minnesota,” the number of organ donors in our area has diminished to a low 23% (Green and Lee 23). (Now that you see the great need for organ donors in our area, let’s look at what may happen if you choose to donate your organs.) II) Organ donation benefits both the donor’s family and the recipients.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Donation After Brain Death (DBD) in The
    Intensive Care Med (2019) 45:322–330 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05574-5 REVIEW Management of donation after brain death (DBD) in the ICU: the potential donor is identifed, what’s next? Ignacio Martin‑Loeches1* , Alberto Sandiumenge2, Julien Charpentier3, John A. Kellum4, Alan M. Gafney5, Francesco Procaccio6 and Glauco A. Westphal7 © 2019 Springer‑Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature Abstract The success of any donation process requires that potential brain‑dead donors (PBDD) are detected and referred early to professionals responsible for their evaluation and conversion to actual donors. The intensivist plays a crucial role in organ donation. However, identifcation and referral of PBDDs may be suboptimal in the critical care environ‑ ment. Factors infuencing lower rates of detection and referral include the lack of specifc training and the need to provide concomitant urgent care to other critically ill patients. Excellent communication between the ICU staf and the procurement organization is necessary to ensure the optimization of both the number and quality of organs transplanted. The organ donation process has been improved over the last two decades with the involvement and commitment of many healthcare professionals. Clinical protocols have been developed and implemented to better organize the multidisciplinary approach to organ donation. In this manuscript, we aim to highlight the main steps of organ donation, taking into account the following: early identifcation and evaluation of the PBDD with the use of checklists;
    [Show full text]
  • A Thesis Entitled Factors That Explain and Predict Organ Donation
    A Thesis entitled Factors that Explain and Predict Organ Donation Registration: An Application of the Integrated Behavioral Model by Matthew Robert Jordan Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Masters of Science Degree in Health Outcomes and Socioeconomic Sciences ________________________________________ Dr. Sharrel L. Pinto, Committee Chair ________________________________________ Dr. Timothy R. Jordan, Committee Member ________________________________________ Dr. Cindy S. Puffer, Committee Member ________________________________________ Dr. Amanda Bryant-Friedrich, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo August 2017 Copyright 2017, Matthew Robert Jordan This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. An Abstract of Factors that Explain and Predict Organ Donation Registration: An Application of the Integrated Behavioral Model by Matthew Robert Jordan Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Masters of Science Degree in Health Outcomes and Socioeconomic Sciences The University of Toledo August 2017 Background: Organ transplantation became a new hope for those living with end-stage organ disease. However, the number of patients waiting for this procedure greatly exceeds the number of available donors. This separation leads to the death of almost 30 Americans per day who are waiting for this life changing procedure. Although Americans have shown a high level of support for organ donation, a large gap exists between the support and intention to register. As one of the most trusted and accessible healthcare professionals, pharmacist may have an opportunity to provide expanded services and education to the public and patients about organ donation.
    [Show full text]
  • Organ Donation and Recovery Improvement Act
    PUBLIC LAW 108–216—APR. 5, 2004 ORGAN DONATION AND RECOVERY IMPROVEMENT ACT VerDate 11-MAY-2000 22:34 Apr 07, 2004 Jkt 029139 PO 00216 Frm 00001 Fmt 6579 Sfmt 6579 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL216.108 SUEP PsN: PUBL216 118 STAT. 584 PUBLIC LAW 108–216—APR. 5, 2004 Public Law 108–216 108th Congress An Act Apr. 5, 2004 To amend the Public Health Service Act to promote organ donation, and for other [H.R. 3926} purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of Organ Donation the United States of America in Congress assembled, and Recovery Improvement SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. Act. This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Organ Donation and Recovery 42 USC 201 note. Improvement Act’’. SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. (a) PUBLIC AWARENESS OF NEED FOR ORGAN DONATION.—It is the sense of Congress that the Federal Government should carry out programs to educate the public with respect to organ donation, including the need to provide for an adequate rate of such donations. (b) FAMILY DISCUSSIONS OF ORGAN DONATIONS.—Congress rec- ognizes the importance of families pledging to each other to share their lives as organ and tissue donors and acknowledges the impor- tance of discussing organ and tissue donation as a family. (c) LIVING DONATIONS OF ORGANS.—Congress— (1) recognizes the generous contribution made by each living individual who has donated an organ to save a life; and (2) acknowledges the advances in medical technology that have enabled organ transplantation with organs donated by living individuals to become a viable treatment option for an increasing number of patients.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MEDICAL DIRECTIVE As Part of a Person’S Right to Self-Determination, Every Adult May Accept Or Refuse Any Recommended Medical Treatment
    THE MEDICAL DIRECTIVE As part of a person’s right to self-determination, every adult may accept or refuse any recommended medical treatment. This is relatively easy when people are well and can speak. Unfortunately, during severe illness people are often unconscious or otherwise unable to communicate their wishes at the very time when many critical decisions need to be made. Iowa law insures that the rights and desires of the seriously ill are honored. It provides that adults can direct, in advance, whether they want to be kept alive by artificial means in the event they become seriously ill and incapable of taking part in decisions regarding their medical care. This written Medical Directive is sometimes called a “living will.” WHAT THE MEDICAL DIRECTIVE DOES The Medical Directive states your wishes regarding various types of medical treatment in several representative situations so that your desires can be respected. The Medical Directive also lets you appoint someone to make medical decisions for you if you should become unable to make your own; this is an “attorney-in-fact,” a “proxy,” or “durable power of attorney.” Additionally, it contains a statement of your wishes concerning organ donation. HOW TO MAKE YOUR MEDICAL DIRECTIVE The following pages contain a Medical Directive form on which you can record your own desires. You may want to discuss the issues with your family, friends or religious mentor, as well as your personal physician and attorney, before completing the form. Please refer to pages 7-9 for details on the signing and witnessing of the Medical Directive.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics of Organ Transplantation
    Ethics of Organ Transplantation Center for Bioethics February 2004 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS MEDICAL ISSUES What is organ transplantation? ……………………………………...Page 5 The transplant process ………….………………………...…………. Page 6 Distributing cadaveric organs ………………………………………..Page 7 A history of organ transplantation …………………….…………….Page 9 Timeline of medical and legal advances in organ transplantation…Page 10 ETHICAL ISSUES Ethical Issues Part I: The Organ Shortage……..………...………… Page 13 Distribution of available organs …….………………………. Page 15 Current distribution policy …………………………………..Page 17 Organ shortage ethical questions …………………………… Page 19 Ethical Issues Part II: Donor Organs ......…………………………... Page 20 Cadaveric organ donation ……………………………………Page 20 Living organ donation ……………………………………….. Page 24 Alternative organs …………………………………………… Page 27 LEGAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES Current laws …………………………………………………………. Page 29 The impact of transplantation ………………………………………. Page 31 OTHER MATERIALS Books and articles …………………………………………………….Page 33 Glossary ………………………………………………………………. Page 39 References ……………………………………………………………. Page 41 3 4 MEDICAL ISSUES What is organ transplantation? An organ transplant is a surgical operation WHAT ARE ORGANS? where a failing or damaged organ in the human body is removed and replaced with a new one. An organ is a Solid transplantable mass of specialized cells and tissues that work together organs: to perform a function in the body. The heart is an § Heart example of an organ. It is made up of tissues and cells § Lungs § that all work together to perform the function of Liver § Pancreas pumping blood through the human body. § Intestines Any part of the body that performs a specialized function is an organ. Therefore eyes are organs because Other organs: their specialized function is to see, skin is an organ § Eyes, ear & nose because its function is to protect and regulate the body, § Skin § Bladder and the liver is an organ that functions to remove waste § Nerves from the blood.
    [Show full text]
  • Organ Donation Good Practice Guidelines
    Good Practice Guidelines in the process of Organ Donation Good Practice Guidelines in the process of Organ Donation National Transplant Organization , 2011 GOOD PRACTICE GUIDELINES IN THE PROCESS OF ORGAN DONATION That “Spain is the leader in organ donations” has become a national and international slogan. It is quite clear that our system has given ample proof of effectiveness and soundness and that our donation and transplantation activity has become a reference worldwide and is motive of pride for our professionals and our society. Furthermore, our system is also characterized by its continuous evaluation and improvement. Our donation and transplantation activity, although growing in absolute terms, has remained stabilized in relative terms over the last decade. A significant number of patients are faced with long periods on the waiting list and, depending on the organ, 6 to 8% of these patients on the list die before receiving a transplant. We are also experiencing times of fortunate epidemiological changes and changes in how society treats and confronts the end of life, changes that give rise to doubts on the stability over time of our potential for donation after brain death. It was within this context that the initiative of the present project was born: Benchmarking applied to organ donation, specifically, to donation after brain death. ‘Benchmarking’ is a modern word used to refer to a practice that is as old as the human being: innately, we establish and try to learn from those who do it the best. The project has tried to identify those differentiating factors that justify some excellence results in the brain death donation process by our coordination team.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Terms for Organ Donation and Transplantation
    Glossary of Terms for Organ Donation and Transplantation Technical Terms for Donation and Transplantation Appropriate Term Inappropriate Term “recover” organs “harvest” organs “recovery” of organs “harvesting” of organs “donation” of organs “harvesting” of organs “mechanical” or “ventilator” support “life” support “donated organs and tissues” “body parts” “deceased” donor “cadaveric” donor “deceased” donation “cadaveric” donation “registered as a donor” “signed a donor card” (antiquated) Blood Type One of four groups (A, B, AB or O) into which blood is classified. Blood types are based on differences in molecules (proteins and carbohydrates) on the surface of red blood cells. Candidate A person registered on the organ transplant waiting list. Criteria (Medical Criteria) A set of clinical or biologic standards or conditions that must be met. Deceased Donor A patient who has been declared dead using either the brain death or cardiac death criteria and from whom at least one solid organ or some amount of tissue is recovered for the purpose of organ transplantation. Donor A deceased donor from whom at least one organ or some amount of tissue is recovered for the purpose of transplantation. A living donor is one who donates an organ or segment of an organ (such as a kidney or portion of their liver) for the intent of transplantation. Living Donation Situation in which a living person gives an organ or a portion of an organ for use in a transplant. A kidney, portion of a liver, lung or intestine may be donated. Living Donor A living person who donates an organ for transplantation, such as a kidney or a segment of the lung, liver or intestine.
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionary of Organ Donation and Transplantation Terms
    Page | 1 Dictionary of Organ Donation and Transplantation Terms acute rejection: The body’s attempt to destroy the transplanted organ. Acute rejection usually occurs in the first year after transplant. adverse reaction: An unintended side effect of a drug or procedure. allocation: The process of determining how organs are distributed, based on policies and guidelines to make sure organs are distributed fairly. allograft: An organ or tissue that is transplanted from one human to another human. antibody: A protein substance made by the body’s immune system to attack a foreign substance, sometimes, unfortunately, they attack transplanted organs. antigen: A foreign substance that triggers the body to try to destroy it. anti-rejection drugs (immunosuppresive drugs): Drugs that reduce the body’s ability to reject the transplanted organ. arteriogram: An x-ray of an artery after a dye has been injected. ascites: A buildup of fluid in the abdomen usually associated with liver disease. biopsy: The removal of a tiny piece of tissue from the body for examination under a microscope. This is done to diagnose rejection of a transplanted organ. blood vessels: The veins, arteries, and capillaries through which blood flows. brain death: The irreversible cessation of all functions of the entire brain, including the brain stem. Brain death is not the same as a coma or persistent vegetative state. cadaver: A dead body. Page | 2 cardiac: Related to the heart. cardiac death: The irreversible stopping of all heart, blood circulation, and breathing functions. chronic: A condition that develops slowly and lasts for a long time, or entire lifetime.
    [Show full text]