DOCSLIB.ORG

Precinct Report Centre County, Pennsylvania Official Run Date:06/08/15 Municipal Primary Run Time:11:26 Am May 19, 2015 Statistics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Precinct Report Centre County, Pennsylvania Official Run Date:06/08/15 Municipal Primary Run Time:11:26 Am May 19, 2015 Statistics PRECINCT REPORT CENTRE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA OFFICIAL RUN DATE:06/08/15 MUNICIPAL PRIMARY RUN TIME:11:26 AM MAY 19, 2015 STATISTICS 0090 90 HALFMOON EAST CENTRAL VOTES PERCENT REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL . 962 REGISTERED VOTERS - DEMOCRATIC PARTY . 360 37.42 REGISTERED VOTERS - REPUBLICAN PARTY . 602 62.58 REGISTERED VOTERS - NONPARTISAN . 0 BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL. 154 BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRATIC PARTY . 59 38.31 BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN PARTY . 95 61.69 BALLOTS CAST - NONPARTISAN. 59 38.31 VOTER TURNOUT - TOTAL . 16.01 VOTER TURNOUT - DEMOCRATIC PARTY. 16.39 VOTER TURNOUT - REPUBLICAN PARTY. 15.78 ********** (DEMOCRATIC PARTY) ********** JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 3 DAVID WECHT. 16 11.35 CHRISTINE DONOHUE. 43 30.50 KEVIN M DOUGHERTY. 13 9.22 JOHN HENRY FORADORA . 23 16.31 ANNE E LAZARUS. 32 22.70 DWAYNE D WOODRUFF. 14 9.93 WRITE-IN. 0 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 36 JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 ALICE BECK DUBOW . 29 59.18 ROBERT COLVILLE . 20 40.82 WRITE-IN. 0 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 10 JUDGE OF THE COMMONWEALTH COURT VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 TODD EAGEN . 25 56.82 MICHAEL WOJCIK. 19 43.18 WRITE-IN. 0 2015_municipal_primary_halfmoon_east_central_p_0090.txt[12/12/2019 12:02:03 PM] OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 15 COUNTY COMMISSIONER VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 2 MARK HIGGINS . 42 49.41 MICHAEL PIPE . 43 50.59 WRITE-IN. 0 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 33 CONTROLLER VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 WRITE-IN. 1 100.00 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 58 SHERIFF VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 MATTHEW A RICKARD. 46 100.00 WRITE-IN. 0 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 13 TREASURER VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 WRITE-IN. 2 100.00 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 57 PROTHONOTARY VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 DEBRA C IMMEL . 49 100.00 WRITE-IN. 0 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 10 RECORDER OF DEEDS VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 GEORGIANN R BENNETT . 44 95.65 WRITE-IN. 2 4.35 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 13 REGISTER OF WILLS VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 AMANDA MCCARTNEY . 44 95.65 WRITE-IN. 2 4.35 2015_municipal_primary_halfmoon_east_central_p_0090.txt[12/12/2019 12:02:03 PM] OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 13 CORONER VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 SCOTT A SAYERS. 51 100.00 WRITE-IN. 0 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 8 SUPERVISOR HALFMOON VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 DANELLE DELCORSO . 49 100.00 WRITE-IN. 0 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 10 AUDITOR HALFMOON VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 WRITE-IN. 2 100.00 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 57 CONSTABLE HALFMOON VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 WRITE-IN. 1 100.00 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 58 SCHOOL DIRECTOR STATE COLLEGE SCHOOL DISTRICT VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 5 LAUREL ZYDNEY . 40 20.62 AMY BADER . 37 19.07 DANIEL DUFFY . 37 19.07 GRETCHEN BRANDT . 39 20.10 AMBER CONCEPCION . 41 21.13 WRITE-IN. 0 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 101 ********** (REPUBLICAN PARTY) ********** JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 3 CORREALE STEVENS . 28 12.79 ANNE COVEY . 41 18.72 REBECCA WARREN. 28 12.79 MIKE GEORGE. 45 20.55 CHERYL ALLEN . 27 12.33 JUDY OLSON . 50 22.83 2015_municipal_primary_halfmoon_east_central_p_0090.txt[12/12/2019 12:02:03 PM] WRITE-IN. 0 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 66 JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 EMIL GIORDANO . 75 100.00 WRITE-IN. 0 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 20 JUDGE OF THE COMMONWEALTH COURT VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 PAUL LALLEY. 75 100.00 WRITE-IN. 0 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 20 COUNTY COMMISSIONER VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 2 CHRIS EXARCHOS. 68 45.03 STEVEN GLENN DERSHEM. 82 54.30 WRITE-IN. 1 .66 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 39 CONTROLLER VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 CHARLES L WITMER . 73 100.00 WRITE-IN. 0 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 22 SHERIFF VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 BRYAN SAMPSEL . 36 41.86 RICHARD SWANK . 50 58.14 WRITE-IN. 0 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 9 TREASURER VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 RICHARD A FORNICOLA . 76 100.00 WRITE-IN. 0 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 19 2015_municipal_primary_halfmoon_east_central_p_0090.txt[12/12/2019 12:02:03 PM] PROTHONOTARY VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 WRITE-IN. 4 100.00 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 91 RECORDER OF DEEDS VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 JOSEPH L DAVIDSON. 76 100.00 WRITE-IN. 0 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 19 REGISTER OF WILLS VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 HOPE MILLER. 35 38.89 CHRISTINE MILLINDER . 54 60.00 WRITE-IN. 1 1.11 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 5 CORONER VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 WRITE-IN. 6 100.00 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 89 SUPERVISOR HALFMOON VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 WRITE-IN. 5 100.00 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 90 AUDITOR HALFMOON VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 WRITE-IN. 1 100.00 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 94 CONSTABLE HALFMOON VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 RAYMOND A CEGLAR II . 68 94.44 WRITE-IN. 4 5.56 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 23 SCHOOL DIRECTOR STATE COLLEGE SCHOOL DISTRICT VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 5 2015_municipal_primary_halfmoon_east_central_p_0090.txt[12/12/2019 12:02:03 PM] DANIEL DUFFY . 64 21.99 LAUREL ZYDNEY . 52 17.87 AMBER CONCEPCION . 58 19.93 AMY BADER . 58 19.93 GRETCHEN BRANDT . 59 20.27 WRITE-IN. 0 OVER VOTES . 0 UNDER VOTES . 184 2015_municipal_primary_halfmoon_east_central_p_0090.txt[12/12/2019 12:02:03 PM].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Middle District ______Docket No
    Received 2/5/2018 9:39:17 AM Supreme Court Middle District Filed 2/5/2018 9:39:00 AM Supreme Court Middle District 159 MM 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT _________________________________________________________________ DOCKET NO. 159 MM 2017 _________________________________________________________________ LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL., Petitioners, v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL., Respondents. __________________________________________________________________ ANSWER OF RESPONDENT, LT. GOVERNOR MICHAEL J. STACK, III TO APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUSTICE DAVID WECHT AND FOR FULL DISCLOSURE BY JUSTICE CHRISTINE DONOHUE __________________________________________________________________ Clifford B. Levine Pa. Id. No. 33507 Alex M. Lacey Pa. Id. No. 313538 Alice B. Mitinger Pa. Id. No. 56781 Cohen & Grigsby, P.C. 625 Liberty Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15222-3152 (412) 297-4900 Lazar M. Palnick Pa. Id. No. 52762 1216 Heberton Street Pittsburgh, PA 15206 (412) 661-3633 On behalf of Respondent Michael J. Stack III, in his Capacity as Lieutenant Governor of Pennsylvania and President of the Pennsylvania Senate I. INTRODUCTION With its majority decision, this Court has held that the 2011 Plan “plainly, clearly and palpably” violates the Pennsylvania Constitution. All parties, including the Legislative Respondents, exhaustively briefed the issues associated with a constitutional challenge to the gerrymandered congressional map, which was created with obvious partisan intent. This Court conducted an extraordinary session for oral argument, which lasted for over three hours, and thoroughly discussed the issues involved in the challenge. Now, after the Court has rendered its decision, the Legislative Respondents seek disqualification of Justice David Wecht and “full disclosure” from Justice Christine Donohue. Their demand is untimely and should be summarily dismissed.
    [Show full text]
  • BOILERMAKERS LOCAL 13 2015 PENNSYLVANIA PRIMARY ELECTION RECOMMENDED CANDIDATES STATEWIDE Pennsylvania Supreme Court Judge Kevin
    BOILERMAKERS LOCAL 13 2015 PENNSYLVANIA PRIMARY ELECTION RECOMMENDED CANDIDATES Recommendations provided by Pennsylvania AFL-CIO, Philadelphia AFL-CIO, regional Building Trades councils and labor councils. * specifically endorsed by Boilermakers Local 13 STATEWIDE Pennsylvania Supreme Court Judge Kevin Dougherty (D)* Judge David Wecht (D) Judge Christine Donohue (D) Pennsylvania Superior Court Judge Robert J. Colville (D) Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Todd Eagan (D) PHILADELPHIA State Senate, 5th District John Sabatina (D)* Mayor of Philadelphia Jim Kenney (D)* City Council, 1st District Mark Squilla (D) City Council, 2nd District Kenyatta Johnson (D) City Council, 3rd District Jannie Blackwell (D) City Council, 4th District Curtis Jones, Jr. (D) City Council, 5th District Darrell Clarke (D) City Council, 6th District Bobby Henon (D)* City Council, 7th District Maria Quinones-Sanchez (D) City Council, 8th District Cindy Bass (D) City Council, 9th District Cherelle Parker (D) City Council, 10th District Brian O’Neill (R) City Council, At-Large Ed Neilson (D)* W. Wilson Goode, Jr. (D) William Greenlee (D) Isaiah Thomas (D) Blondell Reynolds Brown (D) Dan Tinney (R) Dennis O’Brien (R)* City Commissioner Lisa Deeley (D) Register of Wills Ron Donatucci (D) Sheriff Jewell Williams (D) BERKS COUNTY Reading Mayor Vaughn Spencer (D) Reading City Council Johanny Cepeda (D) Bryan Twyman (D) County Commissioner Don Vymazal (D) Kevin Barnhardt (D) Berks Court of Common Pleas Eleni Dimitrou-Geishauser (D,R) Victor Frederick (D,R) Magisterial District
    [Show full text]
  • Currents Environmental Rights at Stake in Pennsylvania Supreme
    pennsylvania currents FALL 2015 | PENNSYLVANIA the clean water action newsletter Environmental Rights at Stake in Pennsylvania Supreme Court Election November 3 The outcome of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court election may be the most important of the election season. The Supreme Court has made decisions in many cases critical to health, communities and the environment in the past decade. It will likely play a role in redistricting after the 2020 census and may hear cases related to local governments’ attempts to restrict fracking. The judges on the court matter. In 2013 Pennsylvania passed Act 13, which stripped local municipalities of the ability to use zoning to protect communities from the dangers associated with natural gas drilling. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court struck down this provision. The Court ruled Act 13 was unconstitutional because it violated the Pennsylvania Constitution’s Environmental Rights Amendment which states “the people have a right to clean air, pure water, and to the preservation of the natural, scenic, historic and esthetic values of the environment. Pennsylvania’s public natural resources are the common property of all the people, including generations yet to come.” The three vacancies on the court are judges who ruled with the majority in this landmark case. Clean Water Action has endorsed the following candidates for Pennsylvania Supreme Court because they have demonstrated a commitment in their personal and judicial philosophy to protecting public health and our environmental rights: DAVID WECHT Judge Wecht serves on the Superior Court of Pennsylvania and is “Highly Recommended” by the Pennsylvania Bar Association. As a Superior Court judge, he has considered numerous environmental issues — ranging from regulations dealing with fracking and mineral rights contracts, to land-use issues related to conservation easements.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonia Sotomayor U.S
    SPRING 2019 JUSTICE Sonia Sotomayor U.S. Supreme Court Justice Visits DU Also in this issue: DU Hosts the National Conference on the First Amendment Plans for New UPMC Cooper Fieldhouse Unveiled www.duq.edu 1 DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY MAGAZINE Contents National Conference on 40 the First Amendment Celebrating the Life Justice Sotomayor 8 of Mister Rogers 36 Visits Duquesne Check out new Duquesne University Magazine videos at duq.edu/magazine highlighting: The National Conference on the First Amendment: Bedrock of American Freedoms ..... page 40 The Dukes' Visit to LeBron James' I Promise School ....................................................................page 64 Every Issue Also... Did You Know?......................................15 Creating Knowledge .........................58 4 24 Bluff in Brief ...........................................60 Designing Robots, Working to Unravel Athletics ..................................................62 Exploring Mars and the Mysteries Behind DU in Pictures ......................................65 Extreme Pogo Bags of Bones Alumni Updates ..................................68 Duquesne University assistant Bayer School of Natural and Event Calendar .................................... 72 professor creates opportunities to Environmental Sciences student uses explore the universe. DNA analysis in research. Facebook “f” Logo CMYK / .eps Facebook “f” Logo CMYK / .eps Vol. 17, Number 2, Spring ’19, Duquesne University Magazine is published by the Office of Marketing and Communications, 406 Koren Building, 600 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15282, Tel: 412.396.6050, Fax: 412.396.5779, Email: [email protected] 2 DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY MAGAZINE Spring '19 PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE Thoughts from the President n my role as president, I’ve tried to emphasize the importance of listening to differing views carefully and respectfully. Open-mindedness is a trait that Ihas always made our country strong, innovative and committed to justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Steven Addlespurger V. David Wecht
    Opinions of the United 2018 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-27-2018 Steven Addlespurger v. David Wecht Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2018 Recommended Citation "Steven Addlespurger v. David Wecht" (2018). 2018 Decisions. 526. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2018/526 This June is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2018 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. CLD-247 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 18-1893 ____________ STEVEN ADDLESPURGER, Appellant, v. DAVID WECHT; SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA; SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA; COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; KIMBERLY BERKELEY CLARK; DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTION OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY; PATRICK QUINN; EUGENE STRASSBURGER; KATE FORD ELLIOTT; PAULA FRANCISCO OTT; CORREALE STEVENS; JOHN BENDER; SUSAN PEIKES GANTMAN __________________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civ. No. 16-cv-01157) District Judge: David S. Cercone __________________________________ Submitted on a Motion for Summary Affirmance Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 June 21, 2018 Before: CHAGARES, GREENAWAY, JR. and FUENTES, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: June 27, 2018) ____________ OPINION* ____________ PER CURIAM Steven Addlespurger appeals from an order of the District Court dismissing his amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).
    [Show full text]
  • Pdfaclu-PA Opposition to HB 38 PN 17 House
    MEMORANDUM TO: ​Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee FROM: ​Elizabeth Randol, Legislative Director, ACLU of Pennsylvania DATE: ​January 12, 2021 RE: OPPOSITION TO HOUSE BILL 38 P.N. 17 (DIAMOND) ​ ​ Background House Bill 38 ​(PN 17) is a proposed amendment to the Pennsylvania Constitution that would create judicial districts for the purpose of electing judges and justices to Pennsylvania’s appellate courts. While judges and justices on the Commonwealth, Superior, and Supreme Courts are currently elected at-large across the state, the proposed amendment would allow the legislature to draw geographic districts based on population. The stated reason for this amendment is to create a more geographically diverse judiciary and limit the number of judges and justices from Allegheny and Philadelphia counties.1 Proposed constitutional amendments must pass with identical language in two consecutive sessions. Having passed last session, if HB 38 passes for a second time this session, it could be placed on the ballot for ratification as early as the May primary. If approved by a simple majority vote of electors, it would become part of the Pennsylvania Constitution. On behalf of over 100,000 members and supporters of the ACLU of Pennsylvania, I respectfully urge you to oppose House Bill 38 (PN 17). Bill Summary House Bill 38 would: ■ Create seven districts for the election of Supreme Court justices, one for each justice on the Court; ■ Create judicial districts for the election of Superior Court judges, in a number determined by the 2 legislature;
    [Show full text]
  • Public Notices
    VOL P. 69 WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 6, 2021 THE LEGAL INTELLIGENCER • 13 PUBLIC NOTICES Jennifer McCullough 215.557.2321 [email protected] ESTATE NOTICES STEIKER, FRANCINE -- Joel WASHINGTON, MARK AN- NOTICE OF HEARING ON PETITION TO Steiker, Executor, c/o Thomas O. THONY (a/k/a MARK INVOLUNTARILY TERMINATE PARENTAL RIGHTS NOTICE TO COUNSEL Hiscott, Esq., 100 Four Falls, Ste. WASHINGTON) -- Roderick L. In Re: Sakari Taylor Spears a/k/a Sakari Spears, a minor, No. CP-02-AP- Your attention is directed to 300, West Conshohocken, PA Foxworth, Jr., Administrator, 122-2020, in the Orphans’ Court Division of the Court of Common Pleas Section 3162 of the Probate, 19428-2950; Thomas O. Hiscott, 7715 Crittenden St., #382, Phila- of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Estates and Fiduciaries Code Atty., Heckscher, Teillon, Terrill delphia, PA 19118; Roderick L. To: Natasha Denise Spears a/k/a Natasha D. Spears a/k/a Natasha of June 30, 1972 (Act No. & Sager, P.C., 100 Four Falls, Ste. Foxworth, Jr., Atty., 7715 Critten- Spears, Richard Beck, and The Unknown Father, parents of Sakari Taylor 164) which requires advertise- 300, West Conshohocken, PA den St., #382, Philadelphia, PA Spears a/k/a Sakari Spears, a minor born on July 7, 2016, in Pittsburgh, ment of grant of letters to con- 19428-2950. 19118. Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. tain the name and address of 01-06-3 01-06-3 A Petition has been filed asking the court to put an end to all rights the personal representatives. you have to your child, Sakari Taylor Spears a/k/a Sakari Spears.
    [Show full text]
  • December 23, 2017 (Pages 7667-7822)
    Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 47 (2017) Repository 12-23-2017 December 23, 2017 (Pages 7667-7822) Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2017 Recommended Citation Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, "December 23, 2017 (Pages 7667-7822)" (2017). Volume 47 (2017). 51. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2017/51 This December is brought to you for free and open access by the Pennsylvania Bulletin Repository at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 47 (2017) by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Volume 47 Number 51 Saturday, December 23, 2017 • Harrisburg, PA Pages 7667—7822 Agencies in this issue The Courts Department of Banking and Securities Department of Community and Economic Development Department of Education Department of Environmental Protection Department of Health Department of Human Services Department of Labor and Industry Department of Revenue Department of Transportation Housing Finance Agency Independent Regulatory Review Commission Insurance Department Joint Committee on Documents Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission State Board of Nursing State Conservation Commission State Police Thaddeus Stevens College of Technology Detailed list of contents appears inside. Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): Pennsylvania Bulletin Pennsylvania No. 517, December
    [Show full text]
  • PA Supreme Court Announces New Work Product Doctrine Waiver Analysis with Regard to Dissemination of Information to Third Parties
    PA Supreme Court Announces New Work Product Doctrine Waiver Analysis with Regard to Dissemination of Information to Third Parties Healthcare Alert | June 24, 2019 By: Daniel Ferhat and Laura Hutchinson On June 18, 2019, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court announced a new attorney work product waiver analysis in BouSamra v. Excela Health. The central holding of the Supreme Court’s decision in BouSamra is that the attorney work product doctrine is not waived by disclosure unless the alleged work product is disclosed to an adversary or disclosed in a manner which significantly increases the likelihood that an adversary or anticipated adversary will obtain it. The work product doctrine, codified in Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 4003.3, protects the disclosure of mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, notes or summaries, or legal theories of a party’s attorney, respecting the value or merit of a claim or defense or respecting strategy or tactics. Considering confidentiality is not a cornerstone of this privilege, disclosure to a third-party does not always undermine the purpose of the work product protection. Prior to BouSamra, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court had declined to comment on the work product doctrine waiver issue. However, in BouSamra, Justice Sallie Updyke Mundy, who wrote the opinion on behalf of the majority, pointed out that the work product doctrine has become confused or conflated with the standards applied to the attorney-client privilege. The Supreme Court explained that the attorney-client privilege is designed to protect confidentiality, such that any disclosure outside the attorney-client relationship is inconsistent with the privilege. By contrast, the work product protection is invoked against adversaries and does not exist to protect a confidential relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Winning Lawyer Says Pa. Supreme Court Ruling Clears up Deadlines
    Winning Lawyer Says Pa. Supreme Court Ruling Clears Up Deadlines for Both Sides, Opponent Says Not So Much "In arguing this before the Supreme Court, all you can hope for is a rule that's fair for both plaintiffs and defendants," said the winning lawyer, Joseph Mayers of The Mayers Firm. "I think Justice Baer outlined such a rule." By Katheryn Tucker I April 02, 2021 The first word in deadline is dead. Period. That's the bottom line of an opinion from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court throwing out a lawsuit over missing the deadline for notifying the other side. “We hold that a trial court has the discretion to dismiss a complaint when a plaintiff fails to offer proof that she diligently attempted to serve process on a defendant in a timely manner and there is no evidence to indicate that the defendant had actual notice of the commencement of the action in the relevant time frame, regardless of whether the plaintiff acted or failed to act intentionally," Justice Max Baer wrote in a March 25 ruling (http://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Supreme/out/J-74- 2020mo%20-%20104727496130809348.pdf?cb=1). He was joined by Justices Thomas Saylor, Debra Todd and Kevin Dougherty. They upheld the trial court and the Pennsylvania Superior Court in tossing a lawsuit Rhasheena Gussom filed against Maurice Teagle in 2018 over injuries from a 2016 car wreck. The lower courts dismissed her complaint saying she had failed to serve notice by the deadline imposed by the two-year statute of limitations. The record shows she tried to serve him in Pennsylvania, but heard he'd moved to Virginia and doesn't say what happened after that.
    [Show full text]
  • April 9, 2016 (Pages 1773-1882)
    Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 46 (2016) Repository 4-9-2016 April 9, 2016 (Pages 1773-1882) Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2016 Recommended Citation Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, "April 9, 2016 (Pages 1773-1882)" (2016). Volume 46 (2016). 15. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2016/15 This April is brought to you for free and open access by the Pennsylvania Bulletin Repository at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 46 (2016) by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Volume 46 Number 15 Saturday, April 9, 2016 • Harrisburg, PA Pages 1773—1882 Agencies in this issue The Governor The Courts Department of Banking and Securities Department of Environmental Protection Department of General Services Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry Department of Transportation Executive Board Insurance Department Patient Safety Authority Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Philadelphia Regional Port Authority State Board of Education State Employees’ Retirement Board Detailed list of contents appears inside. Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): Pennsylvania Bulletin Pennsylvania No. 497, April 2016 TYPE OR PRINT LEGIBLY Attn: 800 Church Rd. W. 17055-3198 PA Mechanicsburg, FRY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. COMMUNICATIONS, FRY CUT ON DOTTED LINES AND ENCLOSE IN AN ENVELOPE CHANGE NOTICE/NEW SUBSCRIPTION If information on mailing label is incorrect, please email changes to [email protected] or mail to: mail or [email protected] to changes email please incorrect, is label mailing on information If (City) (State) (Zip Code) label) mailing on name above number digit (6 NUMBER CUSTOMER NAME INDIVIDUAL OF NAME—TITLE OFFICE ADDRESS (Number and Street) (City) (State) (Zip The Pennsylvania Bulletin is published weekly by Fry PENNSYLVANIA Communications, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate of Pennsylvania
    Senate of Pennsylvania August 27, 2021 The Honorable Max Baer The Honorable Thomas Saylor Chief Justice Justice Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Judicial Center Pennsylvania Judicial Center 601 Commonwealth Avenue 601 Commonwealth Avenue Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17106 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17106 The Honorable Debra Todd The Honorable Christine Donohue Justice Justice Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Judicial Center Pennsylvania Judicial Center 601 Commonwealth Avenue 601 Commonwealth Avenue Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17106 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17106 The Honorable Kevin Dougherty The Honorable David Wecht Justice Justice Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Judicial Center Pennsylvania Judicial Center 601 Commonwealth Avenue 601 Commonwealth Avenue Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17106 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17106 The Honorable Sally Updyke Mundy Justice Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Judicial Center 601 Commonwealth Avenue Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17106 Dear Justices of the Supreme Court: We are writing to request the court take action to halt evictions for those individuals who have applied for one of the emergency rental assistance programs but the submitted application has not yet been reviewed. As you may be aware, Congress has appropriated more than $1.5 billion in emergency rental assistance to the Commonwealth to address rent and utility delinquencies created due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Unfortunately, the United States Supreme Court recently invalidated the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) eviction moratorium. Very few counties had a rental assistance program ready for the sudden influx of money for emergency rental assistance from the Consolidated Appropriation Act of 2020 and the American Rescue Plan. The lack of existing programs required counties to build new programs before assistance could begin flowing to landlords and tenants.
    [Show full text]