Homecoming 2015 • David Puth '74 • Marisa Muscari
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network
Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE May 2016 Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network Laura Osur Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Osur, Laura, "Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network" (2016). Dissertations - ALL. 448. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/448 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract When Netflix launched in April 1998, Internet video was in its infancy. Eighteen years later, Netflix has developed into the first truly global Internet TV network. Many books have been written about the five broadcast networks – NBC, CBS, ABC, Fox, and the CW – and many about the major cable networks – HBO, CNN, MTV, Nickelodeon, just to name a few – and this is the fitting time to undertake a detailed analysis of how Netflix, as the preeminent Internet TV networks, has come to be. This book, then, combines historical, industrial, and textual analysis to investigate, contextualize, and historicize Netflix's development as an Internet TV network. The book is split into four chapters. The first explores the ways in which Netflix's development during its early years a DVD-by-mail company – 1998-2007, a period I am calling "Netflix as Rental Company" – lay the foundations for the company's future iterations and successes. During this period, Netflix adapted DVD distribution to the Internet, revolutionizing the way viewers receive, watch, and choose content, and built a brand reputation on consumer-centric innovation. -
Is Rock Music in Decline? a Business Perspective
Jose Dailos Cabrera Laasanen Is Rock Music in Decline? A Business Perspective Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences Bachelor of Business Administration International Business and Logistics 1405484 22nd March 2018 Abstract Author(s) Jose Dailos Cabrera Laasanen Title Is Rock Music in Decline? A Business Perspective Number of Pages 45 Date 22.03.2018 Degree Bachelor of Business Administration Degree Programme International Business and Logistics Instructor(s) Michael Keaney, Senior Lecturer Rock music has great importance in the recent history of human kind, and it is interesting to understand the reasons of its de- cline, if it actually exists. Its legacy will never disappear, and it will always be a great influence for new artists but is important to find out the reasons why it has become what it is in now, and what is the expected future for the genre. This project is going to be focused on the analysis of some im- portant business aspects related with rock music and its de- cline, if exists. The collapse of Gibson guitars will be analyzed, because if rock music is in decline, then the collapse of Gibson is a good evidence of this. Also, the performance of independ- ent and major record labels through history will be analyzed to understand better the health state of the genre. The same with music festivals that today seem to be increasing their popularity at the expense of smaller types of live-music events. Keywords Rock, music, legacy, influence, artists, reasons, expected, fu- ture, genre, analysis, business, collapse, -
In the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Middle District ______Docket No
Received 2/5/2018 9:39:17 AM Supreme Court Middle District Filed 2/5/2018 9:39:00 AM Supreme Court Middle District 159 MM 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT _________________________________________________________________ DOCKET NO. 159 MM 2017 _________________________________________________________________ LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL., Petitioners, v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL., Respondents. __________________________________________________________________ ANSWER OF RESPONDENT, LT. GOVERNOR MICHAEL J. STACK, III TO APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUSTICE DAVID WECHT AND FOR FULL DISCLOSURE BY JUSTICE CHRISTINE DONOHUE __________________________________________________________________ Clifford B. Levine Pa. Id. No. 33507 Alex M. Lacey Pa. Id. No. 313538 Alice B. Mitinger Pa. Id. No. 56781 Cohen & Grigsby, P.C. 625 Liberty Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15222-3152 (412) 297-4900 Lazar M. Palnick Pa. Id. No. 52762 1216 Heberton Street Pittsburgh, PA 15206 (412) 661-3633 On behalf of Respondent Michael J. Stack III, in his Capacity as Lieutenant Governor of Pennsylvania and President of the Pennsylvania Senate I. INTRODUCTION With its majority decision, this Court has held that the 2011 Plan “plainly, clearly and palpably” violates the Pennsylvania Constitution. All parties, including the Legislative Respondents, exhaustively briefed the issues associated with a constitutional challenge to the gerrymandered congressional map, which was created with obvious partisan intent. This Court conducted an extraordinary session for oral argument, which lasted for over three hours, and thoroughly discussed the issues involved in the challenge. Now, after the Court has rendered its decision, the Legislative Respondents seek disqualification of Justice David Wecht and “full disclosure” from Justice Christine Donohue. Their demand is untimely and should be summarily dismissed. -
BOILERMAKERS LOCAL 13 2015 PENNSYLVANIA PRIMARY ELECTION RECOMMENDED CANDIDATES STATEWIDE Pennsylvania Supreme Court Judge Kevin
BOILERMAKERS LOCAL 13 2015 PENNSYLVANIA PRIMARY ELECTION RECOMMENDED CANDIDATES Recommendations provided by Pennsylvania AFL-CIO, Philadelphia AFL-CIO, regional Building Trades councils and labor councils. * specifically endorsed by Boilermakers Local 13 STATEWIDE Pennsylvania Supreme Court Judge Kevin Dougherty (D)* Judge David Wecht (D) Judge Christine Donohue (D) Pennsylvania Superior Court Judge Robert J. Colville (D) Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Todd Eagan (D) PHILADELPHIA State Senate, 5th District John Sabatina (D)* Mayor of Philadelphia Jim Kenney (D)* City Council, 1st District Mark Squilla (D) City Council, 2nd District Kenyatta Johnson (D) City Council, 3rd District Jannie Blackwell (D) City Council, 4th District Curtis Jones, Jr. (D) City Council, 5th District Darrell Clarke (D) City Council, 6th District Bobby Henon (D)* City Council, 7th District Maria Quinones-Sanchez (D) City Council, 8th District Cindy Bass (D) City Council, 9th District Cherelle Parker (D) City Council, 10th District Brian O’Neill (R) City Council, At-Large Ed Neilson (D)* W. Wilson Goode, Jr. (D) William Greenlee (D) Isaiah Thomas (D) Blondell Reynolds Brown (D) Dan Tinney (R) Dennis O’Brien (R)* City Commissioner Lisa Deeley (D) Register of Wills Ron Donatucci (D) Sheriff Jewell Williams (D) BERKS COUNTY Reading Mayor Vaughn Spencer (D) Reading City Council Johanny Cepeda (D) Bryan Twyman (D) County Commissioner Don Vymazal (D) Kevin Barnhardt (D) Berks Court of Common Pleas Eleni Dimitrou-Geishauser (D,R) Victor Frederick (D,R) Magisterial District -
Rock 'N' Roll Camp for Girls and Feminist Quests for Equity, Community, and Cultural Production
Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Institute for Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Theses Studies 7-31-2006 I'm Not Loud Enough to be Heard: Rock 'n' Roll Camp for Girls and Feminist Quests for Equity, Community, and Cultural Production Stacey Lynn Singer Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/wsi_theses Part of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons Recommended Citation Singer, Stacey Lynn, "I'm Not Loud Enough to be Heard: Rock 'n' Roll Camp for Girls and Feminist Quests for Equity, Community, and Cultural Production." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2006. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/wsi_theses/2 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Institute for Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. I’M NOT LOUD ENOUGH TO BE HEARD: ROCK ‘N’ ROLL CAMP FOR GIRLS AND FEMINIST QUESTS FOR EQUITY, COMMUNITY, AND CULTURAL PRODUCTION By STACEY LYNN SINGER Under the Direction of Susan Talburt ABSTRACT Because of what I perceive to be important contributions to female youth empowerment and the construction of culture and community, I chose to conduct a qualitative case study that explores the methods utilized in the performance of Rock ‘n’ Roll Camp for Girls, as well as the experiences of camp administrators, participants, and volunteers, in order to identify feminist constructs, aims, and outcomes of Rock ‘n’ Roll Camp for Girls. -
“The Stories Behind the Songs”
“The Stories Behind The Songs” John Henderson The Stories Behind The Songs A compilation of “inside stories” behind classic country hits and the artists associated with them John Debbie & John By John Henderson (Arrangement by Debbie Henderson) A fascinating and entertaining look at the life and recording efforts of some of country music’s most talented singers and songwriters 1 Author’s Note My background in country music started before I even reached grade school. I was four years old when my uncle, Jack Henderson, the program director of 50,000 watt KCUL-AM in Fort Worth/Dallas, came to visit my family in 1959. He brought me around one hundred and fifty 45 RPM records from his station (duplicate copies that they no longer needed) and a small record player that played only 45s (not albums). I played those records day and night, completely wore them out. From that point, I wanted to be a disc jockey. But instead of going for the usual “comedic” approach most DJs took, I tried to be more informative by dropping in tidbits of a song’s background, something that always fascinated me. Originally with my “Classic Country Music Stories” site on Facebook (which is still going strong), and now with this book, I can tell the whole story, something that time restraints on radio wouldn’t allow. I began deejaying as a career at the age of sixteen in 1971, most notably at Nashville’s WENO-AM and WKDA- AM, Lakeland, Florida’s WPCV-FM (past winner of the “Radio Station of the Year” award from the Country Music Association), and Springfield, Missouri’s KTTS AM & FM and KWTO-AM, but with syndication and automation which overwhelmed radio some twenty-five years ago, my final DJ position ended in 1992. -
Currents Environmental Rights at Stake in Pennsylvania Supreme
pennsylvania currents FALL 2015 | PENNSYLVANIA the clean water action newsletter Environmental Rights at Stake in Pennsylvania Supreme Court Election November 3 The outcome of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court election may be the most important of the election season. The Supreme Court has made decisions in many cases critical to health, communities and the environment in the past decade. It will likely play a role in redistricting after the 2020 census and may hear cases related to local governments’ attempts to restrict fracking. The judges on the court matter. In 2013 Pennsylvania passed Act 13, which stripped local municipalities of the ability to use zoning to protect communities from the dangers associated with natural gas drilling. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court struck down this provision. The Court ruled Act 13 was unconstitutional because it violated the Pennsylvania Constitution’s Environmental Rights Amendment which states “the people have a right to clean air, pure water, and to the preservation of the natural, scenic, historic and esthetic values of the environment. Pennsylvania’s public natural resources are the common property of all the people, including generations yet to come.” The three vacancies on the court are judges who ruled with the majority in this landmark case. Clean Water Action has endorsed the following candidates for Pennsylvania Supreme Court because they have demonstrated a commitment in their personal and judicial philosophy to protecting public health and our environmental rights: DAVID WECHT Judge Wecht serves on the Superior Court of Pennsylvania and is “Highly Recommended” by the Pennsylvania Bar Association. As a Superior Court judge, he has considered numerous environmental issues — ranging from regulations dealing with fracking and mineral rights contracts, to land-use issues related to conservation easements. -
2017 Fiscal Report
2017 FISCAL REPORT 2017 BBBSPGH Fiscal Report | 1 "There Deji was..." Why the need for BBBSPGH? “It feels awesome to have a Big Brother because my father growth did not compromise excellence. We enhanced our wasn’t really there for me. My mom said, ‘Let’s get signed up training to our Bigs so they are better prepared to mentor their Mentors help youth overcome adversity to become productive members of our society— on something.' She looked this up, and there Deji was.” Littles. high school graduates, educated and trained workers, and good, honest community members. “There Deji was.” The Pennsylvania Big Brother and Big Sister of the Year Big Brother Deji and Little Brother Jordan have been are from our Pittsburgh agency. In November, we held our matched for two years. We asked Jordan and Deji to appear on first Match Maker Breakfast, adding an additional 40 donors the KDKA morning show “Pittsburgh Today Live” and they both to our individual giving program. We started a Campus-Based eagerly agreed to the opportunity to talk about BBBS and their Mentoring Program with University of Pittsburgh students on relationship. It can be risky to put a child on live television; just Saturday mornings. Children from the Rankin Christian Center like in “real life,” kids often say the darndest things. However, are transported to Pitt, and each child is assigned a mentor. unscripted, Jordan summed up his experience in these three Many of the mentors are first-generation college students simple words—”there Deji was.” proving to their Little that with perseverance and support, they Although Deji seemed to appear before Jordan like magic, a too can attend a college of their choice. -
Tokyo Joe Song List
Tokyo Joe Song List Lips of an Angel – Hinder Champagne Supernova – Oasis Wonderwall – Oasis Santeria – Sublime * F - F Far Away – Nickelback Little Red Corvette – Prince - starts on G Purple Rain – Prince - Bb Home Sweet Home - Motley Crue The Gambler – Kenny Rogers Two Princes – The Spin Doctors Shimmer – Fuel *Jessie’s Girl – Rick Springfield - D *Blister in the Sun – Violent Femmes - G Jenny Jenny – Tommy TuTone - F#m Sugar, We’re Going Down – Fall Out Boy She Hates Me – Puddle of Mudd Long Haired Country Boy – Charlie Daniels New Age Girl – Dead Eye Dick Crazy Bitch – Buck Cherry - B Country Boy Can Survive – Hank Jr. Inside Out – Eve 6 *My Own Worst Enemy – Lit - F Breakdown – Tom Petty *Mary Jane’s Last Dance – Tom Petty - Am *Kryptonite – 3 Doors Down Here Without You - 3 Doors Down *Play that Funky Music – Wild Cherry - E Should I Stay or Should I Go – The Clash - D Jumper – Third Eye Blind *Semi-Charmed Life – Third Eye Blind - G How’s it Gonna Be – Third Eye Blind Slide – Goo Goo Dolls If You Could Only See – Tonic *3AM - Matchbox 20 * A Drops of Jupiter – Train You May Be Right – Billy Joel Piano Man - Billy Joel Only the Good Die Young – Billy Joel Interstate Love Song – Stone Temple Pilots - E Big Empty – Stone Temple Pilots I Want You to Want Me – Cheap Trick - A *You Give Love a Bad Name - Bon Jovi * C Hurts so Good – John Cougar - A *Wanted Dead or Alive – Bon Jovi This Love – Maroon 5 Come Together – The Beatles I Alone – Live Lightning Crashes - Live Southern Cross – Crosby Stills and Nash Far Behind – Candlebox - G -
Sonia Sotomayor U.S
SPRING 2019 JUSTICE Sonia Sotomayor U.S. Supreme Court Justice Visits DU Also in this issue: DU Hosts the National Conference on the First Amendment Plans for New UPMC Cooper Fieldhouse Unveiled www.duq.edu 1 DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY MAGAZINE Contents National Conference on 40 the First Amendment Celebrating the Life Justice Sotomayor 8 of Mister Rogers 36 Visits Duquesne Check out new Duquesne University Magazine videos at duq.edu/magazine highlighting: The National Conference on the First Amendment: Bedrock of American Freedoms ..... page 40 The Dukes' Visit to LeBron James' I Promise School ....................................................................page 64 Every Issue Also... Did You Know?......................................15 Creating Knowledge .........................58 4 24 Bluff in Brief ...........................................60 Designing Robots, Working to Unravel Athletics ..................................................62 Exploring Mars and the Mysteries Behind DU in Pictures ......................................65 Extreme Pogo Bags of Bones Alumni Updates ..................................68 Duquesne University assistant Bayer School of Natural and Event Calendar .................................... 72 professor creates opportunities to Environmental Sciences student uses explore the universe. DNA analysis in research. Facebook “f” Logo CMYK / .eps Facebook “f” Logo CMYK / .eps Vol. 17, Number 2, Spring ’19, Duquesne University Magazine is published by the Office of Marketing and Communications, 406 Koren Building, 600 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15282, Tel: 412.396.6050, Fax: 412.396.5779, Email: [email protected] 2 DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY MAGAZINE Spring '19 PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE Thoughts from the President n my role as president, I’ve tried to emphasize the importance of listening to differing views carefully and respectfully. Open-mindedness is a trait that Ihas always made our country strong, innovative and committed to justice. -
Steven Addlespurger V. David Wecht
Opinions of the United 2018 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-27-2018 Steven Addlespurger v. David Wecht Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2018 Recommended Citation "Steven Addlespurger v. David Wecht" (2018). 2018 Decisions. 526. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2018/526 This June is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2018 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. CLD-247 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 18-1893 ____________ STEVEN ADDLESPURGER, Appellant, v. DAVID WECHT; SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA; SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA; COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; KIMBERLY BERKELEY CLARK; DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTION OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY; PATRICK QUINN; EUGENE STRASSBURGER; KATE FORD ELLIOTT; PAULA FRANCISCO OTT; CORREALE STEVENS; JOHN BENDER; SUSAN PEIKES GANTMAN __________________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civ. No. 16-cv-01157) District Judge: David S. Cercone __________________________________ Submitted on a Motion for Summary Affirmance Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 June 21, 2018 Before: CHAGARES, GREENAWAY, JR. and FUENTES, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: June 27, 2018) ____________ OPINION* ____________ PER CURIAM Steven Addlespurger appeals from an order of the District Court dismissing his amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). -
Pdfaclu-PA Opposition to HB 38 PN 17 House
MEMORANDUM TO: Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee FROM: Elizabeth Randol, Legislative Director, ACLU of Pennsylvania DATE: January 12, 2021 RE: OPPOSITION TO HOUSE BILL 38 P.N. 17 (DIAMOND) Background House Bill 38 (PN 17) is a proposed amendment to the Pennsylvania Constitution that would create judicial districts for the purpose of electing judges and justices to Pennsylvania’s appellate courts. While judges and justices on the Commonwealth, Superior, and Supreme Courts are currently elected at-large across the state, the proposed amendment would allow the legislature to draw geographic districts based on population. The stated reason for this amendment is to create a more geographically diverse judiciary and limit the number of judges and justices from Allegheny and Philadelphia counties.1 Proposed constitutional amendments must pass with identical language in two consecutive sessions. Having passed last session, if HB 38 passes for a second time this session, it could be placed on the ballot for ratification as early as the May primary. If approved by a simple majority vote of electors, it would become part of the Pennsylvania Constitution. On behalf of over 100,000 members and supporters of the ACLU of Pennsylvania, I respectfully urge you to oppose House Bill 38 (PN 17). Bill Summary House Bill 38 would: ■ Create seven districts for the election of Supreme Court justices, one for each justice on the Court; ■ Create judicial districts for the election of Superior Court judges, in a number determined by the 2 legislature;