Pacific Journal of Mathematics

LATTICES OF LIPSCHITZ FUNCTIONS

NIKOLAI ISAAC WEAVER

Volume 164 No. 1 May 1994 PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol. 164, No. 1, 1994

LATTICES OF LIPSCHITZ FUNCTIONS

NIK WEAVER

Let M be a metric space. We observe that Lip(M) has a striking lattice structure: its closed unit ball is lattice-complete and completely distributive. This motivates further study into the lattice structure of Lip (A/) and its relation to M. We find that there is a nice duality between M and Lip(Λf) (as a lattice). We also give an abstract classification of all normed vector lattices which are isomorphic to Lip(M) for some M.

The set Lip(Af) of bounded real-valued Lipschitz functions on a metric space M has been studied extensively (see [2] for some ref- erences) as either a or a . However, its natural lattice structure has been almost completely ignored, probably because it is not a : the "Riesz norm" law M < \y\ =» IMI < which connects lattice structure with norm, is not satisfied by either of the two norms customarily given to Lip(Af). (Here |x| = x V (—Λ:).) Nonetheless, the lattice structure of Lip(Aί) is intimately related to its most natural norm. Indeed, for any norm-bounded set of elements

{xa} C Lip(Λf), the join V x<* exists and satisfies

Since — \/ xa = /\{-xa) (whenever either side exists), this implies a similar statement for meets and is equivalent to saying that the closed unit ball of Lip(Af) is lattice-complete. What's more, the unit ball is completely distributive, which makes it very special from the lattice- theoretic point of view. We therefore feel that a study of Lip(Af) which emphasizes its lattice structure is well warranted. This paper begins such a study. Having identified the special lattice properties of Lip(Af), we also find it interesting to examine the class of all normed vector lattices which share these properties. We will call these objects Lip-spaces. (Note: by "" we simply mean a vector lattice which is equipped with a vector space norm. This is at variance with a usage of this term which requires that the norm be a Riesz norm.)

179 180 NIK WEAVER The outline of the paper is as follows. In the first two sections we make several definitions and give some simple results (with proofs mainly left to the reader) on Lip(M) and Lip-spaces. In the third section we state our main theorem on the relation between metric spaces and Lip-spaces, and prove the easy parts of it. The fourth section contains two theorems on the normed vector lattice structure of Lip(Af), and in the fifth section we prove that every Lip-space is isomorphic to Lip(M) for some M. The hard parts of our main theorem are proven in §§IV and V. We assume some familiarity with vector lattices; standard facts will be referred to [3]. Also see [1] for basic material on complete distribu- tivity. This material is based upon work supported under a National Science Foundation graduate fellowship.

I. Throughout the paper, 3Ba{X) will denote the closed ball of ra- dius a about the origin in a X. Let M and N be metric spaces. A Lipschitz function f\ M —> N is a map for which there exists a constant k e R+ such that p(f(p),f(q)) < k p(p, q) for all p, q e M. We define L(f) to equal the least such k. Lip(Af) is defined as the set of all bounded real-valued Lipschitz functions x: M —• R and is given the norm

Lip(M) is a Banach space under || ||, and it has a vector lattice struc- ture with meet and join defined pointwise. Under this structure any norm-bounded set has a join, still taken pointwise, which satisfies (*) of the introduction. This implies that the closed unit ball £$\ (Lip(Af)) is lattice-complete, in fact a complete sublattice (i.e. a subset closed under V and Λ) of the set of all functions M -• [-1, 1] c R. As [-1,1] is completely distributive and this property is preserved by products and complete sublattices, it follows that ^(Lip(Af)) is completely distributive. If M is any metric space, let M1 be the space M remetrized by pM\p,q)=mm(2,pM(p,q)). Then Lip(Af) and Lip(Λf/) are identical (same elements, same op- erations, same norm). Also, if M is the completion of M then Lip(Af) and Lip(Af) are isometrically isomorphic, including lattice- isomorphic. Therefore we restrict attention to the class Jf^ of com- plete metric spaces with diameter < 2. LATTICES OF LIPSCHITZ FUNCTIONS 181

For M, N E J?^ , we say that a map f:M N is bi-Lipschitz if there are positive constants k\, ki such that ί) < p{f{p), for all p, q e M; thus "bi-Lipschitz and onto" is equivalent to "Lip- schitz with Lipschitz inverse." II. Let a Lip-space be a vector lattice X equipped with a vector space norm such that the closed unit ball 3S\ (X) is lattice-complete and completely distributive. This generalizes the properties of Lip(M) it should become clear in §111 that this level of abstraction is appropriate.

In a Lip-space every norm-bounded set {xa} has a join and a meet,

both of norm < sup{||xα||}.

PROPOSITION 1. Every Lip-space is norm-complete.

Proof. Let X be a Lip-space. First let (x;) c X be a sequence such < an that Σ ||#i 11 °° d each x; > 0; we will show that Σ */ exists.

Let sn = x\ + + xn since ||sΛ|| < £ ||x/|| for each n, x = \Jf sn 5 r eac exists. Because the sequence (sπ) is increasing, * = VΓ « f° ^

fceN. Also note that the law (\J xa) - y = V( ^Q: ~ y) is generally valid in any vector lattice whenever one side is defined ([3], p. 56), so

\\Xi\\, n=k n>k i=k+l and as the last sum goes to zero as k —• oo, we have X)^ = x. To show that the norm is complete, we must show that Σ Xι exists n s for an arbitrary sequence (xz) c X such that ΣIWI - °° ^ ^ case let x^ = JC, V 0 and xj~ = (-JC/) V 0 for all / then xt = c^ - jcf ([3, p. 57]). Now xf > 0 and ||xf|| < ||x/||, so by the above both y = Σ ** and z = Σ ^Γ exist. Setting Λ: = y - z, we then have

/=! Έ*t y^ χτ where both of the last two terms go to zero as k —• oo. Thus Σ χi exists and equals x. D 182 NIK WEAVER Every Lip-space X is Archimedean since if x > 0 then

oo oo l\xln = l\x/n < \\x\\/k n=l n=k for any k e N, hence ΛΓ x/n = 0 For each αeR+ there is a constant

ca\J{x:\\x\\

in X. We also define c0 = 0 and C-a = -ca. Then for all α G R,

ca = a Ci thus,

oo oo

Cl/n = /\(ca + Cϊ/n) = /\ = /\ Cb n=\ n=\ n=l b>a

We also have ||cfl|| < \a\, and if X has more than one element then

ca > 0 for any α > 0, and so (1 + e)ca £ ca for any ε > 0, hence

||(1 +e)cfl|| > α, hence ||cfl|| > a. Thus ||cfl|| = \a\ for any a unless the Lip-space is trivial. Note that the closed unit ball of X is contained in but generally not equal to the interval [c_i, C\]. (E.g. consider the case X = Lip([0, 1]), when c\ is the function which is constantly 1.) This is related to the fact that the norm is not a Riesz norm. However, any Lip-space can be made into a Riesz-normed vector lattice by in- troducing the new norm

+ Moo = inf{α e R : C-a < x < ca} + = inf{αeR : |JC|

We have ||x||oo < ||^|| and||cα||oo = \a\ if X is nontrivial. In gen- eral the norm || ||oo is not complete and its unit ball, which equals [c_i, C\], is not lattice-complete. (Note: the term "constant" and the symbol || ||oo are indeed consistent with the case X = Lip(Λf).) The usual vector lattice notions of normal homomorphism and have to be modified here because of the existence of a norm and the special role of norm-bounded joins and meets. Thus, we let a seminor- mal homomorphism of Lip-spaces be a bounded linear map φ: X —> Y which preserves constants and norm-bounded joins. An isomorphism of Lip-spaces is a seminormal homomorphism which is a (not nec- essarily isometric or onto) Banach space isomorphism. By the open mapping theorem, it is enough for φ to be a 1-1 seminormal homo- morphism with norm-closed range. A semiband of a Lip-space X is LATTICES OF LIPSCHITZ FUNCTIONS 183 a linear subspace Y which is closed under norm-bounded joins and such that (y eY and \x\ < \y\) imply x e Y. By essentially a standard argument ([3, pp. 101-103]), every semiband is the kernel of a seminormal homomorphism, and conversely. (The only nonstandard aspect of this argument appears in the forward di- rection when we must endow X/ Y with a norm. Here it is enough to verify that Y is norm-closed; but Y is naturally a Lip-space, so this result follows from Proposition 1.) In the above definitions, the clauses concerning norm-bounded joins

imply similar conditions on norm-bounded meets by the law -\J χa = M-Xa) We also define a sub-Lip-space of a Lip-space X to be a linear subspace Y which contains the constants and is equipped with a norm such that £&\(Y) is a complete sublattice of 3§\{X) which contains C\ (the greatest element of &\ (X)). It is clear that Y is itself a Lip-space whose constants are the same as those of X. However, the norm on Y need not be the restriction to Y of the norm on X. III. We already have a way of going from a metric space M to a Lip-space Liρ(Af). Conversely, if X is a Lip-space let its dual metric space be the set X" of all seminormal homomorphisms X —• R, with metric inherited from the Banach space dual X*. Since every seminormal homomorphism X —• R sends 3&\{X) C [c_i, C\\ into [-1, 1], they all belong to 3B\{X*) and hence the distance between

any two is < 2. Also, X" is complete: any Cauchy sequence (pn) in X~ has a limit p in X* which evidently preserves constants; and if

{xa} c 3§a{X) and \p -pn\ < ε, then

a) - \Jp(Xa)\ < \p (\JXa) " Pn

Pn Pn(Xa) - \JP(x

If M, JV G Λ^2) and f:M-+Nis Lipschitz then we have a natu- ral map f*\ Lip(iV) -* Lip(Λf) given by f*{x) = x°f, and if X and Y are Lip-spaces and 0: X —> y is a seminormal homomorphism, then we have a natural map 0*: 7" -» X" given by φ*(p) = P ° φ. We can now state our main results. 184 NIK WEAVER

MAIN THEOREM. Let M, N e ^^ and let X and Y be Lip- spaces. (a) M is naturally isometric to (Lip(Af))~ . (b) X is naturally isomorphic to Lip(X~) and the natural map τ:X^ Lip(X~) satisfies max(||*||oo, ||*||/3) < ||τ(*)|| < \\x\\ for all xeX. (c) Let f:M^N be Lipschitz. Then (i) /* is a seminormal homomorphism and \\f*\\ = max(l,L(/)) (ii) if f(M) is dense in N then f* is 1-1, and (iii) // / is bi-Lipschitz then f* is onto. (d) Let φ: X —• Y be a seminormal homomorphism. Then (i) φ* is Lipschitz and max(l, L{φ*)) < \\φ\\, (ii) if φ is onto then φ* is bi-Lipschitz, and (iii) if φ is 1-1 then φ*(Y~) is dense in X~.

In parts (c)(i) and (d)(i), the norm of a seminormal homomorphism is just taken to be its usual norm as a map between Banach spaces. We make some observations on this theorem. First, it yields a com- plete classification of Lip-spaces up to isomorphism. By (b) every Lip-space is isomorphic to Lip(M) for some M e J?^ , and by (c) and (d) Lip(Af) is isomorphic to Lip(iV) iff there is a bi-Lipschitz map from M onto N, for bi-Lipschitz plus dense range clearly im- plies onto. We also see that the Lip-spaces are precisely those normed vector lattices which are isomorphic to Lip(Af) for some M. In part (b) τ is generally not an isometry. Indeed, it is easy to con- struct a two-dimensional Lip-space X which provides a counterexam- ple. The existence of such an X also implies that the inequality in part (d)(i) need not be an equality: for in this case φ = τ~ι is not an isometry, hence ||τ" x || > 1, while (τ"1)* = (τ*)"1 is an isometry by part (a), hence L((τ~1)*) = 1. However, if X = Lip(Af) for some M e ^^ , then X is indeed isometrically isomorphic to Lip(X~) since X~ is isometric to M by part (a). It follows that, in part (d)(i), if also Y = Lip(JV) for some NeJfM, then max(l, L(φ*)) = \\φ»\\ = \\φ\\ by part (c)(i) and the fact that X is isometric to Lip(X~) and Y is isometric to Lip(7~). Several parts of this theorem can be proven immediately: (c)(i). The only nontrivial part is determining \\ft\\ of course, this calculation implies that f* is bounded. Assume / is nonconstant; the constant case is trivial. LATTICES OF LIPSCHITZ FUNCTIONS 185 For any x e Lip(iV), ||/*(x)||oo = \\x ° /|U < ||x|U and

L{Ux))= sup p,qeM pφq

Pq P{f(p),f(q)) ' f(p)Φf{q) 0 there exist po, q$ € M, pQ φ q§, such that p(f(p0), f(q0)) > W)-ε)p(p0, q0). Defining x e Lip(N) by x(p) = 1 - p{p, f(q0)), we have ||x|| = 1 and

_ P(f(Po), /(go)) ^ Γ^/ Λ c

So 11/j.ll > L(/) also Λ(^i) = Q implies ||/ic|| > 1, and we are done. (c)(ii). Suppose x, y e Lip(JV) and x φ y\ then x and y are continuous functions on N so {p e N : x(p) Φ y(p)} is a (nonempty) open subset of N. So if /(Af) is dense in N there exists p$ e M such that x(f(Po)) Φ y(f(Po)), i.e. /*(x)(Po) ^ Λ(y)(Po)> and thus

(c)(iii). To prove this part we need to invoke the well-known fact ([5, p. 244]) that if N is a metric space and N' c N, then every Lip- schitz function x: N' —> R extends to a Lipschitz function x: N —* R with Pll = ||x||. Now if /: M -> ΛΓ is bi-Lipschitz then any x G Lip(Af) lifts to a Lipschitz function on f(M), which can then be extended to a function >> e Lip(JV) by the result just quoted. Then f*(y) = x and we conclude that f* is onto. (d)(i). \\φ\\ > 1 since φ(c\) = Ci. Now let p, q e Y~ and sup- pose ρ(φ*{p), φ*{q)) > k. Then there exists x e &\{X) such that \Φ*(p)(x) - Φ*(q)(x)\ > k, hence there exists y = φ(x) e &\\φ\\(Y) such that \p(y) - ^(y)| > fc. Γf follows that ||^|| - p(p, q) > k. We conclude that p(φ*(ρ), ^*(9)) < |Ϊ0|| />(/?, tf), so 0* is Lipschitz and L(Φ*) < WΦW 186 NIK WEAVER (d)(ii). We just showed that φ* is Lipschitz for any φ. Now sup- pose φ: X —• Y is onto. By the open mapping theorem there exists a G R+ with 3SaϋJ\ c φ{βχ{X)). If p, ?GΓ and p(p,q)>k, then there must exist y G £B\{Y) with |p(y) — #001 > &; then φ(x) = αy for some x^3S\ (X), so we have

\Φ*(p)(x) - *(tf)M| = \p(ay) - q(ay)\ >a k,

and we conclude that p{φ*(p)9 Φ*{q)) > a p(p, q). So 0* is bi- Lipschitz. D It remains to prove (a), (b), and (d)(iii). Part (a) will be proven in the next section, and the other two parts will be the content of the last section.

IV. THEOREM 1. Let ¥E/(2) and let Y be a semiband in Lip(Af). Then there is a closed subspace M' c M such that Y consists of precisely those elements of Lip(Af) which are zero on M' that is, Y = ker u, where i: M' —• M is the inclusion map.

Proof. Let x be the largest element of Y of norm < 1 then x > \x\ so x is positive, i.e. x{p) > 0 for all p e M. Define M1 = x~ι(0). If y e Y then \y\/\\ \y\ \\ < JC, hence y{M!) = 0. To prove the converse, we will show that x is the largest element of Lip(Af) of norm < 1 which is zero on M' then y e Lip(Λf) and y{M') = 0 will imply |j>|/|| |y| || < x, hence y € Y. Thus, we must show that 1 x[p) = p(p 9 M') Λ 1 for all p e M. (In case M = 0, we naturally set />(/?, M') = 2 for all p.) Certainly x{p) < p(p, Mf) Λ 1 for all p G M. Now pick PQ G M and λ < 1 and suppose x(po) < 1. For countable ordinals a, we use transfinite induction to construct elements paeM such that

(**) β < a => x(pβ) - χ(pa) > λ p(pβ ,Pa)>0.

The construction goes as follows. Given pa such that x(pa) > 0, to construct pa+χ first define the function y(p) = (x(pa) - λ ρ{p ,pa)) V0. If y < x then y G Y, hence y/||)>|| < x. However, since ||j;|| < 1 and y(pa) = x(Pa) this is a contradiction.

Therefore y ^ x and so there must exist a point /?α+i G Λf such that x(pα+i) < x{Pa)-λ-p(pa+\, /Jα). Assuming condition (**) holds for all β

X(Pβ) - X(pa) > λ . p(pβ , pa) , LATTICES OF LIPSCHITZ FUNCTIONS 187 and X(Pa) ~ X{Pa+\) > λ p(Pa , Pa+l) , hence

x(pβ) - x(pa+ϊ) > λ. p(pβ, pα+1).

Also, for /? < α, p{Pβ,pa+\) > 0 since p^ = pa+\ would imply

x(pβ) = x(pa+ι). So (**) is still satisfied after pa+γ has been con- structed.

For limit ordinals a, the net {x(Pβ))β

below, hence is Cauchy; therefore by (**) the net (Pβ)β

Cauchy and we may define pa to be its limit. In this case, for any β < a the first part of (**) is satisfied by continuity and the satisfaction of the second part is clear.

Since the numbers x(pa) are strictly decreasing, the construction

must stop eventually, but the only way this can happen is if x(pa0) = 0 for some αo In summary, under the assumption that x(po) < 1 we have proven that

x(Po) = x(Po) - *(Pa0) > λ p(p0, Pa0) > λ />(#), M'). Since this is so for any λ < 1 we conclude that x(po) > p(po, M1).

Thus for any poeM, x(p0) > p(p0, M') Λ 1, as desired. D By Theorem 1, it is clear that the maximal semibands of Lip(M) are precisely the kernels of seminormal homomorphisms Lip(M) —• R. Thus the following corollary implies that every M e Jf^ is in a natural bijection with the set of maximal semibands of Lip(Λf).

2 COROLLARY. For any Me^^ \ the natural map σ: M-+(IAp(M))~ is an isometry of M onto (Lip(Af))~. (Main Theorem part (a)).

Proof. The map σ takes p G M to the function x \-+ x(p). To show it is an isometry, choose po, q^eM. For any x e ^(Lip(M)) we have

\σ(po)(x) - σ(qo)(x)\ = \x(p0) - x(qo)\ < p(Po, Go), hence p(σ(po), σ(qo)) < p(po, ^o) Conversely, consider the function x E «^i(Lip(Af)) defined by x(p) = 1 - p(p, qo). We have

\σ(Po)(x) ~ σ(4o)(x)\ = \x(Po) - X(QΌ)\ = P(Po, Qo), and hence p(σ(Po), σ (ίo)) > P(Po> Qo). So σ is an isometry. 188 NIK WEAVER

Now we show σ is onto. Let φ: Lip(Af) —• R be a seminor- mal homomorphism. By Theorem 1, there exists M' c M such that ker0 = ken*, where i: Mf —> M is the inclusion map. Since Lip(Af') = Lip(Af)/ker0 = R, Lip(Af') is one-dimensional, and M' must consist of a single point po: if M1 had more than one point then for any q e M1 the function f(p) = p(p, q) in Lip(Af') would be nonconstant so Liρ(M') could not be one-dimensional. Identifying Lip(Af') with R, the map u is then of the form u{x) = x(po), i.e. U = <τ(A>); and ker** = ker^ and u{c\) = φ(c\) = 1 imply u = Φ So φ = σ(po) and we are done. D The following theorem, which we need for §V, is reminiscent of the Stone-Weierstrass theorem. Note, however, that if the hypothesis that Y contains the constants is removed, then Y may be nowhere near all of Lip(Af). For example, Y c Liρ([0, 1]) could be the set of func- tions of the form x ι-» ax (αeR); this is a one-dimensional subspace which separates points in the manner required by the theorem.

THEOREM 2. Let M e^^ and let Y beasub-Lip-spaceofLip(M) which has the property that for any p, q e M and any ε > 0 there

is an element y e £§\+ε(Y) which satisfies \y(p) - y(q)\ = ρ(p, q). Then Y = Lip(M) as sets and ^(Lip(M)) c

Proof. Let XEJΊ (Lip(Af)) and ε > 0; we will show x e &3+2ε(Y) We begin by showing that for any p, q e M there exists y e ^3+2ε(^) such that x(p) = y(p) and x(q) = y(q). Since \x(p) - x(q)\ <

p(p > Q)9 by hypothesis there exists yo G £B\+e{Y) such that \yo(p) - yo(ί)l ^ kί/7) —X (Q)\ \ multiplying ^o by a suitable scalar of norm

< 1, we get an element y\ e £&\+B{Y) such that \y\(p) - y\(q)\ = |JC(/7) -x(q)\, and the sign of the scalar may be chosen so that y\ (p) - y\{Q) = x\p)-x{q). Now \x(p)-yι(p)\ < Woo + Halloo < 2 + ε, so j; = yi + cx{p)_yι(p) is in ^3+2ε(^) and it satisfies x{p) = y{p), x(q)=y(Q) Now for each p £ M define

yP = \/{y e ^+2ε{Y): y(p) = χ(p)}

we have yp e &i+2ε(Y), yp{θ) > x{q) ΐov all q e M by the result of the last paragraph, and yp(p) = x(p). Thus /\{yp : p e M} is in &$+2e(Y) and equals x. As this holds for any ε > 0, we conclude that x e &3{Y). So ^(Lip(Af)) c ^(Y) 9 and this implies that every element of Lip(Af) is in Y. D LATTICES OF LIPSCHITZ FUNCTIONS 189 V. The final theorem is the most sophisticated in the paper. Its proof relies on the fact [4] that any completely distributive complete lattice L has the following property:

for all y ^ z e L there exist yf jf y and z' ^ z

"' such that L = [0L, z'] U [/, lL]. Here 0χ, and lχ, are the least and greatest elements of L, respectively.

LEMMA. Let u

Aw/, (a) If u A aυ < 0 for some 0 < a < 1 then

+ + au" < w Λ av = (M Λ aυ) V 0 = 0,

hence u < 0, contradiction. (Recall w+ = u V 0.) (b) u + v > 2u, but 2u £ 0. D

THEOREM 3. If X is any Lip-space, then the natural map τ: X —• Lip(X~) w α« isomorphism of X onto Lip(X~), and it satisfies maxfllxlloo, ||JC||/3) < ||τ(jc)|| < ||x|| for all x e X. (Main Theorem part (b).)

Proof. The proof proceeds in four steps. In steps 1-3 we fix an element w ^ 0 in 3&\{X).

Step 1. There exist elements yn, zn (n e N) in 3S\{X) such that yx = w and z\ = c\ and with the properties

(a) &\{X) c [c-i, zn] u [yn, cx] for all n

(b) if m < n then ym jf zΛ ^αλzrf therefore ym >yn)\

(c) y« ^ 0 fαwrf therefore zn > 0) ybr α// π and

(d) zn ^ ci/n ^α«rf therefore yn < ci/n) for all n>\.

We construct yn and zw by induction. First let y\ =w and z\ =

Ci. Having constructed yt and z/ for 1 < / < n-\ satisfying (a)-(d),

let y = 0 and z = yrt_i Λ Cι/n . Then y ^ z by part (a) of the lemma with u = yn-\, v — Ci/(Λ«i), and α = 1 - 1/n . So find y', z' e 3§\{X) f satisfying (f) for L = 3S\(X) and set yn = y , zn = z'. It is clear 190 NIK WEAVER

that yn and zn satisfy (a), (c), and (d). We also have zn ^ yn_x, and then zn £ ym for any m < n - 1 since ym > yn-\ by the inductive assumption. So (b) holds too.

Step 2. There exists an element w1 e &\(X), wf > 0, with the properties / f (a) ^ι(X)c[-cuw ]U[-w ,cι]f

(b) ca ^ w' yor any a > 0, aftflί (c) w j£w'.

Define w' = ΛΓ z" Clearly w' > 0.

First we prove (a). For any x e &\{X), if x < zn for all n then 7 x < tί; . Otherwise x £ zn for some n, hence x > yn so we must show yw > -w'. For any meN, j/m+yn^O by part (b) of the lemma, so

o t ym + yn => -yn t ym => -yΛ < ^. 1 Hence -yn < w , hence yΛ > —w' as desired. This proves part (a). 1 For part (b), recall that c\/n ^ zn hence c\/n £ w for any n > 1.

For any α > 0 we can find n > 1 such that l/n

Part (c) is obvious: w = y\ ^ z2, so w £w'.

3. ΓAere w α semίnormal homomorphism p: X -• R swc/* p(tϋ) > 0. Define /? by

f p(jc) = sup{α eR:x>ca+ λw for some AeR} 1 = inf{α GR: x < ca + λw for some AGR}. We first show that this definition is consistent and that p(x) is finite for all x. Fix x e X. For any a e R let λ = \a\ + ||JC|| then

(x-ca)/λe&ι(X)9 hence

7 f (JC - cfl)/A > -tί; or (x - ca)/λ < w , i.e.

(t) x > ca - (\a\ + \\x\\)w' or x < ca + (\a\ + \\x\\)w'.

This holds for any a, so sup > inf. Conversely, if b < a and ca + f λw < x < cb + μw' for some λ, μ then for k = max(|>l|, \μ\) we have LATTICES OF LIPSCHITZ FUNCTIONS 191

1 1 f ca - kw ca_b < 2kw =» C(a a contradiction. This implies that sup < inf, and so the definition of

p(x) is consistent. Also, c^x\\ < x < C\\x\\ implies p(x) is finite. Now we show p is linear. For any a > 0,

1 x >cb + λw <=> ax > cab + aλw' hence p(ax) = ap(x) and

1 f x>cb + λw o -x < c_b - λw hence p{-x) = —p{x). Also, for any JCI , Xι G X

f (xι

hence p(^i + x2) < p(x\) + p{xi), and p(x{ + x2) > p{xx) + p(x2) similarly. It is clear that p preserves constants. Since p clearly also preserves order, it follows that p takes £$\{X) c [c_i, C\] into [-1, 1], hence p is bounded. Now we show p preserves norm-bounded joins. Let

{xa} C X be a norm-bounded set. Since p preserves order, V p(xa) < p(V Xa) Conversely, using (f) we have

a V' p(Xa) < a^ p(xa) < for all a =>XatCa~ (M + ||*α||)w; fθΓ all a

=> Xa

=> V'xa

Thus \lp{xa) = p{\l Xa) and p is a seminormal homomoφhism. Finally we show /?(u>) > 0. Suppose to the contrary that p(w) < l/n for all neN. Then by (t),

w < c\jn + (l/n + \\w\\)w' for all n, hence

a contradiction.

Step 4. Proof of Theorem. Let x e X and suppose a > 0 is such that x ^ cα . Let w = (x—cα)/||x—cΛ|| then we can find a seminormal 192 NIK WEAVER homomorphism p: X —• R such that p(w) > 0 by steps 1-3. Then

||τ(*)|| > HτWlloo > \τ(x)(p)\ = \p(x)\ = ||x - ca\\p{w) + a>a.

Since any a < HxH^ satisfies x £ ca or -x <£ ca, this shows ||T(X)|| Halloo. Also, ||τ(x)||oo = sup \τ(x)(p)\ = sup \p(x)\ < \\x\\ pex~ ~ and

L{τ{x))= SUp |τ

so We have seen that τ is 1-1, so define a norm ||| ||| on τ{X) by

HI τ(χ) |||= ||,χ||. With this norm τ(X) is a sub-Lip-space of Lip(X~) which satisfies the condition of Theorem 2. We conclude that τ is onto and ||x|| =||| τ{x) \\\< 3||τ(x)|| for any x e X. As τ is clearly a seminormal homomorphism, the proof is complete. D

COROLLARY. Let X and Y be Lip-spaces and let φ: X —• Y be a seminormal homomorphism. If φ is 1-1 then φ*(Y~) is dense in X". (Main Theorem part (d)(iii).)

Proof. Suppose φ*(Y~) is not dense in X~ and let p0 e X~ be such that r = p(p0, φ*(Y~)) > 0. Define y e Liρ(X~) by y{q) =

(r - p{po, β)) V 0 so y(^(y~)) = 0. Then since τx: X -• Lip(X^) is onto, there exists x e X with τ^-(x) = y. For any pGΓ" we then have

hence φ(x) = 0 since τγ: Y ^ Lip(Γ^) is 1-1. But x Φ 0, so must not be 1-1. D

REFERENCES

[1] G. Birkhoff, Lattice Theory (third edition), Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. PubL, vol. 25, Amer. Math. Soc, Providence, RI, 1967. [2] J. A. Johnson, Lipschitz spaces, Pacific J. Math., 51 (1974), 177-186. LATTICES OF LIPSCHITZ FUNCTIONS 193

[3] W. A. J. Luxemburg and A. C. Zaanen, Riesz Spaces, Vol. I, North-Holland, London, 1971. [4] G. N. Raney, Tight Galois connections and complete distributivity, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 97 (1960), 418-426. [5] D. R. Sherbert, The structure of ideals and point derivations in Banach algebras of Lipschitz functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 111 (1964), 240-272.

Received March 20, 1992 and in revised form March 30, 1993.

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY, CA 94720

PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Founded by E. F. BECKENBACH (1906-1982) F. WOLF (1904-1989) EDITORS SUN-YUNG A. CHANG THOMAS ENRIGHT STEVEN KERCKHOFF (Managing Editor) University of California, San Diego Stanford University University of California La Jolla, CA 92093 Stanford, CA 94305 Los Angeles, CA 90024-1555 tenright@ucsd. edu [email protected] [email protected] NICHOLAS ERCOLANI MARTIN SCHARLEMANN F. MICHAEL CHRIST University of Arizona University of California University of California Tucson, AZ 85721 Santa Barbara, CA 93106 Los Angeles, CA 90024-1555 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] R. FINN Stanford University HAROLD STARK HERBERT CLEMENS Stanford, CA 94305 University of California, San Diego University of Utah [email protected] La Jolla, CA 92093 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 [email protected] VAUGHAN F. R. JONES V. S. VARADARAJAN University of California University of California Berkeley, CA 94720 Los Angeles, CA 90024-1555 [email protected] [email protected] SUPPORTING INSTITUTIONS UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA UNIVERSITY OF OREGON UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY STANFORD UNIVERSITY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA UNIVERSITY OF UTAH UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, RENO WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Mathematics of Journal Pacific

Volume 164 No. 1 May 1994

1Entropy versus orbit equivalence for minimal homeomorphisms M.MICHAEL BOYLE and DAVID E.HANDELMAN 15Thehyperspaces of infinite-dimensional compacta for covering and cohomological dimension are homeomorphic TADEUSZ WLADYSLAW DOBROWOLSKI and LEONARD RUBIN 41Theindex of transversally elliptic operators for locally free actions JEFFREY STEPHEN FOX and PETER EVARTS HASKELL 87Unitindices of some imaginary composite quadratic fields MIKIHITO HIRABAYASHI 105Periodicpoints on nilmanifolds and solvmanifolds

EDWARD KEPPELMANN 1994 129Branchedcoverings of surfaces with ample cotangent bundle MICHAEL JEROME SPURR n-dimensional 147Evolutionary existence 1 No. 164, Vol. proofs for the pendant drop and catenary problems ANDREW GUY STONE 179Latticesof Lipschitz functions NIKOLAI ISAAC WEAVER 195Correctionto: “Trace rings for verbally prime algebras” ALLAN BERELE

0030-8730(1994)164:1;1-I