DOCSLIB.ORG

Northeast Skate Complex Fishery Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Northeast Skate Complex Fishery Management Plan Northeast Skate Complex Fishery Management Plan DRAFT Affected Environment for 2022 – 2023 Specifications And Amendment 8 DRAFT for May 2021 AP and Committee meetings Prepared by the New England Fishery Management Council In consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Service Skate Affected Environment - draft 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ...................................... 5 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Target Species (Northeast Skate Complex) .................................................................................. 5 1.2.1 Species Distribution ................................................................................................................ 5 1.2.2 Stock Status ............................................................................................................................. 5 1.2.3 Thorny Skate Rebuilding Plan ................................................................................................ 8 1.2.4 Uncertainty Buffer .................................................................................................................. 9 1.2.5 Biological and Life History Characteristics ............................................................................ 9 1.2.6 Discards ................................................................................................................................. 10 1.3 Non-target Species (Bycatch) ..................................................................................................... 13 1.4 Protected Species ........................................................................................................................ 14 1.5 Physical Environment and Essential Fish Habitat ...................................................................... 14 1.5.1 Physical Environment ........................................................................................................... 14 1.5.2 Essential Fish Habitat ............................................................................................................ 14 1.6 Human Communities .................................................................................................................. 15 1.6.1 Commercial Skate Fishery .................................................................................................... 15 1.6.2 Recreational Skate Landings ................................................................................................. 42 1.6.3 Other Managed Resources and Fisheries .............................................................................. 42 1.6.4 Fishing Communities ............................................................................................................ 45 Table of Tables Table 8. Recent survey indices, survey strata used and biomass reference points of skate species. ............ 7 Table 9. Assumed and estimated discard mortality rates of the seven skate species by gear type. ............ 11 Table 10. Discards (mt) of skates (all species) by gear type from all areas combined, calendar year 1964 – 2018. ..................................................................................................................................................... 12 Table 11. Landings, and total and dead discards of skates (all species) for all gear types, calendar year 1968 – 2018. ......................................................................................................................................... 13 Table 12. Federal fishing permits with and without Federal skate permit (endorsements) and relative skate fishery participation, FY 2003-2019. ................................................................................................... 18 Table 13. Number of active non-bait (wing) vessels by gear type for all non-bait (wing) landings and for non-bait (wing) landings over 1,135 lb whole weight at least once during the fishing year, FY 2003- 2019. ..................................................................................................................................................... 19 Table 14. Federal fishing permits landing skate, FY 2003-2019. ............................................................... 22 Table 15. Federal skate permit entry and exit trends, FY 2003-2019. ........................................................ 23 Skate Affected Environment - draft 2 Table 16. Trends in Federal fishing permits with and without Federal endorsements activity in the skate fishery, FY 2003-2019. ........................................................................................................................ 24 Table 17. Number of skate trips by disposition and gear, FY2018. ............................................................ 26 Table 18. FY 2017 - 2019 in-season monitoring of Northeast skate wing and bait landings. .................... 28 Table 19. Year-end Northeast skate complex annual catch limit (ACL) accounting, FY2017-2019. ........ 29 Table 20. Total allowable landings (TAL) (pounds), live landings, and percent of TAL achieved for the wing and bait fisheries by fishing year, 2010-2020.............................................................................. 30 Table 21. FY 2020 and 2021 skate seasons and possession limits. ............................................................ 31 Table 22. Dates when the incidental limits have been triggered in the skate fishery. ................................ 32 Table 23. Skate wing possession limits by season and fishing year. .......................................................... 33 Table 24. Skate bait possession limits by season and fishing year. ............................................................ 34 Table 25. Skate landings by VMS declaration and skate fishery disposition, FY 2017-2018, combined. 35 Table 26. Skate wing and bait landings (live and landed lb) and revenue, FY 2010 – 2019. ..................... 36 Table 27. Vessels landing 1+ lb of skate on at least one trip by dependence on total revenue from all species and dependence on skate revenue by disposition, FY 2016-2018. .......................................... 38 Table 28. Landings and revenues from trips landing skate, by disposition, FY 2018. ............................... 39 Table 29. FY 2018 revenue by species and disposition of vessels landing skate at least once during FY. 41 Table 30. Estimated recreational skate landings by species, 2012-2018. ................................................... 42 Table 31. Total lobster landings (lb) by state, 2009-2015. ......................................................................... 43 Table 32. Bait use in the inshore Gulf of Maine lobster fishery, in 2010. .................................................. 44 Table 33. Skate fishing community engagement and reliance indicators, 2014-2018 average. ................. 48 Table 34. Fishing revenue (unadjusted for inflation) and vessels in top skate ports by revenue, calendar years 2010-2018. .................................................................................................................................. 49 Table 35. Primary and secondary ports in the Northeast skate fishery. ...................................................... 50 Table 36. Changes in engagement over time for all primary and secondary skate ports, plus any port with medium-high or high skate engagement over the time series, 2004-2018. .......................................... 51 Table 37. Social vulnerability in primary and secondary skate ports, 2018. .............................................. 53 Table 38. Gentrification pressure in primary and secondary skate ports, 2018. ......................................... 54 Table 39. Skate revenue by disposition and port, for calendar years 2010-2018. ...................................... 55 Table 40. Skate landings and revenue by fishery and state, calendar year 2010-2018. .............................. 56 Table 41. Top 20 (non-confidential) landing ports by lobster revenue, 2019, Maine to New Jersey. ........ 57 Table 42. Key port communities for the skate fishery and other fisheries potentially impacted by Amendment 5. ...................................................................................................................................... 58 Table 43. Top five species landed by value in Chatham MA, calendar year 2019. .................................... 61 Table 44. Top five species landed by value in New Bedford MA, calendar year 2019. ............................. 61 Table 45. Top five species landed by value in Little Compton RI, calendar year 2019. ............................ 62 Skate Affected Environment - draft 3 Table 46. Top five species landed by value in Point Judith RI, calendar year 2019................................... 63 Table 47. Top five species landed by value in Montauk NY, calendar year 2019...................................... 63 Table 48. Top five species landed by value in Barnegat Light/Long Beach, calendar year 2019. ............. 64 Table 49. Top five species landed by value in Cape May, calendar year 2019. ......................................... 65 Table of Figures Figure 2. Thorny skate NEFSC survey biomass indices (kg/tow), 1963 - 2019. .......................................... 8 Figure 2. Number of active Federal fishing permits with and without a Federal skate permit (endorsement),
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Barndoor Skate, Dipturus Laevis, Life History and Habitat Characteristics
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NE-173 Essential Fish Habitat Source Document: Barndoor Skate, Dipturus laevis, Life History and Habitat Characteristics U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Region Northeast Fisheries Science Center Woods Hole, Massachusetts March 2003 Recent Issues in This Series: 155. Food of Northwest Atlantic Fishes and Two Common Species of Squid. By Ray E. Bowman, Charles E. Stillwell, William L. Michaels, and Marvin D. Grosslein. January 2000. xiv + 138 p., 1 fig., 7 tables, 2 app. NTIS Access. No. PB2000-106735. 156. Proceedings of the Summer Flounder Aging Workshop, 1-2 February 1999, Woods Hole, Massachusetts. By George R. Bolz, James Patrick Monaghan, Jr., Kathy L. Lang, Randall W. Gregory, and Jay M. Burnett. May 2000. v + 15 p., 5 figs., 5 tables. NTIS Access. No. PB2000-107403. 157. Contaminant Levels in Muscle of Four Species of Recreational Fish from the New York Bight Apex. By Ashok D. Deshpande, Andrew F.J. Draxler, Vincent S. Zdanowicz, Mary E. Schrock, Anthony J. Paulson, Thomas W. Finneran, Beth L. Sharack, Kathy Corbo, Linda Arlen, Elizabeth A. Leimburg, Bruce W. Dockum, Robert A. Pikanowski, Brian May, and Lisa B. Rosman. June 2000. xxii + 99 p., 6 figs., 80 tables, 3 app., glossary. NTIS Access. No. PB2001-107346. 158. A Framework for Monitoring and Assessing Socioeconomics and Governance of Large Marine Ecosystems. By Jon G. Sutinen, editor, with contributors (listed alphabetically) Patricia Clay, Christopher L. Dyer, Steven F. Edwards, John Gates, Tom A. Grigalunas, Timothy Hennessey, Lawrence Juda, Andrew W. Kitts, Philip N.
    [Show full text]
  • Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation of Skate Species (Rajidae)
    16. Gulf of Alaska Skates by Sarah Gaichas1, Nick Sagalkin2, Chris Gburski1, Duane Stevenson1, and Rob Swanson3 1NMFS Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Seattle WA 2ADF&G Commercial Fisheries Division, Kodiak AK 3NMFS Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Kodiak AK Executive Summary Summary of Major Changes Changes in the input data: 1. Total catch weight for GOA skates is updated with 2004 and partial 2005 data. 2. Biomass estimates from the 2005 GOA bottom trawl survey are incorporated. 3. Life history information has been updated with recent research results. 4. Information on the position of skates within the GOA ecosystem and the potential ecosystem effects of skate removals are included. Changes in assessment methodology: There are no changes to the Tier 5 assessment methodology. Changes in assessment results: No directed fishing for skates in the GOA is recommended, due to high incidental catch in groundfish and halibut fisheries. Skate biomass changed between the last NMFS GOA trawl survey in 2003 and the most recent survey in 2005, which changes the Tier 5 assessment results based on survey biomass. The recommendations for 2005 based on the three most recent survey biomass estimates for skates and M=0.10 are: Western Central GOA Eastern GOA GOA (610) (620, 630) (640, 650) Bathyraja skates Gulfwide Big skate ABC 695 2,250 599 ABC 1,617 OFL 927 3,001 798 OFL 2,156 Longnose skate ABC 65 1,969 861 OFL 87 2,625 1,148 Responses to SSC Comments SSC comments specific to the GOA Skates assessment: From the December, 2004 SSC minutes: The SSC is grateful to samplers with ADF&G who collected catch data and biological samples for Kodiak landings.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 IUCN Red List 3.1 Notes on the IUCN Red List the IUCN Maintains a Complete List of All the Species It Considers Critically Endangered, Endangered Or Vulnerable
    Dutch Caribbean Species of High Conservation Value 3 IUCN Red List 3.1 Notes on the IUCN Red List The IUCN maintains a complete list of all the species it considers critically endangered, endangered or vulnerable. The IUCN Red List does not cover many species, especially marine organisms. The ‘Red List’ of Species can be found at http://www.iucnredlist.org/ including further definitions. The status of many populations of flora and fauna is unknown, those that are known and have been included on the list are classified under the following headings; CRITICALLY ENDANGERED (CR): A species is Critically Endangered when it is considered to be facing an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild. ENDANGERED (EN): A species is Endangered when it is therefore considered to be facing a very high risk of extinction in the wild. VULNERABLE (VU): A species is Vulnerable when it is considered to be facing a high risk of extinction in the wild. THIS DATA IS FROM THE 2009 LIST UPDATE, downloaded in 2012. The following tables are the result of a search on the IUCN Red List website, refinement using Red List distribution notes on species and DCNA Management Success anecdotal notes from PA managers. IUCN Red List database search criteria; Caribbean Islands: Aruba, Netherlands Antilles Ocean Regions: Atlantic Midwestern Native, Introduced, Vagrant, Uncertain 3.2 IUCN Red List Summary Data Total Red List Threatened Critically Endangered Endangered Vulnerable Dutch Caribbean 78 8 21 49 Marine 67 7 16 43 Terrestrial 12 1 5 6 IUCN Red List Species 22 November 2012 Dutch Caribbean Species of High Conservation Value 3.3 Critically endangered Red List Species 3.3.1 Marine critically endangered Red List Species Common Group Name Scientific name English Name Notes Aruba Bonaire Curaçao Saba Eustatius St.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Dealer Permit Information the Federal Greater Atlantic Seafood Dealer Initial Permit Application You Requested Is Enclosed
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office 55 Great Republic Drive Gloucester, MA 01930 Phone: (978) 282-8438 September 3, 2020 Initial Dealer Permit Information The Federal Greater Atlantic Seafood Dealer initial permit application you requested is enclosed. You need to complete the enclosed forms, and, if applicable, include required additional documents . This package includes: • Permit application, Owner form and Application instructions Why do you need a dealer permit? You need to have a Greater Atlantic Region dealer permit to purchase lobster, shellfish, and fish from a federally permitted Greater Atlantic Region vessel or HMS vessel harvesting Atlantic tunas. Additionally, you must have that permit in your possession when purchasing the species. You need a Greater Atlantic dealer permit if: • You purchase any of the fish or shellfish listed below harvested from Federal waters (EEZ) or; • You purchase Atlantic tunas harvested from Federal or State waters or; • You purchase these fish or shellfish from a vessel issued a Greater Atlantic vessel permit. If you have any questions, please call the Greater Atlantic Region Permit Office at 978-282-8442 or your area Port Agent, found here: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/contact/port -agents-greater -atlantic -region . List of managed species that require a Greater Atlantic Federal Dealer Permit American lobster Northeast Multispecies continued - NE Skate complex continued - Atlantic bluefish Atlantic halibut
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to List
    Petition to List the Northwest Atlantic Distinct Population Segment (DPS) of the Thorny Skate (Amblyraja radiata) as Endangered or Threatened or, alternatively, to List the United States DPS of the Thorny Skate as Endangered or Threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act Photograph by Bernd Ueberschaer Submitted to the United States Secretary of Commerce, Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the National Marine Fisheries Service Petitioners: Animal Welfare Institute Defenders of Wildlife 900 Pennsylvania Ave. SE 130 17th St NW Washington, DC 20003 Washington, DC 20036 May 28, 2015 i Executive Summary The Animal Welfare Institute and Defenders of Wildlife (Petitioners) hereby petition the Secretary of Commerce, the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, to list the Northwest Atlantic population of thorny skate (Amblyraja radiata) as an endangered or threatened Distinct Population Segment (DPS), pursuant to the Endangered Species Act (ESA) (16 U.S.C. § 1531–44). In the alternative, Petitioners request NMFS to list a U.S. DPS of the thorny skate as a threatened or endangered species. In addition, Petitioners seek the designation of critical habitat concurrently with any listing of the thorny skate, as authorized by statute. The thorny skate is a “K‐selected” species, meaning it is relatively long‐lived, reaches sexual maturity later in life, and has a low fecundity rate. These life history characteristics limit the species’ ability to recover in response to abrupt population declines, and render it particularly vulnerable to overexploitation. Thorny skate populations throughout the Northwest Atlantic have declined precipitously over the past four decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Skate US Atlantic
    Winter skate Leucoraja ocellata Image © Jeffrey C. Domm / Fisheries and Ocean Canada US Atlantic Bottom trawl and Sink gillnet October 6, 2014 Stock status update March 2016 Michelle Cho, Rachel Simon, Consulting researchers Disclaimer: Seafood Watch® strives to have all Seafood Reports reviewed for accuracy and completeness by external scientists with expertise in ecology, fisheries science and aquaculture. Scientific review, however, does not constitute an endorsement of the Seafood Watch® program or its recommendations on the part of the reviewing scientists. Seafood Watch® is solely responsible for the conclusions reached in this report. About Seafood Watch® Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch® program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch® defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. Seafood Watch® makes its science-based recommendations available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from www.seafoodwatch.org. The program’s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservation issues and empower seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans. Each sustainability recommendation on the regional pocket guides is supported by a Seafood Report. Each report synthesizes and analyzes the most current ecological, fisheries and ecosystem science on a species, then evaluates this information against the program’s conservation ethic to arrive at a recommendation of “Best Choices,” “Good Alternatives” or “Avoid.” The detailed evaluation methodology is available upon request.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Longnose Skates Zearaja Chilensisand Dipturus Trachyderma (Rajiformes: Rajidae)
    Univ. Sci. 2015, Vol. 20 (3): 321-359 doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.SC20-3.arol Freely available on line REVIEW ARTICLE A review of longnose skates Zearaja chilensis and Dipturus trachyderma (Rajiformes: Rajidae) Carolina Vargas-Caro1 , Carlos Bustamante1, Julio Lamilla2 , Michael B. Bennett1 Abstract Longnose skates may have a high intrinsic vulnerability among fishes due to their large body size, slow growth rates and relatively low fecundity, and their exploitation as fisheries target-species places their populations under considerable pressure. These skates are found circumglobally in subtropical and temperate coastal waters. Although longnose skates have been recorded for over 150 years in South America, the ability to assess the status of these species is still compromised by critical knowledge gaps. Based on a review of 185 publications, a comparative synthesis of the biology and ecology was conducted on two commercially important elasmobranchs in South American waters, the yellownose skate Zearaja chilensis and the roughskin skate Dipturus trachyderma; in order to examine and compare their taxonomy, distribution, fisheries, feeding habitats, reproduction, growth and longevity. There has been a marked increase in the number of published studies for both species since 2000, and especially after 2005, although some research topics remain poorly understood. Considering the external morphological similarities of longnose skates, especially when juvenile, and the potential niche overlap in both, depth and latitude it is recommended that reproductive seasonality, connectivity and population structure be assessed to ensure their long-term sustainability. Keywords: conservation biology; fishery; roughskin skate; South America; yellownose skate Introduction Edited by Juan Carlos Salcedo-Reyes & Andrés Felipe Navia Global threats to sharks, skates and rays have been 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Skate Complex Fishery Management Plan
    New England Fishery Management Council 2007 Northeast Skate Complex Fishery Management Plan Species Managed Under Fishery Management Plan (FMP) Seven species of skates are included in the Northeast complex: winter skate, barndoor skate, thorny skate, smooth skate, little skate, clearnose skate, and rosette skate. The Northeast skate complex is distributed along the coast of the northeast United States from near the tide line to depths exceeding 700 m (383 fathoms). In the northeast, the center of distribution for little and winter skates is Georges Bank and Southern New England. Barndoor skate is most common in the offshore Gulf of Maine, on Georges Bank, and in Southern New England. Thorny and smooth skates are commonly found in the Gulf of Maine. Clearnose and rosette skates have a more southern distribution, and are found primarily in Southern New England and the Chesapeake Bight. Skates are not known to undertake large-scale migrations, but move seasonally in response to changes in water temperature, moving offshore in summer and early autumn and returning inshore during winter and spring. Members of the skate family lay eggs that are enclosed in a hard, leathery case commonly called a mermaid’s purse. Management Plan Overview The Skate FMP was implemented in September 2003. The primary objectives of the Skate FMP are to: (1) protect the overfished species of skates and increase their biomass to target levels specified in the FMP while preventing overfishing of the other skate species and (2) collect information critical for improving knowledge of skate fisheries by species and for monitoring the status of skate fisheries, resources, and related markets, as well as the effectiveness of skate management approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Barndoor Skate (Dipturus Laevis) in Canada, Prepared Under Contract with Environment Canada
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Barndoor Skate Dipturus laevis in Canada NOT AT RISK 2010 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2010. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Barndoor Skate Dipturus laevis in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xiii + 71 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge James Simon and Sherrylynn Rowe for writing the status report on the Barndoor Skate (Dipturus laevis) in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Paul Bentzen, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Marine Fishes Specialist Subcommittee with the support of Dave Kulka, member of the Marine Fishes Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la grande raie (Dipturus laevis) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Barndoor Skate — Drawn by P.D. MacWhirter and extracted from Sulak et al. (2009). Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2011. Catalogue No. CW69-14/620-2011E-PDF ISBN 978-1-100-18597-2 Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – November 2010 Common name Barndoor Skate Scientific name Dipturus laevis Status Not at Risk Reason for designation This species, one of the largest skates in the western Atlantic Ocean, and with an estimated generation time of 13 years, ranges on continental shelf habitats from Cape Hatteras to the Grand Banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.A Review of Longnose Skates Zearaja Chilensis and Dipturus Trachyderma (Rajiformes: Rajidae)
    Universitas Scientiarum ISSN: 0122-7483 [email protected] Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Colombia Vargas-Caro, Carolina; Bustamante, Carlos; Lamilla, Julio; Bennett, Michael B. A review of longnose skates Zearaja chilensis and Dipturus trachyderma (Rajiformes: Rajidae) Universitas Scientiarum, vol. 20, núm. 3, 2015, pp. 321-359 Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Bogotá, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=49941379004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Univ. Sci. 2015, Vol. 20 (3): 321-359 doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.SC20-3.arol Freely available on line REVIEW ARTICLE A review of longnose skates Zearaja chilensis and Dipturus trachyderma (Rajiformes: Rajidae) Carolina Vargas-Caro1 , Carlos Bustamante1, Julio Lamilla2 , Michael B. Bennett1 Abstract Longnose skates may have a high intrinsic vulnerability among fishes due to their large body size, slow growth rates and relatively low fecundity, and their exploitation as fisheries target-species places their populations under considerable pressure. These skates are found circumglobally in subtropical and temperate coastal waters. Although longnose skates have been recorded for over 150 years in South America, the ability to assess the status of these species is still compromised by critical knowledge gaps. Based on a review of 185 publications, a comparative synthesis of the biology and ecology was conducted on two commercially important elasmobranchs in South American waters, the yellownose skate Zearaja chilensis and the roughskin skate Dipturus trachyderma; in order to examine and compare their taxonomy, distribution, fisheries, feeding habitats, reproduction, growth and longevity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation Status of North American, Central American, and Caribbean Chondrichthyans the Conservation Status Of
    The Conservation Status of North American, Central American, and Caribbean Chondrichthyans The Conservation Status of Edited by The Conservation Status of North American, Central and Caribbean Chondrichthyans North American, Central American, Peter M. Kyne, John K. Carlson, David A. Ebert, Sonja V. Fordham, Joseph J. Bizzarro, Rachel T. Graham, David W. Kulka, Emily E. Tewes, Lucy R. Harrison and Nicholas K. Dulvy L.R. Harrison and N.K. Dulvy E.E. Tewes, Kulka, D.W. Graham, R.T. Bizzarro, J.J. Fordham, Ebert, S.V. Carlson, D.A. J.K. Kyne, P.M. Edited by and Caribbean Chondrichthyans Executive Summary This report from the IUCN Shark Specialist Group includes the first compilation of conservation status assessments for the 282 chondrichthyan species (sharks, rays, and chimaeras) recorded from North American, Central American, and Caribbean waters. The status and needs of those species assessed against the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species criteria as threatened (Critically Endangered, Endangered, and Vulnerable) are highlighted. An overview of regional issues and a discussion of current and future management measures are also presented. A primary aim of the report is to inform the development of chondrichthyan research, conservation, and management priorities for the North American, Central American, and Caribbean region. Results show that 13.5% of chondrichthyans occurring in the region qualify for one of the three threatened categories. These species face an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild (Critically Endangered; 1.4%), a very high risk of extinction in the wild (Endangered; 1.8%), or a high risk of extinction in the wild (Vulnerable; 10.3%).
    [Show full text]
  • Discard Mortality in the Gulf of Maine Groundfish Bottom Trawl Fishery
    ICES Journal of Marine Science (2019), doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsz177 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/icesjms/fsz177/5599855 by guest on 24 October 2019 Utilization of pop-up satellite archival transmitting tags to evaluate thorny skate (Amblyraja radiata) discard mortality in the Gulf of Maine groundfish bottom trawl fishery Ryan Knotek 1,2*, Jeff Kneebone2, James Sulikowski3, Tobey Curtis4, Joseph Jurek5, and John Mandelman2 1School for the Environment—Marine Science and Technology Program, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 William T. Morrissey Blvd., Boston, MA 02125, USA 2Anderson Cabot Center for Ocean Life, New England Aquarium, 1 Central Wharf, Boston, MA 02110, USA 3Marine Science Department, University of New England, 11 Hills Beach Rd., Biddeford, ME 04005, USA 4Highly Migratory Species Management Division, NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service, 55 Great Republic Dr., Gloucester, MA 01930, USA 5Northeast Fishery Sector II, Gloucester, MA 01930, USA *Corresponding author: tel: þ 1 518 879 4084; e-mail: [email protected]. Knotek, R., Kneebone, J., Sulikowski, J., Curtis, T., Jurek, J., and Mandelman, J. Utilization of pop-up satellite archival transmitting tags to evaluate thorny skate (Amblyraja radiata) discard mortality in the Gulf of Maine groundfish bottom trawl fishery. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsz177. Received 24 January 2019; revised 2 August 2019; accepted 7 August 2019. Thorny skate (Amblyraja radiata) remain one of the most overfished species in the Gulf of Maine (GOM) despite being designated as a pro- hibited (zero-possession, mandatory release) species by the New England Fishery Management Council in 2003.
    [Show full text]