DOCSLIB.ORG

Biochar for Environmental Management ES BEM 13-1 13/1/09 15:42 Page Ii ES BEM 13-1 13/1/09 15:42 Page Iii

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biochar for Environmental Management ES BEM 13-1 13/1/09 15:42 Page Ii ES BEM 13-1 13/1/09 15:42 Page Iii ES_BEM_13-1 13/1/09 15:42 Page i Biochar for Environmental Management ES_BEM_13-1 13/1/09 15:42 Page ii ES_BEM_13-1 13/1/09 15:42 Page iii Biochar for Environmental Management Science and Technology Edited by Johannes Lehmann and Stephen Joseph London • Sterling,VA ES_BEM_13-1 13/1/09 15:42 Page iv First published by Earthscan in the UK and USA in 2009 Copyright © Johannes Lehmann and Stephen Joseph, 2009 All rights reserved ISBN: 978-1-84407-658-1 Typeset by MapSet Ltd, Gateshead, UK Printed and bound in the UK by Cover design by For a full list of publications please contact: Earthscan Dunstan House 14a St Cross Street London, EC1N 8XA, UK Tel:+44 (0)20 7841 1930 Fax: +44 (0)20 7242 1474 Email: [email protected] Web: www.earthscan.co.uk 22883 Quicksilver Drive, Sterling,VA 20166-2012, USA Earthscan publishes in association with the International Institute for Environment and Development A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Biochar for environmental management : science and technology / edited by Johannes Lehmann and Stephen Joseph. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-84407-658-1 (hardback) 1. Charcoal. 2. Soil amendments. 3. Environmental management. I. Lehmann, Johannes, Dr. II. Joseph, Stephen, 1950- TP331.B56 2009 631.4'22—dc22 2008040656 The paper used for this book is FSC-certified. FSC (the Forest Stewardship Council) is an international network to promote responsible management of the world’s forests. ES_BEM_13-1 13/1/09 15:42 Page v Contents List of Figures,Tables and Boxes xi List of Contributors xxi Preface xxv Foreword by Tim Flannery xxvii List of Acronyms and Abbreviations xxix 1 Biochar for Environmental Management: An Introduction 1 Johannes Lehmann and Stephen Joseph What is biochar? 1 Biochar terminology 2 The origin of biochar management and research 3 The big picture 5 Adoption of biochar for environmental management 9 2 Physical Properties of Biochar 13 Adriana Downie,Alan Crosky and Paul Munroe Introduction 13 Biochars: Old and new 14 Relevance of extended literature 14 Caution on comparing data 15 Origin of biochar structure 15 Influence of molecular structure on biochar morphology 17 Loss of structural complexity during pyrolysis 19 Industrial processes for altering the physical structure of biochar 20 Soil surface areas and biochar 22 Biochar nano-porosity 22 Biochar macro-porosity 24 Particle size distribution 26 Biochar density 27 Mechanical strength 29 Future research 30 3 Characteristics of Biochar: Micro-chemical Properties 35 James Amonette and Stephen Joseph Introduction and scope 35 Formation and bulk composition 35 Surface chemistry 45 ES_BEM_13-1 13/1/09 15:42 Page vi vi BIOCHAR FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 4 Characteristics of Biochar: Organo-chemical Properties 53 Evelyn S. Krull, Jeff A. Baldock, Jan O. Skjemstad and Ronald S. Smernik Introduction 53 Elemental ratios 54 13C-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy 58 Oulook 63 5 Biochar: Nutrient Properties and Their Enhancement 67 K.Yin Chan and Z. Hiu Xu Introduction 67 Nutrient properties of biochars and crop production responses 68 Factors controlling nutrient properties of biochar 74 Improving the nutrient value of biochars: Research opportunities and challenges 79 Conclusions 81 6 Characteristics of Biochar: Biological Properties 85 Janice E.Thies and Matthias C. Rillig Introduction 85 Biochar as a habitat for soil microorganisms 86 Biochar as a substrate for the soil biota 89 Methodological issues 91 Effects of biochar on the activity of the soil biota 92 Diversity of organisms interacting with biochar 95 Conclusions 102 7 Developing a Biochar Classification and Test Methods 107 Stephen Joseph, Cordner Peacocke, Johannes Lehmann and Paul Munroe Why do we need a classification system? 107 Existing definitions and classification systems for charcoal, activated carbon and coal 108 Proposed classification system for biochar 112 8 Biochar Production Technology 127 Robert Brown Introduction 127 History of charcoal-making 128 Mechanisms of biochar production from biomass substrates 133 Opportunities for advanced biochar production 139 9 Biochar Systems 147 Johannes Lehmann and Stephen Joseph Introduction 147 Motivation for biochar soil management 148 Components of biochar systems 149 Biochar systems 154 Outlook 164 ES_BEM_13-1 13/1/09 15:42 Page vii CONTENTS vii 10 Changes of Biochar in Soil 169 Karen Hammes and Michael W.I. Schmidt Introduction 169 Mechanisms of incorporation and movement of biochar in soil 170 Physical changes of biochar in soil 172 Chemical changes of biochar in soil 174 Biotic changes of biochar in soil 176 Conclusions 178 11 Stability of Biochar in Soil 183 Johannes Lehmann, Claudia Czimczik, David Laird and Saran Sohi Introduction 183 Extent of biochar decay 184 Biochar properties and decay 188 Mechanisms of biochar decay 188 Stabilization of biochar in soil 191 Environmental conditions affecting biochar stability and decay 196 A biochar stability framework 198 12 Biochar Application to Soil 207 Paul Blackwell, Glen Riethmuller and Mike Collins Introduction 207 Purpose of biochar application 208 Biochar properties and application methods 214 Methods of application and incorporation: Specific examples 217 Comparison of methods and outlook 222 13 Biochar and Emissions of Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases from Soil 227 Lukas Van Zwieten,Bhupinderpal Singh, Stephen Joseph, Stephen Kimber, Annette Cowie and K.Yin Chan Introduction 227 Evidence for reduced soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions using biochar 228 Biological mechanisms for reduced GHG emissions following biochar application 232 Abiotic mechanisms influencing GHG emissions using biochar 239 Conclusions 243 14 Biochar Effects on Soil Nutrient Transformations 251 Tom H.DeLuca, M. Derek MacKenzie and Michael J. Gundale Introduction 251 Nutrient content of biochar 252 Potential mechanisms for how biochar modifies nutrient transformations 254 Direct and indirect influences of biochar on soil nutrient transformations 255 Conclusions 265 ES_BEM_13-1 13/1/09 15:42 Page viii viii BIOCHAR FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 15 Biochar Effects on Nutrient Leaching 271 Julie Major, Christoph Steiner,Adriana Downie and Johannes Lehmann Introduction 271 Evidence for relevant characteristics of biochar 273 Magnitude and temporal dynamics of biochar effects on nutrient leaching 279 Conclusions and research needs 282 16 Biochar and Sorption of Organic Compounds 289 Ronald J. Smernik Introduction 289 Sorption properties of ‘pure’ biochars 290 Influence of biochar on the sorption properties of soils 292 Effects on sorption of adding biochar to soil 293 Direct identification of organic molecules sorbed to biochar 294 Conclusions and directions for future research 296 17 Test Procedures for Determining the Quantity of Biochar within Soils 301 David A. C. Manning and Elisa Lopez-Capel Introduction 301 Biochar quantification methods 303 Routine quantification of biochar in soils 311 Conclusions 312 18 Biochar, Greenhouse Gas Accounting and Emissions Trading 317 John Gaunt and Annette Cowie The climate change context 317 Greenhouse gas emissions trading 318 How biochar contributes to climate change mitigation 321 What mitigation benefits are tradable in a pyrolysis for biochar and bioenergy project? 324 Greenhouse gas balance of example biochar systems 325 Issues for emissions trading based on pyrolysis for bioenergy and biochar 333 Conclusions 336 19 Economics of Biochar Production, Utilization and Greenhouse Gas Offsets 341 Bruce A. McCarl, Cordner Peacocke, Ray Chrisman, Chih-Chun Kung and Ronald D. Sands Introduction 341 Pyrolysis and biochar 342 Examination of a biomass to pyrolysis feedstock prospect 343 Sensitivity analysis 354 Omitted factors 355 Conclusions 356 ES_BEM_13-1 13/1/09 15:42 Page ix CONTENTS ix 20 Socio-economic Assessment and Implementation of Small-scale Biochar Projects 359 Stephen Joseph Introduction 359 Developing a methodology 360 Model scenario of a hypothetical village-level biochar project 365 Conclusions 371 21 Taking Biochar to Market: Some Essential Concepts for Commercial Success 375 Mark Glover Introduction 375 Biochar’s positioning in the sustainability and climate change agendas 377 The sustainability context for biomass generally 378 Inherent characteristics of the biomass resource 379 Lessons from the first-generation liquid biofuels sector 380 Biochar commercialization framework 381 Commercial factors and business modelling 388 22 Policy to Address the Threat of Dangerous Climate Change: A Leading Role for Biochar 393 Peter Read The tipping point threat 393 Beyond emissions reductions 394 Carbon removals 395 The economics of biosphere C stock management (BCSM) and biochar 396 A policy framework for carbon removals:The leaky bucket 398 Food versus fuel and biochar 400 Conclusions 401 Index 405 ES_BEM_13-1 13/1/09 15:42 Page x ES_BEM_13-1 13/1/09 15:42 Page xi List of Figures,Tables and Boxes Figures 1.1 Structure of graphite as proven for the first time by J. D. Bernal in 1924 2 1.2 Advertisement for biochar to be used as a soil amendment in turf greens 4 1.3 Motivation for applying biochar technology 5 1.4 The global carbon cycle of net primary productivity (total net photosynthesis flux from atmosphere into plants) and release to the atmosphere from soil (by microorganisms decomposing organic matter) in comparison to total amounts of carbon in soil, plant and atmosphere, and anthropogenic carbon emissions (sum of fossil fuel emissions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2012
    BRINGING How we have performed KNOWLEDGE FIN ANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS • Record adjusted diluted EPS up 7.7% to 40.7p (2011: 37.8p), ahead of market expectations TO LIFE • Full year dividend increased by 10.1% – second interim dividend of 12.5p giving a total 2012 dividend of 18.5p (2011: 16.8p) Businesses, professionals and • Revenue broadly flat despite Robbins Gioia and European academics worldwide turn to Informa Conference disposals – £1.23bn (2011: £1.28bn) for unparalleled knowledge, up-to- • Adjusted operating profit up 4.0% to £349.7m the minute information and highly (2011: £336.2m); organic growth of 2.8% specialist skills and services. • Record adjusted operating margin of 28.4% (2011: 26.4%) Our ability to deliver high quality • Adjusted profit before tax of £317.4m up 7.3% (2011: £295.9m) knowledge and services through • Statutory profit after tax of £90.7m (2011: £74.3m) multiple channels, in dynamic and rapidly changing environments, • Strong cash generation – operating cash flow up 5.7% to £329.0m (2011: £311.2m) makes our offer unique and • Balance sheet strength maintained – net debt/EBITDA extremely valuable to individuals ratio of 2.1 times (2011: 2.1 times) and organisations. OPEAI R T ONAL HIGHLIGHTS • Proactive portfolio management drives significant Annual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended December 31 2012 improvement in the quality of Group earnings • Total product rationalisation reduced Group revenue by 2% • Investment in new products, geo-cloning and platform development • Acquisition of MMPI and Zephyr
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry· Wildlife Guidelines to Habitat Management
    11111111~113 0318 r~1~1 mmmr1~1~11~1~r11~11111111 00028. 8449 This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp (Funding for document digitization was provided, in part, by a grant from the Minnesota Historical & Cultural Heritage Program.) FORESTRY· WILDLIFE GUIDELINES ·, TO HABITAT MANAGEMENT 1985 Revision FOREST - --·----·- ~ ... / -T-R A N S I T I 0 N PRAIRIE ·MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES GENERAL CON:rENrS SEr.rION PAGES .EOLICY - WILDLIFE/FORESTRY COORDINATION •••••••••••••••• A-G I - I'NI.'RC.>IXJC'I ION • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 - 12 Foreword, Approval, Vegetative Zones and Habitat Evaluation, Vegetative Zone Map II - MANAGEMEN.r IN!'EGRATION BY GENERAL PRACI'ICES •••••••••••• 13 -24 Rationale, Soils Evaluation, Timber Harvest, Reforestation, Tirrber stand Improvement III - MANAGEMENI' IN!'EGRATION BY TIMBER TYPE •••••••••••••••••• 25 - 42 References, Aspen and Paper Birch, Oaks, Northern Hardwoods, Central Hardwoods, Lowland Hardwoods, Conifers, Deforested Areas IV - WILDLIFE PROJECTS FOR HABITAT MANAGEMEN.r IN CONJUN:TION WITH TIMBER MANAGEMENI' •••••••••••••••••• 43 - 54 Wildlife Openings, Roads and Trails, Non­ corrmercial Cover Type Regeneration, Brush Piles, Fruit Trees V - WILDLIFE PROJECTS FOR HABITAT MANAGEMENI' SEPARATE FROM TIMBER MANAGEMENI' ••••••••••••••••••••••• 55 - 60 Browse Regeneration, Agriculture Leases
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Land Management Plan
    2009 LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN (Updated Annual Harvest Plan -2014) Itasca County Land Department 1177 LaPrairie Avenue Grand Rapids, MN 55744-3322 218-327-2855 ● Fax: 218-327-4160 LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN Itasca County Land Department Acknowledgements This Land Management Plan was produced by Itasca County Land Department employees Garrett Ous, Dave Marshall, Michael Gibbons, Adam Olson, Bob Scheierl, Roger Clark, Kory Cease, Steve Aysta, Tim Stocker, Perry Leone, Wayne Perreault, Blair Carlson, Loren Eide, Bob Rother, Andrew Brown, Del Inkman, Darlene Brown and Meg Muller. Thank you to all the citizens for their sincere input and review during the public involvement process. And thank you to Itasca County Commissioners Lori Dowling, Karen Burthwick, Rusty Eichorn, Catherine McLynn and Mark Mandich for their vision and final approval of this document. Foreword This land management plan is designed for providing vision and direction to guide strategic and operational programs of the Land Department. That vision and direction reflects a long standing connection with local economic, educational and social programs. The Land Department is committed to ensuring that economic benefits and environmental integrity are available to both present and future generations. That will be accomplished through actively managing county land and forests for a balance of benefits to the citizens and for providing them with a sustained supply of quality products and services. The Department will apply quality forestland stewardship practices, employ modern technology and information, and partner with other forest organizations to provide citizens with those quality products and services. ________________________________ Garrett Ous September, 2009 Itasca County Land Commissioner 1177 LaPrairie Avenue Grand Rapids, MN 55744-3322 218-327-2855 ● Fax: 218-327-4160 ICLD - LMP Section i., page 1 of 3 Itasca County Land Department Land Management Plan Table of Contents i.
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction of Biochar Type and Rhizobia Inoculation Increases the Growth and Biological Nitrogen Fixation of Robinia Pseudoacacia Seedlings
    Article Interaction of Biochar Type and Rhizobia Inoculation Increases the Growth and Biological Nitrogen Fixation of Robinia pseudoacacia Seedlings Qiaoyu Sun 1, Yong Liu 2, Hongbin Liu 1 and R. Kasten Dumroese 3,* 1 Key Laboratory of Non-Point Source Pollution Control, Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Haidian District, Beijing 10081, China; [email protected] (Q.S.); [email protected] (H.L.) 2 Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation, Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, No. 35 Tsinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China; [email protected] 3 US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 1221 South Main Street, Moscow, ID 83843, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-208-883-2324; Fax: +1-208-882-3915 Received: 29 May 2020; Accepted: 23 June 2020; Published: 26 June 2020 Abstract: Adding biochar to soil can change soil properties and subsequently affect plant growth, but this effect can vary because of different feedstocks and methods (e.g., pyrolysis or gasification) used to create the biochar. Growth and biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) of leguminous plants can be improved with rhizobia inoculation that fosters nodule development. Thus, this factorial greenhouse study examined the effects of two types of biochar (i.e., pyrolysis and gasification) added at a rate of 5% (v:v) to a peat-based growth substrate and rhizobia inoculation (yes or no) on 15 15 Robinia pseudoacacia (black locust) seedlings supplied with NH4 NO3. Seedling and nodule growth, nitrogen (N) content, and δ15N 1000 were evaluated after 3 months.
    [Show full text]
  • The EBRARY Platform
    One eContent platform. Many ways to use it. Subscribe, Purchase or Customize Share, Archive & Distribute Integrate THE EBRARY PLatFORM Our eContent Your eContent eBooks, reports, journals, Theses, dissertations, images, journals, sheet music, and more eBooks – anything in PDF Subscribe Purchase Customize Share Archive Distribute SULAIR Select Collections SUL EBRARY COLLECTIONS Select Collections TABLE OF CONTENTS Infotools All ebrary Collections CONTRIBUTORS Byron Hoyt Sheet Music (Browse) INTRODUCTION Immigration Commision Reports (Dillingham) Contents BUSINESS: A USER’S GUIDE Women and Child Wage Earners in the U.S. CSLI Linguistics and Philosophy BEST PRACTICE SUL Books in the Public Domain MANAGEMENT CHECKLISTS Medieval and Modern Thought Text Project ACTIONLISTS MANAGEMENT LIBRARY BUSINESS THINKERS AND MANA DICTIONARY WORLD BUSINESS ALMANAC Highlights Notes BUSINESS INFORMATION SOURC INDEX CREDITS InfoTools Integrates Define Explain Locate multiple online Translate Search Document... resources Search All Documents... Search Web Search Catalog with one Highlight Add to Bookshelf customizable Copy Text... Copy Bookmark interface. Print... Print Again Toggle Automenu Preferences... Help About ebrary Reader... EASY TO USE. Subscribe, Purchase AFFORDABLE. or Customize your ALW ay S AVAILABLE. eBook selection NO CHECK-OUTS. Un I Q U E S U B SC R I B E T O G R OWI ng E B O O K D ataba S E S W I T H SIMULtanEOUS, MULTI-USER ACCESS. RESEARCH TOOLS. ACADEMIC DATABASES Academic Complete includes all academic databases listed below. FREE MARCS. # of # of Subject Titles* Subject Titles* Business & Economics 6,300 Language, Literature 3,400 & Linguistics “ebrary’s content is Computers & IT 2,800 Law, International Relations 3,800 multidisciplinary and Education 2,300 & Public Policy Engineering & Technology 3,700 supports our expanding Life Sciences 2,000 (includes Biotechnolgy, History & Political Science 4,800 Agriculture, and (also includes a bonus selection faculty and curriculum.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Age Class Change Simulator (FACCS): a Spreadsheet-Based Model for Estimation of Forest Change and Biomass Availability
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy Forest Age Class Change Simulator (FACCS): A spreadsheet-based model for estimation of forest change and biomass availability by David C. Wilson, Grant M. Domke and Alan R. Ek February 2014 Staff Paper Series No. 228 Department of Forest Resources College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 1 For more information about the Department of Forest Resources and its teaching, research, and outreach programs, contact the department at: Department of Forest Resources University of Minnesota 115 Green Hall 1530 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55108-6112 Ph: 612.624.3400 Fax: 612.625.5212 Email: [email protected] http://www.forestry.umn.edu/publications/staffpapers/index.html and see also http://iic.umn.edu/ The University of Minnesota is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, disability, public assistance status, veteran status, or sexual orientation. 2 Forest Age Class Change Simulator (FACCS): A spreadsheet based model for estimation of forest change and biomass availability by David C. Wilson, Grant M. Domke and Alan R. Ek February 23, 2014 Technical Report Interagency Information Cooperative 3 Acknowledgements This research was funded by the Interagency Information Cooperative, University of Minnesota Department of Forest Resources and the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station under project MIN 42-019. The authors wish to thank Professor Thomas E.
    [Show full text]
  • Biochar As an Innovative Wood Product: a Look at Barriers to Realization of Its Full Potential
    BIOCHAR AS AN INNOVATIVE WOOD PRODUCT: A LOOK AT BARRIERS TO REALIZATION OF ITS FULL POTENTIAL May 2017 Harry Groot Jeff Howe, Ph. D Jim Bowyer, Ph. D Ed Pepke, Ph. D. Richard A. Levins, Ph. D. Kathryn Fernholz DOVETAIL PARTNERS, INC. Biochar as an Innovative Wood Product A Look at Barriers to Realization of its Full Potential Executive Summary In the previous Dovetail Report Biochar 101: An Introduction to an Ancient Product Offering Modern Opportunities (Groot et al. 20161) the bottom line was: “Biochar is a product with clear benefits but many questions yet to be answered.” That remains the case. However, ongoing research has expanded the knowledge base, and the debate about biochar’s value and cost effectiveness is narrowing as more is known. A barrier to further market growth is that the industry producing biochar is unsettled, with Photo 1. Biochar made from Pecan Hulls (photo by H. Groot) little agreement regarding product standards, message, or carbon accounting. There is an opportunity for more collaboration to resolve these issues, especially among the mid to large-scale producers. The most common use of biochar is as a soil amendment for high-value fruit and vegetable crops, including use in greenhouse and nursery operations, and there is already significant market acceptance in this sector. Biochar is also used to remove impurities and toxins in water filtration and soil remediation, and these applications appear to offer significant growth potential. Commodity crop production conceivably offers the potential for use of the greatest volume of biochar, but there is little information available about the relative cost and benefits of biochar in this application.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Timber Forest Products in Brazil: a Bibliometric and a State of the Art Review
    sustainability Review Non-Timber Forest Products in Brazil: A Bibliometric and a State of the Art Review Thiago Cardoso Silva * , Emmanoella Costa Guaraná Araujo, Tarcila Rosa da Silva Lins , Cibelle Amaral Reis, Carlos Roberto Sanquetta and Márcio Pereira da Rocha Department of Forestry Engineering and Technology, Federal University of Paraná, 80.210-170 Curitiba, Brazil; [email protected] (E.C.G.A.); [email protected] (T.R.d.S.L.); [email protected] (C.A.R.); [email protected] (C.R.S.); [email protected] (M.P.d.R.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +55-8199-956-6178 Received: 4 July 2020; Accepted: 22 August 2020; Published: 2 September 2020 Abstract: Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) are a consolidated source of income and acquisition of inputs from forest environments. Therefore, the objective of this work was to carry out a collection of publications on NTFPs in Brazil, until 2019, available in the Scopus database, presenting a bibliometric review and the state of the art of this theme from the evaluation of these publications, discussing the challenges of Brazilian legislation on NTFPs. After screening the articles of interest, 196 documents were evaluated, in which they were observed institutions and authors, analyzing networks of citations and terms used, areas of forest sciences and sciences that encompass the most explored biomes and the most studied species. The results showed that the concern to research on NTFPs in Brazil began in the 1990s, with an increase in the number of publications over the years. Besides that, the research on NTFPs is multidisciplinary, with emphasis on the areas of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Agroforestry News Index Vol 1 to Vol 22 No 2
    Agroforestry News Index Vol 1 to Vol 22 No 2 2 A.R.T. nursery ..... Vol 2, No 4, page 2 Acorns, edible from oaks ..... Vol 5, No 4, page 3 Aaron, J R & Richards: British woodland produce (book review) ..... Acorns, harvesting ..... Vol 5, No 4, Vol 1, No 4, page 34 page 3 Abies balsamea ..... Vol 8, No 2, page Acorns, nutritional composition ..... 31 Vol 5, No 4, page 4 Abies sibirica ..... Vol 8, No 2, page 31 Acorns, removing tannins from ..... Vol 5, No 4, page 4 Abies species ..... Vol 19, No 1, page 13 Acorns, shelling ..... Vol 5, No 4, page 3 Acca sellowiana ..... Vol 9, No 3, page 4 Acorns, utilisation ..... Vol 5, No 4, page 4 Acer macrophyllum ..... Vol 16, No 2, page 6 Acorus calamus ..... Vol 8, No 4, page 6 Acer pseudoplatanus ..... Vol 3, No 1, page 3 Actinidia arguta ..... Vol 1, No 4, page 10 Acer saccharum ..... Vol 16, No 1, page 3 Actinidia arguta, cultivars ..... Vol 1, No 4, page 14 Acer saccharum - strawberry agroforestry system ..... Vol 8, No 1, Actinidia arguta, description ..... Vol page 2 1, No 4, page 10 Acer species, with edible saps ..... Vol Actinidia arguta, drawings ..... Vol 1, 2, No 3, page 26 No 4, page 15 Achillea millefolium ..... Vol 8, No 4, Actinidia arguta, feeding & irrigaton page 5 ..... Vol 1, No 4, page 11 3 Actinidia arguta, fruiting ..... Vol 1, Actinidia spp ..... Vol 5, No 1, page 18 No 4, page 13 Actinorhizal plants ..... Vol 3, No 3, Actinidia arguta, nurseries page 30 supplying ..... Vol 1, No 4, page 16 Acworth, J M: The potential for farm Actinidia arguta, pests and diseases forestry, agroforestry and novel tree ....
    [Show full text]
  • Biochar Registration Aid
    Biochar Registration Aid ❖ Biochar means materials derived from thermochemical conversion of biomass in an oxygen-limited environment containing at least 60% carbon. Refer to Section 14513.5 of the Food and Agricultural Code. ❖ If your product includes a guarantee for biochar, you must submit a laboratory analysis that verifies that the total carbon content of the biochar ingredient is 60% or greater. ❖ If the laboratory analysis shows that the ingredient is not at least 60% carbon, the ingredient cannot be labeled as biochar. Choose another term to describe the input. Examples of possible acceptable terms are: ash, charcoal, or processed charcoal. Label Requirements: 1. Label must state the feedstock(s) for the biochar. For example: wood biochar 2. 100% Biochar products can only be registered as Auxiliary Soil and Plant Substances (ASPS). If biochar is blended with other soil amendment inputs, it can be categorized as a packaged or bulk soil amendment. 3. If International Biochar Initiative (IBI) certification claimed, provide a copy of the certification. Label Format 1. If the product is an Auxiliary Soil and Plant Substance (ASPS), add the percent of biochar being guaranteed under a “NON-PLANT FOOD INGREDIENT” heading. For example: NON-PLANT FOOD INGREDIENT 95%......... Wood Biochar 2. If the product is a combination product that guarantees nutrients, add the percent of biochar being guaranteed under an “ALSO CONTAINS NON-PLANT FOOD INGREDIENT” heading. For example: ALSO CONTAINS NON-PLANT FOOD INGREDIENT 95%......... Wood Biochar 3. If the product is a packaged soil amendment or a combination product that guarantees nutrients and other soil amending ingredients, biochar may be added to the soil amendment ingredient list.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Forest Activities Produce Over 80 Million Green Tons of Woody Biomass Residues Each Year, Creating a Renewable Energy Resou
    U.S. Forest activities produce over 80 million green tons of woody biomass residues each year, creating a renewable energy resource comparable in size to the annual production of oil from Alaska’s North Slope, yet no technologies have emerged that can economically utillize this material -- until now. -- Large capital investment to risk ratio: Centralized plants THE PROBLEM: typically require new, expensive, and complex technologies. LETTING VALUABLE NATURAL RESOURCES GO TO WASTE These facilities typically require long start up/operational time before realizing profits. Forestry residues are comprised of branches, tree tops, and small diameter stems left over after normal operations. This material is typically concentrat- -- High transportation costs & supply uncertainty: Large ed into “slash piles” and burned, wasting a valuable resource and creating plants require high volumes of feedstock. Transporting feed- air quality and health problems linked to smoke production. Despite growing stock is cost prohibitive (typically a radius of 30-50-miles is the interests in tapping this domestic renewable energy resource, woody bio- maximum). This leads to supply uncertainty and the risk of over- mass presents several unique challenges for integration into the mainstream exploitation of forest resources. energy economy. 2. Mobile Processors: Small-scale, portable technologies reduce Woody Biomass have prohibitively high biomass trans- transportation costs by bringing the conversion process to the forest. portation and production costs because of: Mobile processor prototypes produce solid and liquid fuel products at Low energy content per unit weight high energy conversion rates. While this approach shows promise, sev- High water content (typically 20-50%) eral limitations exist: Material distributed over large spatial areas Natural resistance to chemical conversion.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Sustainable Forest Biomass Potential and Bioenergy Implications for the Northern Lake States Region, USA
    Biomass and Bioenergy 81 (2015) 167e176 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biomass and Bioenergy journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/biombioe Research paper Assessing sustainable forest biomass potential and bioenergy implications for the northern Lake States region, USA * Sidhanand Kukrety a, , David C. Wilson a, Anthony W. D'Amato b, Dennis R. Becker c a Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, 55108 MN, USA b Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, 05095 VT, USA c College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, 83844 ID, USA article info abstract Article history: Forestlands in the United States have tremendous potential for providing feedstocks necessary to meet Received 1 September 2014 emerging renewable energy standards. The Lake States region is one area recognized for its high po- Received in revised form tential of supplying forest-derived biomass; however, the long-term availability of roundwood harvests 31 May 2015 and associated residues from this region has not been fully explored. Better distribution and temporal Accepted 26 June 2015 availability estimates are needed to formulate emerging state policies regarding renewable energy Available online 8 July 2015 development. We used a novel predictive methodology to quantify sustainable biomass availability and likely harvest levels over a 100-year period in the Lake States region. USDA Forest Inventory and Analysis Keywords: Bioenergy estimates of timberland were combined with published growth and yield models, and historic harvest Forest residue data using the Forest Age Class Change Simulator (FACCS) to generate availability estimates. Monte-Carlo GHG reduction simulation was used to develop probability distributions of biomass harvests and to incorporate the À1 Lake states uncertainty of future harvest levels.
    [Show full text]