DOCSLIB.ORG

Serb Integration in Kosovo After the Brussels Agreement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Serb Integration in Kosovo After the Brussels Agreement Serb Integration in Kosovo After the Brussels Agreement This report was funded by the Government of Switzerland and the Government of Norway. Disclaimer: The views and analyses in this report are solely of the Balkans Group and do not reflect the views of the donors. Authors: Marko Prelec and Naim Rashiti Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. I RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................. III INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 THE SERBS OF KOSOVO ................................................................................................ 4 NORTHERN KOSOVO .............................................................................................................................. 5 SOUTHERN KOSOVO MUNICIPALITIES ................................................................................................. 7 ENCLAVES IN ALBANIAN-MAJORITY AREAS ........................................................................................ 8 STATE INSTITUTIONS .................................................................................................. 12 BELGRADE IN KOSOVO ........................................................................................................................ 12 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................................................. 14 THE PERSISTENCE OF PARALLELISM IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT ....................................................... 17 ORIGINS OF SERBIAN MUNICIPAL INSTITUTIONS ............................................................................. 18 CONFUSION IN NORTHERN KOSOVO ................................................................................................. 20 DOUBLE HATS IN SOUTHERN KOSOVO .............................................................................................. 20 THE SERBIAN PUBLIC SECTOR .............................................................................................................. 22 LOCAL GOVERNMENT INTEGRATION ................................................................................................. 24 COURTS, JUSTICE AND POLICE ............................................................................................................. 26 THE COMMUNITY OF SERB MUNICIPALITIES ..................................................... 29 LEGAL FOUNDATIONS .......................................................................................................................... 31 THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE COMMUNITY ........................................................................................ 33 THE SPECTRE OF SECESSION ............................................................................................................... 37 THE SERBIAN LEGAL ORDER AFTER THE BRUSSELS AGREEMENT ................................................. 38 VITAL ISSUES .................................................................................................................. 40 EDUCATION AND HEALTH CARE ......................................................................................................... 40 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................. 43 APPENDIX A: ESTIMATING THE SERB POPULATION ......................................... 45 APPENDIX B: COMPARISON OF THE RS AND THE COMMUNITY .................... 48 APPENDIX C: A NOTE ON NAMES ............................................................................ 49 Serb Integration in Kosovo after the Brussels Agreement Executive Summary Kosovo and Serbia have started an immense task, the integration of the Kosovo Serbs and Belgrade’s administrative and financial infrastructure on Kosovo’s territory into the latter’s system – in short, “Serb integration”. This builds on a hard-won agreement mediated by the EU and hailed as among Brussels’s best achievements. Yet its implementation on the ground has been and continues to be much more challenging. Integration raises deep, emotional issues among Albanians and Serbs, and small misunderstandings can easily produce a violent response. The array of institutions involved – municipal governments, schools, health care, courts, security services and others, with budgets of several hundred million euros – is daunting. There is no precedent, set of best practices or established road map. Pristina and Belgrade started this process for different reasons, the former to establish its sovereignty and territorial integrity, the latter to please the EU. Neither shows an appreciation of the scale of the task, or an inclination to commit the financial – and political – resources it calls for. With the support of international partners, Kosovo and Serbia should set a goal of full integration of Serb institutions into the Kosovo system by the end of 2015 and move quickly to make their agreement a reality. Previous rounds of dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia, from UN-sponsored “future status” talks in 2005 to a EU-mediated “technical dialogue” in 2011, began promisingly but ran into trouble. Pristina claims that Serb rights were negotiated several times, with Belgrade asking for more each time and delivering little or nothing in return, and without a successful conclusion. Belgrade says all the concessions have come from its side, while Kosovo injects status issues – recognition of its independence – into every topic. Both sides try hard to get the EU mediators’ sympathies. There are many issues in play: Serb participation in Kosovo institutions, ending Serbia’s interference on Kosovo territory, Kosovo’s access to the international community, and the legacy of war. The overriding goal is for Kosovo and Serbia to cooperate normally, like good neighbours, and for each to treat its minority population with respect. The bilateral relationship is key and will determine the success of integration. The stakes and risks are high for all concerned, and the process is poorly understood on the ground. A minor confrontation between Albanians and Serb refugees in Gjakovë on 6 January, and a carelessly provocative comment by a Serb minister the same day, led a month later to riots in Pristina, the sacking of the minister and a boycott by Serb parliamentarians that, as this report goes to press, was ongoing. Albanians resent Belgrade’s role in their state and their disputed status; on the street many also chafe at years of mismanagement by an entrenched political elite. Serbs are being transferred against their will from one state to another and fear the consequences. The success or failure of Serb integration can resonate in the neighbouring multi-ethnic states. Kosovo’s Serb community can be divided into three distinct groups. Northern Kosovo is a homogenous Serb area that resisted Pristina’s authority since 1999; many of its residents have little or no experience with Albanians or the Kosovo government and view both with fear and mistrust. Serbian institutions were, until recently, the only governing bodies in this area. The Serb Integration in Kosovo after the Brussels Agreement 19 March 2015 second group comprises six Serb-majority municipalities scattered throughout the rest of the country; most Serbs here comply with Kosovo law but are on the Serbian payroll in one way or another. The third group are Serbs living in scattered villages and neighbourhoods elsewhere in Kosovo. Lacking control of a municipal government and the targeted services it can provide, they also lean heavily on Serbian institutions. All Kosovo Serbs have several overriding concerns. Jobs rank high – the security of the Serbian jobs many now have, and the availability of alternatives once they dry up. The labour market is not open to them. Older employees are anxious to remain within Serbia’s pension scheme. Access to Serbia’s health care system – its clinics, hospitals in Kosovo, referrals for specialist care in Serbia and its insurance scheme – is very important. Families rely on Serbian schools, and students need to receive diplomas that will be honoured whether they remain in Kosovo or move to Serbia. Without Serbian education they will leave. Lastly, physical security is a concern. Enclave Serbs especially are vulnerable to intimidation and occasional assault. For the past year, many local Serb officials have worn two hats, having won election to Kosovo offices and been appointed to other positions in Serbia’s network of parallel municipalities. This cohabitation varies in detail but exists in all Serb-majority areas. The parallel, Serbian system has little effective governing power, but commands a much larger purse; it covers much of Kosovo and employs tens of thousands. The payroll ballooned for political reasons – Belgrade kept the Kosovo Serbs both solvent and loyal – and after 15 years the population is dependent on these jobs. Some work directly for the parallel municipalities; many more for public companies and institutions they administer; and still others in schools and hospitals run from Belgrade. Belgrade should soon close its institutions and transferring employees from the Serbian to the Kosovo payroll will be a daunting and costly task. Belgrade and Pristina chose to frame their agreement in terms of a hybrid entity, an Association/Community of Serb municipalities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Integration of Serb Judges and Prosecutors from the North Into the Kosovar Justice System
    Policy Analysis No. 11/2018 Going south? Integration of Serb Judges and Prosecutors from the North into the Kosovar Justice System _ November 2018 1 Group for Legal and Political Studies is an independent, non-partisan and non-profit public policy organization based in Prishtina, Kosovo. Our mission is to conduct credible policy research in the fields of politics, law and economics and to push forward policy solutions that address the failures and/or tackle the problems in the said policy fields. legalpoliticalstudies.org 2 Policy Analysis 11/2018 Going south? Integration of Serb Judges and Prosecutors from the North into the Kosovar Justice System Authors: Rreze Hoxha*, Francisco José García Martínez ** November 2018 © Group for Legal and Political Studies, November, 2018. The opinions expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect those of Group for Legal and Political Studies donors, their staff, associates or Board(s). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any mean without the permission. Contact the administrative office of the Group for Legal and Political Studies for such requests. Group for Legal and Political Studies “Rexhep Luci‟ str. 16/1 Prishtina 10 000, Kosovo Website: www.legalpoliticalstudies.org E-mail: [email protected] Tel/fax.: +381 38 234 456 * Research Fellow, Group for Legal and Political Studies, Prishtina ** International Research Fellow, Group for Legal and Political Studies, Prishtina “This publication is published by the support of the Democratic Society Promotion (DSP) – financed by the Swiss Development and Cooperation Office (SDC) and Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (DANIDA), and managed by the Kosovo Civil Society Foundation (KCSF).
    [Show full text]
  • Lokalne Samouprave Na Severu Kosova ENG.Pdf
    Published by Institute for Territorial Economic Development (InTER) For the publisher Dragisa Mijacic Authors Dragisa Mijacic Jovana Jakovljevic Vesela Vlaskovic, PhD Year 2017 This study was written as a part of the project financed through a U.S. Embassy, Pristina grant. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed herein are those of the Authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of State. Local Self-Governments in North Kosovo TOWERS OF CARDS August 2017 LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENTS IN NORTH KOSOVO CONTENTS CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 2. LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENTS IN NORTH KOSOVO: A DODGEBALL GAME ..................................... 2 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Local self-governments in North Kosovo ...................................................................................... 2 2.2.1 Local self-governments in North Kosovo during the UNMIK administration (1999 – 2008) .. 4 2.2.2 Local self-governments after Kosovo’s declaration of independence .................................... 6 2.2.3 Brussels Agreement and the changes in functioning of local self-governments in North Kosovo ............................................................................................................................................. 8 2.3 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Usaid Advancing Kosovo Together Local Solution
    USAID ADVANCING KOSOVO TOGETHER LOCAL SOLUTION FINAL REPORT OCTOBER 1, 2014 – DECEMBER 30, 2018 JAN 2019 This report was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by the Community Development Fund, with inputs from Project Partners Kosovo Relief Development KRD; Centre for Peace and Tolerance and AKTIV NGO. USAID ADVANCING KOSOVO TOGETHER LOCAL SOLUTION Cooperative Agreement No: AID–167–A–14-0008 FINAL REPORT October 1, 2014 – October 30, 2018 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or those of the United States Government TABLE OF CONTENT LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................... 3 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW/SUMMARY ................................................................... 5 1.1 Project description/Introduction ................................................................... 5 2. ADVANCING KOSOVO TOGETHER LOCAL SOLUTION (AKT-LS) ................. 7 2.1 GRAČANICA/GRAÇANICË ......................................................................... 7 2.2 KLLOKOT/KLOKOT..................................................................................... 9 2.3 NOVO BRDO/NOVOBËRDË ..................................................................... 10 2.4 PARTEŠ/PARTESH .................................................................................. 11 2.5 RANILUG/RANILLUG ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trend Analysis: Citizens Opinion Survey in North Kosovo
    Aktiv Report on Research Results 2017 Trend Analysis: Citizens Opinion Survey in North Kosovo North Mitrovica Research was commissioned by: NVO AKTIV Authors: MA Nikola Jović Milica Andrić Miodrag Marinković Published by: NVO AKTIV Kralja Petra I, 183a, Severna Mitrovica email: [email protected] www.ngoaktiv.org Disclaimer: This publication is supported by Democratic Society Promotion (DSP) program financed by Swiss Cooperation Office in Kosovo (SCO-K) and Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark (DANIDA), and managed by Kosovar Civil Society Foundation (KCSF). The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of NGO AKTIV and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of SCO-K, DANIDA or KCSF. North Mitrovica October 2017. Content Research methodology………………………………………..3 Quantitative part of research………………………….3 Qualitative part of research……………………………3 Key results…………………………………………………………4 Sample description……………………………………………..6 Research context……………………………………………….8 Research results………………………………………………..12 Conclusions……………………………………………………..59 2 Research Methodology Quantitative part of the research Research method: Face-to-face survey research (F2F) Survey: 51 questions during approximately 15 minutes Research period: May 4th – 11th, 2017 Research locations: North Mitrovica, Leposavić/Leposaviq, Zubin Potok and Zvečan/Zveçan Sample size: 800 respondents Sample type: Stratified random sampling – stratification by the municipality of residence Statistical error: 95% statistical confidence interval with an incidence of 50% is +/- 3,2 Post-stratification:
    [Show full text]
  • Kosovo Political Economy Analysis Final Report
    KOSOVO POLITICAL ECONOMY ANALYSIS FINAL REPORT DECEMBER 26, 2017 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Management Systems International, A Tetra Tech Company. KOSOVO POLITICAL ECONOMY ANALYSIS FINAL REPORT December 26, 2017 IDIQ No. AID-167-I-17-00002 Award No: AID-167-TO-17-00009 Prepared by Management Systems International (MSI), A Tetra Tech Company 200 12th St South, Suite 1200 Arlington, VA, USA 22202 DISCLAIMER This report is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the sole responsibility of the Management Systems International and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. CONTENTS Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................... ii Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 6 II. Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 7 A. Foundational Factors ........................................................................................................................................... 7 B. Rules
    [Show full text]
  • Poisoned by Lead RIGHTS a Health and Human Rights Crisis in Mitrovica’S Roma Camps WATCH
    Kosovo HUMAN Poisoned by Lead RIGHTS A Health and Human Rights Crisis in Mitrovica’s Roma Camps WATCH Kosovo: Poisoned by Lead A Health and Human Rights Crisis in Mitrovica’s Roma Camps Copyright © 2009 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-498-2 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org June 2009 1-56432-498-2 Kosovo: Poisoned by Lead A Health and Human Rights Crisis in Mitrovica’s Roma Camps I. Summary and Recommendations ..................................................................................... 1 Methodology ................................................................................................................. 12 III. Chronology of Events ....................................................................................................14 IV. Background ................................................................................................................. 18 Kosovo’s Romani Communities ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Development of Mitrovica Through the Years This Publication Has Been Supported by the Think Tank Fund of Open Society Foundations
    An overview of the development of Mitrovica through the years This publication has been supported by the Think Tank Fund of Open Society Foundations. Prepared by: Eggert Hardten 2 AN OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF MITROVICA THROUGH THE YEARS CONTENTS Abbreviations .............................................................................................................4 Foreword .....................................................................................................................5 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................7 2. The Historical Dimension – Three Faces of Mitrovica .......................................8 2.1. War ...............................................................................................................8 2.2 Trade ............................................................................................................9 2.3. Industry .......................................................................................................10 2.4. Summary .....................................................................................................12 3. The Demographic Dimension ................................................................................14 3.1. Growth and Decline .....................................................................................14 3.2. Arrival and Departure .................................................................................16 3.3. National vs. Local
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Changes in the Ethnic Structure of the Population in the Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija
    Bulletin of Natural Sciences Research DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/bnsr10-25625 Vol. 10, No. 2, 2020, pp. 23-27. Original Scientific Paper CONTEMPORARY CHANGES IN THE ETHNIC STRUCTURE OF THE POPULATION IN THE AUTONOMOUS PROVINCE OF KOSOVO AND METOHIJA SAŠA MILOSAVLJEVIĆ1, JOVO MEDOJEVIĆ1 1Faculty of Sciences, University in Priština – Kosovska Mtrovica, Kosovska Mtrovica, Serbia ABSTRACT Twenty years (1999 - 2019) after the end of the conflict in the Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija, it can be stated that nowhere in Europe is there such ethnic segregation of the population as is the case with the AP of Kosovo and Metohija. Following the withdrawal of pumped security forces from the entire territory of Kosovo and Metohija and the entry of the United Nations peacekeeping force into the Serbian Autonomous Province, Kosovo Albanians carried out their persecution from Kosovo through terrorist attacks on Serbs and other non- Albanian populations (Montenegrins, Gorans, Roma, Ashkali) carried out their persecution from Kosovo and Metohija and fundamentally changed the ethnic structure of the Province. An insight into the majority of 223.081 exiles and displaced persons from Kosovo and Metohija indicates an exodus against the Serbs. The number of displaced Roma, Ashkali and Egyptians is estimated at about 100.000. The mass persecution of the Serb and other non-Albanian populations has resulted in tremendous changes in the ethnic structure of the Province, which today, with 93% of the total population, is dominated by Albanians, while other ethnic communities have a participation of 7%. Кeywords: Population, Ethnicity, Kosovo and Metohija. destroyed. The same tendencies have continued to this day, along INTRODUCTION with the desecration of cemeteries, stoning and burning of the returnees’ homes (Medojević & Milosavljević, 2019a).
    [Show full text]
  • 78-Management Response (English)
    MANAGEMENT RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INSPECTION PANEL REVIEW OF THE KOSOVO POWER PROJECT (PROPOSED) Management has reviewed the Request for Inspection of the Kosovo Power Project (pro- posed), received by the Inspection Panel on March 29, 2012 and registered on April 12, 2012 (RQ12/01). Management has prepared the following response. May 21, 2012 CONTENTS Abbreviations and Acronyms ......................................................................................... iv Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... v I. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 II. The Request .............................................................................................................. 1 III. Project Background ................................................................................................. 2 IV. Management’s Response ......................................................................................... 5 Map Map 1. IBRD No. 39302 Boxes Box 1. Emergency Evacuation of an At-Risk Part of Hade Village in 2004/05 Annexes Annex 1. Claims and Responses Annex 2. Selected List of Meetings with Civil Society Organizations Regarding Ko- sovo’s Energy Sector Annex 3 List of Publicly Available Documents Regarding the Proposed Kosovo Power Project Annex 4. Country Partnership Strategy for the Republic of Kosovo FY12-15 Annex 5. Comprehensive Water Sector Assessment Annex
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Crimes in Yugoslavia Documentary Evidence
    A/461937 NATO Crimes in Yugoslavia Documentary Evidence 24 March - 24 April 1999 BELGRADE May 1999 Contents Page Preface Xlll BOMBING OF A REFUGEE COLUMN ON THE DJAKOVICA - PRIZREN ROAD, 14 APRIL 1999 Refugee convoy, civilian casualties - a drastic example 1 Dispatches of the Secretariat of the Interior in Djakovica 21-25 Report on the On-Site Forensic-Technical Investigation in Djakovica 26 Report of the Criminal Police Department in Prizren 32-35 Minutes of On-Site Investigation 36 Report on the On-Site Forensic-Technical Investigation in Prizren 37 Sketch of the Site 38 BOMBING OF RESIDENTIAL HOUSES IN TOWNS AND VILLAGES In Rozaje 39 In the Village of Grlic vi 39 In the Village of Nogovac , 39 In the Village of Samokovo 39 In Cacak 45 In Vranje 46 In Aleksinac 49 Investigation Report 56 Official Memos of the Secretariat of the Interior in Aleksinac 61-68 Transcripts from the Register of Deaths 69-76 Autopsy Reports 77-101 List of People Injured in the Bombing on 5/6 April 1999 102 Minutes of the Testimony of Witnesses 104-126 Expert Findings, 21 April 1999 127 In the Village of Dubinje 129 In Podgorica 130 In PriStina 130 In Cuprija 136 Investigation Report 138 In the Village of OseSenica 140 In the Village of Pricevidi 140 In the Village of Merdare 141 In the Village of Samaila 141 In the Village of Turekovac 141 -V- Page In Prijepolje 145 In the Village of Ljubi§te 146 Testimony of Witness Nrec Colaku 146 In the Village of Pavlovac 148 In Subotica * 151 In Batajnica 152 Report on Forensic-Technical On-Site Inspection 156 Investigation
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenges of Planning in the Field Of
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by RAUmPlan - Repository of Architecture; Urbanism and Planning FACTA UNIVERSITATIS Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering Vol. 16, No 3, 2018, pp. 449-463 https://doi.org/10.2298/FUACE180710021N THE CHALLENGES OF PLANNING IN THE FIELD OF CULTURAL HERITAGE IN SERBIA UDC 351.853:7.025.3(497.11) Ana Niković, Božidar Manić Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia (IAUS), Belgrade, Serbia Abstract. Serbia is characterized by a rich cultural heritage and cultural diversity, as well as by a developed system of protecting cultural property. The current trend is that of a constant increase of the number of registered cultural properties under protection. Urban settlements in Serbia are characterized by specific typological characteristics and recognizable architectural typologies that are valuable architectural heritage as well as an urban identity factor. Together, protected cultural property and architectural heritage belong to a wider concept of urban heritage in the sense comprised in the modern charters on the protection of cultural heritage (HUL). The primary starting point of the paper is that the law and plans in Serbia must become more sensitive to the context. In addition to protecting registered property, the protection of buildings and other structures that are not cultural heritage should also be introduced. However, current planning practice in Serbia does not sufficiently recognize cultural heritage in the wider sense of urban heritage, nor does it affirm it as an important resource for sustainable development. By analyzing the planning context, the problems and challenges in terms of institutional, legal and governance frameworks, as well as planning methodologies, can be identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Profile 2018 Prishtinë/Priština Region
    MUNICIPAL PROFILE 2018 PRISHTINË/PRIŠTINA REGION PRISHTINË/PRIŠTINA The OSCE regional centre Prishtinë/Priština covers six (6) PRISHTINË/PRIŠTINA municipalities, including Prishtinë/Priština where the centre is located, and has teams working in all of them. 2018 AREA AND POPULATION AL PROFILE 572 km²area The municipality of Prishtinë/Priština is located in central Kosovo. It covers an area of approximately 572 km² and includes villages Prishtinë/Priština city and 48 villages. It is the administrative, 48 political, economic and cultural centre of Kosovo and the most densely populated municipality. According to the 2011 Kosovo 198,897population Population and Housing Census, the total population is 198,897. MUNICIP Ethnic composition According to the census conducted in 1981, there were 140,043 Kosovo Albanians, 43,875 Kosovo Serbs and 6,394 Kosovo 1.Kosovo Albanians 194,452 Montenegrins in the municipality; according to the census 2.Kosovo Turks 2,156 conducted in 1991*, there were 154,990 Kosovo Albanians, 3.Kosovo Ashkali 557 26,893 Kosovo Serbs and 3,912 Kosovo Montenegrins in the 4.Kosovo Serbs 430 municipality. 5.Kosovo Bosniaks 400 6.Kosovo Gorani 205 According to the UNHCR statistics, 1,753 displaced persons 7.Kosovo Roma 56 have returned to the municipality since 1999, of them 1,145 8.Kosovo Egyptians 8 Kosovo Serbs, 246 Kosovo Roma and 362 Kosovo Ashkali and 9.Other 334 Kosovo Egyptians. 10.Not specified 299 (source: Kosovo Agency of Statistics) *The 1991 census is not accepted by Kosovo Albanians as legitimate. GOVERNING STRUCTURES AND POLITICAL OVERVIEW The total number of voters in Prishtinë/Priština municipality registered for the municipal elections held in 2017 (1st round in October and 2nd round in November) was 188,3411, including out-of-Kosovo voters.
    [Show full text]