DOCSLIB.ORG

THE COURIER, SPECIAL ISSUE NEW EDITION (N.E.) Editorial Staff Director and Editor-In-Chief Hegel Goutier

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The SPECIAL ISSUE C urierMARCH 2008 The magazine of Africa - Caribbean - Pacific & European Union cooperation and relations 50 years of ACP-EU Cooperation Not for sale ISSN 1784-682X SPECIAL ISSUE N.E. - MARCH 2008 CThe urier The The magazine of Africa - Caribbean - Pacific & European Union cooperation and relations C urier Editorial Committee Co-presidents the magazine of africa - caribbean - pacific & european union development cooperation Sir John Kaputin, Secretary General Secretariat of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States www.acp.int Mr Stefano Manservisi, Director General of DG Development European Commission ec.europa.eu/development/ Table of contents THE COURIER, SPECIAL ISSUE NEW EDITION (N.E.) Editorial staff Director and Editor-in-chief Hegel Goutier Contributors François Misser (Deputy Editor-in-chief), OPENER RESULTS Debra Percival 19 Editorial Assistant and Production Development and relations with the ACP States: Success stories Joshua Massarenti Europe in action for 50 years 2 Science and technology: Contributed in this issue Cooperation on the road to emancipation 21 Marie-Martine Buckens EU’s 50th birthday: 3 Congratulations from the ACP Trade protocols and EPAs 23 Public Relations and Artistic coordination Public Relations Andrea Marchesini Reggiani (Public Relations Manager and Responsible for EDITORIAL NGOs’ and experts’ network) EXTENDING COOPERATION Joan Ruiz Valero (Responsible for Networking with EU and National Institutions) The need for Cotonou 4 EPAs: Trade for regional growth Artistic Coordination Sandra Federici and prosperity 24 HISTORY Graphic Conception, Layout Our privileged WTO dialogue 24 Orazio Metello Orsini Unique in the world: Arketipa partner, the 50 years of north-south cooperation 5 Contract Manager OUTLOOK Claudia Rechten ESPACE SENGHOR Georgetown: Tracey D’Afters The foundation of the ACP group 10 The future of ACP-EU cooperation 25 ultural centre promoting artists C from countries in Europe, ACP-EU Cooperation: Milestone events 11 Country strategy papers launch 10th edition Cover Africa, the Caribbean and the of development budget 27 Design by Arketipa Pacific, and cultural exchanges between communities through per- WHO DOES WHAT formance arts, music, cinema, to the holding conferences. It is a AT A GLANCE The institutions of ACP-EU cooperation 15 meeting place for Belgians, immi- grants of diverse origins and The ACP-EU Agreements 28 Non-State actors – bigger players in Cotonou 17 Contact European officials. The Courier 45, Rue de Trèves Espace Senghor An ACP Civil Society Forum on track 1040 Brussels Centre culturel d’Etterbeek for political recognition 18 Belgium (EU) Brussels, Belgium [email protected] www.acp-eucourier.info [email protected] Tel : +32 2 2374392 www.senghor.be Fax : +32 2 2801406 Published every two months in English, French, Spanish and Portuguese For information on subscription, go to our website www.acp-eucourier.info or contact [email protected] he satirical vignettes and illustra- Ttions presented in this issue (P. 3, 9, Publisher responsible 18, 25, 26 and 27) where realised by Hegel Goutier European and African cartoonists that Consortium have been invited to represent the Gopa-Cartermill - Grand Angle - Lai-momo European Union's Charter of Fundamental Rights in the project The views expressed are those of the authors and do not represent the official view of the EC Manifesta! (www.manifestaproject.eu), nor of the ACP countries.. realised by Africa e Mediterraneo asso- The consortium and the editorial staff decline all responsibility for the articles written by exter- ciation. nal contributors. Occhiello Opener Opener * Bernard Petit * Jacques Obia Development and relations with the ACP States: TH Europe in action EU’S 50 BIRTHDAY: for 50 years Congratulations from the ACP n addition to being an area of solidarity millions of people have benefited from this light of the partnership’s key principle. Signed n behalf of the ACP States, I take Giorgio Sommacal, Untitled, 2007, within its own borders (i.e. regarding development cooperation policy and its in the year 2000, the Cotonou Agreement is this opportunity to congratulate Manifesta! regional and social support, cohesion poli- schemes to, for example, combat hunger, pro- based upon this idea, consolidated by the adop- the European Union (EU) on its © Africa e Mediterraneo cy), the European Union is leading the way vide access to water, and build schools and hos- tion of the European Consensus on 50th anniversary as a political Iin promoting international solidarity, particular- pitals. All of these initiatives are a reflection of Development which was adopted in 2005. This Oand economic entity. Since the Treaty of ly in the case of the African, Caribbean and the values that are the essence of the European Consensus meant that a European vision (of Rome was signed on 25 March 1957, the EU Pacific (ACP) States. enterprise: solidarity, respect for human rights Member States and the European Commission) – the most successful regional integration and the rule of law. was defined, based on shared values, joint goals process ever attempted – has become a major This cooperation policy with the poorest coun- and principles, and greatly increased resources. player in world politics and an indispensable tries of the world was launched 50 years ago at After 50 years, now is the time to make an development partner of many developing a time when Europe’s founding fathers were assessment, draw lessons and look towards The keys for development are to be found in an countries. adamant about promoting peace and prosperity the future. array of policies focused on governance, in the interest of overall stability. Consequently, accountability and the adoption of an effective National interests do drive the policy initia- The assessment is that millions of lives have aid system, sector-specific strategies and trade. tives of individual countries. However, the been saved, people are living in a more digni- The key component of development is good success and endurance of the EU has shown fied way and economies are developing, prima- governance and the ACP States can count on that both national and collective interests in rily thanks to Europe. The EU is the world’s firm European Commission support and further an integrative setting need not be mutually leading aid donor and the economic operator aid incentives to encourage them to commit to exclusive. Therein lies a characteristic of the offering the widest market access to poor coun- this approach. Good governance is of funda- EU which demonstrates that unity in diversi- tries. However, this has not been enough to mental importance; the States need to guarantee ty is possible. This is an invaluable lesson for eliminate poverty in the world. Poverty is the each citizen impartial access to courts, adminis- the 79-member ACP Group, given its size scourge of the 21st century. tration, health, education and the opportunity and far-flung geographical locations around to enjoy fundamental freedoms. the world. The lessons are many Jacques Obia. © EC Photo Library and have led to rela- The way forward for the development The European Union has maintained its com- The ACP Group agrees that the Economic tions with the ACP process will be in our ability to take on mitments to the ACP States. This is remark- Partnership Agreements can be effective and States being recast in the board all the major problems in the same able considering the challenges that it has to efficient tools to achieve this objective, espe- spirit: globalisation, climate change, face as it expands its bloc boundaries, con- cially if they were truly development-oriented. energy access, migration management fronts new trading arrangements at home and To do so needs a strong and permanent political and a knowledge-based society. abroad, and attempts to cope with emerging impetus. The ACP Group is confident that this sociopolitical challenges in a globalizing underlying political commitment is shared by The European Commission believes world. The 10th European Development both the ACP and the EU, and will continue to that development is dependent upon a Fund is one of the latest illustrations of the be the main framework to steady our rich and dialogue between partners in a bid to EU’s willingness to sustain development dynamic partnership. meet all the challenges of a globalised world. If endeavours for the ACP States. the problems of poor countries are overlooked Once more, a happy 50th birthday to the today, the problems of security, health and the This is in full compliance with one of the European Union! economy will be intensified tomorrow because goals of the ACP Group which is to ensure Page 2 all regions of the world are now interdependent. the realisation of the objectives of the ACP- * Dean of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Committee of Ambassadors and Ambassador of the Bernard Petit. © EC Photo Library EC Partnership Agreements, and in particu- Republic of Congo. I This is Europe’s message for the future: taking lar, aim for the eradication of poverty, sus- 25 March 1957: Signing of the Treaty of Rome: Paul-Henri Spaak, Belgian Minister for Foreign Affairs joint action with its partners to ensure develop- tainable development, and the smooth and (on the left); Jean-Charles Snoy et d'Oppuers, Head of ment in the interest of all. gradual integration of the ACP States into the the Belgian Delegation at the Inter-Governmental Conference (on the right). © EC Photo Library world economy. * Deputy Director General, European Commission, DG DEV I The Treaty of Rome. © EC Photo Library 2 SPECIAL ISSUE N.E. - MARCH 2008 3 Editorial History The need for Cotonou UNIQUE IN THE his special issue of The Courier celebrates It is not the first time that innovations in the Lomé- the 50th birthday of the European Union Cotonou Conventions have stirred the prophets of (EU).
Recommended publications
  • The Cotonou Agreement Between the European Union and ACP States and the End of the Lomé Convention

    The Cotonou Agreement Between the European Union and ACP States and the End of the Lomé Convention

    Third World Quarterly, Vol 24, No 1, pp 161–176, 2003 Co-operation and coercion? The Cotonou Agreement between the European Union and ACP states and the end of the Lomé Convention STEPHEN R HURT ABSTRACT The Cotonou Agreement, signed on 23 June 2000, defines the new relationship between the European Union (EU) and the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) states. It was the result of 18 months of negotiations to decide the future of EU–ACP relations after the Lomé Convention’s expiry on 29 February 2000. This article highlights the significant changes represented by the Cotonou Agreement and emphasises some of the dangers that may result for the ACP states. In doing so, the article adopts a neo-Gramscian perspective showing how the nature of the new EU–ACP agreement has significantly shifted the relationship further from one of co-operation to one of coercion. The new approach taken by the EU can be understood within the context of the hegemonic dominance of neoliberalism within political elites. This is most explicitly demonstrated by the EU’s major justification for the proposed changes: the need to comply with the core principles and rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO). The European Union (EU) has a long history of development co-operation with the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) states.1 It is a key area within EU external relations and makes Europe a significant actor within the wider realm of North–South relations. The EU is now a major aid provider and the ACP states are heavily reliant on EU markets for their exports.
  • The European Union's Development Policy: a Personal View of 50 Years of International Cooperation

    The European Union's Development Policy: a Personal View of 50 Years of International Cooperation

    Policy Policy Management Report 15 Policy Management Report 15 The European Union’s development policy The European Union’s development policy A personal view of 50 years of international cooperation The Centre is an independent foundation, Onze Lieve Vrouweplein 21 whose capacity building activities aim NL-6211 HE Maastricht to improve cooperation between Europe The Netherlands Pays-Bas Dieter Frisch and countries in Africa, the Caribbean, and the Tel +31 (0)43 350 29 00 Pacific. Fax +31 (0)43 350 29 02 Le Centre est une fondation indépendante. Ses Rue Archimède 5 activités dans le domaine du renforcement des B-1000 Brussels Bruxelles capacités visent à améliorer la coopération Belgium Belgique entre l’Europe et les pays d’Afrique, Tel +32 (0)2 237 43 10 des Caraïbes et du Pacifique. Fax +32 (0)2 237 43 19 [email protected] www.ecdpm.org ISBN: 978-90-72908-37-7 European Centre for Development Policy Management Centre européen de gestion des politiques de développement The European Union’s development policy A personal view of 50 years of international cooperation Dieter Frisch April 2008 The ECDPM acknowledges the support it receives from the Ministries or Foreign Affairs in Finland, Luxemburg, The Netherlands, Sweden, the Belgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, DG Development Cooperation, Irish Aid, Swiss Agency for Development cooperation, l'Instituto Português de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento au Portugal, and the Department for International Development Cooperation in the UK. Copyright © 2008 Frisch, D. 2008. The European Union's development policy. A personal view of 50 years of Development Policy. (Policy Management Report 15).
  • Economic Partnership Agreements (Epas) Between the EU & African, Caribbean & Pacific Countries

    Economic Partnership Agreements (Epas) Between the EU & African, Caribbean & Pacific Countries

    Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) between the EU & African, Caribbean & Pacific countries Standard Note: SN/EP/3370 Last updated: 13 March 2009 Author: Ian Townsend Section Economic Policy & Statistics The European Union and African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries have been renegotiating their relationship. The original aim was Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs), free trade areas between the EU and six ACP regions, covering goods, services and other trade-related issues, with added development support and political dialogue. The negotiations were, and continue to be, controversial. Some ACP governments voiced objections, while NGOs campaigned vocally against EPAs. Concerns include the possible damage to ACP economies from opening them to free trade with the EU. Other criticisms are outlined in this note. With a WTO-imposed deadline for the expiration of preferences previously offered by the EU to these countries’ goods exports towards the end of 2007, the EU adopted a new ‘two-stage’ approach. It would look to sign comprehensive EPAs, along the originally proposes lines, with any region that felt able to do so. However, in those regions that were not ready or willing to do so, the EU would sign interim EPAs – covering goods only – with regions, or individual countries or groups of countries within them. Other matters would be negotiated later. Countries choosing not to sign would lose there existing trade preferences. In the event, only the Caribbean region agreed a comprehensive EPA. Those countries that were most likely to be affected agreed interim EPAs. These were primarily more developed ACP countries, as the ‘Least Developed Countries’ (around 50 of the poorest in the world) in the ACP could benefit from similar preferences under Everything But Arms, part of the EU’s GSP scheme (see note SN/EP/3369), and so many chose not to sign.
  • The Courier the Magazine of ACP-EU Development Cooperation N°199 July-August 2003 : Dossier Non-State Actors and Cotonou Countr

    The Courier the Magazine of ACP-EU Development Cooperation N°199 July-August 2003 : Dossier Non-State Actors and Cotonou Countr

    theΒ CourierISSN 1606-200 0 the magazine of ACP-EU development cooperation N°199 July-August 2003 Editoria Postal address African initiatives for dealing The ACP-EU Courier European Commission (G12, 5/45) B-1049 Brussels with conflict Address for visitors Africa continues to have more conflicts than any other region in the 12 rue de Genève 1140 Brussels - Belgium world, and individual governments do not always have the capacity to httpV/europa.eu.int/comm/development/ solve them when they arise. Such conflicts take a toll on the population, body/publications/publications_courier_ en.htm and are a major cause of poverty and barrier to development. ACP General Secretariat In many parts of the continent, foreign troops are involved in peace 451 avenue Georges Henri operations; for instance, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo 1200 Brussels [email protected] (DRC), in Sierra Leone, in Liberia. Furthermore, private security forces http://www.acpsec.org have stepped into the breech in many cases, particularly where the Publisher state is weak. Koos Richelle Nevertheless, there are heartening examples of peace restoration Director Leonidas Antonakopoulos initiatives, conflict management and resolution, where African Editor leadership has been the decisive ingredient, such as in Burundi, Dorothy Morrissey [email protected] Sudan, DRC, Cote d'Ivoire, and Somalia. African peacekeeping tel: +32.2.296.83.30 forces are also serving throughout the continent. Journalist At the recent African Union (AU) Heads of State summit in Maputo, François Lefebvre franç[email protected] peace and security issues were high on the agenda. The AU's tel: +32.2.295.50.33 predecessor, the Organization of African Unity (OAU), was sworn to Contributors non-interference in the internal affairs of nations.

  • The Netherlands and the European Development Fund

    IOB Evaluation | no. 375 IOB Evaluation | no. IOB Evaluation The Netherlands and the European Development Fund - Principles and practices Evaluation of Dutch involvement in EU development cooperation (1998-2012) The Netherlands and the European Development Fund - Principles and practices | Evaluation of Dutch involvement in EU development cooperation (1998-2012) | IOB Evaluation | no. 375 | The Netherlands and the European Development Fund - Principles and practices | Evaluation of Dutch involvement in EU development cooperation (1998-2012) | IOB Evaluation | no. 375 | The Netherland The Netherlands and the European Development FundThe Netherlands - Principles and practices IOB Evaluation The Netherlands and the European Development Fund - Principles and practices Evaluation of Dutch involvement in EU development cooperation (1998-2012) March 2013 The Netherlands and the European Development Fund - Principles and practices Preface The issue of the future of Europe’s relations with its colonies and overseas territories came up during the negotiations on establishing a European common market in May 1956. The Dutch considered the demands of France and Belgium, to set up an investment fund for these areas and to provide a guaranteed market for their products rather hard to digest for both political and financial reasons. The Netherlands did not want to share in the financial brunt of such a fund, with little say on how it would be used and with a contribution that was likely bigger than the economic advantages that it could expect. While the Dutch Government was more ready to agree to a deal on trade relations, it only gave in on the funding issue when it became apparent that a simple ‘no’ would not be acceptable to the other five nations sitting around the negotiation table and could risk that the European project would be abandoned.
  • Cotonou Agreement Builds on Generations of Cooperation Agreements Between the Expanding ACP Group and an Evolving Europe

    Cotonou Agreement Builds on Generations of Cooperation Agreements Between the Expanding ACP Group and an Evolving Europe

    2 The Cotonou 2.1 A quick look into Agreement in the past a nutshell 2.2 Cotonou - a new way of doing cooperation 2.3 A house built on Article 3 three pillars Article 2 2.4 Key terms and acronyms Article 1 The Cotonou Agreement builds on generations of cooperation agreements between the expanding ACP Group and an evolving Europe. In many ways, however, the Cotonou Agreement marks an important break with the past. Major innovations have been introduced to improve the overall impact of aid, trade and political cooperation between the ACP and the EC.This chapter summarises the most important features of this unique international cooperation agreement. 'The Cotonou Agreement will give a new momentum to the relationship between the ACP States and the European Union. It represents an important component of international efforts aimed at promoting sustainable development and reducing poverty.' Poul Nielson, European Commissioner for Development and Humanitarian Aid1 11 2.1 A quick look into the past Before presenting the contents of the ACP-EC cooperation Cotonou Agreement in some detail, it may The idea of 'European cooperation' started be useful to look back for a moment into in the 1960s with economic cooperation the past in order to understand the origin agreements, mainly with independent of some of the key elements of ACP-EC French-speaking African countries. In 1975, cooperation. the newly constituted ACP group and Europe concluded their first major part- ACP-EC cooperation has been going on for nership agreement - the Lomé I more than 25 years. In the process, the Convention.
  • EU Development Cooperation Arts, Dickson—Eds Artsd/19-Jkt 30/10/03 11:10 Am Page 1 Page Am 11:10 30/10/03 Artsd/19-Jkt EUDPR 10/28/03 3:18 PM Page I

    EU Development Cooperation Arts, Dickson—Eds Artsd/19-Jkt 30/10/03 11:10 Am Page 1 Page Am 11:10 30/10/03 Artsd/19-Jkt EUDPR 10/28/03 3:18 PM Page I

    artsD/19-jkt 30/10/03 11:10 am Page 1 T is increasingly recognised that EU development cooperation policy has failed to meet its stated aims, and EU development cooperation I EU development for this book Arts and Dickson have assembled a collection of papers which cooperation ask the obvious and important question, if the policy doesn’t work, why bother with it? This book assesses why EU develop- From model to symbol ment policy has become largely ineffective, citing among the external factors the liberalisation of trade, and the growing influence of US and international actors such as the World Bank and the IMF on EU policy. It also edited by considers factors within the EU such as karin arts & anna k. dickson the enlargement of its membership and the resulting shifts in priorities. It is this analysis of internal and external factors affecting the decline of EU development policy that makes arts, dickson—eds this study both innovative and unique. It brings together an impressive range of contributors from different disciplines resulting in a thorough and intelligent assessment of the debate. This study will appeal to advanced level undergraduates and academics of European politics in general, EU integration and development studies, and International Relations. Karin Arts is Associate Professor of International Law and Development at the Institute of Social Studies in The Hague, The Netherlands Anna K. Dickson is Lecturer in International Relations in the Politics Department of the University of Durham, UK EUDPR 10/28/03 3:18 PM Page i EU development cooperation EUDPR 10/28/03 3:18 PM Page ii EUDPR 10/28/03 3:18 PM Page iii EU development cooperation From model to symbol edited by Karin Arts and Anna K.
  • The Future of ACP-EU Relations: a Political Economy Analysis

    The Future of ACP-EU Relations: a Political Economy Analysis

    The future of ACP-EU relations: A political economy analysis January 2016 The future of ACP-EU relations: A political economy analysis www.ecdpm.org/pmr21 Contributors to the report This report was developed by a core team with targeted inputs from a broad range of ECDPM staff and external experts, including from the ACP. Core Team of Authors: Jean Bossuyt, Head of Strategy at ECDPM Niels Keijzer, Researcher at the German Development Institute (DIE) Alfonso Medinilla, Policy Officer at ECDPM Marc De Tollenaere, Programme Associate at ECDPM Thematic experts: Junior Lodge, Consultant Paul Goodison, Consultant Carine Nsoudou, Consultant Gemma Pinol Puig, Consultant Zakaria Amar, Programme Associate at ECDPM Andrew Sherriff, Head of Strengthening EU External Action Programme at ECDPM Alisa Herrero, Policy Officer at ECDPM Cecilia Gregersen, Policy Officer at ECDPM ECDPM contributors: Geert Laporte, Deputy Director James Mackie, Senior Advisor Kathleen van Hove, Senior Policy Officer Francesco Rampa, Programme Manager Anna Knoll, Policy Officer Hanne Knaepen, Policy Officer Helene Vanvolsem, Policy Officer Sahra El Fassi, Policy Officer Copyright© 2016 Prior permission is not required for quoting, translating or reproducing part of the contents of this publication provided the source is fully acknowledged as follows: Bossuyt, J. , Keijzer, N., Medinilla, A. and De Tollenaere, M. 2016. The future of ACP-EU relations: A political economy analysis. (ECDPM Policy Management Report 21) Maastricht. ECDPM. www.ecdpm.org/pmr21 ISBN/EAN: 978-90-72908-49-0 Editing: Tony Parr, coverdesign and Infographic page xix: Yaseena Chiu - Van 't Hoff Layout: Yasmine Medjadji and Claudia Backes ii www.ecdpm.org/pmr21 The future of ACP-EU relations: A political economy analysis Table of Contents Contributors to the report ...............................................................................................................