DOCSLIB.ORG

The Future of ACP-EU Relations: a Political Economy Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Future of ACP-EU Relations: a Political Economy Analysis The future of ACP-EU relations: A political economy analysis January 2016 The future of ACP-EU relations: A political economy analysis www.ecdpm.org/pmr21 Contributors to the report This report was developed by a core team with targeted inputs from a broad range of ECDPM staff and external experts, including from the ACP. Core Team of Authors: Jean Bossuyt, Head of Strategy at ECDPM Niels Keijzer, Researcher at the German Development Institute (DIE) Alfonso Medinilla, Policy Officer at ECDPM Marc De Tollenaere, Programme Associate at ECDPM Thematic experts: Junior Lodge, Consultant Paul Goodison, Consultant Carine Nsoudou, Consultant Gemma Pinol Puig, Consultant Zakaria Amar, Programme Associate at ECDPM Andrew Sherriff, Head of Strengthening EU External Action Programme at ECDPM Alisa Herrero, Policy Officer at ECDPM Cecilia Gregersen, Policy Officer at ECDPM ECDPM contributors: Geert Laporte, Deputy Director James Mackie, Senior Advisor Kathleen van Hove, Senior Policy Officer Francesco Rampa, Programme Manager Anna Knoll, Policy Officer Hanne Knaepen, Policy Officer Helene Vanvolsem, Policy Officer Sahra El Fassi, Policy Officer Copyright© 2016 Prior permission is not required for quoting, translating or reproducing part of the contents of this publication provided the source is fully acknowledged as follows: Bossuyt, J. , Keijzer, N., Medinilla, A. and De Tollenaere, M. 2016. The future of ACP-EU relations: A political economy analysis. (ECDPM Policy Management Report 21) Maastricht. ECDPM. www.ecdpm.org/pmr21 ISBN/EAN: 978-90-72908-49-0 Editing: Tony Parr, coverdesign and Infographic page xix: Yaseena Chiu - Van 't Hoff Layout: Yasmine Medjadji and Claudia Backes ii www.ecdpm.org/pmr21 The future of ACP-EU relations: A political economy analysis Table of Contents Contributors to the report ................................................................................................................ ii Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................... v Acronyms and abbreviations ........................................................................................................... vi List of tables .................................................................................................................................... ix List of figures .................................................................................................................................... ix List of boxes .................................................................................................................................... ix EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... x 1. Major changes since 2000 and how these have affected ACP-EU cooperation ..........................1 2. The current state of the debate: trends and risks ........................................................................ 7 3. The added value of a political economy analysis........................................................................ 13 4. The foundations of the partnership and its development ........................................................ 17 5. The rules of the game in the ACP group and its capacity for collective action ......................... 21 5.1. General operation of ACP institutions ..................................................................................................22 Formal and informal rules underpinning the operation of the ACP institutions ......................... 23 The interplay between ACP institutions in practice: limited scope for collective action ...........28 5.2. Limited progress in intra-ACP cooperation ........................................................................................ 30 The programming of intra-ACP funding ................................................................................................30 Joining forces: the experience of the ACP Inter-regional Coordination Committee .................... 32 5.3. The successful involvement of the ACP in the WTO .........................................................................32 5.4. The ACP’s identity in international fora ..............................................................................................34 6. Rules of the game at the EU – How the ACP evolved from a privileged to a rather marginalised partner ......................................................................................................................40 6.1. Rules of the game at the EU and their influence on the partnership with the ACP ...............40 6.2. Reviewing the Cotonou Partnership Agreement and EU actors’ interests ............................... 44 6.3. Globalisation and regionalisation in EU external action: how do they affect ACP-EU relations? ....... ............................................................................................................................................. 49 6.4. The EDF and EU actors’ interests ...........................................................................................................51 7. The ACP-EU partnership in practice .............................................................................................57 7.1. Political dialogue and shared values .....................................................................................................59 The practice of political dialogue under the CPA .................................................................................. 61 Conditionality under article 96 of the CPA ............................................................................................62 Political dialogue in other EU partnerships with non-EU countries: how unique is the CPA? .. 66 Concluding remarks .................................................................................................................................... 69 7.2. Co-management of the EDF ....................................................................................................................71 Co-management in practice: an often parallel, costly and conflict-ridden system ..................... 72 Implications for the future .........................................................................................................................76 iii The future of ACP-EU relations: A political economy analysis www.ecdpm.org/pmr21 7.3. The joint ACP-EU institutions .................................................................................................................78 Joint Council of Ministers and Committee of Ambassadors ..............................................................78 The dedicated joint institutions of the CPA .......................................................................................... 80 Joint institutions set up under the EPAs .................................................................................................83 8. Limited ownership of the CPA beyond official parties .............................................................. 85 The CPA embraces the principle of participatory development ....................................................... 86 Putting the principle into practice ............................................................................................................87 The political economy of participation under the CPA ..................................................................... 89 The implications for the review of the CPA ............................................................................................ 91 9. Can the ACP-EU framework contribute to the provision of global public goods? .................. 93 Assessing the ability of the ACP-EU framework to deliver the 2030 Agenda ............................... 94 The ‘software’ of the 2030 Agenda is not compatible with the CPA’s rules of the game ......... 100 10. Conclusions ...............................................................................................................................103 ANNEXES ...................................................................................................................................113 Annex 1: Key Moments with Regard to Post-Cotonou in the Next Two Years ........................... 114 Annex 2: Summarised Methodology .............................................................................................115 Annex 3: Selected indicators on the ACP group ............................................................................117 Annex 4: Selected ACP trade and development statistics ........................................................... 122 Annex 5: Structures and resourcing of the ACP Secretariat .........................................................126 Annex 6: 11th EDF Committee votes, contribution keys and financial contributions by Member State .................................................................................................................129 Annex 7: Intra-ACP Envelope of the 10th EDF, in EUR mln ............................................................130 Annex 8: Article 96 Consultation procedures (2000-2015) ...........................................................131 Bibliography .................................................................................................................................. 135 iv www.ecdpm.org/pmr21 The future of ACP-EU relations: A political economy
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE COURIER, SPECIAL ISSUE NEW EDITION (N.E.) Editorial Staff Director and Editor-In-Chief Hegel Goutier
    The SPECIAL ISSUE C urierMARCH 2008 The magazine of Africa - Caribbean - Pacific & European Union cooperation and relations 50 years of ACP-EU Cooperation Not for sale ISSN 1784-682X SPECIAL ISSUE N.E. - MARCH 2008 CThe urier The The magazine of Africa - Caribbean - Pacific & European Union cooperation and relations C urier Editorial Committee Co-presidents the magazine of africa - caribbean - pacific & european union development cooperation Sir John Kaputin, Secretary General Secretariat of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States www.acp.int Mr Stefano Manservisi, Director General of DG Development European Commission ec.europa.eu/development/ Table of contents THE COURIER, SPECIAL ISSUE NEW EDITION (N.E.) Editorial staff Director and Editor-in-chief Hegel Goutier Contributors François Misser (Deputy Editor-in-chief), OPENER RESULTS Debra Percival 19 Editorial Assistant and Production Development and relations with the ACP States: Success stories Joshua Massarenti Europe in action for 50 years 2 Science and technology: Contributed in this issue Cooperation on the road to emancipation 21 Marie-Martine Buckens EU’s 50th birthday: 3 Congratulations from the ACP Trade protocols and EPAs 23 Public Relations and Artistic coordination Public Relations Andrea Marchesini Reggiani (Public Relations Manager and Responsible for EDITORIAL NGOs’ and experts’ network) EXTENDING COOPERATION Joan Ruiz Valero (Responsible for Networking with EU and National Institutions) The need for Cotonou 4 EPAs: Trade for regional growth Artistic Coordination
    [Show full text]
  • The Cotonou Agreement Between the European Union and ACP States and the End of the Lomé Convention
    Third World Quarterly, Vol 24, No 1, pp 161–176, 2003 Co-operation and coercion? The Cotonou Agreement between the European Union and ACP states and the end of the Lomé Convention STEPHEN R HURT ABSTRACT The Cotonou Agreement, signed on 23 June 2000, defines the new relationship between the European Union (EU) and the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) states. It was the result of 18 months of negotiations to decide the future of EU–ACP relations after the Lomé Convention’s expiry on 29 February 2000. This article highlights the significant changes represented by the Cotonou Agreement and emphasises some of the dangers that may result for the ACP states. In doing so, the article adopts a neo-Gramscian perspective showing how the nature of the new EU–ACP agreement has significantly shifted the relationship further from one of co-operation to one of coercion. The new approach taken by the EU can be understood within the context of the hegemonic dominance of neoliberalism within political elites. This is most explicitly demonstrated by the EU’s major justification for the proposed changes: the need to comply with the core principles and rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO). The European Union (EU) has a long history of development co-operation with the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) states.1 It is a key area within EU external relations and makes Europe a significant actor within the wider realm of North–South relations. The EU is now a major aid provider and the ACP states are heavily reliant on EU markets for their exports.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union's Development Policy: a Personal View of 50 Years of International Cooperation
    Policy Policy Management Report 15 Policy Management Report 15 The European Union’s development policy The European Union’s development policy A personal view of 50 years of international cooperation The Centre is an independent foundation, Onze Lieve Vrouweplein 21 whose capacity building activities aim NL-6211 HE Maastricht to improve cooperation between Europe The Netherlands Pays-Bas Dieter Frisch and countries in Africa, the Caribbean, and the Tel +31 (0)43 350 29 00 Pacific. Fax +31 (0)43 350 29 02 Le Centre est une fondation indépendante. Ses Rue Archimède 5 activités dans le domaine du renforcement des B-1000 Brussels Bruxelles capacités visent à améliorer la coopération Belgium Belgique entre l’Europe et les pays d’Afrique, Tel +32 (0)2 237 43 10 des Caraïbes et du Pacifique. Fax +32 (0)2 237 43 19 [email protected] www.ecdpm.org ISBN: 978-90-72908-37-7 European Centre for Development Policy Management Centre européen de gestion des politiques de développement The European Union’s development policy A personal view of 50 years of international cooperation Dieter Frisch April 2008 The ECDPM acknowledges the support it receives from the Ministries or Foreign Affairs in Finland, Luxemburg, The Netherlands, Sweden, the Belgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, DG Development Cooperation, Irish Aid, Swiss Agency for Development cooperation, l'Instituto Português de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento au Portugal, and the Department for International Development Cooperation in the UK. Copyright © 2008 Frisch, D. 2008. The European Union's development policy. A personal view of 50 years of Development Policy. (Policy Management Report 15).
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Partnership Agreements (Epas) Between the EU & African, Caribbean & Pacific Countries
    Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) between the EU & African, Caribbean & Pacific countries Standard Note: SN/EP/3370 Last updated: 13 March 2009 Author: Ian Townsend Section Economic Policy & Statistics The European Union and African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries have been renegotiating their relationship. The original aim was Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs), free trade areas between the EU and six ACP regions, covering goods, services and other trade-related issues, with added development support and political dialogue. The negotiations were, and continue to be, controversial. Some ACP governments voiced objections, while NGOs campaigned vocally against EPAs. Concerns include the possible damage to ACP economies from opening them to free trade with the EU. Other criticisms are outlined in this note. With a WTO-imposed deadline for the expiration of preferences previously offered by the EU to these countries’ goods exports towards the end of 2007, the EU adopted a new ‘two-stage’ approach. It would look to sign comprehensive EPAs, along the originally proposes lines, with any region that felt able to do so. However, in those regions that were not ready or willing to do so, the EU would sign interim EPAs – covering goods only – with regions, or individual countries or groups of countries within them. Other matters would be negotiated later. Countries choosing not to sign would lose there existing trade preferences. In the event, only the Caribbean region agreed a comprehensive EPA. Those countries that were most likely to be affected agreed interim EPAs. These were primarily more developed ACP countries, as the ‘Least Developed Countries’ (around 50 of the poorest in the world) in the ACP could benefit from similar preferences under Everything But Arms, part of the EU’s GSP scheme (see note SN/EP/3369), and so many chose not to sign.
    [Show full text]
  • The Courier the Magazine of ACP-EU Development Cooperation N°199 July-August 2003 : Dossier Non-State Actors and Cotonou Countr
    theΒ CourierISSN 1606-200 0 the magazine of ACP-EU development cooperation N°199 July-August 2003 Editoria Postal address African initiatives for dealing The ACP-EU Courier European Commission (G12, 5/45) B-1049 Brussels with conflict Address for visitors Africa continues to have more conflicts than any other region in the 12 rue de Genève 1140 Brussels - Belgium world, and individual governments do not always have the capacity to httpV/europa.eu.int/comm/development/ solve them when they arise. Such conflicts take a toll on the population, body/publications/publications_courier_ en.htm and are a major cause of poverty and barrier to development. ACP General Secretariat In many parts of the continent, foreign troops are involved in peace 451 avenue Georges Henri operations; for instance, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo 1200 Brussels [email protected] (DRC), in Sierra Leone, in Liberia. Furthermore, private security forces http://www.acpsec.org have stepped into the breech in many cases, particularly where the Publisher state is weak. Koos Richelle Nevertheless, there are heartening examples of peace restoration Director Leonidas Antonakopoulos initiatives, conflict management and resolution, where African Editor leadership has been the decisive ingredient, such as in Burundi, Dorothy Morrissey [email protected] Sudan, DRC, Cote d'Ivoire, and Somalia. African peacekeeping tel: +32.2.296.83.30 forces are also serving throughout the continent. Journalist At the recent African Union (AU) Heads of State summit in Maputo, François Lefebvre franç[email protected] peace and security issues were high on the agenda. The AU's tel: +32.2.295.50.33 predecessor, the Organization of African Unity (OAU), was sworn to Contributors non-interference in the internal affairs of nations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Netherlands and the European Development Fund
    IOB Evaluation | no. 375 IOB Evaluation | no. IOB Evaluation The Netherlands and the European Development Fund - Principles and practices Evaluation of Dutch involvement in EU development cooperation (1998-2012) The Netherlands and the European Development Fund - Principles and practices | Evaluation of Dutch involvement in EU development cooperation (1998-2012) | IOB Evaluation | no. 375 | The Netherlands and the European Development Fund - Principles and practices | Evaluation of Dutch involvement in EU development cooperation (1998-2012) | IOB Evaluation | no. 375 | The Netherland The Netherlands and the European Development FundThe Netherlands - Principles and practices IOB Evaluation The Netherlands and the European Development Fund - Principles and practices Evaluation of Dutch involvement in EU development cooperation (1998-2012) March 2013 The Netherlands and the European Development Fund - Principles and practices Preface The issue of the future of Europe’s relations with its colonies and overseas territories came up during the negotiations on establishing a European common market in May 1956. The Dutch considered the demands of France and Belgium, to set up an investment fund for these areas and to provide a guaranteed market for their products rather hard to digest for both political and financial reasons. The Netherlands did not want to share in the financial brunt of such a fund, with little say on how it would be used and with a contribution that was likely bigger than the economic advantages that it could expect. While the Dutch Government was more ready to agree to a deal on trade relations, it only gave in on the funding issue when it became apparent that a simple ‘no’ would not be acceptable to the other five nations sitting around the negotiation table and could risk that the European project would be abandoned.
    [Show full text]
  • Cotonou Agreement Builds on Generations of Cooperation Agreements Between the Expanding ACP Group and an Evolving Europe
    2 The Cotonou 2.1 A quick look into Agreement in the past a nutshell 2.2 Cotonou - a new way of doing cooperation 2.3 A house built on Article 3 three pillars Article 2 2.4 Key terms and acronyms Article 1 The Cotonou Agreement builds on generations of cooperation agreements between the expanding ACP Group and an evolving Europe. In many ways, however, the Cotonou Agreement marks an important break with the past. Major innovations have been introduced to improve the overall impact of aid, trade and political cooperation between the ACP and the EC.This chapter summarises the most important features of this unique international cooperation agreement. 'The Cotonou Agreement will give a new momentum to the relationship between the ACP States and the European Union. It represents an important component of international efforts aimed at promoting sustainable development and reducing poverty.' Poul Nielson, European Commissioner for Development and Humanitarian Aid1 11 2.1 A quick look into the past Before presenting the contents of the ACP-EC cooperation Cotonou Agreement in some detail, it may The idea of 'European cooperation' started be useful to look back for a moment into in the 1960s with economic cooperation the past in order to understand the origin agreements, mainly with independent of some of the key elements of ACP-EC French-speaking African countries. In 1975, cooperation. the newly constituted ACP group and Europe concluded their first major part- ACP-EC cooperation has been going on for nership agreement - the Lomé I more than 25 years. In the process, the Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Development Cooperation Arts, Dickson—Eds Artsd/19-Jkt 30/10/03 11:10 Am Page 1 Page Am 11:10 30/10/03 Artsd/19-Jkt EUDPR 10/28/03 3:18 PM Page I
    artsD/19-jkt 30/10/03 11:10 am Page 1 T is increasingly recognised that EU development cooperation policy has failed to meet its stated aims, and EU development cooperation I EU development for this book Arts and Dickson have assembled a collection of papers which cooperation ask the obvious and important question, if the policy doesn’t work, why bother with it? This book assesses why EU develop- From model to symbol ment policy has become largely ineffective, citing among the external factors the liberalisation of trade, and the growing influence of US and international actors such as the World Bank and the IMF on EU policy. It also edited by considers factors within the EU such as karin arts & anna k. dickson the enlargement of its membership and the resulting shifts in priorities. It is this analysis of internal and external factors affecting the decline of EU development policy that makes arts, dickson—eds this study both innovative and unique. It brings together an impressive range of contributors from different disciplines resulting in a thorough and intelligent assessment of the debate. This study will appeal to advanced level undergraduates and academics of European politics in general, EU integration and development studies, and International Relations. Karin Arts is Associate Professor of International Law and Development at the Institute of Social Studies in The Hague, The Netherlands Anna K. Dickson is Lecturer in International Relations in the Politics Department of the University of Durham, UK EUDPR 10/28/03 3:18 PM Page i EU development cooperation EUDPR 10/28/03 3:18 PM Page ii EUDPR 10/28/03 3:18 PM Page iii EU development cooperation From model to symbol edited by Karin Arts and Anna K.
    [Show full text]