OFFERING MEMORANDUM 165 Avenue B | New York • NY
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chapter 5.1: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION
Chapter 5.1: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION This chapter describes existing land use, zoning, and public policies applicable to the proposed project and evaluates potential significant adverse effects that may result from implementation of the proposed flood protection system. Potential significant adverse effects to land use as a result of implementing the flood protection system are also evaluated. Potential land use issues include known or likely changes in current land uses within the study area, as well as the proposed project’s potential effect on existing and future land use patterns. Potential zoning and public policy issues include the compatibility of the proposed project with existing zoning and consistency with existing applicable public policies. PROJECT AREA ONE Project Area One extends from Montgomery Street on the south to the north end of John V. Lindsay East River Park (East River Park) at about East 13th Street. Project Area One consists primarily of the Franklin Delano Roosevelt East River Drive (FDR Drive) right-of-way, a portion of Pier 42 and Corlears Hook Park as well as East River Park. The majority of Project Area One is within East River Park and includes four existing pedestrian bridges across the FDR Drive to East River Park (Corlears Hook, Delancey Street, East 6th Street, and East 10th Street Bridges) and the East Houston Street overpass. Project Area One is located within Manhattan Community District 3, and borders portions of the Lower East Side and East Village neighborhoods. PROJECT AREA TWO Project Area Two extends north and east from Project Area One, from East 13th Street to East 25th Street. -
New York CITY
New York CITY the 123rd Annual Meeting American Historical Association NONPROFIT ORG. 400 A Street, S.E. U.S. Postage Washington, D.C. 20003-3889 PAID WALDORF, MD PERMIT No. 56 ASHGATENew History Titles from Ashgate Publishing… The Chronicle of Ibn al-Athir The Long Morning of Medieval Europe for the Crusading Period New Directions in Early Medieval Studies Edited by Jennifer R. Davis, California Institute from al-Kamil fi’l-Ta’rikh. Part 3 of Technology and Michael McCormick, The Years 589–629/1193–1231: The Ayyubids Harvard University after Saladin and the Mongol Menace Includes 25 b&w illustrations Translated by D.S. Richards, University of Oxford, UK June 2008. 366 pages. Hbk. 978-0-7546-6254-9 Crusade Texts in Translation: 17 June 2008. 344 pages. Hbk. 978-0-7546-4079-0 The Art, Science, and Technology of Medieval Travel The Portfolio of Villard de Honnecourt Edited by Robert Bork, University of Iowa (Paris, Bibliothèque nationale and Andrea Kann AVISTA Studies in the History de France, MS Fr 19093) of Medieval Technology, Science and Art: 6 A New Critical Edition and Color Facsimile Includes 23 b&w illustrations with a glossary by Stacey L. Hahn October 2008. 240 pages. Hbk. 978-0-7546-6307-2 Carl F. Barnes, Jr., Oakland University Includes 72 color and 48 b&w illustrations November 2008. 350 pages. Hbk. 978-0-7546-5102-4 The Medieval Account Books of the Mercers of London Patents, Pictures and Patronage An Edition and Translation John Day and the Tudor Book Trade Lisa Jefferson Elizabeth Evenden, Newnham College, November 2008. -
Finance Committee Meeting
Finance Committee Meeting November 2016 Committee Members L. Schwartz, Chair F. Ferrer, Vice Chair D. Jones C. Moerdler J. Molloy M. Pally J. Samuelson P. Trottenberg V. Vanterpool J. Vitiello P. Ward C. Wortendyke N. Zuckerman Finance Committee Meeting 2 Broadway, 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY 10004 Monday, 11/14/2016 12:30 - 1:45 PM ET 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERIOD 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – OCTOBER 26, 2016 Finance Committee Minutes - Page 4 3. 2016 COMMITTEE WORK PLAN 2016 Work Plan - Page 14 4. BUDGETS/CAPITAL CYCLE Finance Watch - Page 22 5. MTA HEADQUARTERS & ALL-AGENCY ITEMS Action Item Law Firm Panel Addition - Page 32 Report and Information Items Station Maintenance Billing Update - Page 34 Review and Assessment of the Finance Committee Charter - Page 37 Procurements MTAHQ Procurement Report - Page 40 MTAHQ Competitive Procurement - Page 42 6. METRO-NORTH RAILROAD MNR Action Item - Page 44 MNR Procurements - Page 46 7. LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD (No Items) 8. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT, and MTA BUS OPERATIONS NYCT & MTACC Procurements - Page 54 9. BRIDGES AND TUNNELS (No Items) 10. FIRST MUTUAL TRANSPORTATION ASSURANCE COMPANY (No Items) 11. MTA CONSOLIDATED REPORTS Statement of Operations - Page 64 Overtime - Page 72 Subsidy, Interagency Loans and Stabilization Fund Transactions - Page 77 Debt Service - Page 85 Positions - Page 87 Farebox Recovery Ratios - Page 90 MTA Ridership - Page 91 Fuel Hedge Program - Page 115 12. REAL ESTATE AGENDA Real Estate Action Items - Page 118 Real Estate Info Items - Page 131 Minutes of the MTA Finance Committee Meeting October 26, 2016 2 Broadway, 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY 10004 12:00 PM The following Finance Committee members attended: Hon. -
First Quarter 2018 Report
Manhattan College BRONX Tenay Williamsbridge N Park American Realty Capital FIRST QUARTER 2018 REPORT Knickerbocker New York City REIT CC Englewood Clis NEW FIRST QUARTER 2018 UPDATE YORK Bronx Englewood Zoo INWOOD Henry Hudson Pkwy W 207th St New York American Realty Capital New York City REIT, Inc. (“ARC NYCR”) continues to work closelyUniversity with leasing agents, commercial Dyckman St 10th Ave 10th New York University Nagle Ave brokers, tenants and property managers to lease up vacant space, pursue potentialThe acquisitions and maintain ourBronx existing Cloisters Margaret tenant relationships. A key objective of management in the near-term is to Corbinlease-up Rd the portfolio. Successful execution of Fort George Ave this strategy will requireTeaneck some upfront costs, mainly in the form of leasing commissions and tenant improvements, which are Cabrini Blvd Cabrini Riverside Dr Palisades Park FORT used to attract tenants to sign new leases. However, these initial investments areW 187th StGEORGEexpected to provide long-term benefits to the shareholders as increased occupancy levels and net operating income will improve Saint Nicholas Ave theWashington value Brdg of the portfolio. Henry Hudson Pkwy W 181st St Alexander Hamiliton Trans Mahattan Exwy Brdg dg W 177th St ngton Br Our portfolio currently consists of six properties located in Manhattan, Blvd Cabrini the financial capital of the world and the George Washi Riverside Dr Riverside Leonia WASHINGTON epicenter of commerce among New York City’s five boroughs. These assetsHEIGHTS comprise more than one million square Presbyterian feet. As of March 31, 2018, portfolio occupancy was 88.0%, with the largestHospital increaseDr River Harlem in occupancy coming from 1 Riverside Dr Riverside 9 Times Square, which was 74% leased in comparisonFort to 56% leased in Q1 2017. -
32 Avenue B, New York, Ny Table of Contents
32 AVENUE B, NEW YORK, NY TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY II. THE NEIGHBORHOOD III. DUE DILIGENCE FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT JAMES RYAN Director 646 933 2608 [email protected] FOR FINANCING INQUIRIES, CONTACT STEVEN SPERANDIO Partner, Senior Managing Director 646 933 2638 [email protected] 2 B6 REAL ESTATE ADVISORS 32 AVENUE B 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 B6 REAL ESTATE ADVISORS 32 AVENUE B 5 THE OPPORTUNITY AREA MAP B6 Real Estate Advisors has been retained on an exclusive basis to arrange for the sale of 32 Avenue B, a 5-story mixed-use building located in the vibrant East Village, between East 2nd & 3rd Street. PROPERTY INFORMATION Address 32 Avenue B, New York, NY 10009 Location West side of Avenue B between East 2nd & 3rd Street Block & Lot 398/ 31 32 AVENUE B Lot Dimensions 24.33’ x 80.00' Lot Square Feet 1,945 Stories 5 + Basement Building Dimensions 24.33’ x 70.00’ Building Square Feet 8,516 Approx Total Units 17 Commercial 16 Residential 1 Zoning C1-5/ R7A FAR 2.00/4.00 Building Assessment $567,540 RE Taxes $63,555 TRANSPORTATION TAX MAP TRAIN LINE STATION WALKING DISTANCE F 2nd Avenue 8 minutes F M J Z Delancey/Essex 9 minutes BUS WALKING DISTANCE M8/M9/M21/M14A Within 5 minutes CITI BIKE WALKING DISTANCE 12 bike stations Within 5 minutes DESTINATION RIDE SHARING (UBER/LYFT/VIA LOGO) Fidi 16 minute via FDR Midtown ( Bryant Park) 18 minute drive via FDR Williamsburg 7 minute drive via Williamsburg Bridge Travel times estimated by Google Maps 6 B6 REAL ESTATE ADVISORS 32 AVENUE B 7 INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS ■ Composition: The building consists of seven 1-bedroom apartments and nine studios. -
Chapter 2: Project Alternatives A. INTRODUCTION
Chapter 2: Project Alternatives A. INTRODUCTION Numerous alternatives have been developed and analyzed for a new Second Avenue Subway since the project was first conceived nearly 75 years ago. Although routes continued to evolve during those seven decades, three major plans were developed: a 1929 plan with an alignment under Second Avenue and Water Street, 1940s plans with a similar alignment to the 1929 plan but with additional connections to the Nassau Street Line and the Manhattan Bridge, and a 1968 plan (also along Second Avenue and Water Street), which was partially constructed in East Harlem and the Lower East Side in the late 1970s before construction was suspended because of New York City’s fiscal situation at the time. Most recently, MTA/NYCT undertook an extensive Major Investment Study (MIS) and Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), published in 1999, that analyzed a wide range of possible alternatives to ease transit problems on Manhattan’s East Side. That study, known as the Manhattan East Side Transit Alternatives (MESA) Study, was undertaken in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the MIS process established by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), now the Transportation Efficiency Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21). For more information on the process and the extensive public outreach effort for the MESA Study, see Chapter 4, “Public Outreach and Review Process.” The MIS/DEIS evaluated a large number of possible alternatives, considering the project’s goals and -
Chapter 23: Response to Comments on the SDEIS1
Chapter 23: Response to Comments on the SDEIS1 A. INTRODUCTION This chapter summarizes and responds to all substantive comments on the Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS) published in March 2003 for the Second Avenue Subway. Public review for the SDEIS began on March 2003, with publication and distribution of the document. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) held two public hearings to receive comments on the document: on May 12, 2003 in the auditorium of the Alexander Hamilton U.S. Custom House at One Bowling Green (Lower Manhattan); and on May 13, 2003, in the Hecksher Auditorium at El Museo del Barrio, 1230 Fifth Avenue (at 104th Street in East Harlem). The public comment period remained open until June 10, 2003. The SDEIS was circulated to involved and interested agencies and other parties and posted on the MTA’s website, and notice of its availability and the public hearing were published in the Federal Register on April 11, 2003. To advertise the public hearing, MTA published notices in the New York Post, Hoy, Amsterdam News, Chinese World Journal, and New York Daily News. In addition, information on the public hearing was posted on the MTA’s website, a notice of public hearing was mailed to all public officials and interested parties in the MTA service area; and a press release announcing the hearing was sent to all media outlets in the area. Bilingual signs announcing the hearing were posted in all MTA New York City Transit (NYCT) subway stations and on some buses. Brochures were handed out in major Manhattan East Side NYCT subway stations. -
Nyu-Downloadable-Campus-Map.Pdf
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY 64 404 Fitness (B-2) 404 Lafayette Street 55 Academic Resource Center (B-2) W. 18TH STREET E. 18TH STREET 18 Washington Place 83 Admissions Office (C-3) 1 383 Lafayette Street 27 Africa House (B-2) W. 17TH STREET E. 17TH STREET 44 Washington Mews 18 Alumni Hall (C-2) 33 3rd Avenue PLACE IRVING W. 16TH STREET E. 16TH STREET 62 Alumni Relations (B-2) 2 M 25 West 4th Street 3 CHELSEA 2 UNION SQUARE GRAMERCY 59 Arthur L Carter Hall (B-2) 10 Washington Place W. 15TH STREET E. 15TH STREET 19 Barney Building (C-2) 34 Stuyvesant Street 3 75 Bobst Library (B-3) M 70 Washington Square South W. 14TH STREET E. 14TH STREET 62 Bonomi Family NYU Admissions Center (B-2) PATH 27 West 4th Street 5 6 4 50 Bookstore and Computer Store (B-2) 726 Broadway W. 13TH STREET E. 13TH STREET THIRD AVENUE FIRST AVENUE FIRST 16 Brittany Hall (B-2) SIXTH AVENUE FIFTH AVENUE UNIVERSITY PLACE AVENUE SECOND 55 East 10th Street 9 7 8 15 Bronfman Center (B-2) 7 East 10th Street W. 12TH STREET E. 12TH STREET BROADWAY Broome Street Residence (not on map) 10 FOURTH AVE 12 400 Broome Street 13 11 40 Brown Building (B-2) W. 11TH STREET E. 11TH STREET 29 Washington Place 32 Cantor Film Center (B-2) 36 East 8th Street 14 15 16 46 Card Center (B-2) W. 10TH STREET E. 10TH STREET 7 Washington Place 17 2 Carlyle Court (B-1) 18 25 Union Square West 19 10 Casa Italiana Zerilli-Marimò (A-1) W. -
Chapter 2: Project Alternatives
Chapter 2: Project Alternatives A. INTRODUCTION Numerous alternatives have been developed and analyzed for a new Second Avenue Subway since the project was first conceived nearly 75 years ago. Although routes continued to evolve during those seven decades, three major plans were developed: a 1929 plan with an alignment under Second Avenue and Water Street, 1940s plans with a similar alignment to the 1929 plan but with additional connections to the Nassau Street Line and the Manhattan Bridge, and a 1968 plan (also along Second Avenue and Water Street), which was partially constructed in East Harlem and the Lower East Side in the late 1970s before construction was suspended because of New York City’s fiscal situation at the time. Most recently, MTA/NYCT undertook an extensive Major Investment Study (MIS) and Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), published in 1999, that analyzed a wide range of possible alternatives to ease transit problems on Manhattan’s East Side. That study, known as the Manhattan East Side Transit Alternatives (MESA) Study, was undertaken in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the MIS process established by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), now the Transportation Efficiency Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21). For more information on the process and the extensive public outreach effort for the MESA Study, see Chapter 4, “Public Outreach and Review Process.” The MIS/DEIS evaluated a large number of possible alternatives, considering the project’s goals and objectives, -
Clinton Independent. VOL
lOOO FINQER RIMQS TO CHOOSE FROM AT ALLISON’S JEWELRY STORE. Clinton Independent. VOL. XXXV.—NO. I ST. JOHNS, MICH., THURSDAY, DECEMBER 6, 1900. WHOLE NO.—1778 Natbanlal J. Clarke vs. William Swarthout CIRCUIT COURT. et. al. Bill for Foreclosure. Fred R. Everett ON THANKSGIVING DAY for plaintiff; A. G. Shepard and Edwin H. THE BROTHERHOOD. PREMIUMS AWARDED THEIR fflRST BORN, Lyon for certain Defendants. Soiuo Inttrcitlni Cases Noticed For Trial Occurred * Very Pretty Weddlug at the Emma Gleason vs. Samuel B.Gleason. Bill Their Annual Meeting -Election of Officers To Exhibitors at the Poultry and Pet Stock The News Flashed Over the Wires Freni at the December Term, Now In Session. for Divorce. Fedewa A Walbrldge for plain and a Royal Banquet. Home of Mr. end Mrs. J. H. Wolcott. Show, According to Points Scored. tiff; Spaulding, Norton A Dooilng for de- Denver to at. Johns, a Child Is Born. The December term of the Circuit feudaut. The regular annual meeting of the The home of Mr. and Mrs. J. S. Wol The following is a list of the awards Mr. and Mrs. Geo. 8 . Oorbit received Job Naldrett vs. George E. Bliss. Hill of senior and junior chapters of the Broth cott was the scene of a very pretty made by James A. Tucker, the expert Court for Clinton county, with Judge Complaint. Spaulding. Norton A Dooilng a telegram from Denver, Col., on Mon erhood of St. Andrew, of St. John ’s event last Thursday afternoon when judge at tbe Poultry and Pet Stock day morning last, date Dec. -
Landmarks Preservation Commission August 9, 2011, Designation List 446 LP-2466
Landmarks Preservation Commission August 9, 2011, Designation List 446 LP-2466 CITIZENS SAVINGS BANK, 58 Bowery (aka 54-58 Bowery, 150 Canal Street), Manhattan. Built: 1922-24; architect, Clarence W. Brazer. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 202, Lot 18 in part consisting of the land underneath the 1922-24 building. On March 22, 2011, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Citizens Savings Bank and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 3). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Four people spoke in favor of designation, including representatives of the Historic Districts Council, Bowery Alliance of Neighbors, and New York Landmarks Conservancy. Summary The monumental Beaux-Arts style building at the southwest corner of the Bowery and Canal Street was designed in 1922 by the respected architect Clarence W. Brazer (1880-1956) for the Citizens Savings Bank and completed in 1924. Chartered by the State of New York in 1860 to provide banking services to the small depositor, the Citizens Savings Bank moved to this location in 1862. The bank’s business increased throughout the 19th century and by the 1920s bank officials determined that a larger building was required. During a two year period, construction took place “under, around and over the existing building”1 to avoid disrupting daily operations of the bank. The Citizens Savings Bank is a fine example of the Beaux-Arts style bank building of the late 19th and early 20th century. -
Union Square South Hotel Special Permit by New York City Department of City Planning
January 21, 2020 Recommendation on ULURP Application C 200102 ZMM and N 200107 ZRM– Union Square South Hotel Special Permit By New York City Department of City Planning PROPOSED ACTION New York City Department of City Planning (DCP) seeks multiple land use actions to facilitate the extension of the existing Special Union Square District (SUSD) to include a new sub-district to the south of Union Square (Sub-district B, also referred to herein as the Project Area). The existing Union Square Special District would become Sub-district A. Within the proposed Sub- district B, new hotel development, conversions, or enlargements would require a City Planning Commission special permit. The purpose of this application is to ensure that future hotel development supports the varying contexts of the mixed-use neighborhood south of Union Square. BACKGROUND According to DCP, in 1961, the Project Area was mapped predominately as a C6-1 district, with a portion of University Place mapped as a Cl-7 district. In November 1984, the City Planning Commission approved the creation of the Special Union Square District (C 841005 ZMM). Prior to approval, land use surrounding Union Square was predominantly commercial, consisting of office buildings with ground floor retail. Residential uses were sparse, with only three residential buildings fronting on the Square. In response to these issues, DCP proposed creating the special district and increasing density to encourage the development of mixed residential and commercial buildings on underutilized or vacant lots. Specifically, while the zoning map amendment from a C6-1 to a C6-4 district increased the overall allowable Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to 10, a provision of the special district limited commercial FAR to 6 while maintaining residential FAR at 10.