DOCSLIB.ORG

Xxxi BIBLIOGRAPHY a Alton WG Malpractise

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BIBLIOGRAPHY A Alton W.G. Malpractise (1977) American College Legal Dynamics of Medical Encounters Legal Medicine (1991) Amundsen D.W. "The Liability of the Physician in Roman Law" International Symposium on Society, Medicine And Law (edited by Karplus) (1973) 17 Aronstam P. Freedom of Contract, Consumer Protection and the Law (1979) Aronstam P. "Unconscionable Contracts the South African Solution?" 1979 42 THRHR 18 Arterburn N.F. "The Origin and First Test of Public Callings" University Of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 75 (1927) 4111 Atiyah P.S. An Introduction to the Law of Contract 2d ed. (1995) Atiyah P.S. The Rise and fall of Freedom of Contract (1979) B Beale K. "Unfair Contract terms Act 1977" British Journal of Law And Society Vol. 5 No 1 (1978) 114 at 115 Beatson J. Anson's Law of Contract (2002) Beatson J. and Friedman D. Good Faith and Fault in Contractual Law (1995) Benatar S.R. "The changing doctor-patient relationship and the new medical ethics" SA Journal of Continuing Medical Education Vol. 5 April (1987) Berkhouwer C. and Vorstman L.D. De Aansprakelijkheid van de Medicus voor Beroepsfouten door Hem en Zijn Helpers Gemaakt (1950) Bertolet M.M. and Goldsmith L.S. Hospital Liability Law and Practice (1987) Beauchamp T.L. and Childress J.F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics (1994) Bhana N. and Pieterse J.M. "Towards a reconciliation of contract law and Constitutional values: Brisley and Afrox Revised 2005 123 SALJ 865 Bianco E.A. and Hirsh H.L. "Consent to and refusal of medical treatment" Published in American College of Legal Medicine - Legal Medicine (1991) Bisbin S.B. McMenamin J.P. Granville R.L. "Competency, Capability and Immunity" Published in American College of Legal Medicine - Legal Medicine (1991) Black H.C. Black's Law Dictionary (1979) Blake "The World's Law in one County: The South African Constitutional Court's use of International Law" 1998 SALJ 668 Boberg P.Q.R. "A Chapter of Accidents", Businessman's Law June (1976) 183-184 Boberg P.Q.R. The Law of Delict (1984) Boberg P.Q.R. "Liability for omissions" 1982 11 BML 194 Bohlen "Consent as Affecting Civil Liability to Breaches of the Peace" 1924 Col. L. Rev 819 Bohlen F.H. "Voluntary Assumption of Risk" 1910 20 Hard. L Rev 20 Bolger R.R. "The Contract of Adhesion: A Comparison of Theory And Practice" 20 AM J Comp 53 (1972) Borrie G. "Legislative and Administrative Controls Over standard forms of contract in England" JBL (1978) 317 xxxi Botha H. "International law in the Constitutional order" 1995 SAYIL Botha H. "The values and principles underlying the 1993 Constitution" 1994 9 SAPL 233 Botha and Carpenter "The Constitutional attack on Private Law: Are the fears well founded?" 1996 THRHR 126 Bouvier Law Dictionary 1958 613 Brand D. "A Review of Important cases and International Developments relating to economic and social rights" ESR Review Vol. 1, No 1 March 1998 Brand D. "Disclaimers in hospital admission contracts and constitutional Health right: Afrox Healthcare v Strydom" ESR Review Vol. 3 No 2 September 2002 University of Western Cape Brazier M. Medicine, Patients and the Law (1992) Brazier M. Street on Torts (1993) Brownsword R. Adams J.N. "The Unfair Contract Terms Act: A decade of discretion" 1988 Law Quarterly Review 1 Braxton De Legibus Anglia 1250-1258 A.D. Buckland Textbook of Roman law from Augustus to Justinian (1950) 556 Burns R. Legacies in Ethics and Medicine (1997) Burchell J.M. & Schaffer R.P. "Liability of Hospitals for Medical Negligence" 1977 BML 109 Burton S.J. Contract Law Selected Source Materials (1995) 4ff Brownword R. Contract Law: Themes for the twenty century. (200) C Calamari J.D. Perillo J.M. The Law of Contracts (1987) 429 Carmi A. Hospital Law (1988) Carstens P.A. "The Locality Rule in Medical Malpractice" 1990 De Rebus 421 Carstens P.A. "Die Strafregtelike en Deliktuele Aanspreeklikheid van die Geneesheer op Grond van Nalatigheid" (Unpublished LLD Thesis, University of Pretoria, 1996) Carstens P.A. & Kok A. "An Assessment of the use of disclaimers by South African hospitals in view of constitutional demand, foreign law and medico-legal considerations" (2003) 18 SAPR/PL 430 18 Carstens P.A. "Prophylaxis against medical negligence: A practical approach" 1988 De Rebus May 345 Carstens P.A. and Pearmain D. Foundational Principles of South African Medical Law (2007) Castiglioni Medicine (1975) Chapman C.B. Physicians, Law & Ethics (1984) Chaskalson M., Kentridge J., Klaasen J., Marcus G., Spitz D., Woolman S. Constitutional Law in South Africa (1996) Chaskalson A. "The Impact of Seven Years of Constitionalism on Law and Government in South Africa" http/kas/org/za/publications/seminar reports/constitution.co.zo and % law % co.za/chaskalson. pdf Chaskalson M. "Human dignity as a foundational value of our constitutional order" (2000) 16 SAJHR 193 Chaskalson et al Constitutional Law in South Africa (1996) Cheadle M. and Davis D. "The Application of the 1996 Constitution in the xxxii Private Law Sphere" 1997 SAJHR 44 Cheadle et al South African Constitutional Law: The Bill of Rights (2002) 698 Cheshire G.C., Fifoot C.H.S. and Furmston M.P. Law of Contract (1996) Chitty Chitty on Contracts (1999) Par 1018 Christie R.H. The Law of Contract in South Africa (2007) Christie R.H. The Law of Contract and the Bill of Rights Bill of Rights Compendium (1997) Cilliers H.S. and Benade M.L. Company Law (1982) Claassen C.J. Dictionary of Legal Words and Phrases Vol. 2 D-I (2003) Claassen C.J. & Verschoor T. Medical Negligence in South Africa (1992) Coote B. Exception Clauses (1964) Cockerell A. "Rainbow jurisprudence" 1996 SAJHR 1 Cockerell A. "Private Law and the Bill of Rights: A Threshold Issue of horizontality" Bill of Rights Compendium (1997) Collins H. The Law of Contract (1997) Corbin A.L. "Corbin on Contracts" 872 12 AM Jur. Contracts 683 Corder H. Judges at work: The Role and attitudes of the South African Appellate Judiciary 1910-50 (1984) Cronje-Retief M. "The Legal Liability of Hospitals" (Unpublished LLD Thesis, Orange Free State University (2000) Curran W.J. Health Law (1998) Currie I. "Bill of Rights Jurisprudence" 1999 Annual Survey of South African Law 54 Currie I. and De Waal J. The Bill of Rights Handbook 5ed (2005) D Dada M.D & McQuiod-Mason D.J Introduction to Medico-legal Practice (2001) Davis D. Democracy and Deliberation: Transformation and the South African Legal Order (1999) 162 Delport H. "Exemption Clauses: The English Solution" 1979 De Rebus 641 Dimatteo L.A. Equitable Law of Contracts: Standards And Principles (2001) 168 Deutsch, S. Unfair Contracts (1977) Devenish, G.E. Interpretation of Statutes (1992) Devenish, G.E. A Commentary on the South African Constitution (1998) De Vos P "Pious wishes or directly enforceable human rights?" Social Justice and economic rights in South Africa's Constitution 1997 SAJHR 67 De Vos P "A Bridge too far? History as context in the interpretation of The South African Constitution" 2001 17 SAJHR 1 De Wet, J.C. and Swanepoel, H.L. Die Suid-Afrikaanse Strafreg (1985) De Wet, J.C. and Van Wyk, A.H. Die Suid-Afrikaanse Kontraktereg en Handelsreg (1992) Dimatteo L.A. Equitable Law of Contracts: Standards and Principles (2001) Dönges T.E. The Liability for Safe Carriage of Goods in Roman Dutch Law (1928) 112 Dugard J. International Law: A South African Perspective (2000) Dugard J. Human Rights and the South African Legal Order (1978) Dugard J. "The role of international law in interpreting The Bill of Rights" (1994) SAJHR 20 Dugdale A.M. and Stanton K.M. Professional Negligence (1989) 90 xxxiii Du Plessis L.M. "Good Faith and Equality in the Law of Contract" (2002) THRHR 397 Du Plessis L.M. "A History of Remissio Mercedes and Related Legal Institutions" A doctoral thesis Erasmus University Rotterdam (2003) E Edelstein A. Legacies in Ethics and Medicine (1977) Esser J.H. "Who cares? Reflections on Business in Healthcare" (Unpublished LLM Thesis, University of Stellenbosch (2001) F Farlam I. and Hathaway the textbook on the South African law of contract (1979) Ficarra, B.J. "Ethics in Legal Medicine" A Chapter in Sanbar et al (1995) 147 Legal Medicine Fitzherbert Natura Brevium (1534) Flamm M.B. "Healthcare Provider as a Defendant" A Chapter published in American College of Legal Medicine Legal Medicine (1995) 119 Flemming, J.E. The Law of Torts (1992) and (1997) Fletcher, A. "The Role of Good Faith in the South African Law" (1997) Responsa Meridiana 1 Forsyth C.F. In danger of their talents: A study of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of South Africa From 1950-80 (1985) Frier B.W. A Casebook on the Roman law of Delict (1967) Fuller L.L. and Eisenberg M.A. Basic Contract Law (1981) Furrow B.R. et al Health Law: Cases, Materials and Problems (1997) Furmston M.P. Law of Contract (1999) Fridman G.H.L. The Law of Contract in Canada (1999) G Gane The selective Voet being the Commentary on the Pandects (1955-1958) Giesen D. International Medical Malpractice Law (1988) Giesen D. "From Paternalism to Self-determination to shared decision-making" (1988) Acta Juridica 107 Ginsburg N.H., Thornhill M.C. and Gambarella S.C. Kahn S.J. "Contractual Revisions to Medical Malpractice Liability" Law of Contemporary Problems (1986) 253 Glover G.B. "Good Faith and Procedural Unfairness in Contract" 1998 THRHR 328 Gordley J. The Philosophical Origin of Modern Contract Doctrine (1991) Gordon, Turner and Price Medical Jurisprudence (1953) Grasswell R. and Swart A. Foundations of Contract Law (1994) 15 Green "Assumed risk as a defence" 1961 LA.L.
Recommended publications
  • Implied Terms: the Foundation in Good Faith and Fair Dealing LSE Research Online URL for This Paper: Version: Accepted Version

    Implied Terms: the Foundation in Good Faith and Fair Dealing LSE Research Online URL for This Paper: Version: Accepted Version

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by LSE Research Online Implied terms: the foundation in good faith and fair dealing LSE Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/101641/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Collins, Hugh (2014) Implied terms: the foundation in good faith and fair dealing. Current Legal Problems, 67 (1). 297 - 331. ISSN 0070-1998 https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuu002 Reuse Items deposited in LSE Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the LSE Research Online record for the item. [email protected] https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/ Implied Terms: the Foundation in Good Faith and Fair Dealing Hugh Collins* Confusion as much as controversy permeates the subject of implied terms in contracts. Controversy always surrounds their purpose and legitimacy, for implied terms lie on the point of friction between the basic disposition of the common law to respect freedom of contract and the regulatory impulse to prevent the worst instances of market exploitation and opportunism. Implied terms permit judicial intervention whilst maintaining the appearance of conformity to the idea of respecting the parties’ self-determination. Confusion now reigns as well, however, for there is no consensus on the legal tests for the introduction of implied terms into contracts, even to the extent of losing them altogether within the nebula of the interpretation of contracts.
  • (A) Forte Prelims

    (A) Forte Prelims

    GOOD FAITH IN CONTRACT AND PROPERTY GOOD FAITH IN CONTRACT AND PROPERTY Edited by A. D. M. Forte OXFORD – PORTLAND OREGON 1999 Hart Publishing Oxford and Portland, Oregon Published in North America (US and Canada) by Hart Publishing c/o International Specialized Book Services 5804 NE Hassalo Street Portland, Oregon 97213-3644 USA Distributed in the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg by Intersentia, Churchillaan 108 B2900 Schoten Antwerpen Belgium Distributed in Australia and New Zealand by Federation Press John St Leichhardt NSW 2000 © The contributors severally 1999 The contributors have asserted their right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, to be identified as the authors of this work Hart Publishing Ltd is a specialist legal publisher based in Oxford, England. To order further copies of this book or to request a list of other publications please write to: Hart Publishing Ltd, Salter’s Boatyard, Oxford OX1 4LB Telephone: +44 (0)1865 245533 or Fax: +44 (0)1865 794882 e-mail: [email protected] British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data Available ISBN 1 84113–047–8 Typeset by Hope Services (Abingdon) Ltd. Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by Biddles Ltd, Guildford and Kings Lynn. CONTENTS Table of Cases xi Table of Legislation and Delegated Legislation xix Table of International Conventions and Principles xxiii Preface The Right Honourable the Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Lord President xiv 1. Introduction 1 A.D.M. Forte 2. Good Faith in the Scots Law of Contract: An Undisclosed Principle? 5 Hector L. MacQueen 3. Good Faith: A Matter of Principle? 39 Ewan McKendrick 4.
  • The Negotiation Stage

    The Negotiation Stage

    Part I The negotiation stage M02_HALS8786_02_SE_C02.indd 17 7/19/12 3:47 PM M02_HALS8786_02_SE_C02.indd 18 7/19/12 3:47 PM 2 Negotiating the contract Introduction Lord Atkin once remarked that: ‘Businessmen habitually . trust to luck or the good faith of the other party . .’.1 This comment2 provides more than an insight into the motivations of businessmen. It also implicitly acknowledges a limitation of the common law in policing the activities of contractors: the law no more ensures the good faith of your contractual partner than it guarantees your good fortune in business dealings. However, this might not be an accurate description of the purpose of the law relating to pre-contractual negotiations. In an important judgment that was notable for its attempt to place the legal principles under discussion in a broader doctrinal and comparative context Bingham LJ in the Court of Appeal observed that:3 In many civil law systems, and perhaps in most legal systems outside the common law world, the law of obligations recognises and enforces an overriding principle that in making and carrying out contracts parties should act in good faith . It is in essence a principle of fair and open dealing . English law has, characteristically, committed itself to no such overriding principle but has developed piecemeal solutions to demonstrated problems of unfairness. This judgment makes it clear that the gap between civil and common-law jurisdictions is exaggerated by observations at too high a level of generality. While it is true to say that the common law does not explicitly adopt a principle of good faith, it is as obviously untrue to say that the common law encourages bad faith.
  • Misrepresentation

    Misrepresentation

    5 – MISREPRESENTATION Contract law does not have specific principle requiring disclosure, but there are certain cases where it is needed. Where there is misrepresentation, non-disclosure or mistake, the possible responses are: 1. The contract is void ab initio 2. The contract is voidable via rescission 3. The contract can be rectified to correct the mistake (see previous supervisions) 4. Damages can be awarded to remedy the wrong Where the issue is a statement made in course of negotiations, the remedy will depend on classification of the statement: 1. Contractual term (a ‘warranty’) – damages for breach of contract, possibly termination for breach (depending on nature of term) 2. Misrepresentation – rescission (subject to bars), and potential tort or Misrepresentation Act 1967 damages At one point, misrepresentation could be ground for rescission and damages were available only under the tort of deceit if there was fraud; no damages for innocent misrep. In Hedley Byrne v Heller (1964), HOL made clear breach of the DOC to avoid negligent misstatement could give rise to damages. 1967 Misrepresentation Act extended damages under s 2(1) to the case of misrepresentation inducing a contract where the representor cannot prove absence of negligence or bad faith. This made inference of collateral contract less necessary, although still necessary because representations as to future are harder to fit in scope of Act. Categorising statements made in negotiations Mere puffs These have no legal effect, they mean nothing - Dimmock v Hallett (1866)
  • The Basis of Contractual Duties of Good Faith

    The Basis of Contractual Duties of Good Faith

    Paul Davis Printer's Version 2.0 (Do Not Delete) 5/25/2019 12:31 PM THE BASIS OF CONTRACTUAL DUTIES OF GOOD FAITH PAUL S DAVIES* ABSTRACT. This article considers the basis of duties of good faith where not expressly provided for by the parties. It analyses the different approaches adopted in Canada and England and Wales, and assesses whether good faith is part of an ‘irreducible core’ of contract law or whether it should only be introduced into a contract through the mechanism of implied terms. It is suggested that the latter approach is preferable, and that (in the commercial context at least) courts should be wary about imposing duties of good faith on parties who did not provide for such duties. Well-advised commercial parties who wish particular duties to govern their relationship should be encouraged to stipulate such duties expressly in their contract. KEYWORDS: Contract, good faith, implied terms, Bhasin v Hrynew, Yam Seng, interpretation, commercial law. In Bhasin v Hrynew, Cromwell J rightly observed that “[t]he jurisprudence is not always very clear about the source of the good faith obligations found in [contract] cases”.1 Such *Professor of Commercial Law, University College London. I am grateful for the comments of participants at the very stimulating conference on “Good Faith in Contract” held at the Université de Montréal in May 2018 where an earlier version of this article was presented, and especially to Matthew Harrington for the invitation. Even earlier versions of this article were presented at a Chancery Bar Association seminar on “Contractual Discretions” held at the Inner Temple, London, in March 2018, and at a workshop on “Contract Interpretation: A Comparative Discussion” held at the University of Lund, Sweden, in April 2018 (following the very kind 1 Paul Davis Printer's Version 2.0 (Do Not Delete) 5/25/2019 12:31 PM 2 JOURNAL OF COMMONWEALTH LAW [Vol.
  • The Role of Good Faith in the Performance of Commercial Contracts

    The Role of Good Faith in the Performance of Commercial Contracts

    Good faith, or a good fake? The role of good faith in the performance of commercial contracts Edward Elvin A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree of Bachelor of Laws (with Honours) at the University of Otago October 2015 Acknowledgements Thank you to my supervisor, Jess Palmer. Your patience and support throughout a busy year have been invaluable. Without your encouragement I doubt whether these words would have made it onto the page. Thank you to my awesome family for always being willing to pick up the phone and lend and ear when I needed one. I must give specific mention to my mum, Fiona, and my sister, Rebecca. Your edits and suggestions added polish and direction when I needed it. Finally, thank you to my friends for making law school such a pleasure. Thanks Adam, Emily and Morgan for being rock-solid. 1 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 3 CHAPTER 2: THE CURRENT ROLE OF GOOD FAITH. .................................................. 6 2.1 Recent Common Law Development ................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Good faith in International Sales Law ........................................................................................ 11 2.3 Good faith in civil law ....................................................................................................................... 12 2.4 The role of Good faith in New Zealand: ....................................................................................
  • Implied Terms: the Foundation in Good Faith and Fair Dealing LSE Research Online URL for This Paper: Version: Accepted Version

    Implied Terms: the Foundation in Good Faith and Fair Dealing LSE Research Online URL for This Paper: Version: Accepted Version

    Implied terms: the foundation in good faith and fair dealing LSE Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/101641/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Collins, Hugh ORCID: 0000-0002-2142-2208 (2014) Implied terms: the foundation in good faith and fair dealing. Current Legal Problems, 67 (1). 297 - 331. ISSN 0070-1998 https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuu002 Reuse Items deposited in LSE Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the LSE Research Online record for the item. [email protected] https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/ Implied Terms: the Foundation in Good Faith and Fair Dealing Hugh Collins* Confusion as much as controversy permeates the subject of implied terms in contracts. Controversy always surrounds their purpose and legitimacy, for implied terms lie on the point of friction between the basic disposition of the common law to respect freedom of contract and the regulatory impulse to prevent the worst instances of market exploitation and opportunism. Implied terms permit judicial intervention whilst maintaining the appearance of conformity to the idea of respecting the parties’ self-determination. Confusion now reigns as well, however, for there is no consensus on the legal tests for the introduction of implied terms into contracts, even to the extent of losing them altogether within the nebula of the interpretation of contracts.
  • The Basis of Contractual Duties of Good Faith

    The Basis of Contractual Duties of Good Faith

    THE BASIS OF CONTRACTUAL DUTIES OF GOOD FAITH Paul S Davies* In Bhasin v Hrynew, Cromwell J rightly observed that “[t]he jurisprudence is not always very clear about the source of the good faith obligations found in [contract] cases”.1 Such confusion is lamentable. This paper will consider the basis of obligations of good faith in circumstances where there is no express term of the contract which provides for good faith performance of the contract. Twenty years ago, Sir Thomas Bingham described good faith as “[t]he most important contractual issue of our time”.2 In the recent past, some pressure towards recognising a general obligation of good faith has been exerted on the law of England and Wales by drives towards a greater degree of harmonisation within the European Union.3 As a result of the United Kingdom’s decision to leave the EU, such external influences are no longer likely to have much significance. But instead of looking outwards towards civilian jurisdictions, there is now a greater push towards an inwards-facing view of good faith as intrinsic to the very essence of contract and inherent in all contracts. It is notable that debates concerning good faith are of increasing prominence in all major common law jurisdictions.4 * Professor of Commercial Law, University College London. I am grateful for the comments of participants at the very stimulating conference on “Good Faith in Contract” held at the Université de Montréal in May 2018 where an earlier version of this article was presented, and especially to Matthew Harrington for the invitation.
  • The Shrouded Acceptance of Good Faith As a General Rule of Contract Law on the British Isles Jan Van Dunné*

    The Shrouded Acceptance of Good Faith As a General Rule of Contract Law on the British Isles Jan Van Dunné*

    On a Clear Day, You Can See the Continent—The Shrouded Acceptance of Good Faith as a General Rule of Contract Law on the British Isles Jan van Dunné* Civil law; Common law; Comparative law; Contracts; France; Good faith Introduction With its decisions in Yam Seng and Mid Essex Hospital the High Court has given a striking contribution to the discussion that developed over the last decades about what role the civil law concept of “good faith” may take in the contract law of a common law jurisdiction such as that of the UK.1 Although in the last case the decision was overturned by the Court of Appeal in 2013, with the first case discussed in an obiter, illustrating the sensitive character of this issue, the decisions raised much comment in the legal press. In particular the Queen’s Bench April 2013 decision in Yam Seng, accepting good faith as a source of contractual obligations, has drawn the attention of most contract lawyers, in the UK and abroad. Was this the announcement of a new spring, English common law joining its civil law sisters in accepting the good faith principle as the leading standard of conduct in the law of contract? It is perhaps no coincidence that the case was about the sale of fragrances under a distribution contract. A remarkable feature of this new development, at least to a civil law observer, is that among a majority of positive reactions of London solicitor’s firms in their digital Newsletters, discussing the consequences of the Yam Seng decision for legal practice, some firms advised clients to consider the use of a clause explicitly excluding the application of the duty of good faith in future contracts.
  • Formation: Offer and Acceptance

    Formation: Offer and Acceptance

    Formation: Offer and Acceptance How do we know if a contract exists? Þ Offer and acceptance Þ Consideration Þ Intention to be legally bound Þ Certainty of the contract and its terms Þ Some contracts need to be in a certain form Þ Capacity to enter into contract, e.g. a young person cannot enter into a contract Offer: Intention to contract is unequivocal. Agreement: a consensus (meeting of the minds) amongst all parties aBout the arrangement. There must Be objective evidence of the agreement à Not suBjective, there is no agreement if you don’t say or indicate clear agreement/undertaking. Making a commitment: There is an immediate readiness to Be Bound/undertake obligation/assume responsiBility à e.g. language showing commitment or conduct ----- Invitation to Treat (Invitation to Make Offers) Harvey v Facey [1893] Provision of information, not an offer. Fisher v Bell [1961] Shop window invites offers But is not an offer itself. Only providing an example of things they sell, could Be out of stock which is unfair on the shop. A shop is a place of Bargaining, not of definite sales, and you can haggle about the price (outdated in modern conditions). ‘Snapping-up’ cases Ex. Online shopping at Argos The price + description of a TV set is put on the weBsite £2.99. Customer Bought 200 units, and Argos confirmed payment + delivery. Q: Is the weBsite the same as the shop window? ‘Add to Basket’ = offer, payment confirmation = acceptance One party knows/should have known aBout the other’s mistake. In selling, the customer makes the offer.
  • The Three Ages of Utmost Good Faith

    The Three Ages of Utmost Good Faith

    4 Th e Th ree Ages of Utmost Good Faith HOWARD BENNETT I. Introduction It is axiomatic that insurance contracts have a diff erent underlying ethos from other contracts, a diff erence that is conveniently and pithily encapsulated by the concept of ‘ utmost good faith ’ . General contract law does not advocate bad faith, but insurance contract law has higher expec- tations. Th e prime manifestation of these expectations lies in the rules that attach to contract negotiation. General contract law requires statements made to be true but aff ords each nego- tiating party a largely free choice as to whether to make any statements. 1 Insurance contract law imposes a duty to speak and equates silence with a false statement. Th e resulting duty of disclosure has understandably attracted considerable attention given the onerous nature of the obligation imposed on the assured and, historically at least, the strictness of the remedies for breach. Until relatively recently, however, comparatively little focus was placed on an underlying, pervasive idea or doctrine of utmost good faith. Th is chapter is concerned with utmost good faith in that broader sense. Th e chapter considers utmost good faith from a chronological perspective, distinguishing three ages in its evolution. Th e fi rst age extends from the earliest reference in insurance contract law to utmost good faith throughout an initial period during which its impact was untrammelled by any statutory intervention. Th e second age is the period of nearly 110 years during which utmost good faith was, in part at least, the subject of sections 17 – 20 of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 as originally draft ed.