DOCSLIB.ORG

Land Owner Rights Forest Service Road Right-Of-Way Access Declared As a Forest Service Road

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Land Owner Rights Forest Service Road Right-of-Way Access declared as a Forest Service road. FSRs are used to provide access to provincially managed forests on Crown land. Introduction While most FSRs do not impact private land, there are situations where a road must cross private Providing access to Crown land for property because of geophysical approved logging operations is an restrictions or road design important responsibility of the requirements. When this occurs, Ministry of Forests. Legal forest the ministry establishes a FSR access is provided in accordance right-of-way. with the Forest Act, with consideration being given to long- A right-of-way is a strip of land on term fibre flow, employment, which a FSR exists or will be revenue for the Crown, and constructed to provide access for sustainable management of the approved logging operations. province’s forest resource. The ministry seeks to provide access for timber harvesting via the route that best satisfies Legal Access environmental, regulatory and socio-economic expectations. The process for securing legal access In exploring various rou t e to Crown forest land throu g h al t e r natives, one of the key factors private land right-of-way is guided taken into account is that of land by the Fo r est Act and other fores t ownership. The objective of the management priorities of the mi n i s t r y in this reg a r d is to locate Cr own. Under the Act, regional or Fo r est Service roads so they do not district Forests staff, in consultation conflict with private prop e rt y . with ministry engineering personnel, select the most appropriate rou t e A Forest Service road (FSR) is a road to access Crown timber. There are constructed, modified or maintained two main alternatives for gaining by the Ministry of Forests under legal access: provisions of the Forest Act or is page 2 1.Right-of-way agreements for An agreement for temporary temporary access through access of three years or longer is means of a contractual one of two types. According to the agreement with the land specific situation, an agree m e n t owner. may req u i r e use of only a porti o n of the land. In these situations, a 2.Dedication of right-of-way, su r vey is req u i r ed to identify the which means that the Ministry ar ea to be used and access is of Forests acquires ownership limited to the surveyed area. In of the private land or a portion other situations, the right-of-way thereof. Under section 121 ag r eement allows use of various of the Forest Act, this option pa r ts of the entire prop e r ty and no provides permanent access legal survey is req u i re d . through the Crown’s negotiation for ownership Tem p o r a r y access for less than of the land. th r ee years falls into two categories. One category applies in a situation where there is no Temporary Access: existing road and the volume of timber typically is small. In these instances, a legal survey is not Th e re are diff e rent options req u i r ed and the ministry arra n g e s under contractual right-of-way the agreement with the prop e rt y a g reements, where temporary ow n e r . The other situation applies access is re q u i red and the land is when there is an existing road and retained by the owner. A key a Small Business Forest Enterprise aspect of these alternatives is the Pr ogram (SBFEP) agreement is in length of time for which place. The small scale private sector t e m p o r a ry access is re q u i red. In operator can arrange the situations where the agre e m e n t contractual agreement with the for temporary access is for thre e land owner, using a ministry years or longer, the agre e m e n t contract form. must be re g i s t e red with the Land Title Office. Agreements for less Another alternative for access than three years of access do not involves situations where the land n o rmally re q u i re re g i s t r a t i o n . page 3 is owned and retained by a well-established corporation, with the expectation that corporate ownership will be retained for a long time. The mi n i s t r y can arrange a right-of-way agreement with the owner, with no obligation for a legal survey or registration in the Land Title Offi c e . Temporary Access Alternatives Access for three years or longer 1A 1B legal survey no legal survey right-of-way agreement right-of-way agreement on portion of property over entire property register in Land Title Office register in Land Title Office Access for less than three years 2A 2B (no existing road) (existing road) no legal survey SBFEP agreement right-of-way agreement no registration with Land Title Offi c e 3 Corporate Owner (land retained by corporation) no legal survey long-term right of way agreement no registration with Land Title Office Acquisition investigations will be by Dedication undertaken on the location of the proposed access. When the most appropriate rou t e • The owner is next provided with to access Crown timber cros s e s the results of an engineering private land because no other road location survey. The survey viable alternative exists, the district confirms the road’s location and regional managers may within the property, its authorize right-of-way acquisition proximity to buildings or other to facilitate forest access. improvements and provides some indication of the impact The ministry determines the of the road on the value of the optimal method of securing access property. A legal survey follows, th r ough analysis of many factors which describes the position such as the urgency to gain legal and extent of the proposed access, length of time for which right-of-way in legal terms and access is req u i r ed, volume of timber provides a reference plan for to be accessed, volume of traffic on land title registration purposes. the road, secondary industrial users, potential for non-industrial use, • Next, the reference plan is used funding, costs, legal access by a property negotiator with al t e r natives, licensee agree m e n t s , the Ministry of Forests to justification for the acquisition and estimate the impact of the road the disposition or pref e r ence of the on the value of the property. land owner. Consideration of these This estimate includes the factors may direct ministry offi c i a l s impact of any improvements on to request dedication of legal access. the property, such as buildings or roads, that cannot be successfully removed from the The Steps: right-of-way. This estimate may involve property appraisals or other specialized studies. • After determining that a • The next step occurs when the proposed Forest Service road property negotiator contacts may impact private property, the ministry notifies the property owner that further page 5 the land owner to explain the At the formal request of the acquisition process. At that ow n e r , the matter of time, the owner is provided compensation amount will be with a copy of the ref e r ence plan de t e r mined by the Exprop r i a t i o n and an estimate of Compensation Board. compensation required to offset 3. No agreement reached: the effects of right-of-way If no agreement can be reached acquisition on the utility and regarding dedication of the value of the property. The right-of-way and the owner has the opportunity to compensation level, the ministry seek clarification, ask questions may expropriate or legally take of the negotiator, and can possession of the land in the request an independent right-of-way pursuant to the property appraisal. Expropriation Act. There are three possible outcomes Compensation will be at this point: determined by the Expropriation Compensation 1. Owner agrees to offer:The Board upon the formal request offer letter and reference plan of the owner. are signed by the owner and property negotiator. When the Established in 1988, the plan for the right-of-way is Expropriation Compensation Board deposited in the appropriate Land Title Office, the owner’s is an independent agency with title to the land within the authority under the Expropriation right-of-way is removed or Act to determine the amount of extinguished and compensation compensation for expropriated land is paid to the land owner. and costs to be paid if there is a disagreement on these issues during 2. Owner agrees to dedicate the expropriation. Information about the land, but disputes compensation board and the act can be obtained by level: In this instance, the calling (250) 387-4321 or visiting owner may enter into an the board’s website at agr eement with the ministry that http://www.ecb.gov.bc.ca allows dedication of the right-of- way area, even though there is no agreement on compensation. page 6 Dedication Ministry determination of dedication option Initial contact with land owner Engineering road location survey Legal survey Property negotiator estimates land value Estimate provided to land owner Owner makes decision Accepts offer Agrees to dedication, No agreement, not compensation refer to ECB level and then refer to ECB Frequently Asked comparing the land owner’s entire Questions property with similar properties recently sold on the open market in the area.
Recommended publications
  • Right-Of-Way

    Right-Of-Way

    HD-1301 Chapter RIGHT-OF-WAY Subject General Information GENERAL: The procurement of right of way to widths that accommodate the construction, adequate drainage, and proper maintenance of the highway is a very important part of the overall project. Adequate right-of-way widths permit the construction of gentle slopes, resulting in more safety for the motorist and allowing easier and more economical maintenance. Traffic requirements, topography, environmental issues, utilities, land use, costs, intersection design, and extent of ultimate expansion influence the width of right of way for the complete development of a roadway. RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH: Right of way should be of sufficient width to accommodate construction and the continued maintenance and operation of the facility. Avoiding right-angle breaks in the right-of-way line and irregularities in widths facilitates maintenance operations and fencing and optimizes land use. Consider the use of curb-and-gutter sections in urbanized areas for the reduction of right-of-way widths and compatibility with adjacent development. The use of right of way, permanent easements, and temporary easements should be determined on a site-specific basis in order to facilitate the construction, operation, and maintenance of the facility and adjacent land use. Typically, permanent right of way should be acquired to the back edge of the berm on curb-and-gutter projects with easements used for that portion beyond the right of way for construction, operation, and maintenance of drainage structures. EASEMENTS: It is common practice to use two types of easements on proposed highway projects: temporary and permanent. Temporary Easement—A temporary easement is the use of a tract of land for a specified time duration (typically the duration of construction), with the land reverting to the owner’s exclusive use at the end of the period.
  • Aboriginal Title and Private Property John Borrows

    Aboriginal Title and Private Property John Borrows

    The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference Volume 71 (2015) Article 5 Aboriginal Title and Private Property John Borrows Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Citation Information Borrows, John. "Aboriginal Title and Private Property." The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference 71. (2015). http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr/vol71/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The uS preme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. Aboriginal Title and Private Property John Borrows* Q: What did Indigenous Peoples call this land before Europeans arrived? A: “OURS.”1 I. INTRODUCTION In the ground-breaking case of Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia2 the Supreme Court of Canada recognized and affirmed Aboriginal title under section 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982.3 It held that the Tsilhqot’in Nation possess constitutionally protected rights to certain lands in central British Columbia.4 In drawing this conclusion the Tsilhqot’in secured a declaration of “ownership rights similar to those associated with fee simple, including: the right to decide how the land will be used; the right of enjoyment and occupancy of the land; the right to possess the land; the right to the economic benefits of the land; and the right to pro-actively use and manage the land”.5 These are wide-ranging rights.
  • 2021 State of Utah Uniform Fine Schedule

    2021 State of Utah Uniform Fine Schedule

    2021 UNIFORM FINE SCHEDULE INTENT It is the intent of the Uniform Fine Schedule to assist the sentencing judge in determining the appropriate fine to be imposed as a condition of the sentence in a particular case and to minimize disparity in sentencing for similar offenses and offenders. This schedule is not intended to supplant or to minimize a court’s authority to impose a just sentence. APPLICABILITY These guidelines shall apply to all courts of record and not of record whenever a criminal fine may be imposed. In determining whether a fine is appropriate to impose as a condition of the sentence for a public offense, a judge should consider several factors, including aggravating and/or mitigating circumstances set forth in the Sentencing And Release Guidelines, Tab 6, the cumulative effect of probation conditions, and the ability of the defendant to pay. The amounts listed in the Uniform Fine Schedule may be used as a starting point for setting monetary bail as a condition of pretrial release, however, an individual’s ability to pay must be considered consistent with Appendix J of the Code of Judicial Administration. In those parking, traffic, and infraction cases where the defendant is not required to appear and is mailed a citation indicating the fine amount, pursuant to Utah Code of Judicial Administration Rule 4-701, the amount may be increased $50 if the defendant fails to appear or to pay within fourteen days after receiving the citation. The amount may be increased by an additional $75 if the defendant fails to appear or to pay within forty days after receiving the citation.
  • Law Enforcement & Legal Elements Necessary for Prosecution

    Law Enforcement & Legal Elements Necessary for Prosecution

    Partnership to Combat Critical Infrastructure Copper Theft Webinar Law Enforcement & Legal Elements Necessary for Prosecution February 28, 2012 Roxann M. Ryan, J.D., Ph.D. Iowa Department of Public Safety Division of Intelligence & Fusion Center The theft of copper and other precious metals is hardly new,1 although the targets have changed over time. As copper prices have reached all-time highs, burglars and thieves are accessing new sources of metal. The criminal charges available also have changed over time. In 2011, the Iowa legislature amended two statutes to specifically address the potential risk to public-utility critical infrastructure. What began as House File 299 during the 2011 Iowa legislative session became law on July 1, 2011. That legislation consisted of two primary initiatives: (1) Local ordinances are authorized.2 Municipalities and counties can pass ordinances to require salvage dealers to maintain complete records of their supplies. Failure to comply can result in a suspension or revocation of the salvage dealer’s permit or license. (2) Penalties are increased for trespass on public utility property.3 It is a class “D” felony to trespass on public utility property, which carries a sentence of up to 5 years in prison and a fine of $7500. The options for criminal charges include far more than these two additions. Copper thieves typically commit one or more of the following crimes: Burglary 713.6A. Burglary in the third degree 1. All burglary which is not burglary in the first degree or burglary in the The elements of Burglary are as second degree is burglary in the third degree.
  • Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum

    Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum

    Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum Spring, 1998 8 Duke Env L & Pol'y F 209 ECONOMIC INCENTIVES AND LEGAL TOOLS FOR PRIVATE SECTOR CONSERVATION Ian Bowles, * David Downes, ** Dana Clark, *** and Marianne Guerin-McManus **** * Vice President and Director of Policy Department, Conservation International. ** Senior Attorney with the Center for International Environmental Law. *** Senior Attorney with the Center for International Environmental Law. **** Director of Conservation Finance Program, Conservation International. SUMMARY: ... At the same time, public concern about environmental issues like clean drinking water, overconsumption of natural resources, and worldwide loss of tropical forests has grown explosively and led policymakers to devote more attention to these issues. ... In most jurisdictions, a conservation easement is created when the landowner transfers some or all rights to develop the property to a government agency or qualified conservation non-governmental organization (NGO); the landowner can maintain certain uses but cannot legally take actions inconsistent with the terms of the conservation easement. ... To encourage donations of conservation easements, a number of jurisdictions specifically provide that a conservation easement qualifies as a charitable contribution, enabling a landowner to deduct its value from her taxable income. ... This provision has proven to be a significant incentive for conservation of biodiversity. ... One method for capturing at least some of the many costs of timber extraction is a user fee. ... Recreation, though not as destructive as extractive resource development, has environmental consequences. ... When a landowner donates a conservation easement, or enters into a conservation agreement, ensure that the landowner's property is taxed at a rate according to its current market value (its value subject to the easement or the agreement), rather than its potential development value.
  • LAND TITLES the Following Is General Information About Land Titles

    LAND TITLES the Following Is General Information About Land Titles

    LAND TITLES The following is general information about land titles. It does not replace a lawyer’s advice about a specific legal problem. Everyone’s situation is different, so you may need to get legal help about your matter. Is all the land in the province owned by someone Courts will enforce those rights and make sure that others, or is some of the land public land? including governments, respect them. The Province owns about 35% of the land in Nova Scotia, and the rest of the land (about 65%) is owned privately, or by the federal Where a person does not have title to a specific piece of land, and municipal governments. The majority of the publicly owned they may be denied the opportunity to exercise these rights. land is managed by the Department of Natural Resources. This land is often referred to as Crown lands. Having title to land means that the landowner must comply with the legal obligations of land ownership. These obligations will Can people buy Crown lands or other provincial vary depending on where that land is located. In Nova Scotia, the lands? main legal responsibilities of landowners include paying municipal The Province has been working to buy more land, and does not property taxes and following land use bylaws. If you don’t pay taxes sell a great deal of the land it owns because the percentage and follow applicable laws, the consequences can be severe – you of public land ownership in Nova Scotia is small compared to may need to pay a fine or you could lose title to your land.
  • Right of Way Manual

    Right of Way Manual

    Right of Way Manual Office of Land Management Updated 07/26/2018 General Index 100 Pre-Acquisition 200 Appraisals 300 Acquisition 400 Relocation Assistance Program 500 Property Management 800 Special Procedures Table of Contents 100 Pre-Acquisition ...................................................................................................................................1 101 Initial Program Development Process ........................................................................................................1 101.1 Background .........................................................................................................................................1 101.2 Policy ...................................................................................................................................................1 101.3 Procedures ..........................................................................................................................................1 102 Project Numbers and Right of Way State Project Numbers .......................................................................3 102.1 Policy ...................................................................................................................................................3 102.2 Procedure ...........................................................................................................................................3 103 Base Maps...................................................................................................................................................4
  • Analysis of Written Submissions on the Report Walking Access in the New Zealand Outdoors

    Analysis of Written Submissions on the Report Walking Access in the New Zealand Outdoors

    Analysis of Written Submissions on the Report Walking Access in the New Zealand Outdoors ISBN: 0-478-07822-6 June 2004 Contents page Foreword 1 Executive Summary 2 Background 5 Analysis of submissions on the report “Walking Access in the New Zealand Outdoors” 5 Establishment of the Land Access Ministerial Reference Group 5 The report, Walking Access in the New Zealand Outdoors 5 Consultation 5 This document 6 Content and style 6 1 Introduction 8 Key points made in submissions 8 1.1 Commend the work of the Land Access Ministerial Reference Group 9 1.2 Compliment the Minister of Rural Affairs on this initiative 9 1.3 Labour Party’s outdoor recreation policy 10 1.4 Focus on ‘walking’ access in the terms of reference 10 1.5 The extent of access problems 11 1.6 Perceived bias in the report 11 2 The Characteristics of Access 13 Key points made in submissions 13 2.1 Heritage of freedom of access to the outdoors 13 2.2 Requesting permission – a traditional social convention 14 2.3 Changes in land use 15 2.4 Changes in land ownership 16 2.5 Urban and rural private land 16 3 Arrangements for Access in New Zealand 18 Key points made in submissions 18 3.1 Guidance given to government agencies 18 Resource Management Act 1991 18 New Zealand Walkways Act 1990 19 3.2 Guidance given to landholders 19 3.3 Guidance given to the public 20 3.4 Non-statutory guidance 20 3.5 Access arrangements on Maori land 21 4 Public Access Arrangements in Other Countries 23 Key points made in submissions 23 4.1 New Zealand as a recreation destination 23 i 4.2 Access arrangements
  • Environment Australia

    Environment Australia

    ENVIRONMENT AUSTRALIA SUBMISSION INQUIRY INTO DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES IN REGIONAL AUSTRALIA BASED ON BIOPROSPECTING THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STANDING COMMITTEE ON PRIMARY INDUSTRIES AND REGIONAL SERVICES February 2001 1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION SUMMARY TERMS OF REFERENCE 2: IMPEDIMENTS TO GROWTH OF NEW INDUSTRIES BASED ON BIOPROSPECTING Policy Background The Convention on Biological Diversity Our Living Heritage Australia’s National Biotechnology Strategy Regulating access to biological/genetic resources Environment Australia’s objectives Criteria of the proposed access and benefit sharing scheme Towards a nationally consistent approach to access and benefit sharing Harmonisation of arrangements at the Commonwealth level Harmonisation of Commonwealth, State and Territory approaches Improved access through the Australian Virtual Herbarium TERM OF REFERENCE 3: CAPACITY TO MAXMISE BENEFITS THROUGH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND OTHER MECHANISMS TO SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH TECHNOLOGY KNOWLEDGE INDUSTRIES IN AUSTRALIA Benefits to Australia from access and benefit sharing arrangements Support for benefits to Australia from access to our biological resources Lack of adequate benefit sharing arrangements Examples of benefit sharing arrangements in Australia and their contribution to the development of high technology knowledge industries Monetary and non-monetary benefits Proposed benefit sharing requirements Potential size of the commercial benefits from bioprospecting Potential impact of bioprospecting on regional Australia Conclusions TERM OF REFERENCE 4: THE IMPACTS ON AND BENEFITS TO THE ENVIRONMENT Possible adverse impacts on the environment Environmental assessment, protocols and the precautionary principle Environmental assessment of bioprospecting under the EPBC Act 1999 Benefits to the environment Conclusions 2 APPENDICES 1. The Voumard Inquiry into Access to Biological Resources in Commonwealth Areas 2.
  • Deed of Right-Of-Way Easement

    Deed of Right-Of-Way Easement

    PREPARED BY: ______________________ PLANNING BOARD FILE# ______________________ DEED OF RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT THIS DEED OF EASEMENT is made on this__________ day of_______________, 20_______by ___________________________________________________ whose mailing address is ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor"), and THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"). The words “Grantor” and “Grantee” shall mean all Grantors and all Grantees listed above. THIS EASEMENT is granted by Grantor to Grantee for and in consideration of One ($1.00) Dollar, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. Grantor also acknowledges that the conveyance of this right-of-way easement is a condition of site plan/subdivision approval by the Middlesex County Planning Board (File Number___________) for the development of Block No. ___________, Lot No.___________ as delineated on the prevailing tax map of the ___________ of ___________. THE LANDS AFFECTED by this Easement (the “Affected Lands”) are more formally described on Exhibit "A" (attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference) prepared by______________________, New Jersey License No. __________________. Said Affected Lands is also depicted on a Site Plan/Subdivision Plan dated ___________________________ (last revised ______________________), as prepared by______________________, New Jersey License No. _____________________, attached hereto as Exhibit "B". SAID AFFECTED LANDS are a part of the lands and premises conveyed unto Grantor by deed from ____________________, dated ____________________ and recorded in the Middlesex County Clerk's Office on _____________ at Deed Book _________, Page ________. THIS DEED OF EASEMENT conveys to Grantee the right to utilize the easement area in perpetuity for the widening or improving of _______________ Road (County Road No.
  • Right of Way Manual, Section 4.1, Land Title

    Right of Way Manual, Section 4.1, Land Title

    Topic 575-000-000 Right of Way Manual Effective Date: April 15, 1999 Acquisition Revised: May 18, 2017 Section 7.15 LAND TITLE PURPOSE ............................................................................................................... 7.15.1 AUTHORITY ........................................................................................................... 7.15.1 SCOPE .................................................................................................................... 7.15.1 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................ 7.15.1 DEFINITIONS ......................................................................................................... 7.15.1 7.15.1 QUALITY AND QUANTITY OF TITLE .............................................. 7.15.3 7.15.2 TITLE EVIDENCE ............................................................................. 7.15.4 7.15.3 TITLE SEARCH REPORTS .............................................................. 7.15.4 7.15.4 TITLE INSURANCE .......................................................................... 7.15.7 7.15.5 OPINION OF TITLE .......................................................................... 7.15.8 7.15.6 TITLE EXAMINATION ...................................................................... 7.15.8 7.15.7 PARCEL NUMBERS......................................................................... 7.15.8 7.15.8 FEE TITLE .......................................................................................
  • Construction Guidelines for Wildlife Fencing and Associated Escape and Lateral Access Control Measures

    Construction Guidelines for Wildlife Fencing and Associated Escape and Lateral Access Control Measures

    CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES FOR WILDLIFE FENCING AND ASSOCIATED ESCAPE AND LATERAL ACCESS CONTROL MEASURES Requested by: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Standing Committee on the Environment Prepared by: Marcel P. Huijser, Angela V. Kociolek, Tiffany D.H. Allen, Patrick McGowen Western Transportation Institute – Montana State University PO Box 174250 Bozeman, MT 59717-4250 Patricia C. Cramer 264 E 100 North, Logan, Utah 84321 Marie Venner Lakewood, CO 80232 April 2015 The information contained in this report was prepared as part of NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 84, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board. SPECIAL NOTE: This report IS NOT an official publication of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, or The National Academies. Wildlife Fencing and Associated Measures Disclaimer DISCLAIMER DISCLAIMER STATEMENT The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied are those of the research agency that performed the research and are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board or its sponsors. The information contained in this document was taken directly from the submission of the author(s). This document is not a report of the Transportation Research Board or of the National Research Council. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was requested by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), and conducted as part of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 25-25 Task 84. The NCHRP is supported by annual voluntary contributions from the state Departments of Transportation. Project 25-25 is intended to fund quick response studies on behalf of the AASHTO Standing Committee on the Environment.