DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 10 Compactifications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Chapter X Compactifications 1. Basic Definitions and Examples Definition 1.1 Suppose 2À\Ä]is a homeomorphism of \ into ], where ] is a compact X# space. If 2Ò\Ó is dense in ], then the pair Ð] ß 2Ñ is called a compactification of \. By definition, only Hausdorff spaces \ can (possibly) have a compactification. If we are just working with a single compactification ]\ of , then we can usually just assume that \©] and that 2 is the identity map so that the compactification is just a compact Hausdorff space that contains \\ª]as a dense subspace. In fact, if , we will always assume that 2 is the identity map unless something else is stated. We made similar assumptions in discussing of the completion of a metric space Ð\ß .Ñ in Chapter IV. However, we will sometimes want to compare different compactifications of \ (in a sense to be discussed later) and then we may need to know how \] is embedded in . We will see that different dense embeddings 2\ of into the same space ] can produce “nonequivalent” compactifications. Therefore, strictly speaking, a “compactification of \Ð]ß2Ñ” is the pair . If, in Definition 1.1, \2Ò\Ó] is already a compact Hausdorff space, then is closed and dense in and therefore 2Ò\Ó œ ]. Therefore, topologically, the only possible compactification of \ is \ itself. The next theorem restates exactly which spaces have compactifications. Theorem 1.2 A space \ has a compactification iff it is a Tychonoff space. Proof See the remarks following Corollary IX.6.3. ñ Example 1.3 The circle W2" can be viewed as a compactification of the real line, ‘. Let be the “inverse projection” pictured below: here 2Ò‘‘ Ó œ W" ÖNorth Pole × . We can think of 2Ò Ó as a “bent” topological copy of ‘, and the compactification is created by “tying together” the two ends of ‘ by adding one new “point at infinity” (the North Pole). 418 Since lW"" 2Ò‘‘ Ól œ ", ÐW ß 2Ñ is called a one-point compactification of . (We will see in Example 4.2 that we can call WÞ" the one-point compactification of ‘ ) Example 1.4 1) Ò "ß "Ó is a compact Hausdorff space containing Ð "ß "Ñ are a dense subspace, so Ò "ß "Ó is a “two-point” compactification of Ð "ß "Ñ (with embedding 2 œ 3Ñ. 2) If 2 À‘‘ Ä Ð "ß "Ñ is a homeomorphism, then 3 ‰ 2 À Ä Ò "ß "Ó gives a “two- point” compactification of ‘. It is true (but not so easy to prove) that there is no 8-point compactification of ‘= for #8! Þ Example 1.5 Suppose ]œ\∪Ö:×is a one-point compactification of \. If S is an open set containing :] in , then Oœ]S©\O and is compact. Therefore the open sets containing :\ are the complements of compact subsets of . (Look at open neighborhoods of the North Pole :W in the one-point compactification " of ‘; a base for the open neighborhoods of : consists of complements of the closed (compact!) arcs that do not contain the North Pole.) Suppose B−Yßwhere Y is open in \. Because ] is Hausdorff, we can find disjoint open sets Z and [ in ]with B−Z and :−[Þ Since :ÂZ, we have that Z ©\ and therefore Z ∩\œZ is also open in \. Since B−Y ∩Z, we can use the regularity of \ to choose an open set K in \ for which B−K©cl\ K©Y∩Z ©YÞ But K©Z ©] [(a closed set in ] Ñßso cl] K©] [ ©\ . Therefore cl\]]\Kœ\∩ cl Kœ cl K , so cl K is also closed in ]ÞSo cl \ K is a compact neighborhood of BY inside . This shows that each point B−\ has a neighborhood base in \ consisting of compact neighborhoods. The property in the last sentence is important enough to deserve a name: such spaces are called locally compact. 419 2. Local Compactness Definition 2.1 A Hausdorff space \B−\ is called locally compact if each point has a neighborhood base consisting of compact neighborhoods Þ Example 2.2 1) A discrete space is locally compact. 2) ‘8 is locally compact: at each pointBB , the collection of closed balls centered at is a base of compact neighborhoods. On the other hand, neither nor is locally compact. (Why? Ñ 3) If \\is a compact Hausdorff space, then is regular so there is a base of closed neighborhoods at each point\ and each of these neighborhoods is compact. Therefore is locally compact. 4) Each ordinal space Ò!ßαα Ñ is locally compact. The space Ò!ß Ó is a (one-point) compactification of Ò!ßαα Ñ iff is a limit ordinal. 5Ñ\ Example 1.5 shows that if a space has a one-point compactification, it must be locally compact (and, of course, noncompact and Hausdorff). Therefore neither nor has a one-point compactification. The following theorem characterizes the spaces with one-point compactifications. Theorem 2.3 A space \\ has a one-point compactification iff is a noncompact, locally compact Hausdorff space. (The one-point compactification of \2 for which the embedding is the identity is denoted \Þ‡ ) Proof Because of Example 1.5, we only need to show that a noncompact, locally compact Hausdorff space \:Â\ has a one-point compactification. Choose a point and let \‡‡ œ \ ∪ Ö:×Þ Put a topology on \ by letting each point B − \ have its original neighborhood base of compact neighborhoods, and by defining basic neighborhoods of : be the complements of compact subsets of \À ‡‡ U: œÖR©\ À :−R and \ R is compact × . (Verify that the conditions of the Neighborhood Base Theorem III.5.2 are satisfied.) ‡ If hhU is an open cover of \ and :−Y −, then there exists an R−: with :−R©YÞ ‡ ‡ Since \ R is compact, we can choose Y"8 ß ÞÞÞß Y −h covering \ R. Then ‡‡ ÖY ß Y"8 ß ÞÞÞß Y × is a finite subcover of \ from h. Therefore \ is compact. \+Á,−\+,‡ is Hausdorff. If , then and can be separated by disjoint open sets in \ and these sets are still open in \O‡. Furthermore, if is a compact neighborhood of +\Oin , then and Ð\‡‡ OÑ are disjoint neighborhoods of +and : in \ . ‡‡ Finally, notice that Ö:× is not open in \ or else Ö:× − F: and then \ Ö:× œ \ would be compact. Therefore every open set containing :\\\ intersects , so is dense in ‡. 420 Therefore \\ñ‡ is a one-point compactification of . What happens if the construction for \‡ in the preceding proof is carried out starting with a space \\ which is already compact? What happens if is not locally compact? What happens if \ is not Hausdorff ? Corollary 2.4 A locally compact Hausdorff space \ is Tychonoff. Proof \\ is either compact or has a one-point compactification \Þ\‡ Either way, is a subspace of a compact X\# space which (by Theorem VII.5.9) is Tychonoff. Therefore is Tychonoff. ñ The following theorem about locally compact spaces is often useful. Theorem 2.5 Suppose E©\, where \is Hausdorff. a) If \EœJ∩KJE\E is locally compact and where is closed and is open in , then is locally compact. In particular, an open (or, a closed) subset of a locally compact space \ is locally compact. b) If E\EE is a locally compact and is Hausdorff, then is open in cl\ . c) If E\EœJ∩KJ is a locally compact subspace of a Hausdorff space , then where is closed and E\is open in . Proof a) It is easy to check that if JK is closed and is open in a locally compact space \, then JKand are locally compact. It then follows easily that J∩K is also locally compact. ( Note: Part a) does not require that \ be Hausdorff.) b) Let +−E and let O be a compact neighborhood of + in E. Then +−intE OœY . Since E is Hausdorff, O is closed and therefore Y©clEE Y©O , so cl Y is compact. Because YEßZ\E∩ZœYis open in there is an open set in with and we have: cl(\\E∩ZÑ∩EœÐ clcl YÑ∩EœE Y ©E so ÐE∩ZÑ∩Ecl\ ( ) is compact and therefore closed in \ (since \ is Hausdorff). SinceE∩Z ©Ð cl\\\ ( E∩ZÑ ) ∩Eß we have cl ÐE∩ZÑ©Ð cl YÑ∩Eœ clE Y ©EÞ Moreover, since ZZ∩E©ÐZ∩EÑ is open, then cl\\ cl (this is true in any space \: why? ). So [ œZ ∩cl\\ E© cl ÐE∩ZÑ©Ð cl \ YÑ∩Eœ clE Y ©EÞ Then +−[ ©E and [ is open in cl\\ E so +−int cl E . Therefore E is open in cl \ EÞ 421 c) Since EEEEœE∩K is locally compact, part b) gives that is open in cl\\ , so cl for some open set K\ in . Let JœEÞñcl\ Corollary 2.6 A dense locally compact subspace of a Hausdorff space \\Þis open in Proof This follows immediately from part b) of the theorem ñ Corollary 2.7 If \\ is a locally compact, noncompact Hausdorff space, then is open in any compactification ]\ that contains . Proof This follows immediately from Corollary 2.6. ñ Corollary 2.8 A locally compact metric space Ð\ß .Ñ is completely metrizable. µµµ Proof Let Ð\ ß . Ñ be the completion of Ð\ß .ÑÞ \ is locally compact and dense in \ so µµ \\ is open in . Therefore \K\ is a $-set in so it follows from Theorem IV.7.5 that \ is completely metrizable. ñ Theorem 2.9 Suppose is Hausdorff. Then is locally compact iff \œα−E \α Ág \ i) each \α is locally compact ii) \−EÞα is compact for all but at most finitely many α Proof Assume \Y\B−Y is locally compact. Suppose αααα is open in and .
Recommended publications
  • A Guide to Topology

    A Guide to Topology

    i i “topguide” — 2010/12/8 — 17:36 — page i — #1 i i A Guide to Topology i i i i i i “topguide” — 2011/2/15 — 16:42 — page ii — #2 i i c 2009 by The Mathematical Association of America (Incorporated) Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 2009929077 Print Edition ISBN 978-0-88385-346-7 Electronic Edition ISBN 978-0-88385-917-9 Printed in the United States of America Current Printing (last digit): 10987654321 i i i i i i “topguide” — 2010/12/8 — 17:36 — page iii — #3 i i The Dolciani Mathematical Expositions NUMBER FORTY MAA Guides # 4 A Guide to Topology Steven G. Krantz Washington University, St. Louis ® Published and Distributed by The Mathematical Association of America i i i i i i “topguide” — 2010/12/8 — 17:36 — page iv — #4 i i DOLCIANI MATHEMATICAL EXPOSITIONS Committee on Books Paul Zorn, Chair Dolciani Mathematical Expositions Editorial Board Underwood Dudley, Editor Jeremy S. Case Rosalie A. Dance Tevian Dray Patricia B. Humphrey Virginia E. Knight Mark A. Peterson Jonathan Rogness Thomas Q. Sibley Joe Alyn Stickles i i i i i i “topguide” — 2010/12/8 — 17:36 — page v — #5 i i The DOLCIANI MATHEMATICAL EXPOSITIONS series of the Mathematical Association of America was established through a generous gift to the Association from Mary P. Dolciani, Professor of Mathematics at Hunter College of the City Uni- versity of New York. In making the gift, Professor Dolciani, herself an exceptionally talented and successfulexpositor of mathematics, had the purpose of furthering the ideal of excellence in mathematical exposition.
  • 3. Closed Sets, Closures, and Density

    3. Closed Sets, Closures, and Density

    3. Closed sets, closures, and density 1 Motivation Up to this point, all we have done is define what topologies are, define a way of comparing two topologies, define a method for more easily specifying a topology (as a collection of sets generated by a basis), and investigated some simple properties of bases. At this point, we will start introducing some more interesting definitions and phenomena one might encounter in a topological space, starting with the notions of closed sets and closures. Thinking back to some of the motivational concepts from the first lecture, this section will start us on the road to exploring what it means for two sets to be \close" to one another, or what it means for a point to be \close" to a set. We will draw heavily on our intuition about n convergent sequences in R when discussing the basic definitions in this section, and so we begin by recalling that definition from calculus/analysis. 1 n Definition 1.1. A sequence fxngn=1 is said to converge to a point x 2 R if for every > 0 there is a number N 2 N such that xn 2 B(x) for all n > N. 1 Remark 1.2. It is common to refer to the portion of a sequence fxngn=1 after some index 1 N|that is, the sequence fxngn=N+1|as a tail of the sequence. In this language, one would phrase the above definition as \for every > 0 there is a tail of the sequence inside B(x)." n Given what we have established about the topological space Rusual and its standard basis of -balls, we can see that this is equivalent to saying that there is a tail of the sequence inside any open set containing x; this is because the collection of -balls forms a basis for the usual topology, and thus given any open set U containing x there is an such that x 2 B(x) ⊆ U.
  • What Are Lyapunov Exponents, and Why Are They Interesting?

    What Are Lyapunov Exponents, and Why Are They Interesting?

    BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 54, Number 1, January 2017, Pages 79–105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/bull/1552 Article electronically published on September 6, 2016 WHAT ARE LYAPUNOV EXPONENTS, AND WHY ARE THEY INTERESTING? AMIE WILKINSON Introduction At the 2014 International Congress of Mathematicians in Seoul, South Korea, Franco-Brazilian mathematician Artur Avila was awarded the Fields Medal for “his profound contributions to dynamical systems theory, which have changed the face of the field, using the powerful idea of renormalization as a unifying principle.”1 Although it is not explicitly mentioned in this citation, there is a second unify- ing concept in Avila’s work that is closely tied with renormalization: Lyapunov (or characteristic) exponents. Lyapunov exponents play a key role in three areas of Avila’s research: smooth ergodic theory, billiards and translation surfaces, and the spectral theory of 1-dimensional Schr¨odinger operators. Here we take the op- portunity to explore these areas and reveal some underlying themes connecting exponents, chaotic dynamics and renormalization. But first, what are Lyapunov exponents? Let’s begin by viewing them in one of their natural habitats: the iterated barycentric subdivision of a triangle. When the midpoint of each side of a triangle is connected to its opposite vertex by a line segment, the three resulting segments meet in a point in the interior of the triangle. The barycentric subdivision of a triangle is the collection of 6 smaller triangles determined by these segments and the edges of the original triangle: Figure 1. Barycentric subdivision. Received by the editors August 2, 2016.
  • Topological Description of Riemannian Foliations with Dense Leaves

    Topological Description of Riemannian Foliations with Dense Leaves

    TOPOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION OF RIEMANNIAN FOLIATIONS WITH DENSE LEAVES J. A. AL¶ VAREZ LOPEZ*¶ AND A. CANDELy Contents Introduction 1 1. Local groups and local actions 2 2. Equicontinuous pseudogroups 5 3. Riemannian pseudogroups 9 4. Equicontinuous pseudogroups and Hilbert's 5th problem 10 5. A description of transitive, compactly generated, strongly equicontinuous and quasi-e®ective pseudogroups 14 6. Quasi-analyticity of pseudogroups 15 References 16 Introduction Riemannian foliations occupy an important place in geometry. An excellent survey is A. Haefliger’s Bourbaki seminar [6], and the book of P. Molino [13] is the standard reference for riemannian foliations. In one of the appendices to this book, E. Ghys proposes the problem of developing a theory of equicontinuous foliated spaces parallel- ing that of riemannian foliations; he uses the suggestive term \qualitative riemannian foliations" for such foliated spaces. In our previous paper [1], we discussed the structure of equicontinuous foliated spaces and, more generally, of equicontinuous pseudogroups of local homeomorphisms of topological spaces. This concept was di±cult to develop because of the nature of pseudogroups and the failure of having an in¯nitesimal characterization of local isome- tries, as one does have in the riemannian case. These di±culties give rise to two versions of equicontinuity: a weaker version seems to be more natural, but a stronger version is more useful to generalize topological properties of riemannian foliations. Another relevant property for this purpose is quasi-e®ectiveness, which is a generalization to pseudogroups of e®ectiveness for group actions. In the case of locally connected fo- liated spaces, quasi-e®ectiveness is equivalent to the quasi-analyticity introduced by Date: July 19, 2002.
  • Soft Somewhere Dense Sets on Soft Topological Spaces

    Soft Somewhere Dense Sets on Soft Topological Spaces

    Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 33 (2018), No. 4, pp. 1341{1356 https://doi.org/10.4134/CKMS.c170378 pISSN: 1225-1763 / eISSN: 2234-3024 SOFT SOMEWHERE DENSE SETS ON SOFT TOPOLOGICAL SPACES Tareq M. Al-shami Abstract. The author devotes this paper to defining a new class of generalized soft open sets, namely soft somewhere dense sets and to in- vestigating its main features. With the help of examples, we illustrate the relationships between soft somewhere dense sets and some celebrated generalizations of soft open sets, and point out that the soft somewhere dense subsets of a soft hyperconnected space coincide with the non-null soft β-open sets. Also, we give an equivalent condition for the soft cs- dense sets and verify that every soft set is soft somewhere dense or soft cs-dense. We show that a collection of all soft somewhere dense subsets of a strongly soft hyperconnected space forms a soft filter on the universe set, and this collection with a non-null soft set form a soft topology on the universe set as well. Moreover, we derive some important results such as the property of being a soft somewhere dense set is a soft topological property and the finite product of soft somewhere dense sets is soft some- where dense. In the end, we point out that the number of soft somewhere dense subsets of infinite soft topological space is infinite, and we present some results which associate soft somewhere dense sets with some soft topological concepts such as soft compact spaces and soft subspaces.
  • General Topology

    General Topology

    General Topology Tom Leinster 2014{15 Contents A Topological spaces2 A1 Review of metric spaces.......................2 A2 The definition of topological space.................8 A3 Metrics versus topologies....................... 13 A4 Continuous maps........................... 17 A5 When are two spaces homeomorphic?................ 22 A6 Topological properties........................ 26 A7 Bases................................. 28 A8 Closure and interior......................... 31 A9 Subspaces (new spaces from old, 1)................. 35 A10 Products (new spaces from old, 2)................. 39 A11 Quotients (new spaces from old, 3)................. 43 A12 Review of ChapterA......................... 48 B Compactness 51 B1 The definition of compactness.................... 51 B2 Closed bounded intervals are compact............... 55 B3 Compactness and subspaces..................... 56 B4 Compactness and products..................... 58 B5 The compact subsets of Rn ..................... 59 B6 Compactness and quotients (and images)............. 61 B7 Compact metric spaces........................ 64 C Connectedness 68 C1 The definition of connectedness................... 68 C2 Connected subsets of the real line.................. 72 C3 Path-connectedness.......................... 76 C4 Connected-components and path-components........... 80 1 Chapter A Topological spaces A1 Review of metric spaces For the lecture of Thursday, 18 September 2014 Almost everything in this section should have been covered in Honours Analysis, with the possible exception of some of the examples. For that reason, this lecture is longer than usual. Definition A1.1 Let X be a set. A metric on X is a function d: X × X ! [0; 1) with the following three properties: • d(x; y) = 0 () x = y, for x; y 2 X; • d(x; y) + d(y; z) ≥ d(x; z) for all x; y; z 2 X (triangle inequality); • d(x; y) = d(y; x) for all x; y 2 X (symmetry).
  • Dense Embeddings of Sigma-Compact, Nowhere Locallycompact Metric Spaces

    Dense Embeddings of Sigma-Compact, Nowhere Locallycompact Metric Spaces

    proceedings of the american mathematical society Volume 95. Number 1, September 1985 DENSE EMBEDDINGS OF SIGMA-COMPACT, NOWHERE LOCALLYCOMPACT METRIC SPACES PHILIP L. BOWERS Abstract. It is proved that a connected complete separable ANR Z that satisfies the discrete n-cells property admits dense embeddings of every «-dimensional o-compact, nowhere locally compact metric space X(n e N U {0, oo}). More gener- ally, the collection of dense embeddings forms a dense Gs-subset of the collection of dense maps of X into Z. In particular, the collection of dense embeddings of an arbitrary o-compact, nowhere locally compact metric space into Hubert space forms such a dense Cs-subset. This generalizes and extends a result of Curtis [Cu,]. 0. Introduction. In [Cu,], D. W. Curtis constructs dense embeddings of a-compact, nowhere locally compact metric spaces into the separable Hilbert space l2. In this paper, we extend and generalize this result in two distinct ways: first, we show that any dense map of a a-compact, nowhere locally compact space into Hilbert space is strongly approximable by dense embeddings, and second, we extend this result to finite-dimensional analogs of Hilbert space. Specifically, we prove Theorem. Let Z be a complete separable ANR that satisfies the discrete n-cells property for some w e ÍV U {0, oo} and let X be a o-compact, nowhere locally compact metric space of dimension at most n. Then for every map f: X -» Z such that f(X) is dense in Z and for every open cover <%of Z, there exists an embedding g: X —>Z such that g(X) is dense in Z and g is °U-close to f.
  • DEFINITIONS and THEOREMS in GENERAL TOPOLOGY 1. Basic

    DEFINITIONS and THEOREMS in GENERAL TOPOLOGY 1. Basic

    DEFINITIONS AND THEOREMS IN GENERAL TOPOLOGY 1. Basic definitions. A topology on a set X is defined by a family O of subsets of X, the open sets of the topology, satisfying the axioms: (i) ; and X are in O; (ii) the intersection of finitely many sets in O is in O; (iii) arbitrary unions of sets in O are in O. Alternatively, a topology may be defined by the neighborhoods U(p) of an arbitrary point p 2 X, where p 2 U(p) and, in addition: (i) If U1;U2 are neighborhoods of p, there exists U3 neighborhood of p, such that U3 ⊂ U1 \ U2; (ii) If U is a neighborhood of p and q 2 U, there exists a neighborhood V of q so that V ⊂ U. A topology is Hausdorff if any distinct points p 6= q admit disjoint neigh- borhoods. This is almost always assumed. A set C ⊂ X is closed if its complement is open. The closure A¯ of a set A ⊂ X is the intersection of all closed sets containing X. A subset A ⊂ X is dense in X if A¯ = X. A point x 2 X is a cluster point of a subset A ⊂ X if any neighborhood of x contains a point of A distinct from x. If A0 denotes the set of cluster points, then A¯ = A [ A0: A map f : X ! Y of topological spaces is continuous at p 2 X if for any open neighborhood V ⊂ Y of f(p), there exists an open neighborhood U ⊂ X of p so that f(U) ⊂ V .
  • MATH 3210 Metric Spaces

    MATH 3210 Metric Spaces

    MATH 3210 Metric spaces University of Leeds, School of Mathematics November 29, 2017 Syllabus: 1. Definition and fundamental properties of a metric space. Open sets, closed sets, closure and interior. Convergence of sequences. Continuity of mappings. (6) 2. Real inner-product spaces, orthonormal sequences, perpendicular distance to a subspace, applications in approximation theory. (7) 3. Cauchy sequences, completeness of R with the standard metric; uniform convergence and completeness of C[a; b] with the uniform metric. (3) 4. The contraction mapping theorem, with applications in the solution of equations and differential equations. (5) 5. Connectedness and path-connectedness. Introduction to compactness and sequential compactness, including subsets of Rn. (6) LECTURE 1 Books: Victor Bryant, Metric spaces: iteration and application, Cambridge, 1985. M. O.´ Searc´oid,Metric Spaces, Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series, 2006. D. Kreider, An introduction to linear analysis, Addison-Wesley, 1966. 1 Metrics, open and closed sets We want to generalise the idea of distance between two points in the real line, given by d(x; y) = jx − yj; and the distance between two points in the plane, given by p 2 2 d(x; y) = d((x1; x2); (y1; y2)) = (x1 − y1) + (x2 − y2) : to other settings. [DIAGRAM] This will include the ideas of distances between functions, for example. 1 1.1 Definition Let X be a non-empty set. A metric on X, or distance function, associates to each pair of elements x, y 2 X a real number d(x; y) such that (i) d(x; y) ≥ 0; and d(x; y) = 0 () x = y (positive definite); (ii) d(x; y) = d(y; x) (symmetric); (iii) d(x; z) ≤ d(x; y) + d(y; z) (triangle inequality).
  • Euclidean Space - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Page 1 of 5

    Euclidean Space - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Page 1 of 5

    Euclidean space - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 of 5 Euclidean space From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In mathematics, Euclidean space is the Euclidean plane and three-dimensional space of Euclidean geometry, as well as the generalizations of these notions to higher dimensions. The term “Euclidean” distinguishes these spaces from the curved spaces of non-Euclidean geometry and Einstein's general theory of relativity, and is named for the Greek mathematician Euclid of Alexandria. Classical Greek geometry defined the Euclidean plane and Euclidean three-dimensional space using certain postulates, while the other properties of these spaces were deduced as theorems. In modern mathematics, it is more common to define Euclidean space using Cartesian coordinates and the ideas of analytic geometry. This approach brings the tools of algebra and calculus to bear on questions of geometry, and Every point in three-dimensional has the advantage that it generalizes easily to Euclidean Euclidean space is determined by three spaces of more than three dimensions. coordinates. From the modern viewpoint, there is essentially only one Euclidean space of each dimension. In dimension one this is the real line; in dimension two it is the Cartesian plane; and in higher dimensions it is the real coordinate space with three or more real number coordinates. Thus a point in Euclidean space is a tuple of real numbers, and distances are defined using the Euclidean distance formula. Mathematicians often denote the n-dimensional Euclidean space by , or sometimes if they wish to emphasize its Euclidean nature. Euclidean spaces have finite dimension. Contents 1 Intuitive overview 2 Real coordinate space 3 Euclidean structure 4 Topology of Euclidean space 5 Generalizations 6 See also 7 References Intuitive overview One way to think of the Euclidean plane is as a set of points satisfying certain relationships, expressible in terms of distance and angle.
  • 1.1.3 Reminder of Some Simple Topological Concepts Definition 1.1.17

    1.1.3 Reminder of Some Simple Topological Concepts Definition 1.1.17

    1. Preliminaries The Hausdorffcriterion could be paraphrased by saying that smaller neigh- borhoods make larger topologies. This is a very intuitive theorem, because the smaller the neighbourhoods are the easier it is for a set to contain neigh- bourhoods of all its points and so the more open sets there will be. Proof. Suppose τ τ . Fixed any point x X,letU (x). Then, since U ⇒ ⊆ ∈ ∈B is a neighbourhood of x in (X,τ), there exists O τ s.t. x O U.But ∈ ∈ ⊆ O τ implies by our assumption that O τ ,soU is also a neighbourhood ∈ ∈ of x in (X,τ ). Hence, by Definition 1.1.10 for (x), there exists V (x) B ∈B s.t. V U. ⊆ Conversely, let W τ. Then for each x W ,since (x) is a base of ⇐ ∈ ∈ B neighbourhoods w.r.t. τ,thereexistsU (x) such that x U W . Hence, ∈B ∈ ⊆ by assumption, there exists V (x)s.t.x V U W .ThenW τ . ∈B ∈ ⊆ ⊆ ∈ 1.1.3 Reminder of some simple topological concepts Definition 1.1.17. Given a topological space (X,τ) and a subset S of X,the subset or induced topology on S is defined by τ := S U U τ . That is, S { ∩ | ∈ } a subset of S is open in the subset topology if and only if it is the intersection of S with an open set in (X,τ). Alternatively, we can define the subspace topology for a subset S of X as the coarsest topology for which the inclusion map ι : S X is continuous.
  • Chapter P Prerequisites Course Number

    Chapter P Prerequisites Course Number

    Chapter P Prerequisites Course Number Section P.1 Review of Real Numbers and Their Properties Instructor Objective: In this lesson you learned how to represent, classify, and Date order real numbers, and to evaluate algebraic expressions. Important Vocabulary Define each term or concept. Real numbers The set of numbers formed by joining the set of rational numbers and the set of irrational numbers. Inequality A statement that represents an order relationship. Absolute value The magnitude or distance between the origin and the point representing a real number on the real number line. I. Real Numbers (Page 2) What you should learn How to represent and A real number is rational if it can be written as . the ratio classify real numbers p/q of two integers, where q ¹ 0. A real number that cannot be written as the ratio of two integers is called irrational. The point 0 on the real number line is the origin . On the number line shown below, the numbers to the left of 0 are negative . The numbers to the right of 0 are positive . 0 Every point on the real number line corresponds to exactly one real number. Example 1: Give an example of (a) a rational number (b) an irrational number Answers will vary. For example, (a) 1/8 = 0.125 (b) p » 3.1415927 . II. Ordering Real Numbers (Pages 3-4) What you should learn How to order real If a and b are real numbers, a is less than b if b - a is numbers and use positive. inequalities Larson/Hostetler Trigonometry, Sixth Edition Student Success Organizer IAE Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company.