American Economic Review 2015, 105(9): 2757–2797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.20121607 Education, HIV, and Early Fertility: Experimental Evidence from Kenya† By Esther Duflo, Pascaline Dupas, and Michael Kremer* A seven-year randomized evaluation suggests education subsidies reduce adolescent girls’ dropout, pregnancy, and marriage but not sexually transmitted infection (STI). The government’s HIV curricu- lum, which stresses abstinence until marriage, does not reduce preg- nancy or STI. Both programs combined reduce STI more, but cut dropout and pregnancy less, than education subsidies alone. These results are inconsistent with a model of schooling and sexual behav- ior in which both pregnancy and STI are determined by one factor (unprotected sex), but consistent with a two-factor model in which choices between committed and casual relationships also affect these outcomes. (JEL I12, I18, I21, J13, J16, O15) Early fertility and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), chief among them HIV, are arguably the two biggest health risks facing teenage girls in sub-Saharan Africa.1 Since unprotected sex can lead to both early pregnancy and STIs, a natural assump- tion is that any policy that reduces unprotected sex will be effective at fighting both. However, policies which affect the choice between having a committed relation- ship with a single partner and having multiple casual partners may differentially affect teen pregnancy and STIs. Pregnancy may be relatively more likely in commit- ted relationships while STIs may be relatively more likely in casual relationships. * Duflo: Department of Economics, MIT, 50 Memorial Drive, Building E52, Room 252G, Cambridge, MA 02142 (e-mail:
[email protected]); Dupas: Department of Economics, Stanford University, 579 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94306 (e-mail:
[email protected]); Kremer: Department of Economics, Harvard University, Littauer Center, 1805 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 (e-mail:
[email protected]).