DOCSLIB.ORG

Gippsland Lakes Priorities Plan PAEC - Ramsar Wetlands Inquiry Submission No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gippsland Lakes Priorities Plan PAEC - Ramsar Wetlands Inquiry Submission No PAEC - Ramsar Wetlands Inquiry Submission no. 405 - appendix c Gippsland Lakes Priorities Plan PAEC - Ramsar Wetlands Inquiry Submission no. 405 - appendix c Citation: Gippsland Lakes Coordinating Committee, 2016, Gippsland Lakes Priorities Plan, East Gippsland CMA, Bairnsdale, Victoria. Acknowledgements: The GLCC would like to thank representatives of the following organisations for sharing their insights and experiences in the review of the Gippsland Lakes Environment Fund (GLEF): Australian Marine Mammal Conservation Foundation Australian Platypus Conservancy Baw Baw Shire Council Bug Blitz Trust Department of Environment, Land Water and Planning Dodo Environmental East Gippsland Art Gallery East Gippsland CMA East Gippsland Landcare Network East Gippsland Shire Council Environment Protection Authority, Victoria Gippsland Lakes Ministerial Advisory Council Executive Officers Gippsland Ports Committee of Management Incorporated Greening Australia Gunaikurnai Land and Waters Aboriginal Corporation Monash University Nagle College Parks Victoria PeeKdesigns Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology Southern Rural Water Traditional Owner Land Management Board Victoria University West Gippsland CMA The GLCC would also like to acknowledge the contribution of delivery manager agencies in the development of this plan: Department of Environment, Land Water and Planning East Gippsland CMA East Gippsland Shire Council Gunaikurnai Land and Waters Aboriginal Corporation Parks Victoria West Gippsland CMA Wellington Shire Council Photo credit: Maddison Young, Chilly Ducks on Lake Guthridge, Under 13 winner of the 2013 Gippsland Lakes Photo Competition (http://www.loveourlakes.net.au/linking- together/photo-competition/). PAEC - Ramsar Wetlands Inquiry Submission no. 405 - appendix c Table of contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background and objectives .......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Development of the priorities plan .............................................................................. 1 2 Review of the GLEF ............................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Method......................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Results: Desktop review ............................................................................................... 3 2.3 Results: Stakeholder interviews ................................................................................... 3 2.4 Outcomes and recommendations ............................................................................... 3 3 Gap analysis ........................................................................................................................ 5 3.1 Background .................................................................................................................. 5 3.2 Method......................................................................................................................... 5 3.2.1 Relevant plans and strategies ............................................................................... 5 3.2.2 Themes .................................................................................................................. 6 3.2.3 Analysis ................................................................................................................. 6 3.3 Results .......................................................................................................................... 6 3.4 Priority strategies and actions ..................................................................................... 7 4 Assessing funding applications ........................................................................................... 8 4.1 Eligibility filters ............................................................................................................. 8 4.2 Criteria and scoring .................................................................................................... 10 Appendix 1: Review of the GLEF .............................................................................................. 11 Appendix 2: Gap analysis ......................................................................................................... 20 PAEC - Ramsar Wetlands Inquiry Submission no. 405 - appendix c Abbreviations AMMCF Australian Marine Mammal Conservation Foundation DEDJTR Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources DELWP Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, formerly Department of Environment and Primary Industries DoE Department of Environment (Australian Government) EGCMA East Gippsland Catchment Management Authority EPA Environment Protection Authority, Victoria GLaWAC Gunaikurnai Land and Waters Aboriginal Corporation GLCC Gippsland Lakes Coordinating Committee GLEF Gippsland Lakes Environment Fund GLES Gippsland Lakes Environmental Strategy GLMAC Gippsland Lakes Ministerial Advisory Committee (former) GLRSMP Gippsland Lakes Ramsar Site Management Plan GP Gippsland Ports Committee of Management Incorporated KMA Key Management Action (GLES Business Plan) MID Macalister Irrigation District MERI Monitoring, evaluation, reporting and improvement NGO Non-Government Organisation RCT Resource Condition Target RMIT Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology SRW Southern Rural Water TOLMB Traditional Owner Land Management Board VWMS Victorian Waterway Management Strategy WGCMA West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority PAEC - Ramsar Wetlands Inquiry Submission no. 405 - appendix c 1 Introduction 1.1 Background and objectives In January 2016, The Victorian Minister for Environment, Climate Change and Water announced the membership of the Gippsland Lakes Coordinating Committee (GLCC) and launched the Gippsland Lakes Ramsar Site Management Plan (GLRSMP) (Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2015). The GLCC is tasked with making recommendations to the Minister on specific funding priorities for the Gippsland Lakes, guided by the existing regional waterway strategies for East and West Gippsland and the GLRSMP. The objectives of the GLCC (with respect to this priorities plan) are: To maintain or improve the health of the Gippsland Lakes To foster cooperation and coordination between agencies and organisations with an interest in the health of the Gippsland Lakes To promote awareness of and participation by communities in the management of the Gippsland Lakes. To maximise outcomes through leveraging investments. The management of the Gippsland Lakes is complex, with many management plans, strategies and agencies working together to achieve positive outcomes for the environment, community and business. A priorities plan is required to help the GLCC to maximise environmental outcomes for the Lakes by identifying the highest priority management actions for the next five years (2016 – 2021) and providing a transparent framework for allocation of funding. 1.2 Development of the priorities plan The Gippsland Lakes Priorities Plan has been developed with the GLCC and Delivery Managers (managers from DELWP, Parks Victoria, East Gippsland CMA, West Gippsland CMA, East Gippsland Shire, Wellington Shire Council and GLaWAC). The process is illustrated in Figure 1 and started with a review of the Gippsland Lakes Environment Fund (GLEF) to identify existing projects and lessons learned from the past three years of implementation in the Gippsland Lakes. The outputs of the review of the GLEF together with a review of existing plans and strategies were used as inputs to a gap analysis. The gap analysis informed the identification of high level priority actions for the next five years. The GLRSMP contains high level management strategies that could each be addressed through a number of different programs and projects. To this end, a process for transparently and objectively assessing funding applications has been developed. 1 PAEC - Ramsar Wetlands Inquiry Submission no. 405 - appendix c Figure 1: Process for developing the Gippsland Lakes Priorities Plan. 2 PAEC - Ramsar Wetlands Inquiry Submission no. 405 - appendix c 2 Review of the GLEF This is a summary of the outcomes of the review of the GLEF, the full review can be found in Appendix 1. 2.1 Method The review of the Gippsland Lakes projects funded through the GLEF was completed to inform the Gippsland Lakes Priorities Plan, identifying gaps in the delivery of the objectives and taking learnings from the process to better inform the Gippsland Lakes Coordinating Committee. This review is not a formal evaluation or acquittal of the GLEF. The review was undertaken as two parts; 1. A desktop review of the GLEF funded programs against the 17 KMAs in the business plan, and their contributions to meeting the objectives of the GLES; and 2. A series of stakeholder interviews with delivery partners in the form of an after action review which asked: What worked well and why? What went wrong and why? What would you do differently next time to improve the process? 2.2 Results: Desktop review The desktop reviewed showed that projects were funded across all four business strategies (Coordination and Planning Strategy, Operational Support Strategy, Ecosystem Monitoring, Investigation and Future Research Strategy
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Latrobe River Basin January 2014
    Latrobe River Basin January 2014 Introduction Southern Rural Water is the water corporation responsible for administering and enforcing the Latrobe River Basin Local Management Plan. The purpose of the Latrobe River Basin Local Management Plan is to: • document the management objectives for the system • explain to licence holders (and the broader community) the specific management objectives and arrangements for their water resource and the rules that apply to them as users of that resource • clarify water sharing arrangements for all users and the environment, including environmental flow requirements • document any limits, including water use caps, permissible consumptive volumes or extraction limits that apply to the system. Management objectives The objective of the Local Management Plan is to ensure the equitable sharing of water between users and the environment and the long-term sustainability of the resource. Water system covered The Local Management Plan covers all the rivers and creeks located within the Latrobe River Basin, which includes: Upper Latrobe Catchment Narracan Creek Catchment Moe River Catchment Frenchmans Creek Narracan Creek Bear Creek Harolds Creek Little Narracan Creek Bull Swamp Creek Hemp Hills Creek Trimms Creek Crossover Creek Loch River Dead Horse Creek McKerlies Creek Morwell River Catchment Hazel Creek Sandy Creek Billy’s Creek Loch Creek Stony Creek Eel Hole Creek Moe Main Drain Torongo River Little Morwell River Moe River Upper Latrobe River Morwell River Mosquito Creek Latrobe River Catchment O’Grady Creek Red Hill Creek Tanjil River Sassafras Creek Sassafras Creek Latrobe River Silver Creek Settlers Creek Tyers River Ten Mile Creek Seymour Creek Jacobs Creek Walkley’s Creek Shady Creek Traralgon Creek Wilderness Creek Sunny Creek The Latrobe River Basin is shown in the map below.
    [Show full text]
  • EPBC Act Referral
    Submission #2198 - Fingerboards Mineral Sands Project Title of Proposal - Fingerboards Mineral Sands Project Section 1 - Summary of your proposed action Provide a summary of your proposed action, including any consultations undertaken. 1.1 Project Industry Type Mining 1.2 Provide a detailed description of the proposed action, including all proposed activities. The Fingerboards Mineral Sands Project is a proposal to develop the Glenaladale mineral sands deposit (Glenaladale deposit) in East Gippsland. The Glenaladale deposit straddles East Gippsland Shire and Wellington Shire, however the project area is located entirely in East Gippsland Shire. The Glenaladale deposit contains an estimated 2.7 billion tonnes of mineralised sand and 53 million tonnes (Mt) of heavy minerals including around 12 Mt of zircon. The Fingerboards Mineral Sands Project will mine approximately 10% of the Glenaladale deposit over 20 years. Kalbar Resources will use open cut mining methods to extract 200 Mt of ore from the eastern part of the Glenaladale deposit to produce 6 Mt of heavy mineral concentrate (HMC). It is envisaged that, due to the size of the deposit, mining will continue in other areas of the deposit following the closure of the Fingerboards Mine. The ore will be fed to a mining unit plant (MUP) for slurrying and pumping to the wet concentrator plant (WCP). There the slurried ore will undergo initial onsite processing to produce HMC. The HMC will be exported for further processing into commercial products such as zircon and rutile. All overburden will be returned to the mined-out void, with the majority directly returned as mining progresses.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Condition of Rivers and Streams in the Latrobe, Thomson and Avon Catchments
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION OF RIVERS AND STREAMS IN THE LATROBE, THOMSON AND AVON CATCHMENTS Publication 832 March 2002 1 INTRODUCTION activities have contributed to a significant change in the quantity and quality of water delivered to Lake This publication provides an overview of the Wellington and there is a significant amount of environmental condition of the rivers and streams in public concern regarding impacts on the health of the Latrobe, Thomson and Avon catchments1 (Figure the Gippsland Lakes. 1). The Latrobe and Thomson river systems, for The Latrobe, Thomson and Avon catchments contain example, contribute approximately twice the some of Victoria’s most significant river systems. nutrient inputs to the Gippsland Lakes than all other Located in the Gippsland region of Victoria, these riverine inputs. The most significant nutrient loading three river systems form the total catchment of Lake is associated with high flow events and reflects the Wellington, the western-most of the Gippsland increased surface runoff and erosion caused Lakes. The demands on these freshwater resources through land clearance and urbanisation. are considerable. Australia’s largest pulp and paper It is commonly agreed that the only long-term mill, most of the State’s power industry, much of solution for improving the condition of Lake Melbourne’s water supply and the State’s second Wellington is to significantly reduce the nutrient largest irrigation district fall within their catchment loads from the Latrobe and Thomson river systems. boundaries. Restoration of the catchments to a more sustainable Much change has occurred in these catchments land use, revegetating riparian zones and reducing since early settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • Victorian Recreational Fishing Guide 2021
    FREE TARGET ONE MILLION ONE MILLION VICTORIANS FISHING #target1million VICTORIAN RECREATIONAL FISHING A GUIDE TO FISHING RULES AND PRACTICES 2021 GUIDE 2 Introduction 55 Waters with varying bag and size limits 2 (trout and salmon) 4 Message from the Minister 56 Trout and salmon regulations 5 About this guide 60 Year-round trout and salmon fisheries 6 Target One Million 61 Trout and salmon family fishing lakes 9 Marine and estuarine fishing 63 Spiny crays 10 Marine and estuarine scale fish 66 Yabbies 20 Sharks, skates and rays 68 Freshwater shrimp and mussels 23 Crabs INTRODUCTION 69 Freshwater fishing restrictions 24 Shrimps and prawns 70 Freshwater fishing equipment 26 Rock lobster 70 Using equipment in inland waters 30 Shellfish 74 Illegal fishing equipment 33 Squid, octopus and cuttlefish 74 Bait and berley 34 Molluscs 76 Recreational fishing licence 34 Other invertebrates 76 Licence information 35 Marine fishing equipment 78 Your fishing licence fees at work 36 Using equipment in marine waters 82 Recreational harvest food safety 40 Illegal fishing equipment 82 Food safety 40 Bait and berley 84 Responsible fishing behaviours 41 Waters closed to recreational fishing 85 Fishing definitions 41 Marine waters closed to recreational fishing 86 Recreational fishing water definitions 41 Aquaculture fisheries reserves 86 Water definitions 42 Victoria’s marine national parks 88 Regulation enforcement and sanctuaries 88 Fisheries officers 42 Boundary markers 89 Reporting illegal fishing 43 Restricted areas 89 Rule reminders 44 Intertidal zone
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Gippsland Flood Event - Review of Flood Warnings and Information Systems
    2012 Gippsland Flood Event - Review of Flood Warnings and Information Systems TRIM ID: CD/12/522803 Date: 21 November 2012 Version: Final OFFICE of the EMERGENCY SERVICES COMMISSIONER Page i MINISTERIAL FOREWORD In early June this year, heavy rain and widespread flooding affected tens of thousands of Victorians across the central and eastern Gippsland region. The damage to towns and communities was widespread – particularly in the Latrobe City, Wellington and East Gippsland municipalities. Homes, properties and businesses were damaged, roads and bridges were closed, and more than 1500 farmers were impacted by the rains. A number of people were rescued after being trapped or stranded by the rising waters. Following the floods, some communities had a perception that telephone-based community warnings and information had failed them. As the Minister for Police and Emergency Services, I requested Victoria’s Emergency Services Commissioner to review the effectiveness, timeliness and relevance of the community information and warnings. This report has met my expectations and has identified the consequences and causes for the public’s perception. I welcome the review’s findings. I am confident these will, in time, lead to better and more effective arrangements for community information and warnings and contribute to a safer and more resilient Victoria. PETER RYAN Minister for Police and Emergency Services Page ii Contents Glossary ......................................................................................................................... v Executive Summary....................................................................................................... 1 1. June 2012 Gippsland flood.................................................................................3 1.1 Key physical aspects of the 2012 Gippsland flood event 3 1.2 Key aspects of information and warnings in the incident response 6 1.2.1 Key information and warnings from Bureau of Meteorology 6 1.2.2 Key information and warnings through incident management 7 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rehabilitation Manual for Australian Streams
    A Rehabilitation Manual for Australian Streams VOLUME 1 Ian D. Rutherfurd, Kathryn Jerie and Nicholas Marsh Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation 2000 Published by: Land and Water Resources Research and Cooperative Research Centre Development Corporation for Catchment Hydrology GPO Box 2182 Department of Civil Engineering Canberra ACT 2601 Monash University Telephone: (02) 6257 3379 Clayton VIC 3168 Facsimile: (02) 6257 3420 Telephone: (03) 9905 2704 Email: <[email protected]> Facsimile: (03) 9905 5033 WebSite: <www.lwrrdc.gov.au> © LWRRDC and CRCCH Disclaimer: This manual has been prepared from existing technical material, from research and development studies and from specialist input by researchers,practitioners and stream managers.The material presented cannot fully represent conditions that may be encountered for any particular project.LWRRDC and CRCCH have endeavoured to verify that the methods and recommendations contained are appropriate.No warranty or guarantee,express or implied,except to the extent required by statute,is made as to the accuracy,reliability or suitability of the methods or recommendations,including any financial and legal information. The information, including guidelines and recommendations,contained in this Manual is made available by the authors to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help rehabilitate Australian streams.The Manual is not intended to be a code or industry standard.Whilst it is provided in good faith,LWRRDC
    [Show full text]
  • Walhalla Visitor Guide 3
    WALHALLA Visitor Guide visitwalhalla.com Australia’S valley Of the gods HIDDEN IN A DEEP VALLEy IN THE VICTORIAN ALPS, WALHALLA HISTORIC TOWNSHIP WAS A BOOM TOWN Of THE 1880S THAT WENT BUST IN THE EARLy 1900S AND WAS DESERTED fOR MOST Of THE 20TH CENTURy. Just a short drive east of Melbourne you’ll Exotic trees and cute miner’s cottages line the discover a village that time has passed by. meandering street and twisting creek in the From 1863 until 1914, Walhalla was one of the steep valley. Walhalla’s unique topography in a richest gold areas in Australia with a population narrow mountain gorge meant that the early of over 3,000 people. There were 10 hotels, townsfolk needed to think vertically. 7 churches, several dance halls, a school with Walhalla’s iconic cemetery clings to the side of more than 500 students and over 30 shops. the hill at a 45 degree angle and the slopes are Walhalla’s picturesque location in the Gippsland dotted with cottages built on narrow ledges mountains combines the wild Australian bush cut into the steep hillsides. When gold mining environment with a colonial style reminiscent became unprofitable in 1914 and the mines of the gold era. closed, Walhalla’s decline was rapid. 2 www.visitwalhalla.com WALHALLA VISITOR GUIDE 3 things to see and do Most of the houses and buildings were pulled down and shipped to other towns LONG TUNNEL EXTENDED on the newly opened railway, while GOLD MINE others were simply abandoned. Discover a golden past on an informative 45 minute tour of an original gold mine The structures that remained were with a local guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of Latrobe Water
    26th August 2020 National Water Reform 2020 Productivity Commission Lodgement online at [email protected] Dear Commissioners RE: National Water Reform Inquiry - Submission from Friends of Latrobe Water Friends of Latrobe Water (FLoW) welcomes this opportunity to provide input to the Productivity Commission to assist with its review of National Water Reform. FLoW advocates for the protection of Latrobe Valley’s water sources and safeguarding the protection of the Gippsland Lakes from industry activities, including coal mine rehabilitation and coal ash contamination. Threats include – • Declining water flows • Changes in flows • Overallocation of water sources • Priority sharing of water resources In consideration of the Commission’s 2017 recommendations that jurisdictions recommit to a renewed NWI, FLoW has concerns with, • policy settings for alternative water sources in entitlement and planning frameworks • other policy settings relating to: – urban water management – environmental water management – decision-making on building and supporting new infrastructure. In context to the regional area of Gippsland in Victoria, alignment of water policy on a statewide basis is challenging due to the dominance and current governance of mining in the Latrobe Valley in Gippsland’s central west. This has resulted in substantial impacts to water flow, quality and chemistry to all other beneficial users downstream including environmental water health. In responding to the Issues Paper on the scope of this inquiry FLoW will also address, • emerging challenges faced by Governments, water providers and water users, such as climate change or changes in economic circumstances • the interaction of water policy with other areas (such as land use planning and urban development) • the impacts of climate change on water resources • the provision of reliable water services to regional and remote communities • the principles to be satisfied for any Government investment in major water infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • And Hinterland LANDSCAPE PRIORITY AREA
    GIPPSLAND LAKES and Hinterland LANDSCAPE PRIORITY AREA Photo: The Perry River 31 GIPPSLAND LAKES AND HINTERLAND Gippsland Lakes and Hinterland AQUIFER ASSET VALUES, CONDITION AND KEY THREATS Figure 25: Gippsland Lakes and Hinterland Landscape Priority Area Aquifer Asset Shallow Aquifer The Shallow Alluvial aquifer includes the Denison and Wa De Lock Groundwater Management Areas. It has high Figure 24: Gippsland Lakes and Hinterland Landscape connectivity to surface water systems including the provision Priority Area location of base flow to rivers, such as the Avon, Thomson and Macalister. The aquifer contributes to the condition of other Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems including wetlands, The Gippsland Lakes and Hinterland landscape priority area estuarine environments and terrestrial flora. The aquifer is characterised by the iconic Gippsland Lakes and wetlands is also a very important resource for domestic, livestock, Ramsar site. The Gippsland Lakes is of high social, economic, irrigation and urban (Briagolong) water supply. The shallow environmental and cultural value and is a major drawcard aquifer of the Avon, Thomson, Macalister and lower Latrobe for tourists. A number of major Gippsland rivers (Latrobe, catchments is naturally variable in quality and yield. In many Thomson, Macalister, Avon and Perry) all drain through areas the aquifer contains large volumes of high quality floodplains to Lake Wellington and ultimately the Southern (fresh) groundwater, whereas elsewhere the aquifer can be Ocean, with the Perry River being one of the few waterways naturally high in salinity levels. Watertable levels in some in Victoria to have an intact chain of ponds geomorphology. areas have been elevated due to land clearing and irrigation The EPBC Act listed Gippsland Red Gum Grassy Woodland recharge.
    [Show full text]
  • West Gippsland Region
    Powlett River. Courtesy WGCMA The West Gippsland region is diverse and characterised by areas of natural forest, West areas of high conservation value, fertile floodplains for agriculture, as well as having Gippsland major coal deposits and the Loy Yang, Hazelwood and Yallourn power stations. Region Three river basins form the region – Thomson (basin 25), Latrobe (basin 26) and South Gippsland (basin 27). West Gippsland Region In the north of the region is the Thomson basin, Hydrology characterised by the naturally forested Eastern Highlands. At the foot of the highlands are two major dams - Lake The hydrological condition of streams across the West Glenmaggie and the Thomson dam. Over half (55%) of Gippsland region reflects the varied land use - from natural the stream length in the Thomson basin was found to be and near natural flow regimes in headwater streams in in good or excellent condition. Of the remainder, 41% of forested areas of the region to flow regimes under immense stream length was in moderate condition and just 3% stress in areas dependent on water supply for domestic and 1% in poor and very poor condition respectively. and agricultural use. In the centre of the region is the Latrobe basin. The basin Thomson Dam provided 12,046 ML of environmental water features vast tracts of forest through the Strezlecki Ranges in 2011-12 for six reaches on the Thomson River (reaches and the Great Dividing Range, where streams rise and flow 1-5) and Rainbow Creek (reach 17) and Lake Glenmaggie to Lake Wellington in the east. Although much of the land provided 14,018 ML of environmental water to two reaches has been cleared for agriculture, the dominant land use is on the Macalister River (reaches 7 and 8).
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Acknowledgement
    Aboriginal acknowledgement The Victorian Government proudly acknowledges Victoria’s Aboriginal community and their rich culture and pays respect to their Elders past, present and emerging. We acknowledge Aboriginal people as Australia’s first peoples, and as the Traditional Owners and custodians of the land on which we work and live. We recognise the strength of Aboriginal people, Traditional Owners and their communities, and value the ongoing contribution of Aboriginal people to Victorian life, through their daily work, their application of Aboriginal knowledge and practice, and at key events; we recognise how this enriches us all. We recognise that Aboriginal cultures and communities are diverse and should be celebrated. We acknowledge that the land and water are of spiritual, cultural and economic importance to Aboriginal people. We embrace the spirit of reconciliation, guaranteeing equality of outcomes and ensuring an equal voice. We have distinct legislative obligations to Victorian Traditional Owner groups, related to cultural and natural heritage, that are paramount in our responsibilities in managing Victoria’s resources in partnership with Traditional Owners. Editors: Hui King Ho, John Douglas and Anthony Forster, Freshwater Fisheries Management, Victorian Fisheries Authority. Contact email: [email protected] Preferred way to cite this publication: ‘Ho, H.K., Douglas, J., & Forster, A., (eds) 2018, Vic Fish Stock 2018, Victorian Fisheries Authority’ Acknowledgements: The editors wish to thank the Victorian Fisheries Authority Communications team (Marc Ainsworth, Lauren Hall, Tillie French and Charley May), and Terry George and Matt Byrne for supplying the original text for inclusion. © The State of Victoria, Victorian Fisheries Authority, October 2018 This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.3 Conceptual Modelling for the Gippsland Basin Bioregion This Product Summarises Key System Components, Processes and Interactions in This Bioregion
    Conceptual modelling for the Gippsland Basin bioregion Product 2.3 from the Gippsland Basin Bioregional Assessment 2018 The Bioregional Assessment Programme The Bioregional Assessment Programme is a transparent and accessible programme of baseline assessments that increase the available science for decision making associated with coal seam gas and large coal mines. A bioregional assessment is a scientific analysis of the ecology, hydrology, geology and hydrogeology of a bioregion with explicit assessment of the potential direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of coal seam gas and large coal mining development on water resources. This Programme draws on the best available scientific information and knowledge from many sources, including government, industry and regional communities, to produce bioregional assessments that are independent, scientifically robust, and relevant and meaningful at a regional scale. The Programme is funded by the Australian Government Department of the Environment. For more information, visit http://www.bioregionalassessments.gov.au. Department of the Environment The Office of Water Science, within the Australian Government Department of the Environment, is strengthening the regulation of coal seam gas and large coal mining development by ensuring that future decisions are informed by substantially improved science and independent expert advice about the potential water related impacts of those developments. For more information, visit http://www.environment.gov.au/coal-seam-gas-mining/. Bureau of Meteorology The Bureau of Meteorology is Australia’s national weather, climate and water agency. Under the Water Act 2007, the Bureau is responsible for compiling and disseminating Australia's water information. The Bureau is committed to increasing access to water information to support informed decision making about the management of water resources.
    [Show full text]