July 2016 M&A and Investment Summary Table of Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

July 2016 M&A and Investment Summary Table of Contents July 2016 M&A and Investment Summary Table of Contents 1 Overview of Monthly M&A and Investment Activity 3 2 Monthly M&A and Investment Activity by Industry Segment 8 3 Additional Monthly M&A and Investment Activity Data 40 4 About Petsky Prunier 52 Securities offered through Petsky Prunier Securities, LLC, member of FINRA. This M&A and Investment Summary has been prepared by and is being distributed in the United States by Petsky Prunier, a broker dealer registered with the U.S. SEC and a member of FINRA. 2 | M&A and Investment Summary July 2016 M&A and Investment Summary for All Segments Transaction Distribution . A total of 427 deals were announced in July 2016, of which 252 were worth $33.3 billion in aggregate reported value . Software was the most active segment with 127 deals announced — 87 of these transactions reported $10 billion in value . Digital Media/Commerce was the most valuable subsegment with 109 transactions announced, of which 84 were worth a reported $12.4 billion in value . Strategic buyers announced 183 deals (37 reported $18 billion in value) . VC/Growth Capital investors announced 230 transactions (209 reported $5.1 billion in value) . Private Equity investors announced 14 deals during the month (six reported $10.2 billion in value) July 2016 BUYER/INVESTOR BREAKDOWN Transactions Reported Value Strategic Buyout Venture/Growth Capital # % $MM % # $MM # $MM # $MM Software 127 30% $10,031.2 30% 38 $4,165.7 4 $4,812.2 85 $1,053.3 Digital Media/Commerce 109 26% 12,423.5 37% 30 8,369.5 4 1,820.0 75 2,234.0 Marketing Technology 73 17% 1,844.7 6% 29 527.0 1 - 43 1,317.7 Agency & Marketing Services 34 8% 103.8 0% 30 74.8 1 - 3 29.0 Business Services 34 8% 813.3 2% 24 498.3 2 - 8 315.0 Traditional Media 18 4% 4,281.1 13% 15 4,265.8 0 - 3 15.3 Information 17 4% 3,685.2 11% 12 33.9 2 3,600.0 3 51.3 Digital Advertising 15 4% 124.5 0% 5 48.5 0 - 10 76.0 Total 427 100% 33,307.2 100% 183 17,983.4 14 10,232.2 230 5,091.6 * Oracle’s $9.4 billion acquisition of NetSuite has been excluded to limit comparative distortions 3 | M&A and Investment Summary July 2016 M&A and Investment Summary for All Segments Transaction Distribution . Reported transaction value in July was up more than 40 percent from July 2015 and down 10 percent from June of 2016 . Strategic activity accounted for 43 percent of reported deal activity during the month and included significant transactions: • Verizon’s acquisition of Yahoo’s core operating business for $4.8 billion • The acquisition of the Ultimate Fighting Championship by WME|IMG for a reported $4 billion • KKR’s $3.3 million purchase of enterprise resource planning and retail management software developer Epicor Software • Digital automotive classifieds operator Trader Corporation’s sale to Thoma Bravo for $1.2 billion • The acquisition of Opera’s internet browsing assets by a consortium of China-based investors led by Golden Brick Silk Road for $600 million $120.0 $500.0 $110.0 $100.0 $400.0 $90.0 $80.0 $73.1 $300.0 $70.0 LinkedIn / $60.0 Microsoft $50.0 $44.7 $42.6 $40.4 Supercell / $200.0 $40.0 IMS Health Tencent NetSuite Sungard $26.7 $27.4 $24.9 $30.0 $23.1 Veritas $23.7 HP IT / CSC Solera $21.3 $22.1 $100.0 $20.0 Inter. Data $14.4 $13.7 MultiPlan $10.0 466 448 376 403 424 363 407 418 427 433 404 432 491 $- $- Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 *Note, Charter Communications’ $78.8 billion and $10.8 billion acquisitions of Time Warner and Bright House Networks, Microsoft’s $26.2 billion acquisition of LinkedIn, Quintiles Transnational’s $13.5 billion acquisition of IMS Health, Tencent’s $10.2 billion acquisition of Supercell, Oracle’s $9.3 billion acquisition of NetSuite, Fidelity National Information Services‘ $9.1 billion acquisition of SunGard Data Systems, Computer Science Corporation’s $8.5 billion acquisition of Hewlett Packard Enterprises’ IT Services Division, The Carlyle Group’s $8 billion acquisition of Veritas Systems, Hellman & Friedman and Leonard Green & Partners’ $7.5 billion acquisition of MultiPlan, Intercontinental Exchange’s $7.4 billion acquisition of Interactive Data, and Vista Equity Partners’ $6.7 billion acquisition of Solera Holdings have been excluded to limit comparative distortions. 4 | M&A and Investment Summary July 2016 Selected Transactions with Valuation Information Disclosed ($ in Millions) Selected Transactions With Multiples Information Target Subsegment Buyer/Investor Ent. Value Rev EBITDA EV/REV EV/EBITDA Agency & Marketing Services Forsman & Bodenfors AB Digital Agency MDC Partners, Inc. $ 32.3 $ 40.0 $ - 0.8x NA Business Services Client Strategy Group LLC IT Consulting/Systems Integration Columbus A/S 6.4 4.9 0.7 1.3x 8.7x Digital Advertising Massive Group Pty. Ltd. Search Marketing Jaywing plc 3.5 1.2 0.4 2.9x 8.0x Digital Media/Commerce Yahoo, Operating Business Web Search/Portals Verizon Communications, Inc. 4,825.8 4,968.3 151.1 1.0x 31.9x Dollar Shave Club, Inc. eCommerce Unilever 1,000.0 152.0 - 6.6x NA Opera Software ASA, Internet Browser Assets Web Search/Portals Golden Brick Silk Road Fund Management 600.0 149.0 34.0 4.0x 17.6x Marketing Technology Olapic, Inc. Content Management Monotype Imaging, Inc. 130.0 9.0 - 14.4x NA ConvertMedia Analytics & Targeting Taboola Ltd. 100.0 50.0 - 2.0x NA Software Epicor Software Corporation ERP Software Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Company L.P. 3,300.0 1,000.0 - 3.3x NA AVG Technologies N.V. Security Software AVAST Software s.r.o. 1,453.3 433.4 128.3 NA 11.3x Epiq Systems, Inc. Legal Software OMERS Private Equity, Inc. 1,000.0 529.7 78.8 NA 12.7x OptionsHouse LLC Financial Software E*TRADE Financial Corporation 725.0 103.6 - 7.0x NA Imprivata, Inc. Security Software Thoma Bravo, Inc. 512.2 125.0 - 4.1x NA Traditional Media Greater Media, Inc. Radio Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. 240.0 141.0 - 1.7x NA Metrospace Advertising Pty. Ltd. Traditional Outdoor APN Outdoor Pty. Limited 14.9 4.5 - 3.3x NA 5 | M&A and Investment Summary July 2016 Securities in Registration ($ in Millions) Aggregate LTM Date Company Name Country Segment Offering Value Rev EBITDA Jul-16 CBS Radio Inc. United States Traditional Media $ 100.0 $ 1,220.0 $ 310.0 Jul-16 FOTV Media Networks, Inc. United States Digital Media/Commerce 30.0 NA NA Apr-16 Optiv Security Inc. United States Business Services 100.0 NA NA Apr-16 Medpace, Inc. United States Business Services NA NA 100.0 Apr-16 inVentiv Group Holdings United States Business Services 100.0 1,700.0 NA Dec-15 Nutanix, Inc. United States Software 200.0 283.1 NA Sep-15 PointClickCare Corp. United States Software 100.0 112.6 3.8 6 | M&A and Investment Summary July 2016 LTM IPO Performance Initial Offering Final Price Stock Price at Close Stock Price on % Change from Date Ticker Company Name Country Price Range Per Share on 1st Trading Day Jul 29, 2016 1st Trading Day Jun-16 Nasdaq:TLND Talend SA France $15.00-$17.00 18.00 $25.50 up 42% 25.50 0.0% Jun-16 NYSE:LN LINE Corporation Japan 31.00-33.00 33.00 41.58 up 27% 36.72 (11.7%) Jun-16 NYSE:TWLO Twilio, Inc. United States 12.00-14.00 15.00 28.79 up 92% 40.63 41.1% Jun-16 NasdaqGS:NH NantHealth, Inc. United States 13.00-15.00 14.00 19.47 up 39% 10.10 (48.1%) May-16 NYSE:COTV Cotiviti Holdings, Inc. United States 17.00-19.00 19.00 18.14 down 4.6% 24.14 33.1% Apr-16 NasdaqGS:SCWX SecureWorks Corp. United States 15.50-17.50 14.00 13.88 down 1% 14.81 6.7% Dec-15 NasdaqGS:TEAM Atlassian Corporation Plc Australia 18.00-20.00 21.00 27.78 up 32% 29.97 7.9% Dec-15 NYSE:YRD Yirendai Ltd. China 9.00-11.00 10.00 9.10, down 9% 25.64 181.8% Nov-15 NYSE:INST Instructure, Inc. United States 16.00-18.00 16.00 18.00 up 12.5% 21.74 20.8% Nov-15 NasdaqGS:MTCH Match Group, Inc. United States 12.00-14.00 12.00 14.74, up 23% 15.75 6.9% Nov-15 NasdaqGS:MIME Mimecast Limited United Kingdom 11.00-13.00 10.00 10.10, up 1.0% 11.03 9.2% Nov-15 NYSE:SQ Square, Inc. United States 11.00-13.00 9.00 13.07, up 45% 10.07 (23.0%) Oct-15 NYSE:PSTG Pure Storage, Inc. United States 16.00-18.00 17.00 16.01, down 5.8% 12.60 (21.3%) Oct-15 NYSE:FDC First Data Corporation United States 18.00-20.00 16.00 15.75, down 1.5% 12.40 (21.3%) Jul-15 NasdaqGM:RPD Rapid7, Inc. United States 13.00-15.00 16.00 26.75, up 67% 13.98 (47.7%) Jul-15 NYSE:TDOC Teladoc, Inc. United States 15.00-17.00 19.00 28.50, up 50% 17.44 (38.8%) 7 | M&A and Investment Summary July 2016 Digital Media/Commerce .
Recommended publications
  • Parker Review
    Ethnic Diversity Enriching Business Leadership An update report from The Parker Review Sir John Parker The Parker Review Committee 5 February 2020 Principal Sponsor Members of the Steering Committee Chair: Sir John Parker GBE, FREng Co-Chair: David Tyler Contents Members: Dr Doyin Atewologun Sanjay Bhandari Helen Mahy CBE Foreword by Sir John Parker 2 Sir Kenneth Olisa OBE Foreword by the Secretary of State 6 Trevor Phillips OBE Message from EY 8 Tom Shropshire Vision and Mission Statement 10 Yvonne Thompson CBE Professor Susan Vinnicombe CBE Current Profile of FTSE 350 Boards 14 Matthew Percival FRC/Cranfield Research on Ethnic Diversity Reporting 36 Arun Batra OBE Parker Review Recommendations 58 Bilal Raja Kirstie Wright Company Success Stories 62 Closing Word from Sir Jon Thompson 65 Observers Biographies 66 Sanu de Lima, Itiola Durojaiye, Katie Leinweber Appendix — The Directors’ Resource Toolkit 72 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Thanks to our contributors during the year and to this report Oliver Cover Alex Diggins Neil Golborne Orla Pettigrew Sonam Patel Zaheer Ahmad MBE Rachel Sadka Simon Feeke Key advisors and contributors to this report: Simon Manterfield Dr Manjari Prashar Dr Fatima Tresh Latika Shah ® At the heart of our success lies the performance 2. Recognising the changes and growing talent of our many great companies, many of them listed pool of ethnically diverse candidates in our in the FTSE 100 and FTSE 250. There is no doubt home and overseas markets which will influence that one reason we have been able to punch recruitment patterns for years to come above our weight as a medium-sized country is the talent and inventiveness of our business leaders Whilst we have made great strides in bringing and our skilled people.
    [Show full text]
  • [ "Pearson F-1 Rights Offering" ]
    As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 8, 2000 Registration No. 333-43198 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 Amendment No. 1 to FORM F-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 PEARSON plc (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) England and Wales 2731 Not Required (State or other jurisdiction (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer of incorporation or organization) Classification Code Number) Identification Number) 3 Burlington Gardens Pearson Inc. London, England W1X 1LE 1330 Avenue of the Americas 44-20-7411-2000 New York, New York 10019 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, (212) 641-2400 including area code, of registrant's principal executive (Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, offices) including area code, of agent for service) Copies to: Charles E. Engros Robert M. Thomas, Jr. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Sullivan & Cromwell 101 Park Avenue 125 Broad Street New York, New York 10178 New York, New York 10004 (212) 309-6000 (212) 558-4000 Fax: (212) 309-6273 Fax: (212) 558-3588 Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement. If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. ፤ If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneering Tool to Manage Media Industry's Digital Carbon Footprint 13 January 2020
    Pioneering tool to manage media industry's digital carbon footprint 13 January 2020 industry understand and manage the carbon impact of digital media. Mapping the carbon footprint of digital services like advertising, publishing and broadcasting is difficult because the underlying technological systems are hugely complex and constantly shifting. Media content passes through content delivery networks, data centres, web infrastructure and user devices, to name just a few, with each element of the delivery chain having different owners. With climate change high on the agenda, DIMPACT The online tool with help media industry manage its will allow participating companies to understand digital carbon footprint. Credit: Pixabay/ University of their 'downstream' carbon impacts, right through to Bristol the end-user. This, in turn, will enable more informed decision-making to reduce the overall carbon footprint of digital services. A collaboration between computer scientists at the University of Bristol and nine major media "We know that more and more of our interactions companies, including ITV and BBC, will help the happen online, and screens play an ever more media industry understand and manage the important role in our lives. We can say with significant carbon impacts of digital content. absolute certainty that the digital economy will continue to grow. What we don't know is how those The 12-month collaboration, facilitated by modes of digital consumption translate into carbon sustainability experts, Carnstone, will see impacts and where the 'hotspots' reside. DIMPACT University of Bristol researchers working with will change that," said Christian Toennesen, Senior sustainability and technology teams at the BBC, Partner at Carnstone and DIMPACT's initiator and Dentsu Aegis Network, Informa, ITV, Pearson, product manager.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolters Kluwer Governance Roadshow
    Wolters Kluwer Governance Roadshow Selection & Remuneration Committee of the Supervisory Board of Wolters Kluwer September, 2020 Governance Roadshow, September 2020 1 Forward-looking statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements. These statements may be identified by words such as "expect", "should", "could", "shall", and similar expressions. Wolters Kluwer cautions that such forward-looking statements are qualified by certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from what is contemplated by the forward-looking statements. Factors which could cause actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, general economic conditions, conditions in the markets in which Wolters Kluwer is engaged, behavior of customers, suppliers and competitors, technological developments, the implementation and execution of new ICT systems or outsourcing, legal, tax, and regulatory rules affecting Wolters Kluwer's businesses, as well as risks related to mergers, acquisitions and divestments. In addition, financial risks, such as currency movements, interest rate fluctuations, liquidity and credit risks could influence future results. The foregoing list of factors should not be construed as exhaustive. Wolters Kluwer disclaims any intention or obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Growth rates are cited in constant currencies unless otherwise noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Metrics the State of UK Media and Entertainment 2016
    Media Metrics The state of UK media and entertainment 2016 www.deloitte.co.uk/mediametrics #mediametrics To start a new section, hold down the apple+shift keys and click to release this object and type the section title in the box below. Contents Foreword 1 The state of UK media and entertainment 2 The UK media and entertainment sector in numbers 4 Local vs global: there’s no place like home 11 Ad funded vs paid for: where does the money come from? 15 Physical vs online: physical pounds to digital pennies? 19 Specialised vs diversified: diversify for revenue, focus for profit 23 Creators vs distributors: valuing the end-to-end trend 27 Aquisitive vs organic: when to build and when to buy? 31 Research methodology 34 Contacts 36 Endnotes 37 To start a new section, hold down the apple+shift keys and click to release this object and type the section title in the box below. Foreword Deloitte’s Media Metrics identifies and ranks the UK’s top 100 media and entertainment companies by scale. It is the definitive media power list for the UK today. We have analysed audited data on the 100 largest media and entertainment companies in the UK. Collectively they generate £87bn in annual revenue. We project they will break the £100bn level within the next five years. This is a transformative period for the media and entertainment industry. In a year when the fundamental purpose of the BBC was challenged, when physical book sales in the UK actually rose against expectations, when the Independent became the first national newspaper to move completely online, and when half of the world’s top 10 ten best-selling music artists were from the UK, we can see waves of change washing over many different media and entertainment sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Business Information Specialist Informa’S Book Business Has More Than 55,000 Academic Advisers 26 Directors’ Report 27 and Business Titles
    Business Profile Business WHO WE ARE Business Profile 02 Annual Report & Financial Statements 2009 Our Business 03 Informa at a Glance 04 Academic Information 06 Professional & Commercial Information 08 Events & Training 10 Informa plc is a leading international provider of specialist information and services for the academic and scientific, professional and commercial business communities. Informa has some 150 offices in over 40 countries and employs approximately 8,000 staff around the world. Informa is the largest publicly-owned organiser of conferences and courses in the world with inThe Year The Year in Review 12 an output of around 8,000 events annually. Informa Financial Highlights 13 publishes over 2,100 subscription-based information Chairman’s Statement 14 services including academic journals, real-time news Chief Executive’s Review 16 Financial Review 19 R and structured databases of commercial intelligence. Board of Directors 24 eview Global Business Information Specialist Informa’s book business has more than 55,000 academic Advisers 26 Directors’ Report 27 and business titles. Corporate Governance Statement 38 Directors’ Remuneration Report 45 Corporate Responsibility 55 Financial Statements Financial Financial Statements 58 Independent Auditors’ Report – Group 59 Consolidated Income Statement 60 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 61 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 62 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 64 ”It was an extremely demanding year, Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 65 but one which
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 1: Parker Review Survey Results As at 2 November 2020
    Annex 1: Parker Review survey results as at 2 November 2020 The data included in this table is a representation of the survey results as at 2 November 2020, which were self-declared by the FTSE 100 companies. As at March 2021, a further seven FTSE 100 companies have appointed directors from a minority ethnic group, effective in the early months of this year. These companies have been identified through an * in the table below. 3 3 4 4 2 2 Company Company 1 1 (source: BoardEx) Met Not Met Did Not Submit Data Respond Not Did Met Not Met Did Not Submit Data Respond Not Did 1 Admiral Group PLC a 27 Hargreaves Lansdown PLC a 2 Anglo American PLC a 28 Hikma Pharmaceuticals PLC a 3 Antofagasta PLC a 29 HSBC Holdings PLC a InterContinental Hotels 30 a 4 AstraZeneca PLC a Group PLC 5 Avast PLC a 31 Intermediate Capital Group PLC a 6 Aveva PLC a 32 Intertek Group PLC a 7 B&M European Value Retail S.A. a 33 J Sainsbury PLC a 8 Barclays PLC a 34 Johnson Matthey PLC a 9 Barratt Developments PLC a 35 Kingfisher PLC a 10 Berkeley Group Holdings PLC a 36 Legal & General Group PLC a 11 BHP Group PLC a 37 Lloyds Banking Group PLC a 12 BP PLC a 38 Melrose Industries PLC a 13 British American Tobacco PLC a 39 Mondi PLC a 14 British Land Company PLC a 40 National Grid PLC a 15 BT Group PLC a 41 NatWest Group PLC a 16 Bunzl PLC a 42 Ocado Group PLC a 17 Burberry Group PLC a 43 Pearson PLC a 18 Coca-Cola HBC AG a 44 Pennon Group PLC a 19 Compass Group PLC a 45 Phoenix Group Holdings PLC a 20 Diageo PLC a 46 Polymetal International PLC a 21 Experian PLC a 47
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Business & Tech-Enabled Services Sector Summary Report
    BUSINESS AND TECH-ENABLED SERVICES SECTOR REPORT March 2018 1 BUSINESS & TECH-ENABLED SERVICES DEAL DASHBOARD $94.4 Billion 788 M&A Volume YTD M&A Transactions YTD Quarterly M&A Volume ($Bn) and Deal Count Select M&A Transactions 100 $94.4 Announced Date Acquirer Target EV ($MM) 80 3/29/2018 NA 60 $48.5 $45.1 $45.5 $37.1 3/29/2018 NA 40 $31.1 $24.6 $27.4 $26.9 $19.1 $19.2 $21.7 Volume ($Bn) Volume $14.9 20 3/28/2018 $4,000 (Sig. M inority Stake) 0 3/26/2018 NA Q1 '15Q2 '15Q3 '15Q4 '15Q1 '16Q2 '16Q3 '16Q4 '16Q1 '17Q2 '17Q3 '17Q4 '17Q1 '18 (Investment) 1200 3/21/2018 NA 966 944 964 995 986 1000 901 929 917 875 894 797 788 788 800 3/21/2018 NA 600 3/19/2018 $1,180 Deal Count Deal 400 200 3/15/2018 $383 0 Q1 '15Q2 '15Q3 '15Q4 '15Q1 '16Q2 '16Q3 '16Q4 '16Q1 '17Q2 '17Q3 '17Q4 '17Q1 '18 3/15/2018 NA (1) Last 12 Months Business & Tech-Enabled Services Performance vs. S&P 500 3/14/2018 NA (Investment) 125.0% 3/13/2018 $205 120.0% 115.0% 3/13/2018 NA 110.0% 105.0% 3/12/2018 $108 100.0% 3/6/2018 $564 95.0% 90.0% 3/5/2018 NA Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 Business & Tech-Enabled Services S&P 500 3/1/2018 NA (Investment) Notes: 2 Source: Capital IQ and PitchBook.
    [Show full text]
  • CARAT Client: MANAPPURAM a Trading Division Under Dentsu Manappuram Finance Ltd Aegis Network Communications Lndia Private Limited
    6*ep COTIFIDENTIAL DENTSU AEGIS NETWORK SERVICES AGREEMENT COMMERCIAL TERM SHEE]' .: . l:r : :r '::: :PARi[IES:, Agepc CARAT Client: MANAPPURAM A trading division under Dentsu Manappuram Finance Ltd Aegis Network Communications lndia Private Limited Cl N : U74300MH1986PTC039002 Address: 601-8 Wing, Poonam Chambers, Addr.€.' w l 47O (old) W63BA (New), l:, l:- l1 . ,:1:: l'1. Manappuram House, Valapad, DR. A B Road, Worli, Mumbai- :,:.1:; :.1 r:::::i.: l; !;ii, r. '- 400018 ir:. r::r:-:. l Thrissur, l(erala,lndia - 680 567 TERIV'Ii' rl GI Start,Date: .TUN€ >o\'t O I Tu uY wlV 30 ;l X AUTO RENEW EI --l-lrrlf-r- : - -:: _::-: CI SERV-leEil ,:,.;i; - -,. ;:N -"i Qr- AII lndia except Kerala iht d t- *i tr lVledia Services ril ;i D Creative Services ;; it ]> "-t Z E other Services 1.) )j U p F The Services are more particularly described in each applicable Statement of Wofk.s* BilbS U Mediir I Offline # nEffitr i i,lr, i : r::. r tr'Out of Home H $HHtr i"il s s#fi* li ili El Digital Services {including Display, Performance, SEM, Social, Mobile) ff oSi*x 'l itii H !s!)ttr , $t*="' tf ("T&Cs") nd schedrrles ttw,rijq$-.i This Commercial Term Sheet must be read alongside the Terms and Conditions and schedullgs H are attached to this CommercialTerm Sheet. The T&Cs and schedules, together with this Commercial TEm S h'dct fr paYties; aand' entered into on 08 day of April 2019 constitute a binding agreement f'Agreement") between the 0l will apply to any media schedule, work order and/or any services supplied to the Client by Agency duringI trne Executed for and on behalf of CIi nt//":;.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from FRS17 Disclosures
    Is Pension Fund Asset Allocation Really Determined by Fundamentals? Mike Orszag W W W . W A T S O N W Y A T T . C O M Paris, April 2, 2004 Key Question z Do pension funds make asset allocation decisions based on corporate finance risk considerations? z Factors which might matter: – Size of pension scheme relative to company – Size of deficits relative to company – Maturity of scheme Copyright © Watson Wyatt Worldwide. All rights reserved. Data z UK listed companies have had to report pension liabilities on FRS17 basis since late 2001 z Collected roughly 150 data items for FTSE350 on corporate finance from FRS17 disclosures z Matched data to other data on market returns/option price data, betas, etc. Copyright © Watson Wyatt Worldwide. All rights reserved. Accounting Dates z Roughly 48% of FTSE350 (168 companies) use Dec. 31 as end of year, 17% (60 companies) use 31 March, 8% (29 companies) use 30 September, remainder use a variety of dates z Define a panel with two waves: – 2001 Wave = Accounting dates between 30 June 2001 and 29 June 2002 – 2002 Wave = Accounting dates between 30 June 2002 and 29 June 2003 Copyright © Watson Wyatt Worldwide. All rights reserved. Pension Surplus(Deficit)/Pension Liabilities FTSE 350 companies with positive reported pension liabilities 2001 2002 Wave 2002 has 5% -30% -48.1% only 10 10% -24.9% -43.7% companies with 25% -15.2% -34.0% surpluses as 50% -7.7% -27.4% opposed to 81 in 2001. 75% 3.3% -17.3% Among FTSE 90% 15.5% -8.3% 100, wave 2001 95% 21.8% -1.0% has only 4 companies in surplus as N 242 257 opposed to 46 in 2001 Copyright © Watson Wyatt Worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsidiaries
    166 Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2010 Principal subsidiaries The principal operating subsidiaries at 31 December 2010 are listed below. They operate mainly in the countries of incorporation or registration. The investments are in equity share capital and they are all 100% owned. Country of incorporation or registration Pearson Education Pearson Education Inc. US Pearson Education Ltd England Edexcel Ltd* England NCS Pearson Inc. US FT Group The Financial Times Ltd England Mergermarket Ltd England The Penguin Group Penguin Group (USA) Inc. US The Penguin Publishing Co Ltd England Dorling Kindersley Holdings Ltd* England * Direct investment of Pearson plc. The company has taken advantage of the exemption under Section 410(2) of the Companies Act 2006 by providing information only in relation to subsidiary undertakings whose results or financial position, in the opinion of the directors, principally affected the financial statements. A complete list of subsidiary and associated undertakings will be included in the next Pearson plc annual return filed with the Registrar of Companies. section 6 Financial statements 167 Five year summary i n all figures in £ millions 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 T rodu sales North American Education 1,679 1,667 2,002 2,470 2,640 ct ion International Education 640 735 866 1,035 1,234 Professional 211 226 244 275 333 Education 2,530 2,628 3,112 3,780 4,207 FT Group 280 344 390 358 403 o Penguin 848 846 903 1,002 1,053 ur s T Continuing 3,658 3,818 4,405 5,140 5,663 r a teg Discontinued 765 511 414 484 296
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of the UK Television News Industry 1982 - 1998
    -iì~ '1,,J C.12 The Development of the UK Television News Industry 1982 - 1998 Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Alison Preston Deparent of Film and Media Studies University of Stirling July 1999 Abstract This thesis examines and assesses the development of the UK television news industry during the period 1982-1998. Its aim is to ascertain the degree to which a market for television news has developed, how such a market operates, and how it coexists with the 'public service' goals of news provision. A major purpose of the research is to investigate whether 'the market' and 'public service' requirements have to be the conceptual polarities they are commonly supposed to be in much media academic analysis of the television news genre. It has conducted such an analysis through an examination of the development strategies ofthe major news organisations of the BBC, ITN and Sky News, and an assessment of the changes that have taken place to the structure of the news industry as a whole. It places these developments within the determining contexts of Government economic policy and broadcasting regulation. The research method employed was primarily that of the in-depth interview with television news management, politicians and regulators: in other words, those instrumental in directing the strategic development within the television news industry. Its main findings are that there has indeed been a development of market activity within the television news industry, but that the amount of this activity has been limited by the particular economic attributes of the television news product.
    [Show full text]