DOCSLIB.ORG

Turkey's Cyprus Policy in the Context of Nicosia's Presidency of The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Turkey's Cyprus Policy in the Context of Nicosia's Presidency of The Introduction Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik ments German Institute for International and Security Affairs m SWP Co 501962–2012 Turkey’s Cyprus Policy in the Context of Nicosia’s Presidency of the WP European Council S Turkey Intensifies Its Efforts to Create International Legitimation for the “Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus”, to Date Recognised Only by Ankara Günter Seufert The Cypriot presidency of the EU Council has prompted Turkey to step up its efforts to boost international recognition for its self-administrated statelet in the north of the island, using the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) as an instrument in its endeavours. Ankara is concomitantly reacting to the current constellation of fronts in the Mediterranean, which has formed as a result of the dispute over access to recently detected gas deposits. If developments continue in the direction pursued to date, the European Union is likely to rue its indecisive policy on Cyprus and Turkey, left in the cold as far as the newly-discovered resources are concerned, while Russia increases its Mediterranean influence. From Turkey’s perspective, Cyprus’ EU This is because Turkey refuses to recog- Council presidency, which commenced nise the island’s current Greek-Cypriot on 1st July 2012, is as a red rag to a bull. state. According to its version of events, This is not only because Nicosia is blocking the emergence of proportional representa- the opening of six chapters in Ankara’s tion in the Republic of Cyprus as stipulated accession negotiations with the EU, and in its 1960 constitution proved that the Turkish accession appears likely to founder creation of a Cypriot nation was never the thanks to the conflict, which has been prime intention. On the contrary, the per- smouldering for nigh on sixty years. More manent autonomy of two ethnic groups or pertinently, the EU Council presidency is religious communities was assumed, which boosting the international reputation of both retained their cultural identities and the Republic of Cyprus, thus threatening to would not assimilate. Turkey holds that the negate the Turks’ central argument in the destruction of the proportional representa- Cyprus question. tion regime by the island’s Greek popula- Dr. Günter Seufert is a Senior Associates in SWP’s EU External Relations Division SWP Comments 34 October 2012 1 tion in 1963 effectively extinguished the Geological Survey (UGSG) is assuming that state based on this principle. Moreover, as the Basin’s total reserves amount to 3.45 bil- Cyprus’ two major ethnic groups had been lion cubic metres of gas and 1.7 billion bar- understood as political equals from the rels of natural oil. The Eastern Mediterra- start, the creation of any new state on Cyp- nean is deemed a terra incognita as far as oil riot soil consequently required the approval and gas are concerned. As a result, expec- of both groups. tations regarding future discoveries are rife, In addition, Ankara assumes that the and hopes that the sea region could develop island’s proximity to the Turkish mainland into an alternative source of supply to the – the distance is a mere 40 nautical miles – deposits in the former Soviet Union are run- gives Turkey a justified security policy- ning high. related interest in its foreign policy. The coastal states are demonstrating cor- As a result, Turkey has never accepted responding decisiveness when staking their the international view that the Republic of claims. However, valid bilateral agreements Cyprus, carried as it is by the Greek-Cypriot regarding the reciprocal demarcation of majority, represents the entire island. How- EEZs have only been concluded between the ever, precisely this claim receives renewed Republic of Cyprus and Israel and between international endorsement in the wake of Nicosia and Cairo to date. Relations be- Nicosia’s takeover of the EU Council presi- tween Israel and Lebanon, Israel and Egypt, dency. Lebanon and Syria and Syria and Turkey As early as July 2011, Turkish Foreign remain unclear. Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu announced that The EEZs are a source of open conflict his country would not participate in any between the Republic of Cyprus and Tur- meetings chaired by the Greek-Cypriot in- key. In December 2010, Nicosia and Tel Aviv cumbents for the duration of the EU Coun- clinched a deal regarding the demarcation cil presidency, this in order to consolidate of their mutual EEZs, which served only to Turkey’s position at international level. As exacerbate the existing tension in Ankara’s far as the Cyprus problem itself, no one on strained relations with both countries. the island is anticipating progress during As Turkey refuses to recognise the gov- this period in what can only be termed ernment in Nicosia, it also denies it the faltering negotiations between the two authority to conclude international trea- ethnic groups to overcome partition. ties, deeming the agreements made by The discovery of major natural gas Nicosia regarding the demarcation of Ex- deposits in the Eastern Mediterranean lends clusive Economic Zones in the Mediterra- this political constellation additional eco- nean null and void. Ankara also denies nomic and strategic cause for conflict. Nicosia the right to exploit the natural gas deposits, referring to claims to this new- found wealth by Turkish Cypriots. In Sep- Eastern Mediterranean riches tember 2011, Turkey concluded an agree- and disputes over Exclusive ment regarding the mutual EEZs with its Economic Zones protégé, the self-declared Turkish Repub- By April 2012, 1.025 billion cubic metres lic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC), which only of natural gas had been located in the so- it recognises, after its protests fell on called Levant Basin, which lies between Is- deaf ears in Nicosia. The same month, the rael, Lebanon and Cyprus. Nine of the elev- TRNC commissioned the state-owned en fields discovered are located in Israel’s Turkish oil company TPAO with explora- Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), while the tions north of the island, in waters con- remainder falls within the boundaries of sidered by the Republic of Cyprus part of the EEZ of the Republic of Cyprus. But that its EEZ. The stage was set for further esca- is by no means the end of the story. The U.S. lations. SWP Comments 34 October 2012 2 These duly developed, with Turkey Crete. During the same period, military demonstratively dispatching a research units in the 6th fleet of the USA as well as vessel to the Aphrodite gas field, to which units from Greece and Israel performed an Nicosia lays claim. This triggered military air and naval exercise which tested, among reactions from both the Republic of Cyprus other things, protective measures in place and Israel, whose fighter jets besieged the for oil rigs, and which was clearly intended ship, violating Turkish-Cypriot airspace and to call Turkey’s attention to the limits of its eliciting the deployment of military aircraft sphere of influence in the Eastern Mediter- by Turkey in response. When Israel’s Prime ranean. When Nicosia’s dispute with An- Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, became his kara over the demarcation treaty for the country’s first premier to visit Nicosia in mutual EEZs between Israel and the Repub- February 2012, Turkey reacted with a naval lic of Cyprus hove into view, Washington exercise which involved shooting in the and Brussels immediately affirmed Cyprus’ area of block 12 of the natural gas fields, right to conclude international treaties as which had been claimed by the Republic the sole representative of the entire island. of Cyprus, with live ammunition. Ankara’s situation looks no better as far as international law is concerned. Tel Aviv and Nicosia drew up their agreement on New “frontlines” in the the EEZs in accordance with the guidelines Mediterranean stipulated in the United Nations Conven- Nicosia and Tel Aviv have concluded co- tion on the Law of the Sea. Its standards operation agreements for the exploitation have become international common law, and safety of the natural gas fields and plan and are, as a result, binding for those to collaborate on the issue of gas export. nations which, like Israel and Turkey, have U.S. company Nobel Energy, in which Israel not yet sanctioned the treaty. holds shares, operates in both countries. With this, Turkey is currently largely Greek-Cypriot and Israeli newspapers report isolated in the Eastern Mediterranean. an escalation in military cooperation be- Ankara is experiencing a discrepancy, tween the two countries. According to press unknown until now, between its claim to sources, Israel is interested in using Cyprus’ be a new leading, regulatory power and the Andreas Papandreou military airport, and reality of a front consisting of Israel, Greece is negotiating the establishment of an air- and the Republic of Cyprus, which is bol- base on the island. The Israeli air force used stered by those major Western players, USA Cypriot airspace for exercises as early as and EU. At the same time, Turkey remains October 2011. In May 2012, Cypriot Foreign embroiled in disputes with Syria and Iran, Minister Erato Kozakou-Markoulli declared and its relations with Iraq are becoming that her country was indispensable to Isra- increasingly conflict-ridden. el’s security ahead of the American Jewish Committee’s annual global forum. In the wake of its dispute with Turkey, Turkey’s Cyprus policy: Israel has been drawing nearer to Greece. A case of déjà-vu The two countries signed a military cooper- From Ankara’s perspective, the current ation agreement in Jerusalem in September situation in the Eastern Mediterranean 2011. In late March 2012, a Greek-Israeli- appears to confirm the worst as far as the Cypriot investment summit took place in intrinsic assumptions of Turkey’s Cyprus Athens with the involvement of the USA policy and the associated fears are con- and Noble Energy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ARTISTIC AWAKENING in ANKARA (1953)1 Bülent Ecevit
    DOCUMENT ARTISTIC AWAKENING IN ANKARA (1953)1 BÜLent ecevit Until very recently, we Ankara residents were as jealous of Istanbul’s artistic awareness as we were of its sea and its trees. Our trees have yet to reach maturity, and we are as distant from the sea as ever, but an artistic awakening has now begun in Ankara as well. Concert tickets have begun to sell out in the blink of an eye, as soon as they are available. Curiously enough, tickets to the opening night of the opera reportedly sometimes sell out even before they are released.2 I say “reportedly” because this is a story I heard from one of the people interested in opening nights at the opera. Our opera no longer admits people to the concert hall who are ungroomed or who lack a formal dinner jacket. There are frequent balls at the opera. You’d think you’re in 18th-century Vienna. Because, as far as we know, this kind of dandyism no longer exists in any 20th-century city. Even in the most traditional of cities, like London, people in dinner jackets sit side- by-side with those in sports coats. 1 First published in Turkish as “Ankara’da sanat uyanıs¸ı,” Dünya, April 2, 1953, n.p. 2 The Ankara Opera, designed in 1933 by Turkish architect S¸evki Balmumcu as a space for large-scale exhibitions, was converted for use as the Ankara State Opera by German archi- tect Paul Bonatz in 1948. It was a widely recognized symbol of Turkey’s—and especially Ankara’s—cultural sophistication.
    [Show full text]
  • Ankara University
    Ankara University FOLLOW-UP EVALUATION REPORT July 2011 Team: Fuada Stankovic, chair Alina Gavra Andy Gibbs, coordinator Institutional Evaluation Programme/Ankara University/July 2011 Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Institutional Evaluation Programme and follow-up evaluation process ............................ 3 1.2 Ankara University and the national context ..................................................................... 4 1.3 The Self Evaluation Process ............................................................................................. 4 1.4. Description of the University ............................................................................................ 5 1.5. Changes that have been made since the original evaluation ............................................ 5 2. Internationalisation ......................................................................................................... 7 3. Science and society ....................................................................................................... 10 4. University / Industry Collaboration ................................................................................ 12 5. Quality Monitoring and Administration ......................................................................... 14 6. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 16 2 Institutional
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish President Turgut Özal's Impact on Nursultan
    TURKISH PRESIDENT TURGUT ÖZAL’S IMPACT ON NURSULTAN NAZARBAYEV’S PERCEPTION OF TURKEY* Nursultan Nazarbayev'ın Türkiye Algısına Tugut Özal'ın Etkisi Din Muhammed AMETBEK** Abstract Nursultan Nazarbayev as the founding President of Kazakhstan played a determinant role in the formation of Kazakh foreign policy. In this respect, the article examines Nazarbayev’s perception of Turkey as a decision maker in foreign policy are based on observation rather than realities. Nazarbayev is aware of the fact that the national identity of Kazakhstan is divided between two competing poles; Russian and Kazakh, in a broader sense; Slavic and Turkic. From this perspective, Nazarbayev’s perception of Turkey is significant as it is not only related to foreign policy but at the same time the national identity of Kazakhstan. The study argues that the President of Republic of Turkey of early 1990s Turgut Özal with his active diplomacy towards Kazakhstan contributed to the positive image of Turkey. The research concludes that close and reliable relations between Nazarbayev and Özal became the basis of a strategic part- nership between Kazakhstan and Turkey. Keywords: Turgut Özal, Nursultan Nazarbayev, Kazakhstan, Turkey, Perception, National Identity Özet Kazakistan’ın kurucu Cumhurbaşkanı Nursultan Nazarbayev’in, Kazak dış politi- kasının oluşumunda belirleyici rol üstlendiği kesindir. Bu bağlamda, makale, Nazarba- yev’in Türkiye algısını ele almaktadır. Çünkü inşacı ekolün iddiasına dış politika kararları gerçeklere değil algı üzerine alınmaktadır. Nazarbayev Kazakistan’ın ulusal kimliğinin Rus ve Kazak olarak, daha geniş kapsamda Slav ve Türk olarak yarışan iki kutba ayrıldığının farkındadır. Buradan hareketle, Nazarbayev’in Türkiye algısı, yal- nızca dış politika açısından değil aynı zamanda Kazakistan’ın ulusal kimliği açısından da önemlidir.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Turkish-Western Relations: Toward a Strategic Plan
    The Future of Turkish-Western Relations Toward a Strategic Plan Zalmay Khalilzad Ian O. Lesser F. Stephen Larrabee R Center for Middle East Public Policy • National Security Research Division Prepared for the Smith Richardson Foundation The research described in this report was sponsored by the Smith Richardson Foundation and RAND’s Center for Middle East Public Policy (CMEPP). The research was conducted within the Inter- national Security and Defense Policy Center of RAND’s National Security Research Division. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Khalilzad, Zalmay. The future of Turkish-Western relations : toward a strategic plan / Zalmay Khalilzad, Ian Lesser, F. Stephen Larrabee. p. cm. “MR-1241-SRF.” ISBN 0-8330-2875-8 1. Turkey—Foreign relations—Europe. 2. Europe—Foreign relations—Turkey. 3. Turkey—Foreign relations—United States. 4. United States—Foreign relations—Turkey. I. Lesser, Ian O., 1957– II. Larrabee, F. Stephen. III. Title. DR479.E85 K47 2000 327.5610171'3—dc21 00-059051 RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. © Copyright 2000 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from RAND. Published 2000 by RAND 1700 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org/ To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Internet: [email protected] PREFACE At the dawn of a new century, Turkish-Western relations have also entered a new era.
    [Show full text]
  • CAPITAL MARKETS BOARD of TURKEY ANNOUNCEMENT COMCEC 4Th Capital Market Regulators Forum Meeting Will Be Held in Istanbul. for T
    CAPITAL MARKETS BOARD OF TURKEY ANNOUNCEMENT COMCEC 4th Capital Market Regulators Forum Meeting will be held in Istanbul. For the members of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the Standing Committee for Economic and Commercial Cooperation (COMCEC), “COMCEC 4th Capital Markets Regulators Forum” hosted by the Capital Markets Board of Turkey (CMB) is being held in Istanbul, The Marmara Hotel on November 19, 2014. This year’s annual meeting of the Forum takes place with the participation of competent authorities from Bangladesh, Iran, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Malaysia, Maldives, Pakistan, Palestine, Sudan, Tunisia and Turkey as well as representatives from the Union of Arap Securities Regulators and COMCEC Coordination Office. In line with the calls of the 25th and 26th sessions of COMCEC General Assembly, COMCEC Capital Markets Regulators Forum was established in the Conference for COMCEC Capital Markets Regulators and in the Roundtable Meeting held in Istanbul in 2011. The Forum Secretariat and Chairmanship is being conducted by the CMB since its establishment. The main aim of the Forum is to reinforce capabilities of capital market regulatory bodies in Islamic countries and to offer a platform for COMCEC Member State regulatory authorities to share opinions and ideas on possible cooperation grounds. This year, at the same venue, “Mobilizing Islamic Finance for Long-Term Investment” Conference organised with the cooperation of Capital Markets Board of Turkey, World Bank Global Islamic Finance Centre and Borsa Istanbul will be held on November 18 – 19, 2015 and “Second International Islamic Finance And Economics Conference” will be organised on November 19, 2015 with the cooperation of Borsa Istanbul and Marmara University Faculty of Theology.
    [Show full text]
  • (PBN)- Encapsulated Chitosan and Pegylated Chitosan Nanoparticles
    ORIGINAL ARTICLES Department of Pharmaceutical Technology1, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hacettepe University, Ankara; Department of Pharmaceu- tical Technology2, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ataturk University, Erzurum; Department of Neurology3, Institute of Neurological Sciences and Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey; Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Technol- ogy and Biopharmacy4, UMR CNRS 8612, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Paris-XI, Chatenay-Malabry, France; Depart- ment of Pharmaceutical Technology5, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Santiago de Compostela; Departamento de Quı´mica Orga´nica6, Facultad de Quı´mica, and Unidad de RMN de Biomoleculas asociada al CSIC, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain Preparation and evaluation of alpha-phenyl-n-tert-butyl nitrone (PBN)- encapsulated chitosan and PEGylated chitosan nanoparticles O. Pinarbasli1, Y. Aktas2, T. Dalkara3, K. Andrieux4, M. J. Alonso5, E. Fernandez-Megia6, R. Novoa-Carballal6, R. Riguera6, P. Couvreur4, Y. Capan1 Received December 19, 2008, accepted December 29, 2008 Yilmaz Capan, Ph. D., Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hacettepe University, 06100 Ankara, Turkey [email protected] Pharmazie 64: 436–439 (2009) doi: 10.1691/ph.2009.8374 Alpha-phenyl-n-tert-butyl nitrone (PBN) shows its major effect by scavenging free radicals formed in the ischemia and it has the ability to penetrate through the blood brain barrier easily. The in vivo stability of PBN is very low and when administered systemically, it has a mean plasma half life of about three hours. Therefore, formulations which are able to prolong the plasma residence time of PBN are of major interest, because oxygen radicals are usually continuously formed under pathologi- cal conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Issue of Cyprus in the EU Accession of Turkey
    Claremont-UC Undergraduate Research Conference on the European Union Volume 2011 2011 Article 4 April 2013 The sI sue of Cyprus in the EU Accession of Turkey Melike Baştürk Pitzer College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/urceu Part of the Eastern European Studies Commons, and the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Baştürk, Melike (2011) "The sI sue of Cyprus in the EU Accession of Turkey," Claremont-UC Undergraduate Research Conference on the European Union: Vol. 2011, Article 4. DOI: 10.5642/urceu.201101.04 Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/urceu/vol2011/iss1/4 This Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Claremont at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Claremont-UC Undergraduate Research Conference on the European Union by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Claremont–UC Undergraduate Research Conference on the European Union 15 2 The Issue of Cyprus in the EU Accession of Turkey Melike Basturk A Divided Island: Cyprus It has always been hard to draw the map of Europe due to incomplete depictions of its geography. The borders of Europe include the states settled in Asia such as the Russian Federation, Azerbaijan and Armenia in the Council of Europe and even Israel in the song contest of Europe, Eurovision. However, the Europeanness of states like Turkey and Ukraine are always in question when it comes to the European Union (and the EC, its pre-1993 pre- decessor), even if both are in the Council of Europe simultaneously.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Geopolitics and Geoeconomics: the Growing Role of Gulf States in the Eastern Mediterranean
    Between Geopolitics and Geoeconomics: The Growing Role of Gulf States © 2021 IAI in the Eastern Mediterranean by Adel Abdel Ghafar ABSTRACT The role played by countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) in the Eastern Mediterranean is becoming increasingly ISSN 2610-9603 | ISBN 978-88-9368-177-3 important. This calls for an assessment of their evolving relationship with countries in the region, as well as their involvement in the Libyan conflict. Increased involvement by Gulf actors may inflame existing regional rivalries and geopolitical tensions. The interests of GCC countries in the Eastern Mediterranean are first analysed in the broader context of regional rivalries. Special attention is then devoted to Egypt, Libya, Lebanon, Greece and Cyprus, while considering the role of other key regional actors such as Turkey and Israel. Recommendations on why and how the new US administration should intervene to decrease regional tensions are provided. Gulf countries | Eastern Mediterranean | Turkish foreign policy | Egypt | keywords Libya | Lebanon | Greece | Cyprus | Israel IAI PAPERS 21 | 06 - FEBRUARY 2021 21 | 06 - FEBRUARY IAI PAPERS Between Geopolitics and Geoeconomics: The Growing Role of Gulf States in the Eastern Mediterranean Between Geopolitics and Geoeconomics: The Growing Role of Gulf States in the Eastern Mediterranean © 2021 IAI by Adel Abdel Ghafar* Introduction In August 2020, United Arab Emirates (UAE) Minister of State Anwar Gargash tweeted: “the signing of the maritime boundary demarcation agreement between Egypt and Greece is a victory for international law over the law of the jungle”.1 This thinly veiled insult, directed at Turkey, was the latest salvo in the growing competition in the Eastern Mediterranean.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gordian Knot: American and British Policy Concerning the Cyprus Issue: 1952-1974
    THE GORDIAN KNOT: AMERICAN AND BRITISH POLICY CONCERNING THE CYPRUS ISSUE: 1952-1974 Michael M. Carver A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of The requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2006 Committee: Dr. Douglas J. Forsyth, Advisor Dr. Gary R. Hess ii ABSTRACT Douglas J. Forsyth, Advisor This study examines the role of both the United States and Great Britain during a series of crises that plagued Cyprus from the mid 1950s until the 1974 invasion by Turkey that led to the takeover of approximately one-third of the island and its partition. Initially an ancient Greek colony, Cyprus was conquered by the Ottoman Empire in the late 16th century, which allowed the native peoples to take part in the island’s governance. But the idea of Cyprus’ reunification with the Greek mainland, known as enosis, remained a significant tenet to most Greek-Cypriots. The movement to make enosis a reality gained strength following the island’s occupation in 1878 by Great Britain. Cyprus was integrated into the British imperialist agenda until the end of the Second World War when American and Soviet hegemony supplanted European colonialism. Beginning in 1955, Cyprus became a battleground between British officials and terrorists of the pro-enosis EOKA group until 1959 when the independence of Cyprus was negotiated between Britain and the governments of Greece and Turkey. The United States remained largely absent during this period, but during the 1960s and 1970s came to play an increasingly assertive role whenever intercommunal fighting between the Greek and Turkish-Cypriot populations threatened to spill over into Greece and Turkey, and endanger the southeastern flank of NATO.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-Turkish Relations: a Review at the Beginning of the Third Decade of the Post-Cold War
    U.S.-Turkish Relations a review at the beginning of the third decade of the post–cold war era 1800 K Street, NW | Washington, DC 20006 Tel: (202) 887-0200 | Fax: (202) 775-3199 E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.csis.org Report Coordinators Bulent Aliriza Bulent Aras November 2012 ISBN 978-0-89206-759-6 Ë|xHSKITCy067596zv*:+:!:+:! Blank U.S.-Turkish Relations a review at the beginning of the third decade of the post–cold war era Report Coordinators Bulent Aliriza Bulent Aras November 2012 About CSIS—50th Anniversary Year For 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has developed practical solutions to the world’s greatest challenges. As we celebrate this milestone, CSIS scholars continue to provide strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a bipartisan, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full-time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analysis and de- velop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Since 1962, CSIS has been dedicated to finding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. After 50 years, CSIS has become one of the world’s pre- eminent international policy institutions focused on defense and security; regional stability; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global development and economic integration. Former U.S. senator Sam Nunn has chaired the CSIS Board of Trustees since 1999. John J. Hamre became the Center’s president and chief executive officer in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Comcec 35-Eng
    P.O. Box 55335, Jeddah 21534, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. T +966 12 646 8337 F +966 12 637 1064 www.itfc-idb.org itfccorp ITFC PROGRESS REPORT ON ENHANCING INTRA-OIC TRADE ITFC REPORT TO THE 35th SESSION OF THE COMCEC Member of 25 – 28 November 2019 Istanbul, Turkey Contents A. Introduction 02 Message from ITFC CEO 03 Brief about ITFC 04 Key Achievements up to September 30th, 2019 05 Excerpts from Resolution of the 35th Follow-Up Committee of the Standing Committee for Economic and Commercial Cooperation of the Organization of the Islamic Cooperation (COMCEC) B. ITFC Trade Finance Operations for Development 08 Sustaining Access to Energy 09 Figure 1: ITFC Energy Financing Top 5 Beneficiary Countries in 2018 09 Figure 2: ITFC Energy Financing Portfolio 2008 - 2017 11 Agriculture & Food Security 11 Figure 3: ITFC Agriculture Financing Beneficiary Countries for 2018 13 Access to Finance for SMEs 13 Mobilizing resources for funding Trade 13 Mobilizing resources for Trade Development C. Trade and Business Development 15 Arab-Africa Trade Bridges Program (AATB) 16 Aid for Trade Initiative for Arab States (AfTIAS) Program 17 Reverse Linkage Initiative in Guinea: “Recovery of the Private Sector” 18 Export Launchpad Program 18 International Trade Capacity Building and Market Access Support Program in Senegal 19 Export Launchpad Bangladesh 19 Indonesian Coffee Export Development Program (ICEDP) 20 West Africa SMEs Program 21 Aflatoxin Mitigation Program in the Gambia 22 ITFC's Innovation Master Plan Eng. Hani Salem Sonbol 01 ITFC Report to the 35th Meeting 0f the follow-up Committee of the COMCEC Chief Executive Officer A INTRODUCTION 01 02 Message from ITFC CEO It gives me a great pleasure to present to the 35th meeting of the Programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Nancy Atakan 1946, Lives and Works in Istanbul, Turkey Education 1995
    Nancy Atakan 1946, Lives and works in Istanbul, Turkey Education 1995 PhD, History of Art, Mimar Sinan University, Istanbul, Turkey 1982 MA, Educational Psychology, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey 1968 BA, Fine Arts and History of Art, Mary Washington College, Virginia, USA Solo Exhibitions 2019 Forward, March! (with Maria Andersson), Salt Beyoğlu, Istanbul, Turkey 2018 Under the Radar: 5533, (with Volkan Aslan), ISCP, New York, USA 2017 Making a Shift, (with Maria Andersson), Nordic Art Association, NFK, Stockholm, Sweden A Community of Lines, Pi Artworks Istanbul, Turkey 2016 Sporting Chances, Pi Artworks London, UK 2014 Incomprehensible World, Istanbul Culture and Art Foundation (IKSV) Hamlet Theatre Festival, Istanbul, Turkey 2013 Mirror Mirror on the Wall, Pi Artworks Istanbul, Turkey 2011 How Do We Know We Are Not Impostors?, Pi Artworks Istanbul, Turkey From Here 1970-2011, Pi Artworks Istanbul, Turkey 2009 Holding On, Apartment Project, Istanbul, Turkey I Believe / I Don't Believe, Pi Artworks Istanbul, Turkey Obsession, Manzara Perspectives, Istanbul, Turkey 2007 And, Proje 4L Elgiz Contemporary Art Museum, Artvarium, Istanbul, Turkey 2003 People Objects, Istanbul-Rotterdam Cultural Exchange, Rotterdam, The Netherlands 2002 Lives within Lifetimes, International Longevity Center, New York, NY, USA 2000 And, Mary Ogilvie Gallery, St. Anne's College, Oxford University, Oxford, UK 1990 Environmental, MD Gallery, Istanbul, Turkey Group Exhibitions 2019 Weave Braid Attach, Textile Pioneers and Contemporary Expressions, Vasteras
    [Show full text]