Stabilimenta on the Webs of Uloborus Diversus (Araneae: Uloboridae) and Other Spiders

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stabilimenta on the Webs of Uloborus Diversus (Araneae: Uloboridae) and Other Spiders J. Zool., Lond. (1973) 171, 367-384 Stabilimenta on the webs of Uloborus diversus (Araneae: Uloboridae) and other spiders WILLIAMG. EBERHARD* Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A. (Accepted 12 June 1973) (With 4 plates and 3 figures in the text) Uloborus diversus places extra silk (“stabilimenta”) near the hubs of its webs, preferentially on short radii ending near anchor threads. Spiders probably distinguish these radii from others by their relatively low extensibility. The stabilimentum probably functions as a camouflage device, and the orientation of the stabilimentum lines probably aids disturbed spiders in making quick exits from webs. Turning responses at radius-frame junctions during these exits are influenced by thread angles at the junctions (and possibly by other factors), and also enable disturbed spiders to reach hiding places quickly. The available data on other stabilimentum-building spiders suggests that they also use stabilimenta to provide defence against visually-hunting predators. Contents Page Introduction. ........... .. .. .. .. .. 361 Methods .......... .. .. .. .. .. .. 369 Stabilimentum patterns ........ .. .. .. .. .. 369 Orientation of stabilimenta in the field .... .. .. .. .. .. 312 Orientation of stabilimenta in the laboratory . .. .. .. .. .. 313 Movements preceding stabilimentum construction .. .. .. .. .. 313 Stabilimentum construction ...... .. .. .. .. .. 314 Possible stimuli directing stabilimentum placement .. .. .. .. .. 316 Spiders’ positions on webs in nature .... .. .. .. .. .. 311 Escape behaviour .......... .. .. .. .. 318 Discussion ............ .. .. .. .. .. 380 References ............ .. .. .. .. .. 383 Introduction Many spiders which remain on their webs during the day rest near objects they have fastened to the web. These objects are usually called stabilimenta when found in orb webs. In these webs (made by spiders in the families Uloboridae and Araneidae), stabilimenta consist of bands or tufts of silk, egg sacs, and detritus (Table I). Although egg sac and detritus stabilimenta are generally thought to serve as camouflage (e.g. Gertsch, 1949), the function of silk stabilimenta has been controversial. Silk stabili- menta were first thought to stabilize orbs, supposedly by strengthening the connections between hub threads (McCook, 1889; Comstock, 1940). Other authors suggested they were reserve cables for use in swathing prey (Vinson, 1863 quoted in Wiehle, 1927), * Present address: Universidad del Valle, Departamento de Biologia, Cali, Colombia, South America. 361 368 W. G. EBERHARD TABLEI Orb weaving spiders which spin stabilirnenta, and their daytime resting sites Spider at hub Species during the day? References SILK STABILIMENTA Argiope (apparently all species) Yes McCook, 1889; Wiehle, 1927, 1928; Hingston, 1927, 1932; Marson, 1947a; McKeown, 1952; Levi, 1968; Robinson & Robinson, 1970; Ewer, 1972 Uloborus (apparently all except U.gibbosa McCook, 1889; Wiehle, 1927, 1931; which often omits the stabilimentum) Hingston, 1927, 1932; B. J. Marples, 1955, 1962; Kullmann, 1972; this paper Araneus adiantus Wiehle, 1929 armatus Wiehle, 1931 redii Wiehle, 1927 Aculepeira ceropegia (= Aranea ceropegia) Wiehle, 1927 Cyclosa conica McCook, 1889; Marples & Marples. 1937 ginnage Yaginuma, 1966 inssulana Kullmann, 1972 sedecuolata Yaginuma, 1966 Cyrtophora moluccensis Yaginuma, 1966 Gasterucantha brevispina Marson, 19476 cancriyormis McCook, 1889; Comstock, 1940 pallida Hingston, 1932 versicolor Ernerit, 1968 Landana cygnea Eberhard, in prep. Micrathena armatus Hingston, 1932 gracilis McCook, 1889 sagittata Comstock, 1940 Neoscona benjamina McCook, 1889 Singa haemata Wiehle. 1929 EGG SAC STABILIMENTA (GENERA) Cyrtophora Kullmann, 1961 Cyclosa McCook, 1889; Wiehle, 1927, 1928; Kaston, 1948 Micrathena (1Acrosoma) McCook, 1889 Uloborus Emerton, 1883; McCook, 1889; Scheffer, 1905 DETRITUS STABILIMENTA (GENERA) Gasteracantha Hingston, 1927 Cyclosa McCook, 1889; Hingston, 1927; Wiehle, 1927 Landana Eberhard, in prep. deposits of superfluous silk left over after web construction (Wiehle, 192Q or “love paths” to guide the male to the female (Wolfram, 1924 quoted in Wiehle, 1927). Hingston (1927, 1932), and later Marson (1947a, b) showed the great variety of patterns of silk stabilimenta, and, noting a general correlation between the shape of the stabilimentum and the posture of the spider as it rested at the hub, concluded that stabilimenta function as defence against visually orienting predators by obscuring the outline of the spider or STABILIMENTA ON ULOBORUS DIVERSUS WEBS 3 69 by distracting the attention of such predators from the spider. Several recent authors (e.g. Gertsch, 1949; Robinson & Robinson, 1970) are not convinced of the defensive function of stabilimenta, at least in certain cases, and propose other possible functions such as “tuning” or strengthening the web. The data of this study, which is the first detailed examination of stabilimenta on the webs of Uloborus diversus, suggest that the stabilimenta on these webs function as camou- flage devices, and that they are oriented so the resting spider is in position to follow a short escape route off the web when disturbed. Methods Webs were studied both in the field and in the laboratory. Approximately 325 webs, each spun by a different spider in a different location, were observed in high Sonoran desert near Cave Creek, Arizona (elevation c. lo00 m) between 20 July and 5 August 1966. Webs of spiders of all ages except the first instars were studied. More than 600 webs and more than 30 stabilimentum constructions made by a stock of about 50 spiders were observed between September 1965 and March 1966 in a laboratory in Cambridge, Mass. Light levels were measured with a “Gossen Luna Pro” meter. Strong light did not inhibit stabilimentum construction, and movies (48 f/sec) of this behaviour were obtained and analysed. All significance tests reported below are 2 x 2 two-tailed x2 tests. Stabilimentum patterns Uloborus diversus constructed two types of stabilimentum,* both composed entirely of silk: the “linear” type (Plate I(a)) consisted of one or more mats of white silk laid in lines (“arms”) along radii; the “circular” type (Plate I(b)) contained, in addition to an arm or arms, silk laid in roughly circular loops at the hub (sometimes there was no arm visible in a circular stabilimentum). Occasionally a spider laid stabilimentum silk on lines at the edge of the web or below it (Plate 11). These lines were usually attached to frames or radii in the web, but were sometimes completely free of the web. Linear stabilimenta were most common both in the field and in the laboratory: 65 % of 268 webs in the field had linear stabilimenta, 30 % had circular stabilimenta, and 5 % had none; 42 % of 590 webs constructed in the laboratory had linear stabilimenta, 25 % had circular stabilimenta, and 33 % had none. Pairs of arms were most common in linear stabilimenta, and although the arms tended to be on opposite sides of the hub like those in Plate I(a), there was substantial variation in patterns (Table 11). Ninety-six per cent of TABLEI1 Stabilirnentumpatterns of U. diversus Type of Number of arms in stabilimentum stabilimentum N 0 1 2 3 4 5 Laboratory line 455 - 16% 76% 6% 1% 1% circle 135 1 48 31 14 5 1 Field line 182 - 5 93 2 0 0 circle 86 8 53 32 6 1 0 * The hubs of webs of first instar spiders were usually dotted with white specks which were often so numerous that there was a white “mat” at the hub. These specks were probably by-products of the construction of supple- mentary radii rather than a distinct structure (see Eberhard, in prep.). 3 70 W. G. EBERHARD PLATEI. Linear (a) and circular (b) stabilimenta at the hubs of U. diversus webs. The spider resting at the hub normally just fills the gap between the arms of the linear stabilimenturn. STABILIMENTA ON ULOBORUS DIVERSUS WEBS 371 PLATE11. Web of U. diversus with stabilimentum lines below the web, and the spider at the hub. 167 webs in the field and 96 % of 379 webs in the laboratory which had linear stabilimenta had at least one pair of stabilimentum arms which were on opposite sides of the hub from each other. These trends were reduced to 74 % of 35 webs in the field and 52 % of 61 webs in the laboratory which had circular stabilimenta. As noted by B. J. Maples (1962) in other species of Uloborus, given individuals were capable of making both types of stabilimentum, but most spiders usually spun only one type under constant conditions in the laboratory. Laboratory experiments showed that the light level during the night (when the spiders spun their webs) was correlated with changes in stabilimentum pattern. The amount of night light was changed for 21 consecutive nights, and 18 spiders (instar No. 3 and older) were fed one fruit fly per web, and their webs destroyed each day. The spiders consistently constructed both more circular stabilimenta and more lines under their webs following nights of bright (4.5 Lamberts) illumination; and they constructed fewer, predominantly linear stabilimenta with fewer lines under their webs (both P<0-05)after low light level (less than 1-0 Lamberts) nights (Table 111). Thus spiders resting in spots more exposed to the night sky may construct more elaborate stabilimenta. Webs at such sites would probably be most exposed to large, visually orienting predators, and these trends in stabilimentum size may function to provide maximum camouflage for those spiders most susceptible to attack, and preserve
Recommended publications
  • A Checklist of the Non -Acarine Arachnids
    Original Research A CHECKLIST OF THE NON -A C A RINE A R A CHNIDS (CHELICER A T A : AR A CHNID A ) OF THE DE HOOP NA TURE RESERVE , WESTERN CA PE PROVINCE , SOUTH AFRIC A Authors: ABSTRACT Charles R. Haddad1 As part of the South African National Survey of Arachnida (SANSA) in conserved areas, arachnids Ansie S. Dippenaar- were collected in the De Hoop Nature Reserve in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. The Schoeman2 survey was carried out between 1999 and 2007, and consisted of five intensive surveys between Affiliations: two and 12 days in duration. Arachnids were sampled in five broad habitat types, namely fynbos, 1Department of Zoology & wetlands, i.e. De Hoop Vlei, Eucalyptus plantations at Potberg and Cupido’s Kraal, coastal dunes Entomology University of near Koppie Alleen and the intertidal zone at Koppie Alleen. A total of 274 species representing the Free State, five orders, 65 families and 191 determined genera were collected, of which spiders (Araneae) South Africa were the dominant taxon (252 spp., 174 genera, 53 families). The most species rich families collected were the Salticidae (32 spp.), Thomisidae (26 spp.), Gnaphosidae (21 spp.), Araneidae (18 2 Biosystematics: spp.), Theridiidae (16 spp.) and Corinnidae (15 spp.). Notes are provided on the most commonly Arachnology collected arachnids in each habitat. ARC - Plant Protection Research Institute Conservation implications: This study provides valuable baseline data on arachnids conserved South Africa in De Hoop Nature Reserve, which can be used for future assessments of habitat transformation, 2Department of Zoology & alien invasive species and climate change on arachnid biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Functional Morphology of Attachment Devices in Arachnida
    Comparative functional morphology of attachment devices in Arachnida Vergleichende Funktionsmorphologie der Haftstrukturen bei Spinnentieren (Arthropoda: Arachnida) DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel vorgelegt von Jonas Otto Wolff geboren am 20. September 1986 in Bergen auf Rügen Kiel, den 2. Juni 2015 Erster Gutachter: Prof. Stanislav N. Gorb _ Zweiter Gutachter: Dr. Dirk Brandis _ Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 17. Juli 2015 _ Zum Druck genehmigt: 17. Juli 2015 _ gez. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang J. Duschl, Dekan Acknowledgements I owe Prof. Stanislav Gorb a great debt of gratitude. He taught me all skills to get a researcher and gave me all freedom to follow my ideas. I am very thankful for the opportunity to work in an active, fruitful and friendly research environment, with an interdisciplinary team and excellent laboratory equipment. I like to express my gratitude to Esther Appel, Joachim Oesert and Dr. Jan Michels for their kind and enthusiastic support on microscopy techniques. I thank Dr. Thomas Kleinteich and Dr. Jana Willkommen for their guidance on the µCt. For the fruitful discussions and numerous information on physical questions I like to thank Dr. Lars Heepe. I thank Dr. Clemens Schaber for his collaboration and great ideas on how to measure the adhesive forces of the tiny glue droplets of harvestmen. I thank Angela Veenendaal and Bettina Sattler for their kind help on administration issues. Especially I thank my students Ingo Grawe, Fabienne Frost, Marina Wirth and André Karstedt for their commitment and input of ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supposed Giant Spider Mongolarachne Chaoyangensis, from the Cretaceous Yixian Formation of China, Is a Crayfish
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336925980 The supposed giant spider Mongolarachne chaoyangensis, from the Cretaceous Yixian Formation of China, is a crayfish Article · October 2019 DOI: 10.11646/palaeoentomology.2.5.15 CITATIONS READS 0 456 6 authors, including: Paul A Selden Chungkun Shih University of Kansas Capital Normal University 202 PUBLICATIONS 3,396 CITATIONS 344 PUBLICATIONS 2,660 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Fossil arthropods View project Evolution of wing colour patterns in fossil insects View project All content following this page was uploaded by Chungkun Shih on 25 December 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Palaeoentomology 002 (5): 515–522 ISSN 2624-2826 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/pe/ PALAEOENTOMOLOGY Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 2624-2834 (online edition) PE https://doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.2.5.15 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FD4260C9-09DA-45D1-8B83-58A6A4E372C6 The supposed giant spider Mongolarachne chaoyangensis, from the Cretaceous Yixian Formation of China, is a crayfish PAUL A. SELDEN1, 2, 3,*, ALISON N. OLCOTT2, matt R. DOWNEN2, DONG REN1, CHUNGKUN SHIH1, 4 & XIAODONG CHENG5 1College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China. 2Department of Geology, University of Kansas, 1475 Jayhawk Boulevard, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA. 3Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK. 4Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA. 5Dalian Natural History Museum, Dalian 116023, Liaoning, China.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary List of Fossil Spiders
    A summary list of fossil spiders compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2009 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the spider fossil record and numerous new taxa have been described. As part of a larger project to catalog the diversity of fossil arachnids and their relatives, our aim here is to offer a summary list of the known fossil spiders in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Catalog. For this reason some of the family groupings proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. Genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross-referenced against the primary literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropods of Elm Fork Preserve
    Arthropods of Elm Fork Preserve Arthropods are characterized by having jointed limbs and exoskeletons. They include a diverse assortment of creatures: Insects, spiders, crustaceans (crayfish, crabs, pill bugs), centipedes and millipedes among others. Column Headings Scientific Name: The phenomenal diversity of arthropods, creates numerous difficulties in the determination of species. Positive identification is often achieved only by specialists using obscure monographs to ‘key out’ a species by examining microscopic differences in anatomy. For our purposes in this survey of the fauna, classification at a lower level of resolution still yields valuable information. For instance, knowing that ant lions belong to the Family, Myrmeleontidae, allows us to quickly look them up on the Internet and be confident we are not being fooled by a common name that may also apply to some other, unrelated something. With the Family name firmly in hand, we may explore the natural history of ant lions without needing to know exactly which species we are viewing. In some instances identification is only readily available at an even higher ranking such as Class. Millipedes are in the Class Diplopoda. There are many Orders (O) of millipedes and they are not easily differentiated so this entry is best left at the rank of Class. A great deal of taxonomic reorganization has been occurring lately with advances in DNA analysis pointing out underlying connections and differences that were previously unrealized. For this reason, all other rankings aside from Family, Genus and Species have been omitted from the interior of the tables since many of these ranks are in a state of flux.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Abundance and Diversity O F Web-Building Spiders in Relation to Habita T Structure on Barro Colorado Island, Panama
    Lubin, Y . D. 1978 . Seasonal abundance and diversity of web-building spiders in relation to habita t structure on Barro Colorado Island, Panama . J. Arachnol. 6 :31-51 . SEASONAL ABUNDANCE AND DIVERSITY O F WEB-BUILDING SPIDERS IN RELATION TO HABITA T STRUCTURE ON BARRO COLORADO ISLAND, PANAMA Yael D . Lubin Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute P. O. Box 2072, Balboa, Canal Zone ABSTRAC T Web-building spiders were censused by a visual censuring method in tropical forest understory o n Barro Colorado Island (BCI), Panama Canal Zone. An overall trend of low numbers of spiders in th e late dry season and early wet season (March to May) was seen on all transects . The majority of th e species on the transects had wet season distribution patterns . Some species which occurred year-round on the forest transects had wet season distributions on a clearing-edge transect . A shortage of flyin g insect prey or dessication may have been responsible for the observed distributions . Species diversity and diversity of web types followed the overall seasonal pattern of spider abun- dance. The diversities of species and of web types were greatest on the forest transect with the highes t diversity of structural supports for spider webs . Web density, however, was greatest on the transect a t the edge of a small clearing . Faunal composition, diversity of web types, and seasonal patterns of distribution of spiders on th e BCI transects differed markedly from similar measures derived from censuses taken in a tropica l montane habitat in New Guinea . The differences were attributed in part to differences in the habitat s and in the evenness of the climate .
    [Show full text]
  • Common Kansas Spiders
    A Pocket Guide to Common Kansas Spiders By Hank Guarisco Photos by Hank Guarisco Funded by Westar Energy Green Team, American Arachnological Society and the Chickadee Checkoff Published by the Friends of the Great Plains Nature Center i Table of Contents Introduction • 2 Arachnophobia • 3 Spider Anatomy • 4 House Spiders • 5 Hunting Spiders • 5 Venomous Spiders • 6-7 Spider Webs • 8-9 Other Arachnids • 9-12 Species accounts • 13 Texas Brown Tarantula • 14 Brown Recluse • 15 Northern Black Widow • 16 Southern & Western Black Widows • 17-18 Woodlouse Spider • 19 Truncated Cellar Spider • 20 Elongated Cellar Spider • 21 Common Cellar Spider • 22 Checkered Cobweb Weaver • 23 Quasi-social Cobweb Spider • 24 Carolina Wolf Spider • 25 Striped Wolf Spider • 26 Dotted Wolf Spider • 27 Western Lance Spider • 28 Common Nurseryweb Spider • 29 Tufted Nurseryweb Spider • 30 Giant Fishing Spider • 31 Six-spotted Fishing Spider • 32 Garden Ghost Spider Cover Photo: Cherokee Star-bellied Orbweaver ii Eastern Funnelweb Spider • 33 Eastern and Western Parson Spiders • 34 Garden Ghost Spider • 35 Bark Crab Spider • 36 Prairie Crab Spider • 37 Texas Crab Spider • 38 Black-banded Crab Spider • 39 Ridge-faced Flower Spider • 40 Striped Lynx Spider • 41 Black-banded Common and Convict Zebra Spiders • 42 Crab Spider Dimorphic Jumping Spider • 43 Bold Jumping Spider • 44 Apache Jumping Spider • 45 Prairie Jumping Spider • 46 Emerald Jumping Spider • 47 Bark Jumping Spider • 48 Puritan Pirate Spider • 49 Eastern and Four-lined Pirate Spiders • 50 Orchard Spider • 51 Castleback Orbweaver • 52 Triangulate Orbweaver • 53 Common & Cherokee Star-bellied Orbweavers • 54 Black & Yellow Garden Spider • 55 Banded Garden Spider • 56 Marbled Orbweaver • 57 Eastern Arboreal Orbweaver • 58 Western Arboreal Orbweaver • 59 Furrow Orbweaver • 60 Eastern Labyrinth Orbweaver • 61 Giant Long-jawed Orbweaver • 62 Silver Long-jawed Orbweaver • 63 Bowl and Doily Spider • 64 Filmy Dome Spider • 66 References • 67 Pocket Guides • 68-69 1 Introduction This is a guide to the most common spiders found in Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • Araneus Bonali Sp. N., a Novel Lichen-Patterned Species Found on Oak Trunks (Araneae, Araneidae)
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 779: 119–145Araneus (2018) bonali sp. n., a novel lichen-patterned species found on oak trunks... 119 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.779.26944 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Araneus bonali sp. n., a novel lichen-patterned species found on oak trunks (Araneae, Araneidae) Eduardo Morano1, Raul Bonal2,3 1 DITEG Research Group, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain 2 Forest Research Group, INDEHESA, University of Extremadura, Plasencia, Spain 3 CREAF, Cerdanyola del Vallès, 08193 Catalonia, Spain Corresponding author: Raul Bonal ([email protected]) Academic editor: M. Arnedo | Received 24 May 2018 | Accepted 25 June 2018 | Published 7 August 2018 http://zoobank.org/A9C69D63-59D8-4A4B-A362-966C463337B8 Citation: Morano E, Bonal R (2018) Araneus bonali sp. n., a novel lichen-patterned species found on oak trunks (Araneae, Araneidae). ZooKeys 779: 119–145. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.779.26944 Abstract The new species Araneus bonali Morano, sp. n. (Araneae, Araneidae) collected in central and western Spain is described and illustrated. Its novel status is confirmed after a thorough revision of the literature and museum material from the Mediterranean Basin. The taxonomy of Araneus is complicated, but both morphological and molecular data supported the genus membership of Araneus bonali Morano, sp. n. Additionally, the species uniqueness was confirmed by sequencing the barcode gene cytochrome oxidase I from the new species and comparing it with the barcodes available for species of Araneus. A molecular phylogeny, based on nuclear and mitochondrial genes, retrieved a clade with a moderate support that grouped Araneus diadematus Clerck, 1757 with another eleven species, but neither included Araneus bonali sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter Subfamily Comparison of Gut Microbial Diversity in Twelve Wild
    Inter subfamily comparison of gut microbial diversity in twelve wild spider species of family Araneidae Kaomud Tyagi1, Inderjeet Tyagi1, Priya Prasad2, Kailash Chandra1, and Vikas Kumar1 1Zoological Survey of India 2Affiliation not available August 12, 2020 Abstract Spiders are among the most diverse groups of arthropods remarkably known for extra oral digestion. The largest effort based on targeted 16S amplicon next generation sequencing was carried out to decipher the inter subfamily comparison of gut bacterial diversity in spiders and their functional relationship. Twelve spider species belonging to three subfamilies, Araneinae (8), Argiopinae (2) and Gasteracanthinae (2) of family Araneidae have been studied. Analysis revealed the presence of 22 phyla, 145 families, and 364 genera of microbes in the gut microbiome, with Proteobacteria as the highest abundant Phylum. Moreover, the phyla Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Deinococcus Thermus were also detected. The bacterial phyla Bacteriodetes and Chlamydiae dominated in Cyclosa mulmeinensis and Neoscona bengalensis respectively. At genera level, Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Cutibacterium, Staphylococcus, and Bacillus were the most dominant genera in their gut. In addition to this, the genus Prevotella was observed only in one species, Cyclosa mulmeinensis, and endosymbiont genus Wolbachia generally responsible for reproductive alterations was observed in one spider species Eriovixia laglaizei. Our study revealed that the gut bacterial diversity of the spiders collected from wild are quite different from the diet driven spider gut bacterial diversity as published earlier. A functional analysis revealed the involvement of gut microbiota in carbohydrate, lipid, amino acids, fatty acids and energy metabolism. Introduction Spiders (order Araneae) are arthropods that usually act as natural predators on insect pests in agricultural ecosystem (Michalko et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2017) bio-control agent for various diseases (Ndava et al., 2018), and indicator species for environment monitoring (Ossamy et al, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Web-Monitoring Force Exerted by the Spider Waitkera Waitakerensis (Uloboridae)
    1992 . The Journal of Arachnology 20 :146—14 7 WEB-MONITORING FORCE EXERTED BY THE SPIDER WAITKERA WAITAKERENSIS (ULOBORIDAE) The purpose of this study is to determine i f park in Hamilton (sample size 36) and anothe r the resting force expressed by the primitive, orb- from the Waitakere Mountains near Piha (sam- weaver Waitkera waitakerensis (Chamberlain ple size 19). I recorded the temperature at which 1946) is similar to that of the orb-weaver Ulo- each force measurement was taken and the live borus glomosus (Walckenaer 1841) and less than weight of each spider. These data were compared that of the triangle-weaver Hyptiotes cavatus with those of adult female U. glomosus and H. (Hentz 1847) (Opell 1987a) . This is importan t cavatus, as measured by Opell (1987a) . because Opell (1987a) used U. glomosus to rep- Using a Shapiro-Wilk W-statistic, I first de- resent orb-weavers in a study which conclude d termined if the resting forces of each populatio n that triangle-web spiders exert more force on a or species were normally distributed. If they were, horizontal resting line than do orb-weavers. I used a t test (t) to compare means; if they were I chose the monotypic genus Waitkera for this not, I used a Wilcoxon 2-sample test (W) . Except study because it is one of the two most primitive for the temperature at which force measurements members of the uloborid Glade that is a siste r were taken, all values from the Hamilton an d Glade of the larger assemblage that includes Ulo- Piha populations of W.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Arthropods Bandelier National Monument
    A Guide to Arthropods Bandelier National Monument Top left: Melanoplus akinus Top right: Vanessa cardui Bottom left: Elodes sp. Bottom right: Wolf Spider (Family Lycosidae) by David Lightfoot Compiled by Theresa Murphy Nov 2012 In collaboration with Collin Haffey, Craig Allen, David Lightfoot, Sandra Brantley and Kay Beeley WHAT ARE ARTHROPODS? And why are they important? What’s the difference between Arthropods and Insects? Most of this guide is comprised of insects. These are animals that have three body segments- head, thorax, and abdomen, three pairs of legs, and usually have wings, although there are several wingless forms of insects. Insects are of the Class Insecta and they make up the largest class of the phylum called Arthropoda (arthropods). However, the phylum Arthopoda includes other groups as well including Crustacea (crabs, lobsters, shrimps, barnacles, etc.), Myriapoda (millipedes, centipedes, etc.) and Arachnida (scorpions, king crabs, spiders, mites, ticks, etc.). Arthropods including insects and all other animals in this phylum are characterized as animals with a tough outer exoskeleton or body-shell and flexible jointed limbs that allow the animal to move. Although this guide is comprised mostly of insects, some members of the Myriapoda and Arachnida can also be found here. Remember they are all arthropods but only some of them are true ‘insects’. Entomologist - A scientist who focuses on the study of insects! What’s bugging entomologists? Although we tend to call all insects ‘bugs’ according to entomology a ‘true bug’ must be of the Order Hemiptera. So what exactly makes an insect a bug? Insects in the order Hemiptera have sucking, beak-like mouthparts, which are tucked under their “chin” when Metallic Green Bee (Agapostemon sp.) not in use.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiders of Alberta: from Agelenidae to Uloboridae
    Spiders of Alberta: from Agelenidae to Uloboridae Dr. Heather Proctor University of Alberta for the Edmonton Nature Club, 7 Feb 2019 (selected slides for posting; photos (c) H. Proctor unless otherwise noted) Canadian and Albertan diversity • 1477 species of spiders in 45 families known from Canada – may be up to 1800 spp. • 657 species in 28 families known from Alberta 631 of the 657 species are included here from https://www.albertaparks.ca/media/6255191/list-of-elements-ab-invertebrates-spiders.xlsx The 28 families of spiders known from Alberta • no mygalomorph spiders in AB, only araneomorph • Division Synspermiata – Pholcioidea: Pholcidae, Telemidae • Division Entelegynae – Araneoidea: Theridiidae, Araneidae, Linyphiidae, Mysmenidae, Mimetidae, Tetragnathidae – Uloboroidea: Uloboridae – Titanoecoidea: Titanoecidae – Amaurobioidea: Amaurobiidae – Desoidea: Desidae – Agelenoidea: Dictynidae, Cybaeidae, Hahniidae, Agelenidae – Lycosoidea: Oxyopidae, Thomisidae, Pisauridae, Lycosidae – Salticoidea: Salticidae, Philodromidae, Corinnidae, Eutichuridae – Anyphaenoidea: Anyphaenidae, Clubionidae – Liocranoidea: Liocranidae – Trochanteroidea: Phrurolithidae, Gnaphosidae mygalomorphs from BC, Antrodiaetus sp. Linyphiidae 261 Gnaphosidae 51 Lycosidae 50 Salticidae 45 Number of species known Dictynidae 36 from each family in Alberta Thomisidae 37 Theridiidae 36 (based on Robb Bennett’s Araneidae 32 personal list, 7 Feb 2019) Philodromidae 29 Clubionidae 17 Tetragnathidae 14 Hahniidae 10 Amaurobiidae 7 Agelenidae 6 Corinnidae 3 Phrurolithidae
    [Show full text]