DOCSLIB.ORG

Visual Color Difference Evaluation of Standard Color Pixel Representations for High Dynamic Range Video Compression

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Visual Color Difference Evaluation of Standard Color Pixel Representations for High Dynamic Range Video Compression Visual Color Difference Evaluation of Standard Color Pixel Representations for High Dynamic Range Video Compression Maryam Azimi, Ronan Boitard, Panos Nasiopoulos Mahsa. T. Pourazad Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, TELUS Communications Inc., University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Vancouver, Canada Abstract— With the recent introduction of High Dynamic to 100 cd/m2). However, for representing HDR’s wider range Range (HDR) and Wide Color Gamut (WCG) technologies, of luminance (0.005 to 10,000 cd/m2 [1]), the minimum bit- viewers’ quality of experience is highly enriched. To distribute depth requirement needs to be increased to avoid HDR videos over a transmission pipeline, color pixels need to be quantized into integer code-words. Linear quantization is not compromising the visual quality. In cases where no limitation optimal since the Human Visual System (HVS) do not perceive on bit-depth value is imposed, a point of no visible error can light in a linear fashion. Thus, perceptual transfer functions be reached [1] [2], however current infrastructures of video (PTFs) and color pixel representations are used to convert linear transmission only support 8 and/or 10-bit signals. light and color values into a non-linear domain, so that they Towards the standardization of an HDR video distribution correspond more closely to the response of the human eye. In this pipeline, the ITU-R BT.2100 [3] recommends two PTFs, work, we measure the visual color differences caused by different PTFs and color representation with 10-bit quantization. Our namely the Perpetual Quantizer (PQ) and Hybrid Log-Gamma study encompasses all the visible colors of the BT.2020 gamut at (HLG), as well as two color pixel representations, namely different representative luminance levels. Visual color differences YCbCr and ICtCp. The BT.2100 standard recommends 10 or are predicted using a perceptual color error metric (CIE 12-bit (for future pipeline) quantization. Currently, 10-bit ΔE2000). Results show that visible color distortion can already quantization is the bit-depth defined in HDR10, a profile occur before any type of video compression is performed on the recommended by the Motion Picture Experts Group (MPEG) signal and that choosing the right PTF and color representation can greatly reduce these distortions and effectively enhance the for HDR video compression. quality of experience. While the final quality of the video transmitted through the recommended pipeline has been evaluated comprehensively in Keywords— HDR, Color difference, Perceptual transfer MPEG [4] [5], the effect of the recommended PTFs and color function, Color pixel representation, Quantization. pixel representations in BT.2100, on the perceptual color quality of the 10-bit encoded signal has not been studied in I. INTRODUCTION depth. By ‘encoded’ here and for the rest of the paper we refer to the signal that has been transformed through a PTF and The emerging High Dynamic Range (HDR) technology has quantization, not to the compressed video signal. enormously increased the viewers’ quality of experience by In this work, we evaluate the perceptual color difference of enriching video content with higher brightness and wider color the non-linear quantized color signal across different PTFs and range. HDR technology’s broad range of brightness is color pixel representations compared to the original linear represented by floating-point values. To transmit HDR, its ones. Most of the related studies only focus on the available pixel values need to be first transformed from floating point HDR video content (mainly in BT.709 gamut) and hence they values to integer-coded ones through perceptual transfer do not cover the whole range of possible colors in BT.2020 functions (PTF) and bit-depth quantization since the gamut. We however, sample all the visible colors lying in the transmission pipeline is designed for integer-coded values. If BT.2020 gamut [6] based on their luminance levels and across this lossy transformation is not perceptually optimized, that is the u’v’ chromaticity plane. In order to study solely the error to say without taking advantage of the Human Visual System caused by quantization, we do not apply compression, nor (HVS) limitations, it will produce visible artifacts to the chroma subsampling on the signal. To evaluate the color signal, even before video compression. errors, we rely on a perceptual objective color difference An efficient PTF quantizes the physical luminance metric, which is based on HVS characteristics. Fig. 1 shows information of a captured scene such that only information the general workflow of the evaluation process, while this invisible to the human eye is excluded. Previously, 8-bit figure is discussed in more detail in Section III. quantization was deemed sufficient for the brightness range The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section II supported by Standard Dynamic Range (SDR) technology (0.1 This work was supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC CRDPJ 434659-12 and NSERC RGPIN-2014-05982), and TELUS Communications Inc. Fig. 1. Color difference experiment workflow provides details on the standard HDR PTFs and color pixels provides the possibility to compress the chroma channels’ representations for distribution. Section III includes details on information much more than that of the luminance channel, our setup and discusses the evaluation results. Conclusions are without having a huge impact on the overall quality. Presently, drawn in Section IV. video distribution pipelines convert RGB color channels to YCbCr, with Y being the luminance channel, and Cb and Cr II. BACKGROUND being respectively blue and red difference channels. YCbCr color representation is used in all video compression standards A. HDR Perceptual Transfer Functions including HEVC [13]. Considering that the HVS does not perceive and interpret There are two versions of YCbCr based on how a PTF is light in a linear way, perceptual (and hence non-linear) applied on the original linear RGB signal to obtain a 10-bit transfer functions are used to transfer the physical linear light Y’CbCr (the prime represents that the channel has been values of a scene to values that coincide with the HVS encoded using a PTF and that its values no longer correspond perceptual characteristics. The conventional SDR perceptual to linear light values): Non-constant Luminance (NCL) gamma transfer function (ITU-R BT.1886 [7]), is not efficient Y’CbCr and Constant Luminance (CL) Y’CbCr. The former for HDR as it was designed for the SDR luminance range. In generates the encoded luminance (luma) from a weighted addition, the HVS response diverts from a gamma function mixture of non-linear R’G’B’ values. The latter one relies on behavior at the higher luminance levels covered by HDR. linear RGB values to derive the luminance (Y) and then Therefore, a Hybrid-Log-Gamma function was introduced in applies the PTF on the Y channel to obtain the encoded Y’. [8], and later standardized by the Association of Radio NCL is the conventional approach that is widely adopted in Industries and Businesses (ARIB) as ARIB STD-B67 [9]. This the video distribution pipelines to derive Y’CbCr. However, it function combines a conventional gamma function for dark has been shown in [14] that the NCL approach coupled with areas, and a logarithmic function for bright areas. chroma subsampling will cause visible artifacts on the In [10], another perceptual transfer function was derived encoded and transmitted HDR signal which could have been using the peak sensitivities of the Barten Contrast Sensitivity avoided with the CL approach. Although YCbCr de-correlates Function (CSF) model [11]. This transfer function is usually luminance from chroma to some extent, its Y channel has still referred to as Perceptual Quantizer (PQ) is standardized by the some correlation with Cb and Cr [15]. That means that any Society of Motion Pictures and Television Engineers changes in Y will eventually affect the color, resulting in color (SMPTE) as SMPTE ST 2084 [12]. PQ is designed for shift between the original and the decoded signals. 2 luminance values range from 0.005 to 10,000 cd/m and its The ICtCp color space, proposed first in [15], is a color pixel code-words allocation does not change according to the peak representation for HDR, which claims to achieve better de- luminance of the content, as long as the content peak correlation between intensity and chroma information, closely luminance falls in this range. However, HLG is mainly matching the HVS perceptual mechanism. designed for the range of luminance supported by current 2 reference grading displays, mainly 0.01 to 1000 cd/m (or III. COLOR DIFFERENCE EVALUATION EXPERIMENTS 2 4000 cd/m ). Therefore, its code-words allocation varies In this work, we investigate how the PTFs and color pixel depending on the maximum peak luminance of the graded representations recommended in ITU-R BT.2100 [3] alter content. It is also worth mentioning that PQ is designed to each color perceptually. The evaluated PTFs in this study are better address HDR displays while HLG’s conventional PQ and HLG while the color pixel representations are NCL gamma function gives more emphasis on SDR legacy Y’CbCr, CL Y’CbCr, and ICtCp. Since neither compression nor displays. chroma sub-sampling is applied on the signals, the generated B. HDR Color Pixel Representations errors are due to quantization only (see Fig. 1). Please note Since the human eye is more sensitive to luminance that in this work we only consider signal transmission changes than to chrominance ones, it is common practice to application, therefore 10-bit BT.2020 colors. The 10-bit de-correlate chroma from luminance. This representation also quantization performed throughout this test follows the restricted range quantization as described in BT.2100. cd/m2 in Figs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HDR PROGRAMMING Thomas J
    April 4-7, 2016 | Silicon Valley HDR PROGRAMMING Thomas J. True, July 25, 2016 HDR Overview Human Perception Colorspaces Tone & Gamut Mapping AGENDA ACES HDR Display Pipeline Best Practices Final Thoughts Q & A 2 WHAT IS HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE? HDR is considered a combination of: • Bright display: 750 cm/m 2 minimum, 1000-10,000 cd/m 2 highlights • Deep blacks: Contrast of 50k:1 or better • 4K or higher resolution • Wide color gamut What’s a nit? A measure of light emitted per unit area. 1 nit (nt) = 1 candela / m 2 3 BENEFITS OF HDR Improved Visuals Richer colors Realistic highlights More contrast and detail in shadows Reduces / Eliminates clipping and compression issues HDR isn’t simply about making brighter images 4 HUNT EFFECT Increasing the Luminance Increases the Colorfulness By increasing luminance it is possible to show highly saturated colors without using highly saturated RGB color primaries Note: you can easily see the effect but CIE xy values stay the same 5 STEPHEN EFFECT Increased Spatial Resolution More visual acuity with increased luminance. Simple experiment – look at book page indoors and then walk with a book into sunlight 6 HOW HDR IS DELIVERED TODAY High-end professional color grading displays - Dolby Pulsar (4000 nits), Dolby Maui, SONY X300 (1000 nit OLED) UHD TVs - LG, SONY, Samsung… (1000 nits, high contrast, UHD-10, Dolby Vision, etc) Rec. 2020 UHDTV wide color gamut SMPTE ST-2084 Dolby Perceptual Quantizer (PQ) Electro-Optical Transfer Function (EOTF) SMPTE ST-2094 Dynamic metadata specification 7 REAL WORLD VISIBLE
    [Show full text]
  • A High Dynamic Range Video Codec Optimized by Large Scale Testing
    A HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE VIDEO CODEC OPTIMIZED BY LARGE-SCALE TESTING Gabriel Eilertsen? Rafał K. Mantiuky Jonas Unger? ? Media and Information Technology, Linkoping¨ University, Sweden y Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK ABSTRACT 2. BACKGROUND While a number of existing high-bit depth video com- With recent advances in HDR imaging, we are now at a stage pression methods can potentially encode high dynamic range where high-quality videos can be captured with a dynamic (HDR) video, few of them provide this capability. In this range of up to 24 stops [1, 2]. However, storage and distri- paper, we investigate techniques for adapting HDR video bution of HDR video still mostly rely on formats for static for this purpose. In a large-scale test on 33 HDR video se- images, neglecting the inter-frame relations that could be ex- quences, we compare 2 video codecs, 4 luminance encoding plored. Although the first steps are being taken in standard- techniques (transfer functions) and 3 color encoding meth- izing HDR video encoding, where MPEG recently released a ods, measuring quality in terms of two objective metrics, call for evidence for HDR video coding, most existing solu- PU-MSSIM and HDR-VDP-2. From the results we design tions are proprietary and HDR video compression software is an open source HDR video encoder, optimized for the best not available on Open Source terms. compression performance given the techniques examined. The challenge in HDR video encoding, as compared to Index Terms— High dynamic range (HDR) video, HDR standard video, is in the wide range of possible pixel values video coding, perceptual image metrics and their linear floating point representation.
    [Show full text]
  • SMPTE ST 2094 and Dynamic Metadata
    SMPTE Standards Update SMPTE Professional Development Academy – Enabling Global Education SMPTE Standards Webcast Series SMPTE Professional Development Academy – Enabling Global Education SMPTE ST 2094 and Dynamic Metadata Lars Borg Principal Scientist Adobe linkedin: larsborg My first TV © 2017 by the Society of Motion Picture & Television Engineers®, Inc. (SMPTE®) SMPTE Standards Update Webcasts Professional Development Academy Enabling Global Education • Series of quarterly 1-hour online (this is is 90 minutes), interactive webcasts covering select SMPTE standards • Free to everyone • Sessions are recorded for on-demand viewing convenience SMPTE.ORG and YouTube © 2017 by the Society of Motion Picture & Television Engineers®, Inc. (SMPTE®) © 2016• Powered by SMPTE® Professional Development Academy • Enabling Global Education • www.smpte.org © 2017 • Powered by SMPTE® Professional Development Academy | Enabling Global Education • www.smpte.org SMPTE Standards Update SMPTE Professional Development Academy – Enabling Global Education Your Host Professional Development Academy • Joel E. Welch Enabling Global Education • Director of Education • SMPTE © 2017 by the Society of Motion Picture & Television Engineers®, Inc. (SMPTE®) 3 Views and opinions expressed during this SMPTE Webcast are those of the presenter(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of SMPTE or SMPTE Members. This webcast is presented for informational purposes only. Any reference to specific companies, products or services does not represent promotion, recommendation, or endorsement by SMPTE © 2017 • Powered by SMPTE® Professional Development Academy | Enabling Global Education • www.smpte.org SMPTE Standards Update SMPTE Professional Development Academy – Enabling Global Education Today’s Guest Speaker Professional Development Academy Lars Borg Enabling Global Education Principal Scientist in Digital Video and Audio Engineering Adobe © 2017 by the Society of Motion Picture & Television Engineers®, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptual Signal Coding for More Efficient Usage of Bit Codes Scott Miller Mahdi Nezamabadi Scott Daly Dolby Laboratories, Inc
    Perceptual Signal Coding for More Efficient Usage of Bit Codes Scott Miller Mahdi Nezamabadi Scott Daly Dolby Laboratories, Inc. What defines a digital video signal? • SMPTE 292M, SMPTE 372M, HDMI? – No, these are interface specifications – They don’t say anything about what the RGB or YCbCr values mean • Rec601 or Rec709? – Not really, these are encoding specifications which define the OETF (Opto-Electrical Transfer Function) used for image capture – Image display ≠ inverse of image capture © 2012 SMPTE · e 2012 Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition · www.smpte2012.org What defines a digital video signal? • This does! • The EOTF (Electro-Optical Transfer Function) is what really matters – Content is created by artists while viewing a display – So the reference display defines the signal © 2012 SMPTE · e 2012 Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition · www.smpte2012.org Current Video Signals • “Gamma” nonlinearity – Came from CRT (Cathode Ray Tube) physics – Very much the same since the 1930s – Works reasonably well since it is similar to human visual sensitivity (with caveats) • No actual standard until last year! (2011) – Finally, with CRTs almost extinct the effort was made to officially document their response curve – Result was ITU-R Recommendation BT.1886 © 2012 SMPTE · e 2012 Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition · www.smpte2012.org Recommendation ITU-R BT.1886 EOTF © 2012 SMPTE · e 2012 Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition · www.smpte2012.org If gamma works so well, why change? • Gamma is similar to perception within limits
    [Show full text]
  • DVB SCENE | March 2017
    Issue No. 49 DVBSCENE March 2017 Delivering the Digital Standard www.dvb.org GAME ON FOR UHD Expanding the Scope of HbbTV Emerging Trends in Displays Next Gen Video Codec 04 Consuming Media 06 In My Opinion 07 Renewed Purpose for DVB 09 Discovering HDR 10 Introducing NGA 13 VR Scorecard 08 12 15 14 Next Gen In-Flight Connectivity SECURING THE CONNECTED FUTURE The world of video is becoming more connected. And next- generation video service providers are delivering new connected services based on software and IP technologies. Now imagine a globally interconnected revenue security platform. A cloud-based engine that can optimize system performance, proactively detect threats and decrease operational costs. Discover how Verimatrix is defining the future of pay-TV revenue security. Download our VCAS™ FOR BROADCAST HYBRID SOLUTION BRIEF www.verimatrix.com/hybrid The End of Innovation? A Word From DVB A small step for mankind, but a big step for increase in resolution. Some claim that the the broadcast industry might seem like an new features are even more important than SECURING overstatement, however that’s exactly what an increase in spatial resolution as happened on 17 November when the DVB appreciation is not dependent on how far Steering Board approved the newly updated the viewer sits from the screen. While the audio – video specification, TS 101 154, display industry is going full speed ahead thereby enabling the rollout of UHD and already offers a wide range of UHD/ THE CONNECTED FUTURE services. The newly revised specification is HDR TVs, progress in the production Peter Siebert the result of enormous effort from the DVB domain is slower.
    [Show full text]
  • Visualization & Analysis of HDR/WCG Content
    Visualization & Analysis of HDR/WCG Content Application Note Visualization & analysis of HDR/WCG content Introduction The adoption of High Dynamic Range (HDR) and Wide Colour Gamut (WCG) content is accelerating for both 4K/UHD and HD applications. HDR provides a greater range of luminance, with more detailed light and dark picture elements, whereas WCG allows a much wider range of colours to be displayed on a television screen. The combined result is more accurate, more immersive broadcast content. Hand-in-hand with exciting possibilities for viewers, HDR and WCG also bring additional challenges with respect to the management of video brightness and colour space for broadcasters and technology manufacturers. To address these issues, an advanced set of visualization, analysis and monitoring tools is required for HDR and WCG enabled facilities, and to test video devices for compliance. 2 Visualization & analysis of HDR/WCG content HDR: managing a wider range of luminance Multiple HDR formats are now used consumer LCD and OLED monitors do not worldwide. In broadcast, HLG10, PQ10, go much past 1000 cd/m2. S-log3, S-log3 (HDR Live), HDR10, HDR10+, SLHDR1/2/3 and ST 2094-10 are all used. It is therefore crucial to accurately measure luminance levels during HDR production to Hybrid Log-Gamma (HLG), developed by the avoid displaying washed out, desaturated BBC and NHK, provides some backwards images on consumers’ television compatibility with existing Standard Dynamic displays. It’s also vital in many production Range (SDR) infrastructure. It is a relative environments to be able to manage both system that offers ease of luminance HDR and SDR content in the same facility mapping in the SDR zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Peak Luminance on Perceptual Color Gamut Volume
    https://doi.org/10.2352/issn.2169-2629.2020.28.3 ©2020 Society for Imaging Science and Technology Effect of Peak Luminance on Perceptual Color Gamut Volume Fu Jiang,∗ Mark D. Fairchild,∗ Kenichiro Masaoka∗∗; ∗Munsell Color Science Laboratory, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, USA; ∗∗NHK Science & Technology Research Laboratories, Setagaya, Tokyo, Japan Abstract meaningless in terms of color appearance. In this paper, two psychophysical experiments were con- Color appearance models, as proposed and tested by CIE ducted to explore the effect of peak luminance on the perceptual Technical Committee 1-34, are required to have predictive corre- color gamut volume. The two experiments were designed with lates of at least the relative appearance attributes of lightness, two different image data rendering methods: clipping the peak chroma, and hue [3]. CIELAB is the widely used and well- luminance and scaling the image luminance to display’s peak lu- known example of such a color appearance space though its orig- minance capability. The perceptual color gamut volume showed inal goal was supra-threshold color-difference uniformity. How- a close linear relationship to the log scale of peak luminance. ever, CIELAB does not take the other attributes of the view- The results were found not consistent with the computational ing environment and background, such as absolute luminance 3D color appearance gamut volume from previous work. The level, into consideration. CIECAM02 is CIE-recommended difference was suspected to be caused by the different perspec- color appearance model for more complex viewing situations tives between the computational 3D color appearance gamut vol- [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Perceptual Color Volume V7.1
    EEDS TO CHANG Perceptual Color Volume Measuring the Distinguishable Colors of HDR and WCG Displays INTRODUCTION Metrics exist to describe display capabilities such as contrast, bit depth, and resolution, but none yet exist to describe the range of colors produced by high-dynamic-range and wide-color-gamut displays. This paper proposes a new metric, millions of distinguishable colors (MDC), to describe the range of both colors and luminance levels that a display can reproduce. This new metric is calculated by these steps: 1) Measuring the XYZ values for a sample of colors that lie on the display gamut boundary 2) Converting these values into a perceptually-uniform color representation 3) Computing the volume of the 3D solid The output of this metric is given in millions of distinguishable colors (MDC). Depending on the chosen color representation, it can relate to the number of just-noticeable differences (JND) that a display (assuming sufficient bit-depth) can produce. MEASURING THE GAMUT BOUNDARY The goal of this display measurement is to have a uniform sampling of the boundary capabilities of the display. If the display cannot be modeled by a linear combination of RGB primaries, then a minimum of 386 measurements are required to sample the input RGB cube (9x9x6). Otherwise, the 386 measurements may be simulated through five measurements (Red, Green, Blue, Black, and White). We recommend the following measuring techniques: - For displaying colors, use a center-box pattern to cover 10% area of the screen - Using a spectroradiometer with a 2-degree aperture, place it one meter from the display - To exclude veiling-glare, use a flat or frustum tube mask that does not touch the screen Version 7.1 Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Analysis of Baseband Quantizer on Coding Efficiency for HDR Video
    1 Impact Analysis of Baseband Quantizer on Coding Efficiency for HDR Video Chau-Wai Wong, Member, IEEE, Guan-Ming Su, Senior Member, IEEE, and Min Wu, Fellow, IEEE Abstract—Digitally acquired high dynamic range (HDR) video saving the running time of the codec via computing numbers baseband signal can take 10 to 12 bits per color channel. It is in a smaller range, ii) handling the event of instantaneous economically important to be able to reuse the legacy 8 or 10- bandwidth shortage as a coding feature provided in VC-1 bit video codecs to efficiently compress the HDR video. Linear or nonlinear mapping on the intensity can be applied to the [15]–[17], or iii) removing the color precision that cannot be baseband signal to reduce the dynamic range before the signal displayed by old screens. is sent to the codec, and we refer to this range reduction step as Hence, it is important to ask whether reducing the bitdepth a baseband quantization. We show analytically and verify using for baseband signal is bad for coding efficiency measured test sequences that the use of the baseband quantizer lowers in HDR. Practitioners would say “yes”, but if one starts to the coding efficiency. Experiments show that as the baseband quantizer is strengthened by 1.6 bits, the drop of PSNR at a tackle this question formally, the answer is not immediately high bitrate is up to 1.60 dB. Our result suggests that in order clear as the change of the rate-distortion (RD) performance to achieve high coding efficiency, information reduction of videos is non-trivial: reducing the bitdepth for baseband signal while in terms of quantization error should be introduced in the video maintaining the compression strength of the codec will lead to codec instead of on the baseband signal.
    [Show full text]
  • Quick Reference HDR Glossary
    Quick Reference HDR Glossary updated 11.2018 Quick Reference HDR Glossary technicolor Contents 1 AVC 10 MaxCLL Metadata 1 Bit Depth or Colour Depth 10 MaxFALL Metadata 2 Bitrate 10 Nits (cd/m2) 2 Color Calibration of Screens 10 NRT Workflow 2 Contrast Ratio 11 OETF 3 CRI (Color Remapping 11 OLED Information) 11 OOTF 3 DCI-P3, D65-P3, ST 428-1 11 Peak Code Value 3 Dynamic Range 11 Peak Display Luminance 4 EDID 11 PQ 4 EOTF 12 Quantum Dot (QD) Displays 4 Flicker 12 Rec. 2020 or BT.2020 4 Frame Rate 13 Rec.709 or BT.709 or sRGB 5 f-stop of Dynamic Range 13 RT (Real-Time) Workflow 5 Gamut or Color Gamut 13 SEI Message 5 Gamut Mapping 13 Sequential Contrast / 6 HDMI Simultaneous Contrast 6 HDR 14 ST 2084 6 HDR System 14 ST 2086 7 HEVC 14 SDR/SDR System 7 High Frame Rate 14 Tone Mapping/ Tone Mapping 8 Image Resolution Operator (TMO) 8 IMF 15 Ultra HD 8 Inverse Tone Mapping (ITM) 15 Upscaling / Upconverting 9 Judder/Motion Blur 15 Wide Color Gamut (WCG) 9 LCD 15 White Point 9 LUT 16 XML 1 Quick Reference HDR Glossary AVC technicolor Stands for Advanced Video Coding. Known as H.264 or MPEG AVC, is a video compression format for the recording, compression, and distribution of video content. AVC is best known as being one of the video encoding standards for Blu-ray Discs; all Blu-ray Disc players must be able to decode H.264. It is also widely used by streaming internet sources, such as videos from Vimeo, YouTube, and the iTunes Store, web software such as the Adobe Flash Player and Microsoft Silverlight, and also various HDTV broadcasts over terrestrial (ATSC, ISDB-T, DVB-T or DVB-T2), cable (DVB-C), and satellite (DVB-S and DVB-S2).
    [Show full text]
  • High Dynamic Range Broadcasting
    Connecting IT to Broadcast High Dynamic Range Broadcasting Essential EG Guide ESSENTIAL GUIDES Essential Guide High Dynamic Range Broadcasting - 11/2019 Introduction Television resolutions have increased HDR is rapidly being adopted by OTT from the analog line and field rates of publishers like Netflix to deliver a the NTSC and PAL systems through premium product to their subscribers. HD to the 3840 x 2160 pixels of UHD, Many of the cost and workflow with 8K waiting in the wings. However, issues around the simulcasting of the dynamic range of the system was live broadcasts in HDR and standard very much set by the capabilities of the definition have also been solved. cathode ray tube, the display device of analog television. The latest displays, The scales have been lifted from our LCD and OLED, can display a wider eyes, as imaging systems can now dynamic range than the old standards deliver a more realistic dynamic range to permit. The quest for better pixels, driven the viewer. by the CE vendors, video publishers— OTT and broadcast—as well as directors, This Essential Guide, supported by AJA has led for improvements beyond just Video Systems, looks at the challenges increasing resolution. and the technical solutions to building an HDR production chain. Following the landmark UHD standard, David Austerberry BT.2020, it was rapidly accepted that David Austerberry to omit the extension of dynamic range was more than an oversight. BT.2100 soon followed, adding high dynamic range (HDR) with two different systems. Perceptual Quantisation (PQ) is based on original research from Dolby and others, Hybrid Log Gamma (HLG) offers compatibility with legacy systems.
    [Show full text]
  • High Dynamic Range Versus Standard Dynamic Range Compression Efficiency
    HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE VERSUS STANDARD DYNAMIC RANGE COMPRESSION EFFICIENCY Ronan Boitard? Mahsa T. Pourazad?y Panos Nasiopoulos? ? University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada yTELUS Communications Inc., Vancouver, Canada ABSTRACT encoding HDR content natively, for example using HDR10 High Dynamic Range (HDR) image and video technology [3], results in lower bit-rates than the SDR version [4]. aims at conveying the full range of perceptible shadow and These results are intuitively contradictory, more information highlight details with sufficient precision. HDR is regarded using less bandwidth. In this article, we explain in detail by many experts as the next evolution in digital media. why a pipeline such as HDR10 can be more efficient than However, industrial broadcasters have concerns regarding broadcasting the SDR version. the bandwidth overhead that this new technology entails. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section II While many consider that broadcasting HDR content would introduces the concept of color pixels encoding. Section III increase bandwidth requirements by around 20%, this num- outlines the difference between the traditional SDR and the ber is based on studies where, in addition to the SDR main emerging HDR pipelines. Section IV provides a statistical stream, HDR-related side information is conveyed. A recent analysis of both HDR and SDR content to illustrate that more subjective evaluation reported that encoding HDR video visual information does not mean higher entropy signal. content in a single layer might require less bandwidth than Finally, Section V concludes this article. its associated SDR version. Similar results were discussed in II. COLOR PIXEL ENCODING the MPEG ad-hoc group on High Dynamic Range and Wide Color Gamut.
    [Show full text]