DOCSLIB.ORG

"Spotlight" Interview with George Liber

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
H-Ukraine H-Ukraine "Spotlight" Interview with George Liber Discussion published by John Vsetecka on Friday, January 15, 2021 H-Ukraine “Spotlight” Interview with George Liber George Liber ([email protected]) is Professor of History at the University of Alabama at Birmingham H-Ukraine: According to your online faculty profile page, you were born exactly one week after Joseph Stalin died. Some might consider it fate that you became a historian of Soviet and east European history. What made you interested in researching and teaching the topic in a professional capacity? GL: Fate is perhaps too strong a word. From an early age, I was interested in history and politics. I was raised in a Ukrainian émigré environment in the greater Chicago-metro area. I attended Ukrainian Saturday School at St. Nicholas Greek Catholic Church in Chicago, graduating in 1970. When I was in high school, I traveled by means of the South Shore Railroad from Gary, Indiana, where I lived with my parents, to Chicago to attend these Saturday classes. On these trips, I often spent long periods of time waiting in train stations, perusing the magazine racks in the gift shops. I encountered The Atlantic and Harper’s for the first time and voraciously read them. They introduced me to a wider world, which did not include Ukraine. I felt marginalized. In order to overcome this division between my American and Ukrainian worlds, I hoped to become a professor. My first interest was American history (I remember reading Richard Hofstadter’sAnti-Intellectualism in American Life, a book which had a profound influence on me when I was 15; the book is still worth rereading today, especially in our conspiracy-saturated world). When I entered Indiana University as an undergraduate in 1971, I thought of specializing in East European history, concentrating on Polish history. It was only after the summer of 1973 (when I enrolled in Orest Subtelny’s course on the History of Modern Ukraine at Harvard) that I decided to enter the newly established field of Ukrainian history. Orest Subtelny became my mentor and role model. He was very generous with his time and his advice. I would not have accomplished what I have managed to accomplish without his help at the early stages of my academic career. H-Ukraine: While you remain a specialist in Soviet history more generally, your three books—Total Wars and the Making of Modern Ukraine, 1914-1954 (2016), Alexander Dovzhenko: A Life in Soviet Film (2002), and Soviet Nationality Policy, Urban Growth, and Identity Change in the Ukrainian SSR, 1923-1934 (1992)—focus on Ukraine and Ukrainians. What is it about Ukraine specifically that continues to captivate your interest? Have your interests in Ukrainian history shifted over time? If so, how? GL: Orest Subtelny published a fascinating article on Ukraine in Stanislaus A. Blejwas ed.,East Citation: John Vsetecka. H-Ukraine "Spotlight" Interview with George Liber. H-Ukraine. 01-15-2021. https://networks.h-net.org/node/4555727/discussions/7125115/h-ukraine-spotlight-interview-george-liber Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-Ukraine Central European Studies: A Handbook for Graduate Students (Columbus, Ohio: AAASS, 1973), which inspired me when I was an undergraduate. In this article, Subtelny described the history of Ukraine as a terra incognita, a totally unexplored area where historians could employ any approach (or model) and still make a contribution to the field of Slavic studies. I initially imagined that I would study the intellectual origins of the Ukrainian national movement in the nineteenth century (with Mykhailo Drahomanov as my primary focus). But when I entered the Ph.D. program at Columbia University, I shifted to the study of Soviet social history under Sheila Fitzpatrick. Under her direction, I started to investigate the processes of urbanization and national identity formation in twentieth century Ukraine, which became the basis of my first monograph. Although I have maintained my interest in the interrelationship between urbanization and Ukrainian national identity, I also branched out into biography and film. I have evolved from concentrating on the Ukrainian national movement and Ukrainian nationalism to evaluating the emergence of civic identity in Ukraine, which encompasses all citizens of Ukraine, irrespective of their primary language usage or national identification. H-Ukraine: As a student of Ukrainian history, I am often asked by others about the history of Ukraine and its role within the larger context of Soviet history. While Ukraine is, of course, a major component of Soviet history, it is also part of European (and global) history more broadly. Do you think that the study of Ukraine and its history offers any value to those who research and teach European and world history? In other words, is there room in the historiography, particularly that of Europe’s, for Ukraine and other countries that are often understood only through the Soviet prism? GL: One cannot understand Europe’s great power relationships and conflicts without understanding Ukraine’s role in history. Zbigniew Brzezinski once observed that the most important countries in the world are either geostrategic players or geopolitical pivots. Active geostrategic players possess “the capacity and the national will to exercise power or influence beyond their borders in order to alter . the existing geopolitical state of affairs.” France, Germany, Russia, China, and India belong to this Eurasian club of geostrategic players. In contrast to this group, geopolitical pivots are states whose importance is derived not from their own power and motivation but rather from their sensitive location and from the consequences of their potentially vulnerable condition for the behavior of geostrategic players. Most often, geopolitical pivots are determined by their geography, which in some cases gives them a special role in either defining access to important areas or in denying resources to a significant player. In Brzezinski’s view of the world, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, South Korea, Turkey, and Iran constitute important geopolitical pivots. Throughout the twentieth century, the majority Ukrainian-speaking territories played a key role in shaping the competition between the great powers (active geopolitical players) of Central and East Central Europe, especially Poland, Germany and Russia (later the USSR). In this period, the intensity of the political allegiances and the national identities of the elites and the peoples living on these territories helped decide the success of Moscow’s efforts to assert its influence along its western flank. Ukraine’s emergence as an independent state after 1991 both enhanced Poland’s security and challenged Russia’s hegemony over the post-Soviet region. Citation: John Vsetecka. H-Ukraine "Spotlight" Interview with George Liber. H-Ukraine. 01-15-2021. https://networks.h-net.org/node/4555727/discussions/7125115/h-ukraine-spotlight-interview-george-liber Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-Ukraine In addition to being a pivotal state, Ukraine is to some extent what the late Harvard political scientist Samuel P. Huntington called a cleft country. As defined by Huntington, a cleft country is one whose population includes large groups who imagine that they belong to different civilizations. Internal conflicts develop in cleft countries when groups “belonging to one civilization attempt(s) to define the state as its political instrument and to make its language, religion, and symbols those of the state.” They believe that “we are different peoples and belong in different places.” Ukraine’s divisions did not emerge in a political vacuum. External geopolitical contexts, the overall balance of power, imperial rule, and foreign interventions often helped shape its internal developments. With the emergence of mass politics after the French Revolution, more people became involved in the political process. External factors (wars, economic crisis, political conflicts, natural and environmental disasters) often challenged their unspoken assumptions and inertia, igniting radical shifts, often leading to chaos and mass psychological disorientation. Each of the past century’s brutal wars, revolutions, and subsequent social cataclysms opened new doors and opportunities while closing others, producing a new set of menus, options, contingencies, and unintended consequences for the people living in the Ukrainian-speaking provinces. As the status quo crumbled with each catastrophe, chaos brought novel challenges as well as opportunities. Men and women had to adapt to a different world, one containing unimagined political and social possibilities. People had to reassess their embedded perceptions and assumptions of the world, create new mental maps, make serious political decisions, and even choose sides. Although the masses did not determine the political list of options from which to choose, they could select from various alternatives, however limited in number. As mass politics dragged almost everyone into its volatile undercurrents, the possibility of neutrality disappeared. Ukraine’s geographic location and turbulent political environment helped determine these outcomes. The history of Ukraine, therefore, is very much a part of the history of Europe as well as world history. Its search for certainty in an uncertain world (as exemplified by Brexit and the rise of populist political parties throughout the democratic world) encapsulates the conflicts over different models of certainty and moral complexities in modern times. In short, our current human condition. H-Ukraine: I understand that you were in Kyiv when the current pandemic hit. You were there only a short time before you were required to return to the United States. If I understand it correctly, you were there on an American Councils of International Education (ACIE) grant to work on a new project about post-1991 Ukraine. Can you tell us a little more your current research project and the focus of your new work? GL: Topics for my books usually take years to germinate.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reflecting on the Limitations of Academic Freedom Written by David R
    Reflecting on the Limitations of Academic Freedom Written by David R. Marples This PDF is auto-generated for reference only. As such, it may contain some conversion errors and/or missing information. For all formal use please refer to the official version on the website, as linked below. Reflecting on the Limitations of Academic Freedom https://www.e-ir.info/2020/07/17/reflecting-on-the-limitations-of-academic-freedom/ DAVID R. MARPLES, JUL 17 2020 This is an excerpt from Understanding Ukraine and Belarus: A Memoir by David R. Marples. Download your free copy on E-International Relations. The Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies (CIUS) commemorated its 40th anniversary in 2016. A large sign was placed outside Pembina Hall, on the main University of Alberta campus where it was housed on the fourth floor that said simply: “CIUS – 40 Years of Excellence.” There were a number of events over the year but the highlight was a conference on October 14 and 15 entitled: “Ukrainian Studies in Canada: Texts and Contexts.” The day before the conference, Taras Kuzio, whom Kravchenko had appointed a Research Associate on a three-year contract, offered a talk on “Is Donbas part of Ukraine?” Kuzio was unhappy because his contract had not been renewed, partly as a result of his YouTube broadcasts, several of which targeted CIUS among his usual victims of scholars who in his view were hostile to Ukraine, “Putinophiles,” or fellow travellers. The Conference had a formidable array of scholars working on Ukraine throughout their scholarly careers. It included from Canada: Volodymyr Kravchenko, Paul Robert Magocsi, Serhii Yekelchyk, Bohdan Kordan, Manoly Lupul, Myroslav Shkandrij, Frank Sysyn, Zenon Kohut, Alla Nedashkivska, Heather Coleman, Natalia Khanenko-Friesen, Lubomyr Luciuk, and myself.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Orest Subtelny with Orest Dzulynsky Et Al. Plast: Ukrainian Scouting, a Unique Story, EWJUS, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2018
    Book Reviews 223 Orest Subtelny with Orest Dzulynsky et al. Plast: Ukrainian Scouting, a Unique Story. Plast Publishing, 2016. xx, 442 pp. Illustrations. Maps. Tables. Glossary of Plast Terms. Sources and Further Reading. Index. $35.00, cloth. he last major project undertaken by distinguished York University T historian Orest Subtelny prior to his death was a comprehensive history of Plast, the Ukrainian scouting association that was formally initiated in Western Ukraine in 1912. In the book under review, co-authors (Orest Dzulynsky, Tanya Dzulynsky, and Oksana Zakydalsky), a coordinating committee, contributors, and reviewers worked with Subtelny. Subtelny begins by examining the genesis of the Plast organization in the western Ukrainian lands of Eastern Galicia, which were within the confines of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. There, the organization adapted the tenets of Lord Robert Baden-Powell’s scouting movement within a Ukrainian milieu. The term for the organization itself comes from the Kuban Cossacks, who called their military scouts “plastuny” (8). Subtelny positions the origins of Plast within the context of existing student societies and the popular Sokil and Sich physical-education movements, and he outlines its spread to Bukovyna, Volhynia, Transcarpathia, and, to a limited extent, central and eastern Ukraine. He describes the organization’s tribulations through two world wars—how it suffered under changing and hostile occupational regimes before migrating to diasporas worldwide. The golden age of the Plast organization occurred during the 1920s, at a time when western Ukrainian territories were incorporated into the interwar Polish state. During this period, the organization developed rapidly in both a quantitative sense and a qualitative sense.
    [Show full text]
  • HARVARD UKRAINIAN STUDIES EDITOR Lubomyr Hajda, Harvard University
    HARVARD UKRAINIAN STUDIES EDITOR Lubomyr Hajda, Harvard University EDITORIAL BOARD Michael S. Flier, George G. Grabowicz, Edward L. Keenan, and Roman Szporluk, Harvard University; Frank E. Sysyn, University of Alberta FOUNDING EDITORS Omeljan Pritsak and Ihor Sevcenko, Harvard University BOOK REVIEW EDITOR Larry Wolff EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Daría Yurchuk DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS Robert A. DeLossa ADVISORY BOARD Zvi Ankori, Tel Aviv University—John A. Armstrong, University of Wisconsin—Yaroslav Bilinsky, University of Delaware—Bohdan R. Bociurkiw, Carleton University, Ottawa—Axinia Djurova, University of Sofia—Olexa Horbatsch, University of Frankfurt—Halil inalcık, University of Chi- cago—Jaroslav D. Isajevych, Institute of Ukrainian Studies, Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, L'viv— Edward Kasinec, New York Public Library—Magdalena László-Kujiuk, University of Bucharest— Walter Leitsch, University of Vienna—L. R. Lewitter, Cambridge University—G. Luciani, University of Bordeaux—George S. N. Luckyj, University of Toronto—M. Łesiów, Marie Curie-Sktodowska University, Lublin—Paul R. Magocsi, University of Toronto—Dimitri Obolensky, Oxford Univer- sity—RiccardoPicchio, Yale University—MarcRaeff, Columbia University—HansRothe, University of Bonn—Bohdan Rubchak, University of Illinois at Chicago Circle—Władysław A. Serczyk, University of Warsaw at Białystok—George Y. Shevelov, Columbia University—Günther Stökl, University of Cologne—A. de Vincenz, University of Göttingen—Vaclav Żidlicky, Charles Univer- sity, Prague. COMMITTEE ON UKRAINIAN STUDIES, Harvard University Stanisław Barańczak Patricia Chaput Timothy Colton Michael S. Flier George G. Grabowicz Edward L. Keenan Jeffrey D. Sachs Roman Szporluk (Chairman) Subscription rates per volume (two double issues) are $28.00 U.S. in the United States and Canada, $32.00 in other countries. The price of one double issue is $ 18.00 ($20.00 overseas).
    [Show full text]
  • The Reconstruction of Nations
    The Reconstruction of Nations The Reconstruction of Nations Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania, Belarus, 1569–1999 Timothy Snyder Yale University Press New Haven & London Published with the assistance of the Frederick W. Hilles Fund of Yale University. Copyright © by Yale University. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections and of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Snyder, Timothy. The reconstruction of nations : Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania, Belarus, ‒ / Timothy Snyder. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN --- (alk. paper) . Europe, Eastern—History—th century. I. Title. DJK. .S .—dc A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. For Marianna Brown Snyder and Guy Estel Snyder and in memory of Lucile Fisher Hadley and Herbert Miller Hadley Contents Names and Sources, ix Gazetteer, xi Maps, xiii Introduction, Part I The Contested Lithuanian-Belarusian Fatherland 1 The Grand Duchy of Lithuania (–), 2 Lithuania! My Fatherland! (–), 3 The First World War and the Wilno Question (–), 4 The Second World War and the Vilnius Question (–), 5 Epilogue:
    [Show full text]
  • Marx and Germany
    Communism and Nationalism This page intentionally left blank Communism and Nationalism Karl Marx Versus Friedrich List Roman Szporluk New York Oxford OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 1988 Oxford University Press Oxford New York Toronto Delhi Bombay Calcutta Madras Karachi Petaling Jaya Singapore Hong Kong Tokyo Nairobi Dar es Salaam Cape Town Melbourne Auckland and associated companies in Beirut Berlin Ibadan Nicosia Copyright © 1988 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc., 200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Szporluk, Roman. Communism and nationalism. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Nationalism and socialism. 2. Marx, Karl, 1818-1883—-Views on nationalism. 3. List, Friedrich, 1789-1846—Views on nationalism. I. Title. HX550.N3S95 1988 320.5'32 87-10993 ISBN 0-19-505102-5 135798642 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper For Mary Ann, Ben, Larissa, and Michael This page intentionally left blank Preface In 1977 I began to teach a course at the University of Michigan called "Socialism and Nationalism." The course was based on the idea that in the historical epoch inaugurated by the French and Industrial revolutions, socialism and nationalism addressed very similar—if not identical—ques- tions, but gave different answers to them, provided competing programs for their realization, and in general, offered alternative visions of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Historiography of Modern Ukraine, EWJUS, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2018
    Studying the Blueprint for a Nation: Canadian Historiography of Modern Ukraine Serhy Yekelchyk University of Victoria Abstract: This article discusses the development of a Canadian historiography of modern Ukraine. It argues that the early focus on Ukrainian nation building determined the range of topics that interested Canadian historians, but over the following years their methodology changed significantly. The development of social history provided indispensable tools for in-depth analysis of the Ukrainian national movement. The subsequent development of a new cultural history, post-colonial studies, and the “linguistic turn” allowed for a more subtle analysis of the Ukrainian patriotic discourse and practice. New scholarship focusing on the ambiguities of imperial projects and the everyday life allowed for a re-evaluation of the traditional emphasis on the national intelligentsia’s organic work. Because of its focus on the making of a modern Ukrainian nation, beginning in the 1990s Canadian historiography was well positioned to assist in the transformation of Ukrainian historical scholarship from Soviet models to new theoretical and methodological foundations. This often meant helping Ukrainian colleagues to revise the very “national paradigm” of history writing that early Canadian historians had helped develop. In the decades after an independent Ukraine emerged in 1991, the study of Ukrainian nation building became an increasingly global and collaborative enterprise, with historians from Ukraine studying and working in Canada, and with conferences on topics related to modern Ukrainian history involving scholars from around the world. Keywords: modern Ukraine, Canada, historiography, nation building, national movement. hen the Ukrainian-Canadian historian Orest Subtelny passed away in 2016, the prominent Ukrainian journalist Vitalii Portnikov wrote W that Subtelny’s Ukraine: A History “gave us Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright Julia Lalande, 2006
    Copyright Julia Lalande, 2006 “Building a Home Abroad” – A Comparative Study of Ukrainian Migration, Immigration Policy and Diaspora Formation in Canada and Germany after the Second World War. Dissertation zur Erlangung der Würde des Doktors der Philosophie des Fachbereichs Philosophie und Geschichtswissenschaft der Universität Hamburg vorgelegt von Julia Lalande aus Düsseldorf Toronto, den 26.01.2006 Hauptgutachter: Prof. Dr. Frank Golczewski Nebengutachter: Prof. Dr. Orest Subtelny Datum der Disputation: 29 März 2006 Table of Contents Pages Chapter Outline I-VI Preface VII Abbreviations VIII-X Acknowledgements XI-XII Deutsche Zusammenfassung XIII-XXX Chapter Outline Chapter 1: Introduction – Historiography and Theoretical Approach to the Topic 1-33 1. The Comparative Approach in the Context of Historiography 2-9 2. Studying Immigration History 9-13 3. Diaspora, Immigrant, Refugee, and Ethnic Group – Defining the Terminology 13-19 4. Methodology, Source Base, and Chapter Summary 19-23 4.1. Methodology 19-20 4.2. Source Base 20-21 4.3. Chapter Summary 21-23 5. The Background of Ukrainian Migration 23-33 5.1. Historical Synopsis of Ukrainian Migration to Canada 23-28 5.2. Ukrainian Migration to Germany 28-31 5.3. The Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists 31-33 Chapter 2: Ukrainians in the Displaced Persons Camps, 1945-1948 34-94 1. Introduction 34-38 1.1. Secondary Literature and Primary Sources 34-36 1.2. Method and Outline 37-38 2. UNRRA and the Initial Relief Efforts in Germany 38-46 2.1. The Formation of UNRRA 38-40 2.2. The Early DP Operations and Problems 41-46 3. Repatriation 46-62 3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalities Papers
    Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. 04 Oct 2021 at 17:45:48, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use. Nationalities Papers EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Nancy M. Wingfield, Northern Illinois University, USA ASSISTANT EDITOR BOOK REVIEW EDITOR FOR FORMER Pontus Hiort, Northern Illinois University, USA SOVIET UNION Mary Dakin, Stanford University, USA WEST EUROPEAN EDITOR Frank Golczewski, Universitiit Hamburg, BOOK REVIEW EDITOR FOR EASTERN EUROPE Germany Nicolae Harsanyi, University ofNorth Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA CANADIAN EDITOR Orest Subtelny, York University, Canada MANAGING EDITOR Steven Sabol, University ofNorth ASSOCIATE EDITORS Carolina, Charlotte, USA Daniel Miller, University ofWest Florida, USA Leonid Rudnytsky, Las Salle University, USA Theodore Weeks, Southern Illinois University, USA EDITORIAL BOARD Jasna Adler, University ofGeneva, Switzerland; Edward Allworth, Columbia University, USA; Audrey L. Altstadt, University of Massachusetts, USA; Seymour Becker, Rutgers University, USA; Margaret Beissinger, University of Wisconsin, USA; Stefano Bianchini, University of Bologna, Italy; Melissa Bokovy, University of New Mexico, USA; Maria Bucur, Indiana University, USA; Daniele Conversi, University of Lincolnshire, UK; David Crowe, Elon University, USA; Robert J. Donia, University of Michigan, USA; Tibor Frank, Eotvos Lordnd University, Hungary; William Fierman, Indiana University, USA; Alice Freifeld, University ofFlorida, USA; Geoffrey Hosking, University of London, UK; Mark Katz, George Mason University, USA; Mills Kelly, George
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 2010, No.2
    www.ukrweekly.com InsIde: • Top presidential candidates decline TV debates – page 3. • Analysis of Germany’s case against Demjanjuk – page 11. • Vera Farmiga hailed by critics for latest role – page 13. THEPublished U by theKRA Ukrainian NationalIN AssociationIAN Inc., a fraternal Wnon-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXVIII No.2 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JANUARY 10, 2010 $1/$2 in Ukraine Ukrainian government exploits Ukraine’s leaders greet nation fears of a new winter gas crisis with optimism for the new year by Roman Kupchinsky of inaction is greater than the cost of Eurasia Daily Monitor action and may aggravate the situation in the wider region.” Apparently the IMF In December 2009 Ukrainian officials had a number of good reasons to stop descended on Washington with one over- lending money to Ukraine. riding mission: to convince the Obama According to an article by analyst administration that without the financial Tammy Lynch on the Jamestown help of the International Monetary Fund, Foundation blog on Eurasia, on December Ukraine might be unable to supply the 10, 2009, in the wake of the freezing of European Union with Russian gas this IMF and World Bank funding, and fol- winter. This badly disguised attempt at lowing repeated statements by President blackmail on the part of both Petro Yushchenko calling for the renegotiation Poroshenko, the confectionary oligarch of a Russia-Ukraine gas deal supported and a member of President Viktor by the EU, there was little to discuss. It Yushchenko’s inner circle, and recently seems EU leaders believe Ukraine has not appointed foreign affairs minister and Hryhoriy Nemyria, Prime Minister Yulia lived up to its side of the negotiated bar- Tymoshenko’s right-hand man, was so gain.
    [Show full text]
  • Syllabus for SLA326, Second Language Acquisition Petko Ivanov Connecticut College, [email protected]
    Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College Slavic Studies Course Materials Slavic Studies Department Spring 2014 Syllabus for SLA326, Second Language Acquisition Petko Ivanov Connecticut College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/slaviccourse Recommended Citation Ivanov, Petko, "Syllabus for SLA326, Second Language Acquisition" (2014). Slavic Studies Course Materials. Paper 6. http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/slaviccourse/6 This Course Materials is brought to you for free and open access by the Slavic Studies Department at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Slavic Studies Course Materials by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. C o n n e c t i c u t C o l l e g e Fall 2014 SLA 105 Slavic Church Emanuel, Portland, Oregon Introduction to Slavic Studies Prof. Petko Ivanov SLA 105: Slavic Studies Connecticut College Fall 2014 SLA 105: Introduction to Slavic Studies Fall 2014, Monday/Wednesday 7:00-8:45 PM Location: Blaustein 208 Slavistics for Beginners (Beck, Mast & Tapper 1997: 13) Instructor: Petko Ivanov Blaustein 330, x5449, [email protected] Office hours M/W 1:30-2:30 and by appointment Course Description The existence of “Slavic identity” in the contemporary world seems to be taken as self- evident both on the level of international politics and as an institutionalized field of knowledge (viz. Slavic Departments). Yet the very concept of Slavicness is inherently problematic. Objectively, the only feature that binds all Slavs together is linguistic – the common genealogy and the present similarities of their languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Nothing New Under the Sun? Continuity and Change in Russian Policy Towards Ukraine
    Report Nothing New Under the Sun? Continuity and Change in Russian Policy Towards Ukraine | James Sherr | July 2020 Title: Nothing New Under the Sun? Continuity and Change in Russian Policy Towards Ukraine Author: Sherr, James Publication date: July 2020 Category: Report Cover page photo: Matryoshka dolls depicting Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky (R) are on sale at a street market in St. Petersburg, Russia, 10 December 2019. EPA/ANATOLY MALTSEV/Scanpix Photo on page 21: French President Emmanuel Macron, Ukraine´s President Volodymyr Zelensky, Russian President Vladimir Putin during a meeting of the Normandy Four leaders at the Elysee Palace in Paris, France, on December 9, 2019. Eliot Blondet-Pool/Scanpix Keywords: foreign policy, geopolitics, power, Ukraine, Russia Disclaimer: The views and opinions contained in this report are those of its author only and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the International Centre for Defence and Security or any other organisation ISSN 2228-0529 ISBN 978-9949-7484-4-0 (PRINT) ISBN 978-9949-7484-5-7 (PDF) ©International Centre for Defence and Security 63/4 Narva Rd., 10152 Tallinn, Estonia [email protected], www.icds.ee I Nothing New Under the Sun? I Acknowledgements Like all publications at ICDS, this report is a team effort. The author gratefully acknowledges the guidance and thoughtful comments of Kristi Raik, Director of EFPI, as well as the careful and pains- taking assistance of Sigrid Nuutre, Kristi Luigelaht and Tomas Jermalavicius at ICDS in editing the text and preparing it for publication. Nevertheless, any shortcomings in the work, including but not confined to errors of fact, are the responsibility of the author alone.
    [Show full text]
  • JHP304Y1Y L0101 Ukraine: Politics, Economy and Society Fall 2015/Spring 2016
    JHP304Y1Y L0101 Ukraine: Politics, Economy and Society Fall 2015/Spring 2016 University College (UC) 15 King's College Circle, room 87 Instructor Dr. Serhiy Bilenky Office number: SS 3118, T and R 1-2 pm Email: [email protected] The course meets twice a week on Tuesdays and Thursdays, 10-11 am This is the history of Ukraine through the study of its society, culture, and politics since the earliest times. Among the topics to be considered are: Kievan Rus’ (ninth to thirteenth centuries); the Mongol impact; Lithuanian-Polish-Crimean period; Orthodox revival; the Cossack state; national movement under Austrian and Russian rule; post World War I statehood; interwar Poland and Soviet Ukraine; the Great Famine; World War II to independent statehood. Ukraine will be studied as a territorial concept encompassing different historical experiences of major communities such as Ukrainians, Poles, Jews, and Russians who have lived for centuries on the territory of present-day Ukraine. Students will learn how Ukrainians have become the dominant national project in Ukraine during the last two hundred years. GRADING Participation 10% One in-class test 25% Book review (due December 3) 15% Final essay (due April 5) 50% WRITTEN WORK Essay of 3,000 words (12 pages) should be written in the end of the second term. The essay topic should be chosen in consultation with the instructor. The syllabus contains the basic readings for the course. Some additional readings will be assigned for discussion sections. The following book will be placed on reserve at Robarts Library: 1 - Paul Robert Magocsi, A History of Ukraine: the Land and Its People.
    [Show full text]