DOCSLIB.ORG

Accelerating the Thaumasite Form of Sulfate Attack and an Investigation of Its Effects on Skin Friction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Accelerating the Thaumasite Form of Sulfate Attack and an Investigation of Its Effects on Skin Friction ACCELERATING THE THAUMASITE FORM OF SULFATE ATTACK AND AN INVESTIGATION OF ITS EFFECTS ON SKIN FRICTION by RENÉ BRUECKNER (Dipl.-Ing.) A Thesis Submitted to The University of Birmingham for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Civil Engineering University of Birmingham Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2TT December 2007 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Synopsis The objective of the research was to accelerate the thaumasite form of sulfate attack (TSA) under laboratory conditions in order to identify its effects on skin friction at the soil/concrete interface. The experimental programme was organised into five series which investigated the formation of TSA under unrestrained and restrained conditions whereby the acceleration of TSA was observed at unrestrained conditions depending on water- cement ratio, cement content, casting face and aggressive solution. Restrained conditions simulated soil/concrete interface interactions and were applied to identify changes of the skin friction affected by the formation of thaumasite. TSA was successfully accelerated and a linear deterioration progress was monitored using a developed needle test method. Using clay-restrained conditions thaumasite formed attached to the concrete and favoured a more severe deterioration culminating in thaumasite layers of up to 25mm depending on interface pH and applied pressure. Thaumasite at the interface did not decrease the shear strength including skin friction and cohesion. Therefore it was concluded that TSA occurring at piles or foundation bases does not affect the stability of the superstructure regarding loss of friction and settlements, however, continuous loss of concrete can increase the slenderness and cause premature corrosion. Table of Contents Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background........................................................................................................1 1.2 Aims and Objectives..........................................................................................3 1.3 Scope of the Thesis............................................................................................4 2 Literature Review................................................................................. 5 2.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................5 2.1.1 Sulfate Attack ............................................................................................5 2.1.2 Thaumasite Form of Sulfate Attack...........................................................7 2.2 Occurrence of TSA..........................................................................................10 2.2.1 Mineral Thaumasite.................................................................................10 2.2.2 Consequences of TSA .............................................................................11 2.2.3 Risk Factors .............................................................................................18 2.3 Formation Mechanism.....................................................................................25 2.3.1 Formation Theories .................................................................................25 2.3.2 Reaction Products....................................................................................26 2.3.3 Stability of Thaumasite............................................................................27 2.3.4 Combined Degradation Forms ................................................................28 2.4 Identification of TSA.......................................................................................30 2.4.1 General.....................................................................................................30 2.4.2 X-ray Diffraction .....................................................................................31 2.4.3 Polarisation Microscopy..........................................................................32 2.4.4 Scanning Electron Microscopy................................................................33 2.4.5 Sampling..................................................................................................34 2.5 Thaumasite Prevention ....................................................................................35 2.5.1 General.....................................................................................................35 2.5.2 Binder ......................................................................................................35 2.5.3 Aggregate.................................................................................................36 2.5.4 Additional Preventive Measures..............................................................36 2.5.5 Guidance..................................................................................................37 2.6 Thaumasite in Laboratory Conditions – Accelerated Tests.............................37 Table of Contents 2.6.1 General.....................................................................................................37 2.6.2 Binder ......................................................................................................38 2.6.3 Aggregate.................................................................................................39 2.6.4 Mix Design ..............................................................................................40 2.6.5 Casting.....................................................................................................40 2.6.6 Curing ......................................................................................................41 2.6.7 Storage Solution ......................................................................................42 2.6.8 Storage.....................................................................................................43 2.7 Results of Comparable Field/Laboratory Trials at BRE .................................43 2.7.1 General.....................................................................................................43 2.7.2 Shipston-on-Stour....................................................................................44 2.7.3 Moreton Valence .....................................................................................46 2.8 Structural Effects .............................................................................................46 2.8.1 Pure Structural Effects.............................................................................47 2.8.2 Soil-Structure Effects ..............................................................................48 2.9 Soil/Structure Interaction.................................................................................49 2.9.1 General.....................................................................................................49 2.9.2 Types of Foundations ..............................................................................49 2.9.3 Physical Interactions................................................................................50 2.9.4 Physical Testing.......................................................................................54 2.9.5 Chemical Interactions..............................................................................60 2.9.6 Effect of TSA on the Concrete/Clay Interface ........................................62 2.10 Summary..........................................................................................................63 3 Methodology and Materials............................................................... 66 3.1 Experimental Programme and Test Specimens...............................................66 3.1.1 General.....................................................................................................66 3.1.2 Test Series ...............................................................................................68 3.1.3 Solution....................................................................................................80 3.1.4 Storage.....................................................................................................80 3.2 Test Methods ...................................................................................................81 3.2.1 Needle Test Rig .......................................................................................81 3.2.2 Consolidation of Clay..............................................................................82 3.2.3 Pressure Rig.............................................................................................83 Table of Contents 3.2.4 Shear Strength .........................................................................................84 3.2.5 Chemical Tests ........................................................................................89
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tobermorite Supergroup: a New Nomenclature
    Mineralogical Magazine, April 2015, Vol. 79(2), pp. 485–495 The tobermorite supergroup: a new nomenclature CRISTIAN BIAGIONI*, STEFANO MERLINO AND ELENA BONACCORSI Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita` di Pisa, Via Santa Maria 53, 56126 Pisa, Italy [Received 10 July 2014; Accepted 30 September 2014; Associate Editor: S. J. Mills] ABSTRACT The name ‘tobermorites’ includes a number of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) phases differing in their hydration state and sub-cell symmetry. Based on their basal spacing, closely related to the degree of hydration, 14, 11 and 9 A˚ compounds have been described. In this paper a new nomenclature scheme for these mineral species is reported. The tobermorite supergroup is defined. It is formed by the tobermorite group and the unclassified minerals plombie`rite, clinotobermorite and riversideite. Plombie`rite (‘14 A˚ tobermorite’) is redefined as a crystalline mineral having chemical composition Ca5Si6O16(OH)2·7H2O. Its type locality is Crestmore, Riverside County, California, USA. The tobermorite group consists of species having a basal spacing of ~11 A˚ and an orthorhombic sub-cell symmetry. Its general formula is Ca4+x(AlySi6Ày)O15+2xÀy·5H2O. Its endmember compositions correspond to tobermorite Ca5Si6O17·5H2O(x =1andy = 0) and the new species kenotobermorite, Ca4Si6O15(OH)2·5H2O(x =0andy = 0). The type locality of kenotobermorite is the N’Chwaning II mine, Kalahari Manganese Field, South Africa. Within the tobermorite group, tobermorite and kenotobermorite form a complete solid solution. Al-rich samples do not warrant a new name, because Al can only achieve a maximum content of 1/6 of the tetrahedral sites (y = 1).
    [Show full text]
  • The Hydrated Calcium, Silicates Riversideite, Tobermorite, and Plombierite
    293 The hydrated calcium, silicates riversideite, tobermorite, and plombierite. By J. D. C. McCoNNELL,M.Sc. 1)epartment of Mineralogy and Petrology, University of Cambridge. [Conmmnicated by Prof. C. E. Tilley, F.R.S., read March 26, 1953] ] NTRODUCTION. N a recent paper Taylor has shown that three distinct hydration I levels exist within the" calcium silicate hydrate (l)' group of artificial preparations (Taylor, 1953a, p. 168). The individual hydrates may be distinguished from the position of the 002 reflection in X-ray powder photographs. The d spacings corresponding to the three hydrates of this group examined during the present investigation are 1~'6, 11"3, and 9"6 ,A.. These hydrates have 1-[20 : SiO 2 molar ratios of approximately 2-0, 1.0, and 0"5 respectively. A recent examination of the minerals crestmoreite and riversideite (Taylor, 1953b) has shown that both these nfinerals are intimate inter- :growths of members of the above hydrate series with the mineral wilkeite. Both the artificial preparations and the crestmoreite-riversideite inter- growths have failed to provide material suitable for detailed optical study. During a mineralogical investigation of rocks from a dolerite-chalk contact at Ballycraigy, Larne, County Antrim, a mineral was examined and subsequently identified, from X-ray powder photographs, with the 11"3 .~. hydrate referred to above. Optical and X-ray studies on single crystals of this mineral were made and subsequently both the 14.6 and 9-6 A. hydrates were prepared from this material experimentally. X-ray powder photographs of a gelatinous material collected at Ballycraigy showed that this m~tteria] could also be identified with the 'calcium silicate hydrate (f)' group.
    [Show full text]
  • Phillipsite and Al-Tobermorite Mineral Cements Produced Through Low-Temperature Water-Rock Reactions in Roman Marine Concrete Sean R
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR Geology Faculty Publications Geology 2017 Phillipsite and Al-tobermorite Mineral Cements Produced through Low-Temperature Water-Rock Reactions in Roman Marine Concrete Sean R. Mulcahy Western Washington University, [email protected] Marie D. Jackson University of Utah, Salt Lake City Heng Chen Southeast University, Nanjing Yao Li Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an Piergiulio Cappelletti Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/geology_facpubs Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Mulcahy, Sean R.; Jackson, Marie D.; Chen, Heng; Li, Yao; Cappelletti, Piergiulio; and Wenk, Hans-Rudolf, "Phillipsite and Al- tobermorite Mineral Cements Produced through Low-Temperature Water-Rock Reactions in Roman Marine Concrete" (2017). Geology Faculty Publications. 67. https://cedar.wwu.edu/geology_facpubs/67 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Geology at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Sean R. Mulcahy, Marie D. Jackson, Heng Chen, Yao Li, Piergiulio Cappelletti, and Hans-Rudolf Wenk This article is available at Western CEDAR: https://cedar.wwu.edu/geology_facpubs/67 American Mineralogist, Volume 102, pages 1435–1450, 2017 Phillipsite and Al-tobermorite mineral cements produced through low-temperature k water-rock reactions in Roman marine concrete MARIE D. JACKSON1,*, SEAN R. MULCAHY2, HENG CHEN3, YAO LI4, QINFEI LI5, PIERGIULIO CAppELLETTI6, 7 AND HANS-RUDOLF WENK 1Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Charlesite, a New Mineral of the Ettringite Group, from Franklin, New Jersey
    American Mineralogist, Volume 68, pages 1033-1037,1983 Charlesite, a new mineral of the ettringite group, from Franklin, New Jersey PBre J. DuxN Department of Mineral Sciences SmithsonianInstitution, Washington,D. C. 20560 DoNero R. Peecon Department of GeologicalSciences University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 PBrnn B. LBavBNs Departmentof Geology Universityof Delaware, Newark, Delaware l97ll eNo JonN L. Beuu Franklin Mineral Museum Franklin. New Jersey 07416 Abstract Charlesite,ideally C4(AI,Si)z(SO4)2(B(OH)4)(OH,O)r2.26H2Ois a member of the ettrin- gite group from Franklin, New Jersey, and is the Al analogueof sturmanite. Chemical analysisyielded CaO27.3, Al2O3 5.1, SiO2 3.1, SO3 12.8,B2o33.2, H2O 48.6, sum : 100.1 percent.-Charlesiteis hexagonal,probable spacegroup P3lc, with a = ll.16(l), c = 21.21(2)4. The strongest lines in the X-ray powder difraction pattern (d, IlIo, hkl) are: 9.70,100, 100;5.58, 80, 110;3.855,80, ll4;2.749,70,304;2.538,70,126;2.193,70,2261 404. Charlesite occurs as simple hexagonal crystals tabular on {0001} and has a perfect {10T0}cleavage. The densityis 1.77glcm3 (obs.) and 1.79glcms (calc.). Optically, charlesite is uniaxial( -) with a : | .492(3)and e : 1.475(3).It occurswith clinohedrite,ganophyllite, xonotlite, prehnite, roeblingite and other minerals in severalparageneses at Franklin, New Jersey. Charlesite is named in honor of the late Professor Charles Palache. Introduction were approved, prior to publication, by the Commission Minerals and Mineral Names. I. M. A. The An ettringite-like mineral was first described from on New specimenwas divided into three portions.
    [Show full text]
  • Delayed Ettringite Formation
    Ettringite Formation and the Performance of Concrete In the mid-1990’s, several cases of premature deterioration of concrete pavements and precast members gained notoriety because of uncertainty over the cause of their distress. Because of the unexplained and complex nature of several of these cases, considerable debate and controversy have arisen in the research and consulting community. To a great extent, this has led to a misperception that the problems are more prevalent than actual case studies would indicate. However, irrespective of the fact that cases of premature deterioration are limited, it is essential to address those that have occurred and provide practical, technically sound solutions so that users can confidently specify concrete in their structures. Central to the debate has been the effect of a compound known as ettringite. The objectives of this paper are: Fig. 1. Portland cements are manufactured by a process that combines sources of lime (such as limestone), silica and • to define ettringite and its form and presence in concrete, alumina (such as clay), and iron oxide (such as iron ore). Appropriately proportioned mixtures of these raw materials • to respond to questions about the observed problems and the are finely ground and then heated in a rotary kiln at high various deterioration mechanisms that have been proposed, and temperatures, about 1450 °C (2640 °F), to form cement compounds. The product of this process is called clinker • to provide some recommendations on designing for durable (nodules at right in above photo). After cooling, the clinker is concrete. interground with about 5% of one or more of the forms of Because many of the questions raised relate to cement character- calcium sulfate (gypsum shown at left in photo) to form portland cement.
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals in Cement Chemistry: a Single-Crystal Neutron Diffraction and Raman
    American Mineralogist, Volume 97, pages 1060–1069, 2012 Minerals in cement chemistry: A single-crystal neutron diffraction and Raman spectroscopic study of thaumasite, Ca3Si(OH)6(CO3)(SO4)·12H2O G. DIEGO GATTA,1,2,* GARRY J. MCINTYRE,3 JULIA G. SWANSON,4 AND STEVEN D. JACOBSEN4 1Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita’ degli Studi di Milano, Via Botticelli 23, I-20133 Milano, Italy 2CNR-Istituto per la Dinamica dei Processi Ambientali, Milano, Italy 3The Bragg Institute, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Locked Bag 2001, Kirrawee DC, New South Wales 2232, Australia 4Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, U.S.A. ABSTRACT Thaumasite, Ca3Si(OH)6(CO3)(SO4)⋅12H2O, is recognized as a secondary-alteration mineral and indicator of sulfate attack in Portland cement in contact with sulfate-rich groundwater, especially in cold regions. The hydrogen positions in thaumasite have been determined from single-crystal neutron diffraction structure refinements at 300 and 22 K. No phase transitions occur within the temperature range investigated. The structure of thaumasite is largely held together by hydrogen bonding. The major structural units [CO3 groups, SO4 tetrahedra, Si(OH)6 octahedra, and Ca(OH)4(H2O)4 polyhe- dra] are interconnected via 10 distinct hydrogen bonds. Analysis of the difference-Fourier maps of the nuclear density reveals the positions of all 10 hydrogen atoms in the structure, and the hydrogen bonding becomes shorter (stronger) upon decreasing temperature to 22 K. The SO4 tetrahedron ex- pands upon decreasing temperature (i.e., negative thermal expansion at the molecular level), driven 4+ by shortening of the hydrogen bonding between [Ca3Si(OH)6(H2O)12] columns.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence Mechanism of Ettringite Crystals and Microstructure
    materials Article The Influence Mechanism of Ettringite Crystals and Microstructure Characteristics on the Strength of Calcium-Based Stabilized Soil Youmin Han 1,2,3 , Junwu Xia 1,3,* , Hongfei Chang 1 and Jun Xu 4,5 1 State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Daxue Road, Xuzhou 221116, China; [email protected] (Y.H.); [email protected] (H.C.) 2 School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Anhui Polytechnic University, Beijing Road, Wuhu 241000, China 3 Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Building Energy Saving and Construction Technology, Xueyuan Road, Xuzhou 221116, China 4 School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Changhui Road, Zhenjiang 212100, China; [email protected] 5 School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Southeast University Road, Nanjing 211189, China * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Abstract: To reveal the influence mechanism of ettringite (AFt) crystals and microstructure character- istics on the strength of calcium-based stabilized soil, the strengths and microscopic properties of seven groups of stabilized soil samples were studied systematically through unconfined compressive strength, scanning electron microscope (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetry (TG), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) testing methods. The results indicate that the strength of the cement-stabilized soil is relatively high because abundant calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) gels Citation: Han, Y.; Xia, J.; Chang, H.; coat the outer surface of soil particles to cement together. For the cement–gypsum-stabilized soil, Xu, J. The Influence Mechanism of Ettringite Crystals and superabundant thick and long AFt crystals make the pores in soil particles larger, and the sample Microstructure Characteristics on the becomes looser, resulting in lower strength than that of the cement-stabilized soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Brownmillerite Ca2(Al, Fe )2O5 C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1
    3+ Brownmillerite Ca2(Al, Fe )2O5 c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Orthorhombic. Point Group: mm2. As square platelets, to about 60 µm; massive. Physical Properties: Hardness = n.d. D(meas.) = 3.76 D(calc.) = 3.68–3.73 Optical Properties: Semitransparent. Color: Reddish brown. Optical Class: Biaxial (–). Pleochroism: Distinct; X = Y = yellow-brown; Z = dark brown. Orientation: Y and Z lie in the plane of the platelets; extinction in that plane is diagonal. α = < 2.02 β = > 2.02 γ = > 2.02 2V(meas.) = n.d. Cell Data: Space Group: Ibm2. a = 5.584(5) b = 14.60(1) c = 5.374(5) Z = 2 X-ray Powder Pattern: Near Mayen, Germany. 2.65 (vs), 7.19 (s), 2.78 (s), 1.93 (s), 2.05 (ms), 3.65 (m), 1.82 (m) Chemistry: (1) (2) (3) TiO2 1.5 1.9 Al2O3 17.2 22.3 13.1 Fe2O3 30.5 27.6 41.9 Cr2O3 0.1 n.d. MgO n.d. n.d. CaO 46.2 44.8 43.7 insol. 4.0 LOI 0.5 Total 94.4 100.3 100.6 (1) Near Mayen, Germany; by semiquantitative spectroscopy. (2) Hatrurim Formation, Israel; corresponds to Ca1.99(Al1.09Fe0.86Ti0.05)Σ=2.00O5. (3) Do.; corresponds to Ca1.95(Fe1.31Al0.64 Ti0.06)Σ=2.01O5. Occurrence: In thermally metamorphosed limestone blocks included in volcanic rocks (near Mayen, Germany); in high-temperature, thermally metamorphosed, impure limestones (Hatrurim Formation, Israel). Association: Calcite, ettringite, wollastonite, larnite, mayenite, gehlenite, diopside, pyrrhotite, grossular, spinel, afwillite, jennite, portlandite, jasmundite (near Mayen, Germany); melilite, mayenite, wollastonite, kalsilite, corundum (Kl¨och, Austria); spurrite, larnite, mayenite (Hatrurim Formation, Israel).
    [Show full text]
  • How to Make Concrete More Sustainable Harald Justnes1
    Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology Vol. 13, 147-154, March 2015 / Copyright © 2015 Japan Concrete Institute 147 Scientific paper How to Make Concrete More Sustainable Harald Justnes1 A selected paper of ICCS13, Tokyo 2013. Received 12 November 2013, accepted 16 February 2015 doi:10.3151/jact.13.147 Abstract Production of cement is ranking 3rd in causes of man-made carbon dioxide emissions world-wide. Thus, in order to make concrete more sustainable one may work along one or more of the following routes; 1) Replacing cement in con- crete with larger amounts of supplementary cementing materials (SCMs) than usual, 2) Replacing cement in concrete with combinations of SCMs leading to synergic reactions enhancing strength, 3) Producing leaner concrete with less cement per cubic meter utilizing plasticizers and 4) Making concrete with local aggregate susceptible to alkali silica reaction (ASR) by using cement replacements, thus avoiding long transport of non-reactive aggregate. 1 Introduction SCMs, also uncommon ones like calcined marl 2. Replacing cement in concrete with combinations of The cement industry world-wide is calculated to bring SCMs leading to synergic reactions enhancing about 5-8% of the total global anthropogenic carbon strength dioxide (CO2) emissions. The general estimate is about 3. Producing leaner concrete with less cement per cubic 1 tonne of CO2 emission per tonne clinker produced, if meter utilizing plasticizers. fossil fuel is used and no measures are taken to reduce it. 4. Making concrete with local aggregate susceptible to The 3rd rank is not because cement is such a bad mate- alkali silica reaction (ASR) by using cement re- rial with respect to CO2 emissions, but owing to the fact placements, thus avoiding long transport of non- that it is so widely used to construct the infrastructure reactive aggregate and buildings of modern society as we know it.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of the Incompatibilities of Cement and Superplasticizers and Their Influence on the Rheological Behavior
    materials Article Investigation of the Incompatibilities of Cement and Superplasticizers and Their Influence on the Rheological Behavior Ursula Pott 1, Cordula Jakob 2, Daniel Jansen 2, Jürgen Neubauer 2 and Dietmar Stephan 1,* 1 Department of Civil Engineering, Building Materials and Construction Chemistry, Technische Universität Berlin, 13355 Berlin, Germany; [email protected] 2 Department of Geography and Geosciences, GeoZentrum Nordbayern, Friedrich-Alexander-University, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; [email protected] (C.J.); [email protected] (D.J.); [email protected] (J.N.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 2 December 2019; Accepted: 18 February 2020; Published: 21 February 2020 Abstract: The rheological behavior of cement paste and the improvement of its flowability takes center stage in many research projects. An improved flowability can be achieved by the addition of superplasticizers (SP), such as polycarboxylate ethers (PCE). In order to be able to use these PCEs effectively and in a variety of ways and to make them resistant to changes in the environment, it is crucial to understand the influence of SPs on cement hydration. For that reason, the topic of this paper was the incompatibility of a specific SP and an ordinary Portland cement (OPC). The incompatible behavior was analyzed using rheological tests, such as the spread flow test and penetration test, and the behavior was compared by means of an ultrasound technique and explained by the phase content measured by in-situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) the heat evolution measured by calorimetry, and scanning electron microscope (SEM) images. We showed that the addition of the SP in a high dosage led to a prevention of the passivation of the most reactive and aluminum-containing clinker phases, aluminate and brownmillerite.
    [Show full text]
  • Raman Spectroscopy and Single-Crystal High-Temperature Investigations of Bentorite, Ca6cr2(SO4)3(OH)12·26H2O
    minerals Article Raman Spectroscopy and Single-Crystal High-Temperature Investigations of Bentorite, Ca6Cr2(SO4)3(OH)12·26H2O Rafał Juroszek 1,* , Biljana Krüger 2 , Irina Galuskina 1 , Hannes Krüger 2 , Martina Tribus 2 and Christian Kürsten 2 1 Institute of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia, B˛edzi´nska60, 41-205 Sosnowiec, Poland; [email protected] 2 Institute of Mineralogy and Petrography, University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; [email protected] (B.K.); [email protected] (H.K.); [email protected] (M.T.); [email protected] (C.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-516-491-438 Received: 28 November 2019; Accepted: 27 December 2019; Published: 30 December 2019 Abstract: The crystal structure of bentorite, ideally Ca Cr (SO ) (OH) 26H O, a Cr3+ analogue of 6 2 4 3 12· 2 ettringite, is for the first time investigated using X-ray single crystal diffraction. Bentorite crystals of suitable quality were found in the Arad Stone Quarry within the pyrometamorphic rock of the Hatrurim Complex (Mottled Zone). The preliminary semi-quantitative data on the bentorite composition obtained by SEM-EDS show that the average Cr/(Cr + Al) ratio of this sample is >0.8. Bentorite crystallizes in space group P31c, with a = b = 11.1927(5) Å, c =21.7121(10) Å, V = 2355.60(18) Å3, and Z = 2. The crystal structure is refined, including the hydrogen atom positions, to an agreement index R1 = 3.88%. The bentorite crystal chemical formula is Ca (Cr Al ) [(SO ) (CO ) ] (OH) ~25.75H O.
    [Show full text]
  • Bentorite Ca6(Cr, Al)2(SO4)3(OH)12 • 26H2O C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1
    Bentorite Ca6(Cr, Al)2(SO4)3(OH)12 • 26H2O c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Hexagonal. Point Group: 6/m 2/m 2/m. As stout hexagonal prisms, {1010}, {1011}, {0001}, to 0.25 mm; commonly in fibrous masses, granular aggregates, and thin films. Twinning: On {1010} as composition plane. Physical Properties: Cleavage: {1010}, perfect; {0001}, distinct. Hardness = 2 D(meas.) = 2.025 D(calc.) = 2.021 Optical Properties: Transparent. Color: Bright violet. Streak: Very pale violet. Luster: Vitreous. Optical Class: Uniaxial (+). Pleochroism: O = nearly colorless; E = pale violet. Absorption: O < E. ω = 1.478(2) = 1.484(2) Cell Data: Space Group: P 63/mmc. a = 22.35 c = 21.41 Z = 8 X-ray Powder Pattern: Hatrurim Formation, Israel. 9.656 (100), 5.592 (40), 1.942 (20), 3.60 (10), 3.23 (10), 2.772 (10), 3.89 (8) Chemistry: (1) SO3 14.99 CO2 6.70 SiO2 2.50 Al2O3 1.01 Fe2O3 0.10 Cr2O3 7.48 MgO 0.00 CaO 29.90 H2O 37.70 Total 100.38 (1) Hatrurim Formation, Israel; by AA, SO3 by gravimetric analysis, CO2 and H2O by TGA; after deduction of CaO and CO2 as calcite and CaO, SiO2, H2O as truscottite, the remainder 3+ • (about 80%) corresponds to Ca5.88(Cr1.61Al0.32Fe0.02)Σ=1.95(S1.02O4)3.00(OH)11.97 28.06H2O. Mineral Group: Ettringite group. Occurrence: In low-temperature hydrothermal veins in black calcite–spurrite marble. Association: Calcite, thaumasite, truscottite, vaterite, jennite, tobermorite, brownmillerite, mayenite, melnikovite, “chlorite”. Distribution: In a marble quarry in the Hatrurim Formation, near the Arad-Sodom road, Negev Desert, Israel.
    [Show full text]