DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No Project Description (PD)/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Proposed Oyster Washing, Grading and Storage Facility and Apple Orchard Vacant Agricultural Land (Parcel No. 442608) Cavendish Road (Route No. 6), Bayview, Queens County, PEI JOOSE ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT NO. JE0441 Report prepared for: Raspberry Point Oyster Co. Inc., 12 Milky Way, Charlottetown, PE C1A 2E2 Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 484 Taylor Road PO Box 19 (1088 Colville Road) North Granville, PEI C0A 1E0 North Wiltshire, PEI C0A 1Y0 May 29, 2020 Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI Executive Summary Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. (Joose Environmental) and Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. (Granville Ridge) and were contracted by Raspberry Point Oyster Co. Inc. (Raspberry Point) to complete a Project Description (PD)/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The PD/EIS was completed to meet the requirements of the Province of PEI and the PEI Resort Municipality for a proposed Oyster Washing, Grading and Storage Facility as well as an Apple Orchard. The proposed project is to be developed on vacant agricultural land identified as Parcel No. 442608 and located along the south side Cavendish Road (Route No. 6) in Bayview, Queens County, PEI. As part of the PD/EIS the following mitigation and environmental monitoring elements will be adhered to during the construction and operation of the proposed facility, including: Mitigation • During construction and operation (including accidents, potential malfunctions and unplanned events) all municipal, provincial and federal codes, standards and best management practices will be followed; • During operation mitigation for hazardous waste and non-hazardous waste will be conducted as outlined in Tables 3.1 and 3.2 in Sections 3.2.5 and 3.2.6 of this report; and • The site will be developed in a manner to leave treed buffers to the north, east and west of the site so as to reduce noise levels and protect view planes. Environmental Monitoring • During the construction period personnel, Raspberry Point project manager will conduct regular environmental monitoring site inspections to ensure all construction components adhere to the provincial and federal regulations and codes. ©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 i ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020 Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PROJECT NAME AND INFORMATION .............................................................................. 1 1.2 PROJECT DETAILS ........................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Project Overview and Funding .............................................................................. 2 1.2.2 Current Site Description, Historical and Adjacent Land Use ................................. 2 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................. 4 2.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND ................................................................................................. 4 2.2 PROJECT SCHEDULE ....................................................................................................... 5 2.3 REGULATORY AND PROJECT PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS ..................................... 5 3.0 PROJECT ACTIVITIES ...................................................................................................... 8 3.1 PLANNING COMPONENT .................................................................................................. 8 3.2 CONSTRUCTION COMPONENTS ..................................................................................... 8 3.2.1 Site Preparation and Access ................................................................................ 9 3.2.2 Site Services (Water, Sewer, and Power) ............................................................11 3.2.3 Storm Water Management ..................................................................................11 3.2.4 Fuel Storage ........................................................................................................12 3.2.5 Hazardous Materials Storage ..............................................................................12 3.2.6 Non-Hazardous Materials Storage ......................................................................13 3.3 OPERATION COMPONENT ..............................................................................................13 3.3.1 Use of Facility ......................................................................................................13 3.3.2 Operating Hours ..................................................................................................13 3.3.3 Wastewater Management ....................................................................................14 3.3.4 Air Quality and Noise ...........................................................................................17 3.3.5 Site Security ........................................................................................................18 3.3.6 Emergency Response and Training.....................................................................18 3.3.7 Litter ....................................................................................................................18 3.3.8 Orchard Operation ...............................................................................................18 3.4 DECOMMISSIONING ........................................................................................................19 4.0 SUMMARY OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .................................................19 4.1 PHYSICAL SETTING .........................................................................................................19 4.1.1 Surficial Geology .................................................................................................19 4.1.2 Bedrock Geology .................................................................................................19 4.1.3 Topography and Regional Drainage ....................................................................20 4.1.4 Surface Water Drainage ......................................................................................20 4.2 SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER RESOURCES .............................................................20 4.3 ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT ......................................................................................21 4.4 TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT .......................................................................................22 4.4.1 Environmentally Managed Areas .........................................................................25 4.4.2 Vegetation (Plants and Trees) .............................................................................26 ©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 ii ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020 Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI 4.4.3 Wetlands and Watercourses ...............................................................................26 4.4.4 Breeding Birds and Other Wildlife ........................................................................27 4.5 HUMAN ENVIRONMENT ...................................................................................................28 4.5.1 Archaeological, Heritage or Cultural Resources ..................................................28 4.5.2 Transportation .....................................................................................................29 5.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................29 6.0 CLOSURE .........................................................................................................................30 7.0 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................32 List of Tables Table 1-1 Project Information ……………………………………………………………………. 1 Table 1-2 Adjoining Properties - Current Land Use……………………………………………. 3 Table 1-3 Approval Required - Proposed Oyster Facility………………………………………. 7 Table 3-1 Hazardous Materials Storage…………………………………………………………. 12 Table 3-2 Non-Hazardous Materials Storage…………………………………………………… 13 Table 3-3 Salinity and Relative Turbidity Levels - Current Operations………………………. 16 Table 3-4 Salinity and Relative Turbidity Levels - Proposed Location………………………. 16 Table 4-1 Water Quality Results for Groundwater within the Hope River Watershed………. 21 Table 4-2 Weather Data - Long River Station (Environment Canada) ………………………. 22 List of Figures Figure No. 1 Project Location Figure No. 2 Proposed Layout Figure No. 3 Proposed Layout Aerial Image List of Appendices Appendix A Figures Appendix B Applications for Provincial Permits and Approvals Appendix C ACCDC Data Report ©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 iii ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020 Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI 1.0 INTRODUCTION Joose Environmental Consulting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE
    Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FUTURE of SCREENS from James Stanton a Little Bit About Me
    THE FUTURE OF SCREENS From james stanton A little bit about me. Hi I am James (Mckenzie) Stanton Thinker / Designer / Engineer / Director / Executive / Artist / Human / Practitioner / Gardner / Builder / and much more... Born in Essex, United Kingdom and survived a few hair raising moments and learnt digital from the ground up. Ok enough of the pleasantries I have been working in the design field since 1999 from the Falmouth School of Art and onwards to the RCA, and many companies. Ok. less about me and more about what I have seen… Today we are going to cover - SCREENS CONCEPTS - DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION - WHY ASSETS LIBRARIES - CODE LIBRARIES - COST EFFECTIVE SOLUTION FOR IMPLEMENTATION I know, I know, I know. That's all good and well, but what does this all mean to a company like mine? We are about to see a massive change in consumer behavior so let's get ready. DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION AS A USP Getting this correct will change your company forever. DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION USP-01 Digital transformation (DT) – the use of technology to radically improve performance or reach of enterprises – is becoming a hot topic for companies across the globe. VERY DIGITAL CHANGING NOT VERY DIGITAL DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION USP-02 Companies face common pressures from customers, employees and competitors to begin or speed up their digital transformation. However they are transforming at different paces with different results. VERY DIGITAL CHANGING NOT VERY DIGITAL DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION USP-03 Successful digital transformation comes not from implementing new technologies but from transforming your organisation to take advantage of the possibilities that new technologies provide.
    [Show full text]
  • ENERGY DRINK Buyer’S Guide 2007
    ENERGY DRINK buyer’s guide 2007 DIGITAL EDITION SPONSORED BY: OZ OZ3UGAR&REE OZ OZ3UGAR&REE ,ITER ,ITER3UGAR&REE -ANUFACTUREDFOR#OTT"EVERAGES53! !$IVISIONOF#OTT"EVERAGES)NC4AMPA &, !FTERSHOCKISATRADEMARKOF#OTT"EVERAGES)NC 777!&4%23(/#+%.%2'9#/- ENERGY DRINK buyer’s guide 2007 OVER 150 BRANDS COMPLETE LISTINGS FOR Introduction ADVERTISING EDITORIAL 1123 Broadway 1 Mifflin Place The BEVNET 2007 Energy Drink Buyer’s Guide is a comprehensive compilation Suite 301 Suite 300 showcasing the energy drink brands currently available for sale in the United States. New York, NY Cambridge, MA While we have added some new tweaks to this year’s edition, the layout is similar to 10010 02138 our 2006 offering, where brands are listed alphabetically. The guide is intended to ph. 212-647-0501 ph. 617-715-9670 give beverage buyers and retailers the ability to navigate through the category and fax 212-647-0565 fax 617-715-9671 make the tough purchasing decisions that they believe will satisfy their customers’ preferences. To that end, we’ve also included updated sales numbers for the past PUBLISHER year indicating overall sales, hot new brands, and fast-moving SKUs. Our “MIA” page Barry J. Nathanson in the back is for those few brands we once knew but have gone missing. We don’t [email protected] know if they’re done for, if they’re lost, or if they just can’t communicate anymore. EDITORIAL DIRECTOR John Craven In 2006, as in 2005, niche-marketed energy brands targeting specific consumer [email protected] interests or demographics continue to expand. All-natural and organic, ethnic, EDITOR urban or hip-hop themed, female- or male-focused, sports-oriented, workout Jeffrey Klineman “fat-burners,” so-called aphrodisiacs and love drinks, as well as those risqué brand [email protected] names aimed to garner notoriety in the media encompass many of the offerings ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER within the guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Vascular Plant Surveys in the Polletts Cove and Lahave River Areas of Nova Scotia
    Rare Vascular Plant Surveys in the Polletts Cove and LaHave River areas of Nova Scotia David Mazerolle, Sean Blaney and Alain Belliveau Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre November 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was funded by the Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources, through their Species at Risk Conservation Fund. The Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre appreciates the opportunity provided by the fund to have visited these botanically significant areas. We also thank Sean Basquill for mapping, fieldwork and good company on our Polletts Cove trip, and Cape Breton Highlands National Park for assistance with vehicle transportation at the start of that trip. PHOTOGRAPHY CREDITS All photographs included in this report were taken by the authors. 1 INTRODUCTION This project, funded by the Nova Scotia Species at Risk Conservation Fund, focused on two areas of high potential for rare plant occurrence: 1) the Polletts Cove and Blair River system in northern Cape Breton, covered over eight AC CDC botanist field days; and 2) the lower, non-tidal 29 km and selected tidal portions of the LaHave River in Lunenburg County, covered over 12 AC CDC botanist field days. The Cape Breton Highlands support a diverse array of provincially rare plants, many with Arctic or western affinity, on cliffs, river shores, and mature deciduous forests in the deep ravines (especially those with more calcareous bedrock and/or soil) and on the peatlands and barrens of the highland plateau. Recent AC CDC fieldwork on Lockhart Brook, Big Southwest Brook and the North Aspy River sites similar to the Polletts Cove and Blair River valley was very successful, documenting 477 records of 52 provincially rare plant species in only five days of fieldwork.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview: * Conclusion Modules and Libraries Modern Perl Techniques
    Modern Perl Techniques to Build Distributed Web 2.0 Applications. Presented By: Matt Burns [email protected] * Conclusion Moose just makes things easier. Joose is just like moose but in javascript land. jQuery and Seamstress allow us to be free of clunky template languages. Customized Web Apps spun up on the fly that are stateful are super neato. CPAN modules make concurrent distributed web apps/service possible and straight-forward. Configuration UDC Joose, jQuery Communication Event Distributed Demultiplexing WDC Continuity, Seamstess Computing Dimensions Concurrency Moose, Coro, AnyEvent EDC Service Ideas Behind This: 1) Owning stock and trading options on that will beat owning stock alone. 2) The Web Browser is the new operating system. KiokuDB RDC 3) Distributed parallel programming allows us the ability to tackle very complicated problems. 4) Explore the ideas behind the "Modern Perl" movement. 5) Explore the benefits of the Moose Joose relationship. 6) Instead of templating languages HTML/XML/etc operate directly on the dom. 7) How to enable an ad-hoc system of services to be coordinated into runtime alliances to solve business processes. Distributed Business Component UDC WDC EDC RDC Messages Events Overview: *** Distributed Paradigm Friendly Joose, jQuery Perl, CPAN Dom About how simple(maybe even easy) it is to build a simple distributed application stack with these off the self of CPAN Component Execution Environment The decrease in the impedence mismatch between objects in perl land and objects in Javascript land. Serializing perl/js objects and marshelling them back and forth from the client and server and between server and server. When we think distributed apps there are often many servers working with the client that hosts the user level component of these distributed apps in a piece of dom tied to a Joose object.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species of Dorchester County
    List of Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species of Dorchester County July 2019 Maryland Wildlife and Heritage Service Natural Heritage Program Larry Hogan, Governor Jeannie Haddaway-Riccio, Secretary Wildlife & Heritage Service Natural Heritage Program Tawes State Office Building, E-1 580 Taylor Avenue Annapolis, MD 21401 410-260-8540 Fax 410-260-8596 dnr.maryland.gov/wildlife Additional Telephone Contact Information: Toll free in Maryland: 877-620-8DNR ext. 8540 OR Individual unit/program toll-free number Out of state call: 410-260-8540 Text Telephone (TTY) users call via the Maryland Relay The facilities and services of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources are available to all without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, national origin or physical or mental disability. This document is available in alternative format upon request from a qualified individual with disability. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Maryland Department of Natural Resources would like to express sincere appreciation to the many scientists and naturalists who willingly share information and provide their expertise to further our mission of conserving Maryland’s natural heritage. Publication of this list is made possible by taxpayer donations to Maryland’s Chesapeake Bay and Endangered Species Fund. IMPORTANT NOTES This list is a subset of the main reports: Maryland Natural Heritage Program. 2019. List of Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Plants of Maryland DNR 03-031319-135 and Maryland Natural Heritage Program. 2019. Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Plants of Maryland DNR 03-031319-136 and Maryland Natural Heritage Program. 2016. List of Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Animals of Maryland DNR 03-1272016-633 Please refer to these for important information including grank, history, purpose, governing laws and regulations, understanding state and federal conservation status ranks and legal statuses, and for additional resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Vascular Plant Species Distribution Maps
    Appendix 11.5.1: Aquatic Vascular Plant Species Distribution Maps These distribution maps are for 116 aquatic vascular macrophyte species (Table 1). Aquatic designation follows habitat descriptions in Haines and Vining (1998), and includes submergent, floating and some emergent species. See Appendix 11.4 for list of species. Also included in Appendix 11.4 is the number of HUC-10 watersheds from which each taxon has been recorded, and the county-level distributions. Data are from nine sources, as compiled in the MABP database (plus a few additional records derived from ancilliary information contained in reports from two fisheries surveys in the Upper St. John basin organized by The Nature Conservancy). With the exception of the University of Maine herbarium records, most locations represent point samples (coordinates were provided in data sources or derived by MABP from site descriptions in data sources). The herbarium data are identified only to township. In the species distribution maps, town-level records are indicated by center-points (centroids). Figure 1 on this page shows as polygons the towns where taxon records are identified only at the town level. Data Sources: MABP ID MABP DataSet Name Provider 7 Rare taxa from MNAP lake plant surveys D. Cameron, MNAP 8 Lake plant surveys D. Cameron, MNAP 35 Acadia National Park plant survey C. Greene et al. 63 Lake plant surveys A. Dieffenbacher-Krall 71 Natural Heritage Database (rare plants) MNAP 91 University of Maine herbarium database C. Campbell 183 Natural Heritage Database (delisted species) MNAP 194 Rapid bioassessment surveys D. Cameron, MNAP 207 Invasive aquatic plant records MDEP Maps are in alphabetical order by species name.
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Survey of Tributaries for Eurasian Watermilfoil
    It\OARRIN \f!I fresh Water Institute , ;ammw 7 7 mmnrr I In 1lllIiI@i liD' mpw I't W1I$UU II1I1 =pw Lake George, New York Adirondack Field Station at Bolton Landing A SURVEY OF TRIBUTARIICS TO LAKE GEORGI':, NEW YORK FOR THE PRESENCE OF I:URASIAN WATERMILFOIL prepared lor The fund for Lake George hy Lawrence W, Eichler Research Scientist T,aurie Ahrens-Franklin Sr. Laboratory Technician & Charles W. Boylen Associate Director DaHin Fresh Water Institute Rensselaer "PolJ1echnic instItutt; Troy, NY 12180-3590 Bolton Lanchng, NY 12814 March 2004 DrWI Technical Report 20U4-4 TABLE OF CONTt<:NTS The Survey of Lake George Tributaries for Eurasian watermilfoil· 200J executive Summary III Inlroduction Methods Results and Discussioll 3 References 12 Acknowl edgcrncnls 13 Appendix A. Site Locations Appendix B. MacroJlhyte Community Assessmrut data 11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A survey of tributary Jellas in the south hasin of Lake George was conducted in 2003 to assess the extent of Eurasian watermi[foil (Myriophyllum spicatum L) infestation. The Darrin fresh Water blStitutc conducted the project with financial support from the fund for Lake George. Similar surveys were completed in 1987, 1989, 1991, 1994, 11)1)7 and 2000 as reference points. Delta areas were chosen as read; Iy identifiable points that historically harbor diverse assemblages of native aquatic plants. Results orthese surveys can he used to approximate the rate of spread of11111foil through the Lake George hasin. in 1987, when surveys were initiated, 30 percent of the sites were found to have milfoil. By 1989, this percentage had dropped to 23 percent due to harvesting of mil foil, although three new locations were found in 19R9.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the Nova Scotia— New Brunswick Border Region by George F
    Birds of the Nova Scotia— New Brunswick border region by George F. Boyer Occasional Paper Number 8 Second edition Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Environnement Canada Wildlife Service Service de la Faune Birds of the Nova Scotia - New Brunswick border region by George F. Boyer With addendum by A. J. Erskine and A. D. Smith Canadian Wildlife Service Occasional Paper Number 8 Second edition Issued under the authority of the Honourable Jack Davis, PC, MP Minister of the Environment John S. Tener, Director Canadian Wildlife Service 5 Information Canada, Ottawa, 1972 Catalogue No. CW69-1/8 First edition 1966 Design: Gottschalk-)-Ash Ltd. 4 George Boyer banding a barn swallow in June 1952. The author George Boyer was born in Woodstock, New Brunswick, on August 24, 1916. He graduated in Forestry from the University of New Brunswick in 1938 and served with the Canadian Army from 1939 to 1945. He joined the Canadian Wildlife Service in 1947, and worked out of the Sackville office until 1956. During that time he obtained an M.S. in zoology from the University of Illinois. He car­ ried on private research from April 1956 until July 1957, when he rejoined CWS. He worked out of Maple, Ontario, until his death, while on a field trip near Aultsville. While at Sackville, Mr. Boyer worked chiefly on waterfowl of the Nova Scotia-New Brunswick border region, with special emphasis on Pintails and Black Ducks. He also studied merganser- salmon interrelationships on the Miramichi River system, Woodcock, and the effects on bird popu­ lations of spruce budworm control spraying in the Upsalquitch area.
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands 1996
    National List of Vascular Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary Indicator by Region and Subregion Scientific Name/ North North Central South Inter- National Subregion Northeast Southeast Central Plains Plains Plains Southwest mountain Northwest California Alaska Caribbean Hawaii Indicator Range Abies amabilis (Dougl. ex Loud.) Dougl. ex Forbes FACU FACU UPL UPL,FACU Abies balsamea (L.) P. Mill. FAC FACW FAC,FACW Abies concolor (Gord. & Glend.) Lindl. ex Hildebr. NI NI NI NI NI UPL UPL Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir. FACU FACU FACU Abies grandis (Dougl. ex D. Don) Lindl. FACU-* NI FACU-* Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt. NI NI FACU+ FACU- FACU FAC UPL UPL,FAC Abies magnifica A. Murr. NI UPL NI FACU UPL,FACU Abildgaardia ovata (Burm. f.) Kral FACW+ FAC+ FAC+,FACW+ Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL FACU- FACU- UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL NI NI UPL,FACU- Acacia choriophylla Benth. FAC* FAC* Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. FACU NI NI* NI NI FACU Acacia greggii Gray UPL UPL FACU FACU UPL,FACU Acacia macracantha Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd. NI FAC FAC Acacia minuta ssp. minuta (M.E. Jones) Beauchamp FACU FACU Acaena exigua Gray OBL OBL Acalypha bisetosa Bertol. ex Spreng. FACW FACW Acalypha virginica L. FACU- FACU- FAC- FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acalypha virginica var. rhomboidea (Raf.) Cooperrider FACU- FAC- FACU FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Humm. FAC* NI NI FAC* Acanthomintha ilicifolia (Gray) Gray FAC* FAC* Acanthus ebracteatus Vahl OBL OBL Acer circinatum Pursh FAC- FAC NI FAC-,FAC Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FAC FACU FACU* FAC FACU FACU*,FAC Acer grandidentatum Nutt.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheet1 Page 1 Name of Drink Caffeine (Mg) 5 Hour Energy 60
    Sheet1 Name of drink Size (mL) Caffeine (mg) 5 Hour Energy 60 Equivalent of a cup of coffee Amp Energy (Original) 710 213 Amp Energy (Original) 473 143 Amp Energy Overdrive 473 142 Amp Energy Re-Ignite 473 158 Amp Energy Traction 473 158 Bawls Guarana 473 103 Bawls Guarana Cherry 473 100 Bawls Guarana G33K B33R 296 80 Bawls Guaranexx Sugar Free 473 103 Beaver Buzz Black Currant Energy 355 188 Beaver Buzz Citrus Energy 355 188 Beaver Buzz Green Machine Energy 473 200 Big Buzz Chronic Energy 473 200 BooKoo Energy Citrus 710 360 BooKoo Energy Wild Berry 710 360 Cheetah Power Surge Diet 710 None? Frank's Energy Drink 500 160 Frank's Energy Drink Lime 250 80 Frank's Energy Drink Pineapple 250 80 Full Throttle Unleaded 473 141 Hansen's Energy Pro 246 39 Hardcore Energize Bullet Blue Rage 85.7 300 Hype Energy Pro (Special Edition) 355 114 Hype Energy MFP 473 151 Inked Chikara 473 151 Inked Maori 473 151 Jolt Endurance Shot 60 200 Jolt Orange Blast 695 220 Lost (Original) 473 160 Lost Five-O 473 160 Mini Thin Rush (6 Hour) 60 200 Monster (Original) 710 246 Monster Assault 473 164 Monster Energy (Original) 473 170 Monster Khaos 710 225 Monster Khaos 473 150 Monster M-80 473 164 Monster MIXXD 473 Monster Reduced Carb 473 140 NOS (Original) 473 200 NOS (Original)(Bottle) 650 343 NOS Fruit Punch 473 246.35 Premium Green Tea Energy 355 119 Premium Iced Tea Energy 355 102 Premium Pink Energy 355 120 Red Bull 250 80 Red Bull 355 113.6 Page 1 Sheet1 Red Rain 250 80 Rocket Shot 54 50 Rockstar Burner 473 160 Rockstar Burner 710 239 Rockstar Diet 473 160
    [Show full text]
  • Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Marketing Unveiled
    SUGAR-SWEETENED BEVERAGE MARKETING UNVEILED VOLUME 1 VOLUME 2 VOLUME 3 VOLUME 4 THE PRODUCT: A VARIED OFFERING TO RESPOND TO A SEGMENTED MARKET A Multidimensional Approach to Reduce the Appeal of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages This report is a central component of the project entitled “A Multidimensional Approach to Reducing the Appeal of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages (SSBs)” launched by the Association pour la santé publique du Québec (ASPQ) and the Quebec Coalition on Weight-Related Problems (Weight Coalition) as part of the 2010 Innovation Strategy of the Public Health Agency of Canada on the theme of “Achieving Healthier Weights in Canada’s Communities”. This project is based on a major pan-Canadian partnership involving: • the Réseau du sport étudiant du Québec (RSEQ) • the Fédération du sport francophone de l’Alberta (FSFA) • the Social Research and Demonstration Corporation (SRDC) • the Université Laval • the Public Health Association of BC (PHABC) • the Ontario Public Health Association (OPHA) The general aim of the project is to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages by changing attitudes toward their use and improving the food environment by making healthy choices easier. To do so, the project takes a three-pronged approach: • The preparation of this report, which offers an analysis of the Canadian sugar-sweetened beverage market and the associated marketing strategies aimed at young people (Weight Coalition/Université Laval); • The dissemination of tools, research, knowledge and campaigns on marketing sugar-sweetened beverages (PHABC/OPHA/Weight Coalition); • The adaptation in Francophone Alberta (FSFA/RSEQ) of the Quebec project Gobes-tu ça?, encouraging young people to develop a more critical view of advertising in this industry.
    [Show full text]