Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No

Home , Elatine minima, Joose (framework), NOS (drink), Spiranthes ochroleuca, Tintamarre, Triglochin gaspensis

Project Description (PD)/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Proposed Oyster Washing, Grading and Storage Facility and Apple Orchard Vacant Agricultural Land (Parcel No. 442608) Cavendish Road (Route No. 6), Bayview, Queens County, PEI

JOOSE ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT NO. JE0441

Report prepared for:

Raspberry Point Oyster Co. Inc., 12 Milky Way, Charlottetown, PE C1A 2E2

Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 484 Taylor Road PO Box 19 (1088 Colville Road) North Granville, PEI C0A 1E0 North Wiltshire, PEI C0A 1Y0

May 29, 2020 Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

Executive Summary

Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. (Joose Environmental) and Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. (Granville Ridge) and were contracted by Raspberry Point Oyster Co. Inc. (Raspberry Point) to complete a Project Description (PD)/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The PD/EIS was completed to meet the requirements of the Province of PEI and the PEI Resort Municipality for a proposed Oyster Washing, Grading and Storage Facility as well as an Apple Orchard. The proposed project is to be developed on vacant agricultural land identified as Parcel No. 442608 and located along the south side Cavendish Road (Route No. 6) in Bayview, Queens County, PEI.

As part of the PD/EIS the following mitigation and environmental monitoring elements will be adhered to during the construction and operation of the proposed facility, including:

Mitigation

• During construction and operation (including accidents, potential malfunctions and unplanned events) all municipal, provincial and federal codes, standards and best management practices will be followed;

• During operation mitigation for hazardous waste and non-hazardous waste will be conducted as outlined in Tables 3.1 and 3.2 in Sections 3.2.5 and 3.2.6 of this report; and

• The site will be developed in a manner to leave treed buffers to the north, east and west of the site so as to reduce noise levels and protect view planes.

Environmental Monitoring

• During the construction period personnel, Raspberry Point project manager will conduct regular environmental monitoring site inspections to ensure all construction components adhere to the provincial and federal regulations and codes.

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 i ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1 PROJECT NAME AND INFORMATION ...... 1 1.2 PROJECT DETAILS ...... 2 1.2.1 Project Overview and Funding ...... 2 1.2.2 Current Site Description, Historical and Adjacent Land Use ...... 2

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...... 4 2.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND ...... 4 2.2 PROJECT SCHEDULE ...... 5 2.3 REGULATORY AND PROJECT PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS ...... 5

3.0 PROJECT ACTIVITIES ...... 8 3.1 PLANNING COMPONENT ...... 8 3.2 CONSTRUCTION COMPONENTS ...... 8 3.2.1 Site Preparation and Access ...... 9 3.2.2 Site Services (Water, Sewer, and Power) ...... 11 3.2.3 Storm Water Management ...... 11 3.2.4 Fuel Storage ...... 12 3.2.5 Hazardous Materials Storage ...... 12 3.2.6 Non-Hazardous Materials Storage ...... 13 3.3 OPERATION COMPONENT ...... 13 3.3.1 Use of Facility ...... 13 3.3.2 Operating Hours ...... 13 3.3.3 Wastewater Management ...... 14 3.3.4 Air Quality and Noise ...... 17 3.3.5 Site Security ...... 18 3.3.6 Emergency Response and Training...... 18 3.3.7 Litter ...... 18 3.3.8 Orchard Operation ...... 18 3.4 DECOMMISSIONING ...... 19

4.0 SUMMARY OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ...... 19 4.1 PHYSICAL SETTING ...... 19 4.1.1 Surficial Geology ...... 19 4.1.2 Bedrock Geology ...... 19 4.1.3 Topography and Regional Drainage ...... 20 4.1.4 Surface Water Drainage ...... 20 4.2 SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER RESOURCES ...... 20 4.3 ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT ...... 21 4.4 TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT ...... 22 4.4.1 Environmentally Managed Areas ...... 25 4.4.2 Vegetation (Plants and Trees) ...... 26

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 ii ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020 Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

4.4.3 Wetlands and Watercourses ...... 26 4.4.4 Breeding Birds and Other Wildlife ...... 27 4.5 HUMAN ENVIRONMENT ...... 28 4.5.1 Archaeological, Heritage or Cultural Resources ...... 28 4.5.2 Transportation ...... 29

5.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 29

6.0 CLOSURE ...... 30

7.0 REFERENCES ...... 32

List of Tables

Table 1-1 Project Information ……………………………………………………………………. 1 Table 1-2 Adjoining Properties - Current Land Use……………………………………………. 3 Table 1-3 Approval Required - Proposed Oyster Facility………………………………………. 7 Table 3-1 Hazardous Materials Storage…………………………………………………………. 12 Table 3-2 Non-Hazardous Materials Storage…………………………………………………… 13 Table 3-3 Salinity and Relative Turbidity Levels - Current Operations………………………. 16 Table 3-4 Salinity and Relative Turbidity Levels - Proposed Location………………………. 16 Table 4-1 Water Quality Results for Groundwater within the Hope River Watershed………. 21 Table 4-2 Weather Data - Long River Station (Environment Canada) ………………………. 22

List of Figures

Figure No. 1 Project Location Figure No. 2 Proposed Layout Figure No. 3 Proposed Layout Aerial Image

List of Appendices

Appendix A Figures Appendix B Applications for Provincial Permits and Approvals Appendix C ACCDC Data Report

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 iii ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020 Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. (Joose Environmental) and Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. (Granville Ridge) and were contracted by Raspberry Point Oyster Co. Inc. (Raspberry Point) to complete a Project Description (PD)/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The PD/EIA was completed to meet the requirements of the Province of PEI and the PEI Resort Municipality for a proposed Oyster Washing, Grading and Storage Facility as well as an Apple Orchard. The proposed project is to be developed on vacant agricultural land identified as Parcel No. 442608 and located along the south side Cavendish Road (Route No. 6) in Bayview, Queens County, PEI (refer to Figure No. 1, Appendix A).

1.1 Project Name and Information

Information regarding the project name, proponent and authors of the PD/EIS is provided in Table 1-1.

Table 1-1. Project Information Project Name

Raspberry Point Oysters Inc.: Oyster Grading, Packaging, Storage Facility and Apple Orchard

Proponent Information Name: Raspberry Point Oysters Inc.

Mailing Address: Raspberry Point Oysters Inc. 12 Milky Way Charlottetown, PE C1E 2E2

Principal Contact: Mr. James Power: Manager Telephone: 1 (902) 368-3000 Email: [email protected]

Project Location Project Address: Cavendish Road (Route No. 6) Bayview, Queens County, PEI

Property Tax No.: Parcel No. 442608

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 1 © Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

Funding

Funding Agents: Raspberry Point Oysters Inc.’s Commercial Banking, Potential Federal and Provincial Funding as available Estimate Cost of Project: $3,000,000.00

May 29, 2020 ______Date Signature of Proponent

Authors of Project Description

Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 484 Taylor Road 1088 Colville Road North Granville, PE C0A 1E0 North Wiltshire, PE C0A 1Y0 Mr. Don Maynard, B.Sc., M.Sc. Mr. Peter Joostema, P. Eng., CESA, FEC

1.2 Project Details

1.2.1 Project Overview and Funding

Raspberry Point is proposing to conduct site preparation work (i.e., grading, foundation preparation and surfaces finishing), to construct and operate an Oyster Washing, Grading and Storage Facility on the south side of the Cavendish Road (Route No. 6 - Parcel No. 442608) in Bayview, Queens County, PEI. As part of the proposed project, an apple orchard would be established on the southern portion of the subject site encompassing an area of approximately 2 hectares (5 acres).

The funding of this project is to be sourced by Raspberry Point’s commercial lender as well as potential Provincial and/or Federal funding sources as they become available.

1.2.2 Current Site Description, Historical and Adjacent Land Use

The subject property for the proposed facility is located within the boundaries of the PEI Resort Municipality in Bayview, Queens County, PEI and is situated along the south side of Cavendish Road (Route No. 6). It should be noted that the PEI Resort Municipality encompasses the communities of Stanley Bridge, Hope River, Bayview, Cavendish and North Rustico. The subject property is identified as Parcel No. 442608 and encompasses an area of 13.4 hectares (33 acres) and is currently zoned as resort commercial/commercial (i.e., RD4). The PEI GIS

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 2 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

Address Locator system shows the emergency service providers for the property to be the RCMP and the New Glasgow Fire Department.

The subject property is bordered by the following adjacent/neighbouring properties:

• North: Cavendish Road (Route No. 6) followed by vacant agricultural land;

• West: Agricultural land followed by mixed woodland and a residence located approximately 450 m to the southwest of the proposed facility;

• South: Hope River (approximately 450 m from proposed facility); and

• East: Mixed woodland with a residence located approximately 400 m to the southeast of the proposed facility. A mapped wetland/watercourse along the Hope River and extending along the eastern boundary of the subject site is approximately 300 m from the proposed facility.

The area on the subject property proposed for the facility is currently cleared farmland (present crop rotation over the last ten years has been grains and soya beans. Historically, the subject property has been used for agricultural purposes since it was cleared by the first settlers in the area by the early to mid 1800s.

Adjacent and surrounding land use to the proposed project site is summarized in Table 1-2.

Table 1-2. Adjoining Properties - Current Land Use Direction Current Land Use Current Occupant North Agricultural Farmland (Across Cavendish Road) Farmland/Woodland and West Agricultural/Forest /Residential Residence. South Watercourse Hope River Farmland/Woodland and Residence. Note mapped Agricultural/Forestry/Residential/ wetland and watercourse East Mapped Wetland and extending from Hope River along Watercourse the eastern boundary of the subject site (approx. 300 m from the proposed facility).

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 3 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The proposed facility consists of a single structure with a total planned area of approximately 3,000 m2 (32,300 ft2) and will consist of the following components:

• Office/Change Rooms;

• Dry storage;

• Cooler Storage;

• Grading/Packaging;

• Shop Area; and

• Load/Unload Area.

The proposed facility will be utilized strictly for washing, grading/packaging and storage of oysters. There will be no cooking or serving of oysters at the proposed facility.

As part of the proposed project, an apple orchard would be established on the southern portion of the subject site encompassing an area of approximately 2 hectares (5 acres), containing approximately 6,000 trees. The orchard will be planted in the last week of May 2020 and the first harvest year will be 2022.

2.1 Project Background

Raspberry Point is proposing to relocate their current location which is situated at civic address 9539 Cavendish Road (Route No. 6 - formerly “Fiddles and Viddles” family restaurant). The proposed new Oyster Washing, Grading and Storage facility will be approximately 600 m east along the Cavendish Road (Route No. 6) from Raspberry Point’s the current operation. The proposed facility will provide, increased grading/packaging capacity and increased efficiency, versatility and space for product storage.

The property is presently under cultivation (grains and row crops) however, the location has the potential for a higher yield fruit crop. Raspberry Point will be working with Red Shore Orchards

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 4 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

to establish and operate a commercial apple orchard. The orchard will be established on the southern portion of the property, 15 m buffer zones will be established and maintained between the Hope River and the mapped wetland on the south and southeast property boundaries, respectively. The apple trees would be planted in rows approximately 1 m (3 ft.) apart to produce the Honey Crisp variety of apples. The location and layout of the proposed facility, apple orchard and associated operations are shown on Figure Nos. 2 and 3 in Appendix A.

2.2 Project Schedule

The project schedule for the construction and completion of the proposed new facility will be between the summers of 2020 and 2021 as outlined below:

• Site Preparation: July 2020;

• Construction Phase: August 2020 to October 2021; and

• Commissioning and Operation of Facility: October 2021.

The orchard is scheduled to be planted during the last week of May 2020 with the first harvest planned for the fall of 2022.

2.3 Regulatory and Project Permitting Requirements

The PEI Resort Municipality Zoning and Subdivision Bylaw Section 4.7 requires an EIS to be prepared for certain types of new development within the resort municipality limits. The EIS is the document produced from studying the potential environmental impacts of a proposed project. The principal objective of this PD/EIS report is to predict the impacts which can be expected, should the project proceed. This is accomplished by gathering necessary resource information, conducting field investigations (as required), and using scientific methods to evaluate potential interactions between the environment and activities associated with the undertaking.

The PD/EIS is required to address potential environmental impacts of the project and addresses, but is not limited to, the following items:

• What environmental impacts will the changes to the property have on the adjacent landowners?

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 5 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

• What environmental impacts will the changes to the property have on the groundwater, existing vegetation, watercourse or wetlands?

• Unique landforms, slopes, runoff characteristics, and soil types should be described, as well as the proximity of the proposed undertaking to streams, or watercourses.

• Groundwater and surface water resources should be characterized if the project has any potential to impact them. Baseline surface and groundwater quality should be described where appropriate, and field evaluations may be required to provide site-specific data.

• What environmental impacts will the changes to the property have on the municipal sewer system?

• What environmental impacts will this development have on traffic, access along Cavendish Road (Route No. 6)?

• What environmental impacts will the construction activities associated with the proposed project have? What are the detailed time frames, materials to be used, detailed plans of the development, mitigation measures proposed, etc.?

As well, the installation of a domestic/operations potable well with an extraction rate over 227 Litres per minute (Lpm) or 50 imperial gallons per minute (igpm) will require an Application for Groundwater Exploration Permit and follow-up Groundwater Abstraction Permit from the PEI Department of Environment, Water and Climate Change (PEIDEWCC). In addition, the installation of the oyster grading, wash water discharge pipe to Hope River will require at a minimum, an Application for a Watercourse, Wetland and Buffer Zone Activity Permit from PEIDEWCC. Consequently, in consideration of these two permit requirements, PEIDEWCC has requested that the proponent submit a Project Description for Environmental Impact Assessment - Review/Registration (refer to Appendix B).

An outline of the environmental legislation, approvals, and guidelines that may be applicable to the proposed project is provided in Table 1-3.

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 6 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

Table 1.3. Approvals Required - Proposed Oyster Facility Required Approval Legislative Authority Authority Status Draft completed Environmental Impact Section 4.7 of PEI Resort PEI Resort Municipality Granville Ridge/Joose Assessment Municipality Bylaw Environmental PEI Resort Municipality Application submitted Development Permit PEI Resort Municipality Bylaw Section 4.2 by proponent. Sanitary Waste Water PEI Resort Municipality Cavendish Sewer Utility Application submitted Disposal Bylaw and PEIDEWCC by proponent. PEI Department of Transportation, Application submitted Entrance way Permit to Infrastructure and PEIDTIE and PEI and approved (refer to Energy (PEIDTIE) - Cavendish Road Resort Municipality application in Roads Act and PEI (Route No. 6) Resort Municipality Appendix B). Bylaw Section 4.15 Building Code Design Provincial Fire Application submitted PEI Fire Prevention Act Certificate for fire safety Marshall’s Office by proponent. Acquired after PEI Environmental Protection Act and aboveground storage Fuel Storage Tank PEIDEWCC Home Heat Tanks tanks (ASTs) are Identification Tag Regulations installed. Environmental Impact Submitted by Assessment - Section 9 of the PEI EPA PEIDEWCC proponent. Registration Application for Permit No. 2020-04 PEI Water Act and Groundwater PEIDEWCC issued May 19, 2020 Associated Regulation Exploration Permit (refer to Appendix B). To be submitted by the Application for proponent upon PEI Water Act and Groundwater Extraction PEIDEWCC completion of the Associated Regulation Permit Groundwater Exploration program. Application for a Section 6 of the Watercourse, Environmental Protection Wetland and Buffer Application submitted Act, Watercourse and PEIDEWCC Zone by proponent. Activity Permit Wetland Protection Regulations

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 7 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

3.0 PROJECT ACTIVITIES

A description of the project activities for the new facility has been broken down into four main components including:

• Planning;

• Construction;

• Operation; and

• Decommissioning.

3.1 Planning Component

The subject property proposed for the new facility and apple orchard is identified as Parcel No. 442608 and is currently vacant agricultural farmland which has been owned by owned by Raspberry Point Oysters Co. Inc. since 2016. The planning aspects includes(ed):

• Site reconnaissance (proposed facility and apple orchard);

• Facility plans; and

• Environmental description, permit application and assessment preparation.

3.2 Construction Components

During the construction component it is expected that the equipment to be used will include, but is not limited to excavators, bull dozers/earth movers and tandem dump trucks. During the construction period the Raspberry Point project manager will conduct regular environmental monitoring site inspections to ensure all construction components adhere to all municipal, provincial and federal regulations and codes.

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 8 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

3.2.1 Site Preparation and Access

Site Preparation and Access

The site preparation for the new structure will involve grubbing limited areas of the site where unsuitable materials exist and replacement with structural fill within the new building’s footprint. The topsoil and fill materials grubbed from the area to be developed will be maintained on the subject site and will be utilized by the contractor for landscaping purposes.

The site preparation will involve the following components:

• Installation of Type I slit fencing to control site water runoff during construction;

• Clearing/grubbing of vegetation (including trees) and stripping areas of the subject site which are proposed to be developed with subsequent backfilling with approved fill material (i.e., common borrow or aggregate) in areas to support the components of the building construction as required; and

• Topsoil grubbed from the areas to be developed will be maintained on the subject site and utilized for landscaping purposes.

It is projected that the preparation and grading of the subject site will be conducted principally with on-site material using a balance cut and fill. However, locally sourced, select borrow and other aggregate fill materials may be required in select areas of the subject site.

An oyster wash water decant discharge pipeline and outfall will be installed between the facility and the Hope River (approximately 520 m). The pipeline will be trenched in on the western side of the property and through the river bank where the pipe and outfall will enter the Hope River (refer to Figure Nos. 2 and 3, Appendix A and river bank photos below). Site run-off containment measures (silt booms) during installation and ongoing site protection (river bank erosion protection, buffer zone reseeding) would be conducted.

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 9 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

Photo No. 1. Hope River Shoreline and River Bank at Proposed Outfall

Photo No. 2. Hope River Substrate at Proposed Outfall

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 10 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

In order to properly configure and plant the 2 ha (5 acres) commercial orchard on the southern portion of the property, a two tree (white spruce) wide, hedgerow of approximately 170 m length will be removed (refer to Figure No. 3, Appendix A).

The proposed facility will be using an existing agricultural access onto the subject site which is located along the south side of Cavendish Road (Route No. 6) in Bayview, PEI (refer to Figure Nos. 2 and 3, Appendix A). For additional details regarding site access and traffic refer to Section 4.5.2 below.

3.2.2 Site Services (Water, Sewer, and Power)

Site services will include a potable/domestic/operational water supply provided from a new 203 mm (8 inch) diameter well to be drilled at the subject site as part of the construction program. The proposed facility will require 320 Litres per minute (Lpm) or 70 imperial gallons per minute (igpm) and as such a Groundwater Exploration Permit Application was submitted to the PEIDEWCC as part the current program with the Groundwater Exploration Permit provided on May 19, 2020 (refer to Appendix B).

The proposed facility will be connected to the PEI Resort Municipality municipal system (located along the Cavendish Road (Route No. 6)) for disposal of domestic wastewater generated at the subject site.

Power in the Bayview area is provided by Maritime Electric Company, Limited with the transmission lines running along Cavendish Road (Route No. 6). Power to the facility will be routed from these transmission lines by Maritime Electric Company, Limited.

3.2.3 Storm Water Management

Storm water flow in the area being developed will flow as per the existing natural drainage system for the site. Storm water on the remainder of the site will drain by infiltration or overland flow.

During the construction phase, storm water runoff and sediment control measures will be provided by the site contractor and reviewed by the Raspberry Point Project Manager on a regular basis. This will include installing silt fencing, rip rap, straw bales, and other measures as required.

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 11 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

3.2.4 Fuel Storage

The new facility will have central heating supplied by an oil-fired furnace. Two (2) - 900 litre fuel aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) that meet the requirements of CSA B139-04 and the PEI Environmental Protection Act, Home Heat Tanks Regulations, will be installed in the new facility’s mechanical room. A back-up propane-fired power generator will also be installed at the facility with the propane stored in an exterior propane tank, which will meet the requirements of the PEI Fire Prevention Act.

3.2.5 Hazardous Materials Storage

The facility will utilize a number of detergents, disinfectants, bleaches, cleaning agents, and associated products in quantities required for a facility of this size. Some of these products may be a hazard to human health if used improperly or in the event of a spill. Staff will be trained to use these products in accordance with safety procedures and according to label requirements to avoid personal injury and to reduce exposure to occupants and staff. An inventory of the types of hazardous materials to be stored at the proposed expanded facility is provided in Table 3-1.

Table 3-1. Hazardous Materials Storage

Material Potential Issue Mitigation

Vector control Accidental spill causing Products will be contained inside (Rodenticides) potential risk to human health secure containers and refer to Material and/or environment. Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs). Detergents, Accidental spills causing Products will be contained inside disinfectants, bleaches, potential risk to human health secure containers and located in cleaning agents and/or environment. designated areas of the facility. Products will be used as per manufactures instructions with MSDSs available for review as required. Petroleum Storage Accidental spill causing Emergency response spill kit and potential risk to human health contact PEIDEWCC Emergency and/or environment. Response.

Material safety data sheets (MSDS) will be kept up to date in a central location which is easily accessible by all personnel at the proposed facility. An emergency spill response kit will be provided on-site with staff trained in the proper method of responding to spills, leaks, or chemical exposure.

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 12 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

3.2.6 Non-Hazardous Materials Storage

As part of operations at the proposed facility, there will be limited quantities of non-hazardous material that will be stored at the site. A list of these with suggested mitigation procedures is provided in Table 3-2.

Table 3-2. Non-Hazardous Materials Storage

Material Potential Issue Mitigation

Municipal Solid Waste Litter, leaching of contaminants MSW to be sorted as per waste watch (MSW) requirements and placed in secure storage containers. Waste, compost and recyclables to be transported to appropriate management facilities as required.

3.3 Operation Component

The Oyster Washing, Grading and Storage facility proposed to be developed on the subject site is expected to be ready for operation by July 2021.

3.3.1 Use of Facility

The proposed facility will replace the existing operation current in place at civic address 9539 Cavendish Road (Route No. 6) which is located approximately 1 km west of the subject property. The new facility will operate in a similar manner of washing, grading and storage of oysters while providing increased efficiency, versatility and space for product storage. The site will be accessible to Raspberry Point employees as part of daily operations and other contractors for repair/maintenance of equipment and transportation of products to and from the subject property.

3.3.2 Operating Hours

The proposed facility will operate from 7 am to 6 pm for five (5) to six (6) days per week on a year-round basis pending demand for the product (i.e., higher hours of operation during peak seasons).

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 13 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

3.3.3 Wastewater Management

As indicated above domestic sewage/wastewater generated from the proposed facility will be discharged to the PEI Resort Municipality’s municipal system. The estimated domestic water uses for the facility and subsequent wastewater to be discharge to the PEI Resort Municipality’s municipal system would be in the range of 5 Litre per minute (LPM) or 1 imperial gallon per minute (igpm), with a peak flow of 10 LPM or 2 igpm.

The water uses for the operational component of the proposed facility including oyster washing and grading will be provided by the same 203 mm (8 inch) diameter freshwater well used for potable/domestic supply. The oyster washing/grading unit uses approximately 160 LPM or 35 igpm of water, there will be two (2) units at the facility (refer to photo below).

Photo No. 3. Oyster Washing/Grading Unit at Current Facility

The oyster washing/grading units would operate 8 hours per day and five (5) to six (6) days per week year-round with a peak use of approximately 320 LPM or 70 igpm. The wash water will be screened for larger material (i.e., marine plants, shell fragments, small shellfish) then discharged to a 6,800 LPM or 1,500 igpm, baffled settling tank to remove any sand or sediment. The decant water will then be discharged (maximum discharge rate of 320 LPM or 70 igpm over an eight-hour day) to the Hope River (a distance of approximately 520 m) via a 203 mm (8 inch)

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 14 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

diameter PVC pipeline. The outfall would be at a depth of 0.75 m which would be approximately 6.5 m from the high-water mark of the shoreline.

Photo No. 4. Outfall at Current Oyster Facility

The Hope River adjacent to the subject property is a closed shellfish harvesting zone. There are two mussel seed/spat leases (SEED 0523B and 0419A) in the Hope River adjacent to the subject property. The site operator uses them for mussel spat collection which begins with setting out seed collectors in the spring of the year. Seed collectors are usually frayed pieces of rope that serve as a settlement surface for mussel larvae swimming in the water.

In order to provide a basic characterization (i.e., salinity, turbidity) of the oyster grading wash water/receiving environment at the current operation and the proposed location (Figure No. 1 in Appendix A) a field reconnaissance was conducted on May 8. A YSI Pro 30 hand held meter was used to measure salinity in parts per thousand (ppt). A 120 cm sechi disk tube was used to provide an index of turbidly (i.e., the greater the cm the less the turbidly, any sample with 120 cm plus is to be considered clear of turbidly). The salinity and turbidity results for the current and proposed outfall locations are provided below in Tables 3.3 and 3.4, respectively.

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 15 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

Table 3.3 Salinity and Relative Turbidity Levels - Current Operation Relative Turbidly Sample Location Salinity (ppt) (cm sechi tube) Brackish water from well prior to use in the oyster 1.6 120+ washer/grader Surface water in the settling tank prior to discharge via 1.5 58-67 pipeline Hope River water sample at pipeline outfall, surface 10.6 120+ Hope River water sample at pipeline outfall, at depth of 17.3 N/A 0.75 m, directly over outfall

Table 3.4 Salinity and Relative Turbidity Levels - Proposed Location Relative Turbidly (cm Sample Location Salinity (ppt) sechi tube) Hope River water sample at proposed pipeline outfall, 11.6 120+ surface Hope River water sample at proposed pipeline outfall, 19.3 N/A at depth of 0.75 m

Based on the results obtained the following conclusions are put forth:

• The surface and bottom (0.75 m depth) salinity at the current and the proposed oyster wash water pipeline outfall point is similar within 1 to 2 ppt.

• The oyster wash water at the current location is brackish water and does not appear to pick up any notable additional salinity from the oysters or sediment.

• It appears that the brackish water being discharged is quickly diluted as to within 1 to 2 ppt of ambient conditions.

• The oyster wash water at the current process/location does have some degree of turbidly, 58 - 67 cm versus 120 cm+ for clear water, however end of pipe discharge appears to be quickly diluted as the surface sample from the discharge is 120 cm+ for clear water.

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 16 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

3.3.4 Air Quality and Noise

The main air quality issues associated with the new facility would include:

• emissions for vehicles and equipment operating at the facility and transporting product; and

• fugitive fine particulate matter (dust) from activities on the proposed plants sites’ parking and turning area.

During dry season for construction and as required, a water truck will be on site to provide dust control on the operating surfaces of the main parking and turning area.

There are several potential generators of noise from site operations including:

• operation of equipment washing, grading and storage facility;

• heavy equipment and trucks operating on the site;

• loading and unloading materials;

• back up alarms on vehicles; and

• grass cutting and related activities.

During operation, sound quality may be influenced by the plant operation and associated traffic, however noise is not expected to be a concern during operation. On May 8, 2020, ambient sound monitoring was conducted at the present facility and at the proposed facility site. At the time of the sound monitoring, one oyster washer was in use and there was no truck delivery traffic at the time. The average of four sound measurements at the present facility was 53.8 dB. At the proposed site there was no equipment operating nor truck delivery traffic at the time. The average of four sound measurements at the proposed facility site was 66.9 dB. The observer taking the sound measurements noted that at the present and proposed facility the majority of the sound was generated from road traffic on Cavendish Road (Route No. 6). Given these observations the proposed facility is not expected to cause a substantive increase in sound levels to off-site receptors.

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 17 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

3.3.5 Site Security

Security will be a gate at the site entrance from Cavendish Road (Route No. 6) with security system including surveillance cameras at each entrance point of the facility.

3.3.6 Emergency Response and Training

Fire extinguishers will be provided inside the office area and emergency call numbers for the local fire department, EMS, RCMP and environmental emergency response will be posted in prominent locations. The site is located in the New Glasgow Fire District and a fire hall is located within 13 km of the proposed site.

All site staff will be trained in emergency response basics and will be aware of all protocols for notification in the event of emergency situations.

3.3.7 Litter

Site staff will monitor for the presence of litter on a regular basis and will make arrangements for the picking of litter when deemed necessary by the site manager.

3.3.8 Orchard Operation

Apples are a relatively high maintenance crop, requiring fertilization, physical maintenance, (grass cutting, tree pruning, fruit harvest), multiple applications of pesticides (both fungicides and insecticides) each season. The pesticide applicator must be familiar with the proper application of pesticides, and be aware of any sensitive areas (aquatic, terrestrial or a combination) requiring buffers and must follow all pesticide label and provincial regulatory requirements. A buffer zone is defined by the Pest Management Centre as the distance between the point of direct pesticide application and the nearest downwind boundary of a sensitive habitat. The orchard borders directly on Hope River and a mapped wetland, which would be considered a sensitive aquatic/wetland area.

PEI Provincial regulatory requirements generally require a minimum 15 m buffer zone between pesticide applications and sensitive areas. In addition, most pesticide labels also contain information on the required distance between site of spray application and environmentally sensitive areas (buffer zone). The orchard planting operations will be conducted so as there is a 15 m buffer zone along the Hope River and the mapped wetland to the south/southeast. As well in order to comply with pesticide buffer zone requirements, pesticide application will be ©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 18 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

conducted in no wind situations. If there is a measurable wind then there would only be application, to mitigate downwind drift into sensitive areas, when the wind is from the east or south.

3.4 Decommissioning

It is expected the life capacity of the proposed facility will be a minimum of several decades. At some point it is understood the proposed facility will be decommissioned at the end of its service life. At that time the site will be decommissioned or re-purposed, in accordance with the applicable standards, guidelines and regulations for that period.

4.0 SUMMARY OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

The following sections provide an overview of the existing environmental setting at the subject site.

4.1 Physical Setting

4.1.1 Surficial Geology

Based on an available surficial geology map, the native surficial soil on the subject site consists of a sand phase glacial till (Prest, 1973). This material would be relatively well-drained. The surficial soil type at the subject site consists predominantly of a Charlottetown (Ch) map unit in the area of the proposed new development and Culloden (Cu) map unit on the southern part of the property near Hope River and the mapped wetland along the eastern boundary of the site wetlands. Both of these soil types have excellent drainage characteristics.

4.1.2 Bedrock Geology

Based on the available geology maps, bedrock in the area of the subject site consists of Upper Paleozoic (Pictou Group) Lower Permian Megacyclic Sequence IV - that is made up of redbeds; conglomerate, sandstone and siltstone (H.W. van de Poll, 1977). The bedrock in the area is composed of the Orby Head Formation, which represents some of the youngest bedrock on PEI. The formation is typical of most of the bedrock in the province being composed mainly of flat-lying sandstone beds which, are interbedded with finer-grained claystone and siltstone. The

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 19 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

formation is identified by a characteristic conglomerate, which is found at the base of the formation.

4.1.3 Topography and Regional Drainage

The subject property is located in the Hope River Watershed. The area proposed for the new development is located on the northern section of the site near Cavendish Road (Route No. 6) which is the highest elevation of the subject property. The land slopes to the south from the proposed development towards Hope River at a horizontal gradient (ih) of approximately 3 percent. It should be noted that bottom or most southerly section of the subject site the slope increases to a horizontal gradient (ih) of 15 percent adjacent Hope River and the mapped wetland to the east.

4.1.4 Surface Water Drainage

Surfaces at the site currently consist grasses and tilled farmland with hedge rows separating sections of the agricultural fields. The surface water is anticipated to drain by infiltration and overland flow with the majority of the surface drainage expected to flow towards the Hope River and the mapped wetland (i.e., south/southeast).

4.2 Surface and Groundwater Resources

There are no watercourses (i.e., streams or rivers) located on the subject property. There is a wetland located approximately 200 metres to south/southeast of the area to be developed, and this wetland discharges into Hope River near the Raspberry Point Oyster operation.

There are a number of water wells in the area of the proposed developed. A search of drinking water quality in the Hope River Watershed was made using the Provincial Government Drinking Water Application. As shown in Table 4-1, there were 6 to 9 results depending on the chemical parameter. As outlined in Table 4-1, all parameters listed fall within the Health Canada’s Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality (GCDWQ - October 2014). Consequently, no groundwater chemistry issues are anticipated with the new well for the proposed development.

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 20 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

Table 4-1. Water Quality Results for Groundwater within the Hope River Watershed Hope River Watershed Results Parameter: Average Maximum Minimum Unit: Level: Level: Level: Samples:

Alk Total (mg/L) 80.28 127 56.6 9 Cadmium, dissolved (mg/L) 0 0 0 6 Calcium, dissolved (mg/L) 23.63 36.3 16.9 6 Chloride (mg/L) 12.88 24.4 9.32 9 Chromium, dissolved (mg/L) 0 0 0 6 Iron, dissolved (mg/L) 0 0 0 6 Magnesium, dissolved (mg/L) 8.55 11.3 6.45 6 Manganese, dissolved (mg/L) 0 0 0 6 Nickel, dissolved (mg/L) 0 0 0 6 Nitrate-N (mg/L) 1.98 3.9 0.2 9 pH (chem lab) (pH units) 8.19 8.3 8 9 Phosphorus, dissolved (mg/L) 0.05 0.07 0.03 6 Potassium, dissolved (mg/L) 0.92 1.04 0.83 6 Sodium, dissolved (mg/L) 5.61 6.58 4.92 6 Sulfate, calc from S diss (mg/L) 4.45 5.3 3.58 6 Note: Information from PEIDEWCC Drinking Water Application - March 13, 2016

4.3 Atmospheric Environment

The nearest climate station with climate normal data is situated in Long River, which is located within 15 km west of the subject site. Climate normal data is available from Environment Canada for the 1981 to 2010-time period with Table 4-2 showing the normal values for each month during this time interval.

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 21 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

Table 4-2. Weather Data - Long River Station (Environment Canada) Parameter Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Year Daily Avg Temp (C) -8.0 -7.4 -2.8 3.0 9.4 14.5 18.4 18.4 14.1 8.2 2.8 -3.6 5.6 Rainfall (mm) 26.8 22.2 35.3 56.6 95.1 91.7 82.1 91.4 100.9 102.1 90.3 49.5 843.8 Snowfall (cm) 56.9 41.8 34.0 18.0 3.1 0 0 0 0 0.4 15.0 43.2 212.3 Total Prec. 83.6 64.0 69.3 74.6 98.3 91.7 82.1 91.4 100.9 102.5 105.2 92.6 1,056.2 (mm)

Weather extremes for the Long River station recorded during the period of record (1943 to 2010) as listed below:

- Extreme Maximum Temperature: 33.0 on August 10, 2001;

- Extreme Minimum Temperature: -33.5 on February 7, 1993;

- Extreme daily rainfall: 91.2 on September 22, 1999;

- Extreme daily snowfall: 40.6 cm on March 8, 1960;

- Extreme snow depth: 203 cm on March 26, 1967;

- Average date of last spring frost: May 30;

- Average date of first fall frost: October 01; and

- Average length of frost-free period: 123 day.

4.4 Terrestrial Environment

Information provided by the previous owner of the subject property advised that the cleared portion of the subject site has been farmed for several generations going back to the 1840s. During the summer and fall seasons, bald eagles have been observed soaring or perching on trees along the Hope River Estuary. Photos of current conditions at the subject site are provided below.

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 22 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

Photo No. 5. View of Subject Site (Looking to the North)

Photo No. 6. View of Subject Site (Looking to the Northeast)

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 23 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

Photo No. 6. View of Subject Site (Looking to the South)

Photo No. 7. View of Southern Portion (Adjacent Hope River) of Subject Site (Looking to the East)

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 24 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

This terrestrial environment section includes a review/survey of plants, wildlife species, and their habitats that could potentially occur or that were observed at the subject site. The EIA Registration for the terrestrial environment uses a two-step process as follows:

1. Use existing databases to identify sensitive habitats (e.g., wetlands), plants/trees and wildlife species at risk (SAR) and species of conservation concern (SOCC) on the subject site; and

2. Conduct field surveys on the subject site to verify or potentially verify the presence or absence of these species.

Species that are considered rare in Prince Edward Island, but are not protected or listed by any legislation are considered SOCC. SOCC are here defined to include species which are not SAR, but are ranked S1 (critically imperilled), S2 (imperilled), or S3 (vulnerable) in Prince Edward Island by the Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre (ACCDC 2020) Data Report (Appendix C). These species have no protection under federal or provincial legislation but are considered in this EIA Registration on a precautionary principle.

4.4.1 Environmentally Managed Areas

The subject site is located within a 5 km radius of two (2) environmental management areas and one (1) environmentally significant area within the greater Cavendish area. These are terrestrial habitats that fulfil special management objectives on PEI or have been identified as supporting unique ecological features. The proposed project does not intersect with any such areas. The three (3) managed areas are listed below and are shown on Map 3 of the ACCDC data report in Appendix C.

• Ducks Unlimited Mackies Pond management area;

• PEI National Park management area; and

• PEI National Park IBA area.

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 25 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

4.4.2 Vegetation (Plants and Trees)

The ACCDC Data Report (Appendix C - Section 4.1) for the subject site showed 69 plant SOCC that have been previously recorded within a 5-km radius of the proposed project site. None of the plants listed are currently protected by the SAR.

On April 23 and May 8, 2020, Mr. Donald Maynard, M. Sc., (biologist and wetland delineator) of Granville Ridge conducted a walking survey across the vegetated areas of the subject site that will be disturbed during construction/operation phases. The objective of this survey was twofold:

1. Identify the predominate plants and trees on site and look for any SOCC species identified in the ACCDC Data Report (Appendix C); and

2. Verify the presence of absence or any areas that would be classified as wetlands if wetlands were identified.

No sightings of any species ranked S1 or S2 on the SOCC list were observed during the site visit on April 23 and May 8, 2020. Plant species identified during the site visit generally consisted of species that would commonly be seen regenerating on abandoned farmland, cultivated land and/or bare ground areas in Prince Edward Island.

It is projected that the development of the facility at the subject site will result in the grubbing of ground cover vegetation in the area where construction is to be carried out. The development of the orchard will require the removal of a two tree (white spruce) wide hedgerow approximately 170m length. In the operation phase, the ground cover vegetation will maintain as part of the ongoing property maintenance. Based on the results of the ACCDC Data Report, Section 4.1 (Appendix C) and the site survey, the construction and operation of the proposed Project is not anticipated to interact with SAR; therefore, it is projected that there will not be substantive interaction between vegetation (plants and trees) and the proposed project.

4.4.3 Wetlands and Watercourses

The identification of existing, mapped wetland for the subject and adjacent properties were completed using the PEI Land Online mapping tool (Government of PEI 2018). Two (2) wetlands were identified on the western and eastern adjacent properties as shown on Figure No. 2 and 3, Appendix A. A wetland reconnaissance of these two wetlands was conducted by

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 26 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

Mr. Donald Maynard of Granville Ridge on May 8, 2020 via access on the Hope River. The reconnaissance identified the wetlands as an Estuarine Shore Marsh on the western property and on the eastern property a Riparian Stream Water Wetland). With these proposed mitigative measures (i.e., no disturbance altering to these wetlands and 15 m buffer zones for orchard operations from the eastern wetland), it is projected that there will not be substantive, adverse interaction between wetlands and the proposed project.

The relocation of the oyster wash water discharge pipe, into the Hope River at the proposed location is projected (from the salinity and turbidity observations of the existing discharge pipe at Bayview location) not to have an additive effect on this watercourse. The site operator of the two-mussel seed/spat leases (SEED 0523B and 0419A) in the Hope River adjacent to the subject property has been contacted by Raspberry Point personnel and informed of the proposed relocation of the discharge pipe and the orchard operation. The site operator stated that they did not have any concerns associated with the proposed relocation of oyster facility and addition of the apple orchard.

4.4.4 Breeding Birds and Other Wildlife

Migratory birds are protected under the Migratory Birds Convention Act (MBCA), 1994, which “prohibits the killing, capturing, injuring, taking or disturbing of migratory birds or the damaging, destroying, removing or disturbing of nests.”

Bird habitat on or near the subject site and surrounding properties includes agricultural land, hedgerows, commercial/industrial properties, and wetlands. These areas may be used by migratory birds for both nesting and feeding. Information on birds within or adjacent to the subject site and surrounding properties has been gathered from a review of information obtained by the ACCDC (2020). The ACCDC assembles and provides data about species, ecological communities of conservation concern, and significant areas in Atlantic Canada. Available information from ACCDC on the historical records of bird species within 5 km of the proposed Project was compiled and reviewed. Records of SAR and SOCC species are included in the ACCDC Report - Section 4.2, Appendix C.

There are four species listed under SARA, which were identified in the ACCDC data report as having been historically observed in a 5-km radius of the Project location. The species little brown bat, Northern Long-eared bat, piping plover, red knot and their habitats are protected as endangered or threatened species.

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 27 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

The remaining 53 bird species obtained from the ACCDC search are not specifically protected by endangered species legislation but would be protected from disturbance under the MBCA.

Raspberry Point has committed to removal of the 170 m of field hedgerow outside of the breeding bird season. The remainder of the property preparation/construction will be in the areas of cultivated fields and is projected that there will not be substantive interaction between breeding birds and the proposed project.

Other Wildlife

Other wildlife was considered in the EIA Registration evaluation. The ACCDC Data Report (Appendix C) identified two (2) SARA listed bat species (Little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus), and Northern myotis (Myotis septentrionalis)) as having been historically observed within the 5 km area of the proposed project site. These two (2) SARA listed species have habitat associated with mature deciduous stands with standing deadfall crevices and/or vacant open buildings. Wetlands and watercourses are recognized insect feeding areas for the little brown bats. The project site does not have the tree stands that could be potential habitat, the adjacent properties have mapped wetlands. The proposed project will not alter any features that are recognized as habitat or feeding areas.

4.5 Human Environment

Raspberry Point had purchased the subject property in 2016 and has been renting the majority of the property for agricultural use with a portion of the site being used as a laydown area for their oyster cages. The current operation is located approximately 1 km west of the proposed site and there is no residential or seasonal commercial development with a 400 m radius of this area. The proposed site is considered acceptable within this area and will not negatively impact the environment or substantive increase levels of traffic and/or noise.

4.5.1 Archaeological, Heritage or Cultural Resources

Personnel from Granville Ridge contacted the Aboriginal Affairs Secretariat and Archaeology staff requesting information regarding the potential for archaeological or cultural resources to be found near the project. The response stated there are no archaeological sites with 5 km of the project site (Montogmary, pers. comm., 2020). However, this site has not been archaeologically surveyed and should artifacts or cultural deposits be encountered, notification and mitigation will be applied, as per PEI's Archaeology Act and Archaeology Act Regulations.

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 28 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

4.5.2 Transportation

As noted previously the access to the site will be via an existing agricultural entrance to the property off of the Cavendish Road (Route No. 6). No significant issues associated with the site access are expected. As the site is located off a paved road that has a daily flow of light traffic, no major impact on existing traffic flow is expected in the area due to daily operations on the site. The vehicle flow to and from the site would be the employees and visitors (10 to 20 cars per day) which travel to and from the site on a daily basis. An average of three (3) to four (4) delivery/transport trucks and one (1) to two (2) tractor trailers per day are expected to access the subject site during operational hours. It should be noted there will be no additional traffic volume on Cavendish Road to the present levels as the existing facility is currently located approximately 1 km to the west of the proposed site. The site access road required an entrance way permit from the PEI Department of Transportation, Infrastructure and Energy (PEIDTIE) and an application was submitted and has been approval (refer to application in Appendix B).

Given the traffic review information, minimal disruption, and no net new or marginal increase in marginal increase in traffic, substantive interactions between the project and local transportation are not expected.

5.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The PD/EIS for the proposed project was completed to meet the requirements of both the PEIDEWCC and the PEI Resort Municipality. The PD/EIS evaluated the potential environmental effects of the proposed project taking into consideration all activities required for the construction, operation and maintenance of the future facility. As part of the PD/EIS the following mitigation and environmental monitoring elements will be adhered to during the construction and operation of the proposed facility, including:

Mitigation

• During construction and operation (including accidents, potential malfunctions and unplanned events) all provincial and federal codes, standards and best management practices will be followed;

• During operation mitigation for hazardous waste and non-hazardous waste will be conducted as outlined in Tables 3.1 and 3.2 in Sections 3.2.6 and 3.2.7 of this report; and ©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 29 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

• The site will be developed in a manner to leave treed buffers to the north, east and west of the site so as to reduce noise levels and protect view planes.

Environmental Monitoring

6.0 CLOSURE

This report has been prepared for the sole benefit of Raspberry Point Oyster Co. Inc. The report may not be used by any other person or entity without the express written consent of Raspberry Point Oyster Co. Inc, Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. and Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. Any uses which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on decisions made based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. Granville Ridge and Joose Environmental accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this report.

Some of the information presented in this report was provided through existing documents and interviews. Although attempts were made, whenever possible, to obtain a minimum of two confirmatory sources of information, we in certain instances have been required to assume that the information provided is accurate.

The information and conclusions contained in this report are based upon work undertaken by trained professional and technical staff in accordance with generally accepted engineering and scientific practices current at the time the work was performed. The conclusions and recommendations presented represent the best judgement of Granville Ridge and Joose Environmental based on the data obtained during the assessment. Due to the nature of the assessment and the limited data available, Granville Ridge and Joose Environmental cannot warrant against undiscovered environmental liabilities. Conclusions and recommendations presented in this report should not be construed as legal advice.

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 30 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

This report was prepared by Mr. Don Maynard, B.Sc., M.Sc. and Mr. Peter H. Joostema, FEC, P. Eng., CESA. We trust this report contains the information required at this time, and we are available at your convenience should you have any questions.

Sincerely,

GRANVILLE RIDGE CONSULTING INC. AND JOOSE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING INC.

______Don Maynard, B.Sc., M.Sc. Peter H. Joostema, FEC, P. Eng., CESA Senior Environmental Scientist Principal Environmental Engineer

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 31 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

7.0 REFERENCES

Canada’s Historic Places - http://www.historicplaces.ca/en/pages/register-repertoire.aspx

Canadian Wetland Classification System, 2nd edition, 1997. National Wetlands Working Group.

Environmental Assessment Report for Water Column Aquaculture of Mussels, Oysters and Off- Bottom Aquaculture of Oysters in New London Bay. With Components of New London Bay, French River, Southwest River, Stanley River and Hope River. Volume I. DFO/PWGSC January 2002.

Environment Canada - Atmospheric Environmental Services. Charlottetown Airport Climate Normal for period 1981 - 2010.

Government of Canada - Species at Risk: www.sararegistry.gc.ca

Historical Places of Prince Edward Island - http://www.gov.pe.ca/hpo/

Prest, V. K. (1973) Surficial Deposits of Prince Edward Island - Geology Survey of Canada Map 1366A.

Soil of Prince Edward Island - Research Branch Agriculture Canada (1988).

Van de Pol, H.W. (1983) Geology of Prince Edward Island - Department of Energy and Forestry, Energy and Minerals Branch.

Information from Other Sources

Built-Rite Construction and Renovations:

- Mr. Rob Gillis, Project Contractor

Government of PEI, Indigenous Relations Secretariat

- Ms. Erin Montgomery, Archaeologist

©Granville Ridge Consulting Inc. 2020 Project No. JE0441: May 29, 2020 32 ©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2020

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

PEI Department of Environment, Water and Climate Change:

- Mr. Dale Thompson, Environmental Assessment Officer

PEI Department of Transportation, Infrastructure and Energy Capital - Projects Traffic Operations.

- Ms. Dawn Moase, Western Traffic Operations

Raspberry Point Oyster Co. Inc.

- Mr. Scott Linkletter, Raspberry Point Oyster Co. Inc. - Owner; and - Mr. James Power, Raspberry Point Oyster Co. Inc. - Manager

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

APPENDIX A Figures

Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

APPENDIX B

Applications for Provincial Permits and Approvals

Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. PO Box 19 North Wiltshire, PE C0A 1Y0

May 13, 2020

Joose Environmental Project No. JE0441

PEI Department of Environment, Water and Climate Change (PEIDEWCC) PO Box 2000 Charlottetown, PE C1A 7N8

Attention: Mr. Qing Li

Dear Mr. Li:

Reference: Application for Groundwater Exploration Permit - Domestic and Facility Operations Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), Queens County, Prince Edward Island

Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. (Joose Environmental) is pleased to submit the attached Groundwater Exploration Permit Application and associated drawing on behalf of the Raspberry Point Oyster Co. Inc. for the proposed Oyster Washing, Grading and Storage Facility to be constructed in Bayview, Queens County, PEI. Please review the attached application for the Groundwater Exploration Permit and provide approval with all associated conditions required by the Prince Edward Island Department of Environment, Water and Climate Change (PEIDEWCC).

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.

Sincerely,

JOOSE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING INC.

Peter H. Joostema, FEC, P.Eng., CESA Principal Environmental Engineer [email protected] A\

PHJ/mj

cc: Mr. George Somers, Manager of Drinking Water, Land and Systems Protection - PEIDEWCC Mr. James Power, Manager - Raspberry Point Oyster Co. Inc.

attachments

ATTACHMENTS

GROUNDWATER EXPLORATION PERMIT APPLICATION AND DRAWING

Proposed Oyster Facility Legend Bayview, Queens County, PE 500 m Radius Bayview Proposed Well Location

➤

Permit No: 2020-04

PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND GROUNDWATER EXPLORATION PERMIT

In accordance with the authority provided by Section 6 of the Environment Protection Act WATER WELL REGULATIONS, permission is granted to:

Name: Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. on behalf of Raspberry Point Oyster Co. Inc.

Address: PO Box 19, North Wiltshire, PE, C0A 1Y0

To undertake exploratory activities for a fresh water well on provincial property number 442608, situated in Bayview, Queens County, PEI at coordinates of Latitude 46.476026 and Longitude - 63.427247.

This permit is effective on Tuesday, May 19, 2020, subject to the full implementation of and compliance with the following terms and conditions:

1. Construct the well. The well must have a minimum of 40 ft of casing, and the casing shall be sealed in the ground with bentonite by a method approved by the Department of Environment, Water and Climate Change. 2. Perform a step drawdown pumping test in the well, consisting of 30 minute steps at rates of 30, 65, and 100 igpm or similar rates. 3. Conduct a constant rate pumping test on the well for 12 hours at a rate selected from the results of the preceding step drawdown test. Drawdown and recovery measurements shall be recorded in the pumped well, according to a schedule approved by this Department. Measurements must be recorded in the exploration well during recovery for a period of 3 hours or until the pumped well show 90% recovery (whichever is shorter). 4. Submit the well driller’s log and pumping test data to the Department within 30 days of completion of the pumping test. 5. Collect and submit water samples for general chemical analysis at the beginning and the end of the pumping test from the exploration well. 6. Collect and submit one water sample for detailed analysis including general chemistry, metals, and volatile organic compounds (VOC’s) at the conclusion of the 12 hour constant rate pumping test from the exploration well. 7. This permit expires one year from date of issuance.

If you have any questions regarding the foregoing permit conditions, please contact Qing Li (368-4668).

Date issued: Tuesday, May 19, 2020.

Signed:

Qing Li

Hydrogeologist,

Water and Air Monitoring Section

APPLICATION FOR AN ENTRANCE WAY / HIGHWAY ACCESS Department of Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal

Please check ( U ) the area applied for: ( ) Entrance way on municipal street or approved subdivision

( ) Entrance way on an Arterial Highway ( ) New Highway Access Culvert

( X ) Entrance way on an Seasonal Highway ( ) Re-locate an existing Highway Access Culvert

Note: The location of an entrance way on a Provincial Highway is subject to the Minimum Safe Stopping Sight Requirements imposed by the Roads Act Highway Access Regulations.

General Information: Raspberry Pt. Oysters Applicants Name: James Power (First) (Middle) (Last)

Contact Person if different from Applicant: Donald Maynard, Granville Ridge Consulting, 902-218-2541 Mailing Address: ______12 Milky Way, Charlottetown, PEI Postal Code: ______C1E 2E2

Telephone: Residence: ______Business: ______902-368-3000 Cell Phone: ______902-393-8308 Location of the property:

Property Tax Number: ______442608 Community: ______CivicBayview Address:______N/A

Route No. ______Route No. 6 Road Name: ______Cavendish Road The property is located on the North ______, South ______,X East, ______, West ______, of the highway, ______1.13 Kilometers

North ______, South ______, East ______,X West ______of the intersection with ______Reid Road road, street Entrance way use: Please check ( U )

Existing entrance way use: single family dwelling ( ) commercial ( ) agriculture active ( X ) duplex dwelling ( ) Industrial ( ) agriculture idle ( ) multiple dwelling ( ) Institutional ( ) Other: ______mobile home ( ) Forestry ( ) ______

Proposed use: ( please describe) ______Raspberry Pt Oyster grading, packing, storage facility, relocating from 9539 Rte. 6

I we) understand that this application is subject to review by the Department of Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal and that no entrance way to a highway may be constructed or intensified without approval.

Please see the reverse side before signing.

______Applicants Signature Applicants Signature

Date: ______May 21, 2020 Date: ______To be considered, this application must be accompanied by the following:

For all highways other than arterial and seasonal:

1. A completed application form.

2. A plan of survey, if applicable.

3. A property map or Geo-Linc map showing the entire property, location of existing and proposed buildings and the intended location of the Entrance W ay.

Arterial or Seasonal Highway:

a. A completed application with a $25.00 (non-refundable) application fee.

b. In the case of an application for an expansion of a commercial operation, a scaled detailed floor and site plan illustrating the existing and proposed facility.

c. Copies of the deed for the lot or parcel. Include Schedule “A”.

d. A record of re-zoning or change of use approval, if applicable.

Revised: August 2014

Raspberry Pt Oysters Legend

➤ ➤ N © 2020 Google ImageImage © 2020 CNES // Airbus 300 m © 2020 Google Image © 2020 CNES / Airbus Granville Ridge Joose Environmental PD/EIS: Proposed Oyster Facility and Apple Orchard: Bayview (Parcel No. 442608), PEI

APPENDIX C

ACCDC Report

DATA REPORT 6604: Bayview, PE

Prepared 29 April 2020 by J. Churchill, Data Manager

CONTENTS OF REPORT 1.0 Preface 1.1 Data List 1.2 Restrictions 1.3 Additional Information Map 1: Buffered Study Area 2.0 Rare and Endangered Species 2.1 Flora 2.2 Fauna Map 2: Flora and Fauna 3.0 Special Areas 3.1 Managed Areas 3.2 Significant Areas Map 3: Special Areas 4.0 Rare Species Lists 4.1 Fauna 4.2 Flora 4.3 Location Sensitive Species Map 1. A 100 km buffer around the study area 4.4 Source Bibliography 5.0 Rare Species within 100 km 5.1 Source Bibliography

1.0 PREFACE

The Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre (AC CDC; www.accdc.com) is part of a network of NatureServe data centres and heritage programs serving 50 states in the U.S.A, 10 provinces and 1 territory in Canada, plus several Central and South American countries. The NatureServe network is more than 30 years old and shares a common conservation data methodology. The AC CDC was founded in 1997, and maintains data for the jurisdictions of New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland and Labrador. Although a non-governmental agency, the AC CDC is supported by 6 federal agencies and 4 provincial governments, as well as through outside grants and data processing fees.

Upon request and for a fee, the AC CDC queries its database and produces customized reports of the rare and endangered flora and fauna known to occur in or near a specified study area. As a supplement to that data, the AC CDC includes locations of managed areas with some level of protection, and known sites of ecological interest or sensitivity.

1.1 DATA LIST Included datasets: Filename Contents BayviewPE_6604ob.xls Rare and legally protected Flora and Fauna in your study area BayviewPE_6604ob100km.xls A list of Rare and legally protected Flora and Fauna within 100 km of your study area BayviewPE_6604ma.xls Managed Areas in your study area BayviewPE_6604sa.xls Significant Natural Areas in your study area BayviewPE_6604wf.xls Rare and common Waterfowl in your study area (CWS database) BayviewPE_6604bc.xls Rare and common Colonial Birds in your study area Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 2 of 26 1.2 RESTRICTIONS The AC CDC makes a strong effort to verify the accuracy of all the data that it manages, but it shall not be held responsible for any inaccuracies in data that it provides. By accepting AC CDC data, recipients assent to the following limits of use: a) Data is restricted to use by trained personnel who are sensitive to landowner interests and to potential threats to rare and/or endangered flora and fauna posed by the information provided. b) Data is restricted to use by the specified Data User; any third party requiring data must make its own data request. c) The AC CDC requires Data Users to cease using and delete data 12 months after receipt, and to make a new request for updated data if necessary at that time. d) AC CDC data responses are restricted to the data in our Data System at the time of the data request. e) Each record has an estimate of locational uncertainty, which must be referenced in order to understand the record’s relevance to a particular location. Please see attached Data Dictionary for details. f) AC CDC data responses are not to be construed as exhaustive inventories of taxa in an area. g) The absence of a taxon cannot be inferred by its absence in an AC CDC data response.

1.3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The accompanying Data Dictionary provides metadata for the data provided.

Please direct any additional questions about AC CDC data to the following individuals:

Plants, Lichens, Ranking Methods, All other Inquiries Sean Blaney, Senior Scientist, Executive Director Tel: (506) 364-2658 [email protected]

Animals (Fauna) Plant Communities John Klymko, Zoologist Sarah Robinson, Community Ecologist Tel: (506) 364-2660 Tel: (506) 364-2664 [email protected] [email protected]

Data Management, GIS Billing James Churchill, Data Manager Jean Breau Tel: (902) 679-6146 Tel: (506) 364-2657 [email protected] [email protected]

Questions on the biology of Federal Species at Risk can be directed to AC CDC: (506) 364-2658, with questions on Species at Risk regulations to: Samara Eaton, Canadian Wildlife Service (NB and PE): (506) 364-5060 or Julie McKnight, Canadian Wildlife Service (NS): (902) 426-4196.

For provincial information about rare taxa and protected areas, or information about game animals, deer yards, old growth forests, archeological sites, fish habitat etc., in New Brunswick, please contact Hubert Askanas, Energy and Resource Development: (506) 453-5873.

For provincial information about rare taxa and protected areas, or information about game animals, deer yards, old growth forests, archeological sites, fish habitat etc., in Nova Scotia, please contact Donna Hurlburt, NS DLF: (902) 679-6886. To determine if location-sensitive species (section 4.3) occur near your study site please contact a NS DLF Regional Biologist:

Western: Emma Vost Western: Sarah Spencer Central: Shavonne Meyer Central: Kimberly George (902) 670-8187 (902) 634-7555 (902) 893-6350 (902) 890-1046 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Eastern: Harrison Moore (902) 497-4119 [email protected]

For provincial information about rare taxa and protected areas, or information about game animals, fish habitat etc., in Prince Edward Island, please contact Garry Gregory, PEI Dept. of Communities, Land and Environment: (902) 569- 7595.

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 3 of 26 2.0 RARE AND ENDANGERED SPECIES

2.1 FLORA The study area contains 333 records of 66 vascular, 4 records of 3 nonvascular flora (Map 2 and attached: *ob.xls).

2.2 FAUNA The study area contains 2467 records of 51 vertebrate, 8 records of 6 invertebrate fauna (Map 2 and attached data files - see 1.1 Data List). Please see section 4.3 to determine if 'location-sensitive' species occur near your study site.

Map 2: Known observations of rare and/or protected flora and fauna within the study area.

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 4 of 26 3.0 SPECIAL AREAS

3.1 MANAGED AREAS The GIS scan identified 2 managed areas in the vicinity of the study area (Map 3 and attached file: *ma*.xls).

3.2 SIGNIFICANT AREAS The GIS scan identified 1 biologically significant site in the vicinity of the study area (Map 3 and attached file: *sa*.xls).

Map 3: Boundaries and/or locations of known Managed and Significant Areas within the study area.

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 5 of 26

4.0 RARE SPECIES LISTS Rare and/or endangered taxa (excluding “location-sensitive” species, section 4.3) within the study area listed in order of concern, beginning with legally listed taxa, with the number of observations per taxon and the distance in kilometers from study area centroid to the closest observation (± the precision, in km, of the record). [P] = vascular plant, [N] = nonvascular plant, [A] = vertebrate animal, [I] = invertebrate animal, [C] = community. Note: records are from attached files *ob.xls/*ob.shp only.

4.1 FLORA Scientific Name Common Name COSEWIC SARA Prov Legal Prot Prov Rarity Rank Prov GS Rank # recs Distance (km) N Brachythecium laetum Long-capsuled Ragged Moss S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 2 3.7 ± 0.0 N Atrichum tenellum Slender Smoothcap Moss S2S3 5 Undetermined 1 3.7 ± 0.0 N Amblystegium varium Willow Feather Moss S3S4 5 Undetermined 1 4.0 ± 0.0 P Ostrya virginiana Ironwood S1 2 May Be At Risk 8 3.6 ± 5.0 P Polygala sanguinea Blood Milkwort S1 2 May Be At Risk 1 3.6 ± 5.0 P Fallopia scandens Climbing False Buckwheat S1 2 May Be At Risk 6 1.5 ± 0.0 P Thalictrum confine Northern Meadow-rue S1 2 May Be At Risk 1 4.0 ± 1.0 P Amelanchier fernaldii Fernald's Serviceberry S1 5 Undetermined 1 3.6 ± 5.0 P Galium aparine Common Bedstraw S1 5 Undetermined 4 0.6 ± 0.0 P Eleocharis nitida Quill Spikerush S1 2 May Be At Risk 1 3.3 ± 5.0 P Alopecurus aequalis Short-awned Foxtail S1 2 May Be At Risk 1 2.9 ± 0.0 P Isoetes lacustris Lake Quillwort S1 2 May Be At Risk 1 3.1 ± 0.0 P Rhus typhina Staghorn Sumac S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 4 1.4 ± 0.0 P Salix petiolaris Meadow Willow S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 1 2.4 ± 0.0 P Carex cumulata Dense Sedge S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 1 1.9 ± 0.0 P Carex radiata Eastern Star Sedge S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 1 1.2 ± 0.0 P Amelanchier canadensis Canada Serviceberry S1S3 5 Undetermined 16 0.5 ± 0.0 P Crataegus chrysocarpa Fireberry Hawthorn S1S3 5 Undetermined 47 0.7 ± 0.0 P Rudbeckia laciniata Cut-Leaved Coneflower S2 2 May Be At Risk 1 3.8 ± 3.0 P Euphorbia polygonifolia Seaside Spurge S2 3 Sensitive 1 4.4 ± 0.0 P Capnoides sempervirens Pink Corydalis S2 3 Sensitive 1 1.1 ± 5.0 P Teucrium canadense Canada Germander S2 2 May Be At Risk 1 3.3 ± 0.0 P Circaea canadensis Broad-leaved Enchanter's Nightshade S2 3 Sensitive 18 2.5 ± 0.0 P Actaea pachypoda White Baneberry S2 2 May Be At Risk 4 3.4 ± 0.0 P Pilea pumila Dwarf Clearweed S2 3 Sensitive 7 3.9 ± 0.0 P Carex deflexa Northern Sedge S2 3 Sensitive 5 1.1 ± 0.0 P Dulichium arundinaceum Three-Way Sedge S2 3 Sensitive 1 3.8 ± 0.0 P Corallorhiza maculata Spotted Coralroot S2 2 May Be At Risk 2 0.6 ± 0.0 P Elymus trachycaulus Slender Wild Rye S2 3 Sensitive 1 0.8 ± 0.0 P Glyceria canadensis Canada Manna Grass S2 2 May Be At Risk 1 1.5 ± 0.0 P Potamogeton obtusifolius Blunt-leaved Pondweed S2 3 Sensitive 1 4.0 ± 0.0 P Eurybia macrophylla Large-leaved Aster S2S3 3 Sensitive 2 2.9 ± 0.0 P Honckenya peploides ssp. robusta Seabeach Sandwort S2S3 3 Sensitive 7 0.8 ± 0.0 P Stellaria alsine Trailing Stitchwort S2S3 3 Sensitive 1 1.7 ± 0.0 P Suaeda calceoliformis Horned Sea-blite S2S3 5 Undetermined 6 1.5 ± 0.0 P Polygonum ramosissimum Bushy Knotweed S2S3 3 Sensitive 1 2.5 ± 0.0 P Geum canadense White Avens S2S3 3 Sensitive 47 0.6 ± 0.0 P Geum macrophyllum Large-Leaved Avens S2S3 4 Secure 3 2.4 ± 0.0 P Rosa carolina Carolina Rose S2S3 3 Sensitive 2 0.4 ± 0.0 P Limosella australis Southern Mudwort S2S3 3 Sensitive 3 3.7 ± 0.0 P Carex utriculata Northern Beaked Sedge S2S3 3 Sensitive 1 4.1 ± 0.0 P Lemna trisulca Star Duckweed S2S3 3 Sensitive 7 3.7 ± 0.0 P Calamagrostis stricta ssp. stricta Slim-stemmed Reed Grass S2S3 3 Sensitive 1 3.8 ± 0.0 P Distichlis spicata Salt Grass S2S3 4 Secure 9 1.6 ± 0.0 P Lactuca canadensis Canada Lettuce S3 3 Sensitive 11 0.6 ± 0.0 Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 6 of 26

Scientific Name Common Name COSEWIC SARA Prov Legal Prot Prov Rarity Rank Prov GS Rank # recs Distance (km) P Rorippa palustris Bog Yellowcress S3 5 Undetermined 2 3.9 ± 0.0 P Hypopitys monotropa Pinesap S3 4 Secure 4 0.6 ± 0.0 P Rumex fueginus Tierra del Fuego Dock S3 3 Sensitive 1 3.7 ± 0.0 P Comandra umbellata Bastard's Toadflax S3 3 Sensitive 4 1.7 ± 0.0 P Ulmus americana White Elm S3 3 Sensitive 2 0.8 ± 0.0 P Carex tonsa Deep Green Sedge S3 3 Sensitive 1 4.4 ± 0.0 P Eleocharis parvula Dwarf Spikerush S3 3 Sensitive 3 2.8 ± 0.0 P Maianthemum stellatum Starry False Solomon's Seal S3 4 Secure 13 2.9 ± 0.0 P Platanthera dilatata White Bog Orchid S3 3 Sensitive 1 3.5 ± 5.0 P Agrostis perennans Upland Bent Grass S3 3 Sensitive 2 1.2 ± 0.0 P Deparia acrostichoides Silvery Glade Fern S3 3 Sensitive 1 1.8 ± 0.0 P Polystichum acrostichoides Christmas Fern S3 4 Secure 14 3.7 ± 0.0 P Diphasiastrum tristachyum Blue Ground-cedar S3 3 Sensitive 1 4.7 ± 0.0 P Osmunda regalis var. spectabilis Royal Fern S3 4 Secure 2 3.7 ± 0.0 P Phragmites australis ssp. americanus American Common Reed S3? 4 Secure 1 3.3 ± 5.0 P Geranium robertianum Herb Robert S3S4 4 Secure 10 3.6 ± 0.0 P Ribes triste Swamp Red Currant S3S4 4 Secure 1 1.4 ± 0.0 P Moneses uniflora One-flowered Wintergreen S3S4 4 Secure 4 2.3 ± 0.0 P Endotropis alnifolia alder-leaved buckthorn S3S4 4 Secure 2 4.2 ± 0.0 P Amelanchier laevis Smooth Serviceberry S3S4 5 Undetermined 13 2.5 ± 0.0 P Juniperus communis Common Juniper S3S4 4 Secure 1 4.9 ± 0.0 P Acorus americanus American Sweetflag S3S4 4 Secure 3 3.8 ± 0.0 P Carex pallescens Pale Sedge S3S4 4 Secure 1 1.6 ± 0.0 P Eleocharis obtusa Blunt Spikerush S3S4 4 Secure 7 3.7 ± 0.0

4.2 FAUNA Scientific Name Common Name COSEWIC SARA Prov Legal Prot Prov Rarity Rank Prov GS Rank # recs Distance (km) A Myotis lucifugus Little Brown Myotis Endangered Endangered S1 1 At Risk 20 1.6 ± 0.0 A Myotis septentrionalis Northern Long-eared Myotis Endangered Endangered S1 1 At Risk 5 4.1 ± 0.0 A Charadrius melodus melodus Piping Plover melodus ssp Endangered Endangered S1B 1 At Risk 358 2.8 ± 7.0 A Calidris canutus rufa Red Knot rufa ssp Endangered Endangered S2M 1 At Risk 77 3.5 ± 0.0 A Hirundo rustica Barn Swallow Threatened Threatened S2B 3 Sensitive 1 2.8 ± 7.0 A Dolichonyx oryzivorus Bobolink Threatened Threatened S2B 3 Sensitive 4 1.6 ± 0.0 A Riparia riparia Bank Swallow Threatened Threatened S2S3B 4 Secure 2 2.8 ± 7.0 A Limosa haemastica Hudsonian Godwit Threatened S2S3M 4 Secure 125 2.9 ± 1.0 A Anguilla rostrata American Eel Threatened S4 4 Secure 1 4.1 ± 0.0 A Coccothraustes vespertinus Evening Grosbeak Special Concern Special Concern S1S2B,S2S3N 3 Sensitive 1 2.8 ± 7.0 A Contopus cooperi Olive-sided Flycatcher Special Concern Threatened S2B 1 At Risk 1 2.8 ± 7.0 A Contopus virens Eastern Wood-Pewee Special Concern Special Concern S3B 4 Secure 4 2.8 ± 7.0 A Calidris subruficollis Buff-breasted Sandpiper Special Concern Special Concern SNA 4 Secure 1 3.5 ± 0.0 A Phalaropus lobatus Red-necked Phalarope Special Concern Special Concern SNA 4 Secure 2 3.5 ± 0.0 A Fulica americana American Coot Not At Risk S1B 4 Secure 1 2.8 ± 7.0 A Sterna hirundo Common Tern Not At Risk S1B 2 May Be At Risk 18 2.8 ± 7.0 A Gavia immer Common Loon Not At Risk S1B,S4M 4 Secure 3 1.6 ± 14.0 A Picoides dorsalis American Three-toed Woodpecker S1 3 Sensitive 4 2.8 ± 7.0 A Sorex hoyi American Pygmy Shrew S1? 4 Secure 3 0.9 ± 0.0 A Sterna paradisaea Arctic Tern S1?B 2 May Be At Risk 4 2.8 ± 7.0 A Anas acuta Northern Pintail S1S2B 4 Secure 1 2.8 ± 7.0 A Molothrus ater Brown-headed Cowbird S1S2B 3 Sensitive 2 2.8 ± 7.0 A Mergus serrator Red-breasted Merganser S1S2B,S5N 4 Secure 1 2.8 ± 7.0 A Rallus limicola Virginia Rail S2B 3 Sensitive 2 2.8 ± 7.0 A Tyrannus tyrannus Eastern Kingbird S2B 3 Sensitive 3 2.8 ± 7.0

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 7 of 26

Scientific Name Common Name COSEWIC SARA Prov Legal Prot Prov Rarity Rank Prov GS Rank # recs Distance (km) A Oreothlypis peregrina Tennessee Warbler S2B 3 Sensitive 2 2.8 ± 7.0 A Setophaga castanea Bay-breasted Warbler S2B 3 Sensitive 1 2.8 ± 7.0 A Calidris maritima Purple Sandpiper S2M 4 Secure 1 3.5 ± 0.0 A Charadrius vociferus Killdeer S2S3B 3 Sensitive 20 2.8 ± 7.0 A Actitis macularius Spotted Sandpiper S2S3B 3 Sensitive 56 2.8 ± 7.0 A Pheucticus ludovicianus Rose-breasted Grosbeak S2S3B 3 Sensitive 3 2.8 ± 7.0 A Pluvialis dominica American Golden-Plover S2S3M 4 Secure 27 3.5 ± 0.0 A Calidris melanotos Pectoral Sandpiper S2S3M 4 Secure 8 3.5 ± 0.0 A Poecile hudsonicus Boreal Chickadee S3 4 Secure 2 2.8 ± 7.0 A Spatula discors Blue-winged Teal S3B 4 Secure 4 2.8 ± 7.0 A Gallinago delicata Wilson's Snipe S3B 3 Sensitive 1 2.8 ± 7.0 A Coccyzus erythropthalmus Black-billed Cuckoo S3B 4 Secure 1 2.8 ± 7.0 A Regulus calendula Ruby-crowned Kinglet S3B 4 Secure 2 2.8 ± 7.0 A Setophaga tigrina Cape May Warbler S3B 4 Secure 3 2.8 ± 7.0 A Parkesia noveboracensis Northern Waterthrush S3B 4 Secure 1 2.8 ± 7.0 A Pluvialis squatarola Black-bellied Plover S3M 4 Secure 265 3.5 ± 0.0 A Tringa flavipes Lesser Yellowlegs S3M 4 Secure 89 3.5 ± 0.0 A Arenaria interpres Ruddy Turnstone S3M 4 Secure 186 3.5 ± 0.0 A Calidris alba Sanderling S3M 4 Secure 295 3.5 ± 0.0 A Calidris pusilla Semipalmated Sandpiper S3M 4 Secure 172 3.5 ± 0.0 A Calidris minutilla Least Sandpiper S3M 4 Secure 158 3.5 ± 0.0 A Calidris fuscicollis White-rumped Sandpiper S3M 4 Secure 20 3.5 ± 0.0 A Limnodromus griseus Short-billed Dowitcher S3M 4 Secure 74 3.5 ± 0.0 A Tachycineta bicolor Tree Swallow S3S4B 4 Secure 3 2.8 ± 7.0 A Tringa melanoleuca Greater Yellowlegs S3S4M 4 Secure 163 3.5 ± 0.0 A Charadrius semipalmatus Semipalmated Plover SHB,S3M 4 Secure 266 2.8 ± 7.0 I Pantala flavescens Wandering Glider S2B 2 May Be At Risk 1 3.8 ± 1.0 I Papilio polyxenes Black Swallowtail S3 4 Secure 2 2.4 ± 0.0 I Lycaena dospassosi Salt Marsh Copper S3 2 May Be At Risk 2 2.4 ± 0.0 I Somatochlora walshii Brush-Tipped Emerald S3 4 Secure 1 3.6 ± 1.0 I Somatochlora williamsoni Williamson's Emerald S3 4 Secure 1 3.6 ± 1.0 I Sympetrum semicinctum Band-Winged Meadowhawk S3 3 Sensitive 1 3.5 ± 0.0

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 8 of 26

4.3 LOCATION SENSITIVE SPECIES The Department of Natural Resources in each Maritimes province considers a number of species “location sensitive”. Concern about exploitation of location-sensitive species precludes inclusion of precise coordinates in this report. Those intersecting your study area are indicated below with “YES”.

Prince Edward Island Scientific Name Common Name SARA Prov Legal Prot Known within the Study Site?

4.4 SOURCE BIBLIOGRAPHY The recipient of these data shall acknowledge the AC CDC and the data sources listed below in any documents, reports, publications or presentations, in which this dataset makes a significant contribution.

# recs CITATION 2193 Morrison, Guy. 2011. Maritime Shorebird Survey (MSS) database. Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa, 15939 surveys. 86171 recs. 226 Sharkie, R., MacQuarrie, K., Fraser, M. 2003. A Floral Inventory of the Western Section of Prince Edward Island National Park and adjacent Crown lands. Parks Canada Agency, v + 106 pp. 63 Lepage, D. 2014. Maritime Breeding Bird Atlas Database. Bird Studies Canada, Sackville NB, 407,838 recs. 53 Amirault, D.L. & Stewart, J. 2007. Piping Plover Database 1894-2006. Canadian Wildlife Service, Sackville, 3344 recs, 1228 new. 46 Erskine, A.J. 1992. Maritime Breeding Bird Atlas Database. NS Museum & Nimbus Publ., Halifax, 82,125 recs. 42 Ayles, P. 2006. Prince Edward Island National Park Digital Database. Parks Canada, 179 recs. 40 Blaney, C.S.; Mazerolle, D.M. 2008. Fieldwork 2008. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. Sackville NB, 13343 recs. 25 Burns, L. 2013. Personal communication concerning bat occurrence on PEI. Winter 2013. Pers. comm. 21 Blaney, C.S.; Mazerolle, D.M. 2012. Fieldwork 2012. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre, 13,278 recs. Catling, P.M., Erskine, D.S. & MacLaren, R.B. 1985. The Plants of Prince Edward Island with new records, nomenclatural changes & corrections & deletions, 1st Ed. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, 16 Publication 1798. 22pp. 15 MacDonald, E.C. 2018. Piping Plover nest records from 2010-2017. Canadian Wildlife Service. 11 Paquet, Julie. 2018. Atlantic Canada Shorebird Survey (ACSS) database 2012-2018. Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service. 10 Wilhelm, S.I. et al. 2011. Colonial Waterbird Database. 9 Wilhelm, S.I. et al. 2011. Colonial Waterbird Database. Canadian Wildlife Service, Sackville, 2698 sites, 9718 recs (8192 obs). 8 MacDonald, E.C. 2018. CWS Piping Plover Census, 2010-2017. Canadian Wildlife Service. 6 Blaney, C.S.; Mazerolle, D.M.; Klymko, J; Spicer, C.D. 2006. Fieldwork 2006. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. Sackville NB, 8399 recs. 5 Canadian Wildlife Service, Atlantic Region. 2010. Piping Plover censuses 2006-09. , 35 recs. 4 Belland, R.J. 2012. PEI moss records from Devonian Botanical Garden. DBG Cryptogam Database, Web site: https://secure.devonian.ualberta.ca/bryo_search.php 748 recs. 4 Brunelle, P.-M. (compiler). 2009. ADIP/MDDS Odonata Database: data to 2006 inclusive. Atlantic Dragonfly Inventory Program (ADIP), 24200 recs. 3 Blaney, C.S. 2016. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre Fieldwork 2016. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre, 6719 recs. 3 Hicks, Andrew. 2009. Coastal Waterfowl Surveys Database, 2000-08. Canadian Wildlife Service, Sackville, 46488 recs (11149 non-zero). 2 Curley, F.R. 2018. Two reports of Sorex hoyi from PEI. Pers. comm. 2 Duffy, L.-A. 2002. Prince Edward Island National Park Butterfly Survey. Heritage Protection, Prince Edward Island National Park. 2 Glen, W. 1991. 1991 Prince Edward Island Forest Biomass Inventory Data. PEI Dept of Energy and Forestry, 10059 recs. 2 Lajeunesse, D. et al. 2002. PEINP Collection. Parks Canada, PEI National Park, 9 recs. 1 Atlantic Canada Conservation Area Database (ARCAD) 1 Bateman, M.C. & Prescott, W.H. 1984. The Mammals of Prince Edward Island National Park. Canadian Wildife Service, vol 2:5. 3 recs. 1 Bird Studies Canada & Nature Canada. 2004-10. Important Bird Areas of Canada Database. Bird Studies Canada, Port Rowan ON, 62 objects. 1 Blaney, C.S. 2003. Fieldwork 2003. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. Sackville NB, 1042 recs. 1 Blaney, C.S.; Spicer, C.D.; Rothfels, C. 2004. Fieldwork 2004. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. Sackville NB, 1343 recs. 1 Curley, F.R. 2005. PEF&W Collection 2003-04. PEI Fish & Wildlife Div., 716 recs. 1 Erskine, D. 1960. The plants of Prince Edward Island, 1st Ed. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa., Publication 1088. 1238 recs. 1 Giroux, P. 2013. Personal communication concerning species at risk in and around PEI NP, PE. Winter 2013. Pers. comm. 1 iNaturalist. 2018. iNaturalist Data Export 2018. iNaturalist.org and iNaturalist.ca, Web site: 11706 recs. 1 Mgt agency. Digitised from 1:50 topo map. 1 Munro, Marian K. Nova Scotia Provincial Museum of Natural History Herbarium Database. Nova Scotia Provincial Museum of Natural History, Halifax, Nova Scotia. 2013. 1 Parks Canada. 2010. Specimens in or near National Parks in Atlantic Canada. Canadian National Museum, 3925 recs. 1 Plissner, J.H. & Haig, S.M. 1997. 1996 International piping plover census. US Geological Survey, Corvallis OR, 231 pp. 1 Roland, A.E. & Smith, E.C. 1969. The Flora of Nova Scotia, 1st Ed. Nova Scotia Museum, Halifax, 743pp.

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 9 of 26

5.0 RARE SPECIES WITHIN 100 KM A 100 km buffer around the study area contains 41655 records of 94 vertebrate and 1203 records of 60 invertebrate fauna; 14266 records of 379 vascular, 471 records of 101 nonvascular flora (attached: *ob100km.xls).

Taxa within 100 km of the study site that are rare and/or endangered in the province in which the study site occurs (including “location-sensitive” species). All ranks correspond to the province in which the study site falls, even for out-of-province records. Taxa are listed in order of concern, beginning with legally listed taxa, with the number of observations per taxon and the distance in kilometers from study area centroid to the closest observation (± the precision, in km, of the record).

Taxonomic Group Scientific Name Common Name COSEWIC SARA Prov Legal Prot Prov Rarity Rank Prov GS Rank # recs Distance (km) Prov A Myotis lucifugus Little Brown Myotis Endangered Endangered S1 1 At Risk 63 1.6 ± 0.0 PE A Myotis septentrionalis Northern Long-eared Myotis Endangered Endangered S1 1 At Risk 97 4.1 ± 0.0 PE Charadrius melodus PE A melodus Piping Plover melodus ssp Endangered Endangered S1B 1 At Risk 3257 2.8 ± 7.0 A Calidris canutus rufa Red Knot rufa ssp Endangered Endangered S2M 1 At Risk 716 3.5 ± 0.0 PE A Hirundo rustica Barn Swallow Threatened Threatened S2B 3 Sensitive 934 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Cardellina canadensis Canada Warbler Threatened Threatened S2B 1 At Risk 384 8.1 ± 7.0 PE A Dolichonyx oryzivorus Bobolink Threatened Threatened S2B 3 Sensitive 1232 1.6 ± 0.0 PE A Riparia riparia Bank Swallow Threatened Threatened S2S3B 4 Secure 662 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Limosa haemastica Hudsonian Godwit Threatened S2S3M 4 Secure 751 2.9 ± 1.0 PE A Anguilla rostrata American Eel Threatened S4 4 Secure 1 4.1 ± 0.0 PE A Chaetura pelagica Chimney Swift Threatened Threatened SHB 8 Accidental 35 36.5 ± 7.0 PE A Catharus bicknelli Bicknell's Thrush Threatened Threatened SHB 8 Accidental 3 45.9 ± 7.0 PE A Asio flammeus Short-eared Owl Special Concern Special Concern S1B 3 Sensitive 43 8.1 ± 7.0 PE A Chordeiles minor Common Nighthawk Special Concern Threatened S1B 1 At Risk 70 18.7 ± 0.0 PE A Euphagus carolinus Rusty Blackbird Special Concern Special Concern S1B 3 Sensitive 52 8.1 ± 7.0 PE A Coccothraustes vespertinus Evening Grosbeak Special Concern Special Concern S1S2B,S2S3N 3 Sensitive 141 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Contopus cooperi Olive-sided Flycatcher Special Concern Threatened S2B 1 At Risk 330 2.8 ± 7.0 PE Bucephala islandica Barrow's Goldeneye - PE A Special Concern Special Concern S2N 3 Sensitive 104 15.7 ± 0.0 (Eastern pop.) Eastern pop. A Contopus virens Eastern Wood-Pewee Special Concern Special Concern S3B 4 Secure 483 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Phalaropus lobatus Red-necked Phalarope Special Concern Special Concern SNA 4 Secure 16 3.5 ± 0.0 PE Harbour Porpoise - PE A Phocoena phocoena pop. 1 Special Concern SNR 1 83.6 ± 5.0 Northwest Atlantic pop. Ammodramus savannarum Grasshopper Sparrow, PE A Special Concern Special Concern 1 21.8 ± 1.0 pratensis pratensis subspecies A Lithobates palustris Pickerel Frog Not At Risk S1 2 May Be At Risk 44 41.4 ± 0.0 PE A Fulica americana American Coot Not At Risk S1B 4 Secure 44 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Sterna hirundo Common Tern Not At Risk S1B 2 May Be At Risk 647 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Sialia sialis Eastern Bluebird Not At Risk S1B 8 Accidental 65 28.2 ± 0.0 PE A Gavia immer Common Loon Not At Risk S1B,S4M 4 Secure 331 1.6 ± 14.0 PE Peregrine Falcon - PE A Falco peregrinus pop. 1 Not At Risk Special Concern SNA 4 Secure 29 35.2 ± 0.0 anatum/tundrius A Salmo salar Atlantic Salmon E,T,SC S2 3 Sensitive 18 58.2 ± 50.0 PE A Picoides arcticus Black-backed Woodpecker S1 3 Sensitive 45 18.0 ± 7.0 PE American Three-toed PE A Picoides dorsalis S1 3 Sensitive 11 2.8 ± 7.0 Woodpecker A Sitta carolinensis White-breasted Nuthatch S1 2 May Be At Risk 20 16.9 ± 7.0 PE A Asio otus Long-eared Owl S1? 3 Sensitive 23 14.2 ± 7.0 PE A Cottus cognatus Slimy Sculpin S1? 5 Undetermined 2 78.4 ± 0.0 PE A Sorex palustris American Water Shrew S1? 4 Secure 7 26.7 ± 0.0 PE A Sorex hoyi American Pygmy Shrew S1? 4 Secure 9 0.9 ± 0.0 PE A Buteo platypterus Broad-winged Hawk S1?B 4 Secure 74 25.1 ± 7.0 PE A Sterna paradisaea Arctic Tern S1?B 2 May Be At Risk 32 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Eremophila alpestris Horned Lark S1?B,S4N 4 Secure 19 21.4 ± 7.0 PE A Phalacrocorax carbo Great Cormorant S1B 2 May Be At Risk 335 8.1 ± 0.0 PE

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 10 of 26

Taxonomic Group Scientific Name Common Name COSEWIC SARA Prov Legal Prot Prov Rarity Rank Prov GS Rank # recs Distance (km) Prov A Oxyura jamaicensis Ruddy Duck S1B 4 Secure 76 45.7 ± 2.0 NB A Bartramia longicauda Upland Sandpiper S1B 3 Sensitive 36 21.4 ± 7.0 PE A Mimus polyglottos Northern Mockingbird S1B 4 Secure 65 11.2 ± 0.0 PE A Icterus galbula Baltimore Oriole S1B 3 Sensitive 29 28.2 ± 7.0 PE A Loxia curvirostra Red Crossbill S1B 5 Undetermined 35 18.0 ± 7.0 PE A Lophodytes cucullatus Hooded Merganser S1B,S4M 4 Secure 82 59.3 ± 7.0 NB A Larus delawarensis Ring-billed Gull S1B,S5M 4 Secure 224 8.1 ± 7.0 PE A Vespertilionidae sp. bat species S1S2 10 66.8 ± 0.0 NS A Anas acuta Northern Pintail S1S2B 4 Secure 117 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Vireo philadelphicus Philadelphia Vireo S1S2B 3 Sensitive 38 21.4 ± 7.0 PE A Pooecetes gramineus Vesper Sparrow S1S2B 2 May Be At Risk 62 25.1 ± 7.0 PE A Molothrus ater Brown-headed Cowbird S1S2B 3 Sensitive 168 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Mergus serrator Red-breasted Merganser S1S2B,S5N 4 Secure 186 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Dryocopus pileatus Pileated Woodpecker S2 3 Sensitive 221 27.6 ± 0.0 PE A Perisoreus canadensis Canada Jay S2 4 Secure 196 42.3 ± 7.0 PE A Spatula clypeata Northern Shoveler S2B 4 Secure 220 8.1 ± 7.0 PE A Rallus limicola Virginia Rail S2B 3 Sensitive 251 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Cepphus grylle Black Guillemot S2B 4 Secure 77 8.1 ± 7.0 PE A Tyrannus tyrannus Eastern Kingbird S2B 3 Sensitive 364 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Oreothlypis peregrina Tennessee Warbler S2B 3 Sensitive 219 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Setophaga castanea Bay-breasted Warbler S2B 3 Sensitive 173 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Larus argentatus Herring Gull S2B,S5N 4 Secure 236 7.9 ± 0.0 PE A Calidris maritima Purple Sandpiper S2M 4 Secure 29 3.5 ± 0.0 PE A Charadrius vociferus Killdeer S2S3B 3 Sensitive 706 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Actitis macularius Spotted Sandpiper S2S3B 3 Sensitive 722 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Pheucticus ludovicianus Rose-breasted Grosbeak S2S3B 3 Sensitive 434 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Spinus pinus Pine Siskin S2S3B,S4N 4 Secure 121 8.1 ± 7.0 PE A Larus marinus Great Black-backed Gull S2S3B,S5N 4 Secure 213 8.1 ± 7.0 PE A Pluvialis dominica American Golden-Plover S2S3M 4 Secure 265 3.5 ± 0.0 PE A Calidris melanotos Pectoral Sandpiper S2S3M 4 Secure 468 3.5 ± 0.0 PE A Poecile hudsonicus Boreal Chickadee S3 4 Secure 278 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Loxia leucoptera White-winged Crossbill S3 4 Secure 194 8.1 ± 7.0 PE A Spatula discors Blue-winged Teal S3B 4 Secure 526 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Gallinago delicata Wilson's Snipe S3B 3 Sensitive 933 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Coccyzus erythropthalmus Black-billed Cuckoo S3B 4 Secure 86 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Empidonax flaviventris Yellow-bellied Flycatcher S3B 4 Secure 229 8.1 ± 7.0 PE A Regulus calendula Ruby-crowned Kinglet S3B 4 Secure 721 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Catharus fuscescens Veery S3B 4 Secure 317 12.0 ± 7.0 PE A Dumetella carolinensis Gray Catbird S3B 4 Secure 288 8.1 ± 7.0 PE A Setophaga tigrina Cape May Warbler S3B 4 Secure 168 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Parkesia noveboracensis Northern Waterthrush S3B 4 Secure 120 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Pluvialis squatarola Black-bellied Plover S3M 4 Secure 2755 3.5 ± 0.0 PE A Tringa flavipes Lesser Yellowlegs S3M 4 Secure 2178 3.5 ± 0.0 PE A Arenaria interpres Ruddy Turnstone S3M 4 Secure 1367 3.5 ± 0.0 PE A Calidris alba Sanderling S3M 4 Secure 1332 3.5 ± 0.0 PE A Calidris pusilla Semipalmated Sandpiper S3M 4 Secure 2281 3.5 ± 0.0 PE A Calidris minutilla Least Sandpiper S3M 4 Secure 1311 3.5 ± 0.0 PE A Calidris fuscicollis White-rumped Sandpiper S3M 4 Secure 813 3.5 ± 0.0 PE A Limnodromus griseus Short-billed Dowitcher S3M 4 Secure 1635 3.5 ± 0.0 PE A Tachycineta bicolor Tree Swallow S3S4B 4 Secure 1063 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Tringa melanoleuca Greater Yellowlegs S3S4M 4 Secure 3403 3.5 ± 0.0 PE A Petrochelidon pyrrhonota Cliff Swallow SHB 2 May Be At Risk 224 30.3 ± 0.0 PE A Charadrius semipalmatus Semipalmated Plover SHB,S3M 4 Secure 2240 2.8 ± 7.0 PE A Pinicola enucleator Pine Grosbeak SHB,S3N 4 Secure 19 8.1 ± 7.0 PE Bombus (Psithyrus) PE I bohemicus Gypsy Cuckoo Bumble Bee Endangered Endangered S1 6 27.5 ± 0.0 I Danaus plexippus Monarch Endangered Special Concern S1B 1 At Risk 21 8.9 ± 2.0 PE I Bombus terricola Yellow-banded Bumblebee Special Concern Special Concern S3 3 Sensitive 6 34.2 ± 0.0 PE

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 11 of 26

Taxonomic Group Scientific Name Common Name COSEWIC SARA Prov Legal Prot Prov Rarity Rank Prov GS Rank # recs Distance (km) Prov Hippodamia Thirteen-spotted Ladybird PE I S1 4 Secure 4 34.7 ± 1.0 tredecimpunctata tibialis Beetle I Satyrium acadica Acadian Hairstreak S1 2 May Be At Risk 9 8.9 ± 2.0 PE I Satyrium calanus falacer Banded Hairstreak S1 5 Undetermined 1 33.6 ± 0.0 PE I Callophrys polios Hoary Elfin S1 6 Not Assessed 8 25.5 ± 1.0 PE I Callophrys henrici Henry's Elfin S1 2 May Be At Risk 3 41.5 ± 0.0 PE I Callophrys niphon Eastern Pine Elfin S1 2 May Be At Risk 7 42.5 ± 0.0 PE I Callophrys lanoraieensis Bog Elfin S1 2 May Be At Risk 9 48.9 ± 0.0 PE I Erora laeta Early Hairstreak S1 2 May Be At Risk 1 30.1 ± 0.0 PE I Polygonia faunus Green Comma S1 2 May Be At Risk 8 8.9 ± 2.0 PE I Nymphalis l-album Compton Tortoiseshell S1 2 May Be At Risk 7 12.5 ± 2.0 PE I Oeneis jutta Jutta Arctic S1 2 May Be At Risk 10 75.6 ± 0.0 PE I Aeshna subarctica Subarctic Darner S1 2 May Be At Risk 6 50.5 ± 0.0 PE I Basiaeschna janata Springtime Darner S1 2 May Be At Risk 33 58.2 ± 1.0 PE I Boyeria grafiana Ocellated Darner S1 2 May Be At Risk 4 50.3 ± 1.0 PE I Boyeria vinosa Fawn Darner S1 2 May Be At Risk 10 54.2 ± 1.0 PE I Gomphaeschna furcillata Harlequin Darner S1 2 May Be At Risk 1 47.3 ± 0.0 PE I Dorocordulia lepida Petite Emerald S1 2 May Be At Risk 11 19.5 ± 1.0 PE I Somatochlora cingulata Lake Emerald S1 2 May Be At Risk 3 49.6 ± 0.0 PE I Somatochlora forcipata Forcipate Emerald S1 2 May Be At Risk 5 55.5 ± 1.0 PE I Somatochlora franklini Delicate Emerald S1 2 May Be At Risk 6 25.9 ± 1.0 PE I Somatochlora kennedyi Kennedy's Emerald S1 2 May Be At Risk 12 52.0 ± 0.0 PE I Somatochlora minor Ocellated Emerald S1 2 May Be At Risk 11 42.2 ± 0.0 PE I Celithemis elisa Calico Pennant S1 2 May Be At Risk 4 53.7 ± 0.0 PE I Leucorrhinia frigida Frosted Whiteface S1 2 May Be At Risk 10 53.7 ± 0.0 PE I Sympetrum danae Black Meadowhawk S1 2 May Be At Risk 6 27.4 ± 1.0 PE I Calopteryx maculata Ebony Jewelwing S1 2 May Be At Risk 20 50.2 ± 0.0 PE I Lestes eurinus Amber-Winged Spreadwing S1 2 May Be At Risk 9 39.8 ± 0.0 PE I Enallagma minusculum Little Bluet S1 2 May Be At Risk 31 39.8 ± 0.0 PE I Enallagma aspersum Azure Bluet S1 2 May Be At Risk 18 39.8 ± 0.0 PE I Feniseca tarquinius Harvester S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 19 41.5 ± 0.0 PE I Satyrium liparops Striped Hairstreak S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 20 25.3 ± 0.0 PE I Aglais milberti Milbert's Tortoiseshell S1S2 3 Sensitive 8 8.9 ± 2.0 PE I Margaritifera margaritifera Eastern Pearlshell S1S2 3 Sensitive 46 65.3 ± 0.0 PE I Colias eurytheme Orange Sulphur S1S2B 8 Accidental 19 21.5 ± 0.0 PE I Plebejus idas empetri Crowberry Blue S2 6 Not Assessed 18 62.1 ± 0.0 PE I Polygonia satyrus Satyr Comma S2 2 May Be At Risk 14 8.9 ± 2.0 PE I Polygonia progne Grey Comma S2 2 May Be At Risk 32 16.3 ± 0.0 PE I Gomphus spicatus Dusky Clubtail S2 2 May Be At Risk 29 39.8 ± 0.0 PE I Somatochlora incurvata Incurvate Emerald S2 2 May Be At Risk 9 33.7 ± 0.0 PE I Leucorrhinia glacialis Crimson-Ringed Whiteface S2 3 Sensitive 31 39.8 ± 0.0 PE I Chromagrion conditum Aurora Damsel S2 2 May Be At Risk 14 40.2 ± 0.0 PE I Pantala flavescens Wandering Glider S2B 2 May Be At Risk 11 3.8 ± 1.0 PE I Papilio polyxenes Black Swallowtail S3 4 Secure 63 2.4 ± 0.0 PE I Papilio polyxenes asterius Black Swallowtail S3 6 Not Assessed 4 24.6 ± 100.0 PE I Lycaena hyllus Bronze Copper S3 3 Sensitive 78 22.8 ± 0.0 PE I Lycaena dospassosi Salt Marsh Copper S3 2 May Be At Risk 130 2.4 ± 0.0 PE I Cordulegaster maculata Twin-Spotted Spiketail S3 3 Sensitive 40 32.8 ± 1.0 PE I Aeshna eremita Lake Darner S3 4 Secure 44 39.8 ± 0.0 PE I Dorocordulia libera Racket-Tailed Emerald S3 3 Sensitive 34 25.9 ± 1.0 PE I Epitheca spinigera Spiny Baskettail S3 3 Sensitive 23 25.9 ± 1.0 PE I Somatochlora elongata Ski-Tailed Emerald S3 4 Secure 18 26.9 ± 1.0 PE I Somatochlora walshii Brush-Tipped Emerald S3 4 Secure 23 3.6 ± 1.0 PE I Somatochlora williamsoni Williamson's Emerald S3 4 Secure 22 3.6 ± 1.0 PE I Sympetrum semicinctum Band-Winged Meadowhawk S3 3 Sensitive 25 3.5 ± 0.0 PE I Nehalennia gracilis Sphagnum Sprite S3 3 Sensitive 37 46.0 ± 0.0 PE I Polygonia interrogationis Question Mark S3B 8 Accidental 47 12.4 ± 0.0 PE I Nymphalis antiopa Mourning Cloak S3S4 3 Sensitive 45 8.9 ± 2.0 PE

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 12 of 26

Taxonomic Group Scientific Name Common Name COSEWIC SARA Prov Legal Prot Prov Rarity Rank Prov GS Rank # recs Distance (km) Prov N Pannaria lurida Wrinkled Shingle Lichen Threatened Threatened S1 2 May Be At Risk 2 76.2 ± 0.0 PE N Hypnum pratense Meadow Plait Moss S1 2 May Be At Risk 1 54.5 ± 0.0 PE N Philonotis marchica a Moss S1 2 May Be At Risk 2 77.1 ± 0.0 PE N Pannaria rubiginosa Brown-eyed Shingle Lichen S1 4 45.1 ± 0.0 PE N Collema tenax Soil Tarpaper Lichen S1 1 55.7 ± 0.0 PE N Leptogium milligranum Stretched Jellyskin Lichen S1 7 45.3 ± 0.0 PE N Anaptychia crinalis Hanging Fringed Lichen S1 5 Undetermined 2 17.5 ± 4.0 PE N Moerckia flotoviana Flotow's Ruffwort S1? 1 66.4 ± 0.0 PE N Anomodon rostratus Common Anomodon Moss S1? 2 May Be At Risk 2 46.1 ± 0.0 PE N Dicranum fragilifolium Fragile-leaved Broom Moss S1? 1 88.2 ± 0.0 PE N Dicranum condensatum Condensed Broom Moss S1? 2 May Be At Risk 2 27.9 ± 0.0 PE N Dicranum leioneuron a Dicranum Moss S1? 5 Undetermined 2 87.5 ± 0.0 NB Fontinalis antipyretica var. PE N gigantea a Moss S1? 5 Undetermined 5 37.5 ± 0.0 N Mnium marginatum Bordered Leafy Moss S1? 3 65.7 ± 0.0 PE Orthotrichum speciosum var. PE N elegans a Moss S1? 5 Undetermined 1 46.4 ± 0.0 N Plagiomnium ellipticum Marsh Leafy Moss S1? 1 55.7 ± 0.0 PE N Collema leptaleum Crumpled Bat's Wing Lichen S1? 4 66.5 ± 0.0 PE N Collema occultatum Crusted Tarpaper Lichen S1? 2 49.0 ± 0.0 PE N Leptogium tenuissimum Birdnest Jellyskin Lichen S1? 2 55.2 ± 0.0 PE N Nephroma bellum Naked Kidney Lichen S1? 6 Not Assessed 2 75.6 ± 0.0 PE N Usnea ceratina Warty Beard Lichen S1? 1 52.1 ± 0.0 PE Mealy-rimmed Shingle PE N Pannaria conoplea S1? 16 45.0 ± 0.0 Lichen N Anaptychia palmulata Shaggy Fringed Lichen S1? 2 55.9 ± 0.0 PE Short-bearded Jellyskin PE N Leptogium laceroides S1? 2 45.8 ± 0.0 Lichen N Bryoria salazinica Smooth Horsehair Lichen S1? 2 May Be At Risk 4 18.1 ± 1.0 PE N Bryoria kockiana Kock's Horsehair Lichen S1? 2 May Be At Risk 1 69.9 ± 0.0 PE N Cetraria ericetorum Icelandmoss Lichen S1? 5 Undetermined 1 98.0 ± 20.0 PE N Cladonia botrytes Wooden Soldiers Lichen S1? 3 17.5 ± 4.0 PE N Cladonia cryptochlorophaea Mealy Pixie-cup Lichen S1? 1 52.1 ± 0.0 PE Long-capsuled Ragged PE N Brachythecium laetum S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 3 3.7 ± 0.0 Moss N Bryhnia graminicolor a Moss S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 1 58.4 ± 0.0 PE N Campylium polygamum a Moss S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 1 23.6 ± 0.0 PE N Ditrichum rhynchostegium a Moss S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 1 67.8 ± 0.0 PE N Gymnostomum aeruginosum Tufted Rock Beardless Moss S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 2 87.4 ± 3.0 NS N Hygrohypnum ochraceum Claw Brook Moss S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 2 10.0 ± 0.0 PE N Leucodon andrewsianus a Moss S1S2 5 Undetermined 17 45.4 ± 0.0 PE N Pterigynandrum filiforme Capillary Wing Moss S1S2 5 Undetermined 2 30.4 ± 0.0 PE N Sphagnum flavicomans a Peatmoss S1S2 5 Undetermined 8 53.0 ± 0.0 PE N Sphagnum riparium Streamside Peat Moss S1S2 5 Undetermined 1 53.6 ± 0.0 PE N Sphagnum tenellum Soft Peat Moss S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 4 67.2 ± 0.0 PE N Tetrodontium brownianum Little Georgia S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 1 88.7 ± 0.0 PE N Pseudotaxiphyllum elegans Elegant Silk Moss S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 3 88.7 ± 0.0 PE N Schistidium apocarpum Radiate Bloom Moss S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 4 25.9 ± 0.0 PE N Nephroma helveticum Fringed Kidney Lichen S1S2 3 Sensitive 12 60.4 ± 0.0 PE N Ramalina thrausta Angelhair Ramalina Lichen S1S2 1 67.4 ± 0.0 PE N Hypogymnia krogiae Freckled Tube Lichen S1S2 9 45.1 ± 0.0 PE N Leptogium teretiusculum Beaded Jellyskin Lichen S1S2 11 48.7 ± 0.0 PE N Heterodermia speciosa Powdered Fringe Lichen S1S2 5 51.6 ± 0.0 PE N Parmeliopsis ambigua Green Starburst Lichen S1S2 4 Secure 1 17.5 ± 4.0 PE N Placynthium nigrum Common Ink Lichen S1S2 2 60.3 ± 0.0 PE N Physconia grumosa a Frost Lichen S1S2 2 76.2 ± 0.0 PE N Pseudocyphellaria holarctica Yellow Specklebelly Lichen S1S2 15 45.1 ± 0.0 PE N Physcia dubia Powder-tipped Rosette S1S2 2 42.3 ± 0.0 PE

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 13 of 26

Taxonomic Group Scientific Name Common Name COSEWIC SARA Prov Legal Prot Prov Rarity Rank Prov GS Rank # recs Distance (km) Prov Lichen N Cladonia deformis Lesser Sulphur-cup Lichen S1S2 5 Undetermined 1 71.7 ± 0.0 PE N Collema furfuraceum Blistered Tarpaper Lichen S1S2 5 Undetermined 2 51.6 ± 0.0 PE N Sphagnum lescurii a Peatmoss S1S3 5 53.3 ± 0.0 PE N Sphagnum subfulvum a Peatmoss S1S3 1 44.8 ± 0.0 PE N Usnocetraria oakesiana Yellow Band Lichen S1S3 1 89.0 ± 0.0 PE N Cladonia farinacea Farinose Pixie Lichen S1S3 5 Undetermined 1 76.2 ± 0.0 PE N Leptogium acadiense Acadian Jellyskin Lichen S1S3 8 48.7 ± 0.0 PE N Anomodon attenuatus Slender Anomodon Moss S2? 2 May Be At Risk 11 45.9 ± 0.0 PE N Aulacomnium androgynum Little Groove Moss S2? 5 Undetermined 5 30.4 ± 0.0 PE N Calliergon giganteum Giant Spear Moss S2? 3 Sensitive 2 49.2 ± 0.0 PE N Campylium chrysophyllum Golden Creeping Moss S2? 2 May Be At Risk 3 59.2 ± 0.0 PE N Campylostelium saxicola a Moss S2? 2 May Be At Risk 3 14.5 ± 3.0 PE N Dicranum bonjeanii Bonjean's Broom Moss S2? 5 Undetermined 4 17.2 ± 95.0 PE N Platydictya subtilis Bark Willow Moss S2? 2 May Be At Risk 4 17.2 ± 95.0 PE N Sphagnum centrale Central Peat Moss S2? 5 Undetermined 1 49.2 ± 0.0 PE N Sphagnum warnstorfii Warnstorf's Peat Moss S2? 3 Sensitive 4 45.0 ± 0.0 PE N Schistidium rivulare River Bloom Moss S2? 2 May Be At Risk 2 80.6 ± 0.0 PE N Bryoria glabra Wire Horsehair Lichen S2? 2 May Be At Risk 3 35.4 ± 0.0 PE N Placynthiella uliginosa a Lichen S2? 3 17.5 ± 4.0 PE N Bryoria nadvornikiana Blonde Horsehair Lichen S2? 3 Sensitive 3 51.6 ± 0.0 PE N Atrichum tenellum Slender Smoothcap Moss S2S3 5 Undetermined 2 3.7 ± 0.0 PE Common Large Wetland PE N Calliergonella cuspidata S2S3 5 Undetermined 1 31.9 ± 0.0 Moss N Fissidens bryoides Lesser Pocket Moss S2S3 5 Undetermined 7 30.4 ± 0.0 PE N Hypnum cupressiforme Cypress-leaved Plait Moss S2S3 5 Undetermined 6 28.2 ± 0.0 PE N Paraleucobryum longifolium Long-leaved Notchleaf Moss S2S3 3 Sensitive 3 30.4 ± 0.0 PE N Leptogium subtile Appressed Jellyskin Lichen S2S3 18 35.9 ± 0.0 PE N Cladonia brevis Short Peg Lichen S2S3 5 Undetermined 1 17.5 ± 4.0 PE N Melanohalea exasperatula Lustrous Camouflage Lichen S2S3 2 23.3 ± 0.0 PE Brown-gray Moss-shingle PE N Protopannaria pezizoides S2S3 3 Sensitive 8 45.4 ± 0.0 Lichen N Usnea cavernosa Pitted Beard Lichen S2S3 2 52.1 ± 0.0 PE N Brachythecium plumosum Rusty Ragged Moss S3? 3 Sensitive 4 18.3 ± 0.0 PE N Brachythecium populeum Matted Ragged Moss S3? 3 Sensitive 7 26.6 ± 0.0 PE N Dichodontium pellucidum Transparent Fork Moss S3? 3 Sensitive 8 14.5 ± 1.0 PE N Heterocladium dimorphum Dimorphous Tangle Moss S3? 5 Undetermined 3 30.4 ± 0.0 PE N Sphagnum compactum Compact Peat Moss S3? 5 Undetermined 6 16.2 ± 0.0 PE N Usnea longissima Methuselah's Beard Lichen S3? 5 Undetermined 12 51.6 ± 0.0 PE N Nephroma laevigatum Mustard Kidney Lichen S3? 3 Sensitive 22 35.7 ± 0.0 PE Black-bordered Shingles PE N Parmeliella triptophylla S3? 3 Sensitive 33 45.4 ± 0.0 Lichen N Evernia prunastri Valley Oakmoss Lichen S3? 3 Sensitive 5 17.5 ± 4.0 PE N Amblystegium varium Willow Feather Moss S3S4 5 Undetermined 4 4.0 ± 0.0 PE N Atrichum crispum a Moss S3S4 5 Undetermined 3 26.6 ± 0.0 PE N Buxbaumia aphylla Brown Shield Moss S3S4 5 Undetermined 3 23.6 ± 0.0 PE N Leptodictyum riparium Kneiff's Feather Moss S3S4 5 Undetermined 12 26.2 ± 0.0 PE N Mnium spinulosum a Moss S3S4 5 Undetermined 3 15.4 ± 3.0 PE N Pohlia filum a Moss S3S4 5 Undetermined 3 35.5 ± 1.0 PE N Polytrichum pallidisetum Eastern Haircap Moss S3S4 5 Undetermined 5 17.2 ± 95.0 PE N Sphagnum capillifolium Northern Peatmoss S3S4 5 Undetermined 20 17.5 ± 4.0 PE N Sphagnum cuspidatum Feathery Peat Moss S3S4 5 Undetermined 13 22.1 ± 20.0 PE Symphyotrichum PE P laurentianum Gulf of St Lawrence Aster Threatened Threatened S1 1 At Risk 73 15.6 ± 20.0 P Fraxinus nigra Black Ash Threatened S2 2 May Be At Risk 406 15.6 ± 20.0 PE Lechea maritima var. PE P subcylindrica Beach Pinweed Special Concern Special Concern S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 124 22.5 ± 0.0 P Conioselinum chinense Chinese Hemlock-parsley S1 2 May Be At Risk 1 75.7 ± 0.0 PE

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 14 of 26

Taxonomic Group Scientific Name Common Name COSEWIC SARA Prov Legal Prot Prov Rarity Rank Prov GS Rank # recs Distance (km) Prov P Osmorhiza longistylis Smooth Sweet Cicely S1 2 May Be At Risk 2 44.5 ± 1.0 PE P Zizia aurea Golden Alexanders S1 2 15.6 ± 20.0 PE P Asclepias incarnata Swamp Milkweed S1 2 May Be At Risk 9 48.2 ± 0.0 PE Antennaria howellii ssp. PE P canadensis Howell's Pussytoes S1 2 May Be At Risk 1 68.0 ± 1.0 P Erigeron philadelphicus Philadelphia Fleabane S1 2 May Be At Risk 6 27.8 ± 0.0 PE Pseudognaphalium PE P obtusifolium Eastern Cudweed S1 2 May Be At Risk 30 13.8 ± 5.0 P Hieracium umbellatum Umbellate Hawkweed S1 3 Sensitive 48 9.4 ± 3.0 PE P Packera aurea Golden Groundsel S1 2 May Be At Risk 18 35.8 ± 0.0 PE P Packera schweinitziana Schweinitz's Groundsel S1 2 May Be At Risk 24 23.2 ± 1.0 PE P Solidago juncea Early Goldenrod S1 2 May Be At Risk 19 21.8 ± 0.0 PE P Solidago altissima Tall Goldenrod S1 2 May Be At Risk 2 56.0 ± 0.0 PE Symphyotrichum subulatum NB P (non-Bathurst pop) Annual Saltmarsh Aster S1 2 May Be At Risk 15 46.1 ± 0.0 P Ostrya virginiana Ironwood S1 2 May Be At Risk 52 3.6 ± 5.0 PE P Cardamine diphylla Two-leaved Toothwort S1 2 May Be At Risk 12 29.7 ± 0.0 PE P Cardamine maxima Large Toothwort S1 2 May Be At Risk 2 29.7 ± 0.0 PE P Draba incana Twisted Whitlow-grass S1 2 May Be At Risk 4 76.5 ± 0.0 PE P Campanula intercedens Intermediate Bellflower S1 5 Undetermined 1 22.5 ± 0.0 PE P Lobelia dortmanna Water Lobelia S1 2 May Be At Risk 10 40.3 ± 1.0 PE P Stellaria humifusa Saltmarsh Starwort S1 2 May Be At Risk 6 29.8 ± 0.0 PE P Ceratophyllum echinatum Prickly Hornwort S1 23 47.3 ± 0.0 PE P Oxybasis rubra Red Goosefoot S1 2 May Be At Risk 8 15.6 ± 20.0 PE P Callitriche hermaphroditica Northern Water-starwort S1 2 May Be At Risk 9 11.7 ± 0.0 PE P Hypericum ellipticum Pale St John's-Wort S1 2 May Be At Risk 25 55.2 ± 1.0 PE P Hypericum mutilum Dwarf St John's-wort S1 2 May Be At Risk 16 69.6 ± 2.0 NS P Cornus rugosa Round-leaved Dogwood S1 2 May Be At Risk 49 49.2 ± 0.0 PE P Crassula aquatica Water Pygmyweed S1 2 May Be At Risk 6 30.2 ± 5.0 PE P Drosera intermedia Spoon-Leaved Sundew S1 2 May Be At Risk 25 39.4 ± 5.0 PE P Elatine minima Small Waterwort S1 2 May Be At Risk 7 35.0 ± 0.0 PE P Vaccinium uliginosum Alpine Bilberry S1 2 May Be At Risk 1 75.7 ± 1.0 PE P Apios americana American Groundnut S1 2 May Be At Risk 24 36.9 ± 0.0 PE P Dicentra cucullaria Dutchman's Breeches S1 2 May Be At Risk 5 17.8 ± 1.0 PE P Myriophyllum heterophyllum Variable-leaved Water Milfoil S1 5 Undetermined 1 74.5 ± 0.0 PE P Myriophyllum tenellum Slender Water Milfoil S1 2 May Be At Risk 2 53.3 ± 0.0 PE P Myriophyllum quitense Andean Water Milfoil S1 5 Undetermined 2 31.4 ± 5.0 PE P Hamamelis virginiana American Witch-Hazel S1 2 May Be At Risk 13 38.4 ± 0.0 PE P Utricularia geminiscapa Twin-stemmed Bladderwort S1 2 May Be At Risk 13 38.2 ± 0.0 PE Utricularia vulgaris ssp. PE P macrorhiza Greater Bladderwort S1 2 May Be At Risk 48 15.6 ± 20.0 P Decodon verticillatus Swamp Loosestrife S1 2 May Be At Risk 1 39.5 ± 0.0 PE P Nuphar x rubrodisca Red-disk Yellow Pond-lily S1 2 May Be At Risk 15 40.0 ± 0.0 PE P Nymphaea odorata Fragrant Water-lily S1 2 May Be At Risk 19 15.6 ± 20.0 PE P Epilobium coloratum Purple-veined Willowherb S1 2 May Be At Risk 2 74.2 ± 1.0 NB P Aphyllon uniflorum One-flowered Broomrape S1 2 May Be At Risk 6 6.5 ± 0.0 PE P Polygala sanguinea Blood Milkwort S1 2 May Be At Risk 16 3.6 ± 5.0 PE P Polygonum fowleri Fowler's Knotweed S1 5 Undetermined 5 28.8 ± 0.0 PE P Fallopia scandens Climbing False Buckwheat S1 2 May Be At Risk 30 1.5 ± 0.0 PE P Samolus parviflorus Seaside Brookweed S1 2 May Be At Risk 40 43.3 ± 0.0 PE P Anemonastrum canadense Canada Anemone S1 2 May Be At Risk 2 64.8 ± 0.0 PE Ranunculus hispidus var. PE P caricetorum Bristly Buttercup S1 2 May Be At Risk 9 35.0 ± 5.0 P Ranunculus pensylvanicus Pennsylvania Buttercup S1 2 May Be At Risk 31 70.3 ± 5.0 PE P Thalictrum confine Northern Meadow-rue S1 2 May Be At Risk 1 4.0 ± 1.0 PE P Amelanchier fernaldii Fernald's Serviceberry S1 5 Undetermined 4 3.6 ± 5.0 PE P Crataegus holmesiana Holmes' Hawthorn S1 5 Undetermined 4 15.0 ± 5.0 PE P Rubus repens Dewdrop S1 2 May Be At Risk 15 23.2 ± 0.0 PE

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 15 of 26

Taxonomic Group Scientific Name Common Name COSEWIC SARA Prov Legal Prot Prov Rarity Rank Prov GS Rank # recs Distance (km) Prov P Rubus x crux Ashe's blackberry S1 5 Undetermined 2 44.8 ± 5.0 PE P Dasiphora fruticosa Shrubby Cinquefoil S1 2 May Be At Risk 6 36.4 ± 0.0 PE P Galium aparine Common Bedstraw S1 5 Undetermined 9 0.6 ± 0.0 PE P Galium boreale Northern Bedstraw S1 2 May Be At Risk 4 56.9 ± 3.0 PE P Galium obtusum Blunt-leaved Bedstraw S1 2 May Be At Risk 2 46.9 ± 1.0 NB P Salix candida Sage Willow S1 2 May Be At Risk 6 65.6 ± 0.0 PE P Salix pedicellaris Bog Willow S1 22 51.1 ± 0.0 PE P Geocaulon lividum Northern Comandra S1 2 May Be At Risk 8 54.4 ± 2.0 PE Small-flowered Grass-of- PE P Parnassia parviflora S1 2 May Be At Risk 2 75.3 ± 0.0 Parnassus Agalinis purpurea var. Small-flowered Purple False PE P S1 2 May Be At Risk 39 52.4 ± 0.0 parviflora Foxglove Yellow-seeded False PE P Lindernia dubia S1 2 May Be At Risk 42 56.0 ± 0.0 Pimperel P Laportea canadensis Canada Wood Nettle S1 2 May Be At Risk 17 19.7 ± 5.0 PE P Verbena hastata Blue Vervain S1 2 May Be At Risk 102 48.6 ± 0.0 PE P Viola nephrophylla Northern Bog Violet S1 2 May Be At Risk 5 65.0 ± 0.0 PE P Viola sagittata var. ovata Arrow-Leaved Violet S1 0.1 Extirpated 3 34.4 ± 5.0 PE P Viola lanceolata Lance-leaved Violet S1 2 May Be At Risk 6 77.2 ± 0.0 PE P Sagittaria graminea Grass-leaved Arrowhead S1 2 May Be At Risk 5 37.5 ± 0.0 PE P Carex adusta Lesser Brown Sedge S1 2 May Be At Risk 2 76.2 ± 0.0 PE P Carex annectens Yellow-Fruited Sedge S1 2 May Be At Risk 3 44.9 ± 5.0 PE P Carex argyrantha Silvery-flowered Sedge S1 2 May Be At Risk 2 17.6 ± 0.0 PE P Carex atlantica ssp. atlantica Atlantic Sedge S1 2 May Be At Risk 3 71.6 ± 0.0 NB P Carex bromoides Bromelike Sedge S1 2 May Be At Risk 40 30.6 ± 0.0 PE P Carex buxbaumii Buxbaum's Sedge S1 2 May Be At Risk 1 51.6 ± 0.0 PE P Carex chordorrhiza Creeping Sedge S1 2 May Be At Risk 52 36.0 ± 1.0 PE P Carex comosa Bearded Sedge S1 2 May Be At Risk 8 49.3 ± 0.0 PE P Carex folliculata Northern Long Sedge S1 2 May Be At Risk 18 32.0 ± 0.0 PE P Carex granularis Limestone Meadow Sedge S1 5 Undetermined 8 75.8 ± 0.0 PE P Carex gynocrates Northern Bog Sedge S1 2 May Be At Risk 1 75.5 ± 0.0 PE P Carex haydenii Hayden's Sedge S1 2 May Be At Risk 2 88.7 ± 50.0 NS P Carex livida Livid Sedge S1 2 May Be At Risk 9 53.8 ± 5.0 PE P Carex lurida Sallow Sedge S1 2 May Be At Risk 24 55.7 ± 0.0 PE P Carex pauciflora Few-Flowered Sedge S1 2 May Be At Risk 17 61.5 ± 0.0 PE Loose-flowered Alpine PE P Carex rariflora S1 2 May Be At Risk 1 77.4 ± 0.0 Sedge Narrow-leaved Beaked PE P Carex rostrata S1 2 May Be At Risk 1 76.9 ± 5.0 Sedge P Carex tenuiflora Sparse-Flowered Sedge S1 2 May Be At Risk 8 36.1 ± 0.0 PE P Carex tincta Tinged Sedge S1 2 May Be At Risk 2 15.0 ± 5.0 PE P Carex vesicaria Inflated Sedge S1 2 May Be At Risk 11 44.0 ± 5.0 PE P Carex wiegandii Wiegand's Sedge S1 2 May Be At Risk 14 55.1 ± 0.0 PE P Cladium mariscoides Smooth Twigrush S1 2 May Be At Risk 7 36.2 ± 0.0 PE P Eleocharis elliptica Elliptic Spikerush S1 4 75.5 ± 0.0 PE P Eleocharis intermedia Matted Spikerush S1 1 56.0 ± 0.0 PE P Eleocharis nitida Quill Spikerush S1 2 May Be At Risk 2 3.3 ± 5.0 PE P Eleocharis quinqueflora Few-flowered Spikerush S1 2 May Be At Risk 2 56.8 ± 3.0 PE P Eleocharis ovata Ovate Spikerush S1 2 May Be At Risk 12 43.8 ± 1.0 PE P Trichophorum alpinum Alpine Clubrush S1 2 May Be At Risk 22 36.1 ± 0.0 PE P Eriophorum gracile Slender Cottongrass S1 2 May Be At Risk 51 46.7 ± 5.0 PE P Scirpus atrovirens Dark-green Bulrush S1 2 52.2 ± 0.0 PE P Scirpus pedicellatus Stalked Bulrush S1 5 Undetermined 2 72.1 ± 0.0 PE P Scirpus pendulus Hanging Bulrush S1 5 Undetermined 2 75.7 ± 0.0 PE Schoenoplectus PE P subterminalis Water Bulrush S1 2 May Be At Risk 4 15.4 ± 20.0 P Eriocaulon aquaticum White Buttons S1 2 May Be At Risk 15 40.3 ± 1.0 PE P Elodea nuttallii Nuttall's Waterweed S1 2 May Be At Risk 2 35.9 ± 1.0 PE

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 16 of 26

Taxonomic Group Scientific Name Common Name COSEWIC SARA Prov Legal Prot Prov Rarity Rank Prov GS Rank # recs Distance (km) Prov P Juncus greenei Greene's Rush S1 2 May Be At Risk 10 26.5 ± 0.0 PE P Juncus militaris Bayonet Rush S1 3 Sensitive 20 15.4 ± 20.0 PE P Najas flexilis Slender Naiad S1 2 May Be At Risk 12 15.6 ± 20.0 PE Menzies' Rattlesnake- PE P Goodyera oblongifolia S1 2 May Be At Risk 2 49.3 ± 0.0 plantain P Neottia bifolia Southern Twayblade S1 2 May Be At Risk 9 61.2 ± 0.0 PE Malaxis monophyllos var. North American White PE P S1 2 May Be At Risk 3 27.0 ± 0.0 brachypoda Adder's-mouth P Platanthera grandiflora Large Purple Fringed Orchid S1 2 May Be At Risk 18 37.8 ± 0.0 PE P Platanthera hookeri Hooker's Orchid S1 2 May Be At Risk 19 36.2 ± 2.0 PE P Spiranthes cernua Nodding Ladies'-Tresses S1 2 May Be At Risk 17 26.3 ± 0.0 PE P Spiranthes ochroleuca Yellow Ladies'-tresses S1 2 May Be At Risk 9 75.1 ± 0.0 PE P Alopecurus aequalis Short-awned Foxtail S1 2 May Be At Risk 21 2.9 ± 0.0 PE P Brachyelytrum aristosum Northern Shorthusk S1 2 May Be At Risk 136 36.5 ± 0.0 PE P Catabrosa aquatica Water Whorl Grass S1 2 May Be At Risk 13 26.9 ± 0.0 PE P Danthonia compressa Flattened Oat Grass S1 2 May Be At Risk 3 29.4 ± 1.0 PE P Deschampsia cespitosa Tufted Hair Grass S1 2 May Be At Risk 14 17.6 ± 0.0 PE Elymus virginicus var. NB P halophilus Virginia Wild Rye S1 4 P Elymus virginicus Virginia Wild Rye S1 2 May Be At Risk 21 50.8 ± 0.0 PE Glyceria canadensis var. PE P laxa Limp Mannagrass S1 2 May Be At Risk 25 48.9 ± 1.0 Milium effusum var. PE P cisatlanticum Tall Millet Grass S1 2 May Be At Risk 2 29.8 ± 0.0 P Oryzopsis asperifolia White-grained Mountain Rice S1 2 May Be At Risk 35 41.3 ± 5.0 PE P Poa alsodes Grove Blue Grass S1 2 May Be At Risk 39 58.8 ± 0.0 PE P Schizachne purpurascens Purple Oat Grass S1 2 May Be At Risk 27 19.6 ± 5.0 PE P Sphenopholis intermedia Slender Wedge Grass S1 2 May Be At Risk 30 28.6 ± 5.0 PE P Pontederia cordata Pickerelweed S1 2 May Be At Risk 10 37.1 ± 5.0 PE P Stuckenia filiformis Thread-leaved Pondweed S1 2 May Be At Risk 26 15.4 ± 20.0 PE P Potamogeton oakesianus Oakes' Pondweed S1 2 May Be At Risk 6 45.6 ± 10.0 PE P Potamogeton vaseyi Vasey's Pondweed S1 2 May Be At Risk 2 51.2 ± 0.0 PE P Potamogeton zosteriformis Flat-stemmed Pondweed S1 2 May Be At Risk 15 37.1 ± 0.0 PE P Sparganium fluctuans Floating Burreed S1 2 May Be At Risk 24 15.4 ± 20.0 PE P Cystopteris tenuis A Bladderfern S1 2 May Be At Risk 4 22.7 ± 0.0 PE Dryopteris filix-mas ssp. PE P brittonii Britton's Male Fern S1 2 May Be At Risk 1 92.5 ± 0.0 P Polystichum braunii Braun's Holly Fern S1 2 May Be At Risk 1 65.7 ± 0.0 PE P Equisetum scirpoides Dwarf Scouring-Rush S1 2 May Be At Risk 11 21.3 ± 5.0 PE P Equisetum variegatum Variegated Horsetail S1 2 May Be At Risk 38 27.9 ± 0.0 PE Equisetum variegatum ssp. PE P variegatum Variegated Scouring-rush S1 2 May Be At Risk 1 62.7 ± 0.0 P Isoetes lacustris Lake Quillwort S1 2 May Be At Risk 6 3.1 ± 0.0 PE P Diphasiastrum sitchense Sitka Ground-cedar S1 2 May Be At Risk 5 56.0 ± 0.0 PE P Sceptridium dissectum Dissected Moonwort S1 2 May Be At Risk 4 46.1 ± 0.0 NB Botrychium lanceolatum ssp. PE P angustisegmentum Narrow Triangle Moonwort S1 2 May Be At Risk 12 15.0 ± 5.0 P Botrychium simplex Least Moonwort S1 2 May Be At Risk 2 77.9 ± 5.0 PE P Ophioglossum pusillum Northern Adder's-tongue S1 2 May Be At Risk 8 15.4 ± 20.0 PE P Polypodium virginianum Rock Polypody S1 2 May Be At Risk 10 22.7 ± 0.0 PE P Polypodium appalachianum Appalachian Polypody S1 2 May Be At Risk 2 22.7 ± 0.0 PE Polygonum oxyspermum PE P ssp. raii Ray's Knotweed S1? 5 Undetermined 5 15.4 ± 20.0 P Rumex pallidus Seabeach Dock S1? 0.1 Extirpated 4 27.3 ± 1.0 PE P Euphrasia randii Rand's Eyebright S1? 5 Undetermined 3 21.2 ± 5.0 PE P Carex tonsa var. tonsa Shaved Sedge S1? 2 May Be At Risk 6 46.3 ± 0.0 PE P Puccinellia maritima Seaside Alkali Grass S1? 15 37.1 ± 5.0 PE P Rhus typhina Staghorn Sumac S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 38 1.4 ± 0.0 PE

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 17 of 26

Taxonomic Group Scientific Name Common Name COSEWIC SARA Prov Legal Prot Prov Rarity Rank Prov GS Rank # recs Distance (km) Prov P Sagina nodosa Knotted Pearlwort S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 3 53.1 ± 0.0 PE P Sagina nodosa ssp. borealis Knotted Pearlwort S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 7 28.3 ± 1.0 PE Atriplex glabriuscula var. PE P franktonii Frankton's Saltbush S1S2 5 Undetermined 10 12.8 ± 0.0 P Hudsonia ericoides Pinebarren Golden Heather S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 8 15.6 ± 20.0 PE P Hypericum majus Large St John's-wort S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 15 27.4 ± 0.0 PE P Viburnum lantanoides Hobblebush S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 32 7.5 ± 0.0 PE P Utricularia cornuta Horned Bladderwort S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 22 36.4 ± 0.0 PE P Claytonia caroliniana Carolina Spring Beauty S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 9 10.9 ± 1.0 PE P Pyrola chlorantha Green-flowered Pyrola S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 17 17.7 ± 0.0 PE P Ranunculus recurvatus Hooked Buttercup S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 16 47.9 ± 5.0 PE P Mitchella repens Partridgeberry S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 65 15.6 ± 20.0 PE P Salix petiolaris Meadow Willow S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 61 2.4 ± 0.0 PE P Carex cumulata Dense Sedge S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 10 1.9 ± 0.0 PE P Carex hystericina Porcupine Sedge S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 15 67.8 ± 1.0 PE Carex lasiocarpa ssp. PE P americana American woolly-fruit sedge S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 45 38.2 ± 0.0 P Carex radiata Eastern Star Sedge S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 18 1.2 ± 0.0 PE P Carex recta Estuary Sedge S1S2 3 Sensitive 12 10.0 ± 2.0 PE P Juncus dudleyi Dudley's Rush S1S2 5 Undetermined 27 10.9 ± 0.0 PE Corallorhiza maculata var. PE P occidentalis Spotted Coralroot S1S2 2 52.4 ± 5.0 Corallorhiza maculata var. PE P maculata Spotted Coralroot S1S2 1 32.3 ± 5.0 P Platanthera obtusata Blunt-leaved Orchid S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 16 37.3 ± 0.0 PE Dichanthelium PE P depauperatum Starved Panic Grass S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 9 45.5 ± 0.0 P Muhlenbergia glomerata Spiked Muhly S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 21 19.6 ± 5.0 PE P Potamogeton alpinus Alpine Pondweed S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 22 39.9 ± 0.0 PE P Diphasiastrum x sabinifolium Savin-leaved Ground-cedar S1S2 2 May Be At Risk 9 26.0 ± 5.0 PE Atriplex glabriuscula var. PE P acadiensis Acadian Saltbush S1S3 5 Undetermined 11 49.6 ± 0.0 P Oenothera oakesiana Oakes' Evening Primrose S1S3 5 Undetermined 28 10.0 ± 0.0 PE P Amelanchier canadensis Canada Serviceberry S1S3 5 Undetermined 27 0.5 ± 0.0 PE P Crataegus chrysocarpa Fireberry Hawthorn S1S3 5 Undetermined 72 0.7 ± 0.0 PE P Angelica atropurpurea Purple-stemmed Angelica S2 3 Sensitive 47 27.5 ± 0.0 PE P Angelica lucida Seaside Angelica S2 2 May Be At Risk 26 22.2 ± 0.0 PE P Osmorhiza claytonii Hairy Sweet Cicely S2 2 May Be At Risk 22 29.7 ± 0.0 PE P Aralia racemosa American Spikenard S2 2 May Be At Risk 18 15.0 ± 5.0 PE P Panax trifolius Dwarf Ginseng S2 2 May Be At Risk 97 41.3 ± 5.0 PE P Bidens heterodoxa Connecticut Beggar-Ticks S2 2 May Be At Risk 13 36.7 ± 1.0 PE P Erigeron annuus Annual Fleabane S2 5 Undetermined 17 18.1 ± 0.0 PE P Rudbeckia laciniata Cut-Leaved Coneflower S2 2 May Be At Risk 24 3.8 ± 3.0 PE P Solidago macrophylla Large-leaved Goldenrod S2 2 May Be At Risk 12 31.2 ± 0.0 PE P Symphyotrichum boreale Boreal Aster S2 2 May Be At Risk 66 36.8 ± 0.0 PE P Oclemena nemoralis Bog Aster S2 2 May Be At Risk 60 35.2 ± 0.0 PE P Pseudognaphalium macounii Macoun's Cudweed S2 2 May Be At Risk 44 51.9 ± 0.0 PE P Betula pumila Bog Birch S2 3 Sensitive 47 34.0 ± 5.0 PE P Cuscuta gronovii Swamp Dodder S2 2 May Be At Risk 21 15.6 ± 20.0 PE P Corema conradii Broom Crowberry S2 3 Sensitive 20 15.4 ± 20.0 PE P Empetrum atropurpureum Purple Crowberry S2 5 Undetermined 9 23.2 ± 5.0 PE P Empetrum eamesii Pink Crowberry S2 3 Sensitive 21 26.0 ± 5.0 PE Andromeda polifolia var. Glaucous-leaved Bog PE P S2 2 May Be At Risk 25 37.3 ± 0.0 latifolia Rosemary P Gaylussacia bigeloviana Dwarf Huckleberry S2 4 Secure 46 37.7 ± 1.0 PE P Euphorbia polygonifolia Seaside Spurge S2 3 Sensitive 24 4.4 ± 0.0 PE P Capnoides sempervirens Pink Corydalis S2 3 Sensitive 9 1.1 ± 5.0 PE P Hippuris vulgaris Common Mare's-Tail S2 3 Sensitive 23 15.4 ± 20.0 PE

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 18 of 26

Taxonomic Group Scientific Name Common Name COSEWIC SARA Prov Legal Prot Prov Rarity Rank Prov GS Rank # recs Distance (km) Prov P Teucrium canadense Canada Germander S2 2 May Be At Risk 85 3.3 ± 0.0 PE P Utricularia minor Lesser Bladderwort S2 3 Sensitive 42 27.2 ± 0.0 PE Broad-leaved Enchanter's PE P Circaea canadensis S2 3 Sensitive 34 2.5 ± 0.0 Nightshade P Epilobium strictum Downy Willowherb S2 3 Sensitive 70 26.9 ± 0.0 PE P Persicaria arifolia Halberd-leaved Tearthumb S2 3 Sensitive 103 31.1 ± 1.0 PE P Pyrola asarifolia Pink Pyrola S2 3 Sensitive 48 15.6 ± 20.0 PE P Actaea pachypoda White Baneberry S2 2 May Be At Risk 23 3.4 ± 0.0 PE P Agrimonia gryposepala Hooked Agrimony S2 3 Sensitive 61 14.2 ± 0.0 PE P Amelanchier spicata Running Serviceberry S2 5 Undetermined 12 17.5 ± 4.0 PE P Rubus chamaemorus Cloudberry S2 4 Secure 15 37.7 ± 1.0 PE P Rubus pensilvanicus Pennsylvania Blackberry S2 5 Undetermined 25 21.2 ± 0.0 PE P Galium labradoricum Labrador Bedstraw S2 2 May Be At Risk 44 15.6 ± 20.0 PE Square-stemmed PE P Mimulus ringens S2 3 Sensitive 62 19.9 ± 5.0 Monkeyflower P Pilea pumila Dwarf Clearweed S2 3 Sensitive 80 3.9 ± 0.0 PE P Viola pubescens Downy Yellow Violet S2 2 May Be At Risk 38 12.7 ± 3.0 PE P Juniperus horizontalis Creeping Juniper S2 2 May Be At Risk 48 5.1 ± 0.0 PE P Pinus banksiana Jack Pine S2 3 Sensitive 37 15.6 ± 20.0 PE P Pinus resinosa Red Pine S2 3 Sensitive 32 15.4 ± 20.0 PE P Carex aquatilis Water Sedge S2 2 May Be At Risk 27 23.7 ± 5.0 PE P Carex deflexa Northern Sedge S2 3 Sensitive 52 1.1 ± 0.0 PE P Carex flava Yellow Sedge S2 2 May Be At Risk 37 38.2 ± 0.0 PE P Carex limosa Mud Sedge S2 2 May Be At Risk 53 26.0 ± 5.0 PE P Carex pedunculata Long-stalked Sedge S2 2 May Be At Risk 123 39.8 ± 0.0 PE P Carex foenea Fernald's Hay Sedge S2 2 May Be At Risk 18 22.7 ± 0.0 PE P Dulichium arundinaceum Three-Way Sedge S2 3 Sensitive 69 3.8 ± 0.0 PE P Eleocharis tenuis Slender Spikerush S2 3 Sensitive 29 37.3 ± 5.0 PE P Eriophorum russeolum Russet Cottongrass S2 2 May Be At Risk 196 18.3 ± 6.0 PE P Eriophorum viridicarinatum Green-keeled Cottongrass S2 2 May Be At Risk 38 29.9 ± 1.0 PE P Trichophorum cespitosum Tufted Clubrush S2 3 Sensitive 35 41.8 ± 5.0 PE P Blysmopsis rufa Red Bulrush S2 2 May Be At Risk 8 10.7 ± 1.0 PE P Triglochin palustris Marsh Arrowgrass S2 2 May Be At Risk 7 14.7 ± 5.0 PE P Arethusa bulbosa Arethusa S2 2 May Be At Risk 32 37.1 ± 0.0 PE P Corallorhiza maculata Spotted Coralroot S2 2 May Be At Risk 15 0.6 ± 0.0 PE P Corallorhiza trifida Early Coralroot S2 3 Sensitive 38 17.7 ± 0.0 PE P Cypripedium parviflorum Yellow Lady's-slipper S2 3 Sensitive 28 35.3 ± 0.0 PE Cypripedium parviflorum var. PE P pubescens Yellow Lady's-slipper S2 3 Sensitive 24 34.0 ± 5.0 P Cypripedium reginae Showy Lady's-Slipper S2 3 Sensitive 61 31.7 ± 0.0 PE P Goodyera repens Lesser Rattlesnake-plantain S2 2 May Be At Risk 11 18.3 ± 6.0 PE Checkered Rattlesnake- PE P Goodyera tesselata S2 2 May Be At Risk 23 21.3 ± 5.0 Plantain P Neottia convallarioides Broad-Lip Twayblade S2 2 May Be At Risk 49 15.0 ± 5.0 PE P Neottia cordata Heart-leaved Twayblade S2 3 Sensitive 23 37.8 ± 1.0 PE P Platanthera blephariglottis White Fringed Orchid S2 3 Sensitive 173 36.3 ± 0.0 PE P Platanthera orbiculata Small Round-leaved Orchid S2 3 Sensitive 41 14.6 ± 5.0 PE P Pogonia ophioglossoides Rose Pogonia S2 3 Sensitive 73 15.6 ± 20.0 PE P Elymus trachycaulus Slender Wild Rye S2 3 Sensitive 24 0.8 ± 0.0 PE Elymus trachycaulus ssp. PE P trachycaulus Slender Wild Rye S2 3 Sensitive 2 49.4 ± 0.0 P Glyceria canadensis Canada Manna Grass S2 2 May Be At Risk 85 1.5 ± 0.0 PE Glyceria canadensis var. PE P canadensis Canada Mannagrass S2 2 May Be At Risk 4 77.5 ± 0.0 P Muhlenbergia mexicana Mexican Muhly S2 5 Undetermined 19 25.6 ± 0.0 PE P Potamogeton epihydrus Ribbon-leaved Pondweed S2 2 May Be At Risk 92 26.2 ± 0.0 PE P Potamogeton obtusifolius Blunt-leaved Pondweed S2 3 Sensitive 36 4.0 ± 0.0 PE P Sparganium natans Small Burreed S2 2 May Be At Risk 24 50.1 ± 0.0 PE

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 19 of 26

Taxonomic Group Scientific Name Common Name COSEWIC SARA Prov Legal Prot Prov Rarity Rank Prov GS Rank # recs Distance (km) Prov P Zannichellia palustris Horned Pondweed S2 2 May Be At Risk 26 18.5 ± 2.0 PE P Anchistea virginica Virginia chain fern S2 2 May Be At Risk 10 37.1 ± 5.0 PE Dendrolycopodium Flat-branched Tree- PE P S2 2 May Be At Risk 27 46.0 ± 0.0 obscurum clubmoss P Botrychium matricariifolium Daisy-leaved Moonwort S2 2 May Be At Risk 17 15.0 ± 5.0 PE P Sceptridium multifidum Leathery Moonwort S2 2 May Be At Risk 22 17.5 ± 4.0 PE P Rumex persicarioides Peach-leaved Dock S2? 3 Sensitive 6 19.9 ± 5.0 PE P Sparganium americanum American Burreed S2? 5 Undetermined 73 11.6 ± 0.0 PE P Cirsium muticum Swamp Thistle S2S3 3 Sensitive 40 15.2 ± 5.0 PE Petasites frigidus var. PE P palmatus Northern Sweet Coltsfoot S2S3 3 Sensitive 53 18.4 ± 4.0 P Petasites frigidus Northern Sweet Coltsfoot S2S3 3 Sensitive 11 38.9 ± 0.0 PE P Eurybia macrophylla Large-leaved Aster S2S3 3 Sensitive 87 2.9 ± 0.0 PE P Betula cordifolia Heart-leaved Birch S2S3 5 Undetermined 34 21.9 ± 6.0 PE P Honckenya peploides Seabeach Sandwort S2S3 3 Sensitive 3 10.1 ± 0.0 PE Honckenya peploides ssp. PE P robusta Seabeach Sandwort S2S3 3 Sensitive 41 0.8 ± 0.0 P Stellaria alsine Trailing Stitchwort S2S3 3 Sensitive 22 1.7 ± 0.0 PE P Suaeda calceoliformis Horned Sea-blite S2S3 5 Undetermined 30 1.5 ± 0.0 PE P Persicaria punctata Dotted Smartweed S2S3 3 Sensitive 55 14.7 ± 0.0 PE P Polygonum ramosissimum Bushy Knotweed S2S3 3 Sensitive 24 2.5 ± 0.0 PE P Clematis virginiana Virginia Clematis S2S3 3 Sensitive 196 9.2 ± 5.0 PE P Geum canadense White Avens S2S3 3 Sensitive 69 0.6 ± 0.0 PE P Geum macrophyllum Large-Leaved Avens S2S3 4 Secure 53 2.4 ± 0.0 PE P Rosa carolina Carolina Rose S2S3 3 Sensitive 29 0.4 ± 0.0 PE P Populus balsamifera Balsam Poplar S2S3 3 Sensitive 46 15.6 ± 20.0 PE P Limosella australis Southern Mudwort S2S3 3 Sensitive 52 3.7 ± 0.0 PE P Carex aurea Golden Sedge S2S3 3 Sensitive 14 18.0 ± 5.0 PE P Carex mackenziei Mackenzie's Sedge S2S3 2 May Be At Risk 52 18.0 ± 0.0 PE Carex tonsa var. PE P rugosperma Deep Green Sedge S2S3 3 Sensitive 35 18.0 ± 0.0 P Carex stricta Tussock Sedge S2S3 2 May Be At Risk 74 28.0 ± 0.0 PE P Carex billingsii Billings' Sedge S2S3 3 Sensitive 41 36.3 ± 0.0 PE P Carex utriculata Northern Beaked Sedge S2S3 3 Sensitive 39 4.1 ± 0.0 PE P Carex vulpinoidea Fox Sedge S2S3 3 Sensitive 57 19.9 ± 5.0 PE P Eleocharis acicularis Needle Spikerush S2S3 3 Sensitive 26 38.5 ± 0.0 PE P Iris hookeri Hooker's Iris S2S3 5 Undetermined 9 18.6 ± 1.0 PE P Juncus alpinoarticulatus Northern Green Rush S2S3 4 Secure 1 77.1 ± 0.0 PE Juncus alpinoarticulatus ssp. PE P americanus Northern Green Rush S2S3 4 Secure 17 17.5 ± 4.0 P Lemna trisulca Star Duckweed S2S3 3 Sensitive 37 3.7 ± 0.0 PE P Liparis loeselii Loesel's Twayblade S2S3 2 May Be At Risk 71 15.4 ± 20.0 PE P Platanthera aquilonis Tall Northern Green Orchid S2S3 3 Sensitive 68 29.9 ± 1.0 PE P Calamagrostis stricta Slim-stemmed Reed Grass S2S3 3 Sensitive 32 15.4 ± 20.0 PE Calamagrostis stricta ssp. PE P stricta Slim-stemmed Reed Grass S2S3 3 Sensitive 36 3.8 ± 0.0 P Distichlis spicata Salt Grass S2S3 4 Secure 70 1.6 ± 0.0 PE P Glyceria borealis Northern Manna Grass S2S3 3 Sensitive 96 6.8 ± 0.0 PE P Diphasiastrum complanatum Northern Ground-cedar S2S3 3 Sensitive 21 28.2 ± 5.0 PE P Dendrolycopodium hickeyi Hickey's Tree-clubmoss S2S3 2 May Be At Risk 41 43.5 ± 0.0 PE P Lycopodium lagopus One-cone clubmoss S2S3 3 Sensitive 12 49.3 ± 0.0 PE P Hydrocotyle americana American Marsh Pennywort S3 3 Sensitive 49 14.5 ± 5.0 PE P Sanicula marilandica Maryland Sanicle S3 4 Secure 66 15.0 ± 5.0 PE P Bidens connata Purple-stemmed Beggarticks S3 3 Sensitive 134 18.0 ± 0.0 PE P Eupatorium perfoliatum Common Boneset S3 3 Sensitive 99 25.7 ± 5.0 PE P Lactuca canadensis Canada Lettuce S3 3 Sensitive 69 0.6 ± 0.0 PE P Xanthium strumarium Rough Cocklebur S3 4 Secure 40 14.6 ± 0.0 PE P Eurybia radula Low Rough Aster S3 3 Sensitive 107 35.9 ± 0.0 PE

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 20 of 26

Taxonomic Group Scientific Name Common Name COSEWIC SARA Prov Legal Prot Prov Rarity Rank Prov GS Rank # recs Distance (km) Prov P Rorippa palustris Bog Yellowcress S3 5 Undetermined 31 3.9 ± 0.0 PE Rorippa palustris ssp. PE P palustris Bog Yellowcress S3 5 Undetermined 7 30.4 ± 0.0 P Stellaria borealis Boreal Stitchwort S3 2 May Be At Risk 38 9.4 ± 5.0 PE P Hudsonia tomentosa Woolly Beach-heath S3 4 Secure 163 13.7 ± 0.0 PE P Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Common Bearberry S3 3 Sensitive 28 15.4 ± 20.0 PE P Vaccinium vitis-idaea Mountain Cranberry S3 4 Secure 23 15.6 ± 20.0 PE P Hypopitys monotropa Pinesap S3 4 Secure 62 0.6 ± 0.0 PE P Epifagus virginiana Beechdrops S3 3 Sensitive 27 13.8 ± 3.0 PE P Rumex fueginus Tierra del Fuego Dock S3 3 Sensitive 83 3.7 ± 0.0 PE P Ranunculus gmelinii Gmelin's Water Buttercup S3 3 Sensitive 52 27.7 ± 0.0 PE P Comandra umbellata Bastard's Toadflax S3 3 Sensitive 53 1.7 ± 0.0 PE P Ulmus americana White Elm S3 3 Sensitive 264 0.8 ± 0.0 PE P Viola renifolia Kidney-leaved White Violet S3 4 Secure 46 30.8 ± 3.0 PE P Viola labradorica Labrador Violet S3 3 Sensitive 47 47.4 ± 0.0 PE P Tsuga canadensis Eastern Hemlock S3 4 Secure 113 10.6 ± 0.0 PE P Carex bebbii Bebb's Sedge S3 3 Sensitive 53 27.3 ± 0.0 PE P Carex viridula Greenish Sedge S3 4 Secure 19 18.9 ± 1.0 PE P Carex viridula var. viridula Greenish Sedge S3 4 Secure 1 30.7 ± 0.0 PE P Carex tonsa Deep Green Sedge S3 3 Sensitive 48 4.4 ± 0.0 PE P Eleocharis parvula Dwarf Spikerush S3 3 Sensitive 102 2.8 ± 0.0 PE P Triglochin gaspensis Gasp├⌐ Arrowgrass S3 3 Sensitive 23 18.2 ± 0.0 PE P Juncus canadensis Canada Rush S3 3 Sensitive 110 36.1 ± 0.0 PE P Juncus filiformis Thread Rush S3 3 Sensitive 45 19.3 ± 0.0 PE P Maianthemum stellatum Starry False Solomon's Seal S3 4 Secure 142 2.9 ± 0.0 PE P Calopogon tuberosus Tuberous Grass Pink S3 4 Secure 55 15.6 ± 20.0 PE P Malaxis unifolia Green Adder's-Mouth S3 3 Sensitive 30 15.6 ± 20.0 PE P Platanthera clavellata Club Spur Orchid S3 3 Sensitive 138 22.9 ± 10.0 PE P Platanthera dilatata White Bog Orchid S3 3 Sensitive 43 3.5 ± 5.0 PE P Spiranthes romanzoffiana Hooded Ladies'-Tresses S3 3 Sensitive 24 10.1 ± 5.0 PE P Agrostis perennans Upland Bent Grass S3 3 Sensitive 37 1.2 ± 0.0 PE P Deparia acrostichoides Silvery Glade Fern S3 3 Sensitive 42 1.8 ± 0.0 PE P Polystichum acrostichoides Christmas Fern S3 4 Secure 95 3.7 ± 0.0 PE P Diphasiastrum tristachyum Blue Ground-cedar S3 3 Sensitive 29 4.7 ± 0.0 PE P Lycopodiella inundata Northern Bog Clubmoss S3 4 Secure 38 17.9 ± 5.0 PE P Botrypus virginianus Rattlesnake Fern S3 4 Secure 47 14.6 ± 5.0 PE Osmunda regalis var. PE P spectabilis Royal Fern S3 4 Secure 192 3.7 ± 0.0 Antennaria howellii ssp. PE P petaloidea Pussy-Toes S3? 4 Secure 8 14.3 ± 5.0 P Rubus setosus Bristly Blackberry S3? 3 Sensitive 65 33.5 ± 6.0 PE Phragmites australis ssp. PE P americanus American Common Reed S3? 4 Secure 78 3.3 ± 5.0 P Solidago flexicaulis Zigzag Goldenrod S3S4 3 Sensitive 132 6.9 ± 0.0 PE P Geranium robertianum Herb Robert S3S4 4 Secure 98 3.6 ± 0.0 PE P Ribes triste Swamp Red Currant S3S4 4 Secure 254 1.4 ± 0.0 PE P Moneses uniflora One-flowered Wintergreen S3S4 4 Secure 65 2.3 ± 0.0 PE P Endotropis alnifolia alder-leaved buckthorn S3S4 4 Secure 367 4.2 ± 0.0 PE P Amelanchier laevis Smooth Serviceberry S3S4 5 Undetermined 49 2.5 ± 0.0 PE P Crataegus succulenta Fleshy Hawthorn S3S4 5 Undetermined 7 19.4 ± 5.0 PE P Veronica scutellata Marsh Speedwell S3S4 4 Secure 62 17.9 ± 0.0 PE P Juniperus communis Common Juniper S3S4 4 Secure 28 4.9 ± 0.0 PE Juniperus communis var. PE P depressa Common Juniper S3S4 5 Undetermined 22 18.0 ± 5.0 P Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar S3S4 3 Sensitive 1228 14.7 ± 0.0 PE P Acorus americanus American Sweetflag S3S4 4 Secure 74 3.8 ± 0.0 PE P Carex lacustris Lake Sedge S3S4 3 Sensitive 99 8.6 ± 5.0 PE P Carex pallescens Pale Sedge S3S4 4 Secure 55 1.6 ± 0.0 PE

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 21 of 26

Taxonomic Group Scientific Name Common Name COSEWIC SARA Prov Legal Prot Prov Rarity Rank Prov GS Rank # recs Distance (km) Prov P Eleocharis obtusa Blunt Spikerush S3S4 4 Secure 73 3.7 ± 0.0 PE P Juncus nodosus Knotted Rush S3S4 4 Secure 66 20.9 ± 0.0 PE P Juncus pelocarpus Brown-Fruited Rush S3S4 4 Secure 70 18.8 ± 3.0 PE P Spirodela polyrhiza great duckweed S3S4 4 Secure 76 26.3 ± 0.0 PE P Potamogeton foliosus Leafy Pondweed S3S4 3 Sensitive 17 27.2 ± 0.0 PE Potamogeton foliosus ssp. PE P foliosus Leafy Pondweed S3S4 3 Sensitive 4 41.3 ± 1.0 P Lactuca hirsuta Hairy Lettuce SH 0.1 Extirpated 2 37.1 ± 5.0 PE P Packera paupercula Balsam Groundsel SH 0.1 Extirpated 1 29.0 ± 5.0 PE P Stellaria crassifolia Fleshy Stitchwort SH 2 May Be At Risk 5 29.0 ± 5.0 PE P Myriophyllum verticillatum Whorled Water Milfoil SH 0.1 Extirpated 9 70.3 ± 5.0 PE P Montia fontana Water Blinks SH 0.1 Extirpated 2 27.0 ± 5.0 PE P Pyrola minor Lesser Pyrola SH 0.1 Extirpated 4 15.0 ± 5.0 PE P Piptatheropsis canadensis Canada Ricegrass SH 2 May Be At Risk 1 53.8 ± 5.0 PE

5.1 SOURCE BIBLIOGRAPHY (100 km) The recipient of these data shall acknowledge the AC CDC and the data sources listed below in any documents, reports, publications or presentations, in which this dataset makes a significant contribution.

# recs CITATION 15817 Morrison, Guy. 2011. Maritime Shorebird Survey (MSS) database. Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa, 15939 surveys. 86171 recs. 7301 Lepage, D. 2014. Maritime Breeding Bird Atlas Database. Bird Studies Canada, Sackville NB, 407,838 recs. 6377 Paquet, Julie. 2018. Atlantic Canada Shorebird Survey (ACSS) database 2012-2018. Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service. 3548 Erskine, A.J. 1992. Maritime Breeding Bird Atlas Database. NS Museum & Nimbus Publ., Halifax, 82,125 recs. 2152 eBird. 2014. eBird Basic Dataset. Version: EBD_relNov-2014. Ithaca, New York. Nov 2014. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, 25036 recs. 1377 Berrigan, L. 2019. Maritimes Marsh Monitoring Project 2013, 2014, 2016, 2017, and 2018 data. Bird Studies Canada, Sackville, NB. 1374 Blaney, C.S.; Mazerolle, D.M.; Belliveau, A.B. 2015. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre Fieldwork 2015. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre, # recs. 1037 Patrick, A.; Horne, D.; Noseworthy, J. et. al. 2017. Field data for Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, 2015 and 2017. Nature Conservancy of Canada. 1030 Amirault, D.L. & Stewart, J. 2007. Piping Plover Database 1894-2006. Canadian Wildlife Service, Sackville, 3344 recs, 1228 new. Catling, P.M., Erskine, D.S. & MacLaren, R.B. 1985. The Plants of Prince Edward Island with new records, nomenclatural changes & corrections & deletions, 1st Ed. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, 957 Publication 1798. 22pp. 751 MacDonald, M. 2008. PEI Power Corridor Floral Surveys, 2004-08. Jacques Whitford Ltd, 2238 recs (979 rare). 627 Blaney, C.S.; Mazerolle, D.M. 2008. Fieldwork 2008. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. Sackville NB, 13343 recs. 616 Blaney, C.S. 2016. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre Fieldwork 2016. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre, 6719 recs. 538 Brunelle, P.-M. (compiler). 2009. ADIP/MDDS Odonata Database: data to 2006 inclusive. Atlantic Dragonfly Inventory Program (ADIP), 24200 recs. Pardieck, K.L. & Ziolkowski Jr., D.J.; Hudson, M.-A.R. 2014. North American Breeding Bird Survey Dataset 1966 - 2013, version 2013.0. U.S. Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center 535 . 524 Blaney, C.S. 2017. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre Fieldwork 2017. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. 514 Blaney, C.S.; Spicer, C.D.; Mazerolle, D.M. 2005. Fieldwork 2005. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. Sackville NB, 2333 recs. 465 Blaney, C.S. 2018. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre Fieldwork 2018. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. 441 Blaney, C.S.; Mazerolle, D.M.; Belliveau, A.B. 2013. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre Fieldwork 2013. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre, 9000+ recs. 441 Wilhelm, S.I. et al. 2011. Colonial Waterbird Database. Canadian Wildlife Service, Sackville, 2698 sites, 9718 recs (8192 obs). 439 Mazerolle, D.M. 2017. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre Fieldwork 2017. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. 438 Belliveau, A.G. 2018. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre Fieldwork 2017. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. 429 Chapman, C.J. 2018. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre botanical fieldwork 2018. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre, 11171 recs. 417 Blaney, C.S.; Mazerolle, D.M. 2012. Fieldwork 2012. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre, 13,278 recs. 386 Blaney, C.S. 2003. Fieldwork 2003. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. Sackville NB, 1042 recs. 356 Belliveau, A.G. 2016. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre Fieldwork 2016. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre, 10695 recs. 346 Sharkie, R., MacQuarrie, K., Fraser, M. 2003. A Floral Inventory of the Western Section of Prince Edward Island National Park and adjacent Crown lands. Parks Canada Agency, v + 106 pp. 332 Blaney, C.S.; Mazerolle, D.M.; Klymko, J; Spicer, C.D. 2006. Fieldwork 2006. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. Sackville NB, 8399 recs. 316 Mazerolle, D.M. 2018. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre botanical fieldwork 2018. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre, 13515 recs. 284 Blaney, C.S.; Mazerolle, D.M. 2010. Fieldwork 2010. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. Sackville NB, 15508 recs. 268 Tranquilla, L. 2015. Maritimes Marsh Monitoring Project 2015 data. Bird Studies Canada, Sackville NB, 5062 recs. 259 Erskine, D. 1960. The plants of Prince Edward Island, 1st Ed. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa., Publication 1088. 1238 recs. 258 Blaney, C.S. & Mazerolle, D.M. 2011. Field data from NCC properties at Musquash Harbour NB & Goose Lake NS. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre, 1739 recs.

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 22 of 26

# recs CITATION 247 Blaney, C.S.; Mazerolle, D.M.; Oberndorfer, E. 2007. Fieldwork 2007. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. Sackville NB, 13770 recs. 245 Klymko, J. 2018. Maritimes Butterfly Atlas database. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. 245 MacDonald, E.C. 2018. Piping Plover nest records from 2010-2017. Canadian Wildlife Service. 243 Island Nature Trust. 2016. Farmland birds project. Mader, Shannon (ed.) . 231 Blaney, C.S.; Spicer, C.D.; Rothfels, C. 2004. Fieldwork 2004. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. Sackville NB, 1343 recs. 199 Blaney, C.S.; Spicer, C.D. 2001. Fieldwork 2001. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. Sackville NB, 981 recs. 195 MacDonald, E.C. 2018. CWS Piping Plover Census, 2010-2017. Canadian Wildlife Service. 188 Blaney, C.S. 2000. Fieldwork 2000. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. Sackville NB, 1265 recs. 184 Mazerolle, D.M. 2016. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre Fieldwork 2017. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. 169 Amirault, D.L. & McKnight, J. 2003. Piping Plover Database 1991-2003. Canadian Wildlife Service, Sackville, unpublished data. 7 recs. 168 Churchill, J.L.; Klymko, J.D. 2015. Chignecto and Tintamarre National Wildlife Area Bird Surveys 2015. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre, 2238 recs. 161 Ayles, P. 2006. Prince Edward Island National Park Digital Database. Parks Canada, 179 recs. 161 Curley, F.R. 2005. PEF&W Collection 2003-04. PEI Fish & Wildlife Div., 716 recs. 144 Arsenault, M. 2019. Cormorant colony nest counts. PE Department of Communities, Land, and Environment. 137 Glen, W. 1991. 1991 Prince Edward Island Forest Biomass Inventory Data. PEI Dept of Energy and Forestry, 10059 recs. 136 Blaney, C.S.; Spicer, C.D.; Popma, T.M.; Hanel, C. 2002. Fieldwork 2002. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. Sackville NB, 2252 recs. 135 Burns, L. 2013. Personal communication concerning bat occurrence on PEI. Winter 2013. Pers. comm. 135 Neily, T.H. 2017. Maritmes Lichen and Bryophyte records. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre, 1015 recs. 130 Blaney, C.S & Spicer, C.D.; Popma, T.M.; Basquill, S.P. 2003. Vascular Plant Surveys of Northumberland Strait Rivers & Amherst Area Peatlands. Nova Scotia Museum Research Grant, 501 recs. 109 Blaney, C.S.; Mazerolle, D.M.; Belliveau, A.B. 2014. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre Fieldwork 2014. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre, # recs. 109 Canadian Wildlife Service, Dartmouth. 2010. Piping Plover censuses 2007-09, 304 recs. 89 Blaney, C.S.; Mazerolle, D.M. 2011. Fieldwork 2011. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. Sackville NB. 87 Hicks, Andrew. 2009. Coastal Waterfowl Surveys Database, 2000-08. Canadian Wildlife Service, Sackville, 46488 recs (11149 non-zero). 87 Klymko, J. 2016. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre Fieldwork 2016. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. 84 Belland, R.J. 2012. PEI moss records from Devonian Botanical Garden. DBG Cryptogam Database, Web site: https://secure.devonian.ualberta.ca/bryo_search.php 748 recs. 82 Tims, J. & Craig, N. 1995. Environmentally Significant Areas in New Brunswick (NBESA). NB Dept of Environment & Nature Trust of New Brunswick Inc, 6042 recs. 80 Benjamin, L.K. (compiler). 2007. Significant Habitat & Species Database. Nova Scotia Dept Natural Resources, 8439 recs. 78 Spicer, C.D. & Harries, H. 2001. Mount Allison Herbarium Specimens. Mount Allison University, 128 recs. 72 Newell, R.E. 2000. E.C. Smith Herbarium Database. Acadia University, Wolfville NS, 7139 recs. MacQuarrie, K.E., H. Schaefer, and K. Schoenrank. 1999. A Floral inventory of the Western Area, Greenwich, Prince Edward Island National Park. Parks Canada Agency, Parks Canada Technical Reports in 67 Ecosystem Science, No 021. 65 iNaturalist. 2018. iNaturalist Data Export 2018. iNaturalist.org and iNaturalist.ca, Web site: 11706 recs. 63 Walker, J. 2017. Bird inventories at French River, NS, and Memramcook, NB, for Nature Conservancy of Canada. Pers. comm. to AC CDC. McMullin, R.T. 2015. Prince Edward Island's lichen biodiversity and proposed conservation status in a report prepared for the province of PEI. Biodiversity Institute of Ontario Herbarium, University of Guelph, 776 62 records. 60 Munro, Marian K. Nova Scotia Provincial Museum of Natural History Herbarium Database. Nova Scotia Provincial Museum of Natural History, Halifax, Nova Scotia. 2013. 58 Mazerolle, D.M. 2005. Bouctouche Irving Eco-Centre rare coastal plant fieldwork results 2004-05. Irving Eco-centre, la Dune du Bouctouche, 174 recs. 57 Neily, T. H. 2018. Lichen and Bryophyte records, AEI 2017-2018. Tom Neily; Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. 51 Doucet, D.A. 2007. Lepidopteran Records, 1988-2006. Doucet, 700 recs. 49 e-Butterfly. 2016. Export of Maritimes records and photos. Maxim Larrivee, Sambo Zhang (ed.) e-butterfly.org. 49 MacQuarrie, K. 1991-1999. Site survey files, maps. Island Nature Trust, Charlottetown PE, 60 recs. 48 Nussey, Pat & NCC staff. 2019. AEI tracked species records, 2016-2019. Chapman, C.J. (ed.) Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre, 333. 46 Grandtner, M.M. 1971. Ecological Study of the Interior Dunes of West Brackley Beach, Prince Edward Island National Park. Parks Canada, 1: 70. 41 recs. 44 Klymko, J.J.D. 2016. 2015 field data. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. 44 LaPaix, R.W.; Crowell, M.J.; MacDonald, M.; Neily, T.D.; Quinn, G. 2017. Stantec Nova Scotia rare plant records, 2012-2016. Stantec Consulting. 41 Roland, A.E. & Smith, E.C. 1969. The Flora of Nova Scotia, 1st Ed. Nova Scotia Museum, Halifax, 743pp. 34 Churchill, J.L., Klymko, J.D.D. 2016. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre Fieldwork 2016. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. 34 Newell, R.E. 2005. E.C. Smith Digital Herbarium. E.C. Smith Herbarium, Irving Biodiversity Collection, Acadia University, Web site: http://luxor.acadiau.ca/library/Herbarium/project/. 582 recs. 34 Scott, F.W. 2002. Nova Scotia Herpetofauna Atlas Database. Acadia University, Wolfville NS, 8856 recs. 33 Basquill, S.P. 2010. Plant data from Prince Edward Island National Park Forest Community Plots. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre, 150 records. 32 Benedict, B. Connell Herbarium Specimens. University New Brunswick, Fredericton. 2003. MacQuarrie, K.E., H. Schaefer, and K. Schoenrank. 2001. A Floral inventory of the Central and Schooner Pond Areas of Greenwich, Prince Edward Island National Park. Parks Canada Agency, Parks Canada Technical 32 Reports in Ecosystem Science, No 030. 31 Godbout, V. 2002. SAR Inventory: Birds in Fort Beauséjour NHS. Parks Canada, Atlantic, SARINV02-01. 202 recs. 30 Kelly, Glen 2004. Botanical records from 2004 PEI Forestry fieldwork. Dept of Environment, Energy & Forestry, 71 recs. 30 Spicer, C.D. 2002. Fieldwork 2002. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. Sackville NB, 211 recs. 30 Stevens, C. 1999. Cam Stevens field data from PEI vegetation plots. Sent along with specimens to C.S. Blaney. UNB masters research project, 732 recs. 30 Wilhelm, S.I. et al. 2019. Colonial Waterbird Database. Canadian Wildlife Service. 28 Gagnon, J. 2004. Specimen data from 2002 visit to Prince Edward Island. , 104 recs.

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 23 of 26

# recs CITATION 26 Benedict, B. Connell Herbarium Specimens (Data) . University New Brunswick, Fredericton. 2003. 25 Sollows, M.C,. 2008. NBM Science Collections databases: mammals. New Brunswick Museum, Saint John NB, download Jan. 2008, 4983 recs. 25 Spicer, C.D. 2004. Specimens from CWS Herbarium, Mount Allison Herbarium Database. Mount Allison University, 5939 recs. 24 Chiasson, R. 2018. Breeding bird observations from NBWTF project. pers. comm. to S. Blaney. 23 Blaney, C.S.; Mazerolle, D.M. 2009. Fieldwork 2009. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. Sackville NB, 13395 recs. 23 Clayden, S.R. 1998. NBM Science Collections databases: vascular plants. New Brunswick Museum, Saint John NB, 19759 recs. 23 Erskine, A.J. 1999. Maritime Nest Records Scheme (MNRS) 1937-1999. Canadian Wildlife Service, Sackville, 313 recs. 22 Clayden, S.R. 2007. NBM Science Collections databases: vascular plants. New Brunswick Museum, Saint John NB, download Mar. 2007, 6914 recs. 22 Popma, T.M. 2003. Fieldwork 2003. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. Sackville NB, 113 recs. 21 Canadian Wildlife Service, Atlantic Region. 2010. Piping Plover censuses 2006-09. , 35 recs. 21 Donell, R. 2008. Rare plant records from rare coastal plant project. Bouctouche Dune Irving Eco-centre. Pers. comm. to D.M. Mazerolle, 50 recs. 21 Harris, P. 2004. Plant records from 1997-2003. Island Nature Trust, Charlottetown PE, 71 recs. 21 Morrison, Annie. 2010. NCC Properties Fieldwork: June-August 2010. Nature Conservancy Canada, 508 recs. 21 Staicer, C. & Bliss, S.; Achenbach, L. 2017. Occurrences of tracked breeding birds in forested wetlands. , 303 records. 19 Belland, R.J. Maritimes moss records from various herbarium databases. 2014. 19 NatureServe Canada. 2018. iNaturalist Butterfly Data Export . iNaturalist.org and iNaturalist.ca. 19 Plissner, J.H. & Haig, S.M. 1997. 1996 International piping plover census. US Geological Survey, Corvallis OR, 231 pp. 18 Benedict, B. Connell Herbarium Specimen Database Download 2004. Connell Memorial Herbarium, University of New Brunswick. 2004. 18 Curley, F.R. 2007. PEF&W Collection. PEI Fish & Wildlife Div., 199 recs. 17 Klymko, J.J.D. 2012. Insect fieldwork & submissions, 2011. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. Sackville NB, 760 recs. 16 Hinds, H.R. 1986. Notes on New Brunswick plant collections. Connell Memorial Herbarium, unpubl, 739 recs. 16 Robinson, S.L. 2010. Fieldwork 2009 (dune ecology). Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. Sackville NB, 408 recs. 15 Giberson, D. 2008. UPEI Insect Collection. University of Prince Edward Island, 157 recs. 15 Klymko, J. Dataset of butterfly records at the New Brunswick Museum not yet accessioned by the museum. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. 2016. 15 Neily, T.H. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre botanical fieldwork 2018. T.H. Neily, Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. 15 Speers, L. 2001. Butterflies of Canada database. Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Biological Resources Program, Ottawa, 190 recs. 14 Bryson, I. 2013. Nova Scotia rare plant records. CBCL Ltd., 180 records. 14 Zahavich, J. 2018. Canada Warbler and Olive-sided Flycatcher records 2018. Island Nature Trust, 14 recs. 13 Hall, R.A. 2001. S.. NS Freshwater Mussel Fieldwork. Nova Scotia Dept Natural Resources, 178 recs. 13 Hall, R.A. 2003. NS Freshwater Mussel Fieldwork. Nova Scotia Dept Natural Resources, 189 recs. 13 Harding, R.W. 2008. Harding Personal Insect Collection 1999-2007. R.W. Harding, 309 recs. 13 Klymko, J.J.D.; Robinson, S.L. 2014. 2013 field data. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. 13 MacArthur, M.E.L. 1976. An Ecological Study of the Greenwich Sand Dune System, M.Sc. Thesis. Department of Biology, Acadia University, Wolfville NS, 98 recs. 12 Benjamin, L.K. (compiler). 2012. Significant Habitat & Species Database. Nova Scotia Dept Natural Resources, 4965 recs. 12 Doucet, D.A. 2009. Census of Globally Rare, Endemic Butterflies of Nova Scotia Gulf of St Lawrence Salt Marshes. Nova Scotia Dept of Natural Resources, Species at Risk, 155 recs. 12 Klymko, J. 2019. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre zoological fieldwork 2018. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. 12 Toms, B. 2018. Bat Species data from www.batconservation.ca for Nova Scotia. Mersey Tobeatic Research Institute, 547 Records. 12 Webster, R.P. & Edsall, J. 2007. 2005 New Brunswick Rare Butterfly Survey. Environmental Trust Fund, unpublished report, 232 recs. 11 Blaney, C.S. Miscellaneous specimens received by ACCDC (botany). Various persons. 2001-08. 11 Dibblee, R.L. 1999. PEI Cormorant Survey. Prince Edward Island Fisheries, Aquaculture & Environment, 1p. 21 recs. 11 Kelly, G. 2005. Fraxinus nigra. Dept of Agricuture, Fisheries, Aquaculture & Forestry. Pers. comm. to C.S. Blaney, Mar. 2, 11 recs. 11 Prince Edward Island National Park. 2014. Prince Edward Island National Park Herbarium. Parks Canada Agency, PEINP, 39 recs. 10 Belland, R.J. 2012. PEI moss records from New York Botanical Garden. NYBG Virtual Herbarium, Web site: http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/vii2.asp 135 recs. 10 Layberry, R.A. 2012. Lepidopteran records for the Maritimes, 1974-2008. Layberry Collection, 1060 recs. 10 Munro, Marian K. Nova Scotia Provincial Museum of Natural History Herbarium Database. Nova Scotia Provincial Museum of Natural History, Halifax, Nova Scotia. 2014. 10 Sabine, D.L. 2013. Dwaine Sabine butterfly records, 2009 and earlier. 10 Smith, M.E.M. 2008. AgCan Collection. Agriculture Canada, Charlottetown PE, 44 recs. 10 Tingley, S. (compiler). 2001. Butterflies of New Brunswick. , Web site: www.geocities.com/Yosemite/8425/buttrfly. 142 recs. 9 Guignion, M; Ristau, C.; Lemon, D. 1995. The distribution & abundance of the Gulf of St. Lawrence Aster, Aster laurentianus in Prince Edward Island National Park. Can. Field-Nat, 109:462-464. 10 recs. 9 Pronych, G. & Wilson, A. 1993. Atlas of Rare Vascular Plants in Nova Scotia. Nova Scotia Museum, Halifax NS, I:1-168, II:169-331. 1446 recs. 8 Amirault, D.L. 1997-2000. Unpublished files. Canadian Wildlife Service, Sackville, 470 recs. 8 Hinds, H.R. 1997. Vascular Plants of Cocagne Island. Connell Herbarium, UNB, 267 recs. 8 Manthorne, A. 2014. MaritimesSwiftwatch Project database 2013-2014. Bird Studies Canada, Sackville NB, 326 recs. 8 Ogden, J. NS DNR Butterfly Collection Dataset. Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources. 2014. 7 Daury, R.W. & Bateman, M.C. 1996. The Barrow's Goldeneye (Bucephala islandica) in the Atlantic Provinces and Maine. Canadian Wildlife Service, Sackville, 47pp. 7 Edsall, J. 2001. Lepidopteran records in New Brunswick, 1997-99. , Pers. comm. to K.A. Bredin. 91 recs. 7 Gagnon, J. 2003. Prince Edward Island plant records. Societe de la faune et des parcs Quebec, 13 recs. 7 Klymko, J.J.D. 2018. 2017 field data. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. 6 Hinds, H.R. 1989. Greenwich, Blooming Point plant collections in Plant locations. Pers. Comm. to Robin Day (Ag. Can). 2pp, 8 recs, 8 recs.

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 24 of 26

# recs CITATION 6 Majka, C.G. 2008. Lepidoptera at St Patricks, 1993-2007. Pers. comm. to R. Curley, 8 Jan. 29 recs, 29 recs. 6 Mazerolle, D. 2003. Assessment of Seaside Pinweed (Lechea maritima var. subcylindrica) in Southeastern New Brunswick. Irving Eco-centre, la Dune du Bouctouche, 18 recs. 6 NS DNR. 2017. Black Ash records from NS DNR Permanent Sample Plots (PSPs), 1965-2016. NS Dept of Natural Resources. 6 Parks Canada. 2010. Specimens in or near National Parks in Atlantic Canada. Canadian National Museum, 3925 recs. 6 Phinney, Lori; Toms, Brad; et. al. 2016. Bank Swallows (Riparia riparia) in Nova Scotia: inventory and assessment of colonies. Merset Tobeiatc Research Institute, 25 recs. 6 Zinck, M. & Roland, A.E. 1998. Roland's Flora of Nova Scotia. Nova Scotia Museum, 3rd ed., rev. M. Zinck; 2 Vol., 1297 pp. 5 Boyne, A.W. & Grecian, V.D. 1999. Tern Surveys. Canadian Wildlife Service, Sackville, unpublished data. 23 recs. 5 Chaput, G. 2002. Atlantic Salmon: Maritime Provinces Overview for 2001. Dept of Fisheries & Oceans, Atlantic Region, Science Stock Status Report D3-14. 39 recs. 5 Downes, C. 1998-2000. Breeding Bird Survey Data. Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa, 111 recs. 5 e-Butterfly. 2018. Selected Maritimes butterfly records from 2016 and 2017. Maxim Larrivee, Sambo Zhang (ed.) e-butterfly.org. 5 Kelly, G. 2007. Ostrya virginana observation records. PEI Dept of Environment, Energy and Forestry, Pers. comm. to C.S. Blaney, Jan. 2007. 5 recs. 5 MacQuarrie, K. and R. Sharkie. 2004. Plant lists for selected areas at Brackley and Dalvay, Prince Edward Island National Park. Island Nature Trust, 168 recs. 5 Mazerolle, D. 2003. Assessment and Rehabilitation of the Gulf of St Lawrence Aster (Symphyotrichum laurentianum) in Southeastern New Brunswick. Irving Eco-centre, la Dune du Bouctouche, 13 recs. 5 Zahavich, J. 2017. Canada Warbler and Olive-sided Flycatcher records 2017. Island Nature Trust, 14 recs. 4 Basquill, S.P. 2003. Fieldwork 2003. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre, Sackville NB, 69 recs. 4 Bateman, M.C. 2001. Coastal Waterfowl Surveys Database, 1965-2001. Canadian Wildlife Service, Sackville, 667 recs. 4 Cameron, R.P. 2013. 2013 rare species field data. Nova Scotia Department of Environment, 71 recs. 4 Ferguson, D.C. 1954. The Lepidoptera of Nova Scotia. Part I, macrolepidoptera. Proceedings of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science, 23(3), 161-375. 4 Harding, R.W. 2012. Pickerel Frog observations 2004-12. Pers. comm. to J. Klymko, Sep. 6, 4 recs, photos. 4 Honeyman, K. 2019. Unique Areas Database, 2018. J.D. Irving Ltd. 4 Neily, T.H. Tom Neily NS Sphagnum records (2009-2014). T.H. Neily, Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. 2019. 4 O'Neil, S. 1998. Atlantic Salmon: Northumberland Strait Nova Scotia part of SFA 18. Dept of Fisheries & Oceans, Atlantic Region, Science. Stock Status Report D3-08. 9 recs. 4 Oldham, M.J. 2000. Oldham database records from Maritime provinces. Oldham, M.J; ONHIC, 487 recs. 4 Sollows, M.C. 2008. NBM Science Collections databases: herpetiles. New Brunswick Museum, Saint John NB, download Jan. 2008, 8636 recs. 3 Amirault, D.L. 2000. Piping Plover Surveys, 1983-2000. Canadian Wildlife Service, Sackville, unpublished data. 70 recs. 3 Archibald, D.R. 2003. NS Freshwater Mussel Fieldwork. Nova Scotia Dept Natural Resources, 213 recs. 3 Bateman, M.C. & Prescott, W.H. 1984. The Mammals of Prince Edward Island National Park. Canadian Wildife Service, vol 2:5. 3 recs. 3 Benjamin, L.K. 2009. Boreal Felt Lichen, Mountain Avens, Orchid and other recent records. Nova Scotia Dept Natural Resources, 105 recs. 3 Benjamin, L.K. 2012. NSDNR fieldwork & consultant reports 2008-2012. Nova Scotia Dept Natural Resources, 196 recs. 3 Edsall, J. 2007. Personal Butterfly Collection: specimens collected in the Canadian Maritimes, 1961-2007. J. Edsall, unpubl. report, 137 recs. 3 Freudenstein, John V. 1997. A Monograph of Corallorhiza (Orchidaceae). Harvard Papers in Botany, 1:5-51. 3 Giroux, P. 2013. Personal communication concerning species at risk in and around PEI NP, PE. Winter 2013. Pers. comm. 3 Goltz, J.P. 2012. Field Notes, 1989-2005. , 1091 recs. 3 Houle, F; Haber, E. 1990. Status of the Gulf of St. Lawrence Aster, Aster laurentianus (Asteraceae) in Canada. Can. Field-Nat, 104:455-459. 3 recs. 3 Klymko, J.J.D. 2011. Insect fieldwork & submissions, 2010. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. Sackville NB, 742 recs. 3 Layberry, R.A. & Hall, P.W., LaFontaine, J.D. 1998. The Butterflies of Canada. University of Toronto Press. 280 pp+plates. 3 Ogden, K. Nova Scotia Museum butterfly specimen database. Nova Scotia Museum. 2017. 3 Sollows, M.C,. 2009. NBM Science Collections databases: Coccinellid & Cerambycid Beetles. New Brunswick Museum, Saint John NB, download Feb. 2009, 569 recs. 3 Speers, L. 2008. Butterflies of Canada database: New Brunswick 1897-1999. Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Biological Resources Program, Ottawa, 2048 recs. 2 Basquill, S.P. 2009. 2009 field observations. Nova Scotia Dept of Natural Resources. 2 Basquill, S.P., Porter, C. 2019. Bryophyte and lichen specimens submitted to the E.C. Smith Herbarium. NS Department of Lands and Forestry. 2 Belliveau, A.G. 2014. Plant Records from Southern and Central Nova Scotia. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre, 919 recs. 2 Belliveau, A.G. 2018. E.C. Smith Herbarium and Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre Fieldwork 2018. E.C. Smith Herbarium, 6226 recs. 2 Benedict, B. Connell Herbarium Specimens. University New Brunswick, Fredericton. 2000. 2 Bishop, G. 2018. Elymus virginicus varieties, NBM & UNB. Bishop, G., 63 records. 2 Blaney, C.S. 1999. Fieldwork 1999. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. Sackville NB, 292 recs. 2 Cameron, A.W. 1958. Mammals in the Islands in the Gulf of St Lawrence. Natl. Mus. Can. Bull. , 154:1-165. 2 recs. 2 Cameron, R.P. 2014. 2013-14 rare species field data. Nova Scotia Department of Environment, 35 recs. 2 Churchill, J.L. 2018. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre Fieldwork 2018. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre, 907 recs. 2 Curley, F.R. 2003. Glen Kelly records for Betula pumila & Asclepias syriaca on PEI. , Pers. comm. to C.S. Blaney. 9 recs. 2 Curley, F.R. 2006. Slimy Sculpin observations in PE. , Pers. comm to C.S. Blaney, Jun. 26. 2 recs. 2 Curley, F.R. 2013. Bryoria observations in PE. PEI Dept Environment, Energy and Forestry, 27 records. 2 Curley, F.R. 2018. Two reports of Sorex hoyi from PEI. Pers. comm. 2 Duffy, L.-A. 2002. Prince Edward Island National Park Butterfly Survey. Heritage Protection, Prince Edward Island National Park. 2 Fernald, M.L. 1914. Some annual halophytic asters of the maritime provinces. Rhodora, 16:57-61. 2 recs. 2 Houle, F. & Haber, E. 1990. Status of the Gulf of St. Lawrence Aster, Aster laurentianus (Asteraceae) in Canada. Canadian Field-Naturalist, 104:455-459. 2 recs. 2 Klymko, J. Partial database of the Agriculture Canada Charlottetown Research Station Insect Collection butterfly specimens. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. 2016. 2 Lajeunesse, D. et al. 2002. PEINP Collection. Parks Canada, PEI National Park, 9 recs. 2 Macauley, M. 2008. Email to Sean Blaney regarding rich hardwood floodplain site at Howards Pool, Wallace River, NS.

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 25 of 26

# recs CITATION 2 MacKinnon, W. 2002. St Chrystosome Wildilfe Management Area: shorebird survey, small mammal trapping report, salamander monitoring. Dept of Environment, Energy & Forestry, 2 recs. 2 MacQuarrie, K. 2003. Field Observation Form. , 2pp. 2 Munro, Marian K. Tracked lichen specimens, Nova Scotia Provincial Museum of Natural History Herbarium. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. 2019. 2 Pike, E., Tingley, S. & Christie, D.S. 2000. Nature NB Listserve. University of New Brunswick, listserv.unb.ca/archives/naturenb. 68 recs. 2 Prince Edward Island National Park. 2010. Permanent sample plot ground vegetation data from 2007 & 2010. Parks Canada Agency, 3768 recs. 2 Richardson, D., Anderson, F., Cameron, R, Pepper, C., Clayden, S. 2015. Field Work Report on the Wrinkled Shingle lichen (Pannaria lurida). COSEWIC. 2 Sabine, D.L. 2012. Bronze Copper records, 2003-06. New Brunswick Dept of Natural Resources, 5 recs. 2 Sollows, M.C,. 2009. NBM Science Collections databases: molluscs. New Brunswick Museum, Saint John NB, download Jan. 2009, 6951 recs (2957 in Atlantic Canada). 2 Thomas, A.W. 1996. A preliminary atlas of the butterflies of New Brunswick. New Brunswick Museum. 2 Thomas, H.H., Jones, G.S. & Diblee, R.L. 1980. Sorex palustris on Prince Edward Island. Can. Field Nat., vol 94:329-331. 2 recs. 2 Zahavich, J.L. 2017. Locations of Round-leaved Orchid (Platanthera orbiculata) at Townshend Woodlot and Bird Island. Island Nature Trust, 2 records. 1 Amirault, D.L. 2003. 2003 Peregrine Falcon Survey. Canadian Wildlife Service, Sackville, unpublished data. 7 recs. 1 Belliveau, A.G. E.C. Smith Herbarium Specimen Database 2019. E.C. Smith Herbarium, Acadia University. 2019. 1 Benedict, B. 2003. Unmounted specimen of Polygonum ramosissimum for PEI. Connell Memorial Herbarium, University of New Brunswick, Pers. comm. to C.S. Blaney. 1 rec. 1 Benedict, B. Connell Herbarium Specimens, Digital photos. University New Brunswick, Fredericton. 2005. 1 Blaney, C.S. & Whittam, R.M. 2003. Botanical & freshwater mussel observations at Lake Killarney, Cumberland Co., NS - Sept. 27, 2003. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre, 3 recs. 1 Bouchard, A. Herbier Marie-Victorin. Universite de Montreal, Montreal QC. 1999. 1 Boyne, A.W. 2000. Tern Surveys. Canadian Wildlife Service, Sackville, unpublished data. 168 recs. 1 Bredin, K.A. 2002. NB Freshwater Mussel Fieldwork. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centere, 30 recs. 1 Cairns, D. 1998. Atlantic Salmon: Prince Edward Island SFA 17. Dept of Fisheries & Oceans, Atlantic Region, Science. Stock Status Report D3-07. 1 rec. 1 Cameron, R.P. 2012. Rob Cameron 2012 vascular plant data. NS Department of Environment, 30 recs. 1 Chapman, C.N. (Cody). 2019. Nova Scotia Black Ash (Fraxinus nigra) field observations by Confederacy of Mainland Mi'kmaq. Forestry Program, Confederacy of Mainland Mi'kmaq, 7 records. 1 Christie, D.S. 2000. Christmas Bird Count Data, 1997-2000. Nature NB, 54 recs. 1 Churchill, J.L.; Walker, J. 2017. Species at Risk Surveys at Correctional Services Canada Properties in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. 1 Consortium of North American Lichen Herbaria. 2018. Cetraria ericetorum records from CNALH. CNALH, 3. Curley, F. R. Plant specimens given to AC CDC. PEI Dept Environment, Energy and Forestry 1 . 2010. 1 Curley, F.R. Two rare aquatic plant specimens collected by F.R. Curley in PEI and given to D.M. Mazerolle. retired provincial biologist. 2015. 1 Doucet, D.A. 2007. Coleopteran Records, 1991-2007. Doucet, 33 recs. 1 Doucet, D.A. 2007. Fieldwork 2007: Insects (minus Odonata). ACCDC Staff, 1 rec. 1 Doucet, D.A. 2007. PEI National Park Odonata Survey. Parks Canada, PEI National Park, 1 rec. 1 Doucet, D.A. ACCDC Reference Collection. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre, Sackville NB. 2008. 1 Erskine, D.S. First Myriophyllum tenellum collection for PEI, specimen at DAO herbarium. Agriculture Canada, Research Branch. 1956. 1 Fraser, M. 2003. Fort Amherst Field Observations. Pers. comm., 2pp, 3 recs. 1 Gagnon, E. Herbarium from 2017 Plant Systematics class. Université de Moncton. 2017. 1 Gerriets, S.H. 1997-2001. Element Occurrence Database. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre, Sackville NB, 1 rec. Godbout, V. 2000. Recherche de l'Aster du St-Laurent (Aster laurentianus) et du Satyre des Maritimes (Coenonympha nepisiquit) au Parc national Kouchibouguac et a Dune du Bouctouche, N-B. Irving Eco-centre, 23 1 pp. 1 Harling, L. & Silva, M. 2004. Abundance & species richness of shrews within forested habitats on PEI. Am. Midl. Nat., 151:399-407. 2 recs. 1 Harris, Megan. 2018. Miscellaneous Sorex palustris record. Pers. comm. to S. Blaney. 1 Harris, P. & Blaney, C.S. 2003. SAR Inventory: Plants in Port-La-Joye NHS & Fort Amherst NHS. Parks Canada, Atlantic, SARINV03-23. 4 recs. 1 Hinds, H.R. 1999. Connell Herbarium Database. University New Brunswick, Fredericton, 131 recs. 1 Klymko, J. Univeriste de Moncton insect collection butterfly record dataset. Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre. 2017. 1 LaPaix, R.W.; Crowell, M.J.; MacDonald, M. 2011. Stantec rare plant records, 2010-11. Stantec Consulting, 334 recs. 1 MacKinnon, W. 2005. Sorex hoyi record. PEI Dept of Environment, Energy & Forestry. Pers. comm. to K.A. Bredin, 1 rec. 1 MacPhail, V. Bee and syrphid specimens from MSc research. Pers. comm., J. Klymko. 2006. 1 McAskill, J.D. 2018. Bombylius major and Polygonia progne records from PEI. McAskill, J.D. 1 McAskill, J.D. 2018. Email to J. Klymko regarding occurrence of Papilio polyxenes on PEI. Pers. comm. 1 McLellan, N. 2013. Discovery of extensive Nuphar lutea ssp. rubrodisca population at Tyne Valley. Ducks Unlimited, 1 record. New York Botanical Garden. 2010. American Bryophyte Catalog, Prince Edward Island specimens. C.V. Starr Virtual Herbarium. Online database. http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/hcol/bryo/index.asp. Accessed 1 February 2010., Web site: 135 recs. 1 Oakley, D. 2012. Pickerel Frog observation 2008. Pers. comm. to J. Klymko. email record, 1 photo. 1 Oakley, Dwaine. 2017. Email to John Klymko detailing records of Pickerel Frog observation by Dwaine Oakley in September 2017. Oakley, Dwaine. 1 Oehlke, W. 1999. Record of Polygonia satyrus from Prince Edward Island. http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/ppsatyr.htm. 1 Sabine, M. 2016. Black Ash records from NB DNR permanent forest sampling Plots. New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources, 39 recs. 1 Shortt, R. Connell Herbarium Black Ash specimens. University New Brunswick, Fredericton. 2019. 1 Standley, L.A. 2002. Carex haydenii in Nova Scotia. , Pers. comm. to C.S. Blaney. 4 recs. 1 Stewart, J.I. 2010. Peregrine Falcon Surveys in New Brunswick, 2002-09. Canadian Wildlife Service, Sackville, 58 recs. 1 te Raa, J. 2016. Island Naturalist. Nature PEI, 219.

Data Report 6604: Bayview, PE Page 26 of 26

# recs CITATION 1 Vasseur, J, MacMillan, M. 2015. Miscellaneous Sorex palustris record. Pers. comm. to J. Klymko. 1 Webster, R.P. Atlantic Forestry Centre Insect Collection, Maritimes butterfly records. Natural Resources Canada. 2014.