2Nd & Broadway

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2Nd & Broadway FOR LEASE 2nd & Broadway 209-213 S BROADWAY, LOS ANGELES, CA FINANCIAL DISTRICT BUNKER HILL 2ND & BROADWAY HISTORIC CORE LITTLE TOKYO CONTACT US Bill Durslag Quinn Edwards Senior Vice President Associate +1 213 613 3106 +1 213 613 3229 [email protected] [email protected] Lic. 00498427 Lic. 02058634 www.propertyurl.com FOR LEASE 2nd & Broadway 209-213 S BROADWAY, LOS ANGELES, CA 1ST STREET TIMES MIRROR SQUARE: Renovation of both art deco buildings to 1 bring to creative office layouts and new retail on the ground floor. In addition one 37-story and another 53-story residential tower will be constructed on 2nd Street. The two new towers will bring 1,126 residential units to the corner of 2nd and Broadway 8 TRIBUNE MEDIA DTLA TOWER: 30-Story Building. 107 2ND STREET 2 condominums, 534,000 SF of creative office. 7,200 SF of retail. 6 FEDERAL COURT HOUSE: Recently completed. 24 Courtrooms. 32 3 Judicial Chambers HILL STREET 3 REGIONAL CONNECTOR: Daily ridership forcasted at 90,000 2ND & 4 passangers per day. 17,000 will be new riders. Will connect to S BROADWAY1 STREET Little Tokyo and 2nd & Hope stations LA STREET CAR: 3.8 mile loop through the hear of DTLA. S OLIVE STREETBROADWAY 5 Connecting LA Live, the Historic Core, Bunker Hill and the Financial District to 2nd and Broadway. 4 S SPRING STREET 1ST & BROADWAY PARK: 2 Acre green space conversion. $28 5 2 6 million budget. Adjacent to Grand Park. ANGEL’S LANDING: The City of LA has began soliciting offers for 7 the 2.26 acre development site. It is currently zoned for a 1.3 7 million square foot development. GRAND AVENUE PROJECT: 450 condos and apartments. 16-story 8 300 room Equinox hotel. 200,000 SF of commercial space with 3RD STREET 1,500 parking spaces. Budgeted at $950,000 400 S BROADWAY: 34-story tower. 450 residential units. 7,000 SF 9 S MAIN STREET 9 of ground floor retail. www.propertyurl.com FOR LEASE 2nd & Broadway 209-213 S BROADWAY, LOS ANGELES, CA PROPERTY OFFERING DEMOGRAPHICS BROADWAY CIVIC CENTER Great opportunity to be apart of the exciting retail and AREA DATA creative office co-tenancy of the Broadway Civic Center: Daytime Population Approx. 500,000 + Prominent Broadway Signage Opportunity Approx. 50,000 Residents 58% above the LA County average + 9 existings CUP’s + Asking $4.50 PSF NNN (Net’s $0.27 PSF) $96,200 80% have a 4 year degree Median Income + 5,400 SF Inline Space and 3,000 SF Corner 40% use public transportation Avialable 20,742 Traffic Volume (2nd & Broadway Intersection) + Adjacent Parking Lot (Same Ownership) Counts + 2,400 SF currently built-out as a gym (209 S 7,000+ added to market Broadway / Cardiobarre) Residential Units $102 per grocery store visit + High Ceilings Ample Disposable $16 per lunch Income $28 per dinner + Immediate Delivery CONTACT US Bill Durslag Quinn Edwards © 2018 CBRE, Inc. This information has been obtained from sources believed reliable. We have not verified it and make no guarantee, warranty or representation about it. Any projections, opinions, assumptions or estimates used are for example only and do not represent Senior Vice President Associate the current or future performance of the property. You and your advisors should conduct a careful, independent investigation of the property to determine to your satisfaction the suitability of the property for your needs. Photos herein are the property of their respective +1 213 613 3106 +1 213 613 3229 owners and use of these images without the express written consent of the owner is prohibited. CBRE and the CBRE logo are service marks [email protected] [email protected] of CBRE, Inc. and/or its affiliated or related companies in the United States and other countries. All other marks displayed on this document are the property of their respective owners. Lic. 00498427 Lic. 02058634 www.cbre.com FOR LEASE 2nd & Broadway 209-213 S BROADWAY, LOS ANGELES, CA FORMER FITNESS BROADWAY CIVIC CENTER SPACE OFFICE AND RETAIL TENANTS BASEMENT TENANT CAFECITO PURA VIDA CONTACT US Bill Durslag Quinn Edwards © 2018 CBRE, Inc. This information has been obtained from sources believed reliable. We have not verified it and make no guarantee, warranty or representation about it. Any projections, opinions, assumptions or estimates used are for example only and do not represent Senior Vice President Associate the current or future performance of the property. You and your advisors should conduct a careful, independent investigation of the property to determine to your satisfaction the suitability of the property for your needs. Photos herein are the property of their respective +1 213 613 3106 +1 213 613 3229 owners and use of these images without the express written consent of the owner is prohibited. CBRE and the CBRE logo are service marks [email protected] [email protected] of CBRE, Inc. and/or its affiliated or related companies in the United States and other countries. All other marks displayed on this document are the property of their respective owners. Lic. 00498427 Lic. 02058634 www.cbre.com FOR LEASE 2nd & Broadway 209-213 S BROADWAY, LOS ANGELES, CA 2ND STREET AVAILABLE 3,000 SF CAFECITO PURA VIDA AVAILABLE 5,400 SF (DIVISIBLE) S BROADWAY STREET S BROADWAY www.propertyurl.com.
Recommended publications
  • FIGUEROA 865 South Figueroa, Los Angeles, California
    FIGUEROA 865 South Figueroa, Los Angeles, California E T PAU The Westin INGRAHAM ST S Bonaventure Hotel W W 7TH S 4T H ST T S FREMONT AV FINANCIAL Jonathan Club DISTRICT ST W 5TH ST IGUEROA S FLOWER ST Los Angeles ISCO ST L ST S F E OR FWY Central Library RB HA FRANC The California Club S BIX WILSHIR W 8TH ST W 6 E B TH ST LVD Pershing Square Fig at 7th 7th St/ Metro Center Pershing E T Square S AV O D COC ST N S TheThe BLOCBLO R FWY I RA C N ANCA S G HARBO R W 9TH ST F Figueroa HIS IVE ST Los Angeles, CA L O DOW S W 8T 8T H STS T W 6 TH S T S HILL ST W S OLY A MPIC B OOA ST R LVD FIGUE W 9 S ER ST TH ST W O W 7 L Y 7 A TTHH ST S F W S D T LEGENDAADWAY O FIDM/Fashion R Nokia Theatre L.A. LIVE BROB S Metro Station T W Institute of Design S OLYMPI G ST Light Rail StationIN & Merchandising R PPR C BLVD Green SpacesS S T Sites of Interest SST STAPLES Center IN SOUTH PARK ST MA E Parking S IV L S O LA Convention Center E W 1 L ST 1 ND AV Property Description Figueroa is a 35-storey, 692,389 sq ft granite and reflective glass office tower completed in 1991 that is located at the southwest corner of Figueroa Street and 8th Place in Downtown Los Angeles, California.
    [Show full text]
  • Jational Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form
    •m No. 10-300 REV. (9/77) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE JATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ____________TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS >_____ NAME HISTORIC BROADWAY THEATER AND COMMERCIAL DISTRICT________________________ AND/OR COMMON LOCATION STREET & NUMBER <f' 300-8^9 ^tttff Broadway —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Los Angeles VICINITY OF 25 STATE CODE COUNTY CODE California 06 Los Angeles 037 | CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE X.DISTRICT —PUBLIC ^.OCCUPIED _ AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) —PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED .^COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE .XBOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE ^ENTERTAINMENT _ REUGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS 2L.YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY —OTHER: NAME Multiple Ownership (see list) STREET & NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE VICINITY OF | LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDSETC. Los Angeie s County Hall of Records STREET & NUMBER 320 West Temple Street CITY. TOWN STATE Los Angeles California ! REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TiTLE California Historic Resources Inventory DATE July 1977 —FEDERAL ^JSTATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS office of Historic Preservation CITY, TOWN STATE . ,. Los Angeles California DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED ^ORIGINAL SITE X.GOOD 0 —RUINS X_ALTERED _MOVED DATE- —FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Broadway Theater and Commercial District is a six-block complex of predominately commercial and entertainment structures done in a variety of architectural styles. The district extends along both sides of Broadway from Third to Ninth Streets and exhibits a number of structures in varying condition and degree of alteration.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2, 2018 Oliver Netburn City of Los Angeles Department of City
    August 2, 2018 Oliver Netburn City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning 200 N. Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 [email protected] RE: 2803 W. Broadway - CPC-2017-4388-GPA-ZC-CU-ZV-ZAD-SPR Dear Mr. Netburn: On behalf of The Eagle Rock Association (TERA), I am writing to you regarding the application for development entitlements at 2803 W. Broadway. The proposed project consists of a four-story, 65-foot-tall, approximately 85,000 square foot self-storage facility with fourteen parking spaces. Over the last three years, TERA has met with the applicant regarding this project. In January of this year, TERA met with the applicant and, after careful consideration, decided not to support the project. Our reasons for taking this position were that (1) the project was on an expedited track that made it difficult to for the community to provide constructive feedback and (2) that the scope of the development required sufficient community benefit. Since then, the applicant has taken the project off of the expedited track and has met with members of the community and with community groups, including TERA, which has helped to allay our initial concerns. Since these meetings, the applicant has committed to several items that we feel will benefit the community. These commitments include: A change in the architectural style of the building so that it is no longer contemporary but more in line with existing Eagle Rock architecture and design A 600 square foot community room with separate access from the facility, including a dedicated restroom. The room will be available to all local non-profit organizations on a first come, first served basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Cra/La, A
    MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CRA/LA, A DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY (SUCCESSOR TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA) HELD ON AUGUST 2, 2018 The Regular Meeting of the CRA/LA, a Designated Local Authority and Successor to the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles, California was held at the Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration, 500 West Temple Street, Room B-22, Los Angeles, California, at 9:30 a.m. on August 2, 2018. The meeting was called to order at 9:36 a.m. by Chair Semcken. As Recording Secretary, Angela M. Coleman recorded the minutes of the meeting. Copies of meeting materials are available upon request and payment of nominal copying charges. Tapes of the meeting are available from CRA/LA for one year from the date of adoption of the minutes for the meeting. ROLL CALL Angela M. Coleman, Recording Secretary, took the roll and noted the following present: Mee Semcken, Chair Ed P. Reyes, Vice Chair Recording Secretary declared a quorum in attendance. Also in attendance were: Steve Valenzuela, Chief Executive Officer, CRA/LA Daniel Kahn, Sr. Real Estate Development Agent, CRA/LA Tom Webber, CRA/LA Legal Counsel (Goldfarb & Lipman) CONSENT ITEMS 1. APPROVAL OF JUNE 25, 2018 SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES. 2. LAND USE APPROVAL. REVIEW AND CONSIDER THE PROPOSED PROJECT’S MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, ADOPT LAND USE FINDINGS, AND AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF A LAND USE OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH R.D. OLSON DEVELOPMENT, ALLOWING A 6:1 FLOOR AREA RATIO FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A HOTEL AT 6407 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Journals | Penn State Libraries Open Publishing
    I I • I • I• .1.1' D . , I * ' PA « ~** • * ' > . Mechanized streetcars rose out ofa need toreplace horse- the wide variety ofdifferent electric railway systems, no single drawn streetcars. The horse itselfpresented the greatest problems: system had yet emerged as the industry standard. Early lines horses could only work a few hours each day; they were expen- tended tobe underpowered and prone to frequent equipment sive to house, feed and clean up after; ifdisease broke out within a failure. The motors on electric cars tended to make them heavier stable, the result could be a financial catastrophe for a horsecar than either horsecars or cable cars, requiring a company to operator; and, they pulled the car at only 4 to 6 miles per hour. 2 replace its existing rails withheavier ones. Due to these circum- The expenses incurred inoperating a horsecar line were stances, electric streetcars could not yet meet the demands of staggering. For example, Boston's Metropolitan Railroad required densely populated areas, and were best operated along short 3,600 horses to operate its fleet of700 cars. The average working routes serving relatively small populations. life of a car horse was onlyfour years, and new horses cost $125 to The development of two rivaltechnological systems such as $200. Itwas common practice toprovide one stable hand for cable and electric streetcars can be explained by historian every 14 to 20horses inaddition to a staff ofblacksmiths and Thomas Parke Hughes's model ofsystem development. Inthis veterinarians, and the typical car horse consumed up to 30 pounds model, Hughes describes four distinct phases ofsystem growth: ofgrain per day.
    [Show full text]
  • VI. Other CEQA Considerations VI
    VI. Other CEQA Considerations VI. Other CEQA Considerations 1. Significant and Unavoidable Impacts Section 15126.2(b) of the CEQA Guidelines requires that an EIR describe any significant impacts which cannot be avoided. Specifically, Section 15126.2(b) states: Describe any significant impacts, including those which can be mitigated but not reduced to a level of insignificance. Where there are impacts that cannot be alleviated without imposing an alternative design, their implications and the reasons why the project is being proposed, notwithstanding their effect, should be described. As evaluated in Section IV, Environmental Impact Analysis, of this Draft EIR, and summarized below, implementation of the Project would result in significant and unavoidable impacts related to on-site construction noise, on- and off-site construction vibration (related to human annoyance), and intersection levels of service during Project operation.1 Cumulative impacts with respect to on- and off-site construction noise and off-site construction vibration (related to human annoyance) would also be significant and unavoidable.2 All other impacts associated with the Project would be less than significant or reduced to a less-than-significant level with mitigation. 1 The Project’s on-site construction noise impact and on-site construction vibration impact (with respect to human annoyance) would only be significant and unavoidable if Related Project No. 121 (Times Mirror Square project) is completed and occupied before or during Project construction. 2 Cumulative on-site construction noise impacts would only be significant and unavoidable if construction of Related Project No. 121 (Times Mirror Square project) occurs concurrently with Project construction.
    [Show full text]
  • City of West Hollywood Appendix J
    R2, R3, R4 Multi-Family Survey Report City of West Hollywood Appendix J: 1986-87 Survey Context, prepared by Johnson Heumann Research Associates Appendices November 2008 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP Architects, Planners & Conservators, Inc. when a small group of citizens formed the West Hollywood Incorporation Committee. By November of that year, studies by the Local Agency Formation Commission confirmed that incorporation was indeed economically feasible. Tenants led by the Coalition for Economic Survival, homeowners concerned with planning issues and the gay community were among the leading advocates of cityhoog. Formal application was made on April 4, 1984. On November 4, 1984, by a 4:1 favorable margin, the voters approved incorporation . One of the new city's first tasks was to begin to draft a General Plan , the land use policy document for the municipality required· by State law. In January of 1985, the city began the process of preparing the Plan, noting that the physical environment, social character and quality of life within the City would be influenced by the General Plan. It was a stated goal to link land use and urban design, emphasizing the relationship between parcels and uses throughout the city. A reduction of density from those outlined in the West Hollywood Community Plan, .---- prepared before incorporated by the County of Los Angeles, was planned. As an i ntegral part of this planning process. the city of West Hollywood applied for c survey grant from the State Off ice of Historic Preservation in November of 1985 . 1.2 DEVELOPMENT HISTORY The area now known as West Hollywood has played a key role in t h e development of Los Angeles County west of Los Angeles .
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Claremore Public Works Authority Meeting Council Chambers, City Hall, 104 S
    MINUTES OF CLAREMORE PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 104 S. MUSKOGEE, CLAREMORE, OKLAHOMA MARCH 03, 2008 CALL TO ORDER Meeting called to order by Mayor Brant Shallenburger at 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Nan Pope called roll. The following were: Present: Brant Shallenburger, Buddy Robertson, Tony Mullenger, Flo Guthrie, Mick Webber, Terry Chase, Tom Lehman, Paula Watson Absent: Don Myers Staff Present: City Manager Troy Powell, Nan Pope, Serena Kauk, Matt Mueller, Randy Elliott, Cassie Sowers, Phil Stowell, Steve Lett, Daryl Golbek, Joe Kays, Gene Edwards, Tim Miller, Tamryn Cluck, Mark Dowler Pledge of Allegiance by all. Invocation by James Graham, Verdigris United Methodist Church. ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA Motion by Mullenger, second by Lehman that the agenda for the regular CPWA meeting of March 03, 2008, be approved as written. 8 yes, Mullenger, Lehman, Robertson, Guthrie, Shallenburger, Webber, Chase, Watson. ITEMS UNFORESEEN AT THE TIME AGENDA WAS POSTED None CALL TO THE PUBLIC None CURRENT BUSINESS Motion by Mullenger, second by Lehman to approve the following consent items: (a) Minutes of Claremore Public Works Authority meeting on February 18, 2008, as printed. (b) All claims as printed. (c) Approve budget supplement for upgrading the electric distribution system and adding an additional Substation for the new Oklahoma Plaza Development - $586,985 - Leasehold improvements to new project number assignment. (Serena Kauk) (d) Approve budget supplement for purchase of an additional concrete control house for new Substation #5 for Oklahoma Plaza Development - $93,946 - Leasehold improvements to new project number assignment. (Serena Kauk) (e) Approve budget supplement for electrical engineering contract with Ledbetter, Corner and Associates for engineering design phase for Substation #5 - Oklahoma Plaza Development - $198,488 - Leasehold improvements to new project number assignment.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Argument Before the Supreme Court of The
    SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ------------------ GOOGLE LLC, ) Petitioner, ) v. ) No. 18-956 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., ) Respondent. ) ------------------ Pages: 1 through 96 Place: Washington, D.C. Date: October 7, 2020 HERITAGE REPORTING CORPORATION Official Reporters 1220 L Street, N.W., Suite 206 Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 628-4888 www.hrccourtreporters.com Official - Subject to Final Review 1 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 2 ------------------ 3 GOOGLE LLC, ) 4 Petitioner, ) 5 v. ) No. 18-956 6 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., ) 7 Respondent. ) 8 ------------------ 9 Washington, D.C. 10 Wednesday, October 7, 2020 11 12 The above-entitled matter came on for 13 oral argument before the Supreme Court of the 14 United States at 10:00 a.m. 15 16 APPEARANCES: 17 18 THOMAS C. GOLDSTEIN, ESQUIRE, Bethesda, Maryland; 19 on behalf of the Petitioner. 20 E. JOSHUA ROSENKRANZ, ESQUIRE, New York, New York; 21 on behalf of the Respondent. 22 MALCOLM L. STEWART, Deputy Solicitor General, 23 Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; 24 for the United States, as amicus curiae, 25 supporting the Respondent. Heritage Reporting Corporation Official - Subject to Final Review 2 1 C O N T E N T S 2 ORAL ARGUMENT OF: PAGE: 3 THOMAS C. GOLDSTEIN, ESQ. 4 On behalf of the Petitioner 3 5 ORAL ARGUMENT OF: 6 E. JOSHUA ROSENKRANZ, ESQ. 7 On behalf of the Respondent 38 8 ORAL ARGUMENT OF: 9 MALCOLM L. STEWART, ESQ. 10 For the United States, as amicus 11 curiae, supporting the Respondent 64 12 REBUTTAL ARGUMENT OF: 13 THOMAS C.
    [Show full text]
  • TRIPOD a P~Relations Plan Lesley Moran CM441 December 13, 1999
    TRIPOD A P~Relations Plan !, ' Lesley Moran CM441 - December 13, 1999 I • • ((/ !_;/ } Client: TRIPOD 1727 West Burbank Boulevard Burbank, CA 91506 Phone (818) 972-2080 Fax (818) 972-2090 Client Background: TRIPOD is a private, non-profit educational research organization committed to helping families raise their deaf and hard-of-hearing children in a supportive environment. Mission: TRIPOD's mission is to demonstrate a cost-effective educational model in which deaf and hard-of-hearing children are co-enrolled with their hearing peers so all can realize their full academic potential. • History: The TRIPOD organization has evolved through several different stages~In 1983, TRIPOD founder Megan Williams was researching educational opportunities for her profoundly deaf son Jacob and found them completely sub-par to hearing schools. By raising $150,000 in funding and recruiting deaf education s~ecialis!s, it began as a private pre-school with four children .an ,three years late formed a partnership with a small private elementary school (Stage I). + In 1989, TRIPOD entered into a partnership with the Burbank Unified School District (Stage II). + In 1993, this public/private partnership evolved into a regional program serving four school di~tricts within the Special Education Local Plan Agencies (SELP A) (Stage III). + These efforts have been successful because ofTRIPOD's active role in private fundraising activities. The program is now officially known as the Foothill & Pasadena SELPAs/TRIPOD program for deaf and hard-of-hearing children. It is housed at four sites within the Burbank Unified School District. Nature of Services: Education: Tripod offers an effective combination of programs and services to children and families affected by hearing loss.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Skechers Performance Los Angeles Marathon Media Guide
    2016 Skechers Performance Los Angeles Marathon Media Guide Important Media Information 3 Race Week Schedule 4 About the Race 7 8 Legacy Runners The Course 10 History 25 Logistics 32 On Course Entertainment 37 Media Coverage 43 LA BIG 5K 44 Professional Field 46 Race Records 52 Charities 67 Partners & Sponsors 72 Marathon Staff 78 2017 Skechers Performance Los Angeles Marathon Media Guide Media Contacts Carsten Preisz Jolene Abbott VP, Brand Strategy and Marketing Executive Director, Public Relations Conqur Endurance Group Skechers Performance 805.218.7612 310.318.3100 [email protected] [email protected] Molly Biddiscombe Kerry Hendry Account Supervisor Vice President Ketchum Sports & Entertainment Ketchum Sports & Entertainment 860-539-2492 404-275-0090 [email protected] [email protected] Finish Line Media Center Media Credential Pickup Fairmont Hotel LA Convention Center Wedgewood Ballroom West Hall, Room 510 101 Wilshire Blvd 1201 S. Figueroa Street Santa Monica, CA Los Angeles, CA 90015 310-899-4136 Friday, March 17: 10:30 am – 5 pm Saturday, March 18: 9 am – 2 pm Press Conference Schedule Fairmont Hotel Friday, Wedgewood Ballroom 8:00 am Sunday 6:00 am to 3:00 pm ‘Meet the Elites’ Event, Griffith Park Top athletes, Conqur CEO Tracey Russell Social 11:00 am Pages Website: www.lamarathon.com Pre-race Press Conference, LA Convention Center, West Hall, Room510 www.goconqur.com Top athletes Facebook: facebook.com/LAmarathon Instagram: @lamarathon Sunday, Twitter: @lamarathon 10:00 am Snapchat: @lamarathon
    [Show full text]
  • Iii. Environmental Setting
    III. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING A. OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING i) Regional Setting The Reef Project Site is located in Los Angeles County, within greater downtown Los Angeles (see Section II [Project Description], Figure II-1 [Regional and Project Vicinity Map]). The Project Site is located in the Southeast Los Angeles Community Plan Area of the City of Los Angeles. The Project Site is located within the Council District 9 Redevelopment Project area, the Central City Parking area, the Downtown Housing Incentive area, the Central City Revitalization Zone, the Los Angeles State Enterprise Zone, and the Conditional use Approval for Sale of Alcoholic Beverages Specific Plan area. The northern section of the Southeast Los Angeles Community Plan Area was within the original Los Angeles city boundary (incorporated in 1850). The remainder of the Community Plan Area was consolidated or annexed into the City of Los Angeles between 1859 and 1944. The Community Plan Area includes the neighborhoods of Historic South Central, West Adams, University Park, South Park, Central Alameda, Florence, Green Meadows, Broadway-Manchester, and Watts. The Southeast Los Angeles Community Plan area is surrounded by the City of Los Angeles community plan areas of Central City to the north; Central City North to the northeast; and South Los Angeles to the west. The Cities of Vernon and Huntington Park and the Florence community in unincorporated Los Angeles County border the Southeast Los Angeles Community Plan area on the east. The Willowbrook community in unincorporated Los Angeles County borders the Southeast Los Angeles Community Plan area on the south. Southeast Los Angeles largely comprises single-family neighborhoods, which followed a typical development pattern with commercial corridors along larger streets and single-family residential development along smaller, gridded streets in between.
    [Show full text]