Accountability, Performance Reporting, Comprehensive Audit – an Integrated Perspective

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Accountability, Performance Reporting, Comprehensive Audit – an Integrated Perspective ACCOUNTABILITY, PERFORMANCE REPORTING, COMPREHENSIVE AUDIT - AN INTEGRATED PERSPECTIVE by G UY L ECLERC W. D AVID M OYNAGH J EAN-PIERRE B OISCLAIR H UGH R. HANSON Accountability, performance reporting, comprehensive audit - an integrated perspective Copyright © 1996 CCAF-FCVI Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be repro- duced, stored in a data base or retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher, CCAF-FCVI Inc. Published by CCAF-FCVI Inc. 55 Murray St., Suite 210 Ottawa, CANADA K1N 5M3 (613) 241-6713 Fax (613) 241-6900 ISBN 0-919557-47-3 Printed and bound in Canada. Design and layout by Paul Edwards Design. Print coordination by Poirier Litho. This book is available in French under the title: Reddition de comptes, rapports sur la performance et vérification intégrée - une vue d’ensemble. Translation by Traduction Nicole Plamondon. Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data: Main entry under title: Accountability, performance reporting, comprehensive audit - an integrated perspective Issued also in French under title: Reddition de comptes, rapports sur la performance et vérification intégrée - une vue d’ensemble Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-919557-47-3 1. Auditing. 2. Organizational Effectiveness. I. CCAF-FCVI Inc. HF5667.A26 1996 657’.45 C96-900071-S A CCOUNTABILITY, PERFORMANCE R EPORTING, COMPREHENSIVE A UDIT - AN I NTEGRATED P ERSPECTIVE TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I. ACCOUNTABILITY.................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................3 SECTION 1. ACCOUNTABILITY’S CONTEXT—GOVERNANCE ............................................7 CHAPTER 1. GOVERNANCE—DEFINITIONS AND ISSUES ...............................................................8 GOVERNANCE VERSUS MANAGEMENT ........................................................................9 GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES......................................................................................10 SOME RELATED CONCEPTS........................................................................................10 DEMOCRACY .............................................................................................................12 THE NATURE OF A CONSTITUTION...........................................................................13 ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF GOOD GOVERNANCE............................................14 CHAPTER 2. GOVERNANCE IN CANADA.......................................................................................15 THE FORM OF GOVERNMENT IN CANADA................................................................15 THE ROLE OF ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES................................................................21 INFLUENCES ON POLICY IN A DEMOCRACY...............................................................22 SOME IMPLICATIONS OF FEDERALISM .......................................................................25 GOVERNMENT IN OTHER COUNTRIES ......................................................................26 PRIVATE SECTOR GOVERNANCE ................................................................................27 GOOD GOVERNANCE — A COMMON GOAL..............................................................31 CHAPTER 3. THE LANGUAGE OF GOVERNANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY.....................................33 VOCABULARY AND TERMINOLOGY ............................................................................33 RULES AND DISCRETION ...........................................................................................33 DISCRETIONARY POWERS ..........................................................................................35 BUREAUCRATIZATION................................................................................................35 INDEPENDENCE.........................................................................................................36 NEUTRALITY..............................................................................................................38 AUTONOMY...............................................................................................................39 SUBSIDIARITY ............................................................................................................40 STEWARDSHIP............................................................................................................40 VICARIOUS RESPONSIBILITY ......................................................................................41 MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION .....................................................................41 SECTION 2. ACCOUNTABILITY—ISSUES & PRACTICE.....................................................43 CHAPTER 4. THE MEANING OF ACCOUNTABILITY ......................................................................44 ACCOUNTABILITY DEFINED.......................................................................................44 ACCOUNTABILITY—MANY CONTEXTS, MANY FORMULATIONS .................................44 THE ROOT OF ACCOUNTABILITY...............................................................................47 DEMONSTRATING ACCOUNTABILITY.........................................................................50 EXTERNAL INDUCEMENT FOR ACCOUNTABILITY ......................................................50 THE ENVIRONMENT FOR ACCOUNTABILITY..............................................................54 AUTONOMY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ..........................................................................56 DIMENSIONS OF ACCOUNTABILITY ...........................................................................57 IN SUMMARY .............................................................................................................59 A CCOUNTABILITY, PERFORMANCE R EPORTING, COMPREHENSIVE A UDIT - AN I NTEGRATED P ERSPECTIVE CHAPTER 5. ACCOUNTABILITY OBLIGATIONS..............................................................................61 THE TRADITIONAL VIEW...........................................................................................62 THE DEBATE..............................................................................................................62 ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVANTS....................................................................66 CHAPTER 6. ACCOUNTABILITY IN CERTAIN OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES ........................................71 ACCOUNTABILITY IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR...............................................................71 DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PRIVATE- AND PUBLIC-SECTOR ACCOUNTABILITY ................71 GOVERNMENT IN AND OUT OF BUSINESS.................................................................71 ACCOUNTABILITY IN A MONOPOLY...........................................................................73 THE PRIVATE NONPROFIT SECTOR ............................................................................73 CHAPTER 7. CONTROL AND CONTROLS......................................................................................75 CONTROL..................................................................................................................75 CONTROL AND THE CHANGE IN ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE..................................75 TWO MODELS OF MANAGEMENT ..............................................................................76 IMPROPERLY CONTROLLED DELEGATION—STREET-LEVEL BUREAUCRATS.................77 DELEGATION AND THE DIFFICULTY OF “LETTING GO” ............................................79 CONCLUSION ...............................................................................................................................80 KNOW THE BUSINESS ................................................................................................80 ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE CHECKLIST.............................................................81 APPENDIX. ..................................................................................................................................84 A CASE OF CHANGE IN MANAGERIAL CULTURE ......................................................84 INCREASED MINISTERIAL AUTHORITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY.................................84 PUBLIC SERVICE 2000 ...............................................................................................88 SHARED MANAGEMENT AGENDA (SMA)..................................................................89 WAS CONTROL LOST?................................................................................................91 THE TRANSITION CONTINUES ..................................................................................92 THE MANAGERIAL REVOLUTION: CULTURAL AND PROCEDURAL ..............................92 PART II—PERFORMANCE REPORTING ............................................................95 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................97 SECTION 1. THE THEORETICAL BASIS FOR PERFORMANCE REPORTING......................103 CHAPTER 8. EXISTING REPORTING PRACTICES .........................................................................104 PUBLIC-SECTOR REPORTING MECHANISMS .............................................................104 PRIVATE-SECTOR PERFORMANCE REPORTING .........................................................109
Recommended publications
  • Backgrounder Global Centre for Pluralism Mission
    Global Centre for Pluralism: Backgrounder Global Centre for Pluralism Mission: The Global Centre for Pluralism serves as a global platform for comparative analysis, education and dialogue about the choices and actions that advance and sustain pluralism. Vision: The Centre’s vision is a world where human differences are valued and diverse societies thrive. The Global Centre for Pluralism is an independent, charitable organization created to advance positive responses to the challenge of living peacefully and productively together in diverse societies. Why Canada Founded in Ottawa by His Highness the Aga Khan in partnership with the Government of Canada, the Centre takes inspiration from Canada’s experience. Respect for diversity has developed into a defining characteristic of Canada and a core element of the country’s identity. Although still a work in progress, Canada is a global leader in the way it has valued and managed its diverse multi-ethnic, multicultural fabric. The Centre’s headquarters will be a platform for analysing and sharing Canada’s ongoing pluralism journey with the world. His Highness the Aga Khan His Highness the Aga Khan is the 49th hereditary Imam (Spiritual Leader) of the Shia Imami Ismaili Muslims. For His Highness the Aga Khan, one manifestation of his hereditary responsibilities has been a deep engagement with development for almost 60 years. Ties with Canada: His Highness has long been interested in Canada’s experience of pluralism. His close ties with Canada go back almost four decades to the 1970s when many thousands of Asian refugees expelled from Uganda, including many Ismailis, were welcomed into Canadian society.
    [Show full text]
  • The Agony and the Ecstasy of Rowing
    AUTUMN 1979 a a THE AGONY AND THE ECSTASY OF ROWING Volume 34, Number 3 Autumn 1979 THE FEATURES 4 THE AGONY AND THE ECSTASY OF ROWING SHRUM Sheila Ritchie 8 THE UNIVERSITY CHAPLAINS Generalists in an Age of Specialization BOWL Eleanor Wachtel 10 THE LAST LAUGH When Simon Fraser University In Search of that Elusive Beast, Clansmen College Humor meet the UBC Thunderbirds Trevor Lautens in the United Way Charity Game 14 GEORGE VOLKOFF: Friday, October 19,1979, A Particular Kind of Genius 8 pm at Empire Stadium. Tim Padmore 17 A DEGREE OF INTEGRITY UBC will be defending the trophy won The Major Change in B.C. Education last year. Net proceeds from the game Policy that has given Degree-Granting are donated to the United Way Status to a Private College Campaign. The 1978 game drew 12,000 Murray Mc Millan fans and realized $35,000 for the United DEPARTMENTS Way. 19 NEWS 24 SPOTLIGHT Tickets: $6, $4 and $3 (students) from 30 LETTERS the Vancouver Ticket Centre. CHRONICLECLASSIFIED (A special studentrate of $2 available only through school 30 and campus sales.) - EDITOR Susan Jamieson McLarnon, BA'65 UBC supporters have seats on the west EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Christopher J. Miller (EA, Queen's) COVER PHOTO Ken Mayer side of the stadium and SFU on the east. Editorial Committee Dr. Joseph Katz, Chair; Dr. Ross Stewart, BA'46MA'48, deputy-chair; Dr. Marcia Boyd, MA'75; Geoff Hancock, Come early and attend the BFA'73, MFA'75; Michael W. Hunter, BA'63, LLB'67; Murray McMillan; Bel Nemetz, BA'35; George Plant, ALUMNI PRE-GAME BASc'50; Lorraine Shore, BA67; Nancy Woo, BA69.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DECLINE of MINISTERIAL ACCOUNTABILITY in CANADA by M. KATHLEEN Mcleod Integrated Studies Project Submitted to Dr.Gloria
    THE DECLINE OF MINISTERIAL ACCOUNTABILITY IN CANADA By M. KATHLEEN McLEOD Integrated Studies Project submitted to Dr.Gloria Filax in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts – Integrated Studies Athabasca, Alberta Submitted April 17, 2011 Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................. ii Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 The Westminster System of Democratic Government ................................................................... 3 Ministerial Accountability: All the Time, or Only When it is Convenient? ................................... 9 The Richard Colvin Case .................................................................................................................. 18 The Over-Arching Power of the Prime Minister ............................................................................ 24 Michel Foucault and Governmentality ............................................................................................ 31 Governmentality .......................................................................................................................... 31 Governmentality and Stephen Harper ............................................................................................ 34 Munir Sheikh and the Long Form Census .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Legitimacy of Cabinet Secrecy
    51 The Political Legitimacy of Cabinet Secrecy Yan Campagnolo* La légitimité politique du secret ministériel La legitimidad política del secreto ministerial A legitimidade política do segredo ministerial 内阁机密的政治正当性 Résumé Abstract Dans le système de gouvernement In the Westminster system of re- responsable de type Westminster, les sponsible government, constitutional conventions constitutionnelles protègent conventions have traditionally safe- traditionnellement le secret des délibéra- guarded the secrecy of Cabinet proceed- tions du Cabinet. Dans l’ère moderne, où ings. In the modern era, where openness l’ouverture et la transparence sont deve- and transparency have become funda- nues des valeurs fondamentales, le secret mental values, Cabinet secrecy is now ministériel est désormais perçu avec scep- looked upon with suspicion. The justifi- ticisme. La justification et la portée de la cation and scope of Cabinet secrecy re- règle font l’objet de controverses. Cet ar- main contentious. The aim of this article ticle aborde ce problème en expliquant les is to address this problem by explaining raisons pour lesquelles le secret ministériel why Cabinet secrecy is, within limits, es- est, à l’intérieur de certaines limites, essen- sential to the proper functioning of our tiel au bon fonctionnement de notre sys- system of government. Based on the rele- * Assistant Professor, Common Law Section, University of Ottawa. This article is based on the first chapter of a dissertation which was submitted in connection with fulfilling the requirements for a doctoral degree in law at the University of Toronto. The research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. For helpful comments on earlier versions, I am indebted to Kent Roach, David Dyzenhaus, Hamish Stewart, Peter Oliver and the anonymous reviewers of the Revue juridique Thémis.
    [Show full text]
  • Ian Stewart in His Own Words
    Ian Stewart in his Own Words Ian Stewart Preface by Fred Gorbet th WHEN ANDREW AND I SET OUT TO MARK Ian’s 80 birthday, and extraor- dinary professional career, with this festschrift, I volunteered to draft a brief biography of Ian – focusing on the years we worked together, which encom- passed most of the time from 1968 through 1982. This turned out to be much more difficult than anticipated. Ian was a fantastic mentor to me. He hired me directly out of graduate school to join him at the Bank of Canada in 1968. Through long evenings working on the econometric model RDX2, he taught me more about economics and particularly the nature of the economic adjustment process than I had ever learned in university. As time went on and Ian’s focus shifted from research to the practical application of public policy, he never ceased to challenge me with his keen appreciation of the role of analysis in effective policy design and implementation and his enduring sense of fairness and compassion. Yet, when it came to write about this career, I realized that time had erased many memories and notwithstanding our long New Directions for Intelligent Government in Canada 19 association, there were many gaps in the story as I knew it. I turned to Ian and asked for a brief synopsis of his professional life – one that would bullet-point highlights, achievements, challenges, colleagues, etc. I felt that with this raw material I could fashion a tapestry that would illumi- nate the character and achievements of one of Canada’s best economic researchers and policy advisers.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007-2008 Annual Report
    03 Our Mission 03 Our Themes 04 Achievements in 2007-2008 06 Message from the Chair: A Thrilling and Healthy Foundation 07 Message from the Foundation President: In Just Seven Years 08 The Trudeau Scholarship 08 Preparing for Change 08 Supporting New Talent 08 Highlights 08 Results 08 2008 Scholars 12 The Trudeau Fellowship 12 A Two-Way Street 12 Encouraging the Next Generation 12 Highlights 12 Results 13 2008 Fellows 16 The Trudeau Mentorship 16 Forging the Path 16 Productive Bonds 16 Highlights 16 Results 17 2008 Mentors 20 The Public Interaction Program 20 Working Hand in Hand 20 Creating a Productive Network 20 Highlights 21 2007-2008 PIP Events 26 Board of Directors 27 Members of the Foundation The Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation 2007-2008 Annual Report 28 File Review Committees ISSN 1918-2422 29 Foundation Staff Legal Deposit - Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec, 2008 Legal Deposit - Library and Archives Canada, 2008 31 Financial Statements AN INDEPENDENT AND NON-PARTISAN CANADIAN CHARITY, THE PIERRE ELLIOTT TRUDEAU FOUNDATION WAS ESTABLISHED IN 2001 AS A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE FORMER PRIME MINISTER BY HIS FAMILY, FRIENDS, AND COLLEAGUES. IN 2002, THE GOVERNMENT OUR MISSION OF CANADA ENDOWED The Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation promotes innovative research in the humanities and social sciences. We foster dialogue among scholars and policymakers in the arts, business, government, professions, and volunteer sectors because the global project of democracy demands that the brightest and most creative among us be given the opportunity to learn, think, and wonder “how might” and “what if,” “why” and THE FOUNDATION WITH A “why not.” Through our growing community, we actively encourage talented individuals to develop audacious DONATION OF $125 MILLION.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Independent Advisory Board for Senate Appointments Permanent Process (July to November 2016)
    Report of the Independent Advisory Board for Senate Appointments Permanent Process (July to November 2016) The Right Honourable Justin Trudeau Prime Minister of Canada 80 Wellington Street Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A2 December 13, 2016 Dear Prime Minister, Pursuant to our Terms of Reference, the Independent Advisory Board for Senate Appointments submits to you this report on the first cycle of the permanent process for providing recommendations for appointments to the Senate of Canada. We thank you for your continued confidence and for the opportunity to serve such an important process. Respectfully, Huguette Labelle Chair Federal members: New Brunswick members: Prince Edward Island members: Daniel Jutras Donald Savoie Jeannette Arsenault Indira Samarasekera Roxanne Tarjan Chief Brian Francis British Columbia members: Nova Scotia members: Québec members: Anne Giardini Jennifer Gillivan Sylvie Bernier Vikram Vij Ramona Lumpkin Yves Lamontagne Manitoba members: Ontario members: Heather Bishop Dawn Lavell Harvard Susan Lewis Murray Segal Permanent Process Report (July to November 2016) 1 | P a g e Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Establishment of the Board ....................................................................................................................... 3 Implementation of the new appointments process ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Roundtable Participants
    E APPENDIX E ROUNDTABLE PARTICIPANTS Moncton Roundtable August 31, 2005 Derek Burney, O.C., former Chief of Staff to Prime Minister Brian Mulroney,former Ambassador to the United States of America;currently Chairman of the Board of Directors, New Brunswick Power. Spencer Campbell, former Chief of Staff to the Premier of Prince Edward Island; currently partner in the law firm Stewart McKelvey Stirling Scales. Honourable John C. Crosbie, O.C., former federal Cabinet Minister (Finance,Justice,Transport,International Trade,Fisheries and Oceans, Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency); currently Chancellor of Memorial University of Newfoundland and Counsel with the law firm Patterson Palmer. 231 232 RESTORING ACCOUNTABILITY:RECOMMENDATIONS Pierre Foucher, Professor, Université de Moncton, School of Law, a specialist in constitutional law. Paul Howe, former Research Director at the Institute for Research on Public Policy in Montreal; currently Professor of Political Science, University of New Brunswick and author. Dean Jobb,former reporter,editor and columnist at the Halifax Herald; currently Professor at University of King’s College School of Journalism. Aldéa Landry, former Cabinet Minister (Regional Economic Development Fisheries, Housing) and Deputy Premier of New Brunswick and former public servant with the New Brunswick Department of Justice; currently President of Landal Inc. Honourable Donald H. Oliver, Senator and Counsel with Power, Dempsey, Cooper & Leefe. Wynne Potter,former Vice-President of the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency in Nova Scotia; currently a member of the Board of Genome Atlantic, and an advisor to government officials and committees. Gordon Slade, former Deputy Minister in the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador and former Vice President of the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency; currently Executive Director of ONE OCEAN.
    [Show full text]
  • Archived Content Contenu Archivé
    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. Solicitor General Solliciteur général I*Il Canada Canada PEOPLE AND PROCESS IN TRANSITION Report to the Solicitor General by the Independent Advisory Team on the Canadian Security Intelligence Service JL 86 . S4 15 1987 c.3 TL 1'n 7 'PEOPLE AND PROCESS IN TRANSITION/ fe_ei .
    [Show full text]
  • Departmental Audit Committees and Governance: Improving Scrutiny Or Allaying Public Perceptions of Poor Management?
    Departmental Audit Committees and Governance: Improving Scrutiny or Allaying Public Perceptions of Poor Management? Robert P. Shepherd School of Public Policy and Administration Carleton University, Ottawa, ON Delivered at CPSA Annual Conference May 29, 2009 Departmental Audit Committees and Governance: Improving Scrutiny or Allaying Public Perceptions of Poor Management? “I don't think any institution can go through the scrutiny, the scrubbing we've gone through and come out squeaky clean.” Kofi Annan, 2001 INTRODUCTION1 A fundamental shift is occurring in Canada‟s federal public management - quietly, discreetly and well below the radar of many discussions on the topic. A directive issued by the Treasury Board and administered by the Office of the Comptroller General, requires departments and agencies to institute “departmental and agency audit committees” (DAACs) as of 1 April 2006. The role of these committees is to “ensure that the deputy head has independent, objective advice, guidance, and assurance on the adequacy of the department‟s control and accountability processes. In order to give this support to the deputy head, the audit committee should exercise active oversight of core areas of departmental control and accountability in an integrated and systematic way.”2 These committees support deputy heads in their role as accounting officers. Members of these committees are typically former senior public servants, academics or, as is becoming the norm, former or current high ranking officers from private sector firms. That these individuals would have singular and regular access to deputy heads and detailed and confidential information about the management within departments is unprecedented. That they have the authority and resources to compel departmental officials through the deputy head to follow their advice is also a fundamental shift in organizational culture for federal departments and agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Everyday Heroes Jacques Ménard Is One of Several Ivey Alumni Who Have Received the Order of Canada
    Everyday Heroes Jacques Ménard is one of several Ivey alumni who have received the Order of Canada. Page 26 Ivey in Asia: Five years later Page 16 Publication Sales Agreement 40015801 INSIDE FALL 2003INTOUCH FEATURES 32 Expanding the Boundaries curriculum, a new continental sec- 16 Ivey in Asia: Five years later of Knowledge Thanks to tion of the Executive MBA and more. In September 1998, the Cheng Yu Corus Entertainment and Shaw Tung Management Institute, Ivey’s Communications, Ivey has been 9 Alumni News and Events permanent Hong Kong campus, able to enhance two areas of Wine tasting in California, a high- opened with great fanfare. Today, research – women in management, powered conference in London, the School’s Asian initiative is well and family businesses. young alumni in Toronto – are you established and we’re getting ready missing something? to launch an innovative MBA pro- 34 Close to the Heart Does gram. Join us for a look back and Rick Robertson’s blood run green? 37 Notes from Near and Far forward, and meet four Ivey alumni It seems possible. The three-time Where are they now? Doing who are thriving in Asia. Ivey grad is Director and a passion- amazing things in locations across ate supporter of the unique Ivey North America and around the 26 Honoring Canada’s Best HBA program. world. Catch up on all the latest The Order of Canada medallion is from your classmates. shaped like a snowflake to reflect DEPARTMENTS the uniqueness of 4 Doing Business Catch up on 48 Alumni Speak From Dubai, each recipient of what’s happening around Ivey, a refreshing perspective on war, Canada’s highest including an overhaul of the MBA tolerance and hope.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Economics, Selected Papers
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]