DOCSLIB.ORG

Cdkn2a Smad4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cdkn2a Smad4 NPMNPMNPMNPM NPM 4 6 8 10 6 8 10 12 6 7 8 9 2 4 6 8 2 4 6 8 log ● 2 ● ● ● (expression) ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● p<0.001 ns p<0.001 ns p<0.001 ns p<0.001 p<0.001 p=0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001 ns p<0.001 ID1 AHR KLF5 PPARG HMGB2 H NBC NBC NBCNBCNBC NBC p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001 2 4 6 8 10 6 8 10 log 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 2 4 6 8 1 3 5 ● ● 2 ● ● (expression) ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● p<0.001 p<0.001 p=0.01 p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001 PPARG HMGB2 AHR KLF5 ID1 RBPJL G PC1 (49%) PC1 JUNB ST18 NFIC EPAS1 JUN SREBF2 NFE2L1 ELF3 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ISL1 RUNX1 MYC ELF1 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ZBTB38 ID3 RBPJL MLXIPL EHF ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ZBTB16 ID2 RBPJ MLXIP EGR1 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● XBP1 ID1 PRRX1 MEIS2 DRAP1 ● ● TSHZ3 HSF4 PPARG MEIS1 DMTF1 ● ● ● ● ● TCGA_PDA ● TSC22D3 HMGB3 PEG3 MEF2A CREB3L1 ● ● ● ● ICGC_PDA ● ● TSC22D1 HMGB2 PAX6 MAZ BPTF ● )%31( 2CP ● )%31( ● ● ● PNET ● ● ● ● ● TFDP1 HMGB1 NR5A2 MAFB BHLHE40 ● ● ● ● ● Normal ● ● STAT6 HMGA1 NR4A1 KLF6 BHLHA15 ● Top5_TFs STAT3 HIF1A NPAS2 KLF5 BCL6 F STAT2 FOSB NKX6-3 KLF13 ATF4 PC1 (36%) PC1 STAT1 FOS NKX2-2 JUND AHR D Kras pSMAD2 IHC G12D Normal ;Cdkn2a PNET 2CP )%11( PDA PCA of all TFs in each case each in TFs all of PCA Smad4 Smad4 ICGC & GTEx RNAseq GTEx & ICGC -/- E C -/- +/+ GAPDH GAPDH SMAD2/3 Non-specific Loading pSMAD2/3 pSMAD2/3 SMAD4 SMAD4 - + - + - + - + - - + - + + - + - - + - + + - + - + - - + β: TGF T1H4 CTLR3 HT47 HT11 HT28 HT33 LMCB3 HT30 HT25 HT42 HT24 HT22 NL5 Organoid: B Deep Deletion Deep Missense Mutation (likely driver) (likely Mutation Missense Amplification Truncating Mutation Truncating Missense Mutation (likely passenger) (likely Mutation Missense Genetic Alteration: Genetic (43%) SMAD4 (38%) SMAD4 (6%) SMAD3 (1.3%) SMAD3 (20%) SMAD2 (5%) SMAD2 (7%) TGFBR2 (8%) TGFBR2 (5%) TGFBR1 (6%) TGFBR1 β core pathway alterations in PD in alterations pathway core β TGF- A (UTSW): A β core pathway alterations in PD in alterations pathway core β TGF- A (TCGA): A (38%) SMAD4 (43%) SMAD4 (70%) TP53 (54%) TP53 (46%) CDKN2A (41%) CDKN2A (91%) KRAS (93%) KRAS Most common genetic alterations in PDA (UTSW): PDA in alterations genetic common Most Most common genetic alterations in PDA (TCGA): PDA in alterations genetic common Most A Supplementary Fig. S1 Fig. Supplementary Supplementary Fig. S1: TGF-β signaling and transcriptional networks in PDA A) cBioportal oncoprints of common genetic alterations and TGF-β pathway alterations in PDA. Each column represents one case. B) Western immunoBlot analysis of pSMAD2 and SMAD4 in human PDA organoids treated with or without 100 pM TGF-β for 2h. C) pSMAD2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) of mouse KrasG12D;Cdkn2a-/- PDA in the pancreas (right) and KrasG12D; Cdkn2a-/-;Smad4-/- PDA metastasis in the lung (left). D) Genes represented within the top 5 expressed transcription factors of at least one sample in 225 samples of normal pancreas, PNET, and PDA. E) PCA of GTEx and ICGC RNA-seq datasets from using the complete list of transcription factors expressed in these samples. F) PCA of GTEx, ICGC, and TCGA RNA-seq datasets using the gene set in Supplementary Fig. S1D. G) GEO2R analysis of the expression of the top PDA-enriched PC1 genes (refer to Figure 1E) in the pancreatic microarray dataset GSE71729. N=Normal pancreas, B=Basal PDA, C=Classical PDA. p-values are from two-sided, unpaired t-tests of B versus N, and C versus N. H) GEO2R analysis of the expression of PDA-enriched PC1 genes in pancreatic microarray dataset GSE71729. N=Normal pancreas, P=Primary PDA tumor, M=Metastasis of PDA. P- values from two-sided, unpaired t-tests of P versus N, and M versus P. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ATF4 Promotes Angiogenesis and Neuronal Cell Death and Confers Ferroptosis in a Xct-Dependent Manner
    OPEN Oncogene (2017) 36, 5593–5608 www.nature.com/onc ORIGINAL ARTICLE ATF4 promotes angiogenesis and neuronal cell death and confers ferroptosis in a xCT-dependent manner D Chen1,2,ZFan1,3, M Rauh4, M Buchfelder5, IY Eyupoglu1,5 and N Savaskan1,5,6 Activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) is a critical mediator of metabolic and oxidative homeostasis and cell survival. ATF4 is elevated in response to diverse microenvironmental stresses, including starvation, ER stress damages and exposure to toxic factors. Here we show that ATF4 expression fosters the malignancy of primary brain tumors (WHO grade III and IV gliomas) and increases proliferation and tumor angiogenesis. Hence, ATF4 expression promotes cell migration and anchorage-independent cell growth, whereas siRNA-mediated knockdown of ATF4 attenuates these features of malignancy in human gliomas. Further experiments revealed that ATF4-dependent tumor promoting effects are mediated by transcriptional targeting the glutamate antiporter xCT/SCL7A11 (also known as system Xc-). Thus, xCT is elevated as a consequence of ATF4 activation. We further found evidence that ATF4-induced proliferation can be attenuated by pharmacological or genetic xCT inhibition and ferroptosis inducers such as sorafenib, erastin and GPx4 inhibitor RSL3. Further, fostered xCT expression promotes cell survival and growth in ATF4 knockdown cells. Moreover, increased xCT levels ameliorate sorafenib and erastin-induced ferroptosis. Conversely, ATF4 knockdown renders cells susceptible for erastin, sorafenib and RSL3-induced ferroptosis. We further identified that ATF4 promotes tumor-mediated neuronal cell death which can be alleviated by xCT inhibition. Moreover, elevated ATF4 expression in gliomas promotes tumor angiogenesis. Noteworthy, ATF4-induced angiogenesis could be diminished by ferroptosis inducers erastin and by GPx4 inhibitor RSL3.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Tumor Subgroups of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder Defined by Integrated Genomic Analysis
    Published OnlineFirst August 29, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1807 Clinical Cancer Human Cancer Biology Research Novel Tumor Subgroups of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder Defined by Integrated Genomic Analysis Carolyn D. Hurst, Fiona M. Platt, Claire F. Taylor, and Margaret A. Knowles Abstract Purpose: There is a need for improved subclassification of urothelial carcinoma (UC) at diagnosis. A major aim of this study was to search for novel genomic subgroups. Experimental design: We assessed 160 tumors for genome-wide copy number alterations and mutation in genes implicated in UC. These comprised all tumor grades and stages and included 49 high-grade stage T1 (T1G3) tumors. Results: Our findings point to the existence of genomic subclasses of the "gold-standard" grade/stage groups. The T1G3 tumors separated into 3 major subgroups that differed with respect to the type and number of copy number events and to FGFR3 and TP53 mutation status. We also identified novel regions of copy number alteration, uncovered relationships between molecular events, and elucidated relationships between molecular events and clinico-pathologic features. FGFR3 mutant tumors were more chromosom- ally stable than their wild-type counterparts and a mutually exclusive relationship between FGFR3 mutation and overrepresentation of 8q was observed in non-muscle-invasive tumors. In muscle-invasive (MI) tumors, metastasis was positively associated with losses of regions on 10q (including PTEN), 16q and 22q, and gains on 10p, 11q, 12p, 19p, and 19q. Concomitant copy number alterations positively associated with TP53 mutation in MI tumors were losses on 16p, 2q, 4q, 11p, 10q, 13q, 14q, 16q, and 19p, and gains on 1p, 8q, 10q, and 12q.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Profile of Tumor-Specific CD8+ T Cell Hypofunction in a Transplantable Murine Cancer Model
    Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on September 25, 2021 T + is online at: average * The Journal of Immunology , 34 of which you can access for free at: 2016; 197:1477-1488; Prepublished online 1 July from submission to initial decision 4 weeks from acceptance to publication 2016; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600589 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/197/4/1477 Molecular Profile of Tumor-Specific CD8 Cell Hypofunction in a Transplantable Murine Cancer Model Katherine A. Waugh, Sonia M. Leach, Brandon L. Moore, Tullia C. Bruno, Jonathan D. Buhrman and Jill E. Slansky J Immunol cites 95 articles Submit online. Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists ? is published twice each month by Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts http://jimmunol.org/subscription Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2016/07/01/jimmunol.160058 9.DCSupplemental This article http://www.jimmunol.org/content/197/4/1477.full#ref-list-1 Information about subscribing to The JI No Triage! Fast Publication! Rapid Reviews! 30 days* Why • • • Material References Permissions Email Alerts Subscription Supplementary The Journal of Immunology The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2016 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. This information is current as of September 25, 2021. The Journal of Immunology Molecular Profile of Tumor-Specific CD8+ T Cell Hypofunction in a Transplantable Murine Cancer Model Katherine A.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts from the 9Th Biennial Scientific Meeting of The
    International Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology 2017, 2017(Suppl 1):15 DOI 10.1186/s13633-017-0054-x MEETING ABSTRACTS Open Access Abstracts from the 9th Biennial Scientific Meeting of the Asia Pacific Paediatric Endocrine Society (APPES) and the 50th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology (JSPE) Tokyo, Japan. 17-20 November 2016 Published: 28 Dec 2017 PS1 Heritable forms of primary bone fragility in children typically lead to Fat fate and disease - from science to global policy a clinical diagnosis of either osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) or juvenile Peter Gluckman osteoporosis (JO). OI is usually caused by dominant mutations affect- Office of Chief Science Advsor to the Prime Minister ing one of the two genes that code for two collagen type I, but a re- International Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology 2017, 2017(Suppl 1):PS1 cessive form of OI is present in 5-10% of individuals with a clinical diagnosis of OI. Most of the involved genes code for proteins that Attempts to deal with the obesity epidemic based solely on adult be- play a role in the processing of collagen type I protein (BMP1, havioural change have been rather disappointing. Indeed the evidence CREB3L1, CRTAP, LEPRE1, P4HB, PPIB, FKBP10, PLOD2, SERPINF1, that biological, developmental and contextual factors are operating SERPINH1, SEC24D, SPARC, from the earliest stages in development and indeed across generations TMEM38B), or interfere with osteoblast function (SP7, WNT1). Specific is compelling. The marked individual differences in the sensitivity to the phenotypes are caused by mutations in SERPINF1 (recessive OI type obesogenic environment need to be understood at both the individual VI), P4HB (Cole-Carpenter syndrome) and SEC24D (‘Cole-Carpenter and population level.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • 4-6 Weeks Old Female C57BL/6 Mice Obtained from Jackson Labs Were Used for Cell Isolation
    Methods Mice: 4-6 weeks old female C57BL/6 mice obtained from Jackson labs were used for cell isolation. Female Foxp3-IRES-GFP reporter mice (1), backcrossed to B6/C57 background for 10 generations, were used for the isolation of naïve CD4 and naïve CD8 cells for the RNAseq experiments. The mice were housed in pathogen-free animal facility in the La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology and were used according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and use Committee. Preparation of cells: Subsets of thymocytes were isolated by cell sorting as previously described (2), after cell surface staining using CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53-6.7), CD3ε (145- 2C11), CD24 (M1/69) (all from Biolegend). DP cells: CD4+CD8 int/hi; CD4 SP cells: CD4CD3 hi, CD24 int/lo; CD8 SP cells: CD8 int/hi CD4 CD3 hi, CD24 int/lo (Fig S2). Peripheral subsets were isolated after pooling spleen and lymph nodes. T cells were enriched by negative isolation using Dynabeads (Dynabeads untouched mouse T cells, 11413D, Invitrogen). After surface staining for CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53-6.7), CD62L (MEL-14), CD25 (PC61) and CD44 (IM7), naïve CD4+CD62L hiCD25-CD44lo and naïve CD8+CD62L hiCD25-CD44lo were obtained by sorting (BD FACS Aria). Additionally, for the RNAseq experiments, CD4 and CD8 naïve cells were isolated by sorting T cells from the Foxp3- IRES-GFP mice: CD4+CD62LhiCD25–CD44lo GFP(FOXP3)– and CD8+CD62LhiCD25– CD44lo GFP(FOXP3)– (antibodies were from Biolegend). In some cases, naïve CD4 cells were cultured in vitro under Th1 or Th2 polarizing conditions (3, 4).
    [Show full text]
  • Prox1regulates the Subtype-Specific Development of Caudal Ganglionic
    The Journal of Neuroscience, September 16, 2015 • 35(37):12869–12889 • 12869 Development/Plasticity/Repair Prox1 Regulates the Subtype-Specific Development of Caudal Ganglionic Eminence-Derived GABAergic Cortical Interneurons X Goichi Miyoshi,1 Allison Young,1 Timothy Petros,1 Theofanis Karayannis,1 Melissa McKenzie Chang,1 Alfonso Lavado,2 Tomohiko Iwano,3 Miho Nakajima,4 Hiroki Taniguchi,5 Z. Josh Huang,5 XNathaniel Heintz,4 Guillermo Oliver,2 Fumio Matsuzaki,3 Robert P. Machold,1 and Gord Fishell1 1Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, NYU Neuroscience Institute, Smilow Research Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, 2Department of Genetics & Tumor Cell Biology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, 3Laboratory for Cell Asymmetry, RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, Kobe 650-0047, Japan, 4Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, GENSAT Project, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10065, and 5Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724 Neurogliaform (RELNϩ) and bipolar (VIPϩ) GABAergic interneurons of the mammalian cerebral cortex provide critical inhibition locally within the superficial layers. While these subtypes are known to originate from the embryonic caudal ganglionic eminence (CGE), the specific genetic programs that direct their positioning, maturation, and integration into the cortical network have not been eluci- dated. Here, we report that in mice expression of the transcription factor Prox1 is selectively maintained in postmitotic CGE-derived cortical interneuron precursors and that loss of Prox1 impairs the integration of these cells into superficial layers. Moreover, Prox1 differentially regulates the postnatal maturation of each specific subtype originating from the CGE (RELN, Calb2/VIP, and VIP).
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Utility of Recently Identified Diagnostic, Prognostic, And
    Modern Pathology (2017) 30, 1338–1366 1338 © 2017 USCAP, Inc All rights reserved 0893-3952/17 $32.00 Clinical utility of recently identified diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive molecular biomarkers in mature B-cell neoplasms Arantza Onaindia1, L Jeffrey Medeiros2 and Keyur P Patel2 1Instituto de Investigacion Marques de Valdecilla (IDIVAL)/Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain and 2Department of Hematopathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA Genomic profiling studies have provided new insights into the pathogenesis of mature B-cell neoplasms and have identified markers with prognostic impact. Recurrent mutations in tumor-suppressor genes (TP53, BIRC3, ATM), and common signaling pathways, such as the B-cell receptor (CD79A, CD79B, CARD11, TCF3, ID3), Toll- like receptor (MYD88), NOTCH (NOTCH1/2), nuclear factor-κB, and mitogen activated kinase signaling, have been identified in B-cell neoplasms. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, Burkitt lymphoma, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, hairy cell leukemia, and marginal zone lymphomas of splenic, nodal, and extranodal types represent examples of B-cell neoplasms in which novel molecular biomarkers have been discovered in recent years. In addition, ongoing retrospective correlative and prospective outcome studies have resulted in an enhanced understanding of the clinical utility of novel biomarkers. This progress is reflected in the 2016 update of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms, which lists as many as 41 mature B-cell neoplasms (including provisional categories). Consequently, molecular genetic studies are increasingly being applied for the clinical workup of many of these neoplasms. In this review, we focus on the diagnostic, prognostic, and/or therapeutic utility of molecular biomarkers in mature B-cell neoplasms.
    [Show full text]
  • Supp Table 1.Pdf
    Upregulated genes in Hdac8 null cranial neural crest cells fold change Gene Symbol Gene Title 134.39 Stmn4 stathmin-like 4 46.05 Lhx1 LIM homeobox protein 1 31.45 Lect2 leukocyte cell-derived chemotaxin 2 31.09 Zfp108 zinc finger protein 108 27.74 0710007G10Rik RIKEN cDNA 0710007G10 gene 26.31 1700019O17Rik RIKEN cDNA 1700019O17 gene 25.72 Cyb561 Cytochrome b-561 25.35 Tsc22d1 TSC22 domain family, member 1 25.27 4921513I08Rik RIKEN cDNA 4921513I08 gene 24.58 Ofa oncofetal antigen 24.47 B230112I24Rik RIKEN cDNA B230112I24 gene 23.86 Uty ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat gene, Y chromosome 22.84 D8Ertd268e DNA segment, Chr 8, ERATO Doi 268, expressed 19.78 Dag1 Dystroglycan 1 19.74 Pkn1 protein kinase N1 18.64 Cts8 cathepsin 8 18.23 1500012D20Rik RIKEN cDNA 1500012D20 gene 18.09 Slc43a2 solute carrier family 43, member 2 17.17 Pcm1 Pericentriolar material 1 17.17 Prg2 proteoglycan 2, bone marrow 17.11 LOC671579 hypothetical protein LOC671579 17.11 Slco1a5 solute carrier organic anion transporter family, member 1a5 17.02 Fbxl7 F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 7 17.02 Kcns2 K+ voltage-gated channel, subfamily S, 2 16.93 AW493845 Expressed sequence AW493845 16.12 1600014K23Rik RIKEN cDNA 1600014K23 gene 15.71 Cst8 cystatin 8 (cystatin-related epididymal spermatogenic) 15.68 4922502D21Rik RIKEN cDNA 4922502D21 gene 15.32 2810011L19Rik RIKEN cDNA 2810011L19 gene 15.08 Btbd9 BTB (POZ) domain containing 9 14.77 Hoxa11os homeo box A11, opposite strand transcript 14.74 Obp1a odorant binding protein Ia 14.72 ORF28 open reading
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting Template
    STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ANALYZING GENOMICS DATA By SINJINI SIKDAR A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2017 © 2017 Sinjini Sikdar Dedicated to my husband, Sandipan, who has been a constant source of support and encouragement during the challenges of my PhD life. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am deeply grateful to my advisor Professor Susmita Datta for her unyielding support and invaluable guidance throughout my graduate work. It would not have been possible for me to reach this point without her support. I also want to express my sincere thanks to Professor Somnath Datta as I learnt a lot through my interactions with him and benefited from his expert suggestions. I am also thankful to my other dissertation committee members Professor Fei Zou, and Professor Lauren McIntyre for all their kind support and constructive comments regarding my dissertation. I want to thank Professor Ryan Gill from University of Louisville for his helpful contributions to my research works. I also want to thank all the faculty, staff, and students of the Department of Biostatistics at University of Florida as well as all the faculty and students of the Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics at University of Louisville who have helped me reach this point. I would like to thank my sister Shreejata Sikdar for her invaluable friendship and constant support throughout my PhD life. Finally, I want to thank my parents for their immense encouragement that have helped me in moving forward in my academic life.
    [Show full text]
  • A Flexible Microfluidic System for Single-Cell Transcriptome Profiling
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN A fexible microfuidic system for single‑cell transcriptome profling elucidates phased transcriptional regulators of cell cycle Karen Davey1,7, Daniel Wong2,7, Filip Konopacki2, Eugene Kwa1, Tony Ly3, Heike Fiegler2 & Christopher R. Sibley 1,4,5,6* Single cell transcriptome profling has emerged as a breakthrough technology for the high‑resolution understanding of complex cellular systems. Here we report a fexible, cost‑efective and user‑ friendly droplet‑based microfuidics system, called the Nadia Instrument, that can allow 3′ mRNA capture of ~ 50,000 single cells or individual nuclei in a single run. The precise pressure‑based system demonstrates highly reproducible droplet size, low doublet rates and high mRNA capture efciencies that compare favorably in the feld. Moreover, when combined with the Nadia Innovate, the system can be transformed into an adaptable setup that enables use of diferent bufers and barcoded bead confgurations to facilitate diverse applications. Finally, by 3′ mRNA profling asynchronous human and mouse cells at diferent phases of the cell cycle, we demonstrate the system’s ability to readily distinguish distinct cell populations and infer underlying transcriptional regulatory networks. Notably this provided supportive evidence for multiple transcription factors that had little or no known link to the cell cycle (e.g. DRAP1, ZKSCAN1 and CEBPZ). In summary, the Nadia platform represents a promising and fexible technology for future transcriptomic studies, and other related applications, at cell resolution. Single cell transcriptome profling has recently emerged as a breakthrough technology for understanding how cellular heterogeneity contributes to complex biological systems. Indeed, cultured cells, microorganisms, biopsies, blood and other tissues can be rapidly profled for quantifcation of gene expression at cell resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Analysis of KRAS Mutant Cell Lines Ben Yi Tew1,5, Joel K
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of KRAS mutant cell lines Ben Yi Tew1,5, Joel K. Durand2,5, Kirsten L. Bryant2, Tikvah K. Hayes2, Sen Peng3, Nhan L. Tran4, Gerald C. Gooden1, David N. Buckley1, Channing J. Der2, Albert S. Baldwin2 ✉ & Bodour Salhia1 ✉ Oncogenic RAS mutations are associated with DNA methylation changes that alter gene expression to drive cancer. Recent studies suggest that DNA methylation changes may be stochastic in nature, while other groups propose distinct signaling pathways responsible for aberrant methylation. Better understanding of DNA methylation events associated with oncogenic KRAS expression could enhance therapeutic approaches. Here we analyzed the basal CpG methylation of 11 KRAS-mutant and dependent pancreatic cancer cell lines and observed strikingly similar methylation patterns. KRAS knockdown resulted in unique methylation changes with limited overlap between each cell line. In KRAS-mutant Pa16C pancreatic cancer cells, while KRAS knockdown resulted in over 8,000 diferentially methylated (DM) CpGs, treatment with the ERK1/2-selective inhibitor SCH772984 showed less than 40 DM CpGs, suggesting that ERK is not a broadly active driver of KRAS-associated DNA methylation. KRAS G12V overexpression in an isogenic lung model reveals >50,600 DM CpGs compared to non-transformed controls. In lung and pancreatic cells, gene ontology analyses of DM promoters show an enrichment for genes involved in diferentiation and development. Taken all together, KRAS-mediated DNA methylation are stochastic and independent of canonical downstream efector signaling. These epigenetically altered genes associated with KRAS expression could represent potential therapeutic targets in KRAS-driven cancer. Activating KRAS mutations can be found in nearly 25 percent of all cancers1.
    [Show full text]