Marxist Template
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
LOK SABHA ___LIST of BUSINESS Monday, November 18
LOK SABHA _______ LIST OF BUSINESS Monday, November 18, 2019 / Kartika 27, 1941 (Saka) 11 A.M. _______ OATH OR AFFIRMATION 1. The following members to take oath or make the affirmation, sign the Roll of Members and take their seats in the House:- (1) Shri Prince Raj (Samastipur Parliamentary Constituency, Bihar); (2) Smt. Himadri Singh (Shahdol Parliamentary Constituency, Madhya Pradesh); (3) Shri Shriniwas Dadasaheb Patil (Satara Parliamentary Constituency, Maharashtra); and (4) Shri D.M Kathir Anand (Vellore Parliamentary Constituency, Tamil Nadu). _______ OBITUARY REFERENCES 2. OBITUARY REFERENCES to the passing away of:- (1) Dr. Sudhir Ray (Member, 8th to 10th Lok Sabhas); (2) Shri Raja Paramasivam (Member, 12th Lok Sabha); (3) Smt. Sushma Swaraj (Member, 11th, 12th, 15th and 16th Lok Sabhas); (4) Shri Jagannath Mishra (Member, 5th Lok Sabha); (5) Shri Arun Jaitley (Sitting Member, Rajya Sabha); (6) Shri Sukhdev Singh (Member, 14th and 15th Lok Sabhas); 2 (7) Shri Ram Jethmalani (Sitting Member, Rajya Sabha and Member, 6th and 7th Lok Sabhas); (8) Dr. Naramalli Sivaprasad (Member, 15th and 16th Lok Sabhas); (9) Shri B.L. Sharma ‘Prem’ (Member, 10th and 11th Lok Sabhas); and (10) Shri Gurudas Das Gupta (Member, 14th and 15th Lok Sabhas). _______ QUESTIONS 3. QUESTIONS entered in separate list to be asked and answers given. _______ PAPERS TO BE LAID ON THE TABLE Following Ministers to lay papers on the Table:- 4. SHRI ARJUN RAM MEGHWAL for Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs; and 5. SHRI ANURAG SINGH THAKUR for Ministry of Finance. (Printed on a Separate list) _______ MESSAGE FROM RAJYA SABHA 6. -
Chapter 43 Electoral Statistics
CHAPTER 43 ELECTORAL STATISTICS 43.1 India is a constitutional democracy with a parliamentary system of government, and at the heart of the system is a commitment to hold regular, free and fair elections. These elections determine the composition of the Government, the membership of the two houses of parliament, the state and union territory legislative assemblies, and the Presidency and vice-presidency. Elections are conducted according to the constitutional provisions, supplemented by laws made by Parliament. The major laws are Representation of the People Act, 1950, which mainly deals with the preparation and revision of electoral rolls, the Representation of the People Act, 1951 which deals, in detail, with all aspects of conduct of elections and post election disputes. 43.2 The Election Commission of India is an autonomous, quasi-judiciary constitutional body of India. Its mission is to conduct free and fair elections in India. It was established on 25 January, 1950 under Article 324 of the Constitution of India. Since establishment of Election Commission of India, free and fair elections have been held at regular intervals as per the principles enshrined in the Constitution, Electoral Laws and System. The Constitution of India has vested in the Election Commission of India the superintendence, direction and control of the entire process for conduct of elections to Parliament and Legislature of every State and to the offices of President and Vice- President of India. The Election Commission is headed by the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners. There was just one Chief Election Commissioner till October, 1989. In 1989, two Election Commissioners were appointed, but were removed again in January 1990. -
Women's Studies Paper-15 Geeta Mukherjee-Architect of the Women's
Women’s Studies Paper-15 Geeta Mukherjee-Architect of the Women’s Reservation Bill Module-16 PERSONAL DETAILS Role Name Affiliation Principal Investigator Prof. Sumita Parmar Allahabad University, Allahabad Paper Coordinator Dr. Sabu George & CWDS, New Delhi Dr. Kumudini Pati Independent Researcher Associated with the Centre for Women’s Studies Allahabad University Content Writer/Author Dr. Kumudini Pati Independent Researcher Associated with the Centre for Women’s Studies Allahabad University Content Reviewer (CR) Prof. Sumita Parmar Allahabad University Language Editor (LE) Prof. Sumita Parmar Allahabad University, Allahabad DESCRIPTION OF MODULE Subject name Women’s Studies Paper name The stories the States Tell Module name/Title Geeta Mukherjee-Architect of the Women’s Reservation Bill Module ID Paper-15, Module-16 Pre-requisite Some awareness of the context of the Women’s Reservaton Bill Objectives To give the student an understanding of the history of the Women’s Reservation Bill and the long struggle that has gone into it. Keywords Quota, constitution, election, Lok Sabha, Parliament Geeta Mukherjee-Architect of the Women’s Reservation Bill Introduction A modest self-effacing personality but with a steely resolve to fight for the rights of women and the toiling people of India, Geeta Mukherjee, CPI M.P. from Panskura, West Bengal, remained active till the last day of her life. She was a member of the West Bengal Legislative Assembly from 1967 to 1977, winning the Panskura Purba Assembly seat 4 times in a row. She was elected a Member of Parliament for 7 terms, and remained active in parliamentary struggles for a period of 33 long years. -
2015-16 Annual Report
BITM ANNUAL REPORT 2015-16 Basavarajeswari Group of Institutions (A Unit of T.E.H.R.D. Trust ®) (Certified by ISO 9001:2008) (Recognised by Govt. of Karnataka, Approved by AICTE, New Delhi and Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi) “Jnana Gangotri” Campus, #873/2, Ballari-Hosapete Road, Near Allipur, Ballari-583104 (Karnataka) ANNUAL FOR -16 0 BITM ANNUAL REPORT 2015-16 SN PARTICULARS 1. Founder Chairperson and Former Union Minister 2. Board of Trustees 3. Basavarajeswari Group of Institutions 4. Ballari Institute of Technology & Management 5. Governing Body Members 6. Industry Advisory Board 7. Organizational Chart 8. BITM – Vision & Mission 9. Courses Offered: 10. Students on Rolls (UG) 11. Students on Rolls (PG) 12. Research Centre Details 13. Pass Percentage of Students 14. Faculty Details 15. Dept. Of Computer Science & Engineering 16. Department of Electronics & Communication Engg. 17. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering 18. Dept. of Electrical & Electronics Engineering: 19. Department of Civil Engineering 20. Master of Business Administration (MBA) 21. Central Library (Knowledge Centre) 22. Facilities at BITM 23. MoUs/ COE / and Associations 24. Sports Activities 25. Extension And Outreach Programmes Conducted: 26. Awards And Recognition Received. 27. Scholarships and Awards 28. Research Funds Sanctioned and Received From Various Agencies, Industry and Other Organisations 29. Workshops / Seminars Conducted On Intellectual Property Rights and Industry- Academia Innovative Practices. 30. Research Publications 31. Papers in National / International Conference Proceedings per Teacher. 32 Bibliometric of the Publications: 33 Faculty Participation in Seminars/Conferences and Symposia: 34 Procedure for Infrastructure Management and Administration Process: 1 BITM ANNUAL REPORT 2015-16 35 Infrastructure Maintenance 36 Soft Skill Development, Remedial Coaching, Language Lab, Bridge Courses, Yoga, Meditation, Personal Counselling and Mentoring Etc., 37 Students Benefited By Guidance for Competitive Examinations and Career Counselling Offered By the Institution. -
Genocide in Gujarat the Sangh Parivar, Narendra Modi, and the Government of Gujarat
Genocide in Gujarat The Sangh Parivar, Narendra Modi, and the Government of Gujarat Coalition Against Genocide March 02, 2005 _______________________________ This report was compiled by Angana Chatterji, Associate Professor, Anthropology, California Institute of Integral Studies; Lise McKean, Deputy Director, Center for Impact Research, Chicago; and Abha Sur, Lecturer, Program in Women's Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; with the support of various members of the Coalition Against Genocide. We acknowledge the critical assistance provided by certain graduate students, who played a substantial role in shaping this report through research and writing. In writing this, we are indebted to the courage and painstaking work of various individuals, commissions, groups and organizations. Relevant records and documents are referenced, as necessary, in the text and in footnotes. Genocide in Gujarat The Sangh Parivar, Narendra Modi, and the Government of Gujarat Contents Gujarat: Narendra Modi and State Complicity in Genocide---------------------------------------------------3 * Under Narendra Modi’s leadership, between February 28 and March 02, 2002, more than 2,000 people, mostly Muslims, were killed in Gujarat, aided and abetted by the state, following which 200,000 were internally displaced. * The National Human Rights Commission of India held that Narendra Modi, as the chief executive of the state of Gujarat, had complete command over the police and other law enforcement machinery, and is such responsible for the role of the Government of Gujarat in providing leadership and material support in the politically motivated attacks on minorities in Gujarat. * Former President of India, K. R. Narayanan, stated that there was a “conspiracy” between the Bharatiya Janata Party governments at the Centre and in the State of Gujarat behind the riots of 2002. -
Dissolution of the Lok Sabha
DISSOLUTION OF THE LOK SABHA Tanusri Prasanna* Introduction The dissolution of the twelfth Lok Sabha on the twenty sixth day of April, 1999, by the President Mr. K.R. Narayanan, and the role of the latter in the intense political decision making preceding the same, have thrown open afresh the debate as to the exact role of the President as envisaged in the Constitution in the matter of dissolution. This paper attempts to analyse this issue in light of various controversial views on the subject. Pre-independence constitutional debates in India were influenced by two models of democratic government: the British Parliamentary system, and the Presidential system of the United States. In the final analysis the British model being closer home, "every instalment of constitutional reform was regarded as a step towards the establishment of a democratic and responsible government as it functioned in Britain."' Thus, it is widely accepted by various scholars that the founding fathers of the Constitution had opted for the parliamentary system of government. Working on this premise, the concepts such as executive decision making as well as delineating limits and laying a system of checks and balances on the different wings of the government as provided by the inherent federal structure, have been debated over and over again. However, when the Constitution actually came into force, a reading of its provisions sparked off a new line of thought as to the very nature of government, and the Presidential model of the United States which had been earlier rejected was now compared and contrasted.2 These discussions and debates were mainly concerned with the respective powers of the President and the Prime minister in the Constitution and in cases where both entities were strong the clash of opinions was soon recognised. -
Compounding Injustice: India
INDIA 350 Fifth Ave 34 th Floor New York, N.Y. 10118-3299 http://www.hrw.org (212) 290-4700 Vol. 15, No. 3 (C) – July 2003 Afsara, a Muslim woman in her forties, clutches a photo of family members killed in the February-March 2002 communal violence in Gujarat. Five of her close family members were murdered, including her daughter. Afsara’s two remaining children survived but suffered serious burn injuries. Afsara filed a complaint with the police but believes that the police released those that she identified, along with many others. Like thousands of others in Gujarat she has little faith in getting justice and has few resources with which to rebuild her life. ©2003 Smita Narula/Human Rights Watch COMPOUNDING INJUSTICE: THE GOVERNMENT’S FAILURE TO REDRESS MASSACRES IN GUJARAT 1630 Connecticut Ave, N.W., Suite 500 2nd Floor, 2-12 Pentonville Road 15 Rue Van Campenhout Washington, DC 20009 London N1 9HF, UK 1000 Brussels, Belgium TEL (202) 612-4321 TEL: (44 20) 7713 1995 TEL (32 2) 732-2009 FAX (202) 612-4333 FAX: (44 20) 7713 1800 FAX (32 2) 732-0471 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] July 2003 Vol. 15, No. 3 (C) COMPOUNDING INJUSTICE: The Government's Failure to Redress Massacres in Gujarat Table of Contents I. Summary............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Impunity for Attacks Against Muslims............................................................................................................... -
Lok Sabha’ Were Adopted by the Council of States and the House of People Respectively
Parliament - By Jatin Verma Parliament - The Parliament is the legislative organ of the Union government - It occupies a central position in the Indian democratic political system - It has ‘Westminster’ model of govt. ● Articles 79 to 122 in Part V of the Constitution deal with the powers, duration, officers, organisation, privileges, composition, procedures, etc. of the Parliament. Organisation of Parliament ● The Parliament consists of 3 parts viz, the President, the Council of States and the House of the People. ● In 1954, the Hindi names ‘Rajya Sabha’ and ‘Lok Sabha’ were adopted by the Council of States and the House of People respectively. - Rajya Sabha is the Upper House (2nd Chamber or House of Elders which represents the states and UTs). - Lok Sabha is the Lower House (1st Chamber or Popular House, which represents the people of India as a whole). © Jatin Verma 2017-18. All Rights Reserved Parliament ● President is an integral part of the Parliament, because: - A bill cannot become law without the his assent. - He summons and prorogues both the Houses - He can dissolve the Lok Sabha - He addresses both the Houses - He issues ordinances when they are not in session, etc. ● In Britain, the Parliament consists of the Crown (King or Queen), the House of Lords (Upper House) and the House of Commons (Lower House). ● By contrast, in USA, the legislature, which is known as Congress, consists of the Senate (Upper House) and the House of Representatives (Lower House). ● India has the ‘President-in-Parliament’ like the ‘Crown-in-Parliament’ in Britain. ● The presidential form of government, lays stress on the separation of legislative and executive organs. -
The Journal of Parliamentary Information
The Journal of Parliamentary Information VOLUME LIX NO. 1 MARCH 2013 LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd. 24, Ansari Road, Darya Ganj, New Delhi-2 EDITORIAL BOARD Editor : T.K. Viswanathan Secretary-General Lok Sabha Associate Editors : P.K. Misra Joint Secretary Lok Sabha Secretariat Kalpana Sharma Director Lok Sabha Secretariat Assistant Editors : Pulin B. Bhutia Additional Director Lok Sabha Secretariat Parama Chatterjee Joint Director Lok Sabha Secretariat Sanjeev Sachdeva Joint Director Lok Sabha Secretariat © Lok Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi THE JOURNAL OF PARLIAMENTARY INFORMATION VOLUME LIX NO. 1 MARCH 2013 CONTENTS PAGE EDITORIAL NOTE 1 ADDRESSES Addresses at the Inaugural Function of the Seventh Meeting of Women Speakers of Parliament on Gender-Sensitive Parliaments, Central Hall, 3 October 2012 3 ARTICLE 14th Vice-Presidential Election 2012: An Experience— T.K. Viswanathan 12 PARLIAMENTARY EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES Conferences and Symposia 17 Birth Anniversaries of National Leaders 22 Exchange of Parliamentary Delegations 26 Bureau of Parliamentary Studies and Training 28 PARLIAMENTARY AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 30 PRIVILEGE ISSUES 43 PROCEDURAL MATTERS 45 DOCUMENTS OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND PARLIAMENTARY INTEREST 49 SESSIONAL REVIEW Lok Sabha 62 Rajya Sabha 75 State Legislatures 83 RECENT LITERATURE OF PARLIAMENTARY INTEREST 85 APPENDICES I. Statement showing the work transacted during the Twelfth Session of the Fifteenth Lok Sabha 91 (iv) iv The Journal of Parliamentary Information II. Statement showing the work transacted during the 227th Session of the Rajya Sabha 94 III. Statement showing the activities of the Legislatures of the States and Union Territories during the period 1 October to 31 December 2012 98 IV. -
Speaker: Roles and Responsibility: RSTV – in Depth
Speaker: Roles and Responsibility: RSTV – In Depth What’s in the news? Members of the 17th Lok Sabha have taken oath. The House will now elect its Speaker on 19th June, 2019. The NDA has named two-time BJP MP Om Birla as its nominee for the post. Birla, who won from the Kota-Bundi parliamentary seat in Rajasthan, will easily become the speaker as the National Democratic Alliance has a clear majority in the lower house. This edition of ‘In Depth’ will look at the election process, role and responsibilities of the Speaker. It will also look at the powers vested in the Lok Sabha speaker, who is the highest authority in the House and also the custodian of the Parliament building. Analysis: If elected, Om Birla will succeed 8 time MP, Sumitra Mahajan, as the presiding officer of the Lok Sabha. Birla’s name was proposed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and seconded by Home Minister Amit Shah, and Defence Minister, Rajnath Singh. The BJP has given a notice to the Lok Sabha secretariat, proposing Birla for the post and bringing a motion for his election. The resolution to support Birla’s candidature was passed by the Biju Janata Dal (BJD), and was supported by NDA allies, including the National People’s Party, Shiv Sena, Mizo National Front, Lok Jan Shakti Party, YSRCP, JDU, AIADMK, and Apna Dal. The elections for the post is scheduled for June, 19th, 2019. Note on Om Birla: Om Birla has been an MLA in Rajasthan thrice and an MP twice. Birla is a commerce post graduate, educated at the Government Commerce College, Kota. -
Modi, Social Media, and Competitive Electoral Populism in India
International Journal of Communication 11(2017), 4158–4180 1932–8036/20170005 Fragile Hegemony: Modi, Social Media, and Competitive Electoral Populism in India SUBIR SINHA1 School of Oriental and African Studies, London, UK Direct and unmediated communication between the leader and the people defines and constitutes populism. I examine how social media, and communicative practices typical to it, function as sites and modes for constituting competing models of the leader, the people, and their relationship in contemporary Indian politics. Social media was mobilized for creating a parliamentary majority for Narendra Modi, who dominated this terrain and whose campaign mastered the use of different platforms to access and enroll diverse social groups into a winning coalition behind his claims to a “developmental sovereignty” ratified by “the people.” Following his victory, other parties and political formations have established substantial presence on these platforms. I examine emerging strategies of using social media to criticize and satirize Modi and offering alternative leader-people relations, thus democratizing social media. Practices of critique and its dissemination suggest the outlines of possible “counterpeople” available for enrollment in populism’s future forms. I conclude with remarks about the connection between activated citizens on social media and the fragility of hegemony in the domain of politics more generally. Keywords: Modi, populism, Twitter, WhatsApp, social media On January 24, 2017, India’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), proudly tweeted that Narendra Modi, its iconic prime minister of India, had become “the world’s most followed leader on social media” (see Figure 1). Modi’s management of—and dominance over—media and social media was a key factor contributing to his convincing win in the 2014 general election, when he led his party to a parliamentary majority, winning 31% of the votes cast. -
Wooing Voters in 2019: Some Takeaways from December 2018
Verdict 2018 Wooing Voters in 2019: Some Takeaways from December 2018 SMITA GUPTA Congress President Rahul Gandhi at the party headquarters in New Delhi, Tuesday, December 11, 2018. In December 2018, five Indian States went to the polls to elect representatives to their Legislative Assemblies. The results of these elections, some six months before the term of the Sixteenth Lok Sabha ends, are a timely expression of public opinion on the issues to be addressed by political parties – both all-India and regional – in a diverse democratic nation that is riven by majoritarian politics, ignoring serious issues such as economic inequalities and rural-urban divides. If the results reminded all-India parties of the consequences of ignoring State-specific issues, they provided regional parties an unexpected reality check on their potential to make, or unmake, victors. One key takeaway is that all-India parties would have to negotiate political space with regional parties to make substantive electoral gains. With India scheduled to elect its Seventeenth Lok Sabha in mid-2019, Smita Gupta, Senior Fellow, The Hindu Centre for Politics and Public Policy, turns the spotlight on the key lessons delivered by India’s voters to its political class through the elections to five State Legislative Assemblies. In this analysis, she provides insights into voter behaviour in three Hindi- speaking States and one each in the north east and the south. Rural wrath, urban discontent, rumblings within the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party, and the need for the Opposition parties to come to an understanding at the States, she points out, are some important issues that should engage the attention of India’s political parties as they prepare to woo the voter in 2019.