DOCSLIB.ORG

Central Asia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Central Asia Water & Energy Program Working for Energy and Water Security Development Aspirations of Central Asia THE WORLD BANK THE WORLD BANK Central Asia is a dynamic and geographically diverse scarcity of water resources have strained relations region enjoying steady economic growth and new among the countries of the region. Climate change development opportunities. A key element in the and population growth have the potential to strain continued growth, prosperity, stability, and well-being resources and relations further. of the population is the smart management of the region’s energy and water resources. The Central Asia Water and Energy Program (CAWEP) recognizes that strengthened water and energy Although Central Asia is increasingly globalized, resources management at the national and regional national aspirations, such as food security and reliable levels can lead to increased incomes, poverty reduction, energy services, still drive development decisions. The sustainable development, shared prosperity, and climate competition for energy markets and the anticipated resilience across the region. THE WORLD BANK 2 The Benefits of Smart Management of Natural Resources Central Asia is endowed with water and varied Change of Water Availability in Central Asia energy resources—fossil fuels: oil, gas, and coal, Categories of water availability and even more abundant renewables: hydro- thousand m3/capita/year >1.7 significant 10 1.0-1.7 not significant power, wind and solar. These resources can support 9 8.4 <1.0 shortage 8 increased agricultural production and have the 7 5.9 Central Asia 6 Europe potential to exceed domestic energy demand to 5 4.2 4 supply export markets. 3 2.55 2 1 years However, water and energy resources are unevenly 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 distributed across the region and access varies. In some cases there is a lack of physical infrastructure Over the past 40 years, water supply in Central Asia declined from 8.4 th. m3/person/year to 2.5 th. m3/person/year. By 2030, at the current and the outdated systems that exist are unreliable rate of population growth in Central Asia, this reduction will reach a 3 and inefficient. Some communities cannot meet critical value of less than 1.7 th. m /year. And it is still necessary to an- nually provide an additional 500-700 million m3 of water to sustain the citizens’ electricity needs during certain times of the population of Central Asia even at very low levels of consumption. year, while others lack adequate water supply. Source: EC IFAS Total Fossil Fuel MTOE Working at the national and regional levels Coal MTOE KAZAKHSTAN Crude Oil MTOE 22,629 Gas MTOE 16,000 to manage water and energy resources 4,080 Hydro MTOE 2,549 can bring: MTOE=million tons of oil equivalent 58 • Reliable energy supply and reduced winter energy shortages KYRGYZ REPUBLIC 590 • Higher earnings generated by exporting 5 580 and trading energy UZBEKISTAN 5 4,589 266 • Greater agricultural productivity through 2,851 80 1,657 more reliable access to water 32 • Improved water quality and reduced land CHINA degradation TAJIKISTAN 514 • Better adaptation to climate change and 507 2 water/hydrological variability 5 TURKMENISTAN 412 2,698 • Cost-effective infrastructure development 82 68 • Enhanced environment for international 2,549 4 and private investment for both water AFGHANISTAN and energy Source: Energy Supply/Demand balances and Infrastructure Constraints in Central Asia. Asian Development Bank. 2009 3 Water Melting snow from high mountain peaks and precipita- tion provide the seasonal flows to the two major rivers that feed the Aral Sea Basin: the Amu Darya and the Syr Darya. The origins of the Syr Darya are the snow-covered slopes of the Tien Shan Mountains in Kyrgyz Republic. The Amu Darya originates from the glaciated northern slopes of the Hindu Kush and from Wakhan in the Pamir Highlands in Afghanistan and the Pamirs in Tajikistan. 4 Water Resources in Central Asia Water is a vital resource across the region. Both the Syr Darya and the Amu Darya river systems have the potential to provide abundant low-carbon hydropow- er. At the same time, these and other rivers are vital arteries for livelihoods—providing water for agricul- ture and local fisheries, and sustaining environmental ecosystems, human health, and electricity generation across Central Asia. However, the water sector faces many challenges: 50 percent of irrigated lands are affected by salinization and waterlogging as a result of poor irrigation and drainage systems. In Turkmenistan that number is 96 percent, compromising both agricultural productivity and water quality. Improvements to Increase Efficiency National governments are struggling to rehabilitate THE WORLD BANK aging irrigation and drainage infrastructure and implement innovative irrigation technologies to ad- dress these problems and improve food security and resilience to hydrologic variability. Looking ahead, population growth and the need for increased agri- utes 11 percent to these economies’ GDP. Proposed cultural production will continue to strain the region’s improvements in irrigation efficiency could begin to water resources, making smart water management alleviate the problem. For example, in Uzbekistan, a both nationally and regionally a key factor for the 1 percent increase in water pumping efficiency would livelihoods of farmers and agriculture. Across Kazakh- result in savings of $10 million per year; and a 10 stan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, over 10 million percent increase in water pumping efficiency would hectares of agricultural land depend on these waters result in regional savings of $188 million per year. for irrigation, where agriculture on average contrib- Photo to the left and cover © Daniel Korzhonov, Moscow, Russia. 5 Aralsk Lake Balkhash Northern Aral Sea (38) 5 Population (millions) 18 Ili GNI per capita (US$) $7,970 K A Z A K H S T A N GDP (billions US$) $162.9 Southern % rural population w/access to an 86% Aral Sea improved water source (2010) seasonal lake Kazakhstan Land area (1,000 sq. km) 2,725 A r a l K u m Muynak KAZ 10 S Population (millions) 6.2 yr Da GNI per capita (US$) $1,130 r Karakalpakstan 7.9 ya Bishkek Ysik-Kol GDP (billions US$) $7.6 1 % rural population w/access to an 82% Sarygamysh Planned collector Lake K K Y R G Y Z R E P. improved water source (2010) a r a Chirchik- Kyrgyz Republic Land area (1,000 sq. km) 192 B Naryn o Charvak g a z G Ahangaran o Dashoguz 6.5 15 l Tashkent Horezm 4.4 U Z B E K I S T A N 9 UZB 10 KYR 3 Golden Age Lake Population (millions) 8.9 (under construction) (UZB) (37) GNI per capita (US$) $990 Dashoguz Collector 4 Kara Darya UZB 5.3 Aydar Lake TJK 2 (under construction) 1 GDP (billions US$) $7.1 Lebap 3.9 2 Rivers of Ferghana Valley: 8 % rural population w/access to an 64% UZB 10 Tajikistan improved water source (2010) Za T U R K M E N I S T A N rafs Land area (1,000 sq. km) 141 ha KYR 0.1 n C H I N A Great Turkmen Collector Amu-Bukhara 5.2 Kashkadarya Kafarnigan (under construction) 5.3 0.3 TJK 6.6 1.2 Vakhsh Population (millions) 5.8 Dushanbe T A J I K I S T A N GNI per capita (US$) $6,380 Surhandarya Karshi 4.19 0.6 Panj GDP (billions US$) $37.9 Ashgabat UZB 1.5 Sherabad 1.4 % rural population w/access to an 54% 1.5 Amu Darya improved water source (2010) 0.5 0.2 4 20.2 Turkmenistan Land area (1,000 sq. km) 488 0.9 5.6 Karakum Canal 11 M u 33.3 r g a b Kokcha Average river flow and water intake by canals 3 Population (millions) 32.4 T (km /year) e Rivers of Northern j e Prospective expansion GNI per capita (US$) $2,000 n Afghanistan: 6.1 of irrigation 70 Water discharge GDP (billions US$) $49.7 30 (km3/year) % rural population w/access to an 81% I.R. OF 10 A F G H A N I S T A N 5 Uzbekistan improved water source (2010) IRAN Land area (1,000 sq. km) 447 Kunduz Mountain regions above 2000 metres Kabul Irrigated lands i Rud Source: World Bank 2017 Har 0 250 500 750 1000 km 6 © Zoï Environment Network Source: water flow and water use data www.cawater-info.net ab en s h u C d In WATER RESOURCES OF THE ARAL SEA BASIN Aralsk Lake Balkhash Northern Aral Sea (38) 5 Ili K A Z A K H S T A N Southern Aral Sea seasonal lake A r a l K u m Muynak KAZ 10 S y r Da r Karakalpakstan 7.9 ya Bishkek Ysik-Kol 1 Sarygamysh Planned collector Lake K K Y R G Y Z R E P. a r a Chirchik- B Naryn o Charvak g a z G Ahangaran o Dashoguz 6.5 15 l Tashkent Horezm 4.4 U Z B E K I S T A N 9 UZB 10 KYR 3 Golden Age Lake (under construction) (UZB) (37) Dashoguz Collector 4 Kara Darya UZB 5.3 Aydar Lake TJK 2 (under construction) 1 Lebap 3.9 2 Rivers of Ferghana Valley: 8 UZB 10 Za T U R K M E N I S T A N rafs ha KYR 0.1 n C H I N A Great Turkmen Collector Amu-Bukhara 5.2 Kashkadarya Kafarnigan (under construction) 5.3 0.3 TJK 6.6 1.2 Vakhsh Dushanbe T A J I K I S T A N Surhandarya Karshi 4.19 Ashgabat UZB 0.6 1.5 Panj Sherabad 1.4 1.5 Amu Darya 0.5 0.2 4 20.2 0.9 5.6 Karakum Canal 11 M u 33.3 r g a b Kokcha Average river flow and water intake by canals 3 T (km /year) e Rivers of Northern j e Prospective expansion n Afghanistan: 6.1 of irrigation 70 Water discharge 30 (km3/year) I.R.
Recommended publications
  • The Silk Roads: an ICOMOS Thematic Study

    The Silk Roads: an ICOMOS Thematic Study

    The Silk Roads: an ICOMOS Thematic Study by Tim Williams on behalf of ICOMOS 2014 The Silk Roads An ICOMOS Thematic Study by Tim Williams on behalf of ICOMOS 2014 International Council of Monuments and Sites 11 rue du Séminaire de Conflans 94220 Charenton-le-Pont FRANCE ISBN 978-2-918086-12-3 © ICOMOS All rights reserved Contents STATES PARTIES COVERED BY THIS STUDY ......................................................................... X ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................... XI 1 CONTEXT FOR THIS THEMATIC STUDY ........................................................................ 1 1.1 The purpose of the study ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background to this study ......................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Global Strategy ................................................................................................................................ 2 1.2.2 Cultural routes ................................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.3 Serial transnational World Heritage nominations of the Silk Roads .................................................. 3 1.2.4 Ittingen expert meeting 2010 ........................................................................................................... 3 2 THE SILK ROADS: BACKGROUND, DEFINITIONS
  • Shipbuilding in the Aral Sea and the Amu Darya River

    Shipbuilding in the Aral Sea and the Amu Darya River

    International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-8 Issue-4, November 2019 Shipbuilding in the Aral Sea and the Amu Darya River Fazliddin Jumaniyozov Abstract— This article is focused on the history of the the collection also contains information on the first steps of emergence and development of shipbuilding in the Khorezm oasis shipbuilding in the Aral and The Amudarya. The researcher in the 19th and 20th centuries. The history of Butakov's study of from Bukhara Z.O. Koryagdiev tried to cover the problem in the Aral Sea and the discovery of sea routes in Amu Darya river some way. For example, you can read some details about the has a two-hundred-year period. During this time, the navy and the seafaring reached a high level and almost ended. During this Alibobo Port in Gurlen. The port is said to be located in a period, the major part of cargo transported to the Khorezm oasis very picturesque place - opposite Badaytokay, the ships of by ships was a huge flotilla in this area. The deterioration of the Guzmān are constantly flowing to cross the river, and during ecological situation, the extreme degradation of the river and the the holidays, thousands gather. The Alibobo area, which is complication of ships, the efficiency of rail, automobile, airfreight located on a river, even in the hardest part of the river, is safe. and passenger transport - all led to the limitation of ships' “At the bridge on the road to Alibobo, there was a special movement on the rivers of Central Asia.
  • Federal Research Division Country Profile: Tajikistan, January 2007

    Federal Research Division Country Profile: Tajikistan, January 2007

    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Tajikistan, January 2007 COUNTRY PROFILE: TAJIKISTAN January 2007 COUNTRY Formal Name: Republic of Tajikistan (Jumhurii Tojikiston). Short Form: Tajikistan. Term for Citizen(s): Tajikistani(s). Capital: Dushanbe. Other Major Cities: Istravshan, Khujand, Kulob, and Qurghonteppa. Independence: The official date of independence is September 9, 1991, the date on which Tajikistan withdrew from the Soviet Union. Public Holidays: New Year’s Day (January 1), International Women’s Day (March 8), Navruz (Persian New Year, March 20, 21, or 22), International Labor Day (May 1), Victory Day (May 9), Independence Day (September 9), Constitution Day (November 6), and National Reconciliation Day (November 9). Flag: The flag features three horizontal stripes: a wide middle white stripe with narrower red (top) and green stripes. Centered in the white stripe is a golden crown topped by seven gold, five-pointed stars. The red is taken from the flag of the Soviet Union; the green represents agriculture and the white, cotton. The crown and stars represent the Click to Enlarge Image country’s sovereignty and the friendship of nationalities. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Early History: Iranian peoples such as the Soghdians and the Bactrians are the ethnic forbears of the modern Tajiks. They have inhabited parts of Central Asia for at least 2,500 years, assimilating with Turkic and Mongol groups. Between the sixth and fourth centuries B.C., present-day Tajikistan was part of the Persian Achaemenian Empire, which was conquered by Alexander the Great in the fourth century B.C. After that conquest, Tajikistan was part of the Greco-Bactrian Kingdom, a successor state to Alexander’s empire.
  • In the Hari River Basin, with Re-Validation of P. Turcomana

    In the Hari River Basin, with Re-Validation of P. Turcomana

    Journal of Applied Biological Sciences 9 (3): 01-05, 2015 ISSN: 1307-1130, E-ISSN: 2146-0108, www.nobel.gen.tr Taxonomic Status of the Genus Paraschistura (Teleostei: Nemacheilidae) in the Hari River Basin, with Re-validation of P. turcomana Hamed MOUSAVI SABET1* Saber VATANDOUST2 Arash JOULADEH ROUDBAR3 Soheil EAGDERI4 1Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Guilan, Sowmeh Sara, Guilan, Iran 2Department of Fisheries, Islamic Azad University, Babol Branch, Babol, Iran 3Department Fisheries, Sari University of Agriculture Sciences and Natural Resources, Mazandran, Iran 4Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran *Corresponding author: Received: July 12, 2015 Email: [email protected] Accepted: August 23, 2015 Abstract The genus Paraschistura in the Hari River basin is reviewed, and diagnoses are presented for all the three recognized species. Paraschistura cristata and P. turcmenica are considered valid; and P. turcomana is revalidated. Paraschistura turcomana is a poorly known species from the Kushk River in the Murghab drainage at the border of Afghanistan and Turkmenistan, its validity has been questioned and a synonymy with P. turcmenica has been suggested. In this study, we compare P. turcmenica with the syntypes of P. turcomana. A comparison with the related taxa P. cristata and P. turcmenica reveals that P. turcomana can be separated from them by 7½ branched rays in dorsal fin, scaleless body, elongated and shallow body, shallow caudal peduncle, and colour pattern including obvious dark cross bars. The presence of two additional undescribed species is suggested from the basin. Keywords: Freshwater Fishes, Loach, Afghanistan, Iran, Turkmenistan.
  • The New Silk Roads: China, the U.S., and the Future of Central Asia

    The New Silk Roads: China, the U.S., and the Future of Central Asia

    NEW YORK UNIVERSITY i CENTER ON INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION The New Silk Roads: China, the U.S., and the Future of Central Asia October 2015 Thomas Zimmerman NEW YORK UNIVERSITY CENTER ON INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION The world faces old and new security challenges that are more complex than our multilateral and national institutions are currently capable of managing. International cooperation is ever more necessary in meeting these challenges. The NYU Center on International Cooperation (CIC) works to enhance international responses to conflict, insecurity, and scarcity through applied research and direct engagement with multilateral institutions and the wider policy community. CIC’s programs and research activities span the spectrum of conflict, insecurity, and scarcity issues. This allows us to see critical inter-connections and highlight the coherence often necessary for effective response. We have a particular concentration on the UN and multilateral responses to conflict. Table of Contents The New Silk Roads: China, the U.S., and the Future of Central Asia Thomas Zimmerman Acknowledgments 2 Foreword 3 Introduction 6 The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor 9 Chinese Engagement with Afghanistan 11 Conclusion 18 About the Author 19 Endnotes 20 Acknowledgments I would like to thank the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences (SASS) for its support during the research and writing of this paper, particularly Professor Pan Guang and Professor Li Lifan. I would also like to thank Director Li Yihai, and Sun Weidi from the SASS Office for International Cooperation, as well as Vice President Dong Manyuan, and Professor Liu Xuecheng of the China Institute for International Studies. This paper benefited greatly from the invaluable feedback of a number of policy experts, including Klaus Rohland, Andrew Small, Dr.
  • Water Productivity in the Syr-Darya River Basin

    Water Productivity in the Syr-Darya River Basin

    RESEARCH REPORT Water Productivity in the 67 Syr-Darya River Basin Hammond Murray-Rust, Iskandar Abdullaev, Mehmood ul Hassan and Vilma Horinkova International SM Water Management IWMI is a Future Harvest Center Institute supported by the CGIAR Research Reports IWMI’s mission is to improve water and land resources management for food, livelihoods and nature. In serving this mission, IWMI concentrates on the integration of policies, technologies and management systems to achieve workable solutions to real problemspractical, relevant results in the field of irrigation and water and land resources. The publications in this series cover a wide range of subjectsfrom computer modeling to experience with water user associationsand vary in content from directly applicable research to more basic studies, on which applied work ultimately depends. Some research reports are narrowly focused, analytical and detailed empirical studies; others are wide-ranging and synthetic overviews of generic problems. Although most of the reports are published by IWMI staff and their collaborators, we welcome contributions from others. Each report is reviewed internally by IWMI’s own staff and Fellows, and by external reviewers. The reports are published and distributed both in hard copy and electronically (www.iwmi.org) and where possible all data and analyses will be available as separate downloadable files. Reports may be copied freely and cited with due acknowledgment. Research Report 67 Water Productivity in the Syr-Darya River Basin Hammond Murray-Rust, Iskandar Abdullaev, Mehmood ul Hassan and Vilma Horinkova International Water Management Institute P O Box 2075, Colombo, Sri Lanka i IWMI receives its principal funding from 58 governments, private foundations, and international and regional organizations known as the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR).
  • Water Resources Lifeblood of the Region

    Water Resources Lifeblood of the Region

    Water Resources Lifeblood of the Region 68 Central Asia Atlas of Natural Resources ater has long been the fundamental helped the region flourish; on the other, water, concern of Central Asia’s air, land, and biodiversity have been degraded. peoples. Few parts of the region are naturally water endowed, In this chapter, major river basins, inland seas, Wand it is unevenly distributed geographically. lakes, and reservoirs of Central Asia are presented. This scarcity has caused people to adapt in both The substantial economic and ecological benefits positive and negative ways. Vast power projects they provide are described, along with the threats and irrigation schemes have diverted most of facing them—and consequently the threats the water flow, transforming terrain, ecology, facing the economies and ecology of the country and even climate. On the one hand, powerful themselves—as a result of human activities. electrical grids and rich agricultural areas have The Amu Darya River in Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan, with a canal (left) taking water to irrigate cotton fields.Upper right: Irrigation lifeline, Dostyk main canal in Makktaaral Rayon in South Kasakhstan Oblast, Kazakhstan. Lower right: The Charyn River in the Balkhash Lake basin, Kazakhstan. Water Resources 69 55°0'E 75°0'E 70 1:10 000 000 Central AsiaAtlas ofNaturalResources Major River Basins in Central Asia 200100 0 200 N Kilometers RUSSIAN FEDERATION 50°0'N Irty sh im 50°0'N Ish ASTANA N ura a b m Lake Zaisan E U r a KAZAKHSTAN l u s y r a S Lake Balkhash PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC Ili OF CHINA Chui Aral Sea National capital 1 International boundary S y r D a r Rivers and canals y a River basins Lake Caspian Sea BISHKEK Issyk-Kul Amu Darya UZBEKISTAN Balkhash-Alakol 40°0'N ryn KYRGYZ Na Ob-Irtysh TASHKENT REPUBLIC Syr Darya 40°0'N Ural 1 Chui-Talas AZERBAIJAN 2 Zarafshan TURKMENISTAN 2 Boundaries are not necessarily authoritative.
  • Water, Peace and Capacity Building

    Water, Peace and Capacity Building

    Welcome Water, Peace and capacity building Amir Haidari, Delft University of technology Table of Content Introduction Afghanistan Water Challenges Possible solution Summary Afghanistan A Short Introduction Location - Landlocked country NL - Strategically located - ¾ is covered with mountain AFG Afghanistan 4 A Short Introduction Mountains: source of wealth • Hindukush: Continuation of Himalia • Source of precious stones such as: – Emerald, ruby, sapphire, Lazuli (for making ornaments) – Uranium, Lithium (Arabia of Uranium and Lithium) • Main source of water (80%) in the summer and winter Water in Afghanistan A very short summary River Basins in Afghanistan Name of River Biggest Important Basin river stakeholder(s) Kabul Kabul Pakistan Helmand Helmand Iran Hari_rood (Hari Hari_rood Iran / river) Turkmenistan Shomali (Northen) Shomali - Amu Darya (Amu Amu Tajikistan, River) Darya Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan Water Challenges • National Challenges • International challenge and the role of neighbouring countries - Rural area - Urban area Water Challenges Rural Area Challenges 80% of people living in Rural area 90% of poor living in Rural area Agriculture: - Accounts about ¼ of GDP (excluding opium Poppy) - Afghanistan has much bigger capacity for agriculture - Security: A part is in occupation of poppy fields - Technical support: Not intensive use of the land - Urbanization: A part is not in used due to immigration to cities Water Challenges Urban Area Challenges • The urban population increases rapidly (14% between 1999-2010) • Immigration
  • Water Dispute Escalating Between Iran and Afghanistan

    Water Dispute Escalating Between Iran and Afghanistan

    Atlantic Council SOUTH ASIA CENTER ISSUE BRIEF Water Dispute Escalating between Iran and Afghanistan AUGUST 2016 FATEMEH AMAN Iran and Afghanistan have no major territorial disputes, unlike Afghanistan and Pakistan or Pakistan and India. However, a festering disagreement over allocation of water from the Helmand River is threatening their relationship as each side suffers from droughts, climate change, and the lack of proper water management. Both countries have continued to build dams and dig wells without environmental surveys, diverted the flow of water, and planted crops not suitable for the changing climate. Without better management and international help, there are likely to be escalating crises. Improving and clarifying existing agreements is also vital. The United States once played a critical role in mediating water disputes between Iran and Afghanistan. It is in the interest of the United States, which is striving to shore up the Afghan government and the region at large, to help resolve disagreements between Iran and Afghanistan over the Helmand and other shared rivers. The Atlantic Council Future Historical context of Iran Initiative aims to Disputes over water between Iran and Afghanistan date to the 1870s galvanize the international when Afghanistan was under British control. A British officer drew community—led by the United States with its global allies the Iran-Afghan border along the main branch of the Helmand River. and partners—to increase the In 1939, the Iranian government of Reza Shah Pahlavi and Mohammad Joint Comprehensive Plan of Zahir Shah’s Afghanistan government signed a treaty on sharing the Action’s chances for success and river’s waters, but the Afghans failed to ratify it.
  • Transboundary Water Management in Central Asia Legal Framework to Strengthen Interstate Cooperation and Increase Regional Security

    Transboundary Water Management in Central Asia Legal Framework to Strengthen Interstate Cooperation and Increase Regional Security

    Cahiers d’Asie centrale 25 | 2015 L’eau en Asie centrale Transboundary Water Management in Central Asia Legal Framework to Strengthen Interstate Cooperation and Increase Regional Security Barbara Janusz-Pawletta and Mara Gubaidullina Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/asiecentrale/3180 ISSN: 2075-5325 Publisher Éditions De Boccard Printed version Date of publication: 22 December 2015 Number of pages: 195-215 ISBN: 978-2-84743-131-5 ISSN: 1270-9247 Electronic reference Barbara Janusz-Pawletta and Mara Gubaidullina, « Transboundary Water Management in Central Asia », Cahiers d’Asie centrale [Online], 25 | 2015, Online since 22 December 2016, connection on 19 April 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/asiecentrale/3180 © Tous droits réservés 7UDQVERXQGDU\:DWHU 0DQDJHPHQWLQ&HQWUDO$VLD /HJDO)UDPHZRUNWR6WUHQJWKHQ,QWHUVWDWH &RRSHUDWLRQDQG,QFUHDVH5HJLRQDO6HFXULW\ Barbara -$186=3$:/(77$and Mara *8%$,'8//,1$ ,QWURGXFWLRQ $VDUHVXOWRIWKHFROODSVHRIWKH6RYLHW8QLRQDQGDSSHDUDQFHRI¿YHQHZ independent republics in Central Asia, many natural resources, including main watercourses, have acquired transboundary character. The uneven dis- tribution of water resources in Central Asia resulted in an interdependence of the upstream and downstream countries. Tensions have also been caused by the diverging water related political economic interests of the riparian states and poor management of the resources at all levels: regional, basin, national and local. Deserts, semi-deserts, steppes, combined with the arid climate make the whole ecosystem of the region vulnerable. One of the main current challenges in Central Asia is the targeted tran- sition from the old principles of distribution of water resources set up in the Soviet period towards the system of integrated water resource mana- gement (IWRM). It is not a mere technical issue, but it requires an inte- grated approach to the use of water in such areas like agriculture, energy * PhD, DAAD Scholar at Kazakh-German University (DKU) in Almaty.
  • The Aral Sea Basin Crisis and Sustainable Water Resource Management in Central Asia 1

    The Aral Sea Basin Crisis and Sustainable Water Resource Management in Central Asia 1

    The Aral Sea Basin Crisis and Sustainable Water Resource Management in Central Asia 1 1 THE ARAL SEA BASIN CRISIS AND SUSTAINABLE WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN CENTRAL ASIA Everett J. Peachey This article traces the historical development of water resource management in Central Asia, focusing on the causes of the cur- rent Aral Sea Basin crisis. It examines the obstacles facing the Central Asian republics in addressing this problem and offers predictions regarding the future state of the region’s ecology, economy, and stability, as well as the health of the region’s people. The article also explains how existing plans of action have been largely ineffective and why restoring the Aral Sea to its original state is an impossible task. Finally, it provides feasible policy recommendations on how to prevent the further mismanagement of the region’s water while maintaining viable levels of economic development and population growth. “That which is common to the greatest number has the least care bestowed on it” (Aristotle, Politics, Book II, Chapter 3). The five Central Asian republics of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan are facing a nearly unsolvable crisis in the Aral Sea Basin, the site of an environmental and human catastrophe. Given economic and time constraints, the mitigation of the catastrophe, rather than the reconstruction of the Basin’s original ecosystem, is the only viable Everett J. Peachey is a Master of Arts in Law and Diplomacy candidate at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University ([email protected]). Journal of Public and International Affairs, Volume 15/Spring 2004 Copyright © 2004, the Trustees of Princeton University 7 http://www.princeton.edu/~jpia The Aral Sea Basin Crisis and 2 Everett J.
  • Making the Most of Afghanistan's River Basins

    Making the Most of Afghanistan's River Basins

    Making the Most of Afghanistan’s River Basins Opportunities for Regional Cooperation By Matthew King and Benjamin Sturtewagen www.ewi.info About the Authors Matthew King is an Associate at the EastWest Institute, where he manages Preventive Diplomacy Initiatives. Matthew’s main interest is on motivating preventive action and strengthening the in- ternational conflict prevention architecture. His current work focuses on Central and South Asia, including Afghanistan and Iran, and on advancing regional solutions to prevent violent conflict. He is the head of the secretariat to the Parliamentarians Network for Conflict Prevention and Human Security. He served in the same position for the International Task Force on Preventive Diplomacy (2007–2008). King has worked for EWI since 2004. Before then he worked in the legal profession in Ireland and in the private sector with the Ford Motor Company in the field of change management. He is the author or coauthor of numerous policy briefs and papers, including “New Initiatives on Conflict Prevention and Human Security” (2008), and a contributor to publications, including a chapter on peace in Richard Cuto’s Civic and Political Leadership (Sage, forthcoming). He received his law degree from the University of Wales and holds a master’s in peace and conflict resolution from the Centre for Conflict Resolution at the University of Bradford, in England. Benjamin Sturtewagen is a Project Coordinator at the EastWest Institute’s Regional Security Program. His work focuses on South Asia, including Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iran, and on ways to promote regional security. Benjamin has worked for EWI since April 2006, starting as a Project Assistant in its Conflict Prevention Program and later as Project Coordinator in EWI’s Preventive Diplomacy Initiative.