DOCSLIB.ORG

MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN Annual Report 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN Annual Report 2015 Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN Annual Report 2015 Cover Description On February 27, 2015, the RCA acquired a property known as TNC/Monte Cristo. The project is located north of Avocado Mesa Road in the unincorporated Tenaja area of the County of Riverside. The property size is 22.92 acres and was purchased with State and Federal grant funding. The property is located within Rough Step Unit 5, MSHCP Criteria Cell number 7029, within Tenaja of the Southwest Area Plan. The vegetation for this property consists of grassland, coastal sage scrub, and woodland and forest habitat. Within this area, species known to exist, include California red-legged frog, Bell’s sage sparrow, Cooper’s hawk, grasshopper sparrow, bobcat and mountain lion. The property is adjacent to previously conserved lands on the south and east and connects to conserved lands to the north and west. Conservation of this land will help to assemble the reserve for this area, protecting important grassland and woodland forest habitats that are vital to many species. Western Riverside County MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN ANNUAL REPORT For the Period January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 Submitted by the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Overview of the Plan ........................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Reporting Requirements ...................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Methods................................................................................................................ 1-3 2.0 HABITAT GAINS ......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Conservation Summary ........................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Conservation by Jurisdiction................................................................................ 2-3 2.3 Conservation by Area Plan .................................................................................. 2-4 2.4 Conservation and Acquisition Trends .................................................................. 2-6 2.5 Development Projects and Future Conservation ................................................. 2-6 2.6 Non RCA Conservation ...................................................................................... 2-7 3.0 HABITAT LOSSES ....................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Habitat Loss Summary ......................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Rough Step Summaries ........................................................................................ 3-6 4.0 ACTIVITIES WITHIN PLAN AREA ......................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Single-Family/Mobile Home Activity ................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Public Works Projects .......................................................................................... 4-2 4.3 Participating Special Entity Permits .................................................................... 4-4 4.4 Criteria Refinement .............................................................................................. 4-4 4.5 Agency Cooperation ............................................................................................ 4-4 4.6 Clerical/Minor Amendments to the MSHCP ....................................................... 4-6 4.7 Fires, Floods, Drought ......................................................................................... 4-7 4.8 Activities Affecting Reserve Assembly ............................................................... 4-8 5.0 FUNDING SUMMARY................................................................................................. 5-1 6.0 MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES ................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Management Goal ................................................................................................ 6-1 6.2 General Management Activities .......................................................................... 6-1 6.3 Reserve Management Units ................................................................................. 6-2 Western Riverside County MSHCP Annual Report (January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015) TOC-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 6.4 Reserve Management Staffing ............................................................................ 6-3 6.5 RCA Properties Managed by the Parks District ................................................. 6-4 6.6 2014 Management Activities ............................................................................... 6-6 6.7 Lands Received through 404 Permits and Section 7 ......................................... 6-13 6.8 Future Management Activities ........................................................................... 6-22 7.0 MONITORING ACTIVITIES ..................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................... 7-1 7.2 Inventory Phase and Long-term Monitoring Phase ............................................ 7-1 7.3 Monitoring Program Operations .......................................................................... 7-2 7.4 Summary of 2014 Monitoring Activities and Evaluation of Progress toward Achieving Measurable Objectives ........................................ 7-6 7.5 Suggested Changes and Feedback for Adaptive Management .......................... 7-59 8.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 8-1 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A RCA MSHCP Technical Reports ............................................................................... A-1 1. GIS Methodology, Process and Procedures ........................................................ A-1 2. Monitoring Program Survey Results ................................................................. A-1 3. Clerical Amendments to the MSHCP ................................................................. A-2 4. Agricultural Operations Database and Maps ..................................................... A-2 5. Development Project – Future Conservation GIS Data Files ............................. A-2 6. GIS Data Files ..................................................................................................... A-3 7. Conservation by Area Plan Subunits ................................................................. A-4 8. Contact Information ............................................................................................ A-9 LIST OF FIGURES ES-1 Funding Expended 12/31/2015 ......................................................................................ES-3 ES-2 Acres Conserved 12/31/2015 .........................................................................................ES-4 1 Cumulative Acreage Contributions by Federal, State, and Local Jurisdictions .............. 2-2 2 Western Riverside County MSHCP Rough Step Analysis Units .................................... 3-7 3 Rough Step Unit #1 ........................................................................................................ 3-14 Western Riverside County MSHCP Annual Report (January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015) TOC-2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 4 Rough Step Unit #2 ........................................................................................................ 3-17 5 Rough Step Unit #3 ........................................................................................................ 3-20 6 Rough Step Unit #4 ........................................................................................................ 3-23 7 Rough Step Unit #5 ........................................................................................................ 3-26 8 Rough Step Unit #6 ........................................................................................................ 3-28 9 Rough Step Unit #7 ........................................................................................................ 3-31 10 Rough Step Unit #8 ........................................................................................................ 3-35 11 Rough Step Unit #9 ........................................................................................................ 3-38 12 Reserve Habitat Management Units (HMU) ................................................................... 6-2 13 Acres by Habitat Management Unit (HMU) ................................................................... 6-3 14 Evandale Wilson Property .............................................................................................. 6-6 15 EMWD San Jacinto River Relocation Area................................................................... 6-11 16 DR Horton .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Colchester Natural History Society
    COLCHESTER NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY COLCHESTER BOROUGH COUNCIL (CBC) LOCAL PLAN EXAMINATION MAIN MATTER 6 SOUTH COLCHESTER POLICY SC2 MIDDLWICK RANGES 1. In August 2017 Colchester Natural History Society (CNHS) responded to the CBC Draft Local Plan by acknowledging the policy plan to review the Middlewick ecology. In August 2019 in response to a ‘masterplan consultation’ CNHS opposed development citing species rarity and closeness to SSSI sites and added that as the Local Plan at that time had not been examined the masterplan consultation was premature. 2. CBC’s narrative supporting Local Plan Policy SC2: Middlewick Ranges, acknowledges that the site is a designated Local Wildlife Site (LOW). (Previously LoWS’s were titled SINC’s – Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation, a more accurate description of their function). The CBC narrative adds “3.3.2 Middlewick Ranges is a Local Wildlife Site (LoWS) dominated by acid grassland primarily designated for this and its invertebrate populations, but with important scrub, scattered trees and copses and hedgerows. Birch Brook LoWS to the south of the site supports the brook itself and mixed broadleaf and wet woodland, with some characteristics of ancient woodland. The habitats within the site are of high (up to County) biodiversity value, including approximately 53 Ha of acid grassland. The site supports a range of protected species such as invertebrates, breeding birds and bats.” 3. An independent report by Midland Ecology which is an appendix to this submission identifies seven nationally threatened and eight nationally scarce species. 4. The Midland Ecology report paragraph 3.3 makes the point that an important function of Local Wildlife Sites is to “complement or buffer statutory conservation sites (SSSIs)”.
    [Show full text]
  • County of Riverside General Plan Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan
    County of Riverside General Plan Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Transportation and Land Management Agency 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Riverside, CA 92501-3634 Phone: (951) 955-3200, Fax: (951) 955-1811 October 2011 County of Riverside General Plan Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Vision Summary.......................................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 A Special Note on Implementing the Vision ........................................................................................................ 2 Location ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Features ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Setting ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Unique Features ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Badlands/Norton Younglove Preserve
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Species Translocation Plan Button Wrinklewort (Rutidosis
    Threatened Species Translocation Plan Button Wrinklewort (Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides) Summary Button wrinklewort Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides is a perennial wildflower that grows in grasslands and woodlands in Victoria, NSW and the ACT. There are only 29 known extant populations of the species left and only 8 that contain 5000 or more plants. The species is listed as endangered both nationally (EPBC Act 1999) and locally (Nature Conservation Act 2014). Increasing the number of populations through the establishment of new, self-sustaining populations is identified as a key management objective for the preservation of R. leptorrhynchoides in perpetuity in the wild (ACT Government 2017). The translocation will be undertaken at the Barrer Hill restoration area (Molonglo River Reserve, ACT). The restoration area supports potentially suitable habitat, is within the species known range and is believed to have supported R. leptorrhynchoides in the past. Furthermore, the Molonglo River Reserve is recognised as a biodiversity offset with significant and ongoing funding committed to the restoration, protection and ongoing management of reserve. Objectives To establish a new, self-sustaining, genetically diverse population of Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides within the Molonglo River Reserve that is capable of surviving in both the short and long term. Proponents Parks and Conservation Service (PCS) and Conservation Research (CR), Environment and Planning Directorate (EPD). Australian National Botanic Gardens (ANBG) Greening Australia (GA) Translocation team Richard Milner – Ecologist (PCS) Greg Baines – Senior vegetation ecologist (CR) Emma Cook – Vegetation ecologist (CR) David Taylor (ANBG) Martin Henery (ANBG) Nicki Taws (GA) Background Description The Button Wrinklewort Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides (Figure 1) is an erect perennial forb from the daisy family (Asteraceae).
    [Show full text]
  • In Our Hands: the British and UKOT Species That Large Charitable Zoos & Aquariums Are Holding Back from Extinction (AICHI Target 12)
    In our hands: The British and UKOT species that Large Charitable Zoos & Aquariums are holding back from extinction (AICHI target 12) We are: Clifton & West of England Zoological Society (Bristol Zoo, Wild Places) est. 1835 Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust (Jersey Zoo) est. 1963 East Midland Zoological Society (Twycross Zoo) est. 1963 Marwell Wildlife (Marwell Zoo) est. 1972 North of England Zoological Society (Chester Zoo) est. 1931 Royal Zoological Society of Scotland (Edinburgh Zoo, Highland Wildlife Park) est. 1913 The Deep est. 2002 Wild Planet Trust (Paignton Zoo, Living Coasts, Newquay Zoo) est. 1923 Zoological Society of London (ZSL London Zoo, ZSL Whipsnade Zoo) est. 1826 1. Wildcat 2. Great sundew 3. Mountain chicken 4. Red-billed chough 5. Large heath butterfly 6. Bermuda skink 7. Corncrake 8. Strapwort 9. Sand lizard 10. Llangollen whitebeam 11. White-clawed crayfish 12. Agile frog 13. Field cricket 14. Greater Bermuda snail 15. Pine hoverfly 16. Hazel dormouse 17. Maiden pink 18. Chagos brain coral 19. European eel 2 Executive Summary: There are at least 76 species native to the UK, Crown Dependencies, and British Overseas Territories which Large Charitable Zoos & Aquariums are restoring. Of these: There are 20 animal species in the UK & Crown Dependencies which would face significant declines or extinction on a global, national, or local scale without the action of our Zoos. There are a further 9 animal species in the British Overseas Territories which would face significant declines or extinction without the action of our Zoos. These species are all listed as threatened on the IUCN Red List. There are at least 19 UK animal species where the expertise of our Zoological Institutions is being used to assist with species recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Approaches in Natural Resource Conservation and Management
    MOLECULAR APPROACHES IN NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT Recent advances in molecular genetics and genomics have been embraced by many scientists in natural resource conservation. Today, several major conservation and management journals are using the “genetics” editors of this book to deal solely with the influx of manuscripts that employ molecular data. The editors have attempted to synthesize some of the major uses of molecular markers in natural resource management in a book targeted not only at scientists but also at individuals actively making conservation and management decisions. To that end, the text features contributors who are major figures in molecular ecology and evolution – many having published books of their own. The aim is to direct and distill the thoughts of these outstanding scientists by compiling compelling case histories in molecular ecology as they apply to natural resource management. J. Andrew DeWoody is Professor of Genetics and University Faculty Scholar at Purdue University. He earned his MS in genetics at Texas A&M University and his PhD in zoology from Texas Tech University. His recent research in genetics, evolution, and ecology has been funded by organizations including the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Research Initiative, the Great Lakes Fishery Trust, and the National Geographic Society. His research is published in more than thirty-five journals, and he has served as Associate Editor for the North American Journal of Fisheries Management, the Journal of Wildlife Management,andGenetica. John W. Bickham is Professor in the Department of Forestry and Natural Resources (FNR) and Director of the Center for the Environment at Purdue University.
    [Show full text]
  • Colton Joint Unified School District Student Services Center, Board Room, 851 South Mt
    Colton Joint Unified School District Student Services Center, Board Room, 851 South Mt. Vernon Ave., Colton, CA 92324 Minutes August 2, 2012 The CJUSD Board of Education Thursday, August 2, 2012 at 6:00 p.m. in the Board Room at the CJUSD Student Services Center, 851 So. Mt. Vernon Avenue, Colton, California. Trustees Present Mr. Roger Kowalski, President Mrs. Patt Haro, Clerk Mr. Randall Ceniceros Mr. Frank Ibarra Mrs. Laura Morales Mr. Pilar Tabera Staff Members Present (*excused) Mr. Jerry Almendarez Mrs. Jennifer Jaime Mr. Jaime R. Ayala Mrs. Janet Nickell Mrs. Ingrid Munsterman Ms. Katie Orloff Mr. Mike Snellings Ms. Jennifer Rodriguez Mrs. Bertha Arreguín Ms. Sosan Schaller Mr. Todd Beal Mr. Darryl Taylor Mr. Brian Butler* Mr. Robert Verdi Strategic Plan -- Mission Statement The Mission of the Colton Joint Unified School District, a team of caring employees dedicated to the education of children, is to ensure each student learns the academic knowledge and skills necessary to thrive in college or in the workforce and be responsible, productive citizens by providing engaging, challenging, and enriching opportunities and specialized programs. in a safe environment in partnership with students, families and our diverse communities 1.0 OPENING Call to Order/Renewal of the Pledge of Allegiance Board President Kowalski called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Robert D. Armenta Jr., led in the renewal of the Pledge of Allegiance. 2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 2.1 Board Member Recognition Former board member, Robert D. Armenta Jr., was recognized by the following for his passion, dedication and commitment to students, staff and community of the Colton Joint Unified School District.
    [Show full text]
  • Translocation of Imperiled Species Under Changing Climates
    Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. ISSN 0077-8923 ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Issue: The Year in Ecology and Conservation Biology Translocation of imperiled species under changing climates Mark W. Schwartz1 and Tara G. Martin2 1John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, California. 2Climate Adaptation Flagship, CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, Ecoscience Precinct, Queensland, Australia Address for correspondence: Mark W. Schwartz, Department of Environmental Science & Policy, 1 Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, CA 95616. [email protected] Conservation translocation of species varies from restoring historic populations to managing the relocation of imperiled species to new locations. We review the literature in three areas—translocation, managed relocation, and conservation decision making—to inform conservation translocation under changing climates. First, climate change increases the potential for conflict over both the efficacy and the acceptability of conservation translocation. The emerging literature on managed relocation highlights this discourse. Second, conservation translocation works in concert with other strategies. The emerging literature in structured decision making provides a framework for prioritizing conservation actions—considering many possible alternatives that are evaluated based on expected benefit, risk, and social–political feasibility. Finally, the translocation literature has historically been primarily concerned with risks associated with the target species. In contrast,
    [Show full text]
  • Movers and Stayers: Novel Assemblages in Changing Environments
    Hobbs, R.J., Valentine, L.E., Standish, R.J., & S.T. Jackson (2017) Movers and Stayers: Novel Assemblages in Changing Environments. Trends in Ecology and Evolution: Volume 33, Issue 2, 116 – 128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.001 © 2017. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 1 1 Movers and stayers: novel assemblages in changing environments 2 3 Richard J Hobbs1, Leonie E. Valentine1, Rachel J. Standish2, Stephen T. Jackson3 4 1 School of Biological Science, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia 5 2 School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia 6 3 U.S. Geological Survey, DOI Southwest Climate Science Center, 1064 E. Lowell Street, Tucson, 7 AZ 85721, USA and Department of Geosciences and School of Natural Resources and 8 Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA 9 10 Corresponding Author: Hobbs, R.J. ([email protected]) 11 12 Keywords: range shifts; species persistence; place-based conservation; novel assemblages 2 13 14 15 Increased attention to species movement in response to environmental change highlights the need to 16 consider changes in species distributions and altered biological assemblages. Such changes are well 17 known from paleoecological studies, but have accelerated with ongoing pervasive human influence. 18 In addition to species that move, some species will stay put, leading to an array of novel 19 interactions. Species show a variety of responses that can allow movement or persistence.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC MAP of the SUNNYMEAD 7.5' QUADRANGLE, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Stratigraphic Code
    Prepared in cooperation with the CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES AIR FORCE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN-FILE REPORT 01-450 117o 15' 117o 07' 30" CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS 34o 00' 34o 00' QafQaf Qw Qf Qa Qls VERY YOUNG SURFICIAL DEPOSITS—Sediment recently San Timoteo beds of Frick (1921) (Pleistocene and Ktm Tonalite and mafic rocks, undifferentiated (Cretaceous)—Mainly Holocene transported and deposited in channels and washes, on surfaces of alluvial Pliocene)—Lithologically diverse sandstone, conglomeratic sandstone, biotite-hornblende tonalite containing mixed mafic rocks and subequal Qyw Qyf Qya Qyv Qyls fans and alluvial plains, and on hillslopes. Soil-profile development is non- and conglomerate; nearly all sandstone is arkosic and much is lithic. amounts of mafic inclusions. Inclusion borders mostly gradational and existant. Includes: Named by Frick (1921) for upper Pliocene, vertebrate-bearing, ill-defined. Restricted to single occurance north of US Highway 60 Qof Qols Pleistocene Qaf Artificial fill (late Holocene)—Deposits of fill resulting from human nonmarine strata in San Timoteo Canyon. Upper part of San Timoteo Freeway, west of Hendrick Road QUATERNARY Qvof Qvof1 Qvols construction or mining activities; restricted to east edge of quadrangle, beds contain vertebrate fauna of earliest Pleistocene Irvingtonian I age Kqd Quartz diorite, undifferentiated (Cretaceous)—Mainly biotite- CENOZOIC specifically to off-ramp construction along US Highway 60 Freeway (Repenning, 1987); Eckis (1934) had earlier suggested a Pleistocene hornblende quartz diorite; coarse-grained. Restricted to single Very young alluvial wash deposits (late Holocene)— occurrence in southeastern corner of quadrangle QTstu Qw Deposits of active age for upper part of section.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes May 27, 2010 5:30 Pm
    Colton Joint Unified School District Student Services Center, Board Room, 851 South Mt. Vernon Ave., Colton, CA 92324 Minutes May 27, 2010 5:30 p.m. The Board of Education of the Colton Joint Unified School District met in Regular Session on Thursday, May 27, 2010, 5:30 p.m. in the Board Room at the CJUSD Student Services Center, 851 So. Mt. Vernon Avenue, Colton, California. Trustees Present Mr. Mel Albiso President Mr. Frank A. Ibarra Vice President Mr. David R. Zamora Clerk Mr. Robert D. Armenta Jr. Mrs. Patt Haro Mrs. Marge Mendoza-Ware Mr. Kent Taylor Staff Members Present (*excused) Mr. James A. Downs Mrs. Ingrid Munsterman Mr. Jerry Almendarez Ms. Julia Nichols * Mr. Jaime R. Ayala Mrs. Helen Rodriguez Ms. Mollie Gainey-Stanley Ms. Sosan Schaller Mr. Mike Snellings Mr. Darryl Taylor Mrs. Bertha Arreguín Dr. Patrick Traynor Mr. Todd Beal Ms. Katie Orloff Mrs. Jennifer Jaime Ms. Jennifer Rodriguez Strategic Plan -- Mission Statement The Mission of the Colton Joint Unified School District, a team of caring employees dedicated to the education of children, is to ensure each student learns the academic knowledge and skills necessary to thrive in college or in the workforce and be responsible, productive citizens by providing engaging, challenging, and enriching opportunities and specialized programs in a safe environment in partnership with students, families and our diverse communities. 1.0 OPENING Call to Order/Renewal of the Pledge of Allegiance Board President Albiso called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. Darryl Taylor, facilities director, led in the renewal of the pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
    DRAFT Local Hazard Mitigation Plan May 5, 2021 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................7 1.1 Purpose of the Plan ............................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Scope of the Plan ................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Hazard Mitigation Planning Directive ................................................................................. 7 1.4 Promulgation Authority ...................................................................................................... 7 1.5 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Adoption .............................................................................. 7 2 Planning Process .........................................................................................................................8 2.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Methodology and Timeline ................................................................................................. 8 2.3 Planning Team .................................................................................................................... 9 2.3.1 Members .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cherrywood SDZ Biodiversity Plan with Cover (Pdf
    Biodiversity Plan Cherrywood Strategic Development Zone: Biodiversity Plan Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 2. SUMMARY OF ECOLOGICAL FEATURES IN THE SDZ AREA AND ENVIRONS ....................... 2 2.1 Desktop Review and Field Surveys .................................................... 2 2.2 Habitats List ................................................................................... 2 2.3 Eutrophic lake ................................................................................ 3 2.4 Other artificial lakes and ponds ......................................................... 3 2.5 Eroding upland rivers ...................................................................... 4 2.6 Depositing lowland rivers ................................................................. 4 2.7 Drainage ditches ............................................................................. 4 2.8 Calcareous Springs .......................................................................... 5 2.9 Reed and Large Sedge Swamps ........................................................ 6 2.10 Tall-herb swamp ............................................................................. 6 2.11 Improved agricultural grassland ........................................................ 7 2.12 Amenity Grassland .......................................................................... 8 2.13 Dry calcareous and neutral grassland ...............................................
    [Show full text]