DOCSLIB.ORG

111 Pictures the History of Hypo Tirol Bank 1 2 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
111 Pictures the History of Hypo Tirol Bank 1 2 3 111 PICTURES THE HISTORY OF HYPO TIROL BANK 1 2 3 111 PICTURESBILDER AUS DER GESCHICHTE THE HISTORY OF DER HYPO TIROL HYPO TIROL BANK 7 BANK 8 12 13 14 18 19 20 4 5 6 9 10 11 15 16 17 111111 PICTURESBILDER AUS DER GESCHICHTE THE HISTORY OF DER HYPO TIROL HYPO TIROL BANK 21 BANK 22 23 24 25 111111 PICTURESBILDER AUS DER GESCHICHTE THE HISTORY OF DER HYPO TIROL HYPO TIROL BANK 29 30 BANK 34 35 36 40 41 42 26 27 28 31 32 33 37 38 39 111 PICTURESBILDER AUS DER GESCHICHTE THE HISTORY OF DER HYPO TIROL HYPO TIROL BANK BANK 43 44 45 46 47 50 51 52 111 PICTURESBILDER AUS DER GESCHICHTE THE HISTORY OF DER HYPO TIROL HYPO TIROL BANK BANK 56 57 61 62 63 111 PICTURESBILDER AUS DER GESCHICHTE THE HISTORY OF DER HYPO TIROL HYPO TIROL BANK 48 BANK 49 53 54 55 58 59 60 64 65 66 67 68 69 111 PICTURESBILDER AUS DER GESCHICHTE THE HISTORY OF DER HYPO TIROL HYPO TIROL BANK BANK 73 74 78 79 80 83 84 85 70 71 72 75 76 77 111 PICTURESBILDER AUS DER GESCHICHTE THE HISTORY OF DER HYPO TIROL HYPO TIROL BANK 81 82 BANK 86 87 88 89 90 91 95 96 97 101 102 103 111 PICTURESBILDER AUS DER GESCHICHTE THE HISTORY OF DER HYPO TIROL HYPO TIROL BANK 107 BANK 108 92 93 94 98 99 100 104 105 106 109 110 111 INTRO DUCTION Dear Tyroleans! Dear clients of Hypo Tirol Bank! 2012 was a decisive year in the history of Hypo Tirol Bank. Decisive - because the Province of the Tyrol in its posi- tion as the owner of the bank realised the approved equity capital contribution; decisive - because the European Commission approved and supported this capital contribution; and above all decisive - because we have already achieved some success regarding the new alignment of the bank. The result we achieved in 2012 is satisfying. Needless to say, this result was influenced by substantial restructuring expenses. With regard to 2013, we expect that the measures that have been taken will soon lead to higher results. Due to the fact that we have succeeded in reducing the balance sheet total and the risk-adjusted assets considerably, the owner, the Province of the Tyrol, has received dividends in the amount of 12 million Euros. Subsequent to the deduction of dividends, the bank’s core capital rate has amounted to 9.5 %. Therefore, I would like to thank all our employees for their commitment in the course of these challenging months and for their support to implement the strategies which are required to bring about a change. Moreover, the report written by the European Commission has confirmed, that the owner and the Supervisory Board have chosen the right way; and we will all consequently pursue that way in the forthcoming years. In this context, main emphasis is put on the needs of our clients in the core market of the Tyrol, and we want to convince our clients by offering them up-to-date products, fair conditions and the highest level of service quality. HYPO TIROL BANK AG The Province of the Tyrol is not the only institution that benefits from a successfully operating Hypo Tirol Bank, because the Federal State Bank also makes a major contribution to the economic development by granting loans. 99 % of all Tyrolean companies are small and medium-sized enterprises. Investments that are made by the local tourism enterprises and by more than 35,000 small and medium sized enterprises have to be supported. Therefore, money at reasonable conditions is needed – and it is provided by the Federal State Bank. In addition, a successful Federal State Bank safeguards assets for future generations on the long run. Going private would be like flogging the family silver. To run a regional company means to establish and to safeguard values for generations to come. A challenging year is behind us. The prospects for 2013 and the upcoming years are good; however, greatest efforts that must be made by the entire company will still be required combined with the consequent and unconditional implementation of the initiated measures. The foundation for the positive development was laid by the Province of the Tyrol in December 2011, when it clearly acknowledged the Federal State Bank. Once again, I would like to express my gratitude to the Tyrolean Diet, the Tyrolean Government and in particular to Governor Günther Platter for making fast decisions that have been so favourable for the bank. Yours, Mag. Wilfried Stauder Supervisory Board Chairman of Hypo Tirol Bank CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT 2012 Dr. Markus Jochum Chairman of the Managing Board of Hypo Tirol Bank If you review the year 2012 and the 111th anniversary of Hypo Tirol Bank, what have been the most pleasant and the most challenging events for you? Well, definitely 2012 was both, a very active and a very emotional year. The European Commission approved of a capital increase provided by the owner, the Province of the Tyrol. The negotiations in this respect were constructive and we were all on an equal footing. The positive conclusion was the confirmation on the part of the EU that we had chosen the right way. Brussels has also conformed to the realignment plan submitted by the bank, because it guarantees that Hypo Tirol Bank can engage in profit-making economic activities on the long run. The European Commission’s requirements correspond to the strategic align- ment indicated by the owner and the Supervisory Board. The primarily agreed capital contribution in the amount of EUR 230 million could be reduced to EUR 220 million. The difference of EUR 10 million was generated by ourselves, because, earlier than expected, we have successfully reduced the bank’s equity capital demand by means of volume reduction. Thus, for instance, the credit volume in Italy has already been reduced by EUR 120 million. Press reports and public discussions regarding the downrating by Moody’s belonged to the incidents in 2012 that were rather unpleasant. On the one hand, Moody’s generally does not consider the ownership of Provinces in federal state banks as good as they used to do, and on the other hand it regards the focus on the core market as a risk for strong competition on the own narrow market. However, even though we have expected the rating change, HYPO TIROL BANK AG we definitely do not agree with the degree of downrating. In this context, it is very important to point out once again that we have already initiated all necessary measures and strategic modifications to achieve an improved rating evaluation as soon as possible. What I experienced as most delightful were the numerous activities relating to the anniversary year. An overwhelming number of 133 running teams participated in the corporate challenge which signalized the lasting unbowed loyalty of employees, clients and partners of Hypo Tirol Bank. For us this was a sign of common will to move together, also in terms of further developing ourselves. And in this respect we clearly succeeded in achieving this goal because in 2012, once again a two-figure million result before taxation was generated. Therefore, I would like to express my gratitude to all people who support us with their positive power: my fellow colleagues of the Supervisory Board, the management executives and the numerous employees. Not to forget the works council and the Supervisory board, because without their commitment it would not have been possible to achieve the progress. The confidence that has been shown by the owner, the Province of the Tyrol by providing the capital contribution represents an additional stimulus for us to consequently pursue the way to consolidation in order to return to the road to success. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT 2012 Johann Peter Hörtnagl Member of the Managing Board of Hypo Tirol Bank In 2012, Italy represented a central subject – both, in the media and on an internal basis. What kind of pro- gress has been achieved? As a result of the extraordinary commitment provided by the expert team, which had been established to manage Italian business matters, we could achieve first partial success in 2012. For that reason, I would like to thank all committed team members from Austria and Italy for their cooperation. Even though we are currently facing a challenging economic situation in Italy, we have been able to return granted loans ahead of schedule. HYPO TIROL BANK AG In accordance with our strategy, the Italian branch office network was tightened up and the preparation works -re garding the closing of the branch offices in Trento and Verona were initiated. Therefore, in future, business activities in Italy will concentrate on South Tyrol with a branch office in Bolzano and two consulting centres in Bressanone and Merano. In this context the focus is put on SME-business, private residential building and sophisticated investment. Hypo Tirol Bank still stands by its Italian subsidiary; nevertheless, Hypo Tirol Bank Italy will return to the parent company and will be operated as an EU-branch office. The implementation of this measure required formal and above all structural and process related preparations, which kept us very busy in 2012. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT 2012 Mag. Johann Kollreider Member of the Managing Board of Hypo Tirol Bank Can you describe the conditions relating to the sales department in 2012? What where the challenges, the sales team was confronted with; how did the management provide support and what kind of success was achieved? As far as the sales department is concerned, the conditions in 2012 were definitely not optimal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Liquidity Shock: the Hidden Risk in Modern Markets March 2018
    Investment Intelligence Liquidity Shock: The Hidden Risk in Modern Markets March 2018 Introduction Post-crisis changes to regulations and market Key Takeaways structure have combined with innovations in technology and financial products to make global Today’s markets contain hidden risks that markets more robust and efficient. Despite this increase vulnerability to volatility spikes and progress, today’s markets still contain risks that liquidity shortages. increase vulnerability to volatility spikes, episodic The main sources of these risks are financial Steven Malin, PhD disappearances of liquidity and, potentially, another product innovations, automated and algorithmic Director liquidity crisis. The main sources of these risks are trading practices and regulatory adjustments Senior Investment the ongoing stream of financial product innovations, Strategist put in place to strengthen markets after the automated and algorithmic trading practices and, Global Economics 2008 crisis. & Strategy ironically, some of the very regulatory adjustments put in place to strengthen markets after the Also contributing to more “accident prone” 2008 crisis. markets are diminished bank bond inventories, Together, these factors have the potential to turn the growth of high-frequency trading, and the a small market disruption into a rapid collapse of proliferation of ETFs and rules-based trading asset prices—a danger that became all too real strategies. to investors during the sudden and dramatic reappearance of market volatility in February These risks could be exacerbated in coming 2018. Over the coming decade, these risks could years by unprecedented “quantitative be exacerbated by unprecedented “quantitative tightening” by central banks. tightening” by central banks that could cause funding Institutional investors should act now to account liquidity and, ultimately, market liquidity to shrink.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquidity at Risk Joint Stress Testing of Liquidity and Solvency Risk
    Liquidity at Risk Joint Stress Testing of Liquidity and Solvency Risk Rama Cont & Artur Kotlicki University of Oxford Laura Valderrama International Monetary Fund 1 Solvency stress testing 2 Solvency Risk • Solvency risk is driven by the difference in firm’s asset values and its liabilities. • Bank stress testing, which has become a key tool for bank supervisors, has also mainly focused on solvency risk. • Regulation of insurance companies also focused on solvency risk (Solvency II, Swiss Solvency test). • However, solvency risk does not give the full picture – we have spectacular failures of SIFIs due to lack of liquidity: • Bear Stearns held excess capital at the time of its default. • AIG, which failed to fulfill large payment triggered by a downgrade, was not insolvent at the time of failure. • Banco Popular, which failed through a lack of liquidity in 2017, displayed a capital ratio 6:6% in the 2016 EBA adverse scenario. 3 Liquidity Risk and Default • Liquidity risk: failure to meet a short-term payment obligation. • Default of payment is the legal definition of default. • Inherent risk to instability in short-term funding (e.g. debt roll-over risk) and cash-flows (e.g. variation margin). • Supervision and regulation of bank liquidity: • Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR): banks to hold liquidity provision for expected outflows over 30-day time horizon. • Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR): limits over-reliance on short-term wholesale funding and aims to increase funding stability. • Liquidity stress testing: e.g. ECB’s 2019 sensitivity analysis of liquidity risk (LiST) typically done separately from solvency stress testing. 4 Liquidity Risk Defining liquidity requires the introduction of a horizon T.
    [Show full text]
  • Deloitte ALM Survey of European Banks Practices 2019
    Asset and Liability Management in banks Results of 2019 Deloitte Survey Agenda Introduction and context 3 Executive summary 5 Regulatory background 7 Results of Deloitte Survey 10 Survey participants Risk estimation and measurement • Division of responsibilities concerning planning • Approaches applied in relation to interest rate risk • Approaches applied in relation to liquidity risk • ALM model validation • xVA models and adjustments The role of ALM units in banks Other related Deloitte publications 33 How can we help you? 35 Contact 37 © 2019 Deloitte Polska Asset and Liability Management in banksu 2 Introduction and context © 2019 Deloitte Polska Asset and Liability Management in banks 3 Introduction About the survey There were In 2019 Deloitte asked Central and Eastern European 33 banks to participate in a survey regarding ALM solutions applied. institutions participating in the survey. The survey consisted of open and closed 53 questions aimed survey participants at evaluation of current ALM practices adopted on the A large number of Polish market. The questions focused on the following areas: banks participated due to The survey included banks high involvement of from Central and Eastern Polish Deloitte team. European countries 01 Risk estimation and measurement: Division of responsibilities concerning planning The number of participants totalled 33 leading banks Approaches applied in relation to interest rate risk varying in terms of size and business models Approaches applied in relation to liquidity risk Definition of current
    [Show full text]
  • Liquidity Stress Testing: a Survey of Theory, Empirics and Current Industry and Supervisory Practices
    Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Working Paper No. 24 Liquidity stress testing: a survey of theory, empirics and current industry and supervisory practices October 2013 This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). © Bank for International Settlements 2013. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is stated. ISBN 92-9131-969-4 (print) ISBN 92-9197-969-4 (online) Contents Liquidity stress testing: a survey of theory, empirics and current industry and supervisory practices ........... 1 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. A set of global case studies ........................................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Sources and quantities of liquidity stress ........................................................................................... 7 2.3 Liquidity buffers .......................................................................................................................................... 11 2.4 Other considerations ................................................................................................................................. 14 3. Literature
    [Show full text]
  • Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial
    Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law Volume 13 Issue 3 Article 4 2008 Hedge Funds, Liquidity and Prime Brokers Nathan Bryce Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/jcfl Part of the Banking and Finance Law Commons, and the Business Organizations Law Commons Recommended Citation Nathan Bryce, Hedge Funds, Liquidity and Prime Brokers, 13 Fordham J. Corp. & Fin. L. 475 (2008). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/jcfl/vol13/iss3/4 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HEDGE FUNDS, LIQUIDITY AND PRIME BROKERS By Nathan Bryce* * J.D., expected, Fordham University School of Law, 2009; B.A., cum laude, Cornell University, 2006. I would like to thank Professor Caroline Gentile for her insight, support, and recommendations. I would also like to thank the members of the Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law for their editorial assistance and diligent help throughout the writing process. 475 476 FORDHAM JOURNAL OF Vol. XIII CORPORATE & FINANCIAL LAW INTRODUCTION Over the past decade, the hedge fund industry has enjoyed remarkable growth. The media enthusiastically described the success of the top-performing funds and the lavish riches they bestowed on their employees.1 At the same time, however, there were remarkable stories of failure in the industry.2 Both politicians and economists warned of the potential dangers hedge funds present to the national and global economies.3 These warnings and concerns created a debate regarding the level of regulation needed, if any, over what is currently a largely unregulated industry.4 This Note argues that while increased regulation of the hedge fund industry is necessary, the government’s recent and ongoing attempts to increase regulation are misguided.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring and Managing Liquidity Risk for Other Titles in the Wiley Finance Series Please See Measuring and Managing Liquidity Risk
    Measuring and Managing Liquidity Risk For other titles in the Wiley Finance Series please see www.wiley.com/finance Measuring and Managing Liquidity Risk Antonio Castagna and Francesco Fede This edition first published 2013 Copyright# 2013 John Wiley & Sons Registered office John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. Wiley publishes in a variety of print and electronic formats and by print-on-demand. Some material included with standard print versions of this book may not be included in e-books or in print-on-demand. If this book refers to media such as a CD or DVD that is not included in the version you purchased, you may download this material at http://booksupport.wiley.com For more information about Wiley products, visit www.wiley.com Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book and on its cover are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher and the book are not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Asset Price Bubbles on Liquidity Risk Measures from a Financial Institutions Perspective
    Int. J. Bonds and Derivatives, Vol. X, No. Y, xxxx 1 The impact of asset price bubbles on liquidity risk measures from a financial institutions perspective Michael Jacobs Jr. Accenture Consulting, Finance and Risk Services Advisory/Models, Methodologies & Analytics, 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, N.Y., 10105, USA Email: [email protected] Abstract: This study presents an analysis of the impact of asset price bubbles on a liquidity risk measure, the liquidity risk option premium (‘LROP’). We present a styled model of asset price bubbles in continuous time, and perform a simulation experiment of a stochastic differential equation (‘SDE’) system for the asset value through a constant elasticity of variance (‘CEV’) process. Comparing bubble to non-bubble economies, it is shown that asset price bubbles may cause an firm’s traditional risk measures, such as value-at-risk (‘VaR’) to decline, due to an increase in the right skewness of the value distribution, which results in the LROP to decline and therefore an underpricing of liquidity risk. Keywords: financial crisis; liquidity risk; model risk; asset price bubbles; value-at-risk; stochastic differential equation; SDE; constant elasticity of variance; CEV. Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Jacobs Jr., M. (xxxx) ‘The impact of asset price bubbles on liquidity risk measures from a financial institutions perspective’, Int. J. Bonds and Derivatives, Vol. X, No. Y, pp.000–000. Biographical notes: Michael Jacobs Jr., PhD, CFA, is a Principal Director in the Risk Analytics practice of Accenture. He specialises in risk model development and validation across a range of risk and product types.
    [Show full text]
  • CRAFIELD UNIVERSITY Naif A
    CRAFIELD UNIVERSITY Naif A. Al Baz MODELLING CREDIT RISK FOR SMES IN SAUDI ARABIA Cranfield School of Management Doctor of Business Administration Academic Year: 2016–2017 Supervisors: Professor Huainan Zhao Dr. Vineet Agarwal July 2017 CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY Doctor of Business Administration Academic Year: 2016–2017 Naif A. Al Baz MODELLING CREDIT RISK FOR SMES IN SAUDI ARABIA Supervisors: Professor Huainan Zhao Dr. Vineet Agarwal July 2017 This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Business Administration © Cranfield University 2017. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright owner. ABSTRACT The Saudi Government’s 2030 Vision directs local banks to increase and improve credit for the Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) of the economy (Jadwa, 2017). Banks are, however, still finding it difficult to provide credit for small businesses that meet Basel’s capital requirements. Most of the current credit-risk models only apply to large corporations with little constructed for SMEs applications (Altman and Sabato, 2007). This study fills this gap by focusing on the Saudi SMEs perspective. My empirical work constructs a bankruptcy prediction model based on logistic regressions that cover 14,727 firm-year observations for an 11-year period between 2001 and 2011. I use the first eight years data (2001-2008) to build the model and use it to predict the last three years (2009-2011) of the sample, i.e. conducting an out-of-sample test. This approach yields a highly accurate model with great prediction power, though the results are partially influenced by the external economic and geopolitical volatilities that took place during the period of 2009-2010 (the world financial crisis).
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Balance Sheet Model with Liquidity Risk
    Working Paper Series Grzegorz Hałaj Dynamic balance sheet model with liquidity risk No 1896 / April 2016 Note: This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the European Central Bank (ECB). The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the ECB. Abstract Theoretically optimal responses of banks to various liquidity and solvency shocks are mod- elled. The proposed framework is based on a risk-adjusted return portfolio choice in multiple periods subject to the default risk related either to liquidity or solvency problems. Performance of the model and sensitivity of optimal balance sheet structures to some key parameters of the model are illustrated in a specific calibrated setup. The results of the simulations shed light on the effectiveness of the liquidity and solvency regulation. The flexible implementation of the model and its semi-analytical solvability allows for various easy applications of the framework for the macro-prudential policy analysis. Keywords: asset structure, optimal portfolio, banking JEL Classification: G11, G21, C61 ECB Working Paper 1896, April 2016 1 1 Non-technical summary Banks’ balance sheets change their composition due to market conditions implied by a generic growth of credit and debt in the economy and valuation changes, but also due to bank’s strategic actions. The strategic driver is particularly interesting and challenging from the modeling perspective since it combines the changes in risk and trends in the economy, the impact of the regulatory regime and the asset and liability management (ALM). These strategic responses to the changing market and regulatory parameters have to be well understood in order to gauge the influence and effectiveness that macro-prudential policies can have on banking system.
    [Show full text]
  • Market and Liquidity Risks Using Transaction-By-Transaction Information
    mathematics Article Market and Liquidity Risks Using Transaction-by-Transaction Information Mariano González-Sánchez * , Eva M. Ibáñez Jiménez and Ana I. Segovia San Juan Department of Business and Accounting, UNED (Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia), Paseo Senda del Rey, 11 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] (E.M.I.J.); [email protected] (A.I.S.S.J.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The usual measures of market risk are based on the axiom of positive homogeneity while neglecting an important element of market information—liquidity. To analyze the effects of this omission, in the present study, we define the behavior of prices and volume via stochastic processes subordinated to the time elapsing between two consecutive transactions in the market. Using simulated data and market data from companies of different sizes and capitalization levels, we compare the results of measuring risk using prices compared to using both prices and volumes. The results indicate that traditional measures of market risk behave inversely to the degree of liquidity of the asset, thereby underestimating the risk of liquid assets and overestimating the risk of less liquid assets. Keywords: liquidity risk; volume; trade; intraday frequency Citation: González-Sánchez, M.; Ibáñez Jiménez, E.M.; Segovia San Juan, A.I. Market and 1. Introduction Liquidity Risks Using Liquidity risk is an important field of research in finance, as evidenced by the large Transaction-by-Transaction number of papers published on this subject ([1–16]). However, the large timespan of these Information. Mathematics 2021, 9, publications indicates that this question does not yet have a single answer.
    [Show full text]
  • BASEL PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURE for the Year Ended 30 June 2017 Contents
    BASEL PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURE for the year ended 30 June 2017 contents Overview of risk management ..... 01 Introduction ..... 01 FirstRand strategy ..... 03 Risk profile ..... 05 Current and emerging challenges ..... 07 Risk management approach ..... 08 Risk governance ..... 10 Risk measurement approaches ..... 18 Risk mitigation ..... 20 Financial resource management ..... 22 Risk appetite ..... 22 Stress testing and scenario planning ..... 25 Recovery and resolution regime ..... 26 Link between financial statements and regulatory exposures ..... 27 Capital management ..... 34 Common disclosures ..... 43 Funding and liquidity risk ..... 44 Credit risk ..... 57 Counterparty credit risk ..... 118 Securitisations ..... 133 Market risk in the trading book ..... 141 Non-traded market risk ..... 152 Interest rate risk in the banking book ..... 152 Structural foreign exchange risk ..... 156 Equity investment risk ..... 158 Insurance risk ..... 163 Operational risk ..... 164 Other risks ..... 170 Strategic risk ..... 170 Business risk ..... 171 Reputational risk ..... 172 Environmental and social risk ..... 172 Model risk ..... 173 Regulatory risk ..... 176 Conduct risk ..... 181 Remuneration and compensation ..... 183 1966/010753/06 Index of Pillar 3 disclosure templates and Regulation 43 ..... 184 Certain entities within the Definitions ..... 186 FirstRand group are Authorised Financial Services and Credit Abbreviations ..... 187 Providers. This report is available on the group’s website: www.firstrand.co.za Email questions to [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Analysis Made Easy
    financial analysis made easy IRIS integrated risk management ag www.iris.ch : leading provider of financial analysis solutions IRIS delivers unified risk and profitability analysis solutions for the banking, insurance and corporate sectors. The integrated IRIS solutions cover a broad scope and depth of financial analysis, ensuring consistency of results, and redu- cing the costs of analysis. In addition, the IRIS solutions provide the user with the power of dynamic simulation. Dynamic simulation allows evaluating poten- tial decisions in a what-if environment, and as a consequence making highly quantified strategic decisions. The success of the IRIS solutions relies on the following strengths: 1. easy to use and highly flexible modular software platforms satisfying the internal and external analysis requirements in the field of financial and ope- rational risk analysis for small to large organizations: • riskpro™, including the OpRisk Suite from RCS AG • riskprolight™, a simplified subset of riskpro™ for Basel II standard credit risk 2. unmatched financial products coverage, from saving accounts, complex loans, insurance instruments to exotic options and structured products 3. experienced and talented implementation and support resources providing quality services and know-how transfer to secure effective solution imple- mentation and use. This covers: • management consulting • project management • functional and technical implementation • technical data integration • modeling support • training and workshops by the IRIS academy 4. worldwide
    [Show full text]