DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of the European Heritage Label Action. Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of the European Heritage Label Action. Final Report Evaluation of the European Heritage Label Action Final Report Written by PPMI and EDUCULT January 2019 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture Directorate D – Culture and Creativity Unit D2 – Creative Europe programme Contact: Unit D2 E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION Evaluation of the European Heritage Label Action Final Report Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture Culture and Creativity 2019 EN Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission; however, it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019 ISBN 978-92-76-03929-7 doi: 10.2766/452607 NC-03-19-359-EN-N © European Union, 2019 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Evaluation of the European Heritage Label TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1. THE EUROPEAN HERITAGE LABEL ACTION ................................................................ 1 1.1. Origin of the European Heritage Label ............................................................. 1 1.2. Content and management of the European Heritage Label ................................. 2 2. EVALUATION QUESTIONS ....................................................................................... 6 3. EVALUATION FRAMEWORK ..................................................................................... 6 3.1. Data collection and analysis methods .............................................................. 6 3.1.1. Data collection methods ....................................................................... 7 3.1.2. Data analysis methods ......................................................................... 9 3.1.3. Weaknesses of the methods used, and how they were addressed .............. 9 3.2. Good governance model for cultural heritage .................................................. 10 4. EVALUATION RESULTS .......................................................................................... 11 4.1. Relevance .................................................................................................. 11 4.1.1. The EHL objectives and current needs in the EU ................................. 11 4.1.2. The geographical scope ................................................................... 18 4.1.3. The objectives of sites applying to the EHL ........................................ 21 4.2. Coherence .................................................................................................. 24 4.2.1. Coherence of the EHL with other EU and international initiatives .......... 24 4.3. Efficiency and governance ............................................................................ 34 4.3.1. Selection arrangements and their contribution to the achievement of outputs, results and impacts ............................................................ 34 4.3.2. The efficiency of processes involved in running the action.................... 43 4.3.3. Potential improvements ................................................................... 62 4.4. Effectiveness .............................................................................................. 62 4.4.1. The sites’ activities ......................................................................... 63 4.4.2. The action’s site-specific objectives .................................................. 67 4.4.3. The action’s general and intermediate objectives ................................ 81 4.4.4. Sustainability of the positive effects .................................................. 89 4.4.5. Unintended consequences ............................................................... 91 4.5. EU added value ........................................................................................... 93 4.5.1. Added value in substance and organisation ........................................ 93 4.5.2. Consequences of a hypothetical discontinuation ................................. 99 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................. 101 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................. 110 LIST OF ANNEXES ...................................................................................................... 115 i Evaluation of the European Heritage Label LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. The European Heritage Label logo before 2011 ........................................ 2 Figure 2. The intervention logic of the EHL action .................................................. 2 Figure 3. The European Heritage Label logo after 2011 ........................................... 4 Figure 4. Operational structure of the EHL action ................................................... 5 Figure 5. The good governance model for cultural heritage ....................................10 Figure 6. EHL contributes to the objectives of strengthening intercultural dialogue and European citizens’ sense of belonging to the Union .........................................13 Figure 7. Member States' involvement in the application process ............................19 Figure 8. Distribution of labelled sites per participating states ................................20 Figure 9. Objectives of sites mentioned in the application forms .............................22 Figure 10. Number of labelled sites that are part of other programmes/initiatives .....31 Figure 11. OPC respondents' opinions regarding overlaps between the EHL and other initiatives ..................................................................................................33 Figure 12. Types of sites awarded the EHL during the period 2013-2017 .................35 Figure 13. The ways in which sites labelled in the period 2013-2017 demonstrate their European significance .................................................................................38 Figure 14. Historical periods covered by EHL sites .................................................38 Figure 15. Historical periods covered by all candidate sites (2013-2017) .................38 Figure 16. EHL sites 2013-2017, and the European values they represent ...............39 Figure 17. The relationship between “European significance” and EHL objectives ......40 Figure 18. Scheme for selecting the sites .............................................................44 Figure 19. Participation of Member States in the action based on the types of pre- selection applied (2013-2017) .....................................................................45 Figure 20. Actual and potential selection of sites (2013-2017) ................................45 Figure 21. Opinions of OPC respondents on the selection criteria ............................47 Figure 22. Compliance of non-selected sites with the selection criteria in the period 2013-2017 ................................................................................................48 Figure 23. Opinions of OPC respondents on the EU-level selection procedures (N=24) ...............................................................................................................49 Figure 24. Steps involved in the 2016 monitoring process ......................................53 Figure 25. OPC respondents’ opinions on the EU monitoring procedures (N=24) .......53 Figure 26. Respondent familiarity with the EHL among stakeholders involved and not involved in the action (%) ...........................................................................58 Figure 27. Participants in the annual national coordinator meetings ........................59 Figure 28. Number of times national coordinators from each participating Member State took part in EHL annual meetings organised between 2014 and 2018 ...............60 Figure 29. Sufficient frequency of communication with the Commission within the action ...............................................................................................................60 Figure 30. Perception of the sites regarding the sufficiency of communication with national coordinators ..................................................................................61 Figure 31. Intensity of communication between national coordinators and sites, as perceived by the national coordinators .........................................................61 Figure 32. Communication among sites ...............................................................61 Figure 33. Mechanisms of influence of the EHL .....................................................62 Figure 34. Number of sites implementing activities of different types ......................63 Figure 35. Range of activities implemented by the sites .........................................64 Figure 36. Benefits of EHL designation reported by the sites ..................................66 Figure 37. Sites involved in the organisation of collaboration/exchange
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mapping of Cultural Heritage Actions in European Union Policies, Programmes and Activities
    Mapping of Cultural Heritage actions in European Union policies, programmes and activities Last update: April 2017 This mapping exercise aims to contribute to the development of a strategic approach to the preservation and valorisation of European heritage. It responds to the "Conclusions on cultural heritage as a strategic resource for a sustainable Europe" adopted by the Council of the European Union on 20th May 2014, and complements the European Commission Communication "Towards an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe", published on 22 July 2014. The document provides a wide (but not exhaustive) range of useful information about recent policy initiatives and support actions undertaken by the European Union in the field of cultural heritage. Table of Contents 1. CULTURE ...................................................................................................... 5 1.1 EU policy / legislation ................................................................................ 5 Council Work Plan for Culture 2015-2018 ........................................................... 5 Priority Area A: Accessible and inclusive culture .................................... 5 Priority Area B: Cultural heritage ......................................................... 5 Priority Area C: Cultural and creative sectors: Creative economy and innovation ........................................................................................ 6 Priority area D: Promotion of cultural diversity, culture in the EU external relations and
    [Show full text]
  • UNESCO Heritage Sites and Cultural Spaces in Ethnographic Regions of ESTONIA - Setomaa, Kihnu Island, LATVIA - Suiti Land, Livonian Coast, and SOUTH COAST of FINLAND
    UNESCO HERITAGE SITES AND CULTURAL SPACES IN Ethnographic Regions of ESTONIA - Setomaa, Kihnu Island, LATVIA - Suiti Land, Livonian Coast, and SOUTH COAST OF FINLAND PROGRAMMES FOR TOURISTS The north-eastern shores of Baltic Sea washes three states – Finland, Estonia and Latvia. For centuries these countries have shared common cultural landscape, exchanged and mutually enriched one another’s culture. The way of life in this region characterized by shared cultural context, values and natural resources has developed traditions specific to each nation yet keeping common Nordic-Baltic spirit in every cultural expression. For this reason it is worthwhile taking a closer look into the region finding out what heritage values it has to offer, and which of them are internationally recognized by UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation) an organisation which works to promote and safeguard the heritage of humanity. 1 2 What is UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage? One of the most beautiful UNESCO developed lists of this kind is devoted to promotion of intangible cultural heritage. With the term “intangible cultural heritage”, we understand different forms of oral expressions, languages and dialects, social practices, festive events, performing arts and rituals, traditional knowledge and Destination craftsmanship, including instruments and objects associated with them, as well as area – Latvia, cultural spaces. Estonia and Cultural spaces are special places where traditions passed down from generation South Coast of to generation are concentrated in an environment that relates to the origins Finland. of such traditions. In Latvia and Estonia, Estonia, Latvia and Finland are multiple cultural spaces can be found neighbouring countries in the North which are promoted by UNESCO granting of Europe and Scandinavia, on the international recognition.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Press Release
    PRESS RELEASE Brussels/Strasbourg, 4 September 2015 Spotlight on Europe’s Industrial Heritage for European Heritage Days 2015 Canals, mines, breweries, potteries, forges, railways, cotton mills tell us as much about our heritage as celebrated archelogical sites, cathedrals and castles. This year Europe has come together to examine our shared past through the unique lens of our Industrial Heritage, with more than 30 countries joining this common theme. Throughout Europe we can see the remains of our industrial past: bridges, canals and railways, still in use today, making invaluable contributions to our economy. However, in most countries there are signs of long-gone industry – a derelict mill, a rusting machine, a brick chimney - all marking the sites of a once-thriving workplace and community. Our industrial past tells the story of change, development and creativity. It tells the stories of how and where we worked, the kinds of jobs we did and how we lived. “European Heritage Days exemplifies much of what is central to the Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society – mainly the sense of cultural belonging and connection to heritage at a local level, whilst also understanding it as part of the wider European story. The focus this year on industrial heritage provides a timely opportunity to consider the economic links of Europe’s history as experienced by communities. From exploring the historic shipyard of Belfast’s Titanic quarter to participating in an archaeological dig in Dublin’s Swords Castle; from climbing the lighthouses of Normandy to descending an iron ore mine in Portugal’s Torre de Moncorvo; from sending a telegram in Slovenia to touring a traditional olive oil mill in Spain’s Senia territory, or a textiles factory in Switzerland, or an ironworks furnace in Finland.
    [Show full text]
  • United in Diversity? Cultural Heritage and the Image of a Common European Cultural Identity
    UNITED IN DIVERSITY? CULTURAL HERITAGE AND THE IMAGE OF A COMMON EUROPEAN CULTURAL IDENTITY Kerstin Stamm University of Bonn, Germany ABSTRACT - This paper discusses the European Heritage Label scheme as a contemporary example of creating an image of Europe as a cultural en- tity. It reflects upon the notion of a European cultural heritage as the basis for a common European identity. The analysis focuses on the link between identity and cultural heritage and the process of constructing a common cul- tural heritage for Europe, closely linked to its institutionalisation. It invites the consideration of the exclusive character of the official EU-initiative of the European Heritage Label critically and asks whether, with regard to creating a European identity, a more coherent image is at all required, or how coher- ent an image of a common European cultural heritage would need to be. INTRODUCTION ‘United in diversity’ is the motto of the European Union (EU) and as an of- 1. European Union, preamble to 1 Treaty on the Functioning of the Eu- ficial symbol of the Union it is also included in the so-called Lisbon Treaty. ropean Union (Brussels, 2007), Art. “The motto means that, via the EU, Europeans are united in working togeth- 1.8, ‘Symbols’ er for peace and prosperity, and that the many different cultures, traditions 2. “The Symbols of the EU: United in and languages in Europe are a positive asset for the continent.”2 Still, with Diversity”, European Union, accessed currently 27 member states, the European Union is not Europe and Europe August 31, 2012, http://europa.eu/ abc/symbols/motto/index_en.htm is not the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Report
    DGIV/PAT/JEP(2011)14 15 January 2012 EUROPEAN HERITAGE DAYS A joint action of the Council of Europe and the European Union MEETING ON THE ON THE THEME OF “THE EUROPEAN DIMENSION OF HERITAGE DAYS EVENTS” Strasbourg (France), 11-12 December 2011 Meeting Report by Jelena Mocevic General Rapporteur 1/46 Contents 1. THE “EUROPEAN DIMENSION” OF HERITAGE DAYS EVENTS 1.1 Context 1.2 Meeting Preparation 1.3 Opening 2. EUROPEAN DIMENSION EVENTS: PROPOSALS 2.1 The Polesje Region: place of common heritage and traditions Oksana Vasylieva (Ukraine) and Natalia Khvir (Belarus) 2.2 Castles and Fortresses around the Baltic Sea : Common European History Helle Solnask (Estonia) 2.3 Educate, Discover, Protect, Preserve Heritage for Common Future (EDP) Milena Antonic (Slovenia) / Nada Andonovska (“the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”) 2.4 Heritage Education Serge Grappin (France) 2.5 Stećci (ancient tombstones from 14th to 16th century) Edin Veladzic (Bosnia and Herzegovina) and Milica Vusurovic (Montenegro) 2.6 Prehistoric Pile Dwellings around the Alps: UNESCO World Heritage Daniela Schneuwly (Switzerland) 2.7 Places of Arrival and Departure Jan Solberg (Norway) 2.8 The Utrecht Treaty Edith den Hartigh (the Netherlands) 2.9 The European Wine Museum Map Giorgi Iukuridze (Ukraine) 3. “THE EUROPEAN DIMENSION”: DEFINING CHARACTERISTICS 3.1 The defining characteristics 4. THE “EUROPEAN DIMENSION” – FUNDING OPTIONS 5. THE EUROPEAN HERITAGE DAYS SOFTWARE 5.1 Presentation of the European Heritage Days software 6. HOW DO THE ED EVENTS ILLUSTRATE ARTICLES OF THE FARO CONVENTION? 7. OBJECTIVES AND STRUCTURE OF 2012 EHD FORUM IN CYPRUS 8. ANNEXES 8.1 Capacity Building Session for the National Coordinators 8.2 Meeting Agenda 8.3 List of participants 8.4 ED Template 2/46 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Call for European Heritage Days Stories 2020
    CALL FOR EUROPEAN HERITAGE DAYS EUROPEAN HERITAGE DAYS STORIES 2020 EVERYONE HAS A STORY TO TELL CALL FOR EUROPEAN HERITAGE DAYS STORIES COMPETITIVE GRANT AWARD PROCEDURE AN EHD INITIATIVE ORIENTED TOWARDS: EUROPEAN HERITAGE DAYS COMMUNITIES EUROPEAN HERITAGE AWARD/EUROPA NOSTRA AWARD WINNERS EUROPEAN HERITAGE LABEL SITES FOR THE FUNDING OF ACTIVITY-FOCUSED COMMUNITY PROJECTS CONTENTS PAGE TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1 WHO CAN APPLY? 2 WHAT IS IT? 3 HOW DOES IT WORK? 4 WHAT ARE THE CRITERIA? 5 WHO IS ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE A GRANT? 6 GRANT SELECTION CRITERIA 6 WHAT ARE THE IMPORTANT DATES? 9 LEGAL CONDITIONS APPENDIX I 12 RULE NO. 1374 APPENDIX II 20 TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF STORIES AND GRANT PROJECT PROPOSALS The European Heritage Days (EHD) are the most widely celebrated participatory cultural events shared by people living in Europe. With over 70 000 events organised every year in the 50 European States signatory to the European Cultural Convention and more than 30 million visitors, the EHD, as a joint action of the Council of Europe and the European Commission, represent a unique example of a grass-roots initiative organised and shared by millions of European citizens. Since their launch the EHD have grown and evolved, not only in terms of the increasing number of participating countries and cultural heritage events organised every year, but also in their role in the development of cultural networks that stretch across Europe. For the past ten years, the focus of the European Heritage Days has been on community heritage and the extraordinary significance of a common vision to protect, promote and enhance shared heritage and common European values.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina
    10/21/2014 Organisations - Bosnia-Herzegovina Published on HEREIN System (http://www.herein-system.eu) Home > Organisations - Bosnia-Herzegovina Organisations - Bosnia-Herzegovina Country: Bosnia-Herzegovina Hide all 1.1.A Overall responsibility for heritage situated in the government structure. 1.1.A Where is overall responsibility for heritage situated in the government structure? Is it by itself, or combined with other areas? Ministry's name: Commission to Preserve National Monuments of Bosnia and Herzegovina 1.1.B Competent government authorities and organisations with legal responsibilities for heritage policy and management. Name of organisation: Commission to Preserve National Monuments of Bosnia and Herzegovina Address: Obala Kulina Bana 1 Post code: 71000 City: Sarajevo Country: Bosnia­Herzegovina Website: www.kons.gov.ba E­mail: [email protected] Approx. number of staff: 22.00 No. of offices: 1 Organisation type: Commission Approach Integrated approach Main responsibility: No Heritage management: Designation Financial support Site monitoring Research: Conservation/maintenance Documentation Field recording (photogrammetry..) Inventories Restoration Ownership and/or management No (maintenance/visitor access) of heritage properties: http://www.herein-system.eu/print/188 1/13 10/21/2014 Organisations - Bosnia-Herzegovina Archaeological Heritage Main responsibility: No Ownership and/or management of No heritage properties: Architectural Heritage Main responsibility: No Ownership and/or management No (maintenance/visitor access)
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the European Heritage Label Action
    Contribution ID: 5001 adl 1 -d2e8-41 Oe-aaa7-81 0295e6de62 Date: 24/05/2018 14:30:30 Evaluation of the European Heritage Label Action Fields marked with * are mandatory. [ Introduction Welcome to the European Commission’s online public consultation on the European Heritage Label (EHL) action. This consultation aims to collect information and views about the functioning and results of the action. It aims to involve the general public in the evaluation of the EHL as much as its stakeholders to ensure that the process is inciusive, transparent, effective and coherent. We encourage you to consult the background document as it provides further details about the EHL action and the aims of its evaluation. Depending on your answers, the questionnaire might take you 15 minutes or more to complete. Please be as specific and objective as possible — your answers are valuable to us. We welcome contributions from citizens, social partners, public and private organisations and public authorities. You are free to upload a document (e.g. a position paper) at the end of the questionnaire. About you *You are replying: 0 as an individual in your personal capacity 3 in your professional capacity or on behalf of an organisation * Respondent’s first name rB * Respondent’s last name deV * Respondent’s email address t you do not have an email address, please write ‘Not available’. — 1 * Name of the organisation Ministry of Education, Culture en Science * Postal address of the organisation Postbus 16375, 2500 BJ DEN HAAG, the Netherlands *your contribution, Note that, whatever option chosen, your answers may be subject to a request for public access to documents under Requlation (EC) Nd1049/2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Emil R. Van Brederode President of the Dutch Heritage .Day Foundation and Coordinator of the European Heritage Days Programme
    Emil R. van Brederode President of the Dutch Heritage .Day Foundation and coordinator of the European Heritage Days Programme. The Nether/ands Introduction coordinated by a project of~ce in Amsterdam.Commission ofthe European~etherlandS. Mu ~icipalThe Many countries have to con tend with lack of financial resources and Councils also supports the p oject. insufficient interest when allocating Common points are agreements in Idates. sufficient priority to the maintenance of a common logo and various for1ms of their cultural heritage. Cultural tourism cooperation in border areas and b4tween can however be an instrument for individual cities. 1 bringing about change, due to its I economic importance. Although, when The European Heritage Days be~an in the motives are too heavily baseà France in 1985. The Netherlands and towards econorrlic gain, this may signal a Sweden followed in 1987. Belgi..m in threat to the cultural heritage itself. It is 1988 and now 21 European co~ntries thus of great strategic importance that take part in the event. Every ye,r the maintenance of a country's cultural officiai European Opening is held ,n one heritage can gain support from a ofthis the wasparticipating the ~etherlands.countries. I ] 19911992 sufficiently broad social base. Czechoslovakia. 1993 Belgium d in A number of years ago a new weapon 1994 it will take place in Portug . was launched in Europe -the European , Heritage Days. This is a specific form of The European Heritage Days is weIl cultural tourism, which is primarily thought of, and in many countries it is a aimed at the country's own inhabitants.
    [Show full text]
  • At a Glance Getting to Know the Eu's Cultural Heritage
    AT A GLANCE GETTING TO KNOW Infographic THE EU'S CULTURAL HERITAGE SITES Every year since 1983, World Heritage Day has been celebrated In addition, the European Heritage Awards give prominence The EU attracts a third of all tourists globally. around the globe on 18 April. This is an opportunity to raise to remarkable projects and recognise the commitment of awareness of the diversity and vulnerability of our cultural 'heritage heroes' in four main categories: conservation; heritage and the efforts required for its protection and research; dedicated service to heritage conservation; and conservation. education, training, and awareness raising. Every year, up to four projects are awarded the Grand Prix and €10 000. With more than 380 cultural and natural sites on the Unesco People can also vote online for their favourite project and World Heritage list, the EU attracts over a third of all tourists the winner receives the Public Choice Award. globally. Even though the pandemic caused a collapse in travel, EU countries remain extremely popular, with France, Spain, Italy and Germany being among the world's top 10 European Heritage Label (48) countries in this respect. France, Spain, Italy and Germany UNESCO World Heritage sites (388) are among the world's top 10 holiday destinations. In 2013, the EU launched the European Heritage Label to shine a spotlight on some selected sites for their symbolic 7 Every September, the European Heritage Days value and role in European history. So far, 48 sites have attract over 20 million visitors. been awarded this distinction by a panel of independent 15 2 2 European experts operating under the auspices of the 1 2 European Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • European Heritage Label Panel Report on Monitoring, 2020
    European Heritage Label Panel Report on Monitoring December 2020 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture Directorate D — Culture, Creativity and Sport Unit D.2 — Creative Europe E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION European Heritage Label Panel Report on Monitoring Report of the European Panel to the European Commission in application of Decision 1194/2011/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2011 establishing a European Union action for the European Heritage Label 21 December 2020 Getting in touch with the EU Europe Direct is a service that answers your questions about the European Union. You can contact this service: by freephone: 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (certain operators may charge for these calls), at the following standard number: +32 22999696 or by email via:https://europa.eu/european-union/contact_en Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2020 © European Union, 2020 Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). This report has been edited by Gábor Sonkoly, Chairperson, and Svetlana Hristova, General Rapporteur, on behalf of the European Heritage Label Panel. Unless mentioned otherwise, all photographs illustrating this report are part of the touring exhibition (EU-DG EAC) or were included in the applications or monitoring forms submitted by the European Heritage Label sites. p. 107 photo courtesy: Vince Vasvári TABLE OF CONTENT TABLE OF CONTENT ............................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How to Prepare an Application for the European Heritage Awards / Europa Nostra Awards 2021
    How to prepare an application for the European Heritage Awards / Europa Nostra Awards 2021 Elena Bianchi, Heritage Awards Coordinator Audrey Hogan, Programme Officer Webinar 3 September 2020 Webinar Outline • General information on the Awards Scheme • Procedure and timeline edition 2021 • How to prepare an application • Tips and common mistakes • Q & A European prizes and initiatives Music Moves Europe EU Prize for Literature EU Prize for Contemporary Architecture Music Moves Europe: Talent Award European Heritage Awards/Europa Nostra Awards Young Talent Architecture Award European Capitals of Culture European Heritage Label European Heritage Days European Heritage Awards / Europa Nostra Awards • Awarded with the European Commission since 2002 • 4 categories of entry: Conservation; Research; Dedicated Service to Heritage; Education, Training and Awareness-raising • In 2021: up to 30 Awards, up to 4 Grand Prix Winners, 1 Public Choice Award, 2 ILUCIDARE special prizes ILUCIDARE Special Prizes 1 October October- November November- January January - March April - October Deadline for Registration of the Assessments by Jury and Board Communication submissions submitted dossiers local experts Meetings activities and events (date of sending) What do I need to read and fill in • Visit www.europeanheritageawards.eu/apply • Read carefully theCall for Entries and decide in which category to apply • Click on the red ‘Apply’ button. • Select your country and category of entry • Download the documents: 1. Entrant’s Guide 2. Entry Form European Heritage
    [Show full text]