Climate Change Scepticism: a Transnational Ecocritical Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Climate Change Scepticism: a Transnational Ecocritical Analysis Garrard, Greg.Goodbody, Axel.Handley, George.Posthumus, Stephanie. "Bibliography." Climate Change Scepticism: A Transnational Ecocritical Analysis. London,: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019. 254–279. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 24 Sep. 2021. <>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 24 September 2021, 17:43 UTC. Copyright © Greg Garrard, George Handley, Axel Goodbody and Stephanie Posthumus 2019. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. Bibliography Abram, David. The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in the More-Than- Human World. New York: Vintage, 1996. Abu-Lughod, Lila. ‘Writing Against Culture’, in Recapturing Anthropology, ed. Richard Fox. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, 1991, 137–62. Adams, John. Risk. London; Bristol, PA: UCL Press, 1995. Afeissa, Hicham-Stéphane, editor. Éthique de l’environnement – Nature, valeur, respect. Paris: Vrin, 2007. Afeissa, Hicham-Stéphane. La Fin du monde et de l’humanité. Essai de généalogie du discours écologique. Paris: PUF, 2014. Afeissa, Hicham-Stéphane. Portraits de philosophes en écologistes. Paris: Éditions Dehors, 2012. Allègre, Claude. L’Imposture climatique ou la fausse écologie. Paris: Plon, 2010. Anderegg, William R. L., James W. Prall, and Jacob Harold. ‘Reply to O’Neill and Boykoff: Objective Classification of Climate Experts’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107.39 (2010): E152–E52. Anderegg, William R. L., et al. ‘Expert Credibility in Climate Change’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107.27 (2010): 12107–09. Andermatt Conley, Verena. Ecopolitics. The Environment in Poststructuralist Thought. London; New York: Routledge, 1997. Andrew. ‘Skeptics Smeared as Holocaust Deniers, ADL Silent’. Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Is Not Pollution. Available online at www.populartechnology.net/2014/02/skeptics- smeared-as-holocaust-deniers.html Anshelm, Jonas and Martin Hultman. Discourses of Global Climate Change: Apocalyptic Framing and Political Antagonisms. London; New York: Routledge, 2014. Åsberg, Cecilia, Astrida Neimanis, and Johan Hedrén. ‘Four Problems, Four Directions for Environmental Humanities: Toward a Critical Posthumanities for the Anthropocene’. Ethics and the Environment 20.2 (2015): 230–71. Ashby, Lord and Mary Anderson. ‘Studies in the Politics of Environmental Protection: The Historical Roots of the British Clean Air Act, 1956: III. The Ripening of Public Opinion, 1898–1952’. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 2.3 (1977): 190–206. Attridge, Derek. The Singularity of Literature. London: Routledge, 2004. Kindle. Aykut, Stefan. ‘La construction du changement climatique comme problème public – débat médiatique et expertise climatique en France et en Allemagne’, in Savoirs experts et profanes dans la construction des problèmes publics, ed. Ludivine Damay, Benjamin Denis, and Denis Duez. Brussels: Publications des Facultés universitaires Saint-Louis, 2011, 77–114. Bibliography 255 Aykut, Stefan, Jean-Baptiste Comby, and Hélène Guillemot. ‘Climate Change Controversies in French Mass Media 1990–2010’, Journalism Studies 13.2 (2012): 157–74. Aykut, Stefan, Christophe Bonneuil, Jean Jouzel, Maxime Combes, Nicolas Haeringer, Valérie Cabanes, and Geneviève Azam. ‘Climat: Nicolas Sarkozy, dangereux marchand de doute’. La Libération, 16 September 2016 Available online at http:// www.liberation.fr/politiques/2016/09/16/climat-nicolas-sarkozy-dangereux- marchand-de-doute_1499625 (accessed 2 October 2017). Bachmann, Hartmut. Die Lüge der Klimakatastrophe. … und wie der Staat uns damit ausbeutet. Manipulierte Angst als Mittel zur Macht, 6th ed. Berlin: Frieling 2010. Baqué, Joël. La Fonte des glaces. Paris: P.O.L., 2017. Bartsch, Christian. ‘Wider die Klimahysterie. Mehr Licht im Dunkel des Klimawandels’. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 3 April 2007. Bartsch, Christian, Günter Ederer, Matthias Horx, Wolf Lotter, Dirk Maxeiner, Josef Reichholf, and Wolfram Weimer. ‘Die “Klimaskeptiker” antworten. Wir müssen Urängste relativieren’. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 5 September 2007, p. 35. Available online at http://www.faz.net/aktuell/wissen/klima/die-klimaskeptiker- antworten-wir-muessen-uraengste-relativieren-1462827.html Bate, Jonathan. Romantic Ecology: Wordsworth and the Environmental Tradition. London: Routledge, 1991. Bate, Jonathan. The Song of the Earth. London: Picador, 2000. Bate, Roger and Julian Morris. Global Warming: Apocalypse or Hot Air? London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1994. Bean, Richard. The Heretic. London: Oberon, 2011. Beck, Glenn with Harriet Parke. Agenda 21. New York: Threshold Editions, 2012. Beckerman, Wilfred. Small Is Stupid: Blowing the Whistle on the Greens. London: Duckworth, 1995. Beder, Sharon. ‘Neoliberal Think Tanks and Free Market Environmentalism’. Environmental Politics 10.2 (2001): 128–28. Behringer, Wolfgang. Kulturgeschichte des Klimas. Von der Eiszeit bis zur globalen Erwärmung, 5th ed. Munich: C.H. Beck, 2010. Beinart, Peter. ‘Glenn Beck’s Regrets’. The Atlantic, Atlantic Media Company, 13 December 2016. Available online at www.theatlantic.com/magazine/ archive/2017/01/glenn-becks-regrets/508763/ Bellamy, Edward and Cecelia Tichi. Looking Backward 2000–1887. New York: Penguin, 1982. Bennett, Elena. Seeds of Good Anthropocenes. 2016. Available online at https:// goodanthropocenes.net (accessed 5 December2017). Bennett, Oliver. Cultural Pessimism. Narratives of Decline in the Postmodern World, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2001. Bergthaller, Hannes. ‘Fossil Freedoms: The Politics of Emancipation and the End of Oil’, in The Routledge Companion to the Environmental Humanities, ed. John Christensen, Ursula K. Heise, and Michelle Niemann. London: Routledge, 2017, 424–32. 256 Bibliography Berland, Lucie. ‘Les nouveaux écolos ont tué l’écologie anxiogène’, Slate.fr., 2 May 2015. Available online at http://www.slate.fr/story/116652/nouveaux-ecolos-politique- sourire (accessed 17 May 2017). Bess, Michael. The Light-Green Society: Ecology and Technological Modernity in France, 1960–2000. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2002. ‘Beyond Debate?’ Times Higher Education (THE), THEunijobs, 22 May 2015. Available online at www.timeshighereducation.com/features/beyond-debate/409454.article Bilandzic, Helena and Jens Soentgen. ‘Die Struktur klimaskeptischer Argumente’, Gaia 23.1 (March 2014): 40–47. Bild. ‘Globale Erwärmung: Die CO2-Lüge. Renommiertes Forscher-Team behauptet: Die Klima-Katastrophe ist Panik-Mache der Politik’, 6 February 2012. Bild. ‘Seit 12 Jahren ist die Erd-Erwärmung gestoppt!’, 7 February 2012. Bloor, David. Knowledge and Social Imagery, 2nd ed. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press, 1991. Blow, Charles M. ‘About the “Basket of Deplorables”’. The New York Times, 12 September 2016. Available online at www.nytimes.com/2016/09/12/opinion/about-the-basket- of-deplorables.html Blüchel, Kurt G. Der Klimaschwindel. Erderwärmung, Treibhauseffekt, Klimawandel – Die Fakten. Munich: Bertelsmann, 2007. Blühdorn, Ingolfur. ‘The Governance of Unsustainability: Ecology and Democracy after the Post-democratic Turn’, Environmental Politics 22.1 (2013): 16–36. Available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.755005 Boehmer-Christiansen, Sonja. ‘Science, Equity, and the War against Carbon’. Science, Technology, & Human Values 28.1 (2003): 69–92. Boehmer-Christiansen, Sonja. ‘A Scientific Agenda for Climate Policy?’ Nature 372 (1994): 400–402. Bonner, Frances. ‘Top Gear: Why Does the World’s Most Popular Programme Not Deserve Scrutiny?’ Critical Studies in Television 5.1 (2010): 32–45. Böttcher, Sven. Prophezeiung. Cologne: Kiepenheuer and Witsch, 2011. Boussalis, Constantine and Travis G. Coan. ‘Text-Mining the Signals of Climate Change Doubt’. Global Environmental Change 36 (2016): 89–100. Boyd, David R. The Optimistic Environmentalist: Progressing Towards a Greener Future. Toronto, ON: ECW Press, 2015. Boyer, Frédéric. ‘De son extinction. Discours d’adieu’, in Du souffle dans les mots: Trente écrivains s’engagent pour le climat, ed. Sylvie Gouttebaron. Paris: Éditions Arthaud, 2015, 44–60. Boykoff, Maxwell T. ‘The Cultural Politics of Climate Change Discourse in UK Tabloids’. Political Geography 27.5 (2008): 549–69. Boykoff, Maxwell T. and Maria Mansfield. ‘“Ye Olde Hot Aire”: Reporting on Human Contributions to Climate Change in the Uk Tabloid Press’. Environmental research letters 3.2 (2008): 024002. Bramoullé, Gérard. La Peste verte. Paris: Belles Lettres, 1991. Bibliography 257 Branch, Michael P. ‘Are You Serious? A Modest Proposal for Environmental Humor’, in The Oxford Handbook of Ecocriticism, ed. Greg Garrard. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Brick, Phil. ‘Determined Opposition: The Wise Use Movement Challenges Environmentalism’. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 37.8 (1995): 17–42. Brimblecombe, Peter. ‘The Clean Air Act after 50 Years’. Weather 61.11 (2006): 311–14. Brown, William. Seven Pillars of Creation: The Bible, Science, and the Ecology of Wonder. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Bruckner, Pascal. Le Fanatisme de l’Apocalypse. Paris: Grasset & Fasquelle, 2011. Kindle edition. Brunnengräber, Achim. Klimaskeptiker in Deutschland und ihr Kampf gegen die Energiewende, University of Vienna, Institut für Politikwissenschaft Working Paper 1/2013. Available online at http://politikwissenschaft.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/ user_upload/inst_politikwiss/IPW_Working_Papers/IPW-WP-1_2013-Achim-
Recommended publications
  • Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy
    The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy Dr. Valerie Scatamburlo-D'Annibale University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada Abstract This article explores how Donald Trump capitalized on the right's decades-long, carefully choreographed and well-financed campaign against political correctness in relation to the broader strategy of 'cultural conservatism.' It provides an historical overview of various iterations of this campaign, discusses the mainstream media's complicity in promulgating conservative talking points about higher education at the height of the 1990s 'culture wars,' examines the reconfigured anti- PC/pro-free speech crusade of recent years, its contemporary currency in the Trump era and the implications for academia and educational policy. Keywords: political correctness, culture wars, free speech, cultural conservatism, critical pedagogy Introduction More than two years after Donald Trump's ascendancy to the White House, post-mortems of the 2016 American election continue to explore the factors that propelled him to office. Some have pointed to the spread of right-wing populism in the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis that culminated in Brexit in Europe and Trump's victory (Kagarlitsky, 2017; Tufts & Thomas, 2017) while Fuchs (2018) lays bare the deleterious role of social media in facilitating the rise of authoritarianism in the U.S. and elsewhere. Other 69 | P a g e The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy explanations refer to deep-rooted misogyny that worked against Hillary Clinton (Wilz, 2016), a backlash against Barack Obama, sedimented racism and the demonization of diversity as a public good (Major, Blodorn and Blascovich, 2016; Shafer, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • (A Thousand Points Of) Light on Biased Language
    Shedding (a Thousand Points of) Light on Biased Language Tae Yano Philip Resnik School of Computer Science Department of Linguistics and UMIACS Carnegie Mellon University University of Maryland Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA College Park, MD 20742, USA [email protected] [email protected] Noah A. Smith School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA [email protected] Abstract To what extent a sentence or clause is biased (none, • somewhat, very); This paper considers the linguistic indicators of bias in political text. We used Amazon Mechanical Turk The nature of the bias (very liberal, moderately lib- • judgments about sentences from American political eral, moderately conservative, very conservative, bi- blogs, asking annotators to indicate whether a sen- ased but not sure which direction); and tence showed bias, and if so, in which political di- rection and through which word tokens. We also Which words in the sentence give away the author’s asked annotators questions about their own political • views. We conducted a preliminary analysis of the bias, similar to “rationale” annotations in Zaidan et data, exploring how different groups perceive bias in al. (2007). different blogs, and showing some lexical indicators strongly associated with perceived bias. For example, a participant might identify a moderate liberal bias in this sentence, 1 Introduction Without Sestak’s challenge, we would have Bias and framing are central topics in the study of com- Specter, comfortably ensconced as a Democrat munications, media, and political discourse (Scheufele, in name only. 1999; Entman, 2007), but they have received relatively adding checkmarks on the underlined words.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Faris, Robert M., Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Nikki Bourassa, Ethan Zuckerman, and Yochai Benkler. 2017. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33759251 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA AUGUST 2017 PARTISANSHIP, Robert Faris Hal Roberts PROPAGANDA, & Bruce Etling Nikki Bourassa DISINFORMATION Ethan Zuckerman Yochai Benkler Online Media & the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper is the result of months of effort and has only come to be as a result of the generous input of many people from the Berkman Klein Center and beyond. Jonas Kaiser and Paola Villarreal expanded our thinking around methods and interpretation. Brendan Roach provided excellent research assistance. Rebekah Heacock Jones helped get this research off the ground, and Justin Clark helped bring it home. We are grateful to Gretchen Weber, David Talbot, and Daniel Dennis Jones for their assistance in the production and publication of this study. This paper has also benefited from contributions of many outside the Berkman Klein community. The entire Media Cloud team at the Center for Civic Media at MIT’s Media Lab has been essential to this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Or Fiction?
    The Ins and Outs of Media Literacy 1 Part 1: Fact or Fiction? Fake News, Alternative Facts, and other False Information By Jeff Rand La Crosse Public Library 2 Goals To give you the knowledge and tools to be a better evaluator of information Make you an agent in the fight against falsehood 3 Ground rules Our focus is knowledge and tools, not individuals You may see words and images that disturb you or do not agree with your point of view No political arguments Agree 4 Historical Context “No one in this world . has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of plain people.” (H. L. Mencken, September 19, 1926) 5 What is happening now and why 6 Shift from “Old” to “New” Media Business/Professional Individual/Social Newspapers Facebook Magazines Twitter Television Websites/blogs Radio 7 News Platforms 8 Who is your news source? Professional? Personal? Educated Trained Experienced Supervised With a code of ethics https://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp 9 Social Media & News 10 Facebook & Fake News 11 Veles, Macedonia 12 Filtering Based on: Creates filter bubbles Your location Previous searches Previous clicks Previous purchases Overall popularity 13 Echo chamber effect 14 Repetition theory Coke is the real thing. Coke is the real thing. Coke is the real thing. Coke is the real thing. Coke is the real thing. 15 Our tendencies Filter bubbles: not going outside of your own beliefs Echo chambers: repeating whatever you agree with to the exclusion of everything else Information avoidance: just picking what you agree with and ignoring everything else Satisficing: stopping when the first result agrees with your thinking and not researching further Instant gratification: clicking “Like” and “Share” without thinking (Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Won't Make Hundreds of Millions of Dollars While Their Employees Are Below the Poverty Line
    won't make hundreds of millions of dollars while their employees are below the poverty line. Hillary said "We are going to take things away from you for the common good." Goddess bless her. We need stations like WTPG to show the masses what we liberals Dlan to do to helD this countw. Jeff Coryell 44118 The progressive community in Columbus is vibrant and growing. More and more Ohioans are seeing through the empty right wing spin and coming around to the common-sense progressive agenda. They need a radio station that respects their point of view! ~oan Fluharty 43068 Sara Richman 01940 Progressive Talk Radio sserves an imponant for the public to hear another side of the issues. Talk radio is "lopsidedly" one sided and as we know, this is extremely dangerous in a democracy. Boston lost their Progressive Talk Radio and I feel as if I lost a friend. Out of habit, when I turn to the station in the car or in the kitchen, I get annoying rumba music. I wish a petition could be started to have another Boston station broadcast Progressive Talk. I khank you, Sara Richman Karl lKav 143232 IProqressive radio is imDonant in Central Ohio because someone has to tell They are more than willing to patronize any advenisers to the channel. arilyn eerman Franken and Schultz have reg Iavis 1230 since it started in Columbus in September 2004. On average, we e listened to AM1230 for eight to ten hours a day (my wife listens to it a 1230, as have many of our friends and acquaintances.
    [Show full text]
  • Pofc TBI Main Octnov20.Indd
    Insight on screen TBIvision.com | October/November 2020 Distributor's Survey The inside track Bible reading on the global sales The future of business formats Page 14 Page 34 pOFC TBI Main OctNov20.indd 1 02/10/2020 15:28 pIFC-01 Global Agency TBI OctNov20.indd 2 01/10/2020 10:35 pIFC-01 Global Agency TBI OctNov20.indd 3 01/10/2020 10:35 ABANDONED ENGINEERING S5 12 x 60’ Like a Shot Entertainment EDGES UNKNOWN RACE TO VICTORY 7 x 60’ 4East Media 6 x 60’ CIC Media SEX UNLIMITED 5 x 60’ Barcroft Studios For sales enquiries please contact: [email protected] www.beyondrights.tv pXX Beyond TBI OctNov20.indd 1 28/09/2020 09:44 Welcome | This issue Contents TBI October/November 2020 34. Future-proofi ng formats With the pandemic upending the TV industry across the world, Mark Layton fi nds out what the impact has been on the global format sales business and how it has adapted to the new normal. 38. Keeping the music playing through Covid Karen Smith, MD of Tuesday’s Child and Tuesday’s Child Scotland, on The Hit List. 10 40. Formats Hot Picks The formats that caught our eye this month including 9 Windows, Pooch Perfect and Tough As Nails. 10. Press record TikTok has exploded into the public consciousness like few – if 42. e colourful world of co-productions any other – video-led service before it. UK & Europe chief Rich Sharing production costs on unscripted projects was on the increase Waterworth tells Richard Middleton how he sees the future prior to Covid-19, but is the pandemic accelerating this further? Tim panning out.
    [Show full text]
  • (Pdf) Download
    NATIONAL & LOCAL NEWS MEDIA TV, RADIO, PRINT & ONLINE SOURCES Master List - Updated 04/2019 Pain Warriors Unite Washington Post: Website: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/submit-an-op-ed/?utm_term=.d1efbe184dbb What are the guidelines for letter submissions? Email: [email protected] We prefer letters that are fewer than 200 words and take as their starting point an article or other item appearing in The Post. They may not have been submitted to, posted to or published by any other media. They must include the writer's full name; anonymous letters and letters written under pseudonyms will not be considered. For verification purposes, they must also include the writer's home address, email address and telephone numbers, including a daytime telephone number. Writers should disclose any personal or financial interest in the subject matter of their letters. If sending email, please put the text of the letter in the body and do not send attachments; attachments will not be read. What are the guidelines for op-ed submissions? Submissions should be limited to 800 words. We consider only completed articles and cannot commit to, or provide guidance on, article proposals. Op-eds may not have been submitted to, posted to or published by any other media. They must include the writer's full name — anonymous op-eds or op-eds written under pseudonyms will not be considered. They also must include the writer's home address, email address and telephone numbers. Additionally, we ask that writers disclose any personal or financial interest in the subject at hand. Please use our op-ed submission form L.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Talk Radio and Its Impact on Politics and Public Policy
    Mount Rushmore: The Rise of Talk Radio and Its Impact on Politics and Public Policy Brian Asher Rosenwald Wynnewood, PA Master of Arts, University of Virginia, 2009 Bachelor of Arts, University of Pennsylvania, 2006 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Virginia August, 2015 !1 © Copyright 2015 by Brian Asher Rosenwald All Rights Reserved August 2015 !2 Acknowledgements I am deeply indebted to the many people without whom this project would not have been possible. First, a huge thank you to the more than two hundred and twenty five people from the radio and political worlds who graciously took time from their busy schedules to answer my questions. Some of them put up with repeated follow ups and nagging emails as I tried to develop an understanding of the business and its political implications. They allowed me to keep most things on the record, and provided me with an understanding that simply would not have been possible without their participation. When I began this project, I never imagined that I would interview anywhere near this many people, but now, almost five years later, I cannot imagine the project without the information gleaned from these invaluable interviews. I have been fortunate enough to receive fellowships from the Fox Leadership Program at the University of Pennsylvania and the Corcoran Department of History at the University of Virginia, which made it far easier to complete this dissertation. I am grateful to be a part of the Fox family, both because of the great work that the program does, but also because of the terrific people who work at Fox.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disclosure of Climate Data from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia
    House of Commons Science and Technology Committee The disclosure of climate data from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia Eighth Report of Session 2009–10 Volume II Oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 24 March 2010 HC 387-II Published on 31 March 2010 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Science and Technology Committee The Science and Technology Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Government Office for Science. Under arrangements agreed by the House on 25 June 2009 the Science and Technology Committee was established on 1 October 2009 with the same membership and Chairman as the former Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Committee and its proceedings were deemed to have been in respect of the Science and Technology Committee. Current membership Mr Phil Willis (Liberal Democrat, Harrogate and Knaresborough)(Chair) Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods (Labour, City of Durham) Mr Tim Boswell (Conservative, Daventry) Mr Ian Cawsey (Labour, Brigg & Goole) Mrs Nadine Dorries (Conservative, Mid Bedfordshire) Dr Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat, Oxford West & Abingdon) Dr Brian Iddon (Labour, Bolton South East) Mr Gordon Marsden (Labour, Blackpool South) Dr Doug Naysmith (Labour, Bristol North West) Dr Bob Spink (Independent, Castle Point) Ian Stewart (Labour, Eccles) Graham Stringer (Labour, Manchester, Blackley) Dr Desmond Turner (Labour, Brighton Kemptown) Mr Rob Wilson (Conservative, Reading East) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental Select Committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No.152.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Scepticism: a Transnational Ecocritical Analysis
    Garrard, Greg. "Climate Scepticism in the UK." Climate Change Scepticism: A Transnational Ecocritical Analysis. By Greg GarrardAxel GoodbodyGeorge HandleyStephanie Posthumus. London,: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019. 41–90. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 26 Sep. 2021. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350057050.ch-002>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 26 September 2021, 23:43 UTC. Copyright © Greg Garrard, George Handley, Axel Goodbody and Stephanie Posthumus 2019. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 2 Climate Scepticism in the UK Greg Garrard Before embarking on a detailed analysis of sceptical British texts, I will provide some historical and scholarly context. There have been many studies of anti- environmentalism in the United States (Helvarg; Brick; Ehrlich and Ehrlich; Switzer) and one on the global ‘backlash’ (Rowell), but none focuses exclusively on the UK. The sole treatment of anti-environmentalism within ecocriticism comes from the United States (Buell), just like the various exposés of climate scepticism discussed in the Introduction. As this chapter will show, British climate scepticism is possessed of a prehistory and some distinctive local features that reward closer inspection. Nevertheless, the Anglo-American axis of organized anti-environmentalism is obvious: British climate sceptics such as Christopher Monckton, James Delingpole and Nigel Lawson are darlings of the American conservative think tanks (CTTs) that promulgate sceptical perspectives, while Martin Durkin’s The Great Global Warming Swindle (2007), a British documentary shown on Channel 4, includes interviews with Richard Lindzen, Patrick Michaels and Fred Singer, all prominent American sceptics.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 3: Process Issues Raised by Petitioners
    EPA’s Response to the Petitions to Reconsider the Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act Volume 3: Process Issues Raised by Petitioners U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Atmospheric Programs Climate Change Division Washington, D.C. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 3.0 Process Issues Raised by Petitioners............................................................................................5 3.1 Approaches and Processes Used to Develop the Scientific Support for the Findings............................................................................................................................5 3.1.1 Overview..............................................................................................................5 3.1.2 Issues Regarding Consideration of the CRU E-mails..........................................6 3.1.3 Assessment of Issues Raised in Public Comments and Re-Raised in Petitions for Reconsideration...............................................................................7 3.1.4 Summary............................................................................................................19 3.2 Response to Claims That the Assessments by the USGCRP and NRC Are Not Separate and Independent Assessments.........................................................................20 3.2.1 Overview............................................................................................................20 3.2.2 EPA’s Response to Petitioners’
    [Show full text]
  • View / Open Q&A for Climate Skeptics.Pdf
    Q & A FOR CLIMATE SKEPTICS Answers to the Most Frequently Stated Concerns Edited by the Climate Leadership Initiative Institute for a Sustainable Environment University of Oregon 541-746-0786 Http://climlead.uoregon.edu Background and Table of Contents Most of the information in this document is edited from: "How to Talk to a Climate Skeptic" a series by Coby Beck containing responses to the most common arguments opposing a belief in or action to resolve global warming. There are five parts. Each includes numerous objections heard by skeptics followed by answers to them. Responses will appear under multiple headings and may even appear in multiple subcategories in the same heading. 1. Climate Change is Not Real or Confirmed……………………………………..Page 1 2. We Don't Know Why It's Happening…………………………….……………. Page 31 3. Climate Change Is Natural…………………………………………………….. Page 39 4. Climate Change Is Not Bad……………………………………………………. Page 50 5. Climate Change Can't be Stopped (or Its Too Costly to Stop It)……………… Page 51 1. CLIMATE CHANGE IS NOT REAL OR CONFIRMED a. Inadequate evidence Objection: Despite what the computer models tell us, there is actually no evidence of significant global warming. Answer: Global warming is not an output of computer models; it is a conclusion based on observations of a great many global indicators. By far the most straightforward evidence is the actual surface temperature record. While there are places -- in England, for example -- that have records going back several centuries, the two major global temperature analyses can only go back around 150 years due to their requirements for both quantity and distribution of temperature recording stations.
    [Show full text]