Eastern Massachusetts Fern Foray 2010 by Weston L
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee
Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories Compiled by S. Oldfield Edited by D. Procter and L.V. Fleming ISBN: 1 86107 502 2 © Copyright Joint Nature Conservation Committee 1999 Illustrations and layout by Barry Larking Cover design Tracey Weeks Printed by CLE Citation. Procter, D., & Fleming, L.V., eds. 1999. Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Disclaimer: reference to legislation and convention texts in this document are correct to the best of our knowledge but must not be taken to infer definitive legal obligation. Cover photographs Front cover: Top right: Southern rockhopper penguin Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome (Richard White/JNCC). The world’s largest concentrations of southern rockhopper penguin are found on the Falkland Islands. Centre left: Down Rope, Pitcairn Island, South Pacific (Deborah Procter/JNCC). The introduced rat population of Pitcairn Island has successfully been eradicated in a programme funded by the UK Government. Centre right: Male Anegada rock iguana Cyclura pinguis (Glen Gerber/FFI). The Anegada rock iguana has been the subject of a successful breeding and re-introduction programme funded by FCO and FFI in collaboration with the National Parks Trust of the British Virgin Islands. Back cover: Black-browed albatross Diomedea melanophris (Richard White/JNCC). Of the global breeding population of black-browed albatross, 80 % is found on the Falkland Islands and 10% on South Georgia. Background image on front and back cover: Shoal of fish (Charles Sheppard/Warwick -
Ferns As a Shade Crop in Forest Farming
FERNS AS A FOREST FARMING CROP: EFFECTS OF LIGHT LEVELS ON GROWTH AND FROND QUALITY OF SELECTED SPECIES WITH POTENTIAL IN MISSOURI A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School University of Missouri - Columbia In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by JOHN D. KLUTHE Dr. H. E. ‘Gene’ Garrett, Thesis Supervisor May 2006 The undersigned, appointed by the Dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled FERNS AS A FOREST FARMING CROP: EFFECTS OF LIGHT LEVELS ON GROWTH AND FROND QUALITY OF SELECTED SPECIES WITH POTENTIAL IN MISSOURI Presented by John D. Kluthe a candidate for the degree of Masters of Science and hereby certify that in their opinion it is worthy of acceptance. _______________________________________H.Garrett _______________________________________W.Kurtz _______________________________________M.Ellersieck _______________________________________C.Starbuck ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I thank H. E. ‘Gene’ Garrett, Director of the University of Missouri Center for Agroforestry who has patiently guided me to completion of this Master’s thesis. Thanks to my other advisors who have also been very helpful; William B. Kurtz, University of Missouri – Professor of Forestry and Director of Undergraduate Studies in the School of Natural Resources; Christopher Starbuck, University of Missouri – Associate Professor of Horticulture. Furthermore, thanks to Mark Ellersieck, University of Missouri – Professor of Statistics; and Michele Warmund, University of Missouri – Professor of Plant Sciences. Dr. Ellersieck was very helpful analyzing the statistics while Dr. Warmund assisted with defining color with the use of a spectrophotometer. Many thanks to Bom kwan Chun who gladly helped with this study’s chores at HARC. -
Plants That Weren't Tough Enough
University of Alaska Fairbanks School of Natural Resources and Extension Georgeson Botanical Notes No. 82 (1996) - Revised 2014 Plants that Weren’t Tough Enough by Pat Holloway and Pat Wagner Any researcher working in the Far North is well aware of the beneficial attributes of snow as an insulating blanket for both plants and small animals. We learned in graphic detail just how important snow is in Alaska this past winter. The total accumu- lation of snow through January 1996 was only 6 inches (15.2 cm). During that time the minimum winter air temperature at the Garden reached -43oF (-42oC) in December and -48oF (-44oC) in January. Thirty-three percent of the experimental plants in the Garden were killed by this low snowfall. Damage could have been caused by extreme desiccation, frost heaving or an inability to tolerate low temperature extremes. Whatever the cause, the plants are dead, and we will have lots of room next season for new experiments. Some of the plants were heartbreaking losses such as the lilies, tulips, columbines and grape hyacinths. Some grape hyacinths finally emerged in mid summer, but it was quite obvious the damage was severe. Other plants such as tansy, we won’t miss at all because of its invasive nature. Nearly all of the plants that were growing well prior to last winter will be tested again at a later date. One thing is for certain, all the plants listed below will now come with a warning - needs snow cover to survive! Even more remarkable than this list is the one showing the plants that endured this severe winter. -
Wildlife Protection Ordinance, 20131
ASCENSION REVISED EDITION OF THE LAWS, 2017 ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES WILDLIFE PROTECTION ORDINANCE, 20131 Ordinance A6 of 2013 In force 18 October 2013 Amended by Ordinances A6 of 2014, A8 of 2016 (w.e.f.21 December 2016) No subsidiary legislation to 1 November 2017 ___________________ WILDLIFE PROTECTION ORDINANCE, 2013 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1. Short title 2. Interpretation 3. Protected wildlife product 4. Protected wildlife research licence 5. Marine protection: power to declare prohibited areas and closed seasons 6. Evidence 7. Penalty and power of Magistrates’ Court 8. Forfeitures 9. Offence by corporate body 10. Regulations 11. Repeal Schedule: Prohibited wildlife products AN ORDINANCE to protect and preserve the wildlife and habitat of Ascension. Short title 1. This Ordinance may be cited as the Wildlife Protection Ordinance, 2013. Interpretation 1 Under section 10 of the Revised Edition of the Laws Ordinance, 1999 this text is authoritative and is the sole authentic edition in respect of the law contained in it as at 1 November 2017. 2 2. In this Ordinance, unless the context otherwise requires— “conservation” in relation to wildlife product includes restoration and enhancement of a population or habitat; “fishing limits” means that part of the Atlantic Ocean extending to 200 nautical miles from the baseline from which the breadth of the territorial waters adjacent to Ascension is measured; “miles” means international nautical miles of 1,852metres; “prohibited wildlife product” means any wildlife product listed in the -
Gray Davis 2000 (2.94 MB PDF)
“3 N fl The Status and Distribution of the Endemic Vascular Flora of Ascension Island ,, ,ar • 0 , -i I,. •1 I — .11 ‘S. L. I) It Alan Gray, Samuel Gardner, Lucinda Kirk, Paul Robinson, Zoe Smolka, Lucy Webster. -‘ BirdL We Ir.It4II3,N4I. d Sum man An account of the expedition results relating to the endemic vascular flora of Ascension Island is presented. The status, distribution, and community structure of the ten endemic vascular plant species as recorded by the expedition is given. The expedition found some differences in the distributions of some species notably Luphorhia origaiuniles in comparison to previous studies The expedition increased the population of Sl’urobuIic LU*sp!mu.st!.’ hut this is due to under recording rather than population expansion. Based on our observations te propose no to date categories for the species using 1994 IUCN criteria ILCN, 1994.) on/e,i/1,i/,1 c:ckc(’n.v!nniv Extinct) Snnho1u.v c/un ts Extinct) J)nopieri.c u.s c’U)ISiOfli.V Extinct) tINLC1Th 11th/S ( ( —1 iwrainuui (ExtinctCriticall Endangered D) .Vlarairia purpurascetm (Lower Riskinu i.cpicnnnn :sceuseont.s Status: Lower Ris[c!nt) .ipIwn1ens ascensuinen.se .Spornhn/its ( ( Lower R:sk. nt ) cuespflosu.s Status (Endangered C ?aj Fup!iorhiu nn[inou/c’s Endangered B1--3cd cec/scensluiII.v i Critically Endangered C2a). Results of two way indicator species analysis (Hill. 1979) of the recorded quadrats for the endemic species are given, this together with observations made by the expedition indicate that available moisture may he an important factor in the endemic species distribution. -
Annual Report
Darwin Initiative Annual Report Important note: To be completed with reference to the Reporting Guidance Notes for Project Leaders: it is expected that this report will be about 10 pages in length, excluding annexes Submission Deadline: 30 April Darwin Project Information Project Reference 19026 Project Title Implementing a Darwin Initiative Biodiversity Action Plan for Ascension Island Host Country/ies Ascension Island (UK Overseas Territory) Contract Holder Institution University of Exeter Partner institutions Ascension Island Government Conservation Department (AIGCD) Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH) Queen Mary University of London (QMU) Royal Botanical Gardens, (RBG Kew) Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) University of Lund (UoL) Darwin Grant Value £299,480 Start/end dates of project 01/07/2012 – 31/12/2014 Reporting period (eg Apr 2013 01/05/2013 – 30/04/2014 – Mar 2014) and number (eg Annual Report 2 Annual Report 1, 2, 3) Project Leader name Dr Annette C. Broderick & Prof. Brendan J. Godley Project website www.ascension- island.gov.ac/government/conservation/projects/biodiversity- action-plan/ www.facebook.com/AscensionIslandConservation https://twitter.com/AIGConservation Report author(s) and date Dr Nicola Weber & Dr Sam Weber, Dr Annette C. Broderick & Prof. Brendan J. Godley (April 2014) 1. Project Rationale The Problem: The UK Overseas Territory of Ascension Island is an isolated volcanic peak in the South Atlantic Ocean. The island is small (just 34 sq. miles), yet supports exceptional biodiversity, including at least 55 endemic species of plants, fish and invertebrates. The island also supports the largest green turtle and seabird nesting colonies in the tropical Atlantic. -
Fall 2001 HARDY FERN FOUNDATION QUARTERLY Marlin Rickard to Lecture
THE HARDY FERN FOUNDATION P.O. Box 166 Medina, WA 98039-0166 (206) 870-5363 Web site: www.hardvfems.org The Hardy Fern Foundation was founded in 1989 to establish a comprehen¬ sive collection of the world’s hardy ferns for display, testing, evaluation, public education and introduction to the gardening and horticultural community. Many rare and unusual species, hybrids and varieties are being propagated from spores and tested in selected environments for their different degrees of hardiness and ornamental garden value. The primary fern display and test garden is located at, and in conjunction with, The Rhododendron Species Botanical Garden at the Weyerhaeuser Corpo¬ rate Headquarters, in Federal Way, Washington. Satellite fem gardens are at the Stephen Austin Arboretum, Nacogdoches, Texas, Birmingham Botanical Gardens, Birmingham, Alabama, California State University at Sacramento, Sacramento, California, Coastal Maine Botanical Garden, Boothbay, Maine, Dallas Arboretum, Dallas, Texas, Denver Botanic Gardens. Denver, Colorado, Georgeson Botanical Garden, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska, Harry P. Leu Garden, Orlando, Florida, Inniswood Metro Gardens, Columbus, Ohio, Lewis Ginter Botanical Garden, Richmond, Virginia, New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, and Strybing Arboretum, San Francisco, California. The fem display gardens are at Bainbridge Island Library, Bainbridge Island, WA, Lakewold, Tacoma, Washington, Les Jardins de Metis, Quebec, Canada, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, Colorado, and Whitehall Historic Home and Garden, Louisville, KY. Hardy Fem Foundation members participate in a spore exchange, receive a quarterly newsletter and have first access to ferns as they are ready for distribution. Cover Design by Willanna Bradner HARDY FERN FOUNDATION QUARTERLY THE HARDY FERN FOUNDATION Quarterly Volume 11 • No. -
La Forêt Dense Sèche Tropophile Épineuse Du Domaine Du Sud Malgache
Geo-Eco-Trop, 2015, 39, 2: 151-168 La forêt dense sèche tropophile épineuse du domaine du Sud malgache The dense dry tropophilous prickly forest of the South Madagascan domain Sophie RUELLE1,2 & François MALAISSE3,4 Abstract : The existence, between 150 and 500 m above sea level, of a dense formation of small trees and tall deciduous shrubs, dominated with spaced baobabs in the South Madagascan domain, in particular in the Andohahela massif, has been quoted in diverse papers (HUMBERT, 1941 ; HUMBERT & COURS DARNE, 1965). These last authors insist on the two plant groups that characterized, from a physiognomic point of view, this vegetation, namely the Didieraceae and the arboreal euphorbias, with fleshy twigs, of the Tirucalli section. We have studied more in detail this vegetation unit in the Manarara basin (Hazoara valley). We consider this last as a dense dry tropophilous prickly forest. The floristic composition (> 120 spp.), the structure (vertical and horizontal profiles, structure diagram), density, basal area, family importance coefficients, biological spectrum (raw and weighed), raw spectum of leaf area and ecomorphosis of this forest are successively presented and discussed. Finally the relative importance of spine bearing and leaf succulence are shortly commented on. Key words: Madagascar, South domain, dense dry tropophilous prickly forest, endemism, diversity. Résumé : L’existence, entre 150 et 500 m d’altitude, d’une formation dense de petits arbres et d’arbustes de taille élevée à feuillage caduc, où dominent, espacés, des baobabs dans le domaine sud malgache, en particulier dans le massif de l’Andohahela, a été signalée dans divers travaux (HUMBERT, 1941 ; HUMBERT & COURS DARNE, 1965). -
Winter 2010 - 1 President’S Message
THE HARDY FERN FOUNDATION P.O. Box 3797 Federal Way, WA 98063-3797 Web site: www.hardvfemfoundation.org The Hardy Fern Foundation was founded in 1989 to establish a comprehen¬ sive collection of the world’s hardy ferns for display, testing, evaluation, public education and introduction to the gardening and horticultural community. Many rare and unusual species, hybrids and varieties are being propagated from spores and tested in selected environments for their different degrees of hardiness and ornamental garden value. The primary fern display and test garden is located at, and in conjunction with, The Rhododendron Species Botanical Garden at the Weyerhaeuser Corporate Headquarters, in Federal Way, Washington. Satellite fern gardens are at the Birmingham Botanical Gardens, Birmingham, Alabama, California State University at Sacramento, California, Coastal Maine Botanical Garden, Boothbay , Maine. Dallas Arboretum, Dallas, Texas, Denver Botanic Gardens, Denver, Colorado, Georgeson Botanical Garden, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska, Harry R Leu Garden, Orlando, Florida, Inniswood Metro Gardens, Columbus, Ohio, New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, and Strybing Arboretum, San Francisco, California. The fern display gardens are at Bainbridge Island Library. Bainbridge Island, WA, Bellevue Botanical Garden, Bellevue, WA, Lakewold, Tacoma, Washington, Lotusland, Santa Barbara, California, Les Jardins de Metis, Quebec, Canada, Rotary Gardens, Janesville, Wl, and Whitehall Historic Home and Garden, Louisville, KY. Hardy Fern Foundation -
Fern Gazette Vol 18 Part 1 V7.Qxd
Fern Gazette V18 P2 v6.qxd 01/01/2008 16:39 Page 71 FERN GAZ. 18(2): 71-76. 2007 71 ASSESSING THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF PTERIDOPHYTES, A CHALLENGE FOR THE GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR PLANT CONSERVATION S. BLACKMORE & K. WALTER Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20a Inverleith Row, Edinburgh, EH3 5LR, Scotland, UK Key words: conservation status, Global Strategy for Plant Conservation, Pteridophytes, Red Data Lists. ABSTRACT The Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC) sets out a series of activities with targets intended to halt the decline in plant biodiversity by 2010. This article examines the current state of knowledge concerning the conservation status of ferns in relation to Target 2 of the GSPC. The change in criteria used by the World Conservation Union (IUCN) for assessing conservation status has led to data generated prior to 1997 being marginalised. The latest information, using the revised criteria and published in 2003, refers to a smaller number of pteridophyte species, with only ten species being common to both the 1997 and 2003 assessments. There is an urgent need to capture the knowledge that pteridologists and other specialists undoubtedly have, relating to the conservation status of ferns and fern allies, and to incorporate this into Red Data Lists to provide firmer foundations for the GSPC. INTRODUCTION The biodiversity crisis affecting our world is undoubtedly a real problem (Pimm et al., 1995; Heywood & Watson, 1995; Gomez-Pompa, 2004) and, like global warming with which it is intimately connected (Thomas et al., 2004), it poses great challenges to the future of humanity (Wilson, 2002). The biodiversity crisis might, however, be much more amenable to solution than global climate change if appropriate practical conservation policies are implemented at the local level around the world. -
A Roadmap for Fern Genome Sequencing
A Roadmap for Fern Genome Sequencing Authors: Li-Yaung Kuo, and Fay-Wei Li Source: American Fern Journal, 109(3) : 212-223 Published By: The American Fern Society URL: https://doi.org/10.1640/0002-8444-109.3.212 BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Complete website, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/terms-of-use. Usage of BioOne Complete content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/American-Fern-Journal on 15 Oct 2019 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use Access provided by Cornell University American Fern Journal 109(3):212–223 (2019) Published on 16 September 2019 A Roadmap for Fern Genome Sequencing LI-YAUNG KUO AND FAY-WEI LI* Boyce Thompson Institute, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA and Plant Biology Section, Cornell University, New York 14853, USA ABSTRACT.—The large genomes of ferns have long deterred genome sequencing efforts. To date, only two heterosporous ferns with remarkably small genomes, Azolla filiculoides and Salvinia cucullata, have been sequenced. -
Rare and Threatened Pteridophytes of Asia 2. Endangered Species of India — the Higher IUCN Categories
Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci., Ser. B, 38(4), pp. 153–181, November 22, 2012 Rare and Threatened Pteridophytes of Asia 2. Endangered Species of India — the Higher IUCN Categories Christopher Roy Fraser-Jenkins Student Guest House, Thamel. P.O. Box no. 5555, Kathmandu, Nepal E-mail: [email protected] (Received 19 July 2012; accepted 26 September 2012) Abstract A revised list of 337 pteridophytes from political India is presented according to the six higher IUCN categories, and following on from the wider list of Chandra et al. (2008). This is nearly one third of the total c. 1100 species of indigenous Pteridophytes present in India. Endemics in the list are noted and carefully revised distributions are given for each species along with their estimated IUCN category. A slightly modified update of the classification by Fraser-Jenkins (2010a) is used. Phanerophlebiopsis balansae (Christ) Fraser-Jenk. et Baishya and Azolla filiculoi- des Lam. subsp. cristata (Kaulf.) Fraser-Jenk., are new combinations. Key words : endangered, India, IUCN categories, pteridophytes. The total number of pteridophyte species pres- gered), VU (Vulnerable) and NT (Near threat- ent in India is c. 1100 and of these 337 taxa are ened), whereas Chandra et al.’s list was a more considered to be threatened or endangered preliminary one which did not set out to follow (nearly one third of the total). It should be the IUCN categories until more information realised that IUCN listing (IUCN, 2010) is became available. The IUCN categories given organised by countries and the global rarity and here apply to political India only.