sign in sign up
<<
Home , Bhabat, Bhankharpur, Bidhipur, Budha Theh, Dakha (Ludhiana West), Dhar Kalan

CENSUS OF 2001

SERIES-4

GENERAL POPULATION TABLES (Tables A-1 to A-4)

OFFICE OFTHE DIRECTOR OF CENSUS OPERATIONS PUNJAB Data Product Number 03-011-2001 Cen Book

(ii) Contents

Pages PREFACE v FIGURES AT A GLANCE vii-viii MAP RELATING TO ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISIONS ix

SECTION! General Note 3-11 Basic Census Concepts and Definitions 15-20

SECTION 2 TABLE A-I: NUMBER OF VILLAGES, TOWNS, HOUSEHOLDS, POPULATION AND AREA Fly Leaf 23-27 Statements 28-34 Diagram regarding Area and percentage to total Area 35 Map relating to Rural and Urban Population by Sex 2001 36 Map relating to Sex ratio - 200 i 37 Diagram regarding Area, India and States 200 1 38 Diagram regarding Population, India and States - 2001 39 Diagram regarding Population, State and Districts- 2001 40 Map relating to Density of Population 41 TABLE A-I 43-56 Appendix 57-67 TABLE A -2: DECADAL VARIATION IN POPULATION SINCE 1901 Fly Leaf (/} Statements 70-73 Diagram relating to Growth of Population 1901-2001 India and State 75 TABLE A-2 77-80 Appendix 81-82

(iii) TABLE A -3: VILLAGES BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS Fly Leaf 84 Statements 85-87 TABLE A-3 88-95 Appendix 96-97 TABLE A- 4: TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001 WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 Fly Leaf 99-100 Statements 101-135 Diagram regarding Growth of Urban Population showing percentage (1901-200 1) 137 Map showing Population of Towns in six size classes 2001 138 Map showing Urban Agglomerations 139 Alphabetical list of towns, 200 1 143-144 Alphabetical list of Urban Agglomerations - 2001 147 TABLE A-4 149-181 Appendix-l 182 Appendix-2 183-184

ANNEXURES Annexure - I Specimen of Houselist Schedule 187-188 Annexure - II Specimen of Household Schedule 189-190 Annexure - III (a) List of notified Scheduled Castes- Punjab 191 Annexure - III (b) List of notified Scheduled Tribes- Punjab 192 Annexure - IV The Census Act, 1948 193-196

(iv) PREFACE

Population Census is the most comprehensive source of information and population statistics which form an important component of the set of 'Core Statistics'. Conducting of census in India is a massive exercise involving both the Central and State governments. It is conducted after every ten years. 2001 Census is a landmark Census as we move from 20th century to 21 st century and entered into a new millennium as well. It is for the first time in Indian Census that the data collected through 2001 Census has been put in public domain in print media, in electronic format, through cartographic representations etc. and consultancy services for generation of customized tables on request by any data users on payment. The task of finalizing the tables and production of this volume is the joint effort of various divisions in the office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India and the Directorate of Census Operations. I am extremely grateful to Shri D.K. Sikri, lAS, Additional Secretary and Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India for his guidance in bringing out this publication. I am equally grateful to Shri Jayant Kumar Banthia, lAS, former Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India for his constant inspiration, help and guidance at every stage. I am thankful to Shri D. Roy Choudhary, Deputy Registrar General (Census & Tabulation), Shri Jagan Lal, Assistant Director and all the officers and staff of Census Division for their valuable guidance for bringing out this publication. In the Directorate, I express my thanks to every officer/official contributed in the 2001 Census. Among those who are closely associated with this work, I appreciate each member of Census Cell for scrutiny, finalization of data presented in this publication. S/Shri Madhav Shyam, Deputy Director (since retired), S.K. Bhandari, Assistant Director (since retired), Smt. Kamlesh Gupta, Assistant Director, Dr. B.B. Jain, Research Officer, S/Shri Malkit Singh, Statistical Investigator Grade-I (since retired), Rajender Prasad, Statistical Investigator Grade-I, Pawan Kumar Bansal, SI Grade-II, Mansha Ram, SI Grade- III, Raj Paul Pathak, Meeka Singh and Smt. Shasbi Arora, Compilers, S/Shri Tej Pal Singh, Sr Geographer, Satinder Pal Singh, LDC, Baldev Singh, Data Entry Operator, Ajit Singh, JGO and Harbans Singh, Daftri deserve special appreciation.

Chandigarh R.S. Meena March, 2008 Joint Director Census Operations, Punjab

FIGURES AT A GLANCE

PUNJAB TOTAL POPULATION Total Persons 24,358,999 Males 12,985,045 Females 11,373,954

Rural Persons 16,096,488 Males 8,516,596 Females 7,579,892

Urban Persons 8,262,511 Males 4,468,449 Females 3,794,062

DECENNIAL POPULATION GROWTH RATE 1991-2001 20.1

AREA IN KM2 50362.00 DENSITY OF POPULATION PER KM2 484 SEX RATIO 876 (Number of females per 1,000 males)

LITERACY RATE Persons 69.7 (Excluding children in the age-group 0-6) Males 75.2 Females 63.4

PERCENTAGE OF URBAN POPULATION TO 33.9 TOTAL POPULATION PERCENTAGE TO TOTAL POPULATION

(i) Main Workers Persons 32.2 Males 49.5 Females 12.4

(ii) Marginal Workers Persons 5.3 Males 4.1 Females 6.7

(iii) Non - Workers Persons 62.5 Males 46.4 Females 80.9

(vii) FIGURES AT A GLANCE

PUNJAB BREAK UP OF MAIN WORKERS PERCENTAGE AMONG MAIN WORKERS CULTIVATORS Persons 24.2 Males 26.7 Females 12.8 AGRICULTURAL LABOURERS Persons 13.5 Males 13.9 Females 11.7

HOUSEHOLD INDUSTRY WORKERS Persons 3.1 Males 2.5 Females 5.8 OTHER WORKERS Persons 59.2 Males 56.9 Females 69.7

PERCENTAGE OF SCHEDULED CASTES Persons 28.9 TO TOTAL POPULATION Males 28.6 Females 29.1

PERCENTAGE OF SCHEDULED TRIBES TO Persons TOTAL POPULATION Males Females

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS 4.348,580

TOTAL NUMBER OF VILLAGES Total 12,673 Inhabited 12,278 Uninhabited 395

TOTAL NUMBER OF TOWNS 157

(viii) PUNJAB

ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISIONS 2001

KILOMET NES

BOUNDARY INTERNAT IONA.L .. .

STATE .. . DISTRICT . R TAHSIL .. . @ HEADQUARTERS : DISTR ICT/ TAHSI L il TAHSIL HEADQUARTERS OF -I AND AMRITSAR-II ARE AT AMRITSAR Pocket for K Pocket for P TAHSIL HEADQUARTERS OF -I AND JALANDHAR-II Pocket for Patti Pt ARE AT JALANDHAR.

Pocket for Sunam S TAHSIL HEADQUARTERS OF (EAST) AND LUDHIANA (WEST) The administrative headquarters of , and Punjab are at Chandigarh. ARE AT LUDHIANA.

(ix)

SECTION 1 - GENERAL NOTE

General Note

The first Census of the third millennium and departure from the earlier census tradition, as until twenty first century conducted in 2001 has been the the 1991 Census (except 1971), the sunrise of 1'1 141h continuous and uninterrupted Indian Census since March of the relevant Census year was the census 1872. Thus, 2001 Census while providing data on moment. The enumeration of houseless popUlation was population and its characteristics will also made a carried out on the night of February, 28, 200 1. transition from one century and millennium to another. This gigantic operation, (considered by many to This data will form the benchmark for framing of the be the single largest and complex peace time welfare and development policies for the human beings administrative exercise in the world) was made possible living in this Country. due to the door to door universal canvassing of the Till 1931, Census was a one night affair which Household Schedule by about 2 million enumerators mainly aimed at presenting a snapshot of the country's and supervisors covering 593 districts, 5464 Sub­ population. But since 1941 and upto 1991 Census, districts, 5161 towns and 638588 villages at the national count was staggered and enumeration was being done level. The comprehensive Household Schedule which on Individual Slips. However, in 2001 enumeration replaced the individual slip had three parts and two has been done on Household Schedules. The sides A and B. Part I contained th~ Location questionnaire has thus gone on changing according to Particulars; Part II related to the Individual Particulars the changing needs and requirements of the society and Part ill contained questions for Household engaged and the country. in CultivationIPlantation (Annexure-II). The Part II of As a general rule, every person has to be the Household Schedule had 39 columns and 23 enumerated at his normal place of residence, except questions all of which were universally canvassed and those who are away from their normal places of no sampling was resorted to during enumeration. To residence through out the period of count. These facilitate quick tabulation for bringing out Provisional persons have been enumerated at the place where they Population Totals, provision for page totalling was made were first found by an enumerator during the in the schedule itself for a few items namely population, enumeration period or during his revisional round. males, females, popUlation aged 0-6 years by sex, Houseless persons have been to be enumerated at the literates and workers and their categories by sex. The places they were found on the night of 28 th February, provisional population totals were put in the public th 2001. domain on 30 March, 2001 i.e. within four weeks of the completion of the enumeration. Provisional The Census Act, 1948, forms the legal basis for Population Paper-I of 2001 and Supplement to conduct of popUlation censuses in independent India. Provisional PopUlation Paper-I of 200 I provided the As in the past, the Census of India, 2001 has been basic statistics of the popUlation, literates upto-district, conducted in two phases. During the first phase, the sub-district and town level classified by sex through Houselisting Operation was conducted between April the publication of Paper I, II and III of Provisional to September 2000. The second phase of Census i.e. Population Totals. Subsequently, the distribution of Population Enumeration, was undertaken between population by rural and urban areas and economic February, 9th to 28th February (both days inclusive) activity characteristics of the population by rural and with a revisional round from lSI to 5th March, 2001. urban areas at districtlsub-districtltown level were also The Census moment was 00.00 hours of 1st March, released in electronic format. All the provisional 2001, the referral time at which the snapshot of the population totals released so far are also available on popUlation of the country was taken. This was a census website: http://www.censusindia.gov.in. 3 In Jammu & Kashmir and certain snow bound A quantum leap has been made in the technology areas of and Uttaranchal the front while processing the census 2001 data both for population enumeration was conducted during 11 th_ Houselisting and population Enumeration. The 30th September, 2000 with the revisional round from Schedules for both the phases were scanned through 151 to 51h October, 2000. In Kinnaur district of high speed scanners in fifteen Data-centres and hand­ Himachal Pradesh, the population enumeration had written data from the schedules were converted into to be deferred due to flash floods in August 2000 and digitized form through Intelligent Character Reading was conducted from 12th to 31'1 May, 2001 with (ICR) software for creation of ASCII records for reference date as 1'1 June, 2001. In Jammu and further processing. The designing and formatting of Kashmir, due to certain constraints, the enumeration the Household Schedule had to be done very carefully period was extended from 151 October, 2000 to 15th using specialized software so as to ensure uniformity, November, 2000 with the reference date of 161h which was an essential prerequisite for scanning. The November, 2000 in the six districts viz., Srinagar, selection of appropriate state-of-art technology in data Badgam, Anantnag, Baramulla, Kupwara and processing has made it possible to produce all the Pulwama of Kashmir Valley and four blocks namely, Houselisting as well as popUlation Enumeration tables Banihal, Ramso, Marwa and Wardwan of Doda district on full count basis for the first time in the history of in Jammu Division. It was further extended in Srinagar Census. For Census 2001, about 202 million Schedules town and Pulwama districts until 15th December, 2000 consisting of about 1028 million records were scanned with reference date being 16th December, 2000. and processed within a span of only 10 months starting Further, due to the devastating earthquake in October, 2002. Gujarat on 26th January, 2001 just two weeks prior to After the data is processed, it is essential on the the commencement of the nation wide population part of the data producing agency to satisfy itself about enumeration, the canvassing of the schedule in the its quality before putting the same in public domain. affected areas of Gujarat had to be postponed. The This has to be done mainly through the process of affected areas included the entire district of Kachchh, internal consistency, comparison with similar data in the taluk of Morvi, Maliya-Miana and Wankaner in the past and also through validation with likewise data Rajkot district and Jodiya taluka in Jamnagar district. if available, from external sources. Quite often, the The population enumeration in these areas was local knowledge and perception has to be brought into undertaken during 9th - 28 th February, 2002 with 151 play to understand both the existing and the new March, 2002 as the reference date. emerging trends of population distribution and In addition to the provisional population totals, characteristics. The other very important aspect of the the final results of the Houselisting Operations were data quality is to ensure complete coverage of all released in April, 2003 which provided valuable geographical areas specially for the population information on the housing stock, amenities and assets enumeration phase where the data is disseminated right available to the household which is available in the up to the village level in the rural areas and the ward publication 'Tables on Houses, Household Amenities level in the urban areas. Thus, ensuring the complete and Assets by StateslUTs. Similar publications are coverage and correct geographical linkage of each also available for the Scheduled Caste and the enumeration block has always been one of the major Scheduled Tribe households separately. This data is planks of the quality control, especially for small area also available in printed form and electronic format population statistics. for the states/union territories at district, sub-district A very comprehensive check and edit mechanism and town level. The Houselisting data can be was put in place to objectively examine the immensely useful to the policy makers, planners and preliminary Census 2001 population Enumeration administrators to improve the quality of life for results and finally clear them for use. The countrymen as well as to the corporate sector for responsibility for the final clearance of data was with formulating marketing strategies in reaching the rural the Task Force on Quality Assurance (TFQA), headed masses. by the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, 4 India. The other members of the TFQA were the conducting houselisting operation in the State, Heads and senior officers of the Census Division, finalization of lists of Districts and Tahsils, Allotment Data Processing Division, Map Division, Demography of Location Codes to each village, delineation of Division and Social Studies Division. The Directors houselisting Blocks, preparation of Charge Registers, and their senior officers were required to make detailed Selection and appointment of Enumerators/ presentations of data for their co-opted as members Supervisors/ Charge Officers, arrangements for whenever the TFQA discussed the data for their states/ distribution of material for houselisting, supervision union territories. The Directors and their senior officers during houselisting, publicity measures for were required to make detailed presentations of data houselisting, etc, were discussed in detail. for their own state both in respect to the quality and The second conference of Directors of Census coverage and only after the full possible satisfaction operations was held at New from 3rd to 5th of the TFQA, the population data has been cleared. February 2000 to review the preparatory work and The preparations for the 2001 Census of India arrangements for houselisting operations, storing and had commenced in 2000. First item of Preliminary distribution of schedules/ instructions for houselisting work related to the preparation of up to date list of Operations, disposal of 1991 Census records, villages and towns at state or union territory/district! discussion on houselist schedule and instruction tahsil/town levels in view of the various jurisdictional manual, delineation of population enumeration blocks changes that had taken place since 1991 Census. Draft and preparation of abridged houselist and publicity questionnaires were developed based on past for Census of India-20Ot were discussed. experience, the needs of the country to be served by In third Directors Conference held at New Delhi the Census data, willingness of the people and on 26th & 27th May 2000, the format of household response to the topics and the ability of the schedule to be canvassed during the Census, manual enumerators in understanding the definition and for household schedule were discussed. Training concepts. The questionnaires were presented at the conducted during houselisting Operations and training first data users conference which was held during strategies proposed to be adopted and publicity April, 1998 and attended by the representatives of the measures to be taken to sensitize the public and important Ministries of the Government of India, the awareness about the importance of Census. Planning Commission, the CSO, the State Governments, Universities, Demographic and During fourth Conference, held on 13 th & 14th Population Institutes, Expert and Research insti­ Nov, 2000 at New Delhi, position of receipt of tutions, and Individual experts and Scholars. Based houselisting record and its safe storage. Creation of on the deliberations in the Conference, the population enumeration blocks & status of the work questionnaires were amended and placed before the of preparation of abridged houselist and training Advisory Committee on Technical Issues Connected programme of Master Trainers etc., was discussed. with holding the Census, which was appointed by the During the fifth and last Conference of Directors Government of India in February, 1998. The was held at New Delhi on 18th-20th Dec, 2001 in which questionnaires were again considered by the Action progress of preparation of Provisional Paper-2 and 3, Committee and finalised by the Government. The final Village/Town Directories, methodology for checking questionnaires were again considered by the Action of houselisting tables and finalization of PCA were Committee and finalised by the Government. The final discussed. Steps taken for pre-scanning arrangements questionnaires developed were (1) Houselist (2) the for houselist schedules and household schedules were Household Schedule. reviewed. The first Directors Conference was held from The following new questions were added in the 23 rd September to 25 th September 1999 at Vigyan Houselist Schedule of the Census 2001: Bhawan, New Delhi in which topics related to State hierarchy, Rural and Urban frame work, formation (i) The condition of residential or partly of Urban Agglomeration, preparatory steps for residential houses was categorized as good, 5 livable or dilapidated (Column 8). (This was House Listing mainly based on perception of the The following details were canvassed by the respondents). Census Enumerator during Houselisting. (ii) A question on the number of married couple(s) Building particulars living in the household was introduced (Column 18). Building Number (Municipal or local authority or census number) (iii) Information was sought on the number of married couple(s) having independent rooms Census House Number for sleeping (Column 19). Predominant material of the floor, wall and (iv) Information on whether wastewater outlet was roof of the Census House connected to closed drainage or open drainage Use of the Census House or no drainage (Column 24). Condition of the Census House

(v) Availability of bathroom within the house Household Particulars (Column 25). Household number (vi) Availability of kitchen within the house Total number of persons normally residing in (Column 26). the household (vii) Availability of certain assets to the households, Name of the head of the household namely, radio/transistor, television, telephone, MalelFemale bicycle, scooter! motorcycle! moped, car! jeep! vans (Column 28-33). Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe or Other (viii) Availability of banking services (Colurrin 34). Ownership status of the house Number of dwelling rooms Besides adding new questions, improvement was Number of married couple(s) living in the also made in the format of Houselist Schedule of Census household 2001 by modifying certain questions as shown below: Number of married couple(s) having (i) For the first time, different uses of census independent room for sleeping houses were standardised and grouped into ten main uses and assigned code numbers Household Amenities: (Column 7). Drinking water source (Type) (ii) Plastic/Polythene was added in the list of Drinking water source (Location) materials of wall and roof of a census house (within the premises, near the premises, away) (Columns 5 & 6). Source of lighting (iii) 'Outside premises' as a category of the Availability of latrine within the house location of drinking water source was further split up into two categories, namely, 'near the Waste water outlet connection premises' and away from the premises' Availability of bathroom within the house (Column 21). Availability of Kitchen within the house (iv) 'No lighting' was included as a response to the Fuel used for cooking . question on source of lighting along with other Availability of RadiolTransistor sources, namely, electricity, kerosene, solar, other oil and any other source (Column 22). Availability of Television Availability of Telephone (v) Specific information on availability of type of latrine within the house by the type of latrine Availability of Bicycle was collected for all areas (Column 23). Availability of ScooterlMotor CyclelMoped 6 Availability of Car/JeepNan the question on ex-serviceman. However, a number Availing Banking Services of new questions were added in the Household Schedule in view of the suggestions from policy makers, Household Schedule data users and researchers, while the scope of certain The Household Schedule adopted for the existing questions was modified. These changes were:- population Enumeration also primarily had pre-coded 1. Age at marriage was collected for males also, options for majority of the questions. The questions while it was collected for only ever-married for each data item were made self-explanatory as far females until the 1991 Census. as possible for easy understanding. The comprehensive 2. The type of educational institution attended by Household Schedule had three parts and two sides A a person were school, college, vocational and B. Part I contained the Location Particulars; Part institute, other institute and literacy center in II related to Individual particulars and Part III 2001 instead of school and college in 1991 contained questions for Households engaged in census. CultivationIPlantation·. It consisted of 39 columns as against 34 in 1991 Census and had been so designed 3. The scope of the definition of 'work' was as to record the data on Mother tongue and expanded in the Census of India, 200 1, to include of each individual. This was done for the expeditious production of milk for domestic consumption. In computerised tabulation for the following: the 1991 Census, cultivation of certain crops even for self-consumption was treated as economic (i) Primary Census Abstract with four fold activity. The scope of the term 'Cultivation' was industrial categories of both Main Workers expanded in this Census to include certain other and Marginal Workers upto village level or crops such as tobacco, fruits, all types of flowers, ward of a town. The basic Census data to be roots and tubers, potatoes, chilies and turmeric, presented for each CD Block in rural areas pepper, cardamom, all types of vegetables and allover the country in addition to other level fodder crops etc. This meant that activities related like TahsillTalukalDistrictiState or UTs. to production of all the above mentioned crops (ii) The mother tongue and religion data upto including that for domestic consumption were TahsillTown level. This will help releasing treated as work. Only five crops viz. Tea, coffee, these tables which are in great demand within rubber, coconut and betel nuts were classified a reasonable time after conducting the Census. under 'plantation' in the Census of India, 2001. Three types of Households viz: Normal, 4. At the 1991 Census, the question on seeking! Institutional and Houseless household were recorded. available for work was canvassed for only non­ Cols. 1 to 7 of Household Schedule were to be filled workers. At the Census of India, 2001, this up before the enumeration of individual was taken up. question was asked to the Marginal Workers These related to Serial No., Name, Relationship to also. A question to elicit information on Head, Sex (M.E), Age and Marital Status of the secondary work of Main Workers canvassed at member of the household. This helped in counting all the 1991 Census was dropped. members of the Household without missing none and 5. From among the categories of non-workers in recording the age of the individual more precisely. adopted at the 1991 Census, the category Cols. 8 to 39 of the Household Scheduled pertained 'Inmates of institutions' was dropped and to General Social-cultural Characteristics, 'Retired Persons and Rentiers' was replaced by Characteristics of Workers and Non-Workers, the category 'Pensioners'. Migration Characteristics and Fertility particulars. 6. A new response category 'Moved after birth' The particulars entered into the Household Schedule was included in the question on 'reasons for were to be treated as confidential. migration'. Natural calamities as a reason for Most of the questions canvassed during the 1991 migration from last residence included in the Census, were retained for the 2001 Census, except 1991 Census was excluded . 7 7. Number of children born alive to currently omission. In order to achieve this, maps for all districts, married women during last one year was taluks, tahsils, Community Development Blocks and collected with gender break up. ultimately for every village and town were prepared. Taking all jurisdictional changes that occurred after Besides the above modifications, the following new 1991 Census into consideration all administrative questions were canvassed at the 2001 Census: boundaries were made up-to-date. After identifying 1. A question on total disability was canvassed every village and town on a taluk/tahsil map/ in the 1981 Census. In the 1991 Census, no Community Development Block code numbers were question on disability was included. In 2001, allotted to each of these units which were to be fully a question to elicit information on total or accounted for at the Census. Notional maps of every partial disability was canvassed. The five village and every wardlblock of a town were prepared, types of disability on which information was showing location of every house. The notional maps, collected were-in seeing, in hearing, in speech, proved extremely helpful at the time of enumeration. in movement and mental. Unlike in 1981 They served as the frame for the clear demarcation of Census these questions were canvassed during the enumerator's jurisdiction and enabled him to cover population Census. every household in his block and take note of additions that might have taken place after the preparation of 2. A new question on 'Travel to place of work' notional map. was canvassed mainly for workers engaged in non-agricultural activities. Information on The Census Hierarchy distance from the residence to place of work The Registrar General and Census Commissioner and mode of travel to place of work was of India is responsible for conducting the popUlation collected under this section. census which is a union subject under the charge of 3. The Household Schedule had a new set of the Ministry of Home Affairs. He is assisted by several questions for households engaged in officers who look after the different branches of work cultivation/plantation- i) Net area of land within his office. Except Dadra & Nagar Haveli and under cultivatiOn/plantation, ii) Net area of Daman & Diu, every State and Union Territory has land irrigated and iii) Tenure status. This a permanent Directorate. question was not canvassed at the 1991 For each state and union territory an officer is Census but was canvassed in the 1981 Census appointed as Director of Census operations. He is in a slightly different form. directly responsible to the Census Commissioner of 4. The signature or thumb impression of the India for organising and supervising the census respondent has been taken on the Household operations within his area. For 2001 Census, the Schedule for the first time in the history of Directors of Census Operations were in position by census. This was not only aimed at obtaining May, 2000. The Directors were assisted by a number correct and complete information but for of Deputy/Assistant Directors. Independent Census giving an opportunity to the respondents to Directorates for three newly created States viz. authenticate the information provided by them. Uttaranchal, Iharkhand and Chhattisgarh were not The relationship of the respondent with the established. The Director of Census Operations head of the household was also obtained. This Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Madhya Pradesh were new feature will pave way in carrying out a designated as Directors of Census Operations of methodological study in future on the Uttaranchal, Iharkhand and Chhattisgarh respondent profile in the census. respectively. Preparation of Maps It has been the Indian tradition that in view of the national importance of the census, the entire A Census must ensure that every person in the administrative machinery of the state and local country is enumerated only once and without any government is also called upon to assist the state 8 Director of Census Operations in census work. The census charge officers and district census officers 2001 Census hierarchy in the state or union territory who were all part-time workers. followed the normal administrative set up. For each The enumeration staff performed their duties district, the administrative head of the district (the more as a labour of love. Till the 1951 census the district collector) was designated as the district census enu-merators were not paid anything at all. From 1961 officer who undertook the census duties in addition on wards a small honorarium to each enumerator and to his normal duties. In certain cases, however, some supervisor was paid. This practice continued in 1971, senior officer of the district collector's establishment 1981, 1991 and 200 1 censuses also. worked as district census officer, although the district officer himself remained responsible for the proper New Features of the Census of India, 2001 conduct of the census operations. The district census Several new innovations have been introduced at officer was responsible for demarcating the census almost all the stages of the Census of India 200 1 right jurisdiction within the district, appointing and training from the preparatory efforts to the data processing enumeration personnel and the execution and and dissemination stage. This includes certain supervision at every stage of census operations. The fundamental changes in the form and contents of the district was sub-divided into tehsils, talukas, thanas, Houselist and Household schedules, while maintaining sub-division., blocks, police station etc., according the continuity and comparability of the basic housing to the administrative set up obtaining in each state. and population characteristics with the earlier census. The chief administrative officer of each of the Some of the new features introduced and innovations administrative divisions such as the tehsildar, block made in the Census of India 2001 are listed and development officer was appointed as census charge discussed below. officer for his area. Large cities were treated as separate census charge and the executive officer of Permanent Location Code Number the civic body appointed as census charge officer. For area such as military camps, project area, special One of the important inputs in census taking is industrial areas, railway colonies etc., special charge assigning of the Location Code Numbers at various officers from the organisations concerned were administrative levels. The Location Code Number is appointed. All these officers were required to attend a simple device by which every compact geographical to census duties as part of his normal work. The area in any administrative unit can be uniquely smallest administrative unit was the village or town. identified. Each such administrative unit starting from For each village and each town, enumeration blocks State right down to the village/ward can be referred were formed in such a way that each block covered to by a combination of such unique numbers. Until about 750 popUlation in rural areas and 600 in urban the 1991 Census, a hierarchical coding system was areas. For each of these enumeration blocks, a census followed, whereby each administrative unit was coded enumerator was appointed. Some reserve personnel within the next higher administrative unit serially and were also appointed and trained. Normally, a primary systematically following a geographical order. school teacher or village patwari or some other village The frequent changes in district and sub-district level official in rural areas and teachers or clerical administrative units during the inter-censal period staff or other staff of local offices· in urban areas posed several problems of study in changes in growth were appointed as the census enumerators. A census and distribution of population and their characteristics supervisor supervised and guided the work of five or from one census to another. For the Census of India, six enumerators. The supervisors were generally 2001, a system of Permanent Location Code Numbers officials of the state or local bodies of a status higher (PLCN) has been adopted by assigning to each village than those appointed as enumerators. The within the StatelUT a continuous series from 1 to N. enumerators and supervisors were also basically part­ Each village has been assigned an eight digit code. tim..: honorar) workers who undertook the census The first six digit represent the code of the \ illage as work more out of a sense of duty and spirit to help existing at the present census. The last two digits being a great national task. There was a large number of "OO"are kept for accommodating future changes in 9 case of split of an existing village or creation of new every possible situation so that the enumerators and villages etc. Since the Permanent Location Codes have supervisors can find solutions to all their problems been assigned to each village, theoretically tracing that may arise during the course of their fieldwork. the precise location of village on account of future The Instruction Manuals also contained a number of jurisdictional changes in the boundaries of various appropriate examples and illustrations including filled­ administrative areas within the state should not pose in sample schedules and probing methods for guidance a problem. It is imperative that under this scheme, of the enumerators. the PLCN assigned to villages at the Census of India, The training of census officers in the Directorate 200 1, are adopted in future censuses also to ensure of Census Operations started very early with the the comparability of the data at the village and other formation of four Analytical Groups as early as administrative levels over a long time series. October, 1999. These Analytical Group meetings Formation and Identification of Slum provided a platform to the census officers at all levels Enumeration Block in the Directorate to analyse and review the several aspects of the quality and coverage of census data on The phenomenon of rapid urbanization coupled Housing and population characteristics. The Director with industrialization and growth in manufacturing and at least one senior officer from each Directorate and commercial centers leads to surfacing of slums. were trained in various census concepts in great details In various states, the slums are known by different at these meetings. The Directors and their senior local names officially and unofficially but the basic officers then took upon themselves the responsibility characteristics of slums remains the same such as of training of other officials of herlhis Directorate and inadequate lighting, lack of safe drinking water, all other field census functionaries starting from the absence of toilet facilities and non-availability of basic Principal Census Officer (District Collectors! social and health services. Slum enumeration Blocks Municipal Commissioners) to the Charge Officers were identified for the first time in census, in each (Tahsildars, Block Development Officer, Executive Municipal town having a population of 50,000. Officer of Municipalities etc.). Instructions were issued that these Enumeration blocks do not cut across ward boundaries or non-slum area. It has been our experience in the previous It will thus be possible to compile and tabulate special censuses that though the Charge Officers were mainly tables for 'slums'. This will enable the planners and entrusted with the duties of imparting training to administrators to visualize the impact and pressure enumerators and supervisors, yet its impact was not on urban infrastructure and amenities on one hand uniform. The Charge Officers who are mainly drawn and graphically capture the housing and demographic from Tahsildars, BDOs, Executive Officers of conditions of slum dwellers on the other. Municipal Council etc., were found to be largely pre­ occupied with day-to-day administrative work and Training - Inputs in some parts of the country could hardly devote Training has always been recognized as one of continuously the time required to conduct a complete the most vital inputs for smooth and successful conduct and proper training. Therefore, in a major departure of census. It is not a routine job, as it requires clear from the past, a separate well equipped team of understanding of several census concepts. The trainers called the 'Master Trainers' was created and enumerators are also to be reminded about the engaged for training of enumerator and supervisor. sensitivity of the different questions that are canvassed These Master Trainers were mainly drawn from and given tips on the probing techniques. The training among experienced Lecturers, Principals and other classes have to be properly structured with the right Government officials with good oratory and training emphasis on each of the questions. The training skills. They were trained intensively at the district strategies were chalked out well ahead of time for the level and in a few states at the state level. This Census of India, 2001. The Instruction Manuals for enthusiastic brigade of Master Trainers in turn the Houselisting Operations and Population usually imparted training to enumerators and Enumeration were written up very elaborately, covering supervisors in a phased manner. 10 The tralOlOg classes were by and large Post Enumeration Survey (PES) restricted to 70-80 participants per class. The Post Enumeration Survey (PES), which was traditional mode such as reading and explaining earlier known as Post Enumeration Check (PEC) from the Instruction Manual, the chalk and has become an integral part of the census operations blackboard approach and flip charts were also used in India since 1951. Till the earlier censuses, the in these training classes. To make the training Post Enumeration Survey used to be conducted only sessions interactive and interesting a number of after the popUlation enumeration but for the first training modules were conceived, devised and some time in the Census of India, 2001, a PES of the NGOS also chipped in by participating in the Houselisting Operations was also conducted after training classes particularly for the questions on the completion of the Houselisting Operations in disability. In addition to the traditional approach sixteen major states including Delhi. The main this training was also supplemented with video objectives of the PES for the Census of India, 2001, films, audiocassettes, power point presentations, were (i) to get an estimate, of under coverage of overhead slide projectors, question-answers, mock census houses, (ii) to get an estimate of under demo-nstrations etc. A combination of different coverage of population and (iii) to provide an modules was used according to the local estimate of the extent of the content error with requirements. The practical training was made a respect to certain selected data items. compulsory part of all training sessions. Each The sampling frame used for selection of census functionary was insisted upon to fill in five samples for conducting the PES of the Houselisting practice blue Household Schedules as a part of Operations were the sample units of the Sample the practical training. The supervisory officer/ Registration System (SRS) unlike the PES of the Master Trainer checked these practice schedules popUlation enumeration, where the Enumeration and common discrepancies and mistakes were Blocks (EB) were used as the sampling frame. clarified on an individual basis as also in an open forum in the presence of all enumerators and In 1991 and earlier censuses, the PES used to supervisors before the final round of training. be conducted in certain selected states based on the criteria of the size of the population. However, A team of dedicated and specially selected in this census, the PES was conducted in all the Census Advisors imparted special training to states and union territories of the country. In the Enumerators/Supervisors on gender related issues 1991 Census, for measuring the content error, a ten in Census of India, 2001. In these training sessions per cent sub sample of households enumerated in correct capture of age data, female popUlation and census was selected from each Enumeration Block their economic pursuits were emphasized with the and the usual residents in those households were help of census data and training modules. For each listed along with certain particulars. But at the district, a group of very experienced and trained Census of India, 2001, PES of all the households in directorate officials was deputed to back-up these the sampled EBs were listed along with certain training efforts. The Director and other senior particulars. Since the PES estimation methodology officials undertook intensive training to sort out all is based on the assumption of independence between types of problems on the spot. The district the PES and the census operations, wherever administration provided the necessary support possible, the field work in the states was carried through their active involvement during the two out by the staff of the State Governments, who were months long training period. specially trained for the purpose.

11

CONCEPTS AND DEFINITIONS

Basic Census Concepts and Definitions-Census 2001

It is important for the data users to familiarize (ii) at least 75 per cent of male working themselves with the concepts and the definitions of population engaged in non-agricultural the terms used for proper appreciations of the data pursuits; and contained in this publication. At the same time, it is (iii) a density of popUlation of at least 400 all the more important to understand the implications per sq. km. (1,000 per sq. mile). of the terms used at the Census of India 2001, for making meaningful comparisons of the similar data For identification of places which would qualify generated by various other agencies within the country to be classified as 'urban' all villages, which, as per and with the data produced by other countries in the the 1991 Census had a population of 4,000 and above, world. The concepts and definitions adopted at the a population density of 400 persons per sq. km. and Census of India, 2001 are as given below: having at least 75 per cent of male working population engaged in non-agricultural activity were considered. Generally speaking, persons who were present in To work out the proportion of male working population the household during the entire period of enumeration referred to above against (b) (ii) the data relating to or who were known to be usual residents of the main workers were taken into account. household and have stayed there for part of the enumeration period or who were not present at the Apart from these, the outgrowths (OGs) of cities time of visit of the enumerator but were expected to and towns have also been treated as urban under return by 28 th February, 2001 were eligible to be 'Urban Agglomerations'. Examples of out-growths enumerated. are railway colonies, university campuses, port areas, military camps etc. that may have come up near a Rural and Urban Areas: statutory town or city but within the revenue limits of a village or villages contiguous to the town or city. Census data have always been presented for rural Each such individual area by itself may not satisfy and urban areas separately. The basic unit for rural the demographic criteria laid down at (b) above to areas is the revenue village which has definite surveyed qualify it to be treated as an independent urban unit boundaries. The revenue village may comprise several but may deserve to be clubbed with the towns as a hamlets but the entire village has been treated as one continuous urban spread. Thus, the town level data, unit for presentation of data. In unsurveyed area, like wherever presented, also includes the data for villages within forest areas, each habitation area with outgrowths of such towns. locally recognised boundaries within each forest range officer's beat, was treated as one unit. In the census City of India 200 1, the definition of urban area adopted Towns with population of 1,00,000 and above are was as follows :- called cities.

(a) All places with a municipality, corporation, Urban Agglomerations cantonment board or notified town area committee etc. At the 1961 Census, the concept of 'Town Group' was adopted to obtain a broad picture relating to (b) A place satisfying the following three criteria urban spread. This was refined in 1971 with the simultaneously: concept of 'Urban Agglomeration' to obtain better feed (i) a minimum popUlation of 5,000; back in regard to urban contiguity, processes and trends of urbanisation and other related matters. This concept 15 ·th h nge or modification has remained household. The important link in finding out whether WI out any c a . . the 1981 1991 and 2001 censuses. An it was a household or not was a common kitchen. operatIve lfl' . Urban Agglomeration forms a contmuous urban There may be one member households, two member spread and normally consists of a town and its households or multi-member households. adjoining urban outgrowths (OGs), or two or more A household with at least one Scheduled Caste physically contiguous towns together with contiguous member is treated as Scheduled Caste Household. well recognised outgrowths, if any, or such towns. A Similarly a household having at least one Scheduled place is identified as an out growth as follows: Tribe member is treated as a Scheduled Tribe In several areas around a core city or statutory Household. town fairly large well recognised railway colony, Institutional Household university campus, port area, military camp etc. might have come up. Even if such places are lying outside A group of unrelated persons who live in an the statutory limits of the corporation, municipality institution and take their meals from a common kitchen or cantonment etc. in most of the cases they fall within is called an Institutional Household. Examples of the revenue limit of the village or villages which is or Institutional Households are boarding houses, messes, are contiguous to the town. Since such areas are hostels, hotels, rescue homes, jails, ashrams, already urbanised it is not considered realistic to treat orphanages, etc. To make the definition more clearly such areas lying outside the statutory limits of a town perceptible to the Enumerators at the Census 2001, it as rural units, although a few of them may not satisfy was specifically mentioned that this category of some of the prescribed eligibility tests to qualify households would cover only those households where themselves as independent urban units. Such areas a group of unrelated persons live in an institution and have been termed as outgrowths (OGs) and reckoned share a common kitchen. along with the town. Each such town together with Houseless Household its outgrowth(s) is treated as an integrated urban area Households who do not live in buildings or census and is designated as an 'urban agglomeration'. An houses but live in the open on roadside, pavements, in urban agglomeration, therefore, constitutes: hume pipes, under fly-overs and staircases or live in (i) A city or a town with a continuous outgrowth, the open in places of worship, mandaps, railway the outgrowth being outside the statutory limits platforms, etc., are treated as Houseless Households. but falling within the boundaries of the adjoining village or villages; or Head of the Household The head of the household for Census purpose is (ii) Two or more adjoining towns with their a person who is recognized as such by the household. outgrowths, if any, as in (i) above; or ShelHe is generally the person who bears the chief (iii) A city and one or more adjoining towns with responsibility for managing the affairs of the household or without outgrowths all of which form a and takes decision on behalf of the household. The continuous spread. head of the household need not necessarily be the eldest male member or an earning member, but may be a Household female or a younger member of either sex. In case of A 'Household' is usually a group of persons who an absentee de jure (head) who is not eligible to be normally live together and take their meals from a enumerated in the household, the person on whom the common kitchen unless the exigencies of work prevent responsibility of managing the affairs of household any of them from doing so. Persons in a household rests has to be regarded as the head irrespective may be related or unrelated or a mix of both. However, whether the person is male or female. if a group of unrelated persons live in a Census house but do not take their meals from the common kitchen. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes then they are not constituent of a common household. Article 341 of the provides Each such person was to be treated as a separate that the President may, with respect to any State or 16 Union Territory, specify the Castes, Races or Tribes People who are blind and can read in Braille are or parts of or groups within Castes, Races or Tribes treated as literates. which shall, for the purposes of the Constitution, be Work deemed to be Scheduled Castes in relation to that State or Union Territory. Similarly, Article 342 provides for Work is defined as partICIpation in any specification of Tribes or Tribal Communities or parts economically productive activity with or without of or groups within Tribes or Tribal Communities compensation, wages or profit. Such participation may which are to be deemed for the purposes of the be physical and/or mental in nature. Work involves Constitution to be Scheduled Tribes in relation to the not only actual work but also inclUdes effective various States and Union Territories. In pursuance of supervision and direction of work. It even includes these provisions, the list of Scheduled Castes and / or part-time help or unpaid work on farm, family Scheduled Tribes are notified for each State and Union enterprise or in any other economic activity. All persons Territory and are valid only within the jurisdiction of engaged in 'work' as defined above are workers. that State or Union Territory and not outside. Persons who are engaged in cultivation or milk production even solely for domestic consumption are It is important to mention here that under the also treated as workers. Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950, no person who professed a religion different from Reference period for determining a person as was deemed to be a member of a Scheduled worker or non-worker is one year preceding the date Caste in addition to every member of the Ramdasi, of enumeration. Kabirpanthi, Majhabi or Sikligar Caste, resident in Main Worker Punjab or Patiala and States Union in relation to that State whether they professed the Hindu A person who has worked for major part· of the or the Sikh religion. Subsequently, in September 1956, reference period (i.e., six months or more during the by an amendment of the Presidential Order of 1950 last one year preceding the date of enumeration) in and in all subsequent Presidential Orders relating to any economicaliy productive activity is temled as Scheduled Castes, the Hindu and the Sikh 'Main Worker'. were placed on the same footing with regard to the Marginal Worker specification of Scheduled Castes. Later on, as per the amendment made in the Constitution (Scheduled A person who worked for less than six months of Castes) Order 1990, the Hindu, the Sikh and the the reference period (i.e., in the last one year preceding Buddhist were placed on the same footing with regard the date of enumeration) in any economic activity is to the recognition of the Scheduled Castes. A member termed as 'Marginal Worker'. of Scheduled Tribe may belong to any religion. Non-Worker However, a person will be reckoned as belonging to Scheduled Tribe only if the name of the Tribe appears A person who did not at all work during the in the list of Scheduled Tribes applicable to the State. reference period was treated as non-worker. The non­ workers broadly constitute. Literates Students who did not participate in any economic A person aged seven years and above who can activity paid or unpaid, household duties who were both read and write with understanding in any language attending to daily household chores like cooking, has been taken as literate. A person who can only cleaning utensils, looking after children, fetching water read but cannot write has not been taken as literate. etc. and are not even helping in the unpaid work in the It is not necessary that, to be considered as literate, family form or cultivation or milching, dependant such a person should have received any formal education as infants or very elderly people not included in the or passed any minimum educational standard. Literacy category of worker, pensioners those who are drawing could also have been achieved through adult literacy pension after retirement and are not engaged in any classes or through any non-formal educational system. economic activity. Beggars, vagrants, prostitutes and 17 persons having unidentified source of income and with and or by the members of the household at home or unspecified sources of subsistence and not engaged within the Village in rural areas and only within the in any economically productive work during the ~ precincts of the house where the household lives in reference period. Others, this category includes all urban areas. The larger proportion of workers in Non-workers who may not come under the above household industry should consist of members of the categories such as rentiers, persons living on household including the head. The industry should not remittances, agricultural or non-agricultural royalty, be run on the scale of a registered factory which would convicts in jails or inmates of penal, mental or qualify or has to be registered under the Indian charitable institutions doing no paid or unpaid work Factories Act and should be engaged in manufacturing, and persons who are seeking/available for work. processing, servicing and repairs of goods.

Cultivator It does not include professions such as a Pleader, Doctor, Musician, Dancer, Waterman, Astrologer, For purposes of Census, a person is classified as Dhobi, Barber, etc., or merely trade or business, even Cultivator if he or she is engaged in cultivation on if such professions, trade or services are run at home land owned or held from Government or held from by members of the household. Private persons or Institutions for payment in money, kind or share. Cultivation includes effective supervision Other Worker or direction in cultivation. A person who has been engaged in some economic A person who has given out herlhis land to another activity during the reference period but not as a person or persons or institution(s) for cultivation for Cultivator or Agricultural Labourer or in Household money, kind or share of crop and who does not even Industry is termed as 'Other Worker (OW),. The type supervise or direct cultivation of land, is not treated of workers that come under this category of 'OW' as Cultivator. Similarly, a person working on another include all Government Servants, Municipal person's land for wages in cash or kind or a Employees, Teachers, Factory Workers, Plantation combination of both (agricultural labourer) is not Workers, those engaged in trade, commerce, business, treated as Cultivator. transport, banking, mining, construction, political or Cultivation involves ploughing, sowing, harvesting social work, priests, entertainment artists, etc. In effect, and production of cereals and millet crops such as all those workers other than Cultivators or Agricultural , paddy, jowar, , ragi, etc., and other crops Labourers or Household Industry Workers are 'Other such as sugarcane, tobacco, ground-nuts, tapioca, etc., Workers'. and pulses, raw jute and kindred fibre crop, cotton, Sex-ratio cinchona and other medicinal plants, fruit growing, Sex-ratio has been defined as the number of vegetable growing or keeping orchards or groves, etc. females per 1000 males in the population. Cultivation does not include the following plantation crops- tea, coffee, rubber, coconut and betel-nuts (areca). Number of females Sex-ratio = ------x 1,000 Agricultural Labourer Number of males

A person who works on another person's land for Child Sex-ratio (0-6 years) wages in money or kind or share is regarded as an Child Sex-ratio (0-6 years) has been defined as agricultural labourer. Shelhe has no risk in cultivation, but merely works on another person's land for wages. the number of females in age-group 0-6 years per An agricultural labourer has no right of lease or 1000 males in the same age-group in the population. contract on land on which shelhe works. Number of female childem (0-6 years) Household Industry Worker Child Sex-ratio ------x 1,000 (0-6 years) Number of male childern Household Industry is defined as an Industry (0-6 years) conducted by the head of the household herselflhimself 18 Literacy Rate two villages with PLCNs 00154600 and 00154700, Literacy rate is defined as the percentage of the new village will be allotted PLCN 00 15460 1 and literates to the total population aged seven years and so on. above. The location code number for a town is also an Number of literates eight digit number starting with the digit 4 situated at Literacy rate = ------x 100 the extreme left acting as the unique identifier. The Population aged 7+ next two digits depict the code number of the district in which the town falls followed by two digits Work Participation Rate representing the town serial number in the district. It is the percentage of total workers (main + There are three zeros at the end as buffer mainly to marginal) to the total population. meet the requirement of bringing the number of digits to eight to match the number of digits in the PLCN Total workers for the villages. Thus a town location code number (Main + Marginal) 40305000 represents the town serial number 5 of the Work participation rate = ------:x 100 Total Population district number 03 in a State. The out-growths of towns have not been given Location Code structure adopted in 2001 Census any independent location code numbers. These have In the Census 2001 the following location code been given notional ward codes after the last ward structure has been adopted code of the respective towns to which these OGs Area Number of digits relate to.

State Two digits (within the country) Present Volume District Two digits (within the state) The present volume on general population tables Sub-district Four digits (within the district) contains Tables A-I to A-4 Village Eight digits (within the state) A-I - Number of Villages, Towns, Households, PopUlation and Area. Town Eight digits (within the district) A-2- Decadal variation in population since 1901. Ward Four digits (within the town) A-3 - Villages by population size Class. The general pattern followed in coding of any A-4 - Towns and Urban Agglomerations classified geographical unit was a serpentine one, beginning from by Population size class in 2001 with the North-West comer and completing at the farthest variation since 1901. South-East comer within the State. Abbreviations Used One of the major initiatives taken in the Census 2001 was the allotment of Permanent Location Code Abbreviations of civic status of cities or towns: Number (PLCN) to each and every village within the C.B. - Cantonment Board/Cantonment State and not within a tahsil as in the earlier censuses. PLCN was thus assigned as one continuous number C.M.C. - City Municipal Council from the flrst village in the flrst district to the last E. O. - Estate Office village in the last district. PLCN is an eight digit G.P. - Gram Panchayat unique location code number with the first six digits representing the code number of the village and the I.N.A. - Industrial Notified Area last two digits depicting two zeros '00'. These zeros I.T.S. - Industrial Township are reserved as buffer to be used for coding any new M. - Municipality village(s) that may come up between two villages in future. For example, if a new village comes up between M.B. - Municipal Board

19 M.e. - Municipal Committee S.T.C. - Small Town Committee M.Cl. - Municipal Council T.C. - Town Committee/Town Area Committe-e M.Corp.- Municipal Corporation/Corporation N.A. - Notified Area T.M.C. - Town Municipal Council N.A.C. - Notified Area CommitteelNotifiedArea T.P. - Town Panchayat Council T.S. - Township N.P. - Nagar Panchayat C.T. - Census Town N.T. - Notified Town U.A. - Urban Agglomeration N.T.A. - Notified Town Area O.G. - Out Growth SECTION 2 - TABLES

A-1 NUMBER OF VILLAGES, TOWNS, HOUSEHOLDS, POPULATION AND AREA FLY-LEAF

Table A-I is the basic population table which population living in villages. The village generally corresponds to the general population table A-I of follows the limits of revenue village which is 1991 Census. This table gives the statistics of number recognised by the normal district administration. The of inhabited and uninhabited villages, number of towns, revenue village need not be a single agglomerations number of households, population by sex according of habitation, but the revenue village has definite to the 2oo1census for total, rural and urban areas, surveyed boundaries. area in square lan, and population per square km .. For census purpose the village is always the The figures are given first for state followed by revenue village which is the ultimate unit of area into districts, sub-districts, urban agglomerations, cities and which the country is divided for purposes of land towns. In 2001 Census slight modification has been revenue. In a few past censuses only those revenue made in the presentation of table A-l.This table has villages were considered which had some population been presented into two parts viz. table A-I Part (I) ignoring the uninhabited revenue villages. But in 1961, and A-I (Part II). Table A-I (Part I) gives the statistics the revenue villages which did not have any residential for State/Union Territory, Districts and sub -districts population were also included in the definition of for total, rural and urban areas separately and A-I villages. In 1971 such villages were included in the (Part II) gives the figures of urban agglomerations, census list but were described as 'uninhabited' villages. cities and towns only. The same practice continued in 1981, 1991 and 200 1. The density figures per sq. km. shown under A revenue village having defined boundaries and a column 11 for 'Urban' have been worked out using separate set of land records irrespective of whether the area figures corrected up to two places of decimal that defined area has any population or not and if it obtained by adding the area of individual towns in the has some population whether that popUlation resides respective units. For 'Total' and 'Rura1' the density in one residential locality or is in addition, spread over is worked out on area figures corrected up to two one or more identifiable clusters of population known places of decimal. as hamlets.The hamlets do not have defined boundaries This basic table was renamed as Table A-I in or areas distinctly marked or allotted to them. The hamlets are situated within the areas earmarked for 1951 when 1st Census of Independent India was conducted and prior to this, it was numbered as Table- the village. 1 right from 1881 when first synchronous Census of There are some villages the areas of which have India was taken. The title of the table remained fully or partly been merged or included in the unaltered since 1881, however, two additions and one neighbouring towns or in the towns growing after their deletion had been made in the contents: These are, names but they are recognised as such for land revenue (1) in 1961 when the Column "number of village" purposes by the State Government. In such cases was bifurcated into two Columns i.e. "No. of inhabited there will be no population in the areas of such villages villages" and "number of uninhabited villages", (2) in and hence they have been shown as uninhabited. 1971 when column "number of household" was added The entire revenue village is one unit but there in the table and (3) in 2001 Census Column No.8. of may be unsurveyed villages within forests, etc., which occupied residential houses has been deleted from mainly comprise forest labourers and their families. the table. Such forest villages have also been treated as villages. It is Census tradition to present the census statistics So the inhabited villages shown under col.3 of Table by rural turban break-up. By rural areas we mean the A-I (Part I) includes not only revenue villages having 23 residential population but also inhabited forest villages. Similarly, 17 of the Punjab Hill States were combined The uninhabited villages are shown under separate to form the State of Himachal Pradesh. As such, the head which gives the number of described or area of Punjab State further shrank to 96,809 sq. km. uninhabited revenue villages. (37,378 sq.miles) at the 1951 Census, which was The table has an appendix that gives the details barely one-third of its area in 1901. of all the changes in the jurisdiction of various The highlight of the decade 1951 - 1961 was the administrative units up to Tehsil, Taluk, C.D. Block States Reorganization Act, 1956. With the integration and P.S. level which have taken place during ]991- of Punjab and PEPSU, the area of Punjab increased 2001. The jurisdictional changes are depicted down to 122,005 sq. km (47,106 sq. miles). to Tahsil, Taluka, Police Station and Community Punjab State suffered another loss at the time of Development Block levels. reorganisation of Punjab on 1't November, 1966 and Brief historical account of successive changes in the the area of the State further reduced to 50,362.0 sq. area of the State km. At the time of reorganization; (i) the entire districts of Hisar, Rohtak, Gurgaon, Kamal and Mahendragarh, Territorial changes taken place during each census complete tahsils of , Jagadhri, and decade have been discussed, at length, in the relevant 153 villages along with Kalka town of Kharar tahsil census reports. A brief historical account of the same of and two tahsils viz; Jind and is described below. Narwana of district, covering an area of The word 'Punjab' consists of two Persian words 44,222.0 sq. km. were transferred from composite ~Punj' meaning five and 'ab' meaning water or rivers. Punjab for the formation of newly created State of At the beginning of the 20th century, the erstwhile Haryana, (ii) Entire districts of Kangra, , Lahul Punjab, the land of five rivers, had an area of 294,418 and Spiti, three towns viz. Bakloh, Dalhousie and sq. kms (113,675sq.miles) at the 1901 Census. It Dalhousie Cantt of district, tahsil suffered first loss when 'North-Western Frontier of Ambala district and 290 villages alongwith Una Province' was created. Subsequently, Delhi was town of Una tahsil of district, covering an separated from Punjab and made the capital of India. area of 22,277.3 sq.km., were transferred to Himachal At the 1911 Census, Punjab State had an area of Pradesh, and (iii) 36 villages, Manimajra and 258,428 sq., km. (99,779 sq. miles), which marginally Chandigarh towns of Ambala district, having an area reduced to 256,641 sq. km. (99,089 sq. miles) by 1941. of 114.0 sq.km., were put together to form Union The decade 1941 to 1951 saw a major loss to the Territory of Chandigarh. Punjab State in its jurisdictional set up due to partition At the 1971 Census, Punjab State had an area of of the Country into India and on 15th August, 50.362 sq. km. Ever since 1971, there is no change in 1947. At the time of partition, out of 29 districts of the area of Punjab. the then Punjab, India received 12 complete districts of Hisar, Rohtak, Gurgaon, Kamal, Ambala, Shimla, Jurisdictional Changes: Kangra, Hoshiarpur, J alandhar, Ludhiana, The appendix to table A-I gives inter-state/inter­ and Amritsar; and except for district/intra-district changes in territorial units Shakargarh Tahsil; and 186 villages of Lahore district. during 1991-2001. There is no inter state change On 5th May, 1948, eight native States of Patiala, of territory since 1981. The inter-district changes Kapurthala, Jind, , Faridkot, Malerklota, which occurred during 1991-2001 are given below Nalagarh and were amalgamated to the State while the intra-district changes are reflected in the of Patiala and East Punjab States Union (PEPSU). Appendix to Table A-I.

Gurdaspur District : Punjab Government notification no. Gained two villages of Dasua tahsil of 2I44194-RE-ll(i)/6765 dt. 20.7.1995. : Punjab Government notification no. Gained one village from Firozpur tahsil of 2I44194-RE-ll(i)/6767 dt. 20.7.1995. 24 : Punjab Government notification nos. i) Lost entire tahsil except five villages of lalandhar district. 2144194-RE-ll(i)/I0044 dt. 5.11.1995. ii) Lost five villages of Nawanshahr tahsil of lalandhar district. 2144/94-RE-ll(i)/6765 dt. 20.7.1995. Hoshiarpur District: Punjab Government notification no. Lost two villages of Dasua tahsil no. 2144/94-RE-ll(i)/6765 dt. 20.7.1995. Nawanshahr District: Punjab Government notification no. i) Newly created district by gaining entire Nawanshahr tahsil except five villages of lalandhar District 2144/94-RE-ll(i)/I0044 dt. 5.11.1995 ii) 185 villages including NP of Balachaur tahsil of Hoshiarpur district. District: Punjab Government notification nos. i) Lost five villages to newly formed tahsil of district. 213/92-RE(ll)(i)/4412 dt. 9.4.1992 ii) One village to newly formed tahsil of . 219/99-RE(ll)(i)l2579 dt. 7.5.1999 iii) 19 villages to newly formed Kharnanon tahsil of 213/92-RE(ll)(i)/4412 dt. 9.4.1992 iv) Gained five villages of SamraIa tahsil of .· 2/3/92-RE(ll)(i)/4727 dt. 9.4.1992 v) Gained three villages of tahsil of Patiala district. 213/92-RE(ll)(i)/4727 dt. 9.4.1992 Fatehgarh Sahib District: Punjab Government notification nos. i) Gained five villages of Kharar tahsil of . 213/92-RE(ll)(i)/4412 dt. 9.4.1992 ii) Gained 19 villages of Rupnagar tahsil of Rupnagar district. 213/92-RE(ll)(i)l4412 dt. 9.4.1992 iii) Gained four villages of Sarnrala tahsil of Ludhiana district. 2144194-RE(ll)(i)/6769 dt. 20.7.1995 IV) Gained 58 villages of Sarnrala tahsil of Ludhiana district. 213/92-RE(ll)(i)/4412 dt. 9.4.1992 v) Gained six villages of Khanna tahsil of Ludhiana district. 213/92-RE(ll)(i)l4412 dt. 9.4.1992 vi) Gained 93 villages, and towns of Nabha tahsil of Patiala district. 213/92-RE(ll)(i)/4412 dt. 9.4.1992 vii) Gained one village of Nabha tahsil of Patiala district. 21ln4l92-RE(ll)(i)/3702 dt. 5.5.1995 viii) Gained 9 villages of Rajpura tahsil of Patiala district. 213/92-RE(ll)(i)/4412 dt. 9.4.1992 ix) Gained 255 villages alongwith Bassi and Sirhind towns of 213/92-RE(ll)(i)/4412 dt. 9.4.1992 & Fatehgarh Sahib tahsil of Patiala district. 213/92-RE(ll)(i)4644 dt.9.4.1992 Ludhiana District: Punjab Government notification nos. i) Lost five villages of Sarnrala tahsil to Rupnagar district. 213/92-RE(ll)(i)/4727 dt. 9.4.1992 ii) Lost four villages of tahsil to newly formed Kharnanon tahsil of Fatehgarh Sahib district. 2144/941RE(ll)(i)/6769 dt. 20.7.1995 iii) Lost 58 villages to newly formed Kharnanon and Bassi Pathana tahsils of Fatehgarh Sahib District. 2/3/92/RE(ll)(i)/4412 dt. 9.4.1992 iv) Lost six villages to Amloh tahsil of Fatehgarh Sahib District. 213/92-RE(ll)(i)/4412 dt. 9.4.1992 v) Gained three villages of Nawanshahar tahsil of lalandhar district. 2144194-RE(ll)(i)/6765 dt. 20.7.1995 vi) Gained two villages of Nawanshahr tahsil of lalandhlij: 2144/94-RE(ll)(i)/6765 dt.20.7.1995 & district. 2144194-RE(ll)(i)l6765 dt. 20.7.1995 vii) Gained 8 villages of Balachaur tahsil of Hoshiarpur district. 2144/94-RE(ll)(i)/8011 dt. 26.8.1995 viii) Gained 10 villages of Tahsil of . 2J14192~RE(ll)(i)/11118 dt. 13.8.1992 ix) Gained two villages of Malerkotla tahsil of Sangrur district. 21l4/92-RE(ll)(i)111l18 dt. 13.8.1992 Xl Gained one village of Nabha Tahsil of Patiala district. 213/92-B§QI)(i)/4727 dt. 9.4.1992

25 : Punjab Government notification nos. i) Entire Moga tahsil of . 2153/95-RE(ll)(i)/10725 dt 23124.11.1995 ii) 150 villages and Dharamkot town of Zira tahsil of Faridkot district. 2136198-RE(ll)(i)/6405 dt. 5.11.1999 Firozpur District: Punjab Government notification nos. i) Lost one village to Patti tahsil of Amritsar district. 2144194-RE(ll)(i)/6767 dt. 20.7.1995 ii) Lost one village to Muktsar tahsil of newly formed Muktsar district. 2J35f96.-RE(II)(i)n415 dt. 21.8.1996 iii) Lost four villages to newly formed Shahkot tahsil of Jalandhar district. 2144/94-RE(II)(i)/8011 dt. 26.8.1995 iv) Lost 150 villages and Dhararnkot town to Moga tahsil of newly formed Moga district. 2136198-RE(II)(i)/6405 dt. 5.11.1999 Muktsar District: Punjab Government notification nos. Newly formed district by including; i) Entire Muktsar tahsil of Faridkot district. 2144/94-RE(II)(i)/10050dt. 5.11.1995 ii) 1 village of Jalalabad tahsil of Firozpur district. 2135/96-RE(ll)(i)n415 dt. 21.8.1996 Faridkot District: Punjab Government notification nos. i) Gained one village of Moga tahsil of newly formed Moga district. 2I21/94-RE(ll)(i)/3872 dt. 19.8.1997 ii) Lost entire Muktsar tahsil to newly formed Muktsar district. 2144/94-RE(II)(i)/I0050 dt. 5.11.1995 iii) Lost entire Moga tahsil to newly formed Moga district. 2153/95-RE(II)(i)/10725 dt. 23124.11.1995 District: Punjab Government notification nos. i) Lost entire Mansa tahsil to newly formed Mansa district. 2/2/92-RE(ll)(i)/4020 dt. 8.4.1992 ii) Gained three villages of Mansa tahsil of newly formed Mansa district. 2/68f96.-RE(II)(i)/9454 dt. 19.12.1996 Mansa District: Punjab Government notification nos. Newly formed district by including i) Entire Mansa tahsil of . 2/2/92-RE(II)(i)/4020 dt. 8.4.1992 ii) Lost three villages to Talwandi Saba tahsil of Bathinda district. 2168f96.-RE(ll)(i)/9454 dt. 19.12.1996 Sangrur District: Punjab Government notification nos. i) Lost 10 villages to newly formed tahsil of Ludhiana district. 2/14/92-RE(II)(i)/11118 dt. 13.8.1992 ii) Lost two villages to newly formed Raikot tahsil of Ludhiana district. 2/14/92-RE(ll)(i)/11118 dt. 13.8.1992 Patiala District Punjab Government notification nos. i) Lost 93 villages alongwith Amloh and Gobindgarh towns to newly formed Amloh tahsil of Fatehgarh Sahib district. 213/92-RE(II)(i)/4412 dt. 9.4.1992 ii) Lost one village to newly formed Amloh tahsil of Fatehgarh Sahib district. 2I1n4l92-RE(II)(i)/3702 dt. 5.5.1995 iii) Lost three villages to Kharar tahsil of Rupnagar district. 2/3/92-RE(II)(i)/4727 dt. 9.4.1992 iv) Lost 9 villages to Fatehgarh Sahib tahsil and newly formed Bassi Pathana tahsil of Fatehgarh Sahib district. 2/3/92-RE(II)(i)/4412 dt. 9.4.1992 v) Lost one village to Khanna tahsil of Ludhiana district. 2/3/92-RE(II)(i)/4727 dt. 9.4.1992 vi) Lost 255 villages alongwith Bassi and Sirhind towns to newly 2/3/92-RE(II)(i)/4412 dt. 9.4.1992 & formed Fatehgarh Sahib district. 2/3/92-RE(II)(i)/4644 dtO 9.4.1992 vii) Gained one village of SAS Nagar () tahsil of Rupnagar district. 2/9199-RE(II)(i)/2579 dt. 7.5.1999 26 Changes in spellings of place names during Censuses, 1872 - 2001

Name of districtl Changes in spellings in any of Current name as in 200 1 princely states in 1872-1991 the decade from 1872-1991 2 3

Bhatinda (1951) Bathinda (1981) Bathinda Hoshiyarpoor( 1872) Hoshiarpur( 1881) Hoshiarpur Jullunder (1872) Jullundur (1881) Jalandhar (1891) Jullundur (1901) Jalandhar (1981) Jalandhar Kupoorthulla (1872) Kapurthala( 1881) Kapurthala Umritsir (1872) Amritsar (1881) Amritsar Furreedkot (1872) Faridkot (1881) Faridkot Ferozpoor (1872) Ferozepur (1881) Firozpur (1891) Ferozepur (1901) Firozpur (1971) Firozpur Ropar (1971) Rupnagar (1981) Rupnagar Loodhiana (1872) Ludhiana (1881) Ludhiana

Area Figures Therefore the area figures of urban area of the One of the important statistical information districts are compiled by adding of the area figures provided in Table A-I is the statistics of area given of each town of the district supplied by the local in sq. lans as in 1971,1981, 1991 Censuses, so also bodies. The total urban area figure was subtracted in 2001 Census area (Total) figures are presented at from the total area of the district supplied by the the level of State, District, police Station, City, Urban surveyor General, India to obtain the rural area figure Agglomeration and Town level. of the district. District RurallUrban area figures thus The area figures at State and District level are arrived were added up to give rural/urban area figures supplied by the Surveyor General, India. The area of the state but sub total of rural area figures of each figures below the district level are supplied by the village may not be equal. with the figures of rural local authority. The area figures of towns!cities! Urban area of the district. The area figures of the State agglomeration are supplied by the local bodies. since 1901 in sq. lans are given below. Year Area in Sq.Kms. Remarks

1901 124654.1 Area of joint Punjab as supplied by Surveyor General, India 1911 124602.3 -do- 1921 126184.8 -do- 1931 125029.7 -do- 1941 123359.1 -do- 1951 122911.0 -do- 1961 50235.0 Area of state was obtained by subtr'acting the Area transferred to Himachal Pradesh, Haryana and Chandigarh after Re-organization in 1966. 1971 50362.0 Area supplied by Surveyor General, India 1981 50362.0 -do- 1991 50362.0 -do- 2001 50362.0 -do- 27 The following statement-1 gives the geographical area figures supplied by Surveyor General along with rank­ ing of districts. Statement-1 Ranking of Districts in terms of area

StatelDistrict Area in Km2 given by Proportion to Ranking of Surveyor General total area of State Districts 2 3 4 Gurdaspur 3,551 7.05 6 Amritsar 5,088 10.10 3 Kapurthala 1,633 3.24 14 Jalandhar 2,624 5.21 9 Hoshiarpur 3,386 6.72 7 Nawanshahr 1,282 2.55 16 Rupnagar 2,113 4.20 13 Fatehgarh Sahib 1,180 2.34 17 Ludhiana 3,578 7.10 5 Moga 2,235 4.44 11 Firozpur 5,328 10.58 1 Muktsar 2,593 5.15 10 Faridkot 1,458 2.90 15 Bathinda 3,353 6.66 8 Mansa 2,198 4.36 12 Sangrur 5,108 10.14 2 Patiala 3,654 7.26 4 Punjab 50,362 100.00

In the state significant variations in areal size of adopted since 1961 Census. For the 2001 Census districts is noticeable. Firozpur distri.ct with an area the definition adopted for an urban area is by and of 5,328 sq.km is the largest district and constitutes large the same as that of 1961, 1971, 1981 and 1991 10.58 per cent of the state's area. Sangrur (5,108) which is as under:- and Amritsar (5,088) are the two other districts a) All places with municipality, municipal covering more than one-tenth of the total area of the corporation, cantonment board or notified town state. On the other hand Fatehgarh Sahib (1,180) area committee etc. constituting 2.34 per cent of the total area is the b) All other places which satisfy the following smallest district in the state. N~anshahr (1,282), criteria; Faridkot (1,458) and Kapurthala (1,633) too, are i) a minimum population of 5000; relatively small in their areal size. ii) at least 75% of male working population engaged in non-agricultural pursuits; and Urban Areas iii) a density of population of at least 400 per In Table A-I, figures for different items for each sq. km. unit are presented separately. In India, it was for the Towns falling under category 'a' are termed as first time in 1951 that all census statistics were statutory towns and those under category 'b' are termed presented separately for rural and urban areas. A as Census Towns. Any urban area with a population fairly strict definition of an urban area has been of one lac or more is treated as 'city' in Indian Census.

28 Urban Agglomeration (UA) and Out Growth university campuses, court areas, military campus etc. (OG) come up around a city or a statutory town. Though, locationally these areas fall within the revenue area The concept of VA was introduced at the 1971 of village or villages which are contiguous to the core Census and has been followed in the successive town(s), yet, they deserve to be reckoned alongwith censuses of 1981, 1991 and 2001 also. The VA is towns. Such localities themselves do not qualify to defined as a continuous urban spread spreading be treated as individual towns in their own rights and constituting a town and its adjoining urban out growths are hence treated as urban appendages of the urban or two or more physically contiguous together with center to which they are contiguous. These are continuous well recognized urban out growths, if any, termed as out growths (OGs) for the purpose of of such towns. census. It would be interesting to understand the Quite often in several areas fairly large and well changes in the definition of the towns between 1891 recognized localities such as railway colonies, and 2001 census from the following statement-2. Statement - 2 Criteria for places to be treated as towns 1891-2001

2001 1991 1981 1971 2 3 4 Municipal Corporation Municipal Corporation Municipal Corporation Municipal Corporation Municipal Council Municipal Area Municipal Area Municipal Area Nagar Panchyat Town Committee T own Committee Town Committee Notified Area Committee Notified Area Committee Notified Area Committee Cantonment Board Cantonment Board Cantonment Board Cantonment Board Selected places with (a) density of Selected places with (a) density of Selected places with (a) density Selected places with (a) density of not less than 400 persons per not less than 400 persons per of not less than 400 persons per not less than 400 persons per Km2 (b) a population of 5,000 (c) km2 . (b) a population of 5,000 km2 • (b) a population of 5,000 km2• (b) a population of 5,000(c) three fourths of the \IDrking (c) three fourths of the \IDrking (c) three fourths of the \IDrking three fourths of the \IDrking population should be outside population should be outside population should be outside population should be outside agriculture (d) or any other place agriculture (d) or any other place agriculture (d) or any other place agriculture (d) or any other place \\hich according to the Director \\hich, according to the Director, \\hich, according to the Director, \\hich, according to the Director, possesses pronounced urban possesses pronounced urban possesses pronounced urban possesses pronounced urban characteristics and amenities. characteristics and amenities. characteristics and amenities. characteristics and amenities.

1961 1951 1941 1931 5 6 7 8 Municipal Corporation Municipal Corporation Municipal Corporation Municipal Corporation Municipal Area Municipal Area Municipal Area Municipal Area Town Committee Town Area Committee Notified Area Committee Civil lines not included in All Civil lines not included in All Civil lines not included in municipal limits municipal limits municipal limits cantonment Hoard cantonment cantonment cantonment Selected places with (a) density of Test prescribed for distinguishing Every continuous collection of Every other continuous not less than 1000 persons per sq. towns from· villages in different houses inhabited by not less than collection of houses inhabited by mile (b) a population of 5,000 (c) states \\ere based on ideas 5,000 persons, \\hich the not less than 5,000 persons, three fourths of the \IDrking common to all states, but they Provincial ~erintendent may \\hich the Provincial population should be \IDrking \\ere not identical nor had they decide to treat as a town ~erintendent decide to treat as outside agriculture (d) or any been applied with meticulous urban. In making this decision other place \\hich, according to uniformity. In the case of consideration was given to (a) the the ~erintendent of the state, princely states the definition of character of the population; (b) possesses pronounced urban to'Ml was applied a little relative density of the d\\ellings characteristics and amenities. indiscriminately. (c) importance in trade. historic associations and to avoid treating as to'MlS over grO'Ml villages without urban characteristics. 29 Statement - 2 Criteria for places to be treated as towns 1891-2001

1921 1911 1901 1891 9 10 11 12 Municipal Corporation Municipal Corporation Municipal Corporation Municipal Corporation Municipal Area MWlicipal Area MWlicipal Area MWlicipal Area or any place trought WIder some similar All Civil lines not included in All Civil lines not included in All Civil lines not included in regulation for police or sanitary mWlicipallimits mWlicipallimits mWlicipallimits purposes. Cantonment Cantonment Cantonment Cantonment Every other continuous collection Every other continuous Every other continuous (a) Every place \\here the of houses inhabited by not less collection of houses inhabited by collection of houses proportion of the trading and than 5,000 persons, \\hich the not less than 5,000 persons, permanently inhabited by not industrial population to the total Provincial Superintendent may \\hich the Provincial less than 5,000 persons, \\hich is eqnalto or greater thall, that of decide to treat as a town for Superintendent may decide to the Provincial Superintendent the agricultural population (b) census purposes. In Indian states treat as a town for census may decide to treat as a town for Every other continuous group of \\here there \\ere no purposes. census purposes. houses inhabited by not less than mWlicipalities, this definition was Note- HO\\ever, a few places, 5,000 people. required to be extensively applied chiefly in the Native states \\hich Note-"In dealing with questions did not satisfy the requirements arising WIder head (6), the \\ere treated as towns for special provincial supdt. will have regard purposes. "The Provincial to the character of the Superintendents _re, hO\\ever, population, the relative density of instructed, \\hen considering the the d\\ellings, the importance of question of treating places as the place as a centre of trade and towns on the basis of their its historic associations and will population, to take care to, bear in mind that it is exclude such as are merely Wldersireable to treat as towns overgrown villages and have no overgrown villages, \\hich have urban features. It is true that the no urban characteristics." discretion thus allo_d has occasionally led to a certain want to Wliformity.

Statement 3 gives progress in the number of towns from 1901-2001. Statement-3 Progress in the Number of Towns 1901-2001 ( Excludes Towns Declassified and includes Towns Newly added in a particular Census) State! Number of towns in District 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 1 2 ;1 4 ~ 6 7 8 2 I!} 11 1~ Punjab 157 120 134 108 109 114 75 66 59 62 77 Gurdaspur 14 12 11 10 11 12 6 6 7 8 9 Amritsar 13 10 11 9 9 10 9 7 7 6 7 Kapurthala 7 3 :.d 3 4 5 3 3 3 3 6 lalandhar 14 11 13 9 8 10 5 5 5 5 7 Hoshiarpur 12 9 9 9 8 11 6 5 3 6 9 Nawanshahr 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Rupnagar 11 8 9 7 7 4 3 1 2 2 ESahib 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 Ludhiana 12 In 10 6 7 7 5 4 3 4 6 Moga 4 5 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

contd... 30 Statement-3 Progress in the Number of Towns 1901-2001 ( Excludes Towns Declassified and includes Towns Newly added in a particular Census) State/ Number of towns in District 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 11 12 Firozpur 9 8 8 9 9 8 6 6 5 5 5 Muktsar 4 3 6 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 Faridkot 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 Bathinda 9 8 9 8 8 8 2 2 2 2 3 Mansa 5 3 3 3 3 3 2 1 o o o Sangrur 17 12 14 12 12 15 9 8 6 6 7 Patiala 14 8 9 8 8 7 6 5 5 5 6 concld..... There was not much variation in the number of (14 each) and Amritsar (13), while Faridkot has only towns in the state during 1901 to 1941 as their number three towns .. varied between 59 and 77 during this period. The Statement 4 presents progress in urban population number of towns rose to 114 in 1951, the first post between 1901-2001. independence census in the country. There were 134 towns in Punjab in 1981. However, it declined to 120 Statement No. 4 gives progress in urban primarily due to de-notification of Notified Area population of the state and districts since 1901. Committees by the state Government. In 200 I Census Ludhiana district has the highest Urban population there are 157 towns, out of which 139 are statutory (1,693,653) followed by Amritsar district (12,23,275) towns while the remaining 18 called Census towns and Jalandhar district (9,31,983) whereas are non-statutory towns. Statutory towns, cover 4 Nawanshahr is at the bottom having only 81,066 Municipal Corporations, 96 Municipal'Councils, 36 persons living in urban areas. Out of 17 districts, Nagar Panchayats and 3 Cantonment Boards. four districts namely Ludhiana, Amritsar, Jalandhar Sangrur district has the highest (17) number of and Patiala, cover more than one- half (54.39%) of towns followed by Gurdaspur, Jalandhar and Patiala the total urban population of the state. Statement - 4 Progress in Urban Population of State and Districts 1901-2001 State/ 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 District 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Punjab 8,262,511 5,993,225 4,647,757 3,216,179 2,567,306 1,989,267 1,657,414 1,168,413 869,526 813,224 934,766 Gurdaspur 535,223 386,412 328,268 249,084 190,812 162,163 93,681 69,537 56,025 59,255 66,207 Amritsar 1,223,275 853,831 721,629 535,470 464,024 408,507 472,767 315,892 201,497 182,917 200,719 Kapurthala 246,527 166,605 163,418 99,670 79,219 64,406 52,429 40,865 35,778 34,638 47,520 Ialandhar 931,983 670,355 563,704 401,145 319,363 264,874 175,749 120,739 100,495 99,210 115,268 Hoshiarpur 292,074 222,138 172,990 127,223 94,586 95,351 76,638 52,897 34,852 43,250 62,550 Nawanshahr 81,066 58,447 55,517 36,019 30,625 29,524 27,452 19,685 16,352 15,369, 18,989 Rupnagar 362,407 232,317 154,638 82,595 82,830 30,864 22,294 8,764 7,606 10,976 13,916 F.Sahib 151,091 100,873 80,787 46,648 33,258 27,207 22,407 18,971 17,167 14,968 19,153 Ludhiana 1,693,653 1,242,781 764,140 494,062 322,920 212,503 164,769 114,059 77,990 70,038 92,481 Moga 178,640 156,402 103,889 69,345 54,222 43,443 36,145 24,360 20,105 5,859 13,456 Firozpur 450,725 364,815 288,743 223,830 201,830 150,497 147,394 111,623 85,551 80,787 66,179 Muktsar 198,564 153,117 132,974 84,970 68,903 29,518 26,968 18,475 10,539 8,834 6,389 Faridkot 193,571 149,905 116,034 81,287 75,926 47,286 52,394 41,803 34,279 30,011 19,924 Bathinda 351.754 265.790 227..126 130.897 109.417 66.838 34.348 29.607 25.097 19,552 20,447 Mansa 142,429 85,343 68,751 51,377 38,134 27,645 17,093 8,369 Sangrur 584,819 417,994 321,641 232,896 183,976 151,355 109,268 78,736 63,805 57,150 70,515 Patiala 644,710 466,100 383,508 269,661 217,261 177,286 125,618 94,031 82,388 80,410 101,053 31 Statement 5 gives indices in growth of urban during 1901-2001 by taking 1901=100 as the population of the state and its constituent districts base.

Statement - 5 Indices in growth of Urban Population of State and Districts 1901-2001 as base (1901=100)

Statel 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 District 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Punjab 884 641 497 ·344 275 213 177 125 93 87 Gurdaspur 808 584 496 376 288 245 141 105 85 89 Amritsar 609 425 360 267 231 204 236 157 100 91 Kapurtha1a 519 351 344 210 167 136 110 86 75 73 lalandhar 809 582 489 348 277 230 152 105 87 86 Hoshiarpur 467 355 287 203 151 152 123 85 56 69 Nawanshahr 427 308 292 190 161 155 145 104 86 81 Rupnagar 2,604 1,669 1, III 594 595 222 160 63 55 79 Fatehgarh Sahib 789 527 422 244 174 142 117 99 90 78 Ludhiana 1,831 1,344 826 534 349 230 178 123 84 76 Moga 1,328 1,162 772 515 403 323 269 181 149 44 Firozpur 681 551 436 338 305 227 223 169 129 122 Muktsar 3,108 2,397 2,081 1,330 1,078 462 422 289 165 138 Faridkot 972 752 582 408 381 227 263 210 172 151 Bathinda 1,720 1,300 1,111 640 535 327 168 145 123 96 Mansa 1,702 1,020 821 614 456 330 204 Sangrur 829 593 456 330 261 215 155 112 90 81 Patia1a 638 461 780 267 215 175 124 93 82 80

Index of urban population has declined by 13 definition of village used in census is identical with points in 1911 and 7 points in 1921. After that it has that of an 'Estate'. Under the Punjab Land Revenue shown a rising trend throughout. The maximum Act, 'Estate' means (a) for which a separate record increase has been noticed in the index during 1991- for right exists; (b) which has been separately 2001 when it rose by 243 points from 641 to 884. assessed to land revenue or would have been so The abnormal increase has been noticed in the index assessed, if the land revenue had not been released, of Muktsar (3108), Rupnagar (2604), Ludbiaria (1831), compounde<;l or redeemed or (c) which the state Bathinda (1720), Mansa (1702), Moga (1328) and government, by general rule or special orders, Nawanshahr at the least 427 points. declare to be an 'Estate'.

Rural Areas As such, the village generally follows the limits of a revenue village which is recognized by the district Village is the basic unit for rural areas in the administration. The revenue village need not be single Indian Census. Revenue village is cadastally agglomeration of habitation but the revenue village surveyed area having definite boundary and could has definite survey boundaries. consist one or more hamlets. However, in case of unsurveyed forest areas, boundaries of village are Statement 6 shows district wise total no. of determined by the state forest agencies. The villages and towns in 2001.

32 Statement - 6 State and District wise number of villages and Towns in 200 1 StatelDistrict Total No. of No. of Un-inhabited No. of villages included in towns No. of inhabited No. of Villages villages Fully Partly villages towns 2 3 4 5 6 7 Punjab 12,673 395 114 12,278 157 Gurdaspur 1,617 85 10 1,532 14 Amritsar 1,233 48 11 1,185 13 Kapurtha1a 690 72 8 618 7 la1andhar 950 16 19 934 14 Hoshiarpur 1,417 31 8 1,386 12 Nawanshahr 471 6 465 4 Rupnagar 889 25 7 864 II Fatehgarh Sahib 444 2 6 442 5 Ludhiana 915 18 17 897 12 Moga 329 8 4 321 4 Firozpur 1,004 36 968 9 Muktsar 234 234 4 Faridkot 171 8 163 3 Bathinda 284 4 280 9 Mansa 240 2 2 238 5 Sangrur 701 4 5 697 17 Patiala 1,084 30 15 1,054 14

Out of total 12673 villages 12278 are inhabited Gurdaspur (85), Kapurthala (72) and Amritsar (48) . and 395 (3.12%) are un-inhabited villages. The Statement 7 shows number of inhabited villages number of uninhabited villages is quite significant in at each census during 1901-2001

Statement - 7 No. of Inhabited villages at each Census 1901-2001 Statel Number of Inhabited villages District 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Punjab 12,278 12,428 12,342 12,188 11,947 11,526 12,186 12,223 12,318 12,235 12,309 Gurdaspur 1,532 1,543 1,551 1,526 1,507 1,452 2,229 2,243 2,243 2,234 2,244 Amritsar 1,185 1,203 1,191 1,181 1,169 1,152 1,043 1,036 1,036 1,039 1,042 Kapurtha1a 618 633 602 556 525 516 NA NA NA NA NA lalandhar 934 1,239 1,226 1,209 1,173 1,141 1,209 1,210 1,221 1,214 1,216 Hoshiarpur 1,386 1,591 1,584 1,582 1,545 1,521 2,092 2,099 2,118 2,111 2,117 Nawanshahr 465 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Rupnagar 864 895 893 855 836 NA NA NA NA NA NA Fatehgarh Sahib 442 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ludhiana 897 961 958 969 946 811 860 851 859 859 864 Moga 321 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Firozpur 968 1,118 1,119 1,084 1,023 1,444 1,509 1,507 1,499 1,498 1,503 Muktsar 234 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Faridkot 163 572 565 564 565 NA NA NA NA NA NA Bathinda 280 523 520 519 517 516 NA NA NA NA NA Mansa 238 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Sangrur 697 709 707 709 705 744 NA NA NA NA NA Patiala 1,054 1,441 1,426 1,434 1,436 3,039 NA NA NA NA NA Note: I. Figures prior to 1961 have been reproduced from census reports without making adjustments, hence the details of each transfer are not available. 2. The 1951 figures of Patiala district includes Fatehgarh Sahib and Kohistan districts. 3. N.A. means Not Available 33 It shows the number of inhabited villages at each maximum number of inhabited villages whereas census 1901-2001. Bathinda district (523) was at the bottom. There were 12 districts in 1991 Census. Five more districts are Gurdaspur district (1532) has the maximum formed by the state Government and figures of number of inhabited villages followed by Hoshiarpur inhabited villages are adjusted as per jurisdictional (1386), Amritsar (1185) and Patiala (l 054) whereas changes at Census 2001. Faridkot (163) has the least number of inhabited Progress in rural population of State and its villages. At 1991 Census Hoshiarpur (1591) had the Districts during 1901-2001 is shown in Statement-8.

Statement - 8 Progress in Rural Population of State and Districts 1901-2001 State! Rural Population District 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Punjab 16,096,488 14,288,744 12,141,158 10,334,881 8,567,763 7,171,233 7,942,822 6,X43,912 6,283,285 5,918,286 6,610,024 Gurdaspur 1,568,788 1,370,869 1,185,694 980,615 790,056 688,977 761,287 648,986 578,369 562,753 636,165 Amritsar 1,872,802 1,651,203 1,467,010 1,300,070 1,070,186 958,107 1,148,015 979,075 875,854 838,064 986,126 Kapurthala 507,994 480,042 381,831 329,844 264,559 230,665 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. lalandhar 1,03G,717 979,554 842,865 773,983 662,400 564,923 711,331 621,920 546,591 531,559 606,311 Hoshiarpur 1,188,662 1,076,574 942,809 821,047 687,897 617,089 693,246 625,629 574,798 560,435 588,112 Nawanshahr 506,402 472,806 400,917 346,504 302,319 276,598 300,757 259,018 228,614 224,511 250,812 Rupnagar 753,701 667,270 546,587 453,841 382,543 342,277 328,502 299,175 272,703 271,447 312,177 F. Sahib 386,950 354,046 308,013 258,520 212,783 164,572 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. Ludhiana 1,339,178 1,185,601 1,014,549 890,895 755,349 645,984 674,853 573,328 501,171 457,537 592,557 Moga 716,214 621,520 552,002 467,346 388,951 335,799 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. Firozpur 1,295,382 1,084,088 879,722 712,793 584,945 474,558 563,501 464,367 466,964 367,860 377,000 Muktsar 578,929 501,317 414,420 346,021 313,873 236,980 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. Faridkot 357,321 305,100 254,522 212,188 168,792 134,859 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. Bathinda 831,541 719,51 1 590,638 492,275 399,614 310,919 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. Mansa 546,329 489,319 418,091 350,722 281,255 214,287 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. Sangrur 1,415,354 1,267,455 1,067,188 896,064 754,810 601,986 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. Patiala 1,200,224 1,062,469 874,300 702,153 547,431 372,653 NA N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

The rural population in the state is distributed over in the state having less than one half of its population 12,278 villages. On an average an inhabited village (44.16%) as rural and the same position (48.82%) has a population of 1311. was at Census 1991. Amritsar district has retained Amritsar district has reported highest 18,72,802 its lead in rural population since 1901 to 2001 whereas rural population whereas Faridkot district 3,57,321 has Faridkot has always in the bottom in rural population the lowest rural population. Ludhiana is the only district since 1951 to 2001.

34 I.- ..r::. I.- I.- co I.- :::J m I.- :::J Q.. ..r::. Q. l.- co co co co l.- I.- +-' co l.- I.- e/) 0') ..c c e/) co ..c ..c :::; co 0 "'0 :::J e/) "'0 co C co Q.. .::£ C co I.- co co 1:: co ..c e/) e/) +-' :::J C ..r::. co c co N +-' "'0 0) co "'0 "C co ..c 0) .::£ ..c c I.- Q.. co e/) ~ Q. Cf) "'0 0 l.- +-' c +-' :::J 0 :::J 0 I.- :::; co co co co E co co co :::J co o_ (9 « ~ J I Z n:: u.: _J ~ u.. ~ u. (l) ~ Cf) II 0 D II D II D II 0 II II II II

0~ 0~ L() f'-... 0~ (")

0~ 0

W (!) ~ Z W '#. f'-... CO 0 « 0:: ...., W Z a.. cf2- ::) ~ 0.... C Z 0~ « f'-... « 0>~~ W s 0:: 0~ « ~ ~

35 PUNJAB

RURAL AND URBAN POPULATION BY SEX 2001

KILOMETRES 10 5 0 10 20 30 40

"9 < (/) -

RAJASTHAN

'{

BOUNDARY, INTERNATIONAL. .. TOTAL POPULATION STATE ..... :1 000 000 DISTRICT .. . M = MALE 2 400000 , 8()0000 F = FEMALE , 200 000 Pocket for Kapurthala K Pocket tor Pa\iat a P 000000

36 PUNJAB SEX RATIO 2001

KILOM ETRES 10 5 0 10 20 30 40

GURDASPUR 890

LUDHIANA 824

SANGRUR 871 BATHINDA 870

RAJASTHAN

BOUNDARY,INTERNATIONAL. .. FEMALES PER 1000 MALES

STATE ... 001 AND ABOVE DISTRICT .... STATE AVERAGE 876 - 000 876 Pocket tor Kapurthala K Pocket for Pali al. P 851-875

850 AND BELO W

37 Comparative Size of Area of States and Uts of India

Andaman & Nicobar Islands 0.3

Maharashtra 9.4

Uttar Pradesh 7.3

Sikkim 0.2 ,_ "t' Nagaland 0.5

I'-: .q- ell (/) ·c(/) o Tripura 0.3

Chandigarh 0.0 Delhi 0.0 Daman & Diu 0.0 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 0.0 Goa 0.1 Lakshadweep 0.0 Pondicherry 0.0

38 Comparative Size of Population of States and Uts of India

Himachal Pradesh 1

Uttar Pradesh 16%

Maharashtra 9%

Nagaland 0.2%

Tripura 0.3% Meghalaya 0.2%

Chandigarh 0.1 % Sikkim 0.1% Arunachal Pradesh 0.1 % Mizoram 0.1 % Daman & Due 0.0% Dadra & Nagar Haveli 0.0% Goa 0.1% Lakshadweep 0.0% Pondicherry 0.1 % Andaman & Nicobar Islands 0.0%

39 r

t£6vtB~ I 1-

£L~OOOZ , 1- 99L899 f--

96Z£8~~

I- Z6BO£S

I- £617LLL 'z I- 0 ' LO~9vL~ -. ~ 1- .J t99v6,g :::» f-- 10.. ro 0 ~£BZ£O£ « c. I- J Z , UJW ~vOB£9 ':::J .... I- a.. ~ 80 ~9~~~ , t­ O I- -IX: 99vLS9 I I­ I- en -c 9£L09v~ I-

OOLZ96~ . I- ~l9179L , 1- LL0960£ I-

~ ~OvO ~Z

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 If) LO 0 1.0 0 If) 0 (""') (""') N N T""" T"""

40 PUNJAB,

DENSITY 20011

., <

..... ' o

BOUNDARY, II'ITERNAnONAL ...... ,. . _____ PERSONS PEA 11M2 STATE ... ,.. OISTRICL.,. ... _•. __ ... _ ...•

Pook.t lor Kap""ha'. K STATE AVERAGE P""","orPaliala p .....

41

TABLE A-I (Part I) NUMBER OF VILLAGES, TOWNS, HOUSEHOLDS, POPULATION AND AREA

State/District/ Totall Number of villages Number of Number of Population Area in Population Tahsil Rural/ ______Towns Households ______Square per Square Urban Inhabited Uninhabited P M F kilometre kilometre 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Punjab Total 12,278 395 157 4,348,580 24,358,999 12,985,045 11,373,954 50,362.00 484 Rural 12,278 395 2,796,284 16,096,488 8,516,596 7,579,892 48,265.38 333 Urban 157 1,552,296 8,262,511 4,468,449 3,794,062 2,096.62 3,941 1.Gurdaspur Total 1,532 85 14 366,025 2,104,011 1,113,077 990,934 3,551.00 593 District Rural 1,532 85 268,800 1,568,788 826,787 742,001 3,440.25 456 Urban 14 97,225 535,223 286,290 248,933 11 O. 7 5 4,833 I. Total 28 10,296 52,156 28,004 24,152 256.78 203 Tahsil Rural 28 10,296 52,156 28,004 24,152 256.78 203 Urban 2. Tahsil Total 347 37 5 103,304 573,998 309,050 264,948 678.84 846 Rural 347 37 63,039 359,091 192,379 166,712 636.29 564 Urban 5 40,265 214,907 116,671 98,236 42.55 5,051 3. Gurdaspur Tahsil Total 682 37 4 127,876 744,092 389,146 354,946 1,334.68 558 Rural 682 37 105,752 622,508 324,883 297,625 1,288.31 483 Urban 4 22,124 121.584 64,263 57,321 46.37 2,622 4. Tahsil Total 357 6 4 105,330 618,105 325,336 292,769 936.1 () 660 Rural 357 6 71,650 426,867 223,912 202,955 916.27 466 Urban 4 33,680 191,238 101,424 89,814 19.83 9,644 5. Dera Baba Total 118 5 19,219 115,660 61,541 54,119 300.19 385 NanakTahsil Rural 118 5 18,063 108,166 57,609 50,557 298.1'J 363 Urban 1,156 7,494 3,932 3,562 2.00 3,747 2. Amritsar Total 1185 48 13 541,339 3,096,077 1,650,589 1,445,488 5,088.00 609 District Rural 1185 48 316,994 1,872,802 993,631 879,171 4,870.15 385 Urban 13 224,345 1,223,275 656,958 566,317 217.85 5,615 I. Ajnala Tahsil Total 312 29 3 64,644 384,566 205,035 179,531 1,083.70 355 Rural 312 29 58,346 348,022 185,311 162,711 1,068.20 326 Urban 3 6,298 36,544 19,724 16,820 15.5(; 2,358 2. Amritsar -I Total 139 3 3 50,035 285,981 152,718 133,263 515.17 555 Tahsil Rural 139 3 40,732 233,612 123,556 110,056 505.12 462 Urban 3 9,303 52,369 29,162 23,207 10.05 5,211 3. Amritsar- II Total 102 5 . 220,640 1,206,203 647,982 558,221 513.12 2,351 Tahsil Rural 102 5 35,372 205,667 111,149 94,518 377.12 545 Urban 185,268 1.000.536 536,833 463,703 136.0() 7,357 4. Tarn Taran Total 191 5 69,088 410,761 216,902 193,859 883.70 465 Tahsil Rural 191 5 59,344 354,974 187.641 167,333 863.70 411 Urban 9,744 55,787 29,261 26,526 20.00 2,789 5. Patti Tahsil Total 191 5 3 60,706 363,619 194,263 169,356 1,088.94 334 Rural 191 5 50,869 306,942 163,774 143,168 1,067.11 288 Urban 3 9,837 56,677 30,489 26,188 21.83 2,596 6. Total 95 27,901 164,677 86,603 78,074 441.85 373 Tahsil Rural 95 27,901 164,677 86,603 78,074 441.85 373 Urban 7. Total 155 2 48,325 280,270 147,086 133,184 523.71 535 Tahsil Rural 155 44,430 258,908 135,597 123,311 509.24 508 Urban 2 3,895 21,362 11,489 9,873 14.47 1,476 3. Kapurthala Total 618 72 7 136,664 754,521 399,623 354,898 1,633.00 462 District Rural 618 72 89,648 507,994 265,973 242,021 1,527.94 332 Urban 7 47,016 246,527 133,650 112,877 105.06 2,347 I. Bhulath Tahsil Total 86 15 2 19,290 102,896 53025 49,871 247.78 415 Rural 86 15 15,535 83,189 42,749 40,440 230.60 361 Urban 2 3,755 19,707 10,276 9,431 17.1g 1,147

43 TABLE A·I (Part I) NUMBER OF VILLAGES, TOWNS, HOUSEHOLDS, POPULATION AND AREA

StatelDistrictl Tota II Number of villages Number of Number of Population Area in Population Rural/ ______Tahsil Towns Households Square per Square Urban Inhabited Uninhabited P M F kilometre kilometre 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II

2. Kapurthala Total 245 IS 3 55,976 310,909 165,682 145,227 675.51 460 Tahsil Rural 245 IS 35,237 201,913 105,953 95,960 614.15 329 Urban 3 20,739 108,996 59,729 49,267 61.36 1,776 3. Lodhi Total 181 34 19,118 114,816 60,781 54,035 451.02 255 Tahsil Rural 181 34 16,326 99,245 52,471 46,774 440.50 225 Urban 2,792 15,571 8,310 7,261 10.52 1,480 4. Tahsil Total 106 8 42,280 225,900 120,135 105,765 304.46 742 Rural 106 8 22,550 123,647 64,800 58,847 288.46 429 Urban 19.730 102,253 55,335 46,918 16.00 6,391 4. Jalandhar Total 934 16 14 364,030 1,962,700 1,040,177 922,523 2,624.00 748 District Rural 934 16 186,704 1,030,717 539,021 491,696 2,432.44 424 Urban 14 177,326 931,983 501,156 430,827 191.56 4,865 I. Shahkot Tahsil Total 177 2 27,194 158,683 82,862 75.821 448.32 354 Rural 177 23,371 137,528 71,702 65,826 442.32 311 Urban 2 3,823 21,155 11.160 9,995 6.00 3,526 2. Tahsil Total 146 34,880 196,237 102,358 93,879 441.58 444 Rural 146 29,192 164,829 85,848 78,981 429.08 384 Urban 5,688 31,408 16,510 14,898 12.50 2,513 3. Tahsil Total 229 8 4 66,971 367,307 192,052 175,255 763.83 481 Rural 229 8 56,438 309,510 161,393 148,117 738.17 419 Urban 4 10,533 57,797 30,659 27,138 25.66 2,252 4. Jalandhar ·1 Total 140 4 5 184,534 965,162 517,576 447,586 441.66 2',185 Tahsil Rural 140 4 34,586 184,061 96,359 87,702 308.91 596 Urban 5 149,948 781,101 421,217 359,884 132.75 5,884 5. Jalandhar -II Total 242 2 2 50,45 I 275,311 145,329 129,982 566.85 486 Tahsil Rural 242 2 43,117 234,789 123,719 111,070 552.20 425 Urban 2 7,334 40,522 21,610 18,912 14.65 2,766 5. Hoshiarpur Total 1386 31 12 279,904 1,480,736 765,132 715,604 3,386.00 437 District Rural 1386 31 221,815 1,188,662 610,675 577,987 3,253.27 365 Urban 12 58,089 292,074 154,457 137,617 132.73 2,201 1. Dasua Tahsil Total 381 15 3 64,708 340,494 173,873 166,621 810.29 420 Rural 381 15 55,578 292,068 148,679 143,389 771.89 378 Urhan 3 9,130 48,426 25,194 23,232 38.40 1,261 2. Mukerian Tahsil Total 306 4 3 57,706 308,195 156,270 151,925 632.46 487 Rural 306 4 47,823 258,877 130,369 128,508 602.79 429 Urban 3 9,883 49,318 25,901 23,417 29.67 1,662 3. Hoshiarpur Total 405 9 4 98,889 516,110 271,275 244,835 1,138.62 453 Tahsil Rural 405 9 64,710 346,946 181,079 165,867 1,087.52 319 Urban 4 34,179 169,164 90,196 78,968 5l.I0 3,310 4. Garhshankar Total 294 3 2 58,601 315,937 163,714 152,223 811.30 389 Tahsil Rural 294 3 53,704 290,771 150,548 140,223 797.74 364 Urba~ 2 4,897 25,166 13,166 12,000 13.56 1,856 6. Nawansbahr Total 465 6 4 107,763 587,468 306,902 280,566 1,282.00 458 District" Rural 465 6 92,560 506,402 264,515 241,887 1,250.00 405 Urban 4 15,203 81,066 42,387 38,679 32.00 2,533 1. Nawanshahr Total 280 6 3 74,686 409,448 213,343 196,105 767.07 534 Tahsil Rural 280 6 62,818 346,538 180,525 166,013 741.07 468 Urban 3 11,868 62,910 32,818 30.092 26.00 2,420 2. Balachaur Tahsil Tutal 185 33.077 178.020 93.559 84.461 446.42 399 Rural 185 29,742 159,864 83,990 75,874 440.42 363 Urban 3,335 18,156 9,569 8,587 6.00 3.026

44 TABLE A·l (Part I) NUMBER OF VILLAGES, TOWNS, HOUSEHOLDS, POPULATION AND AREA

State!District! Total! Number of villages Number of Number of Population Area in Population Tahsil Rurall Towns Households Square per Square Urban Inhabited Uninhabited P M F kilometre kilometre 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II

7. Rupnagar Total 864 25 11 205,954 1,116,108 596,582 519,526 2,113.00 528 District Rural 864 25 129,991 753,701 403,147 350,554 1,976.63 381 Urban 11 75,963 362,407 193,435 168,972 136.37 2,658 I. Total 246 3 2 53,611 297,508 155,327 142,181 657.96 452 Tahsil Rural 246 3 41,816 238.251 124,020 114,231 632.14 377 Urban 2 11,795 59,257 31,307 27,950 25.82 2,295 2. Rupnagar Tahsil Total 351 16 3 58,276 331,338 177,622 153,716 784.77 422 Rural 351 16 41,823 249,382 133,880 115,502 754.23 331 Urban 3 16,453 81,956 43,742 38,214 30.54 2,684 3. Kharar Tahsil Total 189 2 4 45,979 257,505 139,026 118,479 522.39 493 Rural 189 2 27,906 165,661 89,374 76,287 471. 93 351 Urban 4 18,073 91,844 49,652 42,192 50.46 1.820 4. S.A.s. Nagar Total 78 4 2 48,088 229,757 124,607 105,150 189.42 1,213 (Mohali) Tahsil Rural 78 4 18,446 100,407 55,873 44,534 159.87 628 Urban 2 29,642 129,350 68,734 60,616 29.55 4,377 8. Fatehgarh Total 442 2 5 93,414 538,041 290,137 247,904 1,180.00 456 Sahib District* Rural 442 2 65,017 386,950 207,937 179,013 1,102.33 351 Urban 5 28,397 151,091 82,200 68,891 77.67 1,945 I. Bassi Pathana Total 100 15,419 93,080 49,535 43,545 206.57 451 Tahsil Rural 100 12,059 74,022 39,608 34,414 203.57 364 Urban 3,360 19,058 9,927 9,131 3.00 6,353 2. Fatehgarh Sahib Total 169 32,288 186,243 99,827 86,416 484.09 385 Tahsil Rural 169 23,162 136,418 73,110 63,308 455.69 299 Urban 9,126 49,825 26,717 23,108 28.40 1,754 3. Amloh Tahsil Total 101 2 31,360 172,877 94,974 77,903 261.20662 Rural 101 17,008 99,511 54,284 45,227 222.20 448 Urban 2 14,352 73,366 40,690 32,676 39.00 1,881 4. Total 72 14,347 85,841 45,801 40,040 195.93 438 Tahsil Rural 72 12,788 76,999 40,935 36,064 188.66 408

Urban 1 1,5~9 8,842 4,866 3,976 7.27 1,216 9. Ludhiana Total 897 18 12 558,650 3,032,831 1,662,716 1,370,115 3,578.00 848 District Rural 897 18 235,747 1,339,178 712,593 626,585 3,327.70 402 Urban 12 322,903 1,693,653 950,123 743,530 250.30 6,766 I. Samrala Tahsil Total 196 4 2 35,674 206,400 109,338 97,062 497.98 414 Rural 196 4 29,120 170,446 90,362 80,084 485.48 351 Urban 2 6,554 35,954 18,976 16,978 12.50 2,876 2. Khanna Tahsil Total 68 4 34,034 191,398 102,338 89,060 241.87 791 Rural 68 4 15,259 88,299 47,062 41,237 217.12 407 Urban 1 18,775 103,099 55,276 47,823 24.75 4,166 3. Payal Tahsil Total 107 4 3 34,834 200,034 107,088 92,946 448.15 446 Rural 107 4 28,718 166,595 88,851 '17,744 431.65 386 Urban 3 6,116 33,439 18,237 15,202 16.50 2,027 4. Ludhiana (East) Total 183 2 2 313,717 1,647,694 926,972 720,722 642.69 2,564 Tahsil Rural 183 2 41,556 231,934 124,613 107,321 478.32 485 Urban 2 272,161 1,415,760 802,359 613,401 164.37 8,613 5. Ludhiana (West) Total 130 3 50,251 275,842 147,111 128,731 611.70 451 Tahsil Rural 130 3 47,677 261,893 139,788 122,105 609.65 430 Urban 2,574 13,949 7,323 6,626 2.05 6,804 n. Raikot Tahsil Total 7-1 .14.:?C\~ I 92.:?~9 101.712 90.527 42457 451 Rural 74 28,461 160,867 85,330 75,537 408.44 394 Urban 2 5,772 31,372 16,382 14,990 16.13 1,945

45 TABLE A·l (Part I) NUMBER OF VILLAGES, TOWNS, HOUSEHOLDS, POPULATION AND AREA

State/District/ Total! Number of villages Number of Number of Population Area in Population Rural! ______Tahsil Towns Households Square per Square Urban Inhabited Uninhabited P kilometre kilometre 2 4 5 6 7 10 11

7. Tahsil Total 139 55,907 319,224 168,157 151,067 809.58 394 Rural 139 44,956 259,144 136,587 122,557 795.58 326 Urban 1 10,951 60,080 31,570 28,510 14.00 4,291 10. Moga Total 321 8 4 153,744 894,854 474,139 420,715 2,235.00 400 District* Rural 321 8 121,415 716,214 379,322 336,892 2,190.00 327 Urban 4 32,329 178,640 94,817 83,823 45.00 3,970 I. Nihal Singhwala Total 39 26,610 156,455 82,909 73,546 438.45 357 Tahsil Rural 39 25,563 150,089 79,611 70,478 435.05 345 Urban 1,047 6,366 3,298 3,068 3.40 1,872 2. Bhagha Purana Total 56 34,391 205,085 108,407 96,678 591.01 347 Tahsil Rural 56 30,719 183,489 97,071 86,418 585.01 314 Urban 1 3,672 21,596 11,336 10,260 6.00 3,599 3. Moga Tahsil Total 226 7 2 92,743 533,314 282,823 250,491 640.24 833 Rural 226 7 65,133 382,636 202,640 179,996 604.64 633 Urban 2 27,610 150,678 80,183 70,495 35.60 4,233 11. Firozpur Total 968 36 9 301,112 1,746,107 926,224 819,883 5,328.00 328 District Rural 968 36 220,456 1,295,382 683,870 611,512 5,235.73 247 Urban 9 80,656 450,725 24.2,354 208,371 92.27 4,885 1. Zi ra Tahsil Total 211 7 2 36,964 223,111 117,398 105,713 1,304.60 171 Rural 211 7 29,351 179,153 94,445 84,708 1,289.88 139 Urban 2 7,613 43,958 22,953 21,005 14.72 2,986 2. Firozpur Tahsil Total 337 11 3 86,098 496,601 265,880 230,721 1,284.61 387 Rural 337 11 55,834 328,875 173,202 155,673 1,250.18 263 Urban 3 30,264 167,726 92,678 75,048 34.43 4,872 3. Jalalabad Tahsil Total 207 7 2 51,385 303,415 158,236 145,179 897.04 338 Rural 207 7 42,885 256,140 133,162 122,978 887.03 289 Urban 2 8,500 47,275 25,074 22,201 10.01 4,723 4. Tahsil Total 137 11 61,432 346,296 182,601 163,695 1,157.20 299 Rural 137 1 1 49,475 278,869 147,397 131,472 1,147.16 243 Urban 11,957 67,427 35,204 32,223 10.04 6,716 5. Tahsil Total 76 65,233 376,684 202,109 174,575 1,177.90 320 Rural 76 42,911 252,345 135,664 116,681 1,154.83 219 Urban 1 22,322 124,339 66,445 57,894 23.07 5,390 12. Muktsar Total 234 4 135,442 777,493 411,217 366,276 2,593.00 300 District* Rural 234 100,552 578,929 306,070 272,859 2,542.02 228 Urban 4 34,890 198,564 105,147 93,417 50.98 3,895 1. Ma10ut Tahsil Total 91 1 . 53,451 302,424 160,067 142,357 1,117.87 271 Rural 91 40,751 231,659 122,251 109,408 1,097.87 211 Urban 12,700 70,765 37,816 32,949 20.00 3,538 2. Total 52 34,625 205,118 108,069 97,049 731.83 280 Tahsil Rural 52 28,429 168,520 88,885 79,635 723.58 233 Urban 6,196 36,598 19,184 17,414 8.25 4,436 3. Muktsar Tahsil Total 91 2 47,366 269,951 143,081 126,870 789.63 342 Rural 91 31,372 178,750 94,934 83,816 766.90 233 Urban 2 15,994 91,201 48,147 43,054 22.73 4,012 13. Faridkot Total 163 8 3 97,690 550,892 292,596 258,296 1,458.00 378 District Rural 163 8 62,163 357,321 188,943 168,378 1,413.01 253 Urban 3 35,527 193,571 103,653 89,918 44.99 4,303 I. Faridkot Tahsil Total 122 8 2 72.721 406.322 216.093 190.229 1.042.82 390 Rural 122 8 42,964 246,216 130,116 116,100 1,007.43 244 Urban 2 29,757 160,106 85,977 74,129 35.39 4,524

46 TABLE A·I (Part I) NUMBER OF VILLAGES, TOWNS, HOUSEHOLDS, POPULATION AND AREA

StateIDistrict! Total! Number of villages Number of Number of Population Area in Population Tahsil Rural! Towns Households Square per Square Urban Inhabited Uninhabited P M F kilometre kilometre 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

2. laitu Tahsil Total 41 24,969 144,570 76,503 68,067 425.93 339 Rural 41 19,199 111,105 58,827 52,278 416.33 267 Urban 1 5,770 33,465 17,676 15,789 9.60 3,486 14. Bathinda Total 280 4 9 208,993 1,183,295 632,809 550,486 3,353.00 353 District Rural 280 4 142,616 831,541 444,118 387,423 3,197.05 260 Urban 9 66,377 351,754 188,691 163,063 155.95 2,256 1. Rampura Phul Total 76 49,004 283,606 150,259 133,347 875.16 324 Tahsil Rural 76 40,770 238,941 126,567 112,374 866.28 276 Urban 1 8,234 44,665 23,692 20,973 8.88 5,030 2. Bathinda Tahsil Total 116 4 6 114,215 631,475 340,083 291,392 1,518.45 416 Rural 116 4 64,236 371,480 200,120 171,360 1,389.45 267 Urban 6 49,979 259,995 139,963 120,032 129.00 2,015 3. Talwandi Sabo Total 88 2 45,774 268,214 142,467 125,747 973.64 275 Tahsil Rural 88 37,610 221,120 117,431 103,689 955.57 231 Urban 2 8,164 47,094 25,036 22,058 18.07 2,606 15. Mansa Total 238 2 5 121,075 688,758 366,446 322,312 2,198.00 313 District* Rural 238 2 94,990 546,329 290,763 255,566 2,147.27 254 Urban 5 26,085 142,429 75,683 66,746 50.73 2,808 I. Tahsil Total 70 27,326 154,927 82,305 72,622 588.52 263 Rural 70 24,256 138,612 73,661 64,951 580.52 239 Urban 1 3,070 16,315 8,644 7,671 8.00 2,039 2. Tahsil Total 85 2 2 39,783 229,122 121,478 107,644 691.18 331 Rural 85 2 32,848 190,715 101,142 89,573 679.12 281 Urban 2 6,935 38,407 20,336 18,071 12.06 3,185 3. Mansa Tahsil Total 83 2 53,966 304,709 162,663 142,046 859.29 355 Rural 83 37,886 217,002 115,960 101,042 828.62 262 Urban 2 16,080 87,707 46,703 41,004 30.67 2,860 16. Sangrur Total 697 4 17 348,922 2,000,173 1,069,289 930,884 5,108.00 392 District Rural 697 4 243,157 1,415,354 756,598 658,756 4,879.37 290 Urban 17 105,765 584,819 312,691 272,128 228.63 2,558 1. Barnala Tahsil Total 124 5 92,014 526,931 281,494 245,437 1,421.52 371 Rural 124 61,904 366,364 194,932 171,432 1,370.77 267 Urban 5 30,110 160,567 86,562 74,005 50.75 3,164 2. Malerkotla Total 188 2 65,999 386,439 206,068 180,371 695.29 556 Tahsil Rural 188 43,231 251,408 134,357 117,051 668.07 376 Urban 2 22,768 135,031 71,711 63,320 27.22 4,961 3. Dhuri Tahsil Total 95 43,047 240,080 128,341 111,739 589.96 407 Rural 95 33,539 190,674 101,916 88,758 557.96 342 Urban 1 9,508 49,406 26,425 22,981 32.00 1,544 4. Sangrur Tahsil Total 124 3 58,185 322,371 172,458 149,913 780.44 413 Rural 124 36,346 206,351 110,472 95,879 753.19 274 Urban 3 21,839 116,020 61,986 54,034 27.25 4,258 5. Sunam Tahsil Total 95 3 56,625 328,799 176,554 152,245 763.73 431 Rural 95 43,036 250,224 134,572 115,652 691.93 362 Urban 3 13,589 78,575 41,982 36,593 71.80 1,094 6. Moonak Tahsil Total 71 3 33,052 195,553 104,374 91,179 773.23 253 Rural 71 25,101. 150,333 80,349 69,984 753.62 199 Urban 3 7,951 45,220 24,025 21,195 19.61 2,306 17. Patiala Total 105~ 30 14 327,859 1,844,934 987,390 857,544 3,654.00 505 District Rural 1054 30 203,659 1,200,224 642,633 557,591 3,480.22 345 Urban 14 124,200 644,710 344,757 299,953 173.78 3,710

47 TABLE A-I (Part I) NUMBER OF VILLAGES, TOWNS, HOUSEHOLDS, POPULATION AND AREA

State/District/ Total! Number of villages Number of Number of Population Area in Population Tahsil Rural/ Towns Households Square per Square Urban Inhabited Uninhabited P M F kilometre kilometre 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

I. Samana Tahsil Total 137 3 53,023 310,312 164,231 146,081 813.29 382 Rural 137 39,568 233,333 123,797 109,536 798.79 292 Urban 3 13,455 76,979 40,434 36,545 14.50 5,309 2. Nabha Tahsil Total 173 44,365 251,326 134,738 116,588 624.42 402 Rural 173 32,824 189,326 101,778 87,548 608.94 311 Urban 11,541 62,000 32,960 29,040 15.48 4,005 3. Patiala Tahsil Total 345 13 4 125,366 682,557 364,689 317,868 1,163.64 587 Rural 345 13 55,810 33i,628 175,886 154,742 1,090.81 303 Urban 4 69,556 351,929 188,803 163,126 72.83 4,832 4. Rajpura Tahsil Total 263 9 3 67,279 389,684 207,832 181,852 724.18 538 Rural 263 9 47,785 285,961 152,979 132,982 687.68 416 Urban 3 19,494 103,723 54,853 48,870 36.50 2,842 5. Dera Bassi Total 136 7 3 37,826 211,055 115,900 95,155 389.43 542 Tahsil Rural 136 7 27,672 160,976 88,193 72,783 354.96 454 Urban 3 10,154 50,079 27,707 22,372 34.47 1,453

48 TABLE A-I (Part II) NUMBER OF TOWNS, HOUSEHOLDS, POPULATION AND AREA StateIDistrict/ Urban Number of Number of Population Area in Population TahsillU.A.I City/Town Towns Households Square per Square P M F kilometre kilometre 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Punjab Urban 157 1,552,296 8,262,511 4,468,449 3,794,062 2,096.62 3,941 l.Gurdaspur District Urban 14 97,225 535,223 286,290 248,933 110.75 4,833 I.Dhar Kalan Tahsil Urban 2.Pathankot Tahsil Urban 5 40,265 214,907 116,671 98,236 42.55 5,051 (MCI) Urban 3,846 21,815 11,408 10,407 5.08 4,294 (eT) Urban 3,951 16,668 9,078 7,590 7:89 2,113 Pathankot UA Urban 31,030 168,485 92,003 76,482 N.A Pathankot (MCI+OG) Urban 31,030 168,485 92,003 76,482 N.A (i) Pathankot (MCI) Urban 29,052 157,925 86,520 71,405 22.10 7,146 (ii) Khanpur (OG) Urban 541 3,127 1,640 1,487 N.A (iii) Lamin (OG) Urban 425 2,445 1,286 1,159 N.A (iv) Dhaki (OG) Urban 1,012 4,988 2,557 2,431 N.A Daulatpur (eT) Urban 797 4,565 2,418 2,147 4.66 980 Kalan (eT) Urban 641 3,374 1,764 1,610 2.82 1,196 3. Gurdaspur Tahsil Urban 4 22,124 121,584 64,263 57,321 46.37 2,622 Dinanagar (MCI) Urban 3,909 21,502 11,277 10,225 14.36 1,497 Gurdaspur (MCI+OG) Urban 12,522 68,441 36,336 32,105 N.A (i) Gurdaspur (MCI) Urban 12,373 67,479 35,769 31,710 10.85 6,219 (ii) Engineering College on Amritsar-Pathankot Road (OG) Urban 86 663 405 258 N.A (iii) Abadi along Road (OG) Urban 15 67 36 31 N.A (iv) Gobind Nagar Colony along Gurdaspur-Amritsar Road (OG) Urban 33 167 88 79 N.A (v) Colony along Jail Road on Dinanagar Road (adjacent to Scheme No.5) (OG) Urban 15 65 38 27 N.A Gurdaspur UA Urban 12,522 68,441 36,336 32,105 N.A Kalanaur (NP) Urban 2,171 12,931 6,893 6,038 6.79 1,904 Dhariwal (MCI) Urban 3,522 18,710 9,757 8,953 14.37 1,302 4. Batala Tahsil Urban 4 33,680 191,238 101,424 89,814 19.83 9,644 (MCl) Urban 2,753 15,915 8,398 7,517 1.50 10,610 Batala (MCI+OG) Urban 26,483 147,872 78,393 69,479 N.A (i) Batala (MCl) Urban 22,406 125,677 66,508 59,169 8.75 14,363 (ii) Bawali Inderjit (OG) Urban 320 1,880 989 891 N.A (iii) Bhatha Inderjit (OG) Urban 88 466 250 216 N.A (iv) Bakewal (OG) Urban 952 4,902 2,640 2,262 N.A (v) Gaunspura (OG) Urban 517 2,918 1;559 1,359 N.A (vi) Alowal (OG) Urban 165 908 503 405 N.A (vii) (OG) Urban 100 573 285 288 N.A (viii) Marrianwala (OG) Urban 233 1,259 679 580 N.A (ix) Umarpura (OG) Urban 341 1,840 992 848 N.A (x) Kothe Malawa (OG) Urban 292 1,554 835 719 N.A (xi) Sagarpur (OG) Urban 209 1,302 685 617 N.A (xii) Haveli Chobdaran (OG) Urban 128 741 390 351 N.A (xiii) Jharriwalan (OG) Urban 150 887 465 422 N.A (xiv) Mani Ghauranga (OG) Urban 32 180 100 80 N.A (xv) Bhode- di-khui (OG) Urban 153 818 447 371 N.A (xvi) Kharal (OG) Urban 397 1,967 1,066 901 N.A Batala UA Urban 26,483 147,872 78,393 69,479 N.A (MCI) Urban 978 5,450 2,824 2,62ti 0.52 10,481 (MCI+OG) Urban 3,466 22,001 11,809 10,192 N.A (i) Qadian (MCI) Urban 3,207 20,254 10,888 9,366 9.06 2,236 (ii) Harijan Colony, LT.L Balmiki Graveyard & D.A.V. Hr. Sec. School (OG) Urban 259 1.747 921 826 N.A 49 TABLE A-I (Part II) NUMBER OF TOWNS, HOUSEHOLDS, POPULATION AND AREA State/District/ Urban Number of Number of Population Area in Population Tahsil/U.A.I City/Town Towns Households Square per Square P M F kilometre kilometre 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Qadian UA Urban 3,466 22,001 11,809 10,192 N.A 5. Tahsil Urban 1,156 7,494 3,932 3,562 2.00 3,747 Dera Baba Nanak (M.C!) Urban 1,156 7,494 3,932 3,562 2.00 3,747 2. Amritsar District Urban 13 224,345 1,223,275 656,958 566,317 217.85 5,615 1. Ajnala Tahsil Urban 3 6,298 36,544 19,724 16,820 15.50 2,358 Ramdas (M.CI) Urban 991 5,779 3,037 2,742 2.50 2,312 Ajnala (NP) Urban 3,123 18,589 10,100 8,489 9.00 2,065 Sansi (NP) Urban 1 2,184 12,176 6,587 5,589 4.00 3,044 2. Amritsar -I Tahsil Urban 3 9,303 52,369 29,162 23,207 10.05 5,211 (M.cJ) Urban 2,190 12,992 6,876 6,116 3.00 4,331 Amritsar (M. Corp.+ OO)(Part) Urban 590 3,381 1,911 1,470 N.A (xxiv) Bara Khankot Doburjee (00) Urban 216 1,377 796 581 N.A (xxvii) Village Mule Chak (00) Urban 374 2,004 1,115 889 N.A Amritsar Cantt. (CB) Urban 2,328 12,162 7,621 4,541 2.85 4,267 (M.C!) Urban 4,195 23,834 12,754 11,080 4.20 5,675 3. Amritsar- II Tahsil Urban 185,268 1,000,536 536,833 463,703 136.00 7,357 Amritsar (M. Corp.+OO) (Part) Urban 185,268 1,000,536 536,833 463,703 N.A (i) Amritsar (M.Corp.) Urban 179,057 966,862 518,388 448,474 136.00 7,109 (ii) Abadi Baba Darshan Singh on Ram Tirth Road (00) Urban 29 155 77 78 N.A (iii) Abadi Baba Jiwan Singh on Ram Tirath Road (00) Urban 50 309 171 138 N.A (iv) Abadi along Khairabad on Ram Tirath Road to Ajnala Road (00) Urban 295 1,713 909 804 N.A (v) Village Roriwala (00) Urban 227 1,246 684 562 N.A (vi) Prem Nagar on Ajnala Road (00) Urban 185 1,059 571 488 N.A (vii) Abadi Mirankot on Ajnala Road (00) Urban 251 1,317 729 588 N.A (viii) Oumtala Colony on Jagdev Kalan Road (00) Urban 205 1,092 607 485 N.A (ix) Ranjit Vihar (00) Urban 128 627 347 280 N.A (x) Mata Kamla Devi Avenue on Fatehgarh Churian Road (00) Urban 153 659 403 256 N.A (xi) Chand Avenue (00) Urban 133 625 358 267 N.A (xii) Mohan Avenue (00) Urban 417 2,019 1,177 842 N.A (xiii) Preet Nagar (00) Urban 240 1,200 658 542 N.A (xiv) Daya Nand Nagar (00) Urban 116 658 338 320 N.A (xv) Baba Deep Singh Nagar (00) Urban 300 1,437 782 655 N.A (xvi) Dashmesh Avenue on Majitha Road (00) Urban 315 1,558 869 689 N.A (xvii) Naushera hurd (00) Urban 171 1,007 546 461 N.A (xviii) Parti Vihar (00) Urban 34 159 90 69 N.A (xix) Ek Rup Avenue (00) Urban 113 581 327 254 N.A (xx) Abadi Naushera (00) Urban 93 448 233 215 N.A (xxi) Silver Estate (00) Urban 126 665 348 317 N.A (xxii) Krishna Lane (00) Urban 125 620 328 292 N.A (xxiii) Village Mudal (00) Urban 717 4,202 2,274 1,928 N.A (xxv) Factories on right side of Doburjee GT. Road (OG) Urban 122 593 328 265 N.A (xxvi) Abadi Khalsa Nagar Near Kot Mit Singh (00) Urban 114 551 309 242 N.A 50 TABLE A-I (Part II) NUMBER OF TOWNS, HOUSEHOLDS, POPULATION AND AREA StatelDistrict/ Urban Number of Number of Population Area in Population Tahsil/U.A.I City/Town Towns Households Square per Square P M F kilometre kilometre 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

(xxviii) Village Kuriwal (OG) Urban 236 1,447 774 673 N.A (xxix) Thandewala (OG) Urban 188 1,118 619 499 N.A (xxx) Basarka Bhaini ( Road) (OG) Urban 694 3,795 2,064 1,731 N.A (xxxi) Village Ghumanpura (OG)Urban 434 2,814 1,525 1,289 N.A Amritsar (M Corp+OG) Urban 185858 1003917 538744 465173 N.A. Arnritsar UA Urban 185858 1003917 538744 465173 N.A. 4. Tarn Taran Tahsil Urban 1 9,744 55,787 29,261 26,526 20.00 2,789 Tarn Taran (M.CI) Urban 1 9,744 55,787 29,261 26,526 20.00 2,789 5. Patti Tahsil Urban 3 9,837 56,677 30,489 26,188 21.83 2,596 * (NP) Urban 1,785 10,293 5,477 4,816 8.00 1,287 (NP) Urban 2,052 11,940 6,623 5,317 4.50 2,653 Patti (M.C!) Urban 6,000 34,444 18,389 16,055 9.33 3,692 6. Khadur Sahib Tahsil Urban 7. Baba Bakala Tahsil Urban 2 3,895 21,362 11,489 9,873 14.47 1,476 (NP) Urban 2,289 12,631 6,634 5,997 7.00 1,804 (CT) Urban 1,606 8,731 4,855 3,876 7.47 1,169 3. Urban 7 47,016 246,527 133,650 112,877 105,06 2,347 1. Bhulath Tahsil Urban 2 3,755 19,707 10,276 9,431 17.18 1,147 (NP) Urban 1,844 9,616 4,938 4,678 7.18 1,339 Bhulath (NP) Urban 1 1,911 10,091 5,338 4,753 10.00 1,009 2. Kapurthala Tahsil Urban 3 20,739 108,996 59,729 49,267 61.36 1,776 (NP) Urban 1,452 7,973 4,164 3,809 2.00 3,987 Kapurthala (M.C!) Urban 15,488 85,686 47,204 38,482 56.00 1,530 (CT) Urban 3,799 15,337 8,361 6,976 3.36 4,565 3. Tahsil Urban 2,792 15,571 8,310 7,261 10.52 1,480 Sultanpur (M.CI) Urban 2,792 15,571 8,310 7,261 10.52 1,480 4. Phagwara Tahsil Urban 19,730 102,253 55,335 46,918 16.00 6,391 Phagwara (M.Cl+OG) Urban 19,730 102,253 55,335 46,918 N.A (i) Phagwara (M.C1) Urban 18,465 95,788 51,671 44,117 16.00 5,987 (ii) Mohalla Gobindpura(OG) Urban 932 4,744 2,762 1,982 N.A (iii) Kot Rani (OG) Urban 333 1,721 902 819 N.A Phagwara UA Urban 19,730 102,253 55,335 46,918 N.A 4. Jalandhar District Urban 14 177,326 931,983 501,156 430,827 191.56 4,865 I. Shahkot Tahsil Urban 2 3,823 21,155 11,160 9,995 6.00 3,526 (NP) Urban 1,510 8,548 4,510 4,038 3.00 2,849 Shahkot (NP) Urban 2,313 12,607 6,650 5,957 3.00 4,202 2. Nakodar Tahsil Urban 5,688 31,408 16,510 14,898 12.50 2,513 Nakodar (M.CI) Urban 1 5,688 31,408 16,510 14,898 12.50 2,513 3. Phillaur Tahs i I Urban 4 10,533 57,797 30,659 27,138 25.66 2,252 landiala (NP) Urban 1,466 7,705 3,989 3,716 13.76 560 Nurrnaha1 (M.CI) Urban 2,214 12,632 6,633 5,999 6.15 2054 (NP) Urban 2,848 15,158 8,045 7,113 5.00 3,032 Phillaur (M.CI) Urban 1 4,005 22,302 11,992 10,310 0.75 29,736 4. lalandhar -I Tahsil Urban 5 149,948 781,101 421,217 359,884 132.75 5,884 Adarnpur (M. Cl) Urban 3,525 16,707 8,667 8,040 8.20 2,037 (M. C1) Urban 1,334 7,172 3,765 3,407 6.00 1,195 la1andhar (M. Corp.+OG) (Part) Urban 137,112 712,631 382,857 329,774 N.A (i)lalandhar (M. Corp.) Urban 135,912 706,043 379,439 326,604 102.00 6,922 (iii) Khambra on Nakodar Road (OG) Urban 742 4,035 2,071 1,964 N.A (iv) Alipur adjacent to village Mithapur (OG) Urban 211 1,146 608 538 N.A (\) Nang,ll Karkhan adjacent to Master Mehnga Singh Colony (OG) Urban 247 1,407 739 668 N.A 51 TABLE A-I (Part II) NUMBER OF TOWNS, HOUSEHOLDS, POPULATION AND AREA State/District/ Urban Number of Number of Population Area in Population Tahsil/U.AJ City/Town Towns Households Square per Square P M F kilometre kilometre 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Sansarpur (CT) Urban 859 4,060 2,066 1,994 1.34 3,030 lalandhar Cantt. (CB) Urban 7,118 40,531 23,862 16,669 15.21 2,665 5. lalandhar -II Tahsil Urban 2 7,334 40,522 21,610 18,912 14.65 2,766 (NP) Urban 2,654 13,919 7,380 6,539 4.65 2,993 Kartarpur (M.CI) Urban 4,402 25,157 13,463 11,694 10.00 2,516 lalandhar (M. Corp.+OG) (Part) Urban 278 1,446 767 679 N.A (ii) on Amritsar Road (OG) Urban 278 1,446 767 679 N.A lalandhar (M. Corp.+OG) Urban 137390 714077 383624 330453 N.A. lalandhar UA Urban 137390 714077 383624 330453 N.A. 5. Hoshiarpur District Urban 12 58,089 292,074 154,457 137,617 132.73 2,201 I. Dasua Tahsil Urban 3 9,130 48,426 25,194 23,232 38.40 1,261 Dasua (M.CI) Urban 3,779 20,114 10,466 9,648 19.90 1,011 Gardhiwala (M.CI) Urban 1,150 6,264 3,281 2,983 2.00 3,132 Urmar Tanda (M.C!) Urban 4,201 22,048 11,447 10,601 16.50 1,336 2. Mukerian Tahsil Urban 3 9,883 49,318 25,901 23,417 29.67 1,662 Mukerian (M.CI) Urban 4,070 21,384 11,177 10,207 2.61 8,193 Hajipur (CT) Urban 1,018 5,360 2,800 2,560 1.64 3,268 (CT) Urban 4,795 22,574 11,924 10,650 25.42 888 3. Hoshiarpur Tahsil Urban 4 34,179 169,164 90,196 78,968 51.10 3,310 Harlana (M.Cl) Urban 1 1,481 7,818 4,101 3,717 1.50 5,212 Chohal (CT) Urban 1,876 7,433 4,413 3,020 8.89 836 Hoshiarpur (M.CI) Urban 30,041 149,668 79,454 70,214 35.00 4,276 Sham Chaurasi (M.CI) Urban 781 4,245 2,228 2,017 5.71 743 4. Garhshankar Tahsil Urban 2 4,897 25,166 13,166 12,000 13.56 1,856 Mahilpur (NP) Urban 2,044 10,018 5,254 4,764 6.56 1,527 Garhshankar (M.CI) Urban 2,853 15,148 7,912 7,236 7.00 2,164 6. Nawanshahr District* Urban 4 15,203 81,066 42,387 38,679 32.00 2,533 I. Nawanshahr Tahsil Urban 3 11,868 62,910 32,818 30,092 26.00 2,420 Banga (M.C!) Urban 3,599 18,809 9,766 9,043 11.00 1,710 Nawanshahr (M.CI+OG) Urban 6,168 31,967 16,698 15,269 N.A (i) Nawanshahr (M.CI) Urban 5,962 30,999 16,132 14,867 9.59 3,232 (ii) Abadi on Banga Road & Sugar Mill Colony (OG) Urban 176 842 499 343 N.A (iii) Toor Colony on Saloh Road (OG) Urban 30 126 67 59 N.A Nawanshahr UA Urban 6,168 31,967 16,698 15,269 N.A (M.CI) Urban 2,101 12,134 6,354 5,780 5.41 2,243 2. Balachaur Tahsil Urban 3,335 18,156 9.569 8,587 6.00 3,026 Balachaur (NP) Urban I 3,335 18,156 9,569 8,587 6.00 3,026 7. Rupnagar District Urban 11 75,963 362,407 193,435 168,972 136.37 2,658 1. Anandpur Sahib Tahsil Urban 2 11,795 59,257 31,307 27,950 25.82 2,295 (M.CI+OG) Urban 9,156 45,368 23,907 21,461 N.A (i) Nangal (M.C!) Urban 8,333 40,694 21,472 19,222 22.82 1,783 (ii) Oustee Colony Block-B (OG) Urban 251 1,673 871 802 N.A (iii) Oustee Colony Block- A (OG) Urban 572 3,001 1,564 1,437 N.A Nangal UA Urban 9,156 45,368 23,907 21,461 N.A Anandpur Sahib (M.C!) Urban 2,639 13,889 7,400 6,489 3.00 4,630 2. Rupnagar Tahsil Urban 3 16,453 81,956 43,742 38,214 30.54 2,684 Nehon (CT) Urban 2,597 10,162 5,740 4,422 1.04 9,771 Rupnagar (M.C!) Urban 9,782 49,159 26,057 23,102 25.00 1,966 Morinda (M.C!) Urban 4,074 22,635 11,945 10,690 4.50 5,030 52 TABLE A-I (Part II) NUMBER OF TOWNS, HOUSEHOLDS, POPULATION AND AREA State!District! Urban Number of Number of Population Area in Population TahsillU.AJ City/Town Towns Households Square per Square P M F kilometre kilometre 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

3. Kharar Tahsil Urban 4 18,073 91,844 49,652 42,192 50.46 1,820 (M.Cl) Urban 4,220 23,047 12,306 10,741 9.00 2,561 Mullanpur Garib Dass (eT) Urban 1,171 6,147 3,284 2,863 8.49 724 (eT) Urban 4,564 20,361 11,355 9,006 14.97 1,360 Kharar (M.Cl+ 00) Urban 8,118 42,289 22,707 19,582 N.A (i) Kharar (M.Cl) Urban 7,620 39,283 21,082 18,201 18.00 2,182 (ii) Nawanshahr (00) Urban 498 3,006 1,625 1,381 N.A Kharar UA Urban 8,118 42,289 22,707 19,582 N.A 4. S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali) Tahsil Urban 2 29,642 129,350 68,734 60,616 29.55 4,377 S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali) (M.Cl) Urban 28,539 123,484 65,642 57,842 23.86 5,175 (eT) Urban I 1,103 5,866 3,092 2,774 5.69 1,031 8. Fatehgarh Sahib Dis!rict* Urban 5 28,397 151,091 82,200 68,891 77.67 1,945 1. Bassi Pathana Tahsil Urban 3,360 19,058 9,927 9,131 3.00 6,353 Bassi Pathana (M.Cl) Urban 3,360 19,058 9,927 9,131 3.00 6,353 2. Fatehgarh Sahib Tahsil Urban 9,126 49,825 26,717 23,108 28.40 1,754 Sirhind Fatehgarh Sahib (M.Cl) Urban 9,126 49,825 26,717 23,108 28.40 1,754 3. Amloh Tahsil Urban 2 14,352 73,366 40,690 32,676 39.00 1,881 Oobindgarh (M.Cl+OO) Urban 11,988 60,677 33,910 26,767 N.A (i) Oobindgarh (M.Cl) Urban 10,969 55,403 30,912 24,491 32.00 1,731 (ii) Iqbal Colony (00) Urban 111 561 324 237 N.A (iii) Sant Nagar (00) Urban 539 2,791 1,516 1,275 N.A (iv) Dalip Nagar (00) Urban 369 1,922 1,158 764 N.A Oobindgarh UA Urban 11,988 60,677 33,910 26,767 N.A Amloh (M.cl) Urban 2,364 12,689 6,780 5,909 7.00 1,813 4. Khamanon Tahsil Urban 1,559 8,842 4,866 3,976 7.27 1,216 Khamanon (NP) Urban 1,559 8,842 4,866 3,976 7.27 1,216 9. Ludhiana District Urban 12 322,903 1,693,653 950,123 743,530 250.30 6,766 I. Samrala Tahsil Urban 2 6,554 35,954 18,976 16,978 12.50 2,876 Samrala (M.CI) Urban 3,288 17,590 9,277 8,313 9.00 1,954 (NP) Urban 3,266 18,364 9,699 8,665 3.50 5,247 2. Khanna Tahsil Urban 18,775 103,099 55,276 47,823 24.75 4,166 Khanna (M.Cl) Urban 1 18,775 103,099 55,276 47,823 24.75 4,166 3. Payal Tahsil Urban 3 6,116 33,439 18,237 15,202 16.50 2,027 Maloud (NP) Urban 1,314 7,186 3,801 3,385 7.00 1,027 Payal (M.Cl) Urban 1,320 7,267 3,866 3,401 3.50 2,076 Doraha (M.CI) Urban 3,482 18,986 10,570 8,416 6.00 3,164 4. Ludhiana (East) Tahsil Urban 2 272,161 1,415,760 802,359 613,401 164.37 8,613 Ludhiana (M. Corp.) Urban 268,700 1,398,467 793,142 605,325 159.37 8,775 (NP) Urban 3,461 17,293 9,217 8,076 5.00 3,459 5. Ludhiana (West) Tahsil Urban 2,574 13,949 7,323 6,626 2.05 6,804 Mullanpur (NP) Urban 1 2,574 13,949 7,323 6,626 2.05 6,804 6. Raikot Tahsil Urban 2 5,772 31,372 16,382 14,990 16.13 1,945 *Akalgarh (CT) Urban 1,290 6,603 3,440 3,163 5.48 1,205 Raikot (M.Cl) Urban 4,482 24,769 12,942 11,827 10.65 2,326 7. Jagraon Tahsil Urban 10,951 60,080 31,570 28,510 14.00 4,291 Jagraon (M.CI) Urban 10,951 60,080 31,570 28,510 14.00 4,291 10. Moga District* Urban 4 32,329 178,640 94,817 83,823 45.00 3,970 I. Nihal Singhwala Tahsil Urban 1,047 6,366 3,298 3,068 3.40 1,872 * (NP) Urban 1,047 6,366 3,298 3,068 3.40 1,872 2. Bhagha Purana Tahsil Urban 3,672 21,596 11,336 10,260 6.00 3,599 Bhagha Purana (NP) Urban 3,672 21,596 11,336 10,260 6.00 3,599 3. Moga Tahsil Urban 2 27,610 150,678 80,183 70,495 35.60 4,233 Dharamkot (M.C!) Urban 2.733 15,399 8,140 7,259 19.50 790 Moga (M.Cl +00) Urban 24,877 135,279 72,043 63,236 N.A (i) Moga (M.e!) Urban 23,141 125,573 66,888 58,685 16.10 7,800

53 TABLE A·l (Part II) NUMBER OF TOWNS, HOUSEHOLDS, POPULATION AND AREA State/Dlsh'lctl Urban Number of Number of Population Area in Population Tahsil/ll.A.! City/Town Towns Households Square per Square P M F kilometre kilometre 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

(ii) Landeke (Amritsar Road) (OG) Urban 493 2,882 1,523 1,359 N.A (iii) Duneke (Firozpur Road) (OG) Urban 1,243 6,824 3,632 3,192 N.A Moga UA Urban 24,877 135,279 72,043 63,236 N.A n. Firozpur District Urban 9 80,656 450,725 242,354 208,371 92.27 4,885 1. Zira Tahsil Urban 2 7,613 43,958 22,953 21,005 14.72 2,986 (NP) Urban 2,152 12,175 6,358 5,817 7.66 1,589 Zira (M.Cl+OG) Urban 5,461 31,783 16,595 15,188 N.A (i) Zira (M.CI) Urban 5,399 31,355 16,385 14,970 7.06 4,441 (ii) Gadriwala on Zira­ Firozpur Road (00) Urban 62 428 210 218 N.A Zira UA Urban 5,461 31,783 16,595 15,188 N.A 2. Firozpur Tahsil Urban 3 30,264 167,726 92,678 75,048 34.43 4,872 (M.CI) Urban 2,518 14,573 7,696 6,877 3.00 4,858 Firozpur (M.C!) Urban 17,661 95,475 50,506 44,969 11.33 8,427 Firozpur Cantt. (CB) Urban 10,085 57,678 34,476 23,202 20.10 2,870 3. J alalabad Tahsil Urban 2 8,500 47,275 25,074 22,201 10.Ql 4,723 (M.C!) Urban I 2,476 14,351 7,537 6,814 2.45 5,858 Jalalabad (M.CI+ 00) Urban 6,024 32,924 17,537 15,387 N.A (i) Jalalabad (M.CI) Urban 5,709 31,007 16,535 14,472 7.56 4,101 (ii) Extended Area Block No. 22 (00) Urban 315 1,917 1,002 915 N.A Jalalabad UA Urban 6,024 32,924 17,537 15,387 N.A 4. Fazilka Tahsil Urban 11,957 67,427 35,204 32,223 10.04 6,716 Fazilka (M.C!) Urban 11,957 67,427 35,204 32,223 10.04 6,716 5. Abohar Tahsil Urban 22,322 124,339 66,445 57,894 23.07 5,390 Abohar (M.CI) Urban 22,322 124,339 66,445 57,894 23.07 5,390 12. Muktsar District* Urban 4 34,890 198,564 105,147 93,417 50.98 3,895 I. Tahsil Urban 12,700 70,765 37,816 32,949 20.00 3,538 Malou! (M.CI) Urban 12,700 70,765 37,816 32,949 20.00 3,538 2. Giddarbaha Tahsil Urban 6,196 36,598 19,184 17,414 8.25 4,436 Giddarbaha (M.el) Urban 1 6,196 36,598 19.184 17,414 8.25 4,436 3. Muktsar Tahsil Urban 2 15,994 91,201 48,147 43,054 22.73 4,012 (NP) Urban 1,254 7,541) 3,975 3,571 5.00 1,509 Muktsar (M.Cl) Urban 14,740 83,655 44,172 39,483 17.73 4,718 13. Faridkot District Urban 3 35,527 193,571 103,653 89,918 44.99 4,303 1. Faridkot Tahsil Urban 2 29,757 160,106 85,977 74,129 35.39 4,524 Faridkot (M.CI+OG) Urban 15,008 79,321 43,188 36,133 N.A (i) Faridkot (M.C!) Urban 14,826 78,265 42.618 35,647 18.14 4314 (ii) Houses & Shellers (Bholowal Road) (OG) Urban 182 1,056 570 486 N.A Faridkot UA Urban 15,008 79,321 43,188 36,133 N.A Kot Kapura (M.CI) Urban 14,749 80,785 42,789 37,996 17.25 4,683 2. Tahsil Urban 5,770 33,465 17,676 15,789 9.60 3,486 Jaitu (M.Cl+ 00) Urban 5,770 33,465 17,676 15,789 N.A (i) Jaitu (M.C!) Urban 5,682 32,904 17,379 15,525 9.60 3,428 (ii) Kothe Lal Premi (00) Urban 88 561 297 264 N.A laitu UA Urban 5,770 33,465 17,676 15,789 N.A 14. Bathinda District Urban 9 66,377 351,754 188,691 163,063 155.95 2,256 1. Rampura Phul Tahsil Urban 8,234 44,665 23,692 20,973 8.88 5,030 Rampura Phul ( M.CI+ OG) Urban 8,234 44,665 23,692 20,973 N.A (i) Rampura Phul (M.en Urban 7,902 42,823 22,706 20,117 8.88 4,822 (ii) Jawahar Nagar on Rampura- Bathinda Road (OG) Urban 137 760 393 367 N.A 54 TABLE A-I (Part II) NUMBER OF TOWNS, HOUSEHOLDS, POPULATION AND AREA State/District/ Urban Number of Number of Population Area in Population TahsillU.A.I City/Town Towns Households Square per Square P M F kilometre kilometre 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

(iii) Dashmesh Nagar on Rampura - Mehraj Road (00) Urban 132 722 395 327 N.A (iv) Outgrowth of Oandhi Nagar on Pitho Road (00) Urban 63 360 198 162 N.A Rampura Phul UA Urban 8,234 44,665 23,692 20,973 N.A 2. Bathinda Tahsil Urban 6 49,979 259,995 139,963 120,032 129.00 2,015 Ooniana (M.CI) Urban 2,312 12,813 6,866 5,947 4.00 3,203 Bhisiana (CT) Urban 1,164 4,775 2,837 1,938 6.84 698 Bhucho Mandi (M.CI) Urban 2,284 13,246 7,017 6,229 4.16 3,184 Bathinda (M.CI) Urban 42,130 217,256 116,946 luO,310 110.00 1,975 Sangat (M.C!) Urban 939 5,401 2,862 2,539 2.00 2,701 Kot Fatta (M.CI) Urban 1 1,150 6,504 3,435 3,069 2.00 3,252 3. Talwandi Sabo Tahsil Urban 2 8,164 47,094 25,036 22,058 18.07 2,606 Raman (M.C!) Urban 3,398 19,551 10,361 9,190 3.99 4,900 Maur (M.CI) Urban 1 4,766 27,543 14,675 12,868 14.08 1,956 15. Mansa District· Urban 5 26,085 142,429 75,683 66,746 50.73 2,808 I. Sardulgarh Tahsil Urban 3,070 16,315 8,644 7,671 8.00 2,039 Sardulgarh (NP) Urban 3,070 16,315 8,644 7,671 8.00 2,039 2. Budhlada Tahsil Urban 2 6,935 38,407 20,336 18,071 12.06 3,185 Budhlada (M.C!) Urban 4,325 23,521 12,429 11,092 8.06 2,918 ( M.CI) Urban 1 2,610 14,886 7,907 6,979 4.00 3,722 3. Mansa Tahsil Urban 2 16,080 87,707 46,703 41,004 30.67 2,860 Bhikhi (NP) Urban 2,663 15,080 7,984 7,096 9.00 1,676 Mansa (M.CI) Urban . 1 13,417 72,627 38,719 33,908 21.67 3,351 16. Sangrur District Urban 17 105,765 584,819 312,691 272,128 228.63 2,558 1. Barnala Tahsil Urban 5 30,110 160,567 86,562 74,005 50.75 3,164 (M.C!) Urban 2,827 16,808 8,913 7,895 6.00 2,801 Barnala (M.C!) Urban 18,599 96,624 52,569 44,055 26.00 3,716 (NP) Urban 1,870 9,733 5,281 4,452 3.00 3,244 Tappa (M.CI) Urban 3,409 18,917 10,078 8,839 10.75 1,760 (M.CI) Urban 3,405 18,485 9,721 8,764 5.00 3,697 2. Malerkotla Tahsil Urban 2 22,768 135,031 71,711 63,320 27.22 4,961 Ahmedgarh (M.CI) Urban 5,012 28,022 14,944 13,078 6.10 4,594 Malerkotla (M.C!) Urban 17,756 107,009 56,767 50,242 21.12 5,067 3. Dhuri Tahsil Urban 9,508 49,406 26,425 22,981 32.00 1,544 Dhuri ( M.C!) Urban 1 9,508 49,406 26,425 22,981 32.00 1,544 4. Sangrur Tahsil Urban 3 21,839 116,020 61,986 54,034 27.25 4,258 Longowal ( M.C!) Urban 3,503 20,239 11,109 9,130 3.25 6,227 Sangrur (M.CI) Urban 15,126 77,989 41,477 36,512 18.00 4,333 Bhawanigarh (M.CI) Urban 3,210 17,792 9,400 8,392 6.00 2,965 5. Sunam Tahsil Urban 3 13,589 78,575 41,982 36,593 71.80 1,094 Cheema (NP) Urban 1 1,585 9,245 4,930 4,315 7.50 1,233 Dirba (NP) Urban 2,200 13,079 7,058 6,021 27.05 484 Sunam (M.CI+ 00) Urban 9,804 56,251 29,994 26,257 N.A. (i) Sunam (M.C!) Urban 8,973 51,174 27,203 23,971 37.25 1,374 (ii) Chamar Tibbi, Moranwali, Model Town (R) and Ougapeer, Kothe Harigarh and Kothe Singhpur (00) Urban 831 5,077 2,791 2,286 N.A. Sunam UA Urban 9,804 56,251 29,994 26,257 N.A. 6. Moonak Tahsil Urban 3 7,951 45,220 24,025 21,195 19.61 2,306 Lehragaga (M.CI) Urban 3,406 19,336 10,299 9,037 8.50 2,275 Moonak (NP) Urban 2.638 14.924 7.935 6.989 6.11 2.443 Khanauri (NP) Urban 1,907 10,960 5,791 5,169 5.00 2,192 17. Patiala District Urban 14 124,200 644,710 344,757 299,953 173.78 3,710 1. Samana Tahsil Urban 3 13,455 76,979 40,434 36,545 14.50 5,309 55 TABLE A-I (Part II) NUMBER OF TOWNS, HOUSEHOLDS, POPULATION AND AREA State/District/ Urban Number of Number of Population Area in Population Tahsi1lV.A.I City/Town Towns Households Square per Square P M F kilometre kilometre I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Ghagga (NP) Urban 1,414 8,212 4,317 3,895 3.00 2,737 Patran (NP) Urban 3,837 22,175 11,673 10,502 6.00 3,696 Samana (M.Cll Urban 8,204 46,592 24,444 22,148 5.50 8,471 2. Nabha Tahsil Urban 11,541 62,000 32,960 29,040 15.48 4,005 Nabha (M.Cll Urban 11,541 62,000 32,960 29,040 15.48 4,005 3. Patiala Tahsil Urban 4 69,556 351,929 188,803 163,126 72.83 4,832 (M.CO Urban 3,159 .17,935 9,613 8,322 5.18 3,462 Patiala ( M. Corp. + OG) Urban 64,214 323,884 173,682 150,202 N.A. (i) Patiala (M. Corp.) Urban 59,794 303,151 162,573 140,578 65.00 4,664 (ii) Hira Bagh Colony (OG) Urban 475 2,411 1,387 1,024 N.A. (iii) Ranjit Nagar Extension - I (OG) Urban 307 1,423 769 654 N.A. (iv) Grid Colony PSEB on Road (OG) Urban 488 2,403 1,295 1,108 N.A. (v) Gujran (OG) Urban 317 1,417 753 664 N.A. (vi) Urban Estate-I (OG) Urban 1,180 5,107 2,646 2,461 N.A. (vii) Punjabi University (OG) Urban 393 2,322 1,223 1,099 N.A. (viii) Urban Estate-II (OG) Urban 829 3,504 1,875 1,629 N.A. (ix) Ranjit Nagar Extension - II (OG) Urban 431 2,146 1,161 985 N.A. Patiala UA Urban 64,214 323,884 173,682 150,202 N.A. (CT) Urban 376 1,931 1,007 924 0.68 2,840 Rurki Kasba (CT) Urban 1 1,807 8,179 4,501 3,678 1.97 4,152 4. Rajpura Tahsil Urban 3 19,494 103,723 54,853 48,870 36.50 2,842 (NP) Urban 979 5,754 3,012 2,742 5.00 1,151 Rajpura (M.C!) Urban 15,788 82,956 43,839 39,117 25.00 3,318 (M.CI) Urban I 2,727 15,013 8,002 7,011 6.50 2,310 5. Dera Bassi Tahsil Urban 3 10,154 50,079 27,707 22,372 34.47 1,453 Dera Bassi (M.CI) Urban 3,284 15,841 8,585 7,256 20.00 792 (CT) Urban 1,798 9,216 4,923 4,293 5.92 1557 (NP) Urban 5,072 25,022 14,199 10,823 8.55 2,927 Notes: 1. Total area figures in column 10 of table A-I (Part-I) against State and District represent "Geographical Area" figures Supplied by Surveyor General. The urban area figures are based on the area figures of individual towns supplied by local bodies. The rural area for a district has been arrived at by subtracting the urban areas from the "Geographical Area" supplied by the Surveyor General. The rural area figures of units lower than the district do not add up to the area figures of the district, because the rural area of the units lower than the district have been computed from the land use, area supplied by the State Director of Land Records. 2. For arriving at TahsillDistrictlState urban area figures, the area of the Statutory Towns have been taken into account since the area of outgrowths were not available in case of urban agglomerations. The area of outgrowths have been accounted for in rural. Further the density of TahsiVdistrictl State levels have been worked out on the areas so obtained. The area/density of Urban Agglomeration have been shown N.A. 3. Towns treated as such for the [trst time in 1991 Census which continue as towns in 2001 Census are shown with asterisk* on their left. 4. Towns treated as such for the first time in 2001 are in italics. 5. The following abbreviations have been used for the status of towns:- M.Corp. Municipal Corporation M.CI. Municipal Council N.P. Nagar Panchayat C.B. Cantonment Board C.T. Census Town 6. N.A. Not Available O.a. Out growth U.A. Urban Agglomeration

56 A-I APPENDIX CHANGES IN TERRITORIAL UNITS DURING 1991-2001 StatelDistrict! 1991 Territory added and its area Name of State! Territory reduced and its area Name of State! Net area Tahsil at 2001 Territorial District! Tahsil District! Tahsil change in unit Name Area in etc., from which Name Area in etc., to which area square square this area is square is added kilometre kilometre reduced kilometre (+ or-)

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 PUNJAB Gurdaspur District Gurdaspur 2 villages 7.27 Dasua Tahsil of +7.27 District Hoshiarpur District Dhar Kalan Tahsil - 28 villages 256.78 Pathankot Tahsil +256.78 of Gurdaspur District

Pathankot Tahsil Pathankot 28 villages 256.78 Newly formed -256.78 Tahsil DharKaian Tahsil of Gurdaspur District Gurdaspur Tahsil Gurdaspur 1 village, Kathana 2.91 Batala Tahsil of -2.91 Tahsil (H.B.No.455) Gurdaspur District Batala Tahsil Batala Tahsil 2 villages 7.27 Dasua Tahsil of - -290.01 Hoshiarpur District 1 village 2.91 Gurdaspur Tahsil - of Gurdaspur District 123 villages ofBataia Tahsil 300.19 Newly formed Oera Baba Nanak Tahsil of Gurdaspur District Dera Baba Nanak - 123 villages 300.19 Batala Tahsil of - +300.19 Tahsil Gurdaspur District Arnritsar District Arnritsar 1 village 7.24 Firozpur Tahsil - +7.24 District of Firozpur District Arnritsar-I Tahsil Arnritsar 107 villages of ArnritsarTaltsii 513.12 Newly formed -499.73 Tahsil Arnritsar-II Tahsil of Arnritsar District I village 1.42 TamTaran Tahsil of Arnritsar District I village 5.97 BabaBakaia Tahsil of Arnritsar District Arnritsar-II Tahsil Arnritsar 107 villages 513.12 Arnritsar Tahsil - +513.12 Tahsil of Arnritsar District Tam Taran Tahsil TamTaran 96 villages of Tam Taran 441.85 Newly formed -449.27 Tahsil Tahsil Khadur Sahib Tahsil of Arnritsar District

57 A-I APPENDIX-contd••••

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 village,Dharar (H.B.No.87) 7.42 Amritsar-I Tahsil - ofAmritsar District Patti Tahsil Patti Tahsil 1 village 7.24 Firo~ur Tahsil - +7.24 ofFiro~ur District Khadur Sahib 96 villages 441.85 Tarn Teran +441.85 Tahsil Tahsil of Amritsar District BabaBakala BabaBakala- 1village, 5.97 Amritsar-I Tahsil -5.97 Tahsil Tahsil (H.B.No.133) of Amritsar District Kapurthala District Kapurthala - District Bhulath Tahsil 107 villages of 247.78 Kapurthala +247.78 Kapurthala. Tahsil of Tahsil Kapurthala District Kapurtbala Tahsil Kapurtbala - 107 villages of Kapurtbala 247.78 Newly formed -247.78 Tahsil Tahsil Bhulath Tahsil of Kapurtbala District Jalandhar District Jalandhar 4 villages 7.99 Zira Tahsil of Entire Nawanshahr Tahsil 767.10 Nawanshahr -766.67 District Firo~ur District except 5 villages of Jalandhar Tahsil of Newly District formed Nawanshahr District 3 villages ofNawanshahr 3.35 Ludhiana East Tahsil of Jalandhar District Tahsil of Ludhiana District

2 villages ofNawanshahr 4.21 Samrala Tahsil of - Tahsil of Jalandhar District Ludhiana District

Nawanshahr Nawanshahr - Entire Nawanshahr Tahsil 767.10 Nawanshahr -774.66 Tahsil Tahsil except 5 villages of Jalandhar Tahsil of Newly District formed Nawanshahr District 3 villages, Togar (H.B.No. 3.35 Ludhiana East 291), Garhi Sheru Tahsil of (H.B.No.290), Gopalpur Ludhiana District Bulandewal (H.B.No. 281) 2 villages, Dhulewal (H.B.No. 4.21 Samrala Tahsil of - 247), Ror Majri (H.B.No. 245) Ludhiana District Shahkot Tahsil 177 villages of 415.93 Nakodar Tahsil - +448.32 Nakodar of Ja1andhar Tahsil District

4 villages 7.99 Zira Tahsil of Firo~ur District " Nakodar Tahsil Nakodar 177 villages ofNakodar Tahsil 415.93 Newly formed -415.93 Tahsil Shahkot Tahsil of lalandhar District -

58 A-I APPENDIX - contd••••

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Jalandhar-I Tahsil Jalandhar 251 villages 566.85 Newly formed -566.85 Tahsil Jale,ndhar-n Tahsil of Jalandhar District Jalandhar-ll Tahsil - 25 I villages 566.85 Jalandbar Tahsil - +566.85 of Jalandhar District Hoshiarpur Hoshiarpur - 2 villages of Dasua Tahsil 7.27 Batala Tahsil of -516.87 District District Gurdaspur District 185 villages & Balacbaur N.P. 498.70 Balachaur Tahsil - of newly fonned Nawansbahr District 8 villages ofBalachaur Tahsil 10.90 SamraJa Tahsil of - Ludhiana District Dasua Tahsil Dasua Tahsil - 2 villages, Fateh (H.B. 7.27 Batala Tahsil of '-414.15 No.517), Kulla (H.B.No.516) Gurdaspur District 314 villages 632.46 Newly formed Mukerian Tahsil of Hoshiarpur District 98 villages 225.58 Hoshiarpur Tahsil of Hoshiarpur District Mukerian Tahsil 314 villages 632.46 Dasua Tahsil of - +632.46 Hoshiarpur District Hoshiarpur Tahsil Hoshiarpur 98 villages 225.58 Dasua Tahsil of -225.58 Tahsil Hoshiarpur District Balachaur Tahsil Balachaur 185 villages & Balachaur N.P. 498.70 Balachaur Tahsil -509.60 Tah~i1 of ncwly fonned Nawanshahr District Balachaur Tahsil Balachaur . 8 villages, Lahangarh (H.B. 10.90 SamarIa Tahsil of . - Tahsil No.461), Dopana Ludhiana District (H.B.No.460),Skandarpur (H.B.No.458),Shergarh (H.B.No.456),Nurpur (H.B.No.455),Thandi (H.B. 454), Chakli Kasab (H.B.No.450), Kamalpur (H.B.No.457) Nawanshahr Entire 767.10 Nawanshahr +1265.80 District Nawanshahr Tahsil of Tahsil except 5 Jalandhar District villages 185 villages & 498.70 Balachaur Tahsil - Balachaur N.P. of Hoshiarpur District Rupnagar District RUPJlagar • - 5 villages 12.60 Ncwly formed -29.40 District B,assi Pathana Tahsil ofncwly fonned Fatehgarh Sahib District

59 A-I APPENDIX - colltd••••

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 villages 0.46 Newly formed Dera Bassi Tail of Patillla District 19 villages 42.66 Newly formed Khamanon Tahsil of newly formed Fatehgarh Sahib District 5 villages 16.06 Samara1a Tahsil - of Ludhiana District 3 villages 10.26 ~pura Tahsil of - Patillla District Anandpur Sahib Anandpur 11 villages 18.96 Rupnagar Tahsil - +18.96 Tahsil Sahib Tahsil of Rupnagar District Rupnagar Tahsil Rupnagar 19 villages 42.66 Newly formed -29.98 Tahsil Khamanon Tahsil of newly formed Fatehgarh Sahib District II villages 18.96 Anandpur Sahib - Tahsil of Rupnagar District 5 villages 16.06 Samrala Tahsil of Ludhiana District 12 villages 15.58 Kharar Tahsil of - Rupnagar DistJ:ict Kharar Tahsil Kharar 5 villages, Kaiilll M.ra 12.60 Newly formed -207.80 Tahsil (H.B.No.372), Khanpur Behlan Bassi Pathana (H.B.No.302),Sil Kapra Tahsil of newly (H.B.No.63), Chuni KIlIan formed Fatchgarh , (H.B.No.62), Chuni Khurd Sahib District ( H.B.No.61) 84 villages 189.88 Newly formed S.AS.Nagar (Mohllli) Tahsil of Rupnagar District 12 villages 15.S8 Rupnagar Tahsil - ofRupnagar District 3 villages 10.26 ~pura Tahsil of - Patillla District S.AS.Nagar 84 villages 189.88 Kharar Tahsil of - +189.42 (Mohllli) Tahsil Rupnagar District 1 village, Zirakpur 0.46 Newly formed (H.B.No.23S) Dera Bassi Tahsil of Patiala District Fatehgarh Sahib 5 villages 12.60 Kharar Tahsil of +1180.24 . District Rupnagar District

60 A-I APPENDIX - CDIIId ....

2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 19 villages 42.66 Rupnapr Tahsil ofRupnapr District 4 villages 13.27 Samrala Tahsil of Ludhiana District 58 villages 147.29 Samrala Tahsil of Ludhiana District 6 villages 19.74 Khanna Tahsil of - Ludhiana District 93 Villages, 261.86 Nabha Tahs,1 of Amloh&. Plltiala District Mandi Gobindgarb Towns 1 village 4.08 Nabha Tahsil of Patiala District 9 Villages 29.10 Rajpura Tahsil of - Patiala District 255 villages, 649.64 Fatehgarh Sahib Bassi Pathana Tahsil ofPatiala· &. Sirhind District Towns Ludhiana District Ludhiana 5 villages 16.06 Rupnagar Tahsil -89.77 District of Rupnagar District 4 villages 13.27 Newly fonned Khamanon Tahsil of Newly fonned Fatehgarh Sahib District 58 villages 147.29 Newly fonned Khamanon &.Bassi Pathana Tahsils of Newly formed fatehgarh Sahib District 6 villages 19.74 Amloh Tahsil of - Newly fonned Fatehgarh Sahib District 3 villages 3.35 Nawanshahr Tahsil of Jalandhar District 2 villages 4.21 Nawanshahr Tahsil of Jalandhar District 8 villages 10.90 Balachaur Tahsil - of Hoshiarpur District 10 villages 63.55 Bamala Tahsil of - Sangrur District

61 A-I APPENDIX - contd"N

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 villages 22.44 Malerkoda TahsilofSangrur District I village 2.14 Nabha Tahsil of - Patiala District Samrala Tahsil Samrala 5 villages, Koda Bet (H.B. No. 16.06 Rupnagar Tahsil -161.51 Tahsil 284), Khera (H.B. No. 285), of Rupnagaf Kiri Afgana (H.B. No.286), District Bassi Gujran (H.B. No. 287), Dhaulran (H.B. No. 288) 4 villages, Barwali Khurd 13.27 Newly formed (H.B. No.11 S),Barwali Kalan Khamanon Tahsil (H.B. No. 114), Jatana Ucha of Newly fonned (H.B. No. 298), Jatana Niwan Fatehgarh Sahib (H.B. No. 297) District 58 villages 147.29 Newly fonned Khamanon Tahsil ofNewly formed Fatehgarh Sahib District 2 villages 4.21 Nawanshahr Tahsil of Jalandhar District 8 villages 10.90 Balachaur Tahsil - of Hoshiarpur District Khanna Tahsil Khanna 6 villages, Fatehgarh Niwan 19.74 Newly formed -319.09 Tahsil (H.B. No.204), Shiraj Majra Amloh Tahsil of (H.B. No.199), Jallowal Newly formed (H.B.No.198), Lohar Majra Fatehgarh Sahib Kalan (H.B. No.200),Dadheri District (H.B. No. 202), Kotla Dadher (H.B. No.201) 72 Villages 301.49 Newly formed Payal Tahsil of Ludhiana District I Village 2.14 Nabha Tahsil of - Patiala District Payal Tahsil 42 villages 138.39 Ludhiana Tahsil - +448.15 of Ludhiana District 72 villages 301.49 Khanna Tahsil of - Ludhiana District Ludhiana East Ludhiana 42 villages 138.39 Newly formed -765.87 Tahsil Tahsil Payal Tahsil of Ludhiana District 133 villages 551.12 Newly formed Ludhiana West Tahsil of Ludhiana District 17 villages 79.71 Newly formed Raikot Tahsil of Ludhiana District

62 A-I APPENDIX-contd•• _

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3 villages 3.35 Nawanshahr Tahsil of la1andhar District Ludhiana West 133 villages 551.12 Ludhiana Tahsil - +611.70 Tahsil of Ludhiana District 6 villages 28.49 Jagraon Tahsil of - Ludhiana District Raikot Tahsil 46 villages 245.10 lagraon Tahsil of - +424.57 Ludhiana District 17 villages 79.71 Ludhiana East Tahsil of Ludhiana District 10 villages 63.55 BarnalaTahsilof- Sangrur District 2 villages 22.44 Malerkotla Tahsil of Sangrur District Jagraon Tahsil Jagraon 6 villages. Kbanjarwal (H.B. 28.49 Ludhiana West -273.59 Tahsil No.75). Mor Karima(H.B. No. Tahsil of { 109). Dba (H.B. No.1 08). Ludhiana District (H.B. No.77). Pandori (H.B. No. 78). (H.B. No. 79) 46 villaps 24S.IO Newly formed Raikot Tahsil of Ludhiana District Moga District EntireMoga 1685.42 Moga Tahsil of - +2.216.14 Tahsil Faridkot District 150 villages &. 546.44 Zira Tahsil of Dharamkot Firozpur District Town I village. Sibbian (H.B. No. 15.72 Faridkot Tahsil of -15.72 120) Faridkot District Firozpur District Firozpur 1 village 7.24 Patti Tahsil of -573.58 District Amritsar District I village t 1.91 Muktsar Tahsil of - Newly funned Muktsar District 4 villages 7.99 Newly fonned Shahkot Tahsil of Jalandhar District 1SO villages It. Dbararnkot 546.44 Moga Tahsil of Town I. Newly fonned Moga District ZiraTahsil Zira Tahsil 4 villages. Oadaipur 7.99 Newly funned -S54.43 (H.B.No.215).Pipli (H.B. Shahkot Tahsil of No.220). Miani (H.B. No.221). Jalandhar District Mirzapur (H.B. No.222) 150 villages It. Dhararnkot 546.44 Moga Tahsil of Town Newly formed M~District

63 A-I APPENDIX-contd••••

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Firozpur Tahsil Firozpur I village, Mothanwala (H.B. 7.24 Patti Tahsil of -515.80 Tahsil No.321) Amritsar District 125 villages 508.56 Jalalabad Tahsil ofFirozpur District Fazilka Tahsil Fazilka 90 villages 403.14 Jalalabad Tahsil -418.85 Tahsil of Firozpur District I village, Roherianwali (H.B. 15.71 Abohar Tahsil of - No. 132) Firozpur District Jalalabad Tahsil 125 villages 508.56 Firozpur Tahsil +897.04 of Firozpur District 90 villages 403.14 Fazilka Tahsil of - Firozpur District I village, Ranjitgarh (H.B. 11.91 Muktsar Tahsil of - No.1 59) Newly formed Muktsar District Abohar Tahsil Abohar I village 15.71 Fazilka Tahsil of - +15.71 Tahsil Firozpur District I village, 19J6· Azimgarh (H.B.No.1I 0) (NEW) Muktsar District Entire Muktsar 2596.47 Muktsar Tahsil +2608.38 Tahsil of Faridkot District I village 11.91 Jalalabad Tahsil - of Firozpur District Faridkot District Faridkot I village 15.72 Moga Tahsil of - -4,266.17 District Newly formed Moga District Entrie Muktsar Tahsil 2596.47 Malout, Giddarbaha &: Muktsar Tahsils of Newly formed Muktsar District Entire Moga Tahsil 1685.42 Nihal Singhwala, - Bhagha Purana &: Mop Tahsils of Newly formed Mop District FBJidkot Tahsil Faridkot 1 village 15.72 Moga Tahsil of - -392.18 Tahsil Newly formed Mop District 41 villages 407.90 Newly formed Jaitu Tahsil of Faridkot District Jaitu Tahsil 41 villages 407.90 Faridkot Tahsil +425.93 of Fariclkot District Muktsar Tahsil Muktsar Entire Muktsar Tahsil 2,596.4 Malouf, -2,596.47 Tahsil 7 Giddarbaha &: Muktsar Tahsils ofNewly formed Muktsar District • Note :- Area of village Azimgarh (H.B. No. 110) has alreadybeen included in Abohar Tashil but this village was shown as merged from 1971 to 1991 censuses, whereas this village posseses separate identity in 200 I

64 A-I APPENDIX - COIIId••••

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MogaTahsil MogaTahsii - Entire Moga Tahsil 1,685.42 Nihal Singhwala, -1,685.42 Bhagha Purana &. Moga Tahsils of Newly fonned Moga District Bathinda District Bathinda Entire Manse Tahsil 2,192.25 Sardulgarh, -2,169.06 District Budhlada&. Manse Tahsils of Newly formed Mansa District 3 villages 23.19 Mansa Tahsil of . Bathinda District Talwandi Sabo Talwandi 3 villages 23.19 Mansa Tahsil of - +23.19 Tahsil SaboTahsil Bathinda District Mansa Tahsil Mansa Tahsil - Entire Mansa Tahsil 2,192.25 Sardulgarh, -2,192.25 Budhlada&. Mansa Tahsils of Newly formed Mansa District Manse District Entire Mansa 2192.25 Mansa Tahsil of - +2,169.06 Tahsil Bathinda District 3 villages, 23.19 Talwandi Sabo (H.B.No.69), Ghuman Kalan Tahsil of (H.B.No.68), Sukha Singhwala Bathinda District (H.B.No. 70) Sangrur District Sangrur 10 villages 63.55 Newly formed -85.99 District Raikot Tahsil of Ludbiana District 2 villages 22.44 Newly formed Raikot Tahsil of Ludbiana District Bamala Tahsil Barnala JO villages, Chak Bhaike (RB. 63.55 Newly formed -63.55 Tahsil No.26), (H.B. No.27), Raikot Tahsil of Kalsan (H.B. No.29), Dadahur Ludbiana District (H.B.No.83), Gobindgarh (H.B. No. 86), Jalaldiwal (H.B. No.30), Rajgarh (H.B. No.87), Shehbalpura (H.B. No.88), Mohamadpura (H.B. No. 90), Johlan (RB. No.89) Maierkotla Tahsil MaierkotJa 2 villages, Kalsian (H.B. No.1), 22.44 Newly formed -612.40 Tahsil Lohalbadi (H.B. No.2) Raikot Tahsil of Ludhiana District 96 villages 589.96 Newly formed Dhuri Tahsil of Sangrur District Dhuri Tahsil 96 villages 589.96 Malerkotla +589.96 Tahsil of Sangrur District Sangrur Tahsil Sangrur 7 villages, Shahpur Kalan 119.64 Sunam Tahsil of -119.64 Tahsil (H.B.No.13), Jharon Sangrur District (H.B.No.I4), Bir Kalan (H.B.No.16), Tolawal (H.B.No.17), Cheema (H.B. No.15), Sheron (H.B. No. 12), Namol (H.B. No.1 12

65 A-I APPENDIX-collld••••

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Sunam Tahsil Sunam 73 villages 773.23 Newly fonned -653.59 Tahsil Moonak Tahsil of Sangrur District 7 villages 119.64 Sangrur Tahsil of • Sangrur District Moonak Tahsil 73 villages 773.23 Sunam Tahsil of - +773.23 Sangrur District Patiala District Patiala 93 villages, Amloh & 261.86 Newly fonned -956.62 District Gobindgarh Towns Amloh Tahsil of Newly fonned Fatehgarh Sahib District I village 4.08 Newly fonned Amloh Tahsil of Newly fonned Fatehgarh Sahib District 3 villages ·10.26 Kharar Tahsil of . Rupnagar District 9 villages 29.10 Fatehgarh Sahib - Tahsil & Newly fonned Bassi Pathana Tahsil of Newly fonned Fatehgarh Sahib District I village 2.14 Khanna Tahsil of • Ludhiana District 255 villages, Bassi & Sirhind 649.64 Bassi Pathana, Towns Fatehgarh Sahib & Amloh Tahsils of Newly fonned Fatehgarh Sahib District I village 0.46 S.AS. Nagar (Mohali) Tahsil of Rupnagar District Nabha Tahsil Nabha Tahsil - 93 villages, Amloh & 261.86 Newly fonned -268.08 Gobindgarh Towns AmIoh Tahsil of Newly fonned Fatehgarh Sahib District 1 village, Badinpur (H.B.No.8) 4.08 Newly fonned Amloh Tahsil of Newly fonned Fatehgarh Sahib District I village, Galwadhi (H.B.No.9) 2.14 Khanna Tahsil of - Ludhiana District Patiala Tahsil Patiala Tahsil 7 viJIilges 37.72 Fatehgarh Sahib - +37.72 Tahsil ofPatiala District

66 A-I APPENDIX-colltd••.•

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Rajpura Tahsil Rajpura 3 villages, Machhli Kalan 10.26 Kharar Tahsil of -406.19 Tahsil (H.B.No.238), Chubar M~ra Rupnagar District (H.B. No.239), Machhli Khurd (H.B.No .. 240) 9 villages, Mehdudan 29.10 Fatehgarh Sahib - ( H.B.No.237), Basian Tahsil & Newly (H.B.No.236), Garolion(H.B. fonned Bassi No.241), Biro Majri Pathana Tahsil of (H.B.No.242), Pawala (H.B. Newly fonned No.243), Paton (H.B. No.244), Fatehgarh Sahib Naraina (H.B. No.24S), District Bhagrana (H.B. No.247), Dadu Majra (H.B.No.246) 149 villages 381.34 [)era Bassi Tahsil - of Patiala District 6 villages 14.51 Fatehgarh Sahib - Tahsil ofPatiala District Fatehgarh Sahib Fatehgarh 255 villages, Bassi & Sirhind 649.64 Bassi Pathana, -701.47 Tahsil Sahib Tahsil Towns Fatehgarh Sahib & Amloh Tahsits of Newly formed Fatehgarh Sahib District 7 villages, Dayagarh (H.B.No. 37.32 Patiala Tahsil of - 344), Rorgarh (H.B.No. 337), Patiala District Chalela (H.B. No.338), Amarnpura (H.B. No.333), Phagan M~ra (H.B.No.334), Kasiana (H.B. No.33S), Nandpur Kesho (H.B. No.282) 6 villages, Shira (H.B. No.27S), 14.51 Rajpura Tahsil of - Tehalpura (H.B. No.286), Sihri Patiala District (H.B. No.276), Akar (H.B. No.277), Akari (H.B. No.278), Bathli (H.B. No.279) Dera Bassi Tahsil - 1 village 0.46 SAS. Nagar +389.43 (Mohali) Tahsil of Rupnagar District 149 villages 381.34 Rajpura Tahsil of - Patiala District 1 village, Bir 1.21 (H.B. No. 16/1) (NEW)· • Note:- Area of this new village has been subtracted during 2001 Census ftom ~pura Tahsil of 1991 Census.

67

TABLE A-2 DECADAL VARIATION IN POPULATION SINCE 1901

FLY-LEAF

Table A-2 for 2001 Census presents the adjusted government through gazette notification .. This table population figures for the last eleven censuses from gives the decadal variation, percentage decadal 1901 to 2001 for States, Union territories and Districts variation and also the population by sex. The conforming to the present jurisdiction as on 1st January, preparation of this table will enable to compare the 2000,the date on which the state/district boundaries data on growth of population of the state and districts were frozen for Census purposes by the state for the last 100 years.

69 Adjustment of Population issued by Registrar General's office and the method The recasting of population of districts or taluks of adjustment is briefly described in the following or tahsils has been done on the basis of instructions statement-I. Statement - 1 Table illustrating the method of estimation of previous Censuses Population for transferred Territories

Description Population Remarks 1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

J aIandhar District Population of 916,675 801,303 822,020 943,438 1,126,900 1,054,136 1,226,182 1,454,501 1,734,574 2,026,787 (l)224401x916675 district as at 1054136 1991 Census

Deduct (I) (2) (3) (4) (5) (2) 224401 x801303 Population of 195,139 170,579 174,989 200,836 239,891 224,401 244,419 280,249 329,582 378,833 1054136 Nawanshahr Tahsil transfered to newly created Nawanshahr district during (3) 224401x822020 1991-2001 1054136

Add Population of 43 45 55 57 71 62 Un- inhabited 876 1,577 1,955 (4)22440lx943438 4 villages \054136 transferred from Firozpur during 1991 - 2001

Population of 721,579 630,769 647,086 742,659 887,080 829,797 981,763 1175,128 1,406,569 1,649,909 (5)22440lxlJ269QQ J aIandhar district 1054136 which should be shown in table A-2 of 2001

Statement 1 shows the illustrating method of villages transferred from Firozpur district are also estimation of previous Census Population for added in the Jalandhar district. Before 1951 village transferred Territories. The population for 1951,1961, wise data were not available therefore popUlation of 1971,1981 and 1991 censuses was recasted by adding! the transferred areas for census prior to 1951 had to subtracting the figures of transferred area as per state be estimated on the assumption that the proportion of Govt's. notifications issued time to time. For example population in the area transferred to the total area and population deducted from Jalandhar district population of the district/tahsil in which it was situated is added in the newly created district Nawanshahr as at the time of transfer was the same in particular per notification similarly area and population of 4 previous census as it was in 1951.

70 Statement 2 shows percentage of decadal and its constituent districts separately for rural and variation of population from 1901 to 200 1 for the state urban areas. Statement - 2 Statement Showing the percentage of Decadal variation of Population from 1901 to 2001 for Total, Rural and Urban State/District T 1901 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 R to to to to to to to to to to to U 2001 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 Punjab T 222.86 20.10 20.81 23.89 21.70 21.56 -4.58 19.82 12.02 6.26 -10.78 R 143.52 12.65 17.69 17.48 20.62 19.47 -9.71 16.06 8.92 6.17 -10.46 U 783.91 37.86 28.95 44.51 25.27 29.06 20.02 41.85 34.37 6.92 -13.00 Gurdaspur T 199.56 19.73 16.07 23.12 25.37 15.24 -0.45 18.99 13.26 1.99 -11.44 R 146.60 14.44 15.62 20.91 24.12 14.67 -9.50 17.30 12.21 2.77 -11.54 U 708.41 38.51 17.71 31.79 30.54 17.67 73.10 34.72 24.12 -5.45 -10.50 Amritsar T 160.87 23.59 14.46 19.24 19.64 12.26 -15.t.8 25.16 20.20 5.52 -13.98 R 89.91 13.42 12.56 12.84 21.48 11.70 -16.54 17.25 11. 78 4.51 -15.01 U 509.45 43.27 18.32 34.77 15.40 13.59 -13.59 49.66 56.77 10.16 -8.87 Kapurthala T 16.68 18.60 26.95 24.94 16.51 NA NA NA NA NA R 5:82 25.72 15.76 24.68 14.69 NA NA NA NA NA U 418.79 47.97 1.95 65.62 24.55 23.00 NA NA NA NA NA Ialandhar T 172.00 18.96 17.30 19.69 19.70 18.31 -6.46 19.45 14.77 2.59 -12.58 R 70.00 5.22 16.22 8.90 16.84 17.25 -20.58 14.38 13.78 2.83 -12.33 U 708.54 39.03 18.92 40.52 25.61 20.57 50.71 45.56 20.14 1.30 -13.93 Hoshiarpur T 127.57 14.02 16.39 17.67 21.19 9.83 -7.46 13.46 11.30 0.99 -7.22 R 102.11 10.41 14.19 14.83 19.36 11.47 -10.99 10.81 8.84 2.56 -4.71 U 366.94 31.48 28.41 35.97 34.51 -0.80 24.42 44.88 51.78 -19.42 -30.85 Nawanshahr T 117.74 10.58 16.39 19.32 14.89 8.76 -6.73 17.76 13.77 2.12 -11.09 R 101.90 7.11 17.93 15.70 14.62 9.30 -8.03 16.11 13.30 1.83 -10.49 U 326.91 38.70 5.28 54.13 17.61 3.73 7.55 39.46 20.38 6.40 -19.06 Rupnagar T 242.27 24.07 28.29 30.72 15.27 24.72 6.37 13.92 9.86 -0.75 -13.39 R 141.43 12.95 22.08 20.44 18.64 11.76 4.19 9.80 9.71 0.46 -13.05 U 2,504.25 56.00 50.23 87.22 0.28 168.37 38.44 154.38 15.22 -30.70 -21.13 Fatehgarh T 18.27 17.01 27.41 24.03 28.29 NA NA NA NA NA Sahib R 9.29 14.94 19.14 21.49 29.29 NA NA NA NA NA U 688.86 49.78 24.86 73.18 40.26 22.24 NA NA NA NA NA Ludhiana T 342.72 24.89 36.53 28.43 28.44 25.60 2.25 22.15 18.69 9.78 -22.99 R 126.00 12.95 16.86 13.88 17.94 16.93 -4.28 17.71 14.40 9.54 -22.79 U 1,731.35 36.28 62.64 54.66 53.00 51.96 28.97 44.46 46.25 11.35 -24.27 Moga T 15.03 18.61 22.21 21.10 16.86 NA NA NA NA NA R 15.24 12.59 18.11 20.15 15.83 NA NA NA NA NA U 1,227.59 14.22 50.55 49.81 27.89 24.81 NA NA NA NA NA Firozpur T 303.09 20.51 24.00 24.75 19.05 25.87 -12.07 23.42 4.25 23.15 3.57 R 243.60 19.49 23.23 23.42 21.86 23.26 -15.78 21.35 -0.56 26.94 -2.42 U 581.07 23.55 26.34 29.00 10.90 34.11 2.10 32.05 30.47 5.90 22.07 Muktsar T 18.80 19.55 27.01 12.60 43.63 NA NA NA NA NA R 15.48 20.97 19.77 10.24 32.45 NA NA NA NA NA U 3,007.92 29.68 15.15 56.49 23.32 133.43 NA NA NA NA NA Faridkot T 21.07 22.79 26.26 19.92 34.35 NA NA NA NA NA R 17.12 19.87 19.95 25.71 25.16 NA NA NA NA NA U 871.55 29.13 29.19 42.75 7.06 60.57 NA NA NA NA NA Bathinda T 20.09 20.49 31.23 22.42 34.75 NA NA NA NA NA R 15.57 21.82 19.98 23.19 28.53 NA NA NA NA NA U 1,620.32 32.34 17.02 73.51 19.63 63.70 NA NA NA NA NA Mansa T 19.85 18.04 21.08 25.90 32.02 NA NA NA NA NA R 11.65 17.04 19.21 24.70 31.25 NA NA NA NA NA U 66.89 24.13 33.82 34.72 37.94 NA NA NA NA NA Sangrur T 18.67 21.36 23.02 20.26 24.62 NA NA NA NA NA R 11.67 18.77 19.10 18.81 25.39 NA NA NA NA NA U 729.35 39.91 29.96 38.10 26.59 21.55 NA NA NA NA NA Patiala T 20.70 21.53 29.43 27.09 39.05 NA NA NA NA NA R 12.97 21.52 24.52 28.26 46.90 NA NA NA NA NA U 537.99 38.32 21.54 42.22 24.12 22.55 NA NA NA NA NA 71 The statement reveals that during last 100 years 1991-2001 respectively. Significantly 20.10% is the the population in Punjab has increased by 222.86 lowest growth rate for the state during 1991-2001 per cent; the corresponding increase in urban after independence. population (783.91 %) was more than five times the Out of 17 districts 11 districts have lesser growth rural (143.52%). The state witnessed a negative rate than the state growth rate. Amritsar 23.59% growth rate first during 1901 to 1911 (-10.78%) Rupnagar 24.07%, Ludhiana 24.89%, Firozpur due to havoc of. epidemics and famInes and then 20.51 %, Faridkot 21.07% and Patiala 20.70% are the during 1941-51 due to exodus of the Muslim six districts possess higher growth rate than the state population on a mass scale in 1947 at the time of (20.10%) during 1991-2001. partition of the country. In all other decades the growth rate accelerated up-words. The state Sex Ratio experienced a growth rate of 21.56%, 21.70%, Sex Ratio is an important demographic 23.89% during the decades 1951-61, 1961-71, 1971- phenomenon and changes in sex ratio during 1901- 81 respectively. The growth rate has declined 2001 of the state and district is presented in the 3.08% points and 0.71 % points during 1981-91 and following Statement-3.

Statement - 3 Changes in Sex Ratio (Females per 1,000 Males) 1901-2001

Statel T/RIU 1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 District 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Punjab T 832 780 799 815 836 844 854 865 879 882 876 R 836 785 808 832 855 854 865 868 884 888 890 U 804 740 735 721 750 807 817 856 865 868 849 Gurdaspur T 853 774 794 809 843 846 869 890 907 903 890 R 851 771 792 813 846 857 886 893 908 905 897 U 877 798 812 769 816 804 804 881 904 895 870 Amritsar T 829 781 796 803 841 841 854 856 871 873 876 R 842 791 816 843 890 871 877 866 876 871 885 U 767 736 714 689 733 774 803 831 860 876 862 KapurthaJa T NA NA NA NA NA 880 886 889 898 896 888 R NA NA NA NA NA 887 896 905 919 910 910 U 704 752 773 765 790 856 853 840 850 857 845 la1andhar T 848 783 807 841 859 857 867 883 890 897 887 R 848 784 812 855 892 882 897 886 904 907 912 U 843 775 781 772 737 806 808 878 870 883 860 Hoshiarpur T 878 828 856 867 879 877 902 899 919 924 935 R 877 828 859 871 885 887 910 904 828 932 946 U 891 828 804 814 825 819 845 868 870 890 891 Nawanshahr T 856 796 821 848 865 876 900 887 898 900 914 R 856 795 822 852 783 877 903 888 900 898 914 U 851 807 810 792 781 868 867 882 890 914 913 Rupnagar T 807 756 781 789 802 812 812 854 862 870 871 R 806 755 780 790 802 813 839 855 867 870 870 U 820 784 791 773 791 802 700 848 844 870 874 Fatehgarh T NA NA NA NA NA 773 815 831 841 871 854 Sahib R NA NA NA NA NA 768 814 830 855 870 861 U 896 834 869 861 813 806 821 839 791 873 838 Ludhiana T 829 765 784 791 832 852 856 848 860 844 824 R 824 765 790 814 852 854 862 862 881 880 879 U 863 770 749 682 753 846 843 823 832 812 783 72 Statement - 3 Changes in Sex Ratio (Females per 1,000 Males) 1901-2001

Statef TfRlU 1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 District 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Moga T NA NA NA NA NA 867 862 866 881 884 887 R NA NA NA NA NA 867 862 863 880 883 888 U 891 852 666 733 743 862 864 884 888 889 884 Firozpur T 826 778 802 814 810 835 840 876 884 895 885 R 857 809 825 854 856 862 862 878 885 898 894 U 663 649 686- 666 654 754 871 871 878 887 860 Muktsar T NA NA NA NA NA 862 846 863 885 880 891 R NA NA., NA NA NA 864 845 859 879 877 891 U 724 698 674 730 744 848 851 878 903 888 888 Faridkot T NA NA NA NA NA 856 849 866 879 883 883 R NA NA NA NA NA 860 849 860 874 882 891 U 780 678 715 712 808 846 850 882 890 884 867 Bathinda T NA NA NA NA NA 839 834 851 861 884 870 R NA NA NA NA NA 845 837 850 869 888 872 U 712 657 644 693 783 812 824 852 843 873 864 Mansa T NA NA NA NA NA 824 830 852 869 873 880 R NA NA NA NA NA 821 829 847 864 871 879 U NA NA NA 729 720 851 835 888 898 881 882 Sangrur T NA NA NA NA NA 819 832 840 860 870 871 R NA NA NA NA NA 814 828 831 854 866 871 U 805 732 704 741 797 840 849 874 882 881 870 Patiala T NA NA NA NA NA 809 831 850 870 882 868 R NA NA NA NA NA 820 835 847 866 875 868 U 760 702 722 719 757 785 822 858 877 899 870

The sex ratio is defined as number of females (914), Rural (914)and (913) in urban respectively, per 1000 males. Out of total popUlation 24358999 in whereas it lowest in Ludhiana (824). Since 1961, the state, 12985045 are males and 11373954 are Hoshiarpur has continuously maintained the first females resulting in over all sex ratio of 876, which position interm of sex ratio. During 1991-2001, out of is significantly lower than the national average of 933. 17 districts Eleven districts experienced higher sex The sex ratio in Punjab has improved consistently ratio, one equal and 5 districts below the state from 1911 to 1991 from 780 to 882 however it average. 8 districts experienced increased in their sex decreased to 876 in 2001 census. The highest sex ratio while it decline in equal no. of districts and one ratio is reported from Hoshiarpur in total (935), rural district Faridkot did not experienced any change in (946) and urban (891) followed by Nawanshahr Total this regard during 1991-2001 census.

73

o0r- 0 N

al 0r- O) «..., 0) z or- ::l or- Il. co 0) C or- Z

« or- I"'- « 0) -c or- z - or- I I CD o"""'" 0) OJ o 0r- e:( N .., I or- Z L() :J o"""'" 0) a.. en 0r- o """'" e:( z or- o "II:t -C - 0) Z ~ or- - ...J 0r- • :::J e") Il. 0) o or- Il. or- LL N 0) o or- :I: or- I- 0r- O) o~ or- 0::: o0r- C> 0) or-

L() 0 L() o I or- ~ I I

3~V1N3:>~3d NI NOI1VlndOd .:10 H1MO~~

75

TABLE A-2 DECADAL VARIATION IN POPULATION SINCE 1901 State/District Census Year Persons Variation since tbe preceding census Males Females Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

PUNJAB 1901 7,544,799 4,118,386 3,426,404 1911 6,731,510 813,280 - 10.78 3,782,236 2,949,274 1921 7,152,811 + 421,301 + 6.26 3,976,180 3,17(;,631 1931 8,012,325 + 859,514 + 12.02 4,415,292 3,597,033 1941 9,600,236 + 1,587,911 + 19.82 5,228,280 4,371,956 1951 9,160,500 439,736 - 4.58 4,968,206 4,192,294 1961 11,135,069 + 1,974,569 + 21.56 6,007,566 5,127,503 1971 13,551,060 + 2,415,991 + 21.70 7,266,515 6,284,545 1981 16,788,915 + 3,237,855 + 23.89 8,937,210 7,851,705 1991 20,281,969 + 3,493,054 + 20.81 10,778,034 9,503,935 2001 24,358,999 + 4,077,030 + 20JO 12,985,045 11,373,954

I. GURDASPUR 1901 702,372 378,985 323,387 DISTRICT 1911 622,008 80,364 - 11.44 350,693 271,315 1921 634,394 + 12,386 + 1.99 353,615 280,779 1931 718,523 + 84,129 + 13.26 397,193 321,330 1941 854,968 + 136,445 + 18.99 463,969 390,999 1951 851,140 3,828 - 0.45 461,017 390,123 1961 980,868 + 129,728 + 15.24 524,739 456,129 1971 1,229,699 + 248,831 + 25.37 650,530 579,169 1981 1,513,962 + 284,263 + 23.12 793,780 720,182 1991 1,757,281 + 243,319 + 16.07 923,646 833,635 2001 2,104,011 + 346,730 + 19.73 1,113,077 990,934

2. AMRITSAR 1901 1,186,845 648,924 537,921 DISTRICT 1911 1,020,981 - 165,864 - 13.98 573,220 447,761 1921 1,077 ,351 + 56,370 + 5.52 600,007 477,344 1931 1,294,967 + 217,616 + 20.20 718,225 576,742 1941 1,620,782 + 325,815 + 25.16 880,163 740,619 1951 1,366,614 254,168 - 15.68 742,187 624,427 1961 1,534,210 + 167,596 + 12.26 827,4'46 706,764 1971 1,835,540 + 301,330 + 19.64 988,946 846,594 1981 2,188,639 + 353,099 + 19.24 1,169,963 1,018,676 1991 2,505,034 + 316,395 + 14.46 1,337,755 1,167,279 2001 3,096,077 + 591,043 + 23.59 1,650,589 1,445,488

3. KAPURTHALA 1901 N.A. N.A. N.A. DISTRICT 1911 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1921 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1931 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1941 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1951 295,071 N.A. N.A. 156,921 138,150 1961 343,778 + 48,707 + 16.51 182,299 161,479 1971 429,514 + 85,736 + 24.94 227,33\ 202,183 1981 545,249 + 115,735 + 26.95 287,286 257,963 1991 646,647 + 101,398 + 18.60 341,030 305,617 2001 754,521 + 107,874 + 16.68 399,623 354,898

4. JALANDHAR 1901 721,579 390,550 331,029 DISTRICT 1911 630,769 90,810 - 12.58 353,813 276,956 1921 647,086 + 16,317 + 2.59 358,037 289,049 1931 742,659 + 95,573 + 14.77 403,439 339,220 1941 887,080 + 144,421 + 19.45 477,098 409,982 1951 829,797 57.283 - 6.46 446,795 383,002 1961 981.763 + 151.966 + 18.31 525.788 455,975 1971 1,175,128 + 193,365 + 19.70 623,987 551.141 1981 1,406,569 + 231,441 + 19.69 744,156 662,413 1991 1.649.909 + 243,340 + 17.30 869,610 780,299 2001 1,962,700 + 312,791 + 18.96 1,040,177 922,523 contd..... 77 TABLE A-2 DECADAL VARIATION IN POPULATION SINCE 1901 State/District Census Year Persons Variation since the preceding census Males Females Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

5. HOSHIARPUR 1901 650,662 346,426 304,236 DISTRICT 1911 603,685 46,977 7.22 330,191 273,494 1921 609,650 + 5,965 + 0.99 328,443 281,207 1931 678,526 + 68,876 + 11.30 363,520 315,006 1941 769,884 + 91,358 + 13.46 409,695 360,189 1951 712,440 57,444 - 7.46 379,499 332,941 1961 782,483 + 70,043 + 9.83 411,474 371,009 1971 948,270 + 165,787 + 21.19 499,260 449,010 1981 1,115,799 + 167,529 + 17.67 581,563 534,236 1991 1,298,712 + 182,913 + 16.39 674,881 623.831 2001 1,480,736 + 182,024 + 14.02 765,132 715,604

6. NAWANSHAHR 1901 269,801 145,365 124,436 DISTRICT * 1911 239,880 29,921 - 11.09 133,580 106,300 1921 244,966 + 5,086 + 2.12 134,516 110,450 1931 278,703 + 33,737 + 13.77 150,814 127,889 1941 328,209 + 49,506 + 17.76 176,015 152,194 1951 306,122 22,087 - 6.73 163,148 142,974 1961 332,944 + 26,822 + 8.76 175,257 157,687 1971 382,523 + 49,579 + 14.89 202,712 179,811 1981 456,434 + 73,911 + 19.32 240,434 216,000 1991 531,253 + 74,819 + 16.39 279,658 251,595 2001 587,468 + 56,215 + 10.58 306,902 280,566

7. RUPNAGAR 1901 326,093 180,475 145,618 DISTRICT 1911 282,423 43,670 - 13.39 160,793 121,630 1921 280,309 2,114 - 0.75 157,418 122,891 1931 307,939 + 27,630 + 9.86 172,082 135,857 1941 350,796 + 42,857 + 13.92 194,699 156,097 1951 373,141 + 22,345 + 6.37 205,890 167,251 1961 465,373 + 92,232 + 24.72 256,807 208.566 1971 536,436 + 71,063 + 15.27 289,325 247,111 1981 701,225 + 164,789 + 30.72 376,684 324,541 1991 899,587 + 198,362 + 28.29 481,115 418,472 2001 1,116,108 + 216,521 + 24.07 596,582 519,526

8. FATEHGARH 1901 N.A. N.A. N.A. SAHIB 1911 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. DISTRICT * 1921 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1931 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1941 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1951 191,779 N.A. N.A. 108,149 83,630 1961 246,041 + 54,262 + 28.29 135,536 110,505 1971 305,168 + 59,127 + 24.03 166,625 138,543 1981 388,800 + 83,632 + 27.41 211,152 177.648 1991 454.919 + 66,119 + 17.01 243,159 211,760 2001 538,041 + 83,122 + 18.27 290,137 247,904

9. LUDHIANA 1901 685,038 374,454 310,584 DISTRICT 1911 527,575 - 157,463 - 22.99 298,827 228,748 IIJ21 579,161 + 51,586 + 9.78 324,581 254,580 1931 687,387 + 108,226 + 18:69 383,816 303,571 1941 839,622 + 152,235 + 22.15 458,351 381,271 1951 858,487 + 18,865 + 2.25 463,478 395,009 1961 1,078,269 + 219,782 + 25.60 580,859 497,410 1971 1,384,957 + 306,688 + 28.44 749,520 635,437 1981 1,778,689 + 393.732 + 28.43 956,423 822.266 1991 2,428,382 + 649,693 + 36.53 1,316,748 1,111,634 2001 3,032,831 + 604,449 + 24.89 1,662,716 1,370,115 contd..... 78 TABLE A-2 DECADAL VARIATION IN POPULATION SINCE 1901 State/District Census Year Persons Variation since the preceding census Males Females Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 ,7

10. MOGA 1901 N.A. N.A. N.A. DISTRICT • 1911 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1921 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1931 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1941 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1951 379,242 N.A. N.A. 203,155 176,087 1961 443,173 + 63,931 + 16.86 237,960 205,213 1971 536,691 + 93,518 + 21.10 287,644 249,047 1981 655,891 + 119,200 + 22.21 348,611 307,280 1991 777,922 + 122,031 + 18.61 412,867 365,055 2001 894,854 + 116,932 + 15.03 474,139 420,715

11. FIROZPUR 1901 433,179 237,195 195,984 DISTRICT 1911 448,647 + 15,468 + 3.57 252,326 196,321 1921 552,515 + 103,868 + 23.15 306,542 245,973 1931 575,990 + 23,475 + 4.25 317,455 258,535 1941 710,895 + 134,905 + 23.42 392,662 318,233 1951 625,055 85,840 - 12.07 340,610 284,445 1961 786,775 + 161,720 + 25.87 427,559 359,216 1971 936,623 + 149,848 + 19.05 499,246 437,377 1981 1,168,465 + 231,842 + 24.75 620,315 548,150 1991 1,448,903 + 280,438 + 24.00 764,488 684,415 2001 1,746,107 + 297,204 + 20.51 926,224 819,883

12. MUKTSAR 1901 N.A. N.A. N.A. DISTRICT • 1911 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1921 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1931 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1941 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1951 266,498 N.A. N.A. 143,135 123,363 1961 382,776 + 116,278 + 43.63 207,348 175,428 1971 430,991 + 48,215 + 12.60 231,402 199,589 1981 547,394 + 116,403 + 27.01 290,428 256,966 1991 654,434 + 107,040 + 19.55 348,146 306,288 2001 777,493 + 123,059 + 18.80 411,217 366,276

13. FARIDKOT 1901 N.A. N.A. N.A. DISTRICT 1911 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1921 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1931 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1941 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1951 182,145 N.A. N.A. 98,135 84,010 1961 244,718 + 62,573 + 34.35 132,344 112,374 1971 293,475 + 48,757 + 19.92 157,258 136,217 1981 370,556 + 77,081 + 26.26 197,196 173,360 1991 455,005 + 84,449 + 22.79 241,690 213,315 2001 550,892 + 95,887 + 21.07 292,596 258,296

14. BATHINDA 1901 N.A. N.A. N.A. DISTRICT 1911 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1921 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1931 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1941 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1951 377,757 N.A. N.A. 205,420 172,337 1961 509,031 + 131,274 + 34.75 277,505 231,526 1971 623,172 + 114,141 + 22.42 336,729 286,443 1981 817.764 + 194.592 +31.23 439,350 378,414 1991 985,301 + 167,537 + 20.49 522,961 462.340 2001 1,183,295 + 197,994 + 20.09 632,809 550,486 contd.....

79 TABLE A-2 DECADAL VARIATION IN POPULATION SINCE 1901 State/District Census Year Persons Variation since the Erecedlns census Males Females Absolute PercentaBe 1 2 3 4 S 6 7

15. MANSA 1901 N.A. N.A. N.A. DISTRICT * 1911 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1921 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1931 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1941 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1951 241,932 N.A. N.A. 132,617 109,315 1961 319,389 + 77,457 + 32.02 174,541 144,848 1971 402,099 + 82,710 + 25.90 217,069 185,030 1981 486,842 + 84,743 + 21.08 260,465 226,377 1991 574,662 + 87,820 + 18.04 306,888 267,774 2001 688,758 + 114,096 + 19.85 366,446 322,312

16. SANGRUR 1901 N.A. N.A. N.A. DISTRICT 1911 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1921 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1931 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1941 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1951 753,341 N.A. N.A. 414,046 339,295 1961 938,786 + 185,445 + 24.62 512,503 426,283 1971 1,128,960 + 190,174 + 20.26 613,609 515,351 1981 1,388,829 + 259,869 + 23.02 746,655 642,174 1991 1,685,449 + 296,620 + 21.36 901,270 784,179 2001 2,000,173 + 314,724 + 18.67 1,069,289 930,884

17. PATIALA 1901 N.A. N.A. N.A. DISTRICT 1911 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1921 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1931 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1941. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1951 549,939 N.A. N.A. 304,004 245,935 1961 764,692 + 214,753 + 39.05 417,601 347,091 1971 971,814 + 207,122 + 27.09 525,322 446,492 1981 1,257,808 T 285,994 T 29.43 672,749 585,059 1991 1,528,569 T 270,761 + 21.53 812,122 716,447 2001 1,844,934 + 316,365 + 20.70 987,390 857,544 Note: N.A. : Not Available

80 A·2 APPENDIX STATE AND DISTRICTS AT THE 2001 CENSUS SHOWING THE 1991 AREA AND POPULATION ACCORDING TO TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION IN 1991, CHANGE IN POPULATION OF 1991 ADJUSTED TO JURISDICTION OF 2001 State/District Area in 2001 Area in 1991 population Population in Net increase or 2001 Census population 1991 Census according to 1991 adjusted to decrease between (Square Kilometre) (Square Kilometre) jurisdiction jurisdiction Columns 5 & 6 prevailing in 1991 of 2001 2 3 4 5 6 7 PUNJAB 50,362.00 24,358,999 50,362.00 20,281,969 20,281,969 1. Gurdaspur (I) 3,551.00 2,104,011 3,562.00 1,756,732 1,757,281 +549 2. Amritsar (m) 5,088.00 3,096,077 5,087.00 2,504,560 2,505,034 +474 3. Kapurtbala 1,633.00 754,521 1,633.00 646,647 646,647 4. Jalandhar (a) 2,624.00 1,962,700 3,401.00 2,026,787 1,649,909 -376,878 5. Hoshiarpur (b) 3,386.00 1,480,736 3,881.00 1,455,028 1,298,712 -156,316 6. Nawanshahr (n) 1,282.00 587,468 531,253 +531,253 7. Rupnagar ( c ) 2,113.00 1,116,108 2,085.00 915,603 899,587 -16,016 8. Fatehgarh Sahib (0) 1,180.00 538,041 454,919 +454,919 9. Ludhiana (d) 3,578.00 3,032,831 3,857.00 2,471,594 2,428,382 -43,212 10. Moga (e) 2,235.00 894,854 777,922 +717,922 11. Firozpur (f) 5,328.00 1,746,107 5,874.00 1,607,817 1,448,903 -158,914 12. Muktsar (p) 2,593.00 777,493 654,434 +654,434 13. Faridkot (g) 1,458.00 550,892 5,740.00 1,730,876 455,005 -1,275,871 14. Bathinda (h) 3,353.00 1,183,295 5,551.00 1,559,963 985,301 -574,662 15. Mansa (i) 2,198.00 688,758 574,662 +574,662 16. Sangrur (j) 5,108.00 2,000,173 5,107.00 1,710,120 1,685,449 -24,671 17. Patiala (k) 3,654.00 1,844,934 4,584.00 1,896,242 1,528,569 -367,673 a) (i) Entire Nawanshahr tahsil (except 5 villages) and 3 towns namely, Banga, Nawanshahr and Rahon with an area of 767.10 Sq. Kms. and population of 377,484 of Jalandhar district transferred to Nawanshahr Tahsil of newly formed Nawanshahr district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No. 2144/94-RE.ll (i)/l0044 dated 5.11.95. (ii) 3 villages with an area of 3.35 Sq.Kms. and population of 420 of Nawanshahr Tahsil of Jalandhar district transferred to Ludhiana East Tahsil of Ludhiana district and 2 villages with an area of 4.21 Sq.Kms. and population of 929 of Nawanshahr Tahsil of Jalandhar district transferred to Samrala Tahsil of Ludhiana district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No. 2144/94 -RE II (i)/676S dated 20.07.9S' (iii) Changes enumerated as against foot note f (iii). b). i) 2 Villages with an area of 7.27 Sq.Kms. and population of 549 of Dasua Tahsil of Hoshiarpur district transferred to Batala Tahsil of Gurdaspur district vide Punjab Govt Notification No. 2144194-RE II (i)/6765 dated 20.07.95. ii) 185 villages and Balachaur Nagar Panchayat with an area of 498.70 Sq. Kms and population of 153,769 of Balachaur Tahsil of Hoshiarpur district transferred to Balachaur tahsil of newly formed Nawanshahr district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No. 2144/94- RE. II (i)/l0044 dated 05.11.95. iii) 8 villages with an area of 10.90 Sq.Kms and population of 1,998 of Balachaur Tahsil of Hoshiarpur district transf~rred to Samrala Tahsil of Ludhiana district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No. 2144194-RE.lI(i)/676S dated 20.07.95 and No. 2144/94-RE.ll (i)/8011 dated 26.08.95. c) i) 5 villages with an area of 12.60 Sq.Kms and population of 5,449 of Kharar Tahsil of Rupnagar district transferred to Bassi' Pathana Tahsil of Fatehgarh Sahib district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No.213/92-RE.ll (i)/4412 dated 9.4.92 ii) 1village with an area of 0.46 Sq. kms and population of 638 of Mohali Tahsil of Rupnagar district transferred to Dera Bassi Tahsil of Patiala district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No. 2/9/99-RE. II(i)2579 dated 7.5.99. iii) 19 villages with an area of 42.66 Sq. Kms. and population of 16,268 of Rupnagar Tahsil of Rupnagar district transferred to Khamanon Tahsil of Fatehgarh Sahib district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No. 2/3/92-RE.I1(i)/4412 dated 9.4.92. iv) Changes enumerated as against foot note d (i) and k (iii). d) i) 5 villages with an area of 16.06 Sq. Kms. and population of 2,908 of Sarnrala tahsil of Ludhiana district transferred to Rupnagar Tahsil of Rupnagar district vide Punjab Government Notification No.2/3/921RE.II(i)/4727 dated 9.4.92. ii) 4 villages with an area of 13.27 Sq. Kms. and population of 4,665 of Sarnrala tahsil of Ludhiana district transferred to Khamanon tahsil of newly formed Fatehgarh Sahib district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No.2144/941RE.II(i)/6769 dated 20.7.95. iii) 58 villages with an area of 147.29 Sq. Kms. and population of 57,365 of Sarnrala tahsil of Ludhiana district transferred to Khamanon & Bassi Pathana tahsils of newly formed Fatehgarh Sahib district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No. 2/3192-RE. I1(i)/4412 dated 9.4.92. iv) 6 villages with an area of 19.74 Sq. Kms. and population of 7,732 of Khanna tahsil of Ludhiana district transferred to Amloh tahsil of newly formed Fatehgarh Sahib district vide Punjab Govt.Notification No. 2/3/92-RE.II(i)/4412 dated 9.4.92. v) Changes enumerated as against foot note a (ii), b (iii), j (i), j (ii) and k (v) e) i) One village Sibbian (H.B. No.120 with an area of 15.72 Sq. Kms. and population of 3,599) of Moga tahsil of Moga district transferred to Faridkot district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No.2/21194-RE.II(i)/3872 dated 19.8.97. ii) Changes enumerated as against foot note f (iv) and g (ii). 81 f) i) One village with an area of 7.24 Sq. Kms. and population of 474 of Firozpur Tahsil of Firozpur district transferred to Patti Tahsil of Amritsar district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No.2!44!94-RE.U(i)! 6767 dated 20.7.95. ii) One village with an area of 11.91 Sq. Kms. and population of 1,355 of lalalabad Tahsil of Firozpur district transferred to Muktsar Tahsil of newly formed Muktsar district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No.2!35/96-RE.U(i)n415 dated 21.8.96. iii) 4 villages with an area of 7.99 Sq. Kms. and population of 1,955 of Zira Tahsil of Firozpur district transferred to Nakodar Tahsil of Ialandhar district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No.2!44!94-RE.II(i)!6767 dated 20.7.95 and then from Nakodar tahsil to Shahkot Tahsil of Ialandhar district vide Punjab Govt. Notification NO.2!44!94-RE. U(i)!8011 dated 26.8.95. iv) 150 villages alongwith Dhararnkot town with an erea of 546.44 Sq. Kms. and population of 155,130 of Zira Tahsil of Firozpur district transferred to Moga Tahsil of newly formed Moga district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No. 2136!98-RE.l1I(i)!6405 dated 5.1l.99. g) i) The entire Tahsil of Muktsar of Faridkot district with an area of 2596.47 Sq. Kms. and population of 653,079 transferred to newly formed Muktsar district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No.2/44/94-RE.I1I(i)I10050 dated 5.11.95. ii) The entire Moga tahsil of Faridkot district with an area of 1685.42 Sq. Kms and population of 626,391 transferred to newly formed Moga district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No. 2/53/95-RE.U(i)110725 dated 23/24 Nov.,1995. iii) Changes enumerated as against footnote e (i). h) i) The entire Mansa tahsil of Bathinda district with an area of 2192.25 Sq. Kms. and population of 580,397 transferred to newly formed Mansa district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No.212192-RE.l1I(i)/4020 dated 8.4.92. ii) Changes enumerated as against foot note i(i). i) i) Three villages namely Ghuman Khurd (H.B.No.68), Ghuman Kalan (H.B.No.69) and Sukha Singhwala (H.B.No.70) with an area of 23.19 Sq. Kms. and population of 5735 of Mansa district Transferred to Bathinda district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No. 2/68/96-RE.1I (i )19454 dated 19.12.96. ii) Changes enumerated as against foot note h (i). j) i) 10 Villages with an area of 63.55 Sq. Kms. and population of 17,869 of Barnala Tahsil of Sangrur district transferred to newly formed Raikot Tahsil of Ludhiana district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No. 2/14/92-RE. II (i)/11118 dated 13.8.92. ii) 2 villages with an area of 22.44 Sq. Kms. and population of 6,802 of Malerkotla Tahsil of Sangrur district transferred to newly formed Raikot Tahsil of Ludhiana district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No. 2114/92-RE. II (i)1 11118 dated 13.8.92. k) i) 93 villages, Amloh and Gobindgarh towns with an area of 261.86 Sq. Kms. and population of 122,842 of Nabha Tahsil of Patiala district transferred to Amloh Tahsil of newly formed Fatehgarh Sahib district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No. 213/92-RE.I1(i)/4412 dated 9.4.92. ii) 1 village Badinpur (H.B.No.8) with an area of 4.08 Sq. Kms. and population of 1,284 of Nabha Tahsil of Patiala district transferred to Khanna Tahsil of Ludhiana district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No. 2/3/92-RE.II(i)/4727 dated 9.4.92 and then from Khanna Tahsil of Ludhiana district to Amloh Tahsil of newly formed Fatehgarh Sahib district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No. 21ln4/92- RE.II(i)/3702 dated 5.5.95. iii) 3 villages with an area of 10.26 Sq.Kms. and population of 3,431 of Rajpura Tahsil of Patiala district transferred to Kharar Tahsil of Rupnagar district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No. 2/3/92-RE.II(i)! 4727 dated 9.4.92. iv) 9 villages with an area of 29.10 Sq. Kms. and population of 8,476 of Rajpura Tahsil of Patiala district transferred to newly formed Fatefgarh Sahib district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No. 213/92-RE.1I (i)/4412 dated 9.4.92. v) 1 village with an area of 2.14 Sq. Kms. and population of 1,440 of Nabha Tahsil of Patiala district transferred to Khanna TaJi.sil of Ludhiana district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No. 2/3/92-RE.II(i)!4727 dated 9.4.92. vi) 255 villages alongwith Bassi and Sirhind towns with an area of 649.64 Sq.Kms. and population of 230,838 of Fatehgarh Sahib Tahsil of Patiala district transferred to newly formed Fatehgarh Sahib district vide Punjab Govt. Notification No. 213!92-RE.U(i)!4412 dated 9.4.92 and No. 2/3/92-RE.II(i)/4644 dated 9.4.92. vii) Changes enumerated as against foot note c (ii). 1) Changes enumerated as against foot note b (i). m) Changes enumerated as against foot note f (i). n) Changes enumerated as against foot note a (i) & b (ii). 0) Changes enumerated as against foot note c (i),(iii), d (ii), (iii),(iv) k (i), (ii), (iv) & (vi). p) Changes enumerated as against foot note f (ii) & g (i).

82 TABLE A-3 : VILLAGES BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS TABLE A- 3 VILLAGES BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS

FLY-LEAF

This table corresponds to table A-3 of 1951, The term village has already been defined in detail 1961, 1971, 1981 and 1991 Censuses and gives the in Fly-leaf to table A-I. To mention briefly the village total number of inhabited villages classified by for census purposes is the revenue village with a seven broad population ranges viz., (i) less than definite name and boundary which contains the main 200 (ii) 200-499 (iii) 500-999 (iv) 1,000-1,999 (v) village together with its hamlets, if any. The nuniber of inhabited villages shown in this table is exclusive 2,000-4,999 (vi) 5,000-9,999 (vii) 10,000 and above of those which have gone to make up urban areas indicating therein the total rural population by and whose population is included in the respective persons, males and females. The figures are given urban areas or towns. In the case of villages partly first for state/union territory followed by districts incorporated in urban areas, the unmerged portions and sub-districts. In previous censuses prior to 1951, of villages which are outside the urban areas have this table was used to be prepared for villages and been treated as villages and their number and towns together. population are included in this table.

84 Statement - 1 Percentage of Population living in villages of various population size with reference to the total Rural Population in - 2001 Statel District Less than 200 200-499 500·999 1000·1999 2000·4"' 5000·9999 10,000+ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Punjab 0.65 4.72 15.50 29.68 36.16 11.10 2.19

Gurdaspuf" 1.05 7:56 23.78 32.15 26.35 6.62 2.49

Amritsar 0.45 2.77 10.96 29.72 39.39 15.58 1.13

Kapurthala 2.11 10.17 23.29 30.04 28.39 6.00

lalandhar 0.79 6.06 20.18 31.10 27.41 9.46

Hoshiarpur 1.53 10.65 27.52 34.70 22.90 2.70

Nawanshahr 1.00 5.47 19.30 40.36 31.36 2.51

Rupnagar 1.29 10.12 28.50 34.56 20.93 4.60

Fatehgarh Sahib 0.73 8.60 36.18 39.08 14.11 1.30

Ludhiana 0.43 3.53 11.92 29.37 41.47 10.50 2.78

Moga 0.25 2.12 5.47 14.07 38.61 36.61 2.87

Firozpur 0.67 4.60 14.53 26.66 42.03 7.91 3.60

Muktsar 0.05 0.33 2.69 22.16 52.25 16.73 5.79

Faridkot 0.05 0.87 6.07 20.07 49.02 21.07 2.85

Bathinda 0.02 0.16 2.19 17.36 49.42 22.57 8.28

Mansa 0.04 0.32 4 .. 22 28.24 47.68 15.35 4.15

Sangrur 0.13 1.00 6.18 24.96 51.19 14.74 1.80

Patiala 0.53 5.57 21.42 39.36 29.16 1.73 2.23

S tatement-l reveals that maximum rural village iIi Faridkot district. The same trend has been population lives in villages of size class 2000-4999 noticed at 1991 Census. (36.16%), followed by 1000-1999 (29.68%) and Muktsar district reported highest rural population 500-999 (15.50%) size classes. It is also observed (52.25%) in 2000A999 size class of population, while that 5.37% of rural population lives in villages of Fatehgarh Sahib with (14.11 %) rural population in size less than 500 population and 13.29% in larger~ class of population 20004999, is at the least. Nawanshahr villages of over 5000 population. There are only district has the highest percentage (40.36%) of rural 26 villages having more than 10,000 population. population lives in size class of 1000-1999 whereas Four villages in this class of population reported in the Moga district with (14.07%) of rural population Bathinda district, 3 villages each in Ludhiana, in the same size class of population is at the bottom. Firozpur, Muktsar and two each in Gurdaspur, Statement-2 gives percentage of villages and Amritsar, Moga, Mansa, Sangrur, Patiala and one population by class of villages in 200 1.

85 Statement Percentage of Villages and

State/ District Year Less than 500 500 - 999 1,000 - 1,999 Percentage of Percentage Percentage of Percentage Percentage of Percentage No.of villages of population of No.of village of Population No.of villages of Population in this range to in this range in this range to in this range in this range to in this range total No. of to total total No. of to total total No.of to total villages population villages Population villages Population 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Punjab 1991 30.88 7.14 29.04 18.47 25.19 30.69 2001 26.14 5.37 27.51 15.5 27.73 29.68 Gurdaspur 1991 38.51 12.10 34.11 27.68 19.42 30.57 2001 32.44 8.61 33.36 23.78 23.76 32.15 Amritsar 1991 23.09 4.34 27.16 15.02 30.90 32.08 2001 19.07 3.22 22.62 10.96 33.16 29.72 Kapurthala 1991 51.66 14.66 25.75 24.68 14.69 27.29 2001 46.28 12.28 26.54 23.29 17.80 30.04 J alandhar I 991 31.73 7.95 30.27 21.50 27.35 37.28 2001 28.59 6.85 30.19 20.18 28.48 36.10 Hoshiarpur 1991 44.31 15.83 32.43 29.90 16.89 29.43 2001 37.30 12.18 33.19 27.52 22.15 34.70 Nawanshahr 1991 30.54 7.54 28.17 20.24 31.40 42.37 2001 27.74 6.47 27.96 19.30 3.1.61 40.36 Rupnagar 1991 42.94 14.75 33.83 31.61 18.11 31.74 2001 36.57 11.41 34.14 28.50 22.34 34.56 Fatehgarh Sahib 1991 32.13 12.75 44.27 41.36 19.33 31.71 2001 26.47 9.33 42.53 36.18 26.02 39.08 Ludhiana 1991 26.26 5.48 24.18 13.61 31.07 34.30 2001 21.18 3.96 23.85 11.92 30.55 29.37 Moga 1991 24.53 2.78 17.08 6.59 22.67 16.66 2001 21.49 2.37 15.89 5.47 22.12 14.07 Firozpur 1991 31.64 7.17 29.15 18.71 23.44 29.48 2001 27.17 5.27 26.65 14.53 25.31 26.66 Muktsar 1991 5.53 0.70 11.06 4.03 42.98 30.03 2001 4.27 0.38 8.55 2.69 35.47 22.16 Faridkot 1991 10.97 1.63 24.39 10.39 27.44 20.87 2001 7.36 0.92 17.17 6.07 31.90 20.07 Bathinda 1991 2.84 0.46 10.64 3.38 35.11 20.67 2001 1.43 0.18 8.21 2.19 33.22 17.36 Mansa 1991 5.39 0.87 15.35 6.01 43.57 30.61 2001 2.94 0.36 12.19 4.22 43.28 28.24 Sangrur 1991 10.19 1.71 21.67 9.21 34.86 27.14 2001 8.32 1.13 16.36 6.18 36.01 24.96 Patiala 1991 28.23 8.21 35.33 26.32 27.68 38.83 2001 22.87 6.10 32.54 21.42 32.07 39.36

This statement reveals that percentage of number trend. Percentage of villages in size class of 1000- of villages as well as percentage of population in the 1999 has reached 27.73% from 25.19% however population ranges less than 500 and 500-999 have percentage of population in the same population range shown a decreasing trend during 1991-200 1. In all has slightly declined 1.01 % from 30.69% in 1991 to other popUlation ranges have shown an increasing 29.68% in 2001.

86 -2 population by class of Villages in 1991 and 2001

2,000 - 4,999 5,000 - 9,999 10,000 and above Year Percentage of Percentage Percentage of Percentage Percentage of Percentage State/District No.of villages of population of No.of village of Population No.of villages of Population in this range to in this range in this range to in this range in this range to in this range total No. of to total total No. of to total total No.of to total villages population villages Population villages Population 9 10 11 ·12 13 14 2 13.10 33.03 1.68 9.48 0.11 1.19 1991 Punjab 16.19 36.16 2.22 11.10 0.21 2.19 2001 7.31 23.68 0.52 3.76 0.13 2.21 1991 Gurdaspur 9.27 26.35 1.04 6.62 0.13 2.49 2001 15.86 33.93 2.82 13.13 0.17 1.50 1991 Amritsar 21.35 39.39 3.63 15.58 0.17 1.13 2001 6.95 25.33 0.95 8.04 1991 Kapurthala 8.57 28.39 0.81 6.00 2001 9.39 25.42 1.15 6.82 0.11 1.03 1991 lalandhar 11.13 27.41 1.61 9.46 2001 5.94 21.33 0.43 3.51 1991 Hoshiarpur 7.00 22.90 0.36 2.70 2001 9.46 26.68 0.43 3.17 1991 Nawanshahr 12.26 31.36 0.43 2.51 2001 4.55 17.13 0.57 4.77 1991 Rupnagar 6.37 20.93 0.58 4.60 2001 4.27 14.18 1991 Fatehgarh Sahib 4.75 14.11 0.23 1.30 2001 16.96 38.64 1.42 7.10 0.11 0.87 1991 Ludhiana 21.52 41.47 2.56 10.50 0.34 2.78 2001 27.02 43.14 8.70 30.83 1991 Moga 28.04 38.61 11.84 36.61 0.62 2.87 2001 14.52 36.83 1.04 5.44 0.21 2.37 1991 Firozpur 18.91 42.03 1.65 7.91 0.31 3.60 2001 34.47 46.86 5.96 18.38 1991 Muktsar 44.02 52.25 6.41 16.73 1.28 5.79 2001 32.93 52.08 4.27 15.03 1991 Faridkot 35.58 49.02 7.36 21.07 0.61 2.85 2001 41.84 49.83 8.51 20.66 1.06 5.00 1991 Bathinda 45.71 49.42 10.00 22.57 1.43 8.28 2001 31.12 45.93 3.74 12.12 0.83 4.46 1991 Mansa 35.29 47.68 5.46 15.35 0.84 4.15 2001 29.41 47.52 3.73 13.58 0.14 0.84 1991 Sangrur 34.29 51.19 4.73 14.74 0.29 1.80 2001 8.21 22.51 0.55 4.13 1991 Patia1a 12.05 29.16 0.28 1.73 0.19 2.23 2001

87 TABLEA·3 VILLAGES BY Statel Districtl Tahsil Total No.of Total Rural Population Less than 200 Inhabited Number Population Villages P M F P M F 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Punjab 12,278 16,096,488 8,516,596 7,579,892 1,079 10',904 55,937 48,967

Gurdaspur District 1,532 1,568,788 826,787 742,001 159 16,653 8,716 7,937 Dhar Kalan Tahsil 28 52,156 28,004 24,152 134 71 63 Pathankot Tahsil 347 359,091 192,379 166,712 47 4,296 2,222 2,074 Gurdaspur Tahsil 682 622,508 324,883 297,625 87 9,022 4,750 4,272 Batala Tahsil 357 426,867 223,912 202,955 19 2,516 1,316 1,200 Dera Baba Nanak Tahsil 118 108,166 57,609 50,557 5 685 357 328

Amritsar District 1,185 1,872,802 993,631 879,171 77 8,506 4,526 3,980 Ajnala Tahsil 312 348,022 185,311 162,711 33 3,773 1,996 1,777 Amritsar -I Tahsil 139 233,612 123,556 110,056 7 738 388 350 Amritsar- II Tahsil 102 205,667 111,149 94,518 2 192 101 91 Tarn-Taran Tahsil 191 354,974 187,641 167,333 5 765 411 354 Patti Tahsil 191 306,942 163,774 143,168 18 1,893 1,020 873 Khadur Sahib Tahsil 95 164,677 86,603 78,074 7 671 349 322 Baba Bakala Tahsil 155 258,908 135,597 123,311 5 474 261 213

Kapurthala District 618 507,994 265,973 242,021 142 10,718 5,718 5,000 Bhulath Tahsil 86 83,189 42.749 40,440 14 1,030 542 488 Kapurthala Tahsil 245 201,913 105,953 95,960 44 3,831 2,003 1,828 Sultanpur Lodhi Tahsil 181 99,245 52,471 46,774 64 4,700 2,543 2,157 Phagwara Tahsil 106 123,647 64,800 58,847 20 1,157 630 527

Jalandhar District 934 1,030,717 539,021 491,696 96 8,099 4,314 3,785 Shahkot Tahsil 177 137,528 71,702 65,826 21 2,045 1,088 957 Nakodar Tahsil 146 164,829 85,848 78,981 10 1,043 546 497 Phillaur Tahsil 229 309,510 161,393 148,117 19 1,506 799 707 lalandhar - I Tahsil 140 184,061 96,359 87,7{)2 11 766 407 359 Ialandhar -II Tahsil 242 234,789 123,719 111,070 35 2,739 1,474 1,265

Hoshiarpur District 1,386 1,188,662 610,675 577,987 162 18,073 9,482 8,591 Dasua Tahsil 381 292,068 148,679 143,389 53 5,504 2,839 2,665 Mukerian Tahsil 306 258,877 130,369 128,508 26 3,376 1,728 1,648 Hoshiarpur Tahsil 405 346,946 181,079 165,867 57 6,058 3,219 2,839 Garhshankar Tahsil 294 290,771 150,548 140,223 26 3,135 1,696 1,439

Nawanshahr District * 465 506,402 264,515 241,887 55 5,071 2,759 2,312 Nawanshahr Tahsil 280 346,538 180,525 166,013 25 2,392 1,329 1,063 Balachaur Tahsil 18S 159,864 83,990 75,874 30 2,679 1,430 1,249

Rupnagar District 864 753,701 403,147 350,554 100 9,729 5,282 4,447 Anandpur Sahib Tahsil 246 238,251 124,020 114,231 20 2,159 1,178 981 Rupnagar Tahsil 351 249,382 133,880 115,502 57 5,317 2,889 2,428 Kharar Tahsil 189 165,661 89,374 76,287 17 1,760 951 809 S.A.S.Nagar (Mohali) Tahsil 78 100,407 55,873 44,534 6 493 264 229

Fatebgarb Sahib District * 442 386,950 207,937 179,013 27 2,855 1,565 1,290 Bassi Pathana Tahsil 100 74,022 39,608 34,414 7 838 477 361 Fatehgarh Sahib Tahsil 169 136,418 73,110 63,308 14 1,383 740 643 Amloh Tahsil 101 99,511 54,284 45,227 5 630 347 283 Khamanon Tahsil 72 76,999 40,935 36,064 4 1 3

Ludhiana District 897 1,3,39,178 712,593 626,585 57 5,690 3,107 2,583 Samrala Tahsil 196 170,446 90.362 80,084 24 2,466 1,337 1.129 Khanna Tahsil 68 88,299 47,062 41,237 2 169 87 82

88 pOPULATION SIZE CLASS

200-499 500-999 State! District! Tahsil Number Population Number Population P M F P M F 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

2,130 759,356 399,020 360,336 3,378 249,4314 1,309,932 1,184,382 Punjab

338 118,562 61,320 57,242 511 372,984 194,390 178,594 Gurdaspur District 6 2,247 1,158 1,089 8 5,958 3,013 2,945 Dhar Kalan Tahsil 79 28,241 14,548 13,693 108 79,248 41,272 37,976 Pathankot Tahsil 167 57,893 29,909 27,984 232 165,760 86,121 79,639 Gurdaspur Tahsil 52 18,858 9,771 9,087 122 91,700 48,151 43,549 . Batala Tahsil 34 11,323 5,934 5,389 41 30,318 15,833 14,485 Dera Baba Nanak Tahsil

149 51,789 27,424 24,365 268 205,215 108,344 96,871 Amritsar District 59 20,414 W,815 9,599 82 61,489 32,663 28,826 Ajnala Tahsil 11 3,975 2,110 1,865 31 24,109 12,611 11,498 Amritsar -I Tahsil 12 4,536 2,436 2,100 18 14,956 7,948 7,008 Amritsar- II Tahsil 11 3,691 1.946 1,745 41 31,453 16,517 14,936 Tarn-Taraa Tahsil 24 8,300 4,444 3,856 40 30,812 16,488 14,324 Patti Tahsil II 3,666 1,911 1,755 ::1 16,142 8,494 7,648 Khadur Sahib Tahsil 21 7,207 3,762 3,445 35 26,254 13,623 12,631 Baba Bakala Tahsil

144 51,640 27,076 24,564 164 118,320 61,575 56,745 Kapurthala District 24 8,363 . 4,337 4,026 18 13,140 6,740 6,400 Bhu1ath Tahsil 59 21,728 11,443 10,285 76 53,683 27,939 25,744 Kapurthala Tahsil 44 15,513 8,189 7,324 49 35,898 18,888 17,010 Sultanpur Lodhi Tahsil 17 6,036 3,107 2,929 21 15,599 8,008 7,591 Phagwara Tahsil

171 62,446 32,927 29,519 .282 208,008 108,494 99,514 Jalandhar District 42 15,302 8,010 7,292 65 46,737 24,371 22,366 Shahkot Tahsil 27 9,292 4,853 4,439 43 31,399 16,427 14,972 Nakodar Tahsil 31 10,857 5,782 5,075 59 43,925 22,907 21,018 Phillaur Tahsil 25 9,490 5,012 4,478 37 27,794 14,428 13,366 lalandhar - 1 Tahsil 46 17,505 9,270 8,235 78 58,153 30,361 27,792 lalandhar -II Tahsil

355 126,598 65,211 61,387 460 327,145 167,496 159,649 Hoshiarpur District 117 40,458 20,852 19,606 121 83,975 42,479 41,496 Dasua Tahsil 83 29,363 14,779 14,584 117 81,061 40,962 40,099 Mukerian Tahsil 99 36,421 18,884 17,537 131 94,917 49,069 45,848 Hoshiarpur Tahsil 56 20,356 10,696 9,660 91 67,192 34,986 32,206 Garhshankar Tahsil

74 27,636 14,556 13,080 130 97,778 50,956 46,822 Nawanshahr District * 30 11,016 5,849 5,167 76 57,573 30,047 27,526 Nawanshahr Tahsil 44 16,620 8,707 7,913 54 40,205 20,909 19,296 Balachaur Tahsil

216 76,305 40,814 35,491 295 214,792 114,222 100,570 Rupnagar District 53 19,189 9,982 9,207 85 64,620 33,559 31,061 Anandpur Sahib Tahsil 99 33,248 17,986 15,262 115 80,885 43,347 37,538 Rupnagar Tahsil 50 18,477 9,926 8,551 71 50,990 27,465 23,525 Kharar Tahsil 14 5,391 2,920 2,471 24 18,297 9,851 8,446 S.A.S.Nagar (Mohali) Tahsil

90 33,267 17,825 15,442 188 139,996 74,803 65,193 Fatehgarh Sahib District * 31 10,690 5,739 4,951 37 27,548 14,716 12,832 Bassi Pathana Tahsil 35 13,354 7,160 6,194 80 59,509 31,791 27,718 Fatehgarh Sahib Tahsil 17 6,659 3,543 3,116 40 28,918 15,492 13,426 Amloh Tahsil 7 2,564 1,383 1,181 31 . 24,021 12,804 11,217 Khamanon Tahsil

133 47,277 24,984 22,293 214 159,683 84,840 74,843 Ludhiana District 50 17,847 9,443 8,404 54 39,972 21,133 18,839 Samrala Tahsil 6 1,666 899 767 22 17,032 9,108 7,924 Khanna Tahsil

Contd ... 89 TABLEA-3 VILLAGES BY State! District! Tahsil 1,000 - 1,999 2,000 - 4,999 Number Number Po[!ulation P M F P M F 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Punjab 3,405 4,778,120 2,518,060 2,260,060 1,987 5,821,284 3,081,582 2,739,702

Gurdaspur District 364 504,311 263,743 240,568 142 413,429 216,288 197,141 Dhar Kalan Tahsil 4 5,110 2,562 2,548 5 14,403 7,575 6,828 Pathankot Tahsil 79 108,492 56,735 51,757 29 86,241 44,946 41,295 Gurdaspur Tahsil 137 189,279 98,343 90,936 52 146,394 75,944 70,450 Batala Tahsil 114 161,282 84,762 76,520 48 140,699 73,679 67,020 Dera Baba Nanak Tahsil 30 40,148 21,341 18,807 8 25,692 14,144 11,548

Amritsar District 393 556,706 294,288 262,418 253 737,626 391,521 346,105 Ajnala Tahsil 94 124,165 65,870 58,295 40 114,148 61,167 52,981 Amritsar -I Tahsil 51 72,299 38,342 33,957 35 102,672 54,339 48,333 Amritsar- II Tahsil 34 48,223 25,574 22,649 29 90,543 48,258 42,285 Tarn-Taran Tahsil 68 101,264 53,525 47,739 57 156,172 82,733 73,439 Patti Tahsil 67 95,933 50,927 45,006 31 92,060 49,336 42,724 Khadur Sahib Tahsil 28 40,983 21,409 19,574 24 72,848 38,471 34,377 Baba Bakala Tahsil 51 73,839 38,641 35,198 37 109,183 57,217 51,966

KapurthaJa District 110 152,597 79,846 72,751 53 144,235 75,434 68,801 Bhulath Tahsil 17 22,670 11,592 11,078 12 31,645 16,246 15,399 Kapurthala Tahsil 49 67,299 35,305 31,994 15 43,213 22,718 20,495 Sultanpur Lodhi Tahsil 19 25,759 13,662 12,097 4 10,908 5,745 5,163 Phagwara Tahsil 25 36,869 19,287 17,582 22 58,469 30,725 27,744

Jalandhar District 266 372,090 194,311 177,779 104 282,574 146,883 135,691 Shahkot Tahsil 41 55,365 28,853 26,512 8 18,079 9,380 8,699 Nakodar Tahsil 44 61,816 32,216 29,600 20 49,920 25,902 24,018 Phillaur Tahsil 80 111,423 58,013 53,410 32 89,591 46,602 42,989 lalandhar - I Tahsil 41 60,577 31,724 28,853 23 64,135 33,083 31,052 lalandhar -II Tahsil 60 82,909 43,505 39,404 21 60,849 31,916 28,933

Hoshiarpur District 307 412,500 211,308 201,192 97 272,222 140,683 131,539 Dasua Tahsil 67 93,397 47,720 45,677 22 61,004 30,976 30,028 Mukerian Tahsil 62 84,342 42,229 42,113 15 43,8'57 21,937 21,920 Hoshiarpur Tahsil 85 110,768 57,559 53,209 32 91,266 48,400 42,866 Garhshankar Tahsil 93 123,993 63,800 60,193 28 76,095 39,370 36,725

Nawanshahr District * 147 204,405 106,321 98,084 57 158,820 82,927 75,893 Nawanshahr Tahsil 106 149,773 77 ,827 71,946 43 125,784 65,473 60,311 Balachaur Tahsil 41 54,632 28,494 26,138 14 33,036 17,454 15,582

Rupnagar District 193 260,477 138,787 121,690 55 157,753 84,980 72,773 Anandpur Sahib Tahsil 65 87,451 45,613 41,838 23 64,832 33,688 31,144 Rupnagar Tahsil 70 95,681 51,256 44,425 9 25,967 14,057 11,910 Kharar Tahsil 38 50,734 27,488 23,246 11 32,106 17,143 14,963 S.A.S.Nagar (Mohali) Tahsil 20 26,611 14,430 12,181 12 34,848 20,092 14,756

Fatehgarh Sahib District * 115 151,218 81,511 69,707 21 54,599 29,660 24,939 Bassi Pathana Tahsil 23 29,564 15,814 13,750 2 5,382 2,862 2,520 Fatehgarh Sahib Tahsil 33 44,071 23,647 20,424 7 18,101 9,772 8,329 Amloh Tahsil 31 41,722 22,932 18,790 8 21,582 11,970 9,612 Khamanon Tahsil 28 35,861 19,118 16,743 4 9,534 5,056 4,478

Ludhiana District 274 393,300 208,848 184,452 193 555,424 294,806 260,618 Samrala Tahsil 54 75,354 39,943 35,411 14 34,807 18,506 16,301 Khanna Tahsil 22 30,091 16,081 14,010 16 39,341 20,887 18,454

90 POPULATION SIZE CLASS

5,000-9,999 10,000 and above State! District! Tahsil Number Population Number Population P M F P M F 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33

273 1,786,540 954,899 831,641 26 351,970 197,166 154,804 Punjab

16 103,803 55,313 48,490 2 39,046 27,017 12,029 Gurdaspur District 4 24,304 13,625 10,679 Dhar Kalan Tahsil 4 23,977 12,623 11,354 28,596 20,033 8,563 Pathankot Tahsil 6 43,710 22,832 20,878 10,450 6,984 3,466 Gurdaspur Tahsil 2 11,812 6,233 5,579 Batala Tahsil Dera Baba Nanak Tahsil

43 291,858 156,324 135,534 2 21,102 11,204 9,898 Amritsar District 4 24,033 12,800 11,233 Ajnala Tahsil 4 29,819 15,766 14,053 Amritsar -I Tahsil 7 47,217 26,832 20,385 Amritsar- II Tahsil 9 61,629 32,509 29,120 Tarn-Taran Tahsil 9 56,842 30,355 26,487 2 21,102 11,204 9,898 Patti Tahsil 4 30,367 15,969 14,398 Khadur Sahib Tahsil 6 41,951 22,093 19,858 Baba Bakala Tahsil

5 30,484 16,324 14,160 Kapurthala District 6,341 3,292 3,049 Bhulath Tahsil 2 12,159 6,545 5,614 Kapurthala Tahsil I 6,467 3,444 3,023 Sultanpur Lodhi Tahsil 5,517 3,043 2,474 Phagwara Tahsil

15 97,500 52,092 45,408 Jalandhar District Shahkot Tahsil 2 11,359 5,904 5,455 Nakodar Tahsil 8 52,208 27,290 24,918 PhiIlaur Tahsil 3 21,299 11,705 9,594 J alandhar - 1 Tahsil 2 12,634 7,193 5,441 J alandhar -II Tahsil

5 32,124 16,495 15,629 Hoshiarpur District 7,730 3,813 3,917 Dasua Tahsil 3 16,878 8,734 8,144 Mukerian Tahsil 7,516 3,948 3,568 Hoshiarpur Tahsil Garhshankar Tahsil

2 12,692 6,996' 5,696 Nawanshahr District * Nawanshahr Tahsil 2 12,692 6,996 5,696 Balachaur Tahsil

5 34,645 19,062 15,583 Rupnagar District Anandpur Sahib Tahsil I 8,284 4,345 3,939 Rupnagar Tahsil 2 11,594 6,401 5,193 Kharar Tahsil 2 14,767 8,316 6,451 SAS.Nagar (Mohali) Tahsil

1 5,015 2,573 2,442 • Fatehgarb Sahib District * Bassi Pathana Tahsil Fatehgarh Sahib Tahsil Amloh Tahsil 5,015 2,573 2,442 ", Khamanon Tahsil 23 140,622 75,891 64,731 3 37,182 20,117 17,065 Ludhiana District Samrala Tahsil Khanna Tahsil

Contd" 91 TABLEA-3 VllLAGES BY

State! District! Tahsil Total No.of Total Rural P02ulation Less than 200 Inhabited Number POl!ulation Villases P M F P M F 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Payal Tahsil 107 166,595 88,851 77,744 3 88 50 38 Ludhiana (East) Tahsil 183 231,934 124,613 101,321 9 792 436 356 Ludhiana (West) Tahsil 130 261,893 139,788 122,105 10 1,218 694 524 Raikot Tahsil 74 160,867 85,330 75,537 13 9 4 Jagraon Tahsil 139 259,144 136,587 122,557 8 944 494 450

Moga District * 321 716,214 379,322 336,892 21 1,786, ·943 843 Nihal Singhwala Tahsil 39 150,Q89 79,611 70,478 B)lagha Purana Tahsil 56 183,489 97,071 86,418 1 120 64 56 Moga Tahsil 226 ~82,636 202,640 179,996 20 1,666 879 787

Flrozpur District 968 1,295,382 683,870 611,512 91 8,684 4,563 4,121 Zira "I'ahsil 211 179,153 94,445 84,708 30 2,747 1,480 1,267 Firozpur Tahsil 337 328,875 173,202 155,673 42 3,941 ·2,044 1,897 Ialalabad Tahsil 207 256,140 133,162. 122,978 15 1,649 861 788 Fazilka Tahsil 137 278,869 147,397 131,472 4 347 178 169 Abohar Tahsil 76 252,345 135,664 116,681

Mllktsar District * 234 518,929 306,010 272,859 5 248 131 117 Malout Tahsil 91 231,659 122,251 109,408 Giddarbaha Tahsil 52 168,520 88,885 79,635 Muktsar Tahsil 91 178,750 94,934 83,816 5 248 131 117

Faridkot District 163 357,321 188,943 168,378 3 189 108 81 Faridkot Tahsil 122 246,216 130,116 116,100 3 189 108 81 I aitu Tahsil 41 111,105 58,827 52,278

Datbinda District 280 831,541 444,118 381,423 1 199 103 96 Rampura Phul Tahsil 76 238,941 126,567 112,374 Bathinda Tahsil 116 371,480 200,120 171,360 199 103 96 Talwandi Sabo Tahsil 88 221,120 117,431 103,689

Mansa District * 238 546,329 290,763 255,566 2 195 103 92 Sardulgarh Tahsil 70 138,612 73,661 64,951 2 195 103 92 Budhlada Tahsil 85 190,715 101,142 89,573 Mansa Tahsil 83 217,002 115,960 101,042

Sangrur District 697 1,415,354 756,598 658,756 21 1,848 1,030 818 Barnala Tahsil 124 366,364 194,932 171,432 2 222 157 65 Malerkotla Tahsil 188 251,408 134,357 117,051 13 1,124 597 527 Dhuri Tahsil 95 190,674 101,916 88,758 Sangrur Tahsil 124 206,351 110,472 95,879 3 258 148 110 S.unam Tahsil 95 250,224 134,572 115,652 23 13 10 Moonak Tahsil 71 150,333 80,349 69,984 2 221 115 106

Patiala District 1054 1,200,224 642,633 557,591 60 6,361 3,487 2,874 Samana Tahsil 137 233333 123,797 109,536 3 338 177 161 Nabha Tahsil 173 189,326 101,778 87,548 9 885 490 395 Patiala Tahsil 345 330,628 175,886 154,742 21 2,159 1,175 984 Rajpura Tahsil 263 285,961 152,979 132,982 14 1,512 831 681 Dera Bassi Tahsil 136 160,976 88,193 72,783 13 1,467 814 653

92 POPULATION SIZE CLASS

200-499 500-999 Statel District! Tahsil Number Population Number Population P M F P M F 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

6 2,042 1,096 946 30 23,466 12,527 10,939 Payal Tahsil 39 14,303 7,511 6,792 43 31,019 16,526 14,493 Ludhiana (East) Tahsil 15 5,283 2,791 2,492 22 16,022 8,565 7,457 Ludhiana (West) Tahsil 2 735 405 330 11 8,450 4,480 3,970 Raikot Tahsil 15 5,401 2,839 2,562 32 23,722 12,501 11,221 J agraon Tahsil

48 15,164 7,949 7,215 51 39,213 20,676 18,537 Moga District '" 5 4,184 2,221 1,963 Nihal Singhwala Tahsil 4 3,137 1,632 1,505 Bhagha Porana Tahsil 48 15,164 7,949 7,215 42 31,892 16,823 15,069 Moga Tahsil

172 59,588 31,311 28,277 258 188,135 98,461 89,674 Firozpur District 49 16,522 8,732 7,790 72 52,618 27,676 24,942 Zira Tahsil 79 27,625 14,558 13,067 100 70,713 37,229 33,484 Firozpur Tahsil 35 12,059 6,254 5,805 65 48,622 25,131 23,491 J alalabad Tahsil 9 3,382 1,767 1,615 20 15,259 7,928 7,331 Fazilka Tahsil 1 923 497 426 Abohar Tahsil

5 1,916 1,011 905 20 15,566 8,313 7,253 Muktsar District '" 5 4,244 2,246 1,998 Malout Tahsil 3 2,289 1,200 1,089 Giddarbaha Tahsil 5 1,916 1,011 905 12 9,033 4,867 4,166 Muktsar Tahsil

9 3,090 1,649 1,441 28 21,687 11,434 10,253 Faridkot District 9 3,090 1,649 1,441 27 21,039 11,088 9,951 Faridkot Tahsil 648 346 302 Jaitu Tahsil

3 1,310 681 629 23 18,174 9,688 8,486 Bathinda District 5 4,303 2,247 2,056 Rampura Phul Tahsil 2 823 424 399 6 4,645 2,492 2,153 Bathinda Tahsil 1 487 257 230 12 9,226 4,949 4,277 Talwandi Sabo Tahsil

5 1,779 956 823 29 23,048 12,246 10,802 Mansa District '" 3 1,114 603 511 10 8,107 4,356 3,751 Sardulgarh Tahsil 311 156 155 13 10,065 5,280 4,785 Budhlada Tahsil 354 197 157 6 4,876 2,610 2,266 Mansa Tahsil

37 14,146 7,513 6,633 114 87,505 46,678 40,827 Sangrur District 4 1,219 656 563 6 4,675 2,509 2,166 Barnala Tahsil 17 6,802 3,595 3,207 44 31,862 16,936 14,926 Malerkotla Tahsil 4 1,664 908 756 16 13,093 6,997 6,096 Dhuri Tahsil 10 3,873 2,047 1,826 29 22,298 11,943 10,355 Sangrur Tahsil 311 168 143 12 9,409 5,022 4,387 Sunaro Tahsil 277 139 138 7 6,168 3,271 2,897 Moonak Tahsil

181 66,843 35,813 31,030 343 257,065 137,316 119,749 Patiala District 7 2,676 1,442 1,234 34 26,130 13,887 12,243 Samana Tahsil 24 9,365 4,958 4,407 67 50,515 26,968 23,547 Nabha Tahsil 76 28,416 14,996 13,420 116 83,621 44,591 39,030 Patiala Tahsil 51 18,069 9,668 8,401 84 63,748 34,256 29,492 Rajpura Tahsil 23 8,317 4,749 3,568 42 33,051 17,614 15,437 Dera Bassi Tahsil Contd .....

93 TABLEA-3 VILLAGESBY

Statel ~ District! Tahsil 1,000 - 1,999 2,000 - 4,999 Number Number Ponulll.tio!l P M F P M F 18 1·9 20 21 22 23 24 25

Payal Tahsil 44 62,419 33,313 29,106 21 60,626 32,305 28,321 Ludhiana (East) Tahsil 53 77,246 41,532 35,714 37 97,710 52,521 45,189 Ludhiana (West) Tahsil 30 45,655 24,023 21,632 46 140,643 74,525 66,118 Raikot Tahsil 28 41,013 21,646 19,367 29 86,055 45,614 40,441 lagraon Tahsil 43 61,522 32,310 29,212 30 96,242 50,448 45,794

Moga District 71 100,801 53,465 47,336 90 276,510 146,499 130,011 Nihal Singhwala Tahsil 7 11,256 5,970 5,286 14 44,616 23,701 20,915 Bhagha Purana Tahsil 13 18,422 9,744 8,678 28 88,869 47,082 41,787 Moga Tahsil 51 71,123 37,751 33,372 48 143,025 75,716 67,309

Firozpur District 245 345,386 180,646 164,740 183 544,500 287,870 256,630 Zira Tahsil 48 68,410 36,058 32,352 11 26,259 13,895 12,364 Firozpur Tahsil 83 114,186 59,720 54,466 29 84,884 44,535 40,349 lalalabad Tahsil 61 83,158 43,153 40,005 29 80,818 42,249 38,569 F azilka Tahsil 47 69,987 36,638 33,349 51 152,406 80,576 71,830 Abohar Tahsil 6 9,645 5,077 4,568 63 200,133 106,615 93,518

Muktsar District 83 128,295 67,626 60,669 103 302,506 159,767 142,739 Malout Tahsil 32 51,561 27,135 24,426 49 141,659 74,744 66,915 Giddarbaha Tahsil 15 24,088 12,711 11,377 27 85,339 44,976 40,363 Muktsar Tahsil 36 52,646 27,780 24,866 27 75,508 40,047 35,461

Faridkot District 52 71,717 37,845 33,872 58 175,154 92,592 82,562 Faridkot Tahsil 42 56,715 29,822 26,893 31 98,606 52,100 46,506 J aitu Tahsil 10 15,002 8,023 6,979 27 76,548 40,492 36,056

Bathinda District 93 144,395 76,404 67,991 128 410,927 217,468 193,459 Rampura Phul Tahsil 30 45,433 24,157 21,276 28 90,807 47,887 42,920 Bathinda Tahsil 31 47,912 25,272 22,640 61 196,893 104,029 92,864 Talwandi Sabo Tahsil 32 51,050 26,975 24,075 39 123,227 65,552 57,675

Mansa District * 103 154,292 82,087 72,205 84 260,465 138,759 121,706 Sardulgarh Tahsil 34 50,789 27,067 23,722 18 60,623 32,084 28,539 Budhlada Tahsil 40 58,766 31,097 27,669 25 74,996 39,930 35,066 Mansa Tahsil 29 44,737 23,923 20,814 41 124,846 66,745 58,101

Sangrur District 251 353,254 187,905 165,349 239 724,507 388,423 336,084 Bamala Tahsil 31 46,301 24,532 21,769 67 213,198 113,538 99,660 Malerkotla Tahsil 82 111,194 58,875 52,319 30 89,304 48,459 40,845 Dhuri Tahsil 35 49,557 26,374 23,183 37 108,908 58,288 50,620 Sangrur Tahsil 46 61,614 32,901 28,713 31 87,341 46,901 40,440 Sunam Tahsil 29 45,825 24,526 21,299 44 138,133 74,348 63,785 Moonak Tahsil 28 38,763 20,697 18,066 30 87,623 46,889 40,734

Patiala District 338 472,376 253,119 219,257 127 350,033 187,022 163,011 Samana Tahsil 50 68,523 36,376 32,147 40 112,463 59,695 52,768 Nabha Tahsil 56 78,814 42,124 36,690 16 41,228 22,225 19,003 Patiala Tahsil 107 148,016 78,704 69,312 25 68,416 36,420 31,996 Rajpura Tahsil 83 118,423 63,258 55,165 31 84,209 44,966 39,243 Dera Bassi Tahsil 42 58,600 32,657 25,943 15 43,717 23,716 20,001

94 pOPULATION SIZE CLASS

5,000-9,999 10,000 and above Statel District! Tahsil Number Population Number Population P M F P M F 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33

3 17,954 9,560 8,394 Payal Tahsil 2 10,864 6,087 4,777 Ludhiana (East) Tahsil 6 38,010 21,064 16,946 15,062 8,126 6,936 Ludhiana (West) Tahsil 2 13,577 7,116 6,461 11,024 6,060 4,964 Raikot Tahsil 10 60,217 32,064 28,153 11,096 5,931 5,165 lagraon Tahsil

38 262,188 139,058 123,130 2 20,552 10,732 9,820 Moga District '" 13 90,033 47,719 42,314 Nihal Singhwala Tahsil 10 72,941 38,549 34,392 Bhagha Purana Tahsil 15 99,214 52,790 46,424 2 20,552 10,732 9,820 Moga Tahsil

16 102,464 55,885 46,579 3 46,625 25,134 21,491 Firozpur District 12,597 6,604 5,993 Zira Tahsil 4 27,526 15,116 12,410 Firozpur Tahsil 1 9,247 4,831 4,416 20,587 10,683 9,904 lalalabad Tahsil 6 37,488 20,310 17,178 Fazilka Tahsil 5 28,203 15,628 12,575 13,441 7,847 5,594 Abohar Tahsil

15 96,872 51,517 45,355 3 33,526 17,705 15,821 Muktsar District '" 4 23,835 12,611 11,224 I 10,360 5,515 4,845 Ma10ut Tahsil 5 33,638 17,808 15,830 2 23,166 12,190 10,976 Giddarbaha Tahsil 6 39,399 21,098 18,301 Muktsar Tahsil

12 75,284 40,013 35,271 1 10,200 5,302 4,898 Faridkot District 9 56,377 30,047 26,330 10,200 5,302 4,898 Faridkot Tahsil 3 18,907 9,966 8941 Jaitu Tahsil

28 187,650 99,677 87,973 4 68,886 40,097 28,789 Bathinda District 11 73,295 39,012 34,283 2 25,103 13,264 11,839 Rampura Phul Tahsil 14 93,979 49,877 44,102 27,029 17,923 9,106 Bathinda Tahsil 3 20,376 10,788 9,588 16,754 8,910 7,844 Talwandi Sabo Tahsil

13 83,887 44,695 39,192 2 22,663 11,917 10,746 Mansa District '" 3 17,784 9,448 8,336 Sardulgarh Tahsil 4 23,914 12,762 11,152 2 22,663 11,917 10,746 Budhlada Tahsil 6 42,189 22,485 19,704 Mansa Tahsil

33 208,679 111,484 97,195 2 25,415 13,565 11,850 Sangrur District 13 86,952 46,228 40,724 13,797 7,312 6,485 Bamala Tahsil 2 11,122 5,895 5,227 Malerkotla Tahsil 3 17,452 9,349 8,103 Dhuri Tahsil 5 30,967 16,532 14,435 Sangrur Tahsil 7 44,905 24,242 20,663 11,618 6,253 5,365 Sunam Tahsil 3 17,281 9,238 8,043 Moonak Tahsil

3 20,773 11,500 9,273 2 26,773 14,376 12,397 PaHala District 2 12,254 6,487 5,767 10,949 5,733 5,216 Samana Tahsil 8,519 5,013 3,506 Nabha Tahsil Patiala Tahsil Rajpura Tahsil 15,824 8,643 7,181 Dera Bassi Tahsil Concld.....

95 A-3 Appendix Number and Population of villages with Population of 5,000 and above and Towns with Population below 5,000 Sr. State/District! Villages with Population 5,000 and above Towns with Population below 5,000 No. Tahsil Number Population Percentage to rural Number Population Percentage to urban Population of State/ Population of State/ District/ Tahsil District/ Tahsil 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

PUNJAB 299 2,138,510 13.29 6 22,950 0.28

Gurdaspur 18 142,849 9.11 2 7,939 1.48 Dharkalan 4 24,304 46.60 Pathankot 5 52,573 14.64 2 7,939 3.69 Gurdaspur 7 54,160 8.70 Batala 2 ll,812 2.77 Dera Baba Nanak

2 Amritsar 45 312,960 16.71 Ajnala 4 24,033 6.91 Amritsar-l 4 29,819 12.76 Amritsar-II 7 47,217 22.96 Tam Taran 9 61,629 17.36 Patti 11 77,944 25.39 Khadoor Sahib 4 30,367 18.44 BabaBakala 6 41,951 16.20

3 Kapurthala 5 30,484 6.00 Bhulath 6,341 7.62 Kapurthala 2 12,159 6.02 Sultanpur Lodhi 6,467 6.52 Phagwara 5,517 4.46

4 Jalandhar 15 97,500 9.46 4,060 0.44 Shahkot Nakodar 2 11,359 6.89 Phillaur 8 52,208 16.87 Jalandhar-I 3 21,299 11.57 4,060 0.52 Jalandhar-II 2 12,634 5.27

5 Hoshiarpur 5 32,124 2.70 4,245 1.45 Dasua 1 7,730 2.65 Mukerian 3 16,878 6.52 Hoshiarpur 7,516 2.17 4,245 2.51 Garhshankar

6 Nawanshahr 2 12,692 2.16 Nawanshahr Balachaur 2 12,692 7.94

7 Rupnagar 5 34,645 4.60 Anandpur Sahib Rupnagar 8,284 3.32 Kharar 2 11,594 7.00 SAS Nagar (Mohali) 2 14,767 14.71

8 Fatehgarh Sahib 5,015 1.30 Bassi Pathana Fatehgarh Sahib Amloh Khamanon 5,015 6.51

96 A-3Appendix Number and Population of villages with Population of 5,000 and above and Towns with Population below 5,000 Sr. State/Districti Villages with Population 5,000 and above Towns with Population below 5,000 No. Tahsil Number Population Percentage to rural Number Population Percentage to urban Population of State/ .t4. Population of State/ Districtl Tahsil Districtl Tahsil 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

9 Ludhiana 26 177,804 18.60 Samrala Khanna Payal 3 17,954 10.78 Ludhiana(East) 2 10,864 4.68 Ludhiana(West) 7 53,072 20.26 Raikot 3 24,601 15.29 Iagraon 11 71,313 27.52

10 Moga 40 282,740 39.48 Nihal Singhwala 13 90,033 59.99 Bhagha Purana 10 72,941 39.75 Moga 17 119,766 31.30

11 Firozpur 19 149,089 11.51 Zira 1 12,597 7.03 Firozpur 4 27,526 8.37 Ialalabad 2 29,834 11.65 Fazilka 6 37,488 13.44 Abohar 6 41,644 16.50

12 Muktsar 18 130,398 22.52 Malout 5 34,195 14.76 Giddarbaha 7 56,804 33.71 Muktsar 6 39,399 22.04

13 Faridkot 13 85,484 23.92 Faridkot 10 66,577 27.04 Jaitu 3 18,907 17.02

14 Bathinda 32 256,536 30.85 4,775 1.36 Rarnpura Phul 13 98,398 41.18 Bathinda 15 121,008 32.57 1 .. 4,775 1.84 Talwandi Sabo 4 37,130 16.79

15 Mansa 15 106,550 19.50 Sardulgarh 3 17,784 12.83 Budhlada 6 46,577 24.42 Mansa 6 42,189 19.44

16 Sangrur 35 234,094 16.54 Bamala 14 100,749 27.50 Malerkotla 2 11,122 4.42 Dhuri 3 17,452 9.15 Sangrur 5 30,967 15.01 Sunarn 8 56,523 22.59 Moonak 3 17,281 11.50

17 Patiala 5 47,546 3.96 1,931 0.30 Sarnana 3 23,203 9.94 Nabha 8.519 4.50 Patiala 1,931 0.55 Rajpura Dera Bassi 15,824 9.83 97

TABLE A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001 WITH VARIATIONS SINCE 1901 FLY-LEAF

This table corresponds to tableA-4 of 1951,1961, in the order of their population size. Similarly, the 1971, 1981 and 1991 Censuses and Imperial table IV total for class II followed by figures of each town of earlier censuses. It gives the variation in urban included in that class arranged in the order of population separately for males and females, decade population and so on, are given. '. variation and percentage decade variation for each Classification of towns given in this table is based town and urban agglomeration during the last hundred on the 200 1 population.As many towns have changed years. In addition the status of the towns and the their class since 1901, the class totals shown in the area figures of the towns and urban agglomerations table for previous censuses are not the totals of are also given in the table. The status and area figures respective population of all towns shown in that class '. ,,are, however, confined to 1961, 1971, 1981, 1991 and in 200 1. They are the totals of popUlation of all towns '. ;,2001 Censuses only. The area of each town/urban which on the basis of population were included in agglomeration is given in square kilometres. that class in those censuses except the towns which This table give all the towns including urban are the constituents of urban agglomerations. Some agglomerations and their population by sex since 1901 of these towns might have gone to higher or lower and its decadal variation. .The towns/cities/urban class and some might .not have been treated as towns . .agglomerations have been arranged in the order of in later censuses. Since this table shows the growth . population size and class of town. As in 1971, 1981 of urban popUlation alone, the figures of previous and 1991, all towns and urban agglomerations have censuses against towns which were not treated as been grouped into the following six broad classes towns in those censuses are not given. Their according to population. size population in those censuses were treated as rural. Class I PopUlation of 100,000 and above They are also not included in the class totals for any census. If any place was treated as town in some Class II Population of 50,000 to 99,999 census and declassified as rural in subsequent Class III Population of 20,000 to 49,999 censuses and again classified as town, then in such cases the population particulars are given only for Class IV Population of 10,000 to 19,999 those censuses in which it was a town and the word Class V Population of 5,000 to 9,999 'declassified' is recorded against other census years Class VI Population of less than 5,000 where it was declassified. According to the tradition of Indian Census any The definitions of town and urban agglomeration place with a population of 100,000 and above is called have already been given at length in the general a City. descriptive note given at the beginning of this volume. As mentioned earlier, the concept of town group as An alphabetical list of all towns and urban adopted in 1961 was given up in 1971 and 1981 mainly agglomerations is given at the end of the Fly Leaf on account of lack of uniformity in defining town which -will help the readers for any reference to the group as applied in different States. In 1971 and entries given in the table. 1981 Censuses, the term town group was replaced The total urban population of State for each by urban agglomeration with an uniform definition census from 1901 to 2001 is given at the beginning throughout the country. The same concept of urban of the table and is followed by similar figures for agglomeration was also adopted for 1991 and 200 l' class I total and the towns included in class I arranged censuses. An urban agglomeration was formed by 99 t~ng ,il)t6 account the continuous urban spread whole in that census. In case of merger of towns, constituting a town and its adjoining urban outgrowths, the merged units are considered as absorbed in the or two or more physically contiguous tow,ns together unit in which it merged. So the unit and not the with continuous well recognised urban outgrowths, if merged town has been presented according to its class any, of such tOWRS. in each census. Where, however, a rural area has been merged with an urban area in a particular While pr~seilting the data of urban agglomerations, its components have been depicted census, the population of only the urban area in censuses preceding that particular one, has been taken wi~ lower ca~e in Roman serial like (i), (ii), (iii), etc. and the units treated as urban outgrowth have as the basis for that single class. been shown' with a sUffix (O.G.) against each. Wherever the population of a town in a previous Where an urban agglomeration consists of two or census had to be adjusted with reference to 2001, a more towns, the core towns have been shown with foot note has been inserted explaining the procedure prefix (a), (b), (c) etc. and extent of such adjustment.

, In striking class totals ail urban agglomeration has This table has been supplemented by the fallowing . been taken as unit not only for 2001, but also for two appendices : :previous censuses. As mentioned earlier the total Appendix-I: This appendix gives, the new towns of for any Class in any previous census has been worked 2001, which were not towns in 1991 and also the o';1t as the total of towns of that particular class in towns of 1991 which have been declassified in 2001, ilrat Par:ticular census. They include towns which might their area and the 1991 and 200 1 population. have been individually withdrawn from urban status in a preceding of"Succeeding census. But a constituent Appendix- 2 : This appendix gives the towns which of an urban agglomeration' has been reckoned not have undergone changes in area between 1991 and according to fts class in a particular census but 200 1, the brief reasons for such changes and their according to the class of'urban agglomeration as a area at the two censuses

100 Table A-4 has two appendices and 13 statements. A brief analysis based on these statements is as follows.

Statement - 1 Growth in number of Cities and Towns and their Population in State and District 1901-2001.

Year Class - I Class - II Class - III Class - IV Class - V Class - VI All Classes No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Punjab

1901 162,429 2 121,280 4 146,477 14 188,080 38 256,825 18 59,675 77 934,766 1911 152,756 2 120,154 4 141,454 10 133,718 29 200,025 16 65,117 62 813,224 1921 160,218 3 177,239 5 139,656 12 157,796 27 193,382 11 41,235 59 869,526 1931 264,840 4 277,379 6 155,263 16 222,523 31 222,717 8 25,691 66 1,168,413 1941 3 637,932 2 152,352 13 348,232 20 267,517 32 233,075 5 18,306 75 1,657,414 1951 3 648,358 2 153,719 17 503,726 21 297,590 37 271,504 34 114,370 114 1,989,267 1961 4 968,130 4 209,102 23 740,819 23 309,598 35 266,439 20 73,218 109 2,567,306 1971 4 1,303,128 8 504,341 22 699,336 32 443,253 30 224,959 12 41,162 108 3,216,179 1981 7 2,155,714 10 668,780 27 940,482 36 524,505 40 301,905 14 56.371 134 4,647,757 1991 10 3,246,224 18 1,193,171 25 774,453 46 648,230 14 102,945 7 28,202 120 5,993,225 2001 14 4,819,089 18 1,314,224 36 1,082,085 54 810,753 29 213,410 6 22,950 157 8,262,511

Gurdaspur

1901 27,365 6 33,102 2 5,740 9 66,207 1911 26,430 3 18,767 4 14,058 8 59,255 1921 26,122 2 16,259 4 13,644 7 56,025 1931 33,204 12,094 3 20,053 4,186 6 69,537 1941 44,458 2 28,995 3 20,228 6 93,681 1951 55,850 2 45,785 2 21,800 3 26,655 4 12,073 12 162,163 1961 2 106,110 27,665 2 21,960 4 30,927 2 4,150 11 190,812 1971 2 154,680 32,064 3 36,997 3 22,913 2,430 10 249,084 1981 2 212,005 39,529 4 55,275 2 15,584 2 5,875 11 328,268 1991 2 231,565 54,733 20,012 4 58,360 2 13,475 2 8,267 12 386,412 2001 2 316,357 68,441 3 65,318 4 64,224 2 12,944 2 7,939 14 535,223

Amritsar

1901 162,429 5 33,862 4,428 . 7 200,719 1911 152,756 4 25,901 4,260 6 182,917 1921 160,218 10,439 5 30,840 7 201,497 1931 264,840 2 22,985 4 28,067 7 315,892 1941 391,010 3 45,722 5 36,035 9 472,767 1951 325,747 4 53,712 4 26,002 3,046 10 408,507 1961 376,295 20,961 3 41,508 3 22,107 3,153 9 464,024 1971 454,805 24,116 2 32,449 2 16,554 3 7,546 9 535,470 1981 594,844 36,903 3 47,140 5 38,619 4,123 11 721,629 1991 708,835 2 75,305 4 51,972 9,122 2 8,597 10 853,831 2001 1,003,917 55,787 2 58,278 7 90,783 2 14,510 13 1,223,275

101 Statement - 1 Growth in number of Cities and Towns and their Population in State and District 1901-2001.

Year Class - I Class - 11 Class - ill Class - IV Class - V Class - VI All Classes No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Kapurthala

1901 2 32,627 9,004 3 5,889 6 47,520 1911 2 28,146 6,492 3 34,638 1921 2 27,637 8,141 3 35,778 1931 20,210 12,049 8,606 3 40,865 1941 26,067 2 26,362 3 52,429 1951 2 48,813 7,733 2 7,860 5 64,406 1961 2 67,263 7,661 4,295 4 79,219 1971 55,012 35,482 9,176 3 99,670 1981 2 126,261 12,143 2 12,064 3 12,950 8 163,418 1991 ' 2 152,883 13,722 3 166,605 2001 102,253 85,686 3 40,999 2 17,589 7 246,527

Jalandhar

1901 67,735 10,840 4 32,270 4,423 7 115,268 1911 69,31.8 4 29,892 5 99,210 1921 71,008 3 24,791 4,696 5 100,495 1931 89,030 4 31,709 5 120,739 1941 135,283 2 23,131 2 17,335 5175,749 1951 168,816 33,174 2 22,527 5 35,905 4,452 10 264,874 1961 222,569 42,461 3 37,712 2 12,082 4,539 8 319,363 1971 296,106 33,724 3 44,343 3 22,240 4,732 9 401,145 1981 408,196 2 59,595 3 46,488 7 49,425 13 563,704 1991 509,510 4 102,047 4 47,434 6,468 4,896 11 670,355 2001 714,077 4 119,398 5 71,023 3 23,425 4,060 14 931,983

Hoshiarpur

1901 2 27,796 4 24,330 3 10,424 9 62,550 1911 17,449 2 12,411 3 13,390 6 43,250 1921 21,285 2 13,567 3 34,852 1931 26,730 4 26,167 5 52,897 1941 35,345 12,734 4 28,559 6 76,638 1951 45,291 4 30,740 6 19,320 11 95,351 1961 50,739 10,383 3 23,373 3 10,091 8 94,586 1971 57,691 4 51,427 2 11,884 2 6,221 9 127,223 1981 85,648 4 64,673 2 15,148 2 7,521 9 172,990 1991 122,705 5 84,090 2 11,632 3,711 9 222,138 2001 149,668 4 86,120 2 25,166 4 26,875 4,245 12 292,074 102 Statement - 1 Growth in number of Cities and Towns and their Population in State and District 1901-2001.

Year Class - I Class - II Class - III Class - IV Class - V Class - VI All Classes No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15

Nawanshahr

1901 2 14,292 4,697 3 18,989 1911 6,292 2 9,077 3 15,369 1921 3 16,352 3 16,352 1931 3 19,685 3 19,685 1941 10,275 2 17,177 3 27,452 1951 13,140 2 16,384 3 29,524 1961 2 24,309 6,316 3 30,625 1971 2 29,412 6,607 3 36,019 1981 26,726 13,490 2 15,301 4 55,517 1991 29,955 2 28,492 3 58,447 2001 31,967 3 49,099 4 81,066

Rupnagar

1901 2 13,916 2 13,916 191 I 6,935 4,041 2 10,976 1921 7,606 7,606 1931 8,764 8,764 1941 10,385 2 11,909 3 22,294 1951 14,213 2 12,385 4,266 4 30,864 1961 34,372 14,136 4 30,133 4,189 7 82,830 1971 21,356 2 27,140 4 34,099 7 82,595 1981 4 104,846 3 36,529 8,571 4,692 9 154,638 1991 78,457 3 96,108 4 57,772 8 232,317 2001 123,484 6 202,859 2 24,051 2 12,013 I I 362,407

Fatehgarh Sahib

1901 13,738 5415 2 19,153 1911 11,125 3843 2 14,968 1921 11,560 2 5607 3 17,167 1931 12,979 2 5992 3 18,971 1941 14,400 5,823 2184 3 22,497 1951 13,151 7,808 2 6248 4 27,207 1961 13,042 2 16,634 3582 4 33,258 1971 2 32,413 9,387 4848 4 46,648 1981 2 57.017 16,672 7.098 4 80.787 1991 2 72,881 18,138 9,854 4 100,873 2001 60,677 49,825 2 31,747 8,842 5 151,091

103 Statement - 1 Growth in number of Cities and Towns and their Population in State and District 1901-2001.

Yell" Class - I Class - II Class - III Class - IV Class - V Class - VI All Classes No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 to II 12 13 14 15

Ludhiana

1901 48,649 2 28,891 ;2 . ;;.H;I:03 3838 6 92,481 1911 44,170 15,039 7,510 3319 4 70,038 1921 51,880 17,731 8,379 3 77,990 1931 68,586 27, I 08 11,810 6,555 4 114,059 1941 Ill, J39 26,704 13,777 7,941 4708 5 164,769 1951 153,795 24,519 2 22,839 3 11350 7 212,503 1961 244,032 2 54,033 11,239 5,439 2 8177 7 322,920 1971 401,176- 2 67,819 11,709 2 13,358 6 494,062 1981 607,052 53,761 39,683 2 27,930 5 35,714 10 764,140 1991 1,042,740 71,990 2 68,433 3 38,613 3 21,005 10 1,242,781 2001 2 1,501,566 60,080 24,769 5 86,182 3 21,056 12 1,693,653

Moga

1901 2 13,456 2 13,456 1911 5,859 5,859 1921 14,145 5,960 2 20,105 1931 17,581 6,779 2 24,360· 1941 27,785 8,360 2 36,145 1951 36,598 6,845 2 43,443 1961 47,779 6,443 2 54,222 1971 61,625 7,720 2 69,345 1981 80,272 14,289 9,328 3 103,889 1991 110,958 2 29,268 2 16,176 5 156,402 2001 135,279 21,596 15,399 6,366 4 178,640

Firozpur

1901 49,341 8,505 3 8,333 5 66,179 1911 50,836 10,985 2 14,588 4,378 5 80,787 1921 54,351 13,829 8,916 2 8,455 5 85,551 1931 64,.634 2 32,498 2 13,021 1,470 6 111,623 1941 82,502 2 49,484 2 13,097 2,311 6 147,394 1951 4 130,897 2 12,672 2 6,928 8 150,497 1961 47,060 3 125,205 2 15,841 3 13,724 9 201,830 1971 2 110,015 2 77,852 11,032 3 20,330 4,601 9 223,830 1981 2 147,496 2 88,226 2 36,220 2 16,801 8 288,743 1991 107,163 3 189,860 2 46,830 2 20,962 8 364,815 2001 124,339 3 220,580 2 64,707 3 41,099 9 450,725

104 Statement - 1 Growth in number of Cities and Towns and their Population in State and District 1901-2001.

Year Class - I Class - II Class - ill Class - IV Class - V Class - VI All Classes No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Muktsar

1901 6,389 6,389 1911 8,834 8,834 1921 10,539 10,539 1931 14,839 3,636 2 18,475 1941 20,651 6,317 2 26,968 1951 k 22,097 7,421 2 29,518 1961 2 51,539 17,364 3 68,903 1971 2 66,149 18,821 3 84,970 1981 50,941 2 67,361 2 11,117 3,555 6 132,974 1991 2 123,251 29,866 3 153,117 2001 2 154,420 36,598 7,546 4 198,564

Faridkot

1901 10,405 9,519 2 19,924 1911 2 22,317 7,694 3 30,011 1921 2 26,367 7,912 3 34,279 1931 2 33,261 8,542 3 41,803 1941 2 40,959 11,435 3 52,394 1951 2 39,665 7,621 3 47,286 1961 2 58,756 17,170 3 75,926 1971 2 61,841 19,446 3 81,287 1981 3 116,034 3 116,034 1991 2 121,055 28,850 3 149,905 2001 2 160,106 33,465 3 193,571

Bathinda

1901 13,185 2 7,262 3 20,447 1911 15,037 4,515 2 19,552 1921 20,154 4,943 2 25,097 1931 22,771 6,836 2 29,607 1941 24,833 9,515 2 34,348 1951 34,991 14,409 6,446 5 10,992 8 66,838 1961 52,253 2 30,644 2 17,561 3 8,959 8 109,417 1971 65,318 23,406 2 24,981 6,408 3 10,784 8 130,897 1981 127,363 31,890 3 43,625 2 16,416 2 7,832 9 227,126 1991 159,042 2 60.710 3 37.696 5.611 2.731 8 265.790 2001 217,256 2 72,208 3 45,610 2 11,905 4,775 9 351,754

105 Statement - 1 Growth in number of Cities and Towns and their Population in State and District 1901·2001.

Year Class - I Class - II Class - III Class - IV Class - V Class - VI All Classes No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Mansa

1901 1911 1921 1931 8·,369 8,369 1941 11,729 5,364 2 17,093 1951 15,251 2 12,394 3 27,645 1961 22,473 2 15,661 3 38,134 1971 31,351 11,713 8,313 3 51,377 1981 43,289 15,968 9,494 3 68,751 1991 55,089 2 30,254 3 85,343 2001 72,627 23,521 3 46,281 5 142,429

Sangrur

1901 21,122 2 21,921 4 27,472 7 70,515 1911 23,880 5 33,270 6 57,150 1921 24,564' . 10,799 4 28,442 6 63,805 1931 25,240 2 24,553 3 22,718 2 6,225 8 78,736 1941 29,321 3 43,660 4 31,919 4,368 9 109,268 1951 32,575 3 51,519 6 46,545 5 20,716 15 151,355 1961 4 110,649 2 26,073 6 47,254 12 183,976 1971 4 142,879 5 65,313 3 24,704 12 232,896 1981 65,756 4 152,180 6 80,429 2 18,353 4,923 14 321,641 1991 3 220,449 3 106,900 6 90,645 12417,994 2001 107,009 3 230,864 3 97,667 . 8 130,301 2 18,978 17 584,819

Patiala

1901 53,545 2 28,677 2 14,190 4,641 6 101,053

1911 46,974 M 13,620 2 15,580 4,236 5 80,410 1921 47,531 14,750 2 16,217 3,890 5 82,388 1931 55,129 2 27,874 6,846 4,182 5 94,031 1941 69,850 22,625 14,912 2 13,496 4,735 6 125,618 1951 97,869 2 48,986 15,364 7,948 2 7,119 7 177,286 1961 125,234 30,603 3 44,058 9,007 2 8,359 8 217,261 1971 151,041 3 81,297 2 26,057 2 11,266 8 269,661 1981 206,254 58,645 2 77,203 13,634 3 22,872 4,900 9 383,508 1991 253,706 2 125,404 1 36,556 3 40,832 9,602 8 466,100 2001 323,884 2 144,956 3 93,789 3 48,789 4 31,361 1,931 14 644,710

106 Not much variation in number of towns has been each, class I towns are in Gurdaspur and Ludhiana noticed from 1901 to 1941. There was a remarkable districts and one each in Amritsar, Kapurthala, J alandhar, jncrease in number of towns in 1951 when it reached Hoshiarpur, Rupnagar, Moga, Firozpur, Bathinda, Sangrur 114 from 75 in 1941, 134 in 1981 and further 157 in and Patiala. Highest urban population has been reported 2001 census. On the other side population has shown from Ludhiana district (16,93,653) and followed by an increasing trend from 1911 onwards. Among the 157 Amritsar (12,23,275) and Jalandhar district (931,983). towns and Urban Agglomerations in 2001 Census, 14 Nawanshahr district (81066) has the smallest urban Towns are Class I, 18 Class n, 36 Class ill, 54 Class population. One third (33.92%) of the state population IV, 29 Class V and 6 Towns Class VI. Amritsar M.Corp living in urban areas. During 1991-2001, the urban emerged as Million plus city during 2001 census. 1\vo population has increased by over (4.37%) points.

Statement - 2 Growth in the number of Cities and Towns and their Population expressed Percentage variation in indices with 1901 as base (1901 =100)

Yea- Class - I Class - II Class - III Class - IV Class - V Class - VI All Classes No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15

1911 0.00 -5.96 0.00 -0.93 0.00 -3.43 -28.57 -28.90 -23.68 -22.12 -ILll 9.12 -19.48 -13.00 1921 0.00 -1.36 50.00 46.14 25.00 4.66 -14.29 -16.10 -28.95 . -24.70 -38.39 -30.90 -23.38 -6.98 1931 0.00 63.05 100.00 128.71 50.00 6.00 42.86 1831 -18.42 -13.28 -55.56 -56.95 -14.29 25.00 1941 200.00 292.75 0.00 25.62 225.00 137.74 42.86 42.24 -15.79 -9.25 -72.22 -6932 -2.60 77.31 1951 200.00.. 299.16 0.00 26.75 325.00 243.89 50.00 58.23 -2.63 5.72 88.89 91.65 48.05 112.81 1961 300.00 496.03 100.00 72.41 475.00 405.76 64.29 64.61 -7.89 3.74 lLll 22.69 41.56 174.65 1971 300.00 702.28 300.00 315.85 450.00 377.44 128.57 135.67 -21.05 -12.41 -33.33 -31.02 40.26 244.06 1981 600.00 1227.17 400.00 451.43 575.00 542.07 157.14 178.87 5.26 17.55 -22.22 -5.54 74.03 397.21 1991 900.00 1898.55 800.00 883.82 525.00 428.72 228.57 244.66 -63.16 -59.92 -61.11 -52.74 55.84 541.15 2001 1300.00 2866.89 800.00 983.63 800.00 638.74 285.71 331.07 -23.68 -16.90 -66.67 -61.54 103.90 783.91

Statement 2 shows percentage variation in highest variation is reported. in No.of towns as well growth in the number of cities and towns and their as in population in I Size class of population and population experienced in indices with 1901 as base lowest in IV Size class of popUlation, however, 100. No. of towns and popUlation has shown a negative growth has been witnessed in V and VI tremendous increasing trend in terms of variation in Size classes of both in No. of towns as well as in 2001 Census, 103.90 and 783.91 % respectively. The population.

107 Statement Percentage of Towns in each class to Total Number of Towns and Percentage of Population

Class 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of No. of Population No. of Population No. of Population No. of Population No. of Population No. of Population Towns Towns Towns Towns Towns Towns

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Punjab

8.92 58.32 8.33 54.16 5.22 46.38 3.70 40.52 3.67 37.71 2.63 32.59 II 11.47 15.91 15.00 19.91 7.46 14.39 7.41 15.68 3.67 8.14 1.75 7.73 III 22.93 13.10 20.84 12.92 20.15 20.24 20.37 21.74 2UO 29.86 14.91 25.32 N 34.39 9.81 38.33 10.82 26.87 1l.28 29.63 )'1.78 2LlO 12.06 18.42 14.96 V 18.47 2.58 11.67 1.72 29.85 6.50 27.78 7.00 32.11 10.38 32.46 13.65 VI 3.82 0.28 5.83 0.47 10.45 1.21 11.11 1.28 18.35 2.85 29.83 5.75

Gurdaspur

I 14.29 59.11 16.67 59.93 18.18 64.58 II 7.14 12.79 8.33 14.16 20.00 62.10 18.18 55.61 8.33 _ 34.44 III 21.43 12.20 8.33 5.18 9.09 12.04 10.00 12.87 9.09 14.50 16.67 28.23 N 28.57 12.00 33.33 15.10 36.37 16.84 30.00 14.85 18.18 11.51 16.67 13.44 V 14.29 2.42 16.67 3.49 18.18 4.75 30.00 9.20 36.37 16.21 25.00 16.44 VI 14.28 1.48 16.67 2.14 18.18 1.79 10.00 0.98 18.18 2.17 33.33 7.45

Amritsar

7.69 82.07 10.00 83.02 9.09 82.43 ILl 1 84.94 ILl 1 81.09 10.00 79.74 II 7.69 4.56 III 15.39 4.76 20.00 8.82 9.09 5.12 11.11 4.50 ILl 1 4.52 N 53.85 7.42 40.00 6.09 27.27 6.53 22.22 6.06 33.33 8.95 40.00 13.15 V 15.38 1.19 10.00 1.07 45.46 5.35 22.22 3.09 33.34 4.76 40.00 6.37 VI 20.00 1.00 9.09 0.57 33.34 1.41 11.11 0.68 10.00 0.74

Kapurthala

14.29 41.48 II 14.28 34.76 66.67 91.76 25.00 77.26 33.33 55.19 III 33.34 35.60 50.00 84.91 40.00 75.79 N_ 42.86 16.63 33.33 8.24 12.50 7.43 V 28.57 7.l3 25.00 7.38 33.33 9.21 25.00 9.67 20.00 12.01 VI 37.50 7.93 25.00 5.42 40.00 12.20

Ialandhar

7.14 76.62 9.09 76.01 7.69 72.41 ILl 1 73.82 12.50 69.69 10.00 63.73 II III 28.57 12.81 36.37 15.22 15.38 10.57 11.11 8.41 12.50 13.30 10.00 12.52 N 35.72 7.62 36.36 7.08 23.08 8.25 33.33 11.05 37.50 11.81 20.00 8.51 V 21.43 2.51 9.09 0.96 53.85 8.77 33.34 5.54 25.00 3.78 50.00 13.56 VI 7.14 0.44 9.09 0.73 ILl 1 1.18 12.50 1.42 10.00 1.68

Hoshiarpur

8.33 51.24 ILl 1 55.24 II 11.11 49.51 ILl 1 45.35 12.50 53.64 III 33.33 29.49 9.09 47.50 IV 16.67 8.62 55.56 37.85 44.45 37.39 44.45 40.42 12.50 10.98 V 33.34 9.20 22.22 5.24 22.22 8.76 22.22 9.34 37.50 24.71 36.36 32.24 VI 8.33 1.45 ILl 1 1.67 22.22 4.34 22.22 4.89 37.50 10.67 54.55 20.26

108 -3 in each class to Total Urban Population from 1901-2001 in State/Districts

1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 Class % of % of % of % of % of 0/0 of 0/0 of 0/0 of 0/0 of % of No. of Population No. of Population No. of Population No. of Population No. of Population Towns Towns Towns Towns Towns

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Punjab

4.00 38.49 1.52 22.67 1.70 18.43 1.61 18.78 1.30 17.38 2.67 9.19 6.06 23.74 5.08 20.38 3.23 14.78 2.60 12.97 II 17.33 21.01 9.09 13.29 8.47 16.06 6.45 17.39 5.19 15.67 III 26.67 16.14 24.24 19.04 20.34 18.15 16.13 16.44 18.18 20.12 N 42.66 14.06 46.97 19.06 45.76 22.24 46.77 24.60 49.35 27.48 V 6.67 1.11 12.12 2.20 18.65 4.74 25.81 8.01 23.38 6.38 VI

Gurdaspur

II 16.67 47.46 16.66 47.75 14.29 46.63 12.50 44.60 11.11 41.33 III 33.33 30.95 16.67 17.39 N 50.00 21.59 50.00 28.84 28.57 29.02 37.50 31.67 66.67 50.00 V 16.67 6.02 57.14 24.35 50.00 23.73 22.22 8.67 VI

Amritsar

11.11 82.71 14.29 83.84 14.29 79.51 16.67 83.51 14.28 80.92 II III 33.33 9.67 28.57 7.28 14.28 5.18 N 55.56 7.62 57.14 8.88 71.43 15.31 66.67 14.16 71.43 16.87 V 16.66 2.33 14.29 2.21 VI

Kapurthala

II 33.33 49.72 33.33 49.46 III 66.67 50.28 33.33 29.48 66.67 77.25 66.67 81.26 33.33 68.66 N 33.34 21.06 33.33 22.75 33.33 18.74 16.67 18.95 V ·50.00 12.39 VI

Ialandhar

20.00 76.98 20.00 73.74 20.00 70.66 20.00 69.87 14.28 58.76 II III 40.00 13.16 14.29 9.40 N 40.00 9.86 80.00 26.26 60.00 24.67 80.00 30.13 57.14 28.00 V 20.00 4.67 14.29 3.84 VI

Hoshiarpur

II 16.66 46.11 20.00 50.53 33.33 61.07 III 16.67 16.62 16.67 40.34 22.22 44.44 N 66.67 37.27 80.00 49.47 66.67 38.93 33.33 28.70 44.45 38.90 V 50.00 30.96 33.33 16.66 VI

109 Statement Percentage of Towns in each class to Total Number of Towns and Percentage of Population

Class 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of No. of Population No. of Population No. of Population No. of Population No. of Population No. of Population Towns Towns Towns Towns Towns Towns

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Nawanshahr

II III 25.00 39.43 33.33 51.25 25.00 48.14 IV 75.00 60.57 66.67 48.75 25.00 24.30 66.67 81.66 66.67 79.38 33.33 44.51 V 50.00 27.56 33.33 18.34 33.33 20.62 66.67 55.49 VI

Rupnagar

9.09 34.07 II 12.50 33.77 III 54.55 55.98 37.50 41.36 44.45 67.80 14.29 25.86 14.29 41.50 IV 18.18 6.64 50.00 24.87 33.33 23.62 28.57 32.86 14.28 17.06 25.00 46.05 V 18.18 3.31 11.11 5.54 57.14 41.28 57.14 36.38 50.00 40.13 VI lUI 3.04 14.29 5.06 25.00 13.82

Fatehgarh Sahib

II 20.00 40.16 III 20.00 32.98 50.00 72.25 50.00 70.58 IV 40.00 21.01 25.00 17.98 25.00 20.64 50.00 69.49 25.00 39.21 25.00 48.34 V 20.00 5.85 25.00 9.77 25.00 8.78 25.00 20.12 50.00 50.02 25.00 28.70 VI 25.00 10.39 25.00 10.77 50.00 22.96

Ludhiana

16.67 88.66 10.00 83.90 10.00 79.44 16.67 81.20 14.28 75.57 14.28 72.37 II 8.33 3.55 10.00 5.79 10.00 7.04 III 8.33 1.46 20.00 5.51 10.00 5.19 33.33 13.73 28.57 16.73 14.29 11.54 IV 41.67 5.09 30.00 3.11 20.00 3.66 16.67 2.37 14.29 3.48 28.57 10.75 V 25.00 1.24 30.00 1.69 50.00 4.67 33.33 2.70 14.29 1.69 VI 28.57 2.53 42.86 5.34

Moga

25.00 75.73 20.00 70.95 II 33.34 77.27 50.00 88.87 III 25.00 12.09 50.00 88.12 50.00 84.24 IV 25.00 8.62 40.00 18.71 33.33 13.75 V 25.00 3.56 40.00 10.34 33.33 8.98 50.00 11.l3 50.00 11.88 50.00 15.76 VI

Firozpur

ILl I 27.59 12.50 29.37 II 33.34 48.94 37.50 52.04 25.00 51.08 22.22 49.15 11.11 23.32 III 22.22 14.35 25.00 12.84 25.00 30.56 22.22 34.78 33.34 62.03 50.00 86.98 IV 33.33 9.12 25.00 5.75 25.00 12.54 11.11 4.93 V 25.00 5.82 33.34 9.08 22.22 7.85 25.00 8.42 VI 11.11 2.06 33.33 6.80 25.00 4.60

110 :.. 3 till each class to Total Urban Population from 1901-2001 in StatelDistricts

1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 Class % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of No. of Population No. of Population No. of Population No. of Population No. of Population Towns Towns Towns Towns Towns

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Nawanshahr

II III 33.33 37.43 IV 66.67 62.57 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 33.33 40.94 66.67 75.26 V 66.67 59.06 33.33 24.74 VI

Rupnagar

II III 33.33 46.58 IV 66.67 53.42 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 50.00 63.18 100.00 100.00 V 50.00 36.82 VI

Fatehgarh Sahib

II III . 33.33 64.26 33.33 68.41 33.33 67.34 50.00 74.33 50.00 71.73 IV 33.33 25.99· 50.00 28.27 V 33.34 9.75 66.67 31.59 66.67 32.66 50.00 25.67 VI

Ludhiana

20.00 67.75 25.00 60.13 33.34 66.52 II 20.00 16.21 25.00 23.77 25.00 63.07 16.67 52.60 III 20.00 8.36 25.00 10.35 33.33 22.73 25.00 21.47 33.33 31.24 IV 20.00 4.82 25.00 5.75 33.33 10.74 25.00 10.72 33.33 12.01 V 20.00 2.86 25.00 4.74 16.67 4.15 VI

Moga

II 50.00 76.87 III 50.00 72.17 50.00 70.36 IV 50.00 23.13 50.00 27.83 50.00 29.64 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 V VI

Firozpur

16.67 55.97 16.67 57.90 20.00 63.53 20.00 62.93 II 33.33 33.57 20.00 74.56 III 33.33 29.11 20.00 16.17 20.00 13.60 IV 33.33 8.89 33.33 11.67 20.00 10.42 40.00 18.05 20.00 12.85 V 16.67 1.57 16.67 1.32 40.00 9.88 20.00 5.42 60.00 12.59 VI

111 Statement Percentage of Towns in each class to Total Number of Towns and Percentage of Population

Class 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 ]951 % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of No. of Population No. of Population No. of Population No. of Population No. of Population No. of Population Towns Towns Towns Towns Towns Towns

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Muktsar

II 50.00 77.77 66.67 80.49 16.67 38.31 III 25.00 18.43 33.33 19.51 33.33 50.66 66.67 77.85 66.67 74.80 50.00 74.86 IV . 33.33 22.15 33.33 25.20 V 25.00 3.80 33.33 8.36 50.00 25.14 'VI 16.67 2.67

Faridkot

II . 66.67 82.71 66.67 80.75 III 33.33 17.29 33.33 19.25 100.00 100.00 66.67 76.08 66.67 77.39 IV 33.33 23.92 33.33 22.61 66.67 83.89 V 33.33 16.11 VI

Bathinda

11.11 61.76 12.50 59.84 11.1 ] 56.07 II 12.50 49.90 12.50 47.76 III 22.22 20.53 25.00 22.84 1l.l1 14.04 12.50 17.88 12.50 52.35 IV 33.34 12.97 37.50 14.18 33.34 19.21 25.00 19.08 25.00 28.00 12.50 21.56 V 22.22 3.38 12.50 2.11 22.22 7.23 12.50 4.90 25.00 16.05 12.50 9.64 VI 11.11 1.36 12.50 1.03 22.22 3.45 37.50 8.24 37.50 8.19 62.50 16.45

Mansa

II .20.00 50.99 33.33 64.55 III 20.00 16.52 33.34 .62.96 33.34 61.02 33.33 58.93 IV 60.00 32:49 66.67 ' 35.45 33.33 23.23 33.33 22.80 33.33 55.17 V 33.33 13.81 33.33 16.18 66.67 41.07 66.67 44.83 VI

Sangrur

I 5.88 18.30 II 17.65 39.48 25.00 52.74 7.14 20.44 III 17.65 16.70 25.00 25.57 28.57 47.31 33.33 61.35 33.33 60.14 6.67 21.52 IV 47.06 22.28 50.00 21.69 42.86 25.01 41.67 28.04. 16.67 14.17 20.00 34.04 V . II. 76 3.24 14.29 5.71 25.00 10.61 50.00 25.69 40.00 30.75 VI 7.14 1.53 33.33 13.69

Patiala

7.14 50.24 12.50 54.43 1l.l1 53.78 12.50 56.01 12.50 57.64 II 14.29 22.48 25.00 26.91 . 11.11 15.29 14.28 55.20 III '21.43 14.55 12.50 7.84 22.22 20.13 37.50 30.15 12.50 14.09 28.57 27.63 IV 21.43 7.57 37.50 8.76 lUI 3.56 25.00 9.66 37.50 20.28 14.29 8.67 V 28.57 4.86 12.50 2.06 33.34 5.96 25.00 4.18 12.50 4.14 14.29 4.48 VI 7.14 0.30 11.11 1.28 25.00 3.85 28.57 4.02 More than half of the total urban population falls in percentage of No. of towns (34.39%) falls in class class I and (29.01%) falls in class II & III and IV, followed by class III (22.93%) and class V remaining falls in Class IV, V, and VI. The highest (18.47%) wherea.s lowe.st (3.82S7c) is reported in Si7t' 112 -3 in each class to Total Urban Population from 1901-2001 in StatelDistricts

1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 Class % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of No. of Population No. of Population No. of Population No. of Population No. of Population Towns Towns Towns Towns Towns

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Muktsar

II 50.00 76.58 III 50.00 80.31 100.00 100.00 IV 50.00 23.42 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 V )0.00 19.69 VI

Faridkot

II 66.67 78.17 III 33.33 21.83 66.67 79.57 66.67 76.92 66.67 74.36 50.00 52.22 IV 33.33 20.43 33.33 23.08 33.33 25.64 50.00 47.78 V VI

Bathinda

II 50.00 72.30 50.00 76.91 50.00 80.30 III 50.00 76.91 33.33 64.48 IV 50.00 27.70 50.00 23.09 V 50.00 19.70 50.00 23.09 66.67 35.52 VI

Mansa

II III 50.00 68.62 IV 50.00 31.38 100.00 100.00 V VI

Sangrur

II 11.11 26.83 12.50 32.06 16.66 38.50 16.67 41.78 14.29 29.95 III 33.33 39.96 25.00 31.18 16.67 16.92 28.57 31.09 IV 44.45 29.21 37.50 28.85 66.67 44.58 83.33 58.22 57.14 38.96 V · i 1.11 4.00 25.00 7.91 VI

Patiala

16.66 55.61 20.00 58.63 16.67 52.99 II 16.67 18.01 20.00 57.69 20.00 58.42 III · 16.67 11.87 40.00 29.64 20.00 17.90 20.00 16.94 33.33 28.38 IV 33.33 10.74 20.00 7.28 40.00 19.69 40.00 19.37 33.33 14.04 V · 16.67 3.77 20.00 4.45 20.00 4.72 20.00 5.27 16.67 4.59 VI

~lass VI. Similar trend has been observed during 1991 percentage of towns is concerned it stands at second Census. Ludhiana district having 88.66% population rank having (16.67%) after Moga (25.00%) in the ~ at the top in size class I, whereas in case of same size class. 113 Statement -4 Percentage of Area of Towns in each class to Total Urban area of State and Districts and Density of Population per Sq.Km. in each class Class 2001 1991 Percentage or Area to Density per Km2 Percentage or Area Density per Km2 total urban area to total urban area 1 2 3 4 5

Punjab

I 36.40 6,315 38.62 5,834 II 18.64 3,363 20.43 4,053 III 19.97 2,584 18.61 2,889 IV 17.51 2,208 17.84 2,522 V 6.43 1,585 3.56 2,007 VI 1.05 1,041 0.94 2,081 All Classes 100.00 3,941 100.00 4,160

Gurdaspur

I 27.86 10,255 40.37 7,506 II 9.80 6,308 14.20 5,045 III 25.73 2,292 11.85 2,209 IV 27.58 2,102 22.82 3,346 V 2.28 5,137 5.81 3,035 VI 6.75 1,061 4.95 2,187 All Classes 100.00 4,833 100.00 5,056

Amritsar

I 62.43 7,382 59.45 6,166 II 9.18 2,789 III 6.21 4,307 20.84 1,869 IV 17.60 2,367 16.16 1,663 V 4.58 (,455 0.78 6,081 VI 2.77 1,607 All Classes 100.00 5,615 100.00 4,416

Kapurthala

I 15.23 6,391 II 53.30 1,530 93.51 2,123 III IV 22.73 1,717 6.49 2,744 V 8.74 1,916 VI All Classes 100.00 2,347 100.00 2,164

lalandhar

I 53.25 7,001 62.08 6,336 II III 20.08 3,104 19.70 4,000 IV 14.09 2,631 15.13 2,420 V 11.88 1,029 0.77 6,468 VI 0.70 3,030 2.32 1,632 All Classes 100.00 4,865 100.00 5,176

Hoshiarpur

I 26.37 4,276 34.49 4,350 II III 48.54 1,337 IV 10.22 1,856 62.95 1,633 Y 10.57 1,916 2.34 6,090 VI 4.30 743 0.22 20,617 All Classes 100.00 2,201 100.00 2,716

114 Statement ·4 Percentage of Area of Towns in each class to Total Urban area of State and Districts and Density of Population per Sq.Km. in each class

Class 2001 1991 Percentage of Area to Density per Km2 Percentage of Area Density per Km2 total urban area to total urba9 area 1 2 3 4 5 Nawanshahr

II III 29.97 3,333 58.94 3,124 IV 70.03 2,191 41.06 4,265 V VI All Classes 100.00 2,533 100.00 3,592 Rupnagar

17.50 5,175 II 20.32 4,704 III 69.14 2,151 45.19 2,591 IV 2.96 5,953 34.49 2,039 V 10.40 847 VI All Classes 100.00 2,658 100.00 2,830 Fatehgarh Sahib

I II 41.20 1,896 III 36.57 1,754 84.98 1,675 IV 12.87~ 3,175 9.77 3,628 3,663 V 9.36 1,216 5.25 VI All Classes 100.00 1,945 100.00 1,971 Ludhiana

7,743 I 73.56 8,155 68.29 4,494 II 5.59 4,291 8.12 2,776 III 4.26 2,326 12.50 2,748 IV 10.21 3,373 7.13 2,693 V 6.38 1,318 3.96 VI All Classes 100.00 6,766 100.00 6,302 Moga

35.78 8,402 31.14 6,892 II III 13.33 3,599 4,122 IV 43.33 7,897 13.73 567 V 7.56 1,872 55.13 VI All Classes 100.00 3,970 100.00 3,025 Firozpur

4,645 I 25.00 5,390 26.04 4,897 II 44.94 5,319 43.76 III 15.85 4,426 25.12 2,104 4,658 IV 14.21 3,135 5.08 V VI All Classes 100.00 4,885 100.00 4,118

115 Statement -4 Percentage of Area of Towns in each class to Total Urban area of State and Districts and Density of Population per Sq.Km. in each class Class 2001 1991 Pereentage of Area to Density per Km2 Percentage of Area Density per Km2 total urban area to total urban area 1 2 3 4 5

Muktsar

I II 74.01 4,093 74.26 5,179 III 16.18 4,436 25.74 3,623 IV V 9.81 1,509 VI All Classes 100.00 3,895 100.00 4,777

Faridkot

II 78.66 4,524 78.27 3,709 III 21.34 3,486 21.73 3,184 IV V VI All Classes 100.00 4,303 100.00 3,595

Bathinda

70.54 1,975 78.11 1,640 II III 14.72 3,145 8.50 5,749 IV 7.79 3,754 12.07 2,515 V 2.56 2,976 0.32 14,387 VI 4.39 698 1.00 2,202 All Classes 100.00 2,256 100.00 2,140

Mansa

II 42.12 3,351 68.54 2,754 III 15.88 2,918 IV 41.40 2,204 31.46 3,296 V VI All Classes 100.00 2,808 100.00 2,925

Sangrur

I 9.24 5,067 II 35.54 2,841 40.35 6,455 III 18.08 2,362 26.91 4,695 IV 32.55 1,751 32.74 3,271 V 4.59 1,807 VI All Classes 100.00 2,558 100.00 4,939

Patiala

37.41 4,983 37.18 8,132 II 23.29 3,581 35.13 4,254 III 11.54 4,678 6.55 6,647 IV 18.23 1,540 17.49 2,781 V 9.14 1,974 3.65 3.138 VI 0.39 2,840 All Classes 100.00 3,710 100.00 5,554

116 It has been observed from the above statement The highest percentage of area to total urban that density of population increased as towns of lower area is reported from Ludhiana district (11.94%) class moved to higher class. The population of towns followed by Sangrur (10.90%) and Amritsar increases, but the area does not increase as much. (10.39%) whereas Nawanshahr (1.53%) followed The highest urban density (6315) is reported in the by Faridkot and Moga (2.15%) each are on the class I towns, against (5834) in 1991 Census, lower side. The highest density 6766 and 5615 however the percentage of area to Total Urban area reported from Ludhiana and Amritsar respectively, (36.40%) decreased as compared to (38.62%) in 1991 Fatehgarh Sahib 1945 and Hoshiarpur 2201 are at Census in the same size class of towns. Lowest urban the tale, whereas Ludhiana 6302 and Patiala 5554 density (1041) is reported in size class VI in 200 1, are at the top and Fatehgarh Sahib 1971 followed whereas it was 2007 in size class V of towns during by Bathinda 2140 were at the bottom during 1991 1991 Census. census.

Statement - 5 Number and Population of Cities and Towns of 1991 and 2001 Censuses arranged in Six Classes I to VI

State! Class of Towns 2001 1221 Percentage! Increase and Percentage District No. of Total No. of Total Increase and decrease in increase or Towns population Towns population decrease in population decrease No. of Towns of class 1991-2001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Punjab All classes 157 8,262,511 120 5,993,225 30.83 2,269,286 37.86 Total class-I 14 4,819,089 10 3,246,224 40.00 1,572,865 48.45 a) Cities with one Million and above Population 2 2,402,384 1,042,740 100.00 1,359,644 130.39 b) Cities with 500,000 to 999,999 popUlation. 714,077 2 1,218,345 -50.00 -504,268 -41.39 c) Cities with 100,000 to 499,999 population. II 1,702,628 7 985,139 57.14 717,489 72.83 Class II 18 1.314.224 18 1,193.171 121.053 10.15 Class III 36 1,082,085 25 774,453 44.00 307,632 39.72 Class IV 54 810,753 46 648,230 17.39 162,523 25.07 Class V 29 213,410 14 102,945 107.14 110,465 107.30 Class VI 6 22,950 7 28,202 -14.29 -5,252 -18.62

Gurdaspur All classes 14 535,223 12 386,412 16.67 148,811 38.51 Total class-I 2 316,357 2 231,565 84,792 36.62 a) Cities with one Million and above Population b) Cities with 500,000 to 999,999 population. c) Cities with 100,000 to 499,999 population. 2 316,357 2 231,565 84,792 36.62 Class II 68,441 54,733 13,708 25.05 Class III 3 65,318 20,012 200.00 45,306 226.39 Class IV 4 64,224 4 58,360 5,864 10.05 Class V 2 12,944 2 13,475 -531 -3.94 Class VI 2 7,939 2 8,267 -328 -3.97

117 Statement - 5 Number and Population of Cities and Towns of 1991 and 2001 Censuses arranged in Six Classes I to VI

State! Class of Towns 2001 1221 Percentage! Increase and Percentage District No. of Total No. of Total Increase and decrease in increase or Towns population Towns population decrease in population decrease No. of Towns of class 1991-2001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Amritsar All classes 13 1,223,275 10 853,831 30.00 369,444 43.27 Total class-I 1,003,917 708,835 295,082 41.63 a) Cities with one Million and above Population 1,003,917 b) Cities with 500,000 to 999,999 population. 708,835 c) Cities with 100,000 to 499,999 population. Class II 55,787 Class III 2 58,278 2 75,305 -17027 -22.61 Class IV 7 90,783 4 51,972 75.00 38,811 74.68 Class V 2 14,510 9,122 100.00 5,388 59.07 Class VI 2 8,597

Kapurthala All classes 7 246,527 3 166,605 133.33 79,922 47.97 Total class-I 102,253 a) Cities with one Million and above Population b) Cities with 500,000 to 999,999 population. c) Cities with 100,000 to 499,999 population. 102,253 Class II 85,686 2 152,883 -50.00 -67197 -43.95 Class III Class IV 3 40,999 13,722 200.00 27,277 198.78 Class V 2 17,589 Class VI

Ialandhar All classes 14 931,983 12 670,355 16.67 261,628 39.03 Total class-I 714,077 509,510 204,567 40.15 a) Cities with one Million and above Population b) Cities with 500,000 to 999,999 popUlation. 714,077 509,510 204,567 40.15 c) Cities with 100,000 to 499,999 population. Class II Class III 4 119,398 4 102,047 17,351 17.00 Class IV 5 71,023 4 47,434 25.00 23,589 49.73 Class V 3 23,425 6,468 200.00 16,957 262.17 Class VI 4,060 4,896 -836 -17.08

118 Statement - 5 Number and Population of Cities and Towns of 1991 and 2001 Censuses arranged in Six Classes I to VI

State! Class of Towns 2001 1991 Percentage! Increase and Percentage District No. of Total No. of Total Increase and decrease in increase or Towns population Towns population decrease in population decrease No. of Towns of class 1991-2001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Hoshiarpur All classes 12 291,074 9 222,138 33.33 69,936 31.48 Total class-I 149,668 122,705 26,963 21.97 a) Cities with one MiIlion and above Population b) Cities with 500,000 to 999,999 popUlation. c) Cities with 100,000 to 499,999 population. 149,668 122,705 26,963 21.97 Class II Class III 4 86,120 Class IV 2 25,166 5 84,090 -60.00 -58,924 -70.07 Class V 4 26,875 2 11,632 100.00 15,243 131.04 Class VI 4,245 3,711 534 14.39

Nawanshahr All classes 4 81,066 3 58,447 33.33 22,619 38.70 Total class-I a) Cities with one MiIlion and above Population b) Cities with 500,000 to 999,999 population. c) Cities with 100,000 to 499,999 population. Class II Class III 31,967 29,955 2,012 6.72 Class IV 3 49,099 2 28,492 50.00 20,607 72.33 Class V Class VI

Rupnagar All classes II 362,407 8 232,317 37.50 130,090 56.00 Total class-I 123,484 a) Cities with one Million and above Population b) Cities with 500,000 to 999,999 population. c) Cities with 100,000 to 499,999 population. 123,484 Class II 78,457 Class III 6 202,859 3 96,108 100.00 106,751 111.07 Class IV 2 24,051 4 57,752 -50.00 -33,701 -58.35 Class V 2 12,013 Class VI

119 Statement - 5 Number and Population of Cities and Towns ?f- 1991 and 2001 Censuses arranged in Six Classes I to VI State! Class of Towns 2001 1991 Percentage! Increase and Percentage District No. of Total No. ~t '.',,-, Total Increase and decrease in increase or Towns population Towns population decrease in population decrease No. of Towns of class 1991-2001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Fatehgarh All classes 5 151,091 4 100,873 25.00 50,218 49.78 Sahib Total class-I a) Cities with one Million and above Population b) Cities with 500,000 to 999,999 population. c) Cities with 100,000 to 499,999 population. Class II 60,677 Class III 49,825 2 72,881 -50.00 -23,056 -31.64 Class IV 2 31,747 18,138 100.00 13,609 75.03 Class V 8,842 9,854 -1,012 -10.27 Class VI

Ladhiana All classes 12 1,693,653 10 1,242,781 20.00 450,872 36.28 Total class-I 2 1,501.566 1,042,740 100.00 458,826 44.00 a) Cities with one Million and above Population 1,398,467 1,042,740 355,727 34.11 b) Cities with 500,000 to 999,999 popUlation. c) Cities with 100,000 to 499,999 population. 103,099 Class II 60,080 71,990 -11,910 -16.54 Class III 24,769 2 68,433 -50.00 -43,664 -63.81 Class IV 5 86,182 3 38,613 66.67 47,569 123.19 Class V 3 21,056 3 21,005 51 0.24 Class VI

Moga All classes 4 178,640 5 156,402 -20.00 22,238 14.22 Total class-I 135,279 110,958 24,321 21.92 a) Cities with one Million and above Population b) Cities with 500,000 to 999,999 popUlation. c) Cities with 100,000 to 499,999 popUlation. 135,279 110,958 24,321 21.92 Class II Class III 21,5')6 Class IV 15,399 2 29,268 -50.00 -13,869 -47.39 Class V 6,366 2 16,176 -50.00 -9,810 -60.65 Class VI

120 Statement - 5 Number and Population of Cities and Towns of 1991 and 2001 Censuses arranged in Six Classes I to VI

State/ Class of Towns 2001 1991 Percentage/ Increase and Percentage District No. of Total No. of Total Increase and decrease in increase or Towns population Towns population decrease in population decrease No. of Towns of class 1991-2001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

FirozllUr All classes 9 450,725 8 364,815 12.50 85,910 23.55 Total class-I 124,399 107,163 17,236 16.08 a) Cities with one Million and above Population t» Cities with 500,000 to 999,999 population. c) Cities with 100,000 to 499,999 population. 124,339 107,163 17,176 16.03 Class II 3 220,580 3 189,860 30,720 16.18 Class III 2 64,707 2 46,830 17,877 38.17 Class IV 3 41,099 2 20,962 50.00 20,137 96.06 Class V Class VI

Muktsar All classes 4 198,564 3 153,117 33.33 45,447 29.68 Total class-I a) Cities with one Million ans! above Population b) Cities with 500,000 to 999,999 popUlation. c) Cities with 100,000 to 499,999 population. Class II 2 154,420 2 123,251 31,169 25.29 Class III 36,598 29,866 6,732 22.54 Class IV 7,546 Class V Class VI

Faridkot All classes 3 193,571 3 149,905 43,666 29.13 Total class-I a) Cities with one Million and above Population b) Cities with 500,000 to 999,999 population. c) Cities with 100,000 to 499,999 popUlation. Class II 2 160,106 2 121,055 39,051 32.26 Class III 33,465 28,850 4,615 16.00 Class IV Class V Class VI

121 Statement - 5 Number and Population of Cities and Towns of 1991 and 2001 Censuses arranged in Six Classes I to VI

Statel Class of Towns 2001 1991 Percentagel Increase and Percentage District No. of Total No. of Total Increase and decrease in increase or Towns population Towns population decrease in population decrease No. of Towns of class 1991-2001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Bathinda All classes 9 351.754 8 265.790 12.50 85.964 32.34 Total class-I 217.256 159.042 58.214 36.60 a) Cities with one Million and above Population b) Cities with 500.000 to 999.999 population. c) Cities with 100.000 to 499.999 population. 217.256 159.042 58.214 36.60 Class II Class III 2 72.208 2 60.710 11.498 18.94 Class IV 3 45.610 3 37.696 7.914 20.99 Class V 2 11.905 5.611 100.00 6.294 112.17 Class VI 4.775 2.731 2.044 74.84

Mansa All classes 5 142,429 3 85.343 66.67 57.086 66.89 Total class-I a) Cities with one Million and above Population b) Cities with 500.000 to 999.999 population. c) Cities with 100.000 to 499.999 population. Class II 72.627 55.089 17.538 31.84 Class III 23.521 Class IV 3 46.281 2 30.254 50.00 16.027 52.97 Class V Class VI

Sangrur All classes 17 584.819 12 .417.994 41.67 166.825 39.91 Total c1ass-I 107.009 a) Cities with one Million and above Population b) Cities with 500.000 to 999.999 population. c) Cities with 100.000 to 499.999 population. 107.009 Class II 3 230.864 3 220,449 10,415 4.72 Class III 3 97.667 3 106.900 -9.233 -8.64 Class IV 8 130.301 6 90.645 33.33 39.656 43.75 Class V 2 18.978 Class VI

122 Statement - 5 Number and Population of Cities and Towns of 1991 and 2001 Censuses arranged in Six Classes I to VI

State! Class of Towns 2001 1991 Percentage! Increase and Percentage District No. of Total No. of Total Increase and decrease in increase or Towns population Towns population decrease in population decrease No. of Towns of class 1991-200 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Patiala All classes 14 644,710 8 466,100 75.00 178,610 38.32 Total class-I 323,884 253,706 70,178 27.66 a) Cities with one Million and above Population b) Cities with 500,000 to 999,999 population. c) Cities with 100,000 to 499,999 population. 323,884 253,706 70,178 27.66 Class II 2 144,956 2 125,404 19,552 15.59 Class III 3 93,789 36,556 200.00 57,233 156.56 Class IV 3 48,789 3 40,832 7,957 19.49 Class V 4 31,361 9,602 300.00 21,759 226.61 Class VI 1,931

Out of 157 towns 14 towns having more than 5,00,000 - 9,99,999. The highest percentage increase 1 lac population as compared to 10 towns during (107.14%) has been witnessed in class V towns due 1991 Census. Out of 14 towns, 11 towns are under to the inclusion of 41 new towns and as lower class the category of having population 1,00,000 to towns moved to higher class. Same trend has been 4,99,999, two towns are under 1 million plus noticed in decadal (1991-2001) percentage increase population and one town falls in the category of in population.

Statement - 6 Proportion of Population in each Class of Town to Total Urban Population in 2001-1991

State Cities with Cities with Cities with Class I Class II Class III Class IV-VI population population 0.5 population 0.1 Over 1 million to 1 million to 0.5 million 2001 1991 2001 1991 2001 1991 2001 1991 2001 1991 2001 1991 2001 1991 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Punjab 29.07 17.40 8.64 20.33 20 .•61 16.44 58.32 54.17 15.91 19.91 13.10 12.92 12.67 13.00

More than half of the urban population (58.32%) proportion of population to total urban population covers under class I and out of. this about fifty reported from other classes IV to VI, whereas it percent (29.07%) are covered in the cities of was 13.00% in 1991 in the same size class of population over one million whereas it was 17.40% population. It revels that with the passes of period in 1991 Census and one fifth covers in the cities lower size class town moves towards higher class with population 0.1 to 0.5 million. Only 12.67% ·category of town.

123 Statement Movement of Cities and Towns from one (a) Indicates number and population of towns which a particular class of 2001 has (b) Indicates number and population of towns which a particular class of 2001 has received (c) Indicates number and population of towns which a particular class of 1991 has passed (increment and decrement of towns in the

State! District Category n m of Class No. 1991 2001 Class No. 1991 2001 Class No. 1991 2001 movement population population population population population population 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 • Punjab (a) (b) n 4 327363 435845 m 4 180873 232795 N 13 226298 286484

N 2 15UOl 45383 (c)

Gurdaspur (a) (b) N 2 33058 43317 (c)

Amritsar (a) (b) III 47529 55787 N 19293 23834 (c)

Kapurthala (a) (b) n 88316 102253 (c)

Jalandhar (a) (b) (c)

Hoshiarpur (a) (b) N 4 72329 86120 (c)

Nawanshahr (a) (b) (c)

Rupnagar (a) (b) n 78457 123484 N 2 35032 45682 N 9429 20361 (c)

Fatehgarh (a) Sahib (b) m I 42063 60677 I (c)

Ludhiana (a) (b) n 71990 103099 m 47372 60080 (c)

Moga (a) (b) N 17287 21596 (c)

Firozpur (a) (b) (c)

124 -7 class to another during 1991-2001 received by a process of decrement from the next higher class range (s) of 1991 by a process of ~ncrement from the next lower of any other lower range of 1991 down by a process of decrement to the next lower of any other lower range of 2001. statement relate to their territorial content in 200 1.)

IV V VI VII (Not treated as town 200 1) Statel Class No. 1991 2001 Class No. 1991 2001 Class No. 1991 2001 Class No. 1991 2001 District population population population population population population population population 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Punjab V 4 38167 60147 VI 3 10957 16630 VI 2 8728 26081 N 9 97888 126883 N II 59079 81959 N 5 22531 18705 V 2 13699 17434 VI 4806 5459

Gurdaspur N 2 30321 29599 VI 3461 5450 N 2 9713 7939 V 609S 6935 VI 4806 5459

Amritsar VI 3832 12162 VI 4765 5779 V 9122 12631 N 6189 8731

Kapurthala N 9256 15337

Jalandhar VI 4896 13919 N 4134 4060

- Hoshiarpur N 8258 10018 N 2 10061 12793

Nawanshahr

Rupnagar N 5395 10162 N 2 9417 12013

Firozpur

V 7604 10499

125 Statement Movement of Cities and Towns from one

(a) Indicates number and population of towns which a particular class of 2001 has (b) Indicates number and population of towns which a particular class of 2001 has received (c) Indicates number and population of towns which a particular class of 1991 has passed (increment and decrement of towns in the State! District Category I n ill of Class No. 1991 2001 Class No. 1991 2001 Class No. 1991 2001 movement l!£E!ulation l!£E!ulation l!£E!ulation E!oE!ulation l!£E!ulation l!£E!ulation 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Muktsar (a) (b) (c)

Faridkot (a) (b) (c)

Bathinda (a) (b) (c)

Mansa (a) (b) N 18717 23521 (c)

Sangrur (a) (b) n 88600 107009 ill 43909 56251 N 16254 20239 (c)

Patiala (a) (b) N 14328 22175 N 5572 25022

30 Towns of 1991 Census have changed their towns which were village/villages during 1991 category in 2001 census, as they have crossed the Census are also added in this statement against population limit of their respective classes. 4 Towns (N) class as per their respective category of ascended from II category to I, another 4 ascended. population. from III category to II, 13 ascended from category Bebrampur and Fateh Nanga! Census Towns of IV to III, 4 Towns from category V to IV and Class V and VI of Gurdaspur district and Kot Ise another 2 towns from category VI to IV and 3 Khan Census Town, class V of Firozpur district are towns ascended from category VI to V. 27 new not treated as towns during 2001 Census.

126 ·7 class to another during 1991·2001 received by a process of decrement from the next higher class range (s) of 1991 by a process of increment from the next lower of any other lower range of 1991 down by a process of decrement to the next lower of any other lower range of 2001. statement relate to their territorial content in 2001.) N V -,:::-_~_....;VI~=-__~=-- VII (Not treated as town 2(01) State! Class No. 1991 2001 Class No. 1991 2001 Class No. 1991 2001 Class No. 1991 2001 District population population population population population population population .population 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Muktsar

Faridkot

Bathinda VI 2731 5401 N 4256 4775

Mansa N 2 21809 31395

Sangrur N 9939 13079 N 4553 9245

Patiala V 9602 15841 N 3 16199 23149 N 4428 1931

127 Statement - 8 Name of Towns which have not changed their class betw~ 1911 and 2001 Size class in 1911 and 2001 Name of Town 2 Amritsar M. Corp IV Bassi Pathana M.CI (Fatehgarh Sahib) Amritsar M.Corp and Bassi Pathana their class between 1911 to 2001, However, M.CI of Fatehgarh Sahib District are the two Amritsar M.Corp has emerged as million plus towns of Punjab State which did not changed city of India. Statement - 9 Number and Population of places not treated as Towns in 1991 but treated as such in 2001 arranged by StateJDistrict and size class State! Total Class - I Class - II Class - III Class - IV Class - V Class - VI District No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of towns Population towns Population towns Population towns Population towns Population towns Population towns Population

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS Punjab 27 272930 2 45383 9 126883 11 81959 5 18705 Gurdaspur 4 37538 2 29599 2 7939 Amritsar 8731 8731 Kapurthal 15337 15337 lalandhar 1 4060 4060 Hoshiarpur 3 22811 10018 2 12793 Nawanshahr Rupnagar 4 42536 20361 101p2 2 12013 Fatehgarh Sahib 8842 8842 Ludhiana 2 24479 17293 7186 Moga Firozpur Muktsar Faridkot Bathinda I 4775 4775 Mansa 2 31395 2 31395 Sangrur 2 22324 13079 1 9245 Patiala 5 50102 25022 3 23149 1931 Of the 27 new places which were not treated district fall in class III, V and VI followed by as town in 1991, but treated as such in 2001 two Gurdaspur and Rupnagar districts (4 each), population belong to class III, nine to class IV, eleven to class (37538) and (42536) respectively falls in class IV and V and five to class VI. Maximum number of towns VI in Gurdaspur and class III, IV and V in Rupnagar (5) and population (50102) are reported from Patiala District.

Statement -10 Percentage Variation of Population 1991-2001 of places which were not treated as Towns in 1991 but treated as such in 2001 classified by StateJDistrict and Size Class. Class Number of towns Population in 1991 Population in 2001 Percentage variation in 2001 population over 1991 i.e. e 2001-1991 x 100 1991 2 3 4 5 Punjab 27 194499 272930 40.32 I II III 2 15001 45383 202.53 IV 9 97888 126883 29.62 V 11 59079 81959 38.73 YI 5 2"531 18705 -16.98 128 Statement -10 Percentage Variation of Population 1991-2001 of places which were not treated as Towns in 1991 but treated as such in 2001 classified by StatelDistrict and Size Class.

Class Number of towns Population in 1991 Population in 2001 Percentage var~ation in 200 I population over 1991 i.e. 2001-1991 x 100 1991 2 3 4 5

Gurdaspur 4 40034 37538 -6.23 I II III IV 2 30321 29599 -2.38 V VI 2 9713 7939 -18.26

Amritsar 6189 8731 41.07

II III IV V 6189 8731 41.07 VI

Kapurthala 9256 15337 65.70 I II III IV 9256 15337 65.70 V VI lalandhar 4134 4060 -1.79 I II III IV V VI 4134 4060 -1.79

Hoshiarpur 3 18,319 22,811 24.52 I II III IV 8,258 10,018 21.31 V 2 10,061 12,793 27.15 VI

Nawanshahr I II III IV V VI

Rupnagar 4 24,241 42,536 75.47 I II III 9,429 20,361 115.94 IV 5,395 10,162 88.36 V 2 9,417 12,013 27.57 VI C()l1td .. 129 Statement -10 Percentage Variation of Population 1991-2001 of places which were not treated as Towns in 1991 but treated as such in 2001 classified by State/District and Size Class. Class Number of towns Population in 1991 Population in 2001 Percentage variation in 2001 population over 1991 Le. 2001-1991 x 100 1991 2 3 4 5

Fatehgarh Sahib 6,506 8,842 35.91 I II III IV V 6,506 8,842 35.91 VI

Ludhiana 2 19,064 24479 28.40 I II III IV 12,910 17,293 33.95 V 6,154 7,186 16.77 VI

Moga I II III IV V VI

Firozpur I II III IV V VI

Muktsar I II III IV V VI

Faridkot I II III IV V VI

Bathinda '4,256 4,775 12.19 I II III IV V VI 4,256 4,775 12.19 Contd .... 130 Statement -10 Percentage Variation of Population 1991-2001 of places which were not treated as Towns in 1991 but treated as such in 2001 classified by StatelDistrict and Size Class. Class Number of towns Population in 1991 Population in 2001 Percentage variation in 2001 population over 1991 i.e. 2001-1991 x 100 1991 2 3 4 5

Mansa 2 21,809 3).395 43.95 I II III N 2 21,809 31,395 43.95 V VI

Sangrur 2 14492 22324 54.04 I II III IV 9939 13079 31.59 V 4553 9245 103.05 VI

Patiala 5 26199 50102 91.24 I II III 5572 25,022 349.07 N V 3 16199 23149 42.90 VI 4428 1 931 -56.39 Concld.... Statement 10 furnishes the percentage variation negative percentage variation has been noticed in the of population 1991-2001 of places treated as towns case of class VI (-16.98). Patiala district with 91.24 in 2001 census. Highest percentage variation 202.53% percentage variation is at the top, however Gurdaspur reported from class III towns, followed by class V district with percentage variation negative (-6.23) after (38.73), class IV (29.62) respectively. However adding 4 new towns ~!l the district is at the tale. Statement - 11 Percentage Variation of Population 1991-2001 of places treated as Towns in 1991 but removed from the list of Towns in 2001 classified by StatelDistrict and Size Class. Class Number of towns Population in 1991 Population in 2001 Percentage variation in 2001 popUlation over 1991 i.e. 2001-1991 x 100 1991 2 3 4 5 Punjab 3 18,505 22,893 23.71 V 2 13,699 17,434 27.26 VI 4,806 5,459 13.59 Gurdaspur 2 10,901 12,394 13.70 V 6,095 6,935 13.78 VI 4,806 5,459 13.59 Firozpur 7,604 10,499 37.41 V 7,604 10,499 37.41

Statement 11 furnishes percentage variation census. There are total 3 towns, 2 from Gurdaspur in 200 1 population over 1991 of places treated as district under class V and VI and one from Firozpur towns in 1991 Census, but declassified during 2001 district in V class. 131 Statement - 12 Numberot Towns of each class during 1901-2001 Urban Aggloineration has been classified according to Total Population State/ District 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 All Classes Punjab 157 120 134 106 106 110 75 66 59 62 76 Gurdaspur 14 12 11 10 II 11 6 6 7 8 9 Amritsar 13 10 11 9 8 9 9 7 7 6 7 Kapurthala 7 3 8 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 5 lalandhar 14 11 13 9 8 10 5 5 5 5 7 Hoshiarpur 12 9 9 9 8 I 1 6 5 3 6 9 Nawanshahr 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Rupnagar 11 8 9 7 7 4 3 I 1 2 2 Fatehgarh Sahib 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 Ludhiana 12 10 10 6 7 7 5 4 3 4 6 Moga 4 5 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 Firozpur 9 8 8 8 8 7 6 6 5 5 5 Muktsar 4 3 6 3 3 2 2 2 1 I Faridkot 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 Bathinda 9 8 9 8 8 8 2 2 2 2 3 Mansa 5 3 3 3 3 3 2 Sangrur 17 12 14 12 12 15 9 8 6 6 7 Patia1a 14 8 9 7 7 7 6 5 5 5 6 Class - I Punjab 14 10 7 4 4 3 3 Gurdaspur 2 2 2 Amritsar Kapurthala lalandhar Hoshiarpur Nawanshahr Rupnagar Fatehgarh Sahib Ludhiana 2 Moga Firozpur Muktsar Faridkot Bathinda Mansa Sangrur Patiala Class - II Punjab 18 18 10 8 5 2 2 4 3 2 2 Gurdaspur 1 1 1 Amritsar Kapurthala 2 2 lalandhar Hoshiarpur Nawanshahr Rupnagar Fatehgarh Sahib Ludhiana Moga 1 1 Firozpur 3 3 2 2 Muktsat 2 2 Faridkot 2 2 Bathinda Mansa I Sangrur 3 3 Patiala 2 2 Contd .... 132 Statement - 12 Number ot Towns of each class during 1901-2001 Urban Agglomeration has been classified according to Total Population State/ District 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Class - III Punjab 36 25 27 22 23 17 13 6 5 4 4 Gurdaspur 3 1 2 Arnritsar 2 2 Kapurthala 2 2 lalandhar 4 4 2 1 Hoshiarpur 4 Nawanshahr 1 1 Rupnagar 6 3 4 Fatehgarh Sahib 2 2 Ludhiana 2 2 2 Moga 1 Firozpur 2 2 2 2 3 4 2 Muktsar 2 2 2 Faridkot 3 2 2 2 Bathinda 2 2 Mansa 1 1 I Sangrur 3 3 4 4 4 Patiala 3 2 3 2 2 Class - IV Punjab 54 46 36 31 20 20 20 16 12 10 14 Gurdaspur 4 4 4 3 2 2 2 1 Arnritsar 7 4 3 2 2 3 3 2 1 Kapurthala 3 1 2 2 2 2 lalandhar 5 4 3 3 3 2 2 Hoshiarpur 2 5 4 4 2 Nawanshahr 3 2 1 2 2 Rupnagar 2 4 3 2 Fatehgarh Sahib 2 2 1 Ludhiana 5 3 2 2 2 Moga 1 2 1 Firozpur 3 2 2 2 Muktsar Faridkot 1 2 2 2 2 Bathinda 3 3 3 2 2 Mansa 3 2 1 1 1 Sangrur 8 6 6 5 2 3 3 2 2 Patiala 3 3 2 2 Class - V Punjab 29 14 40 29 35 36 32 31 27 29 38 Gurdaspur 2 2 2 3 4 2 3 3 2 3 6 Arnritsar 2 5 2 3 4 5 4 5 4 5 Kapurthala 2 2 1 1 1 1 lalandhar 3 I 7 3 2 5 2 4 3 4 4 Hoshiarpur 4 2 2 2 3 4 4 4 2 2 4 Nawanshahr 2 2 2 3 3 2 Rupnagar 2 4 4 2 2 2 Fatehgarh Sahib I 1 I 2 1 Ludhiana 3 3 5 2 2 Moga 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Firozpur 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 Muktsar 2 1 Faridkot Bathinda 2 2 2 Mansa 2 2 1 Sangrur 2 2 3 6 6 4 3 4 5 4 Patiala 4 3 2 2 2 2 2 Contd .... 133 Statement - 12 Number ot Towns of each class during 1901-2001 Urban Agglomeration has been classified according to Total Population State/ District 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Class - VI Punjab 6 7 14 12 19 32 5 8 11 16 17 Gurdaspur 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 2 Amritsar 2 3 Kapurthala 3 2 Ialandhar 1 1 1 Hoshiarpur 2 2 3 6 3 3 Nawanshahr 2 Rupnagar Fatehgarh Sahib 1 2 2 2 Ludhiana 2 3 Moga Firozpur 2 2 3 Muktsar Faridkot Bathinda 2 3 3 5 2 Mansa Sangrur 5 2 Patiala 2 2 1 Concld.... The above mentioned statement shows class the total population of the urban agglomeration has wise number of towns during 1901-2001. Urban been considered for determining its class. Out of total agglomeration has been considered as single urban 139 statutory towns, 19 statutory towns have urban- unit and for classification into size class of towns, agglomerations in the state.

134 Statement - 13 Percentage of Towns in each class to Total No. of Towns and Percentage of Population in each class to Total Urban Population (Urban Agglomeration has been classified according to Total Population) Punjab Percenta e of Class 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Town Population Town Population Town Population Town Population Town Population 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 8.92 58.32 8.33 54.16 5.22 46.38 3.77 40.52 3.77 38.25 II 11.47 15.91 15.00 19.91 7.46 14.39 7.55 15.84 4.72 10.15 III 22.93 13.10 20.84 13.12 20.15 20.46 20.75 22.51 21.70 28.42 IV 34.39 9.81 38.33 10.62 26.87 11.06 29.25 13.32 18.87 10.44 V 18.47 2.58 11.67 1.72 29.85 6.50 27.36 6.S3 33.02 10.07 VI 3.82 0.28 5.83 0.47 10.45 1.21 11.32 1.28 17.92 2.67

Statement - 13

Punjab Percenta e of Oass 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Town Population Town Population Town PopUlation Town Population Town Population Town Population 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2.73 33.11 4.00 38.49 1.52 22.67 1.70 18.43 1.61 18.78 1.32 17.38 II 1.82 7.73 2.67 9.19 6.06 23.74 5.09 20.38 3.23 14.78 2.63 12.97 III 15.45 26.17 17.33 21.01 9.09 13.29 8.47 16.06 6.45 17.39 5.26 15.67 IV 18.18 14.44 26.67 16.14 24.24 19.04 20.34 18.15 16.13 16.44 18.42 20.45 V 32.73 13.18 42.66 14.06 46.97 19.06 45.76 22.24 46.77 24.60 50.00 27.47 VI 29.09 5.37 6.67 1.11 12.12 2.20 18.64 4.74 25.81 8.01 22.37 6.06

Since 1951, percentage of towns and no. of towns and population decreased from 29.09 population under class I shows an increasing and 5.37 to 3.82 and 0.28 respectively. This revels trend. Percentage of No. of towns and population that lower class of towns moves upwards as which was 2.73 and 33.11 in 1951 rose to 8.92 population increased. In other decade i.e. 1901 to and 58.32 respectively during 2001 Census in the 1941, up/down has been witnessed in the same size class. On the contrary class VI shows percentage of towns as well as in percentage of decreasing trend since 1951. The percentage of population.

135

PUNJAB SCAL E OF BAR

GROWTH OF URBAN POPULATION 160 z 140 2

(/) - AMRITSAR

SANGRUR

RAJASTHAN MANSA LJ 1911 .. 1921 CJ 1931 [~ 1941 1951 BOUNDARY, INTERNATIONAL...... 1961 STATE. _...... __ .. DiSTRiCT ...... 1971 1981 Pocket iOT Kapurthal. K Pocket fOT Patiala p 1991 N.A :: DATA NOT AVAILABLE " 2001

137 PUNJAB

POPULATION SIZE OF TOWNS 2001

KILO METRES 10 5 0 10 20 30 40

KILOMETRES De

? o tMjitha M.e o. Salata M.e!. Sri Hargobindpur Raja Sansl M.el. < N.P. OIA\ Amritsar L::J.__) M.CORP. Amritsar 0 Jandiala M.a. Cantt·C.B. 0 Aayya N,P o - oTam Taran M.el. Patti M.a.

o o Mullanpur Jagraon Dakha N.P. M.CI Q AJcalgarh oMoga M. C1. C.T. RaikOl o OM .O Bhaga. Purana /\ N.P L.:':, CT. (\ Badhni Kalan J \ NP ~ o Bhadaur M.a. n Bamal8M.CI.

L8Handi

RAJASTHAN

SIZE CLASS OF URBAN CENTRES

BOUNDARY, INTERNAT IONAL. .. 100,000 AN D ABOVE CLASS - I 0 STATE.. DISTRICT ... CLASS - "D 50,000 - 99,999 20,000 • 49,999 Pockel for Kapurthala K CLASS - 111 0 Pocket for Patiala p \(),()OO - 19,999 CLASS - Iv a

CLASS - V 6 5,000 - 9,999 CLA SS-VI 0 BELOW 5,000

138 PUNJAB URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS 2001

KILOMErRES

10 5 0 ~O 20 30 4Q

KILOMETRES

? oBatala UA < Amri1sar O UA

AMRITSAR

- o

o Mega UA MOGA

SANGRUR Rampura 0 PhulUA D _U.A.

RAJASTHAN

SIZE CLASS OF UAs BOUNDA RY, INTE RNATIONAL.

STATE ... CLASS- I 0 100,000 AND ABOVE DISTR ICT .. CLASS - II D 50.000 - 99.999

Pocket tor Kapurthala K CLASS - III 0 20,000 - 49.999 Pocket for Pati ala. p

139

ALPHABETICAL LIST OF TOWNS-2001

Alphabetical list of towns, 2001

SI. Town District Classl Page Sl. Town District Classl Page No. SI. No. of No. No. SI. No. or No. Table A-4 Table A-4 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 Abohar (M Cl) Firozpur 1110 179 49 Doraha eM CI) Ludhiana IV/4 194 2 (M Cl) Ialandhar IV/17 196 50 Faridkot (M CI) Faridkot IIn 182 3 Ahmedgarh (M Cl) Sangrur 111116 190 5 1 Fatehgarh Churian 4 Ajnala (NP) Amritsar IV/8 195 (M CI) Gurdaspur IV120 197 5 Akalgarh (CT) Ludhiana VII 9 203 52 Fazilka eM CI) Firozpur 11112 183 6 Alawalpur (M Cl) lalandhar VII 8 203 53 Firozpur (M CI) Firozpur 1112 181 7 Amloh eM CI) Fatehgarh Sahib IV/41 199 54 Firozpur Cantt. (CB) Firozpur 11/16 184 8 Amritsar (M Corp.) Amritsar 1/2 173 55 Gardhiwala (M CI) Hoshiarpur V/22 203 9 Amritsar Cantt. (CB) Amritsar IV/47 200 56 Garhshankar (M CI) Hoshiarpur IV126 197 10 Anandpur Sahib (M CI) Rupnagar IV 135 199 57 (NP) Patiala V/8 202 1 I Badhni Kalan (NP) Moga V/21 203 58 Ghanaur (NP) Patiala V/26 204 1 2 Balachaur (NP) Nawanshahr IVlll 195 59 Giddarbaha (M Cil Muktsar 1III9 188 1 3 Banga (M CI) Nawanshahr IV/6 195 60 Gobindgarh (M CI) Fatehgarh Sahib 11114 184 14 Banur (M CI) Patiala IV/28 198 61 Goniana (M Cl) Bathinda IV 140 199 15 Bareta (M Cl) Mansa IV/30 198 62 Goraya (NP) lalandhar IV125 197 16 Bariwala (NP) Muktsar VII 3 202 63 Gurdaspur (M Cl) Gurdaspur III 1 I 183 17 Bamala (M Cl) Sangrur 1111 181 64 Guru Hac Sahai (M Cil Firozpur IVf32 198 1 8 Bassi Pathana (M CI) Fatehgarh Sahib IV/3 194 65 Hajipur (CT) Hoshiarpur V/29 204 19 Batala (M CI) Gurdaspur 118 177 66 Handiaya (NP) Sangrur VII 201 20 Bathinda (M CI) Bathinda 1/5 176 67 Hariana (M CI) Hoshiarpur VIII 202 21 Begowal (NP) Kapurthala V/2 202 68 Hoshiarpur (M Cl) Hoshiarpur 117 177 22 Bhabat (CT) Rupnagar V/24 204 69 Hussainpur (CT) Kapurthala IV/24 197 23 Bhadaur (M Cl) Sangrur IVII6 196 70 lagraon (M Cl) Ludhiana IIIl5 184 24 Bhagha Pur ana (NP) Moga III/31 193 7 1 laitu (M CI) Faridkot IlIlll 188 25 Bhankharpur (CT) Patiala V/4 202 72 lalalabad (M CI) Firozpur 111/12 189 26 (CT) Gurdaspur VII5 205 73 lalandhar (M Corp.) lalandhar I13 175 27 Bhawanigarh (M CI) Sangrur IVII3 196 74 lalandhar Cantt. (CB) lalandhar III/8 188 28 Bhikhi (NP) Mansa IV/27 198 75 landiala (M CI) Amritsar III/21 202 29 Bhikhiwind (NP) Amritsar IV/51 201 76 Iandiala (NP) lalandhar VII2 191 30 Bhisiana (CT) Bathinda VIII 204 77 lugial (CT) Gurdaspur IVII8 197 31 Bhogpur (NP) lalandhar IV/34 199 78 Kalanaur (NP) Gurdaspur IV/39 199 32 Bhucho Mandi (M CI) Bathinda IV/36 199 79 Kapurthala (M CI) Kapurthala 1I13 181 33 Bhulath (NP) Kapurthala IV/53 201 80 Karoran (CT) Rupnagar III/34 193 34 Budha Theh (CT) Amritsar V/6 202 8 I Kartarpur (M CI) Ialandhar III/18 191 35 Budhlada (M Cl) Mansa III122 191 82 Khamanon (NP) Fatehgarh Sahib V/5 202 36 Cheema (NP) Sangrur V/3 202 83 Khanauri (NP) Sangrur IV/50 201 37 Chohal (CT) Hoshiarpur VII 5 203 84 Khanna (M CI) Ludhiana I1l3 180 38 Dasua (M CI) Hoshiarpur III/36 193 85 Kharar (M CI) Rupnagar IIII7 187 39 Daulatpur (CT) Gurdaspur VII2 204 86 Khemkaran (NP) Amritsar IV/49 201 40 Dera Baba Nanak 87 Kot Fatta (M CI) Bathinda V/20 203 (M CI) Gurdaspur VII 4 203 88 Kot Kapura (M Cl) Faridkot Il/6 1.82 41 Dera Bassi (M Cl) Patiala IV/21 197 89 Kurali (M CI) Rupnagar III/23 191 42 Dhanaula (M CI) Sangrur IV/9 195 90 Lehragaga (M CO Sangrur IVI2 194 43 Dharamkot (M Cl) Moga IV/23 197 9 I Lohian Khas (NP) Ialandhar V/17 202 44 Dhariwal (M Cl) Gurdaspur IVI7 195 92 LongQwal (M CI) Sangrur III/35 193 45 Dhilwan (NP) Kapurthala VIIO 202 93 Ludhiana (M Corp.) Ludhiana III 173 46 Dhuri (M ell Sangrur IIl/2 186 94 Machhiwara (NPl Ludhiana IVIIO 195 47 Dinanagar (M CI) Gurdaspur III/32 193 95 Mahilpur (NP) Hoshiarpur IV/54 201 48 Dirba (NP) Sangrur IV/37 199 96 Majitha (M Cl) Amritsar IVf38 199 143 Alphabetical list of towns, 2001

Sl. Town District Classl Page SI. Town District Class/ Page No. SI. Nfl. of No. No. SI. No. of No. Table A-4 Table A-4 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 97 Makhu (NP) Firozpur IV/46 200 128 Raman (M CI) Bathinda IVIl 194 98 Malerkotla (M CI) Sangrur 1112 179 129 Ramdas (M CO Amritsar V125 204 99 Maloud (NP) Ludhiana VIl7 203 130 Rampura Phul (M CI) Bathinda III/6 187 100 Malout (M CI) Muktsar II110 183 131 Rayya (NP) Amritsar IV/43 200 101 Mansa (M CI) Mansa II19 182 132 Rupnagar (M CI) Rupnagar III/3 186 102 Maur (M CI) Bathinda III 11 7 190 133 Rurki Kasba (CT) Patiala V/9 202 103 Moga (M CI) Moga 1/9 179 134 S.A.S.Nagar (Mohali) 104 Moonak (NP) Sangrur IV/29 198 (M Cl) Rupnagar 1111 179 105 Morinda (M CI) Rupnagar III/24 192 135 Sahnewal (NP) Ludhiana IV!l5 196 106 Mukerian (M Cl)' Hoshiarpur III/33 193 136 Samana (M CI) Patiala III/4 186 107 Muktsar (M CI) Muktsar 1114 181 137 Samrala (M cn Ludhiana IV/14 196 108 (NP) Ludhiana IV/33 198 138 Sanaur (M CI) Patiala IV!l2 196 109 Mullanpur Garib Dass 139 Sangat (M Cl) Bathinda V128 204 (CT) Rupnagar V123 204 140 Sangrur (M Cl) Sangrur II18 182 110 Nabha (M CI) Patiala 11113 183 141 (CT) lalandhar VII4 205 111 Nakodar (M Cl) lalandhar IlIIl5 190 142 Sardulgarh (NP) Mansa IVI19 197 112 Nanga! (M CI) Rupnagar HIlS 186 143 Shahkot (NP) li11andhar IV/44 200 113 Nawanshahr (M CI) Nawanshahr III 11 3 189 144 Sham Chaurasi (M CI) Hoshiarpur VII3 205 114 Nehon (CT) Rupnagar IV/52 201 145 Sheikhpura (CT) Patiala VII6 205 115 Nurrnahal (M Cll lalandhar IV/42 200 146 Sirhind Fatehgarh Sahib 116 Pathankot (M CI) Gurdaspur 116 176 (M CI) Fatehgarh Sahib IIIIl 186 117 Patiala (M Corp.) Patiala 1/4 175 147 Sri Hargobindpur (M CI) Gurdaspur V127 204 118 Patran (NP) Patiala Ill/27 192 148 Sujanpur (M Cl) Gurdaspur III130 193 119 Patti (M Cl) Amritsar I11/10 188 149 Sultanpur (M Cl) Kapurthala IV122 197 120 Payal (M Cil Ludhiana VIl6 203 150 Sunam (M Cil Sangrur 11117 185 121 Phagwara (M Cl) Kapurthala 1114 180 151 Talwandi Bhai (M Cil Firozpur IV/31 198 122 Phillaur (M CI) lalandhar IlI126 192 152 Talwara (CT) Hoshiarpur 1II/25 192 123 Qadian (M CI) Gurdaspur 111/29 192 153 Tappa (M CI) Sangrur IV/5 194 124 Rahon (M Cil Nawanshahr IV/48 200 154 Tarn-Taran (M CI) Amritsar I1118 185 125 Raikot (M Cil Ludhiana 111120 191 155 Urmar Tanda (M Cl) Hoshiarpur 1II/28 192 126 Raja Sansi (NP) Amritsar IV/45 200 156 Zir~ (M el) Firozpur 1II/l4 190 127 Rajpura (M Cl) Patiala 1115 181 157 Zirakpur (NP) Patiala 1II/19 191

144 ALPHABETICAL LIST OF URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS - 2001

Alphabetical list of Urban Agglomerations-200l

sl. No. Urban AgglomeratIOn District Classl sl. No. of Page Table A-4 No. I 1 Amritsar VA Amritsar 112 173 2 Batala VA Gurdaspur 1/8 177 3 Faridkot VA Faridkot Iln 182 4 Gobindgarh VA Fatehgarh Sahib 11114 184 5 Gurdaspur VA Gurdaspur 11111 183 6 Iaitu VA Faridkot IIIIlI 188 7 Ialalabad VA Firozpur III/12 189 8 Ialandhar VA lalandhar 1/3 175 9 Kharar VA Rupnagar IIII7 187 10 Moga VA Moga 119 179 11 Nangal VA Rupnagar 11115 186 12 Nawanshahr VA Nawanshahr III/13 189 13 Pathankot VA Gurdaspur 116 176 14 Patiala VA Patiala 114 175 15 Phagwara VA Kapurthala 1114 180 16 Qadian VA Gurdaspur III129 192 17 Rampura Phul VA Bathinda 111/6 187 18 Sunam VA Sangrur 11117 185 19 Zira VA Firozpur III/14 190

147

TABLEA4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 SI. Name of Town! State! Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the preceding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 I) 10 11 ALL CLASSES -19 URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS AND 138 TOWNS

Punjab 1901 934,766 518,109 416,657 1911 813,224 -121,542 -13.00 467,271 345,953 1921 869,526 +56,302 +6.92 501,147 368,379 1931 1,168,413 +298,887 +34.37 679,049 489,364 1941 1,657,414 +489,001 +41.85 946,913 710,501 1951 1,989,267 +331,853 +20.02 1,101,113 888,154 1961 627.65 2,567,306 +578,039 +29.06 1,412,578 1,154,728 1971 691.66 3,216,179 +648,873 +25.27 1,733,040 1,483,139 1981 1,198.80 4,647,757 +1,431,578 +44.51 2,492,746 2,155,011 1991 1,440.80 5,993,225 +1,345,468 +28.95 3,208,611 2,784,614 2001 2,096.62 8,262,511 +2,269,286 +37.86 4,468,449 3,794,062

Class-I (100,000 and above) (7 U.As& 7 Towns)

1901 162,429 93,199 69,230 1911 152,756 -9,673 -5.96 88,879 63,877 1921 160,218 +7,462 +4.88 95,106 65,1l2 1931 264,840 +104,622 +65.30 158,985 105,855 1941 637,932 +373,092 +140.87 373,990 263,942 1951 658,725 +20,793 +3.26 366,166 292,559 1961 143.98 981,890 +323,165 +49.06 540,383 441,507 . 1971 174.57 1,303,128 +321,238 +32.72 711,736 591,392 1981 448.16 2,155,714 +852,586 +65.43 1,167,152 988,562 1991 556.46 3,246,224 +1,090,510 +50.59 1,752,157 1,494,067 2001 763.12 4,819,089 +1,572,865 +48.45 2,627,496 2,191,593

1 Ludhiana Ludhiana 1901 48,649 26,829 21,820 1911 44,170 -4,479 -9.21 25,517 18,653 1921 51,880 +7,710 +17.46 30,273 21,607 1931 68,586 +16,706 +32.20 40,032 28,554 1941 111,639 +43,053 +62.77 65,061 46,578 1951 153,795 +42,156 +37.76 83,820 69,975 1961 M.C 19.66 244,032 +90,237 +58.67 133,443 llO,589 1971 M.C. 41.70 401,176 +157,144 +64.39 222,052 179,124 1981 M.Corp. 110.00 607,052 +205,876 +51.32" 334,390 272,662 1991 M.Corp. 134.67 1,042,740 +435,688 +71.77 580,961 461,779 2001 M.Corp. 159.37 1,398,467 +355,727 +34.11 793,142 605,325

2 Amritsar Urban Amritsar 1901 162,429 93,199 69,230 Agglomeration ! 1911 152,756 -9,673 -5.96 88,879 63,877 1921 160,218 +7,462 +4.89 95,106 65,112 1931 264,840 +104,622 +65.30 158,985 105,855 1941 391,010 +126,170 +47.64 229,199 161,811 1951 336,114 -54,896 -14.04 191,219 144,895 1961 390,055 +53,941 +16.05 216,851 173,204 1971 454,805 +64,750 +16.60 248,924 205,881 1981 594,844 +140,039 +30.79 321,086 273,758 1991 708,835 +113,991 +19.16 376,478 332,357 2001 N.A. 1,003,917 +295,082 +41.63 538,744 465,173

(i) Amritsar 1901 162,429 93,199 69,230 1911 152,756 -9,673 -5.96 88,879 63,877 1921 160,218 + 7,462 +4.88 95,106 65,112 1931 264,840 +104,622 +65.30 158,985 105,855 1941 391,010 +126,170 +47.64 229,199 161,811 1951 336,114 -54,896 -14.04 191,219 144,895 149 A-4TOWNSANDURBANAGGWMERATIONSCLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901

SI. Name of Town! Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the ~recedinG census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1961 M.C 46.62 390,055 +53,941 +16.05 216,851 173,204 1971 M.C, 46.62 454,805 +64,750 +16.60 248,924 205,881 1981 M,Corp, 114.95 594,844 + 140,039 +30.79 321,086 273,758 1991 M,Corp. 114.95 708,835 +113,991 +19.16 376,478 332,357 2001 M.Corp. 136.00 966,862 +258,027 +36.40 518,388 448,474 (ii) Abadi Baba Darshan Singh on Ram Tirath Road (OG) 2001 N.A. 155 77 78 (iii) Abadi Baba Jiwan Singh on Ram Tirath Road (OG) 2001 N.A. 309 171 138 (iv) Abadi along Khairabad on Ram Tirath Road to Ajnala Road (OG) 2001 N.A. 1,713 909 804 (v) Village Roriwala (OG) 2001 N.A. 1,246 684 562 (vi) Prem Nagar on Ajnala Road (OG) 2001 N.A. 1,059 571 488 (vii) Abadi Mirankot on Ajnala Road (OG) 2001 N.A. 1,317 729 588 (viii) Colony on Jagdev Kalan Road (OG) 2001 N.A. 1,092 607 485 (ix) Ranjit Vihar (OG) 2001 N.A. 627 347 280 (x) Mata Kamla Devi Avenue on Fatehgarh Churian Road (OG) 2001 N.A. 659 403 256 (xi) Chand Avenue (OG) 2001 N.A. 625 358 267 (xii) Mohan Avenue (OG) 2001 N.A. 2,019 1,177 842 (xiii) Preet Nagar (OG) 2001 N.A. 1,200 658 542 (xiv) Daya Nand Nagar (OG) 2001 N.A. 658 338 320 (xv) Baba Deep Singh Nagar (OG) 2001 N.A. 1,437 782 655 (xvi) Dashmesh Avenue on Majitha Road (OG) 2001 N.A. 1,558 869 689 (xvii) Naushera Khurd (OG) 2001 N.A. 1,007 546 461 (xviii) Parti Vihar (OG) 2001 N.A. 159 90 69 (xix) Ek Rup Avenue (OG) 2001 N.A. 581 327 254 (xx) Abadi Naushera (OG) 2001 N.A. 448 233 215 (xxi) Silver Estate (OG) 2001 N.A. 665 348 317 (xxii) Krishna Lane (OG) 2001 N.A. 620 328 292 (xxiii) Village Mudal (OG) 2001 N.A. 4,202 2,274 1,928 (xxiv) Bara Khankot Doburjee (OG) 2001 N.A. 1,377 796 581 (xxv) Factories on right side of Doburjee GT. Road (OG) 2001 N.A. 593 328 265 (xxvi) Abadi Khalsa Nagar Near Kot Mit Singh (OG) 2001 N.A. 551 309 242 (xx vii) Village Mule Chak (OG) 2001 N.A. 2,004 1.IIS 889 150 A-4 TOWNS AND URBANAGGWMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 Sl. Name of Town! State! Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the preceding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 (xxviii) Village Kuriwal (00) 2001 N.A. 1,447 774 673 (xxix) Thandewa1a (00) 2001 N.A. 1,118 619 499 (xxx) Basarka Bhaini (Attari Road) (00) 2001 N.A. 3,795 2,064 1,731 (xxxi) Village Ohumanpura (00) 2001 N.A. 2,814 1,525 1,289

3 Jalandhar Urban lalandhar 1901 67,735 37,299 30,436 Agglomeration 1911 69,318 +1,583 +2.34 39,816 29,502 1921 71,008 +1,690 +2.44 40,593 30,415 1931 89,030 +18,022 +25.38 51,119 37,911 1941 135,283 +46,253 +51.95 79,730 55,553 1951 168,816 +33,533 +24.79 91,127 77,689 1961 222,569 +53,753 +31.84 120,454 102,115 1971 296,106 +73,537 +33.04 159,114 136,992 1981 408,196 +112,090 +37.85 220,457 187,739 1991 509,510 +101,314 +24.82 272,472 237,038 2001 N.A. 714,077 +204,567 +40.15 383,624 330,453

(i) Jalandhar lalandhar 1901 67,735 37,299 30,436 1911 69,318 +1,583 +2.34 39,816 29,502 1921 71,008 +1,690 +2.44 40,593 30,415 1931 89,030 +18,022 +25.38 51,119 37,911 1941 135,283 +46,253 +51.95 79,730 55,553 1951 168,816 +33,533 +24.79 91,127 77,689 1961 M.C 44.03 222,569 +53,753 +31.84 120,454 102,115 1971 M.C. 62.16 296,106 +73,537 +33.04 159,114 136,992 1981 M.Corp. 79.40 408,196 +112,090 +37.85 220,457 187,739 1991 M.Corp. 80.41 509,510 +101,314 +24.82 272,472 237,038 2001 M.Corp: 102.00 706,043 +196,533 +38.57 379,439 326,604

(ii) Bidhipur on Amritsar Road (00) 2001 N.A. 1,446 767 679 (iii) Khambra on Nakodar Road (00) 2001 N.A. 4,035 2,071 1,964 (iv) Alipur adjacent to Village Mithapur (00) 2001 N.A. 1,146 608 538 (v) Nangal Karkhan adjacent to Master Mehnga Singh Colony (00) 2001 N.A. 1,407 739 668

4 Pati"la Urban Patiala 1901 53,545 31,494 22,051 Agglomeration !! 1911 46,974 -6,571 -12.27 28,663 18,311 1921 47,531 +557 +1.19 28,476 19,055 1931 55,129 +7,598 +15.99 33,139 21,990 1941 69,850 +14,721 +26.70 40,923 28,927 1951 97,869 +28,019 +40.11 54,561 43,308 1961 125,234 +27,365 +27.96 69,635 55,599 1971 N.A. 151,041 +25,807 +20.61 81,646 69,395 1981 N.A. 206,254 +55,213 +36.55 109,702 96,552

! Chheharta (MC) was an urban unit under Agglomeration in 1971. In 1981 Census Cbheharta (MC) bad been merged with Amritsar MC with a population of 10,367 (6,296 M, 4,071 F) in 1951; population 13,760 (8,013 M, 5,747 F) in 1961 and Population 19,854 (11,115 M, 8,739 F) in 1971. 151 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001WITHVARlATION SINCE 1901 Sl. Name of Townl Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square tbe 2recedin; census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 Z 3 4 5 (; 7 8 9 10 11 1991 N.A. 253,706 +47,452 +23.01 132,858 120,848 2001 N.A. 323,884 +70,178 +27.66 173,682 150,202

(I) Patiala 1901 53,545 31,494 22,051 1911 46,974 -6,571 -12.27 28,663 18,311 1921 47,531 +557 +1.19 28,476 19,055 1931 55,129 +7,598 +15.99 33,139 21,990 1941 69,850 +14,721 +26.70 40,923 28,927 1951 97,869 +28,019 +40.11 54,561 43,308 1961 M.C 33.67 125,234 +27,365 +27.96 69,635 55,599 1971 M.C 24.09 151,041 +25,807 +20.61 81,646 69,395 1981 M.C 31.20 206,254 +55,213 +36.55 109,702 96,552 1991 M.C 31.20 252,171 +45,917 +22.26 132,007 120,164 2001 M.Corp. 65.00 303,151 +50,980 +20.22 162,573 140,578 (ii) Rira Bagh 1991 N.A. 418 225 193 Colony (OG) 2001 N.A. 2,411 +1,993 +476.79 1,387 1,024 (iii) Kberi Gujran (OG) 1991 N.A. 1,117 626 491 2001 N.A. 1,417 +300 +26.86 753 664 (iv) Grid Colony PSEB on Bhadson Road (OG) 2001 N.A. 2,403 1,295 1,108 (v) Punjabi University (OG) 2001 N.A. 2,322 1,223 1,099 (vi) Urban Estate-I (OG) 2001 N.A. 5,107 2,646 2,461 (vii) Urban Estate - II (OG) 2001 N.A. 3,504 1,875 1,629 (viii) Ranjit Nagar Extension-I (OG) 2001 N.A. 1,423 169 654 (ix) Ranjit Nagar Extension-II (OG) 2001 N.A. 2,146 1,161 985

5 Batbinda Bathinda 1901 13,185 7,897 5,288 1911 15,037 +1,852 +14.05 9,232 5,805 1921 20,154 +5,117 +34.03 12,484 7,670 1931 22,771 +2,617 +12.99 13,575 9,196 1941 24,833 +2,062 +9.06 13,968 10,865 1951 34,991 +10,158 +40.91 19,283 15,708 1961 M.C 20.72 52,253 +17,262 +49.33 28,971 23,282 1971 M.C 20.72 65,318 +13,065 +25.00 35,725 29,593 1981 M.C 82.88 127,363 +62,045 +94.99 70,026 57,337 1991 M.C 97.00 159,042 +31,679 +24.87 85,286 73,756 2001 M.CI. 110.00 217,256 +58,214 +36.60 116,946 100,310

(; Pathankot Urban Gurdaspur 1901 6,091 3,436 2,655 Agglomeration 1911 1,007 +916 +15.04 4,181 2,826 1921 7,353 +346 +4.94 4,326 3,027 1931 9,763 +2,410 +32.78 5,798 3,965 1941 12,354 +2,591 +26.54 7,084 5,270 1951 32,415 +20,061 +162.3.8 20,276 12,139 1961 54,810 +22,395 +69.09 32,875 21,935 !! Thaper College of Engineering, which was an O.G of Patiala U.A. since 1971 Census has been merged in M. Corp. Patiala in 2001 census. Therefore, its population has been included in M. Corp. Patiala from 1971 census onwards. In 1971 P 555(M 549 F 6), in 1981 P 1113 (M 916 F 197) and 1991 P 1009 (M 726 F 283). i) D.C.W. colony ii) Back side Central Jail iii) Back side of Thaper College of Engineering iv) Village Rasulpur Saidan which were O.Gs. of Patiala VA in 1991 Census have been merged in Patiala M. Corporation in 2001 Census. Population of these O.Gs. i) DCW Colony in Census 1991 P 4788 (M 2606 F 2182), ii) Backside Central Jail in Census 1991 P 4821 (M 2596 F 2225), iii) Backside of Thaper College of Engg. in 1991 P 2019 (M 1085 F 934) and iv) Village RasuIpur Saidan in Census 1991 P 1166 (M 642 F 524). 152 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGWMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 SI. Name of Town! Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the ~recedinG census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1971 78,192 +23,382 +42.66 41,969 36,223 1981 110,039 +31,847 +40.73 57,565 52,474 1991 N.A. 128,198 +18,159 +16.50 67,092 61,l06 2001 N.A. 168,485 +40,287 +31.43 92,003 76,482

(i) Pathankot 1901 6,091 3,436 2,655 1911 7,007 +916 +15.07 4,181 2,826 1921 7,353 +346 +4.91 4,326 3,027 1931 9,763 +2,410 +32.78 5,798 3,965 1941 12,354 +2,591 +26.54 7,084 5,270 1951 32,415 +20,061 +162.38 20,276 12,139 1961 M.e 11.06 54,810 +22,395 +69.09 32,875 21,935 1971 M.e 16.37 78,192 +23,382 +42.66 41,969 36,223 1981 M.e 20.98 110,039 +31,847 +40.73 57,565 52,474 1991 M.e 22.10 123,930 +13891 +12.62 64,865 59,065 2001 M.e!. 22.10 157,925 +33995 +27.43 86,520 71,405 (ii) Khanpur (OG) 1991 N.A. 1,865 984 881 2001 N.A. 3,127 +1,262 +67.67 1,640 1,487 (iii) Lamin (OG) 1991 N.A. 2,196 1,124 1,072 2001 N.A. 2,445 +249 + 11.34 1,286 1,159 (iv) Dhaki (OG) 1991 N.A. 207 119 88 2001 N.A. 4,988 +4,781 +2,309.66 2,557 2,431

7 Hoshiarpur Hoshiarpur 1901 17,549 9,503 8,046 1911 17,449 -100 -0.57 9,875 7,574 1921 21,285 +3,836 +21.98 12,160 9,125 1931 26,730 +5,445 +25.58 15,249 11,481 1941 35,345 +8,615 +32.23 19,790 15,555 1951 45,291 +9,946 +28.14 25,803 19,488 1961 M.e. 10.12 50,739 +5,448 +12.03 27,981 22,758 1971 M.e. 10.13 57,691 +6,952 +13.70 30,844 26,847 1981 M.e. 21.46 85,648 +27,957 +48.46 46,018 39,630 1991 M.e. 28.21 122,705 +37,057 +43.27 65,378 57,327 2001 M.cI. 35.00 149,668 +26,963 +21.97 79,454 70,214

8 Batala Urban Gurdaspur 1901 27,365 14,037 13,328 Agglomeration 1911 26,430 -935 -3.42 14,180 12,250 1921 26,122 -308 -1.17 13,929 12,193 1931 33,204 +7,082 +27.11 18,102 15,102 1941 44,458 +11,254 +33.89 23,820 20,638 1951 55,850 +1l,392 +25.62 30,097 25,753 1961 51,300 -4,550 -8.15 27,419 23,881 1971 N.A. 76,488 +25,188 +49.10 40,421 36,067 1981 N.A. 101,966 +25,478 +33.31 53,926 48,040 1991 N.A. 103,367 + 1 ,401 +1.37 54,800 48,567 2001 N.A. 147,872 +44,505 +43.06 78,393 69,479

(j) Batala 1901 27,365 14,037 13,328 1911 26,430 -935 -3.42 14,180 12,250 1921 26,122 -308 -1.17 13,929 12,193 1931 33,204 +7,082 +27.11 18,102 15,102 1941 44,458 +11,254 +33.89 23,820 20,638 1951 55,850 +11,392 +25.62 30,097 25,753 1961 M.e. 6.06 51,300 -4,550 -8.15 27,419 23,881 1971 M.e. 6.06 60,784 +9,484 + 18.49 32,036 28,748 1981 M.e. 8.75 87,135 +26,351 +43.35 46,014 41,121 1991 M.e. 8.75 86,006 -1,129 -1.30 45,440 40,566 2001 M.Cl. 8.75 125,677 +39,671 +46.13 66,508 59.169 153 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGWMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2OO1WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 SI. Name of Town! State! Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the preceding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 345 6 7 8 9 10 11

(ii) Bakewal (00) 1971 N.A. 1,207 653 554 1981 N.A. 2,161 +954 +79.04 1,148 1,013 1991 N.A. 3,975 +1,814 +83.94 2,133 1,842 2001 N.A. 4,902 +927 +23.32 2,640 2,262 (iii) Oaunspura (OG) 1971 N.A. 1,525 818 707 1981 N.A. 2,076 +551 +36.13 1,108 968 1991 N.A. 2,601 +525 +25.29 1,386 1,215 2001 N.A. 2,918 +317 +12.19 1,559 1,359 (iv) Bhatha 1971 N.A. 782 391 391 Inderjit (OG) 1981 N.A. 1,105 +323 +41.30 583 522 1991 N.A. 1,830 +725 +65.61 966 864 2001 N.A. 466 -1,364 -74.54 250 216 (v) Marrianwala (OG) 1971 N.A. 728 376 352 1981 N.A. 941 +213 +29.26 511 430 1991 N.A. 1,316 +375 +39.85 712 604 2001 N.A. 1,259 -57 -4.33 679 580 (vi) Umarpura (OG) 1971 N.A. 450 228 222 1981 N.A. 2,009 +1,559 +346.44 1,074 935 1991 N.A. 1,226 -783 -38.97 687 539 2001 N.A. 1,840 +614 +50.08 992 848 (vii) Sagarpur (00) 1971 N.A. 1,012 552 460 1981 N.A. 860 -152 -15.02 472 388 1991 N.A. 1,092 +232 +26.98 586 506 2001 N.A. 1,302 +210 +19.23 685 617 (viii) Kothe Malawa (00) 1971 N.A. 770 402 368 1981 N.A. 863 +93 +12.08 454 409 1991 N.A. 1,091 +228 +26.42 570 521 2001 N.A. 1,554 +463 +42.44 835 719 (ix) Bawali Inderjit (00) 1971 N.A. 1,749 909 840 1981 N.A. 541 -1,208 -69.07 289 252 1991 N.A. 882 +341 +63.03 473 409 2001 N.A. 1,880 +998 +113.15 989 891 (x) Bhode-di-Khui (00) 1971 N.A. 851 464 387 1981 N.A. 666 -185 -21..74 363 303 1991 N.A. 778 +112 +16.82 426 352 2001 N.A. 818 +40 +5.14 447 371 (xi) Alowal (OG) 1971 N.A. 1,475 797 678 1981 N.A. .335 -1,140 -77.29 164 171 1991 N.A. 756 +421 +125.67 422 334 2001 N.A. 908 +152 +20.11 503 405 (xii) Kharal (OG) . 1971 N.A. 928 49l 437 1981 N.A. 643 -285 -30.71 352 291 1991 N.A. 608 -35 -5.44 345 263 2001 N.A. 1,967 +1,359 +223.52 1,066 901 (xiii) Nawanpind (OG) 1971 N.A. 973 541': 427 1981 r-..A. 2,050 +1,077 +110.69 ~,071 979 1991 N.A. 462 -1,588 -77.46 251 211 2001 N.A. 573 +111 +24.03 285 288 (xiv) Jharriwalan (00) 1971 N.A. 280 157 123 1981 N.A. 233 ·47 -16.79 128 105 1991 N.A. 340 +107 +45.92 193 147 2001 N.A. 887 +547 +160.88 465 422 (xv) Have1i 1971 N.A. 2.046 1,094 952 ChobJaran (OG) 1981 N.A. 270 ·J,776 ·86.80 153 117 1991 N.A. 238 -32 -11.85 127 III 2001 N.A. 741 +503 +211.34 390 351

154 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 S1. Name of Town! Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Femlll('s No. Urban District year status square the preceding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 (xvi) Mani 1971 N.A. 928 507 421 Ghauranga (OG) 1981 N.A. 78 -850 -91.59 42 36 1991 N.A. 166 +88 +112.82 83 83 2001 N.A. 180 +14 +8.43 100 80

9 Moga Urban Moga 1901 6,725 3,593 3,132 Agglomeration 1911 Declassified 1921 14,145 8,848 5,297 1931 17,581 +3,436 +24.29 10,454 7,127 1941 27,785 +10,204 +58.04 16,156 11,629 1951 36,598 +8,813 +31.72 19,706 16,892 1961 47,779 +11,181 +30.55 25,661 22,118 1971 61,625 +13,846 +28.98 32,675 28,950 1981 80,272 +18,647 +30.26 42,488 37,784 1991 N.A. 110,958 +30,686 +38.23 58,957 52,001 2001 N.A. 135,279 +24,321 +21.92 72,043 63,236

(i) Moga 1901 6,725 3,593 3,132 1911 Declassified 1921 14,145 8,848 5,297 1931 17,581 +3,436 +24.29 10,454 7,127 1941 27,785 +10,204 +58.04 16,156 11,629 1951 36,598 +8,813 +31.72 19,706 16,892 1961 M.C. 7.12 47,779 +11,181 +30.55 25,661 22,118 1971 M.C. 7.12 61,625 +13,846 +28.98 32,675 28,950 1981 M.C. 16.10 80,272 +18,647 +30.26 42,488 37,784 1991 M.C. 16.10 108,304 +28,032 +34.92 57,511 50,793 2001 M.C)' 16.10 125,573 +17,269 +15.94 66,888 58,685 (ii) Landeke (Amritsar 1991 N.A. 451 232 219 Road)(O.G) 2001 N.A. 2,882 +2,431 +539.02 1,523 1,359 (iii) Duneke(Firozpur 1991 N.A. 2,203 1,214 989 Road)(O.G} 2001 N.A. 6,824 +4,621 +209.76 3,632 3,192

10 Abohar Firozpur 1911 9,492 5,665 3,827 1921 8,916 -576 -6.07 5,495 3,421 1931 14,035 +5,119 +57.41 8,431 5,604 1941 21,222 + 7 ,187 +51.21 12,390 8,832 1951 25,476 +4,254 +20.05 13,803 11,673 1961 M.e. 14.17 46,863 +21,387 +83.95 25,690 21,173 1971 M.C. 14.17 58,925 +12,062 +25.74 31,851 27,074 1981 M.C. 14.17 86,334 +27,409 +46.52 46,582 39,752 1991 M.e. 23.07 107,163 +20,829 +24.13 57,875 49,288 2001 M.C!' 23.07 124,339 +17,176 +16.03 66,445 57,894

11 S.A.S.Nagar Rupnagar 1981 C.T. 12.40 32,351 17,801 14,550 (Mohali) 1991 N.A.C. 16.68 78,457 +46,106 +142.52 42,040 36,417 2001 M.CI. 23.86 123,484 +45,027 +57.39 65,642 57,842

12 MalerkotIa Sangrul 1901 2l,l22 10,815 10,307 1911 23,880 +2,758 +13.06 13,538 10,342 1921 24,564 +684 +2.86 14,466 10,098 1931 25,240 +676 +2.75 14,173 11,067 1941 29,321 +4,081 +16.17 15,606 13,715 1951 32,575 +3,254 +11.10 17,073 15,502 1961 M.e. 4.22 39,543 +6,968 +21.39 20,905 18.638 1971 M.e. 4.22 48,859 +9,316 +23.56 25,916 22,943 1981 M.C. 4.25 65,756 +16,897 +34.58 34,1531 30,925 1991 M.C. 4.25 88,600 +22,844 +34.74 46,978 41,622 ~001 M.Cl ~ 1 1 ~ 107.00Q + 18 .40Q +20.n '56.767 50.242 155 A4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 SI. Name of Town! Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the preceding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 Khanna Ludhiana 1901 3,838 2,016 1,822 1911 3,319 -519 -13.52 1,842 1,477 1921 Declassified 1931 6,555 4,090 2,465 1941 7,941 +1,386 +21.14 4,627 3,314 1951 12,646 +4,705 +59.25 6,950 5,696 1961 M.e. 19.63 24,416 +11,770 +93.07 12,945 11,471 1971 M.e. 19.63 34,820 +10,404 +42.61 18,535 16,285 1981 M.e. 21.06 53,761 + 18,941 +54.40 28,610 25,151 1991 M.e. 16.02 71,990 +18,229 +33.91 38,094 33,896 2001 M.el. 24.75 103,099 +31,109 +43.21 55,276 47,823

14 Phagwara Urban Kapurthala 1901 17,147 9,489 7,658 Agglomeration 1911 11,779 -5,368 -31.31 6,832 4,947 1921 11,395 -384 -3.26 6,526 4,869 1931 12,049 +654 +5.74 6,741 5,308 1941 16,194 +4,145 +34.40 9,226 6,968 1951 25,591 +9,397 +58.03 13,611 11,980 1961 37,929 +12,338 +48.21 20,573 17,356 1971 N.A. 55,012 +17,083 +45.04 30,015 24,997 1981 N.A. 75,961 +20,949 +38.08 42,127 33,834 1991 N.A. 88,316 + 12,355 +16.26 47,892 40,424 2001 N.A. 102,253 +13,937 +15.78 55,335 46,918

(i) Phagwara ! 1901 17,147 9,489 7,658 1911 11,779 -5,368 -31.31 6,832 4,947 1921 11,395 -384 -3.26 6,526 4,869 1931 12,049 +654 +5.74 6,741 5,308 1941 16,194 +4,145 +34.40 9,226 6,968 1951 25,591 +9,397 +58.03 13,611 11,980 1961 M.e. 10.36 37,929 + 12,338 +48.21 20,573 17,356 1971 M.e. 10.36 52,622 +14,693 +38.74 28,2311 24,384 1981 M.e. 16.00 72,499 +19,877 +37.77 40,187 32,312 1991 M.e. 16.00 83,163 +10,664 +14.71 45,060 38,103 2001 M.CI. 16.00 95,788 +12,625 +15.18 51,671 44,117 (ii) Mohalla 1971 N.A. 1,469 1,057 412 Gobindpura 1981 N.A. 1,990 +521 +35.47 1,134 856 (O.G.) 1991 N.A. 2,697 +707 +35.53 1,517 1,180 2001 N.A. 4,744 +2,047 +75.90 2,762 1,982 (iii) Kot Rani (O.G.) 1971 N.A. 921 720 201 1981 N.A. 1,472 +551 +59.83 806 666 1991 N.A. 2,456 +984 +66.85 1,315 1,141 2001 N.A. 1,721 -735 -29.93 902 819

Class-II( 50,000-99,999) (4 U.A.'s + 14 Towns)

1901 121,280 68,793 52,487 1911 120,154 -1,126 -0.93 71,275 48,879 1921 177,239 +57,085 +47.51 103,550 73,689 1931 277,379 +100,140 +56.50 163,174 114,205 1941 152,352 -125,027 -45.07 92,094 60,258 1951 153,719 +1,367 +0.90 84,658 69,061 1961 57.18 260,707 + 106,988 +69.60 145,268 115,439 1971 94.15 509,389 +248,682 +95.39 273,914 235,475 1981 140.17 668,780 +159,391 +31.29 358,371 310,409 1991 294.39 1,193,171 +524,391 +78.41 634,872 558,299 2001 390.84 1,314,224 +121,053 +10.15 705,990 608,234 ! In .1961, (Me) which was treated as a separate urban unit in 1901 with population 3,039 (l,547 M, 1492 F) and in 1951 WIth population 3,725 (1,921 M, 1,804 F) has been merged with Phagwara Me. 156 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 SI. Name of Townl Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the preceding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

1 Barnala Sangrur 1901 6,905 4,091 2,814 1911 5,341 -1,564 -22.65 3,189 2,152 1921 7,714 +2,373 +44.43 4,703 3,011 1931 8,915 + 1 ,201 +15.57 5,182 3,733 1941 12,341 +3,426 +38.43 6,916 5,425 1951 15,996 +3,655 +29.62 9,133 6,863 1961 M.C. 12.95 21,354 +5,358 +33.50 11,529 9,825 1971 M.C. 10.36 31,847 + 10,493 +49.14 17,124 14,723 1981 M.C. 16.00 43,680 +11,833 +37.16 23,387 20,293 1991 M.C. 16.00 75,430 +31,750 +72.69 40,831 34,599 2001 M.C1. 26.00 96,624 +21,194 +28.10 52,569 44,055

2 Firozpur !! Firozpur 1901 49,341 30,311 19,030 1911 50,836 +1,495 +3.03 31,459 19,377 1921 54,351 +3,515 +6.91 32,684 21,667 1931 64,634 +10,283 +18.92 38,884 25,750 1941 82,502 + 17 ,868 +27.64 51,171 31,331 1951 44,503 -37,999 -46.06 24,659 19,844 1961 M.C. 9.22 51,605 +7,102 +15.96 28,022 23,583 1971 M.C. 9.22 56,138 +4,533 +8.78 30,414 25,724 1981 M.C. 11.33 61,162 +5,024 +8.95 32,337 28,825 1991 M.C. 11.33 78,738 +17,576 +28.74 41,909 36,829 2001 M.C!' 11.33 95,475 +16,737 +21.26 50,506 44,969

3 Kapurthala Kapurthala 1901 18,519 10,616 7,903 1911 16,367 -2,152 -11.62 9,485 6,882 1921 16,242 -125 -0.76 9,340 6,902 1931 20,210 +3,968 +24.43 11,772 8,438 1941 26,067 +5,857 +28.98 14,559 11,508 1951 26,947 +880 +3.38 14,824 12,123 1961 M.C. 28.49 29,334 +2,387 +8.86 15,943 13,391 1971 M.C. 20.72 35,482 +6,148 +20.96 19,191 16,291 1981 M.C. 8.00 50,300 +14,818 +41.76 26,907 23,393 1991 M.C. 56.00 64,567 + 14,267 +28.36 34,611 29,956 2001 M.C1. 56.00 85,686 +21,119 +32.71 47,204 38,482

4 Muktsar Muktsar 1901 6,389 3,705 2,684 1911 8,834 +2,445 +38.27 5,202 3,632 1921 10,539 +1,705 +19.30 6,296 4,243 1931 14,839 +4,300 +40.80 8,544 6,295 1941 20,651 +5,812 +39.17 11,651 9,000 1951 22,097 + 1 ,446 +7.00 11,940 10,157 1961 M.C. 2.59 30,765 +8,668 +39.23 16,513 14,252 1971 M.C. 2.59 39,403 +8,638 +28.08 20,931 18,472 1981 M.C. 13.80 50,941 +11,538 +29.28 26,554 24,387 1991 M.e. 13.80 66,383 +15,442 +30.31 34,831 31,552 2001 M.C!' 17.73 83,655 +17,272 +26.02 J~.!72 39,483

5 Rajpura ! Patiala 1941 4,735 2,617 2,1l8 1951 23,310 +18,575 +392.29 12,664 10,646 1961 M.C. 10.13 27,925 +4,615 +19.80 14,781 13,144 1971 M.C. 10.13 40,214 +12,289 +44.01 21,605 18,609 1981 M.C. 14.00 58,645 +18,431 +45.83 31,917 26,728 1991 M.C. 14.00 70,983 + 12,338 +21.04 37,997 32,986 2001 M.C!' 25.00 82,956 +11,973 +16.87 43,839 39,117 !! In 1981 Census. Tankanwali (MC) with the population of 3,800 (2,507M, 1,293F) in 1951. Population 4,545 (2,491 M. 2,054F) in 1961 and Population 5,048 (2,733M, 2,3l5F) in 1971 has been merged with Firozpur (M.C.). ! In 1981 Census, Rajpura Township (N.A.C.) with a population of 16,714 (8,577M, 8,137F) in 1961 and popUlation 25,374 (I3.426M. 11.948F) in 1971 has been merged with Rajpura (M.e.). 157 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOl'dERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 SI. Name of Town! State! Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the preceding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 6 Kot Kapura Faridkot 1901 9,519 5,360 4,159 1911 10,644 + 1,125 +11.82 6,304 4,340 1921 14,063 +3,419 +32.12 8,401 5,662 1931 16,502 +2,439 +17.34 9,434 7,068 1941 20,584 +4,082 +24.74 11,346 9,238 1951 19,683 -901 -4.38 10,687 8,996 1961 M.C. 2.59 32,021 +12,338 +62.68 17,163 14,858 1971 M.C. 2.59 34,116 +2,095 +6.54 18,13{) 15,986 1981 M.C. 14.50 47,550 +13,434 +39.39 25,272 22,278 1991 M.C. 14.50 62,430 +14,880 +31.29 32,790 29,640 2001 M.Cl. 17.25 80,785 +18,355 +29.40 42,789 37,996

7 Faridkot Urban Faridkot 1901 10,405 5,835 4,570 Agglomeration 1911 11,673 +1,268 +12.19 6,777 4,896 1921 12,304 +631 +5.41 7,020 5,284 1931 16,759 +4,455 +36.21 10,151 6,608 1941 20,375 +3,616 +21.58 11,305 9,070 1951 19,982 -393 -1.93 10,794 9,188 1961 26,735 +6,753 +33.80 14,598 12,137 1971 27,725 +990 +3.70 14,683 13,042 1981 42,423 +14,698 +53.01 22,266 20,157 1991 N.A. 58,625 +16,202 +38.19 31,526 27,099 2001 N.A. 79,321 +20,696 +35.30 43,188 36,133

(i) Faridkot 1901 10,405 5,835 4,570 1911 11,673 +1,268 +12.19 6,777 4,896 1921 12,304 +631 +5.41 7,020 5,284 1931 16,759 +4,455 +36.21 10,151 M08 1941 20,375 +3,616 +21.58 11,305 9,070 1951 19,982 -393 -1.93 10,794 9,188 1961 M.C. 6.27 26,735 +6,753 +33.80 14,598 12,137 1971 M.C. 6.27 27,725 +990 +3.70 14,683 13,042 1981 M.C. 15.00 42,423 +14,698 +53.01 22,266 20,157 1991 M.C. 18.14 58,244 +15,821 +37.29 31,329 26,915 2001 M.C1. 18.14 78,265 +20,021 +34.37 42,618 35,647 (ii) Houses & Rice Shellers (Bholowal 1991 N.A. 381 197 184 - Road) (OG) 2001 N.A. 1,056 +675 +177.17 570 486

8 Sangrur Sangrur 1901 11,852 7,623 4,229 1911 9,041 -2,811 -23.72 5,615 3,426 1921 10,799 +1,758 +19.44 6,653 4,146 1931 13,Wl +3,102 +28.72 8,564 5,337 1941 17,132 +3,231 +23.24 9,761 7,371 1951 18,741 +1,609 +9.39 10,097 8,644 1961 M.C. 18.13 28,344 +9,603 +51.24 15,719 12,625 1971 M.C. 10.36 34,015 +5,671 +20.01 18,075 15,940 1981 M.C. 13.90 45,220 +11,205 +32.94 23,880 21,340 1991 M.C. 13.90 56,419 +11,199 +24.77 29,768 26,651 2001 M.C!' 18.00 77,989 +21,570 +38.23 41,477 36,512

9 Mansa Mansa 1941 11,729 6,786 4,943 1951 15,251 +3,522 +30.03 8,408 6,843 1961 M.e. 6.48 22,473 +7,222 +47.35 12,224 10,249 1971 M.C. 12.95 31,351 +8,878 +39.51 16,589 14,762 1981 M.C. 20.00 43,289 +11,938 +38.08 22,726 20,563 1991 M.C. 20.00 55,089 +11,800 +27.26 29,401 25,688 2001 M.C!' 21.67 72,627 +17,538 +31.84 38.719 33.908 158 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 Sl. Name of Town! State! Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the preceding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 10 Malout Muktsar 1961 M.C. 1.03 20,774 11,333 9,441 1971 M.C. 1.04 26,746 +5,972 +28.75 14,243 12,503 1981 M.C. 4.50 40,533 +13,787 +51.55 21,387 19,146 1991 M.e. 10.00 56,868 +16,335 +40.30 30,535 26,333 2001 M.CI. 20.00 70,765 +13,897 +24.44 37,816 32,949

11 Gurdaspur Urban Ourdaspur 1901 5,764 3,491 2,273 Agglomeration 1911 6,248 +484 +8.40 3,897 2,351 1921 8,906 +2,658 +42.54 5,331 3,575 1931 12,094 +3,188 +35.80 7,330 4,764 1941 16,641 +4,547 +37.60 9,510 7,131 1951 22,677 +6,036 +36.27 11,878 10,799 1961 27,665 +4,988 +22.00 15,421 12,244 1971 32,064 +4,399 +15.90 17,226 14,838 1981 39,529 +7,465 +23.28 20,781 18,748 1991 54,733 +15,204 +38.46 29,390 25,343 2001 N.A. 68,441 +13,708 +25.05 36,336 32,105

(i) Gurdaspur 1901 5,764 3,491 2,273 1911 6,248 +484 +8.40 3,897 2,351 1921 8,906 +2,658 +42.54 5,331 3,575 1931 12,094 +3,188 +35.80 7,330 4,764 1941 16,641 +4,547 +37.60 9,510 7,131 1951 22,677 +6,036 +36.27 11,878 10,799 1961 M.e. 2.74 27,665 +4,988 +22.00 15,421 12,244 1971 M.C. 6.47 32,064 +4,399 +15.90 17,226 14,838 1981 M.C. 6.47 39,529 +7,465 +23.28 20,781 18,748 1991 M.C. 10.85 54,733 +15,204 +38.46 29,390 25,343 2001 M.C!' 10.85 67,479 +12,746 +23.29 35,769 31,710

(ii) Engineering College on Amritsar Pathankot Road (00) 2001 N.A. 663 405 258 (iii) Abadi along Pandori Road (00) 2001 N.A. 67 36 31 (iv) Oobind Nagar Colony along Ourdaspur Arnritsar Road (00) 2001 N.A. 167 88 79 (v) Colony along Jail Road on Dinanagar Road (adjacent to Scheme No.5) (00) 2001 N.A. 65 38 27

12 Fazilka Firozpur 1901 8,505 4,726 3,779 1911 10,985 +2,480 +29.16 6,555 4,430 1921 13,829 +2,844 +25.89 7,846 5,983 1931 18,463 +4,634 +33.51 10,789 7,674 1941 28,262 +9,799 +53.07 17,196 11,066 1951 25,934 -2,328 -8.24 13,926 12,008 1961 M.C. 5.44 32,015 +6,081 +23.45 16,979 15,036 1971 M.C. 5.44 36,281 +4,266 +13.33 19,455 16,826 1981 M.C. 5.44 43,548 +7,267 +20.03 22,626 20,922 1991 M.C. 7.34 58,028 +14,480 +33.25 30,879 27,149 2001 M.CI. 10.04 67,427 +9,399 +16.20 35,204 32,223

13 Nabha Patiala 1901 18,468 11,015 7,453 1911 13,620 -4,848 -26.25 7,915 5,705 1921 14,750 + 1,130 +8.30 8,674 6,076 159 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 SI. Name of Town! State! Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the ~recedinl census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1931 17,311 +2,561 +17.36 10,055 7,256 1941 22,625 +5,314 +30.70 12,704 9,921 1951 25,676 +3,051 + 13.49 15,742 9,934 1961 M.C. 4.40 30,603 +4,927 +19.19 16,955 13,648 1971 M.C. 4.40 34,761 +4,158 +13.59 18,676 16,085 1981 M.C. 15.48 45,921 +11,160 +32.10 24,388 21,533 1991 M.C. 15.48 54,421 +8,500 + 18.51 28,812 25,609 2001 M.C!' 15.48 62,000 +7,579 +13.93 32,960 29,040

14 Gobindgarh Fatehgarh 1951 3,385 2,118 1,267 Urban Sahib 1961 7,026 +3,641 +107.56 4,177 2,849 Agglomeration 1971 9,387 +2,361 +33.60 5,509 3,878 1981 26,637 +17,250 +183.76 15,903 10,734 1991 N.A. 42,063 +15,426 +57.91 23,003 19,060 2001 N.A. 60,677 +18,614 +44.25 33,910 26,767

(i) Gobindgarh 1951 3,385 2,118 1,267 1961 M.C. 2.59 7,026 +3,641 +107.56 4,177 2,849 1971 M.C. 2.59 9,387 +2,361 +33.60 5,509 3,878 1981 M.C. 9.00 26,637 +17,250 +183.76 15,903 10,734 1991 M.C. 32.00 40,175 + 13,538 +50.82 21,923 18,252 2001 M.CL 32.00 55,403 + 15,228 +37.90 30,912 24,491 (ii) Iqbal Colony (OG) 1991 N.A. 754 427 327 2001 N.A. 561 -193 -25.60 324 237 (iii) Sant Nagar (00) 1991 N.A. 691 400 291 2001 N.A. 2,791 +2,100 +303.91 1,516 1,275 (iv) Dalip Nagar (00) 1991 N.A. 443 253 190 2001 N.A. 1,922 +1,479 +333.86 1,158 764

IS Jagraon Ludhiana 1901 18,760 9,776 8,984 1911 15,039 -3,721 -19.83 8,128 6,911 1921 17,731 +2,692 +17.90 9,771 7,960 1931 27,108 +9,377 +52.88 17,151 9,957 1941 26,704 -404 -1.49 14,369 12,335 1951 24,519 -2,185 -8.18 12,775 11,744 1961 M.C. 3.24 29,617 +5,098 +20.79 15,628 13,989 1971 M.C. 3.24 32,999 +3,382 +11.42 17,207 15,792 1981 M.C. 10.00 39,683 +6,684 +20.26 20,581 19,102 1991 M.e. 14.00 47,372 +7,689 +19.38 24,723 22,649 2001 M.C!' 14.00 60,080 +12,708 +26.83 31,570 28,510

16 Firozpur Cantt. Firozpur 1901 F 1911 F - 1921 F 1931 F - 1941 F - 1951 38,784 24,963 13,821 1961 C.B 20.10 46,327 + 7,543 +19.45 29,398 16,929 1971 C.B 20.10 41,571 -4,756 -10.27 21,385 20,186 1981 C.B 20.10 44,678 +3,107 +7.47 23,663 21,015 1991 C.B 20.10 53,094 +8,416 +18.84 26,588 26,506 2001 C.B 20.10 57,678 +4,584 +8.63 34,476 23,202

(F) Firozpur Cantonment in 1901, Population 25,866 (17048M, 8,818F), in 1911 Population 26.158 (17,529 M, 8,629 Fl, in 1921 Population 24.656 (l5.662M. 8.994Fl. 1931 Population 30,297(19,205 M, 11 ,092F)and in 1941 Population 41,312 (27,984M, 13,346F) was a part of Firozpur (M.C.). The combined population of Firozpur (M.C.) and Firozpur Cantt. for 1901 to 1941 has been shown against Firozpur (M.e.).

160 A4~WNSANDURBANAGGLOMERATIONSCLA~~DBYPOPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 Sl. Name of Town! State! Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the preceding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 17 Sunam Urban Sangrur 1901 10,069 5,458 4,611 Agglomeration 1911 7,329 -2,740 -27.21 4,161 3,168 1921 8,265 +936 +12.77 4,747 3,518 1931 10,652 +2,387 +28.88 6,132 4,520 1941 14,187 +3,535 +33.19 7,979 6,208 1951 16,782 +2,595 +18.29 9,047 7,735 1961 21,408 +4,626 +27.57 11,362 10,046 1971 N.A. 28,158 +6,750 +31.53 14,896 13,262 1981 N.A. 36,180 +8,022 +28.49 19,154 17,026 1991 N.A. 43,909 +7,729 +21.36 23,173 20,736 2001 N.A. 56,251 +12,342 +28.11 29,994 26,257

(i) Sunam 1901 10,069 5,458 4,611 1911 7,329 -2,740 -27.21 4,161 3,168 1921 8,265 +936 +12.77 4,747 3,518 1931 10,652 +2,387 +28.88 6,l32 4,520 1941 14,187 +3,535 +33.19 7,979 6,208 1951 16,782 +2,595 +18.29 9,047 7,735 1961 M.C. 2.69 21,408 +4,626 +27.57 11,362 10,046 1971 M.C. 3.89 26,966 +5,558 +25.96 14,253 12,713 1981 M.C. 3.89 35,505 +8,539 +31.67 18,790 16,715 1991 M.C. 3.89 41,118 +5,613 +15.81 21,688 19,430 2001 M.C!' 37.25 51,174 +10,056 +24.46 27,203 23,971 (ii) Chamar Tibbi, Moranwali, Model Town (R) and 1971 N.A. 1,192 643 549 Gugapeer, Kothe 1981 N.A. 675 -517 -43.37 364 311 Harigarh and 1991 N.A. 2,791 +2,116 +313.48 1,485 1,306 Kothe Singhpur COG) 2001 N.A. 5,077 +2,286 +81.91 2,791 2,286

18 Tarn Taran Amritsar 1901 4,428 2,491 1,937 1911 4,260 -168 -3.79 2,443 1,817 1921 5,988 +1,728 +40.56 3,418 2,570 1931 10,103 +4,115 +68.72 5,795 4,308 1941 16,607 +6,504 +64.38 9,299 7,30~ 1951 16,344 -263 -1.58 8,826 7,518 1961 M.C. 12.95 20,961 +4,617 +28.25 10,981 9,980 1971 M.C. 12.95 24,116 +3,155 +15.05 12,567 11,549. 1981 M.C. 17.00 36,903 +12,787 +53.02 19,465 17,438 1991 M.C. 36.00 47,529 +10,626 +28.79 25,316 22,213 2001 M.C!' 20.00 55,787 +8,258 +17.37 29,261 26,526

Class· III (20,000·49,999)(8UA's+28 Towns)

1901 146,477 81,992 64,485 1911 141,454 -5,023 -3.43 81,898 59,556 1921 139,656 -1,798 -1.27 81,515 58,141 1931 155,263 +15,607 +11.18 90,022 65,241 1941 348,232 +192,969 +124.29 194,860 153,372 1951 520,558 +172,326 +49.49 295,040 225,518 1961 229.65 729,671 +209,113 +40.17 406,426 323,245 1971 199.93 724,173 -5,498 -0.75 384,721 339,452 1981 302.57 950,872 +226,699 +31.30 505,566 445,306 1991 284.03 786,499 -164,373 -17.29 416,937 369,562 2001 418.74 1,082,085 +295,586 +37.58 577,030 505,055

161 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 Sl. Name of Townl Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the ereceding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 Sirhind Fatehgarh 1901 5,415 2,955 2,460 Fatehgarh Sahib Sahib 1911 3,843 -1,572 -29.03 2,166 1,677 1921 4,064 +221 +5.75 2,198 1,866 1931 4,103 +39 +0.96 2,249 1,854 1941 5,823 +1,720 +41.92 3,378 2,445 1951 7,808 +1,985 +34.09 4,332 3,476 1961 M.C. 1.94 9,608 +1,800 +23.05 5,215 4,393 1971 M.C. 7.12 18,028 +8,420 +87.64 9,651 8,377 1981 M.C. 11.50 30,380 +12,352 +68.52 16,794 13,586 1991 M.C. 11.50 30,818 +438 +1.44 16,300 14,518 2001 M.C!' 28.40 49,825 +19,007 +61.67 26,717 23,108

2 Dhuri Sangrur 1941 7,649 4,590 3,059 \951 9,719 +2,070 +27.06 5,484 4,235 1961 M.C. 2.59 14,835 +5,116 +52.64 8,336 6,499 1971 M.C. 2.59 19,300 +4,465 +30.10 10,409 8,891 1981 M.C. 5.00 27,100 +7,800 +40.41 14,584 12,516 1991 M.C. 15.00 37,431 +10,331 +38.12 19,792 17,639 2001 M.C!' 32.00 49,406 +11,975 +31.99 26,425 22,981

3 Rupnaga~ Rupnagar 1901 8,888 4,782 4,106 1911 6,935 -1,953 -21.97 3,816 3,119 1921 7,606 +671 +9.68 4,246 3,360 1931 8,764 +1,158 +15.22 4,943 3,821 1941 10,385 +1,621 +18.50 5,752 4,633 1951 14,213 +3,828 +36.86 7,965 6,248 1961 M.C. 5.72 14,136 -77 -0.,4 7,703 6,433 1971 M.C. 5.72 16,454 +2,318 +16.40 8,877 7,577 1981 M.C. 25.00 25,165 +8,711 +52.94 13,459 11,706 1991 M.C. 25.00 37,996 +12,831 +50.99 20,212 17,784 2001 M.C!' 25.00 49,159 +11,163 +29.38 26,057 23,102

4 Samana Patiala 1901 10,209 5,194 5,015 1911 9,273 -936 -9.17 4,913 4,360 1921 9,685 +412 +4.44 5,149 4,536 1931 10,563 +878 +9.07 5,610 4,953 1941 14,912 +4,349 +41.17 7,984 6,928 1951 15,364 +452 +3.03 8,235 7,129 1961 M.C. 5.18 16,133 +769 +5.01 8,640 7,493 1971 M.C. 6.47 21,162 +5,029 +31. 17 11,380 9,782 1981 M.C. 5.50 31,282 +10,120 +47.82 16,488 14,794 1991 M.C. 5.50 36,556 +5,274 +16.86 19,233 17,323 2001 M.Cl. 5.50 46,592 +10,036 +27.45 24,444 22,148

S Nangal Urban Rupnagar 1961 42,359 26,612 15,747 Agglomeration 1971 31,353 -11,006 -37.87 17,221 14,132 1981 35,913 +4,560 + 19.51 19,636 16,277 1991 N.A. 44,049 +8,136 +25.39 23,608 20,441 2001 N.A. 45,368 + 1,319 +41.76 23,907 21,461

(I) Nangal 1961 N.A.C. 18.31 42,359 26,612 15,747 1971 N.A.C. 18.31 31,353 -11,006 -37.87 17,221 14,132 1981 N.A.C. 22.82 35,913 +4,560 +19.51 19.636 16,277 1991 N.A.C. 22.82 41,357 +5,444 +14.84 22,210 19,147 2001 M.C!' 22.82 40,694 -663 -38.84 21,472 19,222 (ii) Oustee Colony 1991 N.A. 687 354 333 Block-A (OG) 2001 N.A. 1.001 +2.314 +336.83 1,564 1,437 162 A4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001W1THVARIATION SINCE 1901 Sl. Name of Town! State! Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the 2receding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 (iii) Oustee Colony 1991 N.A. 2,005 1,044 961 Block-B (OG) 2001 N.A. 1,673 -332 -16.56 871 802

6 Rampura Phul Bathinda 1901 4,964 2,704 2,260 Urban 1911 4,515 -449 -9.05 2,566 1,949 Agglomeration 1921 4,943 +428 +9.48 2,783 2,160 1931 6,836 +1,893 +38.30 3,915 2,921 1941 9,515 +2,679 +39.19 5,297 4,218 1951 14,409 +4,894 +51.43 7,903 6,506 1961 19,700 +5,291 +36.72 10,491 9,209 1971 23,406 +3,706 + 18.81 12,378 11,028 1981 31,890 +8,484 +36.25 16,974 14,916 1991 35,530 +3,640 + 11.41 18,718 16,812 2001 N.A. 44,665 +9,135 +25.71 23,692 20,973

(I) Rampura Phul 1901 4,964 2,704 2,260 1911 4,515 -449 -9.05 2,566 1,949 1921 4,943 +428 +9.48 2,783 2,160 1931 6,836 +1,893 +38.30 3,915 2,921 1941 9,515 +2,679 +39.19 5,297 4,218 1951 14,409 +4,894 +51.43 7,903 6,506 1961 M.C. 2.18 19,700 +5,291 +36.72 10,491 9,209 1971 M.C. 2.18 23,406 +3,706 +18.81 12,378 11,028 1981 M.e. 5.76 31,890 +8,484 +36.25 16,974 14,916 1991 M.C. 5.76 35,530 +3,640 + 11.41 18,718 16,812 2001 M.e!. 8.88 42,823 +7,293 +20.53 22,706 20,117 (ii) lawahar Nagar on Rampura - Bathinda Road (OG) 2001 N.A. 760 393 367 (iii) Dashmesh Nagar on Rampura - Mehraj Road (OG) 2001 N.A. 722 395 327 (iv) Outgrowth of Gandhi Nagar on Pitho Road (OG) 2001 N.A. 360 198 162

7 Kharar Rupnagar 1941 6,072 3,448 2,624 Urban 1951 6,317 +245 +4.03 3,526 2,791 Agglomeration 1961 8,216 +1,899 +30.06 4,535 3,681 1971 N.A. 10,686 +2,470 +30.06 5,709 4,977 1981 N.A. 21,807 +11,121 +104.07 11,925 9,882 1991 N.A. 26,109 +4,302 +19.73 14,010 12,099 2001 N.A. 42,289 +16,180 +61.97 22,707 19,582

(i) Kharar 1941 6,072 3,448 2,624 1951 6,317 +245 +4.03 3,526 2,791 1961 M.C. 0.75 8,216 +1,899 +30.06 4,535 3,681 1971 M.C. 0.75 10,235 +2,019 +24.57 5,461 4,774 1981 M.C. 4.20 21,208 +10,973 +107.21 11,615 9,593 1991 M.C. 4.20 25,938 +4,730 +22.30 13,928 12,010 2001 M.Cl. 18.00 39,283 +13,345 +51.45 21,082 18,201

! In 2001 Census, Naya Nangal and Nangal Township are clubbed together to form a Town namely Nangal M.C!' The popUlation of t~ese two towns has also been clubbed for the previous Censuses. i) Nangal Township VA in 1961 Census P 34372, M 21502 F .12870 in 1971 P 21356 M 11849 F 9507 in 1981 P 25523 M 14094 F 11429 and 1991 P 32003 M 17074 F 14929 ii) Naya Nanga1 in 1961 Census P 7987 M SilO F 2877 in 1971 P 9997 M 5372 F 4625 in 1981 P 10390 M 5542 F 4848 and 1991 P 12046 M 6534 F 5512. 163 A4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFJED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 SI. Name of Townl Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the preceding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 (ii) Nawanshahr (OG) 1971 N.A. 451 248 203 1981 N.A. 599 +148 +32.82 310 289 1991 N.A. 171 -428 -71.45 82 89 2001 N.A. 3,006 +2,835 +1657.89 1,625 1,381

8 Jalandhar CanU. Ialandhar 1901* 1911* 1921* 1931* 1941* 1951 33,174 22,114 11,060 1961 C.B. 15.62 42,461 +9,287 +27.99 27,513 14,948 1971 C.B. 15.62 33,724 -8,737 -20.58 17,308 16,416 1981 C.B. 15.62 33,356 -368 -1.09 16,261 17,095 1991 C.B. 15.21 31,520 -1,836 -5.50 15,313 16,207 2001 C.B. 15.21 40,531 +9,011 +28.59 23,862 16,669

9 Giddarbaha Muktsar 1931 3,636 2,134 1,502 1941 6,317 +2,681 +73.73 3,811 2,506 1951 7,421 +1,104 + 17 .48 4,035 3,386 1961 M.C. 1.79 17,364 +9,943 +133.98 9,379 7,985 1971 M.C. 2.74 18,821 +1,457 +8.39 10,061 8,760 1981 M.C. 5.75 26,828 +8,007 +42.54 14,160 12,668 1991 M.C. 8.25 29,866 +3,038 +11.32 15,714 14,152 2001 M.CI. 8.25 36,598 +6,732 +22.54 19,184 17,414

10 Patti Amritsar 1901 8,187 4,195 3,992 1911 7,987 -200 -2.44 4,368 3,619 1921 10,439 +2,452 +30.70 5,886 4,553 1931 12,882 +2,443 +23.40 7,003 5,879 1941 17,595 +4,713 +36.59 9,386 8,209 1951 14,297 -3,298 -18.74 7,629 6,668 1961 M.C. 2.59 15,833 +1,536 +10.74 8,491 7,342 1971 M.C. 2.59 18,389 +2,556 +16.14 10,108 8,281 1981 M.C. 2.59 19,765 +1,376 +7.48 10,481 9,284 1991 M.C. 4.30 27,776 +8,011 +40.53 15,373 12,403 2001 M.C!' 9.33 34,444 +6,668 +24.01 18,389 16,055

11 Jaitu Urban Faridkot 1911 7,694 4,806 2,888 Agglomeration 1921 7,912 +218 +2.83 4,566 3,346 1931 8,542 +630 +7.96 4,832 3,710 1941 11,435 +2,893 +33.87 6,322 5,113 1951 7,621 -3,814 -33.35 4,130 3,491 1961 17,170 +9,549 +125.30 9,284 7,886 1971 N.A. 19,446 +2,276 +13.26 10,372 9,074 1981 N.A. 26,061 +6,615 +34.02 13,843 12,218 1991 N.A. 28,850 +2,789 +10.70 15,261 13,589 2001 N.A. 33,465 +4,615 +16.00 17,676 15,789

(i) Jaitu 1911 7,694 4,806 2,888 1921 7,912 +218 +2.83 4,566 3,346 1931 8,542 +630 +7.96 4,832 3,710 1941 11435 +2893 +33.87 6322 5,113

* lalandhar Cantonment in 1901, Population 13,280 (8,391M, 4,889F), in 1911 Population 13,964 (9,277M, 4,687F), in 1921 Population 11,923 (7,531M, 4,392F), in 1931 Population 14,735 (9,798M, 4,937F) and in 1941 Population 24,314 (l7,827M, 6,487F) was a part of lalandhar (M.C.). The combined population of lalandhar M.C. and lalandhar Cantonment for 1901 to 1941 has been shown against Jalandhar M. Corporation. 164 A4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGWMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001 WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 SI. Name of Town! Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the preceding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 I) 10 11 1951 7,621 -3,814 -33.35 4,130 3,491 1961 M.C. 3.24 17,170 +9,549 +125.30 9,284 7,886 1971 M.C. 9.06 19,403 +2,233 +13.01 10,353 9,050 1981 M.C. 9.06 25,907 +6,504 +33.52 13,767 12,140 1991 M.e. 9.06 28,758 +2,851 +11.00 15,216 13,542 2001 M.e!. 9.60 32,904 +4,146 +14.42 17,379 15,525 (ii) Kothe Lal 1971 N.A. 43 19 24 Premi (OG) 1981 N.A. 154 +111 +258.14 76 78 1991 N.A. 92 -62 -40.26 45 47 2001 N.A. 561 +469 +509.78 297 264

12 Jalalabad Urban Firozpur 1911 5,096 2,837 2,259 Agglomeration 1921 3,833 -1,263 -24.78 2,190 1,643 1931 7,703 +3,870 +100.97 5,160 2,543 1941 7,134 -569 -7.39 3,809 3,325 1951 6,283 -851 -11.93 3,358 2,925 1961 7,723 +1,440 +22.92 4,077 3,646 1971 N.A. 11,032 +3,309 +42.85 6,010 5,022 1981 N.A. 16,639 +,5,607 +50.82 9,011 7,628 1991 N.A. 23,108 +6,469 +38.88 12,611 10,497 2001 N.A. 32,924 +9,816 +42.48 17,537 15,387

(i) Jalalabad 1911 5,096 2,837 2,259 1921 3,833 -1,263 -24.78 2,190 1,643 1931 7,703 +3,870 +100.97 5,160 2,543 1941 7,134 -569 -7.39 3,809 3,325 1951 6,283 -851 -11. 93 3,358 2,925 1961 M.e. 1.04 7,723 +1,440 +22.92 4,077 3,646 1971 M.e. 1.03 10,213 +2,490 +32.24 5,571 4,642 1981 M.e. 2.84 14,734 +4,521 +44.27 7,991 6,743 1991 M.e. 2.84 18,476 +3,742 +25.40 10,202 8,274 2001 M.e!. 7.56 31,007 +12,531 +67.82 16,535 14,472 (ii) Extended Area 1971 N.A. 819 439 380 Block No.22 (OG) 1981 N.A. 1,905 +1,086 +132.60 1,020 885 1991 N.A. 4,632 +2,727 +143.15 2,409 2,223 2001 N.A. 1,917 -2,715 -58.61 1,002 915

L3 Nawanshahr Nawanshahr 1901 5,641 3,010 2,631 Urban 1911 4,475 -1,166 -20.67 2,517 1,958 Agglomeration 1921 5,316 +841 +18.79 2,975 2,341 1931 7,153 +1,837 +34.56 4,133 3,020 1941 10,275 +3,122 +43.65 5,788 4,487 1951 13,140 +2,865 +27.88 7,236 5,904 1961 14,097 +957 +7.28 7,662 6,435 1971 17,527 +3,430 +24.33 9,401 8,126 1981 . 26,726 +9,199 +52.48 14,253 12,473 1991 29,955 +3,229 +12.08 15,630 14,325 2001 N.A. 31,967 +2,012 +6.72 16,698 15,269

(I) Nawanshahr 1901 5,641 3,010 2,631 1911 4,475 -1, 166 -20.67 2,517 1,958 1921 5,316 +841 +18.79 2,975 2,141 1931 7,153 +1,837 +34.56 4,133 3,020 1941 10,275 +3,122 +43.65 5,788 4,487 1951 13,140 +2,865 +27.88 7,236 5,904 1961 M.e. 3.83 14,097 +957 +7.28 7,662 6,435 1971 M.e. 3.83 17,527 +3,430 +24.33 9,401 8,126 1981 M.e. 9.59 26726 +9199 +52.48 14,253 12,473 165 A4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001 WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 SI. Name of Town! Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square tbe ~receding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1991 M.C. 9.59 29,955 +3,229 +12.08 15,630 14,325 2001 M.CI. 9.59 30,999 +1,044 +3.49 16,132 14,867 (ii) Abadi on Banga Road & Sugar Mill Colony (OG) 2001 N.A. 842 499 343 (iii) Toor Colony on Saloh Road (OG) 2001 N.A. 126 67 59

14 Zira Urban Firozpur 1901 4,001 2,162 1,839 Agglomeration 1911 4,378 +377 +9.42 2,465 1,913 1921 4,622 +244 +5.57 2,519 2,103 1931 5,318 +696 +15.06 2,863 2,455 1941 5,963 +645 +12.13 3,273 2,690 1951 6,389 +426 +7.14 3,374 3,015 1961 N.A. 8,118 +1,729 +27.06 4,271 3,847 1971 N.A. 9,264 +1,146 +14.12 4,830 4,434 1981 N.A. 19,581 +10,317 +11l.37 10,531 9,050 1991 N.A. 23,722 +4,141 +2l.15 12,525 11,197 2001 N.A. 31,783 +8,061 +33.98 16,595 15,188

(I) Zira 1901 4,001 2,162 1,839 1911 4,378 +377 +9.42 2,465 1,913 1921 4,622 +244 +5.57 2,519 2,103 1931 5,318 +696 +15.06 2,863 2,455 1941 5,963 +645 +12.13 3,273 2,690 1951 6,389 +426 +7.14 3,374 3,015 1961 M.C. 0.47 8,118 +1,729 +27.06 4,271 3,847 1971 M.C. 0.47 9,264 +1,146 +14.12 4,830 4,434 1981 M.C. 19.42 19,581 +10.317 +111.37 10,531 9,050 1991 M.e. 19.42 23,587 +4,006 +20.46 12,451 1l,136 2001 M.Cl. 7.06 31,355 +7,768 +32.93 16,385 14,970 (ii) Gadriwala on Zira - Firozpur 1991 N.A. 135 74 61 Road (OG) 2001 N.A. 428 +293 +217.04 210 218

15 Nakodar lalandhar 1901 9,958 5,154 4,804 1911 8,859 -1,099 -11.04 4,780 4,079 1921 9,434 +575 +6.49 5,110 4,324 1931 9,584 +150 +1.59 5,147 4,437 1941 10,981 +1,397 + 14.58 5,763 5,218 1951 11,307 +326 +2.97 6,032 5,275 1961 M.C. 2.82 14,452 +3,145 +27.81 7,473 6,979 1971 M.C. 3.16 18,156 +3,704 +25.63 9,401 8,755 1981 M.C. 3.60 26,239 +8,083 +44.52 13,909 12,330 1991 M.e. 3.60 28,478 +2,239 +8.53 15,184 13,294 2001 M.CI. 12.50 31,408 +2,930 +10.29 16,510 14,898

16 Ahmedgarh Sangrur 1931 3,283 2,035 1,248 1941 4,368 +1,085 +33.05 2,630 1,738 1951 6,258 +1,890 +43.27 3,439 2,819 1961 M.C. 3.34 9,074 +2,816 +45.00 4,893 4,181 1971 M.C. 3.34 12,499 +3,425 +37.75 6,597 5,902 1981 M.C. 3.08 16,874 +4,375 +35.00 8,847 8,027 1991 M.C. 3.88 25,560 +8,686 +51.48 13,540 12,020 2001 M.Cl. 6.10 28,022 +2,462 +9.63 14,944 13,078

17 Maur Bathinda 1951 3,847 2,118 1,729 1961 M.C. 2.59 10,944 +7097 +184.48 6,008 4,936 166 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGWMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 SI. Name of Town! State! Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the preceding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1971 M.e. 2.59 13,407 +2,463 +22.51 7,126 6,281 1981 M.e. 4.80 18,853 +5,446 +40.62 9,966 8,887 1991 M.e. 4.80 25,180 +6,327 +33.56 13,517 11,663 2001 M.e!. 14.08 27,543 +2,363 +9.38 14,675 12,868

18 Kartarpur Ialandhar 1901 10,840 5,726 5,114 1911 8,631 -2,209 -20.38 4,631 4,000 1921 8,512 -119 -1.38 4,592 3,920 1931 9,878 +1,366 +16.05 5,290 4,588 1941 12,150 +2,272 +23.00 6,587 5,563 1951 1l,220 -930 -7.65 5,949 5,271 1961 M.e. 3.37 12,202 +982 +8.75 6,480 5,722 1971 M.e. 4.92 14,644 +2,442 "'20.01 7,774 6,870 1981 M.e. 5.95 17,878 +3,234 +22.08 9,400 8,478 1991 M.e. 5.95 21,093 +3,215 +17.98 11,109 9,984 2001 M.e!. 10.00 25,157 +4,064 +19.27 13,463 11,694

19 Zirakpur Patiala 2001 N.P. 8.55 25,022 14,199 10,823

20 Raikot Ludhiana 1901 10,131 5,185 4,946 1911 7,510 -2,621 -25.87 4,073 3,437 1921 8,379 +869 +11.57 4,553 3,826 1931 11,810 +3,431 +40.95 6,530 5,280 1941 13,777 + 1 ,967 +16.66 7,375 6,402 1951 10,193 -3,584 -26.01 5,421 4,772 1961 M.e. 0.88 11,239 +1,046 +10.26 5,854 5,385 1971 M.e. 0.88 11,709 +470 +4.18 6,058 5,651 1981 M.e. 2.00 17,106 +5,397 +46.09 8,895 8,211 1991 M.e. 10.65 21,061 +3,955 +23.12 11,025 10,036 2001 M.e\. 10.65 24,769 +3,708 +17.61 12,942 11,827

21 Jandlala Amritsar 1901 7,750 4,084 3,666 1911 6,959 -791 -10.21 3,822 3,137 1921 7,464 +505 +7.26 4,019 3,445 1931 8,888 +1,424 +19.08 4,809 4,079 1941 11,520 +2,632 ''1-29.61 6,196 5,324 1951 12,704 +1,184 +10.28 6,669 6,035 1961 M.e. 4.04 11,915 -789 -6.21 6,259 5,656 1971 M.e. 4.25 14,060 +2,145 +18.00 7,338 6,722 1981 M.e. 4.20 16,335 +2,275 + 16.18 8,567 7,768 1991 M.e. 4.20 19,293 +2,958 + 18.11 10,191 9,102 2001 M.e!. 4.20 23,834 +4,541 +23.54 12,754 11,080

22 Budhlada Mansa 1931 8,369 4,839 3,530 1941 5,364 -3,005 -35.91 3,151 2,213 1951 7,077 +1,713 +31.94 3,694 3,383 1961 M.e. 2.59 8,620 +1,543 +21.80 4,697 3,923 1971 M.e. 2.59 11,713 +3,093 +35.88 6,200 5,513 1981 M.e. 5.18 15,968 +4,255 +36.33 8,436 7,532 1991 M.e. 5.18 18,717 +2,749 + 17.22 9,886 8,831 2001 M.e!. 8.06 23,521 +4,804 +25.67 12,429 11,092

23 Kurall Rupnagar 1961 M.e. 3.39 6,390 3,535 2,855 1971 M.e. 4.40 9,776 +3,386 +52.99 5,255 4,521 1981 M.C. 7.40 12,637 +2,861 +29.27 6,689 5,948 1991 M.C. 7.40 17,592 +4,955 +39.21 9,341 8,251 2001 M.CI. 9.00 23,047 +5,455 +31.01 12,306 10,741 167 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2OO1WITHVARIATION SINCE 1901 SI. Name of Town! Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square tbe Erecedin; census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 24 Morinda Rupnagar 1941 5,837 3,246 2,591 1951 6,068 +231 +3.96 3,255 2,813 1961 M.C. 2.59 7,540 +1,472 +24.26 4,075 3,465 1971 M.C. 2.59 9,326 +1,786 +23.69 4,939 4,387 1981 M.C. 3.00 13,502 +4,176 +44.78 7,162 6,340 1991 M.C. 3.00 17,440 +3,938 +29.17 9,297 8,143 2001 M.C1. 4.50 22,635 +5,195 +29.79 11,945 10,690

25 Talwara Hoshiarpur 1971 N.A.C. 6.35 17,865 10,238 7,627 1981 C.T. 10.90 17.907 +42 +0.24 10.130 7.777 1991 C.T. 10.90 17,379 -528 -2.95 9,450 7.929 2001 C.T. 25.42 22.574 +5,195 +29.89 11,924 10,650

26 Phillaur lalandhar 1901 6,986 3,851 3,135 1911 5,224 -1,762 -25.22 2,870 2,354 1921 4,696 -528 -10.11 2,505 2,191 1931 5,168 +472 +10.05 2,853 2,315 1941 9,011 +3,843 +74.36 4,753 4,258 1951 9,484 +473 +5.25 5,054 4,430 1961 M.C. 0.44 1}'058 +1,574 +16.60 5,868 5,190 1971 M.C. 0.44 11,543 +485 +4.39 6,015 5,528 1981 M.C. 0.75 17,650 +6,107 +52.91 9,642 8,008 1991 M.C. 0.75 20,956 +3,306 +18.73 11,701 9,255 2001 M.C!' 0.75 22,302 +1,346 +6.42 11,992 10,310

27 Patran Patiala 1981 N.A.C 3.00 7,998 4,207 3,791 1991 N.A.C 5.00 14,328 +6,330 +79.14 7,494 6,834 2001 N.P. 6.00 22,175 +7,847 +54.77 11,673 10,502

28 Urmar Tanda Hoshiarpur 1901 10,247 5,427 4,820 1911 7,016 -3,231 -31.53 3,775 3,241 1921 8,362 +1,346 +19.18 4,422 3,940 1931 9,510 +1,148 +13.73 5,085 4,425 1941 12,734 +3,224 +33.90 6,819 5,915 1951 9,857 -2,877 -22.59 5,214 4,643 1961 M.C. 12.95 10,383 +526 +5.34 5,470 4,913 1971 M.C. 12.95 12,262 +1.879 +18.10 6.357 5.905 1981 M.C. 17.00 17,655 +5,393 +43.98 9,275 8,380 1991 M.C. 17.00 18.786. +1.131 +6.41 9.686 9,100 2001 M.Cl. 16.50 22.048 +3.262 +17.36 11,447 10,601

29 Qadian Urban Gurdaspur 1951 11.531 6.377 5,154 Agglomeration 1961 11,502 -29 -0.25 6,021 5,481 1971 N.A. 13.607 +2,105 +18.30 7,071 6,536 1981 N.A. 16,424 +2,817 +20.70 8,459 7.965 1991 N.A. 20,012 +3,588 +21.85 10,346 9.666 2001 N.A. 22,001 +1.989 +9.94 11,809 10,192

(i) Qadian 1951 11.531 6.377 5,154 1961 M.C. 9.07 11.502 -29 -0.25 6.021 5,481 1971 M.e. 9.06 13.119 + 1,617 +14.06 6,813 6,306 1981 M.C. 9.06 15,804 +2,685 +20.47 8,123 7,681 1991 M.C. 9.06 18,867 +3,063 +19.38 9,726 9,141 2001 M.C!' 9.06 20,254 +1,387 +7.35 10,888 9,366 (ii) Harijan Colony, 1971 N.A. 488 258 230 LT.I.Balrniki Il)g 1 N.A. 620 +132 +27.05 336 284 Graveyard & DAY 1991 N.A. 1,145 +525 +84.68 620 525 Hr.Sec.School (OG) 2001 N.A. 1,747 +602 +52.58 921 826 168 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGWMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 Sl. Name of Townl Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the preceding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 30 Sujanpur ! Gurdaspur 1901 5,687 2,996 2,691 1911 5,512 -175 -3.08 2,996 2,516 1921 4,756 -756 -13.72 2,572 2,184 1931 Declassified 1941 Declassified 1951 10,269 5,575 4,694 1961 M.C. 0.31 10,458 +189 +1.84 5,476 4,982 1971 M.C. 0.31 12,783 +2,325 +22.23 6,748 6,035 1981 M.C. 0.31 13,561 +778 +6.09 7,117 6,444 1991 M.e. 0.31 16,090 +2,529 +18.65 8,436 7,654 2001 M.Cl. 5.08 21,815 +5,725 +35.58 11,408 10,407

31 Bhagha Purana Moga 1981 N.A.C. 6.00 14,289 7,588 6,701 1991 N.A.C. 6.00 17,287 +2,998 +20.98 8,946 8,341 2001 N.P. 6.00 21,596 +4,309 +24.93 11,336 10,260

32 Gurdaspur 1901 5,191 2,773 2,418 1911 4,154 -1,037 -19.98 2,264 1,890 1921 4,047 -107 -2.58 2,146 1,901 1931 5,114 +1,067 +26.37 2,825 2,289 1941 6,968 +1,854 +36.25 3,868 3,100 1951 9,617 +2,649 +38.02 5,094 4,523 1961 M.C. 10.36 9,599 -18 -0.19 5,046 4,553 1971 M.C. 10.36 10,607 +1,008 +10.50 5,486 5,121 1981 M.C. 10.36 ]3,078 +2,471 +23.30 6,858 6,220 1991 M.C. 14.36 16,968 +3,890 +29.74 8,811 8,157 2001 M.C)' 14.36 21,502 +4,534 +26.72 11,277 10,225

33 Mukerian Hoshiarpur 1901 3,589 1,927 1,662 1911 Declassified 1921 Declassified 1931 Declassified 1941 Declassified 1951 7,493 4,196 3,297 1961 M.C. 2.59 8,676 +1,183 +15.79 4,666 4,010 1971 M.C. 2.59 10,937 +2,261 +26.06 5,731 5,206 1981 M.C. 2.59 14,454 +3,517 +32.16 7,523 6,931 1991 M.C. 2.59 17,813 +3,359 +23.24 9,131 8,682 2001 M.Cl. 2.61 21,384 +3,571 +20.05 11,177 10,207

34 Karoran Rupnagar 2001 c.T. 14.97 20,361 11,355 9,006

35 Longowal Sangrur 1941 6,848 3,898 2,950 1951 6,543 -305 -4.45 3,718 2,825 1961 M.C. 7.77 9,269 +2,726 +41.66 5,108 4,161 1971 M.C. 7.77 11,209 +1,940 +13.41 6,166 5,043 198i M.C. 3.25 12,971 + 1,762 +19.20 6,999 5,972 1991 M.C. 3.25 16,254 +3,283 +23.06 8,669 7,585 2001 M.Cl. 3.25 20,239 +3,985 +31.26 11,109 9,130

36 Dasua Hoshiarpur 1901 6,404 3,322 3,082 1911 3,597 -2,807 -43.83 1,944 1,653 ! Harijan and Railway Colony (O.G.) of Sujanpur are merged in Municipal Council Sujanpur due to extention of boundaries in 2001 Census. The Population of the O.G. from 1971 Census (P 12,568 M 6,622 F 5,946), 1981 Census ( P 13,095 M 6,875 F 6,220) and Population of 1991 Census (P 15.414 M 8.078 F 7.336) have been included in Municipal Council Sujanpur. ! Longowal town, which was U .A. 10 1991 Census, did not satisfy the criteria to treat it as UA in 2001 Census, therefore population of 00 as per 1971 Census (P 697 M 410 F 287),1981 Census (P 441 M 228 F 213) and 1991 Census(P 835 M 444 F 391) have been included in the town. 169 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGWMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 Sl. Name of Town! Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation sinte Males Females' No. Urban District year status square the !recedins census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 S (; 7 8 9 10 11 1921 Declassified 1931 Declassified 1941 9,206 4,920 4,286 1951 7,895 -1,311 -14.24 4,103 3,792 1961 M.e. 1.68 8,721 +826 + 10.46 4,593 4,128 1971 M.e. 1.68 10,363 +1,642 +18.83 5,414 4,949 1981 M.e. 16.00 14,657 +4,294 +41.44 7,651 7,006 1991 M.e. 16.00 18,351 +3,694 +25.20 9,670 8,681 2001 M.CI. 19.90 20,114 +1,763 +9.61 10,466 9.648

Class -IV (10,000-19,999)(54 Towns)

1901 191,119 105,893 85,226 1911 133,718 -57,401 -30.03 77,098 56,620 1921 157,796 +24,078 +18.01 91,380 66,416 1931 222,523 +64,727 +41.02 128.431 94,092 1941 267.517 +44,994 +20.22 147,854 119,663 1951 287,223 +19.706 +7.37 156.000 131,223 1961 73.80 267,913 -19,310 -6.72 143.366 124,547 1971 129.82 428,413 +160,500 +59.91 228.222 200.191 1981 197.81 514,115 +85,702 +20.00 272,253 241,862 1991 242.07 636,184 +122,069 +23.74 334,979 301,205 2001 367.19 810,753 +174,569 +27.44 432,121 378,632

1 Raman Bathinda 1951 6,446 3,555 2,891 1961 M.e. 2.36 9,507 +3,061 +47.49 5,212 4,295 1971 M.e. 2.36 11,574 +2,067 +21.74 6,252 5,322 1981 M.e. 7.90 14,318 +2,744 +23.71 7,674 6,644 1991 M.e. 3.99 17,275 +2,9.57 +20.65 9,247 8,028 2001 M.e!. 3.99 19,551 +2,276 +13.18 10,361 9,190

2 Lehragaga Sangrur 1951 3,616 1,933 1.683 1961 M.e. 1.97 7,847 +4,231 +117.01 4,249 3,598 1971 M.e. 1.97 9,531 +1,684 +21.46 5,073 4,458 1981 M.e. 5.80 12,241 +2,710 +28.43 6,481 5,760 1991 M.e. 8.40 15.555 +3.314 +27.07 8.219 7,336 2001 M.e!. 8.50 19,336 +3,781 +24.31 10,299 9,037

3 Bassi Pathana Fatehgarh 1901 13,738 7,149 6,589 Sahib 1911 1l,125 -2.613 -19.02 5,995 5,130 1921 II ,560 +435 +3.91 6.119 5,441 1931 12,979 +1,419 +12.28 6,868 6,lll 1941 ]4,400 +],421 +10.95 7,818 6,582 1951 13,151 -1.249 -8.67 7,067 6,084 1961 M.e. 3.89 13,042 -109 -0.83 6.957 6,085 1971 M.e. 3.89 14.385 +1,343 +10.30 7,599 6,786 1981 M.e. 3.89 16,672 +2,287 +15.90 8,671 8,001 1991 M.e. 5.00 18,138 +1,466 +8.79 9,361 8,777 2001 M.e!. 3.00 19,058 +920 +5.07 9,927 9,131

4 Doraha Ludhiana 1951 3,062 1,692 1,370 1961 M.e. 1.30 4,602 + I ,540 +50.29 2,468 2,134 1971 M.e. 1.29 5,804 +1,202 +26.12 3,060 2,744 1981 M.e. 1.29 7,606 +1,802 +31.05 3,993 3,613 1991 M.e. 1.90 9,589 +1,983 +26.07 4,955 4,634 2001 M.e!. 6.00 18,986 +9,397 +98.00 10,570 8,416

S Tappa! Sangrur 1951 4.671 2,538 2,133 1961 M.e. 0.36 6,220 + 1,549 +33.16 3,267 2,953 1971 M.e. 0.36 8,467 +2,247 +36.13 4,536 3,931 1981 M.e. 2.47 II ,108 +2,641 +31.19 5,915 5,193 170 A4TOWNSANDURBANAGGLOMERATIONSC~~DBYPOPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 SI. Name of Town! Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square tbe preceding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1991 M.C. 2.47 14,161 +3,053 +27.48 7,562 6,599 2001 M.C!' 10.75 18,917 +4,756 +33.59 IOm8 8,839

6 8anga Nawanshahr 1901 4,697 2,678 2,019 1911 4,602 -95 -2.02 2,552 2,050 1921 5,089 +487 +10.58 2,850 2,239 1931 5,840 +751 +14.76 3,210 2,630 1941 9,112 +3,272 +56.03 5,296 3,816 1951 9,843 +731 +8.02 5,170 4,673 1961 M.C. 0.49 10,212 +369 +3.75 5,399 4,813 1971 M.C. 1.30 11,885 +1,673 +16.38 6,221 5,664 1981 M.C. 1.30 13,490 +1,605 +13.50 7,035 6,455 1'191 M.C. 1.50 17,721 +4,231 +31.36 9,227 8,494 2001 M.CI. 11.00 18,809 +1,088 +6.14 9,766 9,043

7 Dbariwal Gurdaspur 1931 4,186 2,435 1,751 1941 7,388 +3,202 +76.49 4,306 3,082 1951 7,731 +343 +4.64 4,205 3,526 1961 M.C. 3.29 9,601 +1,870 +24.19 5,162 4,439 1971 M.C. 3.29 9,985 +384 +4.00 5,264 4,721 1981 M.C. 1.27 12,212 +2,227 +22.30 6,269 5,943 1991 M.C. 1.27 14,214 +2.002 +16.39 7,375 6,839 2001 M.C!' 14.37 18,710 +4,496 +31.63 9,757 8,953

8 Ajnala Amritsar 1981 N.A.C 2.20 7,506 3,895 3,611 1991 Declassified 2001 N.P. 9.00 18,589 10,100 8,489

9 Dbanaula Sangrur 1901 7,443 3,912 3,531 1911 6,094 -1,349 -18.12 3,387 2,707 1921 6,886 +792 +13.00 . 3,781 3,105 1931 7,521 +635 +9.22 4,084 3,437 1941 9,560 +2,039 +27.11 5,192 4,368 1951 9,552 -8 -0.08 5.093 4,459 1961 M.C. 5.83 11,238 +1,686 +17.65 6,115 5,123 1971 M.C. 5.83 11,877 +639 +5.69 6,333 5,544 1981 M.C. 5.00 13,885 +2,008 +16.91 7,359 6,526 1991 M.C. 5.00 15,967 +2,082 +14.99 8,405 7,562 2001 M.C!' 5.00 18,485 +2,518 +15.77 9,721 8,764

10 Macbbiwara Ludhiana 1901 5,588 3,027 2,561 1911 Declassified 1921 Declassified 1931 Declassified 1941 Declassified 1951 Declassified 1961 Declassified 1971 Declassified 1981 N.A.C 1.89 9,621 5,007 4,614 1991 N.A.C 3.00 13,554 +3,933 +40.88 7,066 6,488 2001 N.P. 3.50 18,364 +4,810 +35.49 9,699 8,665

11 8alacbaur Nawanshahr 1981 N.A.C 0.76 6,630 3,476 3,154 1991 Declassified 2001 N.P. 6.00 18,156 9,569 8,587 ! Electricity Colony (O.G.) of Tapa was merged in Municipal Council Tapa due to extention of boundaries in 2001 Census. The popUlation of the O.G. from 1971 Census (P 719 M 403 F 316). J981 Census ( P 20 M II F 9) and 1991 Census (P 14 M 6 F 8) has been included in the Municipal Council Tappa

171 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001WITII VARIATION SINCE 1901 SI. Name of Townl Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the Erecedin& census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Sanaur ! Patiala 1901 8,580 4,391 4,189 1911 6,307 -2,273 -26.49 3,455 2,852 1921 6,532 +225 +3.57 3,479 3,053 1931 6,846 +314 +4.81 3,664 3,182 1941 8,426 + 1 ,580 +23.08 4,519 3,907 1951 7,948 -478 -5.67 4,272 3,676 1961 M.C. 5.18 9,007 +1,059 +13.32 4,718 4,289 1971 M.C. 5.18 11,217 +2,210 +24.54 5,903 5,314 1981 M.C. 5.18 13,634 +2,417 +21.55 7,172 6,462 1991 M.C. 5.18 16,490 +2,856 +20.95 8,658 7,832 2001 M.C!' 5.18 17,935 +1,445 +8.76 9,613 8,322

13 Bhawanigarh $ Sangrur 1951 4,253 2,361 1,892 1961 M.C. 3.89 5,437 +1,184 +27.84 2,933 2,504 1971 M.C. 2.59 6,706 +1,269 +23.34 3,539 3,167 1981 M.e. 2.59 9,817 +3,111 +46.39 5,184 4,633 1991 M.e. 2.59 13,900 +4,083 +41.59 7,396 6,504 2001 M.C!' 6.00 17,792 +3,892 +28.00 9,400 8,392

14 Samrala !! Ludhiana 1951 4,734 2,587 2,147 1961 M.C. 1.27 5,439 +705 + 14.89 2,963 2,476 1971 M.C. 13.47 7,554 +2,115 +38.89 4,081 3,473 1981 M.C. 9.00 10,824 +3,270 +43.29 5,827 4,997 1991 M.C. 9.00 14,921 +4,097 +37.85 7,850 7,071 2001 M.C!' 9.00 17,590 +2,669 +17.89 9,277 8,313

15 Sahnewal Ludhiana 2001 N.P. 5.00 17,293 9,217 8,076

16 Bhadaur Sangrur 1901 7,710 4,173 3,537 1911 5,465 -2,245 -29.12 3,111 2,354 1921 5,577 +112 +2.05 3,104 2,473 1931 6,282 +705 +12.64 3,488 2,794 1941 7,862 +1,580 +25.15 4,250 3,612 1951 7,727 -135 -1.72 4,139 3,588 1961 M.C. 2.59 9,407 +1,680 +21.74 5,083 4,324 1971 M.C. 6.00 10,428 + 1,021 + 10.85 5,596 4,832 1981 M.C. 6.00 13,350 +2,922 +28.02 7,087 6,263 1991 M.e. 6.00 14,808 +1,458 +10.92 7,866 6,942 2001 M.Cl. 6.00 16,808 +2,000 +13.51 8,913 7,895

17 Adampur lalandhar 1961 M.e. 2.72 5,177 2,794 2,383 1971 M.C. 2.72 8,105 +2,928 +56.56 3,970 4,135 1981 M.C. 2.72 10,960 +2,855 +35.23 5,707 5,253 1991 M.C. 8.20 15,331 +4,371 +39.88 7,541 7,790 2001 M.C!' 8.20 16,707 +1,376 +8.98 8,667 8,040

! Break-up of figures for Bazigar Town (0.0.) and Outer Area (0.0.) for 1981 Census are not available. However, combined figures of both these Out-growths in 1981 Census are Persons 603(315M,288F) Sanaur town, which was U.A. in 1991Census, did not satisfy the criteria to treat it as U.A. in 2001 Census, therefore population of OGs has been included in the town from 1971 to 1991 Census Pop. 1971 Census i) Outer area (P 480 M 258 F 222) ii) Bazigar town ( P438 M 233 F 205), in 1981 Census Bazigar town and Outer area considered as one 0.0. having (P 603 M 315 F 288) and in 1991 Census, Bazigar town (P 865 M 444 F 421) and Outer area ( P 1013 M 535 F 478) have been included in the town. $ Jbugi Basti out side M.Cl. limit (O.G.) of Bhawanigarh has been merged in Municipal Council Bhawanigarb due to extention of boundaries in 2001 Census. The population of the 0.0. from 1971 census onwards has been included in the Municipal Council Bhawanigarh,1971 (P 446 M 229 F 217) , in 1981 (P 916 M 474 F 442) and in 1991 (P 3785 M 2015 F 1770) . !! Samrala town, which was U.A. in 1991 Census did not satisfy the criteria to treat it as VA in 2001 Census, therefore popUlation of OG as per 1991 Census (P 634 M 334 F 300) has been included in the town.

172 A4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGWMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001WITHVARIATION SINCE 1901 SI. Name of Town! Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the preceding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 18 Jugial Gurdaspur 2001 C.T. 7.89 16,668 9,078 7,590

19 Sardulgarh Mansa 2001 N.P. 8.00 16,315 8,644 7,671

20 Fatehgarh Gurdaspur 1951 4,151 2,219 1,932 Churian 1961 M.C. 0.44 6,439 +2,288 +55.12 3,357 3,082 1971 M.C. 0.44 7,590 +1,151 +17.88 3,966 3,624 1981 M.C. 1.50 9,372 +1,782 +23.48 4,886 4,486 1991 M.C. 1.50 11,088 +1,716 +18.31 5,795 5,293 2001 M.Cl. 1.50 15,915 +4,827 +43.53 8,398 7,517

21 Dera Bassi Patiala 1901 4,641 2,357 2,284 1911 4,236 -405 -8.73 2,306 1,930 1921 3,890 -346 -8.17 2,077 1,813 1931 4,182 +292 +7.51 2,223 1,959 1941 5,070 +888 +21.23 2,737 2,333 1951 3,651 -1,419 -27.99 1,893 1,758 1961 M.e. 0.80 4,051 +400 +10.96 2,128 1,923 1971 M.e. 0.80 5,807 +1,756 +43.35 3,048 2,759 1981 M.C. 3.06 7,421 +1,614 +27.79 3,879 3,547 1991 M.C. 3.06 9,602 +2,181 +29.39 5,032 4,570 2001 M.C!' 20.00 15,841 +6,239 +64.98 8,585 7,256

22 Sultanpur Kapurthala 1901 9,004 4,869 4,135 1911 6,492 -2,512 -27.90 3,453 3,039 1921 8,141 + 1,649 +25.40 4,318 3,823 1931 8,606 +465 +5.71 4,639 3,967 1941 10,168 +1,562 +18.15 5,503 4,665 1951 7,733 -2,435 -23.95 4,122 3,611 1961 M.C. 10.36 7,661 -72 -0.93 4,086 3,575 1971 M.C. 10.36 9,176 +1,515 +19.78 4,961 4,215 1981 M.e. 5.00 12,143 +2,967 +32.33 6,478 5,665 1991 M.C. 5.00 13,722 +1,579 +13.00 7,228 6,494 2001 M.CI. 10.52 15,571 +1,849 +13.47 8,310 7,261

23 Dharamkot ! Moga 1901 6,731 3,524 3,207 1911 5,859 -872 -12.95 3,163 2,696 1921 5,960 +101 +1.72 3,217 2,743 1931 6,779 +819 +13.74 3,600 3,179 1941 8,360 +1,581 +23.32 4,577 3,783 1951 6,845 -1,515 -18.12 3,627 3,218 1961 M.C. 0.54 6,443 -402 -5.87 3,430 3,013 1971 M.C. 0.54 7,720 +1,277 +19.82 4,140 3,580 1981 M.C. 1.10 9,328 +1,608 +20.83 4,953 4,375 1991 M.C. 1.10 11,981 +2,653 +28.44 6,314 5,667 2001 M.CI. 19.50 15,399 +3,418 +Z8.53 8,140 7,Z59

24 Hussainpur Kapurtha1a Z001 C.T 3.36 15,337 8,361 6,976

25 Goraya Jalandhar 1971 N.A.C. 2.25 6,000 3,225 2,775 1981 N.A.C. 2.65 8,802 +2,802 +46.70 4,702 4,100 1991 N.A.C. 2.65 10,708 + 1,906 +21.65 5,555 5,153 2001 N.P. 5.00 15,158 +4,450 +41.56 8,045 7,113

26 Garhshankar Hoshiarpur 1901 5,803 3,068 2,735 1911 4,923 -880 -15.16 2,601 2,322 ! 80 houses outside M.CI. limit (O.G) of Dharamkot has been merged in Municipal Council Dharamkot due to extention of boundaries in 2001 Census. The population of the O.G. from 1971 census ( P 574 M 312 F 262). in 1981 (P 203 M 116 F 87) and 1991 (P 688 M 377 F 311) have been included in the Municipal Council Dharamkot. 173 A4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGWMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2OO1WITHVARIATION SINCE 1901 SI. Name of Townl Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No . . Urban District year status square the 2receding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 16 11 1921 Declasified 1931 5,561 2,883 2,678 1941 6,885 + 1,324 +23.81 3,760 3,125 1951 5,495 -1,390 -20.19 2,901 2,594 1961 M.C. 1.30 5,976 +481 +8.75 3,227 2,749 1971 M.C. 1.30 6,882 +906 +15.16 3,645 3,237 1981 M.C. 5.00 9,515 +2,633 +38.26 5,013 4,502 1991 M.C. 5.00 11,761 +2,246 +23.60 6,141 5,620 2001 M.CJ. 7.00 15,148 +3,387 +28.80 7,912 7,236

27 Bhikhi Mansa 2001 N.P. 9.00 15,080 7,984 7,096

28 Banur Patiala 1901 5,610 2,962 2,648 1911 Declassified 1921 Declassified 1931 Declassified 1941 Declassified 1951 3,468 1,936 1,532 1961 M.C. 5.83 4,308 +840 +24.22 2,354 1,954 1971 M.C. 5.83 5,459 +1,151 +26.72 2,910 2,549 1981 M.e. 4.50 7,453 +1,994 +36.53 3,983 3,470 1991 M.C. 4.50 10,014 +2,561 +34.36 5,324 4,690 2001 M.Cl. 6.50 15,013 +4,999 +49.92 8,002 7,011

29Moonak Sangrur 1951 3,937 2,156 1,781 1961 Declassified 1971 Declassified 1981 N.A.C. 1.00 8,536 4,480 4,056 1991 Declassified 2001 N.P. 6.11 14,924 7,935 6,989

30 Bareta Mansa 1951 5,317 2,831 2,486 1961 M.C. 2.59 7,041 +1,724 +32.42 3,864 3,177 1971 M.C. 2.59 8,313 +1,272 +18.07 4,421 3,892 1981 M.C. 4.00 9,494 +1,181 +14.21 5,056 4,438 1991 M.C. 4.00 11,537 +2,043 +21.52 6,092 5,445 2001 M.C!' 4.00 14,886 +3,349 +29.03 7,907 6,979

31 Talwandi Bhai Firozpur 1961 M.C. 0.34 4,886 2,623 2,263 1971 M.C. 0.34 6,018 +1,132 +23.17 3,219 2,799 1981 M.e. 2.00 .,,117 +3,099 +51.50 4,894 4,223 1991 M.C. 3.00 10,462 +1,345 +14.75 5,449 5,013 2001 M.Cl. 3.00 14,573 +4,111 +39.29 7,696 6,877

32 Guru Har Sabai Firozpur 1931 1,470 855 615 1941 2,311 +841 +57.21 1,289 1,022 1951 3,128 +817 +35.35 1,699 1,429 1961 M.C. 0.78 4,293 +1,165 +37.24 2,294 1,999 1971 M.e. 0.78 4,601 +308 +7.17 2,447 2,154 1981 M.C. 1.50 7,684 +3,083 +67.01 4,074 3,610 1991 M.C. 1.50 10,500 +2,816 +36.65 5,491 5,009 2001 M.CJ. 2.45 14,351 +3,851 +36.68 7,537 6,814

33 Mullanpur Ludhiana 1981 N.A.C. 2.05 8,115 4,274 3,841 Dakha 1991 N.A.C. 2.05 10,138 +2,023 +24.93 5,312 4,826 2001 N.P.. 2.05 13,949 +3,811 +37.59 7,323 6,626

174 A4 lOWNSAND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001 WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 SI. Name of Town! Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the 2recedins census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 34 Bhogpur lalandhar 1981 N.A.C. 3.00 6,882 3,630 3,252 1991 C.T. 3.00 4,896 -1,986 -28.86 2,603 2,293 2001 N.P. 4.65 13,919 +9,023 +184.29 7,380 6,539

35 Anandpur Rupnagar 1901 5,028 2,864 2,164 Sahib 1911 4,041 -987 -19.63 2,335 1,706 1921 Declassified 1931 Declassified 1941 Declassified 1951 4,266 2,377 1,889 1961 M.C. 0.85 4,189 -77 -1.80 2,275 1,914 1971 M.C. 0.86 5,000 +811 +19.36 2,692 2,308 1981 M.C. 3.00 8,571 +3,571 +71.42 4,673 3,898 1991 M.C. 3.00 10,674 +2,103 +24.54 5,718 4,956 2001 M.Cl. 3.00 13,889 +3,215 +30.12 7,400 6,489

36 Bhucho Mandi Bathinda 1951 1,624 932 692 1961 M.C. 0.44 2,277 +653 +40.21 1,266 1,01l 1971 M.C. 0.44 2,945 +668 +29.34 1,580 1,365 1981 M.C. 2.20 7,820 +4,875 +165.53 4,220 3,600 1991 M.C. 2.00 10,006 +2,186 +27.95 5,266 4,740 2001 M.C!' 4.16 13,246 +3,240 +32.38 7,017 6,229

37 Dirba Sangrur 2001 N.P. 27.05 13,079 7,058 6,021

38 Majitha ! Amritsar 1901 6,403 3,394 3,009 1911 5,223 -1,180 -18.43 2,852 2,371 1921 5,664 +441 +8.44 2,964 2,700 1931 6,709 + 1,045 +18.45 3,713 2,996 1941 9,004 +2,295 +34.21 4,803 4,201 1951 7,368 -1,636 -18.17 3,966 3,402 1961 M.C. 0.21 6,973 -395 -5.36 3,671 3,302 1971 M.C. 0.20 8,225 +1,252 +17.95 4,341 3,884 1981 M.C. 0.20 9,394 +1,169 +14.21 4,954 4,440 1991 M.e. 1.50 10,713 + 1,319 +14.04 5,738 4,975 2001 M.C!' 3.00 12,992 +2,279 +21.27 6,876 6,116

39 KalanauT Gurdaspur 2001 N.P. 6.79 12,931 6,893 6,038

40 Goniana Bathinda 1951 3,948 2,223 1,725 1961 M.C. 2.59 8,054 +4,106 +104.00 4,420 3,634 1971 M.C. 2.59 6,408 -1,646 -20.44 3,484 2,924 1981 M.C. 3.00 8,5% +2,188 +34.14 4,601 3,995 1991 M.C. 9.00 10,415 + 1,819 +21.16 5,459 4,956 200L M.Cl. 4.00 12,813 +2,398 +23.02 6,866 5,947

41 Amloh Fatehgarh 1921 1,543 867 676 Sahib 1931 1,889 +346 +22.42 1,076 813 1941 2,184 +295 +15.62 1,161 1,023 1951 2,863 +679 +31.09 1,548 1,315 1961 M.C. 1.94 3,582 +719 +25.11 1,912 1,670 1971 M.e. 2.59 4,848 +1,266 +35.34 2,603 2,245 1981 M.C. 2.69 7,098 +2,250 +46.41 3,743 3,355 1991 M.C. 2.69 9,854 +2,756 +38.83 5,191 4,663 2001 M.Cl. 7.00 12,689 +2,835 +28.77 6,780 5,909 ! Rori & Idgah O.G. has been merged in Majitha M.C!' due to extention of boundaries in 2001 Census. The population of the O.G. from 1971 Census ( P 424 M 231 F 193) . in 1981 (P 665 M 351 F 314) and 199)( P 801 M 434 F 367) have been included in Majitha M.Cl. 175 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001 WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 SI. Name of Town! Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the ~receding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 42 lalandhar 1901 8,706 4,451 4,255 1911 7,178 -1,528 -17.55 3,798 3,380 1921 6,845 -333 -4.64 3,628 3,217 1931 7,079 +234 +3.42 3,742 3,337 1941 8,324 +1,245 +17.59 4,342 3,982 1951 6,794 -1,530 -18.38 3,581 3,213 1961 M.C. 5.75 6,905 +111 +1.63 3,579 3,326 1971 M.C. 5.75 8,135 +1,230 + 17 .81 4,289 3,846 1981 M.C. 5.75 9,676 + 1,541 ~18.94 5,135 4,541 1991 M.C. 5.75 11,149 +1,473 +15.22 5,815 5,334 2001 M.C!' 6.15 12,632 +1,483 +13.30 6,633 5,999

43 Rayya Amritsar 1981 N.A.C. 1.50 7,049 3,713 3,336 1991 N.A.C. 1.50 9,122 +2,073 +29.41 5,106 4,016 2001 N.P. 7.00 12,631 +3,509 +38.47 6,634 5,997

44 Shahkot lalandhar 1981 N.A.C. 1.50 7,018 3,645 3,373 1991 N.A.C. 3.00 10,246 +3,228 +46.00 5,364 4,882 2001 N.P. 3.00 12,607 +2,361 +23.04 6,650 5,957

4S Raja Sansi Arnritsar 1941 6,033 3,137 2,896 1951 Declassified 1961 Declassified 1971 Declassified 1981 Declassified 1991 C.T. 15.55 10,008 5,290 4,718 2001 N.P. 4.00 12,176 +2,168 +21.66 6,587 5,589

46 Makhu Firozpur 1901 1,355 744 611 1911 Declassified 1921 Declassified 1931 Declassified 1941 Declassified 1951 Declassified 1961 Declassified 1971 Declassified 1981 Declassified 1991 Declassified 2001 N.P. 7.66 12,175 6,358 5,817

47 Amritsar CanU. Arnritsar 1901 @ 1911 @ 1921 @ 1931 @ 1941 @ 1951 @ 1961 C.B. 2.85 7,992 5,658 2,334 1971 C.B. 2.85 3,224 -4,768 -59.66 1,722 1,502 1981 C.B. 2.85 11,Q40 +7,816 +242.43 5,733 5,307 1991 C.B. 2.85 3,832 -7,208 -65.29 2,023 1,809 2001 C.B. 2.85 12,162 +8,330 +217.38 7,621 4,541

48 Rahon Nawanshahr 1901 8,651 4,569 4,082 1911 6,292 -2,359 -27.27 3,437 2,855 1921 5,947 -345 -5.48 3,207 2,740

@ in 1901 Population 1,390 (966M, 424F), in 1911 Population 1,417 (1,051M, 366F), in 1921 Population 3,187 (2,669M, 518F), in 1931 Population 1,630 (I,162M, 468F), in 1941 Population 1,429 (912M, 517F) and in 1951 Population 2,484 (2,l76M, 308F) was a part of Amritsar (M.C.). The combined population of Amritsar M.e. and Amritsar Cantonment for 1901 to 195 I has been shown against M. Corporation. 176 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001 WITH VARIATION SINCE 19()1

Sl. Name of Townl State/ Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the preceding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 8 1 2. 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 1931 6,692 +745 +12.53 3,640 3,052 1941 8,065 +1,373 +20.52 4326 3739 1951 6,541 -1,524 -18 .. 90 3,400 3,141 1961 M.C. 5.18 6,316 -225 -3.44 3,345 2,971 1971 M.C. 5.18 6,607 +291 +4.61 3,520 3,087 1981 M.C. 5.18 8,671 +2,064 +31.24 4,614 4,057 1991 M.C. 5.18 10,771 +2,100 +24.22 5,682 5,089 2001 M.CI. 5.41 12,134 +1,363 +12.65 6,354 5,780

6,083 3,171 2.912 49 Khemkaran Amritsar 1901 1911 5,732 -351 -5.77 2.974 2.758 1921 6,152 +420 +7.33 3,121 3,031 1931 6,898 +746 +12.13 3,598 3,300 3,816 1941 8.023 + 1,125 +16.31 4,207 3,297 1951 7,069 -954 -11.89 3,772 3,825 3,317 1961 2.59 7,142 +73 +1.03 3,568 1971 2.59 8,329 +1,187 +16.62 4,761 4,667 4,090 1981 4.00 8,757 +428 +5.14 1991 Declassified 6,623 5,317 2001 N.P. 4.50 11.940

4,923 2,700 2,223 50 Khanauri Sangrur 1981 NAC 1.50 1991 Declassified 5,791 5,169 2001 N.P. 5.00 10,960

7,165 4,793 51 *Bhikhiwind Amritsar 1991 C.T. 10.00 11,958 5,477 4,816 2001 N.P. 8.00 10,293 -1,665 -13.92

10,162 5,740 4,422 52 Nehon Rupnagar 2001 C.T. 1.04

4,926 2,560 2,366 53 Bhulath Kapurthala 1981 N.A.C. 0.69 1991 Declassified 5,338 4,753 2001 N.P. 10.00 10,091

5,254 4,764 54 Mahilpur Hoshiarpur 2001 N.P. 6.56 10.018

Class ·V (5,000·9,999)(29 Towns)

137,789 119,036 1901 256,825 112,143 87,882 1911 200,Q25 -56,800 -22.12 107,122 86,260 1921 193,382 -6,643 -3.32 123,859 98,858 1931 222,717 +29,335 +15.17 127,847 105,228 1941 233,075 +10,358 +4.65 141,293 120,904 1951 262,197 +29,122 +12.49 140.540 117,912 1961 99.91 258,452 -3.745 -1.43 112,262 97,652 1971 79.43 209,914 -48,538 -18.78 159.654 142,251 1981 93.82 301,905 +91,991 +43.82 54.942 48,003 1991 51.30 102,945 -198.960 -65.90 113,492 99,918 2001 134.68 213,410 +110,465 +107.30

5,414 2,879 2,535 1 Handiaya Sangrur 1901 1911 Declassified 1921 Declassified 1931 Declassified 1941 Declassified 2,294 1.945 1951 4.239 1961 Declassified 1971 Decia"ifieu 177 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGWMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 Sl. Name of Townl Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the preceding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

1981 Declassified 1991 Declassified 2001 N.P. 3.00 9,733 5,281 4,452

2 Begowal Kapurthala 1981 N.A.C. 2.70 6,744 3,415 3,329 1991 Declassified 2001 N.P. 7.18 9,616 4,938 4,678

3 Cheema Sangrur 2001 N.P. 7.50 9,245 4,930 4,315

4 Bhankharpur Patiala 2001 C.T. 5.92 9,216 4,923 4,293

5 Khamanon Fatehgarh 2001 N.P. 7.27 8,842 4,866 3,976 Sahib

6 Budha Theh Amritsar 2001 C.T. 7.47 8,731 4,855 3,876

7 Lohian Khas Jalandhar 1981 N.A.C. 1.60 5,496 2,963 2,533 1991 Declassified 2001 N.P. 3.00 8,548 4,510 4,038

8 Ghagga Patiala 1981 N.A.C. 1.20 4,900 2,572 2,328 1991 Declassified 2001 N.P. 3.00 8,212 4,317 3,895 9 Rurki Kasba Patiala 2001 C.T. 1.97 8,179 4,501 3,678

10 Dhilwan Kapurthala 1951 4,135 2,150 1,985 1961 M.C. 0.52 4,295 +160 +3.87 2,144 2,151 1971 Declassified 1981 N.A.C. 0.98 5,320 2,720 2,600 1991 Declassified 2001 N.P. 2.00 7,973 4,164 3,809

11 Hariana Hoshiarpur 1901 6,005 3,072 2,933 1911 5,395 -610 -10.16 2,916 2,479 1921 5,205 -190 -3.52 2,736 2,469 1931 5,971 +766 +14.72 3,242 2,729 1941 6,417 +446 +7.47 3,381 3,036 1951 4,725 -1,692 -26.37 2,511 2,214 1961 M.C. 0.64 4,468 -257 -5.44 2,331 2,137 1971 M.e. 1.29 5,002 +534 + 11. 95 2,560 2,442 1981 M.e. 1.29 5,633 +631 +12.61 2,938 2,695 1991 M.e. 1.29 6,473 +840 +14.91 3,409 3,064 2001 M.e!. 1.50 7,818 +1,345 +20.78 4,101 3,717

12 Jandiala lalandhar 1901 6,620 3,722 2,898 1911 Declassified 1921 Declassified 1931 Declassified 1941 Declassified 1951 6,832 3,639 3,193 1961 Declassified 1971 Declassified 1981 Declassified 1991 Declassified 2001 N.P. 13.76 7,705 3,989 3,71 b

13 Bariwala Muktsar 1981 N.A.C. 3.00 5,151 2,782 2,369 1991 Declassified 2001 N.P. 5.00 7,546 3,975 3,571 178 A4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGWMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SlZECLASS IN 2001"1THVARIATIONSINCE 19(1l Area in Persons Sl. Name of Townl State! Census Urban VariaticlD since Males e_ea No. Urban District year status square the preceding census ~ Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage '-- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 R ij Iii If"- 14 Dera Baba Gurdaspur 1901 5,118 2,707 :i:4H 4,556 -562 Nanak 1911 ·10.98 2,501 2.,055 4,333 -223 1921 ·4.89 2,278 2,055 1931 5,176 +843 +19.46 2,815 2,361 1941 5,872 +696 +13.45 2,997 2,875 1951 2,868 -3,004 ·51.16 1,537 1,331 1961 M.C. 0.78 5,288 +2,420 +84.38 2,809 2,479 1971 M.e. 0.711 5,338 +50 +0.95 3,024 2,314 1981 M.e. 0.78 6,212 +874 +16.37 3,536 2,616 1991 M.e. 0.78 7,380 +1,168 + I8.S0 4,407 2,973 2001 M.CJ. l.(}!) 1,494 +1l4 +1.54 3,932 3,562

15 Ch(}hal HosbiarpUi: 20{)1 C.T. 8.89 7,433 4.413 3,020

2,717 16 Payal Ludhiana 1901 5,515 2,798 1911 Declassified 1921 Declassitied 1931 Declassified 1941 4,708 2,571 2.137 1951 3,554 -1,154 -24.51 1,900 1,654 1961 M.e. 2.59 3.575 +21 +0.59 1,928 1,647 1971 Declassified 1981 M.C. 0.42 5,224 2,754 2,470 1991 M.e. 0.42 5,852 +628 +12.02 3,063 2,189 2001 M.Cl. 3.50 7,267 +1,415 +24.18 3,866 3,401

3,801 3,385 17 Maloud Ludhiana 2001 N.P. 7.00 7.186 2,325 2,098 18 Alawalpur la1andhar 1901 4,423 1911 Declassified 1921 Declassified 1 gJ J Declassified 1941 Declassified 1951 4,452 2,404 2,048 196! M.e. 0.2! 4,539 +87 +1.95 2,439 2.100 1971 M.e. 0.21 4,132 +193 +4.25 2,492 2,240 1981 M.e. 1.00 5,851 +1,119 +23.65 3,053 2,798 3,091 1991 M.e. 1.00 6,468 +617 +10.55 3,317 2001 M.CL 6.00 7,172 +704 +10.88 3,765 3,407

2,934 2,630 19 "'Akalgarh Ludhiana 1991 e.T. 5.48 5,564 3,163 2001 C.T. 5.48 6,603 + t,039 -1-18.67 3A40

354 286 20 Kot Fatta Bathinda 1951 640 1,762 1961 M.e. 0.39 3.808 +3,16& +495.00 2,046 2,056 1971 M.e. 0.39 4,308 +500 +13.13 2,252 2,666 2,301 1981 M.e. 0.39 4,973 +665 +15.44 2,639 1991 M.C. 0.39 5,611 +638 +12.83 2,972 3,435 3,069 2001 M.CI. 2.00 6,504 +893 +15.92

4,548 4,024 21 *Badhni Kalan Moga 1991 r-:.A.C. 23.96 8.572 3,068 2001 KP. 3.40 6,366 -2,206 ·25.73 3,298

1,958 1,694 22 Ga rdltiw lila Ho,hiarCluf 1901 3.652 1911 Decla~, i tied 1921 Declassified 1931 Declassified 19-11 DecJas,ified 179 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2OO1WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 SI. Name of Town! Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the preceding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1951 3,018 1,623 1,395 1961 M.C. 0.33 3,153 +135 +4.47 1,686 1,467 1971 M.C. 0.62 3,753 +600 +19.03 1,990 1,763 1981 M.C. 0.62 4,459 +706 +18.81 2,387 2,072 1991 M.C. 0.62 5,159 +700 +15.70 2,733 2,426 2001 M.C!' 2.00 6,264 + 1,105 +21.42 3,281 2,983 23 Rupnagar 2001 C.T. 8.49 6,147 3,284 2,863

24 Bhabat Rupnagar 2001 C.T. 5.69 5,866 3,092 2,774

25 Ramdas Amritsar 1941 5,397 2,748 2,649 1951 3,046 -2,351 -43.56 1,610 1,436 1961 M.e. 1.30 3,153 +107 +3.51 1,641 1,512 1971 M.e. 1.30 4,322 + 1,169 +37.08 2,618 1,704 1981 M.e. 1.00 4,123 -199 -4.60 2,197 1,926 1991 M.e. 2.50 4,765 +642 +15.57 2,495 2,270 2001 M.e!. 2.50 5,779 +1,014 +21.28 3,037 2,742

26 Ghanaur Patiala 2001 N.P. 5.00 5,754 3,012 2,742

27 Sri Gurdaspur 1901 4,380 2,299 2,081 Hargobindpur 1911 Declassified 1921 Declassified 1931 Declassified 1941 Declassified 1951 3,049 1,595 1,454 1961 M.e. 0.52 2,341 -708 -23.22 1,234 1,107 1971 M.e. 0.52 2,430 +89 +3.80 1,280 1,150 1981 M.e. 0.52 3,215 +785 +32.30 1,685 1,530 1991 M.e. 0.52 3,461 +246 +7.65 1,755 1,706 2001 M.e!. 0.52 5,450 +1,989 +57.47 2,824 2,626

28 Sangat Bathinda 1951 933 527 406 1961 M.e. 3.89 2,874 +1,941 +208.04 1,577 1,297 1971 M.e. 3.88 3,531 +657 +22.86 1,887 1,644 1981 M.e. 1.24 2,859 -672 -19.03 1,518 1,341 1991 M.e. 1.24 2,731 -128 -4.48 1,415 1,316 2001 M.Cl. 2.00 5,401 +2,670 +97.77 2,862 2,539

29 Hajipur Hoshiarpur 2001 C.T. 1.64 5,360 2,800 2,560

Class - VI (Less than 5,000)(6 Towns) 1901 56,636 30,443 26,193 1911 65,117 +8,481 +14.97 35,978 29,139 1921 41,235 -23,882 -36.68 22,474 18,761 1931 25,691 -15,544 -37.70 14,578 11,113 1941 18,306 -7,385 -28.75 10,268 8,038 1951 106,845 +88,539 +483.66 57,956 48,889 1961 23.13 68,673 -38,172 -35.73 36,595 32,078 1971 13.76 41,162 -27,511 -40.06 22,185 18,977 1981 16.27 56,371 +15,209 +36.95 29,750 26,621 1991 13.55 28,202 -28,169 -49.97 14,724 13,478 2001 22.05 22.950 -5.252 -18.62 12.320 10.630

1 Bhisiana Bathinda 2001 C.T. 6.84 4,775 2,837 1,938

2 Dlwiatpur Gurdaspur 2001 c.T. 4.66 .. ,565 2,418 2,147 180 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001WITH VARIATION SINCE 19()1 SI. Name of Townl Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since Males Females No. Urban District year status square the preceding census Agglomeration kilometer Absolute Percentage 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 8 9 10 11

3 Sham Churasi Hoshiarpur 1951 2,988 1,617 1,371 1961 M.C. 0.18 2,470 -5 I 8 -17.34 1,321 1,149 1971 M.e. 0.18 2,468 -2 -0.08 U14 1,154 1981 M.C. 0.18 3,062 +594 +24.07 1,596 1,466 1991 M.C. 0.18 3,711 +649 +21.20 1,961 1,750 2001 M.CI. 5.71 4,245 +534 +14.39 2,228 2,017

4 Sansarpur lalandhar 2001 C.T. 1.34 4,060 2,066 1,994

5 Bharoli Kalan Gurdaspur 2001 e.T. 2.82 3,374 1,764 1,610

6 Sheikhpura Patiala 2001 C.T. 0.68 1,931 1,007 924

Note: 1 As the area of Out-growth are not available, the area figures of Urban Agglomeration have been shown as N.A. However for arriving at all classes and other size classes area totals, area of the towns have been taken into account. 2 Towns treated as such for the first time in 1991 Census which continue as Towns in 2001 Census are shown with an asterisk (*) on their left. 3 Towns treated as such for the first time in 200 I are in italics. 4 The following abbreviations have been used for status of town. U .A. Urban Agglomeration M.Corp. Municipal Corporation M.CI. Municipal Council M.C. Municipal Committee N.P. Nagar Panchayat NAC Notified Area Committee C.B. Cantonment Board C.T. Census Town 0.0. Out Growth

181 A-4APPENDIX- I New Towns Added in 2001 and Towns of 1991 Declassified in 2001 State/ New Towns Added in 2001 Towns of 1991 Declassified as Rural in 2001 District Name of Town Urban Area in Population Name of Urban Area in Population Status square Town Status square Kilometre 2001 1991 Kilometre 2001 1991 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II Punjab Gurdaspur 1) Jugial C.T. 7.89 16,668 17,259 Behrampur C.T. 3.26 5,459 4,806 2) Daulatpur C.T. 4.66 4,565 5,586 Fateh Nangal C.T. 3.66 6,935 6,095 3) Bharoli Kalan C.T. 2.82 3,374 4,127 4) Kalanaur N.P. 6.79 12,931 13,062

Amritsar 1) Budha Theh C.T. 7.47 8,731 6,189

Kapurthala 1) Hussainpur C.T. 3.36 15,337 9,256

Ialandhar 1) Sansarpur C.T. 1.34 4,060 4,134

Hoshiarpur 1) Hajipur C.T. 1.64 5,360 5,188 2) Chohal C.T. 8.89 7,433 4,873 3) Mahilpur N.P. 6.56 10,018 8,258

Rupnagar 1) Nehon C.T. 1.04 10,162 5,395 2) Mullanpur Garibdass C.T. 8.49 6,147 4,881 3) Karoran C.T. 14.97 20,361 9,429 4) Bhabat C.T. 5.69 5,866 4,536

Fatehgarh Sahib 1) Khamanon N.P. 7.27 8,842 6,506

Ludhiana 1) Maloud N.P. 7.00 7,186 6,154 2)Sahnewai N.P. 5.00 17,293 12,910

Firozpur C.T. 4.55 10,499 7,604

Bathinda I) Bhisiana c.T. 6.84 4,775 4,256

Mansa 1) Sardulgarh N.P. 8.00 16,315 10,262 2) Bhikhi N.P. 9.00 15,080 11,547

Sangrur I) Cheema N.P. 7.50 9,245 4,553 2) Dirba N.P. 27.05 13,079 9,939

Patiala 1) Sheikhpura C.T. 0.68 1,931 4,428 2) Rurki Kasba C.T. 1.97 8,179 4,550 3) Ghanaur N.P. 5.00 5,754 4,149 4) Bhankharpur C.T. 5.92 9,216 7,500 5) Zirakpur N.P. 8.55 25,022 5,572

182 A·4 Appendix -2 Changes in Area of Towns between 1991·2001 and reasons thereof

StatelDistrict Name of Town Area (in Sguare Kilometer) Reasons for the 2001 1991 change in Area 1 2 3 4 5

Punjab 1. Gurdaspur Sujanpur M.C!' 5.08 0.31 Revised Computation 2 Dhariwal M.C!' 14.37 1.27 Revised Computation 3 Dera Baba Nanak M.C!' 2.00 0.78 Revised Computation

2.Amritsar Raja Sansi N.P. 4.00 15.55 Jurisdictional Change 2 Majitha M.C!' 3.00 1.50 Jurisdictional Change 3 Amritsar M.Corp. 136.00 114.95 Jurisdictional Change 4 Tarn Taran M.Cl. 20.00 36.00 Revised Computation 5 Bhil-.hiwind N.P. 8.00 10.00 Jurisdictional Change 6 Patti M.Cl. 9.33 4.30 Jurisdictional Change 7 Rayya N.P. 7.00 1.50 Jurisdictional Change

3. Kapurthala Sultanpur Lodhi M.Cl. 10.52 5.00 Revised Computation

4. Jalandhar 1 Nakodar M.C!' 12.50 3.60 Jurisdictional Change 2 Noor Mahal M.C!' 6.15 5.75 Jurisdictional Change 3 Goraya N.P. 5.00 2.65 Jurisdictional Change 4 Alawalpur M.Cl. 6.00 1.00 Revised Computation 5 Jalandhar M.Corp. 102.00 80.41 Jurisdictional Change 6 Bhogpur N.P. 4.65 3.00 Jurisdictional Change 7 Kartarpur M.Cl. 10.00 5.95 Revised Computation

5. Hoshiarpur Dasua M.C!' 19.90 16.00 Jurisdictional Change 2 Gardhiwala M.Cl. 2.00 0.62 Jurisdictional Change 3 Uemar Tanda M.CI. 16.50 17.00 Revised Computation 4 Mukerian M.C!' 2.61 2.59 Revised Computation 5 Talwara C.T 25.42 10.90 Revised Computation 6 Hariana M.C!' 1.50 1.29 Revised Computation 7 Hoshiarpur M.Cl. 35.00 28.21 Jurisdictional Change 8 Sham Chaurasi M.C1. 5.71 0.18 Revised Computation 9 Garhshankar M.C!' 7.00 5.00 Jurisdictional Change

6. Nawanshahr 1 Banga M.Cl. 11.00 1.50 Revised Computation 2 Rahon M.C!' 5.41 5.18 Revised Computation

7. Rupnagar Morinda M.Cl. 4.50 3.00 Jurisdictional Change 2 Kurali M.Cl. 9.00 7.40 Jurisdictional Change 3 Kharar M.Cl. 18.00 4.20 Jurisdictional Change 4 S.A .. S. Nagar (Mohali) M.C!' 23.86 16.68 Revised Computation

8. Fatehgarh Sahib 1 Bassi Pathana M.Cl 3.00 5.00 Revised Computation 2 Sirhind Fatehgarh Sahib M.Cl 28.40 11.50 Jurisdictional Change 3 Amloh M.C!' 7.00 2.69 Revised Computation

9. Ludhiana 1 Machhiwara N.P 3.50 3.00 Jurisdictional Change 2 Khanna M.C!' 24.75 16.02 Jurisdictional Change 3 Payal M.C!' 3.50 0.42 Revised Computation 4 Doraha M.C!' 6.00 1.90 Jurisdictional Change 5 Ludhiana M.Corp. 159.37 134.67 Jurisdictional Change

10. Moga Badhni Kalan N.P. 3.40 23.96 Revised Computation 2 Dharamkot M.C!' 19.50 1.10 Jurisdictional Change

183 A-4 Appendix -2 Changes in Area of Towns between 1991-2001 and reasons thereof

State/District Name of Town Area (in Square Kilometer) Reasons for the 2001 1991 change in Area 1 2 3 4 5

11. Firozpur Zira M.Cl. 7.06 19.42 Revised Computation 2 Guru Har Sahai M.C!' 2.45 1.50 Revised Computation 3 Jalalabad M.C!' 7.56 2.84 Jurisdictional Change 4 Fazilka M.C!' 10.04 7.34 Jurisdictional Change

12. Muktsar Malout M.CI 20.00 10.00 Jurisdictional Change 2 Muktsar M.Cl 17.73 13.80 Revised Computation

13. Faridkot 1 Kot Kapura M.Cl. 17.25 14.50 Jurisdictional Change 2 Jaitu M.Cl. 9.60 9.06 Revised Computation

14. Bathinda Rampura Phul M.C1. 8.88 5.76 Revised Computation 2 Goniana M.C!' 4.00 9.00 Revised Computation 3 Bhucho Mandi M.CI 4.16 2.00 Jurisdictional Change 4 Bathinda M.Cl 110.00 97.00 Revised Computation 5 Sangat M.CI. 2.00 1.24 Revised Computation 6 Kot Fatta M.C!' 2.00 0.39 Revised Computation 7 Maur M.C!' 14.08 4.80 Revised Computation

15. Mansa 1 Budhlada M.Cl. 8.06 5.18 Revised Computation 2 Mansa M.CI. 21.67 20.00 Jurisdictional Change

16. Sangrur 1 Barnala M.Cl. 26.00 16.00 Jurisdictional Change 2 Tappa M.C!' 10.75 2.47 Jurisdictional Change 3 Ahmedgarh M.CI. 6.10 3.88 Jurisdictional Change 4 Malerkotla M.C!' 21.12 4.25 Revised Computation 5 Dhuri M.C!' 32.00 15.00 Revised Computation Ii Sangrur :\1.CI. 18.00 13.90 Revised Computation 7 Bhawanigarh M.Cl. 6.00 2.59 Jurisdictional Change 8 Sunam M.C!' 37.25 3.89 Jurisdictional Change 9 Lehragaga M.C!' 8.50 8.40 Revised Computation

17. Patiala Patran N.P 6.00 5.00 Jurisdictional Change 2 Patiala M.Corp. 65.00 31.20 Jurisdictional Change 3 Rajpura M.CI. 25.00 14.00 Revised Computation 4 Banur M.Cl. 6.50 4.50 Jurisdictional Change 5 Dera Bassi M.e!. 20.00 3.06 Revised Computation

184 ANNEXURES

-+- -+----+--+--+---r---

J

EJ

<

187 --< .....~ '- 0 , fI.) ;;J fI.) Z '8~ ~u J s E3 :! ~

188 - --

I ~:r~m •E •..: 's ~ i 1 I I t:.~C"l 1 I~I~ 1 i I _I I I I I

.. ~ < Q- -Z

...

n 10 ... o - • 189 • - i8~ .i§l§ 0

:

I :I f- I 1~ 1 HI § I ~ I.... :f ....Ii ! I s € §

.. -

J ~ •~ •~ •f 'II 'II 'I I ~ ~ ~ t -:1., I )" ~l liiiii l~~ ______~~_.~~~ '~ ______~--i.r- __ ~ __" __ ~_~__ ~ __z __~_~ __ ~ __• __ ~_- __~ ____ ~ __r __~_o-. . ______~ 190 Annexure-III (a) List of notified Scheduled Castes- Punjab The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendent) Act,1976 N arne of Scheduled Castes 1 Ad Dharmi 2 Balmiki, Chuhra, Bhangi 3 Bangali 4 Barar, Burar, Berar 5 Batwal 6 Bauria, Bawaria 7 Bazigar 8 Bhanjra 9 Chamar, Jatia Chamar, Rehgar, Raigar, Ramdasi, Ravidasi 10 Chanal 11 Dagi 12 Darain 13 Deha, Dhaya, Dhea 14 Dhanak 15 Dhogri, Dhangri, Siggi 16 - Dumna, Mahasha, Doom 17 Gagra 18 Gandhila, Gandil Gondola 19 Kabirpanthi, Julaha 20 Khatik 21 Kori, Koli 22 Marija, Marecha 23 Mazhabi 24 Megh 25 Nat 26 Od 27 Pasi 28 Perna 29 Pherera 30 Sanhai 31 Sanhal 32 Sansi, Bhedkut, Manesh 33 Sansoi 34 Sapela 35 Sarera 36 Sildigar 37 Sirbband 191 Annexure-III (b) List of notified Scheduled Tribes- Punjab There is no notified Scheduled Tribe in Punjab

NIL

192 Annexure-IV The Census Act, 1948 (Act No. XXXVII of 1948)

An Act to provide for certain matters in (iii) A declaration in writing signed by connection with the taking of Census. any authority authorized by the State GJvemrrrnt in this behalf, 3rd September, 1948 that any person has been duly Whereas it is expedient to provide for the taking appointed a census officer for any of census in India or any part thereof whenever local area shall be conclusive proof necessary or desirable and to provide for certain of such appointrrent. matters in connection with the taking of such census; (iv) That State G>vemrrent may It is hereby enacted as follows: delegate to such authority as it Short title (i) This act may be called the Census thinks fit the power of appointing and extent. Act, 1948. census officers conferred by sub­ (ii) It extends to the whole of India. section (2).

Rule of 2 Any reference to the Indian Penel 5 The Census Commissioner, all Status of cons truction Code or the Indian evidence Act, Superintendents of Census Census respecting 1872, shall in relation to Jammu and Operations and all census-officers authorities shall be deerred to be public as public enactrrrnts Kashmir, be construed as a servants within the treaning of the Servants not extending reference to the corresponding Indian Penal Code. to J&K. enactrrrnt in force in that State. 6 (1) Where the District Magistrate or Discharge Central GJvt. 3 The Central GJvernrrent may by such authority as the State of duties of to take notification in the Official Gazette, G>vemrrent may appoint in this Census census. declare its intention of taking a behalf, by a written order so directs. officers in census in the whole or any part of certain the territories to which this act (a) Every officer in command of cases extends, whenever it may consider any body of rren belonging to it necessary or desirable so to do, the naval, military or air forces, and thereupon the census shall be or of any vessel of war of India, taken. (b) Every person (except a pilot or Appointrrrnt 4 (i) The Central GJvernrrent may, harbour master) having charge of Census appoint a Census Commissioner to orcontrolofa vessel, staff. supervise the taking of the census (c) Every person in charge of a throughout the area in which the lunatic asylum, hospital, census is intended to be taken, and workhouse, prison reformatory superintendents of Census Opera­ or lockup or of any public tions to supervise the taking of the charitable, religious or census within the several States. educational ins titution, (ii) The State GJvemrrent may appoint (d) Every keeper, secretary or persons as census officers to take, rrnnager of any sarai, hotel, or aid in, or supervise the taking of boarding house, lodging house. the census within any specilied emigration depot or club, local area and such persons, when (e) Every manager or officer of a so appointed, shall be bound to railway or any cOII1Irercial or serve accordingly. industrial establishrrent; and 193 (f) Every occupant of inmovable holders, fanners and assignees property wherein at the time of or in the premises of factories, the taking of the census, farms and other establishments, persons are living, or within the areas for which shall perfonnsuch ofthe duties ofa such local authorities are census officer in relation to the established, as the case may be and the persons to whom an persons who at the time of the order under this section is taking of the census are under his directed shall be bound to obey comnand or charge, or are inmates it and shall, while acting in ofhis house, or are present on or in pursuance of such order, be such illTOOvable property or are deemed to be public servants employed under him as may be within the meaning of the specified in the order. Indian Penal Code. 450fl86O (2) All the Provisions of Act relating to census officers shall apply, so far 8 (1) A census officer may ask all such Asking of as may be to all persons while question of all persons within the questions performing such duties under this limits of the local area for which and he is appointed as, by instructions obligation section and any person refusing or issued in this behalf by the State to answer neglecting to perform any duty Government and published in the which under this section he is Official Gazette, he may be directed directed to performshall be dee~d to ask. to have colDllitted an offence under section 187 of the Indian Penal (2) Every person of whom any question is asked under sub­ Code. section (1) shall be legally bound to Power to call 7 The District Magistrate, or such answer such question to the best of upon certain authority as the State Government his knowledge or belief: persons to may appoint in this behalf for any Provided that no person shall be give local area, may by a written order bound to state the name of any assistance which shall have effect throughout female menDer of his household, the extent of his district or of such and no women shall be bound to local area, as the case may be, call state the name of her husband or upon. deceased husband or of any other (a) All owners and occupiers of person whose name she is Jand, tenure-hoJders and forbidden by custom to mention. framers and assignees of land 9 Every person occupying any Occupierto revenue or their agents, house, enclosure, vessel or other permit (b) All members of the district, place shall allow census officers access and municipal, panchayat and other such access thereto as they may affixing of local authorities, and officers require for the purposes of the numbers and servants of such census and as, having regard to the authorities, and customs of the country may be (c) All officers and members of reasonable, and shall allow them to staff of any factory, finn or paint on, or affix to the place such establishment, to give such letters, marks or numbers as may be assistance as shall be specified necessary for the purposes of the census. in the order towards the taking of a census of the persons who 10 (1) Subject to such orders as the State Occupier e'r are, at the time of the taking of Government may issue in this manager to the census, on the lands of behalf, a census officer may, within fill up such owners, occupiers, tenure- the local area for which he is schedule 194 appointed, leave or cause to be left Government or the State a schedule at any dwelling-house GJvernment, discloses any or with the manager or any officer information which he has of any commercial or industrial received by means of or fOf the establishment, for the purpose of purposes ofa census return, or its being filled up by the occupier (c) Any sorter, compiler or other of such house or of any specified member of the cens us staffwho part thereof or by such manager or removes secretes, damages or officer with such particulars as the destroys any census State GJvernment may direct documents or deals with any regarding the inmates of such census documents in a manner house or part thereof, or the likely to fsls ify or impair the persons employed under such tabulation of census results, or manager or officer. as the case may (d) Any person who intentionally be at the time of the taking of the gives a false answer to, or census. refuses to answer to the best of (2) When such schedule has been so his knowledge or belief, any left, the said occupier manager or question asked of him by a officer, as the case may be shall fill census officer which he is it up or cause it to be filled up to legally bound by section 8 to the best of his knowledge or belief answer, or so far as regards the inmates of (e) Any person occupying any such house or part thereof Of the persons employed under him, as house, enclosure, vessel or the case may be, at the time other place who refuses to aforesaid and shaH sign his name allow a census officer such thereto and, when so required. shall reasonable access thereto as he deliver the schedule so filled up is required by section 8 to and signed to the census officer to allow, or such person as the census officer (f) Any ;:>erson who removes, may direct. obliterates, alters, or damages Penalities 11 (1) (a) Any census officer or any any letters, marks or numbers person lawfully required to give which have been painted or ass istance towards the taking affixed for the purpose of the of a census who refuses or census, or neglects to use reasonable (g) Any person who, having been diligences in perfonning any required under section 10 to fill duty imposed upon him or in up a schedule, knowingly and obeying any order issued to without sufficient cause fails to him in accordance with this Act comply with the provisions of or any rule made there under, or that section, or makes any false any person who hinders or return there under, or obstructs another person in (h) Any person who trespasses perfonning any such duty or in into a census office, shall be obeying any such order, or punishable with fine which may (b) Any census officer who extend to one thousand rupees intentionally puts any offensive and in case of a conviction or improper question or under part (b) shall also be knowingly makes any false punishable with imprisonment return or. witho_ut the which may extend to six previous sanction of the Central H10nth5. 195 (2) Whoever abets any offence under 16 Notwithstanding anything in any Temporary sub-section (1) shall be punishable enactment or rule with res peet to s us pens ion with fme, which may extend to one the mode in which a census is to be of other thousand rupees. taken in any municipality, the laws as to Sanction 12 No Prosecution under this Act shall municipal authority in consultation mode of with the superintendent of Census taking required for be instituted except with the Operations or with such other census in prosecutions previous sanction of the State authority as the State Government municipali- Government or of an authority ties authorised in this behalf by the may authorise in this behalf, at the State Cklvernment. time appointed for the taking of any Operation of 13 Nothing in this Act shall be deemed census cause the census of the other laws to prevent any person from being municipality to be taken wholly or not barred prosecuted under any other law for in part be any method authorised by or under this Act. any act or omission, which constitutes an offence under this 17 The Census Commissioner or any Grant of Act. Provided that no such Superintendent of Census Statistical prosecution shall be instituted Operations or such person as the abstract except with the previous sanction State Cklvernment may authorise in referred to in Section 12. - this behalf may, if he so thinks fit, Jurisdiction 14 No court inferior to that of a at the request and cost (to be Presidency Magistrate or a detennined by him) of any Local authority or person, cause Magistrate ofthe second class or in abstracts to be prepared and a Part B State, a Magistrate supplied containing any such corresponding to a Magistrate of statistical infonnation as can be the second class shall try, whether derived from the census returns for under this Act or under any other India or any State, as the case may law, any act or omission which be, being infonnation which is not constitutes an offence under this contained in any published report Act. and which in his opinion it IS Record of 15 No person shall have a right to reasonable for that authority or Census not inspect any book, register or person to require. open to record made by a census officer in inspection the discharge of his duty as such, 18 (I) The Central Government may make Power to nor \)r any schedule delivered under rules for carrying out the purposes make rule admissible in section 10, and notwithstanding of this Act. evidence anything to the contrary in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 no entry (2) In particular power l-' d without prejudice to the gene lity of the in any such book, register, foregoing the Central Government record of schedule shall be may make rules providing for the admissible as evidence in any appointment of census officers and civil proceeding whatsoever or in of persons to perform any of the any criminal proceeding other duties of census officers or to give than a prosecution under this Act assistance towards the taking of a or any other law for any act or <;:ensus, and for the general omission which constitutes an instructions to be issued to such offence under this Act. officers and persons.

196