Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India ISSN 0522-9630 Volume 58(2), December 2013: 213-218

RECORD OF A LATE SUID, TETRACONODON INTERMEDIUS FROM THE BARIPADA BEDS (MAYURBHANJ, ORISSA): AGE IMPLICATIONS

K. MILANKUMAR SHARMA* and RAJEEV PATNAIK*

*DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY (C. A. S.), PANJAB UNIVERSITY, CHANDIGARH-160014 Corresponding e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The highly fossiliferous marine deposits of the Baripada Beds have been assigned ages ranging from Eocene to Pleistocene primarily based on biostratigraphically long-ranging foraminfers, molluscs and selachians. We describe here a short ranging (Late Miocene) suid, Tetraconodon intermedius from these beds for the first time. A detailed comparison and biostratigraphic correlation of our finding with similar finds from the Nagri-Dhok Pathan transition of the Siwalik of Jammu and the Irrawaddy beds of Myanmar allows us to provide a smaller age window of ~10-8 Ma to these beds.

Keywords: Tetraconodon, Late Miocene, Biostratigraphy, Baripada Beds

INTRODUCTION The Baripada Beds, which are considered to be deposited as a consequence of marine transgression (Modak, 1952), are well known for their diverse fossil assemblages: selachians, spine of Rays and Skates, bony fishes, molluscs and foraminifers. However, the precise geological age of these fossiliferous marine deposits has remained contentious for a long period of time due to the presence of long-ranging taxa. The current paper describes an isolated tooth of Tetraconodon intermedius, which is known from the Nagri-Dhok Pathan transition in Jammu Siwalik (Pilgrim, 1926). The present specimen was collected from the bluish grey sandy shale bed overlying the limestone deposits of Itamundia (Fig. 1). This is overlain by a hard, compacted deposit of conglomerate bed of about 1.5 m thickness, which in turn is overlain by lateritic fresh water sediments of Quaternary age. The bluish grey sandy shale yielding Tetraconodon tooth is underlain by fossiliferous limestone bed of 1.5 m thickness. The lowermost bed comprises of green shales, the base of which is not exposed in the studied section. The Tetraconodon intermedius-bearing section has yielded bone fragments of turtles, diverse fossil remains of sharks such as Galaecerdo cuvier, Negaprion brevirotis, Carcharadon carcharias, Carcharodon mecalodon, Charcharias mylobatis sp., Charcharinus egertoni, Odontaspis tricuspidatus, Negaprion brevirostris, Myliobatis sp., Aetobatus sp., Dentex sp. and molluscs (bivalves and gastropods), etc., representing a shallow marine environment (Eames 1937; Modak, 1952; Sahni and Mehrotra, 1981). Various workers have assigned ages ranging from Eocene to Pleistocene to Baripada Beds, which are only 10-14 meters Fig. 1. A, Location map and B, Litho-section exposed at the Locality, thick and exposed on the banks of Burabalang River. The Itamundia, Baripada Beds, Orissa. offshore data from Mahanadi basin indicates presence of ~1903 m thick Miocene sequence (Fuloria et al., 1992). Hora (1939) Bhalla and Dev, 1972, 1975a; Tiwari and Awasthi, 1960; Singh proposed an age of Eocene to these beds based on the presence et al., 1976; Chatterjee, 1977; Mishra, 1985; Eames, 1936). Bhalla of siluroid and scomber fishes. Similar assertions were made and Dev (1975a, 1972) suggested a Lower Miocene age based by Ghosh (1956, 1959) who used the presence of batoids, on the presence of Ostrea which is known from the Gaj Beds Rhinoptera raeburni, Rhinoptera sherborni and Hypolophus (Lower Miocene) of Pakistan and Miocene beds of Burma. and indicated the possibility of a wider age range to these Sahni et al. (1971) opined an age not older than the lower beds. Most of the workers were in favour of a Miocene Age for Miocene and not younger than the Pleistocene based on the the Baripada Beds (Modak, 1952; Sarma, 1956; Mohanty, 1966; fish fauna. 214 K. MILAN KUMAR SHARMA AND RAJEEV PATNAIK

Some worker, however, preferred a Plio-Pleistocene age limestone bed of Baripada Beds, Itamundia, Orissa. Dental for these beds. Chaudhuri (1958) combined terminology and the method of measurements are followed (Potamochoerus and Gazella) and foraminifers, to assign after Thaung-Htike et al. (2005) (Fig. 2A). Dental measurements Baripada Beds a lower Pleistocene age. Chatterji and Adyalkar of the M3 of Tetraconodon intermedius specimen of Baripada (1962) also favoured an age of Plio-Pliestocene to the Beds have been compared with those of other Tetraconodon gravel deposits overlying the fossiliferous deposits of specimens of Thaung-Htike et al. (2005) and Made and Han Miocene age. (1994) (see, Table 1.) The mean dental measurements of Propotamochoerus wui recovered from the upper Miocene MATERIAL AND METHOD deposits of the East Asian site of Lufeng, China (Made and A diagnostic right upper third molar (RM3) (Fig. 2 B) was Han, 1994) that yielded Tetraconodon has been used here for collected from the bluish grey sandy shale just above the comparing ratios.

Fig. 2: A, Dental terminology and measuring method of tetraconodontine teeth. Abbreviations: BL= Base line; L= Mesiodistal length; W = Bucco- 3 3 lingual width; W1 = first lobe width; W2 = Second lobe width; W3 = Third lobe width of M /3. (After, Thaung-Htike et al., 2005). B. M of Tetraconodon intermedius (mks/pal/pu.1020) and its dental terminology.

Table 1: Dental measurements (mm) of the new Tetraconodon intermedius from Baripada Beds (Mks/pal/pu. 1020); T. intermedius (Thaung-Htike et al., 2005), T. cf. T. intermedius (Thaung-Htike et al., 2005) and mean measurements of Propotamochoerus wui (Made, 1994). Abbreviations: L = Mesiodistal length; W1 = first lobe width; W2 = Second lobe width; W3 = Third lobe width of M3; * ¼ estimate (Source, Thaung-Htike et al., 2005). Taxa Specimen M3 L W1 100(L/w1) W2 W3 T. intermedius Mks/pal/pu.1020 31 21.5 144 18 11 T. intermedius Thaung-Htike et al. 2005 GSI B 675 43* 32* 130 T.cf. intermedius Thaung-Htike et al. 2005 NMMP-KU-IR 0225 33.3 26.8 120 22.9 12.1 P. wui Made & Han (1994) Mean 7-28 spec 24.1 17.4 138 14.9 8

RECORD OF TETRACONODON INTERMEDIUS FROM THE BARIPADA BEDS 215

SYSTEMATIC PALAEONTOLOGY mesially; anterior cingulum is convex, protopreconule is not Family Gray, 1821 distinct, furchen are prominent in well developed paracone, Subfamily Tetraconodontinae Lydekker, 1876 protocone, hypopreconule, metacone and hypocone; Genus Tetraconodon Falconer, 1868 protocone is little bit larger than the paracone; pentapreconule (Type Tetraconodon magnus Falconer, 1868) is tiny, pentacone is large and the surface is worn. The Type species: Tetraconodon magnum Falconer, 1868 measurements of the specimen and its comparison with other (including Tetraconodon mirabilis Pilgrim, 1926) described specimens are given in Table 1. Other included species : Tetraconodon minor Pilgrim, 1910; Tetraconodon intermedius Made, 1999; Tetraconodon COMPARISON malensis. A morphological comparison of the present specimen Diagnosis: The Genus Tetraconodon differs from the other shows that it is similar to the M3 of Tetraconodon intermedius 3-4 reported from Myanmar (Thaung-Htike et al., 2005). The Tetraconodontine genera in having extremely enlarged P /3-4, 3 comparison of the size with M3 teeth of other Tetraconodon simple and relatively small M /3, and thick and highly wrinkled 3-4 1-3 specimens show that the present specimen is little bit smaller enamel in P /3-4, and less wrinkled enamel in M /1-3. (Also see, Thaung-Htike et al., 2005). than those of Tetraconodon intermedius and T.cf. T. Tetraconodon intermedius Made, 1999 intermedius, described by Thaung-Htike et al. (2005) and larger (Fig. 2B) than P. wui (Made and Han, 1994) (see Table. 1). T. cf. T.

Tetraconodon intermedius Thaung-Htike et al., 2005, p. 5, fig. 4 intermedius (Thaung-Htike et al., 2005) differs from the present Tetraconodon intermedius Made, 1999, p. 203-205. specimen in having a small minor cuspule at the lingual side 3 Tetraconodon mirabilis Pilgrim, 1926 (in part), p.16, p l. 3, ?g. 4. and small pentacone (Fig. 3). As the M s’ of Tetraconodon Tetraconodon cf. mirabilis Pilgrim, 1926, p. 16 – 17, pls. 4, 6. intermedius are rarely described in the previous literature, Diagnosis: Tetraconodon of intermediate size. interspecific variability of size of the teeth is not well known. Specimen: Mks/pal/pu. 1020, an isolated right upper M3. However, based on the morphological features as well as the Locality: Itamundia relative size of the tooth, the present specimen can be assigned Horizon and Age of the Locality: Baripada Beds, Late to Tetraconodon intermedius. Miocene The teeth of Tetraconodon minor are larger than that of Description: Mks/pal/pu. 1020 is a right upper third molar Conohyus but are smaller than Tetraconodon mirabilis (RM3). The tooth is elongated and narrower distally than (Thaung-Htike et al., 2005; Made, 1999). Tetraconodon minor

Fig. 3. I. Bivariate plot (Length versus W1-width) for the M3 of Tetraconodontinae; II. Bivariate plot (L versus W2) for the M3 of Tetraconodontinae; III. Bivariate plot (L versus W3) for the M3 of Tetraconodontinae; IV. Bivariate plot (W2 versus W3) for the M3 of Tetraconodontinae. The indices in the figures is given as; A = Tetraconodon intermedius (Mks/pal/pu.1020), B = T. intermedius (GSI B 675) (Thaung-Htike et al., 2005), C = T. cf. T. intermedius (NMMP-KU-IR 0225) (Thaung-Htike et al., 2005), D = P. wui (Made, 1994). 216 K. MILAN KUMAR SHARMA AND RAJEEV PATNAIK

had been considered to be the smallest and the most primitive The Genus Tetraconodon most probably originated from Tetraconodon (Pilgrim, 1926; Thaung-Htike et al., 2005; Made, Conohyus sindiensis, the oldest known Asian 1997; Colbert, 1935). However, teeth of Tetraconodon minor tetraconodontine, which occurs in the lower Middle Miocene are found to be three times larger than those of Conohyus (Kamlial or lower Chinji) of the Siwalik Group of Indo-Pakistan sindiensis (Thaung-Htike et al., 2005). An evolutionary and Nepal (Thaung-Htike et al., 2005). The latter species also sequence in the increase in size of Tetraconodon teeth has occurs in the Middle Miocene deposits of Thailand (Thaung- been observed, suggesting that younger the geological age, Htike et al., 2005). Tetraconodon differ from Conohyus in larger the Tetraconodontine teeth (Made, 1997; Pickford, 1988). having greater relative enlargement of the premolars (Pilgrim, Earlier, a large morphological gap existed between Tetraconodon 1926; Thaung-Htike et al., 2005). It has been suggested that minor and Conohyus sindiensis, which is now filled by the the genus is likely to have diverged from Sivachoerus lineage recently described teeth of T. malensis from Central Myanmar before the Late Miocene, the oldest fossil assigned to (Thaung-Htike et al., 2005). Tetraconodon malensis shows Tetraconodon (Made, 1999) (Fig. 5). Both the Sivachoerus and close similarity to C. sindiensis (Thaung-Htike et al., 2005) and Tetraconodon are characterized by having enlarged premolars is smaller than C. indicus (Lydekker, 1884) and C. thailandicus of gigantic size and are considered undoubtedly to have been (Ducrocq et al. 1997). However, the relative size of the enlarged derived from Conohyus (Colbert, 1935).

P4 with respect to M1 and the relatively small M3 distinguishes Tetraconodon mirabilis, which was earlier described from it from C. sindiensis (Pilgrim, 1926; Made, 1999). Jammu (Pilgrim, 1926) is synonymous with T. intermedius and is considered to be approximately of Dhok Pathan or Late Nagri DISCUSSION equivalent (Made, 1999). T. minor lies at the base of Irrawady In the Indian subcontinent, fossils of Tetraconodon have series and is of Early Late Miocene age (Thaung-Htike et al.,

been reported from the Siwalik Group of India and Pakistan 2005). Tetraconodon magnus, which is a large size (M1 length and the Miocene deposits of Myanmar (Pilgrim, 1926; Colbert, of about 31.1 mm) species of Tetraconodon recorded from 1935; Pilgrim, 1910; Pilgrim, 1927) (Fig. 4). Tetraconodontine between Markhanda Pass and Pinjore is of Late Miocene age teeth from the West coast of India (Khari Nadi Formation of (Thaung-Htike et al., 2005). Made (1999) discussed the Kutch) are represented by Conohyus cf. sindiensis (Lydekker, evolutionary sequence of T. minor (Yenangyoung) – T. 1884) or Tetraconodon malensis (Pilgrim, 1926; Bhandhari, et intermedius (Jammu) – T. magnus (Hasnot), in which he al., 2009) and Early Miocene suid Libychochoerus fategadensis suggested that T. minor is probably equivalent to lower part of (Bhandhari, et al., 2009; Prasad, 1967). The Miocene deposits the Nagri Formation and that T. intermedius ranges from the of Myanmar are represented by T. minor, T. intermedius and T. upper part of Nagri Formation to at least a part of the Dhok malensis (Thaung-Htike et al., 2005). Pathan Formation (see, Fig. 5).

Fig. 4. Geographical distribution of the Tetraconodontine localities in the Indian subcontinent. 1. Hasnot; 2. Jammu; 3. Haritalyangar; 4. Saketi: 5. Manchar Formation; 6. Pasuda, Khari Nadi Formation; 7. Perim Island; 8. Male; 9. Chaungsong area; 10. Yenangyoung, Chaingzauk; 11. Lower Irrawadi Formation; 12. Ban Na Sai, Ban San Klang; 13. Baripada Beds, Orissa (Modified after, Thaung-Htike et al., 2005; Made, 1994 and Bhandhari et al., 2009). RECORD OF TETRACONODON INTERMEDIUS FROM THE BARIPADA BEDS 217

Fig. 5. Evolution of Tetraconodontinae. Dots indicate the approximate placement of type material of the taxa. Solid line indicates that the evolution is assumed. Dashed lines indicate uncertainty about the temporal range of a taxon or the position of a speciation. Shading between different linages indicates the moment of the speciation event (Modified after, Made, 1999; dates from, Ranga Rao et al., 1988 and Barry et al., 2002). Grey shaded zone represents possible occurrence of T. intermedius in India and Burma.

Bhalla and Dev (1988) critically evaluated different opinions regarding the age of the Baripada Beds. They came out with the suggestion that on the basis of megafaunal assemblages a Lower Miocene age is more likely, whereas, the microfossil assemblages dominated by foraminifers favours a Middle Miocene age. Further, it may be noted that the findings of foraminifers, Orbulina suturalis Bronnimann and Globigerina quadrilobata hold significance in the sense that the age of the Baripada Beds can not be older than the Middle Miocene (Bhalla and Dev, 1975b, 1988). We have compiled here the known age ranges of the various taxa reported from the Baripada Beds (Fig. 6). CONCLUSIONS The evolutionary lineage of the Genus Tetraconodon (Fig. 5) indicating anagenetic transformation from Early Late Miocene Tetraconodon minor to Late Miocene Tetraconodon intermedius and finally the Latest Miocene Tetraconodon magnus, has been used here for biochronology. A detailed comparison of the suid M3 recovered from the Baripada Beds, allows us to assign it to Fig. 6. Stratigraphic ranges of some important fossil taxa reported from the Baripada Beds, T. intermedius which in turn enables us to Orissa. (Source, Modak, 1952; Bhalla and Dev, 1988; Eames, 1936; Gosh, 1956; Mondal, provide a narrow window of ~10-8 Ma to 2010; Bhalla and Dev, 1975a; Tewari and Awasthi, 1960; Sahni et al., 1971; Sahni and these richly fossiliferous ~10-14 meters thick Mehrotra, 1981; Singh et al., 1976; Pilgrim, 1926). The dark green zone represent most beds (Fig. 6). probable age of Baripada Beds. 218 K. MILAN KUMAR SHARMA AND RAJEEV PATNAIK

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Lydekker, R. 1884. Indian Tertiary and post-Tertiary Vertebrata. Siwalik and Narbada bunodont Suina. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of We thank Drs. M. Takai and Thaung-Htike for their India, Palaeontologia Indica, ser. 10, 3(2):35-104. valuable help in identifying the present specimen. K. Made, J. van der and Han Defen. 1994. Suoidea from the hominoid Milankumar Sharma is thankful to UGC for providing Senior locality Lufeng (Yunnan, China). Proceedings of the Koninklijke Research Fellowship during the ongoing Ph. D work. Help Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, 97(1): 27–82. from Asit Mohanty and Diptiranjan Patanayak during the field Made, J. van der. 1999. Biometrical trends in the Tetraconodontinae, a subfamily of pigs. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: work is thankfully acknowledged. Earth Sciences, 89:199 –225. Mishra, V.P. 1985. On the occurrence of the teleost fish Cybium in the REFFERENCES Baripada beds, Orissa. Current trends in Geology, Indian Geological Barry, J., Morgan, M., Flynn, L., Pilbeam, D., Behrensmeyer, A., Congress, 7-4: 89-92. Raza, S., Khan, I., Badgley, C., Hicks, J. and Kelley, J. 2002. Modak, G. 1952. Some new fossils from the Baripada beds, Mayurbhanj, Faunal and Environmental change in the Late Miocene Siwaliks of Orissa. Proceeding of 39th Indian Science Congress Association, Northern Pakistan. Paleobiology, 28, memoir 3 (Supplement to 3:180 (Abstract). Number 2): 1-71. Mohanty, M. 1966. On a new collection of Neogene fossils from Eastern Bhalla, S.N., and Dev, P. 1972. A note on the occurrence of fossil India (Baripada, Orissa State). Geological Bundest Acft. 3:75-76. vertebra from Baripada beds (Miocene), Orissa. Journal of Mondal, S., Das, S., Mallick, S. and Adhikary, D. 2010. Miocene Geological Society of India, 13(2): 205-207. shark teeth assemblages and ancillary fish taxa from Baripada, Bhalla, S.N., and Dev, P. 1975a. Ostrea in the Miocene beds of Orissa: Taxonomic revision and a global palaeobiogeographic Mayurbhanj, Orissa. Journal of Geological Society of India, 16(1): overview. Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India, 54:135- 93-97. 152. Bhalla, S.N., and Dev, P. 1975b. Planktonic foraminifera from the Pickford, M. 1988. Revision of the Miocene Suidae of the Indian Baripada beds, Orissa. Current Science, 44(5):169. Subcontinent. Munchener Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, Bhalla, S.N., and Dev, P. 1988. Geological age limit of the Baripada Reihe A, Geologie und Palaontologie, 12:1-92. beds, Orissa - A review. Publication of Centre of Advanced Study in Pilgrim, G. E. 1910a. Notices of new mammalian genera and species Geology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 3: 277-286. from the Tertiaries of India. Records of the Geological Survey of Bhandhari, A., Mohabey, D.M., Bajpai, S., Tiwari, B.N., and India, 40:63-71. Pickford, M. 2009. Early Miocene mammals from central Kutch Pilgrim, G.E. 1926. The fossil Suidae of India. Memoirs of Geological (Gujarat), Western India: Implication for geochronology, Survey of India, Palaeontologica Indica, New Series, 8(4): 1– biogeography, eustacy and intercontinental dispersals. Neus 105. Jaharbuch Fur Geologie Und Palaontologie Abhandlugen., 256: Pilgrim, G.E. 1927. The lower canine of Tetraconodon. Records of 69-97; Stuttgart. Geological Survey of India, 60:160–163. Chatterji, G.C. and Adyalkar, P.G. 1962. On gravel deposits from Prasad, K. N. 1967. Fossil mammals of Cutch district, Gujarat, India. Baripada, Mayurbhanj, district, Orissa. Record of Geological Survey Quarterly Journal of Geological, Mineralogical and Metallurgical of India, 91(2): 329-334. Society of India, 39(3): 336-340. Chatterjee, B.P. 1977. Smaller foraminifera from the Baripada beds, Ranga Rao, A., Agarwal, R. P., Sharma, U. N., Bhalla, M. S. and Orissa. Record of Geological Survey of India, 108(2): 153-156. Nanda, A. C.1988. Magnetic polarity stratigraphy and vertebrate Chaudhuri, A. 1958. On the age of the Tertiary deposits of Baripada, paleontology of the upper Siwalik Subgroup of Jammu Hills, India. Mayurbhanj. Quarterly Journal of Geological, Mineralogical and Journal of Geological Society of India, 31: 361–385. Metallurgical Society of India, 30(3):157-158. Sahni, A., Mehrotra, D.K. and Jauhari, A.K. 1971. Microfish fauna of the Baripada beds, Mayurbhanj district. 58th Proceedings of Indian Colbert, E.H. 1935. Siwalik mammals in the American Museum of Science Congress, 317(Abstracts). Natural History. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, Sahni, A. and Mehrotra D.K. 1981. The Elasmobranch fauna of 26:1-401. coastal Miocene sediments of peninsular India. Biological Memoirs, Ducrocq, S., Chaimanee, Y., Suteethorn, V. and Jaeger, J.J. 1997. 5(2): 83-121. A new species of Conohyus (Suidae, Mammalia) from the Miocene Sarma, K.C. 1956. On the palaeontology of the Baripada beds, of northern Thailand. Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und Mayurbhanj, Orissa. Quarterly Journal of Geological, Mineralogical Palaontologie, Monatshefte, 6:348-360. and Metallurgical Society of India, 28(4): 159-160. Eames, F.E. 1936. Ostrea (Crassostrea) gagensis from near Baripada, Singh, P., Jauhari, A. K., and Vimal, K. P. 1976. A note on the Mayurbhanj state. Record of Geological Survey of India, 71(2):150- smaller foraminifera from the Baripada beds, Mayurbhanj district, 151. Orissa. Current Science, 45(5):183-184. Fuloria, R.C., Pandey, R.N., Bharali, B.R. and Mishra, J.K. 1992. Tewari, B.S. and Awasthi, N. 1960. A preliminary note on fossil shark Stratigraphy, Structure and Tectonics of Mahanadi Offshore Basin. teeth from Baripada beds, Orissa. 47th Proceeding of Indian Science In recent Geoscientific Studies in the Bay of Bengal and Andaman Congress Association, 3: 277 (Abstract). Sea. Special Publication of Geological Survey of India, 255-265. Thaung-Htike, Tsubamoto, T., Takai, M., Natori, M., Egi, N., Ghosh, B.K. 1956. Fish remains from Tertiary deposits of Mayurbhanj. Maung-Maung and Chit-Sein, 2005. A revision of Tetraconodon Science and Culture, 22(6): 343. (Mammalia, Artiodactyla, Suidae) from the Miocene of Myanmar Ghosh, B. K. 1959. Some fossil teeth from the Tertiary deposits of and description of a new species. Paleontological Research, 9(3): Mayurbhanj, India. Journal of Paleontology, 33(4): 675-679. 243-253. Hora, S. L. 1939. On two small collections of fossil remains from Balasore, Orissa. Record of Geological Survey of India, 74(2):119- Manuscript accepted May 2013 215.