Universita' Degli Studi Di Padova

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Universita' Degli Studi Di Padova UNIVERSITA’ DEGLI STUDI DI PADOVA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT “M.FANNO” MASTER COURSE IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION MASTER THESIS “EQUITY CROWDFUNDING: an analysis of Italian start-ups case-studies” SUPERVISOR: CH.MO PROF. FABIO BUTTIGNON CANDIDATE: RACHELE PETTAZZONI ID NUMBER: 1165498 ACADEMIC YEAR 2018-2019 Il candidato dichiara che il presente lavoro è originale e non è già stato sottoposto, in tutto o in parte, per il conseguimento di un titolo accademico in altre Università italiane o straniere. Il candidato dichiara altresì che tutti i materiali utilizzati durante la preparazione dell’elaborato sono stati indicati nel testo e nella sezione “Riferimenti bibliografici” e che le eventuali citazioni testuali sono individuabili attraverso l’esplicito richiamo alla pubblicazione originale. The candidate declares that the present work is original and has not already been submitted, totally or in part, for the purposes of attaining an academic degree in other Italian or foreign universities. The candidate also declares that all the materials used during the preparation of the thesis have been explicitly indicated in the text and in the section "References" and that any textual citations can be identified through an explicit reference to the original publication. Student’s signature _________________ 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF TABLES...................................................................................................................... 7 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................... 8 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 1 – CROWDFUNDING: When the Crowd Become Investor ........................ 10 1.1. Definitions and Origins .................................................................................................... 10 1.1.1 Crowdfunding Definitions........................................................................................ 11 1.1.2 Historical Background: From Crowdsourcing to Crowdfunding ............................. 12 1.1.3. The Wisdom Of The Crowd .................................................................................... 15 1.2. Crowdfunding Models ....................................................................................................... 17 1.2.1. Donation based ........................................................................................................ 18 1.2.2. Reward based .......................................................................................................... 19 1.2.3. Lending-based ......................................................................................................... 21 1.2.4. Equity-based ............................................................................................................ 23 1.3. Main CF actors and why they choose CF .......................................................................... 24 1.3.1. Fundraisers .............................................................................................................. 25 1.3.2. Funders .................................................................................................................... 27 1.3.3. CF Platforms ........................................................................................................... 29 CHAPTER 2 – EQUITY CROWDFUNDING: Selling Shares to the Crowd................... 32 2.1 A Focus on ECF ................................................................................................................. 32 2.1.1 The Financing Options: ECF Vs. Traditional Funding Channels ............................ 34 2.1.2 The Funding Gap ...................................................................................................... 41 2.2 Risks and Benefits of Equity Crowdfunding ...................................................................... 44 2.2.1 Risks ......................................................................................................................... 44 2.2.2 Benefits..................................................................................................................... 47 2.3 ECF Dynamics .................................................................................................................... 49 2.3.1 Campaigns Success Factors: Signalling and Herding Behaviour ............................ 49 2.3.2 ECF Platforms Functioning ...................................................................................... 52 CHAPTER 3 – ECF IN ITALY: The Italian Regulation and Market Trends ................. 59 3.1. Italian Regulation .............................................................................................................. 59 3.2. Descriptive statistics about 6 years of ECF in Italy........................................................... 60 CHAPTER 4 – POST-CAMPAIGN RESULTS: An analysis on case studies .................. 76 2 4.1. Methodology and Data collection...................................................................................... 76 4.2. The Sample: 29 companies raising fund through ECF between 2014 and 2016 ............... 78 4.3. ECF Campaigns’ Outcomes .............................................................................................. 82 4.4. Case-Studies Analysis: Business Plan Objectives VS. Financial Statement Results ........ 89 4.4.1. BIOerg S.r.l. ............................................................................................................ 89 4.4.2. Shin Software S.r.l. ................................................................................................. 92 4.4.3. Nexapp S.r.l. ............................................................................................................ 96 4.4.4. Media Vox Pop S.r.l. ............................................................................................... 99 4.4.5. P2R S.r.l. ............................................................................................................... 101 4.4.6. PAPEM S.r.l. ......................................................................................................... 104 4.4.7. Primary System Research S.p.a............................................................................. 107 4.4.8. Brainseeding S.r.l. ................................................................................................. 111 4.4.9. Safeway Helmets S.r.l. .......................................................................................... 114 4.4.10. Skymeeting S.p.a. ................................................................................................ 117 4.4.11. Synbiotec S.r.l. .................................................................................................... 120 4.5. Results ............................................................................................................................. 123 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................... 127 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................... 130 3 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1: different sources of CF as carachterized by Kleeman et al. (2008), (cited by Larralde 2010) ......................................................................................................................................... 13 Figure1.2: The major forms of capital provision ranked by process complexity and risk- return level. (Hemer et al. 2011a, personal adaptation) ...................................................................... 17 Figure 1.3: Main motivations for crowdfunders (Gaida et al. 2012, personal adaptation) ...... 18 Figure 1.4: typology of crowdfunding (Paschen 2017) ............................................................ 19 Figure 1.5: The amount of capital grows with the social network (The World Bank, InfoDev 2013) ......................................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 1.6: the CF process through intermediaries, (Hemer 2011a) ........................................ 25 Figure 1.7: Crowdfunding ecosystem (Beaulieu, Sarker, and et al. 2015) ............................... 28 Figure 2.1: Debt vs Equity Online Alternative Business Finance 2012-2017 (€millions) (Ziegler et al. 2019) ................................................................................................................................ 33 Figure 2.2: Deals by investor type over time (Beahurst 2018) ................................................. 34 Figure 2.3: The Early-stage Equity Investment Ecosystem (De Buysere, Gajda et al. 2012) .. 35 Figure 2.4: Early Stage Investment Market (EBAN 2018) ...................................................... 36 Figure 2.5: Investments by investee’s development stage in 2018 (EBAN 2018) ................... 39 Figure 2.6: Number of VC-backed start-ups by stage 2007-2015 (EIF 2019) ......................... 41 Figure 2.7: CF adoption curve (infoDev 2013) ........................................................................ 43 Figure 2.8: ECF process (Testoni 2014) ..................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Signals in Equity-Based Crowdfunding and Risk of Failure
    Reichenbach and Walther Financ Innov (2021) 7:54 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854‑021‑00270‑0 Financial Innovation RESEARCH Open Access Signals in equity‑based crowdfunding and risk of failure Felix Reichenbach and Martin Walther* *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract Chair of Finance This study investigates signal validity in equity-based crowdfunding by examining and Investment, Technische Universität Berlin, Sec. H whether signals that increase crowd participation are associated with higher post- 64, Straße des 17. Juni 135, ofering success. Post-ofering success is measured as the probability of survival. We 10623 Berlin, Germany use a hand-collected data set of 88 campaigns with over 64,000 investments and 742 updates from a well-established and leading German equity-based crowdfunding platform, Companisto. We fnd that indicating that the chief executive ofcer holds a university degree and a higher number of business-related updates are associated with a lower risk of failure, which is in line with recent research on ofering success. The number of updates on external certifcation, promotions, and the team is associated with a higher risk of failure. In contrast to recent fndings on ofering success, we fnd that the equity share ofered is positively related to post-ofering success, whereas a high number of large investments or updates on campaign development are accom- panied by a higher probability of failure. Our results provide guidance for entrepre- neurs and investors regarding which signals are worth sending or using. Furthermore, these results suggest that investors are partly using wrong signals and challenge the rationality and wisdom of the crowd.
    [Show full text]
  • Crowd Involvement in CHEST: Insights and Recommendations for Crowdsourcing in Innovative Funding Schemes and Successful Crowdfunding of Digital Social Innovations
    Crowd involvement in CHEST: Insights and recommendations for crowdsourcing in innovative funding schemes and successful crowdfunding of Digital Social Innovations 1 Table of Content 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Crowdsourcing Digital Social Innovation in CHEST .......................................................................... 4 2.1 CHEST open call design and results ......................................................................................... 4 2.2 Community engagement supporting idea generation ............................................................ 6 2.3 CHEST CrowdMonitor: Crowd evaluation of beneficiaries ..................................................... 9 3 Crowdfunding ................................................................................................................................ 10 3.1 Types of crowdfunding .......................................................................................................... 10 3.2 Overview of crowdfunding market and platforms ................................................................ 12 3.3 Factors of success .................................................................................................................. 15 3.4 Guidelines for planning and implementing a successful crowdfunding campaign for DSI ... 15 3.4.1 Step 1: Decide if crowdfunding is appropriate for your project ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Název 1 99Funken 2 Abundance Investment 3 Angelsden
    # Název 1 99funken 2 Abundance Investment 3 Angelsden 4 Apontoque 5 Appsplit 6 Barnraiser 7 Bidra.no 8 Bloom venture catalyst 9 Bnktothefuture 10 Booomerang.dk 11 Boosted 12 Buzzbnk 13 Catapooolt 14 Charidy 15 Circleup 16 Citizinvestor 17 CoAssets 18 Companisto 19 Crowdcube 20 CrowdCulture 21 Crowdfunder 22 Crowdfunder.co.uk 23 Crowdsupply 24 Cruzu 25 DemoHour 26 DigVentures 27 Donorschoose 28 Econeers 29 Eppela 30 Equitise 31 Everfund 32 Experiment 33 Exporo 34 Flzing v 35 Fondeadora 36 Fundit 37 Fundrazr 38 Gemeinschaftscrowd 39 Goteo 40 GreenVesting.com 41 Greenxmoney 42 Hit Hit 43 Housers 44 Idea.me 45 Indiegogo 46 Innovestment 47 Invesdor.com 48 JD crowdfunding 49 Jewcer 50 Karolina Fund 51 Katalyzator 52 Ketto 53 Kickstarter 54 KissKissBankBank 55 Kreativcisobe 56 Labolsasocial 57 Lanzanos 58 Lignum Capital 59 Marmelada 60 Massivemov 61 Mesenaatti.me 62 Monaco funding 63 Musicraiser 64 MyMicroInvest 65 Nakopni me 66 Namlebee 67 Octopousse 68 Oneplanetcrowd International B.V. 69 Penězdroj 70 Phundee 71 PledgeCents 72 Pledgeme 73 Pledgemusic 74 Pozible 75 PPL 76 Projeggt 77 Rockethub 78 Seed&Spark 79 Seedmatch 80 Seedrs 81 Snowballeffect 82 Spacehive 83 Spiele offensive 84 Start51 85 Startlab 86 Startme 87 Startnext 88 Startovac 89 Startsomegood 90 Syndicate Room 91 TheHotStart 92 Thundafund 93 Tubestart 94 Ulule 95 Venturate 96 Verkami 97 Vision bakery 98 Wemakeit 99 Wishberry 100 Zoomal Legenda: *Sociální média Vysvětlení zkratek pro sociální média F - Facebook T - Twitter Lin - LinkedIn G+ - Google plus YouT - YouTube Insta - Instagram
    [Show full text]
  • Girişimciler Için Yeni Nesil Bir Finansman Modeli “Kitle Fonlamasi - Crowdfunding”: Dünya Ve Türkiye Uygulamalari Üzerine Bir Inceleme Ve Model Önerisi
    T.C. BAŞKENT ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ İŞLETME ANABİLİM DALI İŞLETME DOKTORA PROGRAMI GİRİŞİMCİLER İÇİN YENİ NESİL BİR FİNANSMAN MODELİ “KİTLE FONLAMASI - CROWDFUNDING”: DÜNYA VE TÜRKİYE UYGULAMALARI ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME VE MODEL ÖNERİSİ DOKTORA TEZİ HAZIRLAYAN ASLI VURAL TEZ DANIŞMANI DOÇ. DR. DENİZ UMUT DOĞAN ANKARA- 2019 TEŞEKKÜR Beni her konuda daima destekleyen, cesaretlendiren, güçlü olmayı öğreten, mücadeleden, öğrenmekten ve kendimi geliĢtirmekten vazgeçmemeyi ilke edindiren, sevgili babama ve rahmetli anneme, Sevgisini ve desteğini daima hissettiğim değerli eĢime, Tezimin her aĢamasında bana tecrübesi ve bilgi birikimiyle yol gösteren, ilgi ve desteğini esirgemeyen tez danıĢmanım Doç. Dr. Deniz Umut DOĞAN’a, Çok değerli görüĢleri ve yönlendirmeleri için Prof. Dr. Nalan AKDOĞAN’a, ÇalıĢma dönemimde destek ve yardımını benden hiç esirgemeyen Çiğdem GÖKÇE’ye ve sevgili dostlarıma, En içten duygularımla teĢekkür ederim. I ÖZET GiriĢimcilerin en önemli problemi finansal kaynaklara ulaĢmalarında yaĢadıkları zorluklardır. GiriĢimciler finansal sorunlarını çözmek için geleneksel finansman yöntemlerinden ve Risk Sermayesi, GiriĢim Sermayesi, Bireysel Katılım Sermayesi, Mikrofinansman gibi alternatif finansman modellerinden yararlanmaktadır. Günümüzde giriĢimcilerin gereksinim duydukları sermayeye ulaĢmak için kullandıkları yeni finansal yöntemlerden biri Kitle Fonlaması modelidir. ÇalıĢmada giriĢimcilik, giriĢim finansmanı ve Kitle Fonlaması modeli konusunda literatür taraması yapılarak ilgili kavramlara değinilmiĢtir. Dünya’da
    [Show full text]
  • Current State of Crowdfunding in Europe
    Current State of Crowdfunding in Europe An Overview of the Crowdfunding Industry in more than 25 Countries: Trends, Volumes & Regulations 2016 Current State of Crowdfunding in Europe 2016 CrowdfundingHub is the European Expertise Centre for Alternative and Community Finance [email protected] www.crowdfundinghub.eu @CrowdfundingHub.eu Keizersgracht 264 1016 EV Amsterdam The Netherlands This report is made possible by the contribution of: Current State of Crowdfunding in Europe is a report based on research conducted by CrowdfundingHub in close cooperation with professionals from all over Europe. Revised versions of this report and updates of individual countries can be found at www.crowdfundingineurope.eu. Current State of Crowdfunding in Europe 2016 Foreword We started this research to get a structured view on the state of crowdfunding in Europe. With the support of more than 30 experts in Europe we collected information about the industry in 27 countries. One of the conclusions is that there is a wide variety of alternative finance instruments that is being offered through online platforms and also that the maturity of the alternative finance industry in a country can not just be measured by the volume of transactions on these platforms. During the process of the research therefore, the idea took root to develop an Alternative Finance Maturity Index. The index takes into account the volumes in the industry, the access to relevant and reliable data, the degree of organization of the industry, the presence and use of all the different forms of alternative finance and also the way governments are regulating the industry with rules that on one hand foster alternative finance but on the other hand also protect consumers and prevent excesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Investors in Equity Crowdfunding: an Empirical Analysis of the Small Investor Protection Act
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Goethner, Maximilian; Hornuf, Lars; Regner, Tobias Working Paper Protecting investors in equity crowdfunding: An empirical analysis of the small investor protection act Jena Economic Research Papers, No. 2020-009 Provided in Cooperation with: Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, School of Economics and Business Administration Suggested Citation: Goethner, Maximilian; Hornuf, Lars; Regner, Tobias (2020) : Protecting investors in equity crowdfunding: An empirical analysis of the small investor protection act, Jena Economic Research Papers, No. 2020-009, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/228311 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt
    [Show full text]
  • Resources for Startups and Entrepreneurs Microwork
    Resources for Startups and Entrepreneurs 1. Microwork 2. Sharing Economy 3. The Investment Cycle 4. EU SME and Startup Funds 5. Microlending, Microfinancing, and Microcredit 6. Crowdfunding (P2P Financing) 7. Alternative Lending 8. Vendor/PO Financing and Online Factoring 9. Other Sources of Financing 10 Resources Microwork (get paid for fulfilling tasks online) Amazon Mechanical Turk LiveOps InnoCentive Samasource Paid online survey sites Kindle Direct Publishing (self-publishing) Craiglist (classified ads) Monster (find a job) Newsy or CNN iReport (citizen journalism) YouTube Partner (share ad revenues) CCNow (accept credit cards and PayPal payments) Amazon Associates (get a commission on referred sales) EBay or Etsy or Alibaba (sell things, including handicrafts) Shareconomy (Sharing Economy) View introductory video AirBnB or Couchsurfing (share your home for a fee) Eatwith or Kitchensurfing (host a meal and get paid) Vayable (become a tour guide) Uber or Lyft or Sidecar (give rides in your car) BorrowedBling or Girl Meets Dress or Rent the Runway (lend your jewelry and haute couture for a fee) Yerdle or Snap Goods (Simplist) or Open Shed (swap, rent, or borrow things) Relay Rides or Getaround (rent out your car) Favor Delivery (get deliveries – or deliver) Task Rabbit (handyman services) Waze (community rides) The Investment Cycle Register firm in target market Doing Business Equity structure Common stock Stock options Convertible debt Series A Preferred Stock (convertible to common stock on IPO/sale) Investment Cycle - Overview Seed
    [Show full text]
  • Compiled by Prof. Anindya Saha
    0 | P a g e Compiled by Prof. Anindya Saha NOTE FROM CONVENER, NCCMP 2018 I am happy to present the book of abstracts of NCCMP 2018. This book covers abstract of contribution made by participants at NCCMP 2018. It covers general management, marketing, finance, economics, business accounting, quality, human resource management, IT, diversity and sustainable development to name a few. I wish all contributors and readers a very rich and rewarding experience. Dr. Ayan Chattopadhyay Associate Professor (Marketing) Convener - NCCMP 2018 & Associate Editor, Kindler 1 | P a g e TRACK: QUALITY / GENERAL MANAGEMENT Impact of entry of low cost carriers on the aircraft operations of Indian scheduled carriers Abhik Kumar Mukherjee Department of Business Administration, Golapbag Campus, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan 713104 ABSTRACT Indian aviation sector was deregulated in 1994-95 by the repeal of the Air Corporations Act of 1953. This ended the regulated era of the Indian airline industry and allowed entry of private players in the domestic civil aviation sector. After almost a decade of deregulation, a new upsurge appeared over the Indian skies in the year 2003 when India’s first low cost carrier ‘Air Deccan’ was launched. Within the next three years six more airline companies were launched in India, all of which happened to be low cost carriers. The emergence and spread of these low cost carriers alongside the full-service carriers changed the dynamics of Indian domestic aviation industry. This study focuses on the impact of entry of these low cost carriers on the aircraft operations of the scheduled domestic airline sector.
    [Show full text]
  • A Deep Dive Into European Early-Stage Tech Startup Activity
    Seed the Future: A Deep Dive into European Early-Stage Tech Startup Activity Early Stage Startups in Europe NOVEMBER 2018 BROUGHT TO YOU BY Stripe is a technology company that builds economic infrastructure for the internet. Businesses of every size from high-growth technology companies like Deliveroo, ManoMano, Catawiki, Uber, Booking.com and Salesforce use our software to accept online payments and run technically sophisticated financial operations in more than 120 countries. Headquartered in San Francisco, with global offices in North America, Europe, Australia, and Asia, Stripe helps new companies get started and grow their revenues. For more information on how Stripe works with startups and can partner with VC’s or accelerators, please get in touch at [email protected] Early Stage Startups in Europe 2 BROUGHT TO YOU BY Techstars is the Worldwide Network that helps entrepreneurs succeed. Through the Techstars Worldwide Entrepreneur Network, founders connect with other entrepreneurs, experts, mentors, alumni, investors, community leaders, and corporations to grow their companies. Techstars currently runs programs in London, Berlin, Paris, Lisbon, Oslo, Amsterdam and Munich. London was the first Techstars program outside of the United States, when it opened its doors in 2013. Led by Eamonn Carey (Managing Director) and Marko Srsan (Program Director), Techstars London now has 70+ companies in their sector and stage-agnostic portfolio that consists of everything from machine learning to graph databases, juice to restaurant analytics and language learning to fish supply chain. More than 45 of those companies went on to raise more than $175M in capital from investors like Connect Ventures, Downing Ventures, Episode 1, Felix Capital, Tekton Ventures, Index Ventures, Kindred Capital, Force Over Mass Capital, Backed VC, Point Nine Capital, Pentech Ventures, Partech Ventures, Rakuten and others.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fintech Book Paint a Visual Picture of the Possibilities and Make It Real for Every Reader
    Financial Era Advisory Group @finera “Many are familiar with early stage investing. Many are familiar with technology. Many are “FinTech is about all of us – it’s the future intersection of people, technology and money, familiar with disruption and innovation. Yet, few truly understandFinancial how different Era an animal Advisory and it’s happeningGroup now there is an explosion of possibilities on our doorstep. Susanne and is the financial services industry. Such vectors as regulation, compliance, risk, handling The FinTech Book paint a visual picture of the possibilities and make it real for every reader. other people’s money, the psychological behaviours around money and capital ensure A must-read for every disruptor, innovator, creator, banker.” that our financial services industry is full of quirks and complexities. As such The FinTech Derek White, Global Head of Customer Solutions, BBVA Book offers a refreshing take and knowledge expertise, which neophytes as well as experts will be well advised to read.” “FinTech is reshaping the financial experience of millions of people and businesses around Pascal Bouvier, Venture Partner, Santander InnoVentures the world today, and has the potential to dramatically alter our understanding of financial services tomorrow. We’re in the thick of the development of an Internet of Value that will “This first ever crowd-sourced book on the broad FinTech ecosystem is an extremely deliver sweeping, positive change around the world just as the internet itself did a few worthwhile read for anyone trying to understand why and how technology will impact short decades ago. The FinTech Book captures the unique ecosystem that has coalesced most, if not all, of the financial services industry.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fintech Opportunity for Sydney
    Unlocking the potential: The Fintech opportunity for Sydney October 2014 Unlocking the potential: the Fintech opportunity for Sydney Foreword from the Deputy Premier Sydney’s position as Australia’s financial services powerhouse is set to move up a gear. The convergence of digital and financial sector strengths and growing global recognition of the city’s role as a key financial hub for the Asia Pacific are fuelling Sydney’s fast emergence as one of the world’s most exciting new financial centres. The NSW Government has recognised this opportunity and is working with businesses and researchers to improve collaboration and knowledge sharing across the NSW financial services industry. We are supporting the establishment of an industry-led Knowledge Hub for financial services to create a new platform for collaboration, to enhance productivity and innovation, build capabilities, and identify market opportunities. With an improved culture of innovation and collaboration between government, industry and research, we have the potential to provide fresh insights for NSW businesses to help them build sustainable long term competitive advantages. The Financial Services Knowledge Hub, coordinated by the Committee for Sydney, aims to capitalise on this by positioning the NSW financial services industry for new markets, new opportunities, new capabilities and global growth. This report provides some specific insights into the rapidly developing market for financial services technology or Fintech, and it will help to inform the activities of the Financial Services Knowledge Hub. Fintech presents a fantastic opportunity for Sydney as a leading financial services and technology hub for Australia and the Asia Pacific. I commend the Committee for Sydney for commissioning this highly relevant research, and for its important ongoing role in driving growth and innovation with the Financial Services Knowledge Hub.
    [Show full text]
  • European Telemedicine
    WWW.DRAKESTAR.COM APRIL 2021 6 Sector Report EUROPEAN TELEMEDICINE Christophe Morvan, Managing Partner Lawrence Giesen, Partner [email protected] [email protected] +33 170 087 610 +33 170 087 613 Grégoire Bizouerne, Analyst Antoine Pigneux, Analyst [email protected] [email protected] +33 170 087 615 +33 170 087 621 A MESSAGE FROM DRAKE STAR We are pleased to publish the inaugural 2021 Drake Star Telemedicine Sector Report presenting the European telemedicine market during an unprecedented year for the industry due to the ongoing Covid-19 outbreak. Our report will explore the uses of telemedicine, market trends, the impact of the Covid-19 crisis, interviews with leaders in the sector as well as an overview of the European landscape and its main players. We will include an extensive list of the recent private placement and M&A activity as well as an analysis of public markets valuations, including the launch of the Drake Star Telemedicine Index. We also provide 72 short profiles of European telemedicine companies, from startups to established firms, offering a diverse picture of the European market. The global telemedicine market recorded historic growth in 2020, reaching $52bn and is projected to triple by 2025 to over $150bn. Based on our estimations, the European market represents 20% of the global telemedicine market, but growing at a slower rate due to structural issues. Telemedicine adoption has been accompanied by a surge in fundraising, enabling platforms to scale quickly. We provide a mapping of the largest and most active financial and industrial investors in the space.
    [Show full text]