As Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 14, 1995
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Attendee Demographics
DEMOGRAPHICS 20REPORT 19 2020 Conferences: April 18–22, 2020 Exhibits: April 19–22 Show Floor Now Open Sunday! 2019 Conferences: April 6–11, 2019 Exhibits: April 8–11 Las Vegas Convention Center, Las Vegas, Nevada USA NABShow.com ATTENDANCE HIGHLIGHTS OVERVIEW 27% 63,331 Exhibitors BUYERS 4% Other 24,896 91,921 TOTAL EXHIBITORS 69% TOTAL NAB SHOW REGISTRANTS Buyers Includes BEA registrations 24,086 INTERNATIONAL NAB SHOW REGISTRANTS from 160+ COUNTRIES 1,635* 963,411* 1,361 EXHIBITING NET SQ. FT. PRESS COMPANIES 89,503 m2 *Includes unique companies on the Exhibit Floor and those in Attractions, Pavilions, Meeting Rooms and Suites. 2019 NAB SHOW DEMOGRAPHICS REPORT PRIMARY BUSINESS Total Buyer Audience and Data Total Buyers: 63,331 ADVERTISING/PUBLIC RELATIONS/MARKETING 6% AUDIO PRODUCTION/POST-PRODUCTION SERVICE 21% BROADERCASTING/CARRIER 19% Cable/MSO Satellite (Radio or Television) Internet/Social Media Telco (Wireline/Wireless) Radio (Broadcast) Television (Broadcast) CONTENT/CHANNEL 8% Film/TV Studio Podcasting Independent Filmmaker Gaming Programming Network Photography DIGITAL MEDIA 4% DISTRIBUTOR/DEALER/RESELLER 4% EDUCATION 3% FAITH-BASED ORGANIZATION 1% FINANCIAL 1% HEALTHCARE/MEDICAL .4% SPORTS: TEAM/LEAGUE/VENUE 1% GOVERNMENT/NON-PROFIT 1% MANUFACTURER/SUPPLIER (HARDWARE) 3% PERFORMING ARTS/MUSIC/LIVE ENTERTAINMENT 1% RENTAL EQUIPMENT 1% SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 3% VIDEO PRODUCTION/POST-PRODUCTION 8% Video Production Services/Facility Video Post-Production Services/Facility WEB SERVICES/SOFTWARE MANUFACTURER 8% OTHER 7% 2019 NAB -
Product Line Card
Product Line Card 3Com Corporation ATI Technologies Distribution CCT Technologies 3M Attachmate Corporation Century Software 4What, Inc. Autodesk, Inc. Certance 4XEM Avaya, Inc. Certance LLC Averatec America, Inc. Chanx Absolute Software Avocent Huntsville Corp. Check Point Software ACCPAC International, Inc. Axis Communications, Inc. Cherry Electrical Products Acer America Corporation Chicony Adaptec, Inc. Barracuda Networks Chief Manufacturing ADC Telecommunications Sales Battery Technology, Inc. Chili Systems Addmaster Bay Area Labels Cingular Interactive, L.P. Adesso Bay Press & Packing Cisco Systems, Inc. Adobe Systems, Inc. Belkin Corporation CMS Products, Inc. Adtran Bell & Howell CNET Technology, Inc. Advanced Digital Information BenQ America Corporation Codi Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Best Case & Accessories Comdial AEB Technologies Best Software SB, Inc. Computer Associates Aegis Micro/Formosa– USA Bionic CCTV ComputerLand AI Coach Bionic Video Comtrol Corporation Alcatel Internetworking, Inc. Black Box Connect Tech All American Semi Block Financial Corel Corporation Allied Telesyn BorderWare Corporate Procurement Altec Lansing Technologies, Inc. Borland Software Corporation Corsair Althon Micro Boundless Technologies, Inc. Corsair Altigen Brady Worldwide Countertrade Products Alvarion, Inc. Brands, Inc. Craden AMCC Sales Corp. Brenthaven Creative Labs, Inc. AMD Bretford Manufacturing, Inc. CRU-Dataport American Portwell Technology Brooktrout Technology, Inc. CryptoCard American Power Conversion Brother International Corporation CTX Anova Microsystems Buffalo Technology/Melco Curtis Young Corporation Antec, Inc. Business Objects Americas AOpen America, Inc. BYTECC Dantz Development Corp. APC Data911 Arco Computer Products, LLC Cables To Go, Inc. Datago Ardence Cables Unlimited Dataram Areca. US Caldera Systems, Inc. Datawatch Corporation Arima Computer Cambridge Soundworks Decision Support Systems Artronix Canon USA Inc. Dedicated Micros Aspen Touch Solutions, Inc. Canton Electronics Corporation Dell Astra Data, Inc. -
The Evolution of Thin Film Magnetic Media and Its Contribution to the Recent Growth in Information Technology
The Evolution of Thin Film Magnetic Media and Its Contribution to the Recent Growth in Information Technology My Personal Experiences In Founding Komag Inc. By Tu Chen © 2013 Tu Chen. All rights reserved This book is dedicated to My wife Pi-Fang (Nancy) and my sons, Glenn and John 2 Table of Contents Foreword …………………………………………………………………………… 5 Preface ……………………………………………………………………………… 7 Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………….. 14 Chapter 1………………………………………………………………………….. 17 How I Got Started Chapter 2…………………………………………………………………………... 25 My Career after obtaining my Ph.D. (1967-1971) Chapter 3…………………………………………………………………………... 31 Joining Xerox PARC Chapter 4…………………………………………………………………………... 44 Low Cost Disk Memory (LCDM) Project at PARC Chapter 5…………………………………………………………………..……..... 84 Leaving PARC and Founding Komag Inc. Chapter 6…………………………………………………………………………. 105 Getting Komag Started Chapter 7…………………………………………………………………............. 138 Manufacturing Ramp Chapter 8…………………………………………………………………………. 152 Komag Offshore Operations, Business Partners and Substrate Technology, Lubricant and Overcoat Improvements Chapter 9…………………………………………………………………………. 172 Foray into the Head Business: Dastek and Headway Chapter 10……………………………………………………………………….. 183 Competition with Oriented Media Chapter 11……………………………………………………………………….. 200 Seeds of Industry Chaos Starting in 1997 and Exit from Komag 3 Chapter 12…………………….....................................................................…….. 215 Perpendicular Media Chapter 13………………………………………………………………………. 224 Final Thoughts Note from -
Second Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief Re Patent Unenforceability and Non-Infringement (Case No
1 KENNETH B. WILSON (SBN 130009) [email protected] 2 CHRISTOPHER P. GREWE (SBN 245938) [email protected] 3 CARR & FERRELL LLP 2200 Geng Road 4 Palo Alto, California 94303 Telephone: (650) 812-3400 5 Facsimile: (650) 812-3444 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs EXCELSTOR TECHNOLOGY, INC., 7 EXCELSTOR TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, EXCELSTOR GROUP LIMITED, 8 EXCELSTOR GREAT WALL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED and SHENZHEN EXCELSTOR 9 TECHNOLOGY LIMITED 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 OAKLAND DIVISION 13 14 EXCELSTOR TECHNOLOGY, INC., a CASE NO. C09-2055 PJH Delaware corporation; EXCELSTOR 15 TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, a Hong Kong corporation; EXCELSTOR GROUP LIMITED, 16 a Cayman Islands corporation; EXCELSTOR GREAT WALL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, a SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 17 Cayman Islands corporation; and SHENZHEN FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF RE EXCELSTOR TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, a PATENT UNENFORCEABILITY 18 Chinese corporation, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT, BREACH OF CONTRACT, 19 Plaintiffs, BREACH OF THE IMPLIED COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH, 20 v. UNJUST ENRICHMENT, CONVERSION, FRAUD, AND 21 PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG, a UNFAIR BUSINESS PRACTICES German corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, 22 inclusive, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 23 Defendants. 24 25 Plaintiffs ExcelStor Technology, Inc., ExcelStor Technology Ltd., ExcelStor Group 26 Limited, ExcelStor Great Wall Technology Limited, and Shenzhen ExcelStor Technology Limited 27 (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or “ExcelStor”) hereby allege for their Complaint against defendant Papst 28 Licensing GmbH & Co. KG (“Defendant” or “Papst”), on personal knowledge as to their own -1- Second Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief Re Patent Unenforceability and Non-Infringement (Case No. C09-2055 PJH) 1 activities and on information and belief as to the activities of others, as follows: 2 3 THE PARTIES 4 1. -
The Eighth Generation of Success
IBM Storage Solution Brief The eighth generation of success Innovations from IBM position tape Highlights storage as the right solution for many modern enterprises • Reduce storage cost with LTO 8 tape drives Far from being in decline, tape today provides data storage • Double storage density solutions to enterprises large and small in a wide range of compared with LTO Ultrium industries around the planet. In fact, tape: 7 drives • Enable 20 percent faster Is used 67% by organizations for archiving, and 57% for data access over LTO backup1 Ultrium 7 • Gain support for AME and Has greater potential to meet capacity predictions over AES-2 56 standard the next decade than HDD technologies2 encryption • Add a barrier to hackers Is 7 times less expensive than disk storage in a 10 year with physical air gap TCO comparative study and is 3 times cheaper than all • Avoid data corruption with cloud systems in a 10 year TCO comparative study3 data immutability with WORM capabilities Is orders-of- magnitude more reliable than disk1 • Deploy tape in modern business use cases such as Is used in IT environments to lower costs through new AI and cloud software-defined storage (SDS) and flash-based architectures IT industry analyst Enterprise Strategy Group (ESG) states: “Nothing is more cost-effective, reliable, or energy- efficient for long-term data retention than a tape in a library slot or on a shelf, and it continues to play a key role for organizations across the globe.”4 IBM has never lost sight of the value and the promise of tape-based storage. -
Show Sags, Technology Too
April 2002 / Volume 15#4 / Issue No. 171 CeBIT 2002 SHOW SAGS, TECHNOLOGY TOO Less major technological innovation, fewer booths and a lot fewer people. For the first time since 1975, the number of exhibitors shrank at CeBIT. Why? (Special report from Jean-Jacques Maleval in Hanover, Germany) No need for panic among the owners of this major event. CeBIT (cebit.de), extended from 7 to 8 days, is still far and away the largest computer show in the world. Nevertheless, overall participation shrank, notwithstanding organiz- ers’ projections of a record 8,316 booths and 810,000 visitors. This year, in fact, there were 131 or 2% fewer booths compared to the previous year. From 2001 to 2002, attendance figures fell significantly, by 18% to roughly 700,000. The trams, the restaurants, the city streets, parking lots, press room and expo floor were decidedly less crowded than last year (much to CEBIT’S GROWTH FROM 1993 TO 2002 the relief of those won- dering how CeBIT could possibly handle more people). Several possible reasons All major general com- puter expos have been hurt this year, and CeBIT was perhaps the least hit. Many are beginning to ask themselves why bother to travel when all the information is a click away on the Internet. It (1) Source: StorageNewsletter (2) Source: CeBIT * estimated doesn’t help, further- more, that the worldwide IT economy is shrinking. Nor is the city of Hanover the best-suited to welcome such an event (and no doubt past visitors have vivid and unpleasant memories of the crowds and the inconvenience). -
Quantum Reference Guide 1983
QUANTUM CORPORATION BACKGROUND Quantum Corporation, founded in February 1980, designs, manufactures and markets rigid disk drives based on Winchester technology which are .soid exclusively to OEMs for use in small business computers, word processors and intelligent terminals. Quantum is the leading independent manufacturer of 8- inch rigid disk drives for the OEM market. The Company currently offers a product line of 8-inch rigid disk drives with capacities of up to 85 megabytes. Quantum announced a line of 5 114-inch rigid disk drives with capacities ranging from 20 to 40 megabytes in November, 1982. Market Overview Disk drives are used in computer systems to store and retrieve digital information. Mdst computer applications require access to a greater volume of information than can economically be stored in the computer's central processing unit. This additional data storage is provided by auxiliary memory systems utilizing reels of magnetic tape or disk drives. Disk drives have a significant advantage over less costly magnetic tape storage in applications where rapid access to data is important. The development and expanded use of more powerful microprocessors has created the need for larger capacity, higher performance auxiliary storage systems. The application of Winchester technology to rigid disk drives has enabled system manufacturers to address this need by incorporating the capacity, speed and reliability of rigid disks into floppy-based microcomputer systems. Winchester technology uses low-mass heads and lubricated disks in an environment sealed against outside contamination. In disk drives, readlwrite heads magnetically record data upon, and retrieve stored data from, selected locations on a disk as the disk rotates within the disk drive. -
Quantum Reference Guide 1985
October, 1985 This book is intended as a reference guide on Quantum Corporation and the Winchester disk drive market. For further information, contact Joseph T. Rodgers, Jr., Vice President, Finance and Treasurer, or Shirley Ann Stough, Manager, Corporate Communications 1804 McCarthy Blvd. Milpitas, CA 95035 (408) 262-1100 QUANTUM CORPORATION Corporate Background October, 1985 Overview Quantum Corporation, Milpitas, Cal ifornia, was founded in February, 1980. The Company designs, manufactures and markets rigid disk drives based on Winchester technology which are sold to Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) as mass storage units for microcomputer-based systems. Quantum sells.directly to major OEMs through a dedicated sales force located in key high technology areas of the United States. In 1984, a sales and service 0 eration for Europe was established in Frankfurt, West Germany. Service for tRe company's disk dr~vesis also provided at the Company's headquarters in Milpitas, the Eastern Regional office in Salem, New Hampshire, and in England through an independent repair center. Quantum's products are distributed in the United States and Canada by Arrow Electronics, Inc., and in other major countries by independent distributors. Products are initially manufactured in Milpitas. When the production process and the product have matured, manufacturing is transferred to the Company's who1 ly-owned subsidiary, Quantum Cari be, Inc., in Ponce, Puerto Rico. In November, 1983, Quantum incorporated a majority-owned subsidiary, Plus Development Corporation, to design and market PC enhancement products to end users. Plus distributes its products through retail outlets, distributors and value-added resellers. In addition, Plus has an account management team to coordinate high volume sales to Fortune 1,000 end user companies. -
Case No COMP/M.6214 - Seagate/ HDD Business of Samsung
EN This text is made available for information purposes only. A summary of this decision is published in all Community languages in the Official Journal of the European Union. Case No COMP/M.6214 - Seagate/ HDD Business of Samsung Only the English text is authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 8 (1) Date: 19/10/2011 EN EN Brussels, 19.10.2011 C(2011) 7592 final PUBLIC VERSION COMMISSION DECISION of 19.10.2011 addressed to: Seagate Technology Public Limited Company declaring a concentration to be compatible with the internal market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case No COMP/M.6214 - Seagate/HDD Business of Samsung) (Only the English version is authentic) TABLE OF CONTENTS COMMISSION DECISION addressed to: Seagate Technology Public Limited Company declaring a concentration to be compatible with the internal market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case No COMP/M.6214 - Seagate/HDD Business of Samsung) ................. 5 I. THE PARTIES............................................................................................................. 6 II. THE OPERATION...................................................................................................... 6 III. Union DIMENSION.................................................................................................... 6 IV. THE FRAMEWORK OF THE ASSESSMENT ......................................................... 7 V. THE COMPETITIVE ASSESSMENT........................................................................ 9 5.1. INTRODUCTION -
The Disk Drive Industry's Dynamic Past
Tuesday Conference Session 3 Roadmaps: The Past and Future of Storage DISK DRIVES: A hard life, but never boring James N. Porter DISK/TREND YESTERDAY’S DISK DRIVES The 1950’s 1956: IBM 350 RAMAC -- 5 MB • First disk drive • 50 24-inch disks • Hydrostatic air bearing heads • Demonstrated market and producibility The 1960’s 1961: Bryant Computer 4240 -- 90 MB • First disk drive with zoned recording • 24 39-inch disks 1962: IBM 1301 “Adv. Disk File” -- 28 MB • First drive with hydrodynamic air bearing heads • 25 or 50 24-inch disks 1963: IBM 1311 “Low Cost File”--2.68 MB • First drive with removable disk pack • First production 14-inch disk drive The 1960’s 1965: IBM 2310 “Ramkit” -- 1.024 MB • First single disk cartridge drive • First voice coil actuator 1966: IBM 2314 Storage Facility--29.17 MB • Eight drives with single controller • Removable disk pack (11 disks) • First drive with ferrite core heads 1967: Memorex 630 -- 7.25 MB • First IBM plug compatible disk drive The 1970’s 1971: IBM 3330-1 “Merlin” -- 100 MB • First track-following servo system 1971: IBM 23FD “Minnow” -- 81 KB • First production flexible disk drive • 8-inch disks, read only 1973: IBM 3340 “Winchester” -- 35/70 MB • First disk drive with low mass heads, lubricated disks, sealed assembly • Removable 3348 Data Module The 1970’s 1974: IBM 3330-11 “Iceberg” -- 200 MB • IBM’s last disk pack drive 1975: IBM 62GV “Gulliver” -- 5/9 MB • First drive with rotary actuator 1976: Shugart Associates SA400 -- 218 KB • First 5.25-inch flexible disk drive The 1970’s 1976: IBM 3350 “Madrid” -- 317.5 MB • Reintroduction of fixed disk media 1979: IBM 3370 “New File Project”--571 MB • First moving head drive with thin film heads, 2-7 encoding. -
Company Vendor ID (Decimal Format) (AVL) Ditest Fahrzeugdiagnose Gmbh 4621 @Pos.Com 3765 0XF8 Limited 10737 1MORE INC
Vendor ID Company (Decimal Format) (AVL) DiTEST Fahrzeugdiagnose GmbH 4621 @pos.com 3765 0XF8 Limited 10737 1MORE INC. 12048 360fly, Inc. 11161 3C TEK CORP. 9397 3D Imaging & Simulations Corp. (3DISC) 11190 3D Systems Corporation 10632 3DRUDDER 11770 3eYamaichi Electronics Co., Ltd. 8709 3M Cogent, Inc. 7717 3M Scott 8463 3T B.V. 11721 4iiii Innovations Inc. 10009 4Links Limited 10728 4MOD Technology 10244 64seconds, Inc. 12215 77 Elektronika Kft. 11175 89 North, Inc. 12070 Shenzhen 8Bitdo Tech Co., Ltd. 11720 90meter Solutions, Inc. 12086 A‐FOUR TECH CO., LTD. 2522 A‐One Co., Ltd. 10116 A‐Tec Subsystem, Inc. 2164 A‐VEKT K.K. 11459 A. Eberle GmbH & Co. KG 6910 a.tron3d GmbH 9965 A&T Corporation 11849 Aaronia AG 12146 abatec group AG 10371 ABB India Limited 11250 ABILITY ENTERPRISE CO., LTD. 5145 Abionic SA 12412 AbleNet Inc. 8262 Ableton AG 10626 ABOV Semiconductor Co., Ltd. 6697 Absolute USA 10972 AcBel Polytech Inc. 12335 Access Network Technology Limited 10568 ACCUCOMM, INC. 10219 Accumetrics Associates, Inc. 10392 Accusys, Inc. 5055 Ace Karaoke Corp. 8799 ACELLA 8758 Acer, Inc. 1282 Aces Electronics Co., Ltd. 7347 Aclima Inc. 10273 ACON, Advanced‐Connectek, Inc. 1314 Acoustic Arc Technology Holding Limited 12353 ACR Braendli & Voegeli AG 11152 Acromag Inc. 9855 Acroname Inc. 9471 Action Industries (M) SDN BHD 11715 Action Star Technology Co., Ltd. 2101 Actions Microelectronics Co., Ltd. 7649 Actions Semiconductor Co., Ltd. 4310 Active Mind Technology 10505 Qorvo, Inc 11744 Activision 5168 Acute Technology Inc. 10876 Adam Tech 5437 Adapt‐IP Company 10990 Adaptertek Technology Co., Ltd. 11329 ADATA Technology Co., Ltd. -
T10/97-011 R0 1
T10/97-011 r0 Voting Results on X3T10 Letter Ballot 96-046r0 on Forwarding SSA-PH2 to first public review Organization Name S Vote Add'l Info --------------------------------- -------------------- - ---- ---------- Adaptec, Inc. Lawrence J. Lamers A Yes Amdahl Corp. Edward Fong P Yes AMP, Inc. Charles Brill P Yes Ancot Corp. Jan Dedek P Yes Apple Computer Ron Roberts A Yes Berg Electronics Douglas L. Wagner P Yes Ciprico Inc. Gerry Johnsen P Yes Circuit Assembly Corp. Ian Morrell P Yes CMD Technology Edward Haske P Yes Congruent Software, Inc. Peter Johansson P Yes Dallas Semiconductor Louis Grantham P Yes Digital Equipment Corp. Charles Monia P Yes IV Distributed Processing Tech. Roger Cummings P Yes Eastman Kodak Co. Robert Reisch P Yes ENDL I D Allan P Yes Exabyte Corp. Edward Lappin P Yes Fujitsu Computer Products,Am Robert Liu P Yes Hewlett Packard Co. J. R. Sims P Yes Hitachi Cable Manchester,Inc Zane Daggett P Yes Honda Connectors Thomas J. Kulesza P Yes IBM Corp. John Scheible A YesC Cmnts Iomega Corp. Geoffrey L. Barton P Yes KnowledgeTek, Inc. Dennis Moore P Yes Linfinity Micro Dean Wallace P Yes Madison Cable Corp. Robert A. Bellino P Yes Maxtor Corp. Pete McLean P Yes Molex Inc. Joe Dambach P Yes Oak Technology, Inc. DNV Ophidian Designs Edward A. Gardner P No IV Cmnts Panasonic Technologies, Inc Stephen F. Heil P Yes Philips Key Modules Bill McFerrin P Yes QLogic Corp. Skip Jones P Yes Quantum Corp. Jim McGrath P Yes Seagate Technology Gene Milligan P YesC IV Cmnts Silicon Systems, Inc. Dave Guss P Yes Sony Electronics, Inc.